NC0037508_NPDES Draft Permit_20041221

Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
December 21, 2004
Mr. James Frye, System Superintendent
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, North Carolina 28315
DENR-FRO
DEC 2 3 2004
DWQ
Subject: Transmittal of NPDES Permit DRAFT
Permit NC0037508
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant Moore
County
Dear Mr. Frye:
In response to Moore County's request to renew the NPDES permit for the subject site, the Division of Water
Quality (the Division) hereby transmits this permit draft. Please review the attached draft for completeness and
accuracy.
Concurrent with this notification, the Division is publishing a notice in newspapers having circulation in the
general Moore County area, soliciting public comment on this permit draft. Please provide any comments you
may have regarding this draft to DENR — DWQ, NPDES Unit no later than 30 days after receiving this
draft permit.
Following the 30-day public comment period, the Division will review all pertinent comments and take
appropriate action prior to issuing a final permit. If you have questions concerning the draft permit, you may e-
mail [e-mail], or please call me at [phone], extension 597.
Revising Ammonia (NH3 as N) Limits. Ammonia Limits have been adjusted for toxicity considering IWC of
41%. The previous permit's Monthly Average (Summer) limit has been adjusted to 2.1 mg/L, and a limit of 6.2
mg/L Monthly Average (Winter) has been added to the permit. Per statewide policy, the Division has added
ammonia Weekly Average limits to this permit. Because Moore County is a major municipal, Weekly Average
limits are calculated as "Monthly Average values times three." This corresponds to a new Weekly Averages of 6.3
mg/L (summer), and 18.6 mg/L (Winter).
Although new ammonia limits are notably more stringent, the Division reviewed the permittee's ammonia data
and anticipates no future compliance problems with new permit limits. Data for the years 2003 and 2004 indicate
average daily ammonia levels regularly reported below detection at 0.5 mg/L with a maximum reported as 0.8
mg/L.
Concerning Mercury. As noted in previous letters to you (see correspondence dated August 30, 2002 and
August 12, 2003), the Moore County and 155 other facilities in North Carolina are subject to EPA low-level
mercury test Method 1631. Please be reminded that you must continue with this, low-level method and required
clean sampling techniques.
Mercury bioaccumulation in fish tissue from the Lumber River Basin has prompted fish consumption advisories
and impaired waterbody designations. Therefore, a Phase II, Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) is currently in
progress for the Lumber and Waccamaw watersheds. This Phase II program is scheduled for completion by
Winter 2006.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
NCDENR
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

Moore County
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NPDES Permit NC0037508
Page 2
Renewal Reasonable Potential Analysis. As part of this renewal, the Division conducted Reasonable Potential
Analyses (RPA) on contaminants of concern. These include potential toxicants and metals considering Significant
Industrial Users (SIUs), previous effluent monitoring, and this facility's Pretreatment Program. This RPA evaluates
"reasonable potential" for parameters to exceed North Carolina's instream Water Quality Standards. Having
concluded its review, the Division offers the following comments and changes to your previous permit (see table).
Table.
Permit Renewal -- Changes/Additions:
Parameter''
Comments / Renewal Action
Ammonia
(NH3 as N) '
...
Revised Limits: adjusted Summer Monthly Ave. to 2.1 mg/L; Added Summer Weekly Ave.
of 6.2 mg/L; added limits Winter Monthly Ave. 6.3 mg/L and Weekly Ave. 18.6 mg/L.
TRC
Added Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Daily Max. limit of 28 µg/L.
Copper
Yes
Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no limits; add monitoring 2/Month
Mercury
—
TMDL for the Lumber River Basin dictates Quarterly monitoring by EPA Method 1631
Silver,
Yes
Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no limits; continue monitoring 2/Month
Zinc .
Yes
Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no limits; continue monitoring 2/Month
*RP = "Reasonable Potential" to exceed instream Water Quality Standard.
Finally, in keeping with a newly adopted statewide standard for Total Residual Chlorine (TRC), the Division has
added a TRC limit to your permit of 28 µg/L.
Res
Je R. Corporo
DES Unit
Enclosure: Draft NPDES Permit NC0037508
cc: ji'ayetteualletRe—gtanal O,ffce; WaterQuali ection [NPDE 't and'FacfSheet]`�
NPDES Unit [NPDES Permit and Fact Sheet]
Aquatic Toxicology Unit [NPDES Permit and Fact Sheet]
EPA Region 4 [NPDES Permit, Fact Sheet, Permit Application, 2°d Species TOX results, PPA 3 events]

Permit NC0037508
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA j
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION' SYSTEM
(NPDES)
PERMIT
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North CJina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Grontrof Act, as amended,
Moore County~1*
r' 1
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewatertfrom an outfall locatedat the
‘�f, �> L
Moore County Water:FPollutionControl Plant
094.,Addar Road
<Moo eCou�nty�,. �s i
O f/ L i
to receiving waters desi atred:as Aberdeen,C er ekloaate•thin the Lumber River Basin in
accordance with eff1 e ilimitati�rxs�, mor ito .rig requirements, and other cokiditions set forth in Parts
I, II, III and IV hereof 1
\\
'
\\
This permit shall become efectiye 1 , 2005.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2009.
Signed this day , 2005.
Alan W. Klimek, PE, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0037508
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are
hereby revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is
no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this
facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions described
herein.
is hereby authorized:
Moore County
1. to continue discharging 6.7 MGD of dome c' andundustrial wastewater from the
existing wastewater treatment facility consisting/of activated sludge wastewater
treatment facilities. The treatment system utlizes:
•
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
pre -aeration
grit removal
primary clarification -----,.
first -stage activated sludge
intermediate clarification
second -stage aeration
final eiarification \/'
anaerobic sludge digestion
sludge\drying beds \ \ 't
and post aeration '\ `\
located at the Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant, 1094 Addor Road, Moore
County, and % I
'
2 to discharge from said treatment facility through Outfall 001 at a specified location
(see attached map) into Aberdeen Creek, a waterbody classified as C waters within
the Lumber River Basin.

Moore County WWTP
Receiving Stream: Aberdeen Creek Drainage Basin: Lumber River
Latitude: 35° 04' 04" N Longitude: 78° 28' 07" W
Sub -Basin: 03-07-50 Permitted Flow: 6.7 MGD
State Grid / USGS Quad: G 2ISW / Pinebluff, N.C. Stream Class: C
Moore County WWTP
and Discharge Line
(Approximate Location)
Faci
lity
Loca Ltion 1. f
not tb scale
North
NPDES Permit NC0037508
Moore County

NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge through
Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETERS `
•
EFFLUENTLIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average j
;Weekly
Average
': Daily
'Maximum:--
Measurement
Frequency
Sample-
TYPe..:
*Sample
Location-
Flow (MGD)
6.7
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD, 5 day, 20°C (April 1 — October 31) 2
22.0 mg/L
33.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E
BOD, 5 day, 20°C (Nov. 1 — March 31) 2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite.
I, E,
NH3 as N (April 1 — October 31)
2.1 mg/L
6.3 mg/L
,/ `>
-
Daily
Composite
E
NH3 as N (Nov. 1 — March 31)
6.2 mg/L
18.6 mg/L /`..
;% -
Daily
Composite.
E
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200 / 100 ml
400 / 10041
\
Daily
Grab
E
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) 3
,/\\Z
\2$ j g/L
Daily
Grab
E
Dissolved Oxygen 4
,f ,;
\ \
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature (°C)
S: ,/
\A,
Daily
Grab
E
Conductivity
\ A
\
Daily
Grab
E
pH g
1N...
A \ /` :
\ Daily
Grab
E
Total Phosphorus
\ti
\ ' _
\,! Monthly
Composite
E
Total Nitrogen (NO2-N + NO3-N + TKN)
`� \
,`e, \ \
Monthly
Composite
E -
Total Copper !'
- �� �
`` . e :
\
2/Monthly
Composite
E
Total Zinc r
`,, \ \
i % ,\, `
\
2/Monthly
Composite
E
Total Silver < i'
'`, \ '
\-< /„ �\'N
\.,
2/Monthly
Composite
E
Total Mercury 6 \.A
) )
\ c, N<>
Quarterly
Composite
E
Chronic Toxicity 7 :% '->-, \ \
,/_ i—�
\ \
Quarterly
Composite
E
Temperature, °C ,,,' %"� -\.
f/ " �'`,```
Variable8
Grab
U, D
Dissolved Oxygen \ <.
; �>
Variable8
Grab
U, D +
\
See next page for Table Footnotes.\
\

NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Table Footnotes:
1. Sample Locations: E — Effluent; I — Influent; U — approximately 100 feet Upstream of the outfall; D — Downstream at NCSR 1225.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15 % of the respective influent
value (i.e., 85% removal is required).
3. Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) shall be monitored only if chlorine is used to disinfect.
4. Daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not fall below 5.0 mg/L.
5. pH shall not fall below 6.0 nor exceed 9.0 standard units.
6. Mercury -- To facilitate the Lumber River's Phase II TMDL process for mercury, the Permittee shall report mercury using sample -
collection criteria and test methods established by EPA Test Method 16J'Tlais permit is subject to Special Condition A.(2.).
7. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 2.6 %; quarterly during Marchf,Jun'September, December; See Special Condition A. (3.)
8. Variable: instream samples shall be collected upstream and downstrea 3/,week during the summer months of June, July, August, and
September; samples shall be collected weekly during the rest 9f$$ie y ar. \
Units: / / \\
mg/L = milligrams per liter Ma-K micrograms per liter;\ Lbs/Day = pounds per day
BOD = biochemical oxygen demand ( NH3 as ammom)as nitrogen\ \ ml = milliliter
.., .\\�` \
Effluent shall contain no floating-- olids or,foam�vi ihle\'n other than. trace amounts.
/ NNN, >
�\ / — —
,----------- \ \ / \ ,
\ ✓
\\\
i \ \>
f,.

NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
SUPPLEMENT TO EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A (2). MERCURY REOPENER.
The Division may re -open this permit to require mercury load limitations, mercury minimization plans, and/or
source water characterization following completion of the Phase IIIVlercury TMDL for the Lumber and
Waccamaw River watersheds.

Nortl�Carolina Divisiijn'of
'Water Quality
�. 1'621�Mai( Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity,Test Forms, shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after
the end of the reporting period for w`hieh,tlie report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting
chemical/physical measurements and a11.coCntration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or
approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is
employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit
number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form.
The report shall be submitted to the,Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required
during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include
alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
SUPPLEMENT OT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. (3.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 41 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina
Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II
Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or suequue/ent; versions. The tests will be performed
during the months of, March, June, September, and December. Efflu' entsmpling for this testing shall be performed at
the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes \
If the test procedure, performed as the first test of any s ngl quarter, resultin"a failure or ChV below the permit
limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed'at'alnnnimum, in each of fte two following months, as
described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Efflue tToxicity Tes Procedure's (Revised -February 1998) or
subsequent versions. \ i�
..7,-. \\ '
The chronic value for multiple concentration test s w11,be det rrriinedl,using the geometric mea roof the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of reproduction or sure`v2l•arid,the'lowe'st concentration that does have a detectable impairment
of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable ai3meitt," collection methods; exposure regimes, and further
statistical methods are specified in the `N,orth Carolina Phase' I Cf%omo•,Whol Ef
\ fluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions!; 2 \ �,
All toxicity testing results reecuir � as part o this � perrru�condi�t'�wiLl be.�tered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring
Form (MR-1) for the months in whicli'test\ere perforitned, using the parametercode TGP3B for the pass/fail results and
THP3B for the Chronic Value: Additioally,`DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: ` { � ` �Envirg mn ent c. iences'B.ranch
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document (such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and/or appropriate environmental controls)
shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing, to be completed no later than the
last day of the month following the month of initial monitoring.

DENR / DWQ / NPDES Unit
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT, DEVELOPMENT
NPDES Permit NC0037508•;
INTRODUCTION
Moore County Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), herein called Moore County or the permittee,
requires a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to`dispose treated
wastewater to the surface waters of the state. The permittee's 5-year NPDES permit expired July 31,
. 2004 and they have requested renewal from the Division of Water Quality (the Division). This Fact
Sheet summarizes background information and rationale used by the Division'sNPDES Unit to
determine permit limits and monitoring conditions.
FACILITY. RECORDS REVIEW
Facility Description. -The Moore County WWTP (Table 1)_ is a 6.7: MGD publicly owned treatment
works (POTW) utilizing a Grade IV activated sludge wastewater treatment facility to treat domestic
and industrial wastewater. The Moore County treatment system utilizes.pre-aeration, grit removal,
primary clarification, first -stage activated sludge, intermediate clarification, second -stage aeration,
final clarification, anaerobic 'sludge digestion,, sludge drying beds, and post -aeration.
Table 1.
The Moore County WWTP
rt F53Facility Information
Fr ;u ,.e ,. _,a _y.�( .. o-_. ..�,. „,-.4.-,,,,,,,,,,,,_. �,,...e.�..t 4 'f� 'ti
Applicant'/Facility Name. ''
The Moore County WWTP {.
Applicant Address rrK .
1094 Addor Road � ; ' ,
Facility Address _ 4 y
Aberdeen:, North Carolina 283'15: , , { , .
Permitted Fow,(MGD) r `4= r
6.7 ,
Type i5f,Waste _ ' ?_ ,• '
Industrial and Domestic (4 SIUs)
Related Perrot (s) e s ; ' fi
• Land -Application WQ0018081 (Anson County)
Facility Grade'/ Pe mitt Status is
Grade IV, Major / Renewal
Drainage Basin `, `;
Lumber River Basin . _ -- I
County. a .,.. ` w , .
.Moore County 1
44 fia iscelaeos1 y z
ReceivingFStream-. _
Lumber River
Regional Office:; = '
Fayetteville
Stream Class carion
,.xk
C
State Gnd l
USGS Topo Quad '
G 21 SW. /
Pinebluff, NC
303(d).Liste2M. ,.
No
•P,eranit Writer„ ;'%z-
Joe R. Corporon •
,Subbasin ,.,;:- ,.'
03-07-50
Date x (,•
3Dec04
Drainage Ar'eaf(sq iu) r
36.3
Sunnier 7Q1;0 (cfs)
15.2
Winter 7QI'0c s r.
28.7
30Q2 (cfs),
Average Flow (cfs);,, `'
47.2
Lat. 35° 04' 04"
Long. 78° 28' 05"
TWC (%),' c"
41 % •
DRAFT Fact Sheet . .
Renewal--.NPDES Peimit NC0037508
Pagel

Correspondence
Staff Report. Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO) conducted an annual facility inspection and Grady
Dobson prepared a Staff Report dated March 22, 2004. The FRO staff found the facility in good
condition and in compliance with the permit recommending that the NPDES Unit renew the permit in
accordance with the basin plan.
Division Records and Permittee's Renewal Application. The current permit expired on July 31,
2004, and the Division received a timely request to renew the permit from the permittee's (Standard
Form 2A) on January 20, 2004.
COMPLIANCE REVIEW
Waste Load Allocation (WLA). The Division prepared the last WLA for the receiving stream in
June 1994 and developed effluent limits and monitoring requirements considering an in -stream waste
concentration (IWC) of 41 % at 6.7 MGD. The Division views these limits and monitoring
requirements appropriate for renewal except as outlined below (see Permitting Approach Summary).
Verifying Existing Stream Conditions. This facility discharges to Aberdeen Creek [Stream Index
No. 14- 2-11-(6)], a Class C waterbody within the Lumber River Basin. Aberdeen Creek is not listed
as "impaired" [not 303(d) listed], However, Aberdeen Creek discharges to Downing Creek, one of 11
waters within the Lumber River Basin with fish advisories for mercury.
Concerning Mercury. Beginning in September 2003, the Division required Moore County to
monitor Quarterly for mercury using new EPA method 1631. The Division did not impose a permit
limit. Conditions have not changed.
To date, the Division has received five sample results using Method 1631. Quarterly results, -
beginning chronologically from September 2003, indicate mercury levels of 16, 12, 12, 6, and 7 ng/L
compared to a potential permit limit of 30 ng/L, based on IWC. Per agreement with EPA, quarterly
monitoring will continue without a permit limit until sufficient data have been collected to firmly
evaluate reasonable potential.
A note will be added to the cover letter stating that the permittee must continue this quarterly
monitoring using Method 1631. A "re -opener" clause has been added to the ;permit to emphasize the
need to reevaluate should compliance questions arise.
DMR Instream and Effluent Data Review. The Division reviewed 44 months of DMRs (January
2001 through October 2004) noting monthly -average flows averaging approximately 5.1 MGD or
about 76% of its permitted capacity. DMRs appear regular, thorough, and complete The Division
contacted the Permittee to correct the database for mercury and the Permittee complied.
Effluent Total Residual Chlorine (TRC). The permittee currently chlorinates and de -chlorinates its
effluent un-restricted by a Weekly Average TRC limit. In accordance with statewide. policy requiring
TRC limit in all permits, a limit of 28 µg/L will be added to this permit.
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing. The Division reviewed Moore County quarterly Whole
Effluent Toxicity records from January 1997 through September 2004 (32 quarterly tests). The
Permittee passed all quarterly toxicity tests during this time period.
DRAFT Fact Sheet
Renewal -- NPDES NC0037508
Page 2

Notices of Violation (NOVs) and Penalty Assessment. Division records for this facility show no
permit limit violations during the time period January 2001 through September 2004.
Toxicant Chronic and Acute Impact — Pollutants of Concern (POCs). To establish POCs, the
Division reviewed the permit application, discharge monitoring reports (Jan 2001 through Sep 2004),
pretreatment data, and the Basin Plan.. The Division then used the standard Reasonable Potential Analysis
(RPA) to calculate a maximum predicted concentration for each POC. Each maximum was then compared
to the POC's freshwater Chronic Standard (Table 2) and also to its Final Acute Value (%Z FAV) for
freshwater (Table 3).
If by the above method, a POC showed reasonable potential to exceed its %2 FAV, the Division included a
permit limit as a Daily Maximum to protect the receiving stream against acute toxic affects. Similarly, if
the maximum exceeded the chronic standard, a Weekly Average limit was added to the permit. Findings
and draft permit changes are summarized below (see Renewal Summary, Table 4).
Table 2.
Moore County WWTP Chronic RPA Findings and Renewal Action
Parameter
Samples `
(n)
Hits '
(n)
Maximum
Predicted
,...,�
Allowable ;
Concentration
, .
` RP*
y/n
. .,<,
t' Comments /
Renewal Action
«fir:._ ,. .... .. ....
Copper
sa,
41
41
493.2 µg/L
17 µg/L
Yes
Action Level Standard — no
toxicity problem, therefore no
limit; add monitoring 2/Month
Mercury '
5
5
0.04548 µg/L
12.0 ng/L
—
Limited database (5 samples by
EPA Method 1631). Continue
monitoring quarterly.
Silver '
38
10
13.9 µg/L
0.148 µg/L
Yes
Action Level Standard — no
toxicity problem, therefore no
limit; add monitoring 2/Month
Z inc ' ;
40
40
2,032.5 µg/L
123 µg/L
Yes
Action Level Standard — no
toxicity problem, therefore no
limit; add monitoring 2/Month
*RP = "Reasonable Potential' to exceed instream Water Quality Standard.
Table 3.
Moore County WWTP Acute RPA Findings and Renewal Action
Parameter
'Samples.
(n)
Hits
(n)
Maximum
.'Predicted
'/2 FAIT)
CMC
RP* 3
y/n
Comments /
' Renewal Action
Copper i
z
41
41
493.2 µg/L
7.3 µg/L
Yes '
Action Level Standard — no
toxicity problem, therefore no
limit; Add monitoring 2/Month
Mercury
5
5
0.04548 µg/L
—
—
No acute limit; Standard based
on bio-accumulation
(See Table 2).
Silver :_ ,:=_ _" =-.'
38
10
13.9 µg/L
1.23 µg/L
Yes
Action Level Standard — no
toxicity problem, therefore no
limit; add monitoring 2/Month
Z►nc. _ Y_`
40
40
2,032.5 µg/L
67 µg/L
Yes
Action Level Standard — no
toxicity problem, therefore no
limit; add monitoring 2/Month
*RP = "Reasonable Potential" to exceed mstream Water Quality Standard.
DRAFT Fact Sheet
Renewal -- NPDES NC0037508
Page 3

