NC0020648_Permit (Issuance)_20000410

NPDES DOCIMENT !;CANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0020648
Washington WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Staff Report
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
April 10, 2000
This document is printed MIL reuse paper - ignore any
content on the resrerse reside

4, State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
April 10, 2000
Jerry Cutler
City of Washington
P.O. Box 1988
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1988
Dear Mr. Cutler:
NCDENR
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit NC0020648
City of Washington WWTP
Beaufort County
The 30-day public notice and comment period, for the NPDES draft permit
NC0020648, has expired. The Division has considered the concerns raised and has
modified the permit in accordance with current Division policy. All responses to
concerns and revisions made to draft permit NC0020648 are explained below:
Comment: The draft permit stipulates 2/Month monitoring of copper and zinc. The
City of Washington requested that the monitoring frequency be reduced to monthly to
match the frequency required by their Long Term Monitoring Plan.
Response: The Division has reviewed the request and modified the measurement
frequency accordingly.
Attached is the NPDES Permit NC0020648 issued April 10, 2000. This permit
is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1
and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US
Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in
this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing
upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This
request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings
(6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such
demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the
Division. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the
permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits
which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROUNA 27699-1617 - TELEPHONE [phone]/FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/ 10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET © http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES

is
Permit: NC0020648
Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or
Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mr. Michael
Myers at telephone number [phone], extension 508.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Washington Regional Office - Water Quality Section
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files
NPDES Files
EPA -Region IV

Permit: NC0020648
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
City of Washington
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
City of Washington WVVTP
Plymouth and Second Street
Washington
Beaufort County
to receiving waters designated as Tar River in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin in accordance with
effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and
IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective May 1, 2000.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on November 30, 2004.
Signed this day April 10, 2000.
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit: NC0020648
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
City of Washington
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue operation of an existing 3.2 MGD wastewater treatment system located at the Washington
WWTP, Beaufort County, consisting of the following treatment units:
• Influent metering vault
• Mechanical bar screen
• Automatic aerated grit chamber
• Splitter box
• Aeration basin
• Activated sludge oxidation ditch
• Three secondary clarifiers with scum removal and pumped sludge return
• Three deep -bed denitrification sand filters with a methanol storage/feed system
• Dual chlorine contact chambers with Clow paced gaseous chlorine feed
• Sulfur dioxide dechlorination
• Post aeration
• Lime storage tower
• Caustic soda and polymer feed system
• Sludge mixing tank with lime addition
• Aerobic digester
• Four sludge thickening lagoons
• Recirculation pump and decant draw off
• 60,000 gallon mud well
• Sludge recirculation pump station
• Effluent pump station
and;
Discharge treated wastewater from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached
map through outfall 001 into the Tar River which is classified C-NSW waters in the Tar -Pamlico
River Basin.

. •••• •••••••..;:'
- --•:-_---„: --,---\-'• • CP ... \ - •
' -4'PrIbne.. (0 :- : • ... €:out
•
Atlantic(C)
Jia 0 i'•
• 0 .
-- - - :-- :.:• -- .,2•1 .1. u0.1)..i.i. ................ .. .. ..... . . ...... .. ... . ,
r ., %-• • - - • .. s
...*----(•'---1--, -6,
.. - ' - - ' ' SPitnpsZ6 0 • / o(c)
'-' '. ----,-,flle ci • • • , ...... ., ..... _ ,
. . .... ... . ._ . • ' .
•-.----:-.. .. - 7. _ . _.... . • . - . ;•-• .., _ •---• ,--. _ • / •••\. , . •
— ...... •••-• , I,/ . .„ _.,--...,. • <4'-'
•
• • • - s - •
. - -• - --- • -
. _
. .
. • - ••• . .• • /- $::•- - . •
• .. •
•••Q1,71'!" 1445
•-• ••:•• •
• -
-
-
-
--
:
\
-
..
.
..
-,--,
s,\
.
.
,•\
,
•
‘)
_
\
,,,
-5,
.
.
,
._1.,•-..•,•.
, -
.0. __
.• '„.•
, ..
\
•
•,..v:t::-:,-/\'"-• .i,..?s\\-.,,.-;,\.,.\k,._.,V4,,'‘Y
v5,.
,\"1\*,-
.*.
s,_•:. !k.
\/,,,‘, \•:.• ..•':.'..s."7:\
•..- '.' „ .,A .,.
°
,,',...-!-,„—
.,
z
Discharge Point
•
•
-
•
-
-
•
-
.
•,
•
•
•
••
t'.
'
t
.
•
i
•
-
•2
1
4
..
.
.-
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
=
•
•
"••7n- o
r
-
\
*
-
.
k11
lba
, •
. • " . ••
-
•
a
b
a
—
.
•a
AHubrd4C
e Daybcin
•
:
'
.
o
',........ '''`,......... ••••• ... •-.........:_ ... ......4,.. • '
',...... **•••••,. -.: ',... ' ... • • - .
...._
••• .. • • .
`,..., ----...... .. .. _
:, • • • ..• ' - :•. \\_,,-.1-s---'''--. 4* '.`• • ' '- ..- •-. • . ' -4.'11.,...- -:'1'..-:;* :::.....1 :.•^:-• T. :•:-.. .:.7:'-••• .. .
....„.....,....
- .. • . / • • • • ...,, - • , . .
/ 1, Ns •
• • 46\e•
\'• '";•-•" /1. `,
j•
0\
12 ,
'1/4, •
\\.• o's
•
a Daybeacons
— .
• . •
r: • • . •
• /.
••• ••
--••'.,:- . r'-„,:. ••- • Y .
1
• ,-.•
. -- -._- _- .- .•- . Porar ' .6.c."1-- ...
.--- ..• - - Jtinetiotis
-- - *,--- h•:- . - ;‘, .7- - •
•
, •
;- *•'••-
coLPf ..•
4- •W'se.-.
• a
. •
/ •
• ?
•. ,
• ./„
/
.
- Piling ° ;
0 •
'MENEM • ••••• • •
• ), "
.; • Or 4 •
- - -601 „ - •••
„ • .
t"— •
- • ..t
° o 0
• Radio Towers
.• •
• •
•
•
• .* Piling
• • •
••• - . .
. • • The Castle.. ;
(C)
Bf4\6
•
Foul
Area
Soft (C)
, • . •
•
o
Pih
Alight (C)
Facility Information
Latitude:
Longitude:
Quad #:
Stream Class:
Receiving Streanx
Permitted Flow:
35°32' 42"
77°04' 32.9"
E3OSE - Washington
C NSW
Tar River
3.2 MGD
Sub -Basin: 03-03-07
City of Washington
NC0020648
City of Washington WWTP

i
Permit: NC0020648
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated wastewater from outfall(s) 001. Such discharges
shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Limits
Monitoring Requirements
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample
Location1
Flow
3.2 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD 5-day, 20°C2
15.0 mg/L
22.5 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E
Total Suspended Residue'
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
•
Daily
Composite
I, E
NH3-N
4.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen3
Daily
Grab
E
Fecal Coliform
200/100m1
400/100 ml
Daily
Grab
E
Total Residual Chlorine
28.0 µg/L
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature
Daily
Grab
E
pH'
Daily
Grab
E
Conductivity
Daily
Grab
E
Copper
Monthly
Composite
E
Zinc
Monthly
Composite
E
Total Nitrogen('
(NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Monthly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Composite
E
Acute Toxicity`'
Quarterly
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen3'7
3/Week
Grab
U, D
Fecal Coliform
3/Week
Grab
U, D
Temperature?
3/Week
Grab
U, D
Conductivity
3/Week
Grab
U, D
Footnotes:
1. Sample Location: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U- Upstream at Grimesland Bridge, D -
Downstream at NC Highway 17.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not
exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85 % removal).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/1.
4. Fecal Coliform shall be calculated using the geometric mean, according to the procedure
detailed in Part II. Section A, Paragraph 9b.
5. The pH of the effluent shall not be less than 6.0 nor greater than 9.0 (on the standard units
scale).
6. Acute Toxicity (Pimephales promelas) P/F at 90%: February, May, August, and November
(see Part I. A. (2.)).
7. Sample collected three times per week during June 1 through September 30 and once per
week October 1 through May 31.
8. See Special Condition Part I A(3).
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Definitions:
ml - milliliter
µg/L - micrograms per liter
mg/L - milligrams per liter
MGD - million gallons per day

Permit: NC0020648
Part I A(2) :ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
Thc permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the North Carolina
Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A Single Effluent
Concentration" (Revised -July. 1992 or subsequent versions). The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead
Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test. The effluent concentration at which there may he at no time
significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as treatment two in the procedure document). Effluent samples for self -
monitoring purposes must he obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. Thc tests
will be performed during the months of Febraury, May, August, and November.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will he entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGE6C. Additionally,
DWQ Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days
after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall he complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must he measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there he no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the
facility name, permit number. pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow"
in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address
cited above.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test
requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to
include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-
up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.

Permit: NC0020648
Part I A(3)
For Association members: Limits on total phosphorus and total nitrogen have not
been included at this time because the facility is participating in the nonpoint
source trading option outlined in the Tar Pamlico NSW Implementation Strategy
Phase II, which was adopted December 8, 1994. If compliance with any element of
this strategy, or subsequent approved revisions to the strategy is not maintained,
the Division reserves the right to reopen this permit to include nutrient limits. If
requirements other than those listed in this NPDES permit are adopted as part of a
future revision to the strategy, the Division reserves the right to reopen this permit
to include these requirements.

away for disposal by the city on
the neighborhood garbage pick-up
day.
Items should be placed in the
American
Red Cross
INVITATION TO BID: Belhaven Public Library,
Belhaven, North Carolina. Sealed Bids from Gen-
eral Contractors for the construction of a new Re-
placement Library for the Belhaven Public Library
Inc. will be received by the Belhaven Town clerk
for: Belhaven Public Library Inc. at the Belhaven
City Hall, 301 East Main Street, Belhaven, North
Carolina until, 2:00 PM prevailing time, on Wed-
nesday March 8, 2000. At said time, will be public-
ly opened and read aloud. The project will be bid
with General Contractors responsible for all phas-
es of work.
The scope of work is the demolition of the existing
library and the construction of a free standing
3600 s.f. Structure consisting of wood framing,
shake siding and standing seam metal roof. The
project includes site work and parking. The struc-
ture is to be constructed at 335 East Main Street,
Belhaven, North Carolina.
Bidding documents may be inspected at the plan
room of AGC in Greenville, North Carolina and
the Minority Business Center in Raleigh North
Carolina or by contacting the Owners Representa-
tive Jim Merritt at 252-943-6365. Plans are availa-
ble with a $100.00 refundable deposit. There will
be a postage and handling charge of $10.00 for
the mailing of Bidding documents.
Bidding documents will be available March 8,
2000.
Contractors offering a proposal on this project
must be licensed to do contracting in the State of
North Carolina.
Bids will be binding for a period of thirty (30) cal-
endar days from the date bids are opened. All
bids are to be accompanied with a bid bond or
certified check of not less than five (5%) of the
base bid. Bids are to be submitted on the Form of
Proposal provided with the instruction to Bidders
Section of the Project Manual for this project. All
bids must comply with the laws of the state of
North Carolina.
The Belhaven Library Inc. encourages participa-
tion by minority businesses to submit bids for this
construction project. The Owner shall award con-
tracts without regard to race, religion, color, creed,
national origin, sex, age or handicapping condi-
tion.
THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO
REJECT ANY AND ALL BIDS AND TO
AWARD THE CONTRACT IN THE BEST IN-
TEREST OF THE OWNER.
2-3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 lltc
NOTICE
THE Tyrrell County Public Library, member of the
Pettigrew Regional Library, is accepting bids for
the construction of a 3750 square foot ADDITION
Tfl THE FXISTINC LIBRARY BUILDING in Co -
collection at no charge on the sec-
ond weeks of February, May,
August and November. The ne
free pick-up will be May 9-12. -
LEGAL NOTICES must be placed by 12 noon,
two days prior to publication.
PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMIS-
SION/NPDES UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699 -1617
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE A
NPDES WASTEWATER PERMIT
On the basis of thorough staff review and applica-
tion of NC General Statute 143.21, Public law 92-
500 and other lawful standards and regulations.,
the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission proposes to issue a National Pollu-
tant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
wastewater discharge permit to the person(s) list-
ed on the attached pages effective 45 days from
the publish date of this notice.
Written comments regarding the proposed permit
will be accepted until 30 days after the publish
date of this notice. All comments received prior to
that date are considered in the final determina-
tions regarding the proposed permit. The Director
of the NC Division of Water Quality may decide to
hold a public meeting for the proposed permit
should the Division receive a significant degree of
public interest.
Copies of the draft permit and other supporting in-
formation on file used to determine conditions
present to the draft permit are available upon re-
quest and payment of the costs of reproduction.
Mait,comments and/or requests for information to
the NC Division of Water Quality at the above ad-
dress or call Ms. Christie Jackson at (919) 733-
5053, extension 538. Please include the NPDES
permit number (attached) in any communication.
Interested persons may also visit the Division of
Water Quality at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh,
NC 27604-1148 between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m. to review information on file.
NPDES Permit Number NC0020648, Town of
Washington WWTP, P.O. Box 1988, Washington,
NC 27889 has applied for a permit renewal for a
facility located in Beaufort County discharging
treated wastewater into Kennedy Creek in the
Tar -Pamlico River Basin. Currently BOD, ammo-
nia, dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, and total re-
sidual chlorine are water quality limited. This dis-
charge may affect future allocations in this portion
of the receiving stream.
2-4 1 tc
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BEAUFORT
IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
ADMINISTRATOR'S - EXECUTOR'S NOTICE
Having qualified as -Executor of the Estate of
Elizabeth Sparrow McNeill of Beaufort County,
North Carolina, this is to notify all persons having
claims against the Estate of, Elizabeth Sparrow
McNeill to present them to the undersigned on or
�" \ 1�L�711R4J 1�I11v, l
Downtown Belha
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BEAUFORT
IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
ADMINISTRATOR'S - EXECUTOR'S NOTICE
Having qualified as Executrix of the Estate of Ce-
cil Belmont Cayton of Beaufort County, North
Carolina, this is to notify all persons having
claims against the Estate of, Cecil Belmont Cay-
ton to present them to the undersigned on or be-
fore the 3rd day of May, 2000 or same will be
pleaded in bar of their recovery. All persons in-
debted to said estate please make immediate
payment.
This the 19th day of January 2000.
Ramona S. Cayton
111 Edgewater B each Road
Washington, NC 27889
1-21,28 2-4,11 4tc
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BEAUFORT
IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
ADMINISTRATOR'S - EXECUTOR'S NOTICE
Having qualified as ADMINISTRATRIX of the
Estate of COTTIE BOOMER MURRAY of
Beaufort County, North Carolina, this is to notify
all persons having claims against the Estate cl
COTTIE BOOMER MURRAY to present them
to the undersigned on or before the 10th day o1
May, 2000 or same will be pleaded in bar of their
recovery. All persons indebted to said estate
please make immediate payment.
This the 26th day of January 2000.
Margarret Spencer
1352 Swamp Rd.
Pantego, NC 27860
1-28 2-4,11,18 4tc
WASHINGTON HISTORIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
February 8, 2000 7:00 P.M.
Notice is hereby given that the Washington Histor
is Preservation Commission will conduct a specie
public meeting on February 8, 2000 at 7:00 p.m
in the City Council Chambers on the second floo
of the Municipal Building located al 102 E. Sec
and Street, Washington, NC. The purpose of thi'
public hearing will be to discuss the followini
items listed below:
A. Major Works, Certificates of Appropriate
ness
1. Pat Lovely of 107 West Main Street has re
quested a Certificate of Appropriateness to insta
a cooler on the back patio located behind th
building. The cooler will be connected to the builc
ing by a two foot long enclosed walkway. The un
and walkway will be screened by a masonry an
wood fence. All interested citizens are encou
aged to attend this meeting. All comments ar
welcome and anyone wishing 10 submit writte
comments should submit them to Chad Hold:
worth, Planner I, comments should be submitte
WASHINGTON DAILY NEW:
The Voice of the Pamlico
P.O. BOX 1788
WASHINGTON, N.C. 27889
CLASSIFIED
ADVERTISING INVOICE
START DATE SMTWTFS
r:/A', : u,l i t3U
STOP DATE INSERTIONS WORDS
AMOUNT DUE
18
PAYABLE UPON
PRESENTATION
PUBLIC ffOTIL.
STATE OF 1ORTE C ROiI>.?"&
EFTIROYMENTAL Jz`lN4L'1,f P '
(.Ot' 1i 5ILUYt:'NDlES t 1IT
1617 NAIL SBtt.'.: , V1� CENTER
RALEIEig., NC 27699 — ;'
tll'd.Z1.t.l TIO o INT M TO ISSUE ,t,

Notes for Town of Washington Wastewater Treatment Plant
General Information
Permit Writer: MJM
Permit #: NC0020648
Permit Review
Permit Issued: April 7, 1995
Permit Modified: May 5, 1995
There are two different sets of effluent limitations and monitoring requirements in the last
permit.
According to the November 4, 1994 Staff Report the facility had an approved
pretreatment program. Pretreatment should be contacted to find out the status of the
pretreatment program.
As of November 4, 1994 the facility was a member of the Tar -Pamlico Basin
Association. Outfall has been relocated from Kennedy Creek to the Tar River.
Permit File Review
Permit Application — Plant was built in 1986 and upgraded in 1994. The WWTP has a
average day — maximum month design flow 3.2 MGD. Possible treatment plant changes:
Presently, the treatment plant is unable to handle peak flow conditions. According to
`Preliminary Engineering Report' submitted by the applicant the facility is planning to
make the following changes during the next permit cycle.
• Installation of an additional clarifiers.
• Increase filter capacity.
• Re -commission all abandoned clarifiers for backwash storage.
• Installation of a second oxidation ditch in order to meet the duality requirements.
• Installation of UV disinfection.
Industrial waste contributors discharging to the PTOW, according to permit application,
include:
• Flanders Filer Inc.- manufactures HEPA Air Filter Media; Producing an
intermittent flow of 0.045 MGD.
• Stanadyne Automotive Corporation — Automotive manufacturing; Producing
an intermittent flow of 0.033 MGD
• Amilite Corporation — Manufactures laminated and tempered glass; Producing
an intermittent flow of 0.032 MGD
A request for speculative limits was received on May 17, 1999. Check with Charles, has
the facility indicated the flow for speculative limits. No formal speculative limit request
has been made. Therefore, this will not be addressed at this time.

7
Wasteload Allocation File Review
The last wasteload was conducted 10-31-94, for two discharge location Kennedy Creek
and Tar River at flow rates of 2.5 MGD and 3.2 MGD, respectively. According to the
WLA, BOD, ammonia, DO, and TRC are water quality limited. The facility currently
has a quarterly acute toxicity testing requirement.
Correspondence File Review
1996 — Long term BOD study conducted.
1998 — Treatment facility was rated as a grade IV biological facility.
There are no other issues documented in the correspondence file. The facility appears to
very well maintained and operated, according to compliance inspection reports.
DMR Review
It would appear that the facility reports their LTMP data on their DMRs. LTMP data has
been request from pretreatment to verify.
Basin Plan Review
The discharge point is located upstream of US 17 in the Tar River. This reach is not
listed on the State's 303(d) list according to the July 1999 Tar -Pamlico River Basinwide
Plan. The facility should be made aware that the Pamlico Sound is currently under
extreme stress due the recent hurricanes. Subbasin 03-03-07 has 25 permitted outfalls
which have individual NPDES permits. There are three major dischargers and 22 minor
dischargers in the subbasin.
General Comments
The facility has moved its discharge location into the Tar River and permitted flow is
now 3.2 MGD. Therefore, the one effluent page is all that should be needed for this
permit renewal.
Per Dave Goodrich, since the discharge is into tidal waters technology -based limits are
implemented for ammonia.
Since the discharge is into tidal water the reasonable potential will be conducted using'/2
FAVs if available. For toxicants where/ FAV has been established the chronic
freshwater standard is used. Initially, zero dilution is assumed. If reasonable potential is
established at zero dilution then RP is conducted again using 50%, 75%, and 99%
dilution.
1/10/00 — Reasonable Potential Results —
Cadmium — analytical results from 1996 through 1999 were all below detection (<2 µg/1)
therefore no reasonable potential exist.

Chromium — According to the reasonable potential analysis a limit for chromium is not
warranted. Though the facility detected chromium in 1996, chromium has not been
detected in the effluent since that time. Since the facility is already monitoring chromium
as part of their LTMP chromium monitoring is not recommended.
Nickel — The facility has not detected nickel above the detection limit (<5 µg/1) over the
last four years. Therefore, implementation of a limit or monitoring requirement is not
warranted at this time.
Cyanide — Cyanide has not been detected in the effluent over the past four years
according to the DMR data.
Copper — Washington WWTP discharges into tidal waters therefore the reasonable
potential was conducted using acute toxicity criteria rather than chronic toxicity criteria
assuming an IWC of 100%. The reasonable potential analysis concluded that reasonable
potential does exist for the facility to exceed the 1/2 FAV value. It is recommended that
the facility be required to monitor copper as a condition for the permit.
Zinc - Washington WWTP discharges into tidal waters therefore the reasonable potential
was conducted using acute toxicity criteria rather than chronic toxicity criteria assuming
an IWC of 100%. The reasonable potential analysis concluded that reasonable potential
does exist for the facility to exceed the 1 FAV value. It is recommended that the facility
be required to monitor zinc as a condition for the permit.
Silver - Washington WWTP discharges into tidal waters therefore the reasonable
potential was conducted using acute toxicity criteria rather than chronic toxicity criteria
assuming an IWC of 100%. The reasonable potential analysis concluded that reasonable
potential does exist for the facility to exceed the l FAV value. Reasonable potential exist
due to one detection in April of 1997. The facility has collected 25 samples since that
time all of which have been below detection limit. Silver is monitored as part of the City
of Washington's Long Term Monitoring Plan, therefore it is not recommended that a
limit or monitoring be placed in the permit.
Arsenic — There is no FAV value for arsenic. A conservative approach was taken in
conducting the reasonable potential. The chronic aquatic life salt water standard for
arsenic was used assuming zero dilution. Using this approach it was concluded that no
reasonable potential exist to exceed the in -stream standard. No monitoring or limits are
proposed at this time.
Mercury — The facility has not detected mercury above the detection level (0.2 µg/L) in
four years, according to the LTMP data.
Selenium — The facility has not detected selenium in fours years of monitoring. No
limits or monitoring is proposed at this time.

3
Molybdenum — There is no standard available for molybdenum. Over the past four
years the facility has detected molybdenum above the detection limit four times. Since
the facility continues to monitor molybdenum as part of their LTMP it is not
recommended that the permit require molybdenum monitoring.
In -stream Data — October 1999, dissolved oxygen was below the state standard of 5.0
mg/L at both the upstream location and the downstream location.
September 1999 dissolved oxygen concentrations were below the state standard for the
majority of the month at both the upstream and downstream locations. The lowest
measurement taken was 2.2 mg/L at the upstream monitoring point.
September 1998 — dissolved oxygen dropped below the state standard of 5.0 mg/L suring
the first and second weeks of September with the lowest DO measurement (2.9 mg/L)
being recorded at the downstream monitoring location.
Reviewing the in -stream data for DO the facility does not appear to be impacting the
receiving stream. The downstream monitoring location typically has higher DO
concentration than the upstream location. During those times when DO was below the
state standard at the downstream location the upstream location was also below the state
standard.

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0020648
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
City of Washington WWTP
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 1988, Washington, North Carolina 27889-1988
Facility Address:
Plymouth and Second Street, Washington, NC
Permitted Flow
3.2 MGD
Type of Waste:
Domestic and industrial
Facility/Permit Status:
Renewal
County:
Beaufort
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Tar River
Regional Office:
Washington
Stream Classification:
C NSW
,
USGS Topo Quad:
E3OSE
303(d) Listed?:
No
_
Permit Writer:
Michael Myers
Subbasin:
03-03-07
Date:
January 12, 2000
Drainage Area (mi2):
Tidal
~�
�gfx,
�
'. I t'• � F E S Y i ��
_ ,l
' 'F 4
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
Tidal
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Tidal
Average Flow (cfs):
Tidal
IWC (%):
Primary SIC Code:
4952
SUMMARY
The City of Washington WWTP is located in Beaufort County, North Carolina in the Tar -Pamlico River
Basin. Over the past five years the facility has moved the discharge location from Kennedy Creek to the Tar
River. Upon moving the outfall to the Tar River the facilities permitted flow increased from 2.12 MGD to 3.2
MGD. At the last permit renewal wasteload allocations were conducted for discharge into both Kennedy
Creek (2.12 MGD) and Tar River (3.2 MGD). Currently, the facility is permitted to discharge 3.2 MGD
through one outfall (001) into the Tar River. Nutrient limits have not been imposed on the facility because of
their participation in the Tar -Pamlico Basin Association.
The treatment works accepts wastewater from three industries. The industries discharging to the Washington
WWTP include the following:
• Flanders Filer Inc.- manufactures HEPA Air Filter Media; Producing an intermittent flow of
0.045 MGD.
• Stanadyne Automotive Corporation — Automotive manufacturing; Producing an intermittent flow
of 0.033 MGD
• Amilite Corporation — Manufactures laminated and tempered glass; Producing an intermittent
flow of 0.032 MGD
The facility is located in subbasin 03-03-07. Subbasin 03-03-07 has a total area of 1,192 square miles with 206
square miles of water area. Land Cover in the subbasin is 55% forest/wetland, 18% surface water, 1% urban,
25% cultivated crop and 1% pasture. There are four major dischargers in this subbasin, including National
Spinning, PCS Phosphate, and Washington WWTP. The Tar River is a source of nitrite/nitrate to the Pamlico
estuary and copper has been detected above the NC action level in the area near Washington. The copper
levels have been attributed to boating activity, since copper additives are common in boat anti -fouling paint
and wood preservatives. Also of concern in the coastal waters of the Tar -Pamlico Basin is Phiesteria, which
has been documented as being a causative factor to fish kills.
In May 1999, Rivers and Associates (consultant) requested speculative limits for the Washington WWTP. No
Clow was stipulated at that time. The acknowledgement letter returned to the facility informed them that
before speculative limits could be issued that flow needed to be stipulated. Since that time there has been no
1�11E-

additional correspondence regarding speculative limits and a formal request for speculative limits has not
been made. Therefore, this request will not be addressed as part of the permit renewal.
Since the facility discharges into tidal water reasonable potential analysis was conducted assuming an IWC of
100% and using'h FAV values as the standard. The stream classification is C NSW, which is a freshwater
classification. Therefore, if available the freshwater'/2 FAV values were used.
In instances where'h FAV values were not available, reasonable potential was evaluated using the chronic
standard and assuming three IWCs. The IWCs used were 100%, 50%, and 1%. If the reasonable potential
analysis concluded that there was no reasonable potential using an IWC of 100% then it was concluded that
no reasonable potential existed.
The reasonable potential analysis concluded that reasonable potential exist for the facility to exceed the '/z
FAVs for copper, silver, and zinc. The reasonable analysis for silver resulted from one detection of silver in
April 1997. Since that time the facility has conducted 25 sampling events without detecting silver. Silver
monitoring is conducted as part of the facilities Long Term Monitoring Plan and is not recommended as a
permit condition.
Additionally, there is reasonable potential for the City of Washington WWTP to exceed the ' FAV values for
copper and zinc. The analysis for copper and zinc was conducted assuming an IWC of 100% and using the '/z
FAV values as a standard. Interpretation of the reasonable potential analysis led to the following conclusion:
'The City of Washington WWTP does have a reasonable potential to exceed the acute toxicity value for
copper and zinc'.
The Division has established that copper and zinc are `action level' parameters. The bioavailabilty of these
metals is dependent on hardness, pH, and temperature. Because North Carolina surface waters typically have
higher hardness values than those assumed by the EPA in developing the criteria for copper and zinc, the
Division has adopted the EPA criteria for these metals as action levels. For action level parameters, if
reasonable potential is established using the chronic standard then as long as the facility passes toxicity testing,
only monitoring of the parameter of concern is included as a condition for the permit. Even though the
Division is implementing the '/ FAVs as standards, it is not recommended that daily maximum limits be
included as a condition for the permit, because of the policy regarding action level parameters. However, it is
recommended that the facility be required to monitor copper and zinc as a condition for the permit.
TOXICITY TESTING:
Current Requirement: Quarterly Acute Toxicity (Pimephales promelas) P/F at 90%.
Recommended Requirement: Quarterly Acute Toxicity (Pimephales promelas) P/F at 90%.
COMPLIANCE SUMMARY:
The facility has had no compliance problems over the past tour years. The facility did exceed their permitted
Clow in September and October 1999, however this was due to flooding resulting from hurricane activity
during September 1999.
INSTREAM MONITORING:
The facility is currently required to monitor the following parameters upstream and downstream of the
permitted outfall:
• Dissolved oxygen
• Fecal coliform
• Temperature
• Conductivity
PROPOSED CHANGES:
Effluent monitoring of copper and zinc has been included as a condition for the permit. (See Summary
above)
Monitoring for Total nitrogen and total phosphorus has been reduced from 2/month to monthly.
N1)1)1 `> H.L_fe\>.,tl
P., t e<° 2

t
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice:
Permit Scheduled to Issue:
STATE CONTACT:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact
MichaelMyers at [phone] ext. 508.
DATE: 0%0/70
Htcl
\1'1)1 S

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: YES NO
IF YES, SOC NO.
To: NPDES Permits and Engineering jni� g N o w
Wa
ter Quality Section 1 L
Attn: Charles Weaver
Date: January 4, 2000
r
JAN 1
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Beaufort County
Permit No. NC0020648
PART I — GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Town of Washington WWTP
Post Office Box 1988
Washington, North Carolina 27889
2. Date of Investigation: October 27, 1999
3. Report Prepared by: Kimberly H. Cole
4. Person(s) contacted and telephone number(s):
Jerry Cutler (Water Resources Superintendent): (252) 975- 9310
Adam Waters (Pretreatment Coordinator)
5. Directions to Site: from US Hwy 264 within the city limits of Washington, turn
south on Plymouth St.; office and control room are at the northwest comer of
Second St. and Plymouth St.; treatment plant is south of the intersection of
Second St. and Plymouth St.
6. Discharge Point:
Latitude: 35° 32' 42.0" Longitude: 77° 04' 32.9"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge
point on map.
USGS Quad. No. USGS Quad Name: Washington. NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application?

X Yes No total site area approx. 700 acres and includes:
301.54 acres permitted for sludge land application and 84 acres of physical
facilities
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain Included) : flat; site is within floodplain
of Kennedy Creek; no units were flooded during Hurricane Floyd floods.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: approximately 750 feet southeast of treatment
facility site
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Tar River
a. Classification: C NSW
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03-03-07
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
The discharge is located in the tidally -influenced transition zone between
the freshwater Tar River and the estuarine Pamlico River; the receiving stream
classification changes to SC NSW at the US 17 bridge approximately 1.2 miles
downstream of the proposed discharge
migration route and spawning grounds for anadramous fish (such as
herring, stripped bass, American shad, and hickory shad); supports freshwater fish
propagation and provides habitat for other wildlife; used for boating and other
non -contact recreation
PART II —DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: 3.2 MGD
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater Treatment
facility? 3.2 MGD.
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity)?
3.2 MGD.
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to
Construct issued in the previous two years:
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed
wastewater treatment facilities: Treatment consists of mechanical
screening, automatic aerated grit removal, aeration basin, activated sludge
oxidation ditch. Treatment is followed by three secondary clarifiers with
scum removal and pumped sludge return, three tertiary deep -bed
denitrification sand filters with methanol storage/feed system, dual parallel
chlorine contact chambers with flow paced gaseous chlorine feed, sulfur
dioxide dechlorination system, post aeration, lime feed, caustic soda feed,
alum feed, and polymer feed, sludge mixing tank, four thickening lagoons

(2 for sludge, 1 for backwash, and 1 for Natl. Spin.), and a 24" effluent
force main with a sub -aqueous diffuser which discharges into the Tar
River.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities:
1-92' diameter clarifier and 2 new denitrification filters (see Potential
Facility Changes in application)
g•
Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: The following substances are
expected to be in the effluent: chloride, fluoride, chromium, iron, zinc,
and surfactants.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): Approved
2.
3. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: NA
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DWQ permit
no. W00001026
Residuals Contractor: Applied by the City of Washington
Telephone No.
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP X PFRP Other
c. Landfill: NA
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
4. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): IV
4. SIC Code: 4952
Wastewater Code of actual wastewater, not particular facilities.
Primary01 Secondary 27 40 50 57 61 76 78 86
Main Treatment Unit Code: 1 0 6 3
PART III —OTHER PERTINTENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public
monies involved? (municipals only)
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests:
3. Additional effluent limits requested:

4. Other: NA
PART IV —EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended to reissue NPDES permit No. NC0020648.
IL.. CO'b )/ k C
Signature of Report ai'ePre r
g p p
ater Quality Regional Supervisor
Date

1 ai ig i 111 1�
/if
oirrusER
A
\. 20' R1yEo 4T5C Ems'
04,
NATIONAL W47011141.
\ P NMI NC NIPI IIEL
\EW
TANK
,;" DIP
P11I0gi1C O CARAC[
J0D 1PTP
00
Eo 00
-k)l 0
0
NIP
NEW CLARIFIER
DENITRIFICATION FILTERS
111C—EXIST
36" OUTFALLChh.
444,44
44.4
oa t
LOCATION MAP,
NO SCALE
IN~RAINPE TCHRNNELSER
PROJECT No. 19975
LEGEND
STRUCTURES PIPELINES
EXISTING Fri
HEW111111
tv.
Mack aVIQstCM
CITY OF WASHINGTON, N.C.
WASTEWATER FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS
SCALE: 1" I$ 400'
FIGURE B
PROJECT SITE PLAN

Name: WASHINGTON
Date: 1/5/100
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet
Location: 035° 32' 54.3" N 077° 04' 21.7" W
Caption: City of Washington WVVTP and Outfall 001
NPDES NC0020648
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) _
7Q1Os (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Washington W
WTP Parameter =
Standard =
NC0020648
3.2
Tidal
100.00
FINAL RESULTS
Arsenic
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
7.2
50.0
Arsenic
50.0
uei
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 2.5 <5 Std Dev. 0.51604685
2 2.5 <5 Mean 2.57608696
3 2.5 <5 C.V. 0.20032198
4 2.5 <5
5 2.5 <5
6 2.5 <5 Mult Factor =
7 2.5 <5 Max. Value
8 2.5 <5 Max. Pred Cw
9 2.5 <5 Allowable Cw
10 6.0 6
11 2.5 <5
12 2.5 <5
13 2.5 <5
14 2.5 <5
15 2.5 <5
16 2.5 <5
17 2.5 <5
18 2.5 <5
19 2.5 <5
20 2.5 <5
21 2.5 <5
22 2.5 <5
23 2.5 <5
24 2.5 <5
25 2.5 <5
26 2.5 <5
27 2.5 <5
28 2.5 <5
29 2.5 <5
30 2.5 <5
31 2.5 <5
32 2.5 <5
33 2.5 <5
34 2.5 <5
35 2.5 <5
36 2.5 <5
37 2.5 <5
38 2.5 <5
39 2.5 <5
40 2.5 <5
41 2.5 <5
42 2.5 <5
43 2.5 <5
44 2.5 <5
45 2.5 <5
46 2.5 <5
1.2
6pg/1
7.2 pg/1
50.0 pg/1

'acility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q1Os (cfs)=
1WC (%) =
City of Washington WWTP
NC0020648
3.2
Tidal
100.00
FINAL RESULTS
Cadmium
Max. Pred Cw 0
Allowable Cw 15.0
Parameter =
Standard =
Cadmium
15.0
pWI
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 1.0000 <2 Std Dev.
2 1.0000 <2 Mean
3 1.0000 <2 C.V.
4 1.0000 <2
5 1.0000 <2
6 1.0000 <2 Mult Factor =
7 1.0000 <2 Max. Value
8 1.0000 <2 Max. Pred Cw
9 1.0000 <2 Allowable Cw
10 1.0000 <2
11 1.0000 <2
12 1.0000 <2
13 1.0000 <2
14 1.0000 <2
15 1.0000 <2
16 1.0000 <2
17 1.0000 <2
18 1.0000 <2
19 1.0000 <2
20 1.0000 <2
21 1.0000 <2
22 1.0000 <2
23 1.0000 <2
24 1.0000 <2
25 1.0000 <2
26 1.0000 <2
27 1.0000 <2
28 1.0000 <2
29 1.0000 <2
30 1.0000 <2
31 1.0000 <2
32 1.0000 <2
33 1.0000 <2
34 1.0000 <2
35 1.0000 <2
36 1.0000 <2
37 1.0000 <2
38 1.0000 <2
39 1.0000 <2
40 1.0000 <2
41 1.0000 <2
42 1.0000 <2
43 1.0000 <2
44 1.0000 <2
45 1.0000 <2
46 1.0000 <2
0
1
0
1Pg,f1
0 pg/1
15.0 pg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Washington WW
NC0020648
3.2
Tidal
100.00
FINAL RESULTS
chromium
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
9.8
50.0
TP Parameter =
Standard =
chromium
50
u�
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data
1 2.500 <5
2 2.500 <5
3 2.500 <5
4 2.500 <5
5 6.000 6
6 6.000 6 Mult Factor =
7 7.000 7 Max. Value
8 2.500 <5 Max. Pred Cw
9 2.500 <5 Allowable Cw
10 2.500 <5
11 2.500 <5
12 2.500 <5
13 2.500 <5
14 2.500 <5
15 2.500 <5
16 2.500 <5
17 2.500 <5
18 2.500 <5
19 2.500 <5
20 2.500 <5
21 2.500 <5
22 2.500 <5
23 2.500 <5
24 2.500 <5
25 2.500 <5
26 2.500 <5
27 2.500 <5
28 2.500 <5
29 2.500 <5
30 2.500 <5
31 2.500 <5
32 2.500 <5
33 2.500 <5
34 2.500 <5
35 2.500 <5
36 2.500 <5
37 2.500 <5
38 2.500 <5
39 2.500 <5
40 2.500 <5
41 2.500 <5
42 2.500 <5
43 2.500 <5
44 2.500 <5
45 2.500 <5
46 2.500 <5
47 2.500 <5
RESULTS
Std Dev. 0.95480672
Mean 2.74468085
C.V. 0.34787532
1.4
7 PO
9.8 pg/1
50.0 pg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7QI0s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Washington WWTP Parameter =
NC0020648 Standard =
3.2
Tidal
100.00
Copper
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
FINAL RESULTS
95.7
7.3
Copper
7.3
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 6.0 6 Std Dev. 4.88341349
2 5.0 5 Mean 3.43333333
3 2.5 <5 C.V. 1.42235344
4 11.0 11
5 3.0 3
6 1.5 <3 Mult Factor =
7 3.0 3 Max. Value
8 1.5 <3 Max. Pred Cw
9 1.5 <3 Allowable Cw
10 1.5 <3
11 1.5 <3
12 1.5 <3
13 7.0 7
14 1.5 <3
15 4.0 4
16 3.0 3
17 1.5 <3
18 3.0 3
19 1.5 <3
20 33.0 33
21 1.5 <3
22 5.0 5
23 2.5 <5
24 3.0 3
25 4.0 4
26 1.5 <3
27 2.5 <5
28 2.5 <5
29 1.5 <3
30 5.0 5
31 3.0 3
32 1.5 <3
33 5.0 5
34 1.5 <3
35 1.5 <3
36 1.5 <3
37 2.5 <5
38 3.0 3
39 1.5 <3
40 3.0 3
41 1.5 <3
42 1.5 <3
43 1.5 <3
44 1.5 <3
45 1.5 <3
2.9
33 ug/1
95.7 ug/1
7.3 pg/1

