20220609 Ver 1_401 Application_20220426

AID
4 1
DWR Pre-Filing Meeting Request Form + -b
NORTH CAROLINA
Em irM,ntnW QuRHfr
Contact Name* Jennifer Robertson
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Owner* Crow Holdings
Project Name* Airlie Parkway
Project County* Lincoln
Owner Address:* Street Address
4064 Colony Rd Suite 405
Address Line 2
City State/Province/Region
Charlotte North Carolina
Postal/Zip Code Country
28211 United States
Is this a transportation project?* Yes • No
Type(s)of approval sought from the DWR:
." 401 Water Quality Certification- 401 Water Quality Certification-
Regular Express
Individual Permit Modification
Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?* RECEIVED
Yes No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with? APR 2 6 2022
Alan Johnson or Doug Perez
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.* DEO-WATER RESOURCES
401 &BUFFER PERMITTING
Industrial
By digitally signing below,I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre-Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401
Certification Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre-filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty-day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting
location and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty-day clock has expired,and you
can submit an application.

Signature"
Submittal Data 10/7/2021

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW—201 - 202102439 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name[PCN Form A2a]: Airlie Parkway
2. Work Type: Private Institutional Government 111 Commercial n
3. Project Description/Purpose[PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Project consists of approx 139.75 acres. The site consists of undeveloped, moderate-to-heavily
wooded land. The project will be developed into a warehouse distribution center - 3 buildings.
4. Property Owner/Applicant[PCN Form A3 or A4]: Crow Holdings/ Mr. Matt Cochrane
5. Agent/Consultant[PCN Form A5—or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Atlas Environmental, Jennifer Robertson
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: 2021-02439
7. Project Location-Coordinates,Street Address,and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
35.464449°/ -81.006403°
8. Project Location-Tax Parcel ID[PCN Form B1a]: 90022, 90020, 02337, and 50096
9. Project Location—County[PCN Form A2b]: Lincoln
10. Project Location—Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Denver
11. Project Information—Nearest Waterbody[PCN Form B2a]: Forney Creek, Class C, Index#: 11-119-2-3
12.Watershed/8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: Upper Catawba - 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 111 Section 10&404
Regulatory Action Type:
_ Standard Permit Pre-Application Request
✓ Nationwide Permit# 39 Unauthorized Activity
_ Regional General Permit# Compliance
Jurisdictional Determination Request No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

air Al TLAS
VIRONMENTAL
April 7, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Ms. Krysta Stygar Attn: Mr. Paul Wojoski
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 611 1617 Mail Service Center
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: Airlie Parkway — ^' 139.75 Acres
926 Airlie Parkway Denver NC 28037
Nationwide Permit 39 Application
Action ID SAW-2021-02439 / DWR Project #: unknown
Krysta/Paul:
Atlas Environmental Inc is submitting the enclosed package on behalf of Crow Holdings, Mr.
Matt Cochrane for approval of a Nationwide Permit 39 verification for unavoidable impacts to
Waters of the United States. Atlas Environmental completed a Waters delineation on
September 2, 2021 and September 16, 2021. There are seven streams totaling 6721 linear feet
and nine wetlands totaling 0.224 acre. CH 100 is a perennial stream (3846 linear feet, 0.640
acre), CH 200 is perennial (1347 linear feet, 0.178 acre), CH 300 is intermittent (248 linear feet,
0.009 acre), CH 400 is intermittent (198 linear feet, 0.010 acre), CH 500 is intermittent (47
linear feet, 0.002 acre), CH 600 is perennial (942 linear feet, 0.058 acre), and CH 700 is
intermittent (93 linear feet, 0.007 acre). WL 1000 (0.025 acre), WL 1100 (0.006 acre) is
hydrologically connected to CH 100. WL 2000 (0.002 acre) abuts CH 200. WL 3000 (0.154
acre), WL 3100 (0.006 acre) abuts CH 300. WL 4000 (0.002 acre) abuts CH 400. WL 5000
(0.018 acre) abuts CH 500. CH 6000 (0.006 acre) abuts CH 600. WL 7000 (0.011 acre) abuts
CH 700.
The enclosed permit application request is for impact S1 95 linear feet (0.014 acre) of perennial
stream impact to facilitate construction of a road crossing to access other industrial warehouse
buildings, truck courts, and employee parking. Impact S2 is for temporary pumping around
during construction. Impact S3 is embedded rip rap which is not a Corps impact but is a DWR
impact. Impact S4 86 linear feet (0.016 acre) of perennial stream impact to facilitate
construction of a road crossing to access other industrial warehouse buildings, truck courts, and
employee parking. Impact S5 is for temporary pumping around during construction. Impact S6
is embedded rip rap which is not a Corps impact but a DWR impact. Impact S7 90 linear feet
(0.003 acre) of intermittent stream is necessary for building pad and truck court grading. The
first permanent wetland impact is defined as impact W1 which is located on wetland 3000 and
is (0.140 acre) of permanent fill impact. The second permanent wetland impact is defined as
impact W2 which is located on wetland 4000 and is (0.002 acre) of permanent fill impact.
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S.Sharon Amity Road,#411
Charlotte,North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206(o)/828-712-9205(m)
www.atlasenvi.com/Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

ar nA
1i W
VIRONMENTAL
All tributaries within the review area drain to Forney Creek which is Classifed as Class C. The
Corps approved the delineation and issued a preliminary jurisdictional determination on
December 9, 2021. A copy of the Jurisdictional Determination is included in this package.
6450 linear feet of stream has been avoided which is over 96% of the streams. 0.142 acre of
wetland impacts are proposed and have been minimized with retaining walls. These slopes will
be reinforced to remain stable. Headwalls will be used at the ends of culverts. Corps mitigation
is proposed at a 2:1 ratio for perennial stream impacts and a 1:1.5 ratio for intermittent stream
impacts. The Corps mitigation will cover the required 1:1 DWR mitigation.
Atlas has completed coordination with Fish and Wildlife Service regarding Section 7
consultation. Suitable habitat exists on site for Rhus michauxii, Hexasty/is naniflora, and
Hellanthus schweinitzii. No species were observed on site for Rhus michauxi/or Hexastylis
nan/flora, however occurrences of a similar species to Hexasty//s nan/flora were observed
(Hexasty//s ar/fo//a). During the field observations on August 26, 2021 and September 9, 2021,
Atlas Environmental staff identified three populations of Helianthusschwe/n/tz//(Schweinitz's
sunflower). All plants will be avoided along the gas line right of way to avoid impacts. Known
populations have been photographed and mapped using a professional grade GPS. Enclosed is
a copy of the FWS comment letter. Enclosed is a copy of the NC Historic Preservation Office
(HPO) Section 106 comment letter.
Enclosed are the necessary permit application documents and additional information. Thank
you for your attention to the enclosed request. Please contact me if you need any additional
information.
Best regards,
/04+diZdet -t.
Jennifer L Robertson, President
irobertson©atlasenvi.com
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S.Sharon Amity Road,#411
Charlotte,North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206(o)/828-712-9205(m)
www.atlasenvi.com/Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

c7\o W ATF9OG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
o DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s)of approval sought from the
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
Corps:
lb. Specify Nationwide Permit(NWP) number: 39 or General Permit(GP)number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ®Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s)of approval sought from the DWQ(check all that apply):
®401 Water Quality Certification—Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑401 Water Quality Certification—Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑Yes ® No ❑Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank ®Yes ❑ No
or in-lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑Yes ® No
below.
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Airlie Parkway
2b. County: Lincoln
2c. Nearest municipality/town: Denver
2d. Subdivision name: not a subdivision
2e. NCDOT only,T.I.P. or state not a DOT project
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s)on Recorded Deed: Crow Holdings
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 2203/537,2203/529, 2203/529, 2203/537
3c. Responsible Party(for LLC if Matt Cochrane
applicable):
3d. Street address: 4064 Colony Rd Suite 405
3e. City,state,zip: Charlotte, NC 28211
3f. Telephone no.: 704-258-9147
3g. Fax no.: n/a
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: Mr. Matt Cochrane
4c. Business name Crow Holdings
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 4064 Colony Rd Suite 405
4e. City,state,zip: Charlotte, NC 28211
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information(if applicable)
5a. Name: Jennifer L Robertson
5b. Business name Atlas Environmental, Inc.
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 338 S. Sharon Amity Road#411
5d. City,state,zip: Charlotte, NC 28211
5e. Telephone no.: 704-512-1206
5f. Fax no.: no fax
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 90022,90020,02337, and 50096
1 b. Site coordinates(in decimal degrees): Latitude:35.464449° Longitude: -81.006403°
1c. Property size: 139.75 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Forney Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C
2c. River basin: Upper Catawba,03050101
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:Commerical, Farm Land, and Residential Development
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.224 acre wetlands
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams(intermittent and perennial)on the property:6721 linear leet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:The purpose is to develop an industrial distribution/warehouse logistics
center that consists of three buildings that provides features and flexibility to attract a tenant(s).
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:The project involves development of the
parcels into three industrial warehouses with associated infrastructure including trailer parking,employee parking,truck
courts,access roads, and seven storm water SCM's. Typical construction equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ®Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project(including all prior phases)in the past? Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination,what type ® Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:Atlas Environmental
Name(if known):Jennifer Robertson,Austin Baggarley Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
12/9/2021 SAW-2021-02439
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project(including all prior phases)in the past?
5b. If yes,explain in detail according to"help file"instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑Yes ® No
6b. If yes,explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project(check all that apply):
®Wetlands ® Streams-tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters 0 Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site,then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Corps(404, 10)or impact
Permanent(P)or (if known) DWQ(401,other) (acres)
Temporary(T)
W1 P Choose one Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.140
W2 P Fill Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.002
W3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
2g.Total wetland impacts: 0.142
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts(including temporary impacts)proposed on the site,then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number- (PER)or (Corps-404, 10 stream length
Permanent(P)or intermittent DWQ—non-404, width (linear
Temporary(T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 P Culvert CH 200 PER Corps 6.4 95(0.014)
S2 T Other(Type In) CH 200 PER Corps 6.4 20
S3 T Other(Type In) CH 200 PER Corps 6.4 30(DWR)
S4 P Culvert CH 100 PER Corps 8 86(0.016)
S5 T Other(Type In) CH 100 PER Corps 8 20
S6 T Other(Type In) CH 100 PER Corps 8 15
271'
permanent
(0.033 ac)
3h.Total stream and tributary impacts: (Corps)/
316'
permanent
(DWR)
3i.Comments:S7 P French Drain CH 300 Int Corps 3 90'(0.003 acre)
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds,estuaries,tributaries,sounds,the Atlantic Ocean,or any other open water of
the U.S.then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact(acres)
Permanent(P)or type
Temporary(T)
01 - Choose one Choose
02 - Choose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f.Total open water
impacts:
4g.Comments: no pond impacts are proposed
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed,then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts(acres) Stream Impacts(feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f.
Total:
5g. Comments: no pond contruction proposed
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area(acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed(acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts(for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer,then complete the chart below. If yes,then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation,then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
Permanent(P)or Stream name mitigation impact impact
Temporary(T) required? (square (square
feet) feet)
B1 - Yes/No
B2 - Yes/No
B3 - Yes/No
B4 - Yes/No
B5 - Yes/No
B6 - Yes/No
6h.Total buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:there are no state regulated stream buffers on site
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form-Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
6450 linear feet of streams will be avoided, impacts are necessary to 4%of the streams on site mostly in order to access the
site,0.142 acres of wetlands will be impacted,and have been minimized by the use of headwalls,the steepest side slopes
allowed to obtain local approval has been used to avoid any additional stream or wetland impacts
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
numerous steep graded slopes are being used to avoid additional stream and wetland impacts,additional trailer parking was
desired but eliminated to avoid impacts,the original and preferred site plan included one large warehouse buidling which
would have required 5,441 linear feet of stream impacts and 0.161 acre of wetland impacts
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ®Yes El No
impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by(check all that apply): ® DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes,which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ElPayment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type:Choose one Quantity none
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type:Choose one Quantity none
Type:Choose one Quantity none
3c.Comments: none
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a.Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ®Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 271 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): none square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.142 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: none acres
4g. Coastal (tidal)wetland mitigation requested: none acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
not applicable
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation(State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—required by DWQ
6a.Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes,then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 none none 3(2 for Catawba) none
Zone 2 none none 1.5 none
6f.Total buffer mitigation required: none
6g. If buffer mitigation is required,discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
not applicable
6h.Comments: no comments
•
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan(required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes,then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? >24%%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ®Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan,explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan,then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Seven large SCM's(water quality ponds)will be constructed. The plan is being approved locally. Storm runoff from the
buildings and impervious surfaces will be directed to the SCM. The wet ponds will be constructed with forebays and
littoral shelves.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Lincoln County
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Lincoln County
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply(check all that apply): ❑Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ®Yes 0 No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ®Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the D Yes ® No
use of public(federal/state)land?
lb. If you answered"yes"to the above,does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina)Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered"yes"to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so,attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations(DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes Z No
2c. If you answered"yes"to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts(DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts)result in ❑Yes ® No
additional development,which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered"yes"to the above,submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered"no,"provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal(DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition(non-discharge or discharge)of wastewater generated from
the proposed project,or available capacity of the subject facility.
sanitary sewer
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ®Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ®Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCDENR Natural Heritage Program Map Viewer and GIS Layer; Section 7 FWS consultation has concluded;see
enclosed letter
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a.Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
https://www.fi sheries.noaa.gov/resou rce/map/essential-fish-habitat-mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources(Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state,federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑Yes ® No
status(e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC HPO comment letter enclosed; SHPO had no comment
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c.What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?FEMA floodmaps GIS layer,there is not a FEMA
floodplain located on the project site
Jennifer L Robertson 4/5/2022
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

a"11117*,T1--AS
RONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams—Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
I,the current landowner, lessee,contract holder to purchase, right to purchase holder,or easement
holder of the property/properties identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my
behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff for the purpose of
conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the US subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 and Waters of the State including 404 Wetlands,Isolated Wetlands, and other non-404
Wetlands subject to a permitting program administered by the State of North Carolina. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation approval
and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or NC DWR Water Quality Program.
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Property Owner of Record: CHI Acquisitions, LLC
Contact Name: Matt Cochrane
Address: 4064 Colony Road Suite 405
Address: Charlotte, NC 28211
Phone/Fax Number: 704-258-9147
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Address: 926 Airlie Parkway
Project Address: Denver, NC 28037
Tax PIN: Lincoln County Parcel ID N :90022,90020,02337,and 50096
Signature:
Date:
ATLAS Environmental Inc.
338 S.Sharon Amity Road,#411
Charlotte,North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206(o)/828-712-9205(m)
j [e-mail]
www.atlasenvi.com

