820390_Routine Inspection_20220411

I),(a15 '//i2/—
l-Division of Water Resources
Facility Number go? - 3 90 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ,a^ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q.Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: WAWA Arrival Time: .3 p Departure Time: _ ` :4/, County: Region: �Q
Farm Name ea e TL , l 7 Owner Email:
Owner Name: /� _ (1 4? 42h1)1 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: rept")
Certified Operator: 4);eel.ce;•71i4 �r Certification Number: /
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
,J(Feeder to Finish /4"IO (QG,� Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poultr Ca s acit Po•. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish •La ers -- Beef Stocker
Gilts II Non-Layers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other II Turke Poults --
Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? IT Yes.� +'v ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes J2'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
•
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ,e'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: ,' - �` ,�=1 Date of Inspection: / -
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2`No ❑ NA 7 NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): /
Observed Freeboard(in): �.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ,„El-No n NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a n Yes�..❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA n NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes. ❑`No ❑ NA n NE
n Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload n Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
Ti PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. n Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): `— 314; s;a
13. Soil Type(s): ?)('el
CC ') te—C— 'C ; /0t,2,_ �.,.(4
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 0-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes __,❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes F No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes .r7 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP nChecklists ❑Design f Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA n NE
❑Waste Application n Weekly Freeboard n Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers n Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking n Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections n Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections n Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 4D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ..[ }No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: '-,7`_ - j ,.; Date of Inspection: I,/ -2_
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ .No n NA n NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑-No n NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey n Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No n NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes, ❑ No n NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA n NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 0-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. n Yes ❑-No n NA n NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond Ti Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? n Yes No n NA n NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
f.
a1 +�f Z_ �✓Jf`f`p
N
Mudge anaijc(5 : it. c,9•2o,9-1
ca�� rat-ror Qy o(P. 2-I
f ree b Ira rd•
wgcfie Sam e •-7. in•IB.9-1; 7* 3 al
Soil compleS: `i. ga
Reviewer/Inspector Name: / ,/j r; /,, Koit(R...,1 ONO-I-Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Simature: �' �ic.:r`r _ Optf pol- • �1
1 g � f �.1. �� Date:
Page 3 al 3 5/12/2020