Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310246_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220426Facility Number 3i tt 1» Division of Water Resources 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation O Other Agency Type of Visit: Q,j Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 9 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Rio Arrival Time: Departure Time: Farm Name: Fb/gt1C4 €Z1 C- M • I `C Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: a i30 Owner Email: Phone: County: Region: (1)Pa Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Title: cid6 1 lZ2uJQ Latitude: Integrator: Phone: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: ` !' Swine Design Current Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean S1(pl' "bisk) Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer Non -Layer Design Current Dr v Poultry Capacity Po Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Cattle Design Current Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field n Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters n Yes -No ❑ NA D NE of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number: 3 j - ds-t(Q Date of Inspection: -/.) PQ tarA Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): Structure 1 Structure 2 a Structure 3 3 31 4 p 39 Structure 4 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ Yes Structure 5 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 7r❑0No ❑NA ❑NE Structure 6 If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): ❑ Yes ?No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE or environmental threat, notify DWR ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. n Yes 'f.Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard n Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis n Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Page 2 of 3 ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes y No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes i No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ,No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number: J I - a(.j,(Q Date of Inspection: Li /4Qe 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. n Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: ❑ Yes [:g3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 171No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ® No ❑ No ❑ Yes ,No ❑ Yes i� No ❑ Yes `'/ ,No ❑ Yes ❑ No 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes No IV , No tx INo ❑NA ❑NE �NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ®NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). eRbr(5 IrV %QG1 5 a�\lot rt-t)trn 1013 50, - 1=ft145 Lok Reviewer/Inspector Name: Jk.fI1 eQn Phone:''q��(V �(h 4( () Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: "1 / d-lI, V�. Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020 'ditty equirement ertif'rcate of Cnverage and Permit )IC card: name and number 4umber of hogs permitted Type of operation Integrator Sludge Survey Sludge Thickness < Liquid Treatment Zone Calibrations Records Soil sample analysis Zn and CU limits Annual QC-91 SI Sludge Ratio: <50% Every two calendar years Date: YaU/a. Every three years3 j (0 I fl 500 for Peanuts (353 Ibs/ac) 2000 for all crops 3000 for all crops Weekly Freeboard records Check for big drops in freeboard against 1RR2s Daily rainfall records Farm must maintain rain gauge ' niiials & date verifying waste system was cked after pCecipiitation > LO inch and at least ,iy_ ^odes & initials for 120m irrigation, sign -tad oplicable (including new -ords for inspection 's and IRR2s Call an agronomist reRse pumping on field 601 Ltd o P-index: >400 must run PLAT within 12 months or by Jan 212021 Required Required Required Required Notify DWR within 30 days Required Required weekly (new permit)