HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0024236_201 Facilities Plan_19900713NPDES DOCUMENT !iCANNINO COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0024236
Kinston Regional WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
l'
201 Facilities Plan
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
July 13, 1990
This documerit is printed on reuses paper - ignore any
content on the re‘Arerise aide
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 13, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rob Brown
1 l r'yi�lii
Ml
FROM: Alan Clark k
a)
THROUGH: Boyd DeVane
SUBJECT: Kinston 201 Facility Plan, Amendment 2
sal
7 \990
Your memo to Boyd DeVane concerning review of the referenced
document has been referred to me for response. I. have reviewed
the document and the accompanying EA and have circulated it
to our Technical Support Branch. Below is a summary of our
comments.
The scope of the EA in terms of covering both primary and
secondary as well as short and long term impacts was generally
good. However, in the discussion of secondary nonpoint source
impacts under Water Quality on page 14, the final sentence in
that section appears to be misleading or in need of elaboration.
Is the Town really planning on implementing a stormwater
management policy that would addressthe impacts of stormwater on
water quality? If yes, they are to be commended and details
should be provided. If no, the statement should be deleted. If
implementation of such a policy is not being planned, the
discussions on water quality under Section C. (Adverse Impacts
Which Cannot Be Avoided and Mitigative Measures) must be revised
to accomodate this change.
See also the June 25, 1990 memo from Juan Mangeles of our
Technical Support Branch (attached). He identifies several items
which need to be corrected or elaborated on. Most of his
comments pertain to the level of assessment of the direct water
quality impacts in the EA.
With the exception of those items presented above, the
document appears to be acceptable. Please contact either Juan or
me if you have any questions.
Kinston.Mem
SEPA 1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Alan Clark
FROM: Juan C. Mangles
THROUGH: Carla Sanderson
Trevor Clements
64/
SUBJECT:
June 25, 1990
Amendment No. 2 to the
201 Facilities Plan
Kinston Northside (NC0024236) and
Kinston Peachtree (NC0020541)
Wastewater Treatment Plants
Lenoir County
The Technical Support Branch has reviewed the subject Amendment of the 201
Facilities Plan for the City of Kinston Northside and Peachtree WWTP's. Our review
indicated that all significant issues of concern are properly addressed for the
basic design of the additional facilities.
However, the environmental assessment (EA) of the proposed project failed to
specifically address the adverse/beneficial water quality impacts associated with
the proposed addition of phosphorus removal and dechlorination facilities. The
EA did not elaborate on the effect of the discharge on dissolved oxygen, NH3-N,
total nitrogen, BOD5, and toxics concentrations in receiving waters which are near
exhaustion of their assimilative capacity. The EA report only notes that "disposal
of effluents into the receiving streams is not expected to have a significant
impact on the receiving streams as the proposed treatment facilities are planned to
produce effluent quality that will protect the current assigned water quality."
Although, the Technical Support Branch does not anticipate additional adverse water
quality impacts at the existing flows, we feel that the EA should have addressed,
in detail, the impact of the aforementioned parameters in the Neuse River system
due to the discharge from the existing and proposed treatment works.
Finally, the report erroneously indicates that DEM requires compliance with
the 2 mg/1 total phosphorus limitation in 1995. Please note that in January, 1988
the Environmental Management Commission stipulated a target compliance date of May
1, 1993 for existing facilities with design flow rates of 0.5 MGD or greater in the
Neuse River basin.
If you need further clarification on this matter, please contact me at ext.
510.
cc: Kinston Peachtree WWTP WLA File
Kinston Northside WWTP WLA File
Central Files
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W Cobey, Jr., Secretary
September 28, 1989
Mr. Stephen Raper, City Manager
City of Kinston
P.O. Drawer 339
Kinston, NC 28501
Subject: Special Order by Consent, EMC WQ 88-20AdII
City of Kinston, Lenior County
Dear Mr. Raper:
R. Paul Wilms
Director
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special
Order by Consent approved by the Division of Environmental
Management.
The terms and conditions of the Order are in full effect,
and you are reminded that the final limits contained in the
permit will not be enforced by the State of North Carolina
provided that the City complies with the limits, schedules,
and conditions contained in the Consent Order.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
contact Mr. Jim Mulligan ar (919) 946-6481.
Sincerely,
•
arles Wakild
Deputy Director
Attachment
cc: Washington Regional Office
Bruce Barrett, EPA
Office of Legal Affairs
Lee Gabele
Elora Lee
Permit File
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919-733-7015
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF LENOIR
IN THE MATTER OF )
NORTH CAROLINA )
NPDES PERMIT )
NO. NC0020541 )
HELD BY THE CITY OF )
KINSTON )
SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT
EMC WQ NO. 88-20 Ad II
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.2
and 143-215.67, this Special Order by Consent is made and entered
into by the City of Kinston, hereafter referred to as the City, and
the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency of
the State of North Carolina created by NCGS 143B-282, and hereafter
referred to as the Commission:
1. The City and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) That the City holds North Carolina NPDES Permit No.
NC0020541 for operation of an existing wastewater treatment
works and making an outlet therefrom for treated wastewater to
the Neuse River, Class "C" waters of this State, in the Neuse
River Basin, but is unable to comply with the final effluent
limitations for fecal coliform as set forth in the Permit.
Compliance will require preparation of plans and specifications
for and construction and operation of additional treatment
works.
(b) That noncompliance with final effluent limitations
constitutes causing and contributing to pollution of the waters
of this State named above, and the City is within the
jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth in NCGS Chapter 143,
Article 21.
(c) That the City desires to cause or allow the discharge of
up to 1,000,000 gpd of additional domestic strength wastewater
to the treatment works, and that the discharge of such
additional wastewater from the treatment works to the waters of
this State will not result in any significant degradation in
their quality or in the quality of any water ultimately
receiving such discharge.
-2-
(d) That the City has secured financing for planning and
construction for treatment works which, when constructed and
operated, will be sufficient to adequately treat the wastewater
presently being discharged and the additional wastewater desired
to be discharged, to the extent that the City will be able to
comply with final permit effluent limitations.
(e) That the City hereby waives its right to a hearing on
the terms of this Special Order by Consent pursuant to
procedural requirements of NCGS 143-215.4 and Commission rules
in 15 NCAC 2I, and also hereby waives its rights to appeal this
Special Order by Consent in accordance with NCGS 143-215.5.
2. The City, desiring to comply with conditions of the permit
identified in paragraph 1(a) above, does hereby agree to do and
perform all of the following:
(a) Provide the Washington Regional Office located at 1424
Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina, with a list of
flow added under all Special/Judicial Orders and update this
list each time flow is added to the system.
(b) Meet and comply with all terms and conditions of the
permit except those effluent limitations identified in paragraph
1(a) above. See Attachment A for monitoring requirements and
effluent limitations. The permittee may also be required to
monitor for other parameters as deemed necessary by the Director
in future permits or Administrative letters.
(c) Upon execution of this Order, undertake the following
activities in accordance with the indicated time schedule:
1) Submit plans and specifications by July 15, 1988. (Met)
2) Initiate construction by February 1, 1989. (Met)
3) Complete construction and meet final limits by
October 17, 1989.
(d) During the time in which this Special Order by Consent
is effective, comply with the interim effluent limitations
contained in Attachment A. The following reflects only the
limitations that have been modified from NPDES requirements by
this Order.
-3-
(Other
Effluent
Characteristics Units
Fecal Coliform col/100 ml
Limitations)
Monthly Weekly
Average Average
No limit No limit
(e) No later than 14 calendar days after any date or time
identified for accomplishment of any activity listed in 2(b)
above, submit to the Division Director and the Regional Office
written notice of compliance or noncompliance therewith. In the
case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a
statement identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or
times for accomplishment of listed activities may be affected.
(f) Enforce the water conservation provisions of the State
Building Code as it applies to new residential construction
(Volume 11, Chapter IV 401.2, 401.3).
(g) Develop and adopt sewer use ordinance limits for
non -conventional pollutants. Implement the pretreatment program
as approved by the Director, including the enforcement of both
categorical pretreatment standards and local limits.
(h) Identify any and all Infiltration and Inflow problems
associated with the facility and establish a program to correct
these problems.
(i) Use forty percent (40%) of the revenue received from
the one-half percent (1/2%) sales tax option for water and
sewage capital outlay purposes or to retire indebtedness
incurred by the municipality for these purposes.
the Commission the following stipulated
meet the deadlines set out in paragraph
3. The City shall pay
penalties for failure to
2(c).
Deadline
Complete construction and
meet final effluent limits
Penalty Amount
$100/day for first 7 days, and
$500/day thereafter
4. In accordance with the provisions of NCGS 143-215.67(b) the
Commission allows the City to accept the additional waste specified
in 1(c) to its waste -disposal system.
-4-
5. This Special Order by Consent and any terms, conditions and
interim effluent limitations contained herein, hereby supersede any
and all previous Special Order and Enforcement Compliance Schedule
Letters, and terms, conditions, and limitations contained therein
issued in connection with NPDES Permit No. NC0020541.
6. Any violation of terms of this Special Order by Consent,
including paragraph 2(c) above and Attachment A shall terminate
Section 4 of this Order and any portion of the authorized additional
waste not previously connected to the system shall not thereafter be
connected until the necessary sewerage system improvements have been
completed and placed in operation. Such violations shall also
subject the City to the enforcement authority of the Commission
of the Director pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6 and Commission rules in 15
NCAC 2J.
7. This Special Order by Consent shall expire on October 17, 1989.
Entered into this the
CITY of KINSTON
BY:
_____16RAM v
ayQx' �'
NORTH CAROL INA ENV ONM I1T,AL MA ► P GEMS T COMMISSION
day of
1989.
BY:
J
/
1 Chairman of the Commission
A(1).
ATTACHMENT A
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - Interim
During the period beginning on the effective date of this Special Order and lasting
until expiration, the permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial
number 001. Such discharge shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as
specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Flow
BOD, 5-day, 20°C**
Total Suspended Residue**
NH3 as N
Dissolved Oxygen (minimum)
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Toxicity
Priority Pollutants
COD
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Chromium
Total Phosphorus
Conductivity
Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Units as specified
Monthly Avg. Weekly Avg.
6.75 MGD
22.0 mg/1
30.0 mg/1
10.0 mg/1
33.0 mg/1
45.0 mg/1
15.0 mg/1
Measurement
Frequency
Continuous
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Weekly
Daily
Daily
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Sample
Type
Recording
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
*Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream, D - Downstream
at Caswell Landing near Royals Acres
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples.
Stream samples shall be collected three times per week during June. July,
August and September and once per week during the remaining months of the
year.
Sample
Location`
I or E
E.I,U,D
E,I
E.U,D
E,U,D
E,U,D
E
E,U,D
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
U.D
U.D
**The monthly average effluent BODS and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not
exceed 15% of the respective influent values (85% removal).
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units
and shall be monitored by a grab sample at the effluent.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts.