NC0021946_Speculative Limits_20011221

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNIN`i COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0021946
Rosman WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Return
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
December 21, 2001
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore arty
content on the rezrerse'side

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Micheal F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
December 21, 2001
The Honorable Johnny Rogers
Town of Rosman
P.O. Box 636
Rosman, North Carolina 28772
Avi7rA
NCDENR
Subject: Speculative Limits for Rosman WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0021946
Transylvania County
Dear Mayor Rogers:
This letter is in response to the request for speculative effluent limits submitted by WK
Dickson for the expansion of the Rosman WWTP. The expansion flow of 0.25 was targeted for
the existing discharge point in the French Broad River. The staff of the NPDES Unit of the Point
Source Branch has reviewed this request and will provide speculative effluent limits. However,
additional information has been reviewed in Rosman's October 2001 preliminary engineering
report and environmental assessment. The Division of Water Quality recommends that Rosman
more closely evaluate the option of connection to the Brevard WWTP. The regionalization of
wastewater treatment facilities remains a primary goal of DWQ and it would appear that the
connection to the Brevard WWTP is a viable option for this facility.
This segment of the French Broad River where Rosman currently discharges has a stream
classification of WS-III Trout. The best usage of these waters is as a source of water supply for
drinking, culinary, or food processing. The trout designation dictates that these are waters that
have conditions, which shall sustain and allow for trout propagation and survival of stocked trout
on a year-round basis. The discharge point has an estimated drainage area of 67.9 square miles,
with an average flow of 240 cfs, a summer 7Q10 of 55.5 cfs and a winter 7Q10 of 63.4 cfs.
There are no other dischargers near this site.
Based on available information, the tentative effluent limits for oxygen -consuming
constituents of the Rosman WWTP discharge at the expansion flow of 0.25 MGD are included
on the attached effluent sheet. Upon formal permit application for the expansion flow, if there is
an industrial wastewater constituency, an evaluation of limits and monitoring requirements for
metals and other toxicants will be addressed at that time.
The Division of Water Quality is requiring chlorine limits for all new or expanding
dischargers proposing the use of chlorine for disinfection. The process of
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/

Rosman WWTP Speculative Limits
Page 2
The Division of Water Quality is requiring chlorine limits for all new or expanding
dischargers proposing the use of chlorine for disinfection. The process of
chlorination/dechlorination or an alternate form of disinfection, such as ultraviolet radiation,
should allow the facility to comply this requirement.
It should also be noted that upon permit renewal or the expansion of the wastewater
treatment plant, the facility would have to begin influent monitoring of BOD5 and Total
suspended residue. In addition, the monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended
Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value, therefore there
must be at least an 85% removal rate (per the secondary treatment requirement per 40 CFR Part
133).
Final NPDES effluent limitations will be determined after a permit application has been
submitted to the Division. If there are any additional questions concerning this matter, please
feel free to contact Jackie Nowell of my staff at [phone] ext. 512.
Respectfully,
David A. Goodrich
NPDES Unit Supervisor
Attachment
cc: Forrest Westall/Asheville Regional Office
Bobby Blowe, Construction Grants
Milt Rhodes/Planning Branch
Central Files
NPDES Permit File

Rosman WWTP Speculative Limits
Page 3
A. SPECULATIVE EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS - ROSMAN WWTP
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample Location'
Row
0.25 MGD
Continuo's
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day, 20°C2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Influent, Effluent
Total Suspended Residue 2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Influent, Effluent
NH3 as N
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean)
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 mi
Weekly
Grab
Effluent,
Upstream & Downstream
pH3
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine4
28 Ng/1_
2/Week
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
(NO2+NO3+TKN)
Semi-annually
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Semi-annually
Composite
Effluent
Temperature, 9C
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Notes:
1. Influent, Effluent, Upstream - at least 100 feet upstream of outfall, Downstream - at least 300 feet
downstream of outfall
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed
15% of the respective influent value (85% removal).
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4. Monitoring requirement and limit applies only if chlorine is added for disinfection.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace

Rosman WWTP Speculative Limits Request
French Broad River WS-III-Tr G7NE
040301
Transylvania County
jmn
Facility requesting spec limits for expansion flow of 0.25 MGD at existing discharge location in
the French Broad River. Spec request was first submitted to the Asheville RO on July 20, 2001
and was transferred to the Central Office in September 2001. On November 15, 2001, WK
Dickson resubmitted request.
Estimated for flows at existing discharge point in the French Broad River
DA= 67.9 mi2
QA= 240 cfs
s7g10=55.5 cfs
w7q10=63.4 cfs
The French Broad River is not listed on the 2000 303d list
Summary of Model results
Must protect for a DO instream standard of 6 mg/1 because of the Trout classification for the
French Broad River. Level B model indicates that the river can assimilate the wastewater at the
expansion flow of 0.25 MGD. Secondary limits of BOD5 = 30 mg/1 will protect the DO standard
of 6 mg/1 instream.
Model setup
One segment with three reaches.
First reach, 0.6-mi. length, to the confluence of Browns Mill Creek.
Second reach, 0.3 mi. length, to the confluence of Middle Fork French Broad River
Third reach, 0.1 mile length — to just upstream of the confluence of the East Fork French Broad
River.
Ran summer and winter models at flow of 0.25 MGD. Model run predicted summer DO
minimum of 7.67 mg/1. Predicted winter DO minimum was 9.64 mg/1. No effluent DO or
summer/winter NH3 limits are needed.

MODEL RESULTS
Discharger : TOWN OF ROSMAN
Receiving Stream : FRENCH BROAD RIVER
SUMMER
MODEL EXPANSION TO 0.25 MGD
The End D.O. is 7.98 mg/1.
The End CBOD is 2.18 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 1.43 mg/l.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 7.67 0.00 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
45.00
0.00
0.00
90.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25000
0.00000
0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger
Receiving Stream
Summer 7Q10 •
Design Temperature:
TOWN OF ROSMAN
FRENCH BROAD RIVER
55.5
23.0
Subbasin : 040301
Stream Class: WSIII
Winter 7Q10 : 63.4
LENGTH SLOPE VELOCITY 1 DEPTH Kd Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN
mile ft/mi fps ft design @20° design @20° design
Segment 1
Reach 1
0.60
11.00
0.765
2.27
0.32
0.28
7.90
7.40
0.38
Segment 1
Reach 2
0.30
11.00
0.792
2.34
0.32
0.28
8.18
7.66
0.38
Segment 1
Reach 3
0.10
11.00
0.830
2.41
0.33
0.28
8.58
8.04
0.38
Flow
cfs
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste 0.388
Headwaters 55.500
Tributary 0.000
* Runoff 11.300
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste
Tributary
* Runoff
Segment 1
Waste
Tributary
* Runoff
0.000
0.400
11.300
Reach 3
0.000
5.200
11.300
CBOD
mg/1
45.000
2.000
2.000
2.000
0.000
2.000
2.000
0.000
2.000
2.000
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile
NBOD D.O.
mg/1 mg/1
90.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.000
1.000
1.000
0.000
1.000
1.000
0.000
7.720
7.720
7.720
0.000
7.720
7.720
0.000
7.720
7.720

SUMMER
MODEL EXPANSION TO 0.25 MGD
I Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD ( NBOD
1 1 0.00 7.67 2.30 1.62
1 1 0.10 7.71 2.29 1.60
1 1 0.20 7.76 2.27 1.58
1 1 0.30 7.80 2.26 1.57
1 1 0.40 7.83 2.25 1.55
1 1 0.50 7.87 2.24 1.54
1 1 0.60 7.90 2.23 1.52
1 2 0.60 7.90 2.23 1.52
1 2 0.70 7.92 2.22 1.51
1 2 0.80 7.95 2.21 1.49
1 2 0.90 7.98 2.20 1.48
1 3 0.90 7.96 2.19 1.45
1 3 0.91 7.96 2.19 1.44
1 3 0.92 7.96 2.19 1.44
1 3 0.93 7.97 2.19 1.44
1 3 0.94 7.97 2.18 1.44
1 3 0.95 7.97 2.18 1.44
1 3 0.96 7.97 2.18 1.44
1 3 0.97 7.98 2.18 1.44
1 3 0.98 7.98 2.18 1.44
1 3 0.99 7.98 2.18 1.44
1 3 1.00 7.98 2.18 1.43
I Seg # I Reach # ( Seg Mi I D.O. ( CBOD I NBOD
Flow I
55.89
57.02
58.15
59.28
60.41
61.54
62.67
63.07
64.20
65.33
66.46
71.66
71.77
71.88
72.00
72.11
72.22
72.34
72.45
72.56
72.67
72.79
Flow

MODEL RESULTS
Discharger : TOWN OF ROSMAN
Receiving Stream : FRENCH BROAD RIVER
WINTER
MODEL @ EXPANSION FLOW OF 0.25
MGD
The End D.O. is 10.01 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 2.17 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 1.40 mg/1.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 9.64 0.00 1
Reach 1 45.00 90.00 0.00 0.25000
Reach 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000
Reach 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : TOWN OF ROSMAN Subbasin : 040301
Receiving Stream : FRENCH BROAD RIVER Stream Class: WSIII
Summer 7Q10 : 55.5 Winter 7Q10 : 63.4
Design Temperature: 12.0
LENGTH SLOPE VELOCITY 1 DEPTH Kd Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN
mile ft/mi fps ft design Q20° design @20° design
Segment 1
Reach 1
0.60
11.00
0.842
2.31
0.20
0.29
6.85
8.15
0.16
Segment 1
Reach 2
0.30
11.00
0.876
2.36
0.20
0.29
7.13
8.48
0.16
Segment 1
Reach 3
0.10
11.00
0.929
2.43
0.20
0.29
7.56
8.99
0.16
Flow
cfs
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste 0.388
Headwaters 63.400
Tributary 0.000
* Runoff 12.200
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 0.000
Tributary 0.700
* Runoff 11.300
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste 0.000
Tributary 6.800
* Runoff 11.300
CBOD
mg/1
NBOD
mg/1
45.000 90.000
2.000 1.000
2.000 1.000
2.000 1.000
0.000
2.000
2.000
0.000
2.000
2.000
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile
0.000
1.000
1.000
0.000
1.000
1.000
D.O.
mg/1
0.000
9.700
9.700
9.700
0.000
9.700
9.700
0.000
9.700
9.700

I Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD
1 1 0.00 9.64 2.26
1 1 0.10 9.69 2.25
1 1 0.20 9.74 2.25
1 1 0.30 9.79 2.24
1 1 0.40 9.83 2.23
1 1 0.50 9.87 2.22
1 1 0.60 9.90 2.22
1 2 0.60 9.90 2.21
1 2 0.70 9.94 2.21
1 2 0.80 9.97 2.20
1 2 0.90 10.00 2.19
1 3 0.90 9.98 2.18
1 3 0.91 9.98 2.18
1 3 0.92 9.98 2.18
1 3 0.93 9.98 2.18
1 3 0.94 9.99 2.18
1 3 0.95 9.99 2.18
1 3 0.96 9.99 2.18
1 3 0.97 10.00 2.17
1 3 0.98 10.00 2.17
1 3 0.99 10.00 2.17
1 3 1.00 10.01 2.17
I Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD
WINTER
MODEL @ EXPANSION FLOW OF 0.25
MGD
NBOD I Flow I
1.54 63.79
1.53 65.01
1.52 66.23
1.51 67.45
1.50 68.67
1.48 69.89
1.47 71.11
1.47 71.81
1.46 72.94
1.45 74.07
1.44 75.20
1.41 82.00
1.41 82.11
1.41 82.22
1.41 82.34
1.40 82.45
1.40 82.56
1.40 82.68
1.40 82.79
1.40 82.90
1.40 83.01
1.40 83.13
NBOD I Flow I

Rosman WWTP
Residual Chlorine
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
55.5
0.25
0.3875
17.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (U 0
IWC (%) 0.69
Allowable Concentration (ug/ 2451.84
Fecal Limit
Ratio of 143.2 :1
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7Q10 (CFS) 55.5
DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 0.25
DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 0.3875
STREAM STD (MG/L) 1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL 0.22
IWC (%) 0.69
Allowable Concentration (m 112.72
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
200/100m1 DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
63.4
0.25
0.3875
1.8
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL 0.22
IWC (%) 0.61
Allowable Concentration (m 260.31
NC0021946
1214/01