Pretreatment Compliance. This NPDES permit requires the Permittee to implement a Long
Term Management Plan (LTMP) or pretreatment program, as specified by federal regulations 40 CFR 403
and Title 15A NCAC 2H.0900 of state regulations. The Permittee's LTMP,has been approved by the
Division and potential influent parameters were considered during the Reasonable Potential Analysis.
Moore County WWTP currently services domestic wastes from several surrounding communities but only 1
Significant Industrial Users (S1U). This SIU provides an average daily discharge of approximately 0.150
MGD or about 2% of Moore County's permitted discharge.
Revising Ammonia (NH3 as N) Limits. Ammonia Limits have been adjusted for toxicity considering
IWC of 41 %. The previous permit's Monthly Average (Summer) limit has been adjusted to 2.1 mg/L, and a
limit of 6.2 mg/L Monthly Average (Winter) has been added to the permit. iPer statewide policy, the
Division has added ammonia Weekly Average limits to this permit. Because Moore County is a major
municipal, Weekly Average limits are calculated as "Monthly Average values times three." This
corresponds to a new Weekly Averages of 6.3 mg/L (summer), and 18.6 mg/L (Winter).
Although new ammonia limits are notably more stringent, the Division reviewed the permittee's NH3 data
and anticipates no compliance problems with new permit limits. Data for the years 2003 and 2004 indicate
average daily ammonia levels consistently reported below detection at 0.5 mg/L with a maximum reported
as 0.8 mg/L.
RENEWAL SUMMARY
Effluent Monitoring
Table 4.
Permit Renewal -- Recommended Changes/Additions:
Parameter.
'RP*
-":Comments / Renewal Actiont : A :-
Ammonia:; ..
(NH3 as 1s1) r .°
—
Revised Limits: adjusted Summer Monthly Ave. to 2.1 mg/L; Added Summer Weekly Ave.
of 6.2 mg/L; added limits Winter Monthly Ave. 6.3 mg/L and Weekly Ave. 18.6 mg/L.
TRC, ` - `: ',:
Added Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Daily Max. limit of 28 µg/L.
Copper'..; ;':":
Yes
Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no limits; add monitoring 2/Month
',Mercury::"=
—
TMDL for the Lumber River Basin dictates Quarterly monitoring by EPA Method 1631
`Silver:-.., ;.":., ;";,,
Yes
Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no limits; continue monitoring 2/Month
Zne:'- -', `t :,' :
Yes
Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no linuts; continue monitoring 2/Month
*RP = "Reasonable Potential" to exceed instream Water Quality Standard.
Instream Monitoring
Previous Requirements:
For Renewal:
Conductivity
Fecal Coliform
Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
Temperature
Delete fecal coliform and conductivity from instream testing, per
Division statewide permitting guidance.
No other changes recommended.
DRAFT Fact Sheet
Renewal -- NPDES NC0037508
Page 4

PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice:
Permit Scheduled to Issue:
NPDES UNIT CONTACT
December 8, 2004
January ;31, 2005
If you have questie s r gardi .any of the above- information or on the attached permit, please
contact Joe Cozdron at 919 733-5083 ext. 597.
DATE:
R •'G • NAL S FFICE COMMENTS.
NAME: . DATE:
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR:
(,/,,/„)
=/Y-a-n-/t_) DATE:
NPDES SUPERVISOR: - DATE:
DRAFT Fact Sheet
Renewal -- NPDES NC0037508
Page 5

MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
THRU: -
SUBJECT:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 22, 2004
Dave Goodrich, Supervisor
Permitting and Engineering Un
Dale Lop Environmental Specialis
Paul Ra ter Quality Supervisor
Fayettevill egional Office
NPDES Staff Report and Recommendations
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County Water Pollution Control
Moore County
Please find attached the staff report and recommendations of the Fayetteville Regional
Office concerning the renewal of subject NPDES Permit.
If you have any questions or require any further information, please advise.
DL/bs-m
Attachment

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: YES_ NO X
If Yes, SOC No.
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Charles Weaver
Date: March 15, 2003
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
COUNTY: Moore
Permit No. NC 0037508
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Moore County Water Pollution Control
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
2. Date of Investigation: December 1, 2003
3. Report Prepared by: Dale Lopez, Environmental Specialist
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: James D. Frye, System Supervisor
910-281-3!146
f
5 Directions to Site: Take SR 1100, south of Addor, for approximately 1 mile. Treatment
plant is on right side of road.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35° 04' 04" Longitude: 78° 28' 07".
Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. G-21-SW U.S.G.S. Quad Name: P nebluff. NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application? Approximately 50 acres
X Yes _ No (If No, explain)
8. Topography: (relationship to flood plain included): Flat and terraced; 0-10% slope
9. Location of nearest dwelling:
None within 1,000 feet

PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION (continued)
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Aberdeen Creek
a. Classification: "Class C"
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Lumber River Basin 03 - 07 - 50
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream.uses:
Fish and wildlife propagation, secondary recreation, agriculture, and other uses requiring
waters of lower quality.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF WASTES AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted: 6.67 MGD (Ultimate Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater Treatment facility? 6.6 MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity). 6.67 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct issued
in the previous two (2) years. N/A
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment
facilities:
The existing waste facility consists of the following: 6.67 MGD (design
capacity), preaeration and grit removal, primary clarification, first (1st)
stage activated sludge, intermediate clarification, second (2nd) stage
aeration, final clarification, anaerobic sludge digestion, sludge dryng
beds, and post aertion.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
In development Approved X
Should be required Not needed

PART II - DESCRIPTION OF WASTES AND TREATMENT WORKS (continued)
2. Residuals handling and utilizing/disposal scheme:
The dried sludge is routed to a lined landfill in Anson County.
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DWQ Permit No.
Permit Number WQ0018018, which has never been used.
Residual Contractor: N/A
Telephone : N/A
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP X PFRP Other
c. Landfill: Uwharrie Environmental Landfill, Troy, North Carolina, Montgomery
County
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (specify):
I
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): Grade IV (see attached)
4. SIC Code(s):
Primary 01 Secondary 55 57
Main Treatment Unit Code: 1 1 0 0 1
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies involved
(municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests:
Please note that the Priority Pollutant Analysis showed greater than detection level amounts for
Antimony, Copper, Zinc and Calcium.
3. Important SOC, JOC, or Compliance Schedule Dates (please attach): N/A
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications N/A
Begin Construction N/A
Complete Construction N/A

PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION (continued)
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the nondischarge options
available? Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: N/A
Connection to Regional Sewer System:. N/A
Subsurface: N/A
Other disposal options: N/A
5. Other Special Items:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommendation of this office that the permit application be processed and the appropriate permit
issued.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Date

IPE4deV4'LS61(3) we±iAda3
I

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATORS
CERTIFICATION COM:MISSION
CLASSIFICATION. • i
RATING SHEET. FOR WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS
FACILITY INFORMATION:
NAME OF FACILITY: /de/e&- UNT G /ii /®i/
7'F4 G6/) DA147-iPat )2/9,-/7-
..tom- 4
MAILING ADDRESS: 1 D l AD b vie /Q®f4„ D 6 E- Ai /'e
l
COUNTY:Ri04R L'
CONTACT PERSON:JAM5.S Aiye.
TELEPHONE: % (9/ 0) 8 —Jam/
.PERMTT NO: G' C D go? Check One: NC j WQ. HEALTH OP
TELEPHONE: i(9/O) g / - 3 / $16
ORC: %%AmF5 1::/91E
RATING INFORMATION: (Before completing this section, please refer to pages 2-4)
PERMITTED FLOW: , 6 7 MGD BNR? ' YES
CHECK CLASSIFICATION: WAS 1'EWA 1'bR: 1
COLLEC:1ION:
SPRAY IRRIGATION SUBSURFACE
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL GRADE I
NO
4
LAND APPLICATION
GRADE II
RATED BY: �� REGION: f'f 0 DATE:
1
/5 -A
REGIONAL OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: (9/D) `74 6'6 15 /EXT: 7/ L

Classification of Biological'Water Pollution Control Treatment Systems:
Grade I Biological WPCS
= Septic tank/sand filter systems
- Biological lagoon systems
Constructed wetlands and associated appurtenances
Grade II Biological WPCS
Systems that utilize an activated sludge or fixed growth process with a permitted flow
less than or equal to 0.5 million gallons per day (mgd)
Grade III Biological WPCS
- Systems that.utili7e an activated sludge or fixed growth process with a permitted flow
of greater than 0.5 through 2.5 million gallons per day (mgd)
- Grade II systems that are required to achieve biological nutrient reduction *
1/ Grade IV Biological WPCS
- Systems that utilizing an activated sludge or fixed growth process with a permitted flow
of greater than 2.5 million gallons per day (mgd)
= Grade III systems that are required to achieve biological nutrient reduction *
* Biological Nutrient Reduction -
The reduction of total nitrogen or total phosphorous by an activated sludge or fixed growth
process as required by the facilities permit.
Classification of Collection Water Pollution Control Systems:
(whichever provides lowest grade)
Same grade as biological water pollution control system. Grade of system:
Based on population served:
1,500. or Less = Grade I
1,501 to 15,000 = Grade II
15,001 to 50,000 =. Grade III
50,001 or more = Grade IV

Classification of Spray Irrigation Water Pollution Control Systems:
Systems which utilize spray irrigation for the reuse or disposal of wasterwater.
These systems include: septic tanks, sand filter, oil/water separators, lagoons,
storage basins, screening, sedimentation. Systems other than those listed above
shall be subject to additional classification.
Classification of Land Application of Residuals Systems:
Systems permitted and dedicated for land application of residuals that are produced by a
water pollution control system or contaminated soils.
Classification of Physical/Chemical Water Pollution Control Treatment Systems:
Grade I Physical/Chemical: Any water pollution control system that utilizes a primarily
physical process to treat wastewater. This classification includes groundwater
remediation systems. **
Grade II Physical/Chemical: Any water pollution control system that utilizes a primarily
chemical process to treat wastewater. This classification includes reverse osmosis,
electrodialysis, and ultrafiltration systems. **
** Any water pollution -,control system that utilizes a phyical/chemical process to enhance an
activated sludge or fixed growth process, shall not be -subject to additional classification.
Classification of Subsurface Water Pollution Control Systems:
Systems which utilize the soil for subsurface treatment and disposal of wastewater
and/or are required to have a certified operator under 15A NCAC 18A.1961. ***j
*** Any subsurface system that has as part of its treatment process a water pollution control
' systems that may be classified under Rules .0302 through .0307 of this section shall be.
subject to midional classification.

Definitions
Activated Sludge - shall mean a biological wastewater treatment process in which predominantly
biodegradable polluntants in wastewater are absorbed, or adsorbed by living aerobic organisms and
bacteria:
Chemical Process - shall mean a wastewater pollution control system process consisting
exclusively of the addition of chemicals to treat wastewater.
Collection System - shall mean a continuous connections of pipelines, conduits, .pumping
stations, and other related constructions used to conduct wastewater to the water pollution
control system.
Electrodialysis System - 'shall mean a system utlizing a selective separation of dissolved solids
process that is based on electrical charge and diffusion through a semipermeable membrane.
Physical Process shall mean any water pollution control system process consisting of
electrodialysis, adsorption, absorption, air stripping, gravimetric sedimentation, floation, and
filtration as a means of treatment.
Reverse Osmosis System - shall mean a system which utilizes solutions and semipermable
membranes to separate and .treat wastewater.
Ultrafiltration System - shall mean a system which utilizes a membrane filter to remove
pollutants from wastewater.
Water Pollution Control System - shall mean any system for the collection, treatment, or
disposal of wastewater and is classified under the provision of G.S. 90A-37.
Note: Please refer to G.S. 90A-37 for additional information and definitions.

ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCE CORP .
' REPORT OF ANALYSIS •
Pam Hester
TBL Laboratory
P.O. Box 589
Lumberton, NC 28359
Date Received January 21, 2004
Description 13718 - Moore County WWTP
Sample ID EFFLUENT 0119122
Collected By
Collection Date : 01/19/04 09:05
Parameter
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
January 29, 2004
SC Sample # L141764-01
Site ID .
Project # : TBL-13718
(
Result Det. Limit ! Units Method Date Dil.
Cyanide
Hardness, calcium
Total Phenol by 4AAP
Thallium
Mercury
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Gbt,
R�=
PP Volatile Organics
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride y
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethane
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
0m0.095 -
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
0.0050 mg/1 1 335.3
mg/1 Calc.
0.040 mg/1 420.2
0.0010 - mg/1 200.8
0.00020 mg/1 245.1
0.0050 mg/1 200.7
0.010 mg/1 200.7
0.0020 mg/1 200.7
0.0050 mg/1 20'0.7
0.50 mg/1 200.7
0.010 ..mg/1 200.7
0.010 mg/1 200.7
0.0050 mg/1 200.7
0.010 mg/1 200.7
0.010 mg/1 200.7
0.0050 mg/1 200.7
0.030 mg/1 200.7
0.0010 mg/1
0.0010 mg/1
0.0010 mg/1
0.0010 mg/1
0.0010 mg/1
0.0010 mg/1
0.0010 mg/1
0:0010 mg/1
0.050 mg/1
0.0050 mg/1
0.0010 mg/1
0.0010 mg/1
0.0010 mg/1
0.0010 mg/1
0.0010 mg/1
01/23/04 1
01/23/04 1
01/28/04 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04- 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04 1
01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1.
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/04 1
624 01/22/0.4 1
624 01/22/04 1
BDL - Below Detection Limit
Det. Limit - Estimated Quantitation Limit(EQL)
. Laboratory Certification Numbers:
A2LA - 1461-01, AIHA - 100789, AL - 40660, 'CA - I-2327, CT- PH-0197, FL - E87487, GA - 923, IN - C-TN-01
KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016, NC - ENV375,DW21704, ND - R-140, SC - 84004„ TN - 2006," VA - 00109, WV - 233
Page 1 of 6

11 1 MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
PERMIT: NCO037508
FACILITY: Moore County Public Utilities - Moore County WPCF C6UNTY: Moore
REGION: Fayetteville _
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING oorpxu`
nEpnnT /pp| LooxTow pxnAwsTsn
10'200 .001 Effluent
Copper, Total (as Cu)
10 ' 2oo1 001 Effluent Phosphorus, Total (asp)
Reporting Violation
vmumnw UNIT OF oALcuuATso
DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE
1031K1 2:month ug8
103101 Monthly mg0
1031/01 Monthly mO8
^10m1m1 uxmonth uo/I
VIOLATION TYPE
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
VIOLATION ACTION
a|ma
Pre -Production
Violation
a|ms
pne'pmuucUon
mu|aoun
8|MS
pm-=muu000n
Violation
B|mS
Pre -Production
Violation
e|mo '
Pre -Production
Violation
MONITORING nUTFAu
VIOLATION UNIT OF cALouuATso
LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE
--11--'2001--001- - -Emu*m'-oyan0&�Tvf;a_|<a��_cn7------l113om1 zxndmffi -ug71r
VIOLATION TYPE
Parameter Missing
VIOLATION ACTION
--a|MS —
Pre -Production
Violation

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
003750.
Report Date: 02/12/04
Page: 1 of 1
PERMIT: NC0037508
FACILITY: Moore County Public Utilities - Moore County WPCF COUNTY: Moore
REGION: Fayetteville
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING -OUTFALL VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED
REPORT / PPI LOCATION PARAMETER • DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT • VALUE VIOLATION TYPE' VIOLATION ACTION
01 --2003 001 Effluent Chlorine, Total Residual 01/04/03 5 X week ug/I Frequency Violation None
01 - 2003 001 Effluent Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC 01/04/03 , 5 X week #/100n11 Frequency Violation None
Broth,44.5C
01 - 2003 001 Effluent Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N) 01/04/03 5 X week mg/I Frequency Violation None
11 - 2003 001 Effluent. Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N) 11/29/03 5 X week mg/I Frequency Violation None
12 - 2002 001 Effluent Silver, Total (as Ag) 12/31/02 2 X month ug/I Frequency Violation None
01 - 2003 001 Effluent pH 01/04/03 5 X week su Frequency Violation None

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary
FACILITY REQUIREMENT
February 16, 2004
YEAR JAN FEB MAIL AI'R MAY JIJN JUL AIJU STEP OCT NOV DEC
Moore:Cobnty WWTP '. •• chr bin: 41 a% Y 2000 - - Pass - - • Pass - - Pass - Pass
NC0037508/001 Bcgin:6/I/2000 Frcqucncy.Q Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp Single 2001 - - Pas's - Pass -- - Pass - Pass
County: Monte Region: 1q(O Subbasin: LUM511 2002 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 6.7 - •Special 2003 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 15.2 • IWC(%; 40.54 2004
Mt. Gilead WWTP chr lim: 3.2% • 2000 - - Pass - - NR Pass - H Pass - Pass
NC0021105/001 Begin:3/I/2000 Frequency Q Mal Jun Scp Dec + NonComp Single 2001 - - NR NR Pass Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County:Montgomery ' Region: FRO Subbasin: YADIO - 2002 - - Pass - - Pass - - Late Pass - Pass
PF:.0.85• Special 2003 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 40,. ' IWC(%;3.2 - 2004
North Barnett Regional WWTI' 24 hr.Fthd p/f ac him: 90%
NC0021636/001 Begin:10/1/2001 Frequency Q. + Jan Apr Jul Oc1
County: Remelt , Region: FRO Subbasin: CPFO7
PF: 0.6 Special'
'7Q10: 550.0 IWC(%;0,17
+' NonComp Single
2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
2003 Fail.Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
. 2004
P9rklon WWTP chr lim: 90%
NC0026921/001 Begin: I/1/2000 Frequency Q , Jan Apr Jul Oct
County:Robeson : Region:IRO Subbasin:.LIJM53
PF: 0.2 . Special
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%: 1110
+ NonComp Single
2000 Fail Pass >100 Pass - - Fail 94.84 NR . 82.13 35.30 35.30
2001 82.16 82.16 35.4 94.9 - - Pass - - Fail >100 35.4
2002 >100 .- 7 Pass - - Pass - - Fail . 94.9. <25
2003 25 >100 33.5 Pass - - Fail ' 94.9 >100 Pass - -
• 2004
Pembroke WWII' chr lira: 1.7% 2000 Late Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
NC0027103/001 Begin:6/1/2000 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct 4 NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County:Robeson Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM51 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 1.33 ' . . Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 114 IWC(%: 1.8 2004 Pass
Raeford WWTP . chr lim: 9% 2000 - Pass - - Pass - - Invalid - Pass Pass
NC0026514/001 Begin:7/I/1996 Frequency 0 P/F + Feb May Aug Nov . NonComp Single • 2001 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County:_Hoke . Region: FRO Subbasin: CPFIS 2002 - Pass - - Pass - - Fail >18 >18 Pass
PF: 3.0 Special 2003 - Pass - - Fail 5.20 >18,Pass Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 49.0... f1VC1%;5.67 2004
Red Springs WWTP chr lim: 90%
NC0025577/001 Begin:5/1/2000 Frequency Q . •Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single •
County:Robeson • Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM52
PF: 2.5 . Special Effective 12/1/02, signed 12/27/02, expires 12/1/04
7Q10: 0.07 IWC(%;98
2000 Late >90 - 17.7 <12.5 35.4 . 17.7 17.7 35.4 >90 17.7 35.4
2001 <12.5 61.2 82.2' >90 35.4 35.4 >90 82.2 <12.5 <12.5 61.2 Invalid
2002 Late Late >90 >90 • 82.2 35.4 >60 - >90 58.1 58.1 33.5
2003 <12:5 >90 33.5 >90 17.7 58.1 58.1 >90 >90 <12.5 17.7 33.5
2004
Robbins WV/TT' chr lim: 10% 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - • Pass -
NC0062855/001 Bcgin:7/I/2002 Frequency Q ' Jan Apr Jul Oct , + NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - NR Pass
County:Moore Region: FRO Subbasin: CPFIO 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
PF: .1.3 Special - 2003 pass - - • Pass - - Pass - - Pass
7QI0: 15.9 IWC.(% 10 2004
Rockingham WWTP . chr lim: 8% 2000 - Pass - . - Pass - - Pass - - • Pass . -
NC0020427/001 Bcgin:WI/1999 Frequency Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single 2001 - Pass - - .Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
County:Richmond Region: FRO Subbasin: YAD16 2002 - Pass • - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
PF: 9.0 Special
-
2003 - Pass - - P. ss - _ _ _-___P_ass.>32 - - Pass>32 --
7Q10: 153 IWC(%:8.0 - --- - 2004 - - -
Roseboro WWTP • - chr lim: 52%
NC0026816/001 Begin:12/1/2003 Frequency Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov
County:Sampson Region: FRO ',Subbasin: CPF19
PF: 0.49 .Special
7Q10: 1.0 IWC(%:52 •
NonComp Single
2000 - Pass - _ _ - - _Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2001 - Pass - - Pass - ,•, - Pass - - Pass
2002 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2003 - - Pass - - Pass . - - Pass - - Pass
2004
• Smithfield Packing Cn, Tarheel Div. chr lim: 0.58% • 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
-NC0078344/001 Begin:12/1/2002 Frequency Q Jan Apt Jul Oct 4 NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - ' Pass - - Pass,Pass -
Connty:Bladen- Region: FRO Subbasin; CPFI6 2002 Pass - Pass - - Pass -. - Pass -
PF: 3.0 Special . ' 2003 pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
' 7Q10: 795 IWC(7: IJ.58 2004 .
4 Pre 2000 Data Available,
LEGEND:
PERM = Permit Items irement LET = Administrative Letter- Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly: h4- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually: A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D. Nisconunued monitoring requirement
Begin .first month required 7Q IU= Receiving stream low flow criterion refs • = gtinrterly monitoring increases to monthly upon hrilure or N Months that testing must occur - es. Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct - NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
PF = Permitted flow (MOD) IWC'%= lnstream waste coocencrati Pih.= Pass/Fail lest AC Anne GI4R=Chronic
Data Notation,'" - Fathead Minnow; • - Ceriodophnia sp.; my - Mysid ',twisty; (`IiV - Chronic value; P - Mortality of staled percentage at highest concentration; at - Performed bar D WQ Aquatic To,. Unit; bl - Dad test
Reporting Notation: --- ,. Oat nor required; NR, Not repose . Facility AO why Stains: 1-inactive, N -Newly Issued(To construct). If -.Active but not discharging; 'I -More data ilvadable Iim month in question; • • = ORC signature. needed
4

