NC0023981_Permit (Issuance)_20010430

NPDES DOCUMENT :SCANNING COVER SHEET
NC0023981
Lenoir — Lower Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
`P.. ermit Issuance ":
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Technical Correction
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
April 30, 2001
This document is printed on reuse paper - igziore any
content on the rei erase side

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
April 30, 2001
Mr. T. S. Childers, Jr.
P.O. Box 958
Lenoir, North Carolina 28645
AVA
NCDENR
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit No. NC0023981
City of Lenoir — Lower Creek WWTP
Caldwell County
Dear Mr. Childers:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject
permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994
(or as subsequently amended).
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty
(30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless
such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the
legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or
permits required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other
Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
Lower Creek is listed as an impaired stream on North Carolina's 303(d) list. This means that
the stream does not meet all water quality standards. Although non -point sources are the main
contributor to this degradation, the Division will continue to monitor compliance at your facility.
Ultimately, the removal of this discharge may be necessary.
It is the plan of the Division to work for the improvement and recovery of the River. In the
event -of the continuance of problems, the future may require the removal of direct point source
dischargers to Lower Creek for the health of the stream. If there is noncompliance with permitted
effluent limits and degradation of Lower Creek can be attributed to the Lower Creek WWTP discharge,
then removal of the discharge may be necessary. The City of Lenoir may determine in the future that
an alternative to surface water discharge may be more appropriate.
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617 - TELEPHONE [phone]/FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/ 10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES

Permit Number: NC0023981
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Michael Myers at telephone
number [phone], extension 508.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Asheville Regional Office/Water Quality Section
Point Source Compliance and Enforcement
Technical Assistance and Certification
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
EPA — Region IV
Central Files
NPDES Files

Permit Number: NC0023981
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1; other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
City of Lenoir
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
City of Lenoir — Lower Creek WWTP
1905 Broadland Road
Lenoir
Caldwell County
to receiving waters designated as Lower Creek in the Catawba River Basin in accordance with effluent
limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective June 1, 2001.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on February 28, 2005.
Signed this day April 30, 2001.
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit Number: NC0023981
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
City of Lenoir
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue operation of a 6.0 MGD wastewater treatment plant consisting of the following
treatment units:
• Mechanical bar screen
• Cyclonic grit removal
• Influent pump station
• Aeration basin w/ aerobic/anoxic process for ammonia removal
• Caustic feed
• Dual clarifiers
• Sludge thickener (DAF)
• Aerobic digester with odor control
• Belt press lime pasteurization
• Disinfection
• Dechlorination
• Sludge holding tanks
• Drying beds
The facility is located at the City of Lenoir - Lower Creek WWTP, 1905 Broadland Rd.,
Lenoir, Caldwell County, and;
2. Discharge treated wastewater from said treatment works at the location specified on the
attached map through outfall 001 into Lower Creek, which is classified C water, in the
Catawba River Basin.

Latitude:
Lowitude:
Qu it
Stream Class:
Receiving Streams
Permitted Flow:
s • r
•
\ II
•
:V1N1!
s„1.053
•
•
( Fairview:
• " -
t
• ie
s
• —91 "
•,,% • .
• •
eb
rc:7
I 17
;
.s.
•
Discharge Location
°
\ •• • ';->‘•
8 i4
1087
• . _, _....
:7i., ' 1 1 • ••4ewage %s .
, 4-•
•
`rf• .• • .
e ;
•
cli`\
4.•';- . , i •
• \ c3 /- ' ---_,,•••-, :t ! • ......:7 . /-- . r ;
: • %
• „ r' ,rp( ', .'
‘:, i ":'; \ /4:?:-.?%:.„:. ----(
4, ;'.';" .•-'s•--' III\ .'-'.:' '----, 1 .
, •-.... 21,.......:-7,,,,,7" !.) :::;7.2.‘%'-'... /
_ 4
,/f.'"7.- ':•,. ". -:' "n\ \..'lliliW ..;
Facility Information
35° 52' 55" Sub -Basin 03--08-31
sr 34' 35"
D 12 NE (Lenoir)
Lower Creek
6.0 MGD
//,...—., • (-•-•-•-• \-- &flier: till --'•;;;'',
,,Zric.,-- - ''' .' . \' ---- hVe)--
‘...,,,,•-,Pe. ... ' -s.":'''' ,....
,.(__ : .7.../( ,...:
- • t' /.'-;--J---7-4,-, ,70"; 1,
',, 7 ./ -.... ' . --- .....„2„,.._.,1
'C
/..... / ., .i ' i ' •
.., if
in ( - N‘,.;.:.,
..,.
" -. --•\.-,;,,•-•:-.- .
. .._ j , L ' ; : ' . • ; i , 1 . ...) ' NAC
• ' . ' ' ..::: , .,.'7<":::11 !.::"; : ' : ' 7' 77 .7
City of Lenoir -Lower Creek WWTP
NC0023981
Caldwell County

Permit Number: NC0023981
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated municipal wastewater from outfall(s) 001. Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent' Characteristics'
_
.: Limits ` _-
, -; ;
_ `- Monitoring Requirements '
:...::.
•
-- Monthly -
er Average
,.. :... g `; ..
Weekly
Average...Maximum
Daily
..-
Measurement
: Frequency
Sample Type
- Sample
':' Locationl
Flow
6.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD, 5-day, 20°C (Summer)'
22.0 mg/L
33.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E
BOD, 5-day, 20°C (Winter)'
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E
Total Suspended Residue'
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E
NH3-N (Summer)3
2.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
E
NH3-N (Winter)3
4.6 mg/L
Daily
Composite
E
Fecal Coliform
200/ 100 ml
400/ 100 ml
Daily
Grab
E
Dissolved Oxygen (Summer)'''
Daily
Grab
E
Dissolved Oxygen (Winter)3
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature
Daily
Grab
E
pH'
Daily
Grab
E
Conductivity
Daily
Grab
E
Total Residual Chlorine`
28 µg/L
Daily
Grab
E
Cadmium
14.7 µg/L
15.0 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
E
Chromium
112.9 µg/L
1022.0 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
E
Lead
33.8 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
E
Selenium
11.3 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
E
Copper
2/Month
Composite
E
Cyanide
2/Month
Grab
E
Zinc
2/Month
Composite
E
Total Nitrogen
(NO2 N + NO; N + TKN)
Monthly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Composite
E
Chronic Toxicity'
Quarterly
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen'
3/Week
Grab
U, D
Fecal Coliform'
3/Week
Grab
U, D
Temperatures
3/Week
Grab
U, D
Conductivity'
3/Week
Grab
U, D
Footnotes:
1. Sample Location: I- Influent, E - Effluent, U- Upstream 50 feet from outfall, D- Downstream at SR
1827.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD, and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed
15% of the respective influent value (i.e. 85% Removal).
3. Summer is defined as April 1 through October 31; Winter is defined as November 1 through March
31.
4. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/1.
5. The pH of the effluent shall not be less than 6.0 nor greater than 9.0 (on the standard units scale).
6. Limits and monitoring for total residual chlorine will apply only if chlorine is added to the waste
stream during the treatment process.
7. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 44%: Feb, May, Aug, Nov (see Part I. A. (2.)).
8. Sample collected three times per week during June 1 through September 30 and once per week
October 1 through May 31.
Defintions:
MGD - Million gallons per day mg/L - Milligram per liter
ml - Milliliter BOD - Biochemical Oxygen Demand
µg/L - Micrograms per liter

Permit Number: NC0023981
A. (2.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 44%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or
"North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent
versions. The tests will be performed during the months of February, May, August, November. Effluent sampling for
this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit
limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as
described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or
subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest
concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does
have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection
methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic
Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the
pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the
following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days
after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the
facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow"
in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address
cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be
required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include
alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an
invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month
following the month of the initial monitoring.

Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Fact Sheet For NPDES Permit NC0023981
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name":
Applicant Address4:
Facility Address4:
Permitted Flown'°'':
Type of Wasten'4'':
Facility/Permit Status's:
Countyz4''
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream24:
Stream Classification''2:
303(d) Listed?:
Subbasin2:
Drainage Area (mi2): [calculated]
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)6:
Winter 7Q10 (cfs)6:
Average Flow (cfs)6:
IWC (%):
Primary SIC Code:
Regional Office:
USGS Topo Quad:
Permit Writer:
Date:
City of Lenoir
P.O. Box 958
1905 Broadland Road
6.0 MGD
Municipal (Domestic and Industrial)
Renewal
Caldwell
Lower Creek
C
Yes — Sediment, Turbidity
03-08-31
47.9 mi2
11.75 cfs
16.77 cfs
68 cfs
44%
4952
Asheville
D 12 NE
Michael Myers
January 2, 2001
Summary
The City of Lenoir requires a NPDES discharge permit to dispose of municipal wastewater to
waters of the state. The City of Lenoir's NPDES permit has expired and they have requested
renewal of their permit. The Division of Water Quality's NPDES Unit issues the permits for
individually permitted facilities, and determines the conditions that must be achieved prior to
discharging wastewater. This fact sheet summarizes the rationale used to determine permit
limits and conditions.
Up until the summer of 2000, the City of Lenoir operated a 4.08 MGD municipal wastewater
treatment system consisting of the following unit processes:
• Mechanical bar screen
• Cyclonic grit removal
• Influent pump station
• Aeration basin
• Caustic feed
Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 1

• Dual clarifiers
• Sludge thickener (DAF)
• Aerobic digester
• Belt press lime pasteurization
• Disinfection
• Dechlorination
• Sludge holding tanks
• Drying beds
Sludge at the facility is stabilized then land applied.
The facility was under Special Order by Consent (SOC) until August 2000. The terms of the
SOC include the design and build of additional treatment units bringing the hydraulic capacity
of the system to 6.0 MGD. The construction of the additional units was completed by summer
2000.
The treatment plant upgrade project includes the installation of the following treatment units:
• Cyclonic grit removal
• Aerobic/anoxic process for ammonia removal
• Aerobic digester with odor control
Construction of the upgraded facility and compliance with the permitted limitations was
completed by August 1, 2000. With the upgrade and expansion, the City of Lenoir now
operates a treatment plant with a hydraulic capacity of 6.0 MGD.
According to the self -monitoring data, the facility is achieving ammonia removal through
nitrification (See Figure 1). Though the system is not designed for denitrification or
phosphorus removal the system is achieving some measure of both as evident from the self -
monitoring data (See Figures 2 and 3). Residual chlorine levels are extremely high for a facility
with dechlorination. The average chlorine level from Jan 2000 through September 2000 was
0.907 mg/L.
Figure 1. Influent and Effluent Ammonia Concentrations for Lower Creek WWTP.
100
90
Ammonia
80
70
60
E
50
c
0
EE
a 40
30
20
10
0
01-Nov-98 09•Feb-99 20-May-99
28-Aug-99 08-Dec-99 15-Mar-00 23..1un.00
Time
01.Oct-00 09-Jan-01
—*— Influent
--a-- Effluent
Fact Sheet
NPI) S Renewal
Page 2

Figure 2. Influent and Effluent Total Nitrogen Loadings for the Lower Creek WWTP.
7000.00
6000.00
5000.00
a 4000.00
C
a,
S
Z 3000.00
3
12
2000.00
1000.00
0.00
09-Feb-99
Total Nitrogen
20-May-99 28-Aug-99 0EDec-99 15-Mar-00
Date
23-Jun-00
01-Oct-00
09Jan-01
t Effluent
--1-- Influent
Figure 3. Influent and Effluent Total Phosphorus for the Lower Creek WWTP.
250.00
200.00
50.00
0.00
Nov-98
Total Phosphorus
Feb-99
May-99
Aug-99
Dec-99
Time
Mar-00
Jun-00
Oct-00
Jan-01
t Influent
— a— Effluent
The facility does maintain an approved full Pretreatment program that consist of quarterly
monitoring of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, cyanide, lead, mercury, molybdemium,
nickel , silver, selenium, zinc and fluoride. The total flow from industrial sources is 0.189 MGD
or 3.15% of the permitted flow (at 6.0 MGD).
Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 3

Lower Creek WWTP accepts flow from three Significant Industrial Users (SIU) that have
received pretreatment permits. The SIUs include the following industries:
• Southeastern Adhesives
• Paxar Corporation
• NACCO Materials Handling Corporation
Southeastern Adhesives has an intermittent discharge of 1, 000 gpd to the treatment plant and
the pollutant of concern consist of ammonia, nitrogen, BOD and TSS.
Paxar Corporation has a continuous discharge of 170,000 gpd to the treatment plant. The
pollutants of concern associated with this facility include: ammonia, BOD and TSS.
NACCO Materials Handling Corporation has a continuous discharge of 18,000 gpd to the
treatment plant. The pollutants of concern associated with this facility include: zinc, TP, BOD,
TSS and ammonia.
Current Stream Conditions
Lower Creek receives the discharge from the City of Lenoir's Lower Creek WWTP. Lower
Creek is a sandy bottom stream that serves used to support wildlife, agriculture and recreation.
The 7Q10 stream flow at the point of discharge is 11.75 cfs. The average and 30Q2 stream flows
at this point are 68 cfs and 22.74 cfs, respectively.
The wasteload allocation conducted in 1992 used a 7Q10 stream flow of 9.3 cfs. The 7Q10
stream flow was updated in 1994 to 11.75 cfs and applied to the limitations for the expanded 6.0
MGD flow.
The stream is listed as an impaired water according to North Carolina's 303(d) list. The
impairment is due to sediment and turbidity. The WPCOG is coordinating a local study on
Lower Creek for fecal contamination and biological indicators. The WPCOG has recommended
nonpoint source controls for the watershed.
The turbidity according the regional office may be due to sampling during and directly after
rainfall events. Possible sources for the impairment are urban runoff, non -urban development,
and municipal point sources.
Ambient data in Lower Creek resulted in a 'fair' benthic ratings downstream of the discharge
and 'good fair' benthic ratings upstream of the discharge. However, a Special Study conducted
in 1997 did not indicate any impacts from the Lenoir WWTP.
Lower Creek at the point of discharge is classified as C waters. Immediately downstream of the
discharge the classification changes from C to WS-IV.
Instream Monitoring
The City of Lenoir is currently required to monitor dissolved oxygen, temperature, fecal
coliform, and conductivity 50 feet upstream of the outfall and downstream at NCSR 11427.
The instream data for fecal coliform indicates numerous fecal levels greater than the state
standard both above and below the discharge. The self monitoring data for dissolved oxygen
indicates that over the past two years there have been no violations of the states' DO standard.
The instream conductivity self monitoring data does not indicate any potential problems.
The instream monitoring program shall remain unchanged during this permit cycle.
Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 4