Facility Name = City of Washington WWTFParameter =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
Nc0020648
3.2
Tidal
100.00
FINAL RESULTS
cyanide
Max. Pred Cw 0
Allowable Cw 22.0
Standard =
cyanide
22.0
ugn
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 2.5000 <5 Std Dev.
2 2.5000 <5 Mean
3 2.5000 <5 C.V.
4 2.5000 <5
5 2.5000 <5
6 2.5000 <5 Malt Factor =
7 2.5000 <5 Max. Value
8 2.5000 <5 Max. Pred Cw
9 2.5000 <5 Allowable Cw
10 2.5000 <5
11 2.5000 <5
12 2.5000 <5
13 2.5000 <5
14 2.5000 <5
15 2.5000 <5
16 2.5000 <5
17 2.5000 <5
18 2.5000 <5
19 2.5000 <5
20 2.5000 <5
21 2.5000 <5
22 2.5000 <5
23 2.5000 <5
24 2.5000 <5
25 2.5000 <5
26 2.5000 <5
27 2.5000 <5
28 2.5000 <5
29 2.5000 <5
30 2.5000 <5
31 2.5000 <5
32 2.5000 <5
33 2.5000 <5
34 2.5000 <5
35 2.5000 <5
36 2.5000 <5
37 2.5000 <5
38 2.5000 <5
39 2.5000 <5
40 2.5000 <5
41 2.5000 <5
42 2.5000 <5
43 2.5000 <5
44 2.5000 <5
45 2.5000 <5
46 2.5000 <5
47 2.5000 <5
48 2.5000 <5
0
2.5
0
2.5 pg/1
0 pgil
22.0 pg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
ITC (%) =
Cityof Washington WW
NC0020648
3.2
Tidal
100.00
FINAL RESULTS
Lead
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
15.3
33.8
TP Parameter =
Standard =
Lead
33.8
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 1.5 <3 Std Dev. 1.09799666
2 1.5 <3 Mean 1.64893617
3 1.5 <3 C.V. 0.66588185
4 1.0 <2
5 1.5 <3
6 1.5 <3 Mult Factor =
7 1.5 <3 Max. Value
8 1.5 <3 Max. Pred Cw
9 1.5 <3 Allowable Cw
10 1.5 <3
11 1.5 <3
12 1.5 <3
13 1.5 <3
14 1.5 <3
15 1.5 <3
16 1.5 <3
17 1.5 <3
18 1.5 <3
19 1.5 <3
20 9.0 9
21 1.5 <3
22 1.5 <3
23 1.5 <3
24 1.5 <3
25 1.5 <3
26 1.5 <3
27 1.5 <3
28 1.5 <3
29 1.5 <3
30 1.5 <3
31 1.5 <3
32 1.5 <3
33 1.5 <3
34 1.5 <3
35 1.5 <3
36 1.5 <3
37 1.5 <3
38 1.5 <3
39 1.5 <3
40 1.5 <3
41 1.5 <3
42 1.5 <3
43 1.5 <3
44 1.5 <3
45 1.5 <3
46 1.5 <3
47 1.5 <3
1.7
9 ue
15.3 pg/1
33.8 pg/1

Facility Name = City of Washington WWTP Parameter =
NPDES # = NC0020648 Standard =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
3.2
Tidal
100.00
FINAL RESULTS
Mercury
Max. Pred Cw 0
Allowable Cw 0.0
Mercury
0.0120
p
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 0.1 <0.2 Std Dev. 3.1414E-09
2 0.1 <0.2 Mean 0.1
3 0.1 <0.2 C.V. 3.1414E-08
4 0.1 <0.2
5 0.1 <0.2
6 0.1 <0.2 Mult Factor =
7 0.1 <0.2 Max. Value
8 0.1 <0.2 Max. Pred Cw
9 0.1 <0.2 Allowable Cw
10 0.1 <0.2
11 0.1 <0.2
12 0.1 <0.2
13 0.1 <0.2
14 0.1 <0.2
15 0.1 <0.2
16 0.1 <0.2
17 0.1 <0.2
18 0.1 <0.2
19 0.1 <0.2
20 0.1 <0.2
21 0.1 <0.2
22 0.1 <0.2
23 0.1 <0.2
24 0.1 <0.2
25 0.1 <0.2
26 0.1 <0.2
27 0.1 <0.2
28 0.1 <0.2
29 0.1 <0.2
30 0.1 <0.2
31 0.1 <0.2
32 0.1 <0.2
33 0.1 <0.2
34 0.1 <0.2
35 0.1 <0.2
36 0.1 <0.2
37 0.1 <0.2
38 0.1 <0.2
39 0.1 <0.2
40 0.1 <0.2
41 0.1 <0.2
42 0.1 <0.2
43 0.1 <0.2
44 0.1 <0.2
45 0.1 <0.2
46 0.1 <0.2
0.100 pg/1
0.000 pg/1
0.0120 pg/1

Facility Name = City of Washinton WWTP
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
NC0020648
3.2
Tidal
100.00
FINAL RESULTS
Molybenum
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
0
0.0
Parameter = Molybenum
Standard = 0.00
pg
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 <5 Std Dev. #DIV/0!
2 <5 Mean #DIV/0!
3 <5 C.V. #DIV/0!
4 <5
5 <5
6 5 Mult Factor =
7 5 Max. Value
8 <5 Max. Pred Cs
9 <5 Allowable Cw
10 <5
11 10
12 <5
13 <5
14 17
15 <5
16 <5
17 <5
18 <5
19 <5
20 <5
21 6
22 <5
23 <5
24 <5
25 <5
26 <5
27 <5
28 <5
29 15
30 <5
31 <5
32 <5
33 <5
34 <5
35 <5
36 <5
37 <5
38 <5
39 <5
40 <5
41 <5
42 <5
43 <5
44 <5
45 <5
46 <5
0 pg/1
0 pg/1
0.0 pg/1

facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
City of Washington W
NC0020648
3.2
Tidal
100.00
FINAL RESULTS
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
0
261.0
TP Parameter =
Standard =
Nickel
261
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 2.5 <5 Std Dev.
2 2.5 <5 Mean
3 2.5 <5 C.V.
4 2.5 <5
5 2.5 <5
6 2.5 <5 Mull Factor =
7 2.5 <5 Max. Value
8 2.5 <5 Max. Pred Cv
9 2.5 <5 Allowable Cw
10 2.5 <5
11 2.5 <5
12 2.5 <5
13 2.5 <5
14 2.5 <5
15 2.5 <5
16 2.5 <5
17 2.5 <5
18 2.5 <5
19 2.5 <5
20 2.5 <5
21 2.5 <5
22 2.5 <5
23 2.5 <5
24 2.5 <5
25 2.5 <5
26 2.5 <5
27 2.5 <5
28 2.5 <5
29 2.5 <5
30 2.5 <5
31 2.5 <5
32 2.5 <5
33 2.5 <5
34 2.5 <5
35 2.5 <5
36 2.5 <5
37 2.5 <5
38 2.5 <5
39 2.5 <5
40 2.5 <5
41 2.5 <5
42 2.5 <5
43 2.5 <5
44 2.5 <5
45 2.5 <5
46 2.5 <5
47 2.5 <5
0
2.5
0
2.5 pg/1
0 pg/1
261.0 pg/1

Facility Name = City of Washington WWTP Parameter =
NPDES # = Standard =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
ITC (%) _
NC0020648
3.2
Tidal
100.00
FINAL RESULTS
Silver
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
3.9
1.2
Silver
1.23
17,
p
n BDL=II2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 1.0 <2 Std Dev. 0.29488391
2 1.0 <2 Mean 1.04347826
3 1.0 <2 C.V. 0.28259708
4 1.0 <2
5 1.0 <2
6 1.0 <2 Mult Factor =
7 1.0 <2 Max. Value
8 1.0 <2 Max. Pred Cw
9 1.0 <2 Allowable Cw
10 1.0 <2
11 1.0 <2
12 1.0 <2
13 1.0 <2
14 1.0 <2
15 1.0 <2
16 1.0 <2
17 1.0 <2
18 1.0 <2
19 1.0 <2
20 1.0 <2
21 3.0 3
22 1.0 <2
23 1.0 <2
24 1.0 <2
25 1.0 <2
26 1.0 <2
27 1.0 <2
28 1.0 <2
29 1.0 <2
30 1.0 <2
31 1.0 <2
32 1.0 <2
33 1.0 <2
34 1.0 <2
35 1.0 <2
36 1.0 <2
37 1.0 <2
38 1.0 <2
39 1.0 <2
40 1.0 <2
41 1.0 <2
42 1.0 <2
43 1.0 <2
44 1.0 <2
45 1.0 <2
46 1.0 <2
1.3
3 pgri
3.9 pg/1
1.2 pg/1

Facility Name = City of Washington WWTP Parameter =
NPDES # = Standard =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
NC0020648
3.2
Tidal
100.00
FINAL RESULTS
Zinc
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
254.4
67.0
Zinc
67
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1 27 27 Std Dev. 20.6794637
2 22 22 Mean 39.5978261
3 24 24 C.V. 0.52223735
4 35 35
5 41 41
6 45 45 Mult Factor =
7 30 30 Max. Value
8 35 35 Max. Pred Cw
9 25 25 Allowable Cw
10 35 35
11 35 35
12 29 29
13 45 45
14 41 41
15 46 46
16 36 36
17 47 47
18 43 43
19 38 38
20 40 40
21 159 159
22 34 34
23 31 31
24 50 50
25 51 51
26 48 48
27 47 47
28 40 40
29 45 45
30 48 48
31 50 50
32 17 17
33 39 39
34 2.5 <5
35 49 49
36 45 45
37 30 30
38 27 27
39 32 32
40 38 38
41 19 19
42 45 45
43 46 46
44 30 30
45 42 42
46 38 38
1.6
159 pg/1
254.4 pg/1
67.0 pg/1

a
MECHANICAL
SCREENING
0 2 trots
o t tslWee3
Sereenlnps
GRIT REMOVAL
o2Unite
o Aerated with
scree washer
TO
LANDFILL
Grit
Alr
AERATION BASIN
o .455 NO
o Coarse Bubble
Diffusers
Air
Alr
OXIDATION
DITCH
o 1.8ND
o Draft TLAe/DIffUSer
Aeration
Alt
1
Air
BLOWER BUILDINGS
Lime Slurry
Supernatant
Scow
POLYMER
FINAL
CLARIFIERS
o 3 1J4l%S
o 65• Diameter
o 13-fh Me Nail
o 482 OFR
ALUM
RAS ® NAS
3.2 090 •
LIME
Lime SIUrry
® = PUMPING STATIONS
METHANOL
EFFLUENT
FILTRATION/
DENITRIFICATION
0 3 Units
o 330 ft? Each
o 2.24 ppm/ft2
CHLORINE
SULFUR
DIOXIDE
TREATED EFFLUENT TO
IINSPINNINGOAL DUSTRIAL
FOR
REUSE
CHL DEICHLONE RINATIONION/[.......
0 30 Nlnutes Detention Ilse
Finer
Backwash
SLUDGE
STRBLI ZATI ON/
THICKENING
STORAGE 'LAGOONS
o FOUr Basins
o .45 MC EOCf
I--]EFFLUENT
REUSE PS
REAERATION
o One 7.5 hp
sutroce Aerator
RIVER:
DISCHARGE PIPE •
SLUDGE TO
LAND APPLICATION
PROJECT N0. 19975
CAUSTIC
1131adiC&1Vatcf
Asbeggo. North Caro no
CITY OF WASHINGTON, N.C.
WASTEWATER FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS
FIGURE A
WWTP PROCESS SCHEMATIC

City of Washington
WWTP
NC0020648
EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FACILITIES
The Wastewater Treatment Plant was built in 1986 and upgraded in 1994 and has an ave.
day max. month capacity of 3.2 mgd. The plant uses an oxidation ditch modified for nutrient
removal by the use of alum and tertiary filters.
EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FACILITIES
Screening
Grit Removal
Oxidation Ditch Tank
Total Flow 3.2 mgd
2-mechanical bar screens, 1-inch spacing, front
cleaned, front returned
2-rectangular aerated grit removal, air lift with
screw grit washer; PD blower located in the
Blower Building
25' x 645' x 15' SWD, volume 1.80 mg;
Detention, 13.5 hrs. @ 3.2 mgd
Flow 60% + 40% = 3.2 mgd
Oxidation Ditch Aeration System 2-platform mounted draft tube mixers and
coarse bubble diffusers; 125 hp @ 1,200 rpm
Blowers - Draft Tube 2 - 750 scfm PD blowers
2 - 550 scfm PD blowers
Blowers - Diffusers 4 - 1,000 cfm PD blowers
192 coarse bubble diffusers
Aeration Basin 38' x 109' x 15' SWD, Volume 0.465 mg
(Converted Digestor) Detention 3.5 hrs. @ 3.2 mgd
Flow 40% of 3.2 mgd
2430 scfm air supply from diffuser blower
Clarifiers
Filter Pump Station
3 - 65 ft. dia., center feed, peripheral weirs,
with full surface skimmers; area 3,318 sf
2@13'SWD, 1@15'ISWD
Overflow rate 321 gpd/ft2 @ 3.2 mgd
4 - submersible pumps with
pipe rotation basin wet well
600- 1,500 gpm @ 21' TDH
Page 1 of 3