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
�FacllltyName
Report Date: 02/12/04
Page: 1 of 1
PERMIT: NC0037508
FACILITY: Moore County Public Utilities - Moore County WPCF COUNTY: Moore
REGION:. Fayetteville
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL
REPORT / PPI LOCATION PARAMETER
10 - 2001 001 Effluent
Copper, Total (as Cu)
10 - 2001 001 Effluent Nitrogen, Total (as N)
10 - 2001 001 Effluent Phosphorus, Total (as P)
10 - 2001 001 Effluent Silver, Total (as Ag)
10 - 2001 001 Effluent Zinc, Total (as Zn)
Reporting Violation
VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED
DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
10/31/01 2 X morith - ug/I
10/31/01 Monthly mg/I
10/31/01 Monthly mg/I
10/31/01 2 X month ug/I
10/31/01 2 X month ug/I
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
'BIMS
Pre -Production
Violation
BIMS
Pre -Production
Violation.
BIMS
Pre -Production
Violation
BIMS
Pre -Production
Violation
BIMS
Pre -Production
Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL
»REPORT / PPI LOCATION PARAMETER
11 - 2001 001 Effluent Cyanide, Total (as Cn)
VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED
DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
11/30/01 2 X month ug/I Parameter Missing BIMS
Pre -Production
Violation

Report Date: 02/12/04 Page: 1 of
iP14tIoi-cCatebory; '" • ::',F,:ttodi;60-1-C•atdd
- • ,„ • .
PERMIT: NC0037508
FACILITY: Moore County Public Utilities - Moore County WPCF COUNTY: Moore
REGION: Fayetteville
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL
•REPORT / PPI
VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED
LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
01 - 2003 001 Effluent Chlorine, Total Residual- 01/04/03 5 X week ug/I Frequency Violation None
01-- 2003- - -001— --Effluent Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC 01/04/03 5 X weik
Broth,44.5C
01 - 2003 001 Effluent Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N)
11 - 2003 001. Effluent Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N)
12 - 2002 001 Effluent Silver, Total (as Ag)
01 - 2003
001 Effluent pH
01/04/03 5 X week
11/29/03 5 X week
12/31/02 2 X month
01/04/03 5 X week
#/100m1
mg/I
mg/I
ug/I
su
Frequency Violation None
Frequency Violation 'None
Frequency Violation None
Frequency Violation None
Frequency Violation None

:Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary
'FACILITY - - ..
REQUIREMENT
February 16, 2004
YEAR SAN FEB MAR APR MAY J11N JUL, AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
'Moore County-WWTP. chr lim: 41 % 9 2000 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
NC0037508/001 Begin:6/12000 Frequency Q, Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp-Single' 2001 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County: Moore Region: FRO . Subbasin: LUM50 2002 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 6.7 • Special 2003 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
'7Q10: 15.2 IWC(%; 40.54 .2004
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MI. Gilead WWTP chr lim: 3.2%
-NC0021105/001 Begin:3/I/2000 Frequency Q Mar Jun Sep Dec
,Counly:Montgomery ' Region: FRO . Subbasin: YADIO
.... PF: 0.85 • Special
7Q10: 40 IWC(%; 3.2
+ NonComp Single
2000 - - Pass - - NR Pass - H Pass - Pass
2001 - - NR NR Pass Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2002 - - Pass - - Pass - - Late Pass ' - Pass
2003 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2004
Norlh,Harnett Reglonal WWTP 24 hr Fihd p/f ac lim: 90%
NC0021636/001 Begin:10/1/2001 Frequency Q + Jan Apr Jul Oct
County: Harnett Region: FRO Subbasin: CPF07
PF: 0.6 Special
7Q10: 550.0 IWC(% 0,17
'Parkton:WWTP " chr lim: 90%
_'NC0026921/001 Begin:1/1/2000Frequency Q -- Jan -Apr Jul Oct
County: Robeson Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM53
PF: 0.2 --
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%; 100
+ NonComp Single
2000 Pass ' - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2003 Fail,Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2004
+ NonComp Single
2000 Fail Pass >100 Pass _ - - Fail 94.84 _ NR_ 82.13. 35.36 35.36
2001 82.16 82.16 35.4 94.9 - - Pass - - Fail >100 35.4
2002 >100 - Pass - - Pass - Fail 94.9 <25
--2003-<25 -- -- - >10- 0- - 33:5 -Pass--- - - --- - - Fail 94,9 >100 Pass - -
' 2004
Pembroke WWTl' - . chr lim: 1.7%
NC0027103/001 Begin:6/l/2000 Frequency Q Jan Apr,lul Oct + NonComp Single
County:Robeson Region: FRO Subbasin: LUMSI
PF: 1.33 • Special
7Q10: 114- I\VC(%: 1.8
2000 Late' Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2001. Pass • - - Pass - . - Pass - Pass
2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2003 Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2004 Pass
Raeford WWTP' • . . - chr lim: 9% 2000 - Pass - - Pass - - Invalid - Pass Pass
NC0026514/001 Begin:7/I/1996 Frequency Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov . NonComp Single 2001 - Pass - - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County:Hoke Region: FRO Subbasin: CPF15 ' 2002 - Pass - - Pass - - Fail >18 >18 Pass
PF: 3.0 Special 2003 - Pass - - Fail 5.20 >18,Pass Pass - - Pass
. 7Q I0: 49.0 _ • . IWC(%; 8.67 • 2004
•
•Red SpringsWWTP •' chrlim: 90% 2000 Late >90 - 17.7 <12.5 35.4 17.7 17.7 35.4 >90 17.7 35.4
NC0025577/tJ01 Begin:5/1/2000 . Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp ▪ Single 2001 <12.5 61.2 82.2 >90 35.4 35.4 >90 82.2 <12.5 <12.5 61.2 Invalid
County: Robeson - Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM52 2002 Late Late >90 >90 82.2 35.4 >00 - >90 58.1 58.1 33.5
PF: 2.5 Spccia1 ElTective 12/1/02, signed 12/27/02, expires 12/1/04 2003 <12.5 >90 33.5 >90 17.7 58.1 58.1 >90 >90 <12.5 17,7 33.5
7QI0:-0.07 IWC(%'98 2004
Robbins WWFP • chrlim: 10%
NC0062855/001 begin:7/1/20112 Frequency 0 ' Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single
County:Moore " 'Region: FRO Subbasin: CPFI0
Special
.7Q10: 15.9 • IWC(%; 10
2000 Pass
2001 Pass
2002 Pass
2003 pass
2004
Pass - - Pass
Pass - - Pass
Pass - - Pass
Pass - - Pass
- - • Pass
- - NR
- - Pass
- - Pass
Pa- ss
Rockingham WWfr' - , chrlim:8%
'.NC0020427/00I - Begin:6/1/1999 Frequency Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single
County:Richmond Region: FRO Subbasin: YAD16
PF: 9.0 Special
7Q10: 153 IWC(%; 8.0
2000 - Pass
2001 - Pass
2002 - Pass .
2003 - Pass
2004
- . - Pass - - Pass -
- - Pass - - Pass -
- - Pass - - Pass -
- Pass - - Pass >32 -
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass,>32
Rosoboro WWTP • chr lim: 52% 2000 - Pass - - Pass - - - Pass - - Pass
NC0026816/001 Begin:12/1/2003 Frequency Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov NonComp Single 2001 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County:Sampson Region: FRO Subbasin: CPF19 2002 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 0.49 ,Special • 2003 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass, - - pass
7QI0: 1.0 IWC(14i;52. 2004
Smithfield Packing Cu, Tanceel Div. ebr lim: 0.58%
NC0078344/001 Begin:12/12002 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
'County:Bladen • . Region: FRO Subbasin: CPF16
PFi 3.0 Special
7Q10: 795 I W C('0,• 0,58 •
NonComp Single
2000 Pass - - Pass
, 2001 Pass - - Pass
2002 Pass - - Pass
2003 pass - - Pass
2004
- - Pass - - Pass -
- - ' Pass - - . Pass,Pass -
- - Pass - - Pass -
Pass - - Pass -
4' -Pre 2000 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM = Permit Requirement LET = Administrative Letter : Target . Ft equency = Monitoring frequency; Q- Quarterly: M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A. Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin First.month required 7Q10 = Receiving stream low, ❑ow criterion (cl's , + = quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or N Months that testing most occur - ex. Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct • NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
PF = Permitted Hove (MUD) IWC% =lnstream waste concentrati P/F = Pass/Fnil test AC = Acute CHR = Chronic
Data Notation: f - Fathead Minnow; • - Ceriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp: (-ti V - Chronic value; P - Mortality am:lied percentage at highest concentration; at - Performed b) MVO Aquatic Tox Unit: bt - Bad test
Reporting Notation: --- - Data not required; NR: Not reporte Faci lit Activity Slaw::: I - Inactive, N -Newly lssued(To construct); II - Active but not discharging; t-More data available 1'nr month in question; • = ORC sign:nm,• needed
4

WATER. POLLUTION CONTROL .SYSTEM OPERATORS
CERTIFICATION COMMISSION
CLASSIFICATION
RATING SHEET FOR WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS
FACILITY INFORMATION:
NAME OF FACILITY:
MAILING ADDRESS:
COUNTY: -
CONTACT PERSON: J,9Mi.S A;f7 E TELEPHONE
pLL1J y/��/ QJPD� /2i9.11:7"
R r: it)e 6R E3l g
ORC: j,4mFS /`-iF'j/t TELEPHONE: (0:/' ).- $% -
RATING INFORMATION: (Before completing this section, please refer to pages 2-4) ,
PERMITTED FLOW: , 4 7 MGD BNR?
CHECK CLASSIFICATION: WASTEWATER:
COLLECTION:
2
YES
SPRAY IRRIGATION SUBSURFACE LAND APPLICATION
PHYSICALJCHEMICAL GRADE I GRADE II
RATED BY:
REGION: D
NO
4
DATE: � 4
REGIONAL OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: (. 9/D '74 S 6 -) K /EXT: 7/

Classification of Biological Water Pollution Control- Treatment Systems:
-
Grade I Biological WPCS
- Septic tank/sand filter systems
Biological lagoon systems
- Constructed wetlands and associated appurtenances
Grade II Biological WPCS
- Systems that utilize an activated sludge or fixed growth process with a permitted flow
less than or equal to 0.5 million gallons per day (mgd)
Grade III Biological WPCS
- Systems that.utili7e an activated sludge or fixed growth process with a permitted flow
of greater than 0.5 through 2.5 million gallons per day (mgd)
- Grade II systems that are required to achieve biological nutrient reduction *
Grade IV Biological WPCS
- Systems that utilizing an activated sludge or fixed growth process with a.permitted flow
of greater than 2.5 million gallons per day (mgd)
= Grade III systems that are required to achieve biologicaljnutrient reduction *
* Biological Nutrient Reduction -
The reduction of total nitrogen or total phosphorous by an activated sludge or fixed growth
•
process as required by the facilities permit.
Classification of Collection Water Pollution Control Systems:
(whichever provides lowest grade)
Same grade as biological water pollution control system. Grade of system:
Based on population served:
1,500. or Less = Grade I
1,501 to 15,000 = Grade II
15,001 to 50,000 = Grade III
50,001 or more = Grade IV

Classification of Spray Irrigation Water Pollution Control Systems:
Systems which utilizespray irrigation for the reuse or disposal of wasterwater.
These systems include: septic tanks, sand filter, oil/water separators, lagoons,
storage basins, screening, sedimentation. Systems other than those listed above
shall be subject to additional classification.
Classification of Land Application of Residuals Systems:
Systems permitted and dedicated for land application of residuals that are produced by a
water pollution control system or contaminated soils.
•
Classification of Physical/Chemical Water Pollution Control Treatment Systems:
Grade I Physical/Chemical: Any water pollution control system that utilizes a primarily
physical process to treat wastewater. This classification includes groundwater
remediation systems. **
Grade II Physical/Chemical: Any water pollution control system that utilizes a primarily
chemical process to treat wastewater:. This classification includes reverseosmosis,
electrodialysis, and ultrafiltration systems. **
** Any water pollutioricontrol system that utilizes a phyicallchemical process to enhance an
activated sludge or fixed growth process, shall not be -subject to additional classification.
Classification of Subsurface Water Pollution Control Systems:
Systems which utilize the soil for subsurface treatment and disposal of wastewater
and/or are required to have a certified operator under 15A NCAC 18A.1961. ***
•
*** Any subsurface system that has as part of its treatment process a water pollution control
systems that may be classified under Rules .0302 through .0307 of this section shall be
subject to addional classification.

' MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Permit,`NC0037508
Facility Name.: %
aram_Name ,°
egion "-,'
ounty
Violation. Category:
Subbasm: %. -
Report Date: -02/12/04 Page: 1 of 1
rogram Categor,
Violatioh.Action:
PERMIT: NC0037508
FACILITY: Moore County Public Utilities- Moore County WPCF COUNTY: Moore
REGION: Fayetteville
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL
REPORT / PPI LOCATION PARAMETER
10 - 2001 ° 001 Effluent Copper, Total (as Cu)
•
VIOLATION
DATE
10/31/01
FREQUENCY
2 X month
UNIT OF CALCULATED
MEASURE LIMIT VALUE VIOLATION TYPE
ug/I Frequency. Violation
10 - 2001 001 Effluent Nitrogen, Total (as N)
10 - 2001 001 Effluent Phosphorus, Total (as P)
10 - 2001 001 Effluent Silver, Total (as Ag)
10 -.2001 001 Effluent Zinc, Total (asZn)
Reporting Violation
10/31/01 Monthly
10/31/01 Monthly
10/31/01 2 X month
10/31/01 2 X month
mg/I
mg/I
ug/I
ug/I
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
VIOLATION ACTION
BIMS - -
Pre -Production
Violation
BIMS
Pre -Production
Violation
BIMS
Pre -Production
Violation
BIMS
Pre -Production
Violation
BIMS
Pre -Production
Violation
MONITORING .OUTFALL
REPORT / PPI LOCATION PARAMETER
11 - 2001 001 Effluent Cyanide, Total (as Cn)
VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED
DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE
11/30/01 2 X month ug/I
VIOLATION TYPE
'Parameter Missing
VIOLATION ACTION
BIMS
Pre -Production
Violation

-MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Report Date: 02/12/04 Page: 1 of 1
Permit: NC0037508',1" 'rags Between 11 2002 {anted 1g 2fl03 ` Region % Violation.Category: % Program Category: %
;Facility Name: % ; ' : Param Name: % .County: % Subbasin: % Violation Action: %
PERMIT: NC0037508
FACILITY: Moore County Public Utilities - Moore County WPCF COUNTY: Moore
REGION: Fayetteville
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED
REPORT / PPI LOCATION PARAMETER DATE - FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
- - 01 = 2003 001 -Effluent Chlorine, Total Residual 01/04/03 5 X-week - ug/I Frequency Violation None
01 - 2003 001 Effluent Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC 01/04/03 5 X week #/100m1 Frequency Violation None
Broth,44.5C
01 - 2003 001 Effluent Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N) 01/04/03 5 X week mg/I Frequency Violation None
11 - 2003 001 Effluent Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N) 11/29/03 5 X week mg/1 Frequency Violation None
12 - 2002 001 Effluent Silver, Total (as Ag) 12/31/02 2 X month ug/I Frequency Violation None
01 - 2003 001 Effluent pH 01/04/03 5 X week su Frequency Violation None

