HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0000892_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220419DocuSign Envelope ID: 8653D432-3A24-422D-93E3-A423391FFD6B
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Mr. Jame Gard
Plant Manager
Arclin USA, Inc.
790 Corinth Road
Moncure, NC 27559
Subject:
Dear Mr. Gard:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 19, 2022
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Arclin USA, Inc. — Moncure Plant
Permit No. NC0000892
Chatham County
On March 11, 2022, Cheng Zhang of the Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) conducted a compliance
evaluation inspection of the subject facility. The assistance provided by Mr. Chris Lamm, the Operator
in Responsible Charge (ORC), and Mr. Bowman Harvey, the HSE Coordinator, was appreciated as it
facilitated the inspection process. The inspection report is attached. The following observations were
made:
Arclin USA, Inc. — Moncure Plant is permitted to discharge at a rate of 0.1 MGD and consists of:
aerated equalization (EQ) basin with surface aerators, active sludge aeration basin with surface aerators,
secondary clarifier, sludge drying beds, effluent flow meter and composite sampler. The plant discharges
into the Haw River, a WS-IV waters in the Cape Fear River basin.
1. Current permit expires on July 31, 2016. The facility submitted permit renewal application On
March 28, 2016, which is in review by the Division of Water Resources.
2. The facility has seven sludge drying beds (four 20 ft x 50ft ones and three 25 ft x 50 ft ones). The
facility does not have tertiary sand filters. At the time of inspection, all beds were in use. Wasted
sludge is injected and mixed with polymer before being placed on the beds. Dried sludge was
placed in a storage area (about half full) adjacent to the beds and ready to be hauled away for
composting by McGill Composting. Drying beds and sludge storage area are covered by roof
3. Domestic sewage is pumped to the EQ basin from the domestic pump station. Process water is
also pumped to the EQ basin. EQ basin has three surface aerators. Aeration basin also have three
surface aerators. These aerators are turned on or off based on the DO levels at the basins. At the
time of inspection, DO at aeration basin was between 6 to 7 mg/L, which was higher than
needed.
NORTH CAROLINA
oay,rorem or Environmental ou.i�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office I 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8653D432-3A24-422D-93E3-A423391FFD6B
4. Mixed liquor from aeration basin is pumped to the secondary clarifier, polymers is fed to
facilitate settling of solids. At the time of inspection, sludge blanket was normal (1 foot in the 12
feet deep clarifier).
5. The ORC maintains a daily logbook. Lab results, chain -of -custody forms, and Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were complete and current, kept in good order and ready for
review. July 2021 and January 2022 DMR data were compared to lab bench sheets; no data
transcription errors were noted during the inspection.
6. The right of way to the Outfall 001 was well maintained. The effluent was observed to be clear
and free of solids. No visible impacts were noted immediately downstream the effluent pipe.
Outfalls 002, 003, and 004 (stormwater discharge outfalls) was also maintained and accessible.
7. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan was reviewed and found compliant with permit
requirements. Qualitative and analytical monitoring results were also reviewed. The facility had
multiple benchmark exceedances (TSS) and took appropriate tier actions with these exceedances.
8. Field lab parameter (Certificate No. 5285) calibration and analysis records were reviewed during
the inspection.
If you have any questions regarding the attached reports or any of the findings, please contact Cheng
Zhang at: (919) 791-4200 (or email: cheng.zhang@ncdenr.gov).
Attachments: Compliance Inspection Report
Cc: Central Files w/attachment (Laserfiche)
Raleigh Regional Office w/attachment
Chris Lamm, ORC (electronic copy only)
D_E
NORTH CARCLINA
gaparhnanl of Environmental quality
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
/6LIA ,SSa f, lUl avuxti.
B2916E6AB32144F...
Vanessa E. Manuel, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
919.707.9000
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8653D432-3A24-422D-93E3-A423391 FFD6B
United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction
1
21IIIIII
671
Code
IN I 2 IL
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection
I 3 I NC0000892 111 121 22/03/11 117
Type
18110
IIIIIIIIIII
Inspector Fac Type
19I S I 201
IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII I IIIIII
P6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved
I 70I3 I 711 1 72 I N I 731 I 74 71
I I
I I I I I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES Dermit Number)
Arclin USA, Inc
790 Corinth Rd
Moncure NC 27559
Entry Time/Date
09:30AM 22/03/11
Permit Effective Date
13/07/01
Exit Time/Date
11:OOAM 22/03/11
Permit Expiration Date
16/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Bowman Harvey/Coordinator HSE/919-545-5753 /
Christopher G. Lamm/ORC/919-542-2526/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Bowman Harvey,790 Corinth Rd Moncure NC 27559/HSE Manager/919-545-5753/
Yes
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenar Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Progran Sludge Handling DispoFacility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Wate
Laboratory Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s)
Cheng Zhang
of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
�Docusignedby: DWR/RRO WQ/919-791-4200/
4/19/2022
"- D6171508E1 EC41 F...
Signature
of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
r:iDocuSigned by:
VA.�I.t,ssa f. / 4/24/2022
B2916E6A 3 1 4F.
EPA Form 3560 i (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8653D432-3A24-422D-93E3-A423391 FFD6B
3I
NPDES yr/mo/day
N C 0000892 111 121 22/03/11
I17
Inspection Type
18LI
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Stormwater Discharge Outfalls (SDO) 002, 003, and 004 were observed during the inspection and
found maintained and accessible.
Stormwater pollution prevention plan was reviewed and found compliant with permit requirements.
Qualitavie and analytical monitoring data were reviewed. The facility had multiple benchmark
exceedances (TSS) in December 2021 and took appropriate tier actions with these exceedances.
Page# 2
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8653D432-3A24-422D-93E3-A423391 FFD6B
Permit: NC0000892
Inspection Date: 03/11/2022
Owner - Facility: Arclin USA, Inc
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The facility analyzes mixed liquor suspended solids (occasionally), temperature, pH,
DO, and sludge blanket for process control
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ El ■ ❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? ❑ • ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Current permit expired on July 31, 2016. Renewal application was received by the
Division
on March 28, 2016.
The facility has seven sludge drying beds; "the four sand filter beds" listed in treatment
units
is misleading and may cause confusion. The facility does not have tertiary filters.
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Dates, times and location of sampling •
Name of individual performing the sampling •
Results of analysis and calibration •
Dates of analysis ■
Name of person performing analyses •
Transported COCs •
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ❑ ❑ • ❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified ❑ ❑ • ❑
operator on each shift?
Page# 3
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8653D432-3A24-422D-93E3-A423391 FFD6B
Permit: NC0000892
Inspection Date: 03/11/2022
Owner - Facility: Arclin USA, Inc
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility
classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment: Monthly ORC visitation logs are filed with DMR files
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment: Flow meter was last calibrated on December 21, 2021.
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
El El El El
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? ❑ • ❑ ❑
Is the wet well free of excessive grease? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable? • El El El
Are float controls operable? • El El El
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? El El • El
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? • El El El
Comment: Process influent pump station has one main pump and one backup pump. A simplex
pump station pumps domestic sewage into EQ basin. Process wastewater is pumped to
EQ basin. There's an process water overflow line to EQ basin in case of pump failure.
Equalization Basins
Is the basin aerated?
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment?
Is the basin free of excessive grease?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are float controls operable?
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
▪ El El El
❑ ❑ • ❑
Page# 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8653D432-3A24-422D-93E3-A423391 FFD6B
Permit: NC0000892
Inspection Date: 03/11/2022
Owner - Facility: Arclin USA, Inc
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Equalization Basins
Are audible and visual alarms operable?
# Is basin size/volume adequate?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Three surface aerators/mixers. Water is usually pumped into aeratio basin. There is an
overflow line connecting EQ basin and aeration basin.
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext. Air
Type of aeration system Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the diffusers operational? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • LI LI LI
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? • LI LI ❑
Is the DO level acceptable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: One surface aerator was turned off, DO in the basin was between 6 to 7 mg/L.
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are weirs level? • El El El
Is the site free of weir blockage? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is scum removal adequate? • El ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? • El El El
Is the drive unit operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? • El ❑ ❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth) • El El El
Comment: Sludge blanket was about one foot.
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are pumps in place?
Are pumps operational?
Yes No NA NE
Page# 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8653D432-3A24-422D-93E3-A423391 FFD6B
Permit: NC0000892
Inspection Date: 03/11/2022
Owner - Facility: Arclin USA, Inc
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site? • ❑ El El
Comment: Two pumps are used to return or waste sludge. Sludge can be retured to EQ basin or
aeration basin.
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? • El El El
Is sample collected below all treatment units? • ❑ El El
Is proper volume collected? • El El El
Is the tubing clean? • El ❑ ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 ■ El El El
degrees Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type • El El El
representative)?
Comment:
Laboratory
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0
degrees Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
Comment:
Drying Beds
Is there adequate drying bed space?
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
# Is the sludge land applied?
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: 8653D432-3A24-422D-93E3-A423391 FFD6B
Permit: NC0000892
Inspection Date: 03/11/2022
Owner - Facility: Arclin USA, Inc
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Drying Beds Yes No NA NE
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Comment: The facility has seven drying beds (three larger ones and four smaller ones, all under
roof). Dried sludge was place at the storage area adjacent to the beds (also under
roof). All seven beds were in use. Sludge storage area was about 1/2 full. Dried sludge
is hauled away by McGill for composting.
Chemical Feed Yes No NA NE
Is containment adequate? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is storage adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ El
Are backup pumps available? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive leaking? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Polymer is fed to mixed liquor before entering clarifier. Polymer is injected into wasted
sludge before being placed on drying beds.
Page# 7