Compliance Summary: (see Appendix B)
October 1999 — Toxicity report not received. NOV issued January 10, 2000.
February 2000 — Facility reported a spill and published notification in the paper.
August 19,1999 — Facility failed to collect a composite sample for the chronic toxicity test. NPD
issued September 30,1999.
June 1999 — Failure of monthly average BOD and TSS NPDES limits. NOV and Civil penalty
assessment issued September 24,1999.
May 1999 - Failure of monthly average BOD and TSS NPDES limits. NOV and Civil penalty
assessment issued August 20,1999. Failure of toxicity limitation; NOV issued July 22,1999.
April 1999 - Failure of monthly average BOD and TSS NPDES limits. NOV and Civil penalty
assessment issued July 16,1999.
March 1999 — Failure of the monthly average BOD limit. NOV issued June 15,1999.
February 1999 - Failure of monthly average BOD and TSS NPDES limits. NOV issued May 12,
1999.
November 1998 — Failure of the toxicity limitation. NOV issued January 20,1999.
August 1998 — Failure of the toxicity limitation. NOV issued October 22,1998.
May 1998 — Failure of the toxicity limitation. NOV issued July 21,1998.
March 1998 — Failure of the TSS NPDES monthly average limitation. NOV issued May 26,1998.
February 1998 - Failure of monthly average BOD and TSS NPDES limits. NOV issued April 13,
1998.
Toxicity Testing
Current Requirement: Chronic toxicity limit monitored quarterly © 44% at 4.08 MGD and 44%
at 6.0 MGD.
During the last three quarters of 1998 and the second quarter of 1999 the facility experienced
toxicity problems. Since the fourth quarter of 1999 and the first three-quarters of 2000 the
facility has had no toxicity compliance problems.
Recommended Requirement: Quarterly Chronic Toxicity © 40% Feb, May, Aug, Nov
Toxicant Analysis
Using the self monitoring data required per the NPDES permit and the approved Long Term
Monitoring Plan, reasonable potential analysis' were conducted on the following toxicants:
arsenic, cadmium, cyanide, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, selenium and zinc.
The standards used for the analysis are consistent with the water supply standards, since the
downstream uses of the receiving stream include water supply.
Refer to the reasonable potential analysis to view the data sets and results.
Arsenic — Analysis indicated that the maximum predicted concentration is less than the
allowable concentration by approximately 5.8 times. There will be no limit or monitoring
requirement for this parameter in the NPDES permit.
Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 5

Cadmium — The reasonable potential was run under two different scenarios. The first analysis
included all available data from the years 2000 and 1999. The maximum value in the data set
occurred in early 1999, therefore the analysis was rerun excluding this data point. The
conclusions from both analyses were the same. The cadmium limit shall remain as a condition
for the permit.
Cyanide — The analysis indicated that the maximum predicted concentration is less than the
allowable concentration by approximately 1.14 times. Therefore the limit shall be removed as a
condition for the permit. However, monitoring shall remain a condition.
Chromium — The reasonable potential was run under two different scenarios. The first analysis
included all available data for the years 2000 and 1999. The data set included a detection of
chromium of 21 µg/L from early 1999 (not the maximum value in the data set). The analysis
was rerun excluding this data point. Exclusion of this data point increase the variability of the
data set and thus increased the multiplier. The data point was included in the final analysis,
however that had no impact on the conclusions garnered from the analysis. The maximum
predicted concentration was greater than the allowable concentration. Therefore, a chromium
limit shall be implemented as a condition for the permit.
Copper — The maximum predicted concentration was greater than the allowable concentration.
However, copper is a action level parameter and no standard exist. It is the Division's position
that a limit is not appropriate for an action level parameter unless the facility has demonstrated
toxicity problems. Therefore the monitoring requirement shall remain as a condition for the
permit.
Lead - The maximum predicted concentration was greater than the allowable concentration. In
August 2000, the facility detected lead at a concentration of 331 µg/L. There has been
insufficient data since this detection to exclude this data point from the analysis. Therefore, a
lead limit shall be included as a condition for the NPDES permit.
Mercury — The facility has had no detectable mercury concentration greater than 0.2 µg/L in
1999 and 2000. Therefore, no limit or monitoring shall be required as a condition for the permit.
Nickel — The analysis was conducted using two different scenarios. The first analysis included
all available data for the years 1999 and 2000. The second analysis excluded a concentration
value of 34 p.g/L detected on February 26,1999. Using all the available data, the maximum
predicted is greater than the allowable concentration. Excluding February 26,1999 data point
the maximum predicted is less than the allowable concentration. No limit is proposed for this
facility for the following reasons:
1. The facility has recently completed a substantial upgrade.
2. During 1999 and 2000, there have only been two occasions where the nickel
concentration were greater than 10 µg/L. The highest value occurred on February
26,1999 and the other detection was slightly above the quantitation level.
3. The discharge is to C waters, however the standard for water supply was used
because the classification changes immediately downstream of the discharge. Using
the aquatic life standard the maximum predicted is less than the allowable.
Together these factors provide sufficient evidence that nickel monitoring through the
pretreatment program is sufficient.
Selenium — The maximum predicted concentration is greater than the allowable concentration.
In May 2000, the facility detected selenium at a concentration of 127 µg/L. There has been
Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 6

insufficient data since this detection to exclude this data point from the analysis. Therefore, a
selenium limit shall be included as a condition for the NPDES permit.
Zinc - The maximum predicted concentration was greater than the allowable concentration.
However, zinc is an action level parameter and no standard exists in North Carolina. It is the
Division's position that a limit is not appropriate for an action level parameter unless the
facility has demonstrated toxicity problems. Therefore, the monitoring requirement shall
remain as a condition for the permit.
Proposed Changes
The 4.08 MGD effluent page has been deleted. The facility has recently completed an expansion
and upgrade to 6.0 MGD.
The cyanide limit will be removed as a condition for the permit. However, monitoring shall
continue to be required. (See the discussion above)
A chromium limit has been added to the permit (See discussion above).
A lead limit has been added to the permit (See discussion above).
A selenium limit has been added to the permit (See discussion above)
Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance
Draft Permit to Public Notice:
Permit Scheduled to Issue:
January 24, 2001.
References
1. Division of Water Quality's Basinwide Information Management System, January 2,
2001, http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/reports/basinsandwaterbodies/alpha/Neuse.pdf
2. 1999. NPDES Regional Staff Report and Recommendations for the Renewal of the City
of Lenoir — Lower Creek WWTP NPDES Permit NC0023981, August 12,1999, Asheville
Regional Office
3. 1999. Catawba River Basinwide Water Quality Plan. North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, Water Quality Section.
4. 1999. NPDES Permit Application Standard Form A, City of Lenoir — Lower Creek
WWTP.
5. 2000. 303(d) List of North Carolina Impaired Waters - Draft. North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, Water Quality Section. Copies obtained through Planning Branch,
Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina.
6. 1993. Low Flow Characteristics of Streams in North Carolina, United States Geological
Survey Water -Supply Paper 2403. Copies obtained at U.S. Geological Survey, Map
Distribution, Box 25286, MS306, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225.
7. 1998. NC0023981 NPDES Permit. Issued to City of Lenoir, expiration February 29, 2000.
Copies obtained through The Division of Water Quality, Central Files, Archdale
Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina.
Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 7

State Contact
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Michael Myers at [phone] ext. 508.
NAME:
NPDES SUPERVISOR
DATE: / / 3
NAME: DATE:
Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 8

Re: City of Lenoir - Lower Creek NPDES Draft permit
Subject: Re: City of Lenoir - Lower Creek NPDES Draft permit
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 16:33:14 -0500
From: Jim Reid <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
To: Mike Myers <[e-mail]>
Mike, I looked at subject documents. They look fine.
However, the facility address appearing on the fact sheet is "801 West Ave NW", the WW
located at 1905 Broadland RD.
Jim
Mike Myers wrote:
Greetings Jim. Attached are the files containing the draft permit,
and fact sheet for the City of Lenoir's Lower Creek WWTP. When you
a chance could you review the draft permit. I would like to notice
permit on January 24th, so if I could get your comments by then, it
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Michael J. Myers
Environmental Engineer
NPDES Unit - Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27669-1617
[phone] x508
mailto:mike.myers@ncmail net
map
get
this
map 23981.ppt
Name:
Type:
Encoding:
Download Status:
fact sheet.doc
map 23981.ppt
Microsoft PowerPoint Show (application/vnd.ms-power.
base64
Not downloaded with message
Name: fact sheet.doc
Type: Winword File (application/msword)
Encoding: base64
Download Status: Not downloaded with message
draft permit.doc
Name: draft permit.doc
Type: Winword File (application/msword)
Encoding: base64
Download Status: Not downloaded with message
Jim Reid - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1 of 2 1/23/01 9:25 AM

t
L • �r71 t =7 7' ..
7� o(:-c ;.: 3•1
co:_,(••
O4.. .:47� _ •1
(.2 0 ` . ems. y •
0(. •4
C0 t V
C c t C.-. C • •
0 (3�' �.' • I
C C S ` 4• •,
C O et C: • •
L. II C.3 • •
r PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA
:ac ENVIRONMENTAL
ii io . MANAGEMENT
. COMMISSION/
i.aeu NPDES UNIT
86E 1617 MAIL SERVICE
CENTER
RALEIGH, NC
27699-1617
NOTIFICATION OF
PO INTENT TO ISSUE
°N A NPDES
1° WASTEWATER
Jett PERMIT
911` On the basis of thor-
1a ough staff review
166E and application of
NC General Statute
•05 143.21, Public. law
Id 92-500 and other
'Sr lawful standards
.-- and regulations, the
North Carolina Envi-
i ronmental Manage-
- ment Commission
proposes to issue a
_National Pollutant
Discharge Elimina-
tion System
(NPDES) Wastewa-
ter discharge permit
to the person(s) list-
ed below effective
45 days from the
publish date of this
notice.
1Written comments re-
garding the pro-
- posed permit will be
accepted until 30
days after the pub-
lish date of this no-
11 tice. All comments
1.41 reat dceived.ate priorare con -
to
) th
sidered in the final
'/, determinations re-
garding the pro-
posed permit. The
Director of the NC
Division of Water
Quality may decide
to hold a public
meeting for the pro-
• posed permit should
• the Division receive
a significant degree
1 of public interest. '
.11 Copies of the draft ..�+
permit and other
supporting informa-
tion on file used to
NORTH CAROLINA,
CALDWELL COUNTY,
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
County and State, duly commissioned, qualified, and
authorized by law to administer oaths, personally
appeared Elaine. •Klipfel
who being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that
he is
of Lenoir Newspapers, Inc., engaged in the publication
of a newspaper known as Lenoir News -Topic, pub-
lished, issued, and entered as second class mail in the
City of Lenoir, in said County and State; that he is
authorized to make this affidavit and sworn state-
ment; that the notice or other legal advertisement, a
true copy of which is attached hereto, was published
in Lenoir News -Topic on the following dates:
Advertising Director
Jan. • •30
and that the said newspaper in which such notice,
paper, document, or legal advertisement was published
was, at the time of each and every publication, a
newspaper meeting all of the requirements and quali-
fications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of
of North Carolina and was �a.. JAJplii ' newspaper within
the meaning of Section �5O3Y olm tee General Statutes
of North Carolina. ,-173 P 4 2C01
o��.�f
This 30th day of ..fir-- , Ly°��
Sworn to and subscribed before me, this ... 30th... .
day of Ja) 1ary A
J...G4!t ............
Notary Public
err Tr
My Commission expires:
pi

p
C v • •
O t: a' • 1
O 4 f c •4
C. C. ••
O Cr `,e ,t
OOLO TlIi10 GOnC1-
tions present in the
draft permit are
available upon " re-
quest and payment
of the costs of re-
production. Mail
comments and/or
requests for infor-
mation to the NC Di-
vision of Water
Quality at the above
address or call Ms.
Christie Jackson at
[phone], ex-
tension 538. Please
! include the NPDES
permit number (at-
tached) in any com-
munication. Interest-
ed persons may al-
so visit the Division
of Water Quality at
512 N. Salisbury
Street, Raleigh, NC
27604-1148 be-
tween the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m. to review infor-
mation on file.
NPDES Permit
Number
NC0023981, Lenoir,
City -Lower Creek
WWTP. P.O. Box
958, Lenoir, NC
28645 has applied
for a permit renewal
for a facility located
in Caldwell County
discharging treated
wastewater into
Lower Creek in the
Catawba River Ba-
sin. Currently BOD,
ammonia, fecal coli-
c form, dissolved oxy-
gen, total residual
7 chlorine, cadmium,
chromium, lead, and
• selenium are water
quality limited, This
discharge may af-
fect future alloca-.
tions in this portion
of the receiving
stream.
Jan. 30
go 111P
•

NPDES/Non-Discharge Permitting Unit Pretreatment Information Request Form
NPDES OR NONDISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT COMPLETES THIS PART:
Date of Request 10/18/00
Facility
City of Lenoir - Lower Creek WWTP
Permit #
NC0023981
Region
Asheville
Requestor
Michael Myers - NPDES Unit
Pretreatment
Contact
A_D Towns- Keyes McGee (ext. 580)
E-L Towns- Vacant Position
M-R Towns- Dana Folley (ext. 523)
S-Z Towns- Steve Amigone (ext 592)
M «tiea.e (
I�1'6 rvt 7D6_( Ft4e
it)46
PRETREATMENT UNIT COMPLETES THIS PART:
Status of Pretreatment Program (circle all that apply)
1) the facility has no SIU's and does have a Division approved Pretreatment Program that isINACTIVE
2) the facility has no SIU's and does not have a Division approved Pretreatment Program
3) the facility has (er is -developing) a Pretreatment Program
c2a) is Full Program with LTMP or 2b) is Modified Program with STMP
4) the facility MUST develop a Pretreatment Program - Full Modified
5) additional conditions regarding Pretreatment attached or listed below
Flow Permitted Actual
% Industrial
STMP time frame:
most recent
next cycle
% Domestic
L
T
M
P
Pollutant
Check List
POC due to
NPDES/Non-
Discharge
Permit Limit
Required
by EPA*
Required by
503 Sludge"
POC due to SIU—
Site specific POC (Provide Explanation)""
STMP
Frequency
effluent
at
LTMP
Frequency at
effluent
✓
BOD
/
✓
4
M
✓
TSS
v'
✓
4
Q
M
✓
NH3
✓
✓
4
Q\ M
✓
Arsenic
v
4
Q
M
J
Cadmium
✓
4
•✓
✓
4
Q
M
d
Chromium
4
/
4
Q
M
4
Copper
'1
✓
✓
4
/ Q
M
✓
Cyanide
✓
J
4
i Q
Q!M
M
-\1
Lead
q
✓
✓
4
/Mercury
v
4 1
Q M
V
Molybdemium
✓
4 /
Q M
J
Nickel
'1
v
✓
4 1
Q M
V
Silver
✓
4 (
Q M
V
Selinium
✓
4 1
M
'i
Zinc
✓
✓
4
4
4
4\...._
4
M
M
QM
M
Q M
Fi ur0 ,-> �• vt
✓
`(;hr.i�•
V
'To+l IQ
V
4
Q M
4
Q M
'Always in the LTMP
"Only in the LTMP if the POTW land applies sludge
•" Only in LIMP while the SIU is connected to the POTW
•"• Only in LTMP when the pollutant is a specilic concem to the POTW fie -Chloride to a POTW who accepts Textile waste)
0= Quarterly
M=Monthly _ /,I� ! nn
Comments: �( ,i,1 Yi P 4Q4 4,✓tl A./3.— 0 - T]i1 12S
NPD ES_Pretreatment.request.f orm
Revised: August 4. 2600

