NC0005126_Permit (Issuance)_20050314

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNINL COVER :SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0005126
Harmony Rendering Plant
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
March 14, 2005
This document ins printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the rewereae side

OF WA7
/906
r NCDENR
H
Mr. Daniel Crowe, Plant Manager
Tyson Foods, Inc.
P.O. Box 185
Harmony, North Carolina 28634
Dear Mr. Crowe:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
March 14, 2005
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit N03005126
Harmony Rendering Plant
Iredell County
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North
Carolina and the US. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
This final permit includes following major changes from the draft permit sent to you on December 21, 2004.
• The 18 months compliance schedule has been added for the newly implemented TRC limit. This time period
is allowed in order for the facility to budget and design/construct the dechlorination of alternative
disinfection system.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to
you, you have the right to an adjudicatoryhearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain
other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land
Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be
required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Sergei Chernikov at telephone number
[phone], extension 594.
cc: Central Files
NPDES Permit File
Mooresville Regional Office/Surface Water Protection
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
N. C. Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
SUSAN A. WILSON
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center: 1 800 623-7748

Permit NC0005126
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Tyson Foods, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Harmony Rendering Plant
501 Sheffield Road
Harmony
Iredell County
to receiving waters designated as Hunting Creek in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin in accordance with effluent
limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof.
The permit shall become effective April 1, 2005.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on March 31, 2009
Signed this day March 14, 2005.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
SUSAN A. WILSON
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0005 126
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of
this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the
exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements,
terms, and provisions included herein.
Tyson Foods, Inc. is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate a 0.5 MGD wastewater treatment facility (outfall 001) that includes
the following components:
> Flow equalization basin/anoxic reactor #1 with subsurface air jet diffuser system
> Flow equalization basin/reactor effluent pump station
> Nitrification reactor #2 with subsurface air jet diffuser system
> Clarifier influent flocculation tank
> Final clarifier
> Aerated lagoon with mechanical aerators
> Effluent disinfection
> Chemical pH adjustment
> Flow measurement equipment
This facility is located at Tyson's Harmony Division, off Sheffield Road near Harmony in
Iredell County
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into
Hunting Creek which is classified WS-III waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.

Latitude: 35° 57' 16"
Longitude: 80° 43' 12"
USGS Quad #: D16NW
River Basin #: 03-07-06
Receiving Stream: Hunting Creek
Stream Class: WS-III
Nt
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Harmony Rendering Plant
NC0005126
Iredell County

Permit NC0005 126
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on April 1, 2005 and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge treated
wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as
specified below:
`EFFLUENTILL ITA t[ONS °
, _O IV,
ING''REQUIREMENTcS
PARAMETER,
rr --•'--�' r
i ,;
=Manthl Avers e ,
Y. 9
l r
ally] al* L `
_ surement .'
Mea
Frequency
: Samplez
Type
_
'Sanr�pleJ
Location,
Flow
0.500 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or
Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 20°C
171 pounds/day
342 pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
209 pounds/day
418 pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
NH3 - N
133 pounds/day
266 pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Oil and Grease
95 pounds/day
190 pounds/day
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean)
200/100 mL
400/100 mL
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
MBAS
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Temperature,°C
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
pH
> 6.0 and < 9.0 standard units
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity1
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
(NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine2
-
28 'NIL
2/Week
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 1.8%; January, April, July, and October; see Special Condition A(2).
2. The limit takes effect September 1, 2006. Until then, the Permittee shall monitor TRC [with no effluent
limit].
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NC0005126
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. (2) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 1.8%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or
"North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or
subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April, July, and October.
Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all
treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit
limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months
as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February
1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest
concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does
have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection
methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic
Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for
the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to
the following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30
days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee
will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit
number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the
form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required
during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include altemate monitoring
requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival,
minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.

