20140380 Ver 1_Application_20140415

�•��• a oeiu .162014
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PATRICK L. MCCRORY
GOVERNOR
April 11, 2014
N.C. Division of Water Resources
Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 MSC - Archdale Building
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Attention: I Mr. Rob Riding, NCDOT Project Coordinator
ANTHONY J. TATA
SECRETARY
2-0 1 4 0 3 8 0
Subject: Proposed widening of SR 1211 (West River Road) in Franklin County;
W -5509. WBS No. 49011
The North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) proposes construction of
2ft wide paved shoulders on SR 1211 (West River Road) in Franklin County 8.29 miles from
Franklinton to Louisburg. It will also be necessary to widen the earth shoulder to install
guardrail in select locations as an additional safety improvement. Only one crossing requires in-
water activity which is at a small box culvert conveying a tributary to the Tar River; Permit Site
1. In order to accommodate the guardrail installation and associated earth shoulder widening at
this culvert crossing, the fill slopes will have to be pushed out by rock plating. This will require
that the concrete headwalls be raised in height, along with the four concrete wing walls of the
culvert to be raised in height and extended in length. Some rip rap bank stabilization up to loft
at each end may be necessary at the tie in points just beyond wing extensions for stability.
During the culvert modifications and associated slope work, the stream will be temporarily
dewatered to maintain a dry work area.
Application is hereby made for NCDENR -DWR Section 401 Water Quality
Certification (WQC) for Road Improvements. A pre- construction notification, construction plan
permit drawing, project mapping, and photographs are attached with this request. By copy of
this letter we are notifying the USACE of the intent to work under a non - reporting NWP 14.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mrs. Heather
Montague at (252)492 -0111 or hwmontague a,ncodot.gov.
Sincerely,
/V'/Q-�- zv
fo, J.W. Bowman, P.E.
Division Engineer
cc: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, NCDOT Coordinator, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mr. Ben Upshaw, P.E., NCDOT Division Design Engineer
Mr. Donald Pearson, EI, CPESC; NCDOT REU Field Operations Engineer
Division Five — 2612 North Duke Street, Durham, North Carolina 27704
Telephone [phone] Fax. [phone]