City of Washington
ww7P
NC0020648
Denitrification Filters
3 - 9.5 x 35 = 332.5 sf ea.
3.2 mgd x 694 = 2.23 gpm/sf
997.5 sf
ra? 8.0 mid x 694 = 8.32 gpm/sf
997.5 sf
Backwash Pumps 2 - submersible
2,000 gpm ® 35' TDH
Backwash Blowers 2 - P.D.Blowers
1,660 cfm @ 10 psi
Methanol Storage 10,200 gal. steel tank
10' dia. x 17.5' height
Methanol Feed Pump 0-15 gph ® 40 psi
Filter Clear Well 1,608 gal.
33 x 21.5 x 10
Chlorine Feeders
Chlorine Storage
Chlorine Contact Basins
Dechlorination
Reaeration Basin
2 - remote vacuum, variable orifice,
auto switchover, 500 lb./day
2 - 2,000 lbs. cylinders w/4,0001b. load cells
2 - lbs. space cylinders
2- 15 x 30 x 7.65 SWD
Volume - 20,900 gallons each
Detention - 30 min. ® 3.2 mgd
2 - sulfur dioxide feeders, 200 lbs./day
2 - 150 lb. cylinders
1-29x31 x6.16 SWD
Volume - 41, 400 gals.
Detention, min. -18.6 @ 3.2 mgd
1 - Floating, high speed,mechanical aerator
7.5 hp
Effluent Pump Station 5 - vertical mixed flow pumps
1,900 gpm @ 25' TDH
Page 2 of 3

City of Washington
WWIP
NC0020648
Effluent Force Main
Return Sludge Pumps
Clarifier 1 & 2
Sludge Storage Lagoons
Sludge Transfer Pumps
Supernatant Pumps
Sludge Loadin& Pumps
Lime System
24"
2- Horizontal, centrifugal belt drive, 2-speed
1050gpm @22'
690 gpm @ 14
4 - 450,000 gallons @ 8 ft. max. depth
2 for sludge, 1 for backwash &
1 for National Spinning Sludge
2 - Vertical, Centrifugal
650 gpm @ 26' TDH
2 - Horizontal, centrifugal
200 gpm @ 20' TDH
6,000 gal. sludge tank
25 hp vacuum pump
For alkalinity control at oxidation
ditch influent
Hydrated lime silo, 2,940 cf
1,680 lbs./hr screw feeder, 750 gal. slurry tank
2 - air diaphragm pumps @ 15 gpm
Page 3 of 3

Potential Facility Changes
Information taken from Preliminary Engineering Report
dated March 1999

Washington Sewer Study - PER 3/99
7.0 PLANT DEFICIENCIES
7.1 GENERAL
The plant needs additional clarifier, filter capacity now to handle the current peak flows. The
filter mud well is inadequate to hold multiple backwashes during peak flows. Additional
storage could be obtained by converting all abandoned clarifiers to backwash storage. With
the peak flow modifications, the Treatment Plant capacity could be increased to 3.65 mgd
and the plant would operate more efficiently.
An additional oxidation ditch will be needed in the future to provide parallel units as
required by the new regulations. With the additional oxidation ditch, the plant flow could be
increased to 4.50 mgd and handle flow through 2010. The City of Washington also wants to
change to UV disinfection to improve safety.
7.2 PEAK FLOWS
The operational data indicates that solids wash out of the clarifier and the filters go into
repeated backwash when the flow exceeds the 3.2 mgd plant design capacity for more than a
few hours. Refer to the circular Chart Recorder data in the Appendix to see visually how
flows over 3.2 mgd cause multiple backwashes over a short period of time.
On 4/9/99, the flow exceed 3.2 mgd and filters began backwashing. Over the next 9 hours,
the flow stayed between 4.5 and 05.5 mgd, and there were 8 backwashes. There were times
when the effluent peaks exceeded the influent peaks as filters went through backwash. A
similar instance occurred on 8/27/98, when the flow varied from 3.2 mgd to 3.8 mgd and 6
backwashes occurred over 10 hours. The clarifier overflow rate and the filter rate need to be
reduced to improve performance at peak flows.
7.3 CLARIFIERS
The clarifier overflow rate at 3.2 mgd is 320 gpd/sf. By adding another clarifier, the plant
capacity could be increased to 3.65 mgd and still keep the overflow rate to 275 gpd/sf. This
would significantly improve the ability of the clarifiers to retain solids. When the plant flow
is increased to 4.5 mgd, a total of 5 - 65' dia. clarifiers would be needed to keep the overflow
rate to 271 gpd/sf.
P:\Muni\Wash\W&SStdy\PER\WSSPER Page 14

Washington Sewer Study - PER 3/99
7.4 FILTERS
At plant design flow of 3.2 mgd, the filter rate is 2.2 gpm/sf and the plant experiences major
problems in this range and above with multiple backwashes in a short period time. By
adding one more filter, the filter rate drops to 1.666 gpm/sf. By adding 1 more filter and
increasing the design flow to 3.65 mgd, the filter rate becomes 1.90 gpm/sf. Adding 2 more
filters and increasing the flow to 4.5 mgd changes the filter rate to 1.80 gpm/sf.
In order to improve the flow to and from the filters, the filter feed pumps will have to be
upgraded and fitted with variable frequency drives. A new filter feed pump station will be
provided for the new clarifier(s). The filters will have to be modified to equalize flow
between filters by cutting a notch in the wall between filters. If the remaining filters can't
handle the flows while one filter is being backwashed, the excess flow will go to the
backwash mud well. The filter controls will be modified to throttle the filter effluent valves
when a newly backwashed filter comes on line to a rate similar to the filter pump. The PLC
in the filter controls will be modified to compose the filter pump flow and the plant effluent
flow and throttle the newly cleaned filter to keep the total effluent flow within 10% of the
filter influent flow.
7.5 MAINTENANCE - STORAGE BUILDING
The WWTP does not have adequate space for maintenance and storage at the WWTP. A
metal building with space for repairs, storage and maintenance personnel workspace and
offices is needed.
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
8.1 PHASE 1 IMMEDIATE NEEDS •
The City of Washington should proceed with the Phase 1 upgrade discussed in this report to
solve the immediate flow related deficiencies. The Total Project Cost is given on Table 10.
This will allow a small increase in flow which will provide time to prepare for the Phase 2
expansion for the year 2010. The City of Washington qualifies for high unit cost grants
which would provide $3,000,000 in grants for this project.
8.2 PHASE 2 FUTURE NEEDS
The City of Washington should continue to plan for an expansion for 2010 including a
parallel oxidation ditch and Ultraviolet Disinfection. Washington should also continue with
the current I/I program to identify cost effective reductions in I/I.
P:1Muni\Wash\W&SStdy\PER\WSSPER Page 15

Washington Sewer Study - PER 3/99
8.3 FUTURE CONSTRUCTION
The City of Washington should make any cost effective corrections in the collection system
to reduce UI. Washington should plan for and encourage sewer extension to serve
Whichard's Beach and Washington Park as discussed in the 1975 201 Facilities Plan as soon
as funds are available that provide sewer at a reasonable user cost. Washington should plan
for sewer to areas recommended for annexation in the Land Use Plan and new residential
developments such as the 400 unit mobile home park north of the City.
8.4 FUTURE PLANNING
Since the 5th and Respess Pump Station handles the majority of the wastewater flow for the
City, we recommend that Washington acquire additional land adjacent to the existing
facilities for future expansion and improvements to the station.
•
P:1Muni\Wash\W&SStdy\PER\WSSPER Page 16

Washington Sewer Study - PER 3/99
TABLE 9
PROPOSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FACILITIES
Additional Clarifiers
& Return Sludge P.S.
2 - new 65' dia or 1 - 92' dia.
Overflow rate @ 3.65 mgd - 220 gpd/sf Phase 1
3,650,000 = 220 gpd/sf
5 x 3,318
Overflow rate @ 4.5 mgd - 271 gpd/sf Phase 2
4,500 gpd = 271 gpd/sf
3x3,318+2x3,318
Filter Pump Station Modifications VFD Drives & Flow Controls
Filter Modifications
Additional Filters
& Filter Pump
Modify Valves, Controls & Tanks
2 - new filters
Filter rate @ 4.5 mgd - 1.88 gpm/sf
4.5 mgd x 694 = 1.88 gpm/sf
1,663
Maintenance 30' x 60' Metal Building
- Storage Building
P:IMuni\Wash\W&SStdy1PER\WSSPER Page 17

LONG TERM MONITORING PLAN REQUEST FORM
FACILITY: City of Washington WWTP
NPDES NO.: NC0020648
EXPIRATION DA 3/31/00
REGION: WaRO
P&E REQUESTOI Michael Myers
PRETREATMENT CONTAC1Tom Poe
DATE OF REQUE 1/7/00
INDICATE THE STATUS OF PRETREATMENT PROGRAM:
Unknown
1) THE FACILITY HAS NO SIU'S AND SHOULD NOT HAVE PRETREATMENT LANGUAGE
2) THE FACILITY HAS OR IS DEVELOPING A PREATREATMENT PROGRAM.
3) ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS REGARDING THE PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ATTACHED.
PERMITTED FLO\ 3.2 MGD
% INDUSTRIAL 16%
% DOMESTIC 84%
Pretreatment Unit Staff (Region)
Bo McMinn (WSRO)
Tom Poe (FRO, ARO, WiRO)
Dana Folley (RRO, WaRO)
Joe Pearce (MRO)
rilltt - 1* ,b7 V 541r ' ; CV ci c i 1v,1il, / c�V, ��,M� ,Se, Al �lcN>ff
g T$: /1/,,1116 > Dom,
TK,, 77/, Tim 1442
thjc22
i' �' » 1iYyZ_

Appal 4B. Rumple LTMPSvalmay Data Ram
NPD>SINOND1
SAMPLE
PCI1W NAME= C 15 ail WAS A , Ar oA., kil vTP
�.xG1�P tars= QP 0 Cc' A'
LAC�►7i�t E Ju epa
Below Detection Limit Data (EDP.) should be marked as "< and the detection limit", i.e. O.O2.
SAMPLE DAM
1
2
3
4
F n /� 5 5-0
CAM 6
7 -0g
8
- 9
l0 P
II
12
13
14
15
16
1T
LB
19
20
I�
1 -I 0
- 1-q
6)10/2. *
TOTAL=
6 VALAES =
AVERAGE=
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM =
A.e613
4-
c.
PotiurAttir•
1
POLLUTANT
�- O.60
eirgsc1.
r1.
POILU CA NT =
4NS iif
iffa
31 cif
. 3I:
. 3314
Jag
$22
1
o.
I.3a
(7, 2 14
Po]
Q
ANT
°t.0
POLLUTANT
A/a3-4/
0.�
0,0301 4
in. 0
0, 63 •y 1 .c.a a f
POLLUTANZ
_gyp 4
POLLMArrr •
5
0. 37
(o.3 f
A
1 4._ 1
10-
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (Le. 0,112 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DETECTION LBW).
Chapter: LTMP Guidance
Fikasr c LIMP data sum
Revision Data: September 41993
f
-T N q.5- 9q ow 7/L
Oi4
Appendix. 48
Page 1
- c
0
11
• - �I�F�
-u
N

•
6~
c
TW NAME
NPDESINONOISCIIARcemoor • i
SAMPLE LOCATION o
Long Tam Mo Ouid nce
Appaidix 4-B. Rumpk LTPSttrnmo3 Dab Foreri
C + 4ail WdS A rAv3/ 4 . i vLvTP1
era
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection limit", i.e. <0.002.
a
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
.40, era: 401003
co,flroA-(70.
s r .: i •�
0, no
-o, o,_
TOTAL z.
4 VALUES
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM =
MINIMUM
©. 00..7
1,0.00
►05
D.O6G
zo, Oa5
.40.•01
0,003
4., r
040-1.
O.no3
e;-0 3Y5-
1.0 , 0 0 3
G.d o .5
Ow
• 30
/ rr
.LOJO&
40, o.as
r P 05
5 ,_Q, 003 401005
Gvtf/Z.)
zo.aC3
40,0o3
L0 036
I�-
404 003
3
c
NMI IVRr1 II
t 4.0,0V
Irrs
s ► _ Ls 00 2
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e. I/2 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DETECTION LIMIT).
Chapter: LTMP G uidan c
MN= LIMP data sum
Revision Data September 2,1993
Chapter4
Appcndii 4B
Page l
•Iq WAa L =
•
cn
-D
W

1-
POTW NAME =
ChM('
Long Taem Monitoring Jew Guidance
Appendix 4-B. maple LTPAP Sti n nary Daum Fong
, 4 off' Was Ar n.571oA. tAitvTP
tsc�tARc� � C 0o 1. 0 612'
SAMPLE LOCATION = I F'�'f U ,a,,
NPDESINONn PERMIT
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection lit", le, <0.002.
SAMPLE. DATE
l i- I2-4 ct
2 2,6-aq
3 3-2.3..4
4
6
s
9
0
11
12.
I3
IS
14
6
17
1a
19
20
(erftt/Z.)
c
PLOW _
POLLITTANT=
POULUr1 ANT=
hSP,v � c
449.005
40'.00.4
/ O 00S
POLLUTANT'. lIOLL[TrANT=/1014
.261;C.41
L0, 00
.�o,an ,0o.3 , 000 ,
40. 005 S 0 op. 4.0,00S
Q.00 L O. 0002
LO100001
,moo, on
.015
L0iOO
..o. Q O
.� 0r Oa
O.00
, POLLUTANT s
Zatij
h0400
.torog
POU..IJfANT
POLLUTANT •
POId7TANT:
-coos i ..0205
.La.000 & 4 az Op
l -0 r 000 & 4¢, 00
<Q, coo Ltd 005
40.oace 4 605
Q,coo
46001
.LQ.OD
ZaOn
�. o, o0
r1. nno • Ln, 00 s O. 0 0.5
TOTAL =
1 VALUES
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM =
MINIMUM =
.O,O6 o
a. aQ..5
I i..o 005
40.003,
.4D.0G0 I 40 o .y .40.n 0
I2la
.40,O0S
0 V-5
L 100S'
. ,Qvv 2 .4.0, Q05
. od o a .Z-0, 65
R 40,000.2 .'Dr00.S
d7, 00S
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e, 0,112 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DEl'ECIION
anytr. LTb1P Guide=
Fiknie: LIMP dash spurn
Revisit" Date: September 1,1993
Mow 4
Appetidki 4-5
Pagel
0
3
u;IN
�0
N
ss

