HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0025836_NOV2022PC0137 & CEI Report_20220321
SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ONLY: NO HARD COPY WILL BE MAILED.
March 21, 2022
Abigail Norton, Mayor
Town of Hot Springs
Email: mayor@townofhotsprings.org
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Tracking Number: NOV-2022-PC-0137
Permit No. NC0025836
Hot Springs WWTP
Madison County
Dear Permittee:
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted an inspection of the Hot Springs WWTP on March 1,
2022. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with the conditions and
limitations specified in NPDES WW Permit No. NC0025836. A summary of the findings and comments noted
during the inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the inspection report.
The Compliance Evaluation inspection was conducted by Division of Water Resources staff from the Asheville
Regional Office. The following violation(s) were noted during the inspection:
Inspection Area Description of Violation _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Disinfection and de-chlorination Chemicals are stored outside with no secondary containment. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Effluent Sampling Effluent sampling is not flow proportional. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Remedial actions should have already been taken to correct this problem and prevent further occurrences in the
future. The Division of Water Resources may pursue enforcement action for this and any additional violations of
State law.
To prevent further action, please respond in writing to this office within 30 days upon your receipt of this Notice
of Violation regarding your plans or measures to be taken to address the indicated violations and other identified
issues, if applicable.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 585F0123-F68F-4203-A5CF-46F9060812DD
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Stephanie Williams with the Water Quality
Regional Operations Section in the Asheville Regional Office at 828-296-4500.
Sincerely,
Daniel Boss, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
ATTACHMENTS: Inspection Report
Ec: Laserfiche
Juanita James (ORC)
DocuSign Envelope ID: 585F0123-F68F-4203-A5CF-46F9060812DD
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 N 52 NC0025836 22/03/01 C S31112171819 20
21 66
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ----------------------Reserved-------------------
N67707172 73 74 75 80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Hot Springs WWTP
Bridge St
Hot Springs NC 28743
Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
09:30AM 22/03/01 21/06/01
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Other Facility Data
12:00PM 22/03/01 25/09/30
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Randy A Joseph,PO Box 218 Hot Springs NC 287430218//828-622-7591/Contacted
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self-Monitoring Program Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s)Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Lauren E Armeni DWR/ARO WQ/828-296-4500/
Stephanie A Williams DWR/ARO WQ/828-296-4500/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 585F0123-F68F-4203-A5CF-46F9060812DD
3/21/2022
3/21/2022
3/21/2022
NPDES yr/mo/day
22/03/01
Inspection Type
C3111218
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Stephanie Williams and Lauren Armeni, with the Asheville Regional Office, conducted a Compliance
Evaluation Inspection of the Hot Springs WWTP on March 1, 2022. This inspection was conducted to
determine if the system is being operated and maintained in compliance with NPDES permit no.
NC0025836. Juanita James (ORC), Jeremy Trantham (maintenance/BORC), and Cody Fisher
(maintenance) were present during the inspection.
The WWTP is permitted for a flow of 80,000 GPD and consists of a manual influent bar screen, a
large aeration basin, a secondary clarifier, and liquid chlorination and dechlorination. The town
recently contracted James and James Environmental to take over operations following the retirement
of the previous ORC. James and James took over operations of both the WWTP and the Collection
System on January 14th and have since made several operational changes.
Operations & maintenance: James and James serviced the motors and blowers in the plant.
Aeration Basin: The 30-minute settleability was 49% on the right side of the aeration basin and 39%
on the left side. Historically, this WWTP has had problems with the return lines splashing sludge into
the air and onto the carwalk. Since take over operations, James and James has weighted the valves
on the return line, which prevents sludge from splashing into the air. The air header on the left side of
the aeration basin has been changed and new valves were added on the right side.
Secondary Clarifier: In an 11-foot clarifier there was a 2.5-foot blanket and 7.5 feet of clear
supernatant. Two loads of sludge have been pumped from the clarifier since the middle of January.
Chlorination and Dechlorination: The existing chemical storage building needs repair and is not
suitable for storing chemicals. Ms. James is planning on repairing the chemical storage building.
Chemicals are stored outside in the meantime. No secondary containment was noted. Additionally,
since taking over operations, Ms. James has significantly increased the dechlorination dosage to
match the chlorine dose.
Flow Meter: The flow meter was out of calibration when James and James took over operations of the
plant, and the meter has since been changed and calibrated.
Effluent sampling: James and James repaired the composite sampler after taking over operations.
The sampler was previously not in use, and it is unclear how long the sampler had not been in use.
Effluent sampling is currently time-based. According to Ms. James, the sampler is wired for flow
proportional sampling, but the sampler seems to not be pulling the aliquot correctly. She stated that
they would change to flow proportional sampling when they connect the sampler to the flow meter.
The following violations were noted during the inspection:
1. Chlorination and Dechlorination: Chemical storage is inadequate.
2. Effluent sampling: Effluent sampling is not flow proportional.
NC0025836 17 (Cont.)
Page#2
DocuSign Envelope ID: 585F0123-F68F-4203-A5CF-46F9060812DD
Permit:NC0025836
Inspection Date:03/01/2022
Owner - Facility:
Inspection Type:
Hot Springs WWTP
Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
The current permit became effective on 6/1/2021 and expires on 9/30/2025.Comment:
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Process controls analyzed include pH and DO.Comment:
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
Is the unit in good condition?
The bar screen is cleaned daily.Comment:
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext. Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin’s surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Page#3
DocuSign Envelope ID: 585F0123-F68F-4203-A5CF-46F9060812DD
Permit:NC0025836
Inspection Date:03/01/2022
Owner - Facility:
Inspection Type:
Hot Springs WWTP
Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/l)
Ms. James stated that on average the DO is kept at 2.8 mg/L on average. The
30-minute settleability was 49% on the right side of the aeration basin and 39% on the
left side. An air header and some valving has been changed in the aeration basin, and
the return valves have been weighted shut. See summary for details.
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately ¼ of the sidewall depth)
The sludge blanked was 2.5 feet with 7.5 feet of clear supernatant in an 11 foot
clarifier. See summary for details.
Comment:
Disinfection-Liquid Yes No NA NE
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
Is there chlorine residual prior to de-chlorination?
Chemicals are stored outside with no secondary containment. See summary for details.Comment:
De-chlorination Yes No NA NE
Type of system ?Liquid
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de-chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Page#4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 585F0123-F68F-4203-A5CF-46F9060812DD
Permit:NC0025836
Inspection Date:03/01/2022
Owner - Facility:
Inspection Type:
Hot Springs WWTP
Compliance Evaluation
De-chlorination Yes No NA NE
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Are tablet de-chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Chemicals are temporarily being stored outside with no secondary containment. The
ORC anticipates rebuilding the chemical storage area in order to store the chemicals
indoors. Since James and James took over operations, staff has significantly increased
dechlorination feed to match the chlorine feed. See summary for details.
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
The flow meter was out of calibration when James and James took over operations. A
new flow meter has been installed and calibrated.
Comment:
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0
degrees Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
representative)?
Effluent sampling is not flow proportional. See summary for details.Comment:
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment:
Page#5
DocuSign Envelope ID: 585F0123-F68F-4203-A5CF-46F9060812DD