820601_Routine Inspection_20220407

&/'113 Y/,, ?-�
0—Division of Water:•Resources
Facility Number `�Z - NM 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
(. Other Agency
Type of Visit: O1 bmpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 2-Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
�J�'
Date of Visit: � �'9-- Arrival Time: ,,•e9-0f Departure Time:W,�, e,f '" County: 71 _�j Region.
::::e:
Owner Email:
43, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
C/
Onsite Representative: I/ Integrator:
Certified Operator: /47...,/g ,_„eel Certification Number: /AY;
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current :. Design :Current Design Current
Swine Capacity .Pop. . Wet Poultry .•.Capacity. Pop. . . Cattle .. Capacity '.
Wean to Finish •• Layer •Dai Cow -
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer ••Dai Calf --
.,/Feeder to Finish 3 4 .1-to/ !H •Dai Heifer --
Farrow to Wean • • • Design Current. •D Cow --£
Farrow to Feeder .,D Poultr Ca I aci • Po..• Non-Dai
Farrow to Finish . •La ers --• •Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- •Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets -- •Beef Brood Cow -
F j � € i o � i , Minan
- S i N z € ii 1. € �' i a € i
i
� 1Y S fd € o a sh"5 � ;: z,, s s : :� w ;i3 .
:x „ . s . 1 . F ,: r ..M Turke Poults - a ,
Other •Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes InNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ` - ./ 3 Date of Inspection: ` _
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes r:E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): /17
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes .PJ Nb ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes. -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes.4F9 i o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 7' , )6.362 1 ,m
r
s
13. Soil Type(s):
1
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes „ -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA 0 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes L.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �.❑�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes .❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. 0-Yes ❑ No ❑ NA IT NE
n Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis [1 Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
n Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield F1120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? n Yes :-r No ❑ NA n NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: -(0016 Date of Inspection: V 1)/
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,121No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 410 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes OiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes .?No 0 NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ."No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 'To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes jWo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 1No 0 NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
ege,a'n 001— .at- e/66-)-0)Z.,Ik del)? 47a-e--e
e7"cZ‘te.092
d3-1
(20 /-0 ,e.e9;7-1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 6/cm ,e 492e2ts-dA_D Phone: 97O 97
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 4-//7 -9i
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020

I
!
,
a
it i
I i
(
FACILITY# -:640 FARM NAME: idd 4,4 LAGOON LEVEL #
)
{
PERMI (#19)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL i
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP)(#20)
- 1 i
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES I '
j I
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
! i
7 74
)i 7
WASTE REPORT(#21)
' 1 �
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
yr-d,?... _
i
DATE )- NITROGEN LEVEL < 3 i
_ DATE ! 1 f6 �"`/ NITROGEN LEVEL /.-3c/ ..• — —
DATE 7/ i I a-- NITROGEN LEVEL /- %
j 3
SOIL REPORT(#21)
- EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE
li/ 5l
•
- P-I(NO MORE THEN 400)
q i
i !
- PH (Note if 4 or less) ZN
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000)CU /6- °
OF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
IRR2(#21) .j
Not over PAN CROP TYPES .
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) •
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITRO N (N) arid i
?t()
•
S
t
Not over PAN CROP TYP '•.
i
i
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) i
i 3
I
}
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
, ,
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) a

i
.
CALBRIATION(#24) i
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
- DATE OF CALIBR-ITION '7"/-36)/ : /
- FLOW RATES �-S C.
RAIN FALL(#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1"RAIN EVENT / r.
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
S UDGE(#21&25)
-DU EVERY YEAR: DATE J,' r. 2l
0: (/ P: rY ( %RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: %RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: %RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: %RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS(#22 AND#21)
RAIN`DREA ER FORM i CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PUNDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass:Opens March 1st-Ends September 30th
Small Grain Over seed:Opens October 1st-Ends March 31 st
Corn:Opens February 15th-Ends June 30th
Cotton:Opens March 15th-Ends August 1st
Rye:Opens September 1st-Ends March 31 st
Oats:Opens September 1st-Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1st-Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1st-Ends September 15th
Fescue:Opens August 1st-Ends July 31st
Sorghum Hay:Opens March 15th-Ends August 31 st