Re: City of Lenoir - Lower Creek Plant
Subject: Re: City of Lenoir - Lower Creek Plant
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 11:21:13 -0500
From: Jim Reid <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
To: Mike Myers <[e-mail]>
Yes, expansion & upgrade of Lenoir's Lower Creek has been completed and
compliance with final effluent limitations was achieved on or before August
1, 2000. Consequently, the SOC has expired and was not renewed. Jim Reid,
ARO
Mike Myers wrote:
> Greetings Jim. Happy New Year. Sorry to hit with business to start the
> new year. I recently started working on the permit renewal for the City
> of Lenoir and had a couple of questions regarding the SOC.
> Was the SOC renewed?
> Has the construction of upgrade to 6.0 MGD been completed?
> I hope to have a draft ready by Wednesday for your review. The permit
> is likely to have some significant changes for the toxicants. Based on
> the status of the upgrade, I am not planning on a schedule for
> compliance. However, I will footnote the toxicants that allows Lenoir
> to request evaluation of the toxicants after collecting sufficient
> data. We can discuss this further after you get a chance to review the
> permit.
> Thanks alot and again Happy New Year.
> Michael J. Myers
> Environmental Engineer
> NPDES Unit - Division of Water Quality
> 1617 Mail Service Center
> Raleigh, NC 27669-1617
> [phone] x508
> mailto:[e-mail]
Jim Reid - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
©Jim.Reid.vcf
Name: Jim.Reid.vcf
Type: VCard (text/x-vcard)
Encoding: 7bit
Description: Card for Jim Reid
1 of 1 1/2/01 1:03 PM

Facility Name =
Qw (MGD) =
IWC (%) =
City of Lenior
6
44.29
Reasonable PofentiaLsumrns
Final Results
Arsenic
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Beryllium
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
I VMS
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Flouride
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Iron
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Awn
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
MBAS
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Action Level
19.6 pg/1
112.9 pg/1
0 pg/1
14.7 pg/1
1017.5 pg/1
14.7 pg/1
9.92 pg/1
11.3 pg/1
402.6 pg/1
112.9 pg/1
2717.8 pg/1
15.8 pg/1
0 pg/1
4064.5 pg/1
o pg/1
2.3 pg/1
3409.3 pg/1
56.5 pg/1
0 pg/1
1129.0 pg/1
NPDES # =
7Q10s (cfs)=
NC0023981
11.7
Mercury
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
TIMM
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
PCB
IMMO
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Selenium
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Turbidity
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
zing
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
0 pg/1
0.0271 pg/1
35.2 pg/1
56.5 pg/1
0 pg/1
0.0023 pg/1
150 pg/1
0.1 pg/1
1633.22 pg/1
11.3 pg/1
7RP Cc.LCJF i D
0 NTU
112.9 NTU
231.2 pg/1
112.9 pg/1

'acuity Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Lenior
NC0023981
6
11.7
44.29
Arsenic
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
FINAL RESULTS
19.6
112.9
Parameter =
Standard =
Arsenic
50.0
lie
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data
1 5.0 <10
2 0.5 <1
3 5.0 <10
4 5.0 <10
5 5.0 <10
6 5.0 <10 Mult Factor =
7 5.0 <10 Max. Value
8 5.0 <10 Max. Pred Cw
9 5.0 <10 Allowable Cw
10 2.5 <5
11 8.0 8
12 1.0 <2
13 0.5 <1
14 <50
RESULTS
Std Dev. 2.23104552
Mean 4.03846154
C.V. 0.55244937
2.45
8 pg/1
19.6 pg/1
112.9 pg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7QlOs (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Lenior
NC0023981
6
11.7
44.29
FINAL RESULTS
Cadmium
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
1017.5
14.7
Parameter =
Standard =
Cadmium
6.5
pig
n BDL=I/2DL Actual Data
1 1.00 <2
2 19.00 19
3 1.00 <2
4 1.00 <2
5 1.00 <2
6 1.00 <2 Mult Factor =
7 1.00 <2 Max. Value
8 1.00 <2 Max. Pred Cw
9 170.00 170 Allowable Cw
10 1.00 <2
11 1.00 <2
12 59.00 59
13 1.00 <2
14 1.00 <2
15 1.00 <2
16 1.00 <2
17 1.00 <2
18 1.00 <2
19 1.00 <2
20 1.00 <2
21 1.00 <2
22 1.00 <2
23 1.00 <2
24 1.00 <2
25 1.00 <2
26 1.00 <2
27 1.00 <2
28 1.00 <2
29 1.00 <2
30 1.00 <2
31 1.00 <2
32 1.00 <2
33 1.00 <2
34 1.00 <2
35 1.00 <2
36 1.00 <2
37 1.00 <2
38 1.00 <2
39 1.00 <2
40 1.00 <2
41 1.00 <2
42 1.00 <2
43 1.00 <2
44 1.00 <2
45 1.00 <2
RESULTS
Std Dev. 36.4711004
Mean 7.78797468
C.V. 4.68300193
3.7
275 pg/1
1017.5 pg/1
14.7 pg/1

46 1.00 <2
47 1.00 <2
48 1.00 <2
49 1.00 <2
50 1.00 <2
51 1.00 <2
52 1.50 <3
53 1.50 <3
54 1.50 <3
55 1.00 <2
56 1.00 <2
57 1.00 <2
58 1.50 <3
59 1.25 <2.5
60 275.00 275
61 1.00 <2
62 1.00 <2
63 1.50 <3
64 4.00 4
65 1.00 <2
66 1.00 <2
67 1.00 <2
68 1.00 <2
69 1.00 <2
70 1.00 <2
71 1.00 <2
72 1.00 <2
73 1.00 <2
74 1.00 <2
75 1.00 <2
76 2.50 <5
77 2.50 <5
78 2.50 <5
79 8.00 8

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Lenior
NC0023981
6
11.7
44.29
FINAL RESULTS
Chromium
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
402.6
112.9
Parameter =
Standard =
Chromium
50
lie
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 2.500 <5 Std Dev.
2 2.500 <5 Mean
3 61.000 61 C.V.
4 2.500 <5
5 2.500 <5
6 2.500 <5 Mult Factor =
7 2.500 <5 Max. Value
8 2.500 <5 Max. Pred Cw
9 2.500 <5 Allowable Cw
10 2.500 <5
11 2.500 <5
12 2.500 <5
13 5.000 5
14 5.000 <10
15 5.000 <10
16 3.000 <6
17 3.000 <6
18 3.000 <6
19 3.000 <6
20 21.000 21
13.397049
6.825
1.96293758
6.6
61 pg/1
402.6 pg/1
112.9 pg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC(%)=
City of Lenior
NC0023981
6
11.7
44.29
FINAL RESULTS
Copper
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
2717.8
15.8
Parameter =
Standard =
Copper
7.0
Ile
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 11.0 11
2 12.0 12
3 8.0 8
4 6.0 6
5 388.0 388
6 26.0 26 Mult Factor =
7 16.0 16 Max. Value
8 16.0 16 Max. Pred Cw
9 7.0 7 Allowable Cw
10 17.0 17
11 19.0 19
12 19.0 19
13 48.0 48
14 6.0 6
15 19.0 19
16 28.0 28
17 12.0 12
18 36.0 36
19 61.0 61
20 7.0 7
21 8.0 8
22 8.0 8
23 13.0 13
24 9.0 9
25 20.0 20
26 32.0 32
27 9.0 9
28 5.0 <10
29 15.0 15
30 38.0 38
31 79.0 79
32 635.0 635
33 91.0 91
34 54.0 54
35 56.0 56
36 24.0 24
37 62.0 62
38 18.0 18
39 34.0 34
40 11.0 11
41 26.0 26
Std Dev. 111.521747
Mean 49
C.V. 2.27595402
4.28
635 pg/1
2717.8 pg/1
15.8 pg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Lenior
NC0023981
6
11.7
44.29
FINAL RESULTS
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
9.92
11.3
Parameter =
Standard =
Cyanide
5.0
ugn
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 2.5 <5 Std Dev.
2 2.5 <5 Mean
3 2.5 <5 C.V.
4 2.5 <5
5 2.5 <5
6 2.5 <5 Mult Factor =
7 2.5 <5 Max. Value
8 5.0 5 Max. Pred Cw
9 8.0 8 Allowable Cw
10 2.5 <5
11 2.5 <5
12 5.0 5
13 2.5 <5
14 2.5 <5
15 2.5 <5
16 2.5 <5
17 2.5 <5
18 2.5 <5
19 2.5 <5
20 2.5 <5
21 2.5 <5
22 2.5 <5
23 2.5 <5
24 2.5 <5
25 2.5 <5
26 2.5 <5
27 2.5 <5
28 2.5 <5
29 2.5 <5
30 2.5 <5
31 2.5 <5
32 2.5 <5
33 2.5 <5
34 2.5 <5
35 2.5 <5
36 2.5 <5
37 2.5 <5
38 2.5 <5
39 2.5 <5
40 2.5 <5
41 2.5 <5
42 2.5 <5
43 2.5 <5
44 2.5 <5
45 7.0 7
0.944651
2.75625
0.34273052
1.24
8 pg/1
9.92 pg/1
11.3 pg/1

46 2.5 <5
47 5.0 5
48 2.5 <5
49 2.5 <5
50 2.5 <5
51 2.5 <5
52 2.5 <5
53 2.5 <5
54 2.5 <5
55 2.5 <5
56 2.5 <5
57 2.5 <5
58 3.0 <6
59 2.5 <5
60 2.5 <5
61 2.5 <5
62 2.5 <5
63 2.5 <5
64 2.5 <5
65 2.5 <5
66 2.5 <5
67 2.5 <5
68 2.5 <5
69 2.5 <5
70 2.5 <5
71 2.5 <5
72 2.5 <5
73 2.5 <5
74 2.5 <5
75 2.5 <5
76 2.5 <5
77 2.5 <5
78 2.5 <5
79 2.5 <5
80 5.0 5

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Lenior
NC0023981
6
11.7
44.29
FINAL RESULTS
Lead
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
3409.3
56.5
Parameter =
Standard =
Lead
25.0
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data
1 331.0 331
2 5.0 <10
3 5.0 <10
4 5.0 <10
5 5.0 <10
6 5.0 <10 Mult Factor =
7 5.0 <10 Max. Value
8 5.0 <10 Max. Pred Cw
9 36.0 36 Allowable Cw
10 5.0 <10
11 5.0 <10
12 5.0 <10
13 5.0 <10
14 5.0 <10
15 5.0 <10
16 5.0 <10
17 5.0 <10
18 5.0 <10
19 5.0 <10
20 7.5 <15
RESULTS
Std Dev. 72.8304583
Mean 22.975
C.V. 3.1699873
10.3
331 µg/1
3409.3 µg/1
56.5 µg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Lenior
NC0023981
6
11.7
44.29
FINAL RESULTS
Mercury •
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
0
0.0
Parameter =
Standard =
Mercury
0.012
Pe
n BDL=]l2DL Actual Data
1 0.1 <0.2
2 0.1 <0.2
3 0.1 <0.2
4 0.1 <0.2
5 0.1 <0.2
6 0.1 <0.2 Mult Factor =
7 0.1 <0.2 Max. Value
8 0.1 <0.2 Max. Pred Cw
9 0.1 <0.2 Allowable Cw
10 0.1 <0.2
11 0.1 <0.2
12 0.1 <0.2
13 0.1 <0.2
14 0.1 <0.2
RESULTS
Std Dev. 1.4612E-09
Mean 0.1
C.V. 1.4612E-08
0
0.100 pg/1
0.000 pg/1
0.0271 pg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES#=
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Lenior
NC0023981
6
11.7
44.29
FINAL RESULTS
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
35.2
56.5
Parameter =
Standard =
Nickel
25
nil
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data
1 11 11
2 5 <10
3 5 <10
4 5 <10
5 5 <10
6 5 <10 Mull Factor =
7 5 <10 Max. Value
8 5 <10 Max. Pred Cw
9 5 <10 Allowable Cw
10 5 <10
11 5 <10
12 5 <10
13 5 <10
14 5 <10
,15 5 <10
16 5 <10
17 5 <10
18 5 <10
19 5 <10
20 34
21 5 <10
RESULTS
Std Dev. 1.34164079
Mean 5.3
C.V. 0.25313977
3.2
11 pg/1
35.2 pg/1
56.5 pg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Lenior
NC0023981
6
11.7
44.29
FINAL RESULTS
Silver
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
150
0.1
Parameter =
Standard =
Silver
0.06
nil
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 1.0 <2 Std Dev. 6.59325812
2 1.0 <2 Mean 4.45
3 1.0 <2 C.V. 1.48163104
4 1.0 <2
5 2.5 <5
6 2.5 <5 Mult Factor =
7 2.5 <5 Max. Value
8 2.5 <5 Max. Pred Cw
9 2.5 <5 Allowable Cw
10 2.5 <5
11 2.5 <5
12 2.5 <5
13 2.5 <5
14 2.5 <5
15 2.5 <5
16 7.0 7
17 13.0 13
18 2.5 <5
19 30.0 30
20 5.0 <10
5
30 ug/1
150 lig/1
0.1 pg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Lenior
NC0023981
6
11.7
44.29
FINAL RESULTS
Selenium
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
1633.22
11.3
Parameter =
Standard =
Selenium
5.0
n BDL=1I2DL Actual Data
1 5.00 <10
2 5.00 <10
3 5.00 <10
4 3.75 <7.5
5 127.00 127.0
6 5.00 <10 Mult Factor =
7 5.00 <10 Max. Value
8 1.00 <2 Max. Pred Cw
9 5.0 <10 Allowable Cw
10 2.5 <5
11 2.5 <5
12 1.0 <2
13 1.5 <3
14 1.0 <2
RESULTS
Std Dev. 33.0971192
Mean 12.1607143
C.V. 2.72164269
12.86
127 pg/1
1633.22 pg/1
11.3 pg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
1WC(%)=
City of Lenior
NC0023981
6
11.7
44.29
FINAL RESULTS
Zinc
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
231.2
112.9
Parameter =
Standard =
Zinc
50.0
Re
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data
1 55 55
2 52 52
3 57 57
4 50 50
5 52 52
6 54 54 Mult Factor =
7 63 63 Max. Value
8 62 62 Max. Pred Cw
9 46 46 Allowable Cw
10 62 62
11 60 60
12 76 76
13 88 88
14 77 77
15 106 106
16 96 96
17 73 73
18 79 79
19 71 71
20 5 <10
21 16 16
22 10 10
23 29 29
24 37 37
25 24 24
26 32 32
27 21 21
28 54 54
29 43 43
30 38 38
31 79 79
32 60 60
33 136 136
34 110 110
35 89 89
36 27 27
37 44 44
RESULTS
Std Dev. 28.8108932
Mean 57.6486486
C.V. 0.49976702
1.7
136 pg/1
231.2 pg/1
112.9 pg/1

