670042_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220331

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 670042
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS670042 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Onslow Region: Wilmington
Date of Visit: 03/31/2022 Entry Time: 11:00 am Exit Time: 12:30 pm Incident #:
Farm Name: Philco Farms Owner Email: [e-mail]
Owner: Philip Kevin Parker Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 899 Jim Blake Rd
Jacksonville NC 28540
Physical Address: 953 Five Mile Rd Richlands NC 28574
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant • Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude:
Murphy -Brown LLC
34° 47' 14"
Southeast of Albert Ellis Airport. On East side of SR 1206 approx. 1 mile North of SR 1205.
Longitude: 77° 37' 34"
Question Areas:
▪ Dischrge & Stream Impacts
▪ Records and Documents
▪ Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
▪ Other Issues
Waste Application
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Phillip Parker
Title
Phone
910-389-3020
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Brian S West
Phone: [phone]
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Sludge at 68%. POAdated 11/20, compliance deadline 11/22. Send copy of irrigation calibration to [e-mail]. OIC
status (BIMS says 2021 fee not paid). Update crop yield. Stocking report update. Odor/insect control checklists, keep in records.
Reminder soil test in 2022. Use waste sample within 60 days of irrigation event, recommend 1 sample per quarter. Winter 21/22
PAN overage, used 100 Ib after Jan 1. Use 50 Ib before 12/31, 50 after -read amendment. NOV-2022-PC-0164 received 4/20
Page 1 of 5

Permit: AWS670042
Owner: Philip Kevin Parker
Inspection Date: 03/31/22 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 670042
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder
Waste Structures
Type
1,776
2,600
Identifier
Effective
Date
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Built
Date
1,776
53,280
Closed Designated Observed
Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
LAGOON #1
04/05/2005
D3/15/1994
20.00
26.00
Page 2 of 5

Permit: AWS670042
Inspection Date: 03/31/22
Owner: Philip Kevin Parker
Facility Number: 670042
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ • ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc DEED
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ • ❑ ❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ • ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE El ❑ ❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ • ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ • ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? • ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
•
Page 3 of 5

Permit: AWS670042
Inspection Date: 03/31/22
Owner: Philip Kevin Parker
Facility Number: 670042
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Crop yields?
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
•❑ ❑ ❑
•❑ ❑ ❑
Page 4 of 5

Permit: AWS670042
Inspection Date: 03/31/22
Owner: Philip Kevin Parker
Facility Number: 670042
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
•
8/21 @ 68%
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
El
El
El
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 5