820478_Routine Inspection_20220314

6 i tch S'„. 3 1 r cv 1 02-2_ ,
•
•
omalitirin
r is a � r L� f1111,I,ILa F r �` �vsaa�� ian �"� r�i �omotr ' , o �
i.
A � � 0 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ,"'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 1 outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: "�/� 1' Arrival Time:j2 'Ofl74 � / �1 Departure Time:� County: Region:
Farm Name: , CjyA 5707A) , _,,,,y2 Owner Email:
Owner Name: �j .e.ZPhone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: }.(: $Z, ,, Title: Phone:
i9t
Onsite Representative: Sc/' / Integrator:
c
Certified Operator: 50- Certification Number: 9q Oa aL.-75
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
design• .Current si Currni£ ,• Design CurentW i agca i Ca PQ . gii : a i i k Swine Ca ac Po £ e ul .
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non Layer Dairy Calf
41
. Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean `�j,� /� - -iiiiii P I �'' V ,3£��gn Current. Dry Cow
. Farrow to Feeder _ "ll Pouf " ` [a ci '` Po#< Non-Dairy
06
Farrow to Finish •La ers -- Beef Stocker y.0
•fir,
Gilts II Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder ' £
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Ageriminkragemsogormikmp
• Other Turke Points -- ££m £'£�`k _ _ -
Other •Other -- _ , £ ,
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ,12`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: J,2.. - Date of Inspection: 3/Ai Waste Collection Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? n Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA n NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): c2:2 j
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑`No ❑ NA n NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes pl<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environme t threat,notify DWR
a�
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? , Yes '11 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No n NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA fl N• E
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN>10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): deg4-1 Zolexell ceLiKteeprtpi, z --&/ege,f
13. Soil Type(s): 06
14. Do the receivingcrops differ from those designated in the/CAWMP?CAWMP? Yes o NA NE
P 1m �62���1%�L 1�17� ❑ ❑
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 1:21iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes i d 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n Yes .-Er No ❑ NA n NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes .3'No n NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
n Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n Yes 'No n NA n N• E
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? n Yes..ErNo ❑ NA n N• E
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

IFacility Number: - Date of Inspection: 34��o*
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,I7°No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [,2°No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes i\lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes , No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes -El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 0.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? 0 Yes pt No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional reconeudations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additio al pages 40-iia
/6„e7, zo-024.eir . 7442j
&du> Zeyeeel4— e.fix7 J.+
Reviewer/Inspector Name: a to higgiefmk) _ Phone: q1)
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: P/4" Date: //L4 J
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015

i
1
3
( i
I
. Itt
1 1
f� ..::_. ' ga-4.04'`"'FACILITY#. -. �' # � FARM NAME: LAGOON LEVEL 1 i
PERMIT c#+g> � 1
I 1
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS7,1j /��j
- EXPERIATION DATE - � " NUMBER OF ANIMALS
- CURRENT BER OF ANIMAL 1l35
- OIC CARDg
OR NO
i � 3
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP)(#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO 1
WASTE REPORT(#21) s 1
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
•
DATE Z 72( NITROGEN LEVEL 6/
.
•
f.// /7 /.- • NITROGEN LEVEL ` i- F9 - o
DATE
9
DATE /L 7.Z.2. NITROGEN LEVEL -�G t F6 , L
3/i/0/, •.)- o?'9 V ///3 1
SOIL REPORT(#21)
-
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE ,36 `
- P-I(NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Note if4orless) cpyrri
- .
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000)CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
IRR2(#21)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES -
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYP S
FLOW RATES ROGEN (N)
.i
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
I
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
1 7
i 3
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) i.
it

✓ 7
z L� / ts3
CALBRIATION(#24) / J /
- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR _ w
DATE OF CALIBRATION 5'//-/ 2-/ (
FLOW RATES
RAIN FALL(#21) / �
-INITIAL AFTER 1"RAIN EVENT J
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
SLUDGE(#21&25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE � . .5�✓2 I
0: P: %RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: %RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: %RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: %RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS(#22 AND#21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM2( CROF YELDS MORTALITY ,,
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass:Opens March 1st-Ends September 30th
Small Grain Over seed:Opens October 1st-Ends March 31st
Corn:Opens February 15th-Ends June 30th
Cotton:Opens March 15th-Ends August 1st
Rye:Opens September 1st-Ends March 31st
Oats:Opens September 1st-Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1st-Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1st-Ends September 15th
Fescue:Opens August 1st-Ends July 31st
Sorghum Hay:Opens March 15th-Ends August 31st