820602_Routine Inspection_20220419

gb Division of Water Resources 9°
Facility NumberE . - (pc);. 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 9- 1 q. 1<-F.0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 50 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 9-I'+,`c Arrival Time: '1 C c Departure Time: ," C) County:3 a m D N v Region: Fj'O
Farm Name: rufl I-, m►eci r RJ e c Hpq ElI 1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: 10h\J III A iti i Cj Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 1-b� rn 6 fij-r, I Title: OW r Phone:
Onsite Representative: I ON I'n(1 fit 1 c Integrator: Fre C5 -e _
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
.Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
/ Feeder to Finish Si 11 E5 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poultr Ca I acit Po•. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish II Layers -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-Layers -_ Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turkey Poults -- `
U Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No 0 NA 0 NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Dll No ❑ NA ❑ NE -
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: PO - COD 0- Date of Inspection: 1 • 9,of
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes '`hl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 40 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? \.
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofedpits,drystacks,and/or wet stacks)
pp
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 1\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C, V� ; iC)3 COQcff1! 6€I 6e1IMPICti oufffN e
13. Soil Type(s): (1 f , C h 1 11(1 1R1 a utrJ vii e/ wwad Ka Tri
.
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 't1\ 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall 0 Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes Ntl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facily Number: 4i5eg - (p Off, Date of Inspection: L i fj 2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? n Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check n Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey n Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facilityfail toprovide documentation of an activelycertified operator in charge? Yes . No NA NE
P g n ❑ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes a``No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes tkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? n Yes \No n NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA n NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? n Yes 'No n NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
(c4 e't (*A 0-1 (-4 1 bi ID"i j
if--)
CaIbtai-io
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Ka ti e Fo n 0 1-- Phone: 9 iq q' r:2
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: KU1Q Date: ( Z2_
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020