O�OF W ATF9OG
y r
O
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 8
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN
Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: non - reporting
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: non - reporting NWP 14
or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes- ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
® Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
W -5509; widening SR 1211 (West River Road)
2b.
County:
Franklin
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
between Franklinton and Louisburg
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
WBS 49011
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
NCDOT Division 5
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
2612 N. Duke'Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Durham, NC 27704
3f.
Telephone no.:
(919)220 -4600
3g.
Fax no.:
(919)560 -3371
3h. Email address:
wbowmanancdot.00v
4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner) N/A
5.
AgenVConsultant Information (if applicable) N/A
Page 1 of 8
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
N/A
1b. Coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Site 1:
Latitude: 36.1043 N Longitude: - 78.3263 W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
Project is 8.29 miles (permit site 0.45ac)
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT to Tar River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: Existing conditions consists of paved 2 lane highway, grass shoulders, and existing box culvert. Surrounding
area includes woods including some adjacent cutover areas and residential land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: NONE
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 140ft
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: W -5509 involves construction of 2 ft wide paved shoulders on SR 1211
(West River Road) in Franklin County from Franklinton to Louisburg. It will also be necessary to widen the earth shoulder to
install guardrail in select locations as an additional safety improvement. There are many stream crossings along this project
length and modifications to pipes at dry line crossings. Only one crossing requires in -water activity which is at a small box
culvert conveying a tributary to the Tar River; Permit Site 1. In order to accommodate the guardrail installation and associated
earth shoulder widening at this culvert crossing, the fill slopes will have to be pushed out by rock plating. This will require that
the, concrete headwalls be raised in height, along with the four concrete wing walls of the culvert to be raised in height and
exended in length. Some rip rap bank stabilization may be necessary at the tie in points just beyond wing extensions for
stability. During the culvert modifications and associated slope work, the stream will be temporarily dewatered to maintain a
dry work area.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Grading, drainage, pavement widening, and guardrail. At Permit 1 the stream will be temporarily dewatered to isolate
wing walls and culvert ends for forming and pouring concrete for the extensions, after which rip rap bank stabilization will
be installed. Then rock plating will be added to the slopes so that shoulder improvements can be made and the pavement
widening and guardrail work can be completed. Work will be completed by excavator, backhoe, grader, dump trucks,
guardrail and paving equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ED No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: N/A
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: N/A
Name (if known): N/A
Other: N/A
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
N/A
Page 2 of 8
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes
® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes
® No
6b. If yes, explain.
I N/A
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question
for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
N /A'
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
NONE
2h. Comments: N/A
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Site 1 ® P ❑ T
rip rap
UT to Tar River
® PER
® Corps
10
20
Stream 1
bank stabilization
El INT
® DWQ
concurrent
Site .1 ❑ P ®T
dewatering
UT to Tar River
® PER
® Corps
10
140
Stream 1
❑ INT
® DWQ
Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
® Corps
Stream 1
❑ INT
® DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
140
3i. Comments: No fill in surface waters is proposed. The only stream impact is
for rip rap bank stabilization along the banks
only to stabilize the tie in points disturbed from the wing wall extensions. Temporary dewatering is necessary to maintain a dry
work area. Dewatering was calculated out to easement lines, but probably can be minimized during construction.
Page 3 of 8
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of
impact number -
waterbody
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
(if applicable)
Temporary T
01 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4f. Total open water
NONE
impacts .
4g. Comments: N/A
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
P2
5f. Total
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no: N/A
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
N/A
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
N/A
5k. Method of construction:
N/A
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ®Tar- Pamlico ❑Other: Jordan Lake
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
T
required?
-Temporary
Site ❑ P ® T
access during
UT to Tar River
❑ Yes
4,200
1,040
Buffer Impact 1
construction
® No
6h. Total buffer impacts
4,200
1,040
6i. Comments: Besides rip rap bank stabilization, proposed buffer impacts are for access and EC measures only. Where ever
possible disturbance through the buffers will be minimized during construction.
Page 4 of 8
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The surface water and buffer impacts are only those necessary in order to complete the roadway improvements and BMPs
will be followed.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices for protection of surface waters and riparian buffers will be
enforced during project construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type N/A
Quantity N/A
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
N/A linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
N/A square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4h. Comments: N/A
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 5 of 8
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
N/A
N/A
3 (2 for Catawba)
N/A
Zone 2
N/A
N/A
1.5
N/A
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
NONE
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). N/A
6h. Comments: N/A
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
® Yes ❑ No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: these guardrail work will not alter storm water runoff at this site
❑ Yes No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
20%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: N/A
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: N/A
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 6 of 8
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply): N/A
❑ Session
Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes
❑ No
attached? N/A
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? N/A
❑ Yes
❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? N/A
❑ Yes
❑ No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental.document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
N/A
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed'project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 7of8
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F, l,

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat? The NES Biological Surveys Group surveyed the site in July 2013
and determined non - suitable habitat although historic records of TSM and
❑ Yes ® No
DWM exists, 3 miles and 4.2 miles downstream respectively. Additionally
no known occurrences of Michaux's sumac exist along this roadway nor
was any observed during multiple onsite visits in 2013 by DIV 5 staff.
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? Gary Jordan replied to a Jared Gray email stating that a
® Yes ❑ No
biological conclusion of No Effect was appropriate for listed mussels (see
attached information).
® Raleigh e
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
http:// www .fws.aov /nc- es /es /countyfr.html and NC Natural Heritage Program Database, Element Occurrences
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http:Hocean.floridamarine.org /efh coral /ims /viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
HPO's historic layer using GIS ArcView database, http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /, and PDEA HEU review (see attached)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http: /twww.ncfloodmal)s.com/
for W. Bowman, P.E.
zv /y 01A..
04/11/14
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
ApplicanVAgent's Signatu rx
(Agents signature is valid only If an authorization Is r from the applicant
Date
Is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Montague, Heather W
From: Gray, Jared S
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:09 PM
To: Montague, Heather W
Subject: FW: W -5509
From: Jordan, Gary rmailto :garyJordan0)fws_gov1
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 2:32 PM
To: Gray, Jared S
Subject: Re: W -5509
Jared,
From Google Earth 2012 photography it looks like the stream turns into a
swamp just downstream. Sounds like you don't really have suitable
habitat at the sight and non - habitat separates the site from the Tar
River. Therefore, I think a "No Effect" would be appropriate.
Gary Jordan
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
US Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636 -3726
Phone: [phone]x.32
Email: gary iordan@f\vs.gov
fivs.gyv
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 -at 2:08 PM, Gray, Jared S <[e-mail]> wrote:
Gary,
This project is approximately 1.2 miles away from the confluence with the Tar River. The Project is 3 miles away
from historic record for TSM in the Tar River and 4.2 from DWM in Fox Creek. Stream is 1 -2 meters wide and we found
35 Elliptio sp.. The stream was also 100% less than 2 ft. deep. The stream also had signs of beaver activity. The stream
had some erosion up and downstream and even had areas that were unstable. The stream upstream had 50 ft. buffer the
rest has been clear cut and downstream had a wide buffer. T just wanted to give you a little more information regarding
the stream.
1

From: Montague, Heather W
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 3:52 PM
To: Medlin, Kenneth N
Cc: Gray, Jared S
Subject: RE: SR 1211 West River Road in Franklin County
Neil-
It turns out that in -water work will be necessary at site 18 (now referred to as Permit Site 1). Based on your
03/20/13 visit and the project description provided below, can you please render a biological conclusion for
DWM and TSM? I suspect some type of informal concurrence with the USFWS will be required. Therefore I
am prepared to submit a concurrence request sent by DIV 5 to the USFWS, but would first need a brief
summary of your survey /report, biological conclusion, and BC rationale as requested by Gary in his email from
April 2012 about informal section 7 consultations. Thank you for your help. Again you could use WBS Number
49011. 1.1 to log your time.
Project Description: W -5509 involves construction of 2 ft. wide paved shoulders on SR 121"1 (West River
Road) in Franklin County from Franklinton to Louisburg. It will also be necessary to widen the earth shoulder
to install guardrail in select locations as an additional safety improvement. There are many stream crossings
along this project length but only one crossing requires in -water activity which is at a small box culvert
conveying a tributary to the Tar River; 36.1043 N & - 78.3263 W. This location will require permits from the
USACE and NCDWQ and will be called Permit Site 1. In order to accommodate the guardrail installation and
associated earth shoulder widening at this culvert crossing,,the fill slopes will have to be pushed out. This will
require that the concrete headwalls be raised in height, along with the four concrete wing walls of the culvert to
be raised in height and extended in length. Some rip rap bank stabilization may be necessary at the tie in points
just beyond wing extensions for stability. During the culvert modifications and associated slope work, the
stream will be temporarily dewatered to maintain a dry work area'
Heather W. Montague
XCDOT DIV .i Environmental Specialist
hwmontaaue(a nedot.gov
(252)492 -0111 office
(919)691 -1596 cell

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
12 -11 -0004
i411111 * HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
W -5509
County:
Franklin
WBS No.:
49011.1
Document
PCE
Type:
Fed Aid No:
HRRR- 0211(31)
Funding:
State Federal
Federal
® Yes No
Permit
Permit(s):
Type(s):
Proiect Description:
Addition of 2 ft. paved shoulders on both sides of SR 1211. Franklinton city Limits to Louisburg
City Limits.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
❑ There are no National Register - listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of
potential effects.
® There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties within the project's area of potential effects.
• There are properties over fifty years old within the area of potential effects, but they do not
meet the criteria for listing on the National Register.
• There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or
documents as needed.)
Date of field visit: December 2012
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on
November 20th, 2012. The Area of Potential Effects is 50' from the centerline each way, from the Franklinton City
Limits to the Louisburg City Limits. There is a survey site, a Study. Listed property, and several properties over fifty
years of age within the APE based on a review of GIS mapping and Google Maps Street view. A survey was
required to assess eligibility and effects for properties along the road.
The project area was surveyed in December 2012. The structures along the road consist of mostly early to mid -
twentieth century one -story brick and frame houses. The houses are common and unremarkable; they are not
National Register eligible.
A survey site, FK328, Cotton Gin, is located at the intersection of W. River Road and Perry's Chapel Rd. The one-
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 4

and -a -half story frame cotton gin with corrugated metal siding is in a severe state of deterioration; the building has
lost an overhang on the west fagade and portions of the roof and siding. The cotton gin has lost integrity of design,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and is not National Register eligible.
The Study Listed Property, Willie Perry House (FK434) is located on May Road south of the intersection with W.
River Rd. The house sits approximately 1200' from the intersection, and a large field stretches from the house
parcel to the road. There will be 2' pavement widening and minor impact to the right of way due to a pipe extension
at this location. The Willie Perry House will not be affected by this project.
A two -story frame house with a pyramidal roof and two -story front porch, built c. 1914, is located on the south side
of the road at 571 West River Rd (PIN 1895 -85- 7388). There are several frame outbuildings located behind the
house as well as what appears to be another two -story frame dwelling. The proposed work will not affect this
property, as the work will not exceed the DOT Right of Way as the proposed work is to widen the pavement 2' and
minor shoulder work at this location. There will be possible slope impacts across W. River Road, however the
house across the street is a one -story mobile home built c. 1986 that is not National Register eligible.
There are no National Register listed or eligible properties affected by this project. If design plans change,
additional review will be required.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
"Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ®Photos ❑Correspondence ®Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes — NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED fain for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 4

YI t)Y�
■
'461
Pa
aJ 2v
..r Rn w O'myQF ■
rl
4
w
Q
■s Jdt ■a" N/0 c 1�
�hMcMe�ih�MM J`i� r
MIS• OMO�i MNM �
■ 3
NC 3g
56
W.
1KDOte
o a�
■ Cnve Croru c
M /YA
es Gu
Lavowrt■
Pa Sv NN
R. UIQ
W1bwcn
uF""4 Pt"In CV.*, WO Nh■mow. Rhvn W Unbn /d■ol2g
ifmied PaYlda 199D e ' rr
4n
d°
■ gickell g��'�"�'
NC-s8
jaui; i1m0Qr ■re�nNll Nooe�1D76
•
1��N1(TInOKYc�Nal■�)»
HPO GIS Website.
FK328 Cotton Gin, Perry's Chapel Rd. south of W. River Rd.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFh''CThD form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qua /ijed in the 2007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 3 of 4
o
N
z
s
i
4m
W.
1KDOte
o a�
■ Cnve Croru c
M /YA
es Gu
Lavowrt■
Pa Sv NN
R. UIQ
W1bwcn
uF""4 Pt"In CV.*, WO Nh■mow. Rhvn W Unbn /d■ol2g
ifmied PaYlda 199D e ' rr
4n
d°
■ gickell g��'�"�'
NC-s8
jaui; i1m0Qr ■re�nNll Nooe�1D76
•
1��N1(TInOKYc�Nal■�)»
HPO GIS Website.
FK328 Cotton Gin, Perry's Chapel Rd. south of W. River Rd.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFh''CThD form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qua /ijed in the 2007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 3 of 4

571 West River Road, looking southwest from W. River Road.
This property will not be affected by this project.
Study Listed Property, 434 Willie Perry House, from W. River Road. This property will not be affected by the
proposed work as the ROW impact will be minor.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED john for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 1007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 4 of 4

c.
F406
• _

i
Y
Y
,I
��✓ � I _tea_ l- � ,. � '� \ \\
_ ' Y
£ 7
I
r
_
w
1
IN
LL
w. i

78" 20'00" 41 J 1 78"1 7'30"
wnn

■
■
■
1
,-o ti
0
ti0
tD
mi
rn
� II
Pao-
m 000
I
' I
1 �
� I
� 1
�I
--,1 1-11 m
r
^z
v l
rn
)1
ICI
)�I
I
I
I
"I
IT
I
I
I
�T
IT!
�I
� � m
I
J�
r T
r
I
-,
m
'b/
8
/ C+ tl
z �
c�
m
IT!
T T
�T
I�
I
I
m LAI
I�
I 3
I
I�
I
i
F
I
I m�
IT �
I
I � ~
I ^�
V J
I '
I
I
I
I
IT
1/
0�-
405
N
0
�z
N �
rn
z
L
-,o
s
z
to �
3
NM
m�
0
b �
m
�
z
Xv
C)
�
Or-
oSy
D
mi
�o
N
O
0
Z mo
v, rn
ti
N
'0
O
4i
ca
<�ZD
Z D�
Z b
z
rrl
�o 2
a
ZY :EW
a
g
Z�2Z
m
my
m N
i
i
o
v
o
D Y
Z
0
m
o ?'+
?
0
a
;ao
D m
; Z
in
GN�r�ox • + +�,•a��
w
Pao-
m 000
I
' I
1 �
� I
� 1
�I
--,1 1-11 m
r
^z
v l
rn
)1
ICI
)�I
I
I
I
"I
IT
I
I
I
�T
IT!
�I
� � m
I
J�
r T
r
I
-,
m
'b/
8
/ C+ tl
z �
c�
m
IT!
T T
�T
I�
I
I
m LAI
I�
I 3
I
I�
I
i
F
I
I m�
IT �
I
I � ~
I ^�
V J
I '
I
I
I
I
IT
1/
0�-
405
N
N
M
�z
N �
rn
��
-,o
:E
to �
3
NM
m�
�z
m
m
m
z
Xv
C)
�
Or-
O
D
�rnr
v
N
iA
c
O
vm�0
m
T
m
TOW+
m
O
�rnr
N
O
W
y
r
M5
i
Z
m
Z
ca
<�ZD
m
o
z
mZ -0
ZY :EW
Z�2Z
m
my
m N
i
i
X
Z
0