20200798 Ver 3_ePCN Application_20220413

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
June 1, 2021 Ver 4.1
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20200798 3
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
What amout is owed? *
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Doug Perez:eads\djperez
la. Name of project:
Little Hope Creek Sewer Improvements Phase III
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Megan Bollero
1 b. Primary Contact Email: * lc. Primary Contact Phone: *
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
4/13/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Little Hope Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
Class C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.170956
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-80.863558
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
Yes No

ID#
20200798
Version
3
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
3/23/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File type must be PDF
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 58 - Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances (frequently used)
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
lf. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Charlotte Water; POC: Stephen Scott
2b. Deed book and page no.:
N/A (Charlotte Water utility -line easement)
2c. Contact Person:
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
Yes No
Yes No

2d. Address
Street Address
5100 Brookshire Blvd
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28216
State / Province / Region
North Carolina
Country
USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Megan Bollero
4b. Business Name:
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28273
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
Multiple
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Seneca Place
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28210
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Little Hope Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
Class C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
2b. Property size:
13
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Catawba

3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501030102
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Little Hope Creek Sewer Improvements - Phase III site is an approximately 18,500-foot long, variable width sewer easement consisting of three corridors, located to the west of Little
Hope Creek. The first corridor begins at Mockingbird Lane and extends north-northwest to Montford Drive. The corridor then splits with one corridor extending to the northwest to
Manhasset Road and the second corridor extending to the northwest to South Boulevard. The third corridor begins just south of Carey Court and extends to the northwest to the
intersection of Seneca Place and Stanfield Drive in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1, Attachment A).
The project area consists of undeveloped forested areas, herbaceous areas, developed urban areas, and a sewer easement. On -site elevations range from 590-690 feet above mean sea
level (Figure 2). Land cover within the project area consists of mixed forest, shrub/scrub, herbaceous areas, forested wetland, emergent wetland, and medium intensity developed land
(Figure 3).
According to the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County (Figure 4) and the NRCS
Published Soil Survey for Mecklenburg County (Figure 5), on -site soils consist of six soil
types (Table 1). None of the soils listed on the Web Soil Survey were listed as being hydric or as containing hydric inclusions.
A review of the NWI GIS layer depicts riverine systems throughout the site and a forested/shrub wetland in the northern and central corridors of the project limits (Figure 6).
Based on the results of wetland delineation performed by Carolina Wetland Services, there are 13 jurisdictional waters of the U.S. located within the project boundary totaling
approximately 0.27 acres, including 668 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel (Figures 8-8C).
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
• Yes No Unknown
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
Phases I&II: DWR# 20200798; USACE# SAW-2020-01055
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.12
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Intermittent: 180 If Perennial: 488 If
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The Little Hope Creek Sewer Improvements project involves installing a new sewer line running west of Little Hope Creek. The proposed sewer line will be placed next to an existing
deteriorating sewer line that will be abandoned. This project will provide for future wastewater needs in the City of Charlotte.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 58, proposed stream impacts associated with this sewer line construction project are due to open cut stream crossings and three permanent at -grade
crossings (S1-S36). Additionally, the project proposes two wetland crossings, resulting in permanent wetland impacts (W1 and W2).
The proposed impacts and construction plan details are included in the Attachment F. The proposed impacts are described in detail below.
Stream Impacts (S1-S36)
All stream sewer line crossings will be constructed via open trench. The temporary impacts were calculated based on the width of the construction corridor and will include the temporary
dewatering devices required in order to construct the sewer line in the dry, temporary stream crossings, sewer line installation, and bank stabilization. Proposed temporary stream impacts
total 345 linear feet. Permanent stream impacts for this project total 195 linear feet,
The three proposed permanent stream crossings will be constructed with armorftex or approved equal and keyed into the existing grade (Detail B; Sheet 33, Attachment F). Each
permanent crossing will be limited to 20 linear feet wide, totaling 60 linear feet of permanent impacts.
All areas disturbed by the work shall be re -graded to leave the area in a smooth condition, sloped for drainage and stabilized. All impacted stream banks shall be permanently stabilized
with rip rap below the ordinary high water mark and seeding and mulch with woven coir net above the ordinary high water mark. The limits of rip rap stabilization will be limited to 10 linear
feet along stream banks per crossing, totaling 135 linear feet for the entire project. Riprap will be keyed at the level of existing grade (Detail B; Sheet 35, Attachment F). The project is
located within urban watershed, therefore rip rap below the ordinary high water mark is required to protect the installed utility crossing. The proposed utility crossings will not result in any
permanent loss of waters of the U.S.
Due to site constraints, the limits of disturbance are closer than ten feet of the top of the bank at multiple locations. The general notes on the plan sheets specify these areas, and mention
that the contractor shall pay special attention in these areas to not disturb the stream. The location of the proposed easement is bounded by an existing sewerline that is to be abandoned,
as well as multiple single family homes and their associated fences, garages, and sheds. Therefore, Charlotte Water is Requesting a waiver for the Water Quality Certification #4276
Activity Specific Condition No.2.
Wetland Impacts (W1-W2)
Proposed permanent wetland impacts to jurisdictional wetlands total approximately 0.12 acre, and is the result of a permanently maintained easement through forested wetland, where
forested wetland will be mechanically cleared and permanently converted to maintained herbaceous wetland.
All disturbed areas will be returned to original grade and seeded with a native seed mix within 90 days of completion of the project. Planting of canopy and shrub species is not proposed.
The undisturbed canopy and shrub species abutting the project corridor will naturally reseed the non -maintained portions of the corridor and will provide an assortment of existing and
diverse native vegetation that matches the abutting species.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A

Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
Phase I of this project is the southernmost portion of the sewer line, beginning at Tyvola Road and extending northwards to Seneca Place. Phase I was permitted ahead of Phase II in
order to minimize conflicts with the current construction of the Cross Charlotte Trail and Little Hope Creek Greenway. The USACE issued the 404 for Phase I on June 22, 2020 and
NCDEQ issued the 401 on July 7, 2020. Phase II is the northernmost portion if the sewer line, beginning at Seneca Place, and extending north/northwest to Belton Street. The USAGE
issued the 404 for Phase 11 on September 9, 2020 and NCDEQ issued the 401 on September 1, 2020. Phase III has three branches off of Phases I and III that extend westward along
tributaries of Little Hope Creek. No other additional phases are planned at this time.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
Sewer easement
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland CC
Yes
Corps
0.060
(acres)
W2
Sewer easement
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland BB
Yes
Corps
0.060
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.120
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.120
2i. Comments:
Permanent wetland impacts are the result of converting forested wetland to herbaceous for the utility -line maintenance easement.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
length*
S1
At -grade crossing
Permanent
Fill
Stream K
Perennial
Corps
20
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S2
At -grade crossing
Permanent
Fill
Stream K
Perennial
Corps
5
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S3
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream K
Perennial
Corps
5
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S4
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream K
Perennial
Corps
12
Average (feet)
5
(linear feet)
S5
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream K
Perennial
Corps
12
Average (feet)
5
(linear feet)
S6
At -grade crossing
Permanent
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
6
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)

S7
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
6
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S8
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream C
Perennial
Corps
4
Average (feet)
25
(linear feet)
S9
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream C
Perennial
Corps
4
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S10
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
8
Average (feet)
25
(linear feet)
S11
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
8
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S12
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream L
Perennial
Corps
20
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S13
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream L
Perennial
Corps
20
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S14
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream I
Intermittent
Corps
4
Average (feet)
30
(linear feet)
S15
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream I
Intermittent
Corps
4
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S16
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream L
Perennial
Corps
15
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S17
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream L
Perennial
Corps
15
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S78
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream H
Intermittent
Corps
4
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S19
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream H
Intermittent
Corps
4
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S20
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream L
Perennial
Corps
12
Average (feet)
40
(linear feet)
S21
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream L
Perennial
Corps
15
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S22
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream L
Perennial
Corps
15
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S23
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
10
Average (feet)
5
(linear feet)
S24
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
10
Average (feet)
5
(linear feet)
S25
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
20
Average (feet)
30
(linear feet)
S26
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
20
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S27
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
6
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S28
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
6
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S29
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
20
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S30
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
20
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S31
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream G
Intermittent
Corps
3
Average (feet)
5
(linear feet)
S32
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream G
Intermittent
Corps
3
Average (feet)
5
(linear feet)
S33
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
15
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S34
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
15
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
S35
Open cut sewer crossing
Temporary
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
8
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S36
Rip rap stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
8
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0

3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
195 345
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
540
3j. Comments:
Permanent stream impacts are the result of three at -grade stream crossings, totaling 60 If, and rip rap stabilization at the sewer crossings, totaling 135 If.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. The Little Hope Creek Sewer Improvements -
Phase III project has been designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters wherever possible and minimize the extent of necessary impacts to
jurisdictional waters. The following paragraph outlines the alternatives analysis and avoidance and minimization efforts undertaken during the planning
and design phase of this project.
The project proposes only three permanent crossings that are required for maintenance vehicles to access the easement. The width of the crossings is
limited to 20 feet. The permanent crossings will be constructed at grade.
The proposed stream crossings are perpendicular or near perpendicular.
Trenchless boring under the creek was considered, but this carries the risk of "blow our of the stream bed where bore pressures exceed the capacity of
the stream bed. Therefore, boring the proposed stream crossings would greatly increase the safety risk to persons and property during construction, as
well as the potential environmental impacts as compared with a more controlled open trench installation. Therefore, the trenchless boring option was
abandoned from further consideration.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be implemented during construction to avoid further Impacts. The construction corridor within jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. will be limited to a maximum width of 40 feet.
The permanently maintained portion of the right-of-way (RNV) corridor within wetland areas will be minimized and will not exceed 20 feet. Proper
sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Anti -seep collars will be installed at the
downstream wetland boundary and every 150 feet up the gradient until the relief sewer exits the wetland. All channel work will be constructed in the dry
in accordance with Water Quality Certification No. 4276.
Timber mats will be utilized within wetlands to prevent rutting and all impacted areas will be returned to their pre -impact grades.
All impacted stream banks shall be permanently stabilized with rip rap below the ordinary high water mark and seeding and mulch with woven coir net
above the ordinary high water mark. The limits of rip rap stabilization will be limited to 10 linear feet along stream banks per crossing. Riprap will be
keyed at the level of existing grade.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Riparian wetland 0.12
Stream 60
3c. Comments
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No

If no, explain why:
This project is not adjacent to protected riparian buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
There will be no significant change in impervious surface.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes No
Comments: *
This project will not require preparation of a SEPA/NEPA environmental document.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will not result in cumulative impacts in the foreseeable future.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No

5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
To determine which protected species are listed as occurring or potentially occurring within the project vicinity and prior to conducting the on -site field
investigation, CWS consulted the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Endangered and Threatened Species and Species of Concern by
County for North Carolina online database for Mecklenburg County. In addition, CWS performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer, and Information for Planning and Consultation (IPAC) database to determine if any record occurrences of federally -
listed, candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat were located within the project limits and conducted a habitat assessment within the
study area. The results of the desktop review and habitat assessment are included in the Protected Species Habitat Assessment report (Attachment G).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
https://www.fisheries. noaa.gov/resou rce/map/essential-fish-habitat-mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on November 26, 2019 to determine the presence of any areas of
architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service a Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission's webpage and found no historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts within the project limits. A letter
was received from SHPO on January 6, 2020 stating that they are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project (Attachment H).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project will not result in above ground fill.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Firm Nos. 3710453200K, 3710454200K, and 3710454100K
Miscellaneous u
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Transmittal Letter - Google Docs.pdf
Attachment A - Figures.pdf
Attachment B- Signed AA.pdf
Attachment C - Photopage.pdf
Attachment D - NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms.pdf
Attachment E - USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms.pdf
Attachment F - Impact Figures(ptp).pdf
Attachment G - PETS.pdf
Attachment H - SHPO.pdf
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
119.36KB
112.34MB
216.12KB
19.76MB
159.32KB
150.13KB
51.45MB
2.15MB
93.92KB
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Megan Bollero
Signature
maw Aefete

Date
4/13/2022