FEB-08-2005 21:22
P.02/02
Fie1CI1CJTICE
STATE aF
ACRTH GIFCUNA
BWIfx]WHYTAL
nrlrw413euevr
COVMS9CN/NFCES UNT
1617NWL SFJMCE
CENTER
A41.BC+4 AC276 91617
1cTnF1CATCN CF INTENT'
7DIS3EA IwGES
wagrt=watER FecivIr
Ch Ihtibasis d tf erugh stair
IV/rewind agtic ltton d AG
General Saute 14.321. FLOC
law M•500 and Other lawful
srmireds atiregbecfs, the
• Auth *tine E+M!a►
Wexner/ arnrisvon ps
pose; torz,ea World Fbl•
Mare Decherge Oimnatlon
Swan(NPDES) der
dectergegemit to the pe•-
46
dayOivntherubl ed
the rdwm
Written camera raga ding
thepicacctcra rttw�beet.
a3pted unfit 30 Osys alter The
d this rove. Ail
aamr te• ns re 10
rot dream w edrntts
final ddamneriars r6r7ardru
lirep occeedp9artt. O.
rector d the MC lavrsJon al
Inter Cam' ity may dead to
hold agaircmeetrru lathe
pcparil per* staid Its O•
rime sisretant CV -
gyre elp. licbltt3rasr.
other • r ol Inet awl
ow �o
m his uoa 0 rmed .
micro !mot rnred* p8r-
mt are avallatie 4271 regtBst
nndpsyrrerrt of the 0205
mproot,dlar Mal aormode
ardorhis for Arnim
to the NC Did1Ston of Water
angry a the above adr7659
Orcall lids. Caidyn Bya t at
919-733.5033 edraatan520
Please include the NPDES
writ nun r (attached) in
any communication.
Irevestedjactems nay also
vlsh the Division of Water
Qlality at 512 N. Salisbury
Stntlet, Raleigh. IWC 27604
114 between the hours of
&tam frdrore�tew tonhie
The ryson Foods. Inc (AO
& r 184 wry, AC2634)
has applied for renewal of
WOES wit liC0X611Sfa
true Hammy A ndeffrl i Rant
in frecbll CUM 7h5 pewit -
led faolilydaaharges treated
wastewater to the Hunting
Cheek in OE Yadon,PLe•Oee
FiverBasin, Currently BCD.
Val aegerrixtsdki4 Tiro
nia nitrogen, al and grease
and tdal fluidal Maine, are
view asliylarded This ds.
du9ehey atted ramEdlo-
caaorts In this portion of the
IlzfiaRsaCtseRte Assn
NORTH CAROLINA
IREDELL COUNTY
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
County and State, duly commissioned, qualified.
and authorized by law to administer oaths, per-
sonally appeared Kimberly P. Ownbey whc
being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that
she is an employee authorized to make this
statement by Media General Newspapers, Inc.
engaged in the publication of a newspaper
known as the Statesville Record & Landmark
published, issued, and entered as second class
mail in the city of Statesville in said County adn
State, that she is authorized to make this affidavit
and sworn statement; that the notice or other
legal advertisement, a true copy of which is
attached hereto, was published in the Statesville
Record & Landmark on the following dates:
and that the said newspaper in which such
notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement
was published was at the time of each and every
such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the
requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597
of the General Statues of North Carolina and was
a qualified newspaper within the meaning of
Section 1-597 of the Greater Statues of North
Carolina.
This c day t.g.Noo.wA w15 201a::1
(Signatur f person making idavit)
Sworn to and subscribed before me. this 9
day of 'C __ t 20(5
J� ,
(11 l 1 •
Notary ublj
Commission expires: 1 -.C(
TOTAL P.02

Dechlorination for NC0005126, Tyson Foods imap://[e-mail]:143/f...
Subject: Dechlorination for NC0005126, Tyson Foods
From: "Campbell, Mike" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:02:24 -0600
To: [e-mail]
Dear Mr. Chernikov
The waste water treatment plant at Tyson Foods in Harmony, N.C.has never had Dechlorination in our waste
water program.
I understand that with the new limit on chlorine , we will need to dechlorinate. Our treatment plant would like
to be putona
Compliance schedule.Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Mike Campbell
Waste Water Manager
Tyson Foods, Harmony , N.C.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the
addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, then you have received this email in error and any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us
immediately of your unintended receipt by reply and then delete this email and your reply. Tyson Foods,
Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates will not be held liable to any person resulting from the unintended or
unauthorized use of any information contained in this email or as a result of any additions or deletions of
information originally contained in this email.
1 of 1 1/18/2005 4:31 PM

MEMORANDUM
To:
From
Subject:
December 21, 2004
Britt Setzer
NC DENR / DEH / Regional Engineer
Mooresville Regional Office
Sergei Q.erntkov
NPDES Unit
Review of Draft NPDES Penn it NC0005126
Harmony Rendering Plant
Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
r
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the draft permit and return this form by
January 21, 2005. If you have any questions on the draft permit, please contact me at telephone number
[phone], extension 594 or via e-mail at [e-mail].
RESPONSE: (Check one)
Concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly, the stated
effluent limits are met prior to discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the designated water quality
standards.
Concurs with issuance of the above permit, provided the following conditions are met:
Opposes the issuance of the above permit, based on reasons stated below, or attached:
Signed
Date: J4,jd
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617 - TELEPHONE [phone]/FAX [phone]
VISIT US ON THE WEB AT http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES

imap://[e-mail]:143/f...
Subject: Draft Permit Review
From: John Giorgino <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:19:28 -0500
To: sergei chernikov <[e-mail]>
Hi Sergei,
I have reviewed Tyson Foods (NC0005126) and have no comments. Thanks for forwarding it
to me.
John
1 of 1 1/12/2005 2:40 PM

NCDENR / DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
Tyson Foods, Inc.
NPDES No. NC0005126
ac.
f 9.rn1Mtion
(1.) Facility Name:
Harmony Rendering Plant (formerly Holly Farms)
(2.) Permitted Flow (MGD):
0.5
(6.) County:
Iredell
(3.) Facility Class:
11
(7.) Regional Office:
Mooresville
(4.) Facility Status:
(New or existing)
Renewal
(8.) USGS Topo Quad:
D16NW
(Calahaln, NC)
(5.) Permit Status:
(i.e., New, Modification, or
Renewal)
Renewal
(1.) Receiving Stream:
Hunting Creek
(2.) Subbasin:
030706
Yadkin
(8.) Drainage Area (mi2):
175.00
(3.) Index No.:
12-108-16-(0.5)
(9.) Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
43
(4.) Stream Classification:
WS-III
(10.) Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
71
(5.) 303(d) Listed:
NO
(11.) 30Q2 (cfs):
92
(6.) 305(b) Status:
NA
(12.) Average Flow (cfs):
175.0
(7.) Use Support:
(13.) IWC (%):
1.8
Summary,
• This is a MINOR renewal for a poultry rendering plant that discharges process wastewater via one
outfall. The treatment system has a design capacity of 1.7 MGD. However, at the company's request,
a permit mod in 10/97 decreased the flow limit from 1.7 to 0.5 MGD, with a resultant decrease in the
instream waste concentration (and chronic toxicity test concentration) from 7% to 1.8%. Since the
last renewal of permit the following upgrades have been added to the treatment system: flow
equalization basin/anoxic reactor #1 with subsurface air jet diffuser system, flow equalization
basin/reactor effluent pump station, nitrification reactor #2 with subsurface air jet diffuser system,
clarifier influent flocculation tank, and final clarifier. The facility has been recently reclassified as
MINOR.
• Facility discharges to Hunting Creek>South Yadkin River>Yadkin River>High Rock Lake. Hunting
Creek is not listed on the 2003 303(d) list.
Technology Based Effluent Limit Development
Permit limits were based on effluent guidelines (40CFR 432 Subpart J- 432.103 and 432.107, based on a
max of 1,898,678 lb/day raw material (RM) consumed) and have been recalculated to reflect the most
current data available (See attached calculations). The results of these calculations are slightly more
stringent than the limits in the current permit. Since the facility has no plans to expand production in the
foreseeable future (per the facility), it is recommended that the new limits are implemented.