Whole .Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary i..r_eb uary 16-2004;
FACILITY _-_- REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT V'G'''-` DEC 3
`MooCefCobrity_W}VTp,,,.. chr lim: 41 % Y 2000 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
NC0037508/001 Begin:6/I/2000 Frequency Q Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp Single 2001 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County: Moore Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM50 2002 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 6.7 - Special 2003 - Pass - - Pass - _ - Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 15.2 1WC(% 40.54 1�20i
Mt. Gilead WWTP chr lim: 3.2% 2000 - - Pass - - NR Pass - H Pass - Pass
NC002I 105/001 Begin:3/I/2000 Frequency Q Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp Single 2007 - - NR NR Pass Pass - - Pass - - Pass
,County: Montgomery Region: FRO Subbasin: YAD10 2002 - - Pass - - Pass - - Lale Pass - Pass
PF: 0.85 • Special 2003 - - Pass - - Pass, - - Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 40. IWC(%;3.2 2004
North Harnett Regional WWTP 24 hr Fthd p/fac lim: 90%
NC0021636/001 Begin:10/1/2001 Frequency Q + Jan Apr Jul Oct
County: Harnett Region: FRO Subbasin: CPF07
PF: 0.6 Special
7Q 10: 550.0 IWC(%; 0.17
+ NonComp Single
2000 Pass - - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2003 Fail,Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2004
Parkton WWTP - chr lim: 90% 2000 Fail Pass >100 Pass - - Fail 94.84 NR 82.13 35.36 35.36
NC0026921/00I Begin: I/12000 Frequency Q - Jan Apr Jul Oct +- NonComp Single 2001 82.16 - 82.16 - 35.4 94.9 - - - Pass - _ - Fail >100 35.4
County:Robeson Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM53 2002 >100 - - Pass - - Pass - - Fail . 94.9 <25
PF: 0.2 Special - 2003 <25 _ ___ _>100_-_33.5_ -Pass__ - _ - -Fail- -94.9- _- _>_100. Pass - _ -------
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%; 100 2004
Pembroke WWTP chr lim: 1.7% 2000 Late Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
NC0027103/001 Begin:6/I/2000 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County: Robeson Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM51 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 1.33 . Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 114 IWC(%; 1.8 2004 Pass
Raeford WWTP chr lim: 9% 2000 - Pass - - Pass - - Invalid - Pass Pass
NC0026514/001 Begin:7/I/I996 Frequency Q P/1' + Feb May Aug Nov • NonComp Single • 2001 - Pass - - Pass - ' - Pass - - Pass
County:Hoke - , Region: FRO Subbasin: CPFIS 2002 - Pass - - Pass - - Fail >18 >18 Pass
PF: 3.0 Special 2003 - Pass - Fail 5.20 >18,Pass Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 49.0 ,. 11VC(%;8.67 2004
•
Red Springs WWTP chr rim: 90%
NC0025577/001 Begin:5/I/2000 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct - + NonComp Single
County: Robeson Region: Rio Subbasin: LUM52
PF: 2.5 Special Effective 12/1/02, signed 12/27/02, expires 12/1/04
7Q10: 0.07 IWC(%; 98
2000 Late >90 - 17.7 <12.5 35.4 17.7 17.7 35.4 >90 17.7 35.4
2001 <72.5 61.2 82.2 >90 35.4 35.4 >90 82.2 <12.5 <12.5 61.2 Invalid
2002 Lale Lale >90 >90 82.2 35.4 >90 - >90 58.1 58.1 33.5
2003 <125 >90 33.5 >90 17.7 58.1 58.1 >90 >90 <12.5 17.7 33.5
2004
Robbins WWTP chr lim: 10%
NC0062855/001 Begin:7/1/2002 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single
County:Moore Region: FRO Subbasin: CPFIO
PF: 1.3 Special
7Q10: 15.9 . IWC(%; 10
2000 Pass
2001 Pass.
2002 Pass
2003 pass
2004
Pass - - Pass - - • Pass
Pass - - Pass - - NR
Pass - - Pass - - Pass
Pass - - Pass - - Pass
Pa- ss
,Rockingham WWTP . chr lim: 8%
NC0020427/001 Begin:6/I/1999 Frequency Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single
County: Richmond Region: FRO Subbasin: YAD16
PF: 9.0 Special
7Q10: 153 IWC(%; 8.0
2000 - Pass
2001 - Pass
2002 - Pass •
2003 - Pass
2004
- - Pass - - Pass
- - Pass - - Pass
- - Pass - - Pass
- Pass - - Pass,>32
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass>32
Roseboro WWTP chr lim: 52%
NC0026816/001 Begin:12/1/2003 Frequency Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov
County:Sampson Region: FRO Subbasin: CPF19
PF:0.49 . ,Special
7Q10: 1.0 I\VC(%; 52
NonComp Single
2000 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2001 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2002 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2003 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2004
Smithfield Packing Co, Tarheel Div. chr lim: 0.58%
NC0078344/001 . Begin:12/12002 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
County:Bladen Region: FRO Subbasin: CPFI6
PF: 3.0 Special
7Q10: 795 IWC(1.,;0.58
+ NonComp Single
2000 Pass - - Pass
2001 Pass - - Pass
2002 Pass - Pass
2003 Pass - - Pass
2004
- - Pass - - Pass -
- Pass - - Pass,Pass -
- - Pass - - Pass -
- - Pass - - Pass -
Y Pre 2000 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM = Permit Requirement LET = Administrative Letter - Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly; M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin -= First month required 7Q10 = Receiving stream low flow criterion (cis += quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or N Months that testing must occur - ex.lan, Apr, Jul, Oct NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
PF = Permitted Bow (1%.113D) IWC%= Instream waste concentrate I'/F = Pass/Fail test AC = Acute CIiR = Chronic .
Data Notation: f - Fathead Minnow; • - Ceriodaphniasp.; my-.Mysid shrimp; C'hV - Chronic value; P - Mortality or stated peteentage at highest concentration; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit; bt - Bad test
Reporting Notation: --- , Data not required; NR - Not reporte Facility Activity Status: I - Inactive, N -Newly Issued(T: construct): li - Active but not discharging; t-More data available for month in question; • = ORC signatmc needed
4

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self Monitoring Summary
FACILITY REQUIREMENT
.P6b- arv:1 6-2000:
YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Lumberton WWTP PERM CHR LIM: 11%; UPON EXP CHR LIM 21% Y 1996 •-- Pass Pass Pass Fail
NC0024571/001 Begin9/1/1994 Frcqucncy:QP/F + Feb May Aug Nov NonComp:SINGLE 1997 --- Pass Pass Pass Pass
County: Robeson Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM51 1998 --- Pass --- Pass .-- --- Pass --- --- Pass
PF: 10.0 • Spacal 1999 .-. .Pass Pass Pass Pass
7Q10: 120 - 1WC(%)11 Order: 2000
Pass(s)
Monsanto/001,002 Perm 24hr p/f ac lim: 90% fthd (combined outfall) Y 1996 --- Pass --• Pass
NC0003719/002 Bcgin 1/1/1996 Frcqucncy:Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov NonComp:Singlc 1997 --- Pass --- Pass
County: Cumberland Region: FRO Subbasin: CPF15 1998 --- Pass •-- Pass
PF: 1.3 Special 1999 --- Pass --- Late
-7QI0:791.0 IWC(%)0.25 Order:• 2000
Pass
Pass --- - Pass •
Pass --- Pass
Pass --- Pass
Fail Pass, ass --- Pass
[Moore County WWTP-1 PERM CHRLIM: 41% Y i..1996,,--, C Pass Pass --- Pass
1NC0037508/001-.Beg n-11I/1995 Frequency:Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:SINGLE 1997 --- Pass --- Pass --- Pass
County: Moore Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM50 ' 1998 Pass --- Pass Pass -•- Pass
PF: 6.7 Special 1999 --- Pass --• Pass Late
7Q10: 15.2 IWC(%)40.54 Order: 2000
Pass
Pass
Late
Pass
Pass
Mt. Gilead WWTP Perm chr lim: 3.2% (New perm 3/1/2000) 1996 --- Pass
NC0021105/001 Begin I I/1/1994 Frequency:Q P/F -+ Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:SINGLE 1997 --- Pass
County: Montgomery Region: FRO Subbasin: YADIO 1998 --- - Fail
- PF: 0.85 - Spacial_ - - _ __ _ 1999 --- . _Pass
7Q10: 40 IWC(%)3.2 Order: 2000
Late
--- Fail Fait
--- -Fail - Pass-
Fail Late Pass
Late
Pass
Pass'
Pass,Pass _--
Late Pass
Pass
- Pass
Pass
Pass
National Mechanical Carbon Corp. Pcrm chr lim: 90% (Grab) 1996. Pass Pass --- Pass
NC0060747/001 Begin 9/1/1996 Frcquency:QP/F ' + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp:Single 1997 Pass Pass --- --- Pass
County:Harnett Region: FRO Subbasin:CPF18 1998 Pass Pass --- --- Pass
PF: 0.026 Special 1999 Pass Pass --- --- Fail
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%) 100 Order: 2000
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Parkton WWTP PERM CHR LIM: 90% (New perm 1/1/2000) 1996 Pass --- Pass
NC0026921/001 Begin I/1/1995 Frequcncy:Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp:SINGLE 1997 Pass --- Pass
County: Robeson Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM53 1998 Late Pass Late
PF: 0.2 Special 1999 Fail Pass Pass
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%) 100 Order- 2000
Pass
NR/Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Late Pass ---
N R Fail,Fail Late
Pass --- ---
Pass
Pembroke WWTP PERM CHR LIM: 1.7% 1996 Pass
NC0027103/001 Begin 12/1/1994 Frequcncy:Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp:SINGLE 1997 Fail
County:Robcson Region: FRO Subbasin:LUMSI 1998 Pass
PF: 1.33 Special _ 1999 pass
7Q10:'114 IWC(%)1.8 Order: 2000
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass Late
Pass -•- Pass
Pass --- Pass
Pass Pass
Pass
Raeford WWTP ' Pcrm chr lim: 9% 1996 --- NR/Pass Pass
'NC0026514/001 Begin7/I/1996 Frequcncy:Q.P/F + Feb May Aug Nov NonComp:Singlc. 1997 --- Pass --- --- Pass
County:Hoke Region:FRO Subbasin:CPFI5- - 1998 --- Late Pass --- Pass
PF:. 3.0 Special 1999 --_ Late Pass --- Late
_7Q10:49.0 IWC(%)8.67 Order. 2000
Pass
Pass NR/Pass
Pass --• .-- Pass
Pass --- Pass
Pass Pass
Red Springs WWTP Pcrm chr lim: 90% 1996 82 35 <12.5 >90 >90 >90 >90 Late >90 --- >90
NC0025577/001 Begin 8/1/1995 Frequcncy:Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp:Singlc 1997 82 N R 61 >90 - >90 --- 35.35 N R >90
County: Robeson Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM52 1998 Late Late Late ->12.5 >90 Late 35 61 >90 --- ---
PF: 2.5 special 1999 35 >90 --- >90 --- --- 35 >90 --- >90 ---
•7Q10: 0.07 IWC(%)98 Order: 2000
Robbins WWTP Pcrm chr lim: 9%; upon cxp 1.3MGD chr lim 10% 1996 Passl,Pess --- --• Pass,Passt Pass --- --- Pass
NC0062855/001 Begin5/1/I997 Frcqucncy:QP/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp:Singlc 1997 Pass --- Pass .-- Pass Pass
County:Moore Region: FRO Subbasin:CPFIO 1998 Pass Pass Pass --- Pass
PF: 1.0 Sisiel 1999 Pass Pass Pass Pass
7Q10: 15.9 IWC(%)8.9 Order. 2000
Rockingham WWTP Perm chr lim: 28%;upon rcloc Pee Dec R. chr lim 8% 1996 --- Pass
NC0020427/001 Begin6/1/1999 Frcqucncy:QP/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 1997 --- Pass
County:Richmond Region: FRO Subbasin:YAD16 1998 --- Fail
PF: 6.0 special
1999 -.. Pass
7Q10: 23.4 IWC(%)28.4 Order: 2000
Pass
Pass --- Pass --- Pass
Pass --- Pass Pass
Pass - --- Pass - Pass
Pass Pass Pass
Y Pre 1996 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM =-Permit Requircmcn LET = Administrative Letter - Tar Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly; M- Monthly; BM Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring m
Begin =.First month required 7Q10 = Receiving stream low flow criterion (c + = quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or Months that testing must occur - ex. Jan, Apr, Jul, 0 NonComp = Current Compliance Requireme
`PF = Perrnittcd-flow (MGD) IWC% = Instrcam waste concentrati P/F = Pass/Fail test AC = Acute CHR = Chronic .
Data Notation: f - Fathead Minnow; • - Ccriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P - Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit; b
Reporting Notation: --- = Data not required; NR - Not repor Facility Activity Status: I - Inactive, N - Newly Issued(To construct); H - Active but not discharging; f-More data available for month in question; = ORC signat
4

AT&
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
December 10, 2003
Dennis Brobst
Moore County Public Works Director
P. O. Box 1927
Carthage, NC 28327
Subject: COMPLIANCE BIOMONITORING INSPECTION
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
• NPDES. Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County
Dear Mr. Brobst:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy. Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Compliance Biomonitoring Inspection report for the inspection conducted
the week of December 1, 2003. The inspection included the same objectives as that of a routine Compliance Evaluation.
Inspection (conducted on December 1 & 2) plus an Aquatic Toxicity (AT) test tio evaluate the biological effect of the
facility's discharge on test organisms. As part of the inspection a tour of the Wastewater Treatment Plant was conducted.
All observations and a .recommendation are in Part D. Summary of Findings/Comments of this inspection report. The
results of the (AT) will be forwarded to you when the,Division of Water Quality (AT) Laboratory completes them.
Additionally, plant effluent samples were taken at the WWTP outfall for the following parameters which are. currently in
your. NPDES Permit: total phosphorus, ammonia as . nitrogen, nitrate as N, nitrite I as' N, TKN as N, zinc, copper, silver,
total suspended solids, and five-day biochemical. oxygen demand. The results of' .these parameters will be forwarded to
you when the Division of Water Quality Chemistry Laboratory completes the analyses. You and your staff are
commended for your. continued efforts to comply with the NPDES permit. If you have any questions or comments
concerning this report or require clarification on part(s) of this report, please feel free to contact me at 910/486-1541.
Sincerely,
Dale Lopez
Environmental Specialist
/dl
Enclosures
cc: James Delmo Frye, ORC
Kevin Bowden, DWQ, ESB, ATU
One
NorthCarolina
225 Green Street — Suite 714, Fayetteville; North Carolina 28301-5043 1' ; ,
attire,
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us/ENR!!'
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled 110 % Post Consumer Paper

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
EPA
Water Compliance Inspection' Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: 'National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day • Inspection
1 N 2 i s I 3 1 N00037s08 1 11 121 ' 03/12/ 01 1 17
181J
If
Type Inspector Fac Type
19I s 1 , 20 L-I
1 •1 11 I I I 1 I I I I 1 166
Remarks
211 I I I I I I I I I I I I l. 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I "I I I I "I
Inspection Work Days . Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA -----
67 L 5.0 169 701 1 • • 71 Lai 72 U..
-------- ----------Reserved----
731 I 174 751 1 I I -1 1 1 .1 80
Section B: Facility Data -
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
.
Moore County WPCF
1060 Addor Road
Aberdeen NC 28315
Entry Time/Date .
1
11I:00 N4 03/12/01
Permit Effective Date
00/06/01
Exit
03:'00
Time/Date
,PM 03/12/01
4 .
Permit Expiration Date
04/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
James D Frye/ORC/910-281-3146/
James Frye//910-281-3146;
dames Frye1/910-28-1-3146/
Other
Facility Data
.
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Gary Frick, PO Box 813 Pine Bluff NC 283731/910-281-3146/. No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations &Ma;ntenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Facility Site Review . Effluent,/Receiving War_ers
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach:additional sheets of narrative land checklists as necessary)
Recommendation: In order to reduce the algae buildup at the weirs o* the f nal1
replace the brushes of the Ford Hall brush assentbl.ias. The.following list t:F
From la;e
constitute an average of 0.2 to 0.3 MGD of flow that were subtracted `'
reporting onto the DMRs: a) decant from the digesters, b) drainage from the dirying
clarifiers, d) all waste activated sludge of MLSS from both the First Stage and
rlr,r:ifiers, _lease repair or
..n•r.::lant wastewaters
.,.ea. o-.
main mete.- reading _
beds, c) scum from the
(cont.)
Name(s) and Signatures) of Inspector(s) Agericy/Office/Phone and Fax
'—le Lopes FRO TQ/,•'J10 468-1'_41197.0-z86-070'
/
Numbers Date
/0 A___
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers ' Date
�q . /2,h1`03
64„:44.60.p41.141
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.

DESCRIPTION OF MOORE COUNTY WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant is a Grade 1V Biological WPCS. The following is a
brief facility description: raw sewage comes from twelve monitoring/metering stations (the furthest
is Carthage), a Plant Influent sewage flowed through the mechanical center flow bar screen to the
Grit Chamber (with aeration from blower), to two Primary Clarifiers (75 ft diameter by 10 ft deep),
to the First Stage Aeration Basin (70 ft by 30 ft by 15 ft deep, four chambers with air diffusers, with
approximately three hours of retention time), the chemical unit/building houses the blowers that
supply the diffuser air to both the Primary and Secondary Aeration Basins, to the two Intermediate
Clarifiers (90 ft diameter by 12 ft deep), the overflow from the Intermediate Clarifiers goes to the
Second Stage Aeration Basins (90 ft by 30 ft by 15 ft deep, four chambers with air diffusers, with
approximately four hours of retention time), the flow travels to two Final Clarifiers (105 ft diameter
by 12 ft deep), the overflow from the Final Clarifiers goes to the Chlorine Contact Basin (30 minutes
of detention time), the effluent is then dechlorinated with sulfur dioxide, and the dechlorinated Plant
Effluent 001 (with an average of 200 micrograms per liter of chlorine) travels through a 36 inch
diameter ductile iron pipe to the receiving stream, Aberdeen Creek. The waste activated sludge
flows to two Anaerobic Digesters. The digested sludge is then pumped to 36 drying beds (each 100-
ft by 44 ft). The dried sludge is hauled to a lined landfill in Anson County.
SECTION D: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS/COMMENTS:
PLANT TOUR--
1. The following list of in-plant'wastewaters constitute an average of 0.2 to 0.3 MGD of flow
that were subtracted from the main flow meter reading for reporting onto the DMRs:
a) decant from the digesters (continuous flow),
b) drainage from the drying beds (continuous flow),
c) scum from the clarifiers (continuous flow),
d) all Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) of MLSS from both the First Stage and the
Second Stage Aeration Basins,
e) any drainage from a tank or a unit when being cleaned.
2. Process control for the wastewater treatment plant was based on the following analyses:
MLSS, turbidity, BOD, ammonia, alkalinity, pH, 30 to 60 minute settleometer, Sludge Age,
F/M ratio, and the clarifier sludge blanket. The Primary Clarifier's sludge blanket is
maintained at 2 ft or less, the Intermediate Clarifier's sludge blanket is maintained at 1 to 1'/2
feet of sludge blanket, and the Final Clarifier's sludge blanket is maintained between Y2 to 1-
foot depth. The target for the lst and 2d stages was 1,800 mg/L to_2,000 mg/L.
3. The Plant Influent Fisher Porter Ultrasonic Flowmeter, located at the Parshall Flume, was
calibrated on October 10, 2003 by ISI (within 2% error). It was noted that there was less
than 2% error when the before and after calibration were compared.
4. The refrigerator at the Plant Influent was 3 degrees Centigrade, and the refrigerator at the
Plant Effluent was 0 degrees Centigrade.
5. A Royce Model 711 Suspended Solids/Interface Meter analyzed the Mixed Liquor
Suspended Solids (MLSS).
6. Each troughof the two final clarifiers was continuously brushed with a brush assembly (Ford
Hall) that was attached to the scum arm.

NPDES yrlmolday
3 I _1C0037508 111 121 03 / 12 /01
•
Inspection Type
18LI
(cont.) 1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
the Second Stage Aeration Basins, e) any drainage from a tank or a unit when being cleaned. The effluent
DtiR for August 2003 was crosschecked.with the laboratory bench sheets and with the commercial laboratory report
sheers. There were no discrepancies observed. The inspection of the areas rioted did. not- reveal any
defec ences. - .

LABORATORY INSPECTION:
1. Expiration dates of the pH buffers: pH 4 = January 4, 2005
pH 7 = September 2004
pH 10 = May 2005
2. The BOD incubator thermometer indicated 19.5 degrees Centigrade.
3. The operator measured Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen with a YSI meter.
4. TSS drying oven was 103 degrees Centigrade.
5. The pH meter was sloped daily with a three-point calibration technique using the 4, 7, and 10
pH buffers (the NPDES permit limit range is 6 to 9 pH). .•
6. The following were the NPDES parameters that were analyzed at the facility: Conductivity,
Dissolved Oxygen, Temperature, Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Ammonia as Nitrogen,
Fecal Coliforms, Chlorine residual, and pH.
7. The Plant Effluent 001 DMR for August 2003 was crosschecked with the laboratory bench
sheets and with the commercial laboratory report sheets. There Were no discrepancies
observed.
RECOMMENDATION---
1. In order to reduce the algae buildup at the weirs of the final clarifiers, please repair or
replace the brushes of the Ford Hall brush assemblies.
Name an\d Signature of Inspecto
Agency/Office/Telephone Date
Dale Lopez j�� .✓n ,, NCDENR/ Fayetteville/ [phone] 12/10/03

lataA A
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
Brief Facility Description:
FACILITY SITE REVIEW
No N/A 1. Treatment units properly operated and, maintained.
No N/A 2. Standby power or other equivalent provision provided.
Yes o N/A 3. Adequate alarm system for power or equipment failure available.
4. Sludge disposal procedures appropriate:
No N/A a. Disposal of sludge according to regulations
No N/A .b. State approval for sludge disposal received.
Y21 No N/A 5. Sufficient sludge disposed of to maintain treatment process equilibrium.
Y s No N/A 6. The ORC and Backup Operator are officially designated with
NCDENR/DWQTraining and Certification Unit.
No N/A 7. Adequate spare parts and supplies inventory maintained.
No N/A 8. Plant has general -safety' structures such as rails around or covers over
tanks, pits, or wells.
No N/A 9. Plant is generally clean, free from open trash areas.
No N/A
N/A
N/A
No N/A
No
10. Screening: , r
a. Manual (M tlyi dCQ vi.,&- L)
b. Mechanical (ec,'TtE FLOW 8.4,E ,Se iPc 4
c. Buildup of debris
d. Screenings properly disposed of.. (S F )
11'. Grit Removal:
N/A a. Excessive organic content in the grit chamber
N/A b. Excessive odors (4Ao
N/A c. Grit poperly disposedof. ,0 G bA) 7y L4NP fit-

Page 2
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ye
Yes
e
Yes
Yes
12.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
o N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
N/A�
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Primary clarifier:
a. Excessive gas bubbles
b. Blackand odorous wastewater
c. Poor suspended solids removed
d. Excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier
e. Weirs level
f. Weir blockage
g. Evidence of short circuiting
h. Lack of adequatescum removal
i. Excessive floating sludge
j. Broken sludge scraper:
13. Trickling Filter:
a. Trickling filter ponding(indicating clogged media)
b. Leak at center column of trickling filter's distribution arms
c. Uneven distribution of flow on trickling filter surface
d.. Uneven or discolored growth
e. Excessive sloughing of growth
f. Odor
g. Clogging of trickling filter's distribution arm orifices
h. Filter flies, worms, or snails.
14. Activated Sludge Basins/Oxidation Ditches:
a. Dead spots
b. Failure of surface ,aerators
c. Air rising in clumps
d. Dark foam or bad color
e. Thick billows of white, sudsy foam
f. Air rising unevenly
g. Excessive air leaks in compressed air piping.
15. Stabilization Ponds/Lagoons:
a. Excessive weeds including duckweed in stabilization ponds
b. Dead fish or aquatic organisms
c. Buildup of solids around influent pipe
d. Excessive scum on surface.

• Yes No
Page 3
'es
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
--HE4(c i'iF/��.5 H/`iO A 6-noLG
16. Secondary Clarifier: %�o r �) A rev Jt/ i c f9G6'9E $ r)/t. D i)P
r Yile aleos.
N/A a. Excessive gas bub les on sur ace
N/A b. Level overflow weirs
N/A c. Weir blockage
N/A d. Evidence of short circuiting
N/A e: Excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier
N/A f. Pin floc in overflow 041 1444 ,14; tzi' tta,t 1-;La.)
N/A g. Effective scum rake •
NIA h. Floating sludge on surface
N/A i.. Excessive high sludge blanket
N/A j. Clogged sludge withdrawal ports on secondary clarifier.
17. Filtration:
Yes No N/Ai a. Filter surface clogging
Yes No N/A b. Short filter run
Yes No N/A c. Gravel displacement of filter media
Yes No N/A d. Loss of filter media during backwashing
Yes No N/A e. Recycled filter backwash water in excess of 5 percent
Yes No N/A f. Formation of mudballs in filter media,
18. Chlorination Unit:
Yes N/A a. Sludge buildup in contact chamber
Yes T N/A b. Gas bubbles
Yes T N/A c... Floating scum and/or solids
o N/A d. Adequate ventilation of chlorine feeding room and storage area
No N/A e. NIOSH-approved 30 minute air pack
No N/A f. All standing chlorine cylinders chained iri place
No N/A g. All personnel trained in the use of chlorine
es No N/A h. Proper chlorine feed; storage, and reserve supply.
19. Ultraviolet radiation disinfection present and in use:
I
20. Dechlorination:
pNo N/A a.. Proper storage of sulfur dioxide cylinders
e No N/A b. Adequate ventilation of sulfur dioxide feeding room
es _ To N/A c. Automati su fur dioxide feed or-eedback control operating
proper13 //4& .G6-2
Yes No N/A/A
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A
Yes No N ,/Ay
21. Aerobic Digester:
a. Excessive foaming in tank
b. Noxious odor
c. Mechanical aeration failure
d. Clogging of diffusers.

No N/A
No N/A
Yes o N/A
Yes N/A
Yes
Yes No
NoN/A
Page 4
22. Anaerobic Digester:
Yes N/A a. Floating cover tilting
No N/A b. Gas burner operative
Yes
Yes
Yes
23. Sludge Drying and/or disposal:
N/A a. Poor sludge distribution on drying beds
N/A b. Vegetation in drying beds
N/A ,c. Dry sludge remaining in drying beds
No N/A d. Dry sludge stored on site
No N/A e. Filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to front of plant
N/A f. Sludge disposal through county landfill.
N/A g. Sludge land applied.
24. Filter Press: 4
Yes No N A/A/ a. High level of solids in filtrate fromfilter presses or vacuum filters
Yes No N/A b. Thin filter cake caused by poor dewatering .
Yes No N/A c. Sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press
Yes No /A d. Excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake.
25. Polishing Ponds or Tanks:
Yes No /N a. Objectionable odor, excessive foam, floating solids, or oil sheens on
water surface
Yes No N/A b. Solids or scum accumulations in tank or at side of pond
Yes No N/A, c. Evidence of bypassed polishing ponds or tanks because of low
_.,/ capacity.
-26. Plant Effluent:
Yes N/A a. Excessive suspended solids, turbidity, foam, grease, scum, color, and
other macroscopic particulate matter present
Yes (j N/A b. Potential toxicity (dead fish, dead plant at discharge)
No N/A c. Outfall discharge lineeasily accessible.
27 4 Flow Measurement:
a. Proper placement of flow measurement device
b. Flow meter calibrated 0'/3 o% 3 sby1 S'1)c edia4Atefil
c. Buildup of solids in flume or weir
d. Broken or cracked flume or weir
e. Clogged or broken stilling wells
f. Weir plate edge corroded or damaged
g. Flow measurement error less than 10%.

Page 5
No N/A
No N/A
No N/A
No N/A
28. Sampling:
a. Sampling and analysis completed on parameters specifiedby pemit
b. Composite sample temperatures maintained at 4 degrees Celsius or
less (but abovefreezing) during sampling
c. Contract laboratory used for sample analysis
d. Effluent composite samples obtained are flow proportional.
RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
es No . N/A 1. Records and reports maintained as required by permit.
No N/A 2. All required information available, complete, and current.
es No N/A 3. Records maintained for 3 years arid all sludge records maintained for.5
years.
0esNo N/A 4. Analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs.
5. Sampling and analyses data adequate and include: ,
Aes
No N/A a.. Dates, times, and location of sampling
No. N/A . b: Name of individualperformingsampling
e No N/A c. Results of analyses and calibration
No N/A d. Dates of analyses
No N/A e. Name of person performing analyses.
6 Monitoring records adequate and include:
No N/A a. Monitoring charts kept for. 3. years
No N/A b. Flowmeter calibration records kept for 3 years.
GgeckCD 44)01)5T ao03�
Ye,) No N/A 7. The pH meter is calibrated daily with two buffers and checked with a
third buffer and properly documented.
No N/A 8. Expiration dates of pH buffers adequate.
No N/A
9. All thermometers used in NPDES.permit reporting is calibrated
annually with an NIST certified thermometer or 'a traceable,
thermometer annually and documented.
No N/A 10. The following NPDES permit required parameters are analyzed on site:
pH, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen and Chlorine Residual.

Yes No
Page 6
es No N/A 11. The NPDES permit required parameter Total Chlorine Residual is
analyzed by approved method.
es No N/A 12. BOD incubator temperature maintained at 20 +/- 1 Degrees Celsius
and the temperature maintained in a log for every day of operation.
es No N/A 13. Fecal coliform incubator maintained at 44.5 +/- 0.2 Degree Celsius and
the temperature maintained in a log for every day of operation.
14. Plant records adequate and include:
No N/A a. 0 & M Manual
No N/A b. "As -built" engineering drawings
No N/A c. Schedules and dates of equipment maintenance repairs(A1/ R , )
Yes No. /A d. Equipment data cards.
15. Pennittee.is meeting compliance schedule:
es No . N/A 16. DMRs complete and include all NPDES permit required parameters.
es No N/A 17. The facility has a permitted flow greater than 5 MGD and is required
to operate seven days per week 24 hours a day.
No N/A 18. ORC visitation logs available and current.
es No N/A 19. ORC certified at a level equal to or greater than the classification of
the wastewater facility:
es No N/A 20. Backup Operator certified at one level less than the classification of
the wastewater facility or greater.
es No N/A 21. Current copy of the complete NPDES permit on site.
es No N/A 22. Facility description verified as contained in NPDES permit.
es No N/A 23. Facility analyzes process control parameters for example: MLSS,
MCRT, Settleable Solids and others that are applicable.
No N/A , 24. Industrial Waste Surveys (IWS) sent to all possible Significant
Industrial•Users (SIUs) within the last five years (especially new
industries).
Revised 7/16/01
by Belinda Henson

AV;41i7rA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
February 11, 2004
Phillip Boles
Moore County Public Works Director
703 Pinehurst Avenue
P.O. Box 756
Carthage, NC 28327
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan W: Klimek, .P.E.,Director
ColeenH. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject:. COMPLIANCE BIOMONITORING INSPECTION
LABORATORY RESULTS
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County
Dear Mr. Boles:
This - letter concerns the laboratory results of samples that were collected during the
Compliance Biomonitoring Inspection that was conducted during the week of December 1, 2003.
24-hour Outfall 001 effluent composite samples were collected on December 2 and December 5
by Dale Lopez (DWQ-FRO) for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The
Division of Water Quality Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, located on Reedy Creek Road in
Raleigh, completed the aquatic toxicity analysis. The test using these samples resulted in a pass,
but these results should not be used for compliance monitoring purposes. The test was deemed
invalid due to organism feeding criteria. Additionally, the Division of Water Quality Chemistry
Laboratory (located on Reedy Creek Road in Raleigh) completed the testing of samples from the
December 2nd 24-hour composite sample:
Analyses Parameters
Outfall 001
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
12 mg/L
NH3 as N •
0.02 mg/L
TKN as N
1.4 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N
22 mg/L
Total Phosphorus as P
2.6 mg/L
BOD 0
12 mg/L
225 Green Street — Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us/ENR/
An Equal Opportunity.! Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled t 10 % Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
naturally

Mr. Boles
Page 2
February 11;2004
If you have any questions or comments concerning this report or require clarification on
part(s) of this report, please feel free to contact me at 910/486-1541.
Environmental Specialist
/d1
cc: Kevin Bowden, DWQ, ESB, ATU
James Delmo Frye, ORC, Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant

Department of Public Utilities
Wastewater Treatment Plant
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
aanty
February 10, 2004
P/gaaace
Re: Results for EPA Expanded Requirements for Permit Renewal
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Mrs. Valery Stephens
NCDENR/D WQ/NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mrs. Stephens:
• Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
DENR-FRO Q�
FEB 13 2004
I sent a letter with our plant permit renewal that we would run the Priority Pollutant Analysis and a Fat
Head Minnow Toxicity in January.' We would then begin to piggy back tilte. remaining test with our
regular quarterly testing starting in March: Please find enclosed'a copy of the results from January 2004.
I will send you results for the remaining test as we receive them.
If additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call me at 910-281-3146.
Sincerely
James D. Frye, System Superintendent
JDF/sab
cc: Mr. Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Office, DEM
Mr. Charles Weaver, NPDES Unit
Mr. Kevin Bowden, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mr. Steve Wyatt, County Manager
Mr. Phillip Boles, Director of Public Utilities

at
ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCE CORP .
Pam Hester
TBL Laboratory
P.O. Box 589
Lumberton, NC 28359
Ole
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Date Received January 21, 2004
Description 13718 - Moore County WWTP
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
January 29, 2004
ESC Sample # : L141764-01
Site ID
Sample ID EFFLUENT 0119122
Collected By Project # : TBL-13718
Collection Date : 01/19/04.09:05
Parameter
Result Det. Limit Units (Method Date Dil.
Cyanide BDL 0.0050 mg/1 3351.3 01/23/04 1
Hardness calcium — mg/1 Calc. 01/23/04 1
Total Phenol by 4AAP BDL 0.040 mg/1 1420.2 01/28/04 1
Thallium 0.0010 mg/1 200.8 01/22/04 1
Mercury BDL 0.,00020 mg/1 245:1 01/22/04 1
v
BDL
Antimony e,.o0811 0.0050 mg/1 200.7 01/22/04 1
Arsenic BDL 0.010 mg/1 200.7 01/22/04 1
Beryllium BDL 0.0020 mg/1 200.7 01/22/04 1
Cadmium BDL 0.0050 mg/1 200.7 01/22/04 1
Calcium 0.50 mg/1 200.7 01/22/04 1
Chromium /�` t BDL 0.010. mg/1 200.7 01/22/04 1
Copper 7 g�( Ooon � 0.010 mg/1 2007.;01/22/04 1
Lead fq / BDL 0.0050 mg/1 200.7 01/22/04 1
Nickel BDL 0.010 mg/1 200.7 '01/22/04 1
Selenium BDL 0.010 mg/1 200.7 01/22/04 1
Silver BDL 0.0050 mg/1 200.5 01/22/04 1
Zinc Iliaallil 0.030 mg/1 200.'7 01/22/04 1
PP Volatile Organics
Benzene BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
Bromodichloromethane - BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
Bromoform BDL 0.0010. mg/1 624 ' 01/22/04 1
Bromomethane BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
Carbon tetrachloride BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 '01/22/04 1
Chlorobenzene BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
Chlorodibromomethane BDL 0-.0010 mg/1 624 , 01/22/04 1
Chloroethane BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether BDL 0.050 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
Chloroform BDL 0.0050 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
Chloromethane - BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 61/22/04 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
1,1-Dichloroethane BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
BDL - Below Detection Limit '
Det. Limit - Estimated Quantitation Limit(EQL)
Laboratory Certification Numbers:
A2LA - 1461-01, AIHA - 100789, AL - 40660, CA - I-2327, CT- PH-0197, FL-1E87487, GA - 923, IN - C-TN-01
KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016, NC - ENV375,DW21704, ND - R-140, SC - 84004, TN - 2006, VA - 00109, WV - 233
Page 1 of 6

ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCE CORP .
Pam Hester
TBL Laboratory
P.O. Box 589
Lumberton, NC 28359
Date Received
Description
Sample ID '
Collected By, .
Collection Date :
Parameter
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
January 21, 2004
13718 - Moore County WWTP
EFFLUENT 0119122
01/19/04 09:05
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
January 29, 2004
ESC Sample # : L141764-01
Site ID .
Project # : TBL-13718
Result Det. Limit Units Method
Date Dil.
1,2-Dichloroethane BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
- 1,1-Dichloroethene • BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
trans-1,2-Diehloroethene BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
1,2-Dichloropropane BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
trans-1,3-Dichlbropropene BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
Ethylbenzene BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624' 01/22/04 1
Methylene Chloride BDL 0.0050 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
Tetrachloroethene BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
Toluene BDL 0.0050 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
Trichloroethene BDL 0.0010 mg/1 624 , 01/22/04 1
Vinyl chloride BDL 0.0010
Sur-r`
Vinyl
, mg/1 624 01/22/04 1
Toluene-d8 i:.:.(r!t J+ L CO
Rec. 624 01/22/04 1
Dibromofluoromethane °-Ig0 % Rec. 624 01/22/04 1
4-Bromofluorobenzene % Rec. 624 01/22/04 1
Pesticide/PCBs 1
Aldrin BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Alpha BHC BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Beta BHC BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Delta BHC BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Gamma BHC BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Chlordane BDL 0.0050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
4,4-DDD BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
4,4-DDE BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
4,4-DDT BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Dieldrin BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
-Endosulfan I BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Endosulfan II BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Endosulfan sulfate BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Endrin BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Endrin aldehyde BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Heptachlor BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Heptachlor epoxide BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
Hexachlorobenzene BDL 0.00050 mg/1 6:08 01/24/04 1
BDL - Below Detection. Limit. i
Det. Limit - Estimated Quantitation Limit(EQL) I
Laboratory Certification Numbers:
A2LA - 1461-01, AIHA - 100789, AL - 40660, CA - I-2327, CT- PH-0197, FLi EB7487, GA - 923, IN - C-TN-01
KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016, NC - ENV375,DW21704, ND - R-140, SC - 84004, TN -12006, VA - 00109, WV - 233
Page 2 of 6

'ENVIRONMENTAL
S C I ENCE CORP .
Pam Hester
TBL Laboratory
P.O. Box 589
Lumberton, NC 28359
PP Base/Neutral Extractables 1
Acenaphthene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Acenaphthylene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Anthracene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Benzidine BDL 0.050 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Benzo(a)anthracene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625, 01/23/04 1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Benzo(a)pyrene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Bis(2-chlorethoxy)methane BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether BDL 0.010 mg/1 625. 01/23/04 1
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether BDL 0.010 mg/1 625' 01/23/04 1
2-Chloronaphthalene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625' 01/23/04 1
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether- BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Chrysene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Fluoranthene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Fluorene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 , 01/23/04 1
Hexachlorobenzene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene BDL 0.010 mg/1 625 01/23/04 1
BDL - Below Detection Limit I
Det. Limit - Estimated Quantitation Limit(EQL)
Laboratory Certification Numbers:
A2LA - 1461-01, AIHA - 100789, AL - 40660, CA - 1-2327, CT- PH-0197, FL -; E87487, GA - 923, IN - C-TN-01
KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016, NC - ENV375,DW21704, ND - R-140, SC - 84004, TN-'2006, VA - 00109, WV - 233
Page 3 of 6
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
January 29, 2004
Date Received January 21, 2004 ESC Sample # L141764-01
Description 13718 - Moore County WWTP 1.
Sample ID EFFLUENT 0119122 Site ID
Collected By Project # : TBL-13718
Collection Date : 01/19/04 09:05
Parameter
Result Det. Limit Units ;Method Date Dil.
Methoxychlor BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
ToxaphenePCB 1016 BDL 0.010 mg/1 608 01/24/04 1
PCB 1221 BDL 0.00050 mg/1 1608 01/24/04' 1
BDL 0.00050 mg/1 :608 01/24/04 1
PCB 1242
PCB 1232 BDL 0.00050 mg/1 1608 01/24/04 1
PCB 1248 BDL 0.00050 mg/1 ,608 01/24/04 1
BDL 0.00050 mg/1 !608 01/24/04 1
PCB 1254 BDL 0.00050 mg/1 608, 01/24/04 1
PCB 1260 BDL 0.00050 mg/1 1608 01/24/04 1
Pest/PCBs er at
Decachlo'r`oben `1
p y MINt 0.00050 % Rec. 1608 01/24/04 1
Tetrachloro-m-xylene q2M10 0.00050 % Rec. 1
608 01/24/04 1

ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCE CORP .
Pam Hester
TBL Laboratory
P.O. Box 589
Lumberton, NC 28359
Date Received
Description
Sample ID
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
January 21, 2004
13718 - Moore County WWTP
EFFLUENT 0119122
Collected By
Collection Date : 01/19/04 09:05
Parameter
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Phenanthrene
Benzylbutyl phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
PP Acid Extractables
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
�rrdga eta et Recovery
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
p-Terphenyl-d14
Phenol-d5
2-Fluorophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone] ,
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
January 29, 2004
ESC Sample # :
L141764-01
Site 'ID .
I '
Project # : TBL-13718
1 ,
Result Det. Limit Units [Method
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL 0.010 mg/1
BDL - Below Detection Limit
Det. Limit - Estimated Quantitation Limit(EQL)
Laboratory
A2LA - 1461-01, AIHA - 100789, AL - 40660, CA -
KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016, NC - ENV375,DW21704,
Note:
The reported analytical results relate only to
This report shall not be reproduced, except in
Reported: 01/29/04 09:13 Printed: 01/29/04 09:13
% Rec.
% Rec.
% Rec.
% Rec.
% Rec.
% Rec.
1625
I625
,625
1625
I,625'„
1625
1625
625
625
625
625
6251
625,
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625 1
625'1
625 I
Cheli Boucher,
Date Dil.
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04
01/23/04,
01/23/04
01/23/04
JL� ' ".
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ESC Representative
Certification Numbers: j
1-2327, CT- PH-0197,'FL-,E87487, GA - 923, IN - C-TN-el
ND - R-140, SC - 84004, TN - 2006, VA - 00109, WV - 233
the sample submitted.
full, without the written approval from ESC.
Page 4 of 6

