NC0003719_Wasteload Allocation_19930714

NPDES DOCUMENT !CANNINO COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0003719
Cedar Creek site WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
(
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Monitoring Report
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
July 14, 1993
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore many
content on the reYerse side

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
RECEIVING STREAM: Cape Fear River
Class: C
PERMIT NO.: NC0003719
PERNIITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Monsanto Company
Fayetteville Plant
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status:
Major �1
Renewal with Modification
Minor
Pipe No.: 001 doi40 1-c 6°2
Design Capacity: -0 1-5 SIGH > . $ 51
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments:
Monsanto proposes to route current 001 discharge to the WWTP (002)
and elminate 001 as a separate discharge, see summary attached
CamoiniA-nr 0 ccf rDkA4e12 0°( 06 —
0vr AL-- .
Sub -Basin: 03-06-15
Reference USGS Quad: H 23 NE
County: Cumberland
Regional Office: Fayetteville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 9/30/92 Treatment Plant Class: III
Classification changes within three miles:
No class change
(please attach)
Requested by: Charles Lowe Date: 4/19/93
Prepared by: / � �iZ� Date: 7//3/ 3
Reviewed by: (JIV6a.v ��(,I/Y1( Date: 3 �I 3
Sww, _I W ill Doggy, 3 Z7, q3
Modeler
Date Rec.
71/34.
,` I�
Drainage Area (mil) L39s Avg. Streamflow (cfs): `t
7Q10 (cfs) 7V Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: 1WC %
Instream Monitoring:
ironic Q L.
R,P,A4Now)
Parameters BDP 1 D. 01 1 Q.,r.i i •/ Ceyl cit.,ctid;
UpstTeam CA i2e-G-e__gve-2 Location �am:owt- 11
Downstream (Ape rem givoLLocation "'/IW ydS. btpc. o-1 ocf . L .
Effluent
Characteri stics
Summer
Mort. aVG 4 DR'I uY MASC.
Winter
god. 4 vg , G.riLY MAX,.
BODS - �` '�
35-0
7C0
700
7400
NH3-N ( i4/)
Z/3
tfC
`7 6
?`7i
D.O. (mg/1)
(NhAi im A,i)
,' O
(ititi twin )
TSS (mg/1)
660
/zG"f
6 -7
/%5.
F. Col. (/100 ml)
oiovitV '
moni Tc-r7
pH (SU)
6_ of
C _ 1
Tf-vt /
* i44104-i4e__Ii)
ir..riI//e
OW:-/er✓
7 a ofJ!f O°G)
Mol
mem hr
CDC (- J y)
3Lf7o
56ag
11715—
76Z1.1-
6/yP6os4f e ( //)
tnel lair)/
No 7/ TY
77J (4,.5 /f')
-FP 0m0)
mon, -foy
mov7"v
Pr,onM'
Not,
Comments: ,Se s. 0 G PS F lz V 1 RAM �N i S

TABLE 1. OCPSF CHEMICALS WHICH SHOULD BE MONITORED ANNUALLY
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
OCPSF FLOW
0.255
MGD
7Q10s
791
cis
Qavg
4340
cis
Limit
Limit
Limit
Limit
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
ugh
ug/l
#/d
#/d
Acenaphthene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Acrylonitrile (c)
242
96
0.515
0.204
Benzene (c)
136
37
0.289
0.079
Carbon Tetrachloride (c)
38
18
0.081
0.038
Chlorobenzene
28
15
0.060
0.032
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
140
68
0.298
0.145
Hexachlorobenzene (c)
8.5
0.018
0.000
1,2-Dichloroethane (c)
211
68
0.449
0.145
1,1,1-Trichioroethane
54
21
0.115
0.045
Hexachloroethane (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
1,1-Dichloroethane
59
22
0.125
0.047
1,1,2-iriichioroethane (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
Chloroethane
268
104
0.570
0.221
Chloroform (c)
46
21
0.098
0.045
2-Chlorophenol
98
31
0.208
0.066
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
163
77
0.347
0.164
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
44
31
0.094
0.066
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
28
15
0.060
0.032
1,1-Dichloroethytene (c)
25
16
0.053
0.034
1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
2,4-Dichlorophenol
112
39
0.238
0.083
1,2-Dichloropropane
230
153
0.489
0.325
1,3-Dichloropropyiene
44
29
0.094
0.062
2,4-Dimethylphenol
36
18
0.077
0.038
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (c)
285
113
0.606
0.240
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
641
255
1.363
0.542
Ethylbenzene
108
32
0.230
0.068
Flouranthene
68
25
0.145
0.053
Methylene Chloride (c)
89
40
0.189
0.085
Methyl Chloride
190
86
0.404
0.183
Hexachlorobutadiene (c)
49
20
0.104
0.043
Naphthalene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Nitrobenzene
68
27
0.145
0.057
2-Nitrophenol
69
41
0.147
0.087
4-Nitrophenol
124
72
0.264
0.153
2,4-Dinitrophenol
123
71
0.262
0.151
MONSANTO
Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used
NC0003719

TABLE 1. OCPSF CHEMICALS WHICH SHOULD BE MONITORED ANNUALLY
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
OCPSF FLOW
0.255
MGD
701 0s
791
ds
Qavg
4340
ds
Limit
Limit
Limit
Limit
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
ug/1
ugn
#/d
#/d
4,6•Dinitro-o-cresol
277
78
0.589
0.166
Phenol
26
15
0.055
0.032
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (c)
279
103
0.593
0.219
Dibutyl phthalate
57
27
0.121
0.057
Diethyl phthalate
203
81
0.432
0.172
Dimethyl phthalate
47
19
0.100
0.040
Benzo(a)anthracene (c, PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
Benzo(a)pyrene (c, PAH)
61
23
0.130
0.049
3,4-Benzofluoranthene (c, PAH)
61
23
0.130
0.049
Benzo(k)fluoranihene (c,PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
Chrysene (c, PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
Acenaphthylene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Anthracene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Fluorene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Phenanthrene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Pyrene
67
25
0.142
0.053
Tetrachloroethylene (c)
56
22
0.119
0.047
Toluene
80
26
0.170
0.055
Trichlororethylene (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
Vinyl Chloride (c)
268
104
0.570
0.221
Total Chromium
2770
1110
5.891
2.361
Total Copper
3380
1450
7.188
3.084
Total Cyanide
1200
420
2.552
0.893
Total Lead
690
320
1.467
0.681
Total Nickel
3980
1690
8.464
3.594
Total Zinc'
2610
1050
5.551
2.233
PAH (total -ng/I)
62.3
'Total Zinc for Rayon Fiber Manufacture
that uses the viscose process and Acrylic
Fiber Manufacture that uses zinc
chloride/solvent process is 6,796 ug/L and
3,325 ug/L for maximum for any one day
and maximum for monthly average, respectively.
MONSANTO Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used NC0003719

TABLE 2. OCPSF CHEMICALS WHICH SHOULD BE MONITORED QUARTERLY
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
OCPSF FLOW
0.255
MGD
7010s
791
cfs
Qavg
4340
cfs
Limit
Limit
Limit
Limit
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
ug/I
ugll
#/d
#Id
Chloroform (c)
46
21
0.098
0.045
2-Chlorophenol
98
31
0.208
0.066
2,4-Dimethylphenol
36
18
0.077
0.038
Methylene Chloride (c)
89
40
0.189
0.085
Phenol
26
15
0.055
0.032
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (c)
279
103
0.593
0.219
Total Chromium
2770
1110
5.891
2.361
Total Copper
3380
1450
7.188
3.084
Total Cyanide
1200
420
2.552
0.893
Total Lead
690
320
1.467
0.681
Total Nickel
3980
1690
8.464
3.594
Total Zinc
2610
1050
5.551
2.233
PAH (total -ng/l)
MONSANTO Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used NC0003719

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0003719
PERNIITTEE NAME: Monsanto Company
FACILITY NAME: Fayetteville Plant
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal with Modification
Major .\1 Minor
Pipe No.: 002
Design Capacity: 0.861 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 8.7 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 91.3 %
Comments:
Currently permitted at 0.70 MGD - per Monsanto letter all facilities
performing at design rate obi CWLA#-71i'36)
001 f `oC)2 17if-- cbM6vN .
RECEIVING STREAM: Cape Fear River
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-06-15
Reference USGS Quad: H 23 NE
County: Cumberland
Regional Office: Fayetteville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 9/30/92 Treatment Plant Class: III
Classification changes within three miles:
No class change
(please attach)
Requested by: Charles_ Lowe Date: 4/19/93
Prepared by: // Date: " 3
Reviewed by: Date:
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
rr-G
4Izl(93
g
2
Drainage Area (mi )
7/37
Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
NH3-N (mg/1)
/f
D.O. (mg/1)
---3V
E
TSS mg
P ,,
F. Col. (/100 ml)
`1 1-
pH (SU)
Comments:

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0003719
PERMT 1TEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Monsanto Company
Fayetteville Plant
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal with Modification
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 003
Design Capacity: 0.030 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments:
Discharge associated with incinerator. Applies only when incinerator is
operational. Probably should put a special condition requiring
notification of regional office prior to discharge from this outfall.
RECEIVING STREAM: Cape Fear River
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-06-15
Reference USGS Quad: H 23 NE (please attach)
County: Cumberland
Regional Office: Fayetteville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 9/30/92 Treatment Plant Class: III
Classification changes within three miles:
No class change
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Charles Lowe
Date: 4/19/93
Date: ✓�' ' ,3
Reviewed by: yv-ebita-A"Y` Date: 7 (3
l
7//z/_7,3
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
.I>A-c,
gaztic3
Drainage Area (mil )
7Q10 (cfs)
75f3g'
Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC %
Instream Monitoring:
30Q2 (cfs)
Acute/Chronic
Parameters 5 fl 0 I DU TF/11.4—•
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Wnter
PAID}iMkKlM it tii
MG�e�Rt,C
BOD5 ti( ,
SC
/9.0
NH3-N
Z. C
D.O. Sr ag/1)
TSS 69542Ay?
-7
/34-
F. Col. (/100 ml)
pH (SU)
C — cf
CcD (tS5/pA^I)
1710
C LYP/W --m 6-0 S bAy)
/I oAI rTo)‹
Comments:
1

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
S ubbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION 14 3 - 3 g
Request # *1•1001111161931-
Monsanto Company/Fayetteville Plan
NC0003719 (001,002, 003)
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Modification
Cape Fear River
C
030615
Cumberland
Fayetteville
Lowe
4/19/93
H23NE
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
3aryv:
MAY 28 1993 - 1
ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
JORDAN DAM
MIN RELEASE
1985
4395
791
4340
various
Facility is requesting a modification of their permit to combine sampling of the 002 (process wastewater) and 001
(non -contact cooling water) outfalls. This should only be allowed if the Fayetteville Regional Office and Permits &
Engineering concur with giving mass limits. Concentration -based limits will not be appropriate if the outfalls are
combined since the 002 wastewater will have the effect of adding dilution to the wastestream. Technical Support has
no objection to giving mass limits, but it should be noted that limits for both options are given in this fact sheet.
Please note only one WET test should be given atC1.0%.
No changes are recommended for the permit based on wastewater from Monsanto. However, since the last WLA,
the EPA has promulgated OCPSF Guidelines for facilities like Wellman and ICI which manufacture polyester resins.
Instead of the usual table with 63 chemicals given to OCPSF dischargers, this permit should require routine
monitoring of a subset of these parameters, given that Monsanto did preliminary sampling for such parameters in 1989-1990. The entire set of chemicals should be sampled annually to assure wastewater characteristics have not -0
changed. - 7
pecial Schedule Requ ements and additional comments from Reviewers:
R. err,/ etl-aez• _ ..
Recommended by:
Reviewed by �J
Instream Assessment: L—bvt-�
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
Date: 5fto/93
Ote/ 2-CP� Date: .5/d4/
/64.3
Date: C ' g --1-3
7/7/i3
JUN 2 3 1993
Y� i

2
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Test/Limit
Existing Monitoring
Schedule:
Proposed Monitoring
Schedule:
TOXICANTS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Acute toxicity (24-hour) using fathead minnows
and Acute toxicity (48-hour) using ceriodaphnia
No significant mortality at 90%
and pass/fail at 14%
Acute test (24-hour) using fatheads (No significant mortality at 90%)
quarterly and semi-annually
quarterly (Feb, May, Aug, Nov)
Existing Limits (001 PIPE - Non -contact cooling water)
Daily Average Daily Maximum
FLOW (MGD): monitor
Total Residual Chlorine (gel): monitor
Total Chromium (mg/1): monitor
pH (SU): 6-9
Total Zinc (mg/1): monitor
TSS (lbs/day): 37.5 56.3
Existing Limits (002 PIPE - Process wastewater)
FLOW (MGD):
BOD5 (lbs/day):
NH3 (lbs/day):
pH (SU):
TSS (lbs/day):
COD ()r(c.gsJJm'.
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1):
Glyphosate (mg/1):
Fecal Colifonm (#/100 ml):
Total Nitrogen (mg/1):
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
Existing Limits (003 PIPE -
FLOW (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
pH (SU):
NH3 (mg/1):
COD (mg/1):
Glyphosate (mg/1):
Daily Average
0.7
350
23.0
6-9
623
3470
5.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
SUMMER
Daily Maximum
700
46.0
1208
5608
Incinerator/Scrubber System)
Daily Average Daily Maximum
0.03
5.0 10.0
67.0 134.0
6-9
1.0 2.0
40.0 80.0
monitor
WINTER
Daily Average
0.7
700 1400
46.0 92.0
6-9
641 1242
4715 7624
5.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Daily Maximum

3
RECOMMENDED REQUIREMENTS FOR TOXICANTS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
IF PROCESS WASTESTREAMS AND COOLING WATER WASTESTREAMS ARE COMBINED
Recommended Limits (001 PIPE IF PIPES 001 and 002 are combined),
FLOW (MGD):
Total Residual Chlorine (µg/l):
pH (SU):
Temperature (°C):
BOD5 (lbs/day):
NH3 (lbs/day):
TSS (lbs/day):
COD (m0}- (t. 35 f cry)
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1):
Glyphosate (mg/1):
Fecal Coliform (#/100 ml):
Total Nitrogen (mg/l):
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
*The temperature of the effluent shall not be such as to cause an increase in the temperature of the receiving stream
of more than 2.8°C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed 32°C.
Monthly Average Daily Maximum WQ or EL
0.859
monitor
6-9
monitor*
350 700 EL
23.0 46.0 EL
659.5 1264.3 EL
3470 5608 EL
5.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
ALSO, SEE TABLES 1. AND 2. FOR MONITORING OF ORGANIC CHEMICALS. NOTE
THAT ONLY THE MASS LIMITS WOULD APPLY IF WASTESTREAMS ARE COMBINED.
Recommended Limits (003 PIPE - Incinerator/Scrubber System)
FLOW (MGD):
BOD5 (lbs/day):
TSS (lbs/day):
pH (SU):
NH3 4ingiT7 (G g5/04 rY)
COD (Ibs/day):
Glyphosate (mg/1):
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Change in procedures x Tox. test
Monthly Average Daily Maximum
0.03
5.0 10.0
67.0 134.0
6-9
1.0 2.0
40.0 80.0
monitor
Parameter($) Affected
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
x No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

RECOMMENDED REQUIREMENTS FOR TOXICANTS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
IF PROCESS WASTESTREAMS AND COOLING WATER WASTESTREAMS ARE NOT COMBINED
Recommended Limits (001 PIPE
FLOW (MGD):
Total Residual Chlorine (14/1):
Total Chromium (mg/1):
Temperature (°C):
pH (SU):
Total Zinc (mg/1):
TSS (lbs/day):
Cooling Water)
Monthly Average Daily Maximum
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor*
6-9
monitor
37.5 56.3
*The temperature of the effluent shall not be such as to cause an increase in the temperature of the receiving stream
of more than 2.8°C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed 32°C.
Existing Limits (902 PIPE - Process Wastewater)
Monthly Average Daily Maximum
0.7
350 700
23.0 46.0
6-9
623 1208
3470 5608
FLOW (MGD):
BOD5 (lbs/day):
NH3 (lbs/day):
pH (SU):
TSS (lbs/day):
COD (mg/1):
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1):
Glyphosate (mg/1):
Fecal Coliform (#/100 ml):
Total Nitrogen (mg/1):
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
5.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
ALSO, SEE TABLES 1. AND 2. FOR MONITORING OF ORGANIC CHEMICALS. PLEASE
NOTE THAT THE LIMITS WOULD BE BASED ON CONCENTRATION AND MASS.
Recommended Limits (003 PIPE - Incinerator/Scrubber System)
FLOW (MGD):
BOD5 (lbs/day):
TSS (lbs/day):
pH (SU):
NH3 (mg/1):
COD (lbs/day):
Glyphosate (mg/1):
Monthly Average Daily Maximum
0.03
5.0 10.0
67.0 134.0
6-9
1.0 2.0
40.0 80.0
monitor
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Change in procedures
Change in wastewater (combination of two outfalls)
Parameter(s) Affected
x Tox. test
x various
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
x No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

5
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: Cape Fear River approximately 2 miles upstream of outfall
Downstream Location: Cape Fear River approximately 100 yards upstream of Lock No. 3
Parameters: BOD5, D.O., Conductivity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demprfstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes // No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
-e-aay �_ a
„140_ca �.
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? / (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.
OC '5 r tAk2 Ik T 71 lc -i69.r kl2M) ..kGuna--nos 4,io 1/1LA,47r65.

TABLE 1. OCPSF CHEMICALS WHICH SHOULD BE MONITORED ANNUALLY
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
OCPSF FLOW
0.255
MGD
7Q10s
791
cfs
Qavg
4340
cfs
C- J GEN r1Z4por✓
MA-
S S
Limit
Limit
Limit
Limit
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
ug/I
ug/I
#/d
#/d
Acenaphthene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Acryloniirile (c)
242
96
0.515
0.204
Benzene (c)
136
37
0.289
0.079
Carbon Tetrachloride (c)
38
18
0.081
0.038
Chlorobenzene
28
15
0.060
0.032
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
140
68
0.298
0.145
Hexachlorobenzene (c)
8.5
0.018
0.000
1,2 Dichloroethane (c)
211
68
0.449
0.145
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
54
21
0.115
0.045
Hexachloroethane (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
1,1-Dichloroethane
59
22
0.125
0.047
1,1,2-triichloroethane (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
Chioroethane
268
104
0.570
0.221
Chloroform (c)
46
21
0.098
0.045
2-Chlorophenoi
98
31
0.208
0.066
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
163
77
0.347
0.164
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
44
31
0.094
0.066
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
28
15
0.060
0.032
1,1-Dichloroethyiene (c)
25
16
0.053
0.034
1,2 trans-Dichloroethylene (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
2,4-Dichlorophenol
112
39
0.238
0.083
12-Dichloropropane
230
153
0.489
0.325
1,3-Dichloropropyiene
44
29
0.094
0.062
2,4-Dimethyiphenol
36
18
0.077
0.038
2,4-Dinitrdoluene (c)
285
113
0.606
0.240
2,6-Dinitroto!uene
641
255
1.363
0.542
Ethylbenzene
108
32
0230
0.068
Flouranthene
68
25
0.145
0.053
Methylene Chloride (c)
89
40
0.189
0.085
Methyl Chloride
190
86
0.404
0.183
Hexachlorobutadiene (c)
49
20
0.104
0.043
Naphthalene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Nitrobenzene
68
27
0.145
0.057
2-Nitrophenol
69
41
0.147
0.087
4-Nitrophenol
124
72
0.264
0.153
2,4-Dinitrophenol
123
71
0.262
0.151
Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used
NC0003719

TABLE 1. OCPSF CHEMICALS WHICH SHOULD BE MONITORED ANNUALLY
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
OCPSF FLOW
0.255
MGD
7010s
791
ds
QaVg
4340
ds
Limit
Limit
Limit
Limit
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
ug/I
ug/l
#/d
#/d
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
277
78
0.589
0.166
Phenol
26
15
0.055
0.032
Bis(2 ethylhexyl) phthalate (c)
279
103
0.593
0.219
Dibutyl phthalate
57
27
0.121
0.057
Diethyl phthalate
203
81
0.432
0.172
Dimethyl phthalate
47
19
0.100
0.040
Benzo(a)anthracene (c, PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
Benzo(a)pyrene (c, PAH)
61
23
0.130
0.049
3,4-Benzofluoranthene (c, PAH)
61
23
0.130
0.049
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (c,PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
Chrysene (c, PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
Acenaphthylene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Anthracene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Fluorene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Phenanthrene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Pyrene
67
25
0.142
0.053
Tetrachloroethylene (c)
56
22
0.119
0.047
Toluene
80
26
0.170
0.055
Trich ororethylene (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
Vinyl Chloride (c)
268
104
0.570
0.221
Total Chromium
2770
1110
5.891
2.361
Total Copper
3380
1450
7.188
3.084
Total Cyanide
1200
420
2.552
0.893
Total Lead
690
320
1.467
0.681
Total Nickel
3980
1690
8.464
3.594
Total Zinc'
2610
1050
5.551
2.233
PAH (total -ngf)
62.3
*Total Zinc for Rayon Fber Manufacture
that uses the viscose process and Acrylic
Fiber Manufacture that uses zinc
chloride/solvent process is 6,796 ug/L and
3,325 ug/L for maximum for any one day
and maximum for monthly average, respectively.
MONSANTO Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used NC0003719

•
TABLE 2. OCPSF CHEMICALS WHICH SHOULD BE MONITORED QUARTERLY
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
OCPSF FLOW
0.255
MGD
7Q10s
791
ds
Qavg
4340
ds
COPfCeAfTRIM
v
P:d4,'5.-S
Limit
Limit
Limit
Limit
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
ug/I
ugh
#/d
#Id
Chloroform (c)
46
21
0.098
0.045
2-Chlorophend
98
31
0.208
0.066
1,1-Dichloroethylene (c)
25
16
0.053
0.034
1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
1,3-Dichloropropylene
44
29
0.094
0.062
2,4-Dimethylphenol
36
18
0.077
0.038
Methylene Chloride (c)
89
40
0.189
0.085
Methyl Chloride
190
. 86
0.404
0.183
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
277
78
0.589
0.166
Phenol
26
15
0.055
0.032
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (c)
279
103
0.593
0.219
Dibutyl phthalate
57
27
0.121
0.057
3,4-Benzofluoranthene (c, PAH)
61
23
0.130
0.049
Tetrachloroethylene (c)
56
22
0.119
0.047
Total Chromium
2770
1110
5.891
2.361
Total Copper
3380
1450
7.188
3.084
Total Cyanide
1200
420
2.552
0.893
Total Lead
690
320
1.467
0.681
Total Nickel
3980
1690
8.464
3.594
Total Zinc
2610
1050
5.551
2.233
PAH (total -ng/1)
Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used NC0003719

FacilityName RO/✓S41077
Permit # 6.57 /9 Pipe #
ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the North Carolina
Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A Single Effluent
Concentration." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static
test, using effluent collected as a 24 hour composite. The effluent concentration at which there may be at no time
significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). Effluent
samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste
treatment. Thefirst t t will,,e perf ed after ter thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the
months ofI� May, DV
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGE6C.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 79/ cfs
Permitted Flow D. 859 MGD Recommended by:
IWC • /7 %
Basin & Sub -basin GPF DOOG/s i
Receiving Stream C. aboVF ,.0Y6
County u.a10&r 44/4 Date 5 93
QAL PIF Fathead 24 Version 9191.

