20202013 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20220513

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
0 No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
11/21/2021
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20202013 2
Is a payment required for this project?*
O No payment required
O Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Wilmington Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
What amout is owed?*
0 $240.00
O $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Holley Snider:eads\hasnider
la. Name of project:
Bridgewater Landing
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Kim Williams - Davey Resource Group
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
5/13/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Mullet Run
Basin
White Oak
Water Classification
SA; HQW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
34.415966
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-77.636820
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Pender
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes ONo

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
O Yes
O No
Please provide the date of the previous submission.*
12/1/2021
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
U Nationwide Permit (NWP)
O Regional General Permit (RGP)
O Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
O Yes 0 No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
OO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
O Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
O Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
OO Yes O No
0 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
OYes ONo
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
11. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
O Yes OO No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
0 Yes ® No
B. Applicant Information
0 Unknown
OYes 0O No
OYes 0O No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
Owl Owner 0 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Edens Lane LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Mary Catherine Santos

2d. Address
Street Address
60 Gregory Rd; Suite 1
Address Line 2
City
Belville
Postal / Zip Code
28451
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Kim Williams
4b. Business Name:
Davey Resource Group
4c. Address
Street Address
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
Address Line 2
City
Wilmington
Postal / Zip Code
28403
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Bridgewater Landing
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Hampstead
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
4214-14-4919-0000
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Edens Lane
Address Line 2
City
Hampstead
Postal / Zip Code
28443
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Mullet Run
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
SA; HQW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
2b. Property size:
86
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
White Oak

3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030203020402
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The applicant has begun construction on site. Site grading has occurred and roads have been installed. Home construction has begun. Several streams run through the site and also form
the southem project boundary. Some of these streams have adjacent wetlands. Three stream crossing have been installed. Adjacent land use is mostly undeveloped and forested, with
some residential and cleared fields.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
O Yes O No 0 Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
12.6
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
4340
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to construct a single family residential subdivision within the site to accommodate the housing needs of the area. Impacts to wetlands and streams are
needed to provide access throughout the site. Another wetland impact is needed for lot development.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The residential subdivision will contain a total of 139 single-family lots and an amenity area. Roads, utilities, stormwater ponds, and a pump station are also proposed. The limits of
disturbance will be cleared of vegetation. Roadways and utilities will be installed. Culverts will be utilized when crossing streams/wetlands and they will be buried per DWR and USACE
requirements. Culvert dimensions are noted in the attached drawings. Track hoe, loader, dump truck, bob cat, and other standard construction equipment will be used.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
* Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
Preliminary O Approved O Not Verified 0 Unknown 0 N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2021-00135
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Wes Fryar
DRG
0 Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
Tom Charles with the USACE issued the JD on July 6, 2021.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes O No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
pO Wetlands Streams -tributaries
0 Open Waters =1 Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
0 Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
1
Road Crossing
P
Riverine Swamp Forest
N/A
Yes
Both
0.037
(acres)

2
Road Crossing
P
Riverine Swamp Forest
N/A
Yes
Both
0.065
(acres)
3
Road Crossing
P
Riverine Swamp Forest
N/A
Yes
Both
0.090
(acres)
4
Lot Fill
P
Riverine Swamp Forest
N/A
Yes
Both
0.036
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.228
2i. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.228
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
Si
Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
UT of Mullet Run
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
68
(linear feet)
S2
Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
UT of Mullet Run
Perennial
Both
5
Average (feet)
74
(linear feet)
S3
Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
UT of Mullet Run
Perennial
Both
5
Average (feet)
72
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
214
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
214
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The applicant attempted to minimize impacts as much as possible. Crossings were placed at narrow wetland points and headwalls will be used to
minimize crossing widths. Wetland impact #4 could not be avoided because these lots are needed to make the project economically feasible. Driveway
crossings were considered, but the wetland area that would remain likely would not be sustainable.
tb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The developer has obtained stormwater and sedimentation and erosion control permits. Headwalls will be used.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
U Yes J No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
O DWR 1 Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
kzi Mitigation bank 0 Payment to in -lieu fee program OO Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Northeast Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Riparian wetland 0.4
Stream 428

3c. Comments
In addition to the mitigation credits, the applicant will restore 0.022 acre of wetlands and 76 LF of stream per the restoration plan that is enclosed with
this PCN.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan including mitigation credits generated.
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
0 Yes J No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes O No
If no, explain why:
Site is located within the White Oak River Basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
OYes 0No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
OYes ONo
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
O Yes O No
O N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
O Local Govemment G' State
State Stormwater Programs
O Phase II
❑ HWQ or ORW
Comments:
The project engineer has obtained a stormwater permit.
G. Supplementary Information
D Coastal Counties
D Other
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
O Yes O No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
O Yes O No
2b Provide an explanation of the violation(s):
DWR issued a NOV on 3/9/22 for unauthorized stream and wetland impacts (NOV-2022-PC-0079). This PCN, restoration plan, and proposed mitigation
are expected to resolve this NOV.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
O Yes O No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project will not provide access or utilities to adjacent tracts. No additional impacts are anticipated on the site.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)

4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
C�Yes 0No0N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Site will tie into municipal wastewater treatment system.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
O Yes O No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act impacts?*
O Yes O No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
O Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0Yes ®No
O No 0 Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S
OYes 0No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0Yes ®No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
0Yes ENo
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0Yes ONo
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program database was reviewed to determine if any rare species are known to occur on or near the site. According to their
files, no federally listed species are known to occur within the site. There is one occurrence of the federally listed American alligator within a one mile
radius of the site. Interior streams on site appear to be too small to provide suitable habitat for this species. Mullet Run, which forms the southern project
boundary, may provide suitable habitat. The USFWS IPaC database was also reviewed and several species were identified as potentially occurring in
the region. Many of these species require coastal and/or marine habitat and would not be found within the site. The site has been cleared of timber
several times over the years. Forested uplands currently support a mix of hardwoods and pines in the canopy and a dense shrub layer and are unlikely
to provide suitable habitat for the RCW. Wetlands support a dense assemblage of hardwoods. Forested areas within the site may provide suitable
roosting habitat for the northern long-eared bat. Since no hibernacula or maternity roosting trees are known to occur in the area, any adverse effect from
tree clearing would be exempt by the 4(d) rule. The site does not appear to provide suitable habitat for any other species known to occur in the area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
O Yes J No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Site is adjacent to Mullet Run. No impacts to this resource will occur. Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan will be implemented.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
_, Yes 0 No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS mapping resource was used to determine the presence of known cultural or historic resources.
No cultural or historical resources were noted within or adjacent to the site. However, Pender County notified the landowner of potential grave sites
within the tract. These graves were located via ground penetrating radar and have been avoided with the site plan.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Map Service Center Website
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Bridgewater Landing Attachments Rev 05-13-22.pdf 17.19MB
File must be PDF or KMZ

Comments
Signature
Z By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kim Williams
Signature
%r6
Date
5/13/2022

DAVEY
Resource Group
TO: Tom Charles
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
May 12, 2022
Holley Snider
NC Division of Water Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Bridgewater Landing; Pender County, NC
NWP 29 Application
Action ID# SAW-2021-01559
Dear Tom and Holley:
On behalf of Edens Lane, LLC, Davey Resource Group is submitting a Pre -Construction Notification form
and associated attachments for the Bridgewater Landing subdivision, located off Edens Lane in
Hampstead, NC. The purpose of the project is to construct a residential subdivision within the tract to
serve the housing needs of Pender County.
As you know, NCDWR issued a Notice of Violation on March 9, 2022 for unauthorized stream and wetland
impacts within the site (NOV-2022-PC-0079). This PCN and restoration plan are being submitted to resolve
this NOV. To mitigate for unauthorized impacts to approximately 290 linear feet of streams and 0.181
acres of 404 wetlands, the applicant proposes to restore 76 LF of stream and 0.022 acres of wetlands and
obtain Section 404/401 permits for 214 LF of stream and 0.228 acres of wetland impact. Additionally, the
applicant will purchase 428 LF of stream and 0.4 acre of wetland mitigation credits from the Northeast
Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank (credits expected to be available within the next 30 days).
If you have any questions, or would like to discuss the application, please do not hesitate to call.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl.
www.Imgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403

Bridgewater Landing
Pender County
PCN Attachments
Table of Contents
1.0 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
2.0 RESTORATION PLAN
3.0 SITE PLAN DRAWINGS
4.0 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
5.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION
NC Natural Heritage Program Letter
USFWS IPaC List

1.0 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

41_,MG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAYEY. company
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Uwe, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group to act as our agent in the
determination of jurisdictional wetland boundaries and Section 401 Section 404 permitting on
the subject property, Edens Lane Property . By way of this form, I. we additionally
authorize access to the site by representatives of the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or the NC
Division of Coastal Management for the purpose of reviewing the flagged wetland boundary and
providing a final jurisdictional determination. Any questions regarding the jurisdictional wetland
determination should be directed to Land Management Group A Davey Company.
Please provide the following information:
Property Address and Parcel ID Number: _Off Edens Lane, Hampstead, NC 28443: 4214-14-
4919-0000
Current Property Owner Name: Edens_Lane LLC
Owner Address, Phone Number, & Email Address: 60 Gregory Road, Suite 1, Belville, NC
28451: attn: mew -St ,i 910 2 4-1-959.
t,,,SroJA . S lounlAOng' • Cann ID a 3 a - (,7a D IAo 5644r
Notice: This authorization, for liability & professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials
to enter the property when accompanied by Land Management Group staff. Please call LMG to arrange a
site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Leo,,„
Print Owner's Name
Owner's S tT ature
1 5
Date
v►ww.Imgroup.net • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403

2.0 RESTORATION PLAN

BRIDGEWATER LANDING
RESTORATION PLAN
Edens Lane
Hampstead, NC
Pender County
Prepared By:
DAVEY*.
Resource Group
Prepared For:
Edens Lane, LLC
Action ID# SAW-2021-00135
DWR Project No. 20202013
MAY 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION Error! Bookmark not defined.
2.0 SITE HISTORY Error! Bookmark not defined.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2
4.0 CROSSING INFORMATION 2
4.1 Crossing #1 2
4.2 Crossing #2 3
4.3 Crossing #3 3
5.0 PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION METHODS 4
6.0 PROPOSED MONITORING 4
LIST OF FIGURES & APPENDICES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3. Aerial Photograph
Figure 4. USACE-Approved Wetland Map
Figure 5. Wetland Map Showing Approximate Location of 5 Crossings
Figure 6. Crossing #1: Existing Conditions
Figure 7. Crossing #1: Proposed Conditions
Figure 7a. Crossing #1 Profiles
Figure 8. Crossing #2: Existing Conditions
Figure 9. Crossing #2: Proposed Conditions
Figure 10. Crossing #3: Existing Conditions
Figure 11. Crossing #3: Proposed Conditions
Figure 11a. Crossing #3 Profiles
Appendix A. Site Photos
Appendix B. Retaining Wall Plans

BRIDGEWATER LANDING
RESTORATION PLAN
PENDER COUNTY, NC
Action ID# SAW-2021-00135
DWR Project No. 20202013
MAY 2022
1.0 Introduction
In order to mitigate for unauthorized impacts to approximately 290 linear feet of streams and
0.181 acres of 404 wetlands within the Bridgewater Landing Subdivision, Edens Lane, LLC
proposes to restore 76 LF of stream and 0.022 acres of wetlands and obtain Section 404/401
permits for 214 LF of stream and 0.228 acres of wetland impact. Additionally, the applicant will
purchase 428 LF of stream and 0.4 acre of wetland mitigation credits from the Northeast Cape
Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank (credits expected to be available within the next 30 days). This
site consists of 86 acres and is located off Edens Lane in Hampstead, NC (Pender County) (Figures
1-3).
2.0 Site History
A Sedimentation and Erosion Control Permit was obtained for the project in 2021. The site plan
attached to this plan was an outdated version that included five stream/wetland crossings. The
developer has assumed that Section 404/401 permits had also been secured and contractors
installed the five road crossings that impacted streams and/or wetlands. It was discovered that
permits had not been obtained and Davey Resource Group, Inc. (DRG) submitted a Section
404/401 permit application for the project on December 1, 2021. A site inspection conducted by
NC Division of Water Resources staff determined that the project had impacted wetlands and
streams without a permit and that the installed configuration did not match the site plan
submitted with the application. A Notice of Violation was issued to Edens Lane, LLC on March 9,

2022 (NOV-2022-PC-0079). Additionally, the 401 Water Quality Certification application was
denied (DWR Project # 20202013).
3.0 Existing Conditions
The site consists of 86 acres and is located off Edens Lane in Hampstead, NC (Pender County)
(Figures 1-3). Several streams run through the site and along the southern project boundary
(Figure 4). Swamp forest wetlands exist adjacent to most of these streams and support hardwood
species such as red maple (Acer rubrum), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua).
Adjacent land use is mostly undeveloped and forested, with some residential and cleared fields.
As noted above, five wetland/stream crossings were installed within the site (Figure 5). Two of
these crossings (#4 and #5) are not needed and have since been removed and stabilized with jute
matting (Appendix A). Three other road crossings remain in place (Crossings #1 - #3 on site plan;
Appendix B). All three of these crossings are currently stabilized with several layers of silt fence.
These crossings will be needed within the subdivision to provide access and utilities to the
planned lots. Therefore, the developer proposes to restore sections of the unauthorized impacts
at each crossing and apply for Section 404/401 permits for unavoidable impacts. See below for
information about current conditions and proposed restoration efforts at each crossing.
4.0 Crossing Information
4.1 Crossing #1
Based on survey information and data collected by DRG in early 2021, the natural stream
channel at Crossing #1 is approximately five feet wide. The contractor installed two 24"
culverts and an approximate 45-ft wide dirt road at this location. Some rip rap was also
installed at the downstream end of the culverts. When installing the culverts and the road,
the contractor excavated the existing stream channel to between 20 — 25' wide both
upstream and downstream of the crossing (Figure 6). Total unauthorized impacts at this
location are 106 LF of stream and 0.045 acre of wetlands.

A recent survey concluded that the culverts were installed too deep. The applicant plans to
remove this road crossing and reinstall the two 24" culverts to the correct elevations (as
noted on the site plan). The culverts will be buried 5". Riprap will be installed at the
downstream side of the culvert and will be embedded in the substrate as to not impede
aquatic organism passage. Approximately 38 LF of stream and 0.008 acre of adjacent
wetlands will be restored (Figure 7). The proposed road crossing will permanently impact
68 LF of stream and 0.037 acres of wetlands. A Section 404/401 permit application will be
submitted for this impact.
4.2 Crossing #2
The natural stream channel at Crossing #2 is approximately 5 feet wide. The contractor
installed two 36" culverts and a 45' wide dirt road at this crossing. Some rip rap was also
installed downstream of the culverts. Similar to Crossing #1, the contractor excavated the
existing stream channel to between 20 — 25' wide both upstream and downstream of the
crossing (Figure 8). The length of widening is between 20 LF and 25 LF at each location.
Total unauthorized impacts at this location are 97 LF of stream and 0.06 acre of wetlands.
The engineer recently determined that these culverts are undersized. The applicant plans
to remove this crossing and replace with three 48" culverts. One culvert will be installed
within the stream channel and will be buried 9.6". The other two culverts will be raised 1.6'
onto the stream banks to accommodate high flow events. Riprap will be installed at the
downstream side of the culvert and will be embedded in the substrate as to not impede
aquatic organism passage. Approximately 23 LF of stream will be restored (Figure 9). Note
that areas immediately upstream and downstream of the culverts will remain open to allow
water to pass through the culverts. The proposed road crossing, culverts, and rip rap will
impact 74 LF of stream and 0.065 acres of wetlands. A Section 404/401 permit application
will be submitted for this impact.
4.3 Crossing #3
The natural stream channel at Crossing #3 is approximately 5 feet wide. The contractor
installed three 24" culverts and a 45' wide dirt road at this crossing. Some rip rap was also

installed downstream of the culverts. The contractor excavated the existing stream channel
approximately 17' wide both upstream and downstream of the crossing (Figure 10). The
length of widening is between 13 LF and 17 LF at each location. Total existing impacts at
this location are 87 LF of stream and 0.076 acre of wetlands.
Similar to Crossing #2, the engineer recently determined that these culverts are undersized.
The applicant plans to remove this crossing and replace with three 48" culverts. One culvert
will be installed in the 5' wide stream channel and will be buried 9.6". Two culverts will be
placed in adjacent wetlands to capture high flow events. Riprap will be installed at the
downstream side of the culvert and will be embedded in the substrate as to not impede
aquatic organism passage. Approximately 15 LF of stream and 0.014 acre of wetlands will
be restored (Figure 11). The proposed road crossing, culverts, and rip rap will impact 72 LF
of stream and 0.09 acres of wetlands. A Section 404/401 permit application has been
submitted for this impact.
5.0 Proposed Stream/Wetland Restoration Methods
At each of the three crossings discussed above, stream and wetland restoration work will occur.
Prior to performing restoration activities, the contractor will ensure that silt fencing is secure.
Additionally, rock check dams will be installed downstream of the restoration work. First -order
stream channel restoration of pattern, profile, dimension, and riparian floodplain bench is
proposed. The existing channel and riparian floodplain bench have been excavated for the
installation of road crossings and culverts. Restoration activities are proposed for 76 linear feet
of stream and 0.014 acres of riparian wetlands, encompassing Impact areas #1 - #3. Proposed
restoration activities of the stream channel include the restoration of the natural channel
dimension, profile, and plan form. Elevation of the channel bed and reconnection of the stream
to the adjacent floodplain will re-establish characteristic riparian wetland hydrology. Channels
and the natural vegetated riparian buffer will be restored to pre -construction contours. Organic
material that was removed from these areas is currently stockpiled on site and will be used to
restore the channels. Restored stream banks and adjacent wetlands will be planted on a 6'
spacing with characteristic and native wetland species as those found in adjacent areas. Typical
wetland species include wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), gallberry (Ilex glabra), fetterbush (Lyonia

Iucida), cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda), and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum). Note that
specific species to be planted will be based on nursery availability. Stream banks will be planted
with black willow (Salix nigra) live stakes. Seed matting and stabilization will be installed to
provide for the temporary stabilization of newly constructed areas. Jute/coir fiber matting (no
plastic) will be installed along the restored stream banks and left in place indefinitely. Sediment
was noted within areas up to approximately 50' downstream of the channels and will be removed
with shovels and hauled to uplands using buckets. Silt fencing and check dams will be removed
once the areas are stabilized.
6.0 Proposed Monitoring
Restored areas will be monitored for stability and after heavy rain events until the area has
stabilized. Any failure of the stream and/or riparian floodplain bench will be addressed
immediately. Additional monitoring will occur every three months after construction for a total
of one year (4 monitoring events) to ensure stream banks are stable and to document plant
survival. A letter will be submitted to the NCDWR and USACE after each monitoring event and
will include a summary of findings and photo documentation of stream and wetland restoration
areas. It is expected that these restored areas will be stable and vegetated at the end of the one-
year monitoring period.

FIGURES

lofF
f
""1,
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User
Community, Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors
L:\WETLANDS\2020 WETLANDS FILES\LMG20.121 ---
Edens Lane Property, Logan Developers\Maps
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: GIS World Street Map Layer
N 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
A Feet
Scale applies to 11X17" print.
Bridgewater Landing
Pender County, NC
tLNIG
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Map Date: January 2021
LMG20.121
LAN!] MANA(FMFNT GROUP
OAVEY' company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

L:\WETLANDS\2020 WETLANDS FILES\LMG20.121 ---
Edens Lane Property, Logan Developers\Maps
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: USGS Topsail Topographic Quad
N 0 350 700 1,400
A Feet
Scale applies to 11X17" print.
Bridgewater Landing
Pender County, NC
Map Date: January 2021
LMG20.121
41,MG
LAN!] MANAGEMENT GROUP
DAVEA company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Figure 2
Topographic Map

•
49. ' . 1 .41 :, . .: .,• .1 . IA. ' re. . ..., • • • - - I' d
.._. . , ,•_•,e . . . , .
_ ..
'.. '..-••.•?L.!..•1•v•4•../1,I1 1111'1.:1:5•.;•.4 s.'4•'4 4';r:I*.V.i.4
i, ; • .# .r f
Project . ' , . "e ' ' - ''41 Is
Area A • `x.
' illil . . ' It.* it .. 4!..'
:- • - , 4
F.
4
. ...... ... . , • ,. ,•••••
• . .. . „, Li
, . • . . .. ... ..._• .
4,,.. •
. . ... , . .
.4,4 • " • •, , I • • • , „,...; . •
• .
... . , . . . ., . ..
,„. . r .4. • \ - .
. lip1 ;,G. .
ti #jeLF •• I rs*
. .,... . ,,,,. I. ,,,7\ . •'. li . .‘ . --... ,•- :
p.. '' lkilik'. '
'`i'''• r Si Itijkligik .. VV. „.. `,. " .. \ e
it
• V11:- .
I
IP/
,I , _ -A
\ ,.'. . • ' \ ? .
•
' * �* • P0.t.ftlki
,,,
i s
•
— k' ifql*F4 k -. fir/' A
•
• . .....,..., 0# r
f". . W. ' . . .144'S' ? 4 '.„ .
+ 4
i d E 1'. Ai rt.•:. 1. "Or
....... ai ... .2. .. .1:1;I:.. tijAietiLik-w: r.o.r. ii:f . I' 1111. •04P /
•i •••• , ;OA;V. IS k-r -.. . ' . .../.. A., , .4r. ',AA . - .. .. .-
/fib '. ri .. ei Y� " y `i {� ,T� - ,' �+•{``, Ill' I' '4
•
\ • sr- j t ,�. + ' 1, r' *f�t .i
ap.
•
i - L ' °' j` fir' ♦ *'
. , „ Ilk
+' . I. 4 . . i'.V S‘ r 'filk r.{:
' . '-'-'.--, * ..1.1111r, i. 4. '1 ....':' . Illpt: . . .
\.%,...• v.?:i...: ip. .... , ' .. 4 ik . . ..".. ..
• ' ;it 4144•41.1511• - .4. d 1.4..... !di,:b 4.,;11 IP) fr •
, ir,,,. ..,.!ItiV ' 4 -Ai, it
i . ' ., iiit&• rri si • ' ; -,.. -:y4). -...-' ...p.'" .„.• 7,---.,, • i.
,• . : k -•' ''..:‘ ' . •
°:, * i =
• .. hC ' C -C & o C � b - S �o -G-oe @REI oto
.... X'. It
� o03G I 03110.0. Co 4.�0 tE c No (4,o e s o • } #
L:\WETLANDS\2020 WETLANDS FILES\LMG20.121 -- N 0 250 500 1,000
Edens Lane Property, Logan Developers\Maps Feet
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2016 GIS World Imagery Layer Scale applies to 11X17" print.
Bridgewater Landing tLMG
Pender County, NC Figure 3
LAN!]MANA1 FMFNT GROUP
Ma Date: January 2021 OAVEY' company Current Aerial
V rY 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG20.121 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

•
This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered '"` =; r::,
approximate. This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field • . � , x
notes.A survey of delineated areas and review and approval by the US . • . �, _J1F} -- . w' .• �, 4 " ' : .'tti.' • :.
Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific site .rt .::,. f+ ..,. _ .., " _, ;'`;` • :'4 - .. :, r tiyy° �ry' .r;:` • '3,.'
planning. ,.t: - ; • .- • ,.mot .:. _, r.; ' rr ; K -.• :,• r." . ,_- .
.:: • '4;9.,•• • -..••'.• ...d.•••,4107-.:Ifitk-::.:1..•T.::::...•t•.. .-e.-st.t.4..
. ;••--...:.v.. e e...;.,, .
4.
. } +M T - :
., s- t y n""' ce ..;_-_
•
•
�6 '}' 1... 5 Sr. ' .
• s}. ".• r' is • �. .. _ .: 411 • }F1.
•
' i1 k- * t _ .Fly' 'L ?!„ '` ;`yA.i4f>11f.jr. '`;r,. "1P '•- •' ' - `;.. - 'v . :
vki.
•
•''.• :i.
::-•. .
� _ ��� . { � : �. .. _ • • _ri. • .a air ;4 .
•
•
ijTJ
} . .. ��.t o :.. :ct : , 4wy .ti5 i,l. . . k - Y
•
r iir; { 'r.. t, i . ' "'7ti:' ? :'fir ;, •• • ' .ie¢:. g fi, {.• 4'
F
•
, '
a •
; :rCD19ttP337', � �,
: R +-
~
49
•CD9 r L'. = 1' ''
41,j h 4 J '+a i 1L _ t ac, , t; .•
T v~'
01.
•
CD1 CA41 • lir w f ;;
•
CA23 C�115 ttPL L. as ' 4. •
• CA80 CA98 CA116 tt PL{ • '' , $• w,4t
CA1 t CA123 tt PL ' . • :ti.•'�"ft ''
'r..... • .1\tr -: -:.;.:: :.-.7,.....g.
•
• _ .`: - •
V }':fix. `
; k -0 a •_ ... -. ' ` CB50
• CB71 CB75 tt PL
., ,.:' CB30 . .
•
t.
4. "' P305 'w ..
•
•
•
' :ice _„ ,. - P30'
•,�1�'• T • G7 i. �',' • "''y .- 4'.^' 54t. '2.: . 'fir • • _ 'ti
• '. Z.S 2't _. i d F , " ' k+ x.'.Y4 �{ • Y °_- _ :Jla y
- . ' ": .op. •"` #;'.' fr' CC24 tt P336 :k � , ..
h r' • h k .,k• .,4:t / .,3 V J�T Y.sl4 2
• .. }' ' _�, ' •iY .4.•.`,+. 1... • 4: _, t •
•.• _ . k - _.rye -'".Le..}' - _ ,...
•
`#•• -'k Li v k"'; •':CC1 tt PL ' P2• -•-al _.-..-. P266 •
•
* 1t. ,. x �: f :• :r# `: "'. ;"«:{ V :fv P15 .
•
•
. a f,' P24e . .
67
16
•
.
. s y ; _ ' - v. err • k P110 r . .I:, P1 P130 P100•
Legend " r P156
y. __mow 4^,�
Boundary - 87.7 ac �• ;: : +,, : Y ,~t •.* : :'
a -• .. ;
Uplands - 75.1 ac (86%) :. �"`_ t �`
_.., .:::_: Wetlands 12.6 ac (14%)
x tip. .'' t !: ,
Perennial Stream 3,800 L.F. t _ • - . • #;••
Intermittent Stream - 540 L.F. • • , ' •°' • , � { ' ` ;:- •.,.'-; _xn -1
-1-,-„ Waters of the US (RPW) ^' 700 L.F. . i r d r - -`
-,-,-„ Non-Jurisdictional Ditch ^' 1 ,600 L.F. • , • ' • - `*."} = ':
Wetland Line Off Property •_ :- -.: ' • .. .° ' k
'.. •.•�. ;'•' :- .P:,.• ':, day: r,,
O Data Points _; : .y .�;� . . ' . ;. ..: n ; . ;.:.�7,...,,
�- �r-: �,�r1�' Esn;HERE��rGarmin, (c)OpenStreetMap,con'•b
.er�Y�t � ? ti ff.‘„••••••ii
N 0 250 500 1 000
L:\WETLANDS\2020 WETLANDS FILES\LMG20.121 --- Edens Lane Property, Logan Developers\Maps Feet
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2016 NC OneMap Aerial Photography Scale applies to 11X17" print.
Bridgewater Landing ZLMG
Pender County, NC Figure 4. USACE Approved
lAND MANAGEMENT GROUP Wetland Delineation Map
Ma Date: 04/24/2020 a omrrEY company
p 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG20.121 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

•
•
This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered '" • •.J�' 'r:�
approximate. This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field .4,!..J10.
• ..., .
notes.A survey of delineated areas and review and approval by the US • . � JtF} -- . w' �, 4 "
Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific site .rt .::,. f+ ..,. _ .., " _, ;'`; • :'4 , tiyy° ry' r;:` '�>'
planning. ,.t: - ; . r.; ' •te• r,;w K ,..:,., . " . ,_- .
00
l'r
•
.to 1" - IV k:
s <y n-"' • ice "';_--
•
•
' • . 11 k- * . _• .Fly' 'L ?!„ ' ;`yA.i Jr>�f.1r. '` r,. • •o-i `•'- •:• •'6.,..4v4.,.
1 • - `;s. - 'v -° •
.
•
e.
•
� _ • .�. . { � • :K •
� .. _ _ri.
air.i;4 .
-rr '
F •
=. * :r, aye { ' •:T :.
.:tr-yam`- 'lam "t .' • • ♦ ,' - - s •ir:'•: `
14042400.
•
\__ 444 , ...
, , _:A. \ ....
•
Cros - - " . . ,
•
STl: �r � S, � , f. _ - y � f'}' F �a*-'�..: v'\^�.. .44..,.-:!.:.--:%:::9;:::?!.....:"..;::. {�} L ka
: ,„:. r- • a" _ • .Crossing : :. -.
•
Y , , , ,. ;{�' Crossing 5:Removed .\•
; `
• • . - . .
•
Walk
•
•
•
,,..- _ _, i' • u! .. k = r'' .e x'. 7 L •,- ti ,r`
: .:. ,_: ... _... ..., ..le,• •,..-;!..% 4. ... ••.. ••• -.•,...•.*9...7.1i:•.. •'‘.7. r ....C 4,_ :::%:4.-e..,... : ••.- .1":.-'54, -
Greer 1 , .:.i. ' .t# '- { .. - 'p24
•
9.
•
•
;'::•I. -R' }.,.Ir.. ., .* i t • 3. r ry ?- ,r 'l _,4_,
. ...
k x i ,,..,, .. . i ... . ,a - P130 P100
V.
4 .. 'Le
..
} *A.4,,yi' '.i .': . r.;1�. '"..' J¢ ,.: r . P 150 • .:�,.;::x
•
LQ Q t 1 r:v r--'- ,M1
egend " r qa., P156
Boundary 87.7 ac '- . V.c.
•Uplands - 75.1 ac (86%) ... �,"�. M14 `
_.., .:::_: Wetlands 12.6 ac •(14%)
x tip. .'' 't !:x.,
Perennial Stream - 3,800 L.F. t _ . . • #;°
'> r .
•
Intermittent Stream - 540 L.F. • , , ' °' xn ;'
-1-,-„ Waters of the US (RPW) ^' 700 L.F. �.. r d r - -`
-,-,-- Non-Jurisdictional Ditch ^' 1 600 L.F. • • '� - `*''} - = '':
•
•
Wetland Line Off Property _ : ' .. .°.'. k f: . yn:rr. . +.
.ti :.. r_
.�. ;' :,. OK:-
.,,,..., ',:.:''=day: ',,
Road Crossings •
:{'y . :,� .•°, ;. r ..: n ; •
• .•: '<.";.
g {- `;••r r: :, �,..z.; : 'n 11. Esn;NERE;rGa'rmin, enStreetMap,con'„b' o .
� .. � .. � � �._.�
N 0 250 500 1 000
L:\WETLANDS\2020 WETLANDS FILES\LMG20.121 --- Edens Lane Property, Logan Developers\Maps Feet
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2016 NC OneMap Aerial Photography Scale applies to 11X17" print.
Bridgewater Landing
Pender County, NC Z LMG Figure 5. Road Crossings
LANE]MANAGEMENT GROUP Overlaid On Wetland Map
April 2022 a nmrEYl company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
(Crossings 4 & 5 Removed)
LMG20.121 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

Excavated Area
w w w w
FM FM
cS
FM FM
nc
nauthorized Stream Impact:
106 LF
1—
w
1-
w
nauthorized Wetland Impacts:
D.A4,acre
w
FM
w w w
FM
xcavated Area
SS
FM FM —
— — Unauthorized Stream Impact: 106 LF
Unauthorized Wetland Impact: 0.045 ac
— Excavated Area
■■■ Existing Culvert
PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Survey and site plan information provided by:
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
Pender County, NC
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Figure 6. Existing Conditions: Crossing #1

Proposed Stream Impact: 18 LF
Proposed Wetland Impact: 0.037 ac
— Excavated Area
I\\N
Proposed Restoration Area (447 sf)
— Proposed Headwall
■ ■ ■ Proposed Culvert
xcavated Area
PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Survey and site plan information provided by:
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
Pender County, NC
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Figure 7. Proposed Crossing #1

1A
404 Wetland Line
Excavated Area
32
30
28
J
26
24
22
IA'
32
Proposed
Restoration
Areas (317 s
30
28
.f.)
26
20
0+00
Ai proximate Exist ng Grade
0+10
24
22
0+20
20
0+30
SCALE: 1" = 5'
J
L7
404 Wetland Line
11-1 Excavated Area
\,
32
32
30
j
30
j
Proposed
1
28
Restoration
28
1
1
I
26
Areas
(130 s.f.)
26
24
24
22
22
20
- _:.
-.-.._
20
/
0+10
Approximate Existing Grade
0+30
PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Survey and site plan information provided by:
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
SCALE: 1" = 8'
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
Pender County, NC
Figure 7a. Proposed Crossing #1 Profiles

■III■III■III■III■III■III
--------------
4
\. ,
A
'
a _\
' estorationArea
(317 sf)
=III■III■III■III■III■III
III■III■III■III■III■
gt1p-.
Excavated Area 1 A —
1 i1 1
�1nn1
- 11n1
R1111
110
1
III■III■
ty .
eA •
ktt.\,\•\•\•
i�'
.t \ \ \
fIIIIIIIIII-H-IIIIII IIIIII
\\\.
_' \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \ ` \
WHEW
III■III■IIIUIII■III■III■III■IIII
�fIIIIIIIIII HE -Hi �-----
'! y _> O_1
-----------------------
1
13'
111
1
1
1
1
xcavated Area
UM
VII
1 134:
,lo,
ReatQration Area %;,
wimmin
ami
I
I
I
'i
y
1(130 sf) i 1
I
it
1 #
I �
I
I i
Proposed Stream Impact: 68 LF
Proposed Wetland Impact: 0.037 ac
— Excavated Area
I\\N
Proposed Restoration Area (447 sf)
Proposed Headwall
mum Proposed Culvert
PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Survey and site plan information provided by:
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
Pender County, NC
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Figure 7. Proposed Crossing #1

Unauthorized Stream Impact:
1
— — Unauthorized Stream Impact: 97 LF
Unauthorized Wetland Impact: 0.06 ac
- Excavated Area
■■■ Existing Culvert
xcavated Area
nauthorized Wetland Im • : _ s:
0.056 ac
xcavated Area
PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Survey and site plan information provided by:
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
Pender County, NC
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Figure 8. Existing Conditions: Crossing #2

W� W
�3M
.13M y"3M
1 1:3M
Area to Remain O.en
to Allow Water to Flow
W
1
1 /
41.4 ;eft
1 _
AI :q
t010
AWAW
/. `\
w�\
�OOwy4�_ rAir% .,
iiw,
4 ffri-7/ Ar
i 71 �'
/ ' i
Area to Remain O.en
to Allow Water to Flow
1
1
i
1
1
xcavated Area
wET
1
WET /
roposed 48" Culverts (3)
FM
xcavated Area
PROPOSED
One 48" Culvert in Channel
Two 48" Culverts on ❑an❑s
— — Proposed Stream Impact: 74 LF
Proposed Wetland Impact: 0.0❑❑ac
— Excavated Area
— Proposed Headwall
■■■ Proposed Culvert (48")
PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Survey and site plan information provided by:
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
Pender County, NC
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Figure 9. Proposed Crossing #2

Unauthorized Stream Impact: 87 LF
Unauthorized Wetland Impact: 0.076 ac
— Excavated Area
■ ■ ■ Existing Culvert
SCALE: 1" = 20'
PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Survey and site plan information provided by:
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
Pender County, NC
Figure 10. Existing Conditions: Crossing #3

1
1
1
1
1
i
/
// /
//
/
/
Ao4,4 ".41,44
4P40
r i
4**01$04"41041 efb
%*.%4PAL4141"," 4441/40%4Wfri
• .j•
17641,
%* /
:dam41141,40,
�4��'.���
IIII�N
Restoration Areal 4
(74 sf y IIf
r
i
Ii
/
/4
1
1
xcavated Area
1
1
1
1
halffnel
estoration
Area (74 sf)
i
1
PROPOSED
One 48" Culvert in Channel
/,' Two 48" Culverts in Wetlands
1
Proposed Stream Impact - 72 LF
Proposed Wetland Impact - 0.09 ac
— Excavated Area
I\\N
Proposed Restoration Area (148 sf)
— Proposed Headwall
mum Proposed Culvert (48")
PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Survey and site plan information provided by:
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
Pender County, NC
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Figure 11. Proposed Crossing #3

3A
22
Excavated Area
20
10
0+00
A
3A'
Propose
storation
reas (74 s.f.
-22
20
18
16
14
Approximate Existing Grade
0+10
0+20
12
10
0+30
SCALE: 1" = 5'
3B
3B'
Excavated Area H
22
1
22
20
1
!
20
18
Proposed
18
Restoration
U) 16
Areas
(74 s.f.)
!
16
2
/
14
14
12
%,,
12
10
Approximate ExistingGrade
1
0
0+00
0+10
pp
0+20 0+30
PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Survey and site plan information provided by:
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
SCALE: 1" = 5'
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
Pender County, NC
Figure 1 1 a. Proposed Crossing #3 Profiles

Appendix A.
Site Photos

Bridgewater Landing; Pender County
Appendix A.Site Photos
Note: Photos of Crossings 1-3 taken in February of 2022.
Additional silt fencing has been installed since then.
Looking Downstream at Crossing#1
t % y 44 rl y p• r, 4y k`x tf rf j-;■
a� is i rClf 1CA L ,e
* > a ° t r� -�^-_ ' e-K:
__,,...„ „,„
4
— --..,---- -__ ,___. :-,„. ,,....,_-......_-,,.. , _.-. .....„. ,s , ,.„......„,„_,,
,,,..., c _.„ „ -. -,„ . I.-0, alirr'.. - ' ,..w 4wer , „--,,,;., .,r: tt;i7-ec-
1 1 P `_
1k `1 4;.� 4 �°, '#r4 I- .`s ue. -s.:,
> .,,5 ! -f 7. =;< e...lar ^
•
Looking Upstream at Crossing#1
i`� d: ;¢Y 1. .
1,� '; - '•�
•
,.t.eb.N I ,.„.-. fir.'. _ :„
.4., P . TX r f s
'� _ rs1's w
Y

Bridgewater Landing; Pender County
Appendix A. Site Photos
Looking Upstream at Crossing#2
;,,,g,i';,_ r.''.':'.:.''''4f#i:,'''.11,.,',_--",':4,-, ''.'t.".:I.111.i$4,0,1'1,.'.-A i'. ,-:,'" .:.,.4'''''',1'4'.- ',111 TA- - ' -- . ''''- ....=- _,-. .
-..... ., -"'''-:.1C-=...":',-,'.',,.,...,1',,,*-- i,-,.',),-:',.'''''tr-.C.7.14-''.:,,li*- :4 ' 1' '',-;'' -' .. / .....,-,. / -
4
___ _,_
a _ . ... 'a te . i oi*, ) k `
,_. ..,.._,_..,..,....,_. .._„ ,. ..„,,_ ,
ii, :,--,:,,_,-- . ..,--
,..
fig-...',„,;-;-,.."....;-4.4;3-,_..,_-,,,, ,_. ...
�- .n"EEE ,. A nisi a - ,� _ _"'g
_ _ _
,4v;_.,-,..,,,,;, ;-., . .., .___-,.. . _
.,__-.- - ,.:, ,
gi„..,.._;,,..,..„;.1._-;!0.1:-::„ ..,.,1--.."-,'',.e;,--.;.-;-..'.'3*Y"-,, ,,-..:,. 17.,.,...„J °'-'',.,,i- ' , '",i0. . . -
L. ,-_,._:-.--;A'=7,n1r.'-'-:-..- `-- '4', '.ij r ..,.7' ;:-if-,,''' E',:', ---,' it 4,' '', - - - „ "
.kir1 i
b ds^_4
�a rg Y `���� �"f-w t.p.14eTtAt
� �X^ T fuy. �,pF � i .
Looking Downstream at Crossing#2
`o Y k ,x w i_4,,,.„....c41..%7i47„;l'''',..2,1-.4,01q.V10-47..,,,a`„ ,,'„iN Illfq.11:9-.t''''.* .
:
Y aP 'i�J'i;,..-4'1.,:....-',.:.;",z,_1441,11,..**1).,,s,L, ,.k-p:tort....,,,iik4,7,...,:,,,,,,?,,,,4„:14,0., ,,,, ,i,:ir'',1'.4r ''"' '- ?''- IS� 1 `.y�py
��� 1Gi��y+ � 6 C��'f�i�V q� �"� .t bin� �.� '�4� ,9tg
n l ��e.T, � , ��� ,fin €�.aR ' ' �'�"
may • , e <°�.-
a 1 g
a #sc
�I
d
,.: mot:
s
t his `•
r
i

Bridgewater Landing; Pender County
Appendix A.Site Photos
Looking Upstream at Crossing#3
'}& del +s L. T R Y ski
5: t '. - k ,.M rho , t � Rt�L �`�"�4.-. N
S f "� -.dT � x d' � � k
�j ',,-1 max Ke�.r f J,. , e [ '• - 2g$ ,'-
dj r h� t„,.I'';';''',14,11)f-f.',:'j'Y,:,e''-'' a� d - � ^ti Er " 'r zae
Tp. 1 4
. ,{e g .sC. 2 1,4N 1c Y 4`9'.5::'' R ,"Sy 5,„.� fa � • R
3k1 �� .� " r 1. s -� x' 'ma..
i a4•, T $ jf °�� .tea :k: -'
..'.E.`.-.•-..-..-- -k..-' , .A.----.4." 4,-' ft,;(41 0.P.- , ' fr- _e • .. iiiiiiiii, '?,
,,,i0 .,..--
M �^ Looking Downstream at Crossing#3
�� � u� k. �'i �� , ' r� ra `-din ' n 1 '
P x.'i;4.' S.z it i � 0'� _,-' ',r 4 :.°�� +`:f r `S^ �i a y L\
s-w,-..t.,f.,..„,.,,,.. )---,,,a,,,..,....,..4...1..,.c. ' ,
'....-' -- :(7,-.V.:,:
1'^0.'-r� r� fT Y .F� s✓AID ',•' �-- --, , 14�Y 4 R'�
? \,ki?
yin : 4 a tf 't r \
�A��� �� .� '-�"'a -., ate, ��
,, ,,.„.,,,,,,k4-177,,A-.3.-_- -..,
` - �—
if - .. - -4
--- �_

Bridgewater Landing; Pender County
Appendix A.Site Photos
Crossing#4 (with road still present)
d ,iev�, t �" r a ;„ c �•f�i y.k2 4 a ,,r,044 Y ? } -,
' '`",,... Tilhli i''. OV.,'
t •o a o,. �� h ."
_,'fir F•,..;", L r 'R' c .t k• £ &-A °i ref '-1 'p t Y"S itu- " —
,t:i..,,,,. iii-t4,-,,,--------_
4-Ec.,''....l',--;.,7t-r:'-i..-,t1,--...,;.;:....,--.. -,1,.- ,-,;,„-4..„,4;..,,.-..-_-- "?--..P-t--Iii.*'A;' -' - __
(I
?` � k ,. ,','' ' i lk °+ s nx
V
,/ -_ may. S' i o-9::.4- .."A. yS IYv,-- ._ '
. .,,,t,,_:.,„„rz,...7,,,......._,,,,,.,„::.:7_.,..;_:,.. V...-.- , -t-J---',..s1,1..,,:_z..'A,;.-],4.I-,---.77.:._,:-:--.•..--.-.,„!7 T' bar O _-p {'
f
).-r,-*-4-_",-,-'_--e„7-,r•t'zt,.i-
h
yam- - -f ; -\ ' " '1 i: .* s. -, r
'6" `k a=�
a.,t `` +K�' .fib "
' ':aY
Crossing#4 (restored; photo taken 3/3/22)
}� x'� � Il x ;? ry ��a5 �'i , r„•,qer ;+' ' ' M4,t✓. Yr; r.
- —
3� v �y t�j'!ik'
--•-4'-- z'l
.-. ._-; ......v.:.,:1_4,../. . . ._
.... ._-..,::: -___:.,,,-.;„_ .,,,fir41.;. _.
:.__ ._ .. _ .... _ ,_, _.,., , .,
__.,;..,--i.:-_- _-,-, .. ..._ ,,_,.. _.- ,..„. ,_ ik-,--__.,,,,,p. ,!...7, ,....„;.,..-,,-. -
_, .., , ,. ay .
..
...,
..4 4. ,.-- -#<,./1''' -,,,
kat:- ,-,
:., -! -
.c 4'' -5::-
-: a 4b'• v e- 1t4___ --
: -.., : ;___-_.,_,,,,,•,:„_--...:-- ,„,:4,,,,...,..,.. .;,,,...„,;:-_-:4.....,.. . .. ..,,,_,,-_,,,i-,. : y _ wanks `_
-.:---
-,...1 ,„‘,.-4:44.0 ,-4,1-7,.-w, ,.. _..-- _.,-„,_-- ,-,-,,,,,, _ 4F0,4„, ,,_..$,-,...,.• -, , ,__,,,,
''N.TY 1LM.PIs EY.'.. 9F`air
_ _ t.

Bridgewater Landing; Pender County
Appendix A.Site Photos
,.-,'_.;i%i-.-,ii:-:.,; ,,,,-:,-.,':'-,-....,_..,.•..:,',,:;*,,,",w',',',.l,i,,'31',.;..-,•„,.,_,..,•:`-.:-.:,,.',,,...,:t,:,,?i''-'„!,',"1•,'7,.•..'1,,„,„..'i,.,::'..„..,,.47'1_,4.:7.„,p,1-1-s-,..,:..„,°,."17„,,,,„,.,!,„,....7w,-t.:,,71_.;,WIiFv:r t<.l,i.,.,•t...-..p,,•-l„,i,A,ii,,....,„'A.§„,%V"
0,,,,4k:,,,,.',,,:•',,W•,,.4i1"._"w7,'i',;,t.-H,::-,.zi„,,'‹1,Ii:.,,;4,,..„,,.,1,-,-0f.?.„„_„,.1,,.,..'„..-,f.:,44::•;'_::',,0.t,,.l.,.:/,.1,,:,,:ir,,:„,',„(,,,,:,:,s•„.!r.;,'‘,;1'...•..„'';.,,,!.'„-
:.,..t.
.,.,'.''tr':,:',•.,-_...i,,v.
,_._;7:.
.7f--;,
,,75„--_.I-,._,.„,7.,
1:.:.
._,i-,,•4,A
f,7 7'
4
._..t1.:—
Crossing 5 (with road still present)
y uh Slyer 1 3n/ r i Y ✓' g ! G i
.,_`p 'g • d r.2 e '".; _*- = �'X, �l ti 4 d' l -1`i� 1 t _" f .a
.,;.:4,,!:.., ,, ,z,.:,,.r4:._.,;,,"'Agit,';',..,,:: .--",":*;i1:1:- .1;q1.1-. :',':.--i4j;' ,,i,,7".. --I.'',-7!f.',..4,1**-; „.'',i,,.:::.•1:::-L.7•,7.,4,,,,','.,',1•f''i::,'.,.
d
..i,.K.-,:o,;:4:„-,.':t.-:'*•',''::'-?''.-,''!'ri.:4.e:.
4v J *` sent ¢` .,: dy l
i.
,:i.,:::",:'''.'"f",'Tt.ln'„-;: :' 'l:''''''44'. ,1-'-,;:,,:";;:z,,.,v4tt';';',;.1',:,,,_:.:J.-. . :.::',• '";,Tr::-...''' Ir;:'''''in,..,,,'-1,?,,c"!'*,..,:t l'' . • ;,... ..4,_._..,,_
4
„.„:,::...,•:.•,,:,,...,7„,.....,„-,,_ ..-•.::,.7:4„,:,„.1ii,;..-•.,.,•,.. ..„.v,,4:,-,,,,,- _. ,,,,,,,,. ..,;,,, ..,f,::••.._,„,7„:4:to., , •,:„.-,..--.,4,,, :•44: 7_,,,,,,,,•-_, „.. ..__,. ..0,7,--
4". ;14.
S%.,s4,,,,,,,,9„ 0
4
.., ,.,_, ,.,,„:, _,,_ .,..,,,, ,, , „.., ,..„.,„„i:_: „:,., ,..,„::„._, •,._:.„,:....•,,01:;•-.,.-.0.41-,,:::„,,,,•„, -.41,.L.-:_ j„. ,fr,!.:--::,,,,_
„,-,.:,,...,-:,•i. .-•::!.:.•:--,,.. . :,-._7•,.. : . ,,•‘,,,4 ...., • ...,, ,,•„:0.-,.,:,,,,-„,;_$•=•!..",it. ..,•,,,. .,„i,;•4,,,..„1-•,,:.,..,,,-., w,..„;; ,,.,..
..„.„:,,,:.• ,:: ....,,,:• •-.,,7,. • -• •,,,::•4,;:•c,•:,,t,„4.zc....4... ...,::,
sy +me . •- x_.e w ' 4 w ,4
E'' � j ar;IY r
Crossing 5 (with road present and sediment in channel)
..,� y' " YLi �S�piH''',..:',.7-2:', r� �t,�m 5 �� i `� r'*
ril
a "ark - ¢.7. ice' W_.' ter ',,3!" x a10.
3 +�a& ..
s
E1 4
_}}4 "
.
`� ?'7. mod / fir. : ' •� °s � ,� 4` .v. r ti r ^ ,. --- n r ys ' .;�" � � �'e--: b ,, W � 4,, , ., '4a ,1 ., _r � . rf '°lE* a _tat -*lip ye ,a;Q

Bridgewater Landing; Pender County
Appendix A.Site Photos
Crossing 5 (restored; photo taken 3/3/22)
N y 1
i
LJic is .d -
4., 4 ma r--
y
_
,
Crossing 5 (Restored; looking downstream; photo taken 3/3/22)
4 1�;- ' .
i
' 4
�"�`"n �
be

Appendix B.
Retaining Wall Information

SHEET 1 OF 8
REV.
CERTIFICATE "U' — 2446
'04) 483-5225
x: [phone]
4090 N. NC HWY 16
P.O. Box 2189
DENVER, NC 28037
www.WWEgeo.com
LKiser©bellsouth.net
00000000
00000N C A Rpo••,,�
/ .•
•
. •
SEAL
. 19258
•
r
Est 440-41.P.
r
LJV 0 LJ�J�
P 11
INDEX OF DRAWINGS:
Sheet 1 of 8:
Sheet 2 of 8:
Sheet 3 of 8:
Sheet 4 of 8:
Sheet 5 of 8:
Sheet 6 of 8:
Sheet 7 of 8:
Sheet 8 of 8:
Cover Sheet
Plan View
Plan View
Plan View
Elevation Views (Wall 1, 2, 3, 4)
Elevation Views (Wall 5, 6, 7, 8)
Details
Notes
COVER
DESIGNER: MICHAEL KISER PE
Bridgewater Landing
RETAINING WALLS
Pender County, NC
DESIGNER
DRAIN SCB DATE 3/29/22 msv.
MLK DATE 3/29/22 I„sp.
DALE
DALE
CONSULTiNG 1kI(";INFFR'- PI ANN RS
NO.
REVISIONS
DRN
DATE
CHK
DATE
SCALE
SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL
REV.

SHEET 2 OF 8
REV.
N
N
N
EDENSLANE
o
W
N 0
SHT. C-4.1 SHT. C-4.2 SHT. C-4.3 SHT. C-4.4
I 1
JAMES R HALL II
KEY MAPLi
IPIN:4214-06-6482-0000DB 2
1, PG
PB36
DRIVEWAY CULVERT #2 [60 LP]
i
NOT TO SWALE
w W W� 24" RCP CLIII (WI FES) HILDA EDENS, TRUSTEE OF THE EDENS LIVING TRUST
�j
w
n T q
EDENSl. 4
[4.8" FILL AT BOTTOM]
PIPE INV.UP[NW]=26.10 PIN: 4214-15-0974-0000 BRYAN TRAVIS HALL 1 I
z
PIPE INV.DWN{SE)=25.85 DB 4725, PG 1766 ERICA LEWIS
PIN 4214-15-3749-000D f HILDA EDENS, TRUSTEE OF THE EDENS LIVING TRUST
' a
EXIST. J /w (PUBLIC)
L•'.
r ;'
PIN: 4214 15-4757-OOOO
+ DB 1858. PG 210 �a PIN: 4214 15 7760 DODO _
f DS 4167, PG 220
a
-
- f
-
■ r DB 4725, PG 1766 �_
If �a _ 2�- - - _ �- _
�����
�-
z
�o . ' - --
... ..-• .,.. ' .- . RIP RAP APRON - - , zs - ���
SEE SHEET C-0.0 FOR SWALE SCHEDULE
e�
e_��
ft�i
n-
A,� � y D_ r�. - �N fr
`�I
w
.-
{TYP. -SEE DETAIL} .. ..Egg ' _ Loo LOD LOD
Lei► LOB
LOD' -....
LOD � *Oil
LOD. �`L L7M i�M1,
_..
-
-
IN
ry
3�� !�
J
✓
J `
.
_ \ - �_ N, PRIVATE DRIVEWAY CULVERT ,.f ��
REVISI01
NCDEQ PH 2
WETLAND CR
'
��
1
/
/ j
.
, \\ CROSSING [31 LF] �i �
1 ' 12" RCP CL. F I
f
/
1
�s
----Ni PIPE I,
PIPE INV.DWN=22.00 WETLANDS '. ;-�
LEGEND:
y
l •
► '
PAD 27.0Q
J
J /
5 ���' .
� �
16- - EXISTING CONTOUR
'
f
/ l
l r
/ l
I `1,
1 1 '
'
I
f '
-
PAD 25.50
l.` a']
PAD 26.DQ
_ _ lGiii
� - -
.•' ,23.04
R �_
PRIVATE CROSSING [44 LF] Y CULVERT __ r- �' '
���
- �
112 RCP CL. III h '.:."--"'"2-.
/ PIPE INV-UP=21-00 ��.--- /� -- / 1
PH
-16 PROPOSED CONTOUR
1
,. I •
-
"� PIPEINV.DWN=20.00 ��/= �-
PROPOSED SWALE I
,�
j ��
?
Jr
..---;i.e..-----
• ��- --� '
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL OTHERS) '
¢1
\ \
1
f3EG1S
39
��`'
-'..
�: BW 14.2t . tf ----:,..--"..-----/-- -� 1
„�
(BY
z5.0r 41
4�
Tw 9.00 1 tJ i- -�
�]
Q
43
4
t , Tw 5.00 ,
1 BW 25.Q0
a • �. SW 19.00 WETLAND CROSSING #3 [52 LF]
r� r t�� '�1
if)
\\ \\TW
: , �t♦
WETLAND CROSSING #2 [50
� TW 2 `' D [2] 24" RCP CL III {OR HDPEj
LF] r
` `
•_
-' ! 48" RCP CL II
a TW FILL A7
- •/i
] 1
I
N
NOTATION: AT�Q LV :
5 504#
BW 24.00 S FILL AT BOTTOM ]
/
. ..00 [10"
DI =DROP INLET F'
PG = PROPOSED GRADE '
44�
N. BW 25.50 l •[ ,�
PIPE INV.UP=20.50
1 PIPE INVAWN=20.30
■.n. i
SWAL= 18
1Y
�`
�s
BW 18.5D PIPE INV.UP
P1PE 1NV pW
+ ` • q 1�.....
20 �� 2v. rD
/�
(�,
BEGINS
1
I
I
_ r
w
0 U
r
1
SWALE 15 �:
_
_
: -
EX =EXISTING GRADE
_
. r BW 2Q.00
I YYY
HP =HIGH POINT ELEVATION
1 ; ,? �.
._p•: ,
�_ 'r,`vl... t •,
A( -
/
.T.''
`rr fr ..� �� ,. .,,., rr
:
�^ ' +
L/V
r
r r+ rr .. rr .' .yq
a aw ar
LP =LOW POINT ELEVATION '
SW =SIDEWALK ELEVATION
3
-•
W 1.25 125 .
�
:
�a�_ +�
EL26.B7 70 �.70 � ���
` 1
(.rly a WETLAND CROSSING #3 [52 LF]\\111
�ie . rz; _ f 2 48" RCPCLIII[SECONDARY]=
¢ --
j_
TIN = TOP OF WALL ELEVATION
�
ram'
r � mo�d!!
1..,
1
� Alal JI
y
r: r
''� / PIPE 1NV.UP=15.20
- � ���1 ��� ��
Q
~
�
'
BW =BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION
�i
�• PIPE INV-pWN=93.80
1
Z
�:
FM t rw.Ar,wmfe,,• Ag rr'!1'� �_�
F.. FM
i ��i - "` s.. 7
p
a
.
44
q.1
"•�'
~
--��
�"°�•u:..w
?
tifi�
f
,?s' J -
+lfr/.�M 1�
ice-
.
Air TW 21.00 /�.= '
'�
`�
't'B1
drM�
ii
BW 2Q.60 'a 7
•
/
S
`
1E
f •
,
,
l) ;.f�
TV/ 22.D€ . d �� I
CULVERT #2 [54 LF]
r
/
'
BW 24.OQ
���
/ �� BW 20.00 22.0� +� c fit
2 18" RCP CL IV
�
PROPOSED SWALE
/
*
c�
:.,ate
PIPE INV-UP=26.20 � �ti
/ 3�
PIPE INV-pWN=26-QQ - �"
r2Z TYP.-SEE DETAIL
J i }
TW24.0�
I
BW23.25
`
rI TT
�r _
S �I:l� '.
/1 .
� �''
/
J,
CULVERT #5 [52 LF]
i
l
■
r r
RETAINING WALL
TW 2 00 .s•
ej�
[3] 24" RCP CL IV
BW 24.00
$
T1N
2
]�
/�
��
C� BY OTHERS
{ j, TYP.
3
BW 19A0 , ' _
-
PIPE INV.UP-25.60
2a.■
.0D
BEGINS
BEGINS
TW 19.r r r
I
I""'�
�,
N
BW 23.5•
Bw21.zt }
4
[�1
Ina
_�
}C �I
/
r p r
PIPE INV.DWN=25.40
BW 19-00
PARAMOUNT
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone] (0) [phone] (F
NC License #: C-2846
r,j
\
iv/ a'' �_
■ rq '��
�
` �/ /
�°
f I
` ,
•
j
I
r.
i
l
I ...
!
19
SEE SHEET C 4.5 I ' I Al•is
�� 6y 13
1 FOR AMENITY ' r
GRADING PLAN I J 445, U
~ is
---
� -+r
LLJ
01 \
I��
�,
,
CO POND 1 INLET
w ,� RIP RAP APRON 10'x20
[ ]
�� POND 1 EMERGENCY ; -
SPILLWAY .
[SEE DETAIL
- ]
POND 1
-�
-� �-
i
c
SILT
l� �_ �..
I =
- A y CI)
FENCE �� \ -� L sa'' LLJ
SEE DETAIL} ��, I l
w
$� /1
�aII
fir+
1
11111kai
OUTLET
STRUCTURE•
� [SEE DETAIL]
■.
1
isRs'
�, WETLANDS
APRON
[SEE DETAIL]
, ..
^ � .+
{TYP:
�
-� f_
'' I I -,.ram '�
-•�- +J - ] LLJ
�. � � � � • �
.,• '■ -- 2�f `� , , I �J,J
�yt - ' 2'>
' 1 Z
�_ _-- $ I 1
_I ii--.
= MH-4.1
U ,
01
f
J
s �r' (5EE DETAIL] ; �i l I
�� Si,
...,
i
`
\\. \
�-
/ -% J ' ' ' 1 =
l" 1 11 U
LA o \ \ (1) I ir
r r
)
1
/0' / Z-4.5___. _____
/ / ( ,
{
..,,Z1\ \ \
--,.. .:::, ..--__
-,i / , 0
_, ,
r_
( ( __., ,
, _____
z .,,
4
-
:
,.�
� , POND 1:K
}I
_ ry )
� � �. �
''..."---
❑ ED4
o
1�I.
MMER
N,,,,
'
� �-a
'
DRAINAGE EASEMENT DI-2.1
[SEE DETAIL] %y7.
,�'` •/
s
• 4 I F1 7--
�a�
- / /''
T ' -^
� `
� �
- -
1" �g
r1 1
ii
I
o
,
I
r 1
FBI r 1
I
-
so RI
0�
12
N.
p, e0 *`
55 = ss -0-�
}
\
r 0 S 55
50R/ J r
Z o
`� � �1
/'
r
1
w w w w
H
.d
I
1 o
+1 7
4
r.w
15]
limm
5W Al>G 9
/ /
1111141111144
r
/
J
1
l
1
❑
/
1
w z
1 ryrc
_
��
�
I
79
$0
1
�
' 1
/E.1ALLTORMDRAINTAGE
f
� �
�1
r-
I
`
'
IWI
HE
HIV
l'
F�
OPE
GTU
RE
OR,
R
RCP',
SPEC
SPECIFICATIONS
IF
MEETS
C
PIPING
�I�S
AND
• '-...
CAN-B
CON
/
�1
\
,
( ((1'•.
1,
\
Ilk
t4,IINSTRUCTED
T"'1
)
1\
t
CTED
/
i
i
PER
WITH
l 12
f
1 1
1 I
.,'
❑
8
® I
I
I `�
I 0
I,
GRADING
BRIDGEWA
TOPSAIL T(
PENDER CO
I i
. I
I i \ , 3� R. 1 Yam
.,‘,../
;
'i'See,
J
I 0
.' -- -
t
DRAWING INFORMATION
DATE: 09.f
SCALE: 1
DESIGNED
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
'
'
STORM SCHEDULE:
/ /
-'E- _- J L MORRIS ENTERPRISES
�a- PIN: 4204 95 5947 000E
DB 1089, PG 274
PB 22, PG 39
rT
1 W
'
W,
PROJECT STATUS
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT:
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT:
FINAL DESIGN:
RELEASED FOR CONST:
PI
-
Upstream
Node
Downstream
Node
Diameter
(In)
Upstream
Invert
Downstream
Invert
Pipe Length
(ft)
Slope �9G)
Upstream
Rim Elev
Downstream
Rim Elev
{
SEAL ,����tiiIllltrrr��,i
���, �.`). ... / ,.�
MH-4.1
fES-3.1
36
20.13
17.00
37
8.51
31.03
20.00
C0
DI-2.1
MH-4.1
36
20.36
20.13
80
0.30
26.00
31.03
(...
•
_ _
-
8Q
028847
--...--. ..4 .. CO
l'iirrlfntitn
3/11/22
_8V.
GRAPHIC SCALE Knowlrwhat's below. �%
0 255 100 200 all before you dig.
C, 4
2
--1
SCALE: 1 "=50'
1
PEI JOB#: 20178. PE
•
, it =
CERTIFICATE €�-2446
N��■����1j11
CAR07%,,)44/267
NOT TO SCALE
PLAN
VIEW
�%..•.N
WORLDWIDE
(704)
483-5225
SS•i°�;9;�y'�,
NOTES:,�:[phone]
.•`��°,*(,c
Bridgewater Landing
; Q �•.•
' r
SEAL
3I2°I • THIS SHEET IS NOT A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT OF WORLDWIDE ENGINEERING GEO. DIV. INC.. GRADING PLAN IS THE PROPERTY OF THE CIVIL
RETAINING WALLS
vfAAIE
4090 N. NC HWY 16
: • 19258
ENGINEER OF RECORD AND IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE TO VIEW WALLS. LOCATE WALLS USING CIVIL ENGINEER'S DOCUMENTS ONLY.
* i i
�F;
P.O. Box 2189
DENVER, NC 28037
:• • • s
• 2018 IBC CODE REQUIRES SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS TO BE CERTIFIED AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CERTIFYING FIRM SHALL BE
Pender County, NC
ENGINEERING
"
•
'../,,,, • °Nc •c..-
UNDER CONTRACT AND ONSITE AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION.
DESIGNER MLK �,E3/29/22 imp. .,1E
www.WWEgeo.com,•.
I NEB c� �•
DESIGNER: MICHAEL KISER PE
DRAWN SCB DATE3/29/22 DATE
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8c PLANNERS MLKiserC�?bellsouth.net
''�•,,;� ••••... `.
NO.
REVISIONS
DRN
DATE
CHIC
DATE
SCALE
SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL
Rom.

SHEET 3 OF 8
REV.
N
EDENSiANE
c,
E,
'A
ry
'8
SHT. C-4.1 SHT. C-4.2 SHT. C-4.3 SHT. C-4.4
KEY MAP �
I
1
HILDA EDENS, TRUSTEE OF THE EDENS LIVING TRUST 1
PI 00 I
NOT TO SCALE 0
❑B 4725,5PG 1766
_�
�` WETLANDS TO
N
�___l~ ���
��
UNDISTURBED, •J 'f �rr -� '
TYP. �� ! I , z / I
W •��
crw
z
OD L•99 r YYC
LOD L0D L!,_
SEE SHEET C-4.0 FOR SWALE SCHEDULE
- - W00 1
51, LOD LEID LOD
_ _ I
� � -'
�
r6
�I
�
w
N
o
����
-T' --- \
—r»—�������
���j fir-- � �� � � � �� -�
N
3EVISIOi
CDEQ PH 2
WETLAND CR,
-,,,
LEGEND: .;
ANE, LLC
)RY ROAD, SUITE 1
E, NC 28451
1 �' /
1 �
I I f
\�
�_ ,
1
- - 16 - - EXISTING CONTOUR ` N
I I " L
' '
16 PROPOSED CONTOUR
tl
PROPOSED SWALE � _\ �' � �
'
—„,,_
if
1 �- `1
2 �'•• ,
'/
~
'
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (BY OTHERS) z I
I
����•
�� POND 3 EMERGENCY
SPILLWAY ( (7 �sy
21�
'
�` \
2r�. , [SEE DETAIL]�4 �!
\ 2�
NOTATION: ' POND3€NLET�+j7
{� I
, RIP -RAP APRON
�, { f
\ \)�
1
:.:t:
[10'?C20�
DI = DROP INLET
, �
2 , � � � I
PG =PROPOSED GRADE �
�' • � �v -: �
�� �, �
EX = EXISTING GRADE I I -
_ � _ � _
I ►
\ :: r{ �\
`-.
t , 1
HP = HIGH POINT ELEVATION CD_.--
,
1 1J M M M
, ,
Ni
j
LP = LOW POINT ELEVATION
SW = SIDEWALK ELEVATION I 1 t 1 , r.r
A•� -0 : , • S
E ' 268
,`�e` , 1\., w• , `
r•+�
a 17
TW = TOP OF WALL ELEVATION 1 2= �~r® SS
5$
a
BW =BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION
r'i���
, POND 3 UREOUTLET
STRUCTURE
C
��'
��
N
D
W
1 •L�►3R�
1 -��P�
E! ' CULVERTRCPCL V
PPE INV.UP=25.20
-r
ALE 31
�
:r
= f [SEE DETAIL]
\ Jy W r
WET POND 3 ti ~ ` ^r
2 r . 4
w W V"
v
PIPE INVAWN=25.DD -_--
� 1
\\\\\ \\11\
RAMOUNTE
N G 1 N E E R 1 N G,
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
'10) 791-6707 (0) [phone] (F)
NC License #: C-2846
/7"-
!��'-�IT
W 1
w
[
h
I
_
POND 3 ,
SKIMMER
- [SEE DETAIL]
_
J
rn .i WETLANDS 4
�• ' POND 3 RIP -RAP a
APRON
` i [SEE DETAIL] 1 w
WETLAND CROSSING #4 [5❑ LF] LLI
I ` 36" RCP CL III [PRIMARY]
r [7' FILL AT BOTTOM]
' 1 } �' PIPE lNV.UP=10.85 CO
LA
r17
I • PIPE INV.DWN=10.60 w
W
RIP RAP APRON LLJ
I I I SEE DETAIL)
� (TYP {j)
w
r
' N yr
'
tqr POND 4 RIP -RAP
' 8A❑ RETAINING WALL l� u, APRON `y
(BY OTHERS). • w
/ BW 18.00 -� ` c... [SEE DETAIL]
g
,;�. -
��j \
0
/
11
%, WETLAND IMPACT FOR ' N. \ \ ft
I
'
rt,m
i /4BW 11.71
Op C %
ti��`,
^
6
BEGINS
ROAD AND CULVERT• ` POND 4 OUTLET =
INSTALLATION, TYP. �� 7s� STRUCTURE • (�
, 1 WETLAND CROSSING #4 5❑ L_`� �� � [SEE DETAIL]. ' _ram
W
Q
R r
-
-
'RCP CL
yy Q
,,,.,. .,.[2] 48 III [SECONDARY) „�.. a; . POND 4
27
CULVERT
2�
PIPE
PIPE
[2] 18'
INv.uP_2a.75
INV.OWN
•
l
#8 [56 LF]i • 5�' F'
RCP CL IV \ �.2:� ..a
/ .
24.25 •�
2.5
��
of
J
-
[SEE
POND
DETAIL]3
- -
2
_
G■.;
J • +PIPE iNV.UP=15.60 1� 1��
`� a ter'' �� •-....„...--.,------„,„, SKIMMER
•r _ PIPE INV.DWN=15.35
T
s'm �/ y ' f •= �� ��T. [SEE DETAIL] / ' *
P�y*s•. 16.❑� 1', _____� r
ro ®� �i BW 16.❑0 ti � , I y , /
�... I 1 2s 1
.. I } .-� �• z '
?LAN
OLIN . \
2�
PROPOSED SWALE
[TYP-SEE DETAIL)
A¢.��6
O - l
TW 17-00 {� �-/
TO/ 19.0
1
I
-
5WA 5
�-
pA •
��
�
.�
' .,_'.Q,.:-
I
5
BEGINS
+ ,..ow 17,00 _ _
POND 2 RIP -RAP y i 11.9 I` _ L \` \
7W is-�� �� �.�.. ��j ,s \
j
I
_
ss ti s�
\ APRON ra JAI
,,
/ ^�
• ��
,
BW 18.00 i `
DETAIL]
H I-�
FM ■ , FM - - ►
1
[SEE
?{ / /�.:.
�STRUCTURE
f�
a -To ROAD FZ gS —�
li—ss
�'
„
POND 2 OUTLET �I � r' ` ,
�;
F� I--1
Gs 5r7 . ill _i-
[SEE DETAIL] \ \
1
W
POND 2 INLET WET POND
2
_
,
,
W =
RIP -RAP APRON
' � c�� �`
r`-�
g 4.5 z
.
_.
/
'
' ii/
1
ry
ry
>�. 1
? y 41 r
1
a
o
o
0 '
POND 2 EMERGENCY • `N I , , 1 ` �-25 -�-
../ '-{ LJ
SPILLWAY , �' A9� FM rtiJ
U
[SEE DETAIL]
4
1
` + '
rii �J
fl�
•. c.
- , }
I� F"'1 ICI i"�'E
r ,`-+.
. ' �• wr.rr.���.r.�
� --
LJ 1
e —1
Q
Q < w
1T°��
1�
1
/
,
t
;1
l����a
`
����1
�
1 11 I f' - _ /
1 1 1 1 0
` t WETLANDS 1 1
1
Q�Q
g z
I
_
?7.-__
- ,
rt \ 1 , I '\, I C
`
�
z
•- _ _ 001 4{ 001 001 001 ' 001
DRAWING INFORMATION
DATE: 09.i
SCALE: t
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
10i Dal 001 001 001 001 = - : _
1
I
, _ - = =
99l'
I
1
J L MORRIS ENTERPRISES W
PIN: 4204-95-5947-00011Cip
DB 1089, PG 274
PB 22, PG 39 , cT4
I-
PROJECT STATUS
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT:
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT:
FINAL DESIGN:
RELEASED FOR CONST:
NOTE
EITHER
MANUFACTURER
ALL
HOPE
STORMDRAINAGE
OR
RCP,
SPECIFICATIONS
IF
MEETS
PIPING
AND
CAN
CONSTRUCTED
BE
CONSTRUCTED
PER
WITH
/
r
® i
SEAL,�0“V I I I H ///l,
,,.\ZH �ARp.�'..,�'
:: °2°$7
��, 01. ['Gig. Ge`�:
oII,,IA'G'�+1i,11,,\
3/11/22
I-4
GRAPHIC SCALE Know Man below.
❑ 25 50 100 200 Call before you dig. I1
C — 4.3
SCALE: 1 "=50'
PEI JOB#: 20178.PE
'► =
CERTIFICATE 'v— 2446
%%%%%%%%%%%%I
CARO�'�•,,
NOT TO SCALE
PLt1_!
VIEW
11
�'..•�N
WORLVIIIDE
(704)
483-5225
1.
NOTES:
.•`��°�.�'oFESS•�04;;..1,•
2
Bridgewater Landing
,. Fax:
[phone]
: ; Q �..
2
SEAL
3IZOI • THIS SHEET IS NOT A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT OF WORLDWIDE ENGINEERING GEO. DIV. INC.. GRADING PLAN IS THE PROPERTY OF THE CIVIL
RETAINING WALLS
IMAAIE
4090 N. NC HWY 16
• 19258
ENGINEER OF RECORD AND IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE TO VIEW WALLS. LOCATE WALLS USING CIVIL ENGINEER'S DOCUMENTS ONLY.
��;
P.O. Box 2189
DENVER, NC 28037
• :• • • s
• 2018 IBC CODE REQUIRES SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS TO BE CERTIFIED AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CERTIFYING FIRM SHALL BE
Pender County, NC
ENGINEERING
"
•
t:./•° tit, •-.•'�
UNDER CONTRACT AND ONSITE AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION.
DESIGNER MLK �,E 3/29/22 , DATE
W W w. WWEg eo. com
I NEB
,, Cy •. S �•
DESIGNER: MICHAEL KISER PE
.
DRAWN SCB DATE 3/29/22 DATE
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8c PLANNERS MLKiserC�?bellsouth.net
''�•,,;� ••••%%% `%
NO.
REVISIONS
DRN
DATE
CHIC
DATE
SCALE
SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL
.

SHEET 4 OF 8
REV.
EDENS LANE
IT /IIIIIIIIIIIIIIAII
SHT. C-4.2
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.
1
1
1
1
1
1
WETLANDS
WET POND 4
[SEE DETAILS]
POND 4 EMERGENCY
SPILLWAY
[SEE DETAIL]
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(TYP.)
M
EL3D
liCll
PAD = 30.65
J L MORRIS ENTERPRISES
P1N:4204-95-5947-000L
DB 1089, PG 274
PB 22, PG 39
SEE SHEET C-4.0 FOR SWALE SCHEDULE
PAD=29.60
' 1 1 5> ]r
PAD = 28.90
.. 1
LEGEND:
---16---
114
16
PAD = 29.25
IL1,'
PAD = 28.65
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SWALE
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (BY OTHERS)
NOTATION:
HILDA EDENS, TRUSTEE OF THE EDENS LIVING TRUST
PIN:4214-25-3147-0000
DB 4725, PG 1766
�1133
PAD = 29.00
PAD = 26.60
DI = DROP INLET
PG = PROPOSED GRADE
EX = EXISTING GRADE
HP = HIGH POINT ELEVATION
LP = LOW POINT ELEVATION
SW = SIDEWALK ELEVATION
TW = TOP OF WALL ELEVATION
BW = BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION
PAD = 25.25
i124�
PROPOSED SWALE
(TYP: SEE DETAIL)
'R/W {PRIVATE)
/ /
PAD = 27.80
al r .1l.
PAD = 28.40
POND 5 INLET
RIP -RAP APRON
[10'x20']
PAD = 27.85
PAD = 27.25
/
J L MORRIS ENTERPRISES
PIN: 4214-23-2291-0000
DB 3362, PG 68
STORM SCHEDULE:
Upstream
Node
Downstream
Node
Diameter
(In)
Upstream
Invert
Downstream
Invert
Pipe Length
(ft)
Slope(%)
Upstream
Rim Elev
Downstream
Rim Elev
MH-8.4
FE5-8.1
18
20.43
19.50
220
0.42
26.27
19.50
DI-8.2
MH-8.4
18
20.50
20.43
25
0.30
24.75
26.27
DI-8.3
DI-8.2
18
21.50
20.50
54
1.85
24.75
24.75
�� WET \ _ „I._ �, \1y 1
r ),\\\1 r - J ''----
x \
PAD = 22.85 PAD = 27'4 �, \ \ \ \
/./1;
Trw 1..vv �
'WI
16aa -
lik
r
CULVERT #9 [54 LF]
\ [2] 12" RCP CL IV
PIPE INV.UP=20.50
PIPE 1NV.DWN=20.30
NOTE ALL STORMDRAINAGE PIPING CAN BE CONSTRUCTED WITH
EITHER HDPE OR RCP, IF MEETS AND CONSTRUCTED PER
MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
POND 5 INLET
RIP -RAP APRON
[10'x20']
7
BEGINS
POND 5
SKIMMER
[SEE DETAIL]
8
BEGINS
BW 14.00
M12'
POND 5 EMERGENCY
SPILLWAY
[SEE DETAIL]
WETLANDS
POND 5 RIP -RAP
APRON
[SEE DETAIL
- SILT FENCE, TYP.
• jSEE DETAIL]
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
WETLANDS
2c0
SCALE: 1 "=50'
0
1-
�o
U
2 a
6
J
coo0
o�
LI
N
0 Q Z
z a_
co
4.11
N
LL7
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
FINAL DESIGN - RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
N
RI
N
6
s:
-C
2
0
CC
CLIENT INFORMATION:
EDENS LANE, LLC
60 GREGORY ROAD, SUITE 1
BELVILLE, NC 28451
Ic f� G L r 4 e E R 1 N © I N C..
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, North Catalina 28403
[phone] (0) [phone] (F)
NC License #: C-2846
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
TOPSAIL TOWNSHIP
PENDER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT STATUS
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT:
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT:
FINAL DESIGN:
RELEASED FOR CONST:
DRAWING INFORMATION
DATE: 09.08.21
SCAT
DESIGNED: ASR
DRAWN: ASR
CHECKED: TGC
SEAL ottiirorio,
4.
028847
3/77/22
C-4
.4
PEI JOBS?: 20178.PE
CERTIFICATE "a- 2446
[phone]
I
Fax: [phone]
CONSULTLNG ENGINEERS 8c PLANNERS M
4090 N. NC HWY 16
P.O. Box 2189
DENVER, NC 28037
www.WWEgeo.com
LKiser©bellsouth.net
,•••••••••••q
���N CAR01'.,
/,
SEAL
9258
•••••••••••
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
• THIS SHEET IS NOT A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT OF WORLDWIDE ENGINEERING GEO. DIV. INC.. GRADING PLAN IS THE PROPERTY OF THE CIVIL
ENGINEER OF RECORD AND IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE TO VIEW WALLS. LOCATE WALLS USING CIVIL ENGINEER'S DOCUMENTS ONLY.
• 2018 IBC CODE REQUIRES SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS TO BE CERTIFIED AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CERTIFYING FIRM SHALL BE
UNDER CONTRACT AND ONSITE AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION.
PLAN VIEW
DESIGNER: MICHAEL KISER PE
Bridgewater Landing
RETAINING WALLS
Pender County, NC
NO.
REVISIONS
DRN
DATE
CHK
DATE
DE9DNER
DRANK!
MLK DATE 3/29/22 iNsp.
SCB DATE 3/29/22 ice,
DATE
DATE
SCALE
SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL
REV.

WALL PROFILE
WALL PROFILE //2
SHEET 5 OF 8
REV.
28.0
26.0
22.0 -
20.0 -
18.0 -
16.0 -
PIPE PEN
INVERT ELEV. 20.5'
PIPE 24" DIA.
(STA 0+18.50)
BEND (STA 0+05) f�
CAPS
0
O
O
+
PIPE PEN
INVERT ELEV. 20.5'
PIPE 24" DIA.
(STA 0+21)
BEND (STA 0+43)
I I I I I I I I
1- I I- I 1- 1 I -1 I
I I I I I I
T I I I I I
I I 1- I- -I
I 1- I I- I
I I I I I 1 1 r
I I I I I I 1-f
FOOTING
(SEE DETAILS)
1
1
O 6.5'
26.0 -
24.0 -
22.0 -
20.0 -
18.0 -
16.0 -
14.0 -
12.0 -
10.0 -
CERTIFICATE 'G- 2446
'04) 483-5225
x: [phone]
4090 N. NC HWY 16
P.O. Box 2189
DENVER, NC 28037
www.WWEgeo.com
LKiser©bellsouth.net
�•• \\ CARO ..'•.
04;9
. //e
SEAL
19258 ,'/.
.
0
0
N
+
6.5' O 6.5'
GEOGRID EMBEDMENT LENGTH
'I
T
24.0
22.0 -
20.0 -
18.0 -
16.0
14.0 -
12.0
0
0
0
+
6.5' O 6.5'
MINIMUM ELEVATION
FOR TOE OF WALL
BEND (STA 0+12)
in
N
+
6.5' O 5.5'
rn
28.0
26.0
24.0
22.0
20.0
18.0
16.0
WALL PROFILE //3
PIPE PEN PIPE PEN PIPE PEN
INVERT ELEV. 15.2' INVERT ELEV. 15.2' INVERT ELEV. 15.2'
PIPE 48" DIA. PIPE 48" DIA. PIPE 48" DIA.
(STA 0+45) (STA 0+54) (STA 0+63)
28.0 -
26.0 -
24.0 -
22.0 -
PIPE PEN
INVERT ELEV. 20.3'
PIPE PEN PIPE 24" DIA.
INVERT ELEV. 20.3' (STA 0+16.5)
PIPE 24" DIA.
(STA 0+14)
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I
I I M I I M I I MI I
I 1- I 1- I I I I
I I
I I
I I M I I M I I MI I
20.0 - •
18.0 -
16.0 -
0
O
O
+
0
/ �\ /- �\ I I I I
I /.1
I I
I I
_r
I
I
1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I
0
O
cci
O
+
0 6.5'
6.5'
GEOGRID EMBEDMENT LENGTH
I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
J i 1 jr1 y I , 1 I I I I 1 1 I i I
III
y
I I I I
IIIII
1/ 1 I I
111
O
O
O
+
O
I I I I I I I LII 1 I f` 7 I r I I I I I I I I
I.
Z -
-IL_1I 4
Z
I I
1 J.
1 1 1
I I I I I
IIIIII
11 1 y 1
9=1•MW
NEM
MI"M a
1111111
1 y I I I I
11
111
11 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
y l I, I I I I
I I � I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
IFE
•
•
•
•
•
O
1
N)
+
6.5' O 6.5'
rn
GEOGRID EMBEDMENT LENGTH
O
O
N
N
+
6.5' O 9.0'
rn
O
O
rr)
+
9.0' O 9.0'
rn
9.0'
WALL PROF LE //4
O
O
N
N
9.0'
h
[O
N
+
O 6.5'
PIPE PEN PIPE PEN PIPE PEN
INVERT ELEV. 13.8' INVERT ELEV. 13.8' INVERT ELEV. 13.8'
PIPE 48" DIA. PIPE 48" DIA. PIPE 48" DIA.
(STA 0+55) (STA 0+64) (STA 0+73)
BEND (STA 0+14) BEND (STA 1 +02)
1 1
I M I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I H� I i, 1 1 1 1 ��
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
0
O
O
+
0
6.0'
0
O
O
O
+
0 8.5'
GEOGRID EMBEDMENT LENGTH
I I 1
I � I
1 1
I I I I
Ire
I I
O
O
O
+
6.5'
I I I I I I I I I I I 1
+g.+4+
I I- I I- I I
1 - -1-
I -I I
I I I I
1 - I . I iib=�`�` I I I I I I rl
I I I I I I -fi I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I -�
0
II)
O
+
8.5' 0 10.0'
10.0'
0
O
In
+
11.0' 0 11.0'
cn
O
N)
O
+
11.0' 0 11.0'
cn
O
N
N
+
11.0' 0 11.0'
cn
10
co
+
11.0' 0 10.0'
in
N
O
+
10.0'
1-5--
8.0'
LEGE\ D
0
O
7.0'
0
10
Mirafi 3XT
0 3' 6'
- 24.0
- 22.0
- 20.0
18.0
- 16.0
- 14.0
- 12.0
12'
0
LE)
N
+
6.5'
rn
6.5'
- 28.0
- 26.0
- 24.0
22.0
• - 20.0
0
O
N)
+
0
rn
- 18.0
- 16.0
0
N)
N
+
6.5'
- 26.0
- 24.0
- 22.0
- 20.0
18.0
16.0
- 14.0
- 12.0
- 10.0
NOTES:
1. THE REINFORCED BACKFILL SHALL BE A CLEAN SAND AND IS RESTRICTED TO HAVING A
MAXIMUM FINE CONTENT OF 20% PASSING THE #200 SIEVE, A MAXIMUM LIQUID LIMIT OF
30 AND A MAXIMUM PI OF 10.
ELEVATION VIEW
DESIGNER: MICHAEL KISER PE
Bridgewater Landing
RETAINING WALLS
Pender County, NC
DESIGNER
DRAIN
MLK
SCB
DATE 3/29/22 INSR.
DATE 3/29/22 INSR.
DALE
DALE
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS M
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1" = 6'
NO.
REVISIONS
DRN
DATE
CHK
DATE
SCALE
SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL
REV.

WALL PROFILE //5
SHEET 6 OF 8
REV.
20.0
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
08.0
22.0 -
20.0 -
18.0 -
16.0 -
14.0 -
12.0 -
10.0 -
08.0 -
06.0 -
22.0 -
20.0 -
18.0 -
16.0 -
14.0 -
12.0 -
10.0 -
08.0 -
BEND (STA 0+08)
PIPE PEN
INVERT ELEV. 10.85'
PIPE 36" DIA.
(STA 0+48)
PIPE PEN
INVERT ELEV. 15.6'
PIPE 48" DIA.
(STA 0+67)
CAPS
(SEE DETAILS)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
I
I I"I 1 1 L 1
0
O
O
PIPE PEN
INVERT ELEV. 15.6'
PIPE 48" DIA.
(STA 0+74)
J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I
I LI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LI I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 i i�
1 1 1 y' i 1 I1' i 1 1 1 I 1 I 11 1 1 �1 1I` 11 1 M I 1 yi i I 1 1 I 4 I /L 1 1
11I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 i 1 \
I -1 I
-IL__ I 1
FOOTINGZ-I _I
(SEE DETAILS) -
I -1 I
-IL_ 1 1
�rr MrrM
I "I I
-
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L
11111111L
I I
I r I 1- I 1- I I- 1 I -1 I I
I" I IM I I I "I I
1 I 1 1
I I"
II I I' l y 1 l, 1 1 1 Ir
s
+
0 6.5'
10
N
N)
N
+
6.5' 0 8.0'
GEOGRID EMBEDMENT LENGTH
N
N7
N
+
8.0' 0 10.5'
MINIMUM ELEVATION
FOR TOE OF WALL
10.5'
PIPE PEN PIPE PEN
INVERT ELEV. 15.6' I NVERT ELEV. 15.6'
PIPE 48" DIA. PIPE 48" DIA.
(STA 0+68) (STA 0+76)
10.5'
STA. L0+67.00'
10.5'
WALL PROFILE //6
PIPE PEN
INVERT ELEV. 10.6'
PIPE 36" DIA.
(STA 0+68)
STA. L0+74.00'
9.0'
h
co
+
9.0' o
0
00
co
+
9.0' o
7.0'
STA. L0+94.50'
6.5'
6.5' 6.0'
22.0
20.0
- 18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
08.0
BEND (STA 0+25) BEND (STA 1+21)
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i�i I I I I I I I I I I I I�
\
I 1- I I T I I" I I- 1 I
I I� I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I -°7-117
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I a I I" I I" 1 I 1 i 1 y 1 y I I, I I I I I I I I 1 y 14 1 1
1 1
I I I I I I I I I I 1
I I I I--4 I I
yI
iiiNEMfll iICE iiiAEC i:=I= I=i��_. rmlEC Giiiiii Mflin=iliiiiiiGiiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiNET tEM NEMfli ilia■
O
O
O
+
O 5.5'
0
O
O
O
+
5.5' O 6.5'
GEOGRID EMBEDMENT LENGTH
WALL PROFILE //7
BEND (STA 0+1 1) BEND (STA 0+18)
AF.mi i� ■ mA
ArmArm
1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 1 11 1 y1 1 1,1 1 1� I "h I - �1 1 r1 1 1 1 1 1 1% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 I 1 1 , , �1 1 1 I 1 1 i1 1 1y 1 1 1 y1 1 1 y1 1 1 IS 1 1
T - y l 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1-
I I I I I I I I I 1 I
1I IIII 1 1 1 1 Jr
0
O
LE)
N
+
6.5' O 8.5'
J
_i 1 1 1 I 1 1
1 If
I 1� 1
I I 1
I I I I
I I I I I
I - 1 I -1 I
I I I I I 1 L
I I 1 1 I I
I" I I
I "I I "I I
I T I r I I
I I " I I
I -1 I
I "1 I
I 1- I I
I I
�I� I T I r I I 1 1 I I I I I
0
O
+
6.0' 0 8.0'
GEOGRID EMBEDMENT LENGTH
CERTIFlCATE 'G- 2446
'04) 483-5225
x: [phone]
4090 N. NC HWY 16
P.O. Box 2189
DENVER, NC 28037
www.WWEgeo.com
LKiser©bellsouth.net
•
41.
00000000000000
���� •oF E s s�i oti �?'y •.
SEAL
19258
•
Z
.�'.,�i� •NG I.NEa •••% .
Ln
N
N
N)
+
8.0' 0 6.5'
w
01/
20.0
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
- 10.0
08.0
0
O
+
8.5'
20.0
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.5'
STA. J0+49.00'
9.5'
STA. L0+54.75'
12.0'
12.0'
0
O
N)
co
+
10.0' 0 8.0'
8.0'
WALL PROFILE //8
BEND (STA 0+57)
0
O
O
+
8.0' 6.5'
BEND (STA 0+65)
0
O
+
6.5' 5.5'
O
O
N
+
5.5'
- 22.0
- 20.0
18.0
16.0
- 14.0
- 12.0
- 10.0
- 08.0
- 06.0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I r� I � I I t 1 I d I' I I' I �I ' I I -I ` I �'I 1 I 1,r 1 I
ii
I i I yl l I l I I I I I 1 l 1 1 1
I I I I I
I I��- I
I I I I I �7
l
I I I I
1 1 1
I I" I I
I I- I I- I I- I I -I
1 T 1
I I- I I- I I- I I -I I
1
1 1 I r 1 1- 1 I- I I- I I -1- I
6.0'
6.0'
Ln
N
O
+
rn
6.0' of 6.5'
6.5'
Ln
N
00
N
+
6.5' of 6.0'
6.0'
+
GEOGRID EMBEDMENT LENGTH
LEGE\ D
Mirafi 3XT
0 3' 6'
12'
20.0
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
NOTES:
1. THE REINFORCED BACKFILL SHALL BE A CLEAN SAND AND IS RESTRICTED TO HAVING A
MAXIMUM FINE CONTENT OF 20% PASSING THE #200 SIEVE, A MAXIMUM LIQUID LIMIT OF
30 AND A MAXIMUM PI OF 10.
ELEVATION VIEW
DESIGNER: MICHAEL KISER PE
Bridgewater Landing
RETAINING WALLS
Pender County, NC
DESIGNER
DRAM SCB DATE 3/29/22 ,NSP.
MLK DATE 3/29/22 , P.
DALE
DALE
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS M
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1" = 6'
NO.
REVISIONS
DRN
DATE
CHK
DATE
SCALE
SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL
REV.

SHEET 7 OF 8
REV.
SLOPE VARIES
DESIGN HEIGHT
CAP UNIT
(ATTACH WITH
CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE)
DIAMOND PRO 12"
SEGMENTAL UNITS
FINISH
GRADE
LEVELING PAD
8" MIN. LOW PERMEABLE
SOIL DRAINAGE SWALE TO
DIVERT SURFACE WATER
GRID LENGTH (SEE ELEVATION VIEW)
.fir■ ter■ :���
2' 0"
•
REINFORCED BACKFILL
UNIT CORE FILL
4"0 PERF. PIPE 2% GRADE
APPROX. EXCAVATION LINE
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION: SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL
12" DIAMOND PRO UNITS
(SCALE: NTS)
STRUCTURAL GEOGRIDS (TYP.)
(SEE ELEVATION VIEW FOR ACTUAL
PLACEMENT LOCATIONS)
ATTACH GEOGRID OVER PINS AND
PULL TIGHT BEFORE PLACING
BACKFILL
BACKFILL & COMPACT IN FRONT
OF WALL BEFORE BUILDING WALL
BEYOND 5' HEIGHT
GEOGRID ATTACHMENT DETAIL
(SCALE: NTS)
WORLDWIDE
VAIVAVIC
ENGINEERING
(-
Fa
CERTIFlCATE 'G— 2446
'04) 483-5225
x: [phone]
4090 N. NC HWY 16
P.O. Box 2189
DENVER, NC 28037
www.WWEgeo.com
LKiser©bellsouth.net
,.....•a•...
SEAL
. 19258
. . • • 1.;'•%C NGINE� � ,"
#'•.;AFL ,0„•••
NOTES:
• INSTALL GEOGRID IN TENSION
• COMPACT SOILS TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR
• COMPACT SOILS IN FRONT OF WALL
• UNIT CORE FILL INSTALLED TO 12" BEHIND UNIT
SHALL BE 3/4" MINUS STONE.
• OUTLET DRAIN LINES THROUGH WALL AT 100' O.C.
WITH SCHEDULE 40 PVC 4" DIA. PIPE.
• STABLE FOUNDATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY A
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.
RETAINED BACKFILL
PLACE GEOGRID IN NEXT 8" LAYER OF
BLOCK IN A MANNER TO REINFORCE GAPS
LEFT BY PREVIOUS LAYER OF GEOGRID.
WASHED STONE BACKFILL
DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
1 111 1 IIII =w-
DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DETAIL
(SCALE: NTS)
1
1
I 1.
J 2.
3.
CONNECT GEOGRID TO
DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
w/ANCHOR BOLTS
INSTALL WASHED STONE
BACKFILL BETWEEN WALL FACE
AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
CONTINUE GEOGRID AT BACK
OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
PLACE GEOGRID IN NEXT LAYER OF BLOCK
WITH THE MAIN REINFORCEMENT RUNNING
90' TO THE PREVIOUS DIRECTION BELOW.
PLACE WITHIN CURVE ONLY.
MIN. 3" OF SOIL BETWEEN
OVERLAPPED GEOGRID (TYP.)
CONCAVE CURVE
GEOGRID LOCATION DETAIL
(SCALE: NTS)
SEGMENTAL UNIT (TYP.)
CONNECTING PINS (TYP.)
MD AXIS OF STRUCTURAL GEOGRID APERTURE
(PERPENDICULAR TO WALL FACE)
GEOGRID ORIENTATION
(SCALE: NTS)
SEGMENTAL UNIT
2' 0"
LEVELING PAD DETAIL
(SCALE: NTS)
CONVEX CURVE
6" UNREINFORCED
CONCRETE LEVELING PAD
OR 8" WASHED STONE
CAP UNIT-
12" BLOCK UNIT
RAILING
(BY OTHERS)
3'-0"
24"
TYPICAL ROADWAY GUARD RAIL DETAIL
N.T.S.
CAP UNIT-
12" BLOCK UNIT
3'-0"
24
RAILING
(BY OTHERS)
CONCRETE FILLED
POST HOLES
NOTE: AUGER THROUGH TOP GEOGRID LAYER
WHEN INSTALLING POSTS.
TYPICAL HANDRAIL DETAIL
N.T.S.
TO FIT AROUND PIPE WITH 3" MIN. GROUT. FILL VOIDS BETWEEN
FIELD CUT BLOCKS \ / BLOCKS AND PIPE
RIP -RAP TOE OF
WALL BELOW PIPE
"140 4.4*
GEOGRID TERMINATES WITHIN 6" OF
PIPE (TYP.)
GEOGRID (TYP.) REFER TO ELEVATION
VIEW FOR LENGTH, TYPE AND ELEVATION
NOTE: PROVIDE 3' OF #57 STONE FOR ENVELOPE
AROUND PIPE. SEPARATE WASHED STONE BACKFILL FROM
SOIL BACKFILL WITH A 6 OZ. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
48" OR SMALLER PIPE
PENETRATION DETAIL
(SCALE: NTS)
D
TAILS
DESIGNER: MICHAEL KISER PE
Bridgewater Landing
RETAINING WALLS
Pender County, NC
DESAMER
DRAM SCB DATE 3/29/22 ,NsP,
MLK DATE 3/29/22 , p.
DATE
DATE
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8c PLANNRS--M
NO.
REVISIONS
DRN
DATE
CHK
DATE
SCALE
SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL
REV.

SHEET 8 OF 8
REV.
CERTIFICATE 'G— 2446
'04) 483-5225
x: [phone]
4090 N. NC HWY 16
P.O. Box 2189
DENVER, NC 28037
www.WWEgeo.com
LKiser©bellsouth.net
�.....•aI...
% C ARo7 ...,
• .
SEAL
. 19258
• .
V;.0. NO I NEB � ,"
#...;A E L ��,.•.
Dia
mond Pro etaininc Walls
1.1 General
Segmental Retaining Wall Systems are designed as a gravity retaining wall utilizing a high tenacity
polyester geogrid to reinforce the soil zone behind the wall. The geogrid is positively connected to the
modular concrete block creating a reinforced soil mass capable of resisting lateral earth pressures and
surcharged loads. All references to the Engineer refer to Worldwide Engineering.
1.2 Backfill Materials
The soil material associated with the retaining wall in the reinforced zone, the retained zone, or the
foundation bedding shall have the following properties:
A) Foundation Soils: 0=30 , cohesion=0 psf, unit weight=120 lbs./cu.ft (moist weight)
B) Retained Soils: 0=30°, cohesion=0 psf, unit weight=120 lbs./cu.ft (moist weight)
C) Reinforced Soils: 0=30`, cohesion=0 psf, unit weight=120 lbs./cu.ft (moist weight)
The soil characteristics above were assumed based on information supplied to the Engineer. If this
information does not represent the actual soil to be used, the Engineer shall be notified immediately,
the new soil parameters shall be submitted to the Engineer, and the wall will be required to be
redesigned. Payment for all designs is the responsibility of the Owner and/or General Contractor.
1.3 Foundation Loads
The maximum applied foundation load for this wall is 2.5 KIPS/sq.ft.
1.4 Concrete Masonry Wall Units
Concrete Wall Units shall be segmental units manufactured in accordance with ASTM—C90 and ASTM
C140 and shall have a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 3000 psi.
1.5 Geogrid Reinforcement
The geogrid reinforcing material shall be a polyethylene or polyester meeting a minimum Long —Term
Design Strength (LTDS) published by the manufacturer of:
MIRAFI 3XT
1.6 Wall Batter
Batter for the entire wall shall be maintained at 8 degrees (1" setback per course).
2.0 Foundation Requirements
The foundation bearing capacity that was assumed for design shall be verified in the the field, and
copies of the test data filed with the Engineer. The footing shall be cleared of loose soil. A minimum of
12" of washed stone shall be placed at the back of each block as indicated on the details.
2.1 Leveling Pad
Material shall consist of compacted sand, gravel, crushed rock, or unreinforced concrete. The pad shall
be 6" thick when pad is concrete and 8" thick otherwise. Sand or gravel material shall be compacted to
95% Standard Proctor. Aggregate material shall receive a minimum of one pass of the compaction
equipment. The top of the leveling pad shall be maintained at a depth of 1.5 feet when the exposed
height of the wall exceeds 7 feet.
2.2 Unit Fill
The void within each unit shall be filled with a washed stone having 100% of the aggregate passing the
1.5" sieve. A minimum of 3/8" washed stone size is required (no more than 5% passing the #200
sieve). Place this material behind the block as well. All excess material shall be swept clean from the
top of the block prior to installing the next course. Each course of block shall be completely filled
before proceeding to the next course.
2.3 First Block Course
The first course of block shall be placed on top of and in full contact with the leveling pad. The units
shall maintain a distance of a minimum 6" from the front and back of the leveling pad. Proper
alignment may be achieved with the aid of a string line. Place stone below the first block and the
leveling pad and level the block in both directions. After placing stone in each of the appropriate holes
proceed to the next course of block. Each unit shall contact the units on both sides as well as above
and below. Some adjustments may be required for walls with curves and a batter.
2.4 Caps
Apply a construction adhesive to the cap units to prevent their removal.
3.0 Geogrid Installation
The geogrid reinforcement shall be laid horizontally on compacted backfill and installed to the face of the block. Geogrid
shall be pulled taut removing all slack from the material and anchored before adding fill. Geogrid shall be installed at the
elevations and lengths required as shown on the plans (refer to details for the appropriate orientation). Soil surface shall
be smooth and level and have been compacted to 95% Standard Proctor before installing the grid.
3.1 Fill Placement
Backfill material shall be placed on a maximum 8" compacted to 95% Standard Proctor. Only hand operated equipment
shall be allowed within 3 feet of the Segmental Block units. Backfill shall be placed from the wall rearward to insure
tautness of the geogrid. Construction equipment shall not be operated directly on the geogrid.
3.2 Unsuitable Materials
Soils containing roots, brush, sod or other organic material shall not be allowed. Frozen soils, snow, ice, heavy clays, or wet
soils shall not be allowed. Material passing the #40 sieve shall not have a liquid limit of greater than 30 and a plastic limit
of greater than 15, unless written consent is obtained from the Engineer prior to placement.
3.3 Soil Properties
Minimum internal angle of friction shall equal or be greater than 30° with 0 psf cohesion. Verification shall be filed with the Engineer that the
soil will meet this criteria. If soils are greater than 35% fines, then the top two (2) geogrid layers shall be increased by 25% for the entire
length of the wall.
4.0 Soil Testing
Compaction testing shall be performed for every lift elevation requiring geogrid or every 3rd lift as a minimum Tests shall be
performed for every 100 linear feet of wall face. Compaction tests as well as a verified friction angle shall be filed with the
Engineer's office.
5.0 Hydrostatic Pressure Potential
The Engineer shall be notified if any of the following should become evident:
— water or wetness from or in a cut bank
— local springs, local storm drains, sewers, water lines under or behind the wall
6.0 Acceptable Block
Segmental Block units shall be used and kept free of defects that would interfere with the placing or positioning of the unit
or impair its strength. Minor cracks incidental to the usual method of manufacturing or minor chipping resulting from
shipment and delivery are not grounds for rejection.
7.0 Acceptable Geogrid
Geogrid shall be rejected if 20% or more of a structural rib has been cut or ripped. The Contractor shall inspect all geogrid
delivered to the site and reject materials that meets this criteria. If the geogrid is damaged on the construction site, it shall
be replaced at the Contractors expense.
8.0 Drainage Composite- (Applies to cut wall applications only)
Drainage Composite shall be installed to cover 30% of the cut behind the geogrid layers. It (6 ft. wide sections) provides
30% coverage when installed on 15 ft. centers and 2/3 the wall height.
9.0 Special Provisions
A) General contractor shall coordinate upper geogrid layers installation with paving installation.
B) No splices shall be made within 6 feet of each other or the modular unit.
C) Maintain the direction of drainage away from the wall face at all times during construction of the wall and finish
grading as shown on plans.
D) Placement of geogrid shall be as per plans reference to length and elevations.
E) The Engineer shall be notified by the installing contractor should the embedment depth of the block be less than 6"
for walls less than 7', and less than 9" for walls greater than 7' in height.
F) The reinforced soil is assumed to be a sandy type material (pure silts and clay are not acceptable).
10.0 Qualification of Design
A. Stability of any temporary slopes required by the installation of segmental retaining wall shall be addressed by a qualified
Georechnical Engineer. Responsibility of these temporary slopes rests with the Owner and/or Architect of this project and the
slopes shall meet all OSHA standards of maximum slope steepness = 1.5H:1V.
B. Handrail/guardrail requirements shall be determined by the Architect or General Contractor.
C. The top of wall elevation for this design has been established by the retaining wall engineer at his discretion. The
flexibility of this design allows for the top of wall to be adjusted higher of lower by 12 vertical inches and still
meet acceptable factors of safety. Any adjustments to the wall height must include maintaining a maximum geogrid
spacing of 24 inches and must be supplied to the retaining wall engineer in writing.
D. The general contractor is responsible for integrating the retaining wall installation into the project. The general contractor is
responsible for verifying that the wall configuration illustrated on these plans can be installed according to the site
information provided on the civil engineer's grading plan without conflicts associated with curb and gutter, pavement sections,
building foundations, utilities, or any other component to be installed in close proximity to this retaining wall system.
E. All conflicts or discrepancies must be presented to the retaining wall engineer at a project meeting on site before construction
begins on the retaining wall. An allowable time for revision to be made and provided by the retaining wall engineer shall be
established at the same meeting before construction begins.
NOTES
DESIGNER: MICHAEL KISER PE
Bridgewater Landing
RETAINING WALLS
Pender County, NC
DESIGNER
DRAM SCB DATE 3/29/22 INsP,
MLK DATE 3/29/22 IMP.
DALE
DALE
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8c PLANNERS M
NO.
REVISIONS
DRN
DATE
CHK
DATE
SCALE
SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL
REV.

3.0 SITE PLAN DRAWINGS

NORTH
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1 "=1,000'
SITE INFORMATION
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
OWNER:
CURRENT LAND USE:
CAMA LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
PIN:
LOGAN DEVELOPERS
60 GREGORY RD, SUITE 1
BELVILLE, NC 28451
EDENS LANE, LLC
60 GREGORY RD, SUITE 1
BELVILLE, NC 28451
EX. GRADE, TYP.
PROPOSED RIP
RAP APRON
VACANT LAND
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAUCOASTAL RESIDENTIAL
RP
RP
4214-14-4919-0000 (86.18 ACRES)
TOWNSHIP: TOPSAIL
DEED BOOK/ PAGE: 4683/103
PROPOSED USE: SFD- SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
DETACHED CONVENTIONAL (SEC. 4.15.1)
TOTAL SITE AREA: ±86.40 ACRES
SINGLE FAMILY DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSED HOUSING TYPE: ALL UNITS ARE SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING
DETACHED CONVENTIONAL
(SEC. 4.15.1)
DIMENSION (LID OPTION):
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:
MAXIMUM LOT SIZE:
FRONTYARD SETBACK:
SIDEYARD SETBACK:
CORNER SIDEYARD SETBACK:
REAR SETBACK:
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:
STRUCTURE SEPARATION (ON SEPARATE LOTS):
MINIMUM CHORD DISTANCE:
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH:
UNIT TOTALS & SITE YIELD
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY:
OPEN SPACE
TOTAL REQUIRED OPEN SPACE
139 LOTS x 0.03 AC
9,000 SF
60,000 SF
15' MINIMUM
5' MINIMUM
15' MINIMUM
12.5' MINIMUM
35'
15' MINIMUM
15'
30'
139 LOTS
4.17 AC
50% MIN. ACTIVE SPACE REQUIRED: ±2.09 AC
ACTIVE OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: ±2.31 AC
PASSIVE OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: ±16.23 AC
TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: ±18.54 AC
NAICS
CODE USE
(No Code) SFD: SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED - CONVENTIONAL AND ALL USES
ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION AND SALE OF HOMES, TEMPORARY
BUILDINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT, AMENITIES, ETC.
FLOODPLAIN NOTES
1. THIS PARCEL IS IN FLOOD ZONE X, WHICH IS NOT A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA,
ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD PANELS 3720320400J AND 3720329200J WITH AN
EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 16, 2007.
WETLAND NOTES
1. THERE ARE WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY. WETLAND JD IS APPROVED
HISTORICAL & ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES
1. NO KNOWN HISTORIC OR ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES EXIST ON ANY OF THE SUBJECT
PARCELS.
Wetland Impacts
WETLAND IMPACTS
IMPACT AREA
LENGTH
PERMANENT
IMPACT
LF
SF
ACRES
1
68
1,618
0.037
2
74
2,830
0.065
3
72
3,915
0.090
4
0
1,580
0.036
TOTAL IMPACTS =
pp
214
9,943
0.228
HENNINGS DRIVE
50' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
—62' IMPACT AREA
PERM. IMPACT LIMIT
tits.
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
1/4" PER FT
1/4" PER FT
OPROPOSED
FORCE MAIN
EDENS LANE
60' PUBLIC ROW
��IAIJ
�I U
\\:
OPROPOSED 0 PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN
— PROPOSED (2) 50 LF 24" RCP CULVERT WITH
HEADWALLS PER NCDOT STANDARDS &
SPECIFICATIONS (BURIED 5")
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 1
TYP. CROAD CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
CROSSING #1
WETLAND IMPACT: 0.037 AC
STREAM IMPACT: 68 LF
PERM. IMPACT LIMIT
PROPOSED
GRADE, TYP.
..J
EX. GRADE, TYP.
PROPOSED RIP
RAP APRON
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
HENNINGS DRIVE
50' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
—68' IMPACT AREA
PERM. IMPACT LIMIT
i
1/4" PER FT
1/4" PER FT
OPROPOSED
WATER MAIN
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
OPROPOSED 0 PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN
— PROPOSED (1) 52 LF 48" RCP CULVERT WITH
HEADWALLS PER NCDOT STANDARDS &
SPECIFICATIONS (BURIED 10"), (2) 48" RCP
FOR HIGHER STORMS
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 2
TYP. CROAD CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
PERM. IMPACT LIMIT
PROPOSED
GRADE, TYP.
..J
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
EX. GRADE, TYP.
PROPOSED RIP
RAP APRON
NOTE ALL STORM DRAI NAGE PIPING CAN BE CONSTRUCTED WITH
EITHER HDPE OR RCP, IF MEETS AND CONSTRUCTED PER
MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
o� W 0
Q
U
W
W7.4
�
6187.524jC?1°C:1
'1
= 68 F
10' x 70' SIGHT
TRIANGLE, TYP.
IMPACT #4
WETLAND IMPACT: 0.036 AC
41
40
39
37
36
\ ISTORMWATER\
BMP
\r
EATHER,, yQ\\`
\\\
BE
i
���`
NORTH
200
SCALE: 1 "=200'
400
50' PRIVATE ROW
WETLAND IMPACT #
AREA = 2,830 SF
STREAM = 74 LFo
600
i
WET AND PAC #4
CROSSING #2
WETLAND IMPACT: 0.065 AC
STREAM IMPACT: 74 LF
-1,58SF
ARITT STREE
50' PRIVATE RO
30
25
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
20
PROPOSED RI
RAP APRON
15
10
STORMWATER
BMP
10+00
30
20
■
CROSSING #3
WETLAND IMPACT: 0.09 AC
STREAM IMPACT: 72 LF
ROPOSED
GRADE
XISTING GRADE
ROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
ITCH BOTTOM
W/5" BURIED PIPE
25
20
LANGSTON ROAD
50' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
—70' IMPACT AREA
PERM. IMPACT LIMIT
1/4" PER FT
1/4" PER FT
OPROPOSED
WATER MAIN
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
OPROPOSED O PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN
— PROPOSED (1) 50 LF 48" RCP CULVERT WITH
HEADWALLS PER NCDOT STANDARDS &
SPECIFICATIONS (BURIED 10"), (2) 48" RCP
FOR HIGHER STORMS
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 3
TYP. CROAD CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
5' SIDEWALK ALONG COLLECTOR
ROADS, REFER TO STREET
CROSS SECTION, THIS SHEET
50' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSE
RETAINING WALL
15
15
2) 24' RCP (5" (FILL AT BOTTOM)
INV UP 20.50
INV DOWN 20.30
co.
N N
10
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 1
CROSS SECTION
1 "=50' HORIZONTAL
1 "=5' VERTICAL
DITCH BOTTOM
W/7" BURIED PIPE
10
5
0
25
PROPOSED
GRADE
20
ROPOSED RETAINING
WALL (52' BETWEEN
RETAINING WALLS
15
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED RIP
RAP APRON
10
(1) 48" RCP (10" (FILL AT BOTTOM)
INV UP 13.70
INV DOWN 12.30
(2) 48" RCP (HIGHER STORMS)
INV UP 15.20
INV DOWN 13.80
I
O
N
10+00
0
PENDER COUNTY GROUP 1
COLLECTOR ROAD
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 2
CROSS SECTION
1 "=50' HORIZONTAL
1 "=5' VERTICAL
PROPOSE■
RETAINING WALL
50' N
20'
25
20
15
5
PERM. IMPACT LIMIT
PROPOSED
GRADE, TYP.
..J
STORMWATER
BMP
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
PUMP STATION
VEI
t klt
0' PRIVATE RIGHT OF -WAY
25
PROPOSED
GRADE
20
PROPOSED RETAINING
WALL (55' BETWEEN
RETAINING WALLS
XISTING GRADE
DITCH BOTTO
W/5" BURIED PIPE
5
0
10
ROPOSED RIP
RAP APRON
1) 48" RCP (10" (FILL AT BOTTOM)
INV UP 10.65
INV DOWN 10.40
(2) 48" RCP (HIGHER STORMS)
INV UP 15.60
INV DOWN 15.35
N d-
cocfi
0
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 3
10+00 CROSS SECTION
1 "=50' HORIZONTAL
1 "=5' VERTICAL
LEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
J
REVISIONS:
NCDEQ PH 2 EC 01/28/22
1
CLIENT INFORMATION:
EDENS LANE, LLC
60 GREGORY ROAD, SUITE 1
BELVILLE, NC 28451
ENJGINEEIR I N G, INC,
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone] (0) [phone] (F)
NC License #: C-2846
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
TOPSAIL TOWNSHIP
PENDER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT STATUS
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT:
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT:
FINAL DESIGN:
RELEASED FOR CONST:
DRAWING INFORMATION
DATE: 03.30.21
SCALE: 1" = 200'
DESIGNED: AHE
DRAWN: JRC
CHECKED: AHE
SEAL \\\\\l CARQ,
.\N° CAR047
:� /':
\ .o�ES° 9
028847
%O ° °.GINEN'..°, '
%/,rG.cIIHLii ��.vv
5/11/22
1
FIG
PEI JOB#: 20178.PE
J

r-
EDENS LANE
SHT. C-4.
SHT. C-4.3 SHT. C-4.4
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
SEE SHEET C-4.0 FOR SWALE SCHEDULE
LEGEND:
---16---
16
NOTATION:
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SWALE
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (BY OTHERS)
DI = DROP INLET
PG = PROPOSED GRADE
EX = EXISTING GRADE
HP = HIGH POINT ELEVATION
LP = LOW POINT ELEVATION
SW = SIDEWALK ELEVATION
TW = TOP OF WALL ELEVATION
BW = BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION
1
1
1
JAMES R HALL II
PIN: 4214-06-6482-0000
DB 634, PG 92
PB 21, PG 36
1
1
i= 30.65 \
1
w w w
EDENS LANE
EXIST. th-/W (PUBLIC)
;,,,
,,,,,,,
;,L;;,-;„,;,1;; PG 30.00 :,, ,,,,
CULVERT #2 [54 LF]
[2] 18" RCP CL IV
PIPE INV.UP=26.20
PIPE INV.DWN=26.00
LLJI-
LLJ
LLJ
LLJ
1G 29.97
J
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(TYP. )
1
PG 29.55
PAD = 30.35
PG 28.50
POND 1 INLET
RIP -RAP APRON _
[10'X20'])
PAD = 31.00
PG 29.35
PAD = 31.45
PG 28.25
PG 29.90 J PG 28.00
PAD = 31.75
PAD = 33.20
PG 31.86
PG 32.45
PG 32.60
DRIVEWAY CULVERT #2 [60 LF]
24" RCP CL III (W/ FES)
[4.8" FILL AT BOTTOM]
PIPE INV.UP(NW)=26.10
PIPE INV.DWN(SE)=25.85
CULVERT #5 [52 LF]
[3] 24" RCP CL IV
PIPE INV.UP=25.60
PIPE INV.DWN=25.40
PG 31.79
PAD = 32.80
I, PG 32.30
PG 32.50 �3
26- /
STORM SCHEDULE
HILDA EDENS, TRUSTEE OF THE EDENS LIVING TRUST
PIN: 4214-15-0974-0000
DB 4725, PG 1766
29--
RIP RAP APRON 8=27
(TYP. DETAIL) �T
EL29 45
SS
SEE
-
PG 28.82 _E 15
PROPOSED SWALE
(TYP.-SEE DETAIL)
PAD = 30.15
7
PG 28.00
/
PG 24.50
POND 1 EMERGENCY
SPILLWAY
[SEE DETAIL]
[SEE DETAIL]
28--
OP
TW 25.00
BW 21.4±
TW 25.50
BW 25.50
-1.25 1.25
TW 24.00
, BW24.00
PAD = 29.40 L I vi / 1.
TW 24.00
�(n BW23.50
4
POND 1 OUTLET
STRUCTURE
[SEE DETAIL]
POND 1
I S/ )1 1
ROSSING #1
WETLAND IMPACT: 0.037 AC
STREAM IMPACT: 68 LF
1 I BTWW24.24.0000
TW 23.5
W B23.25
\
TW 25.00
BW 21.2±2±
\ \\ \\
POND 1 RIP -RAP
APRON
[SEE DETAIL]
1
PG 28.80
PG 28.50?
PAD = 29.50
PG
PG 29.00
WETLAND CROSSING #1 [50 LF]
[2] 24" RCP CL III (OR HDPE)
[5" FILL AT BOTTOM]
PIPE INV.UP=20.50
PIPE INV.DWN=20.30
AL 1PG27.•7'
WETLANDS
ET/ �a \
/re
\
\ SKIMMER
Fr
PAD = 29.55
29
LPG 28.46
IIrz0'9947
c' EL28.87
•
/ / / \
1±/// - i I \ 1 \
,E)ALL STORMDRAIIOGE PIPING CAN B �NSTRUCTED WITH
HE FIDPE OR RCP; IF MEETS \ND tONST"I CTED PER
MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS ( ( r ) i
\ \ \ I\ , / / I
BRYAN TRAVIS HALL
PIN: 4214-15-3749-0000
DB 1858, PG 210
PG 1„, PG 28.60
1
IMPACT #4
WETLAND IMPACT: 0.036 AC j
PG 28.95
PAD = 29.45
,Q.70 -0.70
SILT FENCE
(TYP.-SEE DETAIL)
PG 28.30 /
25
2
L PG 27.79
SEE SHEET C-4.5
FOR AMENITY
GRADING PLAN
N
ERICA LEWIS
PIN: 4214-15-4757-0000
DB 4167, PG 220
\\
- PG 27.25
PG 27.00 - W /
PAD = 27.45
x ►:'
PAD = 28.80 / .. T._,
\-, 3 Q " v \x�v "v
\_ \ TW 25.00
\,
\ I BW 19.00
�\ 2q� TW 25.00
BW 20.00
I PG 26.44
8
TW 20.00
BW20.00-
TW 22.00
/ BW 20.00
- RETAINING WALL
(BY OTHERS), TYP.
Upstream
Node
Downstream
Node
Diameter
(In)
Upstream
Invert
Downstream
Invert
Pipe Length
(ft)
Slope (%)
Upstream
Rim Elev
Downstream
Rim Elev
MH-4.1
FES-3.1
36
20.13
17.00
37
8.51
31.03
20.00
DI-2.1
MH-4.1
36
20.36
20.13
80
0.30
26.00
31.03
�Ly
J L MORRIS ENTERPRISES
PIN: 4204-95-5947-000L
DB 1089, PG 274
PB 22, PG 39
29
30
24
TW 19.00
BW 19.00
TW 21.00
- BW 18.00
TW19.00'
BW 19.00
TW 22.00
BW 18.50
TW 22.00
BW 14.5±
TW 23.00
BW 19.00
TW 21.25
BW 19.00
TW 25.50
BW 21.50
\ \\ 2 001� /11'
BW 22.00 -J,'`f
TW 22.00 /
BW22.00
PG 26.00
27
28
HILDA EDENS, TRUSTEE OF THE EDENS LIVING TRUST
PIN: 4214-15-7760-0000
DB 4725, PG 1766
CROSSING #2
WETLAND IMPACT: 0.065 AC
STREAM IMPACT: 74 LF
BW 14.2±
ETL \I D CROSSING #2 [52 LF]
48" P CL III [PRIMA
W
[1 1 FILL AT BOTTOM]
PE INV.UP=13.70
BW 20.00
PG 26.85
/11
PG26.70\
PG 26.37
PG 29.95
\ PG 29.80
PG 26.98
PG/EG 28.42
PG 31.30
WETLAND CROSSING #3 [52 LF]
/[2] 48" RCP CL III [SECONDARY]
PIPE INV.UP=15.20
PIPE INV.DWN=13.80
PG 27.36
PAD = 31.45
PG 27.59
50'R/W(PRI
PG 29.97
PG 31.25
3o-3A
PAD = 32.20
PG 30.70
PG 30.55 -
PG 30.42
PAD = 31.85
PG 30.90
PG 31.25
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
\ 5\\
PG 30.44
PG 30.88
32
PG 31.60
200
SCALE: 1 "=50'
PG 31.10
PG 31.19
1
1
PG/EG 27.79 ,
PG 30.80 1
PAD = 31.60
U
LLJ
LLJ
PA� LLJ
LLJ
1 v?
PG 31.62
12+64 0
EL30.8°C
PG 31.11
LLLL
PAD = 32.15
PG 31.65
1
1
1
1
1
1
PG
3`Z
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
FINAL DESIGN
REVISIONS:
NCDEQ PH 2 EC 01/28/22
02/28/22
WETLAND CROSSING REVISION
CLIENT INFORMATION:
EDENS LANE, LLC
60 GREGORY ROAD, SUITE 1
BELVILLE, NC 28451
E N G I N E E IR I N G, INC.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone] (0) [phone] (F)
NC License #: C-2846
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
TOPSAIL TOWNSHIP
PENDER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT STATUS
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT:
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT:
FINAL DESIGN:
RELEASED FOR CONST:
DRAWING INFORMATION
DATE: 09.08.21
SCALE: 1 "=50'
DESIGNED: ASR
DRAWN: ASR
CHECKED: TGC
SEAL \\\\011110///
\\' .\\\ CAROB/ //,'%
\
,,\\
OFFS 99 '�;
`0.
- 028847 i -
;o� •1GINE�� ` Q
'//Go C1 \\"\\`
04/21/22
C
4•2
PEI JOB#: 20178.PE
1

r-
EDENS LANE
SHT. C-4.1 SHT. C-4.2
SHT. C-4.4
KEY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
SEE SHEET C-4.0 FOR SWALE SCHEDULE
LEGEND:
16
NOTATION:
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SWALE
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (BY OTHERS)
DI = DROP INLET
PG = PROPOSED GRADE
EX = EXISTING GRADE
HP = HIGH POINT ELEVATION
LP = LOW POINT ELEVATION
SW = SIDEWALK ELEVATION
TW = TOP OF WALL ELEVATION
BW = BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
U
LJJ
LLJ
LLJ
LJJ
LLJ
z
-18
PG/EG 28.36) I
PG30.40`
PAD = 31.10
PG 30.11
PG 30.20
PAD = 30.70
PG 29.70
PG 30.05
32.75 PG 32.35
U ' PAD = 32.65
CQ '
1
1
1
1
1
PG 32.15
PAD = 32.05
PG 30.36
PG 31.15 %3
WETLANDS TO
REMAIN
UNDISTURBED,
TYP.
PG/EG 21.63
PG 29.85
PG 30.55
PG 31.55
PG 31.75
PG 29.91
PG 30.65
PG 29.75
PAD = 30.25
PG 29.25
.,A\E29
PG 29.34
PG
PG 30.50
PG 31.10
PG 30.85
IN PG 29.50
PG 29.30
PAD = 30.35
PG 29.85
PG 30.10
PG 30.10 -
PAD = 29.80
PG 28.80
PG 28.85
PG/EG 25.59
PG/EG 2..5s
PG 29.10
PG 28.85
PG 28.85
PAD = 29.35
POND 3 INLET
RIP -RAP APRON
[ 10'X20']
PG 28.35
PG 28.37
CULVERT #7 [50 LF]
[2] 15" RCP CL IV
PIPE INV.UP=25.20
PIPE INV.DWN=25.00
PAD = 29.85
PG 27.92
PG 27.81
PAD = 29.35
PG 28.85
PG 28.18
PAD = 29.20
PG
PAD = 30.20
PG
\/ PG 29.10 PG 29.00
PG 29.60 -
PG 29.50 PG 29.10
PG 29.90 - PG 29.35
PG 29.75 PG 29.20
PG 30.05
PG 29.80
y PG 29.27
PG 29.46 PG 29.00
PG 30.20
PG 29.75
PG 28.95
PAD = 29.45
PG 28.85 PAD = 29.35
CULVERT #6 [56 LF]
[2] 18" RCP CL IV \
PIPE INV.UP=24.75
PIPE INV.DWN=24.25
PG 27.79 •
PROPOSED SWALE
(TYP.-SEE DETAIL)
PG 28.45
\ PG 28.57
PG
PG
PG 28.19
PAD = 29.20
PG 29.00
PG 27.81
POND 2 INLET
RIP -RAP APRON
[10'X20']
PAD = 28.85
\ PG 28.80
HILDA EDENS, TRUSTEE OF THE EDENS LIVING TRUST
PIN: 4214-25-3147-0000
DB 4725, PG 1766
POND 3 EMERGENCY
SPILLWAY
[SEE DETAIL]
WET POND 3
TW 17.00
BW 17.00
POND 2 RIP -RAP
APRON
[SEE DETAIL]
POND 2 OUTLET
STRUCTURE
[SEE DETAIL]
WETLANDS
J L MORRIS ENTERPRISES
PIN : 4204-95-5947-000L
DB 1089, PG 274
PB 22, PG 39
POND 3 OUTLET
STRUCTURE
[SEE DETAIL]
POND 3 RIP -RAP
APRON
[SEE DETAIL]
WETLAND CROSSING #3 [50 LF]
48" RCP CL III [PRIMARY]
[9.6" FILL AT BOTTOM]
PIPE INV.UP=10.65
PIPE INV.DWN=10.40
RIP RAP APRON
(TYP. - SEE DETAIL)
RETAINING WALL
(BY OTHERS),
TYP.
WETL
RO
wE
WETLANDS \ \
CROSSING #3
WETLAND IMPACT: 0.09 AC
STREAM IMPACT: 72 LF
[2] 48" RCP CL III [SECONDARY]
TW 16.00
�BW16.00 r�
NOTE ALL STORMDRAINAGE PIPING CAN BE CONSTRUCTED WITH
EITHER HDPE OR RCP, IF MEETS AND CONSTRUCTED PER
MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
A
PIPE INV.UP=15.60
\ \
\ \\% MPACT FOR N \ \
AND CULVERT
TALLATION, TYP.\� �s\ ST
WETLAND CROSSING #4 [50 LF] \\�4 [SE
PIPE INV.DWN=15.35
N
\
/
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
POND 4 RIP -RAP
APRON
[SEE DETAIL]
POND 4
SKIMMER y')?
[SEE DETAIL]
200
SCALE: 1 "=50'
1
1
1
1
//
Ale 0,0
M
U
LJJ
LLJ
LLJ
LJJ
1
1
Knew what's below.
CaII before you dig.
LLJ
z
FINAL DESIGN
REVISIONS:
NCDEQ PH 2 EC 01/28/22
02/28/22
WETLAND CROSSING REVISION
CLIENT INFORMATION:
EDENS LANE, LLC
60 GREGORY ROAD, SUITE 1
BELVILLE, NC 28451
E N G I N E E R I N G, INC.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone] (0) [phone] (F)
NC License #: C-2846
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
TOPSAIL TOWNSHIP
PENDER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT STATUS
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT:
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT:
FINAL DESIGN:
RELEASED FOR CONST:
DRAWING INFORMATION
DATE: 09.08.21
SCALE: 1 "=50'
DESIGNED: ASR
DRAWN: ASR
CHECKED: TGC
L \\\\\liuili\c/4./
SEI,7
_ 028847 ° _
O °° 'NGINE-Qe'er \-
,,/ yGCLINE ,\
05/11/22
C 4•3
PEI JOB#: 20178.PE

