HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0021709_Report_19870331NPDES DOCW'IENT !;CANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0021709
Jefferson WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Report
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
March 31, 1987
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the resrerse side
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 31, 1987
MEMORANDUM
TO: Larry Coble
Dennis Ramsey
FROM: St W. Tedder
Steve
e erf
/
4
SUBJECT: Toxicological Evaluation - Jefferson WWTP
Attached is the final report concerning an intensive toxicological
evaluation of the Jefferson WWTP in Ashe County.
If there are any questions, please contact myself or Ken Eagleson
at (919)733-5083.
SWT:ps
cc:
Ken Eagleson
Larry Ausley
Bob DeWeese
Trevor Clements
Jay Sauber
Jim Overton
Jefferson WWTP
Toxicity Examination
NPDES#NC0021709
111111111111
li1111hILllL
111111111111
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources & Community Development
MOB/LE id &
Bioassay and Biomonitoring
LABORATORY
0
oia
0
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
March, 1987
TOXICITY EXAMINATION OF
JEFFERSON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
NC0021709
ASHE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER OUALITY SECTION
TECHNICAL SERVICES BRANCH
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
List of Figures and Tables
Introduction 1
Toxicity Examination 3
Chemical Sampling 9
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Analysis 17
Conclusions 26
Recommendations 27
Footnotes 28
Appendix 29
Daphnia pulex Test Procedure 30
96 Hour Flow -Through Test Procedure 31
Ceriodaphnia Reproduction Test Procedure 34
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Procedure 35
List of Definitions 36
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1. Schematic of Jefferson WWTP 4
Figure 2. Seven Day Ceriodaahnia Mortality 6
Figure 3. Jefferson WWTP Study Area 11
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1. Jefferson WWTP Self -Monitoring Bioassay Results 2
Table 2. Industrial Contributors to Jefferson WWTP 2
Table 3. 96 Hour Fathead Minnow Mortality 5
Table 4. Industrial Contributor Bioassay Results 8
Table 5. Sampling Site Descriptions 9
Table 6. Results of Inorganic Chemical Analyses 12
Table 7. Results of Industrial Contributor Metals Analyses 14
Table 8. Results of Organic Chemical Analyses 15
Table 9. Taxa richness by Group, Naked Creek, Ashe Co., July 1986 19
Table 10. Species List, Naked Creek, Ashe Co., July 1986 20
INTRODUCTION
An on -site toxicity examination was conducted at the Jefferson Wastewater
Treatment Plant (NC0021709) from July 21 through July 26, 1986. The Jefferson
WWTP, located in central Ashe County, serves the Town of Jefferson and three
major industries.
This document details findings of chemical, biological and toxicological
evaluations, including the following:
1.) 48 hour static bioassays employing Daphnia pulex in effluent and
influent samples from the WWTP, as well as discharges from several
industrial contributors, to determine acute toxicity.
2.) 96 hour flow -through bioassay using Pimephales promelas (fathead
minnows) performed on effluent collected prior to chlorination.
3.) Seven day Ceriodaphnia reproduction bioassay to assess chronic toxic-
ity.
4.) Chemical analyses of samples collected from the plant influent, efflu-
ent, receiving stream and industrial contributors.
5.) Collection and analysis of benthic macroinvertebrates to determine the
impact of the effluent on receiving stream populations.
The Jefferson WWTP discharges into Naked Creek (Class C-trout) in the New
Lao
River basin. The 7010 (7 day, 10 year low flow) for Naked Creek is /4 cubic
feet per second (cfs). At maximum permitted flow (0.15 MGD) and 7010 stream flow
46
conditions, the WWTP produces an instream waste concentration (IWC) of 8 3%.
In August of 1986 the Division of Environmental Management required the
Jefferson WWTP to begin 48 hour Daphnia pulex`static self -monitoring bioassays on
a monthly basis. Table 1 shows available results for these bioassays. The tar-
get acute toxicity value (LC60) for these tests is -90%. The LC60 value is the
concentration of effluent lethal to fifty percent of the test organisms.
Table 1. Jefferson WWTP Self —Monitoring Bioassay Results
Month �.CB,Q
August 86 13.6
September 86 None
October 86 7.1
November 86 None
December 86 None
January 87 None
The waste treatment processes at the Jefferson WWTP include a bar screen,
aeration basin, clarifier, chlorine contact chamber, aerated digester and sand
sludge drying. A schematic of the WWTP appears in Figure 1.
The major industrial contributors to the Jefferson WWTP and their flows are
presented in Table 2. During the period surveyed, Gates Rubber Co. was the
dominant contributor, making up 20% of the WWTP's flow.
Table 2. Industrial Contributors to Jefferson WWTP
% of Total
Industry Flow(MGD)* Influent to WWTP
Ashe County Memorial Hospital .008 7.3
Hanes Knitting .004 3.7
Gates Rubber Co. .022 20.2
* Flows are averages from August 1985 to July 1986.
Average flow from WWTP during this period was .109 MGD
TOXICITY EXAMINATION
An on -site toxicity examination was conducted at the Jefferson WWTP as a
result of a 48 hour Daphnia pulex static bioassay conducted on a composite
effluent sample collected February 5, 1986 with a resulting LC60 of 8.2%. Previ-
ous metals analysis of effluent samples had also revealed elevated levels of zinc
and copper.
On -site bioassays were performed from July 16-21, 1986 and included a 96
hour flow -through bioassay using fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) as the
test species, Daphnia pulex 48 hour static bioassays, and a seven-day Ceriodaph-
nia test determining chronic lethality. Dilution water for these on -site tests
was obtained from Naked Creek approximately 15 meters upstream of the Jefferson
WWTP discharge. This water was tested prior to use at the Aquatic Toxicology
Laboratory using the Ceriodaphnia reproduction test. Reproduction in this dilu-
tion water was similar to that of laboratory culture water.
The 96 hour flow -through bioassay was performed on effluent collected from a
drop -box prior to chlorination. The test organisms (fathead minnows) were 45
days old at the beginning of the test. They were obtained from cultures at the
Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory. These minnows were acclimated to the dilution
water approximately 48 hours prior to test initiation. At approximately 19 hours
prior to test initiation, the minnows were randomly transferred to each of 14
test chambers. The percentages of effluent to which the minnows were exposed
were 0 (dilution water), 5, 10, 25, 50, 75 and 100%. These dilutions of effluent
were tested in replicate. Each test chamber contained 10 minnows. The bioassay
was initiated at 9:15 AM on July 22 and terminated at 9:30 AM on July 26, 1986.
The toxicant delivery system cycled 372 times over the 96 hour test period,
yielding a 90% replacement volume of test solutions every 5 hours. Mortality in
4-
Figure 1. Schematic of Jefferson WWTP
Laboratory
Building
Chlorination
Aeration
Basi n
Clarifier
Aerobic
Sludge
Digester
Sludge
Drying
Beds
Bar Screen
Grit Chamber
To Heatherly Creek
Bioassay Sampling Point
-4-
Influent Sampling Point
this bioassay is summarized in Table 3. Probit analysis of this data results in
an LCso of 6.76%.
Table 3. 96 Hour Fathead Minnow Mortality
Effluent
Concentration t%) Mortality (%)
0 0
5 60
10 40
25 90
50 100
75 100
100 100
Daphnia pulex 48 hour static bioassays were conducted while on -site using a
24 hour composite sample of the effluent and an instantaneous grab sample of the
influent The resulting LCso's were 55% and 6.6% respectively. Mortality was
also recorded at the 24 hour mark in the effluent bioassay, resulting in a 24
hour LCso of 74%.
A seven-day Ceriodaphnia static replacement bioassay was performed on dilu-
tions of effluent to assess lethal chronic toxicity. This test was initiated
on -site on July 21, 1986 and terminated at the Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory on
July 28, 1986. A 168 hour chronic LCso value of 3.6% was calculated based on
mortality results. The log-probit graph used to calculate this value is depicted
in Figure 2.
Before proceeding with a discussion of the 7-day Ceriodaphnia test results,
it must be noted that the neonates produced on Day 5 were inadvertently destroyed
in all test rows. This loss of data in no way affected determination of the 168
hour LCso. At the conclusion of the seven-day test period a significant decrease
—5—
Figure 2. Seven Day Ceriodaphnia Mortality
100
T
0
X
C
A
N
T 10
V
0
L
u
M
E
LOG -CONCENTRATION VS R MORTALITY
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
R MORTALITY
LC 50 =3.6%
Jefferson WWTP
-6-
in reproductive success was observed in the 10% test concentration. Reproduction
similar to that of the controls was recorded in the 1%, 0.1%, and 0.01% effluent
concentrations. In this test, 10% effluent represents the Lowest Observed Effect
Concentration (LOEC), while 1% effluent represents the No Observed Effect Concen-
tration (NOEC). There was no mortality noted in any effluent concentrations less
than 10% nor in the controls. Ninety percent mortality was recorded in the 10%
concentration, while complete organism mortality was observed in effluent concen-
trations of 25, 50, 75, and 100% after 168 hours. The calculated Chronic Value
(ChV) for the test, which is the geometric mean of the LOEC and NOEC, is 3.16%.
All of these observations are based only on the available reproduction data which
does not include data destroyed on the fifth day of the bioassay. Therefore the
NOEC, LOEC and chronic value are being presented only as observations and not
reportable results. It should be noted that in this situation the level of sen-
sitivity is essentially the same for chronic mortality and what appears to be the
level of reproduction suppression.
Additionally, two series of 48 hour Daphnia pulex static bioassays were
conducted on grab samples from industrial contributors and area wells. The first
series of samples was collected July 10, prior to the on -site investigation. The
second series was collected on July 24 during the on -site investigation. The
results of these bioassays are summarized in Table 4. All three industrial con-
tributors displayed acute toxicity. Gates Rubber Co. showed the highest levels
with two 48 hour LCso's of <5%. Two of the three wells tested displayed no
toxicity. LCso's in one of Gates Rubber Co.'s wells ranged from 80 to 84%.
Copper, zinc and aluminum were found in concentrations which may have contributed
in part of the observed toxicity, although at the measured concentrations only
chronic effects would be expected. These constitutents are quite variable in
effect based on chemical form. Variations in chemical form significantly
influences bioavailability.
—7—
Table 4. Industrial Contributor Bioassay Results
Source
Sample Date* _CBQ+
Ashe Memorial Hospital 860709 34
Ashe Memorial Hospital 860724 None
Hanes Knitting 860724 28
Gates Rubber Co. 860709 (5
Gates Rubber Co. 860724 (5
Gates Rubber Co. Well *3 860709 None
Gates Rubber Co. Well *3 860724 None
Gates Rubber Co. Well *4 860709 80
Gates Rubber Co. Well *4 860724 84
Jefferson City Well 860724 None
* All samples are instantaneous grabs.
+ All bioassays are 48 hour Daphnia pulex statics
CHEMICAL SAMPLING
Two series of chemical samples collected during the evaluation were analyzed
at the Division of Environmental Management Chemistry Laboratory. Table 5 lists
descriptions of the sampling stations. All samples were collected as instanta-
neous grabs, with the exception of Station 02 (effluent bioassay sampling point),
which were taken as 24 hour composites. Figure 3, a map of the study area,
illustrates sampling site locations. Results and summary of chemical analyses
are documented in Tables 6-8.
Table 5. Sampling Site Descriptions
Station 01 - Naked Creek at NC 88/16 approximately 15 meters upstream of the
Jefferson WWTP discharge. At this point the creek is about 3
meters wide with a mean depth of 0.1 meter. The substrate was
evenly distributed between boulder, rubble, gravel and sand. This
was the dilution water source for all on -site bioassays.
Station 02 - Jefferson WWTP effluent at the drop box just prior to chlorination.
This is the bioassay sampling point.
Station 02A - Jefferson influent from influent trough to aeration chamber.
Station 02B - Chlorinated Jefferson effluent from basin just prior to effluent
discharge pipe.
Station 03 - Naked Creek at SR-1585 approximately 2000 meters below the Jeffer-
son WWTP discharge. At this point the creek is about 3 meters wide
with a mean depth of 0.1 meter. The substrate type is again evenly
divided between boulder, rubble, gravel and sand, although there
was an excessive amount of sediment.
Station 05 - Jefferson City well.
Station 06 - Gates Rubber Co. effluent at manhole just outside main building.
Station 07 - Ashe County Memorial Hospital effluent at lower manhole by drive-
wa
Y•
Station 08 - Hanes Knitting effluent at manhole just outside parking lot.
Station 09 - Gates well water from well *3.
Station 10 - Gates well water from well *4.
Metals analyses revealed copper concentrations of 36 ppb and 62 ppb in the
effluent (02) samples of July 24 and 26 respectively. At these concentrations
and 7010 conditions, the concentration in the receiving stream would average 4.3
ppb, assuming receiving stream concentration of zero. This level is well below
the N.C. Water Duality Action Level of 15 ppb for copper. Copper was not
detected (lower detection limit (10 ppb), in the upstream, downstream or dilution
water (same as the upstream site). Zinc was detected at elevated concentrations
in the effluent on both sampling dates, with 440 ppb on July 24 and 890 ppb on
July 26 (average value = 665 ppb). At these concentrations and 7010 conditions,
the concentration in the receiving stream would average 58.7 ppb, a value that
represents an exceedence of the North Carolina Water Quality Action Level of 50
ppb. Zinc was detected in the influent (02A) at levels of 1700 ppb and 730 ppb
on July 24 and 26, respectively. Small amounts of zinc were detected at down-
stream sites with values of 19 ppb on July 24 and 28 ppb on July 26 being
recorded. Upstream zinc levels on these same dates measured 22 and (10 ug/liter.
Copper LC60's have been reported as low as 9.8 ppb for 48 hour Daphnia manna
bioassays' in water of 45 ppm hardness and 17 ppb in 48 hour Ceriodaphnia
reticulate bioassays2. Zinc LC60's have been reported as low as 107 ppb in D.
pulex bioassays and 762 ppb in Ceriodaphnia reticulate 48 hour bioassays.
Fathead minnows are less sensitive to these metals than cladoceran species, with
96 hour LC6o's of 490 ppba and 600 ppb' for copper and zinc, respectively.
Mercury was detected in the effluent at 0.4 ug/I on both sampling dates.
Available data indicate this level of mercury will not cause acute toxicity. A
Daphnia manna LC60 of 5 ug/I' and a fathead minnow seven day flow -through LC60 of
74 ug/I6 have been reported for mercury. However, fathead minnow juveniles have
shown significant growth retardation when exposed to levels of mercury as low as
0.58 ug/I6. Also of concern is mercury's tendency to bioaccumulate. 8ioaccumu-
Figure 3. Jefferson WWTP Study Area
NC 88/16
N
ew River
.=:1 Mile
-11-
Table 6. Results of Inorganic Chemical Analyses
Permitted Flow (MOD)
0.15
7Q10 (CFS)
2.4
Chemical/Physical
Units
Water Quality
Sta 01
Sta 02
Sta 02A
Sta 02B
Sta 03
Analyses
Standards
860724
860724
860724
660724
660724
BOD
PPM
0.6
51
78
3.6
COD
PPM
<5
600
770
20
Coliform: MF Fecal
0/ 100m1
moo8000
10~
Residue TOTAL
, PPM
83
720
1100
88
volatile
PPM
32
320
420
22
fixed
PPM
51
390
670
66
Residue SUSPENDED
PPM
,
1
110
140
1
volatile
PPM
1
96
130
1
fixed
PPM
<1
18
14
<1
pH (standard units)
_
6.0-9.0
7.1,
7
7.1
7.1
Acidity
PPM _
2
38
35
5
Alkalinity
PPM
33
140
160
32
Arsenic
PPB
<10
<10
Chromium Hex.
, PPB
__
<50
Cyanide
PPM
<.01
<.01
Fluoride
PPM
0.1
Formaldehyde
PPM
<0.1
<0.1
Grease and 011s
PPM _
24
66
Hardness
PPM
34
110
110_
36
MBAS
PPM
0.5
6.2
Phenols
PPB
50
19
<2
Specific Conductance
uMhos/cm _
86
770
1200
110
NH3
PPM
0.04
15
16
0.46
TKN
PPM
0.2
22
42
0.7
NO2.NO3
PPM
0.47
0.03
0.31
0.51
P • total
PPM
0.03
0.05
0.04,
0.03
Silver
PPB
<25
<25
<25
<25
Aluminum
PPB
100
250
400
50
Cadmium
PPB
0.4
<10
<10
<10
<10
Chromium (Total)
PPB
50
<25
<25
<25
<25
Copper
PPB
15(AL )'
<10
36
110
<10
Iron
PPB
1000
170
1400
1200
440
Mercury
PPB
0.2
<0.2
0.4
<0.2
<0.2
Manganese
PPB
30
95
75
120
Nickel
PPB
50
<50
<50
<50
<50
Lead
PPB 25
<50
<50
<50
<50
Zinc
_
PPB 50(AL)
22
440
1700
19
' Values represent action levels,as specified in .0211(bX4) Fresh Water Classifications
Standards
Table 6. fewlts of Inorganic Chemical Analyses -continued
Permitted Flow (MGD)
0.15
7Q10 (CFS)
2.4
Chemical/Physical
Units
Sta 01
Ste 02
Sta 02A
Sta 03
Predicted stream**
Analyses
860726
660726
860726
860726
conc. at 7Q10
B0D
PPM
COD
PPM
9
660
490
21
Coliform: MF Fecal
+/ 100m1
Residue TOTAL
PPM
64
680
670
84
volatile
PPM
7
360
370
25
fixed
PPM
57
320
4 300
59
Residue SUSPENDED
PPM
, 13
170
170
8
volatile
PPM
5
140
150
3
fixed
pH (standard units)
r
PPM
8
7
_27
7.1
_ 20
7.1
5
6.7
Acidity �
PPM
4
39
32
10
Alkalinity
PPM
_
29
160
170
28
Arsenic
PPB
< 10
<10
Chromium Hex.
PPB
Cyanide
PPM
<.01
<.01
Fluoride
PPM
<0.1
Formaldehyde
PPM
<0.1
<0.1
Grease and Oils
PPM
37
Hardness
. PPM
34
87
77
34
MBAS
PPM
4.1
0.455
Phenols
PPB
170
21
2
9.713
Specific Conductance
uMhos/cm
88
660
540
110
NH3
PPM
0.04
19
8.7
0.57
1.501
TKN
PPM
0.3
30
20
0.9
2.296
NO2.NO3
PPM
0.51
0.02
0.22
0.62
0.002
P. total
_
PPM
0.23
1.9
6.2
0.05
0.086
Silver
PPB
<25
<25
<25
<25
<2.207
Aluminum
PPB
400
350
200
150
26.490
Cadmium
PPB
c10
<10
<10
<10
<0.883
Chromium (Total)
PPB
<25
<25
<25
<25
<2.207
Copper
PPB
<10
62
61
<10
4.327
Iron
PPB
800
1700
1200
600
136.865
Mercury
PPB
<0.2
0.4
<0.2
_ •
<0.2
0.035
Manganese
PPB
50
70
70
140
7.285
Nickel
PPB
<50
<50
<50'
<50
<4.415
Lead
PPB
<50
<50
<50
<50
<4.415
Zinc
PPB
<10
890
730
28
58.720
* 41 Values represent predicted Instream concentrations
using average effluent
concentrations of 0.
concentrations.
maximum permitted flow and_assuming_upstream
Table 7. Results of Industrial Contributor Metals Analyses
Chemical/Physical
Units
Water Quality
Sta 05
Sta 06
Ste 07
Sta 08
Ste 09
Sta 10
Analyses
Standards
860724
860724
860724
860724
860724
860724
Silver
PPB
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
Aluminum
PPB
<50
100
100
750
100
50
Cadmium
PPB
2
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
Chromium
PPB
50
<25
<25
(25
(25
(25
<25
Copper
PPB
15(AL)'
41
120
140
120
14
24
Iron
PPB
1000
<50
430
470
1600
<50
<50
.Mercury
PPB
0.2
<0.2
2.9
18
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
Manganese
PPB
_
<25
1300
55
90
250
30
Nickel
_
PPB
50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
Lead
PPB
25
50
75
<50
<50
<50
<50
Zinc
PPB
50(AL)
52
6700
140
3300
75
170
' Values represent action levels _as specified
in .O211(bX4)
fresh Water Classifications Standards 1
Table 8. Results of Organic Chemical Analyses
Permitted Flow (MGD)
0.15
7Q10 (CFS)
2.4
Organic Analyses
Units
Sta 02
Sta 02A
Sta 02
Sta 02A
Toxicity Value
Test Type
860724
860724
860726
860726
(PPB)
Methyl propyl benzene
PPB
3
NO DATA AVAILABLE
Phenol
PPB
16
1050=28.800
96 hr Fathead Minnow
6
Trimethyl bicycloheptanone
PPB
7
LC50=110.000
96 hr Fathead Minnow
6
Biphenyl-o1
PPB
14_
LC50=4700
48 hr Daphnia magna
7
Methyl phenol
PPB
45
26
35
LC50=9600
48 hr Daphnia pulex
8
Tetramethyl thiourea
PPB
73
LC50=770,000
48 hr Daphnia magna
9
Benzene acetic acid
PPB
7
NO DATA AVAILABLE
,Propenyi methoxy phenol
PPB
7
LC50=24000
96 hr Fathead Minnow
10
Nonyl phenol
PPB
12
10
LC50=140
96 hr Fathead Minnow
6
Pyrene'
PPB
9
NO DATA AVAILABLE
Phenothiazine
PPB
18
NO DATA AVAILABLE
Aldrin'
PPB 1
_
1.1
_
LC50=5.6
96 hr Fathead Minnow
11
LC50=8.2
96 hr Bluegill
12
Pentanoic acid
PPB
32
LC50-77,000
96 hr Fathead Minnow
10
Tetraethyl butyl phenol
PPB
10
NO DATA AVAILABLE
Unidentified peaks
*
28
23
7
2
* Footnote I
' Included in N.C. Water Quality Standards list of 'Chemicals Requiring Special Attention.'
' N.C. Water Quality Standard for Aldrin is 0.002 pg/I 1
]
lation factors from 4,380 to 5,680 have been determined for mercury in fathead
minnow juveniles'. The Ashe County Memorial Hospital appears to be the largest
contributor of mercury according to available data with lesser amounts contrib-
uted by Gates Rubber (Table 7).
The BOD level in the July 24 effluent was 51 ppm. This value would indicate
a possible exceedence of the permitted effluent limitation (45 ppm weekly aver-
age). If concentrations of TSS residue remain at encountered levels (110 ppm on
July 24 and 170 ppm on July 26) then it is predicted the effluent will exceed the
permitted effluent limitation of 45 ppm (weekly average).
Also of note is the level of MBAS found in the effluent. On July 24 and 26,
6.2 and 4.1 ppm MBAS, respectively were detected in 24 hour composite samples of
the effluent. The average of these data would produce 0.455 ppm MBAS instream
during low stream flows, only .045 ppm below the N.C. Water Ouality Standard of
0.5 ppm.
It appears that the high level of zinc detected on July 26 (890 ppb), at
least in part, contributed to the acute toxicity exhibited by the fathead minnows
in the flow -through test, although it is likely that other constituents contrib-
uted to the observed 96 hour LC60. Both copper and zinc were present in the
effluent in sufficient quantities to account for portions of the toxicity
observed in the seven day Ceriodaphnia life cycle bioassay and the 48 hour
Daphnia pulex static bioassay.
Metals analyses performed on grab samples collected from the three indus-
trial contributors and several associated water wells (see Table 7.), indicate
that the effluent from Gates Rubber and Hanes Hosiery Mill contain elevated lev-
els of zinc. These zinc levels could contribute significantly to the observed
toxicity of aliquots of the same samples. The Gates Rubber Co. effluent, was the
most toxic with a 48 hour Daphnia ➢ulex LC60 of <5%, followed by Hanes Knitting
(LCao = 28%). Ashe County Hospital's effluent did not display any appreciable
acute toxicity.
Results of analyses for organic chemicals in the Jefferson WWTP influent and
effluent are shown in Table 8 with available toxicity data. Although there are a
number of toxic organic chemicals present, none appear to be in amounts which
would cause acute toxicity. However, the organic component of the Jefferson WWTP
effluent should not be ruled out as a contributing source of either acute or
chronic toxicity due to the numbers of different chemicals present, the unidenti-
fied compounds present, and the fact that toxicity data is not available for all
chemicals detected.
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE ANALYSIS
Benthic macroinvertebrates were collected at 2 sites on Naked Creek on July
21, 1986. These sites are:
Station 01, Naked Creek at US 88/16 bridge, Ashe County, 15 meters above the
Jefferson WWTP discharge point. The creek at this site was
about 3.0 meters wide with a mean depth of 0.1 meters. The
substrate was a mixture of boulder, rubble, gravel and sand,
although there was an excessive amount of sediment. A layer of
Aufwuchs covered the substrate. This site was adjacent to a cow
pasture.
Station 03, Naked Creek at SR-1585, Ashe County, 2000 meters below the Jef-
ferson WWTP discharge. The creek at this site was about 5
meters wide with a mean depth of 0.3 meters. The substrate was
similar to Station 01 except there was an abundance of filamen-
tous algae. This site was also adjacent to the cow pasture.
The water was dark in color and had a sewage odor.
These stations correspond to chemical sampling sites. Station 01 was also used
as the dilution water site for all bioassays.
-17-
Benthic macroinvertebrates were collected using a standardized qualitative
collection technique (DEM 1983). The primary output from this collection tech-
nique is a tabulation of taxa richness, i.e., the number of different kinds of
animals present. Unstressed streams and rivers always have high taxa richness.
Various types of pollution will reduce or eliminate the more pollution intolerant
species, producing lower taxa richness values. In-house criteria have been
developed to relate taxa richness to five water quality ratings or bioclassifi-
cations: Excellent, Good, Good -Fair, Fair, and Poor. Taxa richness values are
calculated both for all species (ST) and for the more intolerant groups (Ephem-
eroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera - SEpT). The distribution can be utilized
to deduce changes in water quality. Taxa richness by group for this survey are
given in Table 9, while a list of all taxa collected is presented in Table 10.
Station 01 received a bioclassification of Good -Fair, with total taxa
richness of 76 and an EPT (pollution intolerant) taxa richness of 31.
Station 03 received a bioclassification of Poor, with total and EPT taxa
richness values of 38 and 6, respectively, indicating a severe decline in water
quality below the Jefferson WWTP discharge. Particularly significant was the
complete absence of Plecoptera at Station 03. Station 01 had 3 Plecopteran
species, 2 of which were abundant. Ephemeroptera declined from 17 taxa at Sta-
tion 01 to 3 at Station 03, while Trichoptera declined from 11 to 3. Declines in
taxa richness among the more pollution tolerant groups such as Coleoptera and
Diptera were also noted.
Additionally, species dominance within groups shifted to more pollution
tolerant taxa. Within the diptera, the dominant taxa at Stations 03, were Cri-
cotopus bicinctus (c/0 sp. 1), C. infuscatus gr. (C/O sp 5), and Polydedilum
illinoense. These organisms are often found together as the dominant taxa in
areas of toxic stresses such as zinc and copper (Simpson and Bode, 1980).
TABLE 9. TAXA RICHNESS♦ BY GROUP, NAKED CR., ASHE C0.,-1986.
TABLE OF ORDER BY STATION
ORDER STATION
101 1 03 1
+ + +
EPHEMEROPTERA 1 17 1 3 1
+ + +
PLECOPTERA 1 3 1 0 1
--M-_-N_-+ + +
TRICHOPTERA 1 11 1 3 1
+ + +
C OL EOPT ER A 1 10 1 4 1
--- + + +
OnONATA 1 4 1 5 1
MEGALOPTERA 1 0 1 1 1
+ + +
DIPTERA-CHIRON 1 14 1 9 1
+ + +
MISC. DIPTERA 1 5 1 5 1
+ + +
OLIGOCHAETA 1 5 1 3 1
+ + +
C RUSTAC EA 1 2 1 1 i
+ + +
MOLLUSCA 1 3 1 3 1
+ + +
OTHER 1 2 1 1 1
+ + +
TOTAL TAXA RICHNESS 76 38
EPT TAXA RICHNESS 31 6
PIOCLASSIFICATION G000/FAIR POOR
TABLE 10. SPECIES LIST NAKED CR., ASHE CO., JULY, 1986.
R=RARE, C=COMMON, A=ABUNDANT
STATION
ORDER
EPHEMEROPTERA
!SPECIES
+
5AETIS
FLAVISTRIGA
+---+
BAFTIS 1 1
INTERCALARIS 1 A 1
+---♦
BAETIS 1 1
PROPINRUUS 1 C 1
+---+--
f3AETISCA 1 1
BERNERI 1 R 1
CAENIS SPP 1 C 1 C
+---+
CENTROPTILUM 1 1
SPP 1 R 1
♦---+
EURYLOPHELLA 1 1
BICOLOR 1 R 1
+---+
HEPTAGENIA SPP 1 C 1
+---+
ISONYCHIA SPP 1 A 1
+---+
PARALEPTOPHLEB-1 1
IA SPP I A 1
+---♦
PSEUDOCLOEON 1 1
SPP I A 1
STENACRON 1 1
INTERPUNCTATUM 1 C 1
+---+
STENACRON 1
PALLIDUM 1 C 1
+ -- -+
STENONEMA 1 1
ITHACA 1 A 1
(CONTINUED)
TABLE 10. SPECIES LIST NAKED CR., ASHE CO., JULY, 1986.
R=RARE, C=COMMON, A=ABUNDANT
ORDER
EPHEMEROPTERA
PLECOPTERA
TRICHOPTFRA
'SPECIES
+
STATION
01 103
1
1
1 1
1 1
STENONEMA 1 1
MODESTUM 1 AIC
STENONEMA 1 1
PUOICUM 1 C 1
ACRONEURIA 1 1
ABNORMIS 1 C 1
ALLOCAPNIA SPP 1 C 1
PELTOPERLA SPP 1 R 1
CHEUMATO°SYCHE 1 1
SPP 1 A 1
+---+--
CHIMARRA SPP 1 R 1
+---+--
GLOSSOSOMA SPP 1 R 1
HYDROPSYCHE 1 1
BRONTA 1 AIC
+-_-+--
HYOROPSYCHE 1 i
MOROSA 1 C I C
HYOROPSYCHE 1 1
SPARNA 1 A 1 A
LEUCOTRICHIA 1 1
PICTIPES 1 R 1
+ ---+ --
LYPE DIVERSA 1 C 1
NEOPHYLAX 1 1
OLIGIUS 1 A 1
+---+--
POLYCENTROPUS 1 1
SPP 1 R 1
(CONTINUED)
TABLE 10. SPECIES LIST NAKED CR.♦ ASHE CO., JULY, 1986.
R=RARE • C=COMMON, A=ABUNDANT
ORDER
1SPECIES
TRICHOPTERA 1PYCNOPSYCHE
1 GENTILIS
+
COLEOPTERA
OD ON AT A
STATION
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 R I
+ ---+
9EQ0SUS SPP 1 R 1
+---+
DINEUTES SPP 1 C 1
DUBIRAPHIA 1 1
VITTATA 1 C 1
+---+--
ECTOPRIA 1 1
NERVOSA 1 1 R.
+---+--
ENCCHRUS S PP I R 1
+---+--
GYRIMUS SPP 1 R 1
HELICHUS SPP 1 C 1
LACCOPHILUS SPP) 1 A
MACRONYCHUS 1 1
GLABRATUS 1 R 1
PSEPHENUS 1 1
HERRICKI 1 A 1 R
+---+
STENELMIS SPP 1 C 1
+__r+_--
TRC?ISTERNUS 1 1
SPP 1 R 1 R
+ +---}-_-
IAESCHNA UMBROSAI R 1 C
1 +---+---
IBOYERIA VINOSA 1 R 1 A
1 +---+---
1CALOPTERYX SPP 1 A 1
I ENALLAGMA SPP 1 1 R
(CONTINUED)
TABLE 10. SPECIES LIST NAKED CR.• ASHE CO., JULY• 1986.
R=RARE, C=COMMON, A=ABUNDANT
ORDER
ODONATA
STATION
01 103
1
1 SPECIES 1 1
+ 1 1
IGOMPHUS SPP
IISCHNURA SPP
+
I R I R
1 I A
MEGALOPTERA 1CORYJALUS 1 1
1CORNUTUS
+
DI PTFRA:CHIR0N
1 1 R
+---+--
ARILLIA SPP 1 A 1
CARO!OCLADIUS 1 1
SPP 1 C 1 R
CHIRINOMUS SPP 1 1 A
CONCHAPELOPIA 1 1
GROUP IAIA
CRICOTOPUS/ORT-1 1
HOCLAD1US SP1 1 1 A
+---+--
CRIC9TPPUS/ORT-1 I
HOCLADIUS SP5 1 C 1 A
CRYPTOCHIRONOM-1 1
US FULVUS 1 C 1
°AGASTIA SPP 1 R 1
PARAPHAENOCLAO-1 1
IUS SPECIES 1 1 C 1
PHAENOPSECTRA 1 1
SP? 1 R 1
POLYPEDILUM 1 1
EALLAX 1 R 1
POLYPEDILUM 1 1
ILLINOENSE 1 C 1 A
(CONTINUED)
TABLE 10. SPECIES LIST NAKED CR., ASHE CO.,•JULY, 1986.
R=RARE, C=COMMON, A=ABUNDANT
ORDER
OIPTERA:CHIRON
DI PTERA: MI SC
!SPECIES
+
!STATION
101 103
1---+---
1 1
1 1
+
1 1
1 1
POLYPEDILUM 1 1
SCALAE ! A 1 R
PS=CTROTAVYPUS 1 1
DYARI 1 1 A
SYNORTHOCLADIUS1 1
SPP 1 1 A
+---+--
TANYTARSUS S°2 1 R 1
TANYTARSUS S°6 1 R 1
+---+--
THIENEMANIELLA 1 1
SPP
ANTOCHA SPP
DIXA SPP
HEXATOMA SPP
PALP1MYIA 1 1
(COMPLEX) 1 1 A.
SEPEDON 1 R 1
4.
SIMULIUM SPP 1 1 C
SIMULIUM 1 1
VITTATUM 1 C 1 A
TIPULA SPP 1 R 1
+ +---+--
!'LIGOCHAETA 1 BRANCHIURA 1 1
ISOWERBYI 1 C 1
lILYODRILUS 1 1
1 TEMPLETONI 1 1 A
(CONTINUED)
TABLE 10. SPECIES LIST NAKED CR., ASHE CO., JULY, 1986.
R=RARE, C=COMMON, A=ABUNDANT
1 STATION
1
101 103
1 1
1 1
+---+--
ORDER 1SPECIES 1 1
+ 1 1
OLIGOCHAETA 1 LIMN')DRILUS 1 1
1 HOFEMEISTERI 1 A 1
1 +---+
I LUMBRI CUL I OAE ICIA
1NAIS SPP 1 C 1
+---+__
10PISTHOPORA SPP1 C 1 R
+ +___+
CRUSTACEA I CAMBARUS SPP 1 R 1 R
MOLLUSCA
OTHER
1
1ORCONECTES
SPP 1 R 1
FLIMIA SP 1 A 1
'ERRISSIA 1 1
PIVULARIS 1 A 1
HELISOMA SPP 1 j C
MENETUS DILATUSI 1 R
+---+--
PHYSFLLA SPP 1 A 1 A
-+ ---+--
1DUGESIA TIGRINAI 1 R
IHYDRACARINA 1 R 1
1 +__-+
1 SIGARA SPP 1 R 1
Although C/O sp. 5 and P. illinoense were collected at Station 01. they were not
dominant and C/O sp. 1 was absent.
Although streams in North Carolina had been stressed last spring and summer
by extremely low flows, the greatly reduced taxa richness and the shift to dom-
inance by tolerant organisms at Station 03 clearly associates instream impacts in
water quality from the effluent of Jefferson WWTP.
CONCLUSIONS
On -site toxicity tests conducted on the effluent of the Jefferson WWTP
resulted in a 96 hour fathead minnow LC6* of 6.76%, a Daphnia, pulex 48 hour LC60
of 55%, and a Ceriodaphnia dubia seven-day LC6o of 3.6%. Given these toxicity
results and the facility's instream waste concentration of 8.83% during low
stream flow conditions, the effluent would be expected to cause significant acute
toxicity in the receiving stream.
Analyses of chemical samples show elevated effluent concentrations of copper
and zinc. Both of these metals were present in sufficient concentrations to have
caused acutely toxic responses in the cladoceran test species. Zinc most likely
contributed to the observed fathead minnow toxicity. None of the organic con-
stituents detected in the effluent were present in amounts sufficient to cause
acute toxicity. Mercury is of concern due to its bioaccumulation tendencies.
Given available data, it appears that there are no organic components pre-
sent in large enough quantities to cause chronic toxicity. A chronically toxic
effect from the organic portion of the effluent should not be ruled out, however,
due to the numbers of different compounds present, the unidentified compounds
present, and because toxicity data is not available for all chemicals detected.
Analysis of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in Naked Creek upstream
and downstream of the Jefferson WWTP clearly indicates a negative impact on water
quality by the WWTP effluent.
Bioassay data from the industrial contributors tested indicates Gates Rubber
Co. to be the most toxic with two 48 hour Daphnia,pulex, static LCgo's of <5%.
Chemical analyses indicate Gates to be the heaviest contributor of zinc (6700
ppb) among the industries analyzed on the date sampled. Zinc appears to be the
major toxic constituent of the Jefferson effluent. That Gates Rubber Co. efflu-
ent typically makes up approximately one-third of the influent wastes to the Jef-
ferson WWTP compounds its effect on the makeup of the WWTP's effluent. It should
be noted that Hanes Knitting and the Ashe Co. Memorial Hospital also contribute
toxicity to the Jefferson WWTP. However, these contributions are present at
lower flows and toxicity levels.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The Jefferson WWTP should continue performance of the 48 hour Daphnia,pulex
acute bioassays until the test has achieved the target level of >90% consis-
tantly. At such time the facility should initiate Pass/Fail Ceriodaphnia
survival and reproduction tests at a test concentration equal to the facil-
ity's instream waste concentration (IWC) of 8.83%. The subject permit, upon
re -issuance, should have toxicity limits included as Ceriodaphnia survival
and reproduction bioassays. The final chronic value achieved as a toxicity
limit should equal or exceed the facility's IWC of 8.83%.
2. The facility should develop a written toxicity reduction plan with a sched-
ule of attaining compliance as will be set forth.
3. Due to effluent levels of copper, zinc and mercury on -site, the sources of
major contribution of these compounds should be further investigated and
efforts made to minimize discharge, and thus reduce observed acute toxicity.
4. The facility may wish to consider performing chemical fractionation proce-
dures in order to determine if any toxicity is contributed by the organic
chemical components of the WWTP's effluent.
FOOTNOTES
1 Biesinger, K.E. and G.M. Christensen. 1972. Effects of various metals on
survival, growth, reproduction and metabolism on Daphnia manna. J. Fish Res.
Board. Con. 29:1691.
2 Mount, D.I. and T.J. Norberg. A Seven -Day Life -Cycle Cladoceran Toxicity Test.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Vol. 3. pp 433. 1984.
8 Pickering, 0., W. Brungs, and M. Gast. 1977. Effect of exposure time and
copper concentration on reproduction of the fathead minnow (Pimephales prome-
las. Water Res., 11:1079-83.
• Benoit, D.A. and G.W. Holcombe. 1978. Toxic Effects of zinc on fathead min-
nows Pimephales promelas in soft water. J. Fish Biol. 13:701-708.
6 Snarski, V.M. and G.F. Olson. Chronic Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Mercuric
Chloride in the Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas. Aquatic Toxicology, 2
(1982) 143-156.
e Geiger, D.L. et. al. 1985. Acute Toxicities of Organic Compounds to Fathead
Minnows (Pimephales promelas) Vol. I1. Center for Lake Superior Env. Studies.
Univ. Wis. Superior.
• Leblanc, G.A. Acute Toxicity of Priority Pollutants to Water Flea (Daphnia
manna). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 24(5), pp 684-691, 1980.
• Slooff, W., J.H. Canton and J.L.M. Hermens, Comparison of the Susceptibility of
22 Freshwater Species to 15 Chemical Compounds. 1. (sub) Acute Toxicity Tests.
Aquatic Toxicology, 4 (1983) 113-128.
o Van Leeuwen, C.J., F. Moberts and G. Niebeck. Aquatic Toxicological Aspects of
Dithiocarbamates and Related Compounds. II. Effects on Survival, Reproduction,
and Growth of Daphnia manna. Aquatic Toxicology, 7 (1985) 165-175.
1O Mattson, Vincent R., John W. Arthur, Charles T. Walbridge. Acute toxicity of
selected organic compounds to fathead minnows. EPA-600/3-76-097, Oct. 1976.
11 Foster, L. Mayer and Mark R. Ellersicek. Manual of Acute Toxicity: Interpre-
tation and Data Base for 410 Chemicals and 66 Species of Freshwater Animals.
United States Depart. of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington
D.C., 1986, pp 10-11.
12 Johnson, W.W. and M.T. Finley. 1980. Handbook of Acute Toxicity of Chemicals
to Fish and Aquatic Invertebrates. U.S. Dept. Inter., Fish Wildl. Serv.,
Resource Publ. 137. 98 pp.
APPENDIX
_29_.
48 Hour Pauhnia pulex Screening Bioassay Appendix
Aquatic Toxicology Group
N. C. Division of Environmental Management
The Aquatic Toxicology Group performs 48 hour static bioassays using the
cladoceran Paphnia pulex to estimate the toxicity of waste discharge to aquatic life
in receiving streams. All test and sampling glassware and equipment are washed
with soap and hot water, then rinsed in nitric acid, acetone, and distilled/deionized
water, to remove all toxins and contaminants. Effluent samples are collected by
DEM Regional Office or Aquatic Toxicology personnel. All samples are collected chilled
and above chlorination unless otherwise specified. Each sample is collected as a grab
or 24 hour composite using an automatic sampler and is sent chilled to the Aquatic
Toxicology Laboratory by state courier or bus. The sample must be received within
72 hours after collection.
The effluent samples are prepared for testing by being thouroughly mixed, adjusted
to standard test temperature, and aerated if dissolved oxygen is below 40X
saturation. Hardness and alkalinity are measured. Chlorine is removed with
sodium thiosulfate if applicable. The effluent is then diluted with D Dulex culture
water, typically to seven concentrations (with replicates) from 0 to 90% effluent
and initial pH and DO are recorded.. Each test chamber receives 100 mis total
volume and ten D. pulex test organisms, 0-24 hours old. The test is conducted in a 20
degree centigrade incubator with a 16:8 hour light: dark cycle. Mortality of the D.
oulex is recorded after 48 hours, along with final pH, dissolved oxygen, and
temperature.
A 48 hour LC50, or concentration of effluent lethal to 50% of the test organisms in 48
hours, is calculated from the mortality data. An instream waste concentration
(IWC) for the effluent in the receiving stream is calculated using the treatment
system permitted flow and receiving stream 7Q10 flow. The LC50 and IWC are then
used to predict instream toxicity. If the effluent toxicity and/or the IWC are high, a
persistance bioassay may be conducted. This involves a second 48 hour static D.
pulex bioassay on the same effluent sample after it has been exposed to light and
aeration for an additional 48 hours. If there is a 100% reduction in the LC50, the
effluent is considered to be non-persistant.
Guidance Document:1985. U. S. E. P. A. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of
effluents to freshwater and marine organisms. Third Ed. (EPA/600/4-85/013)
96 Hour On -site Flowthrough Bioassay Appendix
Aquatic Toxicology Group
N. C. Division of Environmental Management
Candidacy for an on -site toxicity evaluation by the Aquatic Toxicology Group is
determined on the basis of acute toxicity of the effluent in comparison with
instream waste concentration. Acute toxicity is determined by a 48 hour screening
static bioassay .
For each on -site, flowthrough bioassay, a pre -test site inspection is performed in
order to:
1) Determine appropriate areas for physical placement of the mobile laboratory.
2) Acquire proper equipment and installation needed for electrical service.
3) Determine appropriate areas for effluent sampling and equipment needed for
such. Determine discharge schedule. Sampling is done above chlorination unless
otherwise specified.
4) Determine possible areas for dilution sampling (actual receiving waters or other
unstressed streams in the area) and equipment needed for such.
5) Collect additional samples of effluent and possible dilution waters for further
static Daphnia pulex acute and static renewal Ceriodaphnia dubia reproduction
bioassays to determine the range of concentrations of effluent for the flowthrough
bioassay, to test for potential toxicity of possible dilution waters, and for fish
acclimation to the chosen dilution water.
6) Determine route suitability to the facility for the mobile laboratory (eg. low
clearances, poor road conditions) .
7) Discuss test procedures and requirements with appropriate facility personnel.
8) Determine appropriate sampling sites and techniques for benthic
macroinvertebrate surveys.
All test and sampling glassware and equipment are washed with soap and hot
water, then rinsed in nitric acid, acetone, and distilled/deionized water to remove
all toxins and contaminants.
Upon actual arrival on -site with the mobile laboratory, dilution water is obtained
and dilution and effluent pumping systems are set up and tested. Six to eight week
old fathead minnows are wet transferred to the test chambers (containing
approximately one liter of dilution water), ten fish to a chamber.This transfer is
accomplished five fish at a time in a randomized order to each of the fourteen test
chambers until two randomized sets of five have been transferred to each
chamber. Seven concentrations (with replicates) including a control are used. The
second day on -site the dilutor and the dilution and effluent pumping systems are
turned on and the fathead minnow flowthrough bioassay is begun. A water bath is
utilized to bring the effluent and dilution water to a constant 20 degrees centigrade.
Test organisms are fed newly hatched brine shrimp twice daily throughout the
test.
A 7 day Ceriodaphnia dubia static renewal reproduction bioassay using newborn
organisms is begun the first day on -site. The organisms are transfered to fresh
dilution and effluent solutions daily and initial and final pH and dissolved oxygen
are recorded. The number of young born per organism per day is recorded and
mean cumulative reproduction is calculated for each concentration. The test is
conducted in a 25 degree centigrade incubator with 16 light:8 dark hour photoperiod.
Test organisms are fed 0.1 ml of a fermented trout chow mixture per organism per
day.
Individual chemical/physical parameter meters are calibrated daily according to
DEM standards. At 15 minute intervals throughout the test, hydrolab systems
measure and record dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, and specific conductance in
the test chambers with the highest and lowest concentration of effluent. These
systems are calibrated at test initiation, the mid -point of the test, and test
termination. Data from these systems is recovered daily and stored on floppy disc
and hard copy. Samples of dilution water, effluent at the bioassay sampling point,
final effluent, and the receiving stream upstream and downstream of the discharge
point are analyzed for hardness as feasible. Where applicable, daily residual
chlorine measurements will be made at the above sites.
During the on -site evaluation, Biological Monitoring Group personnel collect benthic
macroinvertebrate samples at the upstream, downstream, and dilution sites (see
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Survey appendix). Where appropriate, electrofishing is
undertaken upstream and downstream of the discharge to obtain resident fish
population data. On a site -specific basis, various other efforts are undertaken, such
as monitoring dissolved oxygen levels in the receiving stream.
On a daily basis, test chamber screens are cleaned, effluent and dilution pumping
systems are checked and adjusted as necessary, and pH, dissolved oxygen, and fish
mortalities are recorded for each chamber. Dilution water is generally collected on
an alternating day basis, depending on need.
Two separate 24 hour composite samples of effluent are collected for chemical
analysis by means of an automatic sampler. Receiving stream and dilution water
samples are also taken for chemical testing.
Static 48 hour Daphnia nulex bioassays are conducted on a 24 hour composite sample
of the effluent and a grab sample of the influent. persistence test aging is begun on
the effluent sample. Another static bioassay will be conducted after 96 hours of
aging to determine persistance of toxicity.
A tour of the facility is conducted. The actual treatment process is reviewed to
ascertain the quality of the operation of the treatment system and to determine the
treatment system's appropriateness to the type of waste being treated. An
inventory of any industrial contributors to a municipal waste treatment facility is
made. The manufacturing process at an industrial facility is reviewed to determine
the nature and composition of the waste. An inventory of all chemicals used is
made.
A photographic record is made of the manufacturing and treatment facility,
sampling points, receiving stream, and sampling procedures.
At the end of the 96 hour test period, the dilutor is turned off and final mortality
observations are made. Breakdown and packing routines are performed and the
mobile laboratory is transported back to the Cary Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory.
The Ceriodaphnia dubia reproduction bioassay is continued at the lab until the 7th
test day. The persistance static bioassay is conducted.
-32-
Several special care operating procedures should be mentioned. At facilities that
discharge for only a portion of the day, effluent samples are composited by the
dilutor system into a large reservoir on board the mobile laboratory for use as the
effluent while discharge is not in progress. If the effluent has a high oxygen
demand, aeration systems for the test chambers are utilized and dissolved oxygen
levels in the chambers are monitored closely in order to prevent levels from
dropping below 40% saturation at test temperatures. In the event that actual
receiving waters are deemed unfit for the test (i.e. potentially toxic), an alternate
source of dilution water is sought in the vicinity.
rariggAiilingt Alibi& Reproduction Bioassay Appendix
Aquatic Toxicology Group
N. C. Division of Environmental Management
The cladoceran Ceriodauhnia dubia is used as test organism in a 7 day static
renewal bioassay. This test estimates the effect of an effluent or other water
sample on reproductivity. A control and 8 concentrations of effluent ranging from
0.01% to 100% are used. There are 10 animals per concentration, each animal in a
one ounce polystyrene test chamber with 15 mis of solution. The test is conducted
in a 25 degree centigrade incubator with a 16 light/ 8 dark hour photoperiod.
All test and sampling glassware and equipment are washed with soap and hot
water, then rinsed in nitric acid, acetone, and distilled/deionized water, to remove
all toxins and contaminants. Effluent samples are collected by DEM Regional Office
or Aquatic Toxicology personnel. All samples are collected chilled and above
chlorination unless otherwise specified. Each sample is collected as a grab or 24
hour composite using an automatic sampler and is sent chilled to the Aquatic
Toxicology Laboratory by state courier or bus. The sample must be received within
72 hours after collection.
The effluent samples are prepared for testing by being thouroughly mixed, adjusted
to standard test temperature, and aerated if dissolved oxygen is below 5 mg/1.
Hardness and alkalinity are measured. Chlorine is removed with sodium thiosulfate
if applicable.
The test is initiated with 20-24 hours old animals, or neonates. Adults having brood
sacs with eggs with visible eyespots (indicating eggs are about to be released) are
isolated and checked periodically. Neonates are removed and grouped according to
time of birth. Selected groups are then composited to make the youngest set of 90 or
more neonates born within a 4 hour period. The test is begun when the neonates
are introduced into the test chambers. Temperatures must be within 1 degrees
centigrade for transfer.
The animals are transferred daily to new test chambers containing freshly mixed
solutions. Chemical/physical' parameters are measured twice for each batch of test
solutions. The initial value is taken before the animal is introduced and the final
value after the animal has been transferred out the next day. The animals are fed
daily. Each organism receives 0.1 ml of fermented trout chow -yeast -alfalfa food.
As reproduction begins, only the original test organism, now an adult, is
transferred to the new chamber. A drop of concentrated nitric acid is added to the
old chamber. This kills the young so they can be easily counted under a dissecting
microscope. A mean number of young produced per adult is calculated for each
concentration. Mortality of greater than 209E in control test organisms invalidates a
test.
Guidance Document: 1985. U. 3. E. P. A. Methods for estimaing the chronic toxicity of
effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms. (EPA-600/4-85-014)
-34-
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling Procedure Appendix
Biological Monitoring Group
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
The sampling methodology requires that a stream or river be wadable. High
water conditions may severely impair sampling efficiency by making critical
habitats inaccessable. A fixed number of samples are collected for each station.
These include: 2 kick samples of riffle and snag areas; 3 sweep net samples of
bank areas and macrophyte beds; and 2 fine -mesh washdown samples from
rocks, logs, leaves and substrate. The benthic macroinvertebrates are picked out
with forceps and preserved in alcohol. A collection card is filled out with such
data as canopy cover, substrate composition, stream morphology, dissolved
oxygen, pH, and stream temperature. Organisms are identified to the lowest
possible taxonomic level, generally to species. Density of each taxon is rated as
Rare (1 or 2 individuals), Common (3 to 9), or Abundant (10 or more). Most
organisms may be identified using only a dissecting microscope, but Oligochaeta
and Chironomidae must be mounted and identified with a compound microscope.
Reference collections are maintained and all samples are retained and stored by
study area.
The first level of data analysis summarizes the data by total number of taxa or
"taxa richness" (S) and density (N) for each station. The second level of data
analysis summarizes the data by taxonomic groups (mostly orders of insects) .
The EPT or intolerant (to pollution) taxa richness value is the sum of the taxa
richness values for the intolerant insect orders Ephemeroptera, Plectoptera, and
Trichoptera. The final step in data analysis is to summarize the data separately
for each taxa. The presence or absence of individuals of any tolerant species is, in
itself, insufficient for characterizing water quality. In a stream of good water
quality, both intolerant and tolerant species will be present. Tolerant species will
become dominant only in polluted systems when the intolerant species have been
eliminated.
A rating or "bioclassification" of overall water quality is assigned to a particular
site based on total and intolerant taxa richness values. Information on pollution
tolerance of any given taxon, combined with quantitative data on its distribution,
can often be related to specific chemical or physical changes in the environment.
0
List of Definitions
Aquatic Toxicology Group
N. C. Division of Environmental Management
Acclimation - refers to the process of gradually adjusting organisms from water of one
type to another so that the organisms are not stressed from radical changes in
temperature, hardness, pH, ionic strength, etc.
Acute toxicity - the effect a short term exposure to a chemical or substance has on an
organism; usually defined as death of that organism.
Application factor - a value which estimates an instream toxicant level that will be
safe at a chronic level for resident organisms from acute toxicity data, usually
defined by a fraction of the LC50.
Aquatic - having to do with water.
Aquatic Toxicology Group - the group within the Biological Services Unit (Water Quality
Section) which performs aquatic bioassays for the Division of Environmental
Management. The Group is located at the Cary laboratory facilities. All test
organisms (including Ratan& Dulex, Ceriodaphnia SD., and fathead minnows)
are cultured at these facilities by Aquatic Toxicology personnel.
Benthos/Benthic macroinvertebrates - a wide assemblage of invertebrate animals
(insects, crustaceans, molluscs, etc.) which live in streams, are an important
food source for fish populations, and are used as long term water quality
indicators.
Bioassay - a test used to determine the effects of a chemical or substance on an
organism.
Cadmium - one of the toxicants recommended by EPA for quality assurance testing of
the health of aquatic organisms.
Calibration - the adjustment of meters or systems with standards of known values in
order to assure the quality of data obtained from these meters or systems.
Ceriodaphnia zo, - a small cladoceran crustacean. It is found throughout most of North
America and obtains a maximum size of approximately 1 mm. This organism
has been adopted for aquatic bioassay testing because of its small size, ease of
culture under laboratory conditions, stability of genetic strains, and sensitivity
to toxic substances. It is generally used in a 7 day static renewal "mini -chronic"
bioassay testing for mortality, time to sexual maturity and reproductive rate.
Ceriodaphnia is accepted in the field of aquatic toxicology for testing in
moderately soft waters.
Chronic toxicity - the effect of a chemical or substance on an organism, usually during
a longer period of time than that measured for acute toxicity. This effect is
usually measured as a non -fatal response (eg. reduction in growth, egg
production, predator avoidance, feeding rate, etc.). Tests for chronic toxicity
are frequently performed during the entire life cycle of the organism.
Chronic value(ChV): A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the numeric
values of concentrations analyzed as the No Oberserved Effect Concentration
(N. O. E. C.) and the lowest Oberserved Effect Concentration (L. O. E. C.) by chroic
toxicity testing. The chronic value is an estimate of the toxicant concentration
that will be the actual no effect concentration based on the chronic effect tested.
ChV=Antilog((Logi0L. O. E. C.+ Log10N. O. E. C. )/2)
Composite - a sample or method of sampling used to obtain data on a substance which
may vary over time or space. For example, a time or temporal composite of a
stream would be one collected at intervals of time at the same location. This is
frequently accomplished with automatic sampling devices.
Daphnia Dulex (water flea) - a small cladoceran crustacean. It is found throughout
most of North America and obtains a maximum size of approximately 3.5 mm.
This organism has been adopted for aquatic bioassay testing because of its small
size, ease of culture under laboratory conditions, stability of genetic strains, and
sensitivity to toxic substances. It is generally used in a 48 hour static bioassay
testing for mortality. k. pulex is widely accepted in the field of aquatic
toxicology for testing in moderately soft waters.
Design flow - the volume of water and waste that is initially planned to pass through
a facility or waste treatment plant and still allow maximum operating
efficiency. Design flow is usually expressed in millions of gallons per day (mgd).
Dilution (water) - the water used in bioassay tests to dilute the waste water to
various concentrations (expressed as percent) . Wherever possible, this water is
from the actual stream that receives the waste, upstream from that waste.
When this is not possible, other suitable water is obtained.
Dilutor - refers to a modified Mount and Brungs design serial dilution apparatus which
receives dilution water and effluent/waste and, through a series of chambers
and electrical solenoid valves, mixes the effluent and dilution into a series of
concentrations for the test (expressed as percentages of 100%6 effluent).
Electrofishing - method for collecting fish using electrical shock to momentarily stun
the fish so they float to the surface and are easily netted.
Effluent - the waste water exiting a facility which is discharged as treated waste to a
stream or as untreated waste to some other facility.
Fathead minnow (Pime helas - a small fish which occurs throughout much
of North America. It obtains a maximum size of approximately 100 mm and is
raised commercially as bait fish. The fathead minnow has been raised for
numerous generations in a number of laboratory cultures for use in toxicity
testing. The fish can produce eggs year round in the laboratory environment
under correct conditions, which provide test organisms as needed.
Flow -through - the flow -through bioassay utilizes a mechanical dilutor which either
continuously or occasionally replaces the effluent/toxicant concentrations
throughout the test in an attempt to simulate stream conditions where new
effluent and dilution water are continually flowing through an organism's
habitat.
Hydrolab* - a multiparameter instrument which measures and records temperature,
pH, dissolved oxygen, and specific conductance of water.
Instream waste concentration (IWC) - the percent concentration of an effluent/toxicant
which is present in a stream under assumed worst case conditions. The IWC is
derived from the formula: [DF / (7Q10 + DF)] x 100 = IWC (X), where DF is the
design flow (in cfs) of the facility in question and 7Q10 is the 10 year, 7 day,
low flow (in cfs) of the receiving stream.
LC50 - that concentration or percentage of a waste/chemical/substance which is lethal
to 50% of test organisms over a stated period of time
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration(L. O. E. C. )- The lowest concentration of toxicant to
which organisms are exposed in a life -cycle or partial life -cycle test, which
causes a statistically significant adverse effect on the observed
parameters(usually hatchability, survival, growth, and/or reproduction).
NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. A system devised by the
Federal Government and adopted by North Carolina for the permitting,
monitoring, and pollution abatement of dischargers to surface waters.
Neonate - roughly translated to newly born. In reference to Paphnia pulex, the
neonate refers to the life stage in the first and early second instar, generally the
first 24 hours of its life.
No Observed Effect Concentration(N. 0. E. C. )- The highest concentration of toxicant to
which organisms are exposed in a life -cycle or partial life -cycle test, which
causes no statistically significant adverse effect on the observed
parameters(usually hatchability, survival, growth, and/or reproduction.)
Screening bioassay - a testing system established to determine general levels of acute.
toxicity of compounds/discharges using 48 hour DauhniQ man tests.
7Q10 - the measurement of a stream's lowest average daily flow over a 7 day period
during a 10 year span, generally stated as flow in cubic feet per second (cfs).
Sodium pentachlorophenate - a chemical accepted by EPA as a toxicant for quality
assurance testing of the health of aquatic organisms. This chemical is an organic
pesticide.
Static - refers to an aquatic ioassay in which toxicant/effluent concentrations are set
up at the beginning of t e test and not changed for the rest of the test. This test
is generally short term as compared to a flow -through or replacement test
because of potential degradation of the toxicant/effluent.
Taxa - refers to a group of genetically related organisms, (i. e. genus, order, species).
Taxa richness - number of taxa.
30Q2 - the measurement of a stream's lowest average daily flow over a 30 day period
during a 2 year span, generally stated as flow in cubic feet per second (cfs).
Toxicity - the adverse effect of a chemical/substance on an organism. Toxicity is
usually defined as a fatal or non -fatal response over a given period of time.
UT - Unnamed tributary - a term given to streams which have no accepted name.
*Use of this term .or system does not constitute an endorsement