9/13/21, 12:51 PM Land Report
2020 Tax Values
Parcel 50096 Map 4602
Pin 4602-29-9511 Acres 52.715
Subdivision J.DELLINGER Plat Book-Page N/A
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner Name: INGLESIDE REAL ESTATE Deed: 2203-537
INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC
PO BOX 9
Mailing Address: LINCOLNTON NC 28093 Deed Year: 2010
Account: 0227884 Deed Acres: 53.97
Fire District: EAST LINCOLN Mapped Acres: 52.715
Township: CATAWBA SPRINGS
Neighborhood: 0503R Land Market Value: work in progress
Description: J.DELLINGER Improvement Market Value: work in progress
Category: REAL Total Market Value: work in progress
Zoning
Zone Code Jurisdiction Acres
I-G COUNTY 52.714
52.714
East Lincoln Development District
District Acres
Not In a District 52.714
52.714
Soil Types
Soil Type Agriculture Forestry Horticulture Acres
Gaston sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnB2) Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 3.747
Gaston loam: 15-25 Pct slopes (GaD) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 12.156
Madison sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (MdB2) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 18.108
Gaston sandy clay loam: 8-15 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnC2) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 6.687
Gaston sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnB2) Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 3.535
Pacolet sandy clay loam: 8-15 Pct slopes(Eroded) (PeC2) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 8.481
52.714
Flood Zones
Flood Zone Description Panel Acres
X NO FLOOD HAZARD 3710460300 11.672
X NO FLOOD HAZARD 3710460200 41.042
52.714
2010 Census Block
County Tract Block Acres
37109 071101 3011 52.714
52.714
Sewer Districts
District Acres
Not In a District 40.589
SEWER 12.125
52.714
Watersheds
https://arcgisserver.lincolncounty.org/taxparcelviewer/assets/Lincoln/LandReport.htm?50096 1/2

9/13/21, 12:49 PM Land Report
2020 Tax Values
Parcel 90020 Map 4602
Pin 4602-27-3637 Acres 19.479
Subdivision PT OF DAVID CLARK LAND Plat Book-Page N/A
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner Name: INGLESIDE REAL ESTATE Deed: 2203-529
INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC
BOX 9
Mailing Address: LIONCOLNTON NC 28093 Deed Year: 2010
Account: 0227884 Deed Acres:
Fire District: EAST LINCOLN Mapped Acres: 19.479
Township: CATAWBA SPRINGS
Neighborhood: 0503R Land Market Value: $453,499
Description: PT OF DAVID CLARK LAND Improvement Market Value: work in progress
Category: REAL Total Market Value: $453,499
Zoning
Zone Code Jurisdiction Acres
I-G COUNTY 19.479
19.479
East Lincoln Development District
District Acres
Not In a District 19.479
19.479
Soil Types
Soil Type Agriculture Forestry Horticulture Acres
Gaston sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnB2) Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 10.771
Gaston loam: 15-25 Pct slopes (GaD) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 4.411
Gaston sandy clay loam: 8-15 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnC2) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 0.996
Madison sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (MdB2) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 1.818
Gaston sandy clay loam: 8-15 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnC2) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 1.482
19.478
Flood Zones
Flood Zone Description Panel Acres
AE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA BASE ELEVATION DETERMINED - 100 YEAR 3710460200 0.924
X NO FLOOD HAZARD 3710460200 18.554
19.478
2010 Census Block
County Tract Block Acres
37109 071101 3011 19.479
19.479
Sewer Districts
District Acres
Not In a District 15.584
SEWER 3.895
19.479
Watersheds
Watershed Class Acres
https://arcgisserver.lincolncounty.org/taxparcelviewer/assets/Lincoln/LandReport.htm?90020 1/2

9/13/21, 12:49 PM Land Report
Not in Watershed 19.479
19.479
Voting Precincts
Precinct Acres
TA37_TRIANGLE A (TA37) 19.479
19.479
https://arcgisserver.lincolncounty.org/taxparcelviewer/assets/Lincoln/LandReport.htm?90020 2/2

9/13/21,12:49 PM Land Report
2020 Tax Values
Parcel 90022 Map 4602
Pin 4602-26-2724 Acres 8.228
Subdivision PT OF AIRLIE PARK LAND Plat Book-Page N/A
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner Name: INGLESIDE REAL ESTATE Deed: 2203-537
INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC
Mailing Address: PO BOX 9 Deed Year: 2010
LINCOLNTON NC 28093
Account: 0227884 Deed Acres:
Fire District: EAST LINCOLN Mapped Acres: 8.228
Township: CATAWBA SPRINGS
Neighborhood: 0503R Land Market Value: $184,673
Description: PT OF AIRLIE PARK LAND Improvement Market Value: work in progress
Category: REAL Total Market Value: $184,673
Zoning
Zone Code Jurisdiction Acres
I-G COUNTY 8.228
8.228
East Lincoln Development District
District Acres
Not In a District 8.228
8.228
Soil Types
Soil Type Agriculture Forestry Horticulture Acres
Gaston sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnB2) Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 6.895
Gaston loam: 15-25 Pct slopes (GaD) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 1.333
8.228
Flood Zones
Flood Zone Description Panel Acres
AE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA BASE ELEVATION DETERMINED - 100 YEAR 3710460200 0.027
X NO FLOOD HAZARD 3710460200 8.201
8.228
2010 Census Block
County Tract Block Acres
37109 071101 3011 8.228
8.228
Sewer Districts
District Acres
SEWER 8.228
8.228
Watersheds
Watershed Class Acres
Not in Watershed 8.228
8.228
Voting Precincts
https://arcgisserver.lincolncounty.org/taxparcelviewer/assets/Lincoln/Land Report.htm?90022 1/2

9/13/21,12:49 PM Land Report
Precinct Acres
TA37_TRIANGLE A (TA37) 8.228
8.228
https://arcgisserver.lincolncounty.org/taxparcelviewer/assets/Lincoln/LandReport.htm?90022 2/2

9/13/21, 12:51 PM Land Report
2020 Tax Values
Parcel 02337 Map 4602
Pin 4602-38-3345 Acres 54.325
Subdivision J W NIXON Plat Book-Page N/A
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner Name: INGLESIDE REAL ESTATE Deed: 2203-529
INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC
BOX 9
Mailing Address: LIONCOLNTON NC 28093 Deed Year: 2010
Account: 0227884 Deed Acres: 54.8
Fire District: EAST LINCOLN Mapped Acres: 54.325
Township: CATAWBA SPRINGS
Neighborhood: 0503R Land Market Value: $878,660
Description: ] W NIXON Improvement Market Value: work in progress
Category: REAL Total Market Value: $878,660
Zoning
Zone Code Jurisdiction Acres
I-G COUNTY 54.325
54.325
East Lincoln Development District
District Acres
Not In a District 54.325
54.325
Soil Types
Soil Type Agriculture Forestry Horticulture Acres
Gaston sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnB2) Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 3.277
Gaston loam: 15-25 Pct slopes (GaD) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 5.714
Cecil sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (CeB2) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 10.854
Gaston sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnB2) Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 7.462
Gaston sandy clay loam: 8-15 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnC2) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 11.986
Gaston sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnB2) Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 0.695
Madison sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (MdB2) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 0.315
Pacolet sandy clay loam: 8-15 Pct slopes(Eroded) (PeC2) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 2.570
Pacolet sandy clay loam: 8-15 Pct slopes(Eroded) (PeC2) Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 11.453
54.326
Flood Zones
Flood Zone Description Panel Acres
X NO FLOOD HAZARD 3710460200 53.438
AE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA BASE ELEVATION DETERMINED - 100 YEAR 3710460200 0.887
54.325
2010 Census Block
County Tract Block Acres
37109 071101 3011 54.325
54.325
Sewer Districts
District Acres
Not In a District 4.378
https://arcgisserver.lincolncounty.org/taxparcelviewer/assets/Lincoln/LandReport.htm?02337 1/2

9/13/21, 12:51 PM Land Report
SEWER 49.947
54.325
Watersheds
Watershed Class Acres
Not in Watershed 54.325
54.325
Voting Precincts
Precinct Acres
TA37_TRIANGLE A (TA37) 54.325
54.325
https://arcgisserver.lincolncounty.org/taxparcelviewer/assets/Lincoln/LandReport.htm?02337 2/2

9/13/21, 12:51 PM Land Report
Watershed Class Acres
Not in Watershed 52.714
52.714
Voting Precincts
Precinct Acres
TA37_TRIANGLE A(TA37) 52.714
52.714
https://arcgisserver.lincolncounty.org/taxparcelviewer/assets/Lincoln/LandReport.htm?50096 2/2

- Exhibits\Stream Impacts \2022-02-22 - Stream Impacts - Culvert Exhibit (1_1 slope).dwg
..Prop BM
Prop Building
Wetlands/Stream
Impact #2A (typ.)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III III IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII,
G'. IUI
Stream Impact #1
NORTH ARROW
SCALE: 1" = 300'
0' 150' 300' 600'
.5"
2"
Prop Building
Prop BMP
Stream Impact #3
uuuwuuuuu 9`_`\\
ORIGIN OF DATA NOTE:
1. All Existing linework taken from "Boundary Survey of Parcel ID: 4603122239, 4603111318, 4603103856, 4603007263,
4602097292, 4602184906, 4602170931, 4602262724, 4602273637, 4602383345, 4602299511 Hwy 16 Catawba Springs Township,
Lincoln County, North Carolina" dated 11/03/2021 created by SGC Surveying North Carolina, PLLC and provided by Crow Holdings.
2. Stream Delineation, Wetlands and Historic Area Information provided by ATLAS Environmental
LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM IMPACTS - OVERALL EXHIBIT, CLARK FARMS EAST
MARCH 23, 2022
CHI CAROLINAS 103 LINCOLN, L.P.
I
r•-•
ArRU_D
v
ACRO DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
vC�
ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS

hiblt (1_1 slope).dwg
725"
Proposed BMP
STREAM IMPACT #1
ACRO-DS
ACRO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ENGINEERS• SURVEYORS
It
50' Stream Buffer
(from Top of Bank) ;
95 LF of 84 inch RCP Culvert @ 1.06%
Installed 12" below stream channel
US IE = 707.49
DS IE = 706.48
Stream Delineation
30)1111111111.
NORTH ARROW
0
0'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
1 o' 20'
r. Approximate Bottom
of Reinforced Slope -"
95 LF of Permanent Impact (Fill)
Perennial Stream
Area= 618 SF (0.014 Ac)
40'
Approximate Bottom �
of Reinforced Slope ,
Impact S1
Permanent Road Crossing
95' (0.014 acre)
Proposed BMP
ORIGIN OF DATA NOTE:
1. All Existing linework taken from "Boundary Survey of Parcel ID: 4603122239, 4603111318, 4603103856, 4603007263,
4602097292, 4602184906, 4602170931, 4602262724, 4602273637, 4602383345, 4602299511 Hwy 16 Catawba Springs Township,
Lincoln County, North Carolina" dated 11/03/2021 created by SGC Surveying North Carolina, PLLC and provided by Crow Holdings.
2. Stream Delineation Information provided by ATLAS Environmental
LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM IMPACTS - OVERALL EXHIBIT, CLARK FARMS EAST
MARCH 23, 2022
CHI CAROLINAS 103 LINCOLN, L.P.

7
nl
`760--�'�
5
730
90 LF of Permanent Impact (Fill)
Intermittent Stream
Area = 146 SF (0.003 Ac)
Impact S7
Permanent Fill Slope / Grading
90' (0.003 acre)
WETLANDS/STREAM #2A & 2B
ACRO-DS
ACRO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS
Permanent Wetlands Impact (Fill)
Area = 6,104 SF (0.140 Ac)
Prop. Retaining Wall
Stream Delineation
740
Wetlands (lyp.);
Lo_
NORTH ARROW
50' Stream Buffer
(from Top of Bank)
SCALE: 1" = 30'
0' 15' 30'
60'
0"
1"
Approximate Bottom
Slope
Impact W1
Permanent Fill Slope / Grading
0.140 acre
Impact W2
Permanent Fill Slope / Grading
0.002 acre
Stream Delineation
Permanent Wetlands Impact (Fill)
Area = 75 SF (0.002 Ac)
ORIGIN OF DATA NOTE:
1. All Existing linework taken from "Boundary Survey of Parcel ID: 4603122239, 4603111318, 4603103856, 4603007263,
4602097292, 4602184906, 4602170931, 4602262724, 4602273637, 4602383345, 4602299511 Hwy 16 Catawba Springs Township,
Lincoln County, North Carolina" dated 11/03/2021 created by SGC Surveying North Carolina, PLLC and provided by Crow Holdings.
2. Stream Delineation Information provided by ATLAS Environmental
LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM IMPACTS - OVERALL EXHIBIT, CLARK FARMS EAST
MARCH 23, 2022
CHI CAROLINAS 103 LINCOLN, L.P.

STREAM IMPACT #3
ACRO-DS
ACRO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS
Approximate Bottom of Reinforced Slope•
Top of Reinforced Slope
of Permanent Impact (Fill)
Perennial Stream
Area = 699 SF (0.016 Ac)
75 LF of (3) 66 inch RCP Culvert @ 2.67
Installed 12" below stream channel
US IE= 719.00
DS IE = 717.00
_ Approximate Bottom of Reinforced Slope -
50' Stream Buffer "'
•
(from Top of Bank) Stream Delineation
NORTH ARROW
SCALE: 1" = 20'
0' 10' 20'
40'
.5^
2"
50' Stream Buffer
(from Top of Bank)
Impact S4
Permanent Road Crossing
86' (0.016 acre)
50' Stream Buffer
(from Top of Bank)
ORIGIN OF DATA NOTE:
1. All Existing linework taken from "Boundary Survey of Parcel ID: 4603122239, 4603111318, 4603103856, 4603007263,
4602097292, 4602184906, 4602170931, 4602262724. 4602273637, 4602383345, 4602299511 Hwy 16 Catawba Springs Township,
Lincoln County, North Carolina" dated 11/03/2021 created by SGC Surveying North Carolina, PLLC and provided by Crow Holdings.
2. Stream Delineation Information provided by ATLAS Environmental
LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM IMPACTS - OVERALL EXHIBIT, CLARK FARMS EAST
MARCH 23, 2022
CHI CAROLINAS 103 LINCOLN, L.P.

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id.SAW-2021-02439County:Lincoln U.S.G.S.Quad:NC-Lowesville
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Crow Holdings
Matt Cochrane
Address: 4064 Colony Road Suite 405
Charlotte.NC 28211
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail: mcochrane@chindustriaLcom
Size(acres) 139.75 Nearest Town Denver
Nearest Waterway Forney Creek River Basin Santee
USGS HUC 03050101 Coordinates Latitude:35.464449
Longitude:-81.006403
Location description:Project is located at 926 Airlie Parkway.near the town of Denver.Lincoln County.North Carolina.PIN
(0:90022.90020.02337.and 50096
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property,that may be subj ect to Section 404 ofthe Clean Water
Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).The waters have been
delineated,and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable.The approximate boundaries
of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 12/8/2021.Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may be used in the permit evaluation process,including determining compensatory mitigation.For purposes of computation of
impacts,compensatory mitigation requirements,and other resource protection measures,a permit decision made on the basis of a
preliminary JD will treat allwaters andwetlands thatwould be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they
are jurisdictionalwaters of the U.S.This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part 331).However,you may request an approved JD,which is an appealable
action,by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
0 There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property,that may be subjectto Section 404 ofthe Clean Water
Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).However,since the waters
have not been properly delineated,this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary determination is merely an effective presump tion of CWA/RHA
jurisdiction overall of the waters at the project area,which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable
permit decision.We recommend thatyou have the waters on your project a rea/property delineated.As the Corps may not be able
to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultantto conduct a delineation that can
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above descnbedproject area/property subjectto the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403)and Section 404 ofthe Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waterson the above described project area/property subjectto thepermit requirements of Section 404 ofthe Clean
Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or ourpublished regulations,this determination maybe
relied upon fora period not to exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
❑We recommend you have the waters on yourproject area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
El The waters on yourproject area/property havebeen delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps.The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE.We strongly suggest you have
this delineation surveyed. Upon completion,this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified,this survey

SAW-2021-02439
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA j urisdiction on your property which,provided there is no change in
the law or our published regulations,maybe relied upon for a period notto exceed five years.
Li The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official
identified below onDATE.Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied
upon fora period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S.,to include wetlands,present on the above describedproject area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination maybe relied upon for a periodnotto exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
E The property is located in one ofthe 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA).
You should contactthe Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City,NC,at(252)808-2808 to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US,including wetlands,without a Department ofthe Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC§ 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,construction or
placement of structures,or work within navigable waters ofthe United States without a Department of the Armypermit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC§401 and/or 403).If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program,please contact Krystynka B Stygar at 252-545-0507 or
kry sty nka.b.sty gar@usace.a rmy.mil.
C. Basis For Determination:Based on information submitted by the applicant and available to the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers,the project area exhibits criteria for waters of the U.S.as defined in 33
CFR 328,Regulatory Guidance letter 05-05,and the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual,and/or
Regional Supplement to the 1987 Manual:Eastern Piedmont and Mountains v2.0 See the preliminary
jurisdictional determination form dated 12/9/2021.
D. Remarks:See approximate jurisdictional boundaries on map entitled, "Airlie Parkway Drive-12/08/2021"
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determinationhas been conducted to identify the limits of Corps'Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation pro visions of theFood Security
Act of 1985. If youoryourtenant are USDA Program participants,or anticipate participation in USDAprograms,you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information(This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination,you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and Request for Appeal(RFA)form. Ifyourequest to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr.Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Floor M9
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A.SHANNIN( USACE.ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5,and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days ofthe date ofthe NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form,it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the p ivision Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
114134
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date ofJD:12/9/2021 Expiration Date ofJD:Not applicable

SAW-2021-02439
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so,please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/Vp=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Atlas Environmental Inc
Jennifer Robertson
Address: 338 S.Sharon Amity Road.#411
Charlotte.NC 28211
Telephone Number: 704-512-1206
E-mail: iobertson@,atlasenvicom
Property Owner: Ingleside Real Estate Investments
FIRST LAST
Address: PO Box 9
Lincolnton.NC 28093

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant:Crow Holdings,MattCochrane File Number:SAW-2 0 2 1-02439 Date:12/9/2021
Attached is: See Section below
▪ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
® PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I- The following identifies yourrights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at orhttp://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegzlatorvProg-amandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP), you may accept the LOP and yourwork is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all
rights to appeal the permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly.You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice,or you will
forfeit yourright to appealthe permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter,the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may:(a)modify the permit to address all of your concerns,(b)modify the permit to address some of your
objections,or(c)not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
eva luating your objections,the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration,as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all
rights to appeal the permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictionaldeterminations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appealthe declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appealthe denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice,means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD,you may appealthe approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish,you may request an approved JD(which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II-REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe yourreasons for appealing the decision or yourobjections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where yourreasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record,the Corps memorandum forthe
record of the appeal conference or meeting,and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However,you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
I f you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appealprocess you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division MR.PHILIP A.SHANNIN
Attn: Krystynka B Stygar ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
Charlotte Regulatory Office CESAD-PDS-O
U.S Army Corps of Engineers 60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST,FLOOR M9
8430 University Executive Park Drive,Suite 615 ATLANTA,GEORGIA30303-8803
Charlotte,North Carolina 28262
PHONE:[phone];FAX[phone]
EMAIL:PHILIP.A.SHANNIN@,USACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel,and any government
consultants,to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation,and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi tions.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division,Attn:Krystynka B Stygar,8430 University Executive Park Drive Suite
615,Charlotte,North Carolina 28262
For Permit denials,Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer,Commander,U.S.Army Engineer Division,South Atlantic,Attn:Mr.Philip Shannin,Administrative
Appeal Officer,CESAD-PDO,60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15,Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
Phone:[phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 11/15/2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Crow Holdings,Matt Cochrane,4064
Colony Road Suite 405, Charlotte,NC 28211
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District,Airlie Parkway,SAW-2021-
02439
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Project is located at 926 Airlie
Parkway,near the town of Denver,Lincoln County,North Carolina.PIN(s):90022,90020, 02337,and 50096
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County:Lincoln City: Denver
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):Latitude:35.464449 Longitude:-81.006403
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:Forney Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑Office(Desk) Determination. Date:
®Field Determination. Date(s): December 08,2021
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE"SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number Latitude Longitude Estimated Type of aquatic Geographic
(decimal (decimal amount of resources(i.e., authority to which
degrees) degrees) aquatic wetland vs.non- the aquatic
resources in wetland waters) resource"may be"
review area subject(i.e.,
(acreage and Section 404or
linear feet,if Section 10/404)
applicable
CH 100 35.45792 -81.00513 3846 LF Non-wetland waters Section 404
CH 200 35.45841 -81.00368 1347 LF Non-wetland waters Section 404
CH 300 35.46153 -81.00573. 248 LF Non-wetland waters Section 404
CH 400 35.46189 -81.00529 198 If Non-wetland waters Section 404
CH 500 35.46298 -81.00378 47 LF Non-wetland waters Section 404
CH 600 35.46428 -81.00438 942 LF Non-wetland waters Section 404
CH 700 35.45777 -81.00567 93 LF Non-wetland waters Section 404
WL 1000 35.45755 -81.00567 0.025 acres Wetland Section 404
WL 1100 35.46332 -81.00357 0.006 acres Wetland Section 404
WL 2000 35.45843 -81.00344 0.002 acres Wetland Section 404
W L 3000 35.46141 -81.00561 0.154 acres Wetland Section 404
W L 4000 35.46209 -81.00550 0.002 acres Wetland Section 404
W L 5000 35.46209 -81.00354 0.018 acres Wetland Section 404
W L 6000 35.46461 -81.00441 0.006 acres Wetland Section 404
WL 7000 3.5.4577 -81.00848 0.011 acres Wetland Section 404
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the

review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD(AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit,or a Nationwide
General Permit(NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification"(PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1)the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD,which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2)the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3)the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4)the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit,including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;(5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subjectpermit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,signing a proffered individual permit)or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action,or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and(7)whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further,an AJD, a proffered
individual permit(and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If,during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area,the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result,as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD(check all that apply)Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
®Maps,plans,plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:AtlasEnvironmentalforCrow Holdings.LLC
®Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.Datasheets:
❑Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑Corps navigable waters' study:
®U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
®USGS NHD data:
15 USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
®U.S. Geological Survey map(s).Cite scale&quad name:Lowesville
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:GIS Database
Nationalwetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:GIS Database
❑State/local wetland inventory map(s):
®FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):Aerials.VicinityMap
or® Other(Name& Date): Site photographs 08/27/2021 and 09/02/2021
❑Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Other information(please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
4/46
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person requesting PJD
staff member completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
12/9/2021 impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms.If the requester does not respondwithin the established
time frame,the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

4/
Detail 4: Pa.e
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
Lincoln Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Culvert
I I
eek Ct
rt
CD
rn
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
NO ON AM MI
N
•
Der Sra�k Dr _i;
CgCe
\` Ibrest`Oa
Sketch Map provided for illustrative purposes and
preliminary planning only. Not intended to be relied upon
for exact location, dimension, or orientation. All findings
and assessments are subject to verification from the
Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water
Resources, and/or other appropriate local authorities.
Do not reproduce map set except in its entirety.
Detail 3: Page 5
Detail 2: Page 4
Detail 1: Page 3
State
Rd 15
W Pointe_Dr
eb
esse o De
•
0 300 600 900 1200 Ft
"milif/
, _ Ti.. j
lLJ
IRON MENTAL
Page 1 of 6
Figure: la
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449, -81.006403
Date: December 08, 2021

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Harbor master
(
6 . •
o/ State Rd}15
a
v
y d[lD Clover Lt
4- „ 1 1
r.
Ar Town end o� .,
Legend
O Review Area '` o.
ilk
Streets
I I Lincoln Co. Parcels I ,gin
Delineation toaKoC , , „A-7.7--.,ws--Q,v'i,r,,.,i„tI.1 \
ces
— Perennials F° ° ; fr " l3
Intermittent — D _
Wetland 0 300 600 900 1200 Ft
M Culvert Illllllllli
� Project Name: Airlie Parkway
� .i As
`a . ni( Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
_-w J)
' ! 4ZP-ONMENTAL For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Pa e 2 of 6 Figure: lb Coordinates: 35.464449, -81.006403 Date: December 08, 2021
9

Potential Wetland
WL 1000: - 0.025
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
Lincoln Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
MN Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
MI Culvert
I I
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Potential Wetland
WL 2000: - 0.002 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
CH 200: - 1347 LF, 0.178 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
CH 100: - 3846 LF, 0.640 Ac
100 200 300 400 Ft
Page 3 of 6
Detail 1 Figure: lc
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449, -81.006403
Date: December 08, 2021

Potential Wetland
WL 4000: - 0.002 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
CH 400: - 198 LF, 0.010 Ac
Legend
CI Review Area
Streets
Lincoln Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
MI Culvert
I I
Potential Wetland
WL 3000: - 0.154 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
CH 300: - 248 LF, 0.009 Ac
Note: Stream length and area include
existing culvert
CH 100 Continued)
100
200
300
400 Ft
Page 4 of 6
Detail 2 Figure: 1d
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449, -81.006403
Date: December 08, 2021

Legend
O Review Area
Streets
I 1 Lincoln Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
= Culvert
ONMENTAL
Page 5 of 6 Detail 3
Figure: le
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449, -81.006403
Potential Wetland
WL 6000: - 0.006 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
CH 600: - 942 LF, 0.058 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
CH 500: - 47 LF, 0.002 Ac
Potential Wetland
WL 5000: - 0.018 Ac
100 200 300 400 Ft
Date: December 08, 2021

Potential Non Wetland
CH 700: - 93 LF, 0.007 AC
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
It
Potential Wetland
WL 7000: - 0.011 Ac
Legend
O Review Area
(--1 Lincoln co. Parcels
Streets
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
INN Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
MI Culvert
N
A
50
100
150
200 Ft
Page 6 of 6
IRONMENTAL
Detail 4
Figure: if
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449, -81.006403
Date: December 08, 2021

Lift
ROY COOPER - ,` .' ,
Governor
ELIZABETH S.BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
March 25, 2022
Matt Cochrane
Crow Holdings
4064 Colony Road, Suite 405
Charlotte, NC 28211 Expiration of Acceptance: 9/25/2022
Project: Airlie Parkway County: Lincoln
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services(DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in-
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state,federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s)an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in-lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
(8-digit HUC)
Catawba 03050101 Riparian Wetland 0.142
Catawba 03050101 Warm Stream 271
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Kellv.Williams(a�ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
AtilViktil,&%27yk,4,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Jennifer Robertson, agent
1;1 217 Street North Carolina Department
1 of Environmental Quality I Division
North of Mitigation Services West Jones 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, Carolina 27699-1652
rtsr1.canrn;.m+
own..K s e,.....Y OVA 919.707.8976

__,;.,..srvz,,,,:...,,,,
totik§:...,
Aro
,, „lb lir_0 i
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M.Banos,Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D.Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary,Darin J.Waters,Ph.D.
December 22, 2021
Austin Baggarley abaggarlev(2i atlasenvi.com
Atlas Environmental,Inc.
338 South Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte,NC 28211
Re: Construct warehouse distribution center, 926 Airlie Parkway,Denver, Lincoln County, ER 21-2771
Dear Mr. Baggarley:
Thank you for your letter of November 8, 2021,regarding the above-referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submission and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore,we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator,at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(ancdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project,please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(22_4,,24. itia),Ikai-&-
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
U
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location:109 East Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6898

FISH&WILDLIFE
SERVICE
a�� Z4 United States Department of the Interior c„ir- 1,---it,
UM
p
4RCNa-` FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
3XI
�s Asheville Field Office °�^
160 Zillicoa Street Suite B
Asheville,North Carolina 28801
January 7,2021
Ms.Jennifer Robertson
Atlas Environmental,Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road,#411
Charlotte,North Carolina 28211
Subject: Proposed Airlie Parkway Industrial Development in Denver,Lincoln County,North Carolina.
Dear Ms.Robertson:
On November 22,2021,we received(via email)your information requesting our review of the subject
project. We have reviewed the information that you presented for this request and the following
comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act(42
U.S.C.§4321 et seq.);the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act,as amended(16 U.S.C. 661 -667e); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973,as amended(16 U.S.C. 1531 - 1543)(Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided,Crow Holdings proposes to construct three industrial warehouses
and associated infrastructure on approximately 139.8 acres at 926 Airlie Parkway in Denver,Lincoln
County,North Carolina. A preliminary site plan was included with the review request.
A site visit was conducted on December 10,2021 and a final grading plan was provided on December 22,
2021.
Federally Listed Species
An assessment of suitable habitat and presence/absence species surveys for four species were conducted
by environmental specialist with Atlas Environmental, Inc. (Atlas)in August and September of 2021.
The findings were compiled and included in the review request submitted to our office on November 22,
2021.The following species and their associated habitats were evaluated.
Species Status'
Dwarf-flowered heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora T
Michaux's sumac Rhus michauxii E
Northern long-eared bat Myotis septentrionalis T
Schweinitz's sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii E
'E=endangered and T=threatened.
The review request states that suitable habitat for dwarf-flowered heartleaf is present on site;however,the
only species seen in the Hexastylis genus during surveys was Hexastylis arifolia. Because species in the
Hexastylis genus are evergreen and Hexastylis arifolia is readily identifiable with leaf morphology,the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(Service)Asheville Ecological Services Field Office(AFO)will accept

Ms. Robertson—Atlas 2
this survey outside of the optimal survey window for dwarf-flowered heartleaf. Based on negative results
of visual surveys in August and September of 2021,and given the information provided,we would
concur with a"may affect,not likely to adversely affect"(NLAA)determination from the lead federal
action agency for this species.
The review request states that suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac is present on site;however,the
species was not observed during surveys. Surveys were conducted in August and September of 2021,
outside of the optimal survey window for the species. When targeted botanical surveys are conducted
outside of the optimal survey windows,the Service may not accept survey findings without prior approval
and discussion with the appropriate section 7 biologist in the AFO. We appreciate the project proponent's
consideration of Michaux's sumac when evaluating the action area for impacts to federally listed species
and their habitats. Michaux's sumac is historically known from Lincoln County and the AFO,generally,
does not require section 7 consultation for species only known historically from a county. Therefore,
section 7 consultation is not required for this species.
Based on the information provided,suitable summer roosting habitat for northern long-eared bat(NLEB)
may be present on the site. However,the final 4(d)rule(effective as of February 16,2016),exempts
incidental take of NLEB associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known
hibernation site,and greater than 150 feet from a known,occupied maternity roost during the pup season
(June 1 —July 31). The proposed development would occur at a location where any incidental take that
may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d)rule. Although not required,we encourage
the project proponent to avoid any associated tree clearing activities during the NLEB active season from
April 1 —October 15.
The review request states that suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is present on site and three
discrete locations containing approximately 18 plants were identified on the southern edge of the existing
gas line right-of-way. An updated grading plan showing avoidance of all Schweinitz's sunflowers on site
was provided on December 22,2021. Given the project proponent's commitment to avoiding impacts to
sunflowers,we would concur with a NLAA determination from the lead federal action agency for this
species.
The proposed project is in a county that has potential or known occurrence records of at-risk(ARS)and
candidate(CAN)species. Below is a list of these species known from Lincoln County and for which we
have concerns.
Species Status'
Little brown bat Myotis lucifugus ARS
Monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus CAN
Tricolored bat Perimyotis subflavus ARS
'ARS=at-risk species and CAN=candidate species.
Little brown bat and tricolored bat are ARS and monarch butterfly is a CAN. ARS and CAN are not
legally protected under the Act and are not subject to any of its provisions,including section 7,unless
they are formally proposed or listed as endangered or threatened. While lead federal agencies are not
prohibited from jeopardizing the continued existence of an ARS,CAN,or proposed species until the
species becomes listed,the prohibition against jeopardy and taking a listed species under section 9 of the
Act applies as soon as the listing becomes effective,regardless of the stage of completion of the proposed
action. We are including these species in our response to give you advance notification and request your
assistance in protecting them. Although not required,we recommend that the presence/absence of these
species be addressed in future biological assessments and biological evaluations prepared for similar

Ms.Robertson—Atlas 3
projects. Additionally,we encourage you to coordinate projects with the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission on behalf of these species.
We believe the requirements under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled for the federally listed species
discussed above. However,obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1)new
information reveals impacts of the identified action may affect listed species or critical habitat in a
manner not previously considered,(2)the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that was
not considered in this review,or(3)a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be
affected by the identified action.
Fish and Wildlife Resource Recommendations
We are also concerned about the potential effects the proposed project could have on other natural
resources. We offer the following general recommendations for the benefit of fish and wildlife resources:
• Equipment Use in Riparian Areas and In-Stream. Equipment should be operated from the
streambank. If in-stream work is necessary, stone causeways,work bridges,or mats(designed
for the specific location and type of equipment)should be used. Work pads on streambanks or
approaches to in-stream work areas should minimize disturbance to woody vegetation.
Equipment operated in riparian areas and in/near aquatic resources should be inspected daily and
maintained regularly to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids,or other toxic materials. Construction staging,toxic material storage,and
equipment maintenance,including refueling,should occur outside of the riparian area. The
project proponent should report any toxic material spills in riparian areas and/or aquatic resources
to the Service within 24 hours.
• Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Construction activities near aquatic resources,streams,
and wetlands have the potential to cause bank destabilization,water pollution,and water quality
degradation if measures to control site runoff are not properly installed and maintained. In order
to effectively reduce erosion and sedimentation impacts,best management practices specific to
the extent and type of construction should be designed and installed prior to land-disturbing
activities and should be maintained throughout construction. Natural fiber matting(coir)should
be used for erosion control as synthetic netting can trap animals and persists in the environment
beyond its intended purpose. Land disturbance should be limited to what can be stabilized
quickly,preferably by the end of the workday. Once construction is complete,disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native riparian grass and tree species as soon as possible. For
maximum benefits to water quality and bank stabilization,riparian areas should be forested;
however,if the areas are maintained in grass,they should not be mowed. The Service can
provide information on potential sources of plant material upon request.
A complete design manual that is consistent with the requirements of the North Carolina
Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act and Administrative Rules,can be found at the following
website: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources.
• Impervious Surfaces/Stormwater/Low Impact Development(LID). Increased development
contributes to the increased quantity and decreased quality of stormwater entering project area
waterways. Additionally,increased development outside the floodplain increases stormwater
flows already caused by the lack of or loss of riparian buffers and floodplain development.

Ms.Robertson—Atlas 4
Recent studies' have shown that areas of 10 percent to 20 percent impervious surface(such as
roofs,roads,and parking lots)double the amount of stormwater runoff compared to natural cover
and decrease deep infiltration(groundwater recharge)by 16 percent. At 35—50 percent
impervious surface,runoff triples,and deep infiltration is decreased by 40 percent. Above 75
percent impervious surface,runoff is 5.5 times higher than natural cover,and deep infiltration is
decreased by 80 percent. Additionally,the adequate treatment of stormwater at project sites is
essential for the protection of water quality and aquatic habitat. Impervious surfaces also collect
pathogens,metals,sediment,and chemical pollutants and quickly transmit them(via stormwater
runoff)to receiving waters. According to the Environmental Protection Agency,this
nonpoint-source pollution is one of the major threats to water quality in the United States,posing
one of the greatest threats to aquatic life,and is also linked to chronic and acute illnesses in
human populations from exposure through drinking water and contact recreational.
Increased stormwater runoff also directly damages aquatic and riparian habitat,causing
streambank and stream channel scouring. Additionally,impervious surfaces reduce groundwater
recharge,resulting in even lower than expected stream flows during drought periods,which can
induce potentially catastrophic effects for fish,mussels,and other aquatic life. To avoid any
additional impacts to habitat quality within the watershed,we recommend that all new
developments,regardless of the percentage of impervious surface area created,implement
stormwater retention and treatment measures designed to replicate and maintain the hydrograph at
the preconstruction condition.
We recommend the use of low impact development techniques,2 such as reduced road widths,
grassed swales in place of curb and gutter,rain gardens,and wetland retention areas,for retaining
and treating stormwater runoff rather than the more traditional measures,such as large retention
ponds,etc. These designs often cost less to install and significantly reduce environmental
impacts from development.
Where detention ponds are used,stormwater outlets should drain through a vegetated area prior to
reaching any natural stream or wetland area. Detention structures should be designed to allow for
the slow discharge of stormwater,attenuating the potential adverse effects of stormwater surges;
thermal spikes;and sediment,nutrient,and chemical discharges. Also,because the purpose of
stormwater control measures is to protect streams and wetlands,no stormwater control measures
or best management practices should be installed within any stream(perennial or intermittent)or
wetland.
We also recommend that consideration be given to the use of pervious materials(i.e.,pervious
concrete,interlocking/open paving blocks,etc.)for the construction of roads,driveways,
sidewalks,etc. Pervious surfaces minimize changes to the hydrology of the watershed and can be
used to facilitate groundwater recharge. Pervious materials are also less likely to absorb and store
heat and allow the cooler soil below to cool the pavement. Additionally,pervious concrete
requires less maintenance and is less susceptible to freeze/thaw cracking due to large voids within
the concrete.
'Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group(15 federal agencies of the United States Government).
Published October 1998,Revised August 2001. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles,Processes,and Practices.
GPO Item No.0120-A;SuDocs No.A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653. ISBN-0-934213-59-3.
2We recommend visiting the Environmental Protection Agency's Web site(http://www.epa.gov/polluted-runoff
nonpoint-source pollution/urban-runoff-low-impact-development)for additional information and fact sheets
regarding the implementation of low-impact-development techniques.

Ms.Robertson—Atlas 5
Use of any of the proposed stormwater collection devices described above will dramatically
decrease the quantity and increase the quality of stormwater runoff.
• Pollinators. Pollinators,such as most bees,some birds and bats,and other insects, including
moths and butterflies,play a crucial role in the reproduction of flowering plants and production of
most fruits and vegetables. Over 75 percent of flowering plants and about 75 percent of crops are
pollinated by these types of fauna. A recent study of the status of pollinators in North America
by the National Academy of Sciences found that populations of honey bees(which are not native
to North America)and many wild pollinators are declining. Declines in wild pollinators are a
result of disease and the loss,degradation,and fragmentation of habitat. Because loss of habitat
and diminished native food sources have decreased the populations and diversity of pollinators
throughout the country,we recommend that development projects be sited in areas that are
previously disturbed(fallow fields,closed industrial sites,etc.)or sites that do not impact mature
forests, streams,or wetlands.
We have records of rare species in the area,including monarch butterfly,a federal candidate for
listing.3 Monarch butterflies east of the Rocky Mountains used to number in the hundreds of
millions but the population has declined by approximately 80 percent. Loss of habitat due to
genetically modified crops,overuse of herbicides and insecticides,urban, suburban and
agricultural development,disease,climate change,and overwintering site degradation are the
leading causes of monarch decline. Adults use a wide variety of flowering plants throughout
migration for nectar and breeding.However,milkweed plants(Asclepias spp.)are essential to
monarch breeding as these are the only genus of plants that can host monarchs in their larval
form. For a regional and seasonal list of plants important to monarch butterflies,please visit the
Xerces Society website at: http://www.xerces.org/monarch-nectar-plants/.
Although the provisions of section 7 of the Act do not currently apply to candidate species or
other non-listed pollinators,we would greatly appreciate your assistance in determining if
monarch butterflies or suitable habitat for the species is present on the proposed project site. If
individuals or suitable habitat is present,impacts should be avoided. More specific information
about monarch butterfly can be found at the Service website dedicated to the species at:
https://www.fws.gov/savethemonarcht
To reduce development impacts to monarch butterflies and other pollinators and/or to increase the
habitat and species diversity within the project area,we recommend the following measures be
incorporated into project designs:
1. Throughout the site,avoid non-native seed mixes and plants. Instead, sow native seed mixes
and plant species that are beneficial to pollinators.
a. Avoid seed mixes and plants that have been pre-treated with insecticides,such as
neonictinoids.
b. Taller-growing pollinator plant species should be planted around the periphery of the
site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be restricted during the summer
3"Taxa for which the[Fish and Wildlife]Service has on file enough substantial information on biological
vulnerability and threat(s)to support proposals to list them as endangered or threatened. Proposed rules have not yet
been issued because this action is precluded at present by other listing activity. Development and publication of
proposed rules on these taxa are anticipated. The Service encourages State and other Federal agencies as well as
other affected parties to give consideration to these taxa in environmental planning"(Federal Register,February 28,
1996). Taxa formerly considered as"Category 1"are now considered as"candidates."

Ms.Robertson—Atlas 6
months. Taller plants,not mowed during the summer,would provide benefits to
pollinators,habitat for ground-nesting/feeding birds,and cover for small mammals.
c. Native low-growing/groundcover species should be planted in areas that need to be
maintained. This would provide benefits to pollinators while also minimizing the
amount of maintenance,such as mowing and herbicide treatment.
d. Using a seed mix that includes milkweed species is especially beneficial for monarch
butterflies. The following website provides additional information and a
comprehensive list of native plant species that benefit pollinators:
http://www.xerces.org/pollinator-resource-center/mid-atlantic. We also offer our
assistance with developing seed mixes that can be used in conjunction with fast
growing erosion control seed mixes for overall soil stability and pollinator benefits.
e. Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes,and pollinator habitat
requirements can be provided upon request.
2. Mowing and grounds maintenance,including pesticide use, should be scheduled to not
interfere with monarch breeding or nectaring at project sites that occur along the migration
route. To reduce harm,we advise mowing in the fall or winter when flowers are not in bloom.
3. Provide nesting sites for pollinator species. Different pollinators have different needs for
nesting sites. Therefore,we recommend project designs include a diverse array of habitats to
accommodate varied pollinators. For example:
a. Hummingbirds typically nest in trees or shrubs.
b. Many butterflies lay eggs on specific host plants.
c. Most bees nest in the ground and in wood or dry plant stems.
d. For additional information and actions that can be taken to benefit pollinators,please
visit the following website: https://www.fws.gov/pollinators/.
4. Minimize effects of outdoor light pollution.Recent studies indicate that artificial lighting
disrupts the natural reproduction and feeding patterns of nocturnal pollinators such as beetles
and moths. This disruption results in a decrease of pollination rates in plants and a decrease in
the health and diversity of nocturnal pollinators. When developing an outdoor lighting plan or
installing any outdoor lighting devices,we recommend the following measures be considered
to minimize potential adverse effects of outdoor lighting:
a. Decrease the number of light fixtures,as practicable,to meet lighting objectives.
b. Install lighting only in areas that need illumination for safety(e.g.paths,roads,etc.).
Avoid lighting landscape features such as trees,shrubs,or building facades.
c. Install fully shielded lights that direct light downward.
d. Use only low-pressure sodium(LPS),high-pressure sodium(HPS),or light emitting
diode(LED)light sources that emit"warm"light. "Warm"light sources are those
that contain low amounts of blue light in their spectrum.Choosing light sources with a
color temperature of no more than 3,000 Kelvins will minimize the effects of blue
light exposure.
e. For additional information and actions that can be taken to reduce outdoor light
pollution,please visit the following website: https://www.darksky.org/our-
work/lighting/lighting for-citizens/lighting-basics/.
• Stream Buffers. Natural, forested riparian buffers are critical to the health of aquatic
ecosystems. They accomplish the following:
o Catch and filter runoff,thereby helping to prevent nonpoint-source pollutants from
reaching streams.
o Enhance the in-stream processing of both point-and nonpoint-source pollutants.
o Act as"sponges"by absorbing runoff(which reduces the severity of floods)and by
allowing runoff to infiltrate and recharge groundwater levels(which maintains stream
flows during dry periods).

Ms.Robertson—Atlas 7
o Catch and help prevent excess woody debris from entering the stream and creating
logjams.
o Stabilize stream banks and maintain natural channel morphology.
o Provide coarse woody debris for habitat structure and most of the dissolved organic
carbon and other nutrients necessary for the aquatic food web.
o Maintain air and water temperatures around the stream.
Forested riparian buffers(a minimum 50 feet wide along intermittent streams and 100 feet wide
along perennial streams [or the full extent of the 100-year floodplain,whichever is greater])
should be created and/or maintained adjacent to all aquatic areas. Within the watersheds
supporting federally listed aquatic species,we recommend undisturbed,forested buffers that are
naturally vegetated with trees,shrubs,and herbaceous vegetation. These buffers should extend a
minimum of 200 feet from the banks of all perennial streams and a minimum of 100 feet from
the banks of all intermittent streams(or the full extent of the 100-year floodplain,whichever is
greater.) Impervious surfaces,ditches,pipes,roads,utility lines(sewer,water,gas,transmission,
etc.),and other infrastructure that requires maintenance,cleared rights-of-way and/or compromise
the functions and values of the forested buffers should not occur within these riparian areas.
• Stream Crossings. Bridges or spanning structures should be used for all permanent roadway
crossings of streams and associated wetlands. Structures should span the channel and the
floodplain in order to minimize impacts to aquatic resources,allow for the movement of aquatic
and terrestrial organisms,and eliminate the need to place fill in streams,wetlands,and
floodplains.
Bridges should be designed and constructed so that no piers or bents are placed in the stream,
approaches and abutments do not constrict the stream channel,and the crossing is perpendicular
to the stream. Spanning some or all of the floodplain allows stream access to the floodplain,
dissipates energy during high flows,and provides terrestrial wildlife passage. When bank
stabilization is necessary,we recommend that the use of riprap be minimized and that a
riprap-free buffer zone be maintained under the bridge to allow for wildlife movement. If fill in
the floodplain is necessary,floodplain culverts should be added through the fill to allow the
stream access to the floodplain during high flows.
If bridges are not possible and culverts are the only option,we suggest using bottomless culverts.
Bottomless culverts preserve the natural stream substrate,create less disturbance during
construction,and provide a more natural post-construction channel. Culverts should be of
sufficient size to leave natural stream functions and habitats at the crossing site unimpeded.
Culvert installation and presence should not change water depth,volume(flow), or velocity levels
that permit aquatic organism passage; and accommodate the movement of debris and bed material
during bankfull events. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
• Utility Line Crossings. In the interest of reducing impacts to natural resources,utility crossings
(i.e.,sewer,gas,and water lines)should be kept to a minimum,and all utility infrastructure
(including manholes)should be kept out of riparian buffer areas. If a utility crossing is necessary,
we recommend that you first consider the use of directional boring. Directional boring under
streams significantly minimizes impacts to aquatic resources and riparian buffers.
If directional boring cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the only viable method,
every effort should be made to ensure that impacts to in-stream features are minimized and
stabilized upon completion of the project. Our past experiences with open-trench crossings
indicate that this technique increases the likelihood for future lateral movement of the stream

Ms. Robertson—Atlas 8
(which could undercut or erode around the utility line),and the correction of such problems could
result in costly future maintenance and devastating impacts to natural resources. Therefore,as
much work as possible should be accomplished in the dry,and the amount of disturbance should
not exceed what can be successfully stabilized by the end of the workday. In-stream work should
avoid the spring fish spawning season and should consider forecasted high flow events.
Regardless of the crossing method,all utility lines should cross streams perpendicularly. We
strongly encourage that a qualified biologist monitor the work area until the work is complete in
order to identify any additional impact-minimization measures. The Service may be available to
assist you in this effort.
To determine if any maintenance is required,the work site should be monitored at least every 3
months during the first 24 months and annually thereafter. Moreover,we recommend the
development of a riparian monitoring and maintenance program that would outline procedures for
the prompt stabilization of streambanks near the utility crossing(should any streambank erosion
or destabilization occur)throughout the life of this project.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Ms. Rebekah Reid of
our staff at [e-mail],if you have any questions. In any future correspondence concerning
this project,please reference Log Number 4-2-22-312.
Sincerely,
--original signed--
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor

Legend
O Review Area
Lincoln co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Culvert
NMENTAL
Figure:
Harbor_Maste
1 1119I1 III 11111411 f114
1Vl6i,111141C1111
1'11i91111 11910411 I
1-444144411 641i4/4i4
1-1H4111111141114 ,Yi
Farmstead Ln
- eaest
r Odk.or
400 800 1200 1600 Ft
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449, -81.006403
Date: October 20, 2020

I}if-HI 14H4-HHH{. } +Hf 1 E.+IiI+i-IfFI+F+1fl
0-41-1-1 } IH4 i-}{; }meµ- -Et I HF+4F+1-H
U+ I!I µ C !I ra { )- H4141+N-9 I-II-I-I-I0I II I IId1
�Rl;k!14} f,u C I1
(IIIIIIII{Hfl1 +l- 1-4441114ianR
D-W;I N [ 1 I II II IC ] ICI4bIIC1.1A
FFI ff 1-1H41114t R
Legend
O Review Area
Lincoln co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
Ii• Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
OM Culvert
I
Figure:
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449, -81.006403
Date: October 20, 2020

Preliminary Site Plan/Feasibility Study Stream and Wetland Impact Calculations
Stream Impacts
Name None/Part/All Area (Ac) Length (LF)
CH 100 Partial 0.496 3023
CH 200 Partial 0.167 1257
CH 300 All 0.014 318
CH 400 All 0.01 198
CH 500 All 0.002 47
CH 600 Partial 0.038 598
CH 700 None 0 0
SUM 0.727 5441
Wetland Impacts
Name None/Part/All Amount Units
WL 1000 Partial 0.003 Ac
WL 1100 All 0.006 Ac
WL 2000 All 0.002 Ac
WL 3000 All 0.137 Ac
WL 3100 All 0.006 Ac
WL 4000 All 0.002 Ac
WL 5000 All 0.004 Ac
WL 6000 Partial 0.001 Ac
WL 7000 None 0 Ac
SUM 0.161

• 663
91664 86038
Parcel Map
91818 02731174
�'
...l��'
02612 gt
/
91662
: r cZ
SEE
• .,•g 91660
91413
A
73957®�
��i
91819 ryteRd1/
ll
82095
50096
060
91817 IR 2:9 1 .990'
32744
.90
89047
90017
87124
30585
�
'
87913 � 57288
32207
02183 1
6. 02321
rmstead L 1
34198
= 02337
31
itZor 59486 89431
59480 89695 �
89693 02 '�
"��� 31241 58759 30086
90019'�'
58761 41
90020
59474
SI 34435
59472 58760 7
32807
3301
�� ���tre4
1i1k111o.r.o a
••
32908 51306�
34731 'l
.�
. 14„ll,1
�I
c \
51626
31710
Itir
32597 31741�30450 0 303� „
w .. 30397 34525
31535 / . �. 75532
a'
02210�
58934
MM//��
i4
•�©..33585
90022 52141
29983 i' 57409 R►a,..
30046
_
,i�,,//' � ti 02604 " ( 29541
52139
32973 29982
74317
Legend
11, 51379 I _
, .,•
� 'Si. ' 34527
34528�
�\�
31936 52787
I
C! Review Area
��• 30373
51376 90021
33406
85309 32770
72563 55922\\�
Streets
�•% `
30725
0 400 800 1200 1600 Ft
I I Lincoln Parcels
— 1111
79386
1 r.,„�1 �,tS�
•
'GZcc.
~�
C
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
\�
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
`\ ', FIONMENTAL
Figure: 2
Coordinates: 35.464449°/ -81.006403°
Date: August 20, 2021

O Review Area
o Streets
I I Lincoln Parcels
2 Ft Contours
ONMENTAL
Figure: 3
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449°/ -81.006403°
Date: August 20, 2021

� _.
•, `,. - •jo
�f .Ji / ' 1 ) USGS Topographic Map . a
� .,` �,,, ;,. �
t i v, i
/ 4. I
(7 „
IN:) .
Ataa.g.
ililL. \ \\w ,
1 \ / gi A .n. 0111 AO.
..-- ( ,,...1 / i C '-,‘k.„),W ( 111"..7 010 ? ••• \ s--- ---- ill61111EIVIIIIMI
...,1.._-___,..______F ri ,-,:>. \ 1,o it, \ „...__________---,", f ; \ \:"----'N. / /71 ( --_,,, 1 0 L ---- ibill10011
ik_Withift*- -." i' ININI•11;-- ....- IN ' i IA
2
0
_pm es*" V.., •-•1 u-.' •.--,___,J ,, ,..____,, ,.00 __ _,,,...-- , L 00,44- ri
opionSetif if .st, i f. A--.._________ MI? ‘.. "--- ' '-'-'
glagett $1,- lit/ :---- 0 lik - A
, . _„...c,
dr4t, iii . . ___________, ‘ _.......
., , limouip-i-FiFP
,---<,;----_, ,, _ .F4 --- ,....)7,11/4 `—'---k Ir.
,,., -.„-.--- ',N ,,,, 1 kliT, C-----' \ ,_,.1, tii, 0,,, ),,_, /, ,...,,, ,... - ii-o ,
, ....„ ,,,Jr .,,
lir'i.driiiiii• e"
i
. t 0 ti _,-- ----- -4I I Ilit:Pliiii -r1 \ :i Will I R
ielliti ifilVisp__
ter`' . -.__. ` ...� \ \I, r l , ii---r'',/)1 I i i' IM41* ler -0.—,..,
� r`
f.
1 L`- + \ 4 \ -s'ter-r f 0.7. 1 • •ll I _ -
'. j reehl H% ; \.1 7\46,1
\ ' 1 16
1'4
/-N"0/7 /
744M ii
kti*/
/ ii r 1 ) .TryVIA `0.Al , jIP; - 9: aid 'r
le -
bliiii:..-''„A
,. 4,
)1!Ate ‘A , I/4) / ;
011
11116414 Willti rqta**1 1 "I.43'! ,,.:_______0111. t
Arai
Ateirrig row , "lir ,41
ale lipo. .
Legend ► y�!'�-'� r f, _—kg 1► ,: ' .'•.�
O Review Area i I�'���� 1 r I �� IRA?' � 111.17111rArgi"
I �� `yarl pry.. � o®Streets ��� �'Lincoln Parcels z. " 1 l tel)
..o i 11{. 0 400 800 1200 1600 Ft
USGS Topo ��I;1;�\ IIII � iI / . :!re 11�. ,Nixie.. Mil
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
_ Al
w" Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
�yd, 1 RONMENTAL For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Figure: 4 Coordinates: 35.464449°/-81.006403° Date: August 20, 2021

4127 41.;1;_i4 071R
-•41 IF •,...f.J.-ar,_, , _, • mrtjark-ptil,•••.,Arr._..11•4p,„! '''°'4111134111411111'i:444g121;d1i:111111111 r) 1741441741f4(_ Tar 4,W1r4,4
/ w''.7-:141111r) NNILktk; l'- „illik...•;-IA.- `-'"c.=:-.7( i mgrignr4v-", sro USGS Topographic Map tke.„_, .,•-its.,: „„„tuity.3-,. .._ .,„,,..„,-. :I.",:,,1,16 r„,.,,, ,,4
. - , • 0.4,0' *V
.,_:::...,.., _ _:-._____... v C.),, ...--,,-,:-:-a...-,„...':;• -.7-,/,,2, ,00._sr . ....,0,,v, ,,,,, 5,,.-- ..-,.....pg-il argirt9,-4,;,;;.".:1k;_ni,,,this...1, \%,,..---i;i:,;:x..;;;-.'.--.vr,'-,.-`'3''''',',.,--;-:,'.•'
_,-/..,/4,--- ----,'`-v-i I/ ,..,-2,-:::;:,S s\--- ",,/,`)//'I .:1,-,17,7%,,,Ntrio. ...lytif•_ ,....40q411, ,,ivc, 0-..•-gwo 7. ems 1.,n... lit ,,A.,• •, •:. riff4.,),,---,,,,-vr....-',..,-.,„ ...,-.,..,
,--__-----/- -\A--------,--,-,:,. . ' / • .--- -:--- .- s7,
;7---5---7- ---) \"-.,,' -44 , I,(,1 '---,..7,-3r., ' .Aj'`, .„,-s'71-"Watitt,40 0 ,,, .: laii)1(4p .„orysit74,117/04,,MIT .:1R•0447•41N4-T,4Ckot44;.iii ) 'Icy )%r"%ek.','... „,
' ""•••.... -‘,.. '1,4 ,4- .0..,-,,VAL--‘ . , •fier,,Nre„ ou
i ' \ '• -_,-,.•-17.-:::' , '(‘AlprelAkii"..:-IRS:Midi t ,'-, -1, t iibli' -'...w-'4'''w,7.\, I toe,1))1' 11104•81..,s--• sof_-;g2.‘ -- -''d ,7-A14. a ,,lioz
I _...,-: s•c•--\\. ‘-‘, ..-, , . ii--/- - ..•-••-flesi 514:11:0 ?wily- 4-.' ,'‘‘ -itliento.:4 ' 1.:`,":\ h..'•&4.._!11,411A110,41441411-4111.4gM-_ ) ,- .. -111141;§ _\--- -r-/-'4Viii
Ca5:-.. :`/%t,,`a. ',, 4 i' "--_,,..• / ,-__ - a '''' VITA -'11r° a‘s'•' - , IWO. - •IL*;,"-4,
\ -\:-'1,1\'', ,i,l/ , - a■ _ /---- -- ' - -'''ete via, ... 1,-:--- ----1 ,eA..uliole.:• r'A-•Ir;f',& -77_" --..-__:,-,A fr.. , 11W,-i7 \-,_,,,q, ii!' /let?' -4-.0 ;.-C,B .,1.1
li
14%'- ‘K.-.... f t.f\-- p.07-;,-,‘,, ----, \,Q -4,4,-- -- liv, . ' s 1---- ,--A zrr, '-'v 4 ' MI kNs‘'N,'111',''u• - -27,-__:- <-"k-` -".. ,If 7'." 4IVi
, 0 .
rig / --.--)Allpik th. \ (--/-"( ', 1511. - (j->• 'ii-.' 1'10r ).--, `i'''s \--,', jibr•"4-',-,'" . - , lit --)- \\: 131 V- \k L •- ..h.-.°..- ...." '
• . -- .0 ' 'L''C''': 74Alo, 7, ))oi, - ..-.. itVi 'i / ,,11.-. . ), -.41„.%•,,-,N••, i=•-Z\,,,-,k,701 .s.`•,- irf •-wor VI'r
-------;"\\ ;i -- 7;-- -'7 /1 ;; ``'l'`:` ---- --ii A \.., 11,-0 -' -1 ,10i, bi,.; , 1 tv.-6.,,-:. ,;',;:::.:!,,•=2.1....\-___,•4. ' -/-\ - ':_.„-: - -,-, "....,----‘'4'-
\ '\'".',... •^ ,,,,, ' -YIP% ,--,,' • i,.
,,..._•i:k e 4' s , „,i,-- _lo-...,,„, ,
a& .- ---_:_-___„, • •,
(- I' , , ., i Akil , ----:,AR-1.- dhow:Mr ,1.; :...,.:-;,*--7,‘„:,:t•:
nk ,,_,,......_i_____0.---?-,..,,,,,-.. , , , • -„,._..„\-1 v. ,,,
t••044.-tagiv, ,ks,.7:_ i 7.,__,'-,.1f,..,,,_.__,:.:),4:0,4„,t<44F::,,,,v,t4.,_.,.),.. i,, _.:1,:.,__ .3r‘i (1,,,,c,I, ,,-.. ,(_4/00___,1 140-,,,,,,,,, ., , I k ' p,, / Al: !Oft imumeggint ,'N. - i sr..00-: 'A,,.. .
)
( i ' ` --- =- virrn.!!:ttira'',' _ • •" -,,it‘,.;•;!.., ,t: „s?;
`-12 \•el------.7-ti iiiiii,f' .- ' ' -.(...: ' . ' -.....'.....:
'' '' ' -•-‘-----.t' .. '' 0- CIP.' 'rr;f:SO ri • ' .,, • ,,.,
im.s.&0000".Ablif " . ..,----,__..._.L. tit i-S , .y1-----:""---1-''-'.', -''' .4 ilillikal.Z:nr...:Attill'6, 40, ' ' ,:- • ‘:., ' ' ,- Or-ea
ti — ilik ' _.-. ..._ f---;'''' ,-----/exP 0.!MOW,--ffelStt '"-='.'(A---- Mk Jill 1` j,)):---1"7 7.---.-:-..:1-.'''. . ',,R4,:-.7%.•-•••-:•"1-''''''"'"441 -41-4, .1 '. -".•',.' :A,,.. •'''', - • ' ', ' :'': ,
(
---•i.. --'& '1.--rell .I.I ii...- •:::)., • , *14,"):_:„ .„,r• ,, • -, _....z .
ilia"1._
(-----
„,. - \ Jr III
Mes irdwa-1,-Ia. Air,4,011,„.- ii ( . ,\ g „, , , t(i \s, s.-...iiirN,•...infalligtemitite • .3,-. '.1 yik - •%•} \
1' • i....;ilt ',I' ,1\ ' 444-"Wil'At".. 1,. . :'',', i're,••••0 A ,f . 1. ''k ., ' Y IV •i "
' -,t ilMIW411 I ki -- - Art'lkiridir----11-0-•-" ,.'" _4 ., ,..-.5..;g61*-4'?I'tiiy 1i:
\ - !...---.110,i ///,.,-, --, 1101..iri,IP_`..‘ — •! , 4411. f
&A. A-A4 own III ,' ..• ''',.2.- * , ,,,--; )'.1,-• * ..I _ ., ^
. _ . -I , -•- :=-1*Ic4p.",Plieirv:P 7--=....!-... --3ind-Nisek,.`.' % --,,-,•1-'3"-7,4.*A-' AV* --- "5.„,' ',
I/ ss's` \ i" •,\, ,/ /`-- -- /71":, ,.-"—----T;-410114'- ' .1rAISIIIIII-Viiiii,---• ;% ''''
( 2:7_,', •_ .: .. .. ....,, t : '1.,•„,;,.,\''') \‘',‘,.\
\\ ; . s' ' , — -,:,v, •, \ - ' trill,"411 •,-• ' ',
) C ( (
,..// ,----, --,\ \,,', r .. VI'.4w.ritire.kb 7,‘ . . :41,911110.4341W-•i Ida.-'L likrel 443,,t1 .01ftLow.:ail /ova Lifili,\VVI 41-111*.--4•74/.--- 1,11/P, .vs..440,1 Ap apsd rally lel.i.. .. ... ,, 44%1%4 1:rnriallg49 W• ' '4. `47"--- ,..... ,.11
1-•SI' 4L; IP 4,74'V% to.i ` -.. Arleta., ..--: L,1. ili', . „ 0+for-Allis %.-gilLip.0,1,-
111411W,,4? , ..,,,,j —1 .:_____::„ '.1.,::-...:: 4/ \ " ,:11:1'1111:-4.4-131)-01,--te•iik:;.....ma , LIftrif,„,,..... ...1,41k.... - .by,at ,... efoli \ im. ---- ,
' . :z 0.111,,,-11,4.&de_Am. rAttikiiin
,1/4, . . , , .„.. ,„...... . ow,41k.„41-.----......4.4:4_,..1 _No, 'OA 1 0 aii. I Pt- 0 ,=111111/- J.iii‘grA1•111116.59, L *-//1-4s."--'It ',Ie.: it 1,03164,1/ ' -5'-;_''
- 1,3i.,7-te...'*Zi.eltati7.440,,kiltr-‘)itaivip 4Vir. -114..,440,14\001.41 ma V...„,erolcom•-ajrili orii,X .,.,,,,it,,4 • 11^4/0, ,, 4,43,0•4>L'...;4
_ 4 vas NA 04,0*--11FO• \ItiN ki-O"'"" :kW, ligfilluTi,‘,..4:-,14,;":":;
\ -‘,:-..j „...--- .:4„:-:-... !:,.,,,-,... i7,-,,,i4L, ::-..iq,2 111-ift Iti„11 ,.. iks. (-.- .,/-\‘ Iv* ., ,,,,,,,, .....c.s trip . , ,•\,....r.; ot-Vi*P.,i, Ifitoy,:).,,....*
rir
,.
'114* ir;r4k;Friiiili i ..a.7.....,-__: s'I.A ,. ,i•-..s :
k/, , ) ,,, ,,,,194.,..e ,--7)I t/S45"ikkif. 4 .41441111•401grAy. .ill d.10‘ -,,, 111 46 ft ITC, \• :1,411A4011, 00.- ,-), ,,,,, 4,44 ,., • \:,,,,..e....) ,,,., . ,/:,,,,,
-- , _ . , _ ',oil '- -i 1.1t.,054r481`,,,,,'‘.1".%./Fliiiiiwilyilnit i i..,--_,2 II de .4. 'Arii A illi t 411W, l'•---"Ilf-a•-'' '=— j,/I/ v"., ,111111,6L'' ' 1 '--i" '" • '-?)___--/- '
ik..
/ -ir 4, __4,-, • .A.I ,7
A '2,,. •-:=',.. ',9".,••• 7'1 .r,i3O:10.• . . _...-as 4.: 1 \\‘..• „,,,J1.,......---
0‘4r10‘..'411140 •.711rd.40 .W..-.4, -..,:' ///: 1":.>-.4t. ,7" ‘,‘--,,7,E.2. 1\%,,.., ,,•',1,.....f.,....2
\'..4k;11101.1..... 1 \ ) 1.'1;01.02 /,' ', / 1;' ''.1. . iis"`;:iie•tNii Of ..,` , ---11%.- -'--&.•'-4 ;\' -;„ g --.., c",5'' , '',41M- --. Fax' il"‘",";-101
p \ '`, „' .. pr,,iiiii*:-.),E,t,--0,',i'd.t,-'41.?,/p:•",/,,,,,,,, - ji,14;0,,,i;ei.,,,,,;'-r.P,1 ilitimk- 41 (r.,,-,,,,_.- -----:,, ‘,..":,_.",411(77#.***/,,,,,‘-*/1.,,\,4 ,,,', F41,7.4 ge.:,.. 1),,,,,,,,.:, :1,,,401, 04,0,Itt.,1,,,,,,..,?4,., ,%, __,
it',"Al;-:,A,,„ r,: ; , ,,\`-.*:-1 e,•-:-.47, \ . , it ..ii. 'e -4-?- ,•••.4-.-,....:,,,‘ 4, , i' A .. 1,41-.=-74:''',',- ",
rzi,......z„—.1,4 . ..? ..,;...„.. , , r - N, NAti,,, .;y.,;.• ( f _,-__ „. __..., t,;,,P#V-, hiViao...---74,PA,4 . si ) lifyi-gike"-j'r./.'•..../.‘ stu-3\•
Legend
Ifiviiio' __..., ,-- p.0-,,,- -"is 1 i .,. ,) •\, -=...-Aly,., t - - _ ,,..._,, / ,. 0,-,.. •
-;'-' '4 '..'" ',,,- 40 r'ffitt4i. '''' Am,' ,r- ,•',,' ,'/.*4''7•':::•,/.'......."/'''
. --liti •vr'...1--V:',7,:',..,....,14(.;...e',./.17,on,.......
1 41'.-;;"'.,,; WYel,g,'',-,/,// '\--• I \ ; '440 ' , / , -%-__'-_`: k\itr4Y44e,, i 47ser**410r, 4411141...,,,,_I
USGS Topo r0eve•,-;.-,1-.1„,,,, 1/44 4)_.,-,,', ,k ,'-) k ,i A\- /,-a• --•,\-:,.- .1t, --.,-. c --o .1IgWaIr_ L,,-e,"--•.._12.1v-.1-.1-i-i'.tC;'4''6,oltit•eIktea....is11oL.0•A.4;
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Ft
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
-..-.0111.-....,•
40.•,, AI
0/4•IL WU. A Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
( IMP a-A- 111111 A
‘
NICIIIIIIIIrd,QM-Y 'ONMENTAL For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Figure: 5 Coordinates: 35.464449°/-81.006403° I Date: August 20, 2021

USGS Quadrangles
Ili
Lowesville Lake Norman South
Legend N
O Review Area
0 USGS Quads 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 mi
Lincoln County
a Project Name: Airlie Parkway
mvagi .-
i Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
V V RONMENTAL For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Figure: 6 Coordinates: 35.464449°/-81.006403° Date: August 20, 2021

Aerial Imagery it
y.
Harbor M1etdr r •
ttirr(1,Lui
i~�
/ {W..ckyiCreeklr
ID
cr
A,
DE
m PJ P..
.rn
J
Cyril .,
CIS
` - _ m ��Fdr,T1 cod i
1111111i
n 1
$p n **'a- ,. �,!+ /mod
iiR
rw
2�1
f='i r ' ', veer rr" 5
• r` ack p
* I er Stack Dr ,
d
m
'
r "s `State 0 1393
Legend `o,e / �
Forest Oaf �il i I u>
U �o '� For�'y7{� rwr.Cv� .
B6 ;
O Review Area
= Streets _ , *. W
r I Lincoln Parcels p`��r ft...
Aerial Imagery _ '� ��° �� 0 50�00 150�00 ft
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Am
( / __,._. l" Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
,\ `\ RONMENTAL For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Figure: 7 Coordinates: 35.464449°/-81.006403° Date: August 20, 2021

wiE}I vvr�,AF,IrRrI;Ir iP P Arc c;l5
FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer
±
^,r ..:,
926 Alrlle Parkway Denver NC 28 X Q. ) �.
_ — Show sNd rcfr results(cif 926 Air Ile Par... y r r".
l+r
, ,S' li 1r)r 1-' It. '*3'7) ,,) ' -',_ - '''-----; ; , I I. 1 - .152"2-:°' '-'4,
`{ {
�w , \III. i, 04 r
..41c4? ..,...--, 14-
b" _ 1/4 i.l ,1,,, 1'k.� �
f
'
} ".. k
r i 1 ,
.
1 r =x
w
ti,
ai
c
{{
,11f I a r -
? M
yYt rr I
,:
-(
• l f1
�_
'' Jii I t �I
1,
� :: *
1)- . -----\--- -7„7-5j- 4 '1 ....,-""i"'- l'ai- *"Z., ,,..- ' - ir
y
,ter
. ter' .. #:
it
11
1
Ir
1i. ---- I - - -- ----_.---------------� 1r--___% - _-. 1 f ...,.� - ---- -,' _ . _ ---" --''`-'fir,..... ...'P''gy.
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
1 rf Location:926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
�r4 PONMENTAL For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Figure: 8 Coordinates: 35.464449°/-81.006403° Date: August 20, 2021

I
- , Digital Elevation Mode 10
.. ��
k I ,,.
/11
_------_ ,-- 7' ' i. .0i
\\, ,
____:,.,„ ____ , Atli
., _ ,
__
.. AINaigr........ 1
A ,:.. ,,,...
i .... i ....T.
,,,,,, ,
,.
_-_,_____ , t , 4 r vol. „,,
,,..
X
PPPIONIIIt., ti. / rmstead LI `�
, .'=: ,
\&III --- 1 .441W111-1-/. ...1
* -- — 11111111q
_tir
Legend ,N, , t ,_ Illt
Mit
�.w
Cl
iiii.„,,,
Review Area \ \ i
Streets r ' -
I 1 Lincoln Parcels ` f 1„ �'' \ —
LiDAR
Il� looir
.
1 1721.5 n _
1 751 II& i-1L
1 1 780.5
I
��(.'.` 0 500 1000 1500 2000 ft
� 810 I .. mom.
...ram. - Project Name: Airlie Parkway
...•.: .l
`•.: laii / Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
In�.1,1. CIONMENTAL For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Figure: 9 Coordinates: 35.464449°/-81.006403° Date: August 20, 2021

---) �,r ir rialW.,---ti-/'i ik„\� • ' National Hydrography Dataset % � '�� jJf)///"4r4 j�`
!r t_ ��/� r \� �lNi 1 il�l� ` /9/ �� �v � /, �/ a)� 1 , ,4 a�J�/I��
�..... -I ji,� to h \j+,,``\ _-.J— _ r��� , 1� \\ `�V ',^/^ / 'r��\`�� /'1 I�`0 11 //_-- 1 � �/I
�, --w �� /„ r , ,y, - „�� p/,• v 1`w�', _.'���� i(� _-_ •it
•
\ cr��� . �`..j� % ii r .s:% _.�=s� i j/,i* „ 1,� `lv„ ,,., , `�-J- /,f,., ��_—_ �1 �/
1b � j/� ,. if.:!-----
, .rev _ mpg* / J) 11 �, ; WIN �►-, .
tz,\,,,,or ii„,,,...4.J ti ...,„,..:_, 1444411c „_\_,__N,______±„.: : , 0:,,,,...0^,,r, t,, ---_-„,,_' ,.._;:-__,--,,, ,,,,,fjp -....,-z-•••.__ _____7--,-----,_ 4
i 7----
CI
11 . „,,,,,,,,
te"....-_-Vk ,-. -. .,:,.'",:#4,4,';,•,K`L're,` , 'el/ ..,-----------:_y--7-- -,--P-- ,...._.,,-,.. .4.,/ \s•
..,,,,,,7„,„ ..43.'''.--. ' ilik 4-, \ '--- --
___„ , ,,,,,,..,,, ,,,,.2;m1„,
woric
�� li.,
� �/) 1), ;' ����� � ;r< / girl '�� _�� (---- \=/ �.'
%f �f,//,P,i \ '� pal / >>> -'� I
ltl
,, ( ( \- "-----\,-----4*.:,:,4"... __________ __3144/111raillir----- ----i ---.*.L.:li—gimAriaIll 1,4111111,1,0 ,:".1,6/i
. ,-. 4, 1-- -7,---) \\\ \ •••"--- ...V.Ltw:-.•
tom; ,'/) ( 1,,,,,,,,,..../4--- W) ' .- /P.-C ''11' IlipoWi_. ,(ey;113,-"
ilL-''''`M- r, , ,,, ,k_, _,„ ,,,,( -4,_,.,1 w„01,4*.:, , ...1.651-7-----„_„-
: ,:e.---___---,--4-----_;./-, ,\,,, k / r.--- --\;'"Ok -, 4 '(-;----,
,.,,, , _-,-_, « ,,,, \ rari,„
±.,,,_ _ _;,,,.:,,,, _,, , , v ,, fri_-----t , ,,_../..:_:,.. ,4,I,, ,, i,,,, __ ___,,- _____..,_;________;.v.4.,_40,--440_, ,,Lii__,. ,__2,L_____ _i__,__Fit i arr
_...„„ ,,, ,,„.,,o,,_ „„„ fice \ ,..) __ _, .„,, ,
_____,:_iag
_,.._., _,.... , ,,,_____.:: :,_,,,_„ ,,\,\, / ___:=.:
, .. - )1/ ))ri _-_-,,,.___,/ ,,-, ,,--, ,..,,,_______.s_wa jomaur._ 6i ,,
',,, ly \_.__--- 01.10i, ,'
,IW 1 _ I, t ml, A ''',P / fili ir t 4, ,---',.,- ' -,.rlf,i4e.
�) � }`---- - , , , \•1,* 44'i,. ‘ /60t, i- 1, / ,qi ei,
�� /� � �11\ ' y ft*:
mil '�j _ y91d
/ 1 iei
..„, ,,...,..
,,, , , yr A, a, ,,,__ __isai-A itom,„-- _...„ mk.. ... \ '\'\\ -_, i_______
/ - (
'f''' '',..:_ar. fi )I -------=---:7-_,-,: :XV. ... ,' il 0 (((of,, , wilp „ *_,--,44-
Aveow
Legend
4 1 < ��c,,,,...\-'---,7,-‘,41-:=1,fti7;,4� � likti-i•T'co
� -��`�,gL \, ���r— ,� _�� a 1 P�0,,(� i >,11h= , r L..,� ra Cv i i V� I�' / P ry �'C Review Area ,r � �;J1' /a � j7JIl ► / I�
.sri
Streets � • ' ' f/ ' ��_ 1 -�
,y� /' � a1 ` r 1 hi
Al
Streams \@ i-.fIY�I M / 1 r ! 11 t �� �� �y'�^ r��.�� _ vJ/( ift tqf � -+ i/ f .� ` r`r M
Lincoln Parcels f, ,� _ 1 ` � ,
— 2 Ft Contours •. h� \iy �, �}� ` ��0 120III ft
0
�.r _ Project Name: Airlie Parkway
ilr IP
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver,
� ����'��"'ONMENTAL For:Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt CochraneNC28037
Figure: 10 Coordinates: 35.464449°/-81.006403° Date: August 20, 2021

CM Review Area
Streets
F 1 Lincoln Parcels
2 Ft Contours
NWI
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Lake
F-71 Riverine
Figure: 11
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449°/ -81.006403°
ui
Date: August 20, 2021

NC Surface Water Classifications
+o
■
■■
Parkway Denver NC 28037 X
Show search results for 926 Air...
U.4rn
Click a stream for more information
NC Classifications Wehsite
VIA
Stu -Lane Wate.r ( 7assifica#irins:
Stream Index: 11-119-2-3
Stream Name: Forney Creek
{ }escrintion: I rnm snurre to Killian
Creek
ClasSiiicaLiu,i: C
Date of Class.: February 28 1962
What does this Class. More info
mean?
River Basin: Catawba
Zoom to
Figure: 12
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449°/ -81.006403°
Date: August 20, 2021

IS. 2e 1` N
1S*27 TN
Sod Map —Lincoln County, North Carolina
(Review Areal
P9np Scale: 1:8,01301piteed on A porGat (BS a 111 sheet.
0
100
7[p
0 393 703
NCO
Meters
60D
2100
1,Up proproo t: Ate Nertrec► fcnrrcoonLelm: W Sa9 Ell0ena/ U1101Zane 17N MEAN
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/20/2021
Page 1 of 3
Figure: 13a
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings
Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449°/ -81.006403°
Date: August 20, 2021

2oz `oz Isn6ny :aced
S61414IoH M0a0 :Jo
eueay000 ueW 'aW :Ufb
r
0
n
0
926 Airlie Parkway Denver NC 28037
ABMo{aed ellaly :eweN PDalOJd
Sod Map —Lincoln County, North Carolina
(Review Area)
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
n Area of Interest (AOl)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
.,� Sod Map Unit Lines
® Sod Map Unit Pants
Special Point Natures
Blowout
® Borrow Pit
X Clay Spa
Closed Depression
• Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Q La dktl
A. Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
le Mine or Quarry
O Miscellaneous Water
O Perennial Water
V Rock Outcrop
+, Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
41. Severely Eroded Spot
Q Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
• Sodic Spa
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Q Very Stony Spot
Wel Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
d-44 Rails
e,y Interstate Highways
US Routes
Mellor Roads
Local Roads
Background
IIII Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product Is generated from the USDA -MRCS certified data as
of the version dates) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Lincoln County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 24, Jun 4, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space alows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Dates) aerial images were photographed: Oct 28, 20t8—Oct
30,2018
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
LSO» Natural Resources Web Sod Survey 8/20/2021
all Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map --Lincoln County, North Carolina
Review Area
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AO1
Percent of A01
CeB2
Cecil sandy day loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
10.9
8.1%
LcD
Lloyd loam, 15 to 25 peroent
slopes
23.7
17.5%
LdB2
Lloyd sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
36.7
27.2%
LdC2
Lloyd sandy clay loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
20.9
15.5%
MdB2
Madison sandy clay loam. 2 to
8 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
19.9
14.8%
PeC2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
22.7
16.9%
Totals for Area of Interest
134.8
100.0%
t SDA Natural Resources
Web Sod Survey
ale Conservation Service National Cooperative Sal Survey
8/20/2021
Page 3 of 3
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
IRONMENTAL
Figure: 13c
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings
Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449°/ -81.006403° Date: August 20, 2021

HUC 12 Watershed
Catawba River-Lak-Norman
Upper Dutchmans Creek
Lower Leepers Creek
Mountain Island Lake
Legend
O Review Area
HUC 12
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 mi
O Lincoln County
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
ThAsLocation: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
VAILA !I RONMENTAL For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Figure: 14 Coordinates: 35.464449°/-81.006403° Date: August 20, 2021

'-' HUC 8 Watershed
I
Upper CaP
Legend "
O Review Area
CI HUC 8 0 1 2 3 4 mi
= Lincoln County
_gr. —.. - . Project Name: Airlie Parkway
A Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
!'"J''•NMENTAL For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Figure: 15 Coordinates: 35.464449°/-81.006403° Date: August 20, 2021

1
Mar
'021
Apr
2021
1
1
May
2021
35.464449, -81.006403
2021-09-02
803.35
Mild drought (2021-08)
Dry Season
I tables made by the
nt Precipitation Tool
Jersion 1.0
Jun
2021
2021-07-04
Jul
2021
FL 11r-
Aug
2021
n fl
1 11
Sep
2021
Oct
2021
Nov
2021
30 Days Ending
30th %ile (in)
70th %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weic
2021-09-02
2.893701
4.731496
3.003937
Normal
2
2021-08-03
2.78189
4.841732
5.649606
Wet
3
2021-07-04
2.912992
5.5
4.503937
Normal
2
Result
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Da
MT HOLLY 4 NE
35.3339, -80.9867
609.908
9.088
193.442
5.848
WESTPORT 1.8 S
35.4814, -80.9728
808.071
2.224
4.721
1.011
CORNELIUS 1.4 W
35.4806, -80.8939
806.102
6.428
2.752
2.91
STANLEY 4.8 E
35.3678, -81.013
750.984
6.688
52.366
3.36
DAVIDSON 0.8 W
35.4993, -80.86
800.853
8.582
2.497
3.883
HUNTERSVILLE 2.0 W
35.4177, -80.8801
748.032
7.809
55.318
3.946
SHERRILLS FORD 1.6 NW
35.5932, -81.0115
809.055
8.9
5.705
4.056
HUNTERSVILLE 2.8 SSW
35.3813, -80.8723
792.979
9.488
10.371
4.368

Site Photos:08/27/2021 and 09/02/2021
A le:
7
a
'
•• • ' a •
-4' *`. yama ram'
r '
12) t yam 4.
,
1. Typical vegetation 4. CH 200 at CH 122
M .r4. e
, $A +w ,` < Atf A' I f ' ' * tt aft $
y
n- 4 - , •L
Ald
F
2. CH 100•
5. CH 206
a'
a.
T
,
3. CH 113 6. CH 241

Site Photos:08/27/2021 and 09/02/2021
' +•
t
e aer ewe' i ^"'-'
A 4
s+,. NAP-
a
7. CH 300 at CH 147 10. WL 3000 Soils
-4 -it* '.-
'�, f 2 a M
,, ti
e r
`i
8. CH 300 at WL 3000 11. WL 3100
C m
`• fir -
� #'* .ice
."., y'.#qs-" l l` fir. .<�
r
! `'fir.
9. WL 3000 12, CH 140

Site Photos:08/27/2021 and 09/02/2021
4:,.,,,i;,,..4..,i A,,.,„;,!,,.,,,..„,‘--,-,,,.,,,-„,,..4.'1.4.-,...//H1,k-,i,..,f';.,i-,s-o,,,.,.,•,,,',:,-,4..;.i-,!,':.:t 0-.i.i-,,'i,,.,,',1„,-,.',,,,;.:,.:*::.........,.--,.--.-.,.---,-,,-,,,.;'..,,',,,r','.,..,,'-,,,7-',...',,4.'-•,',','',,;!,'4-,',''-,'''-.',,...,'.,-, ,rw.v k i r•, r , r .
«•a �'` , c t s9
Y 3
' -,-;.- ifi. . 7 7..i.:$'4i''' '.,' ' 1
aj
R„
+,
a.
13. CH400 16. CH615
x� ,a a ^.aoS, "`
":.„.,.;, '''').,s,;:t.:*''.,,i,:,''!,;°,',- .'''
�
.'.::'41-:111tkf:'3'.'
NET ' - L
,,-,,,g4F:','.,, 7"14: :"
U r
r
•
s 1 E'a
4.
• ,,b a17. WL6000 a `f / ,50014. CH � "Al: .-` s ,_
/
r-s av
...ilk,
JI
15. CH600 18. CH700atWL7000

Site Photos:08/27/2021 and 09/02/2021
•
i �.
a^
19. WL 1000
.':.. ,
•
-r
.ter ` ♦
20. WL 1000 Soils

Legend
O Review Area
I Lincoln co. Parcels
Streets
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
MI Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Culvert
Photograph and Data Form Location Map
Project Name: Airlie Parkway
Location: 926 Airlie Parkway Denver, NC 28037
For: Crow Holdings Attn: Mr. Matt Cochrane
Coordinates: 35.464449, -81.006403
Date: September 08, 2020

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET-Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24;the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Airlie Parkway City/County: Denver/Lincoln Sampling Date: 09/02/2021
Applicant/Owner: Crow Holdings/Mr.Matt Cochrane State: NC Sampling Point: All Wetlands
Investigator(s): J Sinclair,A Baggarley,C Griffin,T Casey Section,Township,Range: Denver
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Floorplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): -3
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P,MLRA 136 Lat: 35.46332 Long:-81.00357 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Lloyd sandy clay loam NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
X High Water Table(A2) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) X Drainage Patterns(B10)
X Saturation(A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) X Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
X Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
X Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
X Iron Deposits(B5) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(B9) —Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 4
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: All Wetlands
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambarstyraciflua 5 No FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 8 (A)
3. Acer rubrum 10 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
4. Acer negundo 5 No FAC Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5. Salix nigra 15 Yes OBL Percent of Dominant Species
6. Carpinus caroliniana 5 No FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 88.9% (NB)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
50 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10 OBL species 15 x 1 = 15
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 40 x 2= 80
1. Ligustrum sinense 10 Yes FACU FAC species 62 x 3= 186
2. Acer rubrum 10 Yes FAC FACU species 10 x 4= 40
3. Asimina triloba 10 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 127 (A) 321 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.53
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
30 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Juncus effusus 15 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Carex bromoides 15 Yes FACW present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Microstegium vimineum 15 Yes FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
height.
6.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m)tall.
9.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11 of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
45 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 23 20%of total cover: 9 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans 2 No FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
2 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 1 20%of total cover: 1 Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: All Wetlands
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 5YR 5/1 70 5YR 5/4 40 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
6-16 2.5Y 4/2 75 7.5YR 4/6 25 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
X Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) X Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
X Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122,136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) _Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
•
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control It:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24;the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Airlie Parkway City/County: Denver/Lincoln Sampling Date: 09/02/2021
Applicant/Owner: Crow Holdings/Mr.Matt Cochrane State: NC Sampling Point: Typical Upland
Investigator(s): J Sinclair,A Baggarley,C Griffin,T Casey Section,Township,Range: Denver
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Hillside Local relief(concave,convex,none): Convex Slope(%): —3
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P,MLRA 136 Lat: 35.46339 Long:-81.00349 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Lloyd Sandy Loam NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Climate conditions are wetter than normal. See attached climate data report(NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network). Uplands
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) —
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
—High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
—Iron Deposits(B5) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) X Microtopographic Relief(D4)
_Aquatic Fauna(B13) _FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION(Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Typical Upland
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liquidambarstyraciflua 10 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Ulmus elate 8 Yes FACU That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 _(A)
3. Quercus phellos 3 No FACW Total Number of Dominant
4. Quercus rubra 5 No FACU Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5• - Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
7. _ Prevalence Index worksheet:
26 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 13 20%of total cover: 6 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 3 x 2= 6
1. Ligustrum sinense 4 Yes FAC FAC species 25 x 3= 75
2. Elaeagnus umbellate 5 Yes UPL FACU species 24 x 4= 96
3. Asimina triloba 3 Yes FAC UPL species 10 x 5= 50
4. Column Totals: 62 (A) 227 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.66
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. _2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. • 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
12 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 6 20%of total cover: 3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum 5 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Ligustrum japonicum 2 No UPL present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Elaeagnus umbellate 3 Yes UPL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Allium allegheniense 3 Yes FACU Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
height.
6.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m)tall.
9.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11 of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
13 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 7 20%of total cover: 3 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 3 Yes FACU
2. Toxicodendron radicans 2 No FAC _
3. Vitis 1 No FAC
4. Smilax 5 Yes FACU
5.
Hydrophytic
11 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 6 20%of total cover: 3 Present? Yes No X
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Typical Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 5YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-16 7.5YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122,136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date: 08/27/2021 Evaluator: Atlas Environmental,Inc. Easting: , 35.45792
Project: Airlie Parkway Northing: -81.00513
CH 100,200 and 600
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if> 19 or perennial if>30*
(right-click the purple number and left-click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: riffle-/step-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 2
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes= 3 3
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated:see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 3
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 _ 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
16. Organic debris lines or piles(Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based Evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3 3
Hydrology Subtotal
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 _ 0.5 1 1.5 1
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other=0 0
Biology Subtotal
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification Jennifer L Robertson
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins.
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form#PC039 1

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date: 08/27/2021 Evaluator: Atlas Environmental,Inc. Eastin•: 35.46189
Project: Airlie Parkway Northing: -81.00529
CH 300,400,500 and 700
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if> 19 or perennial if>30*
right-click the gurgle number and left-click U•date Field to summarize soints
A. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-/step-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 1
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 0
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 2
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes= 3 0
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated:see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 1
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 .5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
16. Organic debris lines or piles(Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based Evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3 3
Hydrology Subtotal
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other=0 0
Biology Subtotal
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification Jennifer L Robertson
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins.
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form#PC039 1