Lacs =Len Gaidame
Appau 4-11. Ewmp1e LTIiW Sumin 'y Data Pam
EOTW NAME =
NPDESINONDISCHARGE PERIAT 4 =
SAMPLE LOCATION N
4-: of Was Arkg/o&. LPdk,TP.
I/T ooI 64f
fl1,
Below Detection Limit DM (BDL) should be IDarked as "t.aad the detection limit", Le. 2-
I
SAMPLEDA1E
PLOW=
11'
12
12
14
is
16
17
16
L9
i — 0-q
POLLITI'Al T s
foO.
Q3
POLLUTANT=
Cp
q �t
337
Li. to
POLLUTANT
7%tf1/
31.53
3.$ 0S6
3d111
�Poturr� �aoci-
0.
0 'mg OM
011 3
05.
Ght/Z.
UTANT • 1 PoLWlANT
g.1.qCr
33.1)
I 11. l�w VJ 7
ILO
XrST,
S. $t,r 1 0.o2
r
•
0.3
4' -D'f4
R
Atiks
PowiTANT=
0
1
3
5g
17.5-
'7f
�13
TaTAL. •i
• VALUES
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM =
MINIMUM =
1035
1.1
1.3 5,n
:;1u.554
C.1
3 , af3'
Iq,16S
eats
0.115?
6.23. 1
o •tea. 1
3A.a1a
1R.TM
11,LI61 s')*.6
12
`1:77
2.5 6
ta.
1S
3 gt
1
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (Le, 0,1/2 DETECI'ii ON LII]T, THE DETECTION LIM1T).
Chaplet: LIMP Guidance
Ft1c me: LIME data sum
Revision Dale: September 1..1493
Quptet4
A►ppemdix 4-B
Pagel
s -Y ■ :
0
3
; N
m

long Tenn bi��tan tina Warne
Appendix 4-8. Exemplar...re Sammy Darn. Fain
i
3
4
$
6
. POTW NAME =
NPDPS MONDISc 1M.RGEPMar•=
SAMPLE LOCK LON =
C :147 01 WAS 41 4140n, ivimTP
Oo DPI
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) shoutd be marked as "< and the detection limit', i.e. O.002.
SAMPLE DAM
0-R
u= ;-q4
q
Ala
to 10-1
11 1 I -1
a
SLOW • MOLL- TANT = POLLUTANT = ' POoLurrA N-r a,,
C.
400Q� 0,0oL
O. 9..
11. 00
ara
7. Pawnfig
1.
tea, ao
too
-f nad03
± t zA 4.8„e
-q q
12 ui-o"7-4q
13
14
13
16
17
l4
19
2D
Qrio
4:i s
_) L»43,a0!R
-�s LP' OneViagt
POLLUTANT. POLLUTANT ■ POLLUTANT =
8. i21.o kno§ Q: 81
(144
n.ff.nri ttrolcj ably
meow
4040
tr•rommwict .
•
01
0
nor 0
a go
D,
8r44
0.0
, oo1
0 00
fit.
4.0.0
ca
Crit0/4
PoLttrrANT:
7
P LUTArrr=
O.al
f0
Q�
TOTAL=
A VALUES =
AVERAGE =
MAXIMUM =
MINIMUM •4
11
:11A- g.ggia no..gra a, oaf
1.0 I ..+ram. o o La. o ro, cis s 01 0 1 -0. n t
4 ()i OQS
12d. oos
i
OEN
O, si3.
p1 n.o1 0
q�
• OO 003 1 p005
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e. 0,1/2 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DEfECIION LIIUIIT)..
chapter: LIMP Guidance
Fikrra nc: LIMP dW sum
Reviiinn Date: September 1.1993
Chaptard
Appe . d-B
Peel
LI'Wa
•
co
'2
9
D
tn
en

3
6
a
9
OW(
lgeni
Teem hicatoeins All Guidance
Appendix 4-11. Exaepla LIMP Seams► Data Facet
POTW NAME C t� ailWAS A. �Ir5AL• �NU/TP
NPDFSn4OND!SCNARGEPERMIT N a M C as 6tti
sAMPr.E LocA-noN =
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be merited as "< and the detection limit", i.e. <0.002.
SAMPLEDATE
FLOW
40
0q-g4
1-o s - R
°1-014-
sol f�-04 --99
i•1 1 I -to-4(P
12 0 2-44
13
Li
14
16
17
16
19
20
Cirt$4/4
POLLUTANT POLLUTANT
TC. rSe►J'ie.
W,00 40'QQ
404 4i,QO
IO,cro LQcOLI
Lei 00 4- 0109
L COIS
.[,O. 00ri8; Fog
�.0,AO
GONg
1.0,G005
POLW ANr=_ 1 fPOfLLUJTANT is
02L�PCI'�-}!l���Hltr
0.20 LA__QM S
u.(1003 � .�j moo. 70
2 .000 1,0 U0
� � t00
�,. 1fl
1-0 * O. COS
.� . Q12(A L.0'SO
p
LO,OooA 1 hC 0t
L0,00 La QQ000-
.4.0100 • La.UQO2
4n.00 40,000J.
40ggS cx.013.
rL S
L c�.33
POILUTA NT s VOLurrAI TP • POf WTANt' as POLLUTANT.
• 0.00:5
2.0, a
4O no s
Ut
40.00
40.00
CTi 00
4.O.00S
40.00 s
4004.0,90
i!
1.01
40. 003
TOTAL z
� VALUES
AVERAGE =
)4AXIMUM
MINIMUM =
.LO,060
No Gil
0, 0 021
0,06(a
1O.o�OS
4L . Qos 1 �. 04.S 0. oPa3
G. oo S 44905 G 0 Q003
atoo°.
1
rid)0 5 ACM-5
005
4 o, OQ . 4p. OQ 5
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e. 0,1/2 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DEFECTION LIMIT).
Tapia: LIMP Guidaaa
F ssxnc: LIMP dw. futil ih 4
Revision Dais: September 1. 1993 Appetdis 4B
Pigs 1 '
-- 6ZSZ WO

3
4
5
6
7 -., --'ik
1t �IL1-q
9
it~t in--11-. eta
12 L cfg-
13
14
IS
16
17
1$
19
TOTAL.
VALUES=
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM =
MINIMUM cr
auk
Lang Tee Maiming Pke Cilkla zee
Appmdi. 4-8. EaaeapIC LIMP Sam Data Perm
NPDES{NONDISCHAttGE PERMIT r =
POTIV NAME _+ C . 45 oil WAS A Lk /Dam itvemTP
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as "<andthe detection limit", i.e. <0.0a2.
C--01 /Z. )
POLLUTANT:1 POU.Ui*N T : POLLUTANT = PaLJ.UI'ANT= • • : • POLLUTANT • POLLUTANT: iTANT:. POLLUTANTa
tic IMF fi r INVIAVIENIMIUmmi E ewai
, . . 6 oi,, mim-upth. ..mi mow. ma&f,
..70111111MoNlif ME
111P111111MIWAXIMMI�
'. SSA
i
L4.(4
2.3
im
0.i2.
C. *i3 Q.0
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e.. 0, i/2 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DETECTION LIMIT).
der. LIMP Guidance
Fkns= LIMP data sum
'ttevisian Dais $epiaaba 1.1993
Claps 4
Appendix 4=B
Page '
M.rs21M5i.PW • Eta

Wag Term P4orteno Girding
Appendix 4-B. Extenple MCP Summary Data Fong
Party NAMR C i 44) 01 4 S A, A. 0A� iwJA.'TP
NPDPS, ONDISCHARGEPERMIT/ s 4� ft0 9. 0 Ct f
SAMPLEuoCA1T.ONu g eisie
Below Detection Limn Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection ilinit", i.e. <0.002.
SAMPLE DATE
'43
2
4
5
6
7
8
14
l5
16
37
]9
a �:
qg
•
▪ 41.
POLLUTANT= POLLUTANT
I �e
0. Oot
L
•
•
00
r
r
401 on el
POLLUTANT=
z tvs
a, UO,S
.,0loOS
e•
POLLUTANT . POLLUTANT•
40,.DQ.7 La ca.,
Op 5 40.003
4 Oo41 .4 010DS
0 kJ.
40tin _, •0
O1ad
40,00 S
1
1,0
• .00 s
moo.•
f
Zn.onr
Z.00Q_
• .t
Z.:OA./S 4. 0.
•
,00
0,120
•
I i
.,Q, 00,S
Glit/4)
POLLUTANT , I POLLUTANT
.� Qt 003 d• , 0�c
4 o 3 .eof 0
_ dr I I.
w
POLLUTANT',
40,00.2
it V)Da
p,pso 417.
I I / t ti♦
L.04 71Q •D 40.01.2
.003 �� • 0,
,�a
i s
. 4.
0 00.2
r
TOTAL
• VALUES
AVERAGE =
MAX MUM ■
MINIMUM
$ �t
LQ.001k
-71
LO.oc
O, Ot
o.ic� z 0.�n
LDiOa mo, oci
OS
40,00
LO.O&
t9
0C
40,
LG. X'-
r�- 11.
f �• r.
Q.
�o,�a _ j 05 r— 40,00
400o3 , zoi 0 05 _ Lri,Do.2%-•
BDL DATA USED FOIL AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (Le. 0,1/2 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DETECTION MITT).
apt LT PGuida3oo
Fken= LTMP data sum
Ravid=Date: September I, 1993
Cluiptor 4
.Appendix 4-B
Pape I
I�I �
121
0
U3
cg
c.n

auPir •
Lang Term Maaiteniat rims G t idrrme
Appendix 4-13. Ex■mple•LiMP Smeary Data Foam
POW NAME
NPDESINOND1SCHARGEPERMIT =
C:i5 of Mu 4,
I1'C00?..oCt4r
N/PA kvbvTP
SAMPLE LOCATION =
EMtie Ant
Below Detection Limit Data. (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection limit", i.e. <0.002.
SAMiI D.ATE
1
3
4 L4—f • ft
s _543-4
7
9
t
10
11
1219:
13
Ll
15
36
171
la
19
20
p1_ow =
i
pi -I3- 4g
POLLUTANT=
...r. L. Al
. 0r, 00 l.;7
qg
.p0
no
.ca aat5
i
POLLtUTANT=
40, 01).
O.0
POLLUTANT =
Prue if
'9.0oy_
. �a.Ooa�
igt. .�,�Ii.r1no I
Z0.00 . ,G.. 0r 000 A.
Zcia ad
. 00' 40 . Qg0
40i70 . 0. Qoa
.00 q . noa0.
noa
s 4.daon
POLLUTANT •
fdd&tug
Ghtk)
POLLUTANT • POLLUTANT tUTANT • POLLUTANT •
1
O.i0 OtOej
00o
s •1
S < i O
.tn . oe_5 Q, oos
.4o. no t o,
01
toi60.E <0. 0 03
0.400 cr.
POLLUTANT a
Q0-7
I
TOTAL =
• VALUES=
AVERAGE:
MAx]MUM =
MINIMUM =
1 LR,00s
LDi005
.c .
.�Caon.< Iorn
L n. 0175 .G Q r1( 9,
IQ r2.
0.0002
- .Cd O. 1. OO D oO 2
Z. a. otia9
LO,D4
o.Oak
&co.?
L
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (Le. 0, 1/2 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DETECTION LIMIT).
Chapter: LIMP Guidance.
File L.TMP4ata sum
R mask a Date: Sepstmba I, 1993
Chaphi4
Apr:Wit 4-8
Pagel •
Cren
•
.�1litq

r•
3
4
6
7
'lo Tam Mon>;antt Piss C1Qidaayoo
Appendix 4-B. Rumple L Th1P Sir Data Foam
FEW NAME C: aj S WAS pfr.5/a4_, Wiryrig
NPDE INOND1SC1{A.RGE PERM1T. ; iticoalcatir
SAMPLE e w
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection limit", i.e. <0.002.
SAMPLE DATE
gum
—q
9 9 -16-4
so 1 -t3- q
11 1- eigiF
13
14'
1316
17
18
19
2
FLOW: POLLUTANT=
OD
POLLUTANT
��$ 9
Li
0,0
ISA
POLLUTANT=
u
44
POLLUTANT s
�lAo Al
.
• !
•
a
0.1
11
1; • 4.0
3O 4
F,t:
PO
.3
Ght/Z.)
POILUTANr.
A
1
2
POLLUTAPIT= ^ POLLRTi'AN T=
LP -rgs
I2
1
f' 10
5
•
TOTAL =
1 VALUES
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM! zP
MINIMUM =
11
1
J
5gOh --
10
3 00.
14 +%
2Q..61
xi
1t
Q,c,f
�1.53
19 g
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e. 0,112 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DETECT ION LIMIT).
Clap = LIMP Guidance
Fi en= LIMP dam sum
Rcvisioa Daz September I.1993
Caput 4
Appal& 4-B
Page 1

1.
2
POW NAME =
NPDESINONDISOIARGE PERMIT • is
SAMPLE LOCATION =
ChaPC
Lam Tenn Monitoring Plan Guidance
Appendix 4-B. evm.pk LIMP Stunmm Dw Form
C:15 SP WAS A. tvgicA, W vYP
11/G00.0€14f
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection limit", i.e. <0.002.
SAMPLE DATE
rr1
3 \ 3-o -Q
s 13-
4
6
s
10
1.2
Id
13
15
16�
17
111
19�
2D
Gm,
FLOW = POLLUTANT=
r9.
'7, 2
POLLUTANT s
I. JsLVJ2
4.11 00
40,00D
AZon4-o,QP1
POLLUTANT = POLLUTANT s
C.
.no
4a.0a s
-�. 8; Iq.0o,�'
-1
ziain a61:44k.9
e ,��P.110 2c yo.
b. at r�. Oat L.005
40.00 3
42
.Q13
.10. 03a2
0.Li
�.nu
262 al
POLLUTANT
11'����
�0. 00S
5
z on
�O.DO_S
n5
..
POLLUTANT lePOLLUTANT: !
Q,Oty .
gaff
Q. oocr r�,rat5
4.0. �3 fl. t7
0, p04
Do f.10
.aos 1100
ao
00 100 fli
ni
n.04w
PO1..UTAIdT •
tea.
.dd
.00
011L
TOTAL =
N VALUES :
AVERAGE 1
MAXIMUM =
MINIMUM =
vait
r
i
{t0
'kkO 4 o.oc
�t z0.00
G.1 L7.QQ)
41 U . 041
E 1 .��tv )2:0. o1�{ _ 4 , �a
ia.00s 0,023 i 1.0,003
0, Qc
12..
O. 00'7
1 o�: Q
.I• CP?
�.13�
VCo
,aft
D 01,2:7
'IS.
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e. 0, I/2 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DE['EC'ITDN L IMLT).
Ca: LIMP Guidance
Filename: LIMP data win
Revision Darr. September I.3993
Mon 4
Appendix 4-1I
Page I
ZT 'd 60E0SL62Q2 WONd

•
Long Teem Moulmein Pin Gtridwee
2
3
m.c
Appendix 4-8. Example LTIIP Smarmy Data Fain
POr1W NAME:
NPDESINONDDSCHARGE PERMIT
SAMPLE Lt7CA1TON = -
G: Oil WAS w//A. 1A/lvTP
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be masked as "< and the detection limit`, i.e. c01.002.
SAMPLE DATE
1-13-9
4.Wb
6
10 10-1
1 I t : j
•
-�9
12'to. $- 9
I3
14
13
14
11
18
19
20
FLAW
r
POLLUTANT = POLLUTANT o. POLLUTANT:
C 1" ),.ter
I.o.D s O.o .c 0►0
4040
•�a.4i0 `..C.CJ.
0.00
C
(Pv/Z.
POLLUTANT=
-0, 00 S
. 00
. 00
43.roan I.C.Doq
imam g
�Dooda
Lr t. _ ' O 410.cr
R /
D.n0
a.J
Mono
1
._10.00
POLLUTANT ■
9delVt it w
40,
.Ca5
Iano9 404,90
0.00r La, &I0S
);O.0o t94 00
j
I COS
e ,,a I.O.1
.40.00
FVWTTANT
POLLUTANT
POLLUTANT I
TOTAL= 1
If VALUES =
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM zj
MINIMUM
..:�,
LOAO S
Zo.0o S
f
a 063� 2.
00
.0.005 O. 00a , 00
.0 j00S 40.0004 40400 S
fin.. er.
BDL DATA. USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e. 0, t12 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DEIECFION UNIT).
Chapter LIMP Guidance)
Roam: LIMP Sail sum ampler 4
Revision Date: September 1. 1993 Appendii 4-B
Page
VZ:VZ 00d LT 'W13.d

.+
1
tan Taro M�oar:.1a Guidance
Appendie.4-B. Example LThW Sammy Data Form
puny NAmgNJ\C 15 off' WA s A, Af>/01_, MWT P
RB PERMIT,:iV C Q a 1. D ‘tir
SAMPLE LOCATION:
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection limit i.e. 002.
mG.b _
SAMPLEDA1E
I - - qi
2 L— i2 "
PLOW .
Avg Pow
IL
Ia
143
I ict,
Ifs
io-pa
b_,=
1010 - — .
12 . lm515
13
14
15'
I •
a
POILUTANT
Syr
POLLUTANT=
n
•
8,4
mamma = Pou u rulr. I renown s I09
•e_cf V
Q.
Q.
of
L3S-Low
-
'3,
c
KILawir
LUTA/4?
0
• 3 •
.40
1. Q
16
17
111
19
?A
t0TAL. i%orti21
M VALUES 1 S.•
fliVit
AXDAVERuM_ I .
MINIMUM 1. 44 $1
f'
O. b
a,
CI,
I.
1 (47 c
5.8 1
6 au
R
t°
Ls l./ 8II4
•.a
LO,C L
20,01
ti
-Lo. 0 t
ILL 10 s37'S
iL-14S 0, ,
1915 Q I 0.4
1
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (Le. 0,1/2 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DETECTION Leff).
Char: I.ThP Guidance
Fiisai= LIMP dux ma
Revision Dna Scptearbes 1.1.993
Appendix. 413
Page 1
--{
- 0SL6zS2 WO

lj_
•
LongTcrm M 3ton i1I1 G1 4aoe
Appendix 4-B. Example MCP Swm eery Pas Boni
ppm r1AMe- c:1.5 al' %ai A.,ryia.. WW1
]SC tARc PERMITS = A! C. 00 10 At ft
SAMPLE LOCA1]O91 • EFF
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection Bent", i.e. <0.002.
SAMPLE DATE
_
3.3—t L-• g
4 14-
6
7
S!
9
10
11
11�
13
14
1S
L6
17
18
19'
1
i2_- r TJ
CPat *
1
TOM
•VALUES=
AVERAGE=
MAXIMUM =
MINIMUM.
-7f
PXLUT
Cd
t
I PccurrAmr
C
4 ,00a
<0.
40.005
.00
40r00
POLLUTANT
POLLUTANT
mama
b
10,
4
"7.Q 4O,0O2 1-0i00
L0,00g ,o+, oc S
40.0C 0. 40.00
. 4. , r./Io 40rOu/
40 Orin_ 0. 00
00
0
4 DO
0
O. . 033
4-
Z.0
03
ID
3
0,00
0
4.O.D
..0, o0
40, aq
4.0,O0.
.L O,00S
40,005
140
C
vQ mrANTo POLE. rr'APIT ■
1
4
L r/f3 Cj:OLw
Z. jOO ,03
40,00 ,0-13
4.0,00 a,C}
.00 1-0
Q. 0,23 0,0
0,0
0.00
L°f00'
93.000
t 0.002
L, f3aObn
fLf 00.
IBDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i,e. 0.1 f2 DETEC I1ON LIMIT, THE DEFECTION LIMIT).
Charm:. LTMPCnidirste
Fiimtrne: LIMP data Rum
Revision Dam Scpsrmnba E.1993
Chapter 4
Appgadk 4.B
Pap 1 •
gZ:VG 00, LT •' a
IirgifiWOMBIK

r NAML.
NFDL'+SIN. ot1DISONARGE PERMITS
SAMPLE L OCATIo91.
Lad Tam 31oisa Oradea
Appendix a'B. &ample LIMP Sumaisly Dau Form
C {4j W4S ,/, /D4 i44, TP
t/rc, oo:Ao 6%4 r
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and he detection limit', i.e. <0.0O2.
SAMPLE DAIS
I 4/2
3�
4j
PLOW. POLLUTANT
5 it
37—'— ql7
8 ,fir- a3-
9 q.r
to10
11111 —
. 00
,00
.tQ. 4Q
.40,00
Lc), oo
11) 1- °17
13
:14
15
16
17
18
19
.LOr QaS
1�005
Pou JrANr•
LQ4D0
LQ100
40100
40100
40, 00
40<0S
zO.-oo 5
o, oa
Z-0.00
f .tea, oa1
0 0 . .00
�o'00aa
Y0
POUAIRANT
o�00
40, 000 2
q 0 ,aua avg.
2,, pp0 Dy
moo, aoox
40, aoa
C
Cep1/4)
POV.UTANr• 1rr*12'• POLLUTANT=
PIOID/iiIofr+rrr4- S At urv+._
0 00.5
400S _ 40• Oti
rou vriarr•
40.00 _ 40.00 S.
. 01900P A41,00
142i Ow I .Loeoo.
ZO, coo a.
ar.
40.60
oa
40.00E
Z.o.U0
-d-O, 00
.10.00
2e
•
TOTAL
VALUES
AVERAGE •
MAXIMUM ■
MINIMUM ■
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e. 0,1/2 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DETECIION LIM T).
ampial MP
Ream: LIMP dies sas Casper 4
Rnr1:1oi D11c Sotember 1.1993 I
LZ:i1T 00. LT

NPD131140141iSQlARGB1aF1tM1Ti=
c
POW/ NAME;
Loci Team M �tlan Guidance
Appendix 4-13. Example LIMP Summery OForm
rm
C:15 oil WAS A. kJQ�
,., 'u TP `
%i, . 0 0 0 eV R.
A,8C SAM1AA11ON =1 Z1,I
1
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection limit", i.e. <01.002.
11
1
13
14
15
L6
17
Col& )
BDL. DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e. 0,1 /2 DETECTION LIMIT, THE OSTECTION LIMIT').
Mow LtMPGuidance
Pik : LIMPdass sum
Rion Date: SepIslaber 1,1993
Clo pima
4e
L , r- a.
0
664 y.9 7 m
0
3
-U

Loc Tom M " tiara Guiding
Appcatrix 4-11. Example LTMP S =unary Disa Farm
r
2
3
4
s
6
7
1
poly NAME:
SAMPLE LOCATION:
10
13
C ic7 c Was Ai •.54A, I 'k# P
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) :should be marked as "< and the detection limit", Lc. <0.002.
12
13
SAMPLE Dk1E
1
4—
14
1S
16
17
LB
19
26
'TOTAL •
9VALUES •
AVGE�
MAXIMUM :
MINIMUM
-7.
'1 P
4-O.
4Q frr
LO 1 fo
rL 0. no
12.
61Q,00
Z.n.(10
LO,00
POILITrANT ■
POLLUTANT: I PO{ LL1TA]+1TLI
M
'RD 1
a,o�s
O. D'k3
�♦I6',a���jc��
i110 in
0,0ol
Q. d14
0. 3.5 1
�..03
0,115
•LDS nOS
�. C f7t7S
loos
Cpts;14)
POLLUTANT TTANT,i PQLLUTANP •
leiOiw
.1rl(
001.1 el,
O.O6
MOO S
.2h/
O.O4O ...C1.06s
e
40,00 , 003 .40,
go
Q.03.7
,go
040
POILUTANT:
a.CO'
IBDI, DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (Le. 0, 112 DETECTION LIMIT, THE *DETECTION L1Mfl).
MIME: LIMPGoldin=
Mumma na MN*. sous
/Wilke Dsks Septcmbar 1,1993
0Oc
Ckaita-
.. �-
'�r�%�.'��=f��'��I���i

• Long Term =Ciao Guidance
Appendix 4-a. Ex mple 1.17.1P Sammy Da1L FORM
l
2
ram NAME4I4 :J5 of WAS A iv,/Ai, invLV-T'P
NPDEi/NDNDISCHAR1E I RM1T • . % C p Q c 614 g
SAMPLE LOCATION :
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection limit', i.e. <0.002.
SAMPLE DA
1
(1)1/4
PLOW
-
3
4 Li-
1'W W M1F - yP�OILU TANT POLLUTANT: POLLUTANT r POILLRAzas POLLUTANT
-17 CW r?rSe tir' C Meet. c � 'iIkd iiim. ' Shcu 11
I, n(j' 4.0.00S AOoo1 4 0,OoS .4ry,ockg
Ln.042 L['i.fraS Ln.Ilan a 0.na4t '• 46.Ot S
4 0. tin L 13. lint. Le, onfii 17.( Z. .S O. nn
�. 0in Immo S 1. n,000A. i_[%riaS z. ova
3 5— 14 q
6 (-1L- 01'
7 - S�
aR-11
9°J'-II- _cri
10f0-?-
�1li VQ _ 40.n0 S °nog
�10� 4. 0, ��f S � o. 000
(i. 0D S 44n, noa a.
.a0 Q.nn k 0 000 2.
at. 00 4o, nnS I n. 00o 3
oi_o_o
3 n. OD
Liii -.
1219.q-
Z. 0, o S ! f. O.,io
0,005
a. oos
1.12, 000 £
O. 00os.l
Ll1. no.S . L n, no
0.011 Lb.ran
0.210 4Qr00
4O.00S LO.na
401 (PUS 40. 00
L.O.01 4ij
4o1Qa 4.0100
1ocwrANT-
POLLUTANT :
14
15
16
17
18
19'
20
'TOTAL:.
a VALUES •
AVERAGE or\
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM 4
LD04 a
140, 005
5,py
4otO4D9
CO,Oo
0, 002 T
4. fir.0 Eo
! lal
0. 005 ___n. d 0 C v. n. Z[l 0a
ZOr00,E 0.O00tj MO.LO.0O
Zp,00 S t.9,noa Ld. f Q Si 49,00 3
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (Le. 0♦ 1l2 DETECTION MGT THE DETECTION Mel).
Ogden L'!MPGuidance
Fiknam : Medea Dna
Revision Dstc September 1.1993
Omen 4
Appendix 4B
s1;:iftWOPA

f
Long Tam =ro'Isrr Oak=
Apprrd'is 443. Enpbr LIMP Soaaaarr Dam Farm
BW
pow HMS: C t5 Grin Wa SA. dvoL tivwrP
1 +nrs it/Cool.0•Stir
sA1 PUILOCATION w I L'F
Below Detection Lamar' Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the de cction limit', i.e. ©0.002.
SAMPLE DATE
2
3
4
3
6
7
1
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
1B
19
TOTAL
A VALUES
MAXIMUM
h 15?
GSM
6)19/2-)
0.5
X.f,.1 Ll
BDL DATA USED FOR. AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e. 0,DEMTION LIMIT, THE DETECITON LIM1Tn.
Oupter: LTMP &Waco
Ft LIW Bois sum
Rcvkzlco Dam September 1.1993
Cbtpiar 4
Appcc is 48
Pie 1
at J-14.94
. 8.6•v 7
Ertl MI4IC
.70