4_
r 7 e-/ f r J�`t •
04,1
h�o
11(46.--(4-`"
1/ 3%rn
de4-4-0- 11- tzt
Ma:E. 4,
L-04, ci711,4<s./
5-t ?ffo-r- ‘4e
s-0
ifs F.
/72i)
0/6-,
-16-kr (It
w/p n.o
CAA, clot-it4141-t
(trig
e-- FYRs�-�.
G �x )
C is /) ••c.
G ZjT .
+t- 2h - T1Lok-P r-e-e4a-
'efT,

D/U Statistics for Fecal Coliform
Total sampling Points 146
Sampling Points >1 71
Percent of sampling points with greater than 10% increase from upstream to downstream 48.6
Percent of sampling points with Tess than 10% increase from upstream to downstream 51.4
Average over sampling period
Standard Deviation
95 percentile
99 pecentile
1.18
0.80
2.50
3.97
Average Upstream 3376 ' oz µ-%-
Average Downstream 3261 // ' -C_ .

p xa r .CtzI4�'^Y4ks,
Upst earn
"t �A3�T�*::�xa a.. ..,B�Ffax
Dow tream
s
Ica nt
.1 0 m
G x
DU
Dimensionless
�
s oun
/100m
6400
8200
1.281
37000
20000
0.541
1400
1600
1.143
1900
470
_ _
0.247
940
420
0.447
1200
250
0.208
280
280
1.000
3800
9400
2.474
3600
800
0.222
1400
1100
0.786
3600
5200
1.444
1200
400
0.333
4400
3600
0.818
2400
2500
1.042
1500
1200
0.800
9200
16000
1.739
18000
8700
0.483
1600
2000
1.250
6300
5100
0.810
9400
8800
0.936
5300
7000
1.321
4400
4300
0.977
10000
9600
0.960
2600
5000
1.923
2700
_
13000
4.815
6700
8800
1.313
22000
11000
0.500
16000
4600
0.288
11000
2700
0.245
10000
6800
0.680
1100
2200
2.000

1900
1500
0.789
1300
1500
1.154
31000
77000
2.484
2100
1500
0.714
1400
1400
1.000
12000
5200
0.433
24000
11000
0.458
18000
7200
0.400
4000
1900
0.475
2700
1600
0.593
3400
6500
1.912
1500
1100
0.733
1200
1800
1.500
1000
1200
1.200
5000
4900
0.980
5600
7700
1.375
23000
20000
0.870
2900
2400
0.828
470
1200
2.553
600
1300
2.167
2900
5000
1.724
450
930
2.067
980
1400
1.429
2300
2000
0.870
1100
1000
0.909
1400
1500
1.071
640
1200
1.875
1000
1100
1.100
1200
1600
1.333
600
1100
1.833
2000
2400
1.200
1200
1800
1.500
320
790
2.469
380
860
2.263
440
850
1.932
1300
1600
1.231
6400
9000
1.406

1400
1400
1.000
270
500
1.852
330
600
1.818
170
500
2.941
220
_
480
2.182
520
1300
2.500
450
820
1.822
370
330
0.892
3000
2400
0.800
1400
1100
0.786
1000
1200
1.200
750
1200
1.600
900
1200
1.333
680
1400
2.059
860
1300
1.512
800
680
0.850
580
1100
1.897
650
1300
2.000
5200
1600
0.308
4000
4200
1.050
3600
10000
2.778
880
1500
1.705
700
600
0.857
910
430
0.473
5400
5100
0.944
1400
2100
1.500
440
970
2.205
980
1300
1.327
1200
1200
1.000
390
480
1.231
580
650
1.121
1300
2700
2.077
1300
3400
2.615
550
1000
1.818
8600
5400
0.628
2100
1600
0.762
5000
6000
1.200

7000
2300
0.329
3400
2300
0.676
1300
2800
2.154
2300
2700
1.174
1200
2400
2.000
8000
7000
0.875
1200
1500
1.250
2600
1500
0.577
730
350
0.479
480
2400
5.000
650
480
0.738
3700
400
0.108
920
170
0.185
730
420
0.575
910
420
0.462
6600
440
0.067
2100
1500
0.714
630
380
0.603
810
480
0.593
500
440
0.880
730
1300
1.781
600
88
0.147
1900
4900
2.579
550
730
1.327
3900
2600
0.667
280
140
0.500
560
510
0.911
250
110
0.440
680
440
0.647
210
270
1.286
430
70
0.163
760
1400
1.842
360
210
0.583
300
100
0.333
120
92
0.767
180
33
0.183
220
260
1.182

340
100
0.294
240
36
0.150
260
54
0.208
410
230
0.561

In -stream DO Assessment
for NPDES Permit No. NC0023981
In -Stream DO Assessment Instructions -
Shaded areas require user inputs. If salinity and/or elevation are unknown and cannot be
determined then leave blank, this will not affect the final outcome. After entering data
drag the DO saturation cells, percent saturation cells, and impact assessment cells
down to the appropriate line.
Note: that if salinity or elevation values are not enter then the DO saturation values only
represent the temperature corrected values only.
Upstream Sampling Point Elevation
Downstream Sampling Point Elevation
Stream DO Standard
5
6.0 mg/L if trout water; otherswise 5.0mg/L
Temperature
°C
Temperature
K
Field
Measured
DO
mg/L'
Field
Measured
Salinity
g/L
Upstream
DO Saturation
mg/L
DO Saturation
mg/L
DO Saturation
mg/L
Percent
Saturation
22
295.15
8.2
8.74
8.74
8.74
93.78
21.5
294.65
9.1
8.83
8.83
8.83
103.07
18
291.15
8.8
9.47
9.47
9.47
92.95
20
293.15
9.2
9.09
9.09
9.09
101.18
20.5
293.65
9.9
9.00
9.00
9.00
109.96
21
294.15
8.2
8.92
8.92
8.92
91.98
15
288.15
10.3
10.08
10.08
10.08
102.14
18
291.15
9.3 `
9.47
9.47
9.47
98.24
20
293.15
7.4
9.09
9.09
9.09
81.39
20.5
293.65
8.8
9.00
9.00
9.00
97.75
18
291.15
8.3
9.47
9.47
9.47
87.67
15
288.15
10
10.08
10.08
10.08
99.17
22
295.15
7.6
8.74
8.74
8.74
86.92
22
295.15
7.6
8.74
8.74
8.74
86.92
22.5
295.65
7.7 ' : "
8.66
8.66
8.66
88.91
23
296.15
8.2 ' :
8.58
8.58
8.58
95.59
22.5
295.65
7.6
8.66
8.66
8.66
87.76
19
292.15
9.4 '
9.28
9.28
9.28
101.33
20.5
293.65
8.5 `
9.00
9.00
9.00
94.41
21.5
294.65
7.5
8.83
8.83
8.83
84.95
20.5
293.65
9.3
9.00
9.00
9.00
103.30
19.5
292.65
6.9
9.18
9.18
9.18
75.13
21.5
294.65
8.1
8.83
8.83
8.83
91.75
21
294.15
8
8.92
8.92
8.92
89.74
21
294.15
7.4
8.92
8.92
8.92
83.01
22.5
295.65
6.3
8.66
8.66
8.66
72.75
22
295.15
6.7
8.74
8.74
8.74
76.63
23
296.15
7.4 ` "
8.58
8.58
_
8.58
86.26
23
296.15
6.9
8.58
8.58
8.58
80.44
21.5
294.65
7.6
8.83
8.83
8.83
86.08
20.5 . _
293.65
10.9'..
:`
9.00
9.00
9.00
121.07
21
294.15
9 " :
8.92
8.92
8.92
100.95
22
295.15
7.6
8.74
8.74
8.74
86.92
20.5
293.65
7.8
9.00
9.00
9.00
86.64
19.5
292.65
7.2
9.18
9.18
9.18
78.40
MJM
1
1/3/01

In -stream DO Assessment
for NPDES Permit No. NC0023981
Number of upstream DO violations
0
Number of Downstream DO violations
0
Number of Downstream DO violations
where upstream was above standard
0
Note since this is swamp water the DO standard is not applicable, however the facility
has an effluent DO limit of 6.0 mg/L.
Temperature
°C
Temperature
K
Field
Measured
DO
mg/L
Downstream
Field
Measured
Salinity
g/L
DO Saturation
mg/L
DO Saturation
mg/L
DO Saturation
mg/L
Percent
Saturation
%
22.5
295.65
7.8
8.66
8.66
8.66
90.09
21.5
294.65
8.2
8.83
8.83
8.83
92.91
18.5
291.65
8.7
9.37
9.37
9.37
92.87
20.5
293.65
8.6
9.00
9.00
9.00
95.55
21
294.15
9.2
8.92
8.92
8.91
103.23
21.5
294.65
8.4
8.83
8.83
8.83
95.17
16
289.15
9.6
9.87
9.87
_
9.87
97.29
18
291.15
8.6
9.47
9.47
9.46
90.87
20.5
293.65
7.4
9.00
9.00
9.00
82.22
21
294.15
8.4
8.92
8.92
8.91
94.25
19
292.15
8.6
9.28
9.28
9.27
92.74
15.5
288.65
9.2
9.98
9.98
9.97
92.25
22.5
295.65
7.3
8.66
8.66
8.66
84.32
22
295.15
7.3
8.74
8.74
8.74
83.51
23 `
296.15
7.3
8.58
8.58
8.58
85.13
23.5
296.65
7.9
8.50
8.50
8.49
_
93.00
22.5
295.65
7.3
8.66
8.66
8.66
84.32
20.5
293.65
8.7
9.00
9.00
9.00
96.66
21.5
294.65
7.8
8.83
8.83
8.83
_ 88.38
22.5
295.65
7.5
8.66
8.66
8.66
86.63
20.5
293.65
8.6
9.00
9.00
9.00
95.55
20.5
293.65
6.8
9.00
9.00
9.00
75.55
22
295.15
7.4
8.74
8.74
8.74
84.66
22
295.15
7.3
8.74
8.74
8.74
83.51
21.5
294.65
7.3
8.83
8.83
8.83
82.71
23
296.15
6.1
8.58
8.58
8.58
71.13
22.5
295.65
6.7 .
8.66
8.66
8.66
77.39
23.5
296.65
7.2
8.50
8.50
8.49
84.76
23.5
296.65
7.1
8.50
8.50
8.49
83.58
22
295.15
7.4
8.74
8.74
8.74
84.66
21
294.15
10.6
8.92
8.92
8.91
118.94
22
295.15
8.3
8.74
8.74
8.74
94.95
23
296.15
7
8.58
8.58
8.58
81.63
21
294.15
7.4 "
8.92
8.92
8.91
83.03
20
293.15
6.8
9.09
9.09
9.09
74.81
MJM
2
1/3/01

1n-stream DO Assessment
for NPDES Permit No. NC0023981
21
294.15
8.2
8.92
8.92
8.92
91.98
20
293.15
8.3
9.09
9.09
9.09
91.28
19
292.15
6.2
9.28
9.28
9.28
66.84
20.5
293.65
7.4
9.00
9.00
9.00
82.20
21
294.15
7.9
8.92
8.92
8.92
_
88.61
22
295.15
7.4
8.74
8.74
8.74
84.63
23
296.15
7
8.58
8.58
8.58
81.60
21.5
294.65
7.5
8.83
8.83
8.83
84.95
21.5
294.65
7.6
8.83
8.83
8.83
86.08
21
294.15
6.9
8.92
8.92
8.92
77.40
21.5
294.65
7.4
8.83
8.83
8.83
83.82
22
295.15
7.3
8.74
8.74
8.74
83.49
13
286.15
9.6
10.54
10.54
10.54
91.11
18
291.15
8.2
9.47
9.47
9.47
_
86.62
15.5
288.65
8.6
9.98
9.98
9.98
86.21
19.5 . ::
292.65
8.2
9.18
_
9.18
9.18
89.29
9
282.15
10.8
11.56
11.56
11.56
93.43
7
280.15
11.4
12.14
12.14
12.14
93.91
10
283.15
9.9
11.29
11.29
11.29
87.70
11.5
284.65
9.9
10.90
10.90
10.90
90.82
3
276.15
11.9
13.46
13.46
13.46
88.40
4
277.15
12.3
13.11
13.11
13.11
93.83
5.5 .
278.65
12.1
12.61
12.61
12.61
95.97
5 - -
278.15
11.7
12.77
12.77
12.77
91.61
10
283.15
10.8
11.29
11.29
11.29
95.68
13
286.15
9.3
10.54
10.54
10.54
88.26
6
279.15
11.4
12.45
12.45
12.45
91.58
3.5
276.65
12.6
13.28
13.28
13.28
94.86
4
277.15
12.9
13.11
13.11
13.11
98.41
3
276.15
13.3
13.46
13.46
13.46
98.80
6
279.15
11.9
12.45
12.45
12.45
95.60
12
285.15
9.8
10.78
10.78
10.78
90.93
10.5
283.65
10
11.16
11.16
11.16
89.64
9.5
282.65
10.7
11.42
11.42
11.42
93.68
13.5
286.65
9.5
10.42
10.42
10.42
91.17
11.5 `
284.65
9.6
10.90
10.90
10.90
88.07
11
284.15
10.3
11.03
11.03
11.03
93.41
14.5
287.65
9.7
10.19
10.19
10.19
95.16
17.5
290.65
8.7
9.57
9.57
9.57
90.96
17
290.15
8.3
9.66
9.66
9.66
85.88
14
287.15
9.7
10.31
10.31
10.31
94.12
9
282.15
9.6
11.56
11.56
11.56
83.05
20.5
293.65
7.6
9.00
9.00
9.00
84.42
20
293.15
7.8
9.09
9.09
9.09
85.79
21.5
294.65
6.7
8.83
8.83
8.83
75.89
18
291.15
8.7 %
9.47
9.47
9.47
91.90
19
292.15
8.4
9.28
9.28
9.28
90.55
19.5
292.65
8.2
9.18
9.18
9.18
89.29
16.5
289.65
8.7
9.77
9.77
9.77
89.08
18.5
291.65
8.4
9.37
9.37
9.37
89.64
13
286.15
9.3
10.54
10.54
10.54
_
88.26
20
293.15
7.5
9.09
9.09
9.09
82.49
MJM
3
1/3/01

In -stream DO Assessment
for NPDES Permit No. NC0023981
21.5 ;: -` ;
294.65
7.8
8.83
8.83
8.83
88.38
20.5
293.65
8.9
9.00
9.00
9.00
98.89
19.5
292.65
6.2
9.18
9.18
9.18
67.53
21.5
294.65
7
8.83
8.83
8.83
79.31
21.5
294.65
7.7
8.83
8.83
8.83
87.24
22.5
295.65
7
8.66
8.66
8.66
80.85
23.5
296.65
7.6
8.50
8.50
8.49
89.46
22
295.15
7.2
8.74
8.74
8.74
82.37
22
295.15
7.2
8.74
8.74
8.74
82.37
22
295.15
6.6
8.74
8.74
8.74
75.51
22.5
295.65
7.3
8.66
8.66
8.66
84.32
22
295.15
7.2
8.74
8.74
8.74
82.37
14
287.15
9.1
10.31
10.31
10.30
88.33
18.5 ; .
291.65
9.5
9.37
9.37
9.37
101.41
16.5
289.65
8.1
9.77
9.77
9.76
82.96
20
293.15
7.6 ` `
9.09
9.09
9.09
83.61
9.5
282.65
10
11.42
11.42
11.42
87.57
7.5
280.65
10.8
11.99
11.99
11.99
90.10
10
283.15
9.9
11.29
11.29
11.28
87.73
12
285.15
9.3
10.78
10.78
10.77
86.32
5..
278.15
11.4
12.77
12.77
12.77
89.29
5
278.15
11.6
12.77
12.77
12.77
90.86
7
280.15
11.1
12.14
12.14
12.14
91.47
6
279.15
11.2
12.45
12.45
12.44
90.00
10.5
283.65
10.4
11.16
11.16
11.15
93.25
13
286.15
9.2
10.54
10.54
10.53
87.34
6.5
279.65
11.4
12.29
12.29
12.29
92.77
4
277.15
12.2
13.11
13.11
13.10
93.10
4.5
277.65
11.7
12.94
12.94
12.93
90.46
3
276.15
10.4
13.46
13.46
13.46
77.28
5.5
278.65
11.2
12.61
12.61
12.60
88.86
12.5
285.65
9.5
10.66
10.66
10.65
89.18
11.: -:
284.15
9.8
11.03
11.03
11.02
88.90
9.5 ..:.
282.65
10.6 ;
11.42
11.42
11.42
92.83
14.5
287.65
9
10.19
10.19
10.19
88.32
12
285.15
9.6
10.78
10.78
10.77
89.11
12
285.15
9.5
10.78
10.78
10.77
88.18
14.5
287.65
9
10.19
10.19
10.19
88.32
17.5
290.65
8.1
9.57
9.57
9.56
84.71
18
291.15
7.7
9.47
9.47
9.46
81.36
15
288.15
8.8
10.08
10.08
10.08
87.29
9.5
282.65
8.9
11.42
11.42
11.42
77.94
21
294.15
7.3
8.92
8.92
8.91
81.91
21.
294.15
7.2
8.92
8.92
8.91
80.79
21.5
294.65
7
8.83
8.83
8.83
79.31
18
291.15
8
9.47
9.47
9.46
84.53
19
292.15
:..7.7
9.28
9.28
9.27
83.03
20
293.15
7.6
9.09
9.09
9.09
83.61
17.5
290.65
7.7
9.57
9.57
9.56
80.53
19
292.15
7.6
9.28
9.28
9.27
81.95
14
287.15
8.4
10.31
10.31
10.30
81.53
19
292.15
7.4
9.28
9.28
9.27
79.80
MJM
4
1/3/01

In -stream DO Assessment
for NPDES Permit No. NC0023981
20
293.15
7.7
9.09
9.09
9.09
84.69
17
290.15
6.8
9.66
9.66
9.66
70.36
23.5
296.65
8.2
8.50
8.50
8.50
96.50
22
295.15
7.8
8.74
8.74
8.74
89.21
21.5
294.65
7.4
8.83
8.83
8.83
83.82
22.5
295.65
6.6
8.66
8.66
8.66
76.21
21.5
294.65
7.5
8.83
8.83
8.83
84.95
22
295.15
6.6
8.74
8.74
8.74
75.48
23
296.15
" 7
8.58
8.58
8.58
81.60
23
296.15
7.2 `
8.58
8.58
8.58
83.93
21
294.15
7.3
8.92
8.92
8.92
81.88
20.5
293.65
7.2
9.00
9.00
9.00
79.97
20.5
293.65
7.5
9.00
9.00
9.00
83.31
21.5
294.65
7.1
8.83
8.83
8.83
80.42
20.5
293.65
7.4 :.
9.00
9.00
9.00
82.20
22.5
295.65
7 ::
8.66
8.66
8.66
80.83
22.5
295.65
7.2,
8.66
8.66
8.66
83.14
21.5
294.65
7.4
8.83
8.83
8.83
83.82
19.5
292.65
7.4
9.18
9.18
9.18
80.58
18
291.15
8.2
9.47
9.47
9.47
86.62
20.5
293.65
9.5
9.00
9.00
9.00
105.52
21
294.15
8.3
8.92
8.92
8.92
93.10
21.5
294.65
7.8
8.83
8.83
8.83
88.35
22.5 -
295.65
;'" 7.2
8.66
8.66
8.66
83.14
22
295.15
7.6
8.74
8.74
8.74
86.92
23
296.15
7.7
8.58
8.58
8.58
89.76
23
296.15
7.4
8.58
8.58
8.58
86.26
18
291.15
8.5
9.47
9.47
9.47
89.79
18.5
291.65
6.8
9.37
9.37
9.37
72.57
18.5
291.65
8.1
9.37
9.37
9.37
86.44
19.5
292.65
7.9 ':-.
9.18
9.18
9.18
86.02
20.5 "
293.65
7.6
9.00
9.00
9.00
84.42
19 "
292.15
7.8 `r
9.28
9.28
9.28
84.09
21
294.15
7.1
8.92
8.92
8.92
79.64
18.5
291.65
8.2 .
9.37
9.37
9.37
87.51
18
291.15
8.3
9.47
9.47
9.47
87.67
19
292.15
8.3 '
9.28
9.28
9.28
89.48
19
292.15
8.5
9.28
9.28
9.28
91.63
21.5 .:' ;
294.65
8.1
8.83
8.83
8.83
91.75
12
285.15
9.6
10.78
10.78
10.78
89.08
15.5
288.65
8.7
9.98
9.98
9.98
87.21
15.5
288.65
8.3
9.98
9.98
9.98
83.20
18.5
291.65
8.5
9.37
9.37
9.37
90.71
15.5.
288.65
9.2
9.98
9.98
9.98
92.22
14
287.15
9.6
10.31
10.31
10.31
93.15
11
284.15
10.1
11.03
11.03
11.03
91.59
16
289.15
` 9.6 :
9.87
9.87
9.87
97.26
7
280.15
10.8 `
12.14
12.14
12.14
88.97
4.5
277.65
11.8
12.94
12.94
12.94
91.21
6.5
279.65
11
12.29
12.29
12.29
89.49
8
281.15
11
11.84
11.84
11.84
92.88
7.5
280.65
10.3
11.99
11.99
11.99
85.91
MJM
5
1/3/01

In -stream DO Assessment
for NPDES Permit No. NC0023981
19.5
292.65
7.3
9.18
9.18
9.18
79.51
18
291.15
6.9
9.47
9.47
9.46
72.91
24
297.15
7.6..
8.42
8.42
8.42
90.31
21.5
294.65
6.8
8.83
8.83
8.83
77.05
21.5
294.65
6.8
8.83
8.83
8.83
77.05
23
296.15
6.2
8.58
8.58
8.58
72.30
22
295.15
6.5
8.74
8.74
8.74
74.36
22
295.15
7.4
8.74
8.74
8.74
84.66
23.5
" :
296.65
64::.
8.50
8.50
8.49
75.34
23.5
296.65
6.5
8.50
8.50
8.49
76.52
22
295.15
6.4
8.74
8.74
8.74
73.22
21
294.15
7.6
8.92
8.92
8.91
85.28
21
294.15
7.3
8.92
8.92
8.91
81.91
22
295.15
6.7
8.74
8.74
8.74
76.65
21.5..
294.65
7 -
8.83
8.83
8.83
79.31
23 - .
296.15
6.8
8.58
8.58
8.58
79.29
23
296.15
6.4
8.58
8.58
8.58
74.63
23
296.15
6.5
8.58
8.58
8.58
75.80
19.5
292.65
8.1
9.18
9.18
9.18
88.23
18
291.15
7.8
9.47
9.47
9.46
82.42
20.5
. '
293.65
8.6
9.00
9.00
9.00
95.55
21
294.15
7.2
8.92
8.92
8.91
80.79
21.5
294.65
6.5
8.83
8.83
8.83
73.65
23
296.15
7.2
8.58
8.58
8.58
83.96
22.5
295.65
6.9
8.66
8.66
8.66
79.70
23
296.15
6.9
8.58
8.58
8.58
80.46
23.5
296.65
" 6.2
8.50
8.50
8.49
72.98
18 .
291.15
6.3 .
`
9.47
9.47
9.46
66.57
18.5
291.65
5.9 -
9.37
9.37
9.37
62.98
19 "
292.15
6.6
9.28
9.28
9.27
71.17
20
293.15
5.4
9.09
9.09
9.09
59.41
21
294.15
5 -
8.92
8.92
8.91
56.10
20
293.15
5.4.
9.09
9.09
9.09
59.41
21
294.15
5.7
8.92
8.92
8.91
63.96
18
291.15
6.4
9.47
9.47
9.46
67.62
18
291.15
6.2
9.47
9.47
9.46
65.51
19 ..
292.15
5.9
9.28
9.28
9.27
63.62
19
292.15
` 59 "
`
9.28
9.28
9.27
63.62
21.5 ."
294.65
5.7 "
8.83
8.83
8.83
64.58
12.5
285.65
8.8.
10.66
10.66
10.65
82.61
16
289.15
7.4
9.87
9.87
9.87
74.99
16
289.15
7.4
9.87
9.87
9.87
74.99
19
292.15
6.2
9.28
9.28
9.27
66.86
16
289.15
8.2
9.87
9.87
83.10
14.5
287.65
8.2
10.19
_9.87
10.19
10.19
80.47
11 " .
284.15
8.8
11.03
_
11.03
11.02
79.83
16.
289.15
7.6
9.87
9.87
9.87
77.02
7.5
280.65
10.4
11.99
11.99
11.99
86.77
5
278.15
10.4
12.77
12.77
12.77
81.46
6.5
279.65
10.6
12.29
12.29
12.29
86.26
8
281.15
10.8
11.84
11.84
11.84
91.22
8
281.15
9.8
11.84
11.84
11.84
82.77
MJM
6
1/3/01

In -stream DO Assessment
for NPDES Permit No. NC0023981
9.5
282.65
9.8
11.42
11.42
11.42
85.80
4.5
277.65
12
12.94
12.94
12.94
92.75
3.5
276.65
12
13.28
13.28
13.28
90.34
0.5
273.65
12.2
14.42
14.42
14.42
84.63
3.5
276.65
11.8
13.28
13.28
13.28
88.84
6
279.15
11.3 `
12.45
12.45
12.45
90.78
7
280.15
10.8
12.14
12.14
12.14
_
88.97
MJM 7 1/3/01

In -stream DO Assessment
for NPDES Permit No. NC0023981
10
283.15
9.1
11.29
11.29
11.28
80.64
5
278.15
11.5
12.77
12.77
12.77
90.08
4
277.15
11.5
13.11
13.11
13.10
87.76
0.5
273.65
12.1
14.42
14.42
14.41
83.96
4
277.15
12.1
13.11
13.11
13.10
92.34
6.5
279.65
10.9
12.29
12.29
12.29
88.70 �-
75
280.65
10.1
11.99
11.99
11.99
84.26
MJM 8 1/3/01

s
City of Lenoir - Lower Creek WWTP
NC00023981
Ratio of Percent DO Saturation Upstream to Percent DO Saturation Downstream of Permitted
Outfall(s)
5.00
c
0
15 4.50
cti
0 4.00
0
c
e 3.50
au
a
0 3.00
E E
cI
co
aW
2.50
0
c p
O 2.00
To
cn 1.50
0
0
a2 1.00
a)
a_
° 0.50
cii
cc
0.00
MJM
1/3/01

City of Lenoir - Lower Creek WWTP
BOD Removal Assessment
Percent
Date Influent Effleunt Removal
Mo/yr mg/L mg/L %
04-Sep-00 160 1 99.38%
05-Sep-00 85 2.1 97.53%
06-Sep-00 150 1 99.33%
07-Sep-00 330 1 99.70%
08-Sep-00 260 1 99.62%
11-Sep-00 170 8.6 94.94%
12-Sep-00 250 6.1 97.56%
13-Sep-00 240 4.4 98.17%
14-Sep-00 280 3.9 98.61%
15-Sep-00 290 5.1 98.24%
18-Sep-00 220 2.2 99.00%
19-Sep-00 230 3.8 98.35%
20-Sep-00 300 3.3 98.90%
21-Sep-00 350 5.7 98.37%
22-Sep-00 270 4.6 98.30%
25-Sep-00 250 5.6 97.76%
26-Sep-00 190 5.5 97.11%
27-Sep-00 180 4.2 97.67%
28-Sep-00 180 4.4 97.56%
29-Sep-00 260 4.2 98.38%
01-Aug-00 250 4.2 98.32%
02-Aug-00 300 4.4 98.53%
03-Aug-00 390 3.5 99.10%
04-Aug-00 240 4.7 98.04%
07-Aug-00 220 1 99.55%
08-Aug-00 210 2 99.05%
09-Aug-00 200 5.2 97.40%
10-Aug-00 350 4.3 98.77%
11-Aug-00 270 1 99.63%
14-Aug-00 220 6.9 96.86%
15-Aug-00 220 5.5 97.50%
16-Aug-00 240 5.9 97.54%
17-Aug-00 360 3.6 99.00%
18-Aug-00 240 6.5 97.29%
21-Aug-00 280 2.8 99.00%
22-Aug-00 290 2.3 99.21%
23-Aug-00 180 2.7 98.50%
24-Aug-00 280 3.1 98.89%
25-Aug-00 400 3.5 99.13%
28-Aug-00 200 2.5 98.75%
29-Aug-00 260 4 98.46%
30-Aug-00 280 2.6 99.07%
31-Aug-00 250 3 98.80%
03-Jul-00 290 6.2 97.86%
05-Jul-00 260 3.7 98.58%
06-Jul-00 300 3.7 98.77%
07-Jul-00 340 3.3 99.03%
Average Removal Efficiency 98.37%
Minimum Removal Efficiency 86.90%
NC0023981
MJM 1/4/01