09/21/2001 09:01 4
PAGE 01
r� iKsoni
I •f ll4i i i . • 11e(.1111', • '•alM .4'Ipth
I .1, 'IQ, .1,
July 20, 2001
Mr. Forest Westall, PE
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, North Garolina 28801
RE: Waste -Load Allocation Request
for the Town of Rosman
Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
WKD #90203.40
Transylvania, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Westall:
jr'. JUL 23t' `!
We are working with the Town of Rosman to expand their existing wastewater
treatment plant capacity to 0.25 MGD. The existing treatment plant has a
capacity of 0.09 MGD. The effluent is discharged into the French Broad River,
south of Rosman, as shown in the attached figure. The facility operates under
the NPDES permit number NC0021946.
We are requesting a preliminary waste -load allocation, effluent limitations and
monitoring requirements for the expansion so that we may complete the
alternatives analysis for this project. Currently, the wastewater is primarily
domestic in nature and is not likely to change in the future.
If you have any questions, or require additional information, do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
W. K. Dickson & Company, Inc.
Victor Lofquist,
Enclosures
cc: File, Town of Rosman
SA.151.I6111
FAXA2ti,n:,1611
www.wkdil:ksun.cum
Atlanta. GA
Charlotte Nl'
111ciorL1 NC
F:alrigF. N .
Wilmirntnn, w('
�=ulurnvm. 5C.

09/21/2001 09: 01
4 PAGE 02
f
• •
1 •
• •r l
ij ,
r
1.1
R.y^MI '1 R
• f IV
• •i
No
i, MLR 3�
Itt tie 0
• 1 •
•{
• •
Rocky Mtn
• •r,I
Cou bl S r1
Gap •'. j j I
•
pool?*
1 i11 +,,
} ti. 1. t \ `6
i ` \ ,•' ▪ w� ; f j .eke Tox� y
• Gam• • ▪ {k r;'• ;;--Ai f" • ! i \'''Ch Itield
ito
, 1 a,i '.., •_: •i ' 1• • -
?• •:
r -J ,• -. • N • `. , • • 11
(..3 T.,
\., •0 ___:,
_,-,).
,.....•• e . .
. •r . pvt •
•
▪ \ . • . •. . perm W ,-•,4...;
'
:r , r • • • ••1 1 1 ~" \
0 i I .., _ i
k'8M I.R 7321 S .( •.:
..0ti y J;160
/t A.
'' 1 .
•. `\
•et,
•
r' ► •. 40
•
r •'
• 9is•& , "TAW
•
• d
yi Z1Ql1v
t w•
J ` 1
', s ••=� /'' ,,mot
�+ "Or
1 A
' �N/ rr��nfiasM •
it
> 1# •"..
3
A.'
1 44 a • ;.
vA0‘\o '• ITT°'`
• •
•
• •r.
•
R°5M •€ .•
t.
—ir•� h
: , :' ..*: ,7e*
41
• ' Br_
• I •• u61
• 1
Otktk
• STATE PRISON.
••OAMP }
• ;
fl i•
• r i
•J/i•i
.
..,;,.)0. , ( .....,,,, ) ...,s. .. f...,..Af . - z .. :
... V p .?, i ii? 7 I 47 1;, ) dfrt," ."..
•
VI a
•
•
1• :J•
\
�Mr iori .�
�•'r•Ch • s._ •
Cj.1ver� ••
r„•
i•
r • • 1 L.
fki
7 i
I. Mi1Q
0
(Irlt! 111
(r
•
•
i4
• %;.».. v'
4.ao=raT Noy. . • )4 Powel1town
.A
`off • . c ,, •
•.1
•
I
•�
�4 • •
GA SINO
STATION
CI
i h
•
1 •
1
'
•

'Sep 21 01 1O:13a WKD Registered User
828 251-1611 p.1
TRANSMITTAL
II DICKSON
1419 Patton Avenue • Asheville, North Carolina 28806 • 828-251-1610 • 828-251-1611 (fax)
To: Charles Weaver [phone] From: Jody Lowe
Company: NCDENR CC: Towns of Rosman and Highlands
Date: September 21, 2001
Reference: Preliminary Waste -Load Allocation Requests
❑ Urgent El For Review ❑ Please Comment Q Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
Attached are copies of the original requests sent to Forest Westall of NCDENR in Asheville on July
20, 2001 requesting preliminary waste -load allocations for the expansions of theTowns of Rosman
and Highlands wastewater treatment facilities. Included is a copy of the original cover letter and
map for each project. Please call if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Total # of pages: 5
If you do not receive all pages or if the transmission is not legible please call our receptionist at [phone].
The information in this fax transmittal is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient any
distribution or copying hereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received this fax transmittal in error, please call our
receptionist and return this fax transmittal to W.K. Dickson & Co. by mail. Thank you.
-1-

Sep 21 01 10:14a WKD Registered User
828 251-1611 p.2
1 w K
July 20, 2001
Mr. Forest Westall, PE F COP Y
North Carolina Department of Environmentand Natural Resources
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
RE: Waste -Load Allocation Request
for the Town of Rosman
Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
WKD #90203.40
Transylvania, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Westall:
We are working with the Town of Rosman to expand their existing wastewater
treatment plant capacity to 0.25 MGD. The existing treatment plant has a
capacity of 0.09 MGD. The effluent is discharged into the French Broad River,
south of Rosman, as shown in the attached figure. The facility operates under
the NPDES permit number NC0021946.
We are requesting a preliminary waste -load allocation, effluent limitations and
monitoring requirements for the expansion so that we may complete the
alternatives analysis for this project. Currently, the wastewater is primarily
domestic in nature and is not likely to change in the future.
If you have any questions, or require additional information, do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
W. K. Dickson & Company, Inc.
�JL _DTI
sJ v
Victor Lofquist, tit
Enclosures
cc: File, Town of Rosman

•
Sep 21 01 10:14a
WKD Registered User
828 251-1611
p.3
•
•
•+'• .' , k.! i. Doublq Sp rtgs . . •\. ' ' f` f-) ' t••-~. '',- '
r,Z:5: t I. Gap. J 1 .. `, . ,� #j• .fir
•y` 'i'.1. 4. b i ' •,' e , . -,•,• , -.., Kalfar Cake / O ` �.1 .•.
_
�s:^.".--..� • \ t`',`., 7 ♦ .�•... J `;� \� r0 r ,, yam"• `Y
v rT ++
a f —a / L. • : N,.... f' herr.111..1.!
t J•
r ; 'ti \ • •
I
•
- . •
• ' '1 l 1 ; ,, •
w•jiOii�r _,
,:. M.�r -ni
rgar, iit r
•, •'• ' '..1y; •,^f•..,•Zor, 1")
., J OL. , ` ‘l': nr�i ,‘• • '�•
. er•
t 71; . • •
•
•
«�. ‘6M LR 733••
?209
M+F�
•z
•
paoc- :1•,:1:' . • (,w. • +' . _) • ".�`
•� ' j.t •1 • • • "'. i•• ` i
•
�. -:� a • . ,'-., ► :
l
\'
L•<1 f •--; 4._
• •_s' `., .. -• ,._ peter eaiigr ..... - ..'•
- - **-ri . • 5 ..• ..C---\... t) . ! : . •• . •
x v ••• .'• „` 7• I •
-XBM !AI 733, j -• . -
' 2260 J ' • • j •
1 , r> • ,,•
�yo ;
-;\...• k..--)1:-/7.... ::.• ... -1—
r•'r *.--4.- - •
•1'3%.\..) t•-•-
1•
�i
.' r�
!"II' i •
;
1 \
1
r •\
•
• Rocky Mtn
• .• ; •
t•-% '. .fie• . • 'a::
\ • :Ro.st-vpk.t,,)
--• •
G°
• •
f I. •
•
•"; FKE��
(• '..
i
i '; 4 4
• 4 .
4 • •
•
• " •
•
n• B
•f1 r•• • • M
'ki
•I. • .•,:w•••s '
+� \ • h
•• s `I -:,Bit• y� , Powelltown 'y
i ao"• ••:
••
•
`L Li.sr• rs
•
•
q�� � 1'r ••Q{4i 1i �� • _
,�
}
Drive-in.
C/ '-'::',::•'..-....I
••1/4/ •. /
•C• - hi �•• `.
CAlvert • ••
•
•.6M1R73�_'•
•
•
•
•
.
•
•
•21
•
•
• i.•
l •
1 ,
•
�O
'&4 QINO l • . •' '
STATION j f, +•:
D
•
4, 0a� V • •a%
f

GKEX88/MP 12/12/2001
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALYSIS REPORT PAGE 1
PERMIT--NC0021946 PIPE--001
FACILITY--ROSMAN (TOWN) WWTP
LOCATION--ROSMAN
REPORT PERIOD: 0101-0112 LOC---E
DESIGN FLOW-- .0900 CLASS--2
REGION/COUNTY--01 TRANSYLVANIA
50050 00310 00530 00610 31616 50060 00010 00400
MONTH Q/MGD BOD RES/TSS NH3+NH4- FEC COLI CHLORINE TEMP PH
LIMIT F .0900 F 30.00 F 30.0 NOL F 200.0 NOL 9.0 6.0
01/01 .0630 14.17 18.7 5.61 114.7 .503 14.66 7.2-7.1
01/02 .0725 17.70 26.5 11.85 47.6 .455 15.03 7.2-7.0
01/03 .0775 15.68 10.4 7.02 106.2 15.30 7.1-7.0
01/04 .0750 8.95 5.7 1.00 133.4 18.95 7.1-6.9
01/05 .0702 7.27 7.2 4.59 4.0 .569 20.45 7.1-7.0
01/06 .0485 8.00 6.0 2.87 4.6 20.50 7.1-7.0
01/07 .0535 13.65 7.2 10.30 9.5 22.58 7.1-7.0
01/08 .0576 11.04 10.2 7.66 .5 22.85 7.1-7.0
01/09 .0696 9.82 12.8 2.40 35.2 .411 20.75 7.1-7.0
01/10 .0722 8.27 9.0 6.29 5.3 19.00 7.0-6.9
AVERAGE .0659 11.45 11.3 5.95 46.1 .484 19.00
MAXIMUM .0900 30.40 44.0 19.50 1020.0 .800 24.00 7.200
MINIMUM .0310 2.00 2.0 .20 .1 .090 14.50 6.900
UNIT MGD MG/L MG/L MG/L #/100ML MG/L DEG.0 SU

GKEX88/MP 12/12/2001
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALYSIS REPORT PAGE 2
PERMIT--NC0021946 PIPE--001
FACILITY--ROSMAN (TOWN) WWTP
LOCATION--ROSMAN
00600 00665
MONTH TOTAL N PHOS-TOT
01/01
01/02
01/03
01/04
01/05
LIMIT NOL NOL
01/06 5.440 1.6400
01/07
01/08
01/09
01/10
AVERAGE 5.440 1.6400
MAXIMUM 5.440 1.6400
MINIMUM 5.440 1.6400
UNIT MG/L MG/L
REPORT PERIOD: 0101-0112 LOC---E
DESIGN FLOW-- .0900 CLASS--2
REGION/COUNTY--01 TRANSYLVANIA

GKEX88/MP 12/12/2001
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALYSIS REPORT PAGE 1
PERMIT--NC0021946 PIPE--001
FACILITY--ROSMAN (TOWN) WWTP
LOCATION--ROSMAN
REPORT PERIOD: 0001-0012 LOC---E
DESIGN FLOW-- .0900 CLASS--2
REGION/COUNTY--01 TRANSYLVANIA
50050 00310 00530 00610 31616 50060 00010 00400
MONTH Q/MGD BOD RES/TSS NH3+NH4- FEC COLI CHLORINE TEMP PH
LIMIT F .0900 F 30.00 F 30.0 NOL F 200.0 NOL 9.0 6.0
00/01 .0753 10.00 14.0 3.81 14.0 .513 9.97 7.1-6.9
00/02 .0781 17.67 16.5 5.17 141.9 .482 11.90 7.0-6.8
00/03 .0805 16.90 15.4 14.20 89.9 .486 14.24 7.2-6.9
00/04 .0772 10.52 13.7 8.26 52.0 .510 19.52 6.8-6.5
00/05 .0687 16.35 18.2 15.10 31.3 .520 20.57 6.9-6.7
00/06 .0688 6.10 7.8 6.95 5.3 .574 22.64 6.8-6.5
00/07 .0691 5.52 17.7 8.73 9.9 .572 24.97 7.1-6.8
00/08 .0664 5.10 12.2 1.00 .4 24.14 6.9-6.7
00/09 .0721 8.80 10.0 4.85 10.9 23.36 7.2-6.9
00/10 .0766 3.67 4.0 10.59 .6 18.70 7.1-6.8
00/11 .0757 4.56 5.0 4.70 23.5 .423 15.38 7.1-6.9
00/12 .0713 6.73 9.2 1.34 6.6 .595 13.38 7.0-6.8
AVERAGE .0733 9.32 11.9 7.05 32.1 .519 18.23
MAXIMUM .0890 38.60 43.0 19.50 1300.0 .800 25.20 7.200
MINIMUM .0610 .00 0 .00 .1 .051 9.80 6.500
UNIT MGD MG/L MG/L MG/L #/100ML MG/L DEG.0 SU

GKEX88/MP 12/12/2001
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALYSIS REPORT PAGE 2
PERMIT--NC0021946 PIPE--001
FACILITY--ROSMAN (TOWN) WWTP
LOCATION--ROSMAN
00600 00665
MONTH TOTAL N PHOS-TOT
LIMIT
00/01
00/02
00/03
00/04
00/05
LIMIT NOL NOL
00/06 14.000 .3500
00/07
00/08
00/09
00/10
00/11
00/12 18.000 2.1000
AVERAGE 16.000 1.2250
MAXIMUM 18.000 2.1000
MINIMUM 14.000 .3500
UNIT MG/L MG/L
REPORT PERIOD: 0001-0012 LOC---E
DESIGN FLOW-- .0900 CLASS--2
REGION/ COUNTY- -01 TRANSYLVANIA

GKEX88/MP 12/12/2001
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALYSIS REPORT PAGE 1
PERMIT--NC0021946 PIPE--001
FACILITY--ROSMAN (TOWN) WWTP
LOCATION--ROSMAN
REPORT PERIOD: 9901-9912 LOC---E
DESIGN FLOW-- .0900 CLASS--2
REGION/COUNTY--01 TRANSYLVANIA
50050 00310 00530 00610 31616 50060 00010 00400
MONTH Q/MGD BOD RES/TSS NH3+NH4- FEC COLI CHLORINE TEMP PH
LIMIT F .0900 F 30.00 F 30.0 NOL F 200.0 NOL 9.0 6.0
99/01 .0059 4.92 3.5 2.77 5.7 10.00 7.3-6.9
99/02 .0579 6.37 3.7 6.66 6.6 8.47 7.0-6.7
99/03 .0585 5.15 3.7 6.16 4.8 9.50 7.1-6.9
99/04 .0604 10.12 1.4 5.49 31.7 12.20 7.2-6.9
99/05 .0766 11.32 6.7 9.24 40.5 15.25 7.1-6.9
99/06 .0826 6.30 2.5 16.53 4.6
99/07 .0850 7.68 1.4 2.47 4.7 19.60 7.1-6.9
99/08 .0584 7.05 6.0 3.41 21.6 .474 18.00 7.1-6.8
99/09 .0692 11.88 20.4 10.14 70.8 .280 22.30 6.5-6.2
99/10 .0660 7.65 7.7 4.26 9.0 .555 20.97 6.8-6.6
99/11 .0899 7.12 27.0 2.26 198.2 .228 19.50 7.0-6.5
99/12 .0760 16.56 13.8 3.76 151.0 .236 17.32 7.1-6.9
AVERAGE .0655 8.51 8.1 6.09 45.7 .354 15.73
MAXIMUM .6580 26.40 86.0 19.20 1170.0 .800 22.80 7.300
MINIMUM .0050 2.30 1.0 1.00 4.0 .060 4.90 6.200
UNIT MGD MG/L MG/L MG/L #/100ML MG/L DEG.0 SU

GKEX88/MP 12/12/2001
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALYSIS REPORT PAGE 2
PERMIT--NC0021946 PIPE--001
FACILITY--ROSMAN (TOWN) WWTP
LOCATION--ROSMAN
00600 00665
MONTH TOTAL N PHOS-TOT
NOL NOL
99/01
99/02
99/03
99/04
99/05 557.000 7.3200
99/06
99/07
99/08
99/09
99/10
99/11
99/12 3.600 1.0000
AVERAGE 280.300 4.1600
MAXIMUM 557.000 7.3200
MINIMUM 3.600 1.0000
UNIT MG/L MG/L
REPORT PERIOD: 9901-9912 LOC---E
DESIGN FLOW-- .0900 CLASS--2
REGION/COUNTY- -01 TRANSYLVANIA
t