820395_Routine Inspection_20220419

9D Division of Water Resources LF./2I N S V
Facility Number 9 . - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ZIO Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: or; Cj 0 Departure Time: ( ;a) County:Si j coN Region: PO
Farm Name:Ch ce Co'e I (V e ctD Owner Email:
Owner Name: cCDtt N(J t±h i c Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: c CO It ill(rfh �� Title: Phone:
ctitt m iti-+- hi Pr74i7ç1Onsite Representative: Integrator: t,
Certified Operator: c,1UDt\ 1111t11")I( Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
ccoti_
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
' Feeder to Finish �„Q Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poultr Ca i acit Po I. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MI Layers -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-Layers -- Beef Feeder
Boars M Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
•Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ YesI o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes 13„N0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes \ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 62 - 1jCfCj Date of Inspection: L • �
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): ziv
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ` `'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes \ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes \❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes "❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ (1 Evidencee of Wind Driftcgo
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C/ V v f 633 W f ftA l l u a)1 ;
13. Soil Type(s) �11 �''`U� I� micilam. Bodin
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E-, No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ESR
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA El NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes tp No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: Kt - Date of Inspection: H.
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes b No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes. ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑,,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes N\Co ❑ NA El NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
fUuhl r€ tnOve4 ci4g€ ci c/uqe
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Ka tie €D1iI1D I Phone: (I V I. Nt q 1
iK,Va.,Q :W I(1 22_
Rev ewer/Inspector Signature: Date.
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020