.002
ATMOSPHERE
1
.089
.234
.988
BACKWASH
POND
ICIA
PROCESS
DOMESTIC
WATER
TREATMENT
.107
1414.141174)
f 11'
PROCESS
.049
.014
.090
DEMIN.
WATER
.012
SLOWDOWN
.021
SOFTENER
.525
.285
BOILER
.216
.038
BLOWDOWN
PROCESS
.002
COOLING .
TOWER
64.174
1.515
RIVER
WATER
INTAKE
FIRE
POND
84.174
.002
ATMOSPHERE
PROCESS
COOLING
SANITARY .075
.338
EFFLUENT
TREATMENT
.007
ATMOSPHERE
„Aubtafo
TECH.
PROCESS
FORMW.14 7044
PROCESS
.470
ATMOSPHERE
.008
.005 PRODUCT
.008
NOTE02
INCINERATION
.016
ATMOSPHERE
DISCHARGE
003
.030
4-*
.008
NOTE81
SBR
02
SBR
01
•I
1
NOTEII: TO BE OPERATED
AS NEEDED
NOTE/2: TO BE OPERATED
AS NEEDED
♦..* = SAMPLE POINT
DISCHARGE
• 002
.680
PROCESS WATER FLOW DISTRIBUTION
FINAL
OUTFALL TO
RIVER

PRETREATMENT
� RocEsss waste
1 MM
0.038 MM GALS
SPILL
BASIN
i
OIL
TANK
OIL
SKIMMER
& PH CONT
LIFT
STATION
at
CHEMICAL
Wi6TE
L. •
L J
NUTRIENT
ADDITION
4 MM GALS.
EQUALIZATION
BASIN
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
BYPASS
T
SANITARY
WASTE
—►
.4 MM GALS.
AERATION
BASIN 41
r 1,
*
I 50 FT. DIA.
I CLARIFIER
I I
t
RETURN
SLUDGE
PUMPS
SUPERNATANT
1.0 MM GALS.
AERATION
BASIN 42
90FT. DIA.
CLARIFIER
AEROBIC
DIGESTOR
♦
FILTER
PUMP
STATION
SLUDGE
STORAGE
BASIN
DRYING BEDS
■ .pmksc+ A LMr% IANAarc TQGSTMENT PLANT
• PRESENTLY
NOT IN SERVICE
(NOT NEEDED)
CLORINATION
CHAMBER
i
METER
STATION
1
OUTFALL
TO CAPE
FEAR RIVER
COMMINUTORS

e•
HISTORY OF WLA's at MONSANTO
Qw = 0.861 MGD (001)
Qw = 0.150 MGD (002)
Cape Fear River
030615
#7435, 7436, 7437 Goodrich
NC0003719 April 1993
G
This facility was built by a Philadelphia company called Rohm and Haas in the 19X0's and
used as a textile plant. Later the plant changed to a carpet manufacturer. Ne 5c.- Monsank s 6l1oly'3
(ems �'
Monsanto uses the main plant row i° '
•
and has sold two auxilli facilities located on the site to other companies. Monsanto o ruin' cs 1Q,r►�,rs
�'Y P .�
makes glyphosate which is sold as the herbicide "Roundup". Raw materials used in this r 17Gj
process include isopropyl amine and n-phosphonometyl imino-diacetic acid. Monsanto
provides utilities (water and power) for the other two manufacturers - Wellman, Inc., The
Fibers Division, and ICI Americas, Inc., ICI Films. Both of these facilities manufacture
synthetic fibers. Wellman takes polyester chips, melts them, adds oils, and creates a
number of different polyester threads which are spun and sent out to textile plants. ICI
Films is a polyethyleneterraphthalate (PET) plant which sells polyester chips (melinar) used
in making plastic beverage containers, film for cameras, potato chip bags, etc. ICI
combines dimethylterraphthalate (DMT) and ethylene glycol as well as catalysts to make a
monomer which is then esterfied to make the polymer melinar which is the end product.
The oldest WLA in Technical Support's files was done by Meg Kerr in 1986. She
renewed with existing limits which appear to have been based on effluent guidelines.
David Vogt modeled the discharge from Monsanto in 1987 after new target flows were
established for the Cape Fear River following the construction of Jordan Lake. Results of
this modeling indicated that Monsanto, which interacts with both Fayetteville WWTP's,
would need to be limited at 20 mg/1 (BOD5) and 4 mg/1 (NH3). Effluent guidelines for
some parameters were given in this WLA but the facility was not given OCPSF guidelines
because these requirements were not yet promulgated by the EPA. Two WET tests were
given based on permitted flows from the 002 and 003 pipes only. The first test is a 48-
hour static test using daphnia pulex, or ceriodaphnia. Compliance is judged on a pass/fail
basis at 14% concentration of effluent in the aliquot. The second test was required on a
semiannual basis using fathead minnows during a 24-hour static test.
After reviewing the draft NPDES permit, Monsanto requested deletion of the flow limit
and changing the total suspended solids limit to total non -filterable residue. Frequency for
pH monitoring was also requested to be changed to twice per month. These comments
were considered, and acted on appropriately. After meeting with DEM, Monsanto
requested BODS limits be given at 350 lbs/day because anything less than this would not be
reflective of the wastewater treatment plant design efficiency. Apparently, this relaxed limit
was granted since a flow of 948 cfs (needed to protect water quality according to the Level
B model) occurs 87% of the time during April through October at the point of discharge.
In 1989 Monsanto recognized the promulgation of the OCPSF Guidelines by the EPA.
They then requested that NCDNRCD approve Morisanto's plan to gather preliminary data
which would better characterize the wastewater emanating from Monsanto and the two
OCPSF facilities. This data would then be used by DEM in the future permitting process
which includes this discussion on the history of Monsanto.
Q 1/ 1 1 . 1 • i tits

WLA in 1993 at MONSANTO
Qw = 0.861 MGD (001)
Qw = 0.150 MGD (002)
Cape Fear River
030615
#7435, 7436, 7437
NC0003719
DMR/INSTREAM DATA
Goodrich
April 1993
This facility has three pipes: cooling water/boiler blowdown (001); process
wastewater including sanitary and lab wastes (002); and scrubdown water from an on -site
incinerator (003). (See diagram of Process Water Flow Distribution.) The incinerator has
never been used, but is in place in case the levels of glyphosate become too elevated in the
wastewater to be handled by the conventional WWTP and/or the sequencing batch reactor.
If this occurs, the incinerator would be used to dispose of glyphosate. Monsanto would
like to keep this 003 pipe in their permit although they hope never to use the incinerator.
Cooling water/boiler blowdown appears to be testing within the limits of the permit.
One TSS violation was documented in the past three years.
Process wastewater has also been within permitted limits. Total phosphorus is
elevated, as is COD. According to Manhar Patel (Monsanto), when the sequencing batch
reactor is used to destroy high concentrations of glyphosate COD is increased greatly.
After reviewing the WET test results and speaking with Christy Robson (Aquatic
Toxicology), it appears that Monsanto is passing toxicity test requirements on a consistent
basis.
Monsanto is reporting monthly instream data during the winter months. Samples
are collected both upstream and downstream at 8 a.m. (?!) This may be possible because
Monsanto appears to use DuPont's upstream sample for their downstream sample result but
it seems unlikely that both samples are always collected at 8 a.m. BOD5 seems to be
higher on average downstream of Monsanto then upstream of the outfall. However,
conductivity, and dissolved oxygen show no spatial patterns. It should be noted that DO
does drop below the standard in this area of the river.
September 1992 had some erroneous data, including a DO of 162 mg/1 and a
conductivity of 7.6 µmhos/cm2.
A second instream monitoring station was eliminated upon the facility's request in
the summer of 1991. The bridge which had been used to gain access to the Cape Fear
River had been demolished earlier that year.
WLA IN 1993
Background
Lowe (P & E) and I toured Monsanto and the two OCPSF facilities on March 30,
1993. The purpose of the trip was to learn more about the processes which create
wastewater at these three WWTP's in order to more appropriately regulate the discharge
through the NPDES process. It would appear that the Monsanto plant mainly discharges
glyphosate from their facility, although there is a certain biochemical oxygen -consuming
component to their waste. From a business standpoint, it is unacceptable for Monsanto to
discharge too much glyphosate since it is their primary product and, therefore, their means
for guideli es but as of now there The are no such e from onsanto guidelin s ford the manufacture off eerbi�et k ' phorate
As a result, no new requirements should be given solely as a result of Monsanto's
contribution to the wastewater.

Wellman, Inc. and ICI Films add wastewater which will change the requirements of
the permit. These plants discharge organic chemicals to the Monsanto WWTP, and the
EPA has promulgated copious directives and advice on how to handle such discharges
since the last WLA was done. It should be noted that Wellman, Inc. only had small
amounts of their discharge which could be considered OCPSF in -nature. Most of their
discharge is non -contact cooling water which would have caused their entire system to be
disrupted if there was contact. Minute holes in brass dye casts were used to form the
individual polyester fibers before they were solidified and made into thread for shipment to
textile plants. These casts were burned clean and theoretically some of the OCPSF
parameters may have been found in the washdown water from the incinerator. Wellman,
Inc. appeared to have a number of recycling and reuse projects going on at the time of the
site visit.
ICI Films had an operation which probably lent itself more to discharging organic
chemicals than Wellman, Inc. The majority of these chemicals undoubtedly came from the
condensate which was discharged during the constant chemical reactions used to fonn
monomers and polymers under vacuum conditions. ICI Films was in the process of
improving their "pretreatment" capabilities by installing a larger oil -water separator.
OCPSF Issues
To my knowledge, this is the first OCPSF facility in North Carolina which has
done some preliminary monitoring for organics prior to a permit renewal request. Per the
EPA's guidance of this type of discharger (see Development Document for Effluent
Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Organic Chemicals. Plastics and Synthetic
Fibers, Point Source Category, Volumes I and II), "monitoring for pollutants could be
drastically reduced if preliminary monitoring and other information indicated that the
pollutants would not be discharged at significant levels" (p. X-33). That is, EPA required
the regulation of 63 toxicants for all OCPSF facilities, realizing that only a limited subset (5
- 15) would actually be discharged from a given permittee. Therefore, data collected by
Monsanto was compared to those parameters which would be given if no data had been
collected to determine which parameters were appropriate to include in Monsanto's permit.
Table 1. shows those chemicals which are in the EPA's "master list" of OCPSF
constituents. Included in this table are proposed limits based on concentrations and mass.
(Note that none of these parameters are water quality limited with the exception of
Hexachlorobenzene and some of the PAH parameters.) Table 2. summarizes the results of
the monitoring done by Monsanto, specifically noting those parameters which were and
were not detected in the wastewater. Please note that Monsanto did not monitor for the
following parameters during their preliminary monitoring:
• 1,1-Dichloroethylene
• 1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene
• 1,3-Dichloropropylene
• 3,4-Benzofluoranthene
• 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
• Dibutyl phthalate
• Methyl chloride
• Tetrachloroethylene
I spoke with Manhar Patel (Monsanto) about this fact during the 3/30/93 site visit. He did
not realize there were parameters which were missed during the intial monitoring and he
asked if there was anything Monsanto could do about that now. I told him probably not
but upon further discussion, I said I would ask Ray Kelling at our Cary Lab to determine
if, based on the absence or presence of other chemical classes/compounds, it can safely be
assumed that one or more of the eight chemicals listed above does not exist in this
discharge. After reviewing the information, Kelling told me by telephone on 5/10/93 that
there would be no way to know for sure if any of these eight chemicals were not in the

4
TABLE 1. OCPSF WORKSHEET FOR MONSANTO
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
OCPSF FLOW
0.255
MGD
7Q10s
791
ds
Qavg
4340
ds
Limit
Limit
Fedi
Standard
Standard
Allowable
Allowable
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Dolly maximum
Monthly avg
State
C
WS
conc. ("C")
conc. (WS)
ugA
ug/I
#/d
#/d
stdrd
mil
µgA
14/1
µg/I
Acenaphihene
59
22
0.125
0.047
FC
2700 .
1200
5406115.56
2402718.03
Acrylonitrile (c)
242
96
0.515
0.204
FC
0.66
0.059
7247.72
647.90
Benzene (c)
136
37
0.289
0.079
FC
71.4
1.19
784071.40
13067.86
Carbon Tetrachloride (c)
38
18
0.081
0.038
SS
4.42
0254
48537.75
2789.27
Chlorobenzene
28
15
0.060
0.032
FC
21000
680
42047565.46
1361540.22,
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
140
68
0298
0.145
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUEI
Hexachlorobenzene (c)
28
15
0.060
0.032
FC
0.00075
0.00077
8.24
8.46
1,2-Diichloroethane (c)
211
68
0.449
0.145
FC
99
0.38
1087157.82
4172.93
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
54
21
0.115
0.045
FC
18400
1030000
36841676.41
###########
Hexachloroethane (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
FC
8.85
1.95
97185.32
21413.71
1,1-Dichloroethane
59
22
0.125
0.047
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
1,1,2-trichloroethane (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
FC
42
0.6
461218.47
6588.84
Chloroethane
268
104
0.570
0.221
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Chloroform (c)
46
21
0.098
0.045
FC
470
5.7
5161254.31
62593.94
2-Chlorophenol
98
31
0208
0.066
FC
400
120
800906.01
240271.80
1,2 Dichlorobenzene
163
77
0.347
0.164
FC
17000
2700
34038505.38
5406115.56
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
44
31
0.094
0.066
FC
2600
400
5205889.06
800906.01
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
28
15
0.060
0.032
FC
2600
400
5205889.06
800906.01
1,1-Dichloroethylene (c)
25
16
0.053
0.034
FC
3.2
0.057
35140.45
625.94
1,2-trans-Diichloroethylene (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
FC
no stdrd
700
#VALUE!
7686974.51
2,4-Dichlorophenoi
112
39
0238
0.083
FC
790
93
1581789.37
186210.65
1,2-Dichloropropane
230
153
0.489
0.325
FC
39
0.52
78088.34
1041.18
1,3-Dichloropropylene
44
29
0.094
0.062
FC
1700
10
3403850.54
20022.65
2,4-Dimethylphenol
36
18
0.077
0.038
FC
2300
540
4605209.55
1081223.11
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (c)
285
113
0.606
0.240
FC
9.1
0.11
99930.67
1207.95
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
641
255
1.363
0.542
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Ethylbenzene
108
32
0230
0.068
FC
325
no stdrd
650736.13
#VALUE!
Fiouranthene
68
25
0.145
0.053
FC
370
300
740838.06
600679.51
Methylene Chbride (c)
89
40
0.189
0.085
FC
1600
4.7
17570227.45
51612.54
Methyl Chloride
190
86
0.404
0.183
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Hexachtorobutadiene (c)
49
20
0.104
0.043
FC
50
44
549069.61
483181.25
Naphthalene
59
22
0.125
0.047
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Nitrobenzene
68
27
0.145
0.057
FC
1900
17
3804303.54
34038.51
2-Nitrophenol
69
41
0.147
0.087
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
4-Nitrophenol
124
72
0264
0.153
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
2,4-Dinitrophenol
123
71
0262
0.151
FC
14000
70
28031710.31
140158.55
Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used

TABLE 1. OCPSF WORKSHEET FOR MONSANTO
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
OCPSF FLOW
0.255
MGD
70100
791
ds
Qavg
4340
ds
Limit
Limit
Fedi
Standard
Standard
Allowable
Allowable
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
State
C
WS
conc. ("C")
conc. (WS)
ugli
ugll
#/d
#/d
stdrd
µg/l
µgA
µO
µg/l
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
277
78
0.589
0.166
FC
765
13.4
1531732.74
26830.35
Phenol
26
15
0.055
0.032
FC
4600000
21000
9210419101.83
42047565.46
Bis(2 ethylhexyl) phthalate (c)
279
103
0.593
0.219
FC
5.9
1.8
64790.21
19766.51
Dibutyl phthalate
57
27
0.121
0.057
FC
12000
2700
24027180.27
5406115.56
Diethyl phthalate
203
81
0.432
0.172
FC
120000
23000
240271802.66
46052095.51
Dimethyl phthalate
47
19
0.100
0.040
FC
2900000
313000
5.81E+09
626708951.93
Benzo(a)anthracene (c, PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
FC
0.049
0.0044
538.09
48.32
Benzo(a)pyrene (c, PAH)
61
23
0.130
0.049
FC
0.049
0.0044
538.09
48.32
3,4-Benzofluoranthene (c, PAH)
61
23
0.130
0.049
FC
0.049
0.0044
538.09
48.32
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (c,PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
FC
0.049
0.0044
538.09
48.32
Chrysene (c, PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
FC
0.049
0.0044
538.09
48.32
Ac enaphthylene •
59
22
0.125
0.047
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUEI
#VALUE!
Anthracene
59
22
0.125
0.047
FC
110000
9600
220249152.44
19221744.21
Fluorene
59
22
0.125
0.047
FC
14000
1300
28031710.31
2602944.53
Phenanthrene
59
22
0.125
0.047
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Pyrene
67
25
0.142
0.053
FC
11000
960
22024915.24
1922174.42
Tetrachloroethyiene (c)
56
22
0.119
0.047
FC
8.85
0.8
971 85.32
8785.11
Toluene
80
26
0.170
0.055
FC
11
no stdrd
22024.92
#VALUE!
Trichiororethyiene (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
SS
81
2.7
889492.76
29649.76
Vinyl Chloride (c)
268
104
0.570
0.221
SS
525
2
5765230.88
21962.78
Total Chromium
2770
1110
5.891
2.361
SS
50
no stdrd
100113.25
#VALUE!
Total Copper
3380
1450
7.188
3.084
SS
7
no stdrd
14015.86
#VALUE!
Total Cyanide
1200
420
2.552
0.893
SS
5
no stdrd
10011.33
#VALUE!
Total Lead
690
320
1.467
0.681
SS
25
no stdrd
50056.63
#VALUE!
Total Nickel
3980
1690
8.464
3.594
SS
88
25
176199.32
50056.63
Total Zinc'
2610
1050
5.551
2.233
SS
50
no stdrd
100113.25
#VALUEI
PAH (total -ng/l)
SS
0.0311
2.8
62.27
5606.34
aromatic hydrocarbons
'Total Zinc for Rayon Fber Manufacture
that uses the viscose process and Acrylic
Fiber Manufacture that uses zinc
chloride/solvent process is 6,796 ug/L and
3,325 ug/L for maximum for any one day
and maximum for monthly average, respectively.
Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used

effluent based on the available data. Therefore, these chemicals should be limited as well
as those which were found at levels of concern.
After talking with George Jett (EPA), annual monitoring of all 63 OCPSF
parameters will be given. This will characterize any changes in wastewater as a result of
varying raw materials, different processes, or new products.
Limits will be based on the highest average annual flow recorded in the past three
years. This was 0.255 MGD in 1990. The highest monthly average flow in the past 12
months was not used, because the OCPSF flow was lower in that one month than it was
than the average OCPSF flow for the entire year of 1990.
Table 2. Chemicals which were found in wastestream from the OCPSF facilities
Chloroform
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Methylene Chloride
Phenol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Tetrachoroethene
Total Chromium
Total Copper
Total Cyanide
Total Lead
Total Nickel
Total Zinc
NOTE THAT ALL OTHER PARAMETERS WHICH WERE LISTED ON TABLE 1.
WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE EIGHT COMPOUNDS LISTED IN THE
COMMENTS SECTION WERE NOT DETECTED IN SAMPLES COLLECTED.
Table 2a. Chemicals which were sampled
Acrolein
Chloromethane
Bromonethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-dichloroethene
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
trans 1,3-dichloropropene
Bromoform
2-choroethyl vinyl ether
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
N-nitrosodimethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine
Isophorone
but are not included in the OCPSF Guidelines
bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
Hexac hlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronapthelene
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether
Pentachlorophenol
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Butylbenzylphthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Ideno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Benzo (g,h,i)perylene
Benzidine
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
(None of these parameters were found above detection.)