City of Lenoir - Lower Creek WWTP
10-JuI-00 420 9.4 97.76%
11-Jul-00 390 4 98.97%
12-JuI-00 420 7 98.33%
13-JuI-00 300 5.6 98.13%
14-JuI-00 320 2.8 99.13%
17-Jul-00 200 2.1 98.95%
18-Jul-00 150 9 94.00%
19-Jul-00 270 10 96.30%
20-Jul-00 270 4.6 98.30%
21-JuI-00 300 7 97.67%
24-JuI-00 240 8.3 96.54%
25-Jul-00 240 3.4 98.58%
26-JuI-00 340 4.3 98.74%
27-Jul-00 290 4.4 98.48%
28-JuI-00 390 7.7 98.03%
31-JuI-00 220 5.6 97.45%
01-Jun-00 240 8.5 96.46%
02-Jun-00 190 7.6 96.00%
05-Jun-00 270 4.8 98.22%
06-Jun-00 270 2.9 98.93%
07-Jun-00 310 6.6 97.87%
08-Jun-00 350 5.8 98.34%
09-Jun-00 290 4 98.62%
12-Jun-00 260 11 95.77%
13-Jun-00 300 12 96.00%
14-Jun-00 320 6.5 97.97%
15-Jun-00 490 11 97.76%
16-Jun-00 290 4.8 98.34%
19-Jun-00 530 4.6 99.13%
20-Jun-00 340 4.9 98.56%
21-Jun-00 270 5.2 98.07%
22-Jun-00 460 5.1 98.89%
23-Jun-00 330 4.2 98.73%
26-Jun-00 260 9.5 96.35%
27-Jun-00 290 12 95.86%
28-Jun-00 280 11 96.07%
29-Jun-00 250 6.8 97.28%
30-Jun-00 240 5.9 97.54%
01-May-00 220 6.1 97.23%
02-May-00 280 7.5 97.32%
03-May-00 260 6.3 97.58%
05-May-00 250 14 94.40%
08-May-00 260 4.7 98.19%
09-May-00 320 2.1 99.34%
10-May-00 370 3.4 99.08%
11-May-00 260 3.9 98.50%
12-May-00 440 3.4 99.23%
15-May-00 290 4.6 98.41%
16-May-00 280 4.9 98.25%
17-May-00 310 3.6 98.84%
18-May-00 360 1 99.72%
19-May-00 290 6.1 97.90%
NC0023981
MJM
1/4/01

City of Lenoir - Lower Creek WWTP
22-May-00 200 1 99.50%
23-May-00 370 3.8 98.97%
24-May-00 290 11 96.21%
25-May-00 240 3.9 98.38%
29-May-00 260 10 96.15%
30-May-00 260 11 95.77%
31-May-00 320 8.8 97.25%
01-Mar-00 300 7.8 97.40%
02-Mar-00 260 6.2 97.62%
03-Mar-00 630 4.8 99.24%
06-Mar-00 230 5.7 97.52%
07-Mar-00 230 9.3 95.96%
08-Mar-00 250 8.5 96.60%
09-Mar-00 370 4.8 98.70%
10-Mar-00 260 8.9 96.58%
13-Mar-00 250 6.9 97.24%
14-Mar-00 220 7.3 96.68%
15-Mar-00 270 6.9 97.44%
16-Mar-00 270 9.2 96.59%
17-Mar-00 220 7.8 96.45%
20-Mar-00 160 4.9 96.94%
21-Mar-00 84 11 86.90%
22-Mar-00 180 6.5 96.39%
23-Mar-00 230 6.8 97.04%
24-Mar-00 200 3.6 98.20%
27-Mar-00 230 14 93.91%
28-Mar-00 210 4.8 97.71%
30-Mar-00 520 4.4 99.15%
31-Mar-00 440 3.8 99.14%
01-Feb-00 180 7.6 95.78%
02-Feb-00 500 9 98.20%
03-Feb-00 210 12 94.29%
04-Feb-00 270 6.1 97.74%
07-Feb-00 270 12 95.56%
08-Feb-00 340 11 96.76%
10-Feb-00 240 4.8 98.00%
11-Feb-00 260 6.7 97.42%
14-Feb-00 170 9.6 94.35%
15-Feb-00 190 8.6 95.47%
16-Feb-00 240 11 95.42%
17-Feb-00 270 8.9 96.70%
18-Feb-00 410 6.5 98.41%
21-Feb-00 190 13 93.16%
23-Feb-00 260 4.9 98.12%
24-Feb-00 400 18 95.50%
25-Feb-00 240 5.1 97.88%
28-Feb-00 230 6.6 97.13%
29-Feb-00 270 7.5 97.22%
03-Jan-00 220 14 93.64%
04-Jan-00 290 7.7 97.34%
05-Jan-00 180 4.6 97.44%
06-Jan-00 290 9.3 96.79%
NC0023981
MJM
1/4/01

City of Lenoir - Lower Creek WWTP
07-Jan-00 270 5.1 98.11%
10-Jan-00 260 8.6 96.69%
11-Jan-00 130 6.3 95.15%
12-Jan-00 240 8.5 96.46%
13-Jan-00 300 5.7 98.10%
14-Jan-00 250 7.8 96.88%
18-Jan-00 410 6 98.54%
19-Jan-00 250 6.7 97.32%
20-Jan-00 220 7.5 96.59%
21-Jan-00 290 7.1 97.55%
24-Jan-00 180 8.1 95.50%
25-Jan-00 220 13 94.09%
26-Jan-00 360 15 95.83%
27-Jan-00 230 11 95.22%
28-Jan-00 250 7.6 96.96%
31-Jan-00 210 11 94.76%
NC0023981
MJM 1/4/01

City of Lenoir - Lower Creek WWTP
TSS Removal Assessment
Percent
Date Influent Effleunt Removal
Mo/yr mg/L mg/L
04-Sep-00 140 6.2 95.57%
05-Sep-00 130 7.1 94.54%
06-Sep-00 140 11 92.14%
07-Sep-00 360 9.9 97.25%
08-Sep-00 310 15 95.16%
11-Sep-00 190 7.1 96.26%
12-Sep-00 250 5.7 97.72%
13-Sep-00 300 6.5 97.83%
14-Sep-00 280 6.1 97.82%
15-Sep-00 310 6.2 98.00%
18-Sep-00 350 6.1 98.26%
19-Sep-00 340 7.9 97.68%
20-Sep-00 250 9 96.40%
21-Sep-00 290 8.3 97.14%
22-Sep-00 440 7 98.41%
25-Sep-00 210 6.4 96.95%
26-Sep-00 440 9.2 97.91%
27-Sep-00 200 19 90.50%
28-Sep-00 190 6.7 96.47%
29-Sep-00 280 8 97.14%
01-Aug-00 280 6.4 97.71%
02-Aug-00 250 8 96.80%
03-Aug-00 290 6.8 97.66%
04-Aug-00 300 5.3 98.23%
07-Aug-00 270 6.1 97.74%
08-Aug-00 440 8.1 98.16%
09-Aug-00 190 7 96.32%
10-Aug-00 230 8.9 96.13%
11-Aug-00 200 6.8 96.60%
14-Aug-00 200 8.1 95.95%
15-Aug-00 300 11 96.33%
16-Aug-00 210 5.6 97.33%
17-Aug-00 460 6.8 98.52%
18-Aug-00 260 9.9 96.19%
21-Aug-00 230 5.4 97.65%
22-Aug-00 330 8.2 97.52%
23-Aug-00 250 8.2 96.72%
24-Aug-00 200 7.3 96.35%
25-Aug-00 370 7.2 98.05%
28-Aug-00 190 6.2 96.74%
29-Aug-00 300 6.7 97.77%
30-Aug-00 460 9.5 97.93%
31-Aug-00 180 3.3 98.17%
03-JuI-00 300 10 96.67%
05-Jul-00 240 4.6 98.08%
06-Jul-00 280 3.6 98.71 %
07-Jul-00 330 3 99.09%
Average Removal Efficiency 96.52%
Minimum Removal Efficiency 86.67%
MJM NC0023981 1/4/01

e •
City of Lenoir - Lower Creek WWTP
10-JuI-00 380 3.2 99.16%
11-JuI-00 310 4.2 98.65%
12-JuI-00 290 6.6 97.72%
13-Jul-00 300 5.8 98.07%
14-JuI-00 240 4.1 98.29%
17-JuI-00 190 5 97.37%
18-JuI-00 250 4.6 98.16%
19-JuI-00 270 3.7 98.63%
20-JuI-00 270 3.7 98.63%
21-JuI-00 140 4 97.14%
24-JuI-00 200 5.5 97.25%
25-JuI-00 230 5.9 97.43%
26-Jul-00 340 6.9 97.97%
27-JuI-00 330 7.3 97.79%
28-JuI-00 420 6.9 98.36%
31-Jul-00 330 4.2 98.73%
01-Jun-00 210 6.6 96.86%
02-Jun-00 160 8.4 94.75%
05-Jun-00 240 5.2 97.83%
06-Jun-00 300 8.6 97.13%
07-Jun-00 190 8.8 95.37%
08-Jun-00 400 12 97.00%
09-Jun-00 310 12 96.13%
12-Jun-00 190 11 94.21
13-Jun-00 360 11 96.94%
14-Jun-00 350 8.8 97.49%
15-Jun-00 540 13 97.59%
16-Jun-00 360 10 97.22%
19-Jun-00 1100 11 99.00%
20-Jun-00 490 11 97.76%
21-Jun-00 180 13 92.78%
22-Jun-00 640 11 98.28%
23-Jun-00 310 14 95.48%
26-Jun-00 300 8.5 97.17%
27-Jun-00 370 8.6 97.68%
28-Jun-00 210 7.9 96.24%
29-Jun-00 410 9.7 97.63%
30-Jun-00 420 9.4 97.76%
01-May-00 180 6.6 96.33%
02-May-00 240 7.8 96.75%
03-May-00 180 6.7 96.28%
05-May-00 180 9.4 94.78%
08-May-00 290 10 96.55%
09-May-00 460 5.5 98.80%
10-May-00 300 4.7 98.43%
11-May-00 260 4.9 98.12%
12-May-00 440 4.7 98.93%
15-May-00 290 5.2 98.21%
16-May-00 280 4.7 98.32%
17-May-00 310 5.3 98.29%
18-May-00 360 7.1 98.03%
19-May-00 290 5.8 98.00%
MJM NC0023981 1/4/01

City of Lenoir - Lower Creek WWTP
22-May-00 200 6.8 96.60%
23-May-00 370 7.6 97.95%
24-May-00 290 7.3 97.48%
25-May-00 240 8.3 96.54%
29-May-00 260 6.1 97.65%
30-May-00 260 6.8 97.38%
31-May-00 320 7.2 97.75%
01-Mar-00 300 13 95.67%
02-Mar-00 220 12 94.55%
03-Mar-00 520 17 96.73%
06-Mar-00 390 9.6 97.54%
07-Mar-00 240 11 95.42%
08-Mar-00 220 9.1 95.86%
09-Mar-00 360 16 95.56%
10-Mar-00 160 9.6 94.00%
13-Mar-00 150 9.3 93.80%
14-Mar-00 220 9.4 95.73%
15-Mar-00 190 10 94.74%
16-Mar-00 350 17 95.14%
17-Mar-00 270 12 95.56%
20-Mar-00 250 12 95.20%
21-Mar-00 150 20 86.67%
22-Mar-00 190 13 93.16%
23-Mar-00 260 13 95.00%
24-Mar-00 170 15 91.18%
27-Mar-00 170 8.3 95.12%
28-Mar-00 200 7.6 96.20%
29-Mar-00 260 13 95.00%
30-Mar-00 250 11 95.60%
31-Mar-00 290 10 96.55%
01-Feb-00 110 13 88.18%
02-Feb-00 270 14 94.81
03-Feb-00 200 14 93.00%
04-Feb-00 260 13 95.00%
07-Feb-00 150 12 92.00%
08-Feb-00 300 13 95.67%
10-Feb-00 310 12 96.13%
11-Feb-00 220 14 93.64%
14-Feb-00 190 11 94.21%
15-Feb-00 160 14 91.25%
16-Feb-00 370 12 96.76%
17-Feb-00 330 14 95.76%
18-Feb-00 400 13 96.75%
21-Feb-00 190 22 88.42%
22-Feb-00 180 13 92.78%
23-Feb-00 700 13 98.14%
24-Feb-00 390 13 96.67%
25-Feb-00 260 13 95.00%
28-Feb-00 220 14 93.64%
29-Feb-00 200 12 94.00%
03-Jan-00 200 12 94.00%
04-Jan-00 210 9.7 95.38%
MJM NC0023981 1/4/01

City of Lenoir - Lower Creek INWTP
05-Jan-00 150 12 92.00%
06-Jan-00 300 12 96.00%
07-Jan-00 190 13 93.16%
10-Jan-00 260 15 94.23%
11-Jan-00 140 17 87.86%
12-Jan-00 210 16 92.38%
13-Jan-00 290 20 93.10%
14-Jan-00 190 13 93.16%
18-Jan-00 430 14 96.74%
19-Jan-00 200 14 93.00%
20-Jan-00 240 15 93.75%
21-Jan-00 260 19 92.69%
24-Jan-00 150 15 90.00%
25-Jan-00 180 13 92.78%
26-Jan-00 260 14 94.62%
27-Jan-00 160 15 90.63%
28-Jan-00 140 18 87.14%
31-Jan-00 190 16 91.58%
MJM NC0023981 1/4/01

250.00
200.00
74
co
150.00
u
N
3
i
0
s
N
0
t
a 100.00
e2
0
I-
50.00
0.00
Nov-98
Total Phosphorus
Feb-99
May-99
Aug-99
Dec-99
Time
Mar-00
Jun-00
Oct-00
Jan-01
--•— Influent
—4— Effluent
MJM NC0023981 1/3/01

7000.00
6000.00
5000.00
154
co
413
4000.00
u
C
a)
an
0
L
rr
Z 3000.00
0
H
2000.00
1000.00
0.00
09-Feb-99
Total Nitrogen
♦ + ♦-.---+
20-May-99
28-Aug-99 06-Dec-99 15-Mar-00
Date
23-Jun-00
01-Oct-00
09-Jan-01
Effluent
-G- Influent
MJM NC0023981 1/3/01

100
90
80
70
TA 60
E0)
•61 50
0
E
E
a 40
30
20
10
0
01-Nov-98 09-Feb-99 20-May-99 28-Aug-99 06-Dec-99
Time
Ammonia
15-Mar-00 23-Jun-00
01-Oct-00 09-Jan-01
Influent
—a— Effluent
MJM
NC0023981
1/3/01

