HomeMy WebLinkAbout310246_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220426Facility Number
3i
tt
1» Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Q,j Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 9 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Rio
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Farm Name: Fb/gt1C4 €Z1 C- M • I `C
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
a i30
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region: (1)Pa
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
cid6 1 lZ2uJQ
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
` !'
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
S1(pl'
"bisk)
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dr v Poultry Capacity Po
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field n Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters n Yes -No ❑ NA D NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued
Facility Number: 3 j - ds-t(Q
Date of Inspection: -/.) PQ tarA
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2
a
Structure 3
3
31 4 p 39
Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
7r❑0No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding
❑ PAN
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ Yes ?No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. n Yes 'f.Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard n Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis n Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued
Facility Number: J I - a(.j,(Q
Date of Inspection: Li /4Qe
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
n Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes [:g3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 171No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Application Field
❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
® No
❑ No
❑ Yes ,No
❑ Yes i� No
❑ Yes `'/ ,No
❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
IV , No
tx INo
❑NA ❑NE
�NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ®NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
eRbr(5 IrV %QG1 5
a�\lot rt-t)trn 1013
50, -
1=ft145 Lok
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Jk.fI1 eQn Phone:''q��(V �(h 4( ()
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: "1 / d-lI, V�.
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020
'ditty
equirement
ertif'rcate of Cnverage and Permit
)IC card: name and number
4umber of hogs permitted
Type of operation
Integrator
Sludge Survey
Sludge Thickness < Liquid Treatment Zone
Calibrations Records
Soil sample analysis
Zn and CU limits
Annual QC-91 SI
Sludge Ratio: <50%
Every two calendar years
Date: YaU/a.
Every three years3 j (0 I fl
500 for Peanuts (353 Ibs/ac)
2000 for all crops
3000 for all crops
Weekly Freeboard records
Check for big drops in freeboard against 1RR2s
Daily rainfall records
Farm must maintain rain gauge
' niiials & date verifying waste system was
cked after pCecipiitation > LO inch and at least
,iy_
^odes & initials for 120m irrigation, sign
-tad
oplicable (including new
-ords for inspection
's and IRR2s
Call an agronomist
reRse pumping on field
601
Ltd o
P-index: >400 must run PLAT within
12 months or by Jan 212021
Required
Required
Required
Required
Notify DWR within 30 days
Required
Required weekly (new permit)