Attachment A
List of Analytes with QC Qualifiers
Sample #
L141764-01
Analyte ,
Qualifier
Chloromethane J4
Vinyl chloride J4
Benzidine J3
Isophorone J4
Benzylbutyl phthalate J4
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol J4
Cyanide W
4,4-DDE J4
Tetrachloro-m-xylene J2
Page 5 of 6

Attachment B
Explanation of QC Qualifier Codes
Qualifier Meaning
J2
J3
Surrogate recovery limits have been exceeded; values are outside lower
control limits
The associated batch'QC was outside the established; quality control range
for precision.
J4 The associated batch QC was outside the established
for accuracy.
W (ESC)-The laboratory analysis was from a sample
container
Qualifier Report Information
ESC utilizes sample and result qualifiers as set forth by the EPA Contract Laboratory Program and
as required by most certifying bodies including NELAC. In addition to the EPA qualifiers adopted
by ESC, we have implemented ESC qualifiers to provide more information pertaining to our analytical
results. Each qualifier is designated in the qualifier explanation as either EPA or ESC.
Data qualifiers are intended to provide the ESC client with more detaildd,ihformation concerning
the potential bias of reported data. Because of the wide range of constituents and variety of
matrices incorporated by most EPA methods,it is common for some compounds to fall outside of
established ranges. These exceptions are evaluated and all reported data is valid and useable
unless qualified as 'R' (Rejected).
quality control range
collected in an improper
Definitions
Accuracy - The relationship of the observed value of a known sample to the
true value of a known sample. Represented by percent recovery and
relevant to samples such as: control samples, matrix spike recoveries,
surrogate recoveries, etc.
Precision - The agreement between a set of samples or between duplicate samples.
Relates to how close together the results are and is represented by
Relative Percent Differrence.
Surrogate - Organic compounds that are similar in chemical composition, extraction,
and chromotography to analytes of interest. The surrogates are used to
determine the probable response of the group of analytes that are chem-
ically related to the surrogate compound. Surrogates are added to the
sample and carried through all stages of preparation and analyses.
Control Limits
2-Fluorophenol 31-119 Nitrobenzene-d5 43-118 Dibromfluoromethane 79-126 83-119
Phenol-d5 12-134 2-Fluorobiphenyl 45-128 Toluene-d8 81-114 82-116
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 51-141 Terphenyl-d14 43-137 4-Bromofluorobenzene 65-129 72-126
TIC
- Tentatively Identified Compound: Compounds detected in samples that are
not target compounds, internal standards, system monitoring compounds,
or surrogates.
Page 6 of 6

TBL Laboratory
2401 West 5th Street
Lumberton,NC 28359
Report.
Phone[phone]
[phone] --
Collected by:
(print):
Collected by (signature):
Sample ID
'Matrix: SS - Soil/Solid GW
marks:
elinquished by. (Signature)
elip
by: (Sign
Prrrjec tame:
0e3r2_
CJiI Project.H.
TTTBL :1:37
IDH:
!Rush?'
( Lab MUST Be Notified )
Same Day 200%
Next Day. 100%
Two Day.. 50%
Comp/Grab
Matrix'
1_,OLAD
Depth
Alternate billing information:
-ESC Key:
P.0.11:
'73 D
Results Neerfrrl:
FAX? No_Y•r; I
Dale
iltatH
Analy
sis/Container/Preserva(ive
cr
vf
a; •
kr)
3 I _v71 z
( wi
I .31
7,1
• • -- I
()( 05 / )(1 )1: )4!. )(
roundwa ter WW - VVasteWa ter DW - Drinking Water 01.-
Dale:
°AMA
Dale:
L-42/11
Dale:
-.2O-8/
• )C
Time: Recee by: (Signalu
Time:
Received for 613-by
(Si3”,70 it,
lu.
FedEx 1Cou ier
I emp:
Dale:
Bottles Received:
(
1 ime:
Chain of Custody
Page of
Prepared by:
4/11. ENVIIZONI1TENTAI,
SCIENCE CORI'.
I 2065 Lebanon Road
NIL Juliet. TN 371)2
Phone [phone]
_Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
CoCode: TIILLAB
Ternplate/Prelogin
Cooler #:
Shipped Via:
Remarks/Conlarninant
(lab use only)
Sarnple fl (lab only)
LILL t-764e4
N 0C .)
r I? I: f,171?-1.. , 2_ sY
Ey.
A L.
N T
l'emp
Other
Condition:
pH Checked: 1 NCF:
9

TBL Laboratory
2401 West 5th Street
Lumberton,NC 28359
Alternate billing information:
Report.
4'ef
Phone[phone]
FAX: [phone]
' Collected by:
(print):
Proirme:
(Dor4a, CD(...7)1
Client Project #: ESC Key:
-T8L- 13-7 18
Site/Facility ID#:
Collected by (signature):
'Rush?'
(.Lab MUST Be Notified)
Same Day 200%
Next Day. 100%
Two Day. 50%
Sample ID
Comp/Grab
Matrix'
Wk.,0
Depth
ci—c-5' 3
Date Results Neefiffl:
FAX? _.No_Y:?,
-I CO'S
Anay
sis/Container/Preservative
-40
. Ct •
2e1,; `XI
w • A-! r6 ! v);
E : co •
Ai
!
Date _
M 0165 i X )1
'Matrix: SS - Soil/Solid GW,
elinquished by. (Signature
alinq by: (Sign re)
d b0Signature)
th
roundwa ter
Date:
AVA
Date:
Date:
WW - WasteVVa ter DW - Drinking Water 07' .
Time: 1 Receilec by: (Signatu e:.
Tinie:
/1
Time:
1
ed
Received for lab by:
(Signature)
L
L
Chain of Custody
Page of
Prepared by:
4/11' ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCE CORP.
12065 Lebanon Road
Mt Juliet, TN 37122
Phone [phone]
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
CoCode: TIILLAB (lab use only)
Template/Prelogin
Cooler #:
Shipped Via:
Remarks/Contaminant
0 I U
Sample # (lab only)
1
r,3 r • z
l!71
7.147TY.ii
pl I
Flow ()tiler
S5iiifilsTeliirriTd via: LI UPS
FedEx Courier Li
-_______._•_____ Temp
Ternp:
Bottles Received:
9
Condition:
(lab use only) '
.
Date:
Time:
pH Checked: 1NCF:

"y Effluent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test Date:1/30/2004
x
Facility: Moore County WWTP
Laboratory: Meritech, Inc.
IPDES # NC0037508 Pi
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
pe #:
County: Moore
Comments
[ P
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time 1/20/2004 / 11:45 AM
% Eff.
Control
Repl.
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
10.25
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
20.5
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
411
61.5
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
82
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) !nit/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
'est Organisms
1
2 3
Avg Wt/Surv. Control
10
10
10
10
10
101
10
10
0.327
0.340
0.248
0.288
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.297
0.311
0.340
0.289
8
10
8
10
10
10
10
10
0.207
0.287
0.270
0.302
10
8
8
9
10
10
10
10
0.278
0.252
0.251
0.273
9
8
9
8
10
10
10
10
0.271
0.273
0.276
0.276
6
6
5
5
10
10
10
10
0.255
0.215
0.197
0.208
0
Day
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
(0.3011
1100.0
[0.301
100.0
0.3091
1 90.01
0.267
87.5
0.264
185.01
0.274
55.0
0.2191
1
2
3
8.08 /
8.06
8.08 /
8.06
8.09 /
8.08
8.09 /
8.08
8.07
/ 8.05
7.98 / 8.00
7.81 / 7.87
/
7.78 /
7.08
7.80 /
7.11
7:61 /
7.06
7.65 /
7.07
7.81
/7.127.87/7.117.72,/7.13
/
25.0 /
24.8
25.0 /
24.8
25.0 /
24.7
25.0 /
24.7
25.0
/ 24.8
25.0 / 24.8
25.0, . / 24.8
/
0
1
2
3
7.63 /
7.86
7.61 /
7.83
7.65 /
7.90
7.63 /
7.88
7.21 /
7.83
7.90 /
7.80
,7.76
: /
7.78
/
7.91 /
7.15
7.94 /
7.16
8.01 /
6.98
8.04 /
7.00
7.92 /
7.08
7.88 /
7.00
17.73
' /
6.98
/
25.0 /
24.9
25.0 /
24.8
25.0 /
24.8
25.0 /
24.7
25.0 /
24.8
25.0 /
24.8
125.0
/
24.7
/
1
2
3
1/18/2004
1/19/2004
1/22/2004
24.00
24.00
.24.00.
466 .
450
446
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
Cultured In -House r
Outside Supplier F
Hatch Date/Time 1/19/2004 / 2:30 PM
Normal
Hom. Var.
NOEC
LOEC
ChV
Method
Crit t/rsum
Conc.
10.25%
20.50%
41.00%
61.50%
82.00%
Survival Growth
IrI ICI
41.00% 62%
62% 82%
50% 71%
Steel's Dunnett
10 2.41
Calc t/rsum
18• -0.4244 '
14 1.7101
12 1.8599
10 1.3356
10 4.0943
Result
Pass
Fail
ChV
50%
DWQ Form AT-5 (8/03)

MERITECH
Chronic Fathead Minnow Benchsheet
Transfer and Feeding Dates and Times
Test Initiation Data:
Start Date: 1-
Start Time:
Initials/Signature: s•Li
Date/Time Fed
Date/Time Born ;j.
,•
.1.2
• a
Transfer
Date Time Initials
Day 1
Day 2 1••,)..),.0%.4..
Day 3 1•4?-;.-.•,,
Day 4
Day 5
-t • -
Test Termination Data:
Initials/Signature: 723-
End Date: 1. :0 -01„...
• End Time: octS•
# of Organisms per Chamber: i Q.)
. Test Vessel Size: c1-"....9
Test Solution Volume: .
Temp. of Stock:
# of Reps: LI
Date Time 1
Day 0 i •;•10- ip14
Day 1 I -a., 1-•;,1-•
Day 2 I tly,•1
Day 3 1-T“,,
Facility ()I'D° rci_
NPDES
Dilution Water:SA-;1$11.
Randomization: NO
Incubator #:
Feeding
Initials • Time 2
Day 4 l.1%4 -
Day 5 • -;.•••••i,
Day 6
4'7,3
Initials
Time 3 Initials

MERITECH, INC.
;Ur
FISH LARVAL SURVIVAL/pROWTH DATA SHEET
CHRONIC FATHEAD MINNOW
FACILITY: Ork.r,rc
NPDES #: cc)c)
DATE OF TEST: -o-o- 11-,474
DATE WEIGHED: i -;•;`.3-- C4
ORGANISM: Pt‘A,kreci'ht;.:)l,k
CONC
r
• ) •
REP.
A
B
D
A
B
D
A
B
D
!••
PAGE OF
OUTFALL:
• INITIALS:
FOIL WT.
(nig)
FOIL WT. +
ORG. (mg)
\
D.
f."-;
o
WT. OF
ORG. (mg)
# ORG.
I 0
MEAN WT/
ORG. (mg)
0
c.T3s(0
(6 ,
7 rg
c6 D\LjOJ <
0 • - • • r.
0
Z,Sk,9
u-1 7-P,
86). t)
S.
On,
•?-
\.4.0
Y.)).
•
10
10
10
,f)
SURV %
100
Cio
0.L.)40
0-
• -
6.
oo

s
MERITECH, INC.
FISH LARVAL SURVIVAL/GROWTH DATA SHEET
CHRONIC FATHEAD MINNOW I'
FACILITY: .1
NPD.ES #: l`.ir.E-)'
DATE OF TEST:
DATE WEIGHED: 1.a-t•
ORGANISM: P!,�.:�,i
CONC
REP.
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
PAGE i`j= OF a.
OUTFALL:
INITIALS:
FOIL WT. FOIL WT. + WT. OF # ORG. MEAN WT/
(mg) ORG. (mg) ORG. (mg) ORG. (mg)
)04cs
)I l
11-
(. S-r)
v i , .
c_\ •
Yc3
•
S-4.
9D-
• Jr/ •
i
:'
•
•
ii
•
ii
irT,C.„)
tl t

Conc. I r.�t3:-• f. I I 1 2 i
1 T l o l° I C I 1 ,Renarks
ramp. initial la 1.=1I.riC--- I._.,:-r. I I-,, (..) 174 .`c
ti. 1 1 + I
Final. IU ,. I:.t,to:�. I.-.,..1: 1::.,;.s., 1:,!-4.�s 1��: r )��i:`�
u . 0. In i ti a 1 11-1. Fk-24.. I-?gi b..1),,;CI. ti. - 7. ,
i n a I .;-.\ i% t: -[ l (Ti: 1- 1'i::-�... 177.1E 2 1" f. t I :�-10 I
17':.; , 1=,,�:, i ::. I cil:--i_:_ I �=��= I i. ci =I 7. ,-;1.)1
�ina.I 1 cc. I=T=ci 1,�P:,. IE3c )- I �.�?91'7, ,=(t;� ^t l 14, s3 I
1
Atir. a i i n i iy 1• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f
1 Hardness I • I I .I
r.Dn.dut t Tn.; eia 1 I'=:7 () Ia,', 7 I;Ai n 1 3,? I -.e!Sc, D Ic.•:.> `a 1
_:al ITS 1.-. 13767 I`C,_: -11.•m r 13_s« .I TV) I-'"
Res. ..
Chlorine or, ne Ir t 11 t l 4.o: t I.• n. 1 14,0.1 I tr.: 4i I Lc 1. I
'
Conc.
.ierp
�;. 11 1 2 1 3 1 6 1 I I
. ,. i.:'� '�` I I _ I / I P. mil l r k S
Initial1,1• I e :7 fr I..�.'•>..a I_°,-•C> • I).a- & I -6 . J I
Fill?-1 I o .i 1 iC' 3-.- . L_''Dtk ,. 1^Z� 1
i,). J. ��-: I �.�, �� I � i � (�._. �' (.:L.E �(-: i• n art:~,
! n i i a 1 1"4r. ,. I .T5?-a- I' 1'--i�.,y I .t"c- I.'r?; 1 7, S�I 1`• i';1
i-i n a ► 1 , ;;+. 1.)-‘2-, I --1—,7 - . I -<<.' I ; 1. 1 '7-1 0 I - . I
1` I >%c , 1 •'. --1 :: 1 r•';'. I>,-4 i I'V t.(;.— I 7.7 71
,` fi n a l 1-.- c='.. i-7)= �r I '+`-�.ci I i. I t • L_ I F� . �=''' C,
'i a!i,n1:y 1 I :� I • D 1
I
rlard ness I I 1 I I I I
Cond,, t, . ;En ti a l l L 0 I "i 't' i A}: ,. I hF '-f 1 .:- 1- > 0 1. 1 "7 I
Chi i ne Ie:_,z: I I:'.; 1 .;•;-, I'_ I ,^t. i <-..:.y i 1> > 1
pH initial
MERITEC
Chenical DB r i n3 tons
Facilityn`,cc;:-a ;r< NPDES fi,� y��Sc :Test Datesl: ; Start r JC:r,.iEnd L Test Organism: it. Analyst Test Time: E _ Start ;;u�;�-E rd <:;•�;>i-_
Conc.
Temp.
1 Day I
I .3 I ,,, ,,, t (' i 1? Y I f o( 7 i Remarks
4 �
Initial I, .i'� .. .o I I. Z ' 1
C '-^i`{;S L�4�. �': I;.`r'..t.. � 1�=r ',: 1.�ti.. .tip I ?..-. l' -1 • I ..),,: C? I
J.U. ins Lial 1 T->r 1`RF.) 1 Il` k- I= ' 1 tl7 17.7..RI
I »; 1 -\ t IH "y+,, I 'c I'!.!� 11, I i 1 I- 1
pH Initial I:- ; 1`; `=: I` :i. •IGC Ico l 7 'cri" -7S l 1
Alkalinity Final ( =. i ) I Pa192 IF. P c-1 <ri 1`.'{-'{� 1
I` 1 1 1 1 1 • I 1
11ardness . I La_ I ) t4,4._ I . I L i I I I
Conduc:.lnitialI.^:LID' la ..3I:Z:rO 1�i'i:k 13.11:t I l>-3.1 ,".) )
_ ~final 1 _� 1 _ C.-it)! 3tJ�I:ri7 2- D `I `` 1 •
Res. Chlorine f : I --, t I r 1 ',o. 0110,E I
I'-..i_ s � tom: �t 1 4.:'. i �; 7 � - •! I ! .�� . 1 II ,
ai./^i.
Final
tina►
Day
aH Initial
Day

ChetiCa1 _ fa. Physical cal Dei.a_m inn .ions
Facility ^::..._.�
i 1 r~- NPDES fis`Jrsr eYr,:Test Dates
Test Sta-rt�"�rs:� End,•,1�, ;�--
Organism: ,�; �: analyst Test Time: Start)1kice,:-
1 Day
Conic . i 4 L. !: I, I 1 2 1 3 1 4 1
Temp. Ini tttlal I 1 '?4';7 1 1 $.�
Final I ` -f.{--6 1 is-;r. 1 •1,;< 1 }rtich
I).O. n�l.,.1aI s-se; 1•41.2?s
rival
H !n1 7-1aI I'T== I f :.. -, 1:41, 1
I 1 1 I I
Final
Alkal1n77:y
Hardness
I- -5:; 17, (Y
Conduct. Initial! 1 " ; i ,9,b 1 .1"2,:.),:1, I
Final 1.5�ii 1 • '7't}13 Ieti13u I,L`C.
Res. Chlorine 1:.-J. kJ:), I •c;t r. 1 ::. k
0 1 / •
,D I .
1. 1;c:c 1 7.7S1
7:cf el
I
1
I
I(-17..)1
Remarks
I Day. 1
Conc. i-,i r.:T.'.t. I I I 2 I 3 1 4 1 5 1 5 I/ 1
Te_mp. Initial 14:••, I z_•,:`> I_a.�,. IDS. I i'<l 1.-'.-0 I. .OI
Final: I i-' , I :3.r-1 I ):. - 1-_I.,.,.. 1 4 1=�&2$ ;1 . Y 1
-f "
D..0. In.1tjal 1", ): t l4--4.- Il .1,.. I,<<-'1 1 r,C.?79?.7I 1
FinaI I:i-Zp/:h .,
PH Initial 1- - 1:I: �4 1::1•J,.-I -1 r� 1',3. I`I. )--I .-7S 1
r i na.l 1• '. 1'V='I c:� I =';c;°Z 1::ci). 1-7 .. 7- I r . .c"17)-, -
Afkaiinity 1' 1 1.1 1 1 1 1
Hardness ! 1 ! .1 1 1 1
Conduct Initial =, ':? I a ,t'7 I ( 3l :3 1:�1r,i; 1..-`;^isi 4 I m��S' 1
_final I:�`i 7; 1'39i'0 l ice; 1.t- i3 , I IIF='" I
Rag. Chiorine 1�_�:_€, I C.3>>1 i'.-Ci./i. I'LK.).1 I! J,1 1L:.t
Remarks
1 1 .) r Day
, 2'
n'='MD. . ini t_c1!_.,Cj : 1 3•
..11 4! 5 1 0 1/ 1
Remarks
Final I r;,: , 1�...4.(
i.1 . O. i n i l a) L..r i S, 1• ;a'I i �-i
final 11)'t I.1- i i„
DH Initial
Final II,`�h:?.
��t-i �� ..�'!•:� 1a `:1 1)-9 "L3 1 1
lSt-Ai I`;:°ca li,1, 'z;I7.7' I
( iri 1"):vc) 1 'i 1.-<4I i�L11 : `fir' I
I'__� I' 17• :(pi
"x1 14' 1
'ikai,nity 15;; I I I'` 1 1 1
Hardness Imo?„ i Si.;- I I I 1 1
Conduct . 7n 4 t := 42.0 I1?'h7i` I 4001ur_:z 1;(--7 4 1 Li. 1
Fin a1 1ti J 1 lc 1 I.I. I j r i h I1 h -I I _l+•�F I U`71._i I14.;I`-' 1
:?es. C^l or Tie. 1 // rf I L t;',. ILL--,, I/.J),. If;,.`{ I, =..? I / . 11