SERVICE NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ONE (1) 1-INCH WATER
SERVICE PER LOT AND ONE (1) 4-INCH SEWER
SERVICE PER LOT.
J L MORRIS ENTERPRISES
PIN: 4204-95-5947-000L
DB 1089, PG 274
PB 22, PG 39
ZONING: GB
10
PROPERTY LINE
(TYP. )
w
v`
UTILITY NOTES: (NCAC 15A.02T.0305 / T15A.18C.0906)
WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID SO AS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET FROM SEWERS. IF CONDITIONS EXIST SUCH THAT
THIS SEPARATION CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, THE WATER MAIN CAN BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER, EITHER IN A
SEPARATE TRENCH, OR IN THE SAME TRENCH ON A BENCH OF UNDISTURBED EARTH.
2. WHEN CROSSING A WATER MAIN OVER A SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LAID AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE SEWER. IF CONDITIONS EXIST
SUCH THAT THIS SEPARATION CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, BOTH THE WATER MAIN AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH
JOINTS THAT MEET WATER MAIN STANDARDS. THE DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL EXTEND 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CROSSING WITH A SECTION OF
WATER MAIN PIPE CENTERED ON THE CROSSING.
3. CROSSING A WATER MAIN UNDER A SEWER. WHENEVER IT IS NECESSARY FORA WATER MAIN TO CROSS UNDER A SEWER, BOTH THE WATER MAIN AND
THE SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF FERROUS MATERIALS AND WITH JOINTS EQUIVALENT TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A DISTANCE OF 10
FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE POINT OF CROSSING. A SECTION OF WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED AT THE POINT OF CROSSING.
4. WHERE VERTICAL CLEARANCE IS LESS THAN 24" BETWEEN SANITARY SEWER AND STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR
A MINIMUM OF 10' EITHER SIDE OF CROSSING AND STORM DRAIN SHALL BE RC PIPE.
5. WHERE VERTICAL CLEARANCE IS LESS THAN 18" BETWEEN WATER MAIN AND STORM DRAIN, WATER MAIN SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR A MINIMUM
OF 10' EITHER SIDE OF CROSSING AND STORM DRAIN SHALL BE RC PIPE.
6. A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 12" SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF OTHER UTILITIES.
.i-10 MATCHLINE - SHEET C-5.3
�� % ' 11 rr� _7.
„,,
,,
,,,
--
11+00
32
(1) 8"x8" MJ TEE
(2) 8" MJ GATE VALVE
SSMH-042 -
n_
HENNINGS DRIVE
50' PRIVATE R/W
PROPOSED CULVERT (TYP.) SSMH-030
(SEE GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLANS)
eL
EQ-
Q O
G)
MATCHLINE - SHEET C-5.6
Io
G)
8" C-900 (DR-18)
- PVC WATER MAIN
PROPOSED SWALE TYP.)
(SEE GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLANS)
0
HENNINGS DRIVE PLAN VIEW
STA. 10+00 TO STA. 16+50
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "=50'
NOTE ALL STORMDRAINAGE PIPING CAN BE CONSTRUCTED WITH
EITHER HDPE OR RCP, IF MEETS AND CONSTRUCTED PER
MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
MATCHLINE - SHEET C-5.2
T
SSMH-031
SSMH-030
_r/
/
TIMIN
i 11 l:ll '
(1) 8" X 6" MJ TEE
(1) FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
/
�J u -
o
b)
(1) 8"x8" MJ TEE c"
(2) 8" MJ GATE VALVE -
SSMH-029 \
N
PROPOSED DRAINAGE C°
EASEMENT (TYP.)
4)
I-
(1) 8"x8" MJ TEE /
(2) 8" MJ GATE VALVE 1
LANE 5°' --
A PRIAVATE _ wco
MATCHLINE - SEE RIGHT
z
J
GRAVITY SEWER NOTES;
1. ALL MANHOLES LOCATED WITHIN 50' OF WETLANDS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
1.1. SEAMS SHALL BE EXTERNALLY TAPED / SEALED WITH WATERTIGHT MATERIAL.
1.2. ALL MANHOLE INTERIORS SHALL BE FULLY LINED WITH WATERPROOF COATING.
1.3. MANHOLES SHALL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C1244 "STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR CONCRETE SEWER MANHOLES BY NEGATIVE AIR PRESSURE (VACUUM) TEST
PRIOR TO BACKFILL.
2. ALL SEWER PIPE MATERIALS, INSTALLATION, AND TESTING SHALL MEET WATER MAIN STANDARDS WHEN LOCATED WITHIN 50' OF WETLANDS.
WATER MAIN NOTES;
1. ALL WATER MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 5' FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
2. NO VALVES, HYDRANTS, OR OTHER WATER MAIN APPURTENANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SWALES.
FORCE MAIN NOTES;
1. ALL FORCE MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 5' FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
2. NO VALVES OR OTHER FORCE MAIN APPURTENANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SWALES.
17+00
SS ASS
1
1
4" C-900 (DR-18)
PVC FORCE MAIN
(4' MIN. COVER)
ss
ti
90�3��0
/
)
PAD = 29.85
(1)8"X6"MJTEE
(1 FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
RMN7ri5)
8" C-900 (DR-18)
PVC WATER MAIN
PG 28.82
SSMH-028
(1) 4" MJ 90° BEND -
/
/
/ (84
PAD =30.15
HENNINGS DRIVE
50' PRIVATE R/W
4" C-900 (DR-18)
PVC FORCE MAIN
(4' MIN. COVER)
I;
PAD =
PG 28.00 ti,(
HENNINGS DRIVE PLAN VIEW
STA. 16+50 TO STA. 19+50
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "=50'
12'
\
PAD
W 25.00
BW 25.]
TW 25.50
BW 24.00
HIGH
POINT
STA. =
10+55.43
HIGH POINt
FVI STA.
ELEV.
= 10+
= 32.55
5.0d
PVI STA. =
11+50.00
PVI ELEV.
= 32.79
PVI
ELEV.
=
K = 5
31.5•
K
- 43'
VC
50' 'VC
�
o
IGH
POINT
STA.
= 16+86100'
53
6
4-
o
+
■■■■■■■■■
PN
LOW OITS
bW
'VI
o
N
co
PVT STA. = 1'
_PVT ELEV.
■■■■■■■■■
POINT
PVI StA.
ELEV.
= 15+60.63
=
28.$7
PVI
STA.
ELEV.
= 17+00.63
=
29.67
OW
POINT
STA. =
182'/
616
II
>
■■■■■■■■■
PVI
ELEV.
=
=
71'
28..9
ELEV.
PVI STA. = 18+d5.6'3
C S7A. L 16+50.63
100
VC-
rA. 17+50I63
LIJ
w
;
■■■■■■■■■
100
VC
PV
ELEV.21.36
>
o
0
0
_
1 bo' VC
-
a
■■■■■■■■■
n
N
;
'
II
N
PROPOSED
GRADE
Q
II
■■■■
VT STA. = 19+3!
wT �LEV. = 27.)/
w
0.70/a
°
=
■
111
EXISTING
GRADE
�
in
I
w
Q-_
[2]
18"
0 RCP
-
-
-
---
-
PVC FORCE
MAIN
25/
ail
�_
ill
(4' MIN.
COVER)
17
LF
OF
8 IN.
C-900
PV
(DF
149
LF OF 8
�-
`
.
�■■������
PVC
g" C-900
(DR-18)
WATER MAIN
IN.
900 PVC DR-18)
@ 0.40
/
-
`
-
-
41111
SANITARY/WATER
mial//I54
•,,
LF
.
•
•
��
Z
•
•'
'
•��
' �'
`--
vim"
�„A
5 LF
'
TOTAL)
OF
il
8
I_-���������
CROSSING.
USE 45° VERT.
•
in
��
-�
,_
_':,,
]
1
BENDS & DUCTILE IRON
PIPE
TO PROVIDE 18"MIN.
-■
_
_'
�_
-
WATER/STORM
CROSSING.
-
USE
DUCTILE
45° VERT. DTO
IRON PIPE
SEPARATION AS REQ'D
\_,
PROVIDE
18" MIN.
[TYP.] (SEE NOTE)
CROSSING.USE 45°
[M 2] 24' RCP
��,
SANITARY / STORM CROSSING.
VERT. BENDS &
SANITARY/WATER J
SEPARATION
AS REQ'D
CROSSING. USE 45° VERT.
_�_
[TYP.]
(SEE NOTE)
PROVIDE 20 LF DIP (PRESSURE CL.
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
BENDS & DUCTILE IRON
0 0 0
0
350) SANITARY MAIN CENTERED AT
CROSSING AND BRIDGE STORM
0
Mo
o
TO PROVIDE 18"MIN.
2
0
2
PIPE TO PROVIDE 18" MIN.
SEPARATION AS REQ'D
SEWER AS REQ'D [TYP. - 0" TO 12" �n
SEPARATION AS
[TYP.] (SEE NOTE)
�
P SEPARATION] (SEE NOTE & DETAIL)�o
REQ'D [TYP.] (SEE
NOTE)
M
N
i1
6.9
6.91
6.2d
26!
M
N
f
= 24.72
UT=24
021
16+4
129.�7
N
N
o
-StA. = 17+87-
RIVI=128.60
M N
CO
N-II
u Is
NV
o-
II
.H
o
M N • N II
-o II is
M
o-6'
'
M-N
71-
a
II
u
±
=
II 1 z0
Q »
2
II NZZ0
» >
zO
»
2
zQ
»
u)u�zzz
7
c2i1
��
c2n
��Ezz
zz
1
zz
I
co
N
co
I-- co
N N
N co
M
in N
N
N co
M
N I�
M T
N M
M
In
O T
r M
M
O
N O
r co
M
O r
co T
O M
M
CO O
O
O co
M
O M
T O
O co
M
M M
O O
O M
N
I� M
O
O M
N
N M
T O
O M
N
OD CO
O O
O N
N
OD I�
O O
O N
N
N CO
co O
O N
N
M O
OD
O N
N
LI, r
O O
O N
N
CO CO
0
O N
N
co
co M
N
N
r O)
0 0
N
N
9+50
10+00
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+00
15+00
HENNINGS DRIVE - PROFILE VIEW
STA. 10+00 TO STA. 19+50
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "=50'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1 "=5'
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00
CROSSING #1
WETLAND IMPACT: 0.037 AC
STREAM IMPACT: 68 LF
■
1
1
45
40
35
30
MATCHLINE - SHEET C-5.5
WATER/STORM CROSSING.
PROVIDE 18" MIN.
SEPARATION AS REQ'D
25 [TYP.] (SEE NOTE)
SANITARY/STORM
20 CROSSING. PROVIDE 20 LF
DIP (PRESSURE CL. 350)
SANITARY MAIN CENTERED
AT CROSSING
15
10
19+50
FORCE MAIN / STORM
CROSSING. PROVIDE 18"
MIN. SEPARATION AS REQ'D
[TYP.] (SEE NOTE)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
200
SCALE: 1 "=50'
FINAL DESIGN
REVISIONS:
NCDEQ PH 2 EC 01/28/22
CLIENT INFORMATION:
EDENS LANE, LLC
60 GREGORY ROAD, SUITE 1
BELVILLE, NC 28451
ENGINEERING, INJC.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone] (0) [phone] (F)
NC License #: C-2846
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
TOPSAIL TOWNSHIP
PENDER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT STATUS
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT:
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT:
FINAL DESIGN:
RELEASED FOR CONST:
DRAWING INFORMATION
DATE: 09.08.21
SCALE: 1" = 50'
DESIGNED: ASR
DRAWN: ASR
CHECKED: TGC
SEAL \\\\\\l111ii,1
°°PS° ° 9 ,
028847 -
;-off° GIN�a' '
-
4/20/22
C
5•4
PEI JOB#: 20178.PE

(1) 2"X2"
COMPRESSION WYE
REDUCE TO IRRIGATION
SERVICE CLASS 200 CTS
POLYETHYLENE
(1) 1" 45° BEND
I 1
(1) 3/4" IRRIGATION METER (PER PCU STD. DETAIL)
(1) 1" RPZ BFP & ENCLOSURE (WATTS LF909 OR APPROVED EQUAL)
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
SERVICE NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ONE (1) 1-INCH WATER
SERVICE PER LOT AND ONE (1) 4-INCH SEWER
SERVICE PER LOT.
2" DOMESTIC METER (PER PCU STD. DETAIL) \ \ y ��\
2" RPZ BFP & ENCLOSURE (WATTS LF909 OR APPROVED EQUAL) 'AN. 28.80
111
PROVIDE 6" SEWER SERVICE
FOR AMENITY BUILDING.
k
PG 28 46
8" C-900 (DR-18
PVC WATER MAIN
G 28.43
4' C 900 (DR 18)
PVC FORCE MAIN
(4' MIN. COVER)
2" CLASS 200 CTS
POLYETHYLENE 3M� 3
DOMESTIC
SERVICE
we
BW 19.00
1)8"X6"MJTEE
(1) FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
HENNNIGS DRIVE ,
50 PRIVATE R/W J PG 26.4,4
N
UTILITY NOTES: (NCAC 15A.02T.0305 / T15A.18C.0906)
1. WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID SO AS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET FROM SEWERS. IF CONDITIONS EXIST SUCH THAT
THIS SEPARATION CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, THE WATER MAIN CAN BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER, EITHER IN A
SEPARATE TRENCH, OR IN THE SAME TRENCH ON A BENCH OF UNDISTURBED EARTH.
2. WHEN CROSSING A WATER MAIN OVER A SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LAID AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE SEWER. IF CONDITIONS EXIST
SUCH THAT THIS SEPARATION CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, BOTH THE WATER MAIN AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH
JOINTS THAT MEET WATER MAIN STANDARDS. THE DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL EXTEND 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CROSSING WITH A SECTION OF
WATER MAIN PIPE CENTERED ON THE CROSSING.
3. CROSSING A WATER MAIN UNDER A SEWER. WHENEVER IT IS NECESSARY FORA WATER MAIN TO CROSS UNDER A SEWER, BOTH THE WATER MAIN AND
THE SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF FERROUS MATERIALS AND WITH JOINTS EQUIVALENT TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A DISTANCE OF 10
FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE POINT OF CROSSING. A SECTION OF WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED AT THE POINT OF CROSSING.
4. WHERE VERTICAL CLEARANCE IS LESS THAN 24" BETWEEN SANITARY SEWER AND STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR
A MINIMUM OF 10' EITHER SIDE OF CROSSING AND STORM DRAIN SHALL BE RC PIPE.
5. WHERE VERTICAL CLEARANCE IS LESS THAN 18" BETWEEN WATER MAIN AND STORM DRAIN, WATER MAIN SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR A MINIMUM
OF 10' EITHER SIDE OF CROSSING AND STORM DRAIN SHALL BE RC PIPE.
6. A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 12" SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF OTHER UTILITIES.
PAL) = 2 /.45 ,
00
~---- TW19.00
j BW 19.00
TW 25.00 �� `, TW 21.00
BW 18.00
TW 19.00
►�►��BW 19.00
TW 22.00
ti
III„ �� -. itt -
/ -
SSMH-026im/WAW - '//,Z
jr.irf
HENNINGS DRIVE PLAN VIEW
STA. 19+50 TO STA. 25+50
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "=50'
/ 15'
CROSSING #2
WETLAND IMPACT: 0.065 AC
STREAM IMPACT: 74 LF
% �'�/ /-/./ / //-- /,0'
/// /// ..--‘,./ / // /j
\oz
Z- „--
/ jAti��jj/`_-�i
PROPOSED WETLANDS
/ CROSSING CULVERT (TYP.)
/// 7- (SEE GRADING AND
/ ' DRAINAGE PLANS)
i
/
PG/EG 28.42
•
MATCHLINE - SHEET C-5.7
O
/7
561' ;DI
co
co
o
:a
♦ co
a
PROPOSED SWALE (TYP.)
(SEE GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLANS)
17 m
a
ti
'Lsz<z<,
v/k,
c9
d
GRAVITY SEWER NOTES;
1. ALL MANHOLES LOCATED WITHIN 50' OF WETLANDS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
1.1. SEAMS SHALL BE EXTERNALLY TAPED / SEALED WITH WATERTIGHT MATERIAL.
1.2. ALL MANHOLE INTERIORS SHALL BE FULLY LINED WITH WATERPROOF COATING.
1.3. MANHOLES SHALL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C1244 "STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR CONCRETE SEWER MANHOLES BY NEGATIVE AIR PRESSURE (VACUUM) TEST
PRIOR TO BACKFILL.
2. ALL SEWER PIPE MATERIALS, INSTALLATION, AND TESTING SHALL MEET WATER MAIN STANDARDS WHEN LOCATED WITHIN 50' OF WETLANDS.
WATER MAIN NOTES;
1. ALL WATER MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 5' FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
2. NO VALVES, HYDRANTS, OR OTHER WATER MAIN APPURTENANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SWALES.
FORCE MAIN NOTES;
1. ALL FORCE MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 5' FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
2. NO VALVES OR OTHER FORCE MAIN APPURTENANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SWALES.
Q.
NI
8" C-900 (DR-18) a
PVC WATER MAIN
M /
o,
NiN� TE RIVJ
5o PR\ P
SSMH-023
4" C-900 (DR-18)
PVC FORCE MAIN
\ (4' MIN. COVER)
9
MATCHLINE - SHEET C-5.7
SSMH-024
(1) 4" MJ 90° BEND
i I -
a ��
T_-
1
I
28+87
js
HENNINGS DRIVE PLAN VIEW
MATCHLINE - SHEET C-5.6
STA. 25+50 TO STA. 28+77
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 =50
HI
H POIIIT StA.
= 27+1/72
HrGH
POIN LEV. = 321b8
PVI STA. = 26+60 63
PVI
BLEV.
=
32.90
K=43'
200 VC
HIGI-
POINT
STA. =
20+90.47
PVI STA.
= 22+10.63
com
O
com
ELEV.
STA. = 20+85.6
= 28.8�
PVI �LEV.
= 28.18
M
HIGH POINT
PVI
LOW
POINT
STA.
23+85.22
+ co
PVC ELEV. = 29.d
1 1 1 1 I
n
PVC 5TA. =2I
N
II
II
PVI
EL�V.
= 29.06
65'
K =
100
69'
VC
Lb
�POINTfA
ELEV.
=
63.'L4
PVC STA.1= 21+60.63
PVC ELEV. = ?8.53 I'
m
o
b
VC
PVI
�LEV.
=
23 90
2
-J
I-
-
m
1
0'
-
UHi-
a
�
co
co
�
N
II
`-
K
200
VC
V
+ •
co
N
II
m
CO
O
'1"
CO
EV: = 27.50
1 1 1
s
VC STA. =
IVC 'ELEV.
O
+
N II
II
QW
COW
5
as
5
(+(
N
II
II
N
II
ULW
--1
¢
1.07%
��
d�
¢w
jyI
08%
a�
I
�.70
PROPOSED
GRADE
%
�
�
\.
7
`
2.
/4A
EXISTING
GRADE
'�
MOM
C-900
96
LF
PVC
OF 8 I
(DR-18)
..
,'
,'
N.
C-900
PVC
`
DR-18)
@ -0.40%
,
PVC
WATER
MAIN
91
F OF
8 IN. C-900
PVC
(DR-1 .
@ -0.40%
1
5 L
OF
8
IN.
C-900
175
PVC
'DR-18)
@ -0.40%
LF OF 8
IN.
900 PVC (DR-18)
@ -0.40%
1
4" C-900 (DR-18)
PVC FORCE MAIN
\,
iv
,
(4' MIN. COVER)
._,
°'
'
i
N
9
N
O
N
O
N
O
V IN.62
I2520.94 (SSMH
topT420;84I
[3]
48"
0
RCP
RIM -INV IN 3119.42 (SSMH
INV OUT = 19;32 I
INV IN 25.94 (SSMH-02
NVIN 25.58 (SSMH-00.
N
N
O
CO
t-CO
m
N
N
O
-SfA. = 24+88-
RIM =126.63
N
N
O N
t
N II
II
N
O
O
N
N
9
-A. 20
M=28.�
VIN=2
V OUT
iMH-024
A. 2~7
M=31.�
V OUT;
2
2
II
Q
=
z O
=
�Q
II
SSMH-(
STA. =
co
(o
u)
(�
(�
(�
U)
Z Z
T
co
O
I� N
N
M O
M
O N
N
r
I'
co N
N
co
O O
O N
N
r O
O
O N
N
in r
r
O N
N
M Cn
M
N
N
I�
N Oj
O -
N
N r
-
N
O co
N C,�
N
N
Cn
O
N
N
co
r
I� N
N
N co
O
O N
N
COO
O N
M
O
O
r M
M
in O
O O
N CO
CO
M O
O
r CO
M
co
Oj
r N
M
O
O
CO
19+50
20+00
21+00
22+00
23+00
24+00
25+00
HENNINGS DRIVE - PROFILE VIEW
STA. 19+50 TO STA. 28+77
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "=50'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1 "=5'
26+00
27+00
28+00
45
40
35
30
8"x8" MJ TEE
(2) 8" MJ GATE VALVE
LC)
SSMH-038
Q
d
co
0
0
a-
NOTE ALL STORMDRAINAGE PIPING
CAN BE CONSTRUCTED WITH
EITHER HDPE OR RCP, IF MEETS
AND CONSTRUCTED PER
MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
25
FORCE MAIN / WATER
CROSSING. PROVIDE 18"
MIN. SEPARATION AS REQ'D
[TYP.] (SEE NOTE)
20
15
10
29+00
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
200
SCALE: 1 "=50'
FINAL DESIGN
REVISIONS:
NCDEQ PH 2 EC 101/28/22
02/28/22
WETLAND CROSSING REVISION
CLIENT INFORMATION:
EDENS LANE, LLC
60 GREGORY ROAD, SUITE 1
BELVILLE, NC 28451
E N G I N E E IR I N G,
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone] (0) [phone] (F)
NC License #: C-2846
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
TOPSAIL TOWNSHIP
PENDER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT STATUS
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT:
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT:
FINAL DESIGN:
RELEASED FOR CONST:
DRAWING INFORMATION
DATE: 09.08.21
SCALE: 1" = 50'
DESIGNED: ASR
DRAWN: ASR
CHECKED: TGC
SEAL 0\011111 i/,
° OFES ° , 9
028847 -
:FNGIN�''Q.•
y°'° ° ...°..°°S
-, G. c� N`Q \.
4/20/22
C 5•5
PEI JOB#: 20178.PE