A
Combination of Wastestreams (001 & 002)
Federal guidelines for OCPSF-related discharges are designed to be based on
minimum technology. Therefore, permit limits in concentration should not be given if
other wastestreams are providing "dilution" of certain constituents. This has been DEM's
policy for several years, and should remain the same for this case. However, if the
permittee would agree to mass limits of these OCPSF parameters, then DEM could allow
this mixing of wastestreams and compliance could be judged downstream of the existing
001 and 002 pipes.
Other Limits
Dilutioni is too high to warrant a limit for fecal conform. Limits for wasteflow and
TSS should be changed to reflect the combined wastestreams. Existing limits for TSS
from the 001 and 002 pipes were combined to arrive at a limit for TSS in the proposed
combined wastestream (660.5 lbs/day). A flow limit of 0.7 MGD was given for the
process wastewater (002), but only monitoring was given for the cooling water (001)
discharge. Based on a schematic of process wasteflows, a maximum flow of 0.159 MGD
would be expected to be created from cooling water flows. Therefore, a flow limit of
0.859 MGD was given for the combined wastestreams.
It should also be noted that Monsanto requested one set of limits which apply for
the entire year. As a result, the most stringent limits (i.e., summer limits) were
recommended only.

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Water Quality Section/Rapid Assessment Group
June 28, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tommy Stevens
THROUGH: Carla Sanderson
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Dave Goodrich0
Comments from Monsanto Regarding May 28, 1993 Fact Sheet
Monsanto Agricultural Group
NC0003719
Cumberland County
I offer the following responses to Monsanto's June 10, 1993 letter to you regarding
Monsanto's comments on the wasteload allocation prepared for their Cumberland County
plant. The item numbers given below correspond to Monsanto's three page table of
comments.
ITEM #1 - Monsanto requests the flexibility to perform their WET test during any of the
three months in a quarter. This cannot be allowed since any facility which fails a pass/fail
WET test must resample the following month.
I IhM #2 - Monsanto requests three issues under this item: A) The permit be issued with
both summer and winter limits; B) Frequencies for BOD5 and COD be given as 2/month;
and C) NH3 be listed as NH3 - N. I have no objections to A) or C). Frequency for BOD5
and COD will be weekly per the .0500 regulations which have been modified since their
last permit was issued.
ITEM #3 - Monsanto would like limits for flow and TSS to be rounded to the nearest
whole number. This will be done for TSS, but flow limits are normally this precise since
they mirror the design statistic given in the Authorization to Construct.
IThM #4 - Again, three issues are listed under this item: A) Monitoring of temperature is
not clear; B) Frequencies of monitoring for parameters not given; and C) Remove 0800
hours as time for sampling. Temperature should be monitored instream, and the narrative
statement found at the bottom of the recommended limits for 001 should be enforced at the
instream monitoring locations. Frequencies of monitoring, as you know, are given by the
permitting engineer, but will probably be weekly based on the .0500 regulations. Finally, I
believe C) is a misinterpretation of my notes regarding this facility. There is no intention of
requiring Monsanto to monitor at 0800.
1'1'hM #5 - I indicated that eight compounds on the OCPSF list were not sampled by
Monsanto. After checking with the Cary Laboratory, this is incorrect, so these parameters
will be deleted from the list of OCPSF chemicals which should be monitored quarterly.

page -2-
Response to Comments Regarding Monsanto's WLA
June 24, 1993
ITEM #6 - Monsanto is requesting annual sampling of OCPSF compounds. This is not
°Aceptable. Normally, an OCPSF facility which has not collected data characterizing their
effluent will be given quarterly monitoring of the entire list of OCPSF chemicals (i.e., 63
compounds). Since Monsanto had collected such data, my first inclination was to allow
them to sample quarterly solely for those six organic chemicals and six metals which were
documented in the effluent. After speaking with George Jett of the EPA, he convinced me
that the intent of the OCPSF guidelines was to have a minimum of annual sampling for the
list of 63 chemicals contained in the federal guidelines. Therefore, I gave the short list
quarterly and the long list annually. This is less restrictive than what DEM is giving other
OCPSF facilities which have not undertaken sampling prior to their permit renewal.
(Please note that the EPA Development Document assumes no less than weekly monitoring
requirements for OCPSF chemicals at these facilities.)
ITEM #7 - Monsanto contends that limits for OCPSF parameters should be given
considering Monsanto's flow as well as the flow from ICIA and Wellman. The regulations
for OCPSF discharges [40 CFR Part 414.91(b)] specifically states that limits are to be
determined accounting for only the flows emanating from "any point source subject to this
subpart". Since flows from Monsanto are not covered under this sub -part, the limits as
given were correct.
cc: Coleen Sullins

Monsanto
v
{` 1 7 1993
MONSANTO AGRICULTURAL COMPANY.�� ; ;.,,
A UNIT OF MONSANTO COMPANY
P.O. BOX 2307
FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28302
PHONE [phone]
June 10, 1993
Mr. Tommy Stevens
North Carolina DEHNR
Suite 714, Wachovia Bldg.
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Mr. Stevens:
The recent preview of the waste load allocation fact sheet dated May 28, 1993, which you
shared with us was very much appreciated. Monsanto's Agricultural plant at the Fayetteville
site essentially agrees to your analysis and, for the most part, recommendations on limits.
However, we offer a few clarifications accompanied by requests for changes for your
consideration.
The issues pertaining to these requests by Monsanto Co. are outlined in the attached
referenced as comments. Additional attachments are provided as references and basis for
the comments and requests.
It is expected that you will consider these as pertinent to the subject(s) outlined in our
comments and incorporate them to reflect the changes requested by Monsanto Co. We
offer these comments to safeguard the ongoing commitment by Monsanto in loading and
operating within the permitted limits and, therefore, believe that NC-DEHNR will
incorporate these as requested. Once again, your sharing of this preview of waste load
allocation is highly appreciated.
Thank you,
-791aAtilotiu
Manhar Patel
tw
Attachments

(ATTACHMENT I)
COMMENTS
NOTE: Refer pages to the fact sheet
(i.e. Waste Load Allocation -
May 28, 1993 from DNR)
Page 1 of 3
Item #
Reference
Page
Issue
(Subject)
N. C. State Position
or Recommendation
Concerns
Monsanto
Recommendations
1)
2
Acute toxicity test
Monitoring schedule
quarterly --designated
by months (Feb., May,
Aug., Nov.).
Currently the flexibility
of scheduling this in any
of the 3 months of a
Remove stipulation
that these samples
occur during
Feb., May, Aug.,
n Nov.) . )ey
IL. 44-46y 0; - 1
p.
given quarter is pre-
ferred.
2)
3
Combine the pipes 001 and
N. C. State allocation
In the past (1989/90)
Monsanto respect'
002 as required and base
is based on the lower
operating at higher
fully requests LT
the parameters and numbers
limits, i.e. the "old"
capacity) rates during
the summer and
as requested in the appli-
summer limits.
winter has caused
winter limits as
cation as follows:
Daily
(Summer)
exceedances to "summer"
specified in he
t
permit.
Daily
limitations.
Avq. Max.
Avg. Max.
A) Eg. BOD: 525 1224
A) BOD: 350 700
COD: 4090 6616
COD: 3470 5608
B) Have frequency of
samples stated for above
to be 2/month (max.).
B) No frequency of
sampling has been
stated in the
document.
C) NH3
b�Typographical
C} Typograp
error.
-
C) NH3N

Item #
Reference
Page
Issue
(Subject)
N. C. State Position
or Recommendation
Concerns
Monsanto -
Recommendation.,
3)
3
Rounding off the limits
where applicable.
Eg. decimalized limits
used for flow and TSS.
None specific.
For ease of control
the numbers should
be to nearest
whole figures.
4)
3 a)
Temperature measurements
Monitoring frequency
Currently no such
"Grab" approach to
max. 32°C and no more than
2.8°C impact to receiving
stream.
not clear.
requirement in the
permit.
temp measurement
should suffice
rather than con-.`//
tinuous nit9!;tng,
am ;y • �'
b)
Generally all parameters
"monitoring only."
No specific frequency
is stated for "monitor-
Should be at a frequency
no greater than the
current parameters.
Consider current„,
permit D9)
frequencies.
inq onlv," parameters.
c)
Upstream/downstream river
water monitoring.
0800 hours (?!) men-
tioned as time for
sampling.
Scheduling and timing.
Remove any stipula-
tion to 8 0 h s
timing. -")i
5)
Page 14
OCPSF Issues - Supposedly
These were erroneously
These parameters were
Revise the OCPSF
eight (8�issing" para-
indicated as missing
never missing. These were
paragraph to
meters from the original
OCPSF constituents. (See
explanation in Attach-
ment II.)
from data.
tested by Monsanto; how-
ever, they show up under
their respective synonyms
as shown in Attachment
II by matching CAS# and
the changes (based
on Attachment 1I
details) on Pages
15, 16, 17 and 18
well as OCPSF
names. (See Table B.)
1 and Table 2
1ations 01 p /V

NOTE: Refer pages to the fact sheet
(i.e. Waste Load Allocation -
May 28, 1993 from DNR)
Page 3 of 3
Item #
Reference
Page
Issue
(Subject)
N. C. State Position
or Recommendation
Concerns
Monsanto
Recommendations
6)
General:
1) Annual monitoring
All 3 sets of monitor-
An unnecessary and expen-
Eliminate
(Pages 6,
7,8)
(63 compounds)
ing are required in
the proposed permit.
sive burden, especially
duplication of analysis
between OCPSF and
DEM-AT-2 requirements.
No justifiable and
reasonable exemption is
given to Monsanto:
a) For undertaking a
proactive sampling
program for OCPSF
parameters involv-
ing characteriza-
tion of each influ-
ent during 1989/90.
b) No significant find-
quartely
ments of
pounds and
lidate DEM-AT-2
and OCPSF
63 compounds
single requirement
on a one
require-
21 com-
conso-
scan of
to a
per annum
.
2) Quarterly monitoring
(21 compounds)
3) Additionally, annual
monitoring using the
NC-DEM form AT-2
protocol.
basis.
Ne
,
ings of any consti-
tuents through
extensive analysis
over past 4 years.
7)
Pages 15,
16, 17
OCPSF calculations based on
Only the OCPSF flows
are used for allowance
Additional flow from
Monsanto as a "non-
Add on to the.pro-
posed limits the
mass limitations. In cal-
culating the "allowances"
for the OCPSF industries
the combined flow of 0.255
MGD has been used for ICIA
and Wellman. However, no
allowances have been given
to "non-OCPSF" flow from
at the outfall...
OCPSF" flow should be
considered in calcula-
tions by adding on the
actual amounts
constituents
in Monsanto's
from the
analysis
in the applica-
tion. This
result in
increase
limits at
of
shown
flow
OCPSF
provided
will
net
in mass
outfall.
constituents expected
from that source.
Monsanto for these 63
compounds.

Chronological Correction for 1st Paragraph on Page #12
Plant Ownership
This facility was built by a Philadelphia based company called Rohm
and Haas in the mid 1960's for the manufacture of textiles. Part
of this facility was purchased by Monsanto Co., who assumed
ownership on January 1, 1978. Monsanto's purchase included two
textile plants, the utilities production areas, and the WWTP. Rohm
and Haas retained the section of the facility called Carodel that
produced polyester chips. Monsanto produced polyester textile
fibers at this location until January of 1981. In 1981 Monsanto
built a Roundup herbicide production unit at this site, and stopped
producing polyester fibers. Monsanto sold one of the textile
plants to Celanese Company, and shut the remaining textile unit
down. The plant purchased by Celanese was subsequently sold to The
Sterling Group and then to Wellman Inc, The Fibers Divisions, who
is the owner at the present time. In the Mid 1980's Rohm and Haas
sold the polyester chip plant to ICI Americas, Inc., ICI Films, who
is the owner at the present time.

TABLE B
Ref: Page 14
SUBJECTS: OSPSF ISSUF.S
ISSUE: IPS's "Master List" of OCPSF compounds vs. Monsanto's monitoring data shows that
Monsanto did not excludethe eight (8) compounds stated below. (See Page 14.) The are
stated under their synonyms and CASE numbers (Please see the matching CASE # in the
attached Davis and Floyd list of OCPSF reference.)
CASE #
COMPOUND NAME CITED
COMPOUND ACTUALLY
(AS "NOT MONITORED")
MONITORED UNDER THE SYNONYM
75-35-4
156-60-5
10061-01-5
205-99-2
534-52-1
84-74-2
74-878-3
127-18-4
1, 1, - Dichloroethylene
1, 2, - Trans - Dichloroethylene
1, 3 - Dichloroprop lene
3, 4 - Benzofluoranthene
4, 6 - Dinitro -0- Cresol
Di butylphthalate
Methyl Chloride
Tetrachl oroeth,�. rl ene
1, 1 - Di chl oroethene
Trans - 1, 2 - Dichloroethene ✓
Cis - 1, 3 - Dichloropropene
Benzo (b) Fluoranthene et ficfx ✓co
4, 6 - Dinitro - 2- Methylphenol ✓
DI -N-Butyl phthal ate
Chloromethane ✓
Tretachloroethene

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
04/19/93
To: Dave Goodrich
Technical Support Branch
From: Charles Lowe
Permits and Engineering Unit
• NC0003719
Monsanto Agricultural Company
Cumberland County
Monsanto has requested that the blowdown and cooling waters from Outfall 001 be
allowed to discharge to the WWTP Outfall 002. Summary data and wasteload requests for Outfall
001, 002 and 003 are attached along with summaries and supporting data.
Monsanto has also requested that they have a final set of limitations instead of summer
and winter limits. Compliance data review indicates that:
1) The facility has had no problems meeting the existing 350.0 mg/l BOD summer limit with a
maximum reported BOD of 206.5 mg/l.
2) The facility has had no problems meeting the existing 623.0 mg/l TSS summer limit.
3) The facility has reported very low NH3 values and would apparently have no problem meeting a
single lower (summer) limit used as a final limit.
4) The facility has occasionally reported high fecal coliform values and although they are only
required to monitor, they have reported values as high as 6000 /100 ml with a typical high value
being around 600 /100 ml.
5) The facility has reported no D.O. problems.
Thanks
cc: Permit File

a
tCPSF Limit Monsanto Parm Daily Max (NA Mon. Avg Daily Max (ma Mon. Avg
✓1,ri ,1-Trich loroethane
✓11 �1,2-trichloroethane (c)
vl ,1-Dichloroethane
1,1- Echloroethylene (c)
4-Trichlorobenzene
-Dichlorobenzene
Dichloroethane_(c)
,2-Dichloropropane
1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene (c)
6-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichloropropylene
t-1 Dichlorobenzene
v4Dichlorophenol
VS, Dimethylphenol
Dinitrophenol
14-Dinitrotoluene (c)
✓2-Dinitrotoluene
L-,Ghlorophenol
-Nitrophenol
3,4-Benzofluoranthene (c, PAH)
4,,6 Dinitro-o-cresol
✓ itrophenol
Venaphthene
enaphthylene
A rylonitrile (c) - '
vAngiracene ;
tar
nzene (c)
nzo(a)anthracene (c, PAH)
nzo(a)pyrene (c, PAH)
e'nzo(k)fluoranthene (c,PAH)
is(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (c)
Cbon Tetrachloride (c)
Vhlorobenzene
loroethane
chloroform (c)
hrysene (c, PAH)
lbutyl phthalate
iDthyl phthalate
'methyl phthalate
�thylbenzene
ouranthene
F uorene
achlorobenzene (c)
jxachlorobutadiene (c)
vHexachloroethane (c)
Methyl Chloride
vAethylene Chloride (c)
Flaphthalene
✓IGtrobenzene
AHhenanthr(total -eng/l)ne
54 21 108.987 42.384
54 21 108.987 42.384
59 22 119.079 44.402
25 16 50.457 32.292
140 68 282.559 137.243
163 77 328.980 155.408
211 68 425.857 137.243
230 153 464.204 308.797
54 21 108.987 42.384
44 31 88.804 62.567
44 29 88.804 58.530
28 15 56.512 30.274
112 39 226.047 78.713
36 18 72.658 36.329
123 71 248.248 143.298
285 113 575.210 228.066
641 255 1293.717 514.661
98 31 197.791 62.567
69 41 139.261 82.749
61 23 123.115 46.420
277 78 559.064 157.426
124 72 250.267 145.316
59 22 119.079 44.402
59 22 119.079 44.402
242 96 488.424 193.755
59 22 119.079 44.402
136 37 274.486 74.676
59 22 119.079 44.402
61 23 123.115 46.420
59 22 119.079 44.402
279 103 563.100 207.883
38 18 76.695 36.329
28 15 56.512 30.274
268 104 540.899 209.901
46 21 92.841 42.384
59 22 119.079 44.402
57 27 115.042 54.494
203 81 409.711 163.481
47 19 94.859 38.347
108 32 217.974 64.585
68 25 137.243 50.457
59 22 119.079 44.402
28 15 56.512 30.274
49 20 98.896 40.366
54 21 108.987 42.384
190 86 383.473 173.572
89 40 179.627 80.731
59 22 119.079 44.402
68 27 137.243 54.494
59 22 119.079 44.402
4henol 26 15 52.475 30.274
Pyrene 67 25 135.225 50.457
trachloroethylene (c) 56 22 113.024 44.402
oluene 80 26 161.462 52.475
Total Chromium 2770 1110 5590.636 2240.291
Total Copper 3380 1450 6821.786 2926.506
Total Cyanide 1200 420 2421.936 847.678
Total Lead 690 320 1392.613 645.850
Total Nickel 3980 1690 8032.754 3410.893
Total Zinc* 2610 1050 5267.711 2119.194
7richlororethylene (c) 54 21 108.987 42.384
t Vinyl Chloride (c) 268 104 540.899 209.901

f0oaft Ita FI) wA'r e)7tAM
F-t t iy`' fn}
OCPSF WORKSHEET
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
OCPSF FLOW
0.233
MGD
Flow represents monthly average in past 12 months.
7Q10s
791
cfs
Qavg
4340
cis
Limit
Limit
Fedl
Standard
Standard
Allowable
Allowable
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
State
C
WS
conc. ("C")
conc. (WS)
ug/I
ug/I
#/d
#/d
s
stdrd
µg/I
µg/1
µg/I
µg/I
Acenaphthene
59
22
0.115
0.043
FC
2700
1200
5916309.30
2629470.80
Acrylonitrile (c)
242
96
0.470
0.187
FC
0.66
0.059
7931.99
709.07
Benzene (c)
136
37
0.264
0.072
FC
71.4
1.19
858097.15
14301.62
Carbon Tetrachloride (c)
38
18
0.074
0.035
SS
4.42
0.254
53120.30
3052.61
Chlorobenzene
28
15
0.054
0.029
FC
21000
680
46015739.03
1490033.45
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
140
68
0.272
0.132
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Hexachlorobenzene (c)
28
15
0.054
0.029
FC
0.00075
0.00077
9.01
9.25
1,2-Dichloroethane (c)
211
68
0.410
0.132
FC
99
- 0�.3,8Tr>`�
1189798.57
4566.90
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
54
21
0.105
0.041
FC
/'-ti8d '
_tBBe6ee -f�
40318552.29
###########
Hexachloroethane (c)
54
21
0.105
0.041
FC
8.85
1.95
106360.78
23435.43
1,1-Dichloroethane
59
22
0.115
0.043
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
1,1,2-trichloroethane (c)
54
21
0.105
0.041
FC
42
0.6
504763.03
7210.90
,loroethane
268
104
0.521
0.202
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
(c)
46
21
0.089
0.041
FC
470
5.7
5648538.67
68503.55
„chloroform
2-Chlorophenol
98
31
0.190
0.060
FC
400
120
876490.27
262947.08
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
163
77
0.317
0.150
FC
17000
2700
37250836.36
5916309.30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
44
31
0.086
0.060
FC
2600
400
5697186.74
876490.27
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
28
15
0.054
0.029
FC
2600
400
5697186.74
876490.27
1,1-Dichloroethylene (c)
25
16
0.049
0.031
FC
32
0.057
38458.14
685.04
1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene (c)
54
21
0.105
0.041
FC
no stdrd
700
#VALUE!
8412717.17
2,4-Diichlorophenol
112
39
0218
0.076
FC
790
93
1731068.28
203783.99
1,2-Dichloropropane
230
153
0.447
0.297
FC
39
0.52
85457.80
1139.44
13•Dichloropropylene
44
29
0.086
0.056
FC
1700
10
3725083.64
21912.26
2,4-Dimethylphenol
36
18
0.070
0.035
FC
2300
540
5039819.04
1183261.86
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (c)
285
113
0.554
0.220
FC
9.1
0.11
109365.32
1322.00
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
641
255
1246
0.496
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Ethylbenzene
108
32
0210
0.062
FC
325
nostdrd
712148.34
#VALUE!
ylouranthene
68
25
0.132
0.049
FC
370
300
810753.50
657367.70
Methylene Chloride (c)
89
40
0.173
0.078
FC
1600
4.7
19229067.81
56485.39
Methyl Chloride
190
86
0.369
0.167
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Hexachlorobutadiene (c)
49
20
0.095
0.039
FC
50
44
600908.37
528799.36
Naphthalene
59
22
0.115
0.043
FC
nostdrd
nostdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Nitrobenzene
68
27
0.132
0.052
FC
1900
17
4163328.77
37250.84
2-Nitrophenol
69
41
0.134
0.080
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
4-Nitrophenol
124
72
0.241
0.140
FC
nostdrd
nostdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
2,4-Dinitrophenol
123
71
0.239
0.138
FC
14000
70
30677159.35
153385.80
Page 1

OCPSF WORKSHEET
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
iBis(2-ethylhexyl)
✓Vinyl
✓
V
✓/Total
OCPSF FLOW
0.233
MGD
Flow represents monthly average in past 12 months.
7010s
791
cfs
Qavg
4340
cfs
Limit
Limit
Fedl
Standard
Standard
Allowable
Allowable
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
State
C
WS
conc. ("C")
conc. (WS)
ug/I
ug/I
#/d
#/d
stdrd
µg/I
µg/I
µg/I
µg/l
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
277
78
0.538
0.152
FC
765
13.4
1676287.64
29362.42
Phenol
26
15
0.051
0.029
FC
4600000
21000
############
46015739.03
phthalate (c)
279
103
0.542
0.200
FC
5.9
1.8
70907.19
21632.70
Dibutyl phthalate
57
27
0.111
0.052
FC
12000
2700
26294708.02
5916309.30
Diethyl phthalate
203
81
0.394
0.157
FC
120000
23000
262947080.16
50398190.36
Dimethyl phthalate
47
19
0.091
0.037
FC
2900000
313000
6.35E+09
685853634.09
Benzo(a)anthracene (c, PAH)
59
22
0.115
0.043
FC
0.049
0.0044
588.89
52.88
Benzo(a)pyrene (c, PAH)
61
23
0.119
0.045
FC
0.049
0.0044
588.89
52.88
3,4-Benzotluoranthene (c, PAH)
61
23
0.119
0.045
FC
0.049
0.0044
588.89
52.88
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (c,PAH)
59
22
0.115
0.043
FC
0.049
0.0044
588.89
52.88
Chrysene (c, PAH)
59
22
0.115
0.043
FC
0.049
0.0044
588.89
52.88
Acenaphthylene
59
22
0.115
0.043
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Anthracene
59
22
0.115
0.043
FC
110000
9600
241034823.48
21035766.41
Fluorene
59
22
0.115
0.043
FC
14000
1300
30677159.35
2848593.37
Phenanthrene
59
22
0.115
0.043
FC
no stdrd
no stdrd
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Pyrene
67
25
0.130
0.049
FC
11000
960
24103482.35
2103576.64
'Tetrachloroethylene (c)
56
22
0.109
0.043
FC
8.85
0.8
106360.78
9614.53
Toluene
80
26
0.155
0.051
FC
11
no stdrd
24103.48
#VALUE!
Trichlororethylene (c)
54
21
0.105
0.041
SS
81
2.7
973471.56,
32449.05
Chloride (c)
268
104
0.521
0.202
SS
525
2
6309537.88
24036.33
Total Chromium
2770
1110
5.383
2.157
SS
50
no stdrd
109561.28
#VALUEI
Total Copper
3380
1450
6.568
2.818
SS
7
no stdrd
15338.58
#VALUE!
'Total Cyanide
1200
420
2.332
0.816
SS
5
no stdrd
10956.13
#VALUE!
Lead
690
320
1.341
0.622
SS
25
no stdrd
54780.64
#VALUE!
Total Nickel
3980
1690
7.734
3.284
SS
88
25
192827.86
54780.64
Total Zinc`
2610
1050
5.072
2.040
SS
50
no stdrd
109561.28
#VALUE!
PAH (total -ngd)
SS
0.0311
2.8
68.15
6135.43
aromatic hydrocarbons
'Total Zinc for Rayon Fiber Manufacture
that uses the viscose process and Acrylic
Fiber Manufacture that uses zinc
chloride/solvent process is 6,796 ug/L and
3,325 ug/L for maximum for any one day
and maximum for monthly average, respectively.
Page 2

e
TABLE 1. OCPSF CHEMICALS WHICH SHOULD BE MONITORED ANNUALLY �►
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
OCPSF FLOW
0.255
MGD
MONSANTO
70109
791
cfs
FLOW
0.235
MGD
Qavg
4340
cfs
Allowable
Allowable
Allowable
Allowable
Limit
Limit
Allowable
Allowable
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
ug/l
ugA
#/d
#/d
ug/i
ug/I
#/d
#/d
Acenaphthene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Acrylanitrile (c)
242
96
0.515
0.204
Benzene (c)
136
37
0.289
0.079
136
37
0.267
0.073
Carbon Tetrachloride (c)
38
18
0.081
0.038
38
18
0.074
0.035
Chiorobenzene
28
15
0.060
0.032
28
15
0.055
0.029
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
140
68
0.298
0.145
Hexachlorobenzene (c)
8.5
0.018
0.000
1,2-Dichloroethane (c)
211
68
0.449
0.145
211
68
0.414
0.133
1,1,1 Trichloroethane
54
21
0.115
0.045
54
21
0.106
0.041
Hoxachloroethane (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
1,1-Dichloroethane
59
22
0.125
0.047
1,1,2-trichloroethane (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
Chloroethane
268
104
0.570
0.221
Chloroform (c)
46
21
0.098
0.045
46
21
0.090
0.041
2-Chlorophenol
98
31
0.208
0.066
98
31
0.192
0.061
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
163
77
0.347
0.164
163
77
0.319
0.151
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
44
31
0.094
0.066
1,4-Diichlorobenzene
28
15
0.060
0.032
28
15
0.055
0.029
1,1-Dichloroethylene (c)
25
16
0.053
0.034
25
16
0.049
0.031
1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
54
21
0.106
0.041
2,4-Dichlorophenol
112
39
0.238
0.083
112
39
0.220
0.076
1,2-Dichloropropane
230
153
0.489
0.325
230
153
0.451
0.300
1,3-Dichloropropylene
44
29
0.094
0.062
44
29
0.086
0.057
2,4-Dimethylphenol
36
18
0.077
0.038
36
18
0.071
0.035
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (c)
285
113
0.606
0.240
2,6-Dlnitrotoluene
641
255
1.363
0.542
Ethylbenzene
108
32
0.230
0.068
108
32
0.212
0.063
Rouranthene
68
25
0.145
0.053
Methylene Chloride (c)
89
40
0.189
0.085
89
40
0.174
0.078
Methyl Chloride
190
86
0.404
0.183
190
86
0.372
0.169
Hexachlorobutadiene (c)
49
20
0.104
0.043
Naphthalene
59
22
0.125
0.047
59
22
0.116
0.043
Nitrobenzene
68
27
0.145
0.057
2-Nitrophenol
69
41
0.147
0.087
4-Nitrophenol
124
72
0.264
0.153
2,4-Dinitrophenoi
123
71
0.262
0.151
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
277
78
0.589
0.166
MONSANTO
Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used
NC0003719

TABLE 1. OCPSF CHEMICALS WHICH SHOULD BE MONITORED ANNUALLY
A
Final Limit
Final Limit
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
PARAMETER
#Id
#Id
0.125
0.047
Acenaphthene
0.515
0.204
Acrylonitrile (c)
0.556
0.151
Benzene (c)
0.155
0.074
Carbon Tetrachloride (c)
0.114
0.061
Chlorobenzene
0.298
0.1451,2,4-Trichforobenzene
0.018
0.000
Hexachforobenzene (c)
0.862
0.278
1,2-Dlchloroethane (c)
0.221
0.086
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.115
0.045
Hexachloroethane (c)
0.125
0.047
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.115
0.045
1,1,2-trichloroethane (c)
0.570
0.221
Chloroethane
0.188
0.086
Chloroform (c)
0.400
0.127
2-Chlorophenol
0.666
0.3151,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.094
0.0661,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.114
0.061
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.102
0.065
1,1-Dichloroethylene (c)
0.221
0.086
1,2-trans-Dichforoethyiene (c)
0.458
0.159
2,4-Dichlorophenol
0.940
0.6251,2-Dichloropropane
0.180
0.1191,3-Dichloropropylene
0.147
0.074
2,4-Dimethylphanol
0.606
0.240
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (c)
1.363
0.542
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
0.441
0.131
Ethylbenzene
0.145
0.053
Flouranthene
0.364
0.163
Methylene Chloride (c)
0.776
0.351
Methyl Chloride
0.104
0.043
Hexachlorobutadiene (c)
0.241
0.090
Naphthalene
0.145
0.057
Nitrobenzene
0.147
0.087
2-Nitrophenol
0.264
0.153
4-Nitrophenol
0.262
0.151
2,4-Dinitrophenol
0.589
0.166
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
MONSANTO
Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used NC0003719

TABLE 1. OCPSF CHEMICALS WHICH SHOULD BE MONITORED AN ALLY
MONSANTO (NC0003719)
t
OCPSF FLOW
0.255
MGD
MONSANTO
7010s
791
cfs
FLOW
0.235
MGD
Glavg
4340
cfs
Allowable
Allowable
Allowable
Allowable
Umit
Limit
Allowable
Allowable
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Effluent
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
ug/1
ug/1
#/d
#/d
ug/l
ug/I
#/d
#/d
Phenol
26
15
0.055
0.032
26
15
0.051
0.029
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (c)
279
103
0.593
0.219
Dibutyl phthalate
57
27
0.121
0.057
Diethyl phthalate
203
81
0.432
0.172
Dimethyl phthalate
47
19
0.100
0.040
Benzo(a)anthracene (c, PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
Benzo(a)pyrene (c, PAH)
61
23
0.130
0.049
3,4-Benzofluoranthene (c, PAH)
61
23
0.130
0.049
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (c,PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
Chrysene (c, PAH)
59
22
0.125
0.047
Acenaphthylene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Anthracene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Fluorene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Phenanthrene
59
22
0.125
0.047
Pyrene
67
25
0.142
0.053
Tetrachloroethylene (c)
56
22
0.119
0.047
56
22
0.110
0.043
Toluene
80
26
0.170
0.055
80
26
0.157
0.051
Trichlororethyiene (c)
54
21
0.115
0.045
Vinyl Chloride (c)
268
104
0.570
0.221
Bromodichloromethane
380
142
0.745
0.278
Bromonethane
380
142
0.745
0.278
Dibromochloromethane
794
196
1.556
0.384
Tribromomethane
794
196
1.556
0.384
Total Chromium
2770
1110
5.891
2.361
Total Copper
3380
1450
7.188
3.084
Total Cyanide
1200
420
2.552
0.893
640
220
1.254
0.431
Total Lead
690
320
1.467
0.681
690
320
1.352
0.627
Total Nickel
3980
1690
8.464
3.594
Total Zinc*
2610
1050
5.551
2.233
PAH (total -ngll)
62.3
*Total Zinc for Rayon Fiber Manufacture
that uses the viscose process and Acrylic
Fiber Manufacture that uses zinc
chloride/solvent process is 6,796 ug/L and
3,325 ug/L for maximum for any one day
and maximum for monthly average, respectively.
MONSANTO
Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used
NC0003719

TABLE 1. OCPSF CHEMICALS WHICH SHOULD BE MONITORED ANNUALLY
s1
Final Limit
Final Limit
Daily maximum
Monthly avg
PARAMETER
MI
#Id
0.106
0.061
Phenol
0.593
0.219
Bis(2-ethyihexyi) phthalate (c)
0.121
0.057
Dibutyl phthalate
0.432
0.172
Diethyl phthalate
0.100
0.040
Dimethyl phthalate
0.125
0.047
Benzo(a)anthracene (c, PAH)
0.130
0.049
Benzo(a)pyrene (c, PAH)
0.130
0.049
3,4-Benzofluoranthene (c, PAH)
0.125
0.047
Benzo(k)fluoranthene (c,PAH)
0.125
0.047
Chrysene (c, PAH)
0.125
0.047
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
0.125
0.047
0.125
0.047
Fluorene
0.125
0.047
Phenanthrene
0.142
0.053
Pyrene
0.229
0.090
Tetrachloroethylene (c)
0.327
0.106
Toluene
0.115
0.045
Trichlororethylene (c)
0.570
0.221
Vinyl Chloride (c)
0.745
0.278
Bromodichloromethane
0.745
0.278
Bromonethane
1.556
0.384
Dibromochloromethane
1.556
0.384
Tribromomethane
5.891
2.361
Total Chromium
7.188
3.084
Total Copper
3.806
1.324
Total Cyanide
2.820
1.308
Total Lead
8.464
3.594
Total Nickel
5.551
2.233
Total Zinc* J
0.000
0.000
PAH (total -ng/l)
MONSANTO
Average flow from 1990 (peak flow year) was used NC0003719

C-)c_ 175 Fi
try
( c?(
( (1 '7
• '-`'N , 7") .
.50c, //1)
-
114 c- 7-Felt:
me- v- r-7 /1/1 ATt- "41
/kt-LAR-r--1
co Otct Yi-E-1•37 pj k:44L r br_s:
ca. ( (0-A), frioe .L:
fUfri-7
Alk(r Fikt-
4 ..-61147/7
511/11g7/0
/4/1/04frAwt-C (M'w/Cc_ /Atd /
(-Lr g, fetWiaSW-9`
6fts-. 54-y.7740 74,-.0..,4-sy.ct7 6,4 IS't6- /1 7(44.-f
•(77 ke ff°
4fa4-6- &A"kind t-a-CCe/P('--
1
• /5
Ve-,4 POI
(

S-952
135:6681
EPA EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICALS
(40 CFR 455; 43 FR 17776, April 25, 1978; Revised through July 1, 1991; amended
at 58 FR 50689, Sept. 28, 1993)
[Editor's note: Part 455 was originally
promulgated at 41 FR 48087, Nov. 1,
1976.]
TITLE 40—PROTECTION
OF ENVIRONMENT
CHAPTER 1—ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
SUBCHAPTER N—EFFLUENT
GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS •
PART 455—PESTICIDE CHEMICALS
Authority: Secs. 301, 304, 306, 307,
and 501, Pub. L. 92-500, 86 Stat. 816,
Pub. L. 95-217, 91 Stat. 156, and Pub. L.
100-4 (33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314, 1316,
1317, and 1361).
[Amended at 58 FR 50689, Sept 28,
1993]
Sec.
455.10
455.11
General definitions.
Compliance date for pretreatment
standards for existing sources
(PSES).
Subpart A —Organic Pesticide Chemicals Manu-
facturing Subcategory
455.20 Applicability; description of the or-
ganic pesticide chemicals manufac-
luring subcategory.
455.21 Specialized definitions.
455.22 Effluent limitations guidelines repre-
senting the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best practicable control
technology currently available.
455.23 Effluent limitations guidelines repre-
senting the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best conventional
pollutant control technology
(BCT).
455.24 Effluent limitations guidelines repre-
senting the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best available control
technology economically achievable
(BAT).
455.25 New source performance standards
(NSPS).
455.26 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources (PSES).
455.27 Pretreatment standards for new
sources (PSNS).
Subpart B—Metallo-Organic Pesticide Chemicals
Manufacturing Subcategory
455.30 Applicability; description of the
metallo-organic pesticide chemicals
manufacturing subcategory.
455.31 Specialized definitions.
455.32 Effluent limitations guidelines repre-
senting the degree of:e®uent re-
duction attainable, by the applica-
tion of the best practicable control
technology currently available.
455.33 Effluent limitations guidelines repre-
senting the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by applica-
tion of the best conventional
pollutant control technology
• (BCT): [Reserved]
455.34 Effluent limit_ ti
aons guidelines repre-
senting the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best available .control
technology economically. achievable
(BAT). [Reserved]
455.35 New source performance standards
(NSPS). [Reserved]
455.36 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources (PSES). [Reserved]
455.37 Pretreatment standards for new
sources (PSNS). [Reserved]
Subpart C—Pesticide Chemicals Formulating and
Packaging Subcategory
455.40 Applicability; description of the pesti-
cide chemicals formulating and
packaging subcategory.
455.42 Effluent limitations guidelines repre-
senting the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best practicable control
technology currently available.
Subpart D—Test Methods for Pesticide Pollu-
tants
455.50 Identification of test procedures.
§455.10 General definitions.
As used in this part:
(a) (1) "Pesticide" means any sub-
stance or mixture of substances intended
for preventing, destroying, repelling, or
mitigating any pest. •
(b) "Active ingredient" means an in-
gredient •of a pesticide which is intended
to prevent,.destroy, repel, or mitigate any
pest.
• (c)."Pesticide chemicals" means the
sum of -all active - ingredients manufac-
tured at each facility covered by this part.
(d)-"Pest" means: (1) Any insect,ro-
dent, nematode, fungus, weed, or (2)_ any
other form of terrestrial or aquatic plant
or animal *life' or virus, bacteria, or other
micro-organism (except virusus, bacteria,
or other micro-organisms on or in .living
man or other living. •animals) which the
Administrator declares to be a.pest under
section 25(c)_(1) of Pub. L. 94-140 , Fed-
eral Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenti-
cide Act. •
(e) Except as provided in this regula-
tion, the general definitions, abbreviations
[Sec. 455.10(e)]
11-12-93
Copyright © 1993 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 257
0013-9211 /93/$0+$1.00

135:6682 - = FEDERAL REGULATIONS
and methods of analysis set forth in Part
401 of this chapter shall apply to this
part.
[§455.10 amended at 50 FR 40701, Oct.
4, 1985; 51 FR 44911, Dec. 15, 1986]
(f) Priority Pollutants means the toxic
pollutants listed in 40 CFR part 423, ap-
pendix A.
[§455.10(f) added at 58 FR 50689, Sept.
28, 1993]
§455.11 Compliance date for pretreatment
standards for existing sources (PSES).
All discharges subject to pretreatment
standards for existing sources (PSES) in
this part must comply with the standards
no later than September 28, 1996.
[§455.11 added at 58 FR 50689, Sept. 28,
1993]
Subpart A —Organic Pesticide
Chemicals Manufacturing
Subcategory
[Subpart A added at 43 FR 44846, Sept.
29, 1978]
§455.20 Applicability; description of the
organic pesticide chemicals manufactur-
ing subcategory.
(a) For the purpose of calculating and
applying effluent limitations for COD,
BODS, and TSS, and applying pH Limits
under BPT (§455.22), BCT (§ 455.23),
and NSPS (§455.25), the provisions of
this subpart are applicable to discharges
resulting from the manufacture of organic
pesticide active ingredients and organo-tin
pesticide active ingredients, excluding the
following: Allethrin; Benzyl Benzoate;
Bisethylxanthogen; Chlorophacinone;
Coumafuryl; Dimethyl Phthalate;
Diphacinone; Endothall Acid; EXD
(Herbisan); Gibberellic Acid; Glyphosate;
Naphthalene Acetic Acid; Propargite; 1,8
Naphthalic Anhydride; Quinmethionate;
Rotenone; Sulfoxide; Triazine compounds
(both symmetrical and asymmetrical);
and Warfarin and similar anticoagulants.
Provided, however, that the effluent limi-
tations of this subpart for BODS and
TSS, but not COD, apply to manufactur-
ers of Ametryn, Prometon, Prometryn,
Terbutryn, Cyanazine, Atrazine,
Propazine, Simazine, Terbuthylazine,
Hexazinone, and Glyphosate.
[§455.20 revised at 58 FR 50689, Sept.
28, 1993]
(b) For the purpose of calculating BPT
effluent limitations for organic Pesticide
chemicals, the provisions of this subpart
are applicable to discharges resulting
from the manufacture of the following or-
ganic active ingredients: Aldrin, BHC,
Captan, Chlordane, DDD, DDE, DDT,
Dichloran, Dieldrin, Endosulfan, Endrin,
Heptachlor, Lindane, Methoxychlor,
Mirex, PCNB, Toxaphene, Trifluralin,
Azinphos Methyl, Demeton-O, Demeton-
S, Diazinon, Disulfoton, Malathion, Para-
thion Methyl, Parathion Ethyl, Amino-
carb, Carbaryl, Methiocarb, Mexa-
carbate, Propoxur, Barban, Chlor-
propham, Diuron, Fenuron, Fenuron-
TCA, Linuron, Monuron, Monuron-TCA,
Neubron, Propham, Swep, 2,4-D, Di-
camba, Silvex, 2,4,5-T, Siduron,
Perthane, and Dicofol.
(c) The intermediates used to manufac-
ture the active ingredients and active in-
gredients used solely in experimental pes-
ticides are excluded from coverage in this
subpart. Insecticidal pathogenic orga-
nisms such as Bacillus thuringiensis, in-
sect growth hormones, plant extracts such
as pyrethrins; sex attractants and botani-
cals such as Rotenone are also excluded
from BPT coverage in this subpart.
(d) A plant that manufactures a pesti-
cide active ingredient listed in Table 1 of
this part must comply with the BAT efflu-
ent limitations and new source perfor-
mance and pretreatment standards for
that pesticide active ingredient listed in
table 2 (BAT and PSES) or Table 3 of
this part (NSPS and PSNS). A plant that
manufactures a pesticide active ingredi-
ent listed in Table 1 of this part must also
comply with the BAT effluent limitations
and new source performance and pre-
treatment standards for priority pollu-
tants listed in Tables 4, 5 and 6 of this
part. The limitations in Table 4 of this
part (BAT and NSPS) are applicable to
existing and new direct discharge point
sources that use End -of -Pipe biological
treatment. The limitations in Table 5 of
this part (BAT and NSPS) are applicable
to existing and new direct discharge point
sources that do not use end -of -pipe biolog-
ical treatment: The limitations in Table 6
of this part (PSES and PSNS) are appli-
cable to existing and new sources that dis-
charge to Publicly Owned Treatment
Works.
[§455.20(d) added at 58 FR 50689, Sept.
28, 1993]
(e) In the case of lead and total cya-
nide, the discharge quantity (mass) shall
be determined by multiplying the concen-
trations listed in the applicable tables in
this subpart times the flow from non-com-
plexed lead -bearing waste streams for
lead and times the flow from non-com-
plexed cyanide -bearing waste streams for
total cyanide. Discharges of cyanide in cy-
anide -bearing waste streams are not sub-
ject to the cyanide limitation and stan-
dards of this subpart if the permit writer
or control authority determines that the
cyanide limitations and standards are not
achievable due to elevated levels of non -
amenable cyanide (i.e., cyanide that is not
oxidized by chlorine treatment) that re-
sult from the unavoidable complexing of
cyanide at the process source of the cya-
nide -bearing waste stream and establishes
an alternative total cyanide or amenable
cyanide limitation that reflects the best
available technology economically achiev-
able. The determination must be based
upon a review of relevant engineering,
production, and sampling and analysis in-
formation, including measurements of
both total and amenable cyanide in the
waste stream. An analysis of the extent of
complexing in the waste stream, based on
the foregoing information, and its impact
on cyanide treatability shall be set forth
in writing and, for direct dischargers, be
contained in the fact sheet required by 40
CFR 124.8.
[§455.20(e) added at 58 FR 50689, Sept.
28, 1993]
[§455.20 added at 43 FR 44846, Sept. 29,
1978, amended at 50 FR 40702, Oct. 4,
1985; 51 FR 44911, Dec. 15, 1986]
§455.21 Specialized definitions.
(a) "Organic active ingredients" means
carbon -containing active ingredients used
in pesticides, excluding metalloorganic ac-
tive ingredients.
(b) "Total organic active ingredients"
means the sum of all organic active ingre-
dients covered by §455.20(a) which are
manufactured at a facility subject to this
subpart.
(c) "Organic pesticide chemicals"
means the sum of all organic active ingre-
dients listed in §455.20(b) which are
manufactured at a facility subject to this
subpart.
(d) Process wastewater flow means the
sum of the average daily flows from the
following wastewater streams: Process
[Sec. 455.21(d)]
11-12-93 Environment Reportet =• 258
0013.9211/93/50+51.00

PESTICIDE CHEMICALS GUIDELINES
S-952
135:6683
finding that such factors are or are not
fundamentally different for that facility
compared to those specified in the Devel-
opment Document. If such fundamentally
different factors are found to exist, the
Regional Administrator or the State shall
establish for the discharger effluent limi-
tations in the NPDES permit either more
or less stringent than the limitations es-
tablished herein, to the extent dictated by
such fundamentally different factors.
Such limitations must be approved by the
Administrator of the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency. The Administrator may
approve or disapprove such limitations,
specify other limitations, or initiate pro-
ceedings to revise these regulations.
The following limitations establish the
quantity or quality of pollutants or pollu-
tant properties controlled by this para-
graph which may be discharged from the
manufacture of organic active ingredient
by a point source subject to the provisions
of this paragraph after application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
Effluent characteristic
COD
BOD
TSS
Organic pesticide
chemicals
ph
stream and product washes, equipment
and floor washes, water used as solvent for
raw materials, water used as reaction me-
dium, spent acids, spent bases, contact
cooling water, water of reaction, air pollu-
tion control blowdown; steam jet
blowdown, vacuum pump water, pump
seal water, safety equipment cleaning wa-
ter, shipping container cleanout, safety
shower water, contaminated storm water,
and product/process laboratory quality
control wastewater. Notwithstanding any
other regulation, process wastewater flow
for the purposes of this subpart does not
include wastewaters from the production
of intermediate chemicals.
[§455.21(d) added at 58 FR 50689, Sept.
28 1993]
(e) Process wastewater pollutants
means those pollutants present in process
wastewater flow.
[§455.21(e) added at 58 FR 50689, Sept.
28 1993]
§455.22 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
In establishing the limitation set forth
in'this section, EPA took into account all
information it was able to collect, develop,
and solicit with respect to factors (such as
age and size of plant, raw materials, man-
ufacturing processes, products produced,
treatment technology available, energy
requirements, and costs) which can affect/ , �_ '
` nhi eO.
the industry subcategorization and ei$u- 91 f E: For C• r, = , and TSS, metric units: Kilo -
Effluent Limitations
Maximum
for any 1
day
OD
ent levels established. It is possible, howl gram/1,000 kg of total organic active ingredients. English
ever, that data which would affect these units Pound/1,000 Ib of total organic active Ingredients.
limitations have not been available and For organic pesticide chemicals —metric units: Kilo-
gram/1,000 kg of organic pesticide chemicals. English
as a result, these limitations should be ad- units Pound/1,000 Ib of organic pesticide chemicals.
13.000
7.400
6.100
Average of daily
values for 30
consecutive days
shall not
exceed-
9.0000
1.6000
1.8000
.0018
(1)
justed for certain plants in this industry.
An individual discharger or other interest-
ed person may submit evidence to the Re-
gional Administrator (or to the State, if
the State has the authority to issue
NPDES permits) that factors relating to
the equipment or facilities involved, the
process applied, or othersuch factors re-
lated to such discharger are fundamental-
ly different from the factors considered in
the establishment of the guidelines. On
the basis of such evidence or other avail-
able information, the Regional Adminis-
trator (or. the State) will make a written
§455.23 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best conventional pollutant control tech-
nology.(BCT).
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
through 125.32, any existing point source
subject to this subpart must achieve the
effluent limitations representing the de-
gree of effluent reduction attainable by
the application of the best conventional
pollutant control technology: The limita-
tions for BOD, TSS and pH are the same
as those specified in 40 CFR 455.22.
BCT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
Effluent Limitations
Pollutant or pollutant
property
Maxi-
mum
for any
one
day"
Average
of daily
values
shall not
exceed'
BOD5 7.400 1.6000
TSS 6.100 1.8000
pH
- Within the range 6.0 to 9.0
" Metric units: Kilogram pollutant/1,000 kg of
total organic active ingredients.
English units: Pound pollutant/1,000 Ib of total
organic active ingredients
[§455.23 added at 58 FR 50689, Sept. 28,
1993]
§455.24 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best available control technology eco-
nomically achievable (BAT).
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
through 125.32, any existing point source
subject to this subpart must achieve the
effluent limitations representing the de-
gree of effluent reduction attainable by
the application of the best available tech-
nology as specified in 40 CFR 455.20(d).
For the priority pollutants, such sources
must achieve discharges not exceeding the
quantity (mass) determined by multipy-
ing the process wastewater flow subject to
this subpart as defined in 40 CFR 455.21
(d) times the concentrations listed in ta-
ble 4 or table 5 of this part, as appropri-
ate, of this subpart.
[§455.24 added at 58 FR 50689, Sept. 28,
1993]
§455.25 New source performance stan-
dards (NSPS).
(a) Any new source subject to this sub-
part which discharges process wastewater
pollutants must achieve the new source
performance standards specified in 40
CFR 455.20(d), and subject to 455.20(a),
must meet the following standards for
BOD5, TSS, COD and pH:
NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
[Sec. 455.25(a)]
11-12-93 Copyright © 1993 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 259
0013-9211/93/30+91.00

• 135:6684 FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Standards
Pollutant or pollutant
property
Maxi
mum
for arty
one
day
Average
of daily
values
shajl not
exceed -
COD
BODs
TSS.
PH
9.360
5.328
4.392
6.480
1.1520
12960
• Within the range 6.0 to 9.0
Metric units: Kilogram pollutant /1,000 kg of
total organic active ingredients.
English units: Pound pollutant/1,000 lb of total
organic active ingredients
(b) For the priority pollutants, such
sources must achieve discharges not ex-
ceeding the quantity (mass) determined
by multiplying the process wastewater
flow subject to this subpart as defined in
40 CFR 455.21(d) times the concentra-
tions listed in table 4 or table 5 of this
part, as appropriate, of this subpart.
[§455.25 added at 58 FR 50689, Sept. 28,
1993]
§455.26 Pretreatment standards for ex-
isting sources (PSES).
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7,
any existing source subject to this subpart
which introduces pollutants into a public-
ly owned treatment works must comply
with 40 CFR part 403 and achieve the
pretreatment standards for existing
sources (PSES) as specified in 40 CFR
455.20(d). For the priority pollutants,
such sources must achieve discharges not
exceeding the quantity (mass) determined
by multiplying the process wastewater
flow subject to this subpart as defined in
40 CFR 455.21(d) times the concentra-
tions listed in Table 6 of this part. If mass
limitations have not been developed as re-
quired, the source shall achieve dis-
charges not exceeding the concentration
limitations listed in Table 6 of this part.
[§455.26 added at 58 FR 50689, Sept. 28,
1993]
§455.27 Pretreatment standards for new
sources (PSNS).
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7,
any new source subject to this subpart
which introduces pollutants into a public-
ly owned treatment works must comply
with 40 CFR part 403 and must achieve
the pretreatment standards for new
sources (PSNS) as specified in 40 CFR
455.20(d). For the priority pollutants, the
source must achieve discharges not ex-
ceeding the quantity (mass) determined
by multiplying the process wastewater
flow subject to this subpart as defined in
40 CFR 455.21(d) times the concentra-
tions listed in table 6 of this part. If mass
limitations have not been developed as re-
quired, the source shall achieve dis-
charges not exceeding the concentration
limitations listed in table 6 of this part.
[§455.27 added at 58 FR 50689, Sept. 28,
1993]
Subpart B—Metallo-Organic Pesti-
cide Chemicals Manufacturing Sub-
category
§455.30 Applicability; description of the
metallo-organic pesticide chemicals
manufacturing subcategory.
The provisions of this subpart are appli-
cable to discharges resulting from the
manufacture of metallo-organic active in-
gredients containing mercury, cadmium,
arsenic, or copper. The manufacture of
intermediates used to manufacture the ac-
tive ingredients are excluded from cover-
age by this subpart.
§455.31 Specialized definitions.
(a) "Metallo-organic active ingredi-
ents" means carbon containing active in-
gredients containing one or more metallic
atoms in the structure.
§455.32 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
In establishing the limitations set forth
in this section, EPA took into account all
information it was able to collect, develop
and solicit with respect to factors (such as
age and size of plant, raw materials, man-
ufacturing processes, products produced,
treatment technology available, energy
requirements and costs) which can affect
the industry subcategorization and efflu-
ent levels established. It is possible, how-
ever, that data which would affect these
limitations have not been available and,
as a result, these limitations should be ad-
justed for certain plants in this industry.
An individual discharger or other interest-
ed person may submit evidence to the Re-
gional Administrator (or to the State, if
•
the State has the authority to issue
NPDES permits) that factors relating to
the equipment or facilities involved, the
process applied, or other such factors re-
lated to such discharger are fundamental-
ly different from the factors considered in
the establishment of the guidelines. On
the basis of such evidence or other avail-
able information, the Regional Adminis-
trator (or the State) will make a written
finding that such factors are or are not
fundamentally different for that facility
compared to those specified in the Devel-
opment Document. If such fundamentally
different factors are found to exist, the
Regional Administrator or the State shall
establish for the discharger effluent limi-
tations in the NPDES permit either more
or less stringent than the limitations es-
tablished herein, to the extent dictated by
such fundamentally different factors.
Such limitations must be approved by the
Administrator of the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency. The Administrator may
approve or disapprove such limitations,
specify other limitations, or initiate pro-
ceedings to revise these regulations.
The following limitations establish the
quantity or quality of pollutants or pollu-
tant properties controlled by this para-
graph which may be discharged from the
manufacture of metallo-organic active in-
gredients by a point source subject to the
provisions of this paragrah after applica-
tion of the best practicable control tech-
nology currently available: There shall be
no discharge of process waste water pollu-
tants to navigable waters.
§455.33 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best conventional pollutant control tech-
nology (BCD. [Reserved]
[§455.33 added and reserved at 58 FR
50689, Sept. 28, 1993]
§455.34 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best available control technology eco-
nomically achievable (BAT). [Reserved]
[§455.34 added and reserved at 58 FR
50689, Sept. 28, 1993]
§455.35 New source performance stan-
dards (NSPS). [Reserved]
1§455.35 added and reserved at 58 FR
50689, Sept. 28, 1993]
[Sec. 455.35]
11-12-93 Environment Reporter 260
0013-9211 /93/$0+$1.00

PESTICIDE CHEMICALS GUIDELINES
S-952
135:6685
§455.36 Pretreatment standards for ex-
isting sources (PSES). [Reserved]
[§455.36 added and reserved at 58 FR
50689, Sept. 28, 1993]
§455.37 Pretreatment standards for new
sources (PSNS). [Reserved]
[§455.37 added and reserved at 58 FR
50689, Sept. 28, 1993]
Subpart C—Pesticide Chemicals
Formulating and Packaging
Subcategory
§455.40 Applicability; description of the
pesticide chemicals formulating and
packaging subcategory.
The provisions of this subpart are appli-
cable to discharges resulting from all pes-
ticide formulating and packaging opera-
tions.
[§455.40 added at 51 FR 44911, Dec. 15,
1986]
§455.42 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur-
rently available.
In establishing the limitations set forth
in this section, EPA took into account all
information it was able to collect, develop
and solicit with respect to factors (such as
age and size of plant, raw materials, man-
ufacturing processes, products produced,
treatment technology available, energy
requirements and costs) which can affect
the industry subcategorization and efflu-
ent levels established. It is possible, how-
ever, that data which would affect these
limitations have not been available and,
as a result, these limitations should be ad-
justed for certain plants in this industry.
An individual discharger or other interest-
ed person may submit evidence to the Re-
gional Administrator (or to the State, if
the State --has the authority to issue
NPDES permits) that factors relating to
the equipment or facilities involved, the
process applied, or other such factors re-
lated to such discharger are fundamental-
ly different from the factors considered in
the establishment of the guidelines. On
the basis of such evidence or other avail-
able information, the Regional Adminis-
trator (or the State) will make a written
finding that such factors are or are not
fundamentally different for that facility
compared to those specified in the Devel-
opment Document. If such fundamentally
different factors are found to exist, the
Regional Administrator or the State shall
establish for the discharger effluent limi-
tations in the NPDES permit either more
or less stringent than the limitations es-
tablished herein, to the extent dictated by
such fundamentally different factors.
Such limitations must be approved by the
Administrator of the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency. The Administrator may
approve or disapprove such limitations,
specify other limitations, or initiate pro-
ceedings to revise these regulations.
The following limitations establish the
quantity or quality of pollutants or pollu-
tant properties controlled by this para-
graph from the formulation and packag-
ing of pesticides by a point source subject
to the provisions of this paragraph after
application of the best practicable control
technology currently available: There
shall be no discharge of process waste wa-
ter pollutants to navigable waters.
Subpart D—Test Methods for Pesti-
cide Pollutants
[Subpart D added at 58 FR 50689, Sept.
28, 1993]
§455.50 Identification of test procedures.
The pesticide active ingredients to
which this regulation applies and for
which effluent limitations guidelines and
standards are specified in this part are
named, together with the Chemical Ab-
stracts Service (CAS) number (provided
to assist in identifying the pesticide active
ingredient only) and analytical method(s)
designation(s) in table 7 of this part. Ex-
cept as provided in 40 CFR 136.5, the
discharge parameter values required un-
der the Clean Water Act must be deter-
mined by one of the analytical methods
cited and described in table 7 of this part.
Pesticide manufacturers may not use the
analytical method cited in table 1 B, table
1C, or table ID of 40 CFR part 136 to
make these determinations (except where
the method cited in those tables is identi-
cal to the method specified in table 7 of
this part). The full texts of the analytical
methods cited in table 7 of this part are
contained in the "Methods For The De-
termination of Nonconventional Pesti-
cides In Municipal and Industrial Waste-
water, Volume I," EPA 821-R-93-010A
(August 1993 Revision I) and "Volume
II", EPA 821-R-93-010B (August 1993)
(the "Compendium"). Each pesticide
chemical manufacturer that is required to
determine discharge parameter values un-
der this part using one of the analytical
methods cited in table 7 of this part must
request in writing a copy of the Compen-
dium from the permit authority or local
control authority (as applicable) prior to
determining such discharge parameter
values, unless the manufacturer already
has a copy.
TABLE 1 TO PART 455.—LIST OF ORGANIC PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS
EPA census
code
Pesticide
code
Pesticide name
CAS No.
1
10501
•
Dicofol[1,1-Bis(chloropheny1)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol]
00115-32-2
2
51501
Malefic Hydrazide
00123-33-1
3
42002
EDB [1,2-Ethylene dibromide] .
00106-93-4
4
82901
Vancide TH [1,3,5-Triethylhexahydro-s-triazine]
07779-27-3
5
29001
Dichloropropene
00542-75-6
7
17901
Dowicll 75[1-(3-Chloroally1)-3,5,7-triaza-1-azoniaadamantanechloride]
04080-31-3
6
109901
Triadimefon
43121-43-3
9
44901
Hexachlorophene (nabac)
00070-30-4
10
55004
Tetrachlorophene
01940-43-8
11
55001
Dichlorophene
00097-23-4
12
84001
Dichiorvos
00062-73-7
13
102401
Landrin-2 f2.3.5-trimethvlohenvlmethvicarbamatel
02686-99-9
[Sec. 455.50]
11-12-93 Copyright © 1993 by The Bureau of National Affairs, inc. 261
0013-9211/93/$0+$1.00

• 135:6686
FEDERAL REGULATIONS
TABLE 1 TO PART 455.—LIST OF ORGANIC PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS—Contd.
EPA census
code
Pesticide
code
Pesticide name
CAS No.
14
82601
Fenac [2,3,6-Trlchlorophenylacetic acid]
00085-34-7
14....»....»...»...
15.......-....
(')
Fenac Salts and Esters ..» »..» ».
(1)
82001
2,4,5-T [2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid] »».....»»........ ... -.».».
00093-76-5
» »
15....•-
(t)
2,4,5-T Salts and Esters ....... .» »....»»»....»... .».....»....»...
(I)
.............
16.».-»..----
30001
2,4-D [2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic add]
00094-75-7
16.»..»».
(I)
2,4-D Salts and Esters ». ..».»».
(I)
17..........».»...»
30801
2,4-DB [2,4-Dichlorophenoxybutyric add] »..»»..».»....»»»............»......»».....».....
00094-82-6
)7.
(I)
2,4-DB Sags and Esters .....».. »...... .......».
(1)
..».......
80811
Anilazine[2,4-Dichloro-6-(o-chloroanilino)-s-triazine]
00101-05-3
19..... _______
36001
Dinocap
39300-45-3
20..».....»...»....
31301
Dichloran (2,6-dichloro.4-nitroaniline) ». ».............
00099-30-9
21»»......»........
8707
Susan 90[2-Bromo-4-hydroxyacetophenone]....». »...».
02491-38-5
22.»».....».......
15801
Mevinphos ...
�
07786-34-7
23.:».:».....
39001
Sulfallate[2-chloroailyldiethyldithiocarbamate] .»
00095-06-7
24 ».
84101
Chlorfenvinphos ».
00470-90-6
25...»...........
10010
Cyanazine ....».....».......... .»»....»..........».»»...»».........».............».......»....
21725-46-2
26.-».....-.....».
19101
Propachlor .....
01918-16-7
27.................».
30501
MCPA [2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic add] ...
00094-74-6
27 ».......»..»
(')
MCPA Salts and Esters
(1)
28 .-
99901
Octhilinone ....
26530-20-1
29 »».....»....
67703
Pindone....».»........»....»»...»...»».»»............»........»»........
00083-26-1
30..»...-.»»---
31401
Dichlorprop [2-(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy) propionic add]...........»....
00120-36-5
30
(1)
Dichlorprop Salts and Esters
(I)
31_...... »...-...
31501
MCPP [2-(2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxy)propion1c add]
00093-65-2
31...»-.»...... ....
r)
MCPP Salts and Esters -.
(1)
32...»...».-.....».
60101
Thiabendazole
00148-79-8
33..».--..».....
80815
Belclene 310[2-(methylthio)-4-(ethylamino)-6-(1,2-dimethylamino)-s-triazine]
22936-75-0
34................»..
21201
Cloprop [2-(m-Chlorophenoxy)propionic acid]
00101-10-0
34
(I)
Cloprop Salts and Esters
35........»....»....
35603
TCMTB[2-(Thiocyanomethylthio)benzothiazole]
21564-17-0
36......
99001
HAE [2-((Hydroxymethyl)amino) ethanol ... .........
34375-28-5
37....»........-....
6770
Chlorophacinone
03691-35-8
38
102401
Landrin-1[3,4,5-trimethylphenylmethylcarbamate]
02686-99-9
39...»...............
101701
Pronamide
23950-58-5
40.»»..»........».
100501
Methiocarb
02032-65-7
41...»....---.....
28201
Propanil
00709-98-8
42
107801
3-lodo-2-propynyl butylcarbamate
55406-53-6
43
86001
3-(a-Acetonylfurfuryl)-4-hydroxycoumarin [Coumafuryl]
00117-52-2
43........
(I)
Coumafuryl Salts and Esters
• • • • (1)
44...».
37507
DNOC (4.6-dinitro-o-cresol) 1!t
00534-52-1
45..»................
101101
Metribuzin
21087-64-9
46
19401
CPA (4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid)
00122-88-3
46
(i)
CPA Salts and Esters
47.....
19201
MCPB [4-(2-Methyl-chlorophenoxy)butyric acid]
00094-81 r5
47.»»»...-........
()
MCPB Salts and Esters
48.....».-...
44401
Aminocarb[4-(dimethylamino)-m-tolylmethylcarbamate]
02032-59-9
49
84701
Etridiazole
02593-15-9
50....-..»........ ..
55501
Ethoxyquin
00091-53-2
51....................
59804
Ouinoliol sulfate (8-Ouinoliol sulfate)
00134-31-6
52.
103301
Acephate
30560-19-1
53
114401
Acifluorfen
50594-66-6
53 ».
114402
Acifuorfen Salts and Esters
62476-59-9
54
90501
Alachlor
15972-60-8
55--..--- .......
98301
Aldicarb
00116-06-3
56•..»...............
69105
Hyamine 3500 [Alkyl' dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride • (50% C14, 40% C12, 10% C16))
68424-85-1
57
4001
Aliethrin (all isomers and allethrin coil)
00584-79-2
58
80801
Ametryn
00834-12-8
59....»»......»»»
106201
Amitraz
33089-61-1
60 »....»...».
80803
Atrazine •
01912-24-9
61.»......
105201
Bendiocarb
22781-23-3
52........... »...»..
99101
Benomyl and Carbendazim
17804-35-2
63
8901
Benzene Hexachloride
00608-73-1
64•...»....-.....».
9501
Benzyl benzoate
00120-51-4
65
10101
Lethane 384 [Beta-Thiocyanoethyl esters of mixed fatty acids containing from 10-18 carbons]
00301-11-1
66
104301
Bifenox
42576-02-3
68
12301
Bromadl
00314-40-9
68......».»...-....
12302
Bromacil, lithium
53404-19-6
59
35301
Bromoxynil•01689-84-5
69•».......
35302
Bromoxynil octanoate
01669-99-2
•
[Sec. 455.50]
11-12-93
Environment Reporter
0013-9211 /93/$0+$1.00
262

PESTICIDE CHEMICALS GUIDELINES
S-952
135:6687
TABLE 1 TO PART 455.—LIST OF ORGANIC PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS—Contd.
EPA census
code
Pesticide
code
Pesticide name
CAS..No.
70
70
73
74
75
76
ri
78
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
90
91
92
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
116
118
119
120
121
122
123
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
•
112301
101401
81701
81301
56801
90601
90602
29901
(I)
58201
27301
81501
81901
25501
83701
59102
59101
14504
109301
43401
28901
(')
27501
57601
104801
14502
11301
29801
(I)
29601
103401
32101
86501
57801
108201
69122
35001
53501
35201
58801
78701
57901
37505
37801
67701
36601
38501
47201
63301
35505
44303
44301
79401
38901
(I)
41601
113101
58401
41101
100601
28801
41405
59901
206600
53301
34801
35503
75002
81601
Butachtor
Giv-gard [fi-Bromo-/3-nitrostyrene]
Captafol
Captan
Carbaryl [Sevin]
Carbofuran
Carbosulfan
Chloramben
Chloramben Salts and Esters
Chlordane •
f
Chloroneb •
Chloropicrin
Chlorothatonil .
Chloroxuron
Stirofos
Chlorpyrifos methyl
Chlorpyrifos
Mancozeb
Fenvalerate •
Cycloheximide
Dalapon (2.2-dichloropropionic acid)
Dalapon Salts and Esters
Dienochtor
Demeton [0,0-Diethyl 0-(and S-) (2-ethylthio)ethyl) phosphorothioate]
Desmedipham
Diammonium ethylenebisdithiocarbamate
DBCP [Dibromo-3-chloropropane)
Dicamba [3,6-Dichloro-o-anisic acid]
Dicamba Salts and Esters
Dichlone (Phygon)
Thiophanate ethyl
Perthane [Diethyl diphenyl dichloroethane and related compounds]
EXD [Diethyl dithiobis (thionoformate)]
Dlazinon
Diflubenzuron
Benzethonium chloride
Dimethoate
Parathion methyl
Dicrotophos
Crotoxyphos
DCPA [Dimethyl 2,3,5,6-tetrachloroterephthalate]
Trichlorofon
Dinoseb
Dioxathion
Diphacinone
Diphenamid
Diphenylamine
MGK 326 [Dipropyl isocinchomeronate]
Nabonate [Disodium cyanodithioimidocarbonate)
Diuron
Metasol DGH [Dodecylguanidine hydrochloride]
Dodine (dodecylquanidine acetate)
Endosulfan [Hexachlorohexahydromethano-2.4,3-benzodioxathlepin-3-oxide]
Endothall
Endothall Salts and Esters
Endrin
Ethaltiuralin
Ethion
Ethoprop
Fenamiphos
Chlorobenzilate
Butylate
Famphur
Fenarimol •
Fenthion
Ferbam
Fluometuron
Fluoroacetamide
Foloet
•
•
•
•
•
•
-
-
3184-664
07166-19-0
02425-06-1
00133-06-2
00063-25-2
01563-66-2
55285-14-8
00133-90-4
(1)
00057-74-9
02675-77-6
00076-06-2
01897-45-6
01982-47-4
00961-11-5
05598-13-0
02921-88-2
08018-01-7
51630-58-1
00066-81-9
00075-99-0
(1)
02227-17-0
08065-48-3
13684-56-5
03566-10-7
00096-12-8
01918-00-9
(11
00117-80-6
23564-06-9
00072-564
00502-55-C
00333-41-5
35367-38-5
00121-54-C
00060-51-5
002913-00-C
00141-664
07700-17-E
01861-32-1
00052-68-5
. 00088-85-1
00078-344
00082-66-5
00957-51-1
00122-39-4
00113-48-1
00138-934
00330-54-1
13590-97-1
02439-10-:'
00115-29-1
00145-73-;
(1
00072-20-1
55283-68-4
00563-124
13194-48-4
22224-92-1
00510-15-1
02008-41-1
00052-85-1
60168-88-1
00055-38-1
14484-64-'
02164-17r:
00640-19-4
00133-07-:
[Sec. 455.50]
11-12-93 Copyright © 1993 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 263
0013-9211/93/$0+$1.00

. 135:6688
FEDERAL REGULATIONS
TABLE 1 TO PART 455.—LIST OF ORGANIC PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS—COntd.
EPA census
code
Pesticide
code
Pesticide name
CAS No.
138
103601
Glyphosate [N-(Phosphonomethyl) glycine]
01071-83-6
138
(1)
Glyphosate Salts and Esters
(')
139
103602
Glyphosine
02439-99-8
140
44801
Heptachlor
00076-44-8
141
115601
Cycloprate
54460-46-7
142
107201
Hexazinone
51235-04-2
143
109401
Isofenphos
25311-71-1
144
100201
lsopropalin
33820-53-0
145
47601
Propham
00122-42-9
146..._...._.......
97401
Karbutilate
04849-32-5
147
9001
Lindane
00058-89-9
148
35506
Linuron
00330-55-2
149....___
39504
Malachite green [Ammonium(4-(p-(dimethylamino)-alpha-phenylbenzylidine)-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-
ylidene)-dimethyl chloride]
00569-64-2
150............_
57701
Malathion
00121-75-5
151......... ____
14505
Maneb
12427-38-2
152
34802
Manganous dimethyldithiocarbamate
15339-36-3
153...._............
114001
Mefluidide[N-(2,4-dimethyl-5-(((trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl)-amino) phenyl acetamide]
53780-34-0
153.._.
(1)
Mefluidide Salts and Esters
(1)
154
101201
Methamidophos
10265-92-6
155
100301
Methidathion -
00950-37-8
156
90301
Methomyl
16752-77-5
157
105401
Methoprene
40596-69-8
158
34001
Methoxychlor
00072-43-5
159
69134
Methylbenzethonium chloride
15716-02-E
160
53201
Methylbromide
00074-83-S
162
69129
Hyamine 2389 [Methyldodecylbenzyl trimethyl ammonium chloride 80% and methyldodecylxylylene
bis (trimethylammoniumchloride) 20%]
01399-80-C
163
68102
Methylenebisthiocyanate
06317-18-E
164
54101
Ouinmethionate
02439-01-2
165
108801
Metolachlor
51218-45-2
166
44201
Mexacarbate
00315-18-4
167
14601
Metiram
t 09006-42-2
168
35502
Monuron TCA
00140-41-C
169.......... _......
35501
Monuron
00150-68-5
170
103001
Napropamide
15299-99-7
171
80301
Deet
00134-62--
172
14503
Nabam
00142-59-E
173
34401
Naled
00300-76-5
174
35801
Norea
18530-56-8
175 _
105801
Norflurazon
27314-13-2
176
30701
N-1-Naphthylphthalimide
05333-99-C
176
30702
Naptalam [N-1-Naphthylphthalamic acid]
00132-66-1
176
30703
Naptalam Salts and Esters
00132-67-2
177
57001
MGK 264 [N-2-Ethylhexyl bicycloheptene dicarboxlmide]
00136-45-E
178
84301
Benfluralin
01861-40-1
179
79501
Sultotepp
03689-24-5
180
79101
Aspon
03244-90-4
181
36501
Coumaphos
00056-72-4
182
32701
Fensulfothion
00115-90-2
183
32501
Disulfoton
00298-04-4
184
105901
Fenitrothion
00122-14-5
185
59201
Phosmet
00732-11-E
186
58001
Azinphos Methyl
00086-50-C
187
58702
Oxydemeton methyl
00301-12-2
192
(')
Organo-tin pesticides
(I,
194
104201
Oryzalin
19044-88-2
195
103801
Oxamyl
23135-22-(
196
111601
Oxyfluorfen
42874-03-:
197............ _....
111501
Bolstar [Sulprofos]
35400-43-:
198
219900
Sulprofos Oxon
38527-90-1
199 _
41801
Santox (0-Ethyl 0-(p-nitrophenyl) phenylphosphonothioate
02104-64-
[Sec. 455.50]
5
11-12-93
Environment Reporter
0013-9211/93/$0+$1.00
264

PESTICIDE CHEMICALS GUIDELINES
S-952
135:6689
TABLE 1 TO PART 455.—LIST OF ORGANIC PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS—COntd.
EPA census
code
Pesticide
code
Pesticide name
CAS No.
207
. 108001
Perftuidone
37924-13-3
208
109701
Permethrin •
• - 52645-53-1
209
98701
Phenmedlpham
13684-63-4
210
64501
Phenothiaztne -
00092-84-2
211
64103
Phenylphenol
00090-43-7
212
57201
Phorate
00298-02-2
213
97701
Phosalone
02310-17-0
214
18201
Phosphamidon
13171-21-6
215
5101
Pictoram
01918-02-1
215
5104
Pictoram Salts and Esters ,,
02545-60-0
216
•67501
Piperonyl butoxide
00051-03-6
217
69183
PBED (Busan 77) [Poly (oxyethylene (dimethylimino) ethylene (dimethylimino) ethylene dichloride]....
31512-74-0
218
34803
Busan 85 [Potassium dimethyldithiocarbamate]
00128-03-0
219
102901
Busan 40 [Potassium N-hydroxymethyl-N-methyldithiocarbamate]
51026-28-9
220
39002
KN Methyl [Potassium N-methyldithiocarbamate]
00137-41-7
221
101301
Metasol J26 [Potassium N-(alpha-(nttroethyl) benzyl)-ethylenediamine]
53404-62-9
222
111401
Profenofos
•
41198-08-7
223
80804
Prometon
01610-18-0
224
80805
Prometryn
07287-19-6
225
97601
Propargite
02312-35-8
226
80808
Propazlne •
00139-40-2
227
77702
Propionlc acid
00079-09-4
228
119301
Propamocarb and Propamocarb HCL
24579-73-5
229
69004
Pyrethrin coils
00121-21-1
230
69001
Pyrethrin I
231
69002
Pyrethrum (other than pyrethrins)
08003-34-7
232
69006
Pyrethrin II
00121-29-9
233
97801
Resmethrin
10453-864
234
58301
Ronne!
00299-84-3
235
71003
Rotenone
00083-79-4
236
74801
DEF [S,S,S-Tributyl phosphorotrithioate]
00078-48-E
237
35509
Siduron
01982-49-E
238
82501
Silvex(2-(2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxypropionic acid)]
00093-72-1
238
(r)
Silvex Salts and Esters
0:
239
80807
Simazine
•
00122-344
240-
103901
Bentazon
25057-89-C
241
34804
Carbam-S [Sodium dimethyldithiocarbanate]
•
00128-04-1
242
75003
Sodium monofluoroacetate •
r
00062-74-E
243
39003
Vapam [Sodium methyldithiocarbamate]
00137-42-E
244
57101
Sulfoxide
00120-62-7
245
41301
Cycloate
01134-23-1
246
41401
EPTC [S-Ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate]
00759-94-4
247
41402
Molinate
02212-67-1
248
41403
Pebulate
01114-71-1
249
41404
Vernolate
01929 77-7
250
. 35604
HPTMS [S-(2-Hydroxypropyl) thiomethanesulfonate]
29803-57-4
251
9801
Bensulide
00741.=58-:
252
105501
Tebuthiuron
34014-18-1
253 •
59001
Temephos
03383-96-E
254
12701 •
Terbacil
05902-=51-1
255
105001
Terbufos
1307149-E
256
80814
Terbuthylazine
05915=414
257 -
80813
Terbutryn
•
00886-50-1
258
63004
Tetrachlorophenol
25167-834
258
259 •
63007
35602
Tetrachlorophenol Salts and Esters
Dazomet •
00533=74-4
260
102001
Thiophanate methyl •
235647054
261 i
•79801
Thiram
00137=2674
262
80501
Toxaphene
08001 35,=1
263
• 74901
Merphos [Tributyl phosphorotrithioate)
00150-50=.
264
36101
Trifluralin -
01582-09-1
265
86002
Warfarinpia-Acetonylbenzyl)-4-hydroxycoumarin] -
00081-81-i
.
265
(1)
Warfarin Salts and Esters -
r
266
•
51705
Zinc MBT [Zinc 2-mercaptobenzothiazolate]
00155-04
267
14506
Zineb
12122-67
268
34805
Ziram
,00137-30-4
269
-
- 78802
S-(2,3,3-trichloroatlyl) diisopropylthiocarbamate •
02303-17-
270 •
271
69005
• 69003
Phenothrin
Tetramethrin -
- .
26002-80-,
07696-12-1
[Sec. 455.50]
11-12-93 Copyright © 1993 by The Bureau of National Affairs. Inc.
0013-9211 /93/$0+$1.00
265

135:6690
FEDERAL REGULATIONS
ti
TABLE 1 TO PART 455.--UST OF ORGANIC PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS-COrltd.
EPA census
code
Pesticide
code
Pesticide name
CAS No. •
272.
18301
Chloropropham
00101-21-3
Note:
Multiple compounds for active ingredient.
TABLE 2 TO PART 455.-ORGANIC PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS BEST AVAILABLE
TECHNOLOGY ECONOMICALLY ACHIEVABLE (BAT) AND PRETREATMENT STANDARDS FOR EXISTING SOURCES (PSES)
•
• Pesticide
•
•
' kg/kkg (Ib/1,000 lb) Pounds
of pollutant per 1000 lbs.
product
Notes
Daily maxi-
mum shall
not exceed
Monthly av-
erage shall
not exceed
2.4-0 ...... .......»...........».»»..».
1.97xx104
6.40x104
--- ......
2,4-0 Salts and Esters
2,4-DB Salts and Esters ...............................».......
Acephate.......»..................».......»..
Adfluorlen..»..... �•
6
6.39x104
2.45
1.97x10�+
1.
9.3x104
--........
Acifluo r
5.19x104
1.54x104
Aidicarb»..»....».....»......».»»................
7.23x104
3.12x104
.............
Ametryn••••»•-•••••»-»--
7.72x104
5.12x10s
2.53x104
1.72x104
����-�•�����
Atraztne --
Azinphos Methyl
2.74x104
1.41 x104
....»..... -
Benfluralin
3.22x104
1.09x10'
1
Benomyl and Carbendazim
3.50x104
8.94x104
2
Bolster ......».
Bromadl
1.69x102
3.83x104
8.72x104
1.16x10''
.....»--�--
Bromacil, lithium
Bromoxynil
(1) 9r. 5x10" '
)
127x104
Bromoxynil octanoate
3.95x10'
1.27x10'
..-...... -.
Busan 40 [Potassium N-hydroxymethyl-N-methyldithiocarbamate]
5.74x104
1.87x103
Busan 85 [Potassium dimethyldithiocarbamate]
5.74x104
1.87x10"
Butachtor ».
5.19x104
1.54x104
Captafol
4.24x104
1.31 x104
Carbam-S [Sodium dimethyldithlocarbamate]
5.74x104
1.87x104
Carbaryl ...
1.6x10'e
7.3x10"
Carbofuran
1.18x10{
2.80x104
Chtoroneb
8.16x104
3.31x102
Chlorothalonil
1.51x104
4.57x104
Chlorpyrifos
8.25x104
2.43x10'
Cyanazine
1.03x104
3.33x10'
Dazomet»......».................».
5.74x104
1.87x104
DCPA
7.79x104
2.64X104
....... ».».
DEF [S,S,S-Tributyl phosphorotrithloate]
1.15x104
5.58x104
Diazinon
2.82x104
1.12x10"
Dich!orprop Salts and Esters
._,,,,.»,�.
Dichiorvos '
9 6x10a
2 95x104
Dinoseb •
4.73 •
1.43
..»..
Dioxathion
3.40x104
1.29x10;
Disuttoton
7.33x104
3.79x10'
Diuron
Endothall Salts and Esters
3.15x104
)
1.4X10$
Endrin
2 2x10;
51x104
Ethalfluralin
3.22x104
1.09x10"
1
Ethion ...•5.51x10+
1.57x104
.............
Fenarimol
1.02x104
3.61x104
Fensulfothion
1.48x10$
7.64x104
Fenthion
1.83x104
9.45x104
Fenvalerate
5.40x104
2.08x104
.........»»
Heptachlor
8.8x104
2.9x104
Isopropalin
7.06x104
2.49x104
• 1
KN Methyl [Potassium N-methyldithiocarbamatej
5.74x104
1.87x10,
Unuron -
.
2.69x10-
1.94x104
Malathion
MCPA Salts and Esters
2.35x10"
r1
9.55x104
hl
...»-���»
•
[Sec. 455.501
11-12-93
Environment Reporter
0013-9211 /93/60+$1.00
286

•
PESTICIDE CHEMICALS GUIDELINES
S-952
135:6691
TABLE 2 TO PART 455.-ORGANIC PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS BEST AVAILABLE
OGY ECONOMICALLY ACHIEVABLE (BAT) AND PRETREATMENT STANDARDS.FOR EXISTING SOURCES (PSES)=Contd.
. __....__
,..-
kg/kkg (Ib/1,000 ib) Pounds
of pollutant per 1000 lbs.
•
product
•
Pesticide
Notes
Daily maxi-
Monthly av-
.
mum shall
erage shall
not exceed
not exceed
MCPP Salts and Esters
Merphos
1.15x104
5.58X104
Methamidophos
1.46x104
7.53X104
Methomyl
3.82x104
1.76x104
Methoxychlor
%
3.23x104
1.31x104
Metribuzln •
1.36x104
7,04X104
Mevinphos
1.44x10-
.5.10x104
Nabam
5.74X103
1.87x104
Nabonate
Naled
5.74x10a� •t
7
1.87X104
310x10'
Norfiurazon
20X10'4
Organo-tin pesticides
1.72x104
7.42x104
3
Parathion -
•
7.72x10{
3.43x10r
Parathion methyl
7.72x10{
3.43x104
PCNB
5.75x104
1.90X104
Pendimethaiin
1.17x104
3.62X104
Permethrin•
2.32x104
6.06X108
Phorate
3.12x10'
9.37x104
Phosmet
'
72x104
t •
4
Prometon •
2.53X104
Prometryn
Pronamide • •
7.72x104 • .
6.64x10{ -
2.53x104
2.01 X10-4
Propachtpr.
5.19x10,-
1.54x104
Propanil .•
•1.06x104
4.80:104
Propazine'
7.72x10°
2.53X10,
Pyrethrin I and Pyrethrin II
1.24X102 .
3.33X103
Simazirie
7.72x10°
2.53X103
Stirofos
4.10x104
1.35x104
TCMTB
3.89x104
1.05x104
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil •
9.78x10-2
3.83x104
3.40x104
1.16X10it
Terbufos •
4.92x10;
1.26x104
Terbuthylazine
7.72x104
2.53X104
Terbutryn
-
7.72x104
2.53X104
Toxaphene -
1.02x102
3.71 X104
Triadimefon
6.52x104
3.41 X104
•
Trifiuralin
3.22x104
1.09X10'
: 1
Vapam (Sodium methyldithiocarbamate]
5.74x104'
1.87x104
Ziram [Zinc dimethyldithlocarbanate]
5.74x104
1.87x10a
t' No discharge of process wastewater pollutants.
Notes:
1 Monitor and report as total Trifluralin.
= Pounds of product include Benomyl and any Carbendazim production not converted to Benomyl.
a Monitor and report as total tin.
4 Appfes• to purification by recrystaiization portion of the process.
•
r•
• r
[Sec. 455,5t!1
11-12-93 Copyright © 1993 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. - 267
0013-9211 /93/$0+$1.00

- 135:6692
FEDERAL REGULATIONS
a
l'
TABLE 3 TO PART 455.-ORGANIC PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENT NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
(NSPS) AND PRETREATMENT STANDARDS FOR NEW SOURCES (PSNS)
e
• Pesticide
kg/kkg (ib/1.000 lb) Pounds of
pollutant per 1000 lbs.product
Notes
Daily maxi-
mum shall not
exceed
Monthly aver -
age shall not
exceed
2,4-0 ».
1.42 x 104
4.61 x 104
2,4-0 Satts and Esters........»»..»»»........»......................»».»....... ...
(1)
2,4-0B Salts and Esters.............»».....
(1)
(I)
Acephate »..
6.39 X 104
1.97 x 104
Acifluorfen...............»..».........».»..»».»».»..». »».
1.77
6.69 x 104
Alachlor...»».»....»»........ ». ».
3.74 x 10"
1.11 x 104
Aldicarb....... y
5.21 x 104
2.25 X 104
Ametryn ....
5.56 x 104
1.82 x 104
Atrazine....»»........».....»....»..........»...»»......»....»..............»....».....»...».»».....».............»..............».»..»....»...........
3.69 x 10•s
1.24 x 104
Benfluralin ...
3.22 x 104
1.09 x 104
1
Benomyl and Carbendazom
2.52 x 104
6.44 x 104
2
Bolstsr».»...»»».»».»...».»..»..»....»..»»..»..»..».».».».»»..»»..»..»».......»...».». .»
1.22 x 104
•
6.28 x 104
Bromacit ........»......»»......... .... ».
2.76 x 104
8.36 X 104
Bromacit, lithium
Bromoxynil
2.84 x 104
9.14 x 104
Bromoxynll Octanoate
2.84 x 104
9.14 x 104
Busan 40 [Potassium N-hydroxymethyl-N-methyldithiocarbamate]
4.14 x 104
1.35 X 104
Susan 85 [Potassium dimethyldithiocarbamate]
4.14 x 104
1.35 X 104
Butachtor..... ...
3.74 x 104
1.11 x 104
Captafol '
4.24 X 10+
1.31 X 104
Carbam-S [Sodium dimethyldithiocarbanate]
4.14 x 104
1.35 X 104
Carbaryl
1.18 x 104
5.24 x 104
Carbofuran
1.18 x 104
2.80 x 104
Chloroneb
5.87 x 104
2.39 x 104
Chlorothalonli
1.09 x 104
3.29 x 104
Chtorpyrifos ....».».»»
5.94 x 10"
1.75 x 104
Cyanazine
7.42 x 104
2.40 X 10+
Dazomet
4.14 x 10e
1.35 x 104
DCPA
5.61 x 104
1.90 x 104
DEF [S,S.S-Tributyl phosphorotrithioate]
1.15 x 104
5.58 x 104
lit
Diazinon
2.05 x 104
8.13 X 104
Dichlorprop Salts and Esters
Dichlorvos ....».
6 88 x 104
213 x 10+
Dinoseb »...»
3.41
1.03
Dioxathion
2.54 x 104
9.31 x 104
Disulfoton
5.28 x 104
2.72 x 104
Diuron
2.27 x 104
1.01 x 104
Endothall Satts and Esters
Endrin
1.57 x 104
3 69 x 104
Ethalfluralin ».
3.22 x 104
1.09 X 104
1
Ethion
3.97 x 104
1.33 x 10+
Fenarimol
1.02 x 1043.61
X 104
Fensulfothton
1.06 x 104
5.50 x 10+
Fenthion
1.32 x 104
6.79 x 10"*
Fenvaterate
3.91 x 104
1.50 x 10a
Guthion
1.97 x 104
1.02 x 104
Heptachlor
6.31 x 104
2.06 x 104
Isopropaltn
5.07 x 104
1.82 x 104
KN Methyl [Potassium N-methyldithiocarbamate]
4.14 x 104
1.35 x 104
Unuron •
1.94 x 104
1.40 x 104
Malathion
1.69 x 104
6.88 x 10+
MCPA Salts and Esters
MCPP Salts and Esters
(I)
(I)
Merphos ,..
1 15 x 104
S 58 x 104
Methamidophos
1.05 x 104
5.42 x 104
Methomyl
2.75 x 104
1.27 x 104
Methoxychlor
2.34 x 104
9.25 x 104
Metribuzin
9.80 is 104
5.06 x 104
Mevinphos
1.03 x 104
3.69 X 104
Nabam
4.14 x 104
1.35 x 10e
Nabonate
Naiad
4.14 x 104
)
1.35 x 10"
Norflurazon
7 20 x 104
2 x 10 x 104
Organo-tin pesticides
1.25 x 104
5.36 x 10'
3
Environment Reporter
0013-9211 /93/$0+$1.00
•
[Sec. 455.50]
268

PESTICIDE CHEMICALS GUIDELINES
S-952
135:6693
TABLE 3 TO PART 455.-ORGANIC PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENT NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
(NSPS) AND PRETREATMENT STANDARDS FOR NEW SOURCES (PSNS)-COntd.
kg/kkg (Ib/1,000 lb) Pounds of
pollutant per 1000 Ibs.product
Pesticide
Notes
Daily maxi-
Monthly aver -
mum shall not
age shall not
exceed
exceed
Parathion Ethyl
Parathion Methyl
PCNB
Pendimethalin
5.56 x 10-4
5.56 x 10-4
4.16X10'
1.17 x 104
2.45 x 104
2.45 X 10-4
1.38x10-4
3.62 x 10-3
Permethrin
-•
1.68 x 10-4
4.39 x 104
Phorate
z
3.12 X 104
9.37 X 106
4
Phosmet
Prometon
5.56 X 104
1.82 x 10'
Prometyrn
5.56 X 104
1.82 X 10'
Pronamide
4.78 x 10-4
1.45 x 104
Propachlor
3.74 x 10
1.11 x 10s
Propanil
Propazine
7.63 x 104
5.56 x 10a
3.48 X 10r
1.82 x 10-3
Pyrethrin I and Pyrethrin II
8.91 x 104
2.40 x 10'
Simazine
5.89 x 104
1.91 x 10'
Stirofos
2.95 X 104
9.72 x 10'
TCMTB
2.80 x 10'
7.54 x 104
Tebuthiuron
Terbacil
9.78 x 10'
2.76 x 10'r
3.41 x 10'2
8.36 x 10-2
Terbufos
4.92 x 104
1.26 x 104
Terbuthylazine
5.56 x 10'
1.82 x 104
Terbutryn
5.56 x 10-'
1.82 x 10-
Toxaphene
Triadimefon
7.35 X 10'
4.69 x 104
2.67 x 10-
2.46 x 10-2
Trifluralin
3.22 x 10-4
1.09 x 10-4
1
Vapam [Sodium methyldithiocarbamate]
4.14 x 10-3
1.35 x 104
Ziram [Zinc dimethyldithiocarbanatej
4.14 x 104
1.35 x 104
r No discharge of process wastewater pollutants.
Notes:
1 Monitor and report as total Trifluralin.
a Pounds of product shall include Benomyl and any Carbendazim production not converted to Benomyl.
a Monitor and report as total tin.
4 Applies to purification by recrystalization portion of the process.
TABLE 4 TO PART 455.-BAT AND
NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR PRIOR-
ITY POLLUTANTS FOR DIRECT DISCHARGE
POINT SOURCES THAT USE END -OF -PIPE
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
[Micrograms per liter (fig/I))
Pollutant
Daily
maximum
shall not
exceed
Monthly
average
shall not
exceed
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-trans-
Dichloroethylene
1,3-Dichloropropene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
25
54
211
230
163
54
44
28
98
112
TABLE 4 TO PART 455.-BAT AND
NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR PRIOR-
ITY POLLUTANTS FOR DIRECT DISCHARGE
POINT SOURCES THAT USE END -OF -PIPE
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT-Contd.
[Micrograms per liter (pg/I )
Pollutant
2,4-Dimethylphenol
16 Benzene
21-Bromodichloromethane
66 yBromomethane
153 Chlorobenzene`
77hloromethane
ide (Total)
brromochtorom
chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Lead (Total)
2
15
31
39
Daily
maximum
shall not
exceed
36
136
380
380
28
190
"ka-U 640
i r 794
nlu^.--- 89
108
690
17)
Monthly
average
shall not
exceed
TABLE 4 TO PART 455.-BAT AND
NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR PRIOR-
ITY POLLUTANTS FOR DIRECT DISCHARGE
POINT SOURCES THAT USE END -OF -PIPE
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT-Contd.
[Micrograms per liter (pg/I)]
Daily Monthly
maximum average
shall not shall not
exceed exceed
Pollutant
18 Naphthalene
37 Phenol
142 Tetrachloroethylene
142 -1Tetrachloromethane
15 Toluene
86 -24fribromomethene
220-iTrichloromethane
196
40
32
320
59
26
56
38
80
794
46
22
15
22
18
26
196
21
T� t ACAliTYc ntcltt ftt.t(,: GQibCM izirxr l+/Ov ck.
jribrew nrtti<fit4W- 1,/61e1c;V'wl
f (I*C- (roti)U fitusytC c
13 re Mt,rYu i V vrC _ ► t*('I 1:1►fiv))ck i
046 6 rn-dttrti1L Old f
ky c11 fan
/IG{C-.
c j (o 14,--+itakt4d=- 1114G]Y c _ J1(eyi
[Sec. 455.50]
11-12.93 Copyright © 1993 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 269
0013-9211 /93/S0+51.00

' 135:6694 FEDERAL REGULATIONS
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART A. —BAT AND
NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR PRIOR-
ITY POLLUTANTS FOR DIRECT DISCHARGE
POINT SOURCES THAT DO NOT USE END -
OF -PIPE BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT •
[Micrograms per liter (jg/I))
Pollutant
Daily
maximum
shall not
exceed
Monthly
average
shall not
exceed
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,2-trans-
Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloropropane.._
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,3-Dichloropropene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenot
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromomethane
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Cyanide (Total)
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Lead (Total)
Naphthalene
Phenol
60
59
66
794
794
574
794
380
47
134
380
380
380
295
640
794
170
380
690
47
47
22
22
25
196
196
180
196
142
19
57
142
142
142
110
220
196
36
142
320
19
19
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART A. —BAT AND
NSPS EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR PRIOR-
ITY POLLUTANTS FOR DIRECT DISCHARGE
POINT SOURCES THAT DO NOT USE END -
OF -PIPE BIOLOGICAL TREAT-
MENT—COntd.
[Micrograms per liter (µg/I)]
Pollutant
Daily
maximum
shall not
exceed
Tetrachloroethylene
Tetrachloromethane
Toluene
Tribromomethane
Trichloromethane
164
380
74
794
325
Monthly
average
shall not
exceed
52
142
28
196
111
TABLE 6 TO PART 455—PSES AND
PSNS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
[Micrograms per liter (pg/I))
Pollutant
Daily
maximum
shall not
exceed
Monthly
average
shall not
exceed
22
22
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ...
1,2-trans-
Dichloroethylene
60
59
66 25
TABLE 6 TO PART 455—PSES AND
PSNS FOR PRIORITY POLLU-
TANTS—COntd.
(Micrograms per liter (µg/I)]
Pollutant
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,3-Dichloropropene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromomethane
Chlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Cyanide (Total)
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Lead (Total)
Naphthalene
Tetrachloroethylene
Tetrachloromethane
Toluene
Tribromomethane
Trichloromethane
Daily
maximum
shall not
exceed
794
794
574
794
380
134
380
380
380
295
640
794
170
380
690
47
164
380
74
794
325
Monthly
average
shall not
exceed
196
196
180
196
142
57
142
142
142
110
220
196
36
142
320
19
52
142
28
196
111
TABLE 7 TO PART 455.—TEST METHODS FOR PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS
EPA survey
code
Pesticide name
CAS No.
EPA analytical method No.(s)
8
12
16
17
22
25
26
27
30
31
35
39
41
45
52
53
54
55
58
60
62
68
69
69
70
73
75
76
80
82
84
86
90
Triadimeton
Dichlorvos
2,4-D; 2,4-D Salts and Esters (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid]
2,4-DB; 2,4-DB Salts and Esters [2,4-Dichlorophenoxybutyric acid]
Mevinphos
Cyanazine
Propachlor
MCPA; MCPA Salts and Esters [2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid]
Dichlorprop; Dichlorprop Salts and Esters [2-(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy) propionic
acid]
MCPP; MCPP Salts and Esters [2-(2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxy) propionic acid]
TCMTB (2-(Thiocyanomethylthio) benzothiazole]
Pronamide
Propanil
Metribuzin
Acephate
Acifluorfen
Alachlor
Aldicarb
Ametryn
Atrazine
Benomyl
Bromacil; Bromacil Salts and Esters
Bromoxynil
Bromoxynil octanoate
Butachlor
Captatol
Carbaryl [Sevin]
Carbofuran
Chloroneb
Chlorothalonil
Stirofos
Chlorpyrifos
Fenvalerate
43121-43-3
00062-73-7
00094-75-7
00094-82-6
07786-34-7
21725-46-2
01918-16-7
00094-74-6
00120-36-5
00093-65-2
21564-17-0
23950-58-5
00709-98-8
21087-64-9
30560-19-1
50594-66-6
15972-60-8
00116-06-3
00834-12-8
01912-24-9
17804-35-2
00314-40-9
01689-84-5
01689-99-2
23184-66-9
02425-06-1
00063-25-2
01563-66-2
02675-77-6
01897-45-6
00961-11-5
'02921-88-2
51630-58-1
507/633/525.1/1656
1657/507/622/525.1
1658/515.1/615/515.2/555
1658/515.1/615/515.2/555
1657/507/622/525.1
629/507
1656/508/608.1/525.1
1658/615/555
1658/515.1/615/515.2/555
1658/615/555
637
525.1/507/633.1
632.1/1656
507/633/525.1/1656
1656/1657
515.1/515.2/555
505/507/645/525.1/1656
531.1
507/619/525.1
505/507/619/525.1/1656
631
507/633/525.1/1656
1625/16561661
507/645/525.1/1656
1656
531.1/632/553
531.1/632
1656/508/608.1/525.1
508/608.2/525.1/1656
1657/507/622/525.1
1657/508/622
1660
[Sec. 455.50]
11-12-93 Environment Reporter 270
0013-9211/93/$0+51.00

PESTICIDE CHEMICALS GUIDELINES
S-952
135:6695
TABLE 7 TO PART 455.-TEST METHODS FOR PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS-Contd.
EPA survey
code
Pesticide name
CAS No.
EPA analytical method No.(s)
103
Diazinon
00333-41-5
1657/507/614/622/525.1
107
Parathion methyl
00298-00-0
1657/614/622
110
DCPA [Dimethyl 2,3,5,6-tetrachloroterephthalate]
01861-32-1
508/608.2/525.1/515.1/515.2/1656
112
Dinoseb
00088-85-7
1658/515.1/615/515.2/555
113
Dioxathion
00078-34-2
1657/614.1
118
Nabonate [Disodium cyanodithioimidocarbonate]
00138-93-2
630.1
119
Diuron
00330-54-1
632/553
123
Endothall
00145-73-3
548/548.1
124
Endrin
00072-20-8
1656/505/508/608/i 17/ 525.1
125
Ethalfluralin
55283-68-6
00563-12-24
- 1 1656r 627
614.1
127
127 �
Ethion 1
Ethoprop
1657/507/622/525.1
132
Fenarimol
60168-88-9
507/633.1/525.1/1656
133
Fenthion
00055-38-9
1657/622
138
Glyphosate [N-(Phosphonomethyl) glycine]
01071-83-6
547
33820-53-0
144
Isopropalin
1656/627
148
Linuron
00330-55-2
553/632
150
Malathion
00121-75-5
1657/614
154
Methamidophos
10265-92-6
1657
156
Methomyl
16752-77-5
531.1/632
158
Methoxychlor
00072-43-5
1656/505/508/ 608.2/617/525.1
172
Nabam
00142-59-6
630/630.1
173
Naiad
00300-76-5
1657/622
175
Norflurazon
27314-13-2
507/645/525.1/1656
178
Benfluralin
01861-40-1
' 1656r 627
182
Fensulfothion
00115-90-2
1657/622
183
Disulfoton
00298-04-4
1657/507/614/622/525.1
185
Phosmet
00732-11-6
1657/622.1
186
Azinphos Methyl
00086-50-0
1657/614/622
192
Organo-tin pesticides
12379-54-3
Ind-01/200.7/200.9
197
Bolstar
35400-43-2
1657/622
203
Parathion
00056-38-2
1657/614
204
Pendimethalin
40487-42-1
1656
205
Pentachloronitrobenzene
00082-68-8,
1656/608.1/617
206
Pentachlorophenol
00087-86-5
625/1625/515.2/555/515.1/525.1
208
Permethrin
52645-53-1
608.2/508/525.1/1656/ 1616
212
Phorate
00298-02-2
1657/622
218
Busan 85 [Potassium dimethyldithiocarbamate]
00128-03-0
630/630.1
219
Busan 40 [Potassium N-hydroxymethyl-N-methyldithiocarbamate]
51026-28-9
630/630.1
220
KN Methyl [Potassium N-methyldithiocarbamate]
00137-41-7
630/630.1
223
Prometon
01610-18-0
507/619/525.1
224
Prometryn
07287-19-6
507/619/525.1
226
Propazine
00139-40-2
507/619/525.1/1656
230
Pyrethrin 1
00121-21-1
1660
232
Pyrethrin II
00121-29-9
1660
236
DEF [S,S,S-Tributyl phosphorotrithioate]
00078-48-8
1657
239
Simazine
00122-34-9
505/507/619/525.1/1656
241
Carbam-S [Sodium dimethyldithlocarbanate]
00128-04-1
630/630.1
243
Vapam [Sodium methyldithiocarbamate]
00137-42-8
630/630.1
252
Tebuthluron
34014-18-1
507/525.1
254
Terbacil
05902-51-2
507/633/525.1/1656
255
Terbufos
13071-79-9
1657/507/614.1/525.1
256
Terbuthylazine
05915-41-3
619/1656
257
Terbutryn
00886-50-0
507/619/525.1
259
Dazomet
00533-74-4
630/630.1/1659
262
Toxaphene
08001-35-2
1656/505/508/608/ 617/525.1
263
Merphos [Tributyl phosphorotrithioate]
00150-50-5
1657/507/525.1/622
264
Trifluralin
01582-09-8
1656/508/617/627/525.1
268
Ziram [Zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate]
00137-30-4
630/630.1
1 Monitor and report as total Trifluralin.
[Sec. 455.50]
11-12-93 Copyright ® 1993 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 271
0013-9211/93/$0+$1.00

Monsanto-NC0003719 4/19/93, Page 1
OUTFALL, QQ2
Monsanto proposes to route current 001 discharge through the wastewater treatment system,
outfall 002, and eliminate 001 as a separate discharge.
Summary of flows to Outfall 002:
1 ) Cooling Tower Blowdown
Boiler Blowdown
Demineralized Water Blowdown
Backwash Pond
2) Wellman, Inc.
ICI Americas
3) Sanitary
4) Monsanto tech. and form. process
TOTAL PROPOSED FLOW TO 002
0.040 MGD
0.038 MGD
0.012 MGD
0.069 MGD
0.159 MGD (18.47%, Total from 001 to 002)
0.049 MGD (5.69%, OCPSF process to WWTP)
0.234 MGD (27.18%, OCPSF process to WWTP)
0.075 MGD (8.71%, Sanitary flow to WWTP)
0.344 MGD (39.95%, Herbicides)
0.702 MGD (Total original 002 flow)
0.861 MGD
1) LIMITATIONS FOR ORIGINAL OUTFALL 001 BLOWDOWN AND BACKWASH WATERS:
(0.159 MGD, 18.47% OF 002 FLOW, EFFLUENT SHEET ATTACHED)
EFFLUENT MONTHLY
CHARACTERISTIC AVERAGE
FLOW
TSS
CHROMIUM
ZINC
CHLORINE
BIOMONITORING
BIOMONITORING
pH
37.5 Ibs/day
monitor
monitor
monitor
6-9
DAILY
MAXIMUM
56.3 Ibs/day
monitor
monitor
monitor
6-9
Weekly
2/month
Monthly
Monthly
Weekly
Quarterly
Semi-annual
Instantaneous E
Grab E
Grab E
Grab E
Grab E
Composite E
Composite E
Flow is not limited but calculations were based on 0.15 MGD, actual flow based on application is
0.159 MGD.

Monsanto-NC0003719 4/19/93, Page 2
2) GUIDELINES FOR OCPSF FLOWS CONTRIBUTING TO OUTFALL 002,
0.283 MGD, 32.87% OF 002 FLOW, EFFLUENT SHEET ATTACHED,
REFERENCE 40 CFR 414 SUBPART D - THERMOPLASTIC RESINS (414.40-414.46)
414.43 - BAT LIMITS (RECOMMENDS USING BPT-414.41)
EFFLUENT MONTHLY DAILY
CHARACTERISTIC IMF MAXIMUM
BOD5 24.0 mg/I 64.0 mg/I
TSS 40.0 mg/I 130.0 mg/I
pH 6-9 6-9
MASS LIMITATIONS BASED ON 0.283 MGD OCPSF FLOW (CALCULATED):
EFFLUENT MONTHLY DAILY
CHARACTERISTIC AVERAGE MAXIMUM
BOD5 56.6 Ibs/day 151.0 Ibs/day
TSS 94.4 Ibs/day 306.8 Ibs/day
pH 6-9 6-9
(OCPSF Excel run at 0.283 MGD attached)

Monsanto-NC0003719 4/19/93, Page 3
3) GUIDELINES FOR SANITARY FLOW CONTRIBUTING TO OUTFALL 002:
(0.075 MGD, 8.71% OF 002 FLOW)
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTIC
MONTHLY DAILY
Ay=115172F MAXIMUM
BOD 30.0 mg/I 45.0 mg/I
TSS 30.0 mg/I 45.0 mg/I
EFFLUENT MONTHLY DAILY
CHARACTERISTICF MAXIMUM
BOD 18.8 ppd 28.2 ppd
TSS 18.8 ppd 28.2 ppd

Monsanto-NC0003719 4/19/93, Page 4
4) MONSANTO TECH AND FORMULATION PROCESS CONTRIBUTING TO 002 FLOW, 0.344 MGD,
39.95 % OF 002 FLOW,
BPJ from existing permit (Summer)
EFFLUENT MONTHLY DAILY
CHARACTERISTIC g1i4 MAXIMUM
BOD 350.0 ppd 700.0 ppd
TSS 623.0 ppd 1208.0 ppd
NH3 23.0 ppd 46.0 ppd
CCD 3470.0 ppd 5608.0 ppd
DO 5.0 mg/I 5.0 mg/I

Monsanto-NC0003719 4/19/93, Page 5
SUMMARY OF ITEMS 2, 3 AND 4:
2) OCPSF FLOWS CONTRIBUTING TO OUTFALL 002,
(0.283 MGD, 32.87% OF 002 FLOW)
BOD5 56.6 Ibs/day 151.0 Ibs/day
TSS 94.4 Ibs/day 306.8 Ibs/day
pH 6-9 6-9
3) SANITARY FLOW CONTRIBUTING TO OUTFALL 002:
(0.075 MGD, 8.71% OF 002 FLOW)
EFFLUENT MONTHLY DAILY
CHARACTERISTIC AVERAGE MAXIMUM
BOD 18.8 ppd 28.2 ppd
TSS 18.8 ppd 28.2 ppd
4) MONSANTO TECH AND FORMULATION PROCESS CONTRIBUTING TO OUTFALL 002
(0.344 MGD, 39.95 % OF 002 FLOW)
EFFLUENT MONTHLY DAILY
CHARACTERISTIC AVERAGE MAXIMUM
BOD 350.0 ppd 700.0 ppd
TSS 623.0 ppd 1208.0 ppd
NH3 23.0 ppd 46.0 ppd
CCD 3470.0 ppd 5608.0 ppd
D.O. 5.0 mg/I 5.0 mg/I
TOTALS FOR OUTFALL 002:
COD 3470.0 ppd 5608.0 ppd
BOD 425.4 ppd 2402.9 ppd
TSS 736.2 ppd 2168.0 ppd
NH3 23.0 ppd 46.0 ppd
Organic Pesticide
Chemicals 0.541 ppd 30.05 ppd
D.O. 5.0 mg/I 5.0 mg/I
pH 6-9 6-9

Monsanto-NC0003719 4/19/93, Page 6
Outfall 01)3:
Incinerator - 0.030 MGD
(request that this outfall be retained although not currently being used)
Recommend using BPJ from existing permit:
EFFLUENT MONTHLY DAILY
CHARACTERISTIC AVERAGE MAXIMUM
BCD 5.0 ppd 10.0 ppd
TSS 67.0 ppd 134.0 ppd
NH3 1.0 ppd 2.0 ppd
CCD 40.0 ppd 80.0 ppd
Glyphosphate monitor monitor
pH 6-9 6-9

.002
ATMOSPHERE
.007 ,
ATMOSPHERE
988
0.
1.515
BACKWASH
POND
OOMESTIC
WATER
TREATMENT
SOFTENER
RIVER
WATER
INTAKE
BOILER
COOLING
TOWER
FIP.E
POND
ICIA
PROCESS
k/6u.Ni)
PROCESS
.012
SLOWDOWN
PROCESS
64.174
'.
PROCESS
COOLING
ATMOSPHERE
TECH.
PROCESS
A�l�li
x�GFa7r
.470
ATMOSPHERE
.989
SANITARY .075
.007
ATMOSPHERE
FORM{J .
PROCESS
.005 PRODUCT
.008
NOTE#2
INCINERATION
IORi6 JAL obi g'•,,G ca 7
ooZ
oc.k( 4ac - n
1;11-AK(I (: R4.1 k /'�0./e r
DISCHARGE
# 003
030
EFFLUENT
TREATMENT
.016
ATMOSPHERE
P-
.006
NOTE#1
SBR
# 1
NOTENI:TO BE OPERATED
AS NEEDED
NOTE#2: TO BE OPERATED
AS NEEDED
= SAMPLE POINT
DISCHARGE
4 002
.860
FINAL
OUTFALL
PROCESS WATER FLOW DISTRIBUTION
TO
RIVER

002
ATMOSPHERE
. .069
.007
ATMOSPHERE
►1.�
.988
1
BACKWASH
POND
!CIA
PROCESS
.234
DOMESTIC
WATER
TREATMENT
.107
W6ie.NM)
PROCESS
.049
.014
.090
DEMIN.
WATER
.012
SLOWDOWN
.02t
SOFTENER
.525
BOILER
.285
.216
.038
SLOWDOWN
PROCESS
.002
COOLING
TOWER
64.174
1.515
RIVER
WATER
INTAKE
FIRE
POND
64.174
.002
ATMOSPHERE
PROCESS
COOLING
SANITARY .075
.336
EFFLUENT
TREATMENT
.008
1
TECH.
PROCESS
.007
ATMOSPHERE
FORMV(.0fri0A
PROCESS
.008
.005 PRODUCT
.008
_1
.470
ATMOSPHERE
NOTE#2
INCINERATION
DISCHARGE
0 003
.030
.016
ATMOSPHERE
NOTE#1
SBR
0 2
SBR
01
J
NOTEO1: TO BE OPERATED
AS NEEDED
NOTE#2: TO BE OPERATED
AS NEEDED
DISCHARGE
0 002
.860
FINAL
OUTFALL
PROCESS WATER FLOW DISTRIBUTION
SAMPLE POINT
TO
RIVER

Monsanto
MONSANTO AGRICULTURAL COMPANY
A UNIT OF MONSANTO COMPANY
P.O. BOX 2307
FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28302
PHONE [phone]
March 4, 1992
Mr. M. Dale Overcash, P. E.
Supervisor, NPDES Permits
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. DEHNR
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Dear Mr. Overcash:
Monsanto Company Fayetteville, N. C., facility submits the attached application (3 copies),
together with the $400.00 processing fees, for consideration for an NPDES permit renewal
due September 30, 1992. The major differences from the present permit to the proposed
are highlighted as follows:
> Monsanto requests monitoring and limitations on outfall #002 only as
outlined on application Pages II-6 and 11-7.
> Monsanto requests the removal of outfall #001 monitoring requirements.
This outfall contains the noncontact blowdown streams --Cooling Tower
Blowdown, Boiler Blowdown, Demineralized Water Treatment Blowdown,
and Backwash Pond Blowdown. In the proposed scheme these will be routed
through the biotreatment system and discharged via outfall #002. Since these
will undergo treatment the "previous" outfall #001, as a noncontact outfall,
will no longer exist .
> Monsanto requests that the outfall #003, which is the effluent for the
Incineration Scrubber Unit, be retained in the permit. There are no inten-
tions of using the incinerator unless warranted by future regulatory require-
ments. Should an occasion to activate the incinerator arise, however, the local
DNR office will be notified.

DATE: March 12, 1992
ATTN: Dale Overcash
Three application packages are forwarded to you as follows:
1) 1st package contains one, copy plus a check
for $400.
2) 2nd package contains two copies.
Manhar Patel

Permit No. NC0003719
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Monsanto Company
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue the discharge of non -process water consisting of
wastewater from water treatment and neutralization facilities,
boiler blowdown and cooling tower blowdown at the point of the
existing discharge into the Cape Fear River (Outfall No. 001);
2. Continue to operate a domestic and industrial process wastewater
treatment facility (Outfall No. 002) (See Part III of this Permit);
3. Continue to operate a wastewater treatment system consisting of
pH control and filtration units installed to treat the effluent
from the glyphosate incinerator/wet wash scrubber system (Outfall
No. 003), except that the incinerator and this treatment system
need be run only as required to maintain compliance with the limits
of this permit; and
4. Discharge wastewater from said facilities and treatment works
through a common discharge pipe into the Cape Fear River, which
is classified Clas s."C" waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.
l
'
411.46.
\ O�

PRETREATMENT
1 MM (iAL.S.ROCESS8 WASTE
0.036 MM GALS
SPILL
BASIN
OIL
TANK
OIL
SKIMMER
& PH CONT
LIFT
STATION
CI-EMICAL
WASTE
SANITARY _
WASTE
►
* SBR
#1
1
T
SBA
#2
NUTRIENT
ADDITION
4 MM GALS.
EQUALIZATION
BASIN
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
BYPASS
.4 MM GALS.
AERATION
BASIN #E1
i
*
50 FT. DIA.
CLARIFIER
RETURN
SLUDGE
PUMPS
SUPERNATANT
1.0 MM GALS.
AERATION
BASIN #2
J
90 FT. DIA.
CLARIFIER
AEROBIC
DIGESTOR
FILTER
PUMP
STATION
SLUDGE
STORAGE
BASIN
i►
COMMINUTORS DRYING BEDS
MONSANTO WASTE TREATMENT PLANT
* PRESENTLY
NOT IN SERVICE
(NOT NEEDED)
CLORINATION
CHAMBER
METER
STATION
OUTFALL
TO CAPE
FEAR RIVER

Discharge 002
Section II
Item 216
No. 16 - Wastewater Characteristics
Item 216
The following list of chemicals further identifies compounds which may be present
in the discharge.
a) Ammonia may be added as a nutrient to the biological treatment plant and
may be present at low levels in sanitary wastewater. I will be neutral-
ized before discharge.
b) Calcium hydroxide may be used to neutralize and precipitate materials from
a waste stream. It will be neutralized before reaching the effluent.
c) Chlorine may be used to disinfect wastewater before discharge to meet
fecal coliform standard.
d) Formaldehyde is in the wastewater influent to the biotreatment system for
removal; however, virtually all of it is biodegradable.
e) Formic acid is in the wastewater sent to the biotreatment system for
removal.
f) Salts of phosphoric (and phosphorous) acid will be present in measurable
quantities, after neutralization, in the wastewater effluent because of
the nature of the manufacturing sources.
g)
Sodium hydroxide is used as a neutralizing chemical and its salts will be
in the wastewater effluent, such as a sodium phosphate.
h) Sulfuric acid, as a neutralized salt such as sodium sulfate, will be in
the wastewater effluent.
i) During chlorination trace quantities of cyanogen chloride have been
detected in the plant outfall.
Samples of the waste treatment effluent, outfall 002, were collected at
Monsanto's Fayetteville Plant, Fayetteville, North Carolina, during 1989, 1990
and 1991 by plant personnel. The samples were submitted to outside testing
agencies(*) for analyses.
The analytical results of the 002 outfall water samples are as follows:
(REF: See 26 - Additional Information.)
* David & Floyd, Inc. (1989, 1990)
Aqua Tech Environmental Consultants (1991)

•
Discharge 002
Section II
Item 217a
No. 17 - Description of Intake and Discharge
Item 217a
Influent water from the Cape Fear River is treated for solids removal by
coagulation, sedimentation, and filtration. Water is demineralized for process
needs using ion exchange. Zeolite softeners are used for boiler feedwater.
Drinking water is chlorinated.
Flow
The total daily intake from the Cape Fear River directly contributing to
discharge 002 is estimated at 1,515,000 gallons per day. The raw intake water
from the Cape Fear River is monitored periodically and has been characterized on
next page (Calgon Analytical Lab Report).
Samples of the influent streams to the waste treatment facility were collected
during 1989 for a period of six months on a once/month basis. These samples were
designated as CHEML, ICIA, FII and Victrex. These samples were collected and
analyzed by Davis & Floyd, Inc. under the influent evaluation program referred
to as the OCPSF sampling program.
Concurrent to the above OCPSF program, the total outfall was also analyzed for
an extended period of 12 months (once/month basis) during 1989/1990. The
analytical results of the influent and the effluent samples are submitted along
with this application under the following references: (See 26.)

i
SUBSIDIARY OF MERCK & CQ. INC.
WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION
P.O. BOX 1346
PITTSBURGH, PA 15230
[phone]
WATER ANALYSIS REPORT
CUSTOMER NAME: MONSANTO
LOCATION: CEDAR CREEK ROAD
FAYETTEVILLE NC
COPIES: ---
SPONSOR: REEDER
MAIL DROP: RALEIGH
SAMPLE NUMBER: 318655
DESCRIPTION: RIVER WATER
SAMPLE POINT: TREATMENT PLANT
DATE SAMPLED: 11/7/91 TIME SAMPLED: 12:45
PH @ 25C
P ALKALINITY
M ALKALINITY
CONDUCTIVITY
SUSPENDED SOLIDS
DISSOLVED SOLIDS
TOTAL SOLIDS
TURBIDITY
HYDROXIDE (OH)
CARBONATE (CO3)
BICARBONATE (HCO3) 39
AMMONIA (NH3) <0.05
FLUORIDE (F) 0.2
SILICA (Si02) 4.8
CHLORIDE (C1) 17
SULFATE (SO4) 25
ORTHO PHOSPHATE(PO4) 0.10
ORG. PHOSPHATE(PO4) <0.1
7.0
mg/L CaCO3
32 mg/L CaCO3
180 UN -NEUTRALIZED, umhos/cm
10 MG/L
120 MG/L
130 MG/L
7.0 NTU
CALCIUM (Ca)
MAGNESIUM (Mg)
SODIUM (Na)
POTASSIUM (K)
IRON (Fe)
COPPER (Cu)
MANGANESE (Mn)
ALUMINUM (Al)
ZINC (Zn)
NICKEL (Ni)
CHROMIUM (Cr04)
-MG/L-
TOTAL (MG/L)
6.0
1.8
25
<0.5
0.4
<0.05
0.05
<0.1
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
CALGON ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,
REPORTED: 11/26/91 RECEIVED:
APPROVED BY: KJG
11/13/91
21491A0

Discharge 002
Section II
Items 219a and 219c
No. 19 - Water Treatment Additives
Items 219a and 219c
NOTE: No biocides are used on site for treatment. Corrosion
inhibitor for cooling tower water is used. (*)
Calgon Additive Application Quantity (Lbs./Day)
(*) Conductor 6130 Corrosion Inhibitor 107
for cooling tower water
2005C Corrosion Inhibitor for 15
Chilled Water System
K-91, Sulfite Boiler Feedwater Treatment 16
NFL 125 Corrosion Inhibitor for 30
Condensate Return
(*) MSDS is attached on the following page.

-'7PN-18-1990 13:09 FROM CRLGONWMD
TO 79194334240 P.04
1ts6 zia:
•1
-4
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
CALGON CORPORATION
P.O. Box 1346
Pittsburgh, PA 15230-1346
24 Hour Emergency Telephone - - [phone]
10.1-G ON
wwOw,...0•.
SUB$*Ots►RY Or MERCK 6 CO..INC.
I. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCT NAME: Cond ctor 6130
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION: Scale and corrosion inhibitor
PRODUCT CLASS: Cooling water Product
I_I_. HAZARDOUS ING EDIENTS AND EXPOSURE LIMITS
Chemical Name
Potessit= polyphosphate
Potass.•r hydroxide
Socuum :alyitriazole
2 by
CALF W.it
6806-75•2 7
1310-S15-3 i
6460-57.2 3
*Test results on 30T aqueous solution.
•
Oral LDSO
l ram ti���
Not available
273 mg/kg
920 mg/kg (male)*
640 mg/kg (female)"
Dermal LIMO
(rabbit)
Not available
Not available
>Z a/ka
ACGIE TLv
Not listed
Ceiling 2 am3/m3
Not, listed
III. TYPICAL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
?OILING POINT: Not available
VAPOR PRESSURE: Not available
UNA DENSITY (air•1): Net available
t VOLAT/:.F. B' v7 ti'.• 70
APPEARANCZ AND ODOR: Clear. pale yellow liquid
SOLUBILITY IN WATER: Complete
sPDCIFIc RAVSTY: 1.26
pH: 12.3
FREEZING POINT: 130F
Iv. FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA
FLASK POINT: This product is not flammable or combustible.
EXTINGUTSUING MEDIA: Use extinguishing media appropriate for surrounding dire.
SPECIAL FIRE -FIGHTING PROCEDURESt Exercise caution when tighting any chemical fire.
apparatus and protective vlothias are essential.
A self-contained bxest:hina
UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Plaits toxic gases =der fire conditions. Closed containers may rupture or
explode due to steam pressure buildup when exposed to extreme heat.. Water
may be used to cool closed Containers.
NFPA RATINGS: Beelth • 3
Flammability • 0 Reactivity • 0
Special. Hazard • NONE
While this information and recommendations set forth herein are believed to be accurate as of the date hereof.
CA1.00)t CCRKWATION MAZES NO WARRANTY WITH RESPECT HERETO AND DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY FROM RELIANCE THEREON.
itSDS No.: 6X89-06-13-89
PAS, 10Edo
Date: 7/24/89

JAN-18-1990 13:10 FROM CALGDNWMD
TO 79194334240 P.05
V. REACTIVITY DATA_
CHEMICAL STADILITT: Stable
HAZARDOUS POL tIZATICR: Will not occur.
INCOMPATIBILITY: Strong oxidizers sod strap& acids.
HAZARDOUS DDGCMlOSTITC t PRODUCTS: Carbon monoxide. carbon dioxide. phosphorus acid**. potassium oxide. sodium
oxide. nitrogen oxides, hydrogen cyanide. sulfur oxides.
V I . _ _NEALTH_HAZARO DATA
PRIMARY ROUTES OF E1 TRY: Eye and skin contact. roses& ion. inhalation of mist or vapor.
TARGET C,R AI : Eyes. skin
MEDICAL CCODITIQCS AGGRAVATED EY EXPOSURE: This product may aggravate existing skin and/or eye conditions
on contact.
May cause severs eye and skin dsmsae.
May ho harmful if swallowed.
May cause respirstory tract irritation.
EFFECTS of OVEREXPOSURE:
ACUTE
EYE CONTACT: May cause severe eye damage upon contact.
SKIN CONTACT: This product may ;medusa burns upon contact with the skin. The severity of the burn is
generally determined by the conosntxation of the solution and the duration of the
exposure.
ENGdSTIO'R: It swallowed. this product may cause chemical burns to the mouth. throat and
;astrointsstinal tract.
INVALATTCN: This product is su aqueous solution and would not be expected to present an inhalation
hazard unless nists or vapors arse worsted. Inhalation of potassium hydroxide mist can
cause mild ixxitstics at 2 ms/m . Sever burns and damaoe could occur at higher
cancsntratioas and pneumeMtta can result from severe exposures to potassium hydroxide
mist.'
SUNCERORIC_CZITC
io applicable saformatien was found concerning err/ potential health effects resulting from subchroeic
or chronic exposure to the product.
OM: 110
IAiiC: No
cam tie
HMIS RATINGS: Health • 3 Flammability • 0 Reactivity • 0
Personal Protective Equipment • to be supplied by veer depending on Ilse conditions
MOOS No.: 6li8I-06-33-U
Page 2 of • Date: 7/24/00

t
•
VII. APPLICABLE CONTROL MEASURES
APPROPRIATE EYGZE1IC PRACTICES: Do not get in eyes. on skin or clothing.
Avoid bresthins mist or vapor.
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT:
EYE PROTECTION: Chemical splash goggles and full face shield
SKIN PROTECTION: Chemical resistant glows and protective clothing
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: If airborne concentrations became irritating or exceed published exposure limits.
use a NIOSB approved respirator in accordance with OSHA respiratory protection
requirements :29 Cut 1910.124).
WCEK PRACTICES: Eye wash station end safety shower should be accessible in i:>mediate area.
EANDLING AND STORAGE PRECAUTIONS: Use with adequate ventilation.
Keep container Closed when not in use.
Wash thoroughly alter bundling.
£NGINEERIIIG CONTROLS: Use local exhaust ventilation: where mist or spray may be generated.
VIII. FIRST AID
EYE OON1ACT: In case of contact. immediately flush eyes with plenty of water for at least 2$ minutes. Seek
medical aid immediately..
SKIN CONTACT: In case of contact. immediately flush skin with plenty of welter for at least 1S minutes while
removing contaminated clothing and shoes. Seek medical aid immediately. wash clothing helots
reuse.
INiGlSTION: If swallowed, do NOT induce vomiting. Give large quantities of water. Seek medical aid
immediately. !fever give anything by mouth to an unconscious person.
INHALATION: IS inhaled and irritation or difficulty in breathing occurs. remove to fresh sir. Seek medical
aid if irritation or discomfort persists.
lX. SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURIS/WASTE DISPOSAL
STEPS TO S£ TAKEN If MATZRIAL IS RELEASE OR SPILLED: Wearing appropriate personal protective equipment.
contain spill, collect onto inert absorbent and piece into suitable container.
WASTE DISPOSAL: Dispose of in accordance with local, state and federal rssulation$.
Do not allow to contaminate sewers and water sources.
ENVERCDENTAL DATA:
Although the principal problem of phosphates in the environment is not direotly related
to human health. there is considerable concern about the effects of phosphorus tres
various sources on Mates quality. Phosphate is s major cause of the eutrophication
process in lakes and ponds.
X. REGULATORY STATUS
TSCA STATUS: The ingredients of this product are listed on the Toxic Substances Control Act (ISCA)
Chemical Substances Inventory.
!CDS No.: 6X09-06-13.$9
Pose S of Date: 7/24/SS

X. REGULATORY STATUS (continued)
RCRA STATUS: This product as sold would be considered a RCM Hazardous Waste based or
corrosivity, the EPA Basatdous Waste Humber is 0002.
CERC A reportable quantity of EPA
hazardous substances in product:
Chemical al Potassium bydsde
PA • 1000
SARA ?22I2 III:
notify EPA of product spilla
exceeding 25.000 pounds.
8eot10a 302 Extsesesly Hazardous $ubstaacest Moue
Section 311 and 312 Health and Physical Bawds:
Immediate Dllsied ?ire Pressure Reactivity
(yes/ trio 3 tsto 1 Eno l (no l
Station 313 Toxic Chemicals: Nona
DOT CLASs1TZCATIOM:
Hazard Class: Corrosive material
Proper shipping nese: Corrosive liquid. N.O.S. (potassium hydseaide)
ID number: UR 1760
Label: Corrosive
the characteristic of
PREPARED DY: P.J Malmo,
MS02 No.: 6X39.06.12•S9
Page a of s Date: 7126169
.�s
•
•
w• .alter