NPDES PERMIT FACT SHEET Tyson Foods, Inc.
Page 2 NPDES No. NC0005126
Toxicity Testing
Current Requirement: Quarterly Chronic Toxicity @ 1.8% JAN, APR, JUL, OCT
Recommended Requirement: Quarterly Chronic Toxicity @ 1.8% JAN, APR, JUL, OCT
The facility has been consistently passing its WET tests.
Compliance Summary
DMRs have been reviewed for the period January 2001 through November 2004. Facility has a mixed
compliance record. During the review period, the following NOVs (notices of violation) have been
issued: 05/20/04 — fecal, 09/08/03 — fecal, 08/27/03 — fecal, 03/03/03 - fecal, 11/20/02 — NH3, 10/14/02 —
NH3, 12/06/01— NH3.
A compliance biomonitoring inspection conducted on June 17, 2004 did not find any problem areas.
Proposed Changes
• Monitoring Frequencies: No changes are proposed.
• Limits: Based on the application data, calculations were conducted in accordance with federal
guidelines (see attached). Based on the calculation results, limits were reduced for BOD, NH3, TSS,
and Oil and Grease. A daily maximum total residual chlorine (TRC) limit has been added to the
permit.
Existing permit limits and recommended limits/monitoring are summarized in the table below:
Parameter
Existing Daily Max
Limit (lb/day)
Existing
Monitoring
Proposed Daily Max
Limit (lb/day)
Proposed
Monitoring
BOD
360
Weekly
342
Weekly
NH3
280
Weekly
266
Weekly
TSS
440
Weekly
418
Weekly
O&G
100
Weekly
190
Weekly
State Contact
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact
Sergei Chernikov at [phone] ext. 594.
Regional Office comments:
Regional office recommended renewal of the permit.
NAME: DATE:
Page 2
Version: December 10, 2004

NPDES PERMIT FACT SHEET Tyson Foods, Inc.
Page 3 NPDES No. NC0005126
EPA comments:
NAME: DATE:
Page 3
Version: December 10, 2004

Pei`.
PC‘;'t
/\1114,)71) 1.
J � r
live
osvn 1061A, - -Hi\-;s
's l,,/, / 1 (j -c- 144,
/1;
val.�e IS fro:
100J
�J855
NPS dw+'"`°`- di 855 x o,1 = 26s I e/daA
/V 6- r A ti3_ _� _ 4 Igyix D, 07-
i of 0,;! a �G-x — ' 55 8 = 3 y ? lei
0 1D• r..-01\A� a� = -1,(355 0.05 = 4q1 le/61
SS )061 w ,c ,g55 x O,Zz= /6 f64
r SS = a S11 � = 20,1 1.0
0114 ---- cl) -y--- --- ---_ gig �

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary November 15, 2004
FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY ?UN JUL AUO SEP OCT NOV DEC
Tyrrell County WTP Monit chr 90%
NC0087092/001 Bcgin:7/1/2004 Frequency; Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
County: Pasquotank Region: WARO Subbasin: PAS53
PF: 0.053 Special
7Q10: IWC(%) 100 Order:
+ NonComp:
2000 — — — --- — — --
2001 — — — — — — —
2002 — — — — -- — —
2003 — — — ..- — — --
2004 — — — — — — Fail
Tyson Foods Inc -Harmony Division chr lim: 1.8%
NNC0005126/001 Begin:10/1/1999 Frequency: Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
oi County Irodcll Rcgion: MRO Subbasin: YADO6
PF: 0.5 Spada!
7Q10: 43 IWC(%) 1.8 Order
+ NonComp:Single
2000 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — NR/Pass
2001 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
2002 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
2003 pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
2004 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — --
UNC-Chapel Hill Power Plant 24hr ac monit cpis fthd
NC0025305/001 Bcgin:9/1/2001 Frequency:50WD/A
County Orange Region: RRO Subbasin: CPF06
PF: 0.048 special
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%) 100 Order:
NonComp:
2000 Fall >100 >100 NR/Fail 74.8 56.156.1t Pass — — Pass — —
2001 Fat <15 >90 H H H H H H H H H
2002 H H H H H — H H H H H H
2003 H H H H H H — H H H H H
2004 H H H H H H H H H
Unimin Corp -Mica Operations (001) chr lim: 10% 2000 — Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
NC0000361/001 13egin:8/I/2004 Frequency. Q Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Singlc 2001 — Fail >20(s) 12.25 Pass — — Fall >20 >20 Pass
County Avery Region: ARO Subbasin: FRB06 2002 — late Pass — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
PF: 2.16 Special 2003 — Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
7Q10: 30 IWC(%) 10 Orda: 2004 — Pass — — Late Pass — Pass —
Unimin Corp. chr lim: 11%
NC0000175/001 Bcgin:8/1/2004 Frequency: Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
County Mitchell Region: ARO Subbasin: FRB06
PF: 3.61 special
7Q10: 45.0 IWC(%) 11 Order:
+ NonComp:Singlc
Y 2000 Fat 28.3 >40 Pass — — NRIPass — — Pass — —
2001 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass --- —
2002 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Fat >44 >44
2003 Pass — — Fail <5.5 <5.5.6.6.>44 Pass — — Pass
2004 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
Unimin Corp. Red Hill Plant chr lim: 1.2%
NC0085839/001 Begin:5/1/2004 Ftequcncy. Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
County Mitchell Region: ARO Subbasin: FRB06
PF: 0.682 Special
7Q10: 90.7 IWC(%) 1.2 Order:
+ NonComp:Singlc
2000 Pass
2001 Pass
2002 Pass
2003 pass
2004 Fat
— — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
— — Pass — — Pass — — NR/Pass
— — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
— — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
>4.8 >4.8 Pass — — Pass — —
Unimin Corp. -Crystal Operation chr lim: 1.3%
NC0084620/001 Begin:5/1/2004 Frequency: Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
County Mitchell Region: ARO Subbasin: FRB06
PF: 0.36 Special
7Q 10: 41 IWC(%) 1.3 Order:
+ NonComp:Single
2000 N — — N — — N — — N
2001 N — — N — — N — — N
2002 N — — N — — N — — N
2003 N — — N — -. N — — N
2004 N — — N — — H — —
Union County -Six Mile Creek chr lim: 90% 2000
NC0066559/001 Begin:12/1/1996 Frequency: Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov NonComp:Singlc 2001
County Union Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB38 2002
PF: 1.0 Special 2003
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%) 100 Order: 2004
— H — — H — — H — — H
— H — -.- H _. — H — — H
— H — .-. H — — H — — H
— H — — H -. — H — — H
— H — — H — — H —
Union County -Twelve Mile Creek WWTP chr lim: 90%
NC0085359/001 Begin:1/1/2003 Frequency: Q Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single
County: Union Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB38
PF: 2.5 Special
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%) 100 Order:
2000 — Pass — — NR/Pass — — Pass — — Pass
2001 — Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
2002 — Fail 67.1 >100 Pass — -- Pass — — Pass
2003 — Pass — — Pass — — Pass — Pass
2004 — Pass,>100(p) — — Pass,92.5(P) — — Pass —
United Chemi-Con chr lim: 0.75%
NC0000019/001 Bcgin:4/1/2001 Frequency: Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
County: Ashe Region: WSRO Subbasin: NEW02
PF: 0.2 Special
7Q10: 41.0 IWC(%) 0.75 Order:
Unocal Corp-Rhom and Haas Facility chr lim: 90%
NC0085057/001 Bcgin:11/1/2002 Frequency. Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
County Mecklenburg Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB34
PF: 0.0432 Special
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%) 100 Order:
+ NonComp:Singlc
+ NonComp:Single
2000 Pass
2001 Pass
2002 Pass
2003 Pass
2004 Pass
Pass — — Pass
Pass — — Pass
Pass — — Pass
Pass — — Pass
Pass — — Pass
2000 Pass — — Pass — — Pass
2001 Pass — — Fall <45 97.5 Pass
2002 Fall >100 >100 Pass — — Pass
2003 pass — — Pass — — Pass
2004 NR/H — — H — — H
Pass
Pass
Pass
P333
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Y Pre 2000 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM = Permit Requirement LET - Administrative Letter - Targct Frequency - Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly; M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin - First month required 7Q10 - Receiving stream low flow criterion (cfs) + - quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or NR Months that testing must occur - ex. Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct NonComp - Current Compliance Requirement
PP = Permitted flow (MGD) IWC% - Instrcam waste concentration P/F - Pass/Fail test AC = Acute CHR = Chronic
Data Notation: f - Fathead Minnow; • - Ccriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P - Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit; bt - Bad test
Reporting Notation: — - Data not required; NR - Not reported Facility Activity Status: I - Inactive, N - Newly Issued(To construct); H - Active but not discharging; t-More data available for month in question; - ORC signature needed
44

Harmony 2002/2003 Raw Tons 6 day avg. work week, 8 hr work day.
2001
Daily prod., lb/day
Raw Pounds
Raw Tons
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
1635498.333
1518386.667
1554588.333
1506834.167
1571447.333
1659019.167
1650079.167
1745454.667
4
5
4
4
5
4
1 4
39601900/
19,801
5
52363640
26,182
39251960
45551600
37310120
36164020
47143420
39816460
19,626
22,776
18,655
18,082
23,572
19,908
2002
Daily prod., lb/day
Raw Pounds
Raw Tons
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
1526750
1437894
1398180
1545556.667
I 1571333.333
1531750
1656735.833
1836016.667
4
5
4
4
5
4
4 I
5
36642000
43136820
33556320
37093360
47140000
36762000
39761660
55080500
18,321
21,568
16,778
18,547
23,570
18,381
19,881
27,540
2003
Daily prod., lb/day
Raw Pounds
Raw Tons
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
1535226.667
1499226.667
1666738.333
1854023.333
1673300.667
1868190
1827530
1872902
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
5
36845440
44976800
40001720
44496560
50199020
44836560
43860720
56187060
18,423
22,488
20,001
22,248
25,100
22,418
21,930
28,094
Average daily production (lb/Day) =
1702790.7
Daily maximum production used for calculating permit limits (IblDay)=
1,898,678 (value does not exceed 20%
of the daily average production)

Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
FY 2001
1817181.667
1787022.5
1752808
1666785.833
1655425.486
4
4
5
4 •
400028601
20,001
516291120
258,146
43612360
42888540
52584240
21,806
21,444
26,292
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
FY 2002
1846664.167
1784697.5
1803673.333
1596501.667
1627979.431
4
4
5 1
4
443199401
42832740
54110200
38316040
5087515801
22,160
21,416
27,055
19,158
254,376
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
FY 2003
1898677.5
1875374.167
1866656.667
2461760.833
1824967.236
4
4
5
4
45568260
45008980
55999700
59082260
567063080
22,784
22,504
I 28,000
29,541
.283,532

To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Susan Wilson
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
Date: April 7, 2004
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County: Iredell
NPDES Permit No.: NC0005126
MRO No.: 03-100
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Tyson Foods, Inc.- Harmony Plant
Post Office Box 158
Harmony, N.C. 28634
2. Date of Investigation: March 3, 2004
3. Report Prepared By: Michael L. Parker, Environmental Engineer II
4. Person Contacted and Telephone Number: Mike Campbell, ORC; Dan Crowe, Plant
Manager, [phone]
5. Directions to Site: From the jct. of Hwy. 901 and SR 2126 (Seffeld Rd.) south-ast of the
Town of Harmony in northeastern Iredell County, travel east on SR 2126 1.4 mile �e
Tyson Foods' plant is located on the left side of SR 2126 just after cr ng Huritin
17 id
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge Points: - ^'
Latitude: 35 ° 57' 16"
Longitude: 80° 43' 12"
USGS Quad No.: D 16 NW
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application: Yes. There is area available for
expansion, however, it appears to be located within the 100 year flood plain. Any treatment
units constructed in this area will have to be constructed with flood protection.
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): The existing WWTP appears to have
been constructed above the 100 year flood plain, however, extensive flooding that occurred
in the spring/summer of 2003 brought flood waters up to the foundations of some of the
treatment units. None of the units were impacted by the flood waters.

Page Two
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling: Approx. 1000+ feet from the WWTP site.
10. Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters: Hunting Creek
a. Classification: WS-III
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin 030706
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The receiving
stream has excellent flow at the point of discharge (15-20 feet wide x 1-3 feet deep).
The area is very rural with agriculture being the primary use. There are no water
intakes and/or other known dischargers for a distance of several miles below this
outfall.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater: 1.7 MGD (Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity: 0.5 MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of current facility (current design capacity): 1.7 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous ATCs issued in the previous
two years: An ATC was issued for the construction of the following treatment units:
an equalization basin/reactor (provides for first stage carbonaceous BOD removal)
followed by a nitrification reactor (second stage treatment for ammonia nitrogen and
final stage carbonaceous BOD removal), a circular final clarifier, and a conversion of
the existing aeration basin into a sludge storage lagoon.
e. Description of existing or substantially constructed WWT facilities: The existing
WWT facilities consist of an influent pump station followed by a dissolved air
floatation (DAF) unit, polymer addition, a flow equalization basin (FEB) with
diffused aeration, an aeration basin with diffused aeration, a facultative lagoon with
mechanical aeration and mixing, a final clarifier, chlorine effluent disinfection
(gaseous), chemical pH adjustment and flow measurement equipment.
f. Description of proposed WWT facilities: Tyson has requested authorization to
construct the following treatment processes: a new wastewater screen to remove grit,
solids, and rocks from the WWT system, a FEB located immediately upstream of the
existing DAF unit, and the existing DAF pump station is to be relocated to function
as the new FEB pump station. This ATC request has not yet been authorized.
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: This facility has a consistent compliance
record with passing their toxicity tests (IWC = 7%).
2. Residual handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. Land applied: DWQ Permit No. WQ0000701
Residuals Contractor: EMA Resources

Page Three
3. Treatment Plant Classification: Class II (rating may change when new treatment facilities
are constructed)
4. SIC Code(s): 2296 Wastewater Code(s): 23 MTU Code(s): 12013
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies
involved (municipals only)? Neither public monies nor grant funds were used in the
construction of the existing WWT facilities.
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: None at this time.
3. Important SOC/JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: This facility is not under an SOC or
JOC nor is one proposed at this time.
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: There is no known alternative available for this facility.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The permittee (Tyson Foods, Inc.) requests renewal of the subject Permit. There have been a
number of changes to the existing WWTP since the permit was last renewed (see Part II, No. 1(e).
These additional WWT facilities should be included in the facility description upon renewal of the
permit. Tyson also has submitted a recent request to add additional treatment units (ATC No.
005126A02), however, it is doubtful that these additional treatment units will be approved and
constructed prior to the reissuance of this permit.
The addition of the WWT facilities noted in Part II, No. 1(e) above have enabled Tyson to
dramatically improve the operational flexibility of their WWTP. With numerous process control
capabilities throughout the treatment process, Tyson has been able to provide significant reductions
in BOD5, TSR, and NH3 as N. This is noteworthy considering Tyson is treating a waste stream that
can be characterized by 4-digit BODs, and Ammonia values well above what would be considered
domestic waste strength. Isolated fecal coliform permit excursions still occasionally plague this
facility, however, this should not take away from the progress Tyson has made in improving their
effluent quality.
Pending receipt an approval of the draft permit, it is recommended that the Permit be
renewed as requested.
Signature of Report Preparer
7 / ?
Water Quality Regio l Supervisor
h:ldsr\dsr031tyson.dsr
Date

It's what your ami
y deserves.
September 25, 2003
Via Certified Mail
Mrs. Valery Stephens
NCDENR/ Water Quality/ Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Tyson Foods, Inc. — Harmony Plant WWTP
Iredell County, North Carolina
Renewal of NPDES Permit # NC0005126
Dear Mrs. Stephens:
Enclosed is the NPDES permit renewal package for the Harmony facility located in Iredell
County, North Carolina.
Since the last renewal of permit #NC0005126, we have added the following improvements to the
wastewater treatment system:
A. Flow Equalization Basin/Anoxic Reactor #1 with subsurface air jet diffuser system
B. FEB/Reactor Effluent Pump Station
C. Nitrification Reactor #2 with subsurface air jet diffuser system
D. Clarifier Influent Flocculation Tank
E. Final Clarifier
The sludge management plan for the facility is as follows:
A. The DAF sludge is removed from the subject facility via tanker truck and land applied, as
authorized under permit number WQ 0000701.
B. The waste activated sludge is sent to the former activated sludge treatment lagoon, which
was converted to a new Waste Sludge Lagoon, prior to ultimate disposal by land
application.
Tyson Foods, Inc. Animal Food Ingredients Group P.O. Box 158 Harmony, NC 28634 704-546-2602 www.tyson.com

It's what It's what yourfamily deserves.'
y y
Thank you for your assistance. Please contact me at 704.546.2602 if there are any questions.
Sincerely,
son Foods, Inc.
Daniel Crowe
Plant Manager — River Valley Animal Foods
Attachments: Permit Application
Cc: Doug Baxter — Tyson Foods, Inc.
Tyson Foods, Inc. Animal Food Ingredients Group P.O. Box 158 Harmony, NC 28634 704-546-2602 www.tyson.com

Please print or type In the unshaded areas only.
CPA 1.0. NUMBER Icoov from Item 1 of Dorm 1)
NC0005126
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0086.
Approval expires 8-31-98.
FORM
PiPDES
1. OUTFALL
4•1EpA
LOCATION
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
EXISTING MANUFACTUR NG, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURAL OPERATIONS
Consolidated Permits Program
For each outfall, list the latitude and longitude ofits location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water.
NV TFAL
I• LATITUDE
C. LONGITUDE
(lII��
ate)
1. DEO.
1. MIN.
I. ■tC.
I. DED,
1, MIN.
1. 9EC.
D. RECEIVING WATER (name)
001
35
57
16
80
43
12
Hunting Creek
11. FLOWS, SOURCES OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
A. Attach a line drawing showing the water flow through the facility. Indicate sources of intake water, operations contributing wastewater to the effluent,
and treatment units labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in Item B. Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing average
Rows between intakes. operations, •treetrnent.units, and outfails. If a water balance cannot be determined (e.g., for tertian mining activities), provide a
pictorial description of the nature and amount of any sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.
B. For each outfall, provide a description af: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater,
cooling water, end storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue
on additional sheets if necessary.
LOUT-
2. Or[RATION(SI CONTRIBUTING FLOW
3. TREATMENT
FALLNO
Ws0a.
OPERATION (liar)
b. AVERAGE FLOW
(Include uniti)
.O.
a. DESCRIPTION
LIST CODES FROM
TABLE 2C-i
Stormwater Runoff
24,000 gpd
Flow Equalization Basin
001
Feather Condensate
94,000 gpd
Chemical Coagulation
9
11
Meat Condensate
291 0.00 gpd
Tli ssnl vPrl A; r rlc4Pt on
1
U
Drainage and Washdown
,
65,000 gpd
Activated Sludge
3
A
Boiler Blowdown
12,000 gprl
Blood Coagulation
24,000 gpd
Disinfection(Chlorine)
2
F
Scrubbers
60.000 gpd
DPchlnrinarinn
2
E
Sludge Lagoon
5
T
Discharge to Surface Water
4
A
OFFICIAL USE ONLY (ef?kltnt tu1dsilnea SMb-egttaor(s) _
Form 351062C (8-90)
PAGE 1 OF 4

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
C. Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are any of the discharges described in Items II -A or B intermittent or seasonal?
❑YEs (complete the following table) Z NO (go to Section III)
. OUTFALL
NUMBER1U
( ist)
2. OPERATION(J)
CONTRIBUTING FLOW
(list)
3. FREQUENCY
4. FLOW
e. DAYS
PER WEEK
(specify
average)
b. MONTHS
PER YEAR
(specify
average)
a, FLOW RATE
an rngd)
G TOTAL VOLUMQ
(specify with unite)
C.DUR-
ATION
an days)
1. LONG TERM
AVERAGE
t. MAXIMUM
DAILY
I, LONG TERM
AVERAGC
r. MAXIMUM
DAILY
I. PRODUCTION
A. Does an effluent
guideline lir„itntinn ro I t d b
GINA
mu ga e y A under Section 3t14 of the Clean Water Act apply to your facility?
E Yes (complete Item III-B). M NO (to to Section IV)
B. Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or other measure of operation)?
YeS (complete Item III.C) ❑No (go to Section IV)
C. If you answered "yes"' to Item III-B, list the quantity which reprosents an actual measurement of your level of production, expressed in the terms and units
used in the applicable effluent guideline, and indicate the affected outfatls.
1. AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION
2. AFFECTED
OUTFALLS
(fir( outfall numbers)
a, QUANTITY PIER DAY
b. UNITII OI MEASURE
C• ION, IRODUCT, M IAL, ETC,
(speeifY)
r
V.IMPROVEMENTS
•
A. Are you now required by any Federal, State or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operation of waste-
water treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This includes,
but it not limited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant
or loan conditions.
0YEa (complete the following tabie) No (go to Item IV-B)
2. AFFECTED OUTFALLs
1. IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION,
AGREEMENT, ETC.
S. No. b. ■DURCE Dr DI$CHARE[
3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
FLIANC�, DAME
a. RE- � ►Ro-
EUIRED JECTED
B. OPTIONAL: Youmay attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect
your di h°� lea you
nowt eve underway or whicfi,;youi plan• Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actual or •. - -. ❑MARK.')(.^' IP'DL,CRIpTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAMS IS ATTACHED
EPA Form 3510-2C (Roy. 2-85) PAGE 2 OF 4 CONTINUE ON PAGE 3

EPA 1.D. NUMBER (copy tram Item 1 of Form 1)
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 S � l •
V.,INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
A, B, &'C: See•instructlons before proceeding — Complete one set of tables for each outran — Annotate the outfall number In the space provided.
NOTE: Tables V-A, V-B, and V-C are included on separate sheets numbered V-1 through V-9.
D. Use the space below to list any of the pollutants listed in Table 2c•3 of the instructions, which you know or have reason to believe is discharged or may be
discharged from any outfall. For every pollutant you list, briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in your
possession.
1. POLLUTANT
2. SOURCE
1. POLLUTANT
2. SOURCE
None
VI. POTENTIAL DISCHARGES NOT COVERED BY ANALYSIS
Is any pollutant listed in Item V-C a substance or a component of a substance which you currently use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or •
byproduct?
YES (list all such pollutants below)
NO (go to Item VI-B)
EPA Form 3510-2C (8.90)
PAGE 3 OF 4
CONTINUE ON REVERS!

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
VI1, iJOLOGICAL TOXICITY TESTING DATA
Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any biological test for scuts or chronletoxlcity has been made on,enyof your diiFcharges or on a
water relation ter In in.ion to your discharge within the last a years? . - , . .
NO (go to Section VIII)
EYGs (Identify the testis) and describe their purposes below)
Chronic toxicity testing required on a quarterly basis per Permit No. NC0005126
VIII.CONTRACT ANALYSIS INFORMATION
Were any of the analyses reported in Item V performed by a contract laboratory or consulting firm?
YES (list the name, address, and telephone number of and pollutants
analyzed by, each such laboratory or firm below)
ENO (go to Section iX)
A. NAME
Meritech
IX. CERTIFICATION
B. ADDRESS
642 Tamco Road
Reidsville, NC 27320
(P. 0. Box 27)
C. TELEPHONE
(area code & no.)
[phone]
D. POLLUTANTS ANALYZED
(fiat)
Hardness
Spec. Cond.
Chlorine
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments ware prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or
those persons directlyresponsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (type or print)
Dan Crowe — Plant Manager
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90)
PAGE 4 OF 4
B. PHONE NO. (area code & no.)
[phone] (Ext:, 225)
D. DATE SIGNED
9/

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item J of Form I)
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all of
this information on separate sheets (use the same format) instead of completing these pages.
NC0005126
•"V ",vV , 1V„V. OUTFALL NO.
V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continued from page 3 of Form 2-C) 001
•
PART A - You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details.
2. EFFLUENT •
3. UNITS
4. INTAKE (optional)
-67 MAXI 90 VALUE
a.l ON A G VALUE 1
(specify If blank)
a. LONG TERM
1. POLLUTANT
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
S1M pJAY
It ava labial
7 avalla e) d NO. OF
AVERAGE VALUE
b. NO. OF
(I)
CONCG.ITRATIOK
(s) Mwss
(II
,I COMCCTN ATION
Is) MA"
(.1
CONCCNTRATION
(s) .,Ass
ANALYSES
CONCEN-
aTRATION
b. MASS
(1)ANALYSES
CONCCNT RATION
(2) MASS
a. Biochamical
Oxygen Demand
MOD)
38.7
123.3
10.0
16.0
45
mg/L
#/day
b. Chemical
Oxygen Demand
(COD)
117
152
1
mg/L
4'/day
c. Total Organic
Carbon (TOC)
35'; 6
47.5
1
mg/T,
H/clay
d. Total Suspended
Solids (TSS)
57.4
76.7
17.9
31.1
52 '
mg/L
#/day
e. Ammonia (as N)
35.8
45.0
8.5
17.9
52
mg/L
#/day
I
f. Flow
VALUE
VALUE
0.324: MGD
VALUE •
0.193 MGI)
365
VALUE
fl•Temparafura
(winter)
VALUE
VALUE
7.5
VALUE
12.1
264
°C
VALUE
h. Temperature
(summer)
VALUE
VALUE
30.0
VALUE
25.8
264
°C
VALUE
I. pH
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
6.98
MAXIMUM
7,73
264
STANDARD UNITS
-,
PART B - Mark "X" in column 2-a for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark "X•' in column 2-b for each pollutant you believe to be absent. if you mark column 2a for any pollutant
which is limited either directly, or indirect y but expressly, In an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at (east one analysis for that po Iutant. For otherpollutants for which you mark
column 28, you must provide quantitative data or an explanation of their presence in your discharge. Complete one table for each outfall. See the instructions for additional details and requirements.
1. POLLUT-
Z. MARK 'X'
3. EFFLUENT f 4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (optional)
ANT AND
CAS NO.
a. .c•I
Nevi
b. ■c-
LICVCO
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIIrt 41M ]0 pA) VALUE
1 0Ua a c
c.LONG T�RM AVRG. VALUE
1 aUala a
ENO OFJ
a. CONCEN-
b.
a. LONG TERM
AVERAGE VALUE
tx NO. OF
ANAL -
(if available)
:::Zr;
•lNT
11)
ConC1NTRATION
(2) MA11
(')
CONC[(0 ATION
•(2) M was
II)ANAL-
CONCC I.) ATIOn
(2) MASS
YSES
TRATION
MASS
(')
CONC CNTR ATION
(_) MASS
YSES
a. Bromide
(24959.67.9)
X
b. Chlorine,
Total Reslduel
X
0.27
0.44
0.18
0.30
257
mg/L
#/day
c. Colo`'
X
150
NVA
1
pcu
N/A
d. Fecal
collform
X
1,589
N/A
330
N/A
58
MPN/
100 mi
IN/A
a. Fluoride
(18984-48.8)
X
f. N/trate--
Ntufts (w N)
X
417.85
1,234
130.6
289
51
mg/L
#/day
PAGE V-1
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90)
CONTINUE ON REVERSE

ITEM V-8 CONTINUED FROM_FRONT_ .
-
rs 467„- 3: M*RK 'x• ;•
. .3..EFFLU.ENT . • .. .I 4. VNITS
S; INTAKE (optional)•
AND.: a. •s - b.II- L MAXIMUM OAILY VALUE
i• � • AV • Iv)
f � NO AV Ate-
. PA WI/agar vw uc
�
- _ G
a. • -aftA VA Lita
av
d, NC.O!
_.
a- co.NCRN-
i Nin
AVER VALUE
•NO:OF
'(ltmrali bia) "'UHT stNT (Si
• . .• • CONC<NTIIATIO
Is) MAss
CONCJIJN*T10N
�_] M.Ass
(�)
CONCENTRATION
(a) MA8s
ANAL-
YSES
TRATION
b. MASS
I.]
(a) MAI►i
J1 AL-
t%
YSES
aaCONCiNT1OAT10N
. rl r is •
fakP_:°••°• X
•
1.72
2.3
0.54
0.93
52
mg/L
#/day
. h: Gli and•
R..• !,: • X.
•
•
5
12 4'
4.5
8.2
47
mg/L
#/day
1. ftiosphorus
fat .9 •:Total X
(7723.14.0) . i
-
25.9
56.8
17.5
32.2
52
mg/L
' #/day -
1. R.dl::ctivity
•
6) "AiPh!. '
Tot<a1
'
X
•
•
(2). Bata, •
Total_ •X
•
(3) Radium,
.Total'
X
.
(4) Radium
226. Total
X
i
k. Sulfate
(as SO )
(14808 79.8)
X
50
66.7
1
mg/L
#/day
1. Sulfide
(as 8)
X
m. SuNlts
(a s SO3)
(14265-45.3)
X
•
•
n. Surfactants
X
0.73
1.63
0.56
1.09
52
mg/L
#/day
0. Aluminum,
Total
(7429.90 5)
•
,
,
P. Et um,
Total
(7440-39-3)
q. 8oron,
. Total
(7440.42-8)
X
.
r. Cobalt,
Total
(7440.48.4)
X
-
s. Iron, Total
(7439-69.6)
X
X
0.11
0.15
•
1
mg/L
#/day
t. Moonss(um,
Total
(7439.96.4)
X
223
297,5
1
mg/L
#/day
. Molybdenum,
Total ' •
(7439.98.7)
X
•
v. Manganese.
Total
(7439-96-5)
X
X
0.13
0.17
1
mg/L
#/day
'
w. Tin, Total
(7440.31.5)
X
x. Titanium.
Total
(7440.32.6)
X
•
•
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90)
CONTINUE ON PAGE V -3

_ WATERRAKE
WFOR
SOFTENERS BOILER
BATHROOMS
1212 DORN
14PD
275.933 CPD
DZ IRv
J+ea0PD
BMHROOM 21.057 OPD
1ST-30 MEAT ? TST-30 Cam. 13.000
DUPPS 440 U
T COOKER
20.NO OPD
MEAT COND.
12.500 LBS./HR. EA.
(1) MEAT COND.
25,000 LBS./1(R. EA.
■
No. 2
500.000 OPD
CHLORINAIOWDECHLORINAMON
CHAMBER
ZW
Z
r
0
M
i
A
le
n
N
0
LL
1
:• ,"
1E74.
—14