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary November 20, 2000
FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Leland Industrial Park WWTP Perm 24hr p/fac lim: 90% flhd 1996 - -- Pass ••- -- Pass - Pass Fail,Fail
NC0065676/001 Begin:9/1/1996 Frequency: Q + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:Single 1997 Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Pass - -- Pass -- NR/Fail
County: Brunswick Region: WIRO Subbasin: CPF17 1998 NR NR Pass - - Fail Fail Pass Pass -• Foil
PF: 0.25 Special 1999 Fall Fail Fail Pass - Pass - - Pass - Pass
7Q10: 600 IWC(%)0.065 Order: 2000 -- --- Fail Fail NR/Fail NR/Pass - - BI
Lenoir- Gunpowder Creek WWTP Penn chr lim: 52% 1996 Pass Pass - Pass - -- Fail NR/Pass - Late
NC0023736/001 Begin:5/1/1995 Frequency: Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:Single 1997 NR/Pass Pass - Pass - Pass -- - Late
County. Caldwell Region: ARO Subbasin: CTB32 1998 Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 2.0 Spacial 1999 -. - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -- -- Ol
7Q10: 3.0 IWC(%):52.0 Order: 2000 -- Pass Pass - Pass - - Pass
Lenoir- Imwer Creek WWTP Pem1 chr lim: 40%: when pf 6MGD chr lim 44 % 1990 --- Fall
NC0023981/001 Begin: 1 1/1/1998 Frequency: Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 1997 --- Pass
County: Caldwell Region: ARO Subbasin: CTB31 1998 - Pass
PF: 4.08 Special 1999 - Pass
7Q10: 9.3 1WC(%):40 Order: 2000 -- Pass
Pass
- Pass - - Pass
- Pass - - Pass
-- Fail,Pass - - Fail
-•• Fail 89.4 <20 Bt
-- Pass - - Pass
Pass
NR
Pass
Pass
Fail•Pass
Pass
Lexington Regional WWTP PERM CHR LIM: 56% Y 1996 -- Pass -- - Pass - - Pass - -- Pass
NC0055786/001 Begire6/1/1994 Frequency: Q P/F 4- Feb May Aug Nov NonComp:SINGLE 199T -- Pass - - Pass -- - Pass -- - Pass
County: Davidson Region: WSRO Subbasin: YADO7 1998 - Pass - Pass - - Pass -- -- Pass
PF: 5.5 Spacial 1999 _- Pass - - Pass - - >100,Fa0 -- Pass
7Q10: 6.7 IWC(%)55.99 1hder: 2000 -- Pass - Pass - Fail,>90 39.6
Libbey-Owens Ford Co. Penn 24 hr p/f ac lim: 90% fthd (grab) 1996 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
NC0049514/001 Begin:I2/1/1999 Frequency: Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp:Single 1997 Pass - Pass - - Pass - - H
County: Scotland Region: FRO Subbasin: LIJM55 1998 Pass -• Pass - Pass - - ---
PF; VAR Spacial 1999 _- Pass -- Pass - - Pass - Pass
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%):100 Order: 2000 Late Pass Pass - Pass
Pass
Liberty Fabrics, Inc. Perm 24hr p/f ac lim: 90% fthd
NC0023710/001 Begin:6/1/1997 Frequency: Q + Mar Jun Sep Dec
County: Martin Region: WARO Subbasin: ROA09
PF: 0.45 Special
7Q10t 1200 IWC(%):0.06 Order:
+ NonComp:Single
1996 - Pass - - Pass - Pass -- --- Pass
1997 -- - Pass - Pass - - Pass --- --- Pass
1998 -- -- Pass - Pass - - Pass - --- Pass
1999 -• Pass Pass - Pass -- Pass.>90
2000 -•- Pass.>90 -- Pass - Pass
Lillington WWTP Perm 24 hr p/f ac lim: 90% 1996 Pass -- Pass - Pass -- Pass
NC0021636/001 Begin:5/I/1996 Frequency: Q + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp:Single 1997 Pass --- --- Pass --- --- Pass --- -- Pass
County: Harnett Region: FRO Subbasin: CPF07 1998 Pass --- --- Pass --- --• Pass --- Pass
PF: 0.6 Special 1999 Pass --- --- Pass - -- Pass -- Pass
7Q10: 550.0 IWC(%):0.17 Order: 2000 Pass --- Pass - --- Pass ---
Lineolnton WWTP Penn chr lim: 11 % 1996 -- -- Pass
NC0025496/001 Begin:9/1/1995 Frequency: Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:Single 1997 - - Fail
County. Lincoln Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB35 1998 - - Pass
PF: 6.0 Special 1999 -- - Pass
7010: 77.0 IWC(%):I1.0 Order: 2000 -- Pass
Pass
- Pass Pass - - Pass
- Pass - - Pass - - Pass
- Pass - - Pass - - Pass
- Pa85 - - Pass - - Pass
- Pass - -- Pass
Linville Resorts, Inc. Penn chr lim: 7%; if exp to 0.15 chr lim 10% 1996
NC0039446/001 Begin:12/1/2000 Frequency:Q Jan Apr Jul Oct +.NonComp:Single 1997
County: Avery Region: ARO Subbasin: CTB30 1998
PF: 0.10 Special 1999
7Q10:2.1 IWC(%):10.0 Order: 2000
Lithium Corp Perm chr lim: 78%;pf 0.7 chr lim 80%;pf 0.8 chr lim 82%;pf 0.9 Y 1996 88(s) - 88 >100(s) >100(s) - -- Pass(s) - -
NC0005177/001 Begin:5/1/1997 Frequency: Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp:Single 1997 >100(s) - -- 88(s) - -. 61>100(s) - 76.5.88.3 76.5(s) >100(s)
County: Gaston Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB37 1998 >100(s) -- >100 --- --- >100 - 88.3 -- -
PF: 0.615 Spaaa! 1990 >100 -- >100 --- --- >100 H >100
7Q10; 0.27 IWC(%):78 Order. 2000 >100 -- - >100 - --- >100 --
Livingstone Coating Corporation Perm chr lim: 90%
NC0086002/001 Begin:10/1/1997 Frequency: Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct
County: Mecklenburg Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB34
PF: 0.0216 Special
7QI0: 0.0 IWC(%):100 Order:
+ NonComp:Single
1996 -- - - - --- --. -.
1997 _- - - _- - -- -. -_ H
1998 H -- Pass - -- Pass - -- Pass
1999 Pass Pan - Pass - Pass
2000 Pass - Pass - -- Pass - --
Y Pre 1996 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM = Permit Requirement LET = Administrative Letter - Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q. Quarterly; M- Monthly, BM -Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually, OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin = First month required 7010 = Receiving stream low flow criterion (cfs) += quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or NR Months that testing must occur - ex. Jan. Apr, Jul, Oct NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
PF = Pemlitted Bow (MGD) IWC%= Instrcam waste concentration P/F = Pass/Fail test AC = Acute CHR = Chronic
e Data Notation: f- Fathead Minnow; • - Ceriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P - Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit; bt - Bad test
Reporting Notation: --- = Data not required: NR - Not reported Facility Activity Status: 1 - Inactive, N - Newly Issued(To construct); H - Active but not discharging; t-More data available for month in question; • = ORC signature needed
29

s
CATAWBA RIVER BASIN
Name of Stream
Subbasin Stream Index Number Map Number Class
Lonon Branch
Loom Creek
Lost Cove Creek
Lost Cove Creek
Loving Branch
Lower
Lower
Lower
Lower
Lower
Lower
Creek,
Creek)
Creek
Little
Little
Little
River
River
River
Lucky Creek
Lyle Creek
Lyle Creek
Lyle Creek
Lytle Branch
Mace Branch
Machine Branch
Mackey Creek
Mackey Creek
Mackey Creek
Magazine Branch
Mahaffie Branch
Maiden Creek
Maiden Creek
Maiden Creek, including
elevation 842
CTB30
CTB30
CTB30
CTB31
CTB31
CTB31
CTB31
CTB31
CTB32
CTB32
CTB32
CTB32
CTB32
CTB32
CTB32
CTB30
CTB30
CTB38
CTB30
CTB30
CTB30
CTB30
CTB32
CTB35
CTB35
Maiden reservoir below CTB35
Major .Branch
Maple Tree Branch
Marks Mountain Branch
Martin Branch
Marvin Branch
Mauney Creek
Maynard Lake
McAloine Creek (Waverly Lake)
McBride Branch
McClure Branch
McCrary Creek
McCullough Branch
McDowell
McDowell
McDowell
Creek
Creek
Creek
McGalliard Creek
McGalliard Creek
McGegers Branch
McGill Branch
McGill Creek
McIntyre Creek
McIntyre Creek
McLean Branch
McLin Creek
McLin Creek
McLin Creek
McMullen Creek
CTB31
CTB31
CTB31
CTB30
CTB38
CTB35
CTB34
CTB34
CTB38
CTB33
CTB32
CTB34
CTB33
CTB33
CTB33
CTB31
CTB31
CTB30
CTB37
CTB37
CTB34
CTB34
CTB31
CTB32
CTB32
CTB32
CTB34
11-24-10-1
11-12-8-1
11-7-10-2
11-38-34-11
11-38-32-17-2
11-39-(0.5)
11-39-(6.5)'+
11-39-(9)
11-69-(0.5)
11-69-(5.5)
11-69-(7.5)
11-110
11-76-(0.5)
11-76-(3.5)
11-76-(4.5)
11-12-4
11-24-14-12-1-1
11-138-2-5
11-15-(1)
11-15-(2)
11-15-(3.5)
11-32-2-9-2
11-76-2
11-129-5-7-2-(1)
11-129-5-7-2-(3)
11-129-5-7-2-(2.5)
11-38-34-11-3-2
11-38-34-11-4-2
11-38-34-11-3-5
11-24-11
11-138-3-4
11-129-15-5
11-137-4-3
11-137-9
11-138-3-3
11-119-1-11
11-91
11-137-7
11-115-(1)
11-115-(1.5)
11-115-(5)
11-44-(0.5)
11-44-(3)
11-24-16
11-135-9
11-135-2
11-120-3-(1)
11-120-3-(2)
11-38-20
11-76-5-(0.3)
11-76-5-(0.7)
11-76-5-(3)
11-137-9-5
D10SE3
ElOSW3
ElONW7
C11SE7
D12NE1
D13NW4
D12SE3
D12 S476
C14SW7
D14NW8
D14SW3
F15NW1
E14NW2
E14NE1
ElOSW5
D10SE2
H16NW4
ElONW6
ElONW6
ElONW6
E11SE1
E14NW2
E14SW3
E14SW2
E14SW2
C11SE5
C11SE6
C11SE8
D10SE6
H15NE2
F14NE7
G15NW5
G16NW5
G15SE8
F14NE4
E15SW2
G15SW2
F15NW6
F15NE1
F15NW8
E12NE1
D12SE8
D10SE9
G13NE6
G13NE2
F15SE4
F15SW6
D12NW2
E14NW5
E14NW5
E14NE1
G15NE8
C Tr
C
C HQW
C Tr ORW
C
C
ws-Iv
WS-IV CA
C
WS-IV
WS-IV CA
WS-IV&B CA
C
WS-IV
WS-IV CA
C
C HQW
C
WS-I Tr
C HQW
C
C
C
WS-II
C
WS-II CA
C Tr ORW
C Tr ORW
C Tr ORW
C Tr
C
WS-IV
C
C
C
C
WS-IV&B CA
C
C
WS-IV
WS-IV CA
WS-IV
WS-IV CA
C
C
C
C
WS-IV
B
C
Ws -Iv
WS-IV CA
C
Page 12 of 19

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
IF YES, SOC NUMBER
TO: PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ATTENTION: Charles Weaver
DATE: September 14, 1999
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
COUNTY Caldwell
PERMIT NUMBER NC0023981
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address:
2. Date of Investigation:
3. Report Prepared By:
4.
N
1999
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
City of Lenoir, Lower Creek Plant
801 West Ave NW
Lenoir, NC 28645
August 12, 1999
James R. Reid
Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: T. S. Childers, Jr.
704-757-2176
5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of Highway 18
with Southwest Blvd (SR 1933), go South on Southwest
Blvd 0.8 mile to Miller Hill Road (SR 1149). Travel
Southwest on SR 1145; turn right on SR 1149. The plant
is located at the end of SR 1149.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35° 52' 55"
Longitude: 81° 34' 35"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and
discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. D12NE U.S.G.S. Quad Name Lenoir, NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application?
X Yes No If No, explain:
-1-

8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Terraced slope
adjacent to flood plain.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: 300 feet or greater.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Lower Creek.
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: CTB 030831
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream
uses: Sandy bottomed stream used as a source of water for
wildlife support, agriculture, and recreation.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted 6.0 MGD (Ultimate
Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater
Treatment facility? 4.08
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current
design capacity 6.0 MGD after upgrade/expansion, completion
of which is scheduled to occur March 1, 2000.
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two years:
November 30, 1994 A-to-C for sludge press, lime
stabilization, expansion of secondary clarifiers, addition of
dechlorination. June, 1998 A-to-C for installation of
aerobic/anoxic process for ammonia removal, new cyclonic grit
removal, upgrade of aerobic digester, addition of odor
control apparatus.
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially
constructed wastewater treatment facilities: Existing -
mechanical bar screen, cyclonic grit removal, influent pump
station, aeration basin, caustic feed, dual clarifiers,
sludge thickener (DAF), aerobic digester, belt press, lime
pasteurization, disinfection, dechlorination, sludge holding
tanks, drying beds, land application of sludge.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment
facilities: Expansion to 6.0 MGD is being completed under
SOC. The SOC project includes installation of aerobic/anoxic
process for ammonia removal, new cyclonic grit removal,
upgrade of aerobic digester, addition of odor control
apparatus.
-2-

g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Ammonia & chlorine.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved X
should be required not needed
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DWQ
Permit Number WQ0002049
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP X OTHER
C. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): IV
4. SIC Codes (s) : 4952
Primary 01 Secondary 55, 57
Main Treatment Unit Code: 120 3
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds
or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)? Yes
YES
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests:
No
3. Important SOC, JOC, or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate)
Submission of Plans and
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
Achieve Compliance with
Specifications
final limitations
Date
October 1, 1997
July 1, 1998
March 1, 2000
August 1,2000
-3-

4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of
the non -discharge options available. Please provide regional
perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: Insufficient land available.
Connection to Regional Sewer System: Lower Creek Plant is the
regional system.
Subsurface: Flow is too great.
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility is well operated and maintained. Renewal of the permit
is recommended.
Signature of Report Piepara� of Preparer
ater Quality Regional Supervisor
-4-