I
bag Tens =Clan Guidance
Appian 6-13. Example LIMP Sumer Data Farad
> oTAP NAME=lC Iy o 1A/a',, .Mjc a, WTP1
RGe mar _ dI C a t O Cv
SAMPLE LOCATIONrF
Below won Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection limit", i.e. <0.002.
SAMPI BDATB
1 2 -sa
3 1=, ' .
4 .
S 30 . r
6.� 9 9-f1-q
.LO t
1L0 3-Q
1212-IQ-4
13
14
15
16
17
1B
l9�
FLOW
IT = POLU T�r =1
A POLLUTANT ■ I FWD./TAW= POLLUTANT in
Cd c c 1 ;
g°
111
00
?. 40. 00
�. at00
.4_0 00
ILO, 00
L.o,O
I.01Oa
'4VC;6
o
Ot00 .4a 00
Ceim,/z-)
pownwir rouvr.247., Forma.
464,003 O, o 5 z ea_
ho,003 Ojo3 s alag
Go _ 44o S
.0O 20.00 S
Z0, 003 I-Ot00S
I.o, 023
0,0 Lam
4L ,00 3 .4 o,00$
0, 003
4o,00 S
0,00 Q, 1 .14.0.00.S
O, 00 1 .40. t7 LD,003
o, 00
0 .i 40,Qo
.40.005
-moo, 005
4 iOQ,1 O- 0
moo6.0
0,003 0, 0 3.9
4 a, 00 9, 04
.4o.003 0 riw A
4.0. a 2. 9.033
4C�.aOl (lam 0,4
VICO D.o a.
.CO, ?
LO,o 3 0.�.0. Q
TOTAL
• VALUES In
AVERAGE s
?AMMAN
MINIMUM*
LV3c)
r
•
1-443[2.titiMMU
3
N4 11iQ04_N
.4 00 .5 0. 3J 1 %� Q I4•"� •r Gay jiti
oo O,bol D•005 L0,00 L0o&3 .a 0GI.0.00 O.aai r,.o!1 L,0a5-� 1J.0
.Lo,qL Lo,005 4Q,003 4 D,00.4.o, o G 0. o 1� L. 0012- L
1
D. t 0
-01 n55
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (Le. 0.112 DETECTION LEVITY, TIM DETECTION UM).
Chapter LIMP Guidance
Fika= LIMP dal aum
Emilia'. Data Scpumbar 1.1993
(per 4
Apra: 4 3
Page 1
to

!ors Term 14 r IN Gui ana
Appoodix 4-B. Example LIMP Sammy Data Pain
tuna NAB.! C 15 ail Was A, Ar , i,trvT ,,
EPERMIT* = ,0 2'
s c LOCATION = I f
Below Detection Linri1Data (BDL) should be marked as "< and the detection limit', i.e. <0.002.
91 Q-II-9'6
10- IV -9 &
ll 11-1-.a 6.
12 1O -q6
13
14
15
1i
17
10
19
POt3ANT
RCN
4D, 00
L 00 z igo
00 0,0O
2.0 rO03 0i 0a
LO <C0 .4 00
4 0 0l0c
�.�,OO' .'0000
,4C1100 .LO, Oo
POLLUTANT
Arseivr
�o
POLL17TANT= POLLUTANT
Mer .0:144,
L0401
o.O .40a GOO .O,O0S
0,O0 0.000
.[� COO �.
.40)000.2.
•�+f}. Goa 2
.La, coo
o. 000 2.
O.Oo(.
+, 000
100. ho,O'05 AO, 000
iO 40, 00 hp moo
Critsw2.
POLuUTAN - rammer
Sae w+vw
4 0,00 i
0•005
. 0,00
a.0a
4040 5
4 0, 00S
LO, Sao
LDS 00
O.0O
49.00 S
40100
2.0.0.0
POLLUTANT
PCL UTANT=
40,10PS
.CA, 00
. 4Qr0w
20
TOTAL kQIJGC, ` .ICJ,0gd 0„001l ' 3,065
A 4 0. O D01 Q 0 2 0: 005 L.0. OD
vM 4 dkCQ LQ,Da' n. Q c71 0,005 a, c�
MINIMUM
G, Q _ 40,0 z chow 2 l LQr 0I 5 1 L0r 00 5
0 b
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.e. 0, 1flDETECIIDN LI IIT, THE DEFECTION LIM ,.
Chapter LTM1 Midaow
F L1Wdim a=
Starlike Data Sepwetober 1, 1993
Chapter
Pat 1
r
•
ra
.o
���I�?=�
ft

•
C
Smog Tenn M Gvitlam
A ppcadis 4-B. Examp k LIN P Stmuan Mu Form
POr1...C.15 1�A ailWas A, ar5/01 I %V TP f .
LSOSA I3EPERMiC•s Al G a 2. 0 rtj(4)1/Z"
SAMPLE LACATLQE1= IX f -
Below Detection Limit Data CBDL) should be marked as "< and the detection limit", i.c. <0.002.
FLOW = ANT = po1ltTrAM'lc pore vrAuT = POCIAMPc- Pou UrANr= POLLUTANT,.iga• mummy.
SAMPLE DAIS N0 COO /VO, �p Lehi A/ At 1--A/ P
3 27- f a. t; ElkillinarkiWili: "Sit
44 -- - . T'1� ao .r
.•
7 - - I ��, TAIN 0 3. ' . ..F
���
wI. . -,Qtti
ag
Iii&LIS: Jr
9
10' !0-14- q
1t j ,--i� - �?
IL I2.- r -�
13
14
15
16
17
A
1.9
.0
65,3
1--
14"-
•65
Ly, 0
31
3co
20
TOTAL
9 VALUES =
AVERAGE=
MAXIMUM
MINDIUM
101=
3 1424
1
10
0 We
3 1 %C.0
0.1
RN. aLf
q. g0 i 0,1
.91
3.LI
•1
!Zan
BDL DATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIKKIED TO BE (i.e. 0. l I2 DETECTION i.EM; THE DETECTION Y. ?•
Chapter: LIMP Ciaadin
Fi"lca�os: LTIO data ISM
'Revision Date Sgturber 1,1993
Chapter 4
Appends: 4-3
Pagel
ro
m
!=S

s
Isms Tam Ma=Celan Guidance
Appendix 4-B. Example LIMP Si iw uy Doi Faso
NPE,DARGE PERMIT • a
SAMPLE LOCATION s
AV coo l a Ati g'
Below Detection Limit Data (EDP should be mulled as "c and the detection limit", i.e. 41002.
ANT
SAMPLE DAIS
111
4
s
6
ma r
- 1 2. 40, no a.
-Q1
- 9 -�
10 10-Itw -q
111 11- 3 -9
12 is-f0 -9
13
14
1S
16
17
18
19
20
2
1
POLIflANT. PO Ltmun. POLLUTANT
Pk/
4.0.4nS nff2n .- o.n
iamt
POLLUTANT
.o3
I,I ♦r0' ♦ AO '' 001 i f
Lp. D
.40.60
,1)G
.�„a. 00.2
Go 0
n1
10Tu�
i VALUES is
MAXIMAVPl;ACISI
MINIMUM
UM
-?,3
12_
00
1� -
.�, 0, °0 n .0 ik Q.
41*),j2Q g $. 0 .OLI
1 z.o . co A 1 c 0. 005 Oa 015
0:
.00
Zo.00
40,00
t9'fCOS
rceursorr.
nor
LI. OF3 0, 955 7-
is
Mal LAI 111i21L`1;► .
trr+ r3 • j 1-0, 0
BDL DATA WED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE: (i.c. 0,112 DETECTION LIMIT, THE DETECTION Lli411).
Captor: L'FMP Woo
Filenamm L1W dda BUM
Rabic!, DM' 8q i mb& I, 1993
Curer 4
APpa a1R 4-B
Page 1 •
2MN-qqW11§GtX
-

'c
ten Tens MC. Ism Guidance
AFpr idbi 443. Fast* LIMP Summer Dale Farm
PM/ NAME 4 C i5 71 WAS A. & Wok, IlviiI TP
SAMPLEOC L *11ON =1 J iJ-
Below Detection Limit Data (BDL) should be marked as'< and the detection limit", i.e. <0.002.
5
2
3
4
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
13
14
17
18
1
?A
SAMPLEDA1
—3-q
Ceintilz)
FLOW • POLLUTANT = POILUTANT POL 1J1 ANT = POLLUTANT = POLLUTAI+LT POLLUTANT • 1FC)LLITTANT= POLL TANT=
. C1) 1viercv" hi: • SsiFiviu
°Loos 1.► . t •F it . . .�.•
�r - i Th7 - r ��
11111
.
,Lf].Ol}� tom. (?� S Q.Of�fJ_ �1 ♦ r'� f i.,
tea. ao n, ago II.. � �
.�r�. no o, a� rri.Qapg �o.ao o,do
U ao fit? SOS GCS noa9. LO.bO �•• �.�
L1Jrlli -�
.__I' t r
•
G ' +/..0, On S . r . 2. Z. r • ir,
ill
$ . . Oa• 1 OO S • • 000 . ' .1)0 4000 S
2- 0 -$e .00 . o oo,5 . , 000a• A 00
11111111
2.0. (in S
TOTAL
M VALVES
AV BRAGS
MAXIMUM
MIXONIMI
3 LC1,#r L0,0O0X hO,005 Zo.00
jBDLDATA USED FOR AVERAGES ARE ESTIMATED TO BE:(i.e. ,112 DETECTION UMLT, THE DETECTION L1Mll'j
Qom: LIMP Guidance
Elm= LINPdam SIMI
ReYaim Dow September 1,1993
Oscar 4
8
4.
Appendix Paso 1
� • i i �
n
-c
O
l-
:v

PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROUNA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMIS-
SION/NPDES UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699 -1617
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO . ISSUE A _,
NPDES WASTEWATER PERMIT
On the basis of thorough staff review and applica-
tion of NC General Statute 143.21, Publiclaw 92-
500 and other lawful standards and regulations.,
the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission proposes to issue a National Pollu-
tant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
wastewater discharge permit to the person(s) list-
ed on the attached pages effective 45 days from
the publish date of this notice.
Written comments regarding the proposed permit
will be accepted until 30 days attar the publish
date of this notice. All comments received prior to
that date are considered in the final determina-
tions regarding the proposed permit. The Director
of the NC Division of Water Quality may decide to
hold a public meeting for the proposed permit
should the Division receive a significant degree of
public interest.
Copies of the draft permit and other supporting in-
formation on file used to determine conditions
present to the draft permit are available upon re-
quest and payment of the, costs of reproduction.
Mail comments and/or requests for information to
the NC Division bf Water Quality at the above ad-
dress or call Ms. Christie Jackson at (919) 733-
5053, extension 538. Please include the NPDES
permit number (attached) in any communication.
Interested persons may also visit the Division of
Water Quality at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh,
NC 27604-1148 between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m. to review information on file.
NPDES Permit Number NC0020648, Town of
Washington WWTP, P.O. Box 1988, Washington,
NC 27889 has applied for a permit renewal for a
facility located in Beaufort County discharging
treated wastewater into Kennedy Creek in the
Tar -Pamlico River Basin. Currently BOO, ammo-
nia, dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, and total re-
sidual chlorine are water quality limited. This dis-
charge may affect future allocations in this portion
of the receiving stream.
2-4 1tc
MAR - 8 2000
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Beaufort County.___
North Carolina
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of
said county and state, duly commissioned,
qualified and authorized by law to admin-
ister oaths, personally appeared Gene Kin ,
who being first duly sworn, deposes an says:
that he is the Advertising Director of the
Washington Daily News, a newspaper published,
issued and entered as second class mail in
Washington, NC in said county and state; that
he is authorized to make this affidavit and
sworn statement; that the notice or other
legal advertisement, a true copy of which is
attached hereto, was published in the Wash-
ington Dail News on the following dates:
and that the said newspaper in which such
notice, paper, document, or legal advertise-
ment was published was, at the time of each
and every publication, a newspaper meeting
all of the requirements and qualifications of
Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of
North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper
within the"meaning of Section 1-597 of the
General Statutes of North Carolina.
ThiI2..cday of..i:.1ZZ%L
(Signature of ipi making affidavit)
Sworn to and subscribeebef ore me,
a Notary
Public, this . LO... day of %'7 0/.... . ,� ck15) .
(Notary
My commission expires..
Publication cost $ 6 / Q Paid in full