MERITECH
Mortality Data: Chronic Fathead Test
Start Date/Time I + s. ;, . End Date/Time
Concentration Co.-,
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
Rep #1
Rep #2
Rep #3
Rep #4
Concentration i( --,I5 • .,
Day 0
Rep #1
t2
Day 1
L)
0
a
e_
Cs)
0 0 2 0
Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
Rep #2 4,�� �"� 6.) ( (1) t
Rep #3 CJ ( .i C) 0 o (__1
Rep #4 i �) CD
Concentrationi;•c J,
Day6 Day7
f )
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
Rep #1 \.J C1 () ( ( )
Rep #2
Rep #3 if.---) j
Rep #4 (1 0
J
C)
cT ; �.
0

MERITECH
Mortality Data: Chronic Fathead Test
Start Date/Time End Date/Time
Concentration L1•.
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day5 Day 6 Day 7
Rep #1 0C)
•
Rep #2 0 f---
C)
Rep #3 0 (7)
(')
Rep #4 0 (1) 0 ) I
Concentration (,-)1.5 '(_
Rep #1
Rep #2 0
Rep #3
Rep #4
Concentration
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 - Day 3 Day 4 Day Day 6 Day 7
II
-1) CI)
0C) C.)
0
o
0.0
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
Rep #1 0
Day 6. Day 7
Rep #2 C) 0 ,_/ 7.-.-..-\
.
I . ,
Rep #3 0 0 k. . t '''N
1 .
Rep #4 CT. ) C) ,.:\ i----
N.......) ... 1 (-.-72j

Collector's Signature:
Client Information
1
CIient: t\ F'Ci (, ` i 4
TBL
PO Box 589
Lumberton, NC 28359
910-738-6190
Merited, Inc. r ,; -
Bioassay Sample Chain of Custody
642 Tamco Rd
Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone]
M Q.,
Type of Faculty uenerming .L.,..,J1. •
Sample information _
Sampling Site: C 1 ► lw_Q_Cl
Sample Type: Grab
Sampling Time: START Date: t
END Date: t
Sample Chilled (Covered witl.ce): Yes
Collector's Name (Print): f ' �e-� -C
Zip:
Pol# r3.3
NPDES #: = )e i`t 3 `? 5D
Phon: eQ 1- i re
Pipe Number:
•
Composite # of Containers Q
I 'i ' 1O'-i Time: 9 , 15 C1VI PM
i 19 I n,- Time: ;-1: l ; �M IPM
✓ No
e'oxke:ty Test Information
Test Required: Chronic: Test Organism: Ceriodaphnia; Dubia:
Acute: Pimephales promelas:
Mysidopsis bahia: �'
IWC:
Toxicity Test Concentration(s):
List Any Special Requirements:
Shipping information
Relinquished By:
Received By:
Relinquished By:
Received By:
Sample Temperature (C°):
Date: Time:....,' :`� CPM
Date: /- /7 -oc( Time:47 .S AM PM
Date: /-1 ? •dfG Time: . AM PM
Date: Time: AM PM
Method of Shipment: WTC(p/i) UPS Fed -Ex
Circle One Other:
Sample Receiving (Laboratory Use Only)
Received From:
Received By: 'D ,
Sample Temperature (C°):
Date: ; ii: )cc/ Time:
Sample Condition: .1:

Client Information
Client: ''\
Contact:
Add
City
Cou:
Type.
Meritech, Inc.
Bioassay Sample Chain of Custody
642 Tamco Rd
Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone]
t
c, •'7 C r
TBL
PO Box 589
Lumberton, NC 28359
910-738-6190
Sample Information
Sampling Site:
Sample Type: Grab
Sampling Time: START
END
Sample Chilled (Covered with Ice): Yes
Collector's Name (Print : + p : l° E.)/Collector's Signature: �.;.., .,,,, � _ . `-�
Zip:
0/2 :)/7
-r& 3 I
PO 675.
NPDES #: uc-33'-1t2
(4.
Pipe Number:
c;InfIS
Composite # of Contai
Date: i. `?�( Time: I - .�
Date:
Li Time: -1� (�
fin - PM '� �
No
-r
•
Toxicity Test Information
‘-\Q
Test Required: Chronic: Test Organism: Ceriodaphniai Dubia:
Acute: PimephaIes pi•omelas:
Mysidopsis bahia:
IWIu:
Toxicity Test Concentration(s):
List Any Special Requirements:
Shipping Information
Relinquished By: `'' y';fu •, - r " r {
Received" B ry . Date: j �, �� Time: =;a ''/may NOM
RelinquishedY , �� Date: i 1 ��- Time: c> 1 c: i�JskPM
Date: Time: il`o ° A►� PM
Received By: Date: /- - p Time: %/Da AM ' M
Sample Ten erature C
( ): Method of Shipment: WTC(p/u) UPS Fed -Ex
/' B ' t.a O _o " / Circle One Other:
Sample Receiving (Laboratory Use Only)
Received From: -repEx
Received By: �� �-UJ r' �P 1 , /
Date: /- l - 64 Time: ' `f S AV PM
Sample Temperature (C°): a;;") L/ ' ti Sample Condition

Bioassay Sample Chain of Custody
642 Tamco Rd
Reidsville, NC 27320
.[phone]
Client Information
Client: i
Contact: r, w,ec
TBL
PO Box 589
Lumberton, NC 28359
910-738-6190
LTC)
1vC _ Zip:
Meritech, Inc t r 1 i t'l LL.(
L- ( -21Z
PO # `j
NPDES. #:
Phone: -3f01
Pipe Number:
Sample Information
Sampling Site: r7) jus \t
Sample Type: Grab Composite
Sampling Time: START Date: , &DD: 61 Time:
END Date: 9 as ! oq
Sample Chilled (Covered with ice): Yes -
.Collector's Name (Print): i s-rpA lM�r�u
'Collector's Signature: e fi
# of!Containers 3
• Ltd' M PM
Time: 9 :I 6.Mk PM
No
Toxicity Test information
Test Required: Chronic:c„.6.1 fAb
Test Organism:
Acute:
IWC:
Toxicity Test Concentration(s):
List Any Special Requirements:
Ceriodaphni i Dubia:
Pimephales promelas:x.
Mysidopsis bahia:
Shipping Information
Relinquished By: �� y,�t „4l•.:
Received B.
Relinquished By:
Received By:
Sample Temperature (C'):
Time: ,-- .� )PM
Time: ��'l ( PM
cs Time:: A M
Time: AM PM
Method of Shipment: WTC(p%u) !UPS Fed -Ex
Circle One Other:
Date:
- Date:
Date:
Date:
Sample Receiving (Laboratory Use Only)
Received From: ram( . Ex,/;
Received By: /i r"t1 L Date: t z1-l. t(
Sample Temperature (C°): c' - L / 0/3 - Sample Condition
Time:! ; /
L 7)
(
AM PM

• Title: Moore County
File: moore Transform:
NO TRANSFORMATION
Kolmogorov Test for Normality
D=
D* =
0.1388
0.7025
(p-value > 0H_00)
Critical D* = 1.035 (alpha = 0.01', N = 24)
= 0.895 (alpha = 0.05 , N = 24)
Data PASS normality test (alpha = 0.01). Continue analysis.

Title: Moore County
File: moore Transform:
NO TRANSFORMATION
Bartlett's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
Calculated B1 statistic = 14.4886
(p-value = 0.0128)
Data PASS B1 homogeneity test at 0.01 level. Continue analysis.
Critical B = 15.0863 (alpha = 0.01, df = 5)
= 11.0705 (alpha = 0.05, df = 5)

• Title: Moore County
File: moore
Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
Summary Statistics on Data
'TABLE 1 of 2
GRP IDENTIFICATION N MIN
MAX MEAN
1 control 4 0.2480 0.3400
2 •10.25% 4 0.28900.30
08
3 0.3400� 0.3093
20.5% 4 0.2070 0.3020 0.2665
4 41% 4 0.2510 0.2780 0.2635
5 61.5% 4 0.2710 0.2760 0.2740
6 82% 4 0.1970 0.2550 0.2188
Title: Moore County
File:, moore
Transform:
Summary Statistics on Data
NO TRANSFORMATION
TABLE 2 of 2'
GRP IDENTIFICATION VARIANCE
SD SEM
C.V. %
1 control 0.0017 0.0415 ,0.0208 13.8095
2 10.25% 0.0005 0.0224 ;0.0112
3 20.5% 7.2517
0.0017 0.0418 :0.0209 15.6718
4 41% 0.0002 0.0140 �0.0070
5 61.5% 5.3176
0.0000 0.0024 0.0012 0.8940
6 82% 0.0006 0.0253
,0.0126 11.5551

• Title: Moore County
File: moore
Transform:
ANOVA Table
• NO TRANSFORMATION
SOURCE
DF SS
MS
F
Between
5 0.0206
0.0041
Within (Error) 18 0.0144
,0.0008
5.1417
Total
23 0.0351
(p-value = 0.0042)
Critical F = 4.2479 (alpha = 0.01, df = 5,18)
= 2.7729 '(alpha = 0.05, df = 5,18)
Since F > Critical F REJECT Ho: All equal (alpha = 0.05)

Title: Moore County
File: moore
Transform:
Dunnett's Test - TABLE 1 OF 2
NO TRANSFORMATION
Ho:Cont'rol<Treatment
TRANSFORMED MEAN CALCULATED IN SIG
GROUP IDENTIFICATION MEAN ORIGINAL UNITS T STAT 0.05
1 control 0.3008
2 0.3008
10.25% 0.3093 0,.3093
30.2665 -0.4244
4 20.5% 0.2665
41% 0.2635 1.7101
5 61.5% 0.2740 Oi.2635 1.8599
6 82 % 0.2188 0�• 2740 1.3356
01.2188 4.0943 *
Dunnett critical value = 2.4100 (1 Tailed, alpha=:0.05, df = 5,18)
Title: Moore County
File: moore
Dunnett's Test
Transform:
TABLE 2 OF 2
NO TRANSFORMATION
Ho:Control<Treatment
GROUP NIDENTIFICATION NUMS OF MIN SIG DIFF % OF DIFFERENCE
(IN ORIG. UNITS);' CONTROL FROM CONTROL
2 10.25% 4 0.0483
3 20.5% 4 0.0483
4 41% 4 0.0483
5 61.5% 4 0.0483
6 82% 4 0.0483
1 control 4
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
-0.0085
0.0343
0.0373
0.0267
0.0820

Title: Moore County
File: Moore12004 Transform: ARC SINE (SQUARE ROOT(Y))
Shapiro - Wilk(s Test for Normality
D =
W =
0.1864
0.9505
Critical W = 0.8840 (a1ph = 0.01 , N = 24)
W = 0.9160 (alpha = 0.05 , N = 24)
I
j Data PASS normality.test (alpha = 0.01). Continue analysis.
I ,

Data FAIL to meet homogeneity of variance
Additional transformations are useless.
Hartley's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
Bartlett's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
Title: Moore County
File: Moore12004 Transform: ,ARC SINE(SQUARE ROOT(Y))
These two tests can not be performed because at least one group has
zero variance.
assumption.

. Title:
File:
Moore County
Moore12004
Transform:: H ARC SINE (SQUARE ROOT (Y) )
Steel's Many -One Rank Test _
Hp: Control<Treatment
GROUP IDENTIFICATION TRANSFORMED RANK
MEAN SUM
1 Control 1.4120
2 10.25% 1.4120
3 18.001 : 10.00 4.00
4 20.5% 1.256 14.001 10.00 4.00
41% 1.2188
5 61.5% 1.1781 12.00 10.00 4.00
6 82 0 10.00 I ' 10.00 4.00
0.8357 10.00 10.00 4.00 *
CRIT. SIG
;VALUE DF 0.05
Critical values are 1 tailed ( k = 5 )
1

11)L Lauuratory
nwdIvsls/L,ontarner!Preserrative
Chain of Custody
Page of
Prepared by:
P.O. Box 589
Lumberton,NC 28359
Project jtame: ,\
P 'v C ir)(,L'j.
(9I0) 738 6190 Client Project #:
FAX: [phone] (q/L),f-I _rl �fF
Re ort:
FY-
hone
Collected by:
(print): kx
Collected by (signbture):
Site/Facility ID#:
P.O.#:
Rush? ( Lab MUST Be Notified )
_ Same Day 200%
Next Day. 100%
__ Two Day.. 50%
Sample ID Comp/Grab
'Matrix: SS- SoiVSolid
Remarks:
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: ( ign ure)
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Matrix'
Depth
• ,
Date Results Needed:
FAX? No Yes
Date
Time
GW - Groundwater WW - WasteWater DW - Drinking Water OT - Other
Time:
ignature
eceived by: Ignature)
Received for lab by:
(Signature)
No.
or
Cntrs
414
EtiVIRONNIEN'T.AL
SCICtiCE CORP.
12065 Lebanon Road
Mt. Juliet'rN 37122
Phone [phone]
Phonc [phone]
FAX [phone]
CoCode: TBLLAAB
Template/Prelogin
Cooler #:
Shipped Via:
Remarks/Contaminant
(lab use only)

State of North Carolina
Department of 'Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, ;P.E., Director
December 11, 2003
Dennis Brobst
Moore County Public Utilities
P O BOX 1927
Carthage, NC 28327
CDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL 'RESOURCES
0 2003
SUBJECT: Renewal Application Requirements forPermit NCi0037508
Moore County WPCF
Dear Permittee:
Your,NPDES permit for a municipally owned/operated WWTP expires on July 31, 2004. This advance notice is
being sent to explain the new requirements for your permit renewal application.
You are receiving this advance notice because your facility has a permitted flow at or above 1 MGD, or -your • •
WWTP has a pretreatment program. If either of these criteria no 'longer apply to your facility, contact the NPDES
Unit before submitting a renewal application.
.Federal (40 CFR 122) and state (15A'NCAC 2H.0105(e)) regulations require that permit renewal applications•befiled
at least 180 days prior to expiration of the current permit. Your renewal application is due to the Division no later
than February 2, .2004. -Failure to apply for renewal by the appropriate deadline may result ina civil penalty
assessment, or others enforcement activity at the discretion of the Director.
The U.S. EPA revised and expanded the application requirements for municipal permits, effective August 1, 2001.
EPA forms 1 and 2A are attached to this Notice, and must be used for your permit renewal application. The new
application requirements mandate additional effluent testing:
1. Conduct three Priority Pollutant Analyses (PPAs) and submit results) with your renewal application.
Collect samples for the PPAs in conjunction with sampling for your current quarterly toxicity test. The
new PPA requirements differ from previous versions. Each PPA must include:
> Analyses for all total recoverable metals listed in Part D of form 2A. ' This includes metals that are
not normally monitored through your NPDES permit.
> Analyses for total phenolic compounds and hardness.
> Analyses for all of the volatile organic compounds listed in. Part D.
> Analyses for all of the acid -extractable compounds listed in Part D.
> Analyses for all base -neutral compounds' listed in Part D.
2. Conduct four toxicity tests for an organism other than Ceriodaphnia and submit results with your renewal
application. The tests should be conducted quarterly, with samples collected on the same day as your
current toxicity test. Call the Aquatic Toxicology Unit at [phone] for guidance in conducting the
additional tests.
These additional analyses must accompany your permit renewal application, or any request for a major permit
modification. The Division cannot draft your permit without' the additional data. Any data submitted cannot be
over 41/2 years old, and must account for seasonal variation (samples cannot be collected during the same season
each year if collected over multiple years).
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Visrr us ON THE irrERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES
919 733-5083, extension 511 (fax) 919 733-0719
charies.weaver@ ncmail.net

Renewal Notice for Permit NC0037508
Moore County
Page 2
If your permit already contains a requirement for an annual effluent pollutant scan, additional scans are not
required [provided you have conducted at least 3 scans prior to submitting your application].
If any wastewater discharge will occur after the current permit expires, this NPDES permit must be renewed.
Discharge of wastewater without a valid permit would violate Federal and North Carolina law. Unpermitted
discharges of wastewater could result in assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day. If all wastewater
discharge has ceased at your facility and you wish to rescind this permit, contact Vanessa Manuel of the Division's
Compliance Enforcement Unit at [phone], extension 532. You may also contact the Fayetteville Regional
Office at [phone] to begin the rescission process.
•
Use the checklist below t complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you must
submit with the permit renewal application. If you have any questions, please contact me. My telephone number, fax
number and e-mail address are listed at the bottom of the previous page.
Sincerely,
144
Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NPDES Unit
cc: Central' Files'
rFayett`eville REgional-Office, Water Quality Sectional
NPDES File
The following items are REQUIRED for all renewal'packages:
❑ A cover letter requesting renewal of the permit and documenting any changes at the facility since issuance of the
last permit. Submit one signed original and two copies.
❑ The completed application form (copy attached), signed by the permittee or an Authorized Representative.
Submit one signed original and two copies.
❑ If an Authorized Representative (such as a consulting engineer or environmental consultant) prepares the renewal
package, written documentation must be ' provided showing the authority delegated to the Authorized
Representative (see Part II.B.11.b of the existing NPDES permit).
❑ A narrative description of the sludge management plan for the facility. Describe how sludge (or other solids)
generated during wastewater treatment are handled and disposed. If your facility has no such plan (or the
permitted facility does not generate any solids), explain this in writing. Submit one signed original and two
copies. This information can be included in the cover letter.
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mrs. Valery Stephens
NC DENR / Water Quality / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

.;State of North Carolina
'Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water. Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director:
January 29, 2004
Mr. James Frye
Moore County
1094 ADDOR ROAD
ABERDEEN NC 28315
NCDENR
._� NORTH- CAROL!NA •DEPARTMENT OF
Iy
ENVIRONMENT;At,ID NATURAL RESOURCES
[;BAN 3 0 2004
Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal Application
Permit NC0037508
Moore County:WPCP
Moore County
Dear Mr. Frye:
The NPDES Unit received your permit renewal application on January 20, 2004. Thank you for
submitting this package.
Your permit renewal application has been assigned to a staff member for review. If the reissuance
of your permit is delayed, the existing requirements in your permit will remain in effect until the
permit is renewed (or the Division takes other action). We'appreciate your patience and
understanding while we work to resolve the backlog of projects. If you have any additional
questions concerning renewal of the subject permit, please contact Charles Weaver at (919) 733-
5083, extension 511.
Valery Stephens
Point Source Unit
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
NPDES-File
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 733-5083, extension 520 (fax) 919 733-0719
- VISIT US ON THE INTERNET ( http://h2o.enr,state.nc.us/NPDES [e-mail]

r -
Department of Public Utilities
Wastewater Treatment Plant
1094 A'ddor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
aL' At co4ce
January 2, 2004
Re: NPDES Permit Application
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County Water Pollution Control. Plant
Mrs. Valery Stephens
NCDENR/D WQ/NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mrs. Stephens:
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
JAB 2 0 2004 t
I1
1:,'Ott SOURCE GrIANCr:,3
Moore County's NPDES Permit expires July 4, 2004. In compliance with Federal (40 CFR 122) and State
(15A NCAC 2H.0105(e)) regulations, we must submit a Permit Renewal a least 180 days prior to the
expiration date. The following items are submitted:
1. Application Standard Form 2A-Municipal-Sections A, B, C, D, E,& F
(in triplicate)
2. No renewal fee required as of January 1, 2004
The County of Moore requests that their existing Permit berenewed as is, without any modifications.
If additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call me at 910281-3146.
Sincerely,
/p
James D. Frye, System Superintendent
JDF/sab
Enclosures:
cc: Mr. Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Office, DEM
Mr. Steve Wyatt, County Manager
Mr. Phillip Boles, Director of Public Utilities