SERVICE NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ONE (1) 1-INCH WATER
SERVICE PER LOT AND ONE (1) 4-INCH SEWER
SERVICE PER LOT.
MATCHLINE - SHEET C-5.7
1
SSMH-01 8
PG2��
(1) 4" MJ 90° BEND
z
Ctkt-
MATCHLINE - SHEET C-5.7
45
40
35
30
25
20
WATER/FORCEMAIN
CROSSING. PROVIDE 18"
MIN. SEPARATION AS
REQ'D [TYP.] (SEE NOTE)
15
10
5
0
UTILITY NOTES: (NCAC 15A.02T.0305 / T15A.18C.0906)
1. WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID SO AS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET FROM SEWERS. IF CONDITIONS EXIST SUCH THAT
THIS SEPARATION CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, THE WATER MAIN CAN BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER, EITHER IN A
SEPARATE TRENCH, OR IN THE SAME TRENCH ON A BENCH OF UNDISTURBED EARTH.
2. WHEN CROSSING A WATER MAIN OVER A SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LAID AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE SEWER. IF CONDITIONS EXIST
SUCH THAT THIS SEPARATION CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, BOTH THE WATER MAIN AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH
JOINTS THAT MEET WATER MAIN STANDARDS. THE DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL EXTEND 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CROSSING WITH A SECTION OF
WATER MAIN PIPE CENTERED ON THE CROSSING.
3. CROSSING A WATER MAIN UNDER A SEWER. WHENEVER IT IS NECESSARY FORA WATER MAIN TO CROSS UNDER A SEWER, BOTH THE WATER MAIN AND
THE SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF FERROUS MATERIALS AND WITH JOINTS EQUIVALENT TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A DISTANCE OF 10
FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE POINT OF CROSSING. A SECTION OF WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED AT THE POINT OF CROSSING.
4. WHERE VERTICAL CLEARANCE IS LESS THAN 24" BETWEEN SANITARY SEWER AND STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR
A MINIMUM OF 10' EITHER SIDE OF CROSSING AND STORM DRAIN SHALL BE RC PIPE.
5. WHERE VERTICAL CLEARANCE IS LESS THAN 18" BETWEEN WATER MAIN AND STORM DRAIN, WATER MAIN SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR A MINIMUM
OF 10' EITHER SIDE OF CROSSING AND STORM DRAIN SHALL BE RC PIPE.
6. A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 12" SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF OTHER UTILITIES.
CROSSING #3
WETLAND IMPACT: 0.09 AC
STREAM IMPACT: 72 LF
\ \
STORMWATER \ N.
POND N N
\ \
(1) 8"x8" MJ TEE
(2) 8" MJ GATE VALVE
•STORMWATER
POND
(1) 8" X 6" MJ TEE
(1) FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY r/
1 t //
I
IMPACT #3
r 1 //.P:,�.t��i1 41 1
II1
1
„zz:\ � � 13M l3M 13N1 ��I I/ /�-� \-Z� /�� / �\� \ \ \� (1)8"X6"MJTEE\ ` ��_ / ��\\ ()kr � J ASSEMBLY
\11')11�11 ' 24--
II \ \
8" C-900 (DR-18) \ (1) 8" MJ 11.25° BEND
PVC WATER MAIN
/ / 7I
SSMH-016
LANGSTON ROAD
/ / 50' PRIVATE R/W
PROPOSED WETLANDS
CROSSING CULVERT (TYP.) \ /
/ (SEE GRADING AND \ /
DRAINAGE PLANS) \ /
I I I I I I I I � I,/
I N
1d1 1 1 \
I 1 1 1 , ` \
/
15+00
PROPOSED SWALE (TYP.)
(SEE GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLANS)
LANGSTON ROAD PLAN VIEW
STA. 10+00 TO STA. 19+50
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "=50'
16+00
GRAVITY SEWER NOTES;
1. ALL MANHOLES LOCATED WITHIN 50' OF WETLANDS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
1.1. SEAMS SHALL BE EXTERNALLY TAPED / SEALED WITH WATERTIGHT MATERIAL.
1.2. ALL MANHOLE INTERIORS SHALL BE FULLY LINED WITH WATERPROOF COATING.
1.3. MANHOLES SHALL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C1244 "STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR CONCRETE SEWER MANHOLES BY NEGATIVE AIR PRESSURE (VACUUM) TEST
PRIOR TO BACKFILL.
2. ALL SEWER PIPE MATERIALS, INSTALLATION, AND TESTING SHALL MEET WATER MAIN STANDARDS WHEN LOCATED WITHIN 50' OF WETLANDS.
WATER MAIN NOTES;
1. ALL WATER MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 5' FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
2. NO VALVES, HYDRANTS, OR OTHER WATER MAIN APPURTENANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SWALES.
FORCE MAIN NOTES;
1. ALL FORCE MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 5' FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
2. NO VALVES OR OTHER FORCE MAIN APPURTENANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SWALES.
1 FIRE HYDRANT \
`\ \
\ \ \
`"
(1)8"MJ22.5°BEND
_
SSMH-01 5
/
STORMWATER
POND
(1) 8" MJ 11.25° BEND
4" C-900 (DR-18)
PVC FORCE MAIN
(4' MIN. COVER)
MATCHLINE - SHEET C-5.9
NOTE ALL STORMDRAINAGE PIPING CAN BE CONSTRUCTED WITH
EITHER HDPE OR RCP, IF MEETS AND CONSTRUCTED PER
MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
PVI
STA.
-
15+50.00
PVI
STA.
= 11+25.00
PVI
ELEV.
=
27.08
PVI
ELEV.
K
= 60'
= 25.98
K =
120'
52'
VC
o
o
00
100'
VC
0
-
0 0
LOW
LOW
POINT
POINT
STA.
ELEV.
= 13+12.34
-
21.611
0
00
+
C9
V. = 27.50I
��
1-
U
>
o+
_
°
N
"
PVI
STA.
=
13+00.00
+
Lo
N
EXISTING
GRADEA
u
w
ii
w
PVI
ELEV.
K=
=
38'
19.58
ii
•
J
u
250'
VC
cn
J
w
a
(I) W
n w
so
w
PROPOSED GRADE
—\
> >
> >
o
>
>
>
>
rNiP
d- N
E
2.0p�0
u•
.7o°i°
oII
+
>
_�
\�
-�
,
is
as
i
'
U
3°1O
8"
MIN.
\
\
`\
---
4" C-900
(DR-18)
\�
•■
��PVC
-.alai
FORCE MAIN
\\
M
III
(4' MIN. COVER)
-...111111111111"1111111111111
�'��
rl�
[2]
48"
O RCP
8"
C-900
(DR-18)
PVC
WATER
MAIN
I.,
`\
i
ep
(V
206
L
OF 8 IN.
C-900
PVC
v
�i
N
h1
'
1;.-
/
(DR-18)
@ -0.40%
1
/
209
LF
(TOT•
L
OF 8 IN.
C-900
PVC
(DR-18)
@ 0.40%
243 LF OF 8 IN. C-900 PVC
(DR-18) @ -0.40%
�
I _
WATER/STORM
CROSSING. PROVIDE
340 LF
@
-0.40%
OF 8
IN.
C-900
PVC
(DR-18
SANITARY/STORM CROSSING.
I
i
;
CD
`�
NECESSARY BENDS FOR FULL PIPE AT 18"
SEPARATION CENTERED AT CROSSING.
PROVIDE 20 LF DIP (40 LF
k
jI
TOTAL) (PRESSURE CL. 350)
48"
0 RCP
FORCEMAIN/STORM CROSSING.
PROVIDE NECESSARY BENDS FOR
SANITARY MAIN CENTERED
18" MIN. SEPARATION.
AT EACH
CROSSING
INTERFERENCE STRUCTURE
`
0
C°
0
°'
o
cc')
no
00
0
_
_
_
_
_
s
u)(0�
(
■■■
SS H-0 16
ST'.=14+1.
RIM = 3.06
co
INV IN=21'.581
INV OUT = 15.2'
ST . = 12+07
RIM = 2.96
INV IN = 14.54
INV OUT = 14.2
oo
0
STA. =10+
RIM = 28.5
INV IN = 15
o
��LO
u�
o
ST . = 16+
RIM = 27.6�
INV IN=12
INV OUT
I
1
s
2
z0
w
co
zz
r
O
N
0) O
O
O N
N
O CO
NCO
N
CO N
N
N
N N
O OM
ui r
N
N O
M r
N
CO O
N r
N
CO O
O OO
N
N
CO
NCC)
N
N
N r
N N
N
CO O
O O
4 N
N
N O
CON.
6 NCO
N
N
N
N CO
co
I� N
N
OD O
N
CO O)
O
coNNOD
N
O N
OO
N
CO CO
O
coNN
N
O O)
T O
O N
N
CO M
Lo O
O N
N
9+50
10+00
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+00
15+00
LANGSTON ROAD - PROFILE VIEW
STA. 10+00 TO STA. 19+50
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "=50'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1 "=5'
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
19+50
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
200
SCALE: 1 "=50'
FINAL DESIGN
REVISIONS:
NCDEQ PH 2 EC 01/28/22
02/28/22
N
N
N
0
WETLAND CROSSING REVISION
WETLAND CROSSING REVISION
CLIENT INFORMATION:
EDENS LANE, LLC
60 GREGORY ROAD, SUITE 1
BELVILLE, NC 28451
ENGINEERING, INJC.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone] (0) [phone] (F)
NC License #: C-2846
BRIDGEWATER LANDING
TOPSAIL TOWNSHIP
PENDER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT STATUS
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT:
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT:
FINAL DESIGN:
RELEASED FOR CONST:
DRAWING INFORMATION
DATE: 09.08.21
SCALE: 1" = 50'
DESIGNED: ASR
DRAWN: ASR
CHECKED: TGC
SEAL \\\\'Viol///
028847
...c.,....,,i;
//// 1 CII1\\\`\
5/11/22
C
5•8
PEI JOB#: 20178.PE

4.0 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-00135 County: Pender County U.S.G.S.Quad:Topsail
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: Eden's Lane LLC
D Logan
Address: 60 Gregory Road
Suite 1
Belville,NC,28451
Telephone Number: 910-232-6720
Size(acres) 87.7 Nearest Town Hampstead
Nearest Waterway Mullet Run River Basin Onslow Bay
USGS HUC 03020302 Coordinates Latitude:34.415966
Longitude:-77.63682
Location description: The project area is located off Edens Lane on 87.7 acres,Pender County,North Carolina.Pin#'s ID:
4214-14-4919-0000.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ There are waters,including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403). The
waters,including wetlands, have been delineated,and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,including
determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts,compensatory mitigation requirements,and other
resource protection measures,a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However,you may request an approved JD,which is an appealable action,by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33
USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).However,since the
waters,including wetlands, have not been properly delineated,this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the
permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary determination is merely an effective
presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters,including wetlands, at the project area,which is not sufficiently
accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters of the U.S. on your
property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to
obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403)and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§
1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
X There are waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
Page 1 of 2

SAW-2021-00135
_ The waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified
by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion,this survey should be reviewed and
verified by the Corps. Once verified,this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on
your property which,provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations,may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed
by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on .Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S.,to include wetlands,present on the above described project area which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City,NC,at(252)808-2808 to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US,including wetlands,without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC§ 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,construction or
placement of structures,or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC§401 and/or 403).If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program,please contact Thomas Charles at(910)251-4101 or
thorn as.p.charles(a,u sace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: The project area exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland
Delineation Manual and appropriate Regional Supplement.This determination is based on information submitted by
LMG and a desktop review by Thomas Charles(7/2/2021). See attached Approved JD forms.
D. Remarks: This determination is only for the project area depicted on the preliminary upland/wetland delineation
sketch for the Edens Lane Tract Pender County,NC (87.7 Acres)Pin#4214-14-4919-0000,dated 4/24/2020.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource boundaries and/or the
jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular site identified in this request.This
delineation and/or jurisdictional determination may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985,as amended.If you or your tenant are USDA program participants,or anticipate participation in USDA programs,you should
discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the local USDA service center,prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)
If you object to this determination,you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and Request for Appeal(RFA)form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr.Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Floor M9
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8803
AND
[e-mail]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5,and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form,it must be received at the above address by 9/11/2021

SAW-2021-00135
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Thomas Charles Digitally signed by Thomas Charles
Corps Regulatory Official: Date:2021.07.06 03:20:16-04'00'
Date: July 6,2021 Expiration Date: July 6,2026
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so,please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey,located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0.
Copy Furnished:
Land Management Group
Paul Farley
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington,NC,28403

SAW-2021-00135
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: D Logan,Eden's Lane LLC File Number: SAW-2021-00135 Date: July 6,2021
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
ix APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I -The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the
permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly.You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice,or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter,the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may:(a)modify the
permit to address all of your concerns,(b)modify the permit to address some of your objections,or(c)not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections,the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration,as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for fmal
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the
permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD,you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW-2021-00135
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish,you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II -REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record,the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However,you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division, US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Thomas Charles South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr.Philip A.Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Floor M9
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8803
[e-mail]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel,and any government
consultants,to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation,and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division,Attn: Thomas Charles, 69 Darlington Avenue,Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials,Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer,Commander,U.S.Army Engineer Division,South Atlantic,Attn: Mr.Philip Shannin,
Administrative Appeal Officer,CESAD-PDO,60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15,Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone],PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(&,USACE.ARMY.MIL

•
This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered ' _ -'= . _a.• =2-.' ' : - • =
Y r. . , ry • .4. ;' z.,..T of = r.. .
approximate. This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field n ..
notes. A survey of delineated areas and review and approval by the US 1. , . • . . , _ tF} .w' . _ ti _
Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific site `=x . 'Y,',._ ',, . 7.. -: _ ;�.• :'4 • :.ti.y�° `'_r; >'
planning. . ., .: =.•f Y ; • r '. .y- �rti so-. ¢• . _. r .• :.!,
•11. ‘.. •r'ffi • -• •-••• ..- " -ni• • 1-44irrir)ii..•:. -I.:VT- •r6 .474'. torlobozie•;,-",• 7 ': ' 'V; ''' -.;.V6.:41;IP. .. 424-itr-'11":‘'% e'.-::: 4.'4''' '' F ::v&O.k•••:'
i„or
•
i"}, 4• ....'ry .t .Y '5'' xo- • r •Yr. bA- ' .*� X7.4-•._ .,.' :. ;, Y 1.-
•
•
.•14
,� r' ter-,' ..4' ..•.-«X3f£ t• `� k
vitiirr
i 'i1{'
•
T 7' •", s- STY' _ rJ*� �Y�.f. Y" 'T� r} 'G':}tia'� '1�' • ti
r ;, rT '. "4-"k{..'r..' M1 T. �{ .= M1fY ,-. r4'F ' yr n.'.`
•
+
•
CD19 tt P337', \•
h ".
'� ` 4•t 8
•
-• :NJ D' • . , . . . .. .
��� .1 . L '#- M1ie .. . 3 r- r a'. .4p
•
CD9 � - t : 1, ,,max �,.
i At
•
,•'nett _ I • w �.:... - • Y
• i^ • k'wC' s.+
,:'- _
CBI
irli
s r4M1 it
*`' � " `: T3 o
A • � v� .. , , CB50 CB7CB75 tt PL
`, w. # - x :30 .-
•
. 4.ifY .3-' 4.2:9: IN .'. , .. NO-
... •..:47;... ..76.:•:;,:.:.rt.41,.:.•: 1,.. : ...‘ . ....„%., -..-... l .i • 4 r • .. - r .
•
•
e.
{ " .-..-:.-.;•,;...--......:,M1 • ' ° • 54'�' cs y.. ' ?'r - - - - y
•
;;:,a: W.; .r• ;+ t ;' .` •.• r;•. ••:1z= -''4, ' n' •329 DR = , P267 .:..J�. :z. s .. . :: .,
}• i k { 'I}x �• z•.`.J_- •r. '"S.,r, ` • - ,A,} P S ": _ _" - '-'..:' • :.• � 4:
L •
- n .v 2 .'M �. }-_"- ---•- : r':o "`�' 4 I"J _ _. .:d,i, t. .a. P266 ,.
%
1I1[r I q3 i ,�'..r,a{ lc } 14 C,{.r.Cl-
io sY. ., '.W�I,y
• * - 'r ' '. -•x� :_" .��yy - '
•
x •.T Greer •
, - r,.. sd,"- . fit• •,•f'4' ;
•.4.1
•
•
. . -;,`. . yT ; ' ', n: . .• -, - ,. / . . r 1 .. .:}'., ,t M1%.:.. . NJ D4 -.
.., • , _ .r. . . e'•,. e ' r . . . . .2 -•� - w,_t. s ..._. P100
4 .:•••,•,4' : i.7.4•• • ..-.: ,•,- . ':-:.'i .-.',. '.-,.,..-,4•,,,-*9. . .-..,-., _,' ;•:r :4!); • • -t- %-..r-;,-r-4,-.4.,...,.
Le
. . •. ... . . ,-
7,1V. ....Li:I..., . •• .... • ': ..‘" . . . • ... .q r .• r -.W52. : • .: .f....
•
} ' '
Legend = Y SAY
P156 �..
Boundary - 87.7 ac .. :- •,1• .' , •a. }� �: ;� ;. , : ... y ___
Uplands 75.1 ac (86%)
Wetlands 12.6 ac (14%) � ~ `
— Perennial Stream 3,800 L.F. �: . .. "`} ` ' . T ° "�_� .' "'
•
Intermittent Stream 540 L.F. • �b. °' � { ry' '`•`•=� • ••• • • •'......-;....-. •;'
....... Waters of the US (RPW) - 700 L.F. ; , " •' : i #I • „ - -
' • • _ :..
Non-Jurisdictional Ditch - 1 ,600 L.F. r y- *•}.
•
Wetland Line Off Property x= I ''. r' y k•
..... .1t- - e \\%..i.
;
© Data Points .' . ' 4t4.- ;...• n ; #
y ti 'n EsrHERErG;armin, (c)OpenStreetMap,c©ntribu}ors..
N 0 250 500 1000
L:\WETLANDS\2020 WETLANDS FILES\LMG20.121 --- Edens Lane Property, Logan Developers\Maps Feet
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2016 NC OneMapAerial Photography Scale applies to 11X17" print.
Edens Lane Tract T
Pender County, NC 4LMG Preliminary
i.ANn MANAGF.h'FNTGROUP Upland/Wetland
Ma Date: 04/24/2020 DAVEYe company Delineation Sketch
p 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG20.121 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

5.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION
NC Natural Heritage Program Letter
USFWS IPaC List

r ■■■
■■ ■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
•
a■It■.. NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
November 21, 2021
Kim Williams
Land Management Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
RE: Edens Lane
Dear Kim Williams:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Directtrr, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-16389
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
4) 121 W. JONES STREET, RALEiGh 1_ NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC V19 707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Taxonomic
Group
Bird
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Edens Lane
November 21, 2021
NCNHDE-16389
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last '
servation
Date
2017-08-01
33765 2004-Pre
3970 2018-02-26
17515 1983-10-17
37546 2018-08-31
1995-04-11
1946-03
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
Reptile
Reptile
Reptile
19936 Passerina ciris
Vascular Plant 9052
Vascular Plant 5860
Somatochlora
georgiana
Alligator
mississippiensis
Heterodon simus
Sistrurus miliarius
miliarius
Crocanthemum
carolinianum
Rhynchospora alba
Painted Bunting
Coppery Emerald
American Alligator
Southern Hognose
Snake
Carolina Pigmy
Rattlesnake
Carolina Sunrose
Northern White
Beaksedge
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
Holly Shelter Game Land and Vicinity R1 (Exceptional)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
anage rea "ame
•
Holly Shelter Game Land
W 11 -
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Element Accuracy
Occurrence
Rank
AB 3-Medium
H? 5-Very
Low
E 4-Low
H 3-Medium
B 3-Medium
C 3-Medium
H 5-Very
Low
Federal
Status
Threatened
Similar
Appearance
Collective Rating
C1 (Exceptional)
Owner Type
State
State Global State
tatus Rank Rank
Special G5 S2B
Concern
Significantly G3G4 S1?
Rare
Threatened G5 S3
Threatened G2 S1S2
Special G5T4T S2
Concern 5
Endangered G4 S1
Significantly G5 S2
Rare
Peripheral
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on November 21, 2021
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
source
NCNHP, Q3 October 2021.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-16389: Edens Lane
40 t'n5 C),
November 21, 2021
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
111 NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
• Managed Area (MAREA)
1:27,987
O 0.225 0.45
0.8 mi
O 0.375 0.75
r I
1.5 km
Sources: Esn, HERE, Garrrin, Inlarmap, increment P Corp., GERCQ, USGS,
FAQ, NP$, NRCAN, GeoBase. IGN, Nadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri japan,
MEII, Esri China (Hung Kpry), [c) Operw5lree1Map canybulors, and the GIS
User Canmunlry
Page 3 of 3

IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below.The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site-specific(e.g., vegetation/species surveys)and project-specific(e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities)information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s)with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that
follows(Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands)for additional
information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
SI161111111...11
Pender County, North Carolina
yC1)1111411r-
it, %
9
ccc Nra
it
1‘461111111111"KtMi.l.PM*
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
la [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project
level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI)for species are also considered.An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the
project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-
specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action"for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency.A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only
be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
S. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species
1 and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service(USFWS)and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries=).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:

Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Threatened
Wherever found Marine mammal
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
http s://ec o s.f ws.gov/ecp/species/4469
Birds ()4
NAME STATUS
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Thovicel
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
111‘.•\1111..
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened
Wherever found -.
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fvvs.gov/ecp/species/1864
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Wherever Found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SAT
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199

Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii Endangered
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
1\414
https://ecos.fws.govfecp/species/1110
o'S\O
Insects
NAME N STATU
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus SNkiwo Candidate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species
http s://e c o s.f ws.govf ec p/s p e c i e s1974 3
vio
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281
Golden Sedge Carex lutea Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6025
Rough-leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747

Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Threatened
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds Nr:‘411/44..
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
-and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act& %
N °c °
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
11,
1. The Migra ry Bir 5 Tre ty A t of 1918. �
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http,/lwww.fws.gov/birds/ma nagement/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below.This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area.To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area,visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.

For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project
area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON(IFA
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST,THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS
ITS ENTIRE RANGE."BREEDSI
ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT THE
BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY BREED IN
YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Brs Apr 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions(BCRs)in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis Breeds May1 to Sep30
p p
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.govlecpispecies16177
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres morinella Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions(BCRs)in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.

Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any
location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur
in the project area.When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.To see when birds are most likely to occur
and be breeding in your project area,view the Probability of Presence Summary.Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern(BCC)and other species that
may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN].The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey.banding,and citizen science data sets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)which your project intersects,
and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area,an eagle
(Eagle Act requirements may apply),or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development. _
Again,the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area.To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area,please visit the AKN Phenology Tool. NO 'PPP
k.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network(AKN1.This data is derived from a growing collection of survey.banding,and citizen science
datasets. e—N
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available.To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them,go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the"Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding,wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within(i.e.breeding,wintering, migrating or year-
round),you may refer to the following resources:The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide,or(if
you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there),the ornPU Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If
a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area,there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If"Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated,then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern(BCC)that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii,the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico,and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC- BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions(BCRs)in the
continental USA; and

3. "Non-BCC-Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements(for eagles)or(for non-eagles)potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities(e.g.offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds,efforts should be made, in particular,to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list,especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts
and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal.The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately,you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration.Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data,see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles,you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle
Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern.To learn more about how your list is generated,and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ"What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the"probability of presence"of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s)that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint.On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort(indicated by the black vertical bar)and for the existence of the"no data"indicator(a
red horizontal bar).A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high,then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast,a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and,therefore,a lack of certainty about presence of the species.This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area,when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding(which means nests might be present).The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence,and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities,should presence be confirmed.To learn more about conservation
measures,visit the FAQ"Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

Marine mammals
Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also protected
under the Endangered Species Act
and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora?.
The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals are
shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears, manatees,
and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries
3 [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales, dolphins, and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the
responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list; for additional information on those
species please visit the Marine Mammals page of the NOAA Fisheries website.
The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take (to harass, hunt, capture, kill, or attempt to
harass, hunt, capture or kill) of marine mammals and further coordination may be necessary for
project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office shown.
IX\ 14.
1. The Endangered Series Act(ESA) ❑f 1973.
2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)is a
treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and animals does not threaten their survival in
the wild.
3. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following marine mammals under the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are
potentially affected by activities in this location:
NAME
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
http s://e c o s.f ws.govlecp is p ec i es/4469
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.

Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory(NWI) map service is unavailable, or for very
large projects that intersect many wetland areas.Try again, or visit the NWI map to view wetlands at
this Location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location,type and size of these resources.The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation,visible hydrology and geography.A margin of error is inherent in the
use of imagery;thus,detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery,the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work.There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands.These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities(coral or tuberficid worm reefs)have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth,go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal,state,and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory.There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory,to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal,state,or local government or to establish the
geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,state,or