CITY MANAGER
JAMES H. HIPP
August 26, 1999
CITY OF LENOIR
NORTH CAROLINA
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, NPDES Unit
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
y©2
SEP qO3 199Q
JERRY N. BROOKS
POINT SOURCE BR/CI]YICOU�JCIL
D.
!W. BARLOW
G. L. BERNHARDT
T. W. BROACH
B. L. BUSS
J. E. GEORGE
F. H. MOORE
M. O. STRAWN
RE: NPDES Permit NC0023981- City of Lenoir, Caldwell County
Dear Mr. Weaver:
Please note the attached information relative to permit renewal for the Lower
Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, Broadland Road, Lenoir, NC.
This writing is to formally request, pursuant to North Carolina Administrative
Code 15A NCAC 2H.0105(e), renewal of the NPDES permit (NC0023981) which
expires February 29, 2000.
Since issuance of the last permit the Lower Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
has and is undergoing changes, the culmination of which is an increase in
design capacity from 4.08 MGD to 6.0 MGD.
The history and changes since last permit issuance are as follows:
The Lower Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility was originally constructed in
1969 to provide the City of Lenoir with a modern wastewater treatment facility.
At that time, the design of the 6.0 MGD (later reduced its current 4.08 MGD
capacity) system was based on an extended aeration biological process with
static aerators, clarification, and a chlorinating facility for disinfecting effluent
which is discharged into the Lower Creek basin. Sludge was of a Class "B" type
which was generated as aerobically digested and dried in sand beds. These
Class "B" biosolids were land applied in either a liquid or solid "cake" form with
the majority of the product being applied as a liquid.
The Lower Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility, which as stated above,
became operational in May of 1996, It now houses an RDP EnVesselTM
Pasteurization process adjacent to the city's dewatering operation. The
dewatering operation utilizes a 2.0 meter Enviroquip belt filter press constructed
from stainless steel. It is worth noting again that liquid SBR (sequential batch
POST OFFICE BOX 958 • LENOIR. NORTH CAROLINA 28645-0958 • [phone]

reactor) concentrated sludge is trucked to the Lower Creek facility from the City
of Lenoir's Gunpowder Wastewater (2.0 MGD) plant. In addition, the Lower
Creek facility receives, from the City of Lenoir's Water Treatment (12 MGD) plant
approximately 50,000 gallons/week of concentrated alum sludge. The City of
Lenoir also receives wastewater sludge from an adjacent municipality, the Town
of Blowing Rock. All of these sludges are combined and dewatered at the Lower
Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility. These sludges are initially blended and
then thickened to >3% in a DAF thickener. These blends are subsequently
dewatered on the 2.0 meter belt filter press which produces consistent "cake"
solids which are easily produced to a 22% to 25% dry solids.
As of this writing the plant is undergoing yet another improvement to address
nutrient removal via an anoxic/oxic basin technology, commonly referenced as
an "A Squared 0" process. This technology is being supplied and guaranteed by
the Kruger Company of Cary, North Carolina. It is in direct response to both
address current and past ammonia limits and to enhance plant capacity from
4.08 MGD to 6.0 MGD.
In detail, the sludge management program is as follows:
In the early 1990's land was beginning to disappear from the City of Lenoir's
permitted Class "B" land application program. Consequently, the City became
interested in pursuing a Class "A" sludge treatment process to generate a
"beneficial reuse product," reduce the paperwork, and potential liability
associated with the Class "B" program. In 1996, the City of Lenoir installed
RDP's EnVessel Pasteurization' process in concert with a new 2.0 meter belt
filter press to manage the solids at the Lower Creek facility. It is worth noting
here that the Lower Creek Wastewater facility also receives wastewater sludge
from the City of Lenoir's Gunpowder Wastewater facility, wastewater sludge from
the nearby Town of Blowing Rock, and alum sludge from the City of Lenoir's
Lake Rhodhiss Water Treatment facility. At the time of the contract, the City of
Lenoir also installed a dechlorination system in an attempt to prepare for a
tightening of the chlorine regulatory limits. In addition, the city constructed a
combined laboratory space as a part of this project. Paralleling these physical
improvements the City of Lenoir expanded the existing biosolids storage pad
with reclaimed asphalt and purchased a spreader truck. The truck is used to
land apply biosolids on demonstration projects as well as fertilizing properties for
the City's benefit.
The City of Lenoir, North Carolina has developed a successful biosolids program
through beneficial co -utilization of biosolids and other indigenous by-products.
Beneficial co -utilization involves the blending by-products from a variety of
sources to yield a product of substantiated value. The City of Lenoir initially
blended wood ash, lime, and Class "A" - Exceptional Quality biosolids to produce
Lenoir' Blends. As time and success progressed the introduction of sawdust

and other wood by-products readily available in the area were used as a
substitute for the wood ash. These blends are all natural organic products that
offer a balance of nitrogen, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, as well as essential
micro- and macro -nutrients.
The Blends were produced with various wood ashes and sawdust principally
derived from the internationally known local furniture industries (e.g. Broyhill,
Bernhardt, Thomasville, and others). The wood ash was available to the City of
Lenoir at no cost and greatly reduces the quantity of materials that were destined
for the Caldwell County landfill. At the same time, both the wood ash and
sawdust add valuable micro- and macro -nutrients to the City's Class "A" -
Exceptional Quality biosolids product.
Lenoir's Blends are used primarily on City property for the benefit of the citizens
of Lenoir. In addition, interested parties come to the plant to receive product in
their own vehicles. Larger volume users can make prior arrangements to be
loaded in bulk.
It is my hope that this information will prove to be of benefit to the issuance of
NPDES permit NC0023981.

•c
FOR AGEF CY USE
STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION III. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS AND SCHEDULES OF IMPLEMENTATION
This section requires information on any uncompleted implementation schedule which has been imposed for construction of waste
treatment facilities. Requirement schedules mayhave been established bylocal, State, or Federal agenciesCCor by court action. IF
YOU ARE SUBJECT TO SEVERAL DIFFERENT IMPLEMENTATION C1HbE SCHEDULES,
STAGED CONSTRUCTIONOF DIFFERENT
R NT
LEVELS OF AUTHORITY IMPOSING DIFFERENT SCHEDULES (ITEM
SEPARATE OPERATIONAL UNITS (ITEM 1c), SUBMIT A SEPARATE SECTION I11 FOR EACH ONE..
1.
FOR AGENCY USE
Improvements Required
a Discharge Serial Numbers
Affected List the discharge
serial numbers, assigned in
Section II, that are covered by
this implementation schedule
b. Authority Imposing Require-
ment Check the appropriate
item indicating the authority
for the implementation schedule
If the identical implementation
schedule has been ordered by
more than one authority, check
the appropriate items. (see
instructions)
Locally developed plan
Areawide Plan
Basin Plan
State approved implementation
schedule
Federal approved water quality
standards implementation plan
Federal enforcement procedure
or action
State court order
Federal court order
300
301a
301b
ARE
❑ BAS
SOS
was
WQS
ENF
CRT
FED
c. Improvement Description Specify the 3-character code for the General Action
Description in Table II that best describes improvements�applies
required bYry the
implementation schedule. If more
of a staged construction schedule, state the stage of construction being described
here with the appropriate general action code. Submit a separate Section III for each
stage of construction planned. Also. list all the 3-character (Specific Action) codes which
describe in more detail the pollution abatement practices that the Implementation schedule requires.
3-character general action 301c
description
3-character specific action 301d I I I I
2 Implementation Schedule and 3. Actual Complete Dates
Provide dates imposed by schedule and any actual dates of completion for implementation steps listed below.
Indicate dates as accurately as possible. (see instructions)
Implementation Steps 2. Schedule
a Preliminary plan complete
b. Final plan complete
c. Financing complete & contract
awarded
d Site acquired
e. Begin construction
f. End construction
g. Begin dscharge
h. Operational level attained
302a
302b
302c
302d
302e
302f
302g
302h
/ /
/ /
I I
/ /
/ /
3. Actual Completion (Yr/Mo/Day)
303a
303b
303c
333d
303e
303f
g
303h
I I
/ /
/ /
l• I
I /
/ /
/ /
/ /

FOR AGENCY USE
STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
Submit a description of each major industrial facility discharging to the municipal system, using a separate Section IV for each
facility description. Indicate the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code for the industry, the major product or raw
material, the flow (in thousand gallons per day), and the characteristics of the wastewater discharged from the industrial facility
into the municipal system. Consult Table III for standard measures of products or raw materials. (see instructions)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instructions)
Name
Number & Street
City
County
State
Zip Code
2 Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code(see Instructions)
3. Primary Product or Raw Material
(see instructions)
Product
Raw Material
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discharged into the municipal sys-
tem in thousand gallons per day
and whether this discharge is
intermittent or continuous.
5. Pretreatment Provided Indicate if
pretreatment is provided prior to
entering the municipal system
6. Characteristics of Wastewater
(see instructions)
401a
401b
401c
401d
401e
401f
402
403a
403b
404a
404b
405
,s o t/ e45` er,1 14-1495;ves
eV/ Vr9.�1i`4.- s
1-eMo r
f
&d+e5i✓ed'
r/
Intermittent(int)
Yes
403c
403d
Quantity
thousand gallons per day
Continuous (con)
�No
403e
403f
Units(See
Table III)
Parameter
Name
1�
let _ .1
.�n j
-rim
S 0 -5
-r55
Numberter
00(NN0
,
V 0655
0 0310
0a$7
Value
2.7'7
3 Z66
2700
53

FOR AGENCY USE
STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
Submit a description of each major industrial facility discharging to the municipal system, using a separate Section IV for each
facility description. Indicate the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code for the industry, the major product or raw
material, the flow (in thousand gallons per day), and the characteristics of the wastewater discharged from the industrial fadlity
into the municipal system. Consult Table III for standard measures of products or raw materials. (see instructions)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instructions)
Name
Number & Street
City
County
State
Zip Code
2 Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code(see Instructions)
3. Primary Product or Raw Material
(see instructions)
Product
Raw Material
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discharged. into the municipal sys-
tem in thousand gallons per day
and whether this dscharge is
intermittent or continuous.
5. Pretreatment Provided Indcate if
pretreatment is provided prior to
entering the municipal system
6. Characteristics of Wastewater
401a
401b
401c
401d
401e
401f
402
403a
403b
404a
404b
405
[] Yes
Pa)car Cvs oc' r at 2,1
ct50 Ger!norl S t_
j-enoir
Caldwell
2.8641s
23q�
Printed kiwis
(70
403c
403d
Quantity
thousand gallons per day
Intermittent(int) Continuous (con)
No
403e
403f
Units(See
Table IIII
Parameameter
N
Bo,D -.5"TSS
/d113 -A)
Parameter
Number
00,310
00S34'
0 0600
Value
/30
25
1. g

4.
•
FOR AGENCY USE
STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
Submit a description of each major industrial facility discharging to the municipal system, using a separate Section IV for each
facility description. Indicate the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code for the industry, the major product or raw
material, the flow (in thousand gallons per day), and the characteristics of the wastewater discharged from the industrial facility
into the municipal system. Consult Table III for standard measures of products or raw materials. (see instructions)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instructions)
Name
Number & Street
City
County
State
Zip Code
2 Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code(see Instructions)
3. Primary Product or Raw Material
(see instructions)
Product
Raw Material
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discharged into the municipal sys-
tem in thousand gallons per day
and whether this dscharge is
intermittent or continuous.
5. Pretreatment Provided Indcate if
pretreatment is provided prior to
entering the municipal system
6. Characteristics of Wastewater
(see instructions)
401a
401b
401c
401d
401e
401f
402
403a
403b
404a
404b
405
41fr&!L? Ind c4 (5
Ram cuing a. o r j>
ao o /i?n�,090 81vaf , 3w
NG
3537
forkl,'f /nasty
�ytinlers
403c
403d
Quantity
r O thousand gallons per day
[] Intermittent(int) Of Continuous (con)
[] Yes czsNo
403e
403f
Units(See
Table III
NamParameter
e
�>h �
o� � I p
I
BOP
T 55
NI/3NI/3-N
Parameter
O
O/o q2,
po 5S
00,3p
oo530
0060
Value
0.388
214,0
-I8o
6 l o
5- 7, 7

LOWER CREEK WWTP RESULTS: JUNE 1998 - MAY 1999
MONTH ELQW TEMP pH MAX. pH MIN. ELC BOD-I BOD-E TSS-I TSS-E NH3-I NH3-E TKN-I TKN-E N3N2-I N3N2-E TOTP-I TOTP-E Dom(
June 1998 2.639 22.8 7.34 6.82 5 197 19 483 202 20 11.5 12.0 27.8 19.0 0.14 0.22 3.36 2.93 6.8
July 1998 2.367 25.1 7.26 6.96 2 207 12 861 171 10 16.0 13.2 29.8 0.18 4.40 0.67 6.6
August 1998 2.417 25.0 7.47 6.96 5 214 15 559 203 21 17.7 21.0 32.8 32.2 1.16 0.20 4.32 3.35 6.7
September 1998 2.282 23.8 7.43 6.97 14 209 12 534 181 13 15.9 13.8 21.3 0.69 5.37 0.52 6.5
October 1998 2.340 20.3 7.34 6.93 15 219 19 862 220 17 18.3 11.0 23.3 0.77 4.93 3.08 7.1
November 1998 2.059 17.0 7.43 6.77 7 286 20 671 283 16 19.4 11.4 35.7 20.3 1.34 0.17 4.90 3.00 7.6
December 1998 2.258 15.0 7.46 6.73 4 237 14 694 217 17 18.0 11.6 31.9 16.3 2.68 0.45 9.24 2.61 8.1
January 1999 2.781 11.9 7.27 6.73 2 159 8.9 726 207 21 11.7 11.3 22.1 17.4 0.20 0.06 3.58 1.98 8.8
February 1999 2.751 12.8 7.64 6.97 9 226 41 851 231 40 17.2 16.0 16.7 0.17 7.76 0.57 8.7
March 1999 2.532 12.9 8.53 6.64 13 275 36 453 241 28 10.6 14.0 22.9 0.06 4.96 4.03 8.6
April 1999 2.598 17.5 7.32 6.73 19 284 83 1068 271 76 14.7 14.8 31.1 38.5 0.26 0.05 4.12 3.28 7.6
May 1999 3.036 19.7 7.60 6.88 4 253 58 1167 241 103 16.5 16.8 47.4 44.0 0.12 0.06 5.92 6.07 7.3
Yearly Avg. 2.505 18.650 ------ __-- 6.455 231 28 744 222 32 15.6 13.9 32.7 25.1 0.84 0.26 5.24 2.67 7.5
Yearly Max. 3.036 8.53 286 83 1167 283 103 19.4 21.0 47.4 44.0 2.68 0.77 9.24 6.07 8.8
Yearly Min. 2.059 6.64 159 8.9 453 171 10 10.6 11.0 22.1 16.3 0.12 0.05 3.36 0.52 6.5
April -October 22.0
November -March 13.9