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NC0037508
PLICATION INFORMATIC:.
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
renewal
RIVER BASIN:
AP, APPLICATION INFORMATION,FOR AWAPPUCANI
An treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name
Mailing Address
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Contact Person James D. Frye
Title
System Superintendent
Telephone Number ( 910) 281-1146
Facility Address
(not P.O. Box)
ntro1 Plant
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Moore County Board of Commissionersi.
Mailing Address PO Box 905
Carthage, NC 28327
Contact Person Michael Holden
Title
Telephone Number
Chairman
1910-) 947-6403
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
XX owner 0 operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
0 facility If applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NC0037508 PSD
UIC OtherAir i 076511102
RCRA otherLand. App,. WQ8818018
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of CollectionSystem Ownership
Tn of Aberdeen 3400 separate ` town
Pinehurst 9700 separate municipal until 3/04
Tn of Sou Pines 10900 separate ! town
Tn of Pineb1»ff 1100 separate town
Tn of Carthage
1870
Tourism/seasonal/resort 6000
(. PA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
separate
separate
town
town
Page 2 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant •
NCOf 1750
Form Approved 1/14i99
OMB Number 2040-0086
A.S. Indian Country.
a. ' Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
Yes X No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
X Yes No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant'(i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the average
daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period with the 12th
month of 'This year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.'
a. Design flow rate 6. 7 mgd
Two Years A io Last Year This Year
b. Annual average daily stow rate 4.475 4.338 1 ' 5.081 mgd
c. Maximum daily flow rate 5.021 5.051 ' 6.259 mgd
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the y type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
X Separate sanitary sewer approximate 17 miles %
' Combined stone and sanitarysewer
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? X Yes No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent 1
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
v. Other
O
()
()
0
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, g ponds, or other surface Impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? Yes X No
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
Annual average daily volume discharged to surface impoundment(s) mgd
Is discharge continuous or intermittent?
c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater? Yes X No
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site: Mgd
Is land application
continuous or intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
Yes X No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 3 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NC0037508
Form Approved 1/14/99
OMB Number 2040-0086
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter name:
Mailing Address:
Contact person:
Title:
Telephone number.
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name:
Mailing Address:
Contact person:
Title:
Telephone number.
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge.
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility. mgd
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included in ! I i
A.8.a through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection)? ! Yes X No
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed of by this method:
Is disposal through this method continuous or intermittent?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms -7550-8 & 7550-22.,
Page4of21

•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NC0037508
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
Fonn Approved 1/14/99
OMB Number 2040-0086
If you answered "yes" to question A.8:a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "no" to question A.8.a, go to
Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Duffel!.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location
Aberdeen 28315
(Cityor town, if applicable)
Moore
(County)
35° 04' 04"
(Latitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable)
d. Depth below surface (if applicable)
e., Average daily flow rate
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic
discharge?
If yes, provide the following information:
Number of times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser?
Yes
(Zip Code)
North Carolina
ft.
ft.
mgd
o State ��
7q 28 10
(Longitude)
X ' No (go to A.9.g.)
! I
mgd
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Aberdeen Creek
b. Name of watershed (if known)
Yes X No
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code Of known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable): .
acute cfs _ chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/l of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 5 of 21

Form Approved 1/14/99
OMB Number 2040.0086
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMB R:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant `
NC0037508
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What levels of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
X Primary X Secondary
Advanced Other. Describe: I
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 90
' Design SS removal 90
Design P removal 10
Design N removal 75 %
Other
c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season,
chlorination
please describe.
'
If disinfection is by chlorination, is dechlorination used for this outfall? X
/ Yes No
d. Does the treatment plant have post aeration? I
Ye X No
I.
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent
parameters. Provide the Indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each
testing data for the following .
outfall through which effluent Is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information
reported be based
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more
Outfall number: 001
must on data
comply with QA/QC requirements of
not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
than four and one-half years apart.
PARAMETER
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE
DAILY VALUE
Value
Units
Value .
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
6.32
s,u;
6.77
I s .u.
260
pH (Maximum)
7.85
s.u.
7.41
s'.tr.
260
Flow Rate
6,17
mgd
5.05
' mgd
365
Temperature (venter)
22.4
° C
15.9
i, °IC
365
Temperature (Summer)
26.0
a C
22.4
° C
365
For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
_
,
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE'
AVERAGE
DAILY DISCHARGE !,
1:
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML 1 MDL
Conc.
• Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS. 1
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BOD-5
14.1
mg/1
7.2 .
mg/1
260 it
SM5210B
DEMAND (Report one)
CBOD-5
FECALCOLIFORM
128 .
#/100mL
13 •
;#/100mL
- 260
SM9222D
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
19
mg/1
13
mg/1
260
SM2540D
END OF PART A. ,
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A.YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 6 of 21

FAC4LITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution'Control Plant
NC0037508
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
Form Approved 1/14/99
OMB Number 2040-0086
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate > 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through 8.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
750,000 gpd includes the plant & towns
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
The plant & the towns are checking interceptor lineshoping to cut
down on the influent.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area sunrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other stmctures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant., Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground._
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within 1/4 mile ofjthe property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant. !
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where that hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram'showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all backup
power sources or redundancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g, chlorination and
dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge pointsandapproximate daily flow rates between
treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? _Yes . X No b
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional pages
if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number.
Responsibilities of Contractor.
'B.5. Scheduled Improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment; effluent quality, or design (capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules•or is planning several improvements, submit separate response's to question B.5 for
each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
001
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
Yes X No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 7of21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NC0037508
OMBorm ApprovedmberO4o-08
' ; � OMB Number 2040.0086
c If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes; briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
plan to purchase a new lime system
as applicable.
applicable.
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance
For improvements planned independently
Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
•
Implementation Stage
— Begin construction
- End construction-
— Begin discharge
— Attain operational level
e. Have appropriate permits/dearances
Describe briefly:
schedule or any actual dates of completion for
of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned
Schedule Actual Completion
MM / DD / YYYY MM / DD / YYYY
the implementation
or
obtained?
actual
,
steps listed below,
completion dates, as
-
-
:_Yes X No
_/_/ 2004 _//
_/ / 2005 •_/
/
_/
_/_/
_/
_/
_/ /
/
conceming other Federal/State requirements
been
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Applicants that discharge
required by the permitting
this section. All information
data must comply with
addressed by 40 CFR Part
and one-half years old.
Outfall Number: 001
(GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
authority for each outfall through which effluent is dischamed. Do
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing
not include information on combined sewer overflows in
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this
requirements for standard methods for analytes not
three pollutant scans and must be no more than four
reported must
QA/QC requirements
136. At a minimum,
be based on data collected through analysis conducted
of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
effluent testing data must be based on at least
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
' ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML / MDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
-Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS.
AMMONIA (as N)
< - 0. 50
mg/1
< 0.50
mg/1
26d
SM4500F
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
304
ug/I
115
ug/1
I ,
2601
SM4500G
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
1
11.09
mg/1
9.35
-mg/1
365
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
2.10
mg/1
1.21
mg/l
I ,
141
351. 2
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
16.0
mg/1
' 13.1
mg/1
11
353.2
OIL and GREASE
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
2.90
. mg/1
2. 34•-
mgf 1
14
SM4500B&E
TOTAL DISSOLVED
SOLIDS (TDS)
1 .
OTHER
r
I.
i
END OF -PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 8 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMB gg
Moore County Water oLLutl Jon Control Plant
NC0037508
OMB Number 2040-0086
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION 4 , .
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer forthe purposes of this certification. All
applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which parts of Form 2A you have
completed and are `submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed' Form 2A and have'completed all sections
' that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted. 1. ,
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
X Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information
packet:
Effluent Testing Data) ,
I
Biomonitoring Data)
Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
Sewer Systems) I , ;
.
X Part D (Expanded
X Part E (Toxicity Testing:
X Part F (Industrial User
Part G (Combined
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system.designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the
system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and '
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, Including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing
violations.
Name and official title Michael Holden - Chairman -
Signature
Telephone number . 910-947-6403
Date signed Q �,k0 8 `O 4
Upon request of the'permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assess wastewater treatment practices at the treatment. works
or identify appropriate permitting requirements. .
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
EPA Fomi 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. i Page 9 of 21

Department of Public Utilities
Wastewater Treatment Plant
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Waunty o/ P_Ao•oxe
July 26, 2004
Re: Results for EPA Expanded Requirements for Permit Renewi al
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Mrs. Valery Stephens
NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mrs. Stephens:
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
COPY
DENRFR
JUL 2 2004
Please find included a copy of the Priority Pollutant Analysis and the Fat Head Minnow
Toxicity test results for June 2004. This is the third set of test for plant renewal. This
concludes the Priority Pollutant Analysis (PPAs) required for plant renewal. We are
required to do one more Fathead Minnow Toxicity which will be done in September. I
will send you those results as I receive them.
If additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call me at 910-281-3146.
Sincerely,
p,
James D. Frye, System Superintendent
JDF/sab
Cc: Mr. Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Office, DEM
Mr. Charles Weaver, NPDES Unit
Mr. Kevin Bowden, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mr. Steve Wyatt, County Manager
Mr. Phillip Boles, Director of Public Works
•

Attn:
Client:
Ms. Stephanie Brixcy
lioorc County WWTP,
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Meriteih, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Report Date:
Date Sample Rcvd:
PY
7/20/04
6/25/04
Mleritech Work Order #
Parameters
1,PA 624+Acrolcin+Acryl nitrile
IPA 625
EPA 608
▪ Antimony, total
1 fardncss, total
aArsenic, total
▪ Beryllium, total
• Cadmium, total
• Calcium, total
Chromium, total
(olper,_totala�
Lead, total
Mercury. total
Nickel, total
. Selenium, total
Silver, total
1h` laylium; tcital 0 011 ml,/l`-?
%trig total . __ _,Ing/Itkft
Cyanide, total < 0.005 mg/1
1'l cnol _total's P-.7. ,
06250440
Result
Sample: PPA 0624237
Analysis Date
See attached 7/1/04
See attached 7/2/04
See attached 7/2/04
< 0.025 mg/1 6/29/04
115 mg eq CaCO3/1 6/28/04
< 0.010 mg/1 6/29/04
< 0.005 mg/1 6/29/04
< 0.002 mg/1 6/29/04
45.9 mg/1 6/28/04
< 0.005 mg/1 6/29/04
6/29/04
<0.010 mg/1 6/29/04
< 0.0002 mg/1 6/29/04
< 0.010 mg/1 6/29/04
< 0.010 mg/I 6/29/04
< 0.005 mg/1 6/29/04
6/29/04
6/29/04
7/2/04
7/9/04
Repotting Limit
0.025 mg/i
0.662 mg eq CaCO3/1
0.010 mg/1
0.005 mg/,I
0.002 mg/1
0.100 mg/1
0.005 , mg/1
0.002 .mg/]
0.010 mg/1
0.0002 mg/1
0.010 mg/1
0.010 mg/1
0.005 mg/1
0.020 mg/I
0.010 'mg/l
0.005 mg/I
0.010 mg/1
6/24/2004
Method
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
E1'A 200.7
1sPA 200.7
IVA 200.7
EPA 245.1
".PA, 200.7
I?PA 200.7
EPA 200.7
l',PA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 335.2.
EPA 420.1
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

MERITECH,
642 Tamco
Reidsville,
iger tel [phone]
fax (336)
Chain of Custody Record
Inc.
Road
NC 27320
3427.1522
`-.
.
. " ..r.,
II
,
-AA Do, c, Oc., 4,1 N .
4.; I
Client: Cf)C 0,..'1_,ST P;::,)
NPDES# 11'4 CCy,1-) •,;25 ri ":.."") c.)::::,,
.. .-,. ig./(
Tel , : • '7.' •=3 / —' %-
.
Address:
Attention:
_AO 9 Li ,-1 0, (.1,.. r 12\ d.
l'A .V.) a( 6,Q.,; 1 , (NA, ......-,,6.. -:,,, 1 s
Fax 9 I I. - •-•-.32 i
cy
P.O. # (.0 ••;) C-s5 4 •
5,A. 4..;14'-e-',''''(,', g (j, '
Project #
If Composite?
Person Taking Sample (Signature): '''. Lab Use Only
Sample
- • Location/ID#
Dale Date
1
Titne
1
Date
2
Time
2
C?
G?
# of
Conts.
Tests Required -
Iced?
Temp?
pH
OK?
Chlorine
OK?
,.:•)_"'::1-,•,•)---_":•-(4-
1-)t"-7:16-"0.'„I
t-iiii
- - - " "
_
1 0
E-_ rif- fi.: ,,-,?5 Li -r-I (...1 06 1 t ' i t.t .,\•I ' i il P nc i i AO -- 1 --C -7 - -'-L\O
V
!"1,f-c -7/1
,
-4,-).--
=
---
- ---
------------
-•.,ii
_
.
• i• i
.
•
•
,
.
!
1,
•
..:
.
..„
. , , 1, -; :
' • '
.
,
-..
•.,
„
.
-
. _...._.......
.. -
...
-
•
. -
.
, . „...,.•
....... , -
Method of Shipment:
LI UPS
Fed Ex
Hand Delivery
Other
Comments: . . .
...
\ i ....--- —7-- , -r i
" 1--zi • ---, --„
......,,.....„......
6.01 41- c Lt,c;\
' /
Will these results be used for regulatory purposes? Ves EJ No
i
Relinquished by.
, f
. Vitt iLCA. /-Y.: A..Q,‘„,_,.
_
Date: Time:
•
0 (";)-50 L.( irz-
(—Received by: Date /
\ , • .1 r Time ),,,, 1
i 1 r r. -r--
.......,9
f ' , -
Relinquished by
Date • Time:
.Fleceivect by: / Date Time:
Relinquished by
Date: Time
Received at lab by: Dale Time:

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc:
Moore County WWTP
624
Trip Blank
06/24/04
Meritech ID#: 106250440TB
Analysis:'07/01/04
Analyst: CAL
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS.
Parameter
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
"C111oroformY_,.--
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
12-Dibromoethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1, 1-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Additional Compounds
Acrolein < 50.0 ug/L
Acrylonitrile . < 10.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Result
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1-.00 ug/L.
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1:00 ug/L
< , 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L .,
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< .1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
<.1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
<-1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
<. 1.00 ug/L
<',1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc:
Moore County WWTP
624
0624237 PPAs
06/24/04
Meritech ID#: 06250440
Analysis: 07/0,'1 /04
Analyst: CAL
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Result
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00"ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L.
Chkoroform-�•; -� - 2 73-ug/L3
Chloromethane <'`5.00 ug/L
Dibromochloromethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dibromoethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethene < 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloropropane < 1.00 ug/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene < 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene < 1.00 ug/L
Ethyl benzene < 1.00 ug/L
Methylene chloride < 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
Tetrachloroethene < 1.00 ug/L
Toluene < 1.00 ug/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L•
1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
Trichloroethene < 1.00 ug/L
Trichlorofluoromethane < 5.00 ug/L
Vinyl chloride < 5.00 ug/L
Additional Compounds
Acrolein < 50.0 ug/L
Acrylonitrile . < 10.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
Parameter
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzyl butyl phthalate
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
625
0624237 PPAs
06/24/04
Meritech ID#: 06250440
Analysis: 07/02/04
Extraction: 06/,28/04
Analyst: CAL
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Result
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
< 10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
< 10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Parameter
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
2-Methylnapthalene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Result
<10 ug/L
;<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Faz,

MERITECH, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Client: MCWWTP
Project: PPA
Client Sample ID: 0624237 PPAs
Sample Collection: 06/24/04
EPA 608 - Organochlorine Pesticides
Parameter Result
Meritech ID: 062504.40
Extraction: 06/30/04 -
Analysis: 07/02/04
Analyst: KB/MC
Aldrin < 0.25 ug/L
a-BHC < 0.25 ug/L ,
b-BHC < 0.25 ug/L
d-BHC < 0.25 ug/L
g-BHC < 0.25 ug/L
4,4'-DDD < 0.50 ug/L
4,4'-DDE < 0.50 ug/L
4,4'-DDT <0.50 ug/L
Dieldrin ' - < 0.50 ug/L
Endosulfan I < 0.25 ug/L
Endosulfan II < 0.50 ug/L
Endosulfan sulfate < 0.50 ug/L
Endrin < 0.50 ug/L
Endrin aldehyde < 0.50 ug/L
Heptachlor < 0.25 ug/L
Heptachlor epoxide < 0.25 ug/L
Methoxychlor < 5.0 ug/L
Toxaphene <50 ug/L
Aroclor — 1016 < 0.50 ug/L
Aroclor — 1221 < 1.0 ug/L
Aroclor —1232 < 0.50 ug/L
Aroclor — 1242 < 0.50 ug/L
Aroclor — 1248 < 0.50 ug/L
Aroclor — 1254 < 0.50 ug/L ;
Aroclor — 1260 < 0.50 ug/L
Chlordane <5.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco `Road * Riedsville, NC 27320:
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

TestAmerica
ANALYTICAL TESTING CORPORATION
MERITECH, INC.
FRANK PAZTOR
642 TAMCO RD.
REIDSVILLE, NC
Project:
Project Name:
Sampler:
2960- FUS'r :s (2s:IOMrOn .DRIVE • NASHVILLE. TENNESSHE 37204
800-763.0980 • 615-726.3104 FAX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
2822 Lab Number: 04-A99950
Sample ID: 062540
Sample Type: Water
27320 Site ID:
Date
Time
Date
Time
Collected: 6/24/04
Collected:- 7:41
Received: 6/29/04
Received: 14:19
Analyte
Report
Result Units Limit
*PESTICIDES/PCB's/HERBICIDES*
Aldrin
Aroclor 1016.
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
a-BHC
b-BHC
d-BHC
g-BHC, Lindane
Chlordane
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
0.25
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.25
0.25
0.25,
0.25
5.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.25 •
0.50'
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.25
0.25
5.00
50.0
5
1
1,
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Dil Analysis
Factor Date
7/ 1/04
7/ 2/04
7/ 2/04
7/ 2/04
7/ 2/04
7/ 2/04
7/
7/
.7 /
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
2/04
2/04
1/04
1/04
1/04
1/04
1/04
1/04
1/04
1/04
1/04
7/ 1/04
7/ 1/04
7/ 1/04.
7/ 1/04
7/ 1/04
7/ 1/04
7/ 1/04
7/ 1/04
7/ 1/04
0:23
1:11
1:11
1:11
1:11
1:11
1:11
1:1
0:23
0:23
0:231
0:23
Analysis
Time
0:23'
0:23
0:231
0:23
0:231
0:23
0:23I
0:231
0:23:
0:231'
1
0:23r
0:23'
0:23I
0:23
•
Analyst Method Batch
K. Burritt
M. Cauthen
M; Cauthen
M�. Cauthen
M. Cauthen
M. Cauthen
M. Cauthen
M. Cauthen
K! Burritt
K. Burritt
K: Burritt
K. Burritt
K. Burritt
Burritt
K: Burritt
K Burritt
K. Burritt
K. Burritt
K.� Burritt
K. Burritt
K.i Burritt
K., Burritt
K. Burritt
K., Burritt
K. Burritt
K. Burritt
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608
608.2
608
4067
7680
7680
7680
7680
7680
7680
7680
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
4067
Sample report continued . . -

ANALYTICAL REPORT
Laboratory Number: 04-A99950•
Sample ID .062540
Page 2
Sample Extraction Data
Parameter -
Wt/Vol
Extracted Extract Vol Date Time Analyst Method
OC Pest 500. ml 5. ml 6/30/04 K. Turner 608
PCB's 500. ml 5.00 ml 7/ 1/04 M. Ricke 608
.Surrogate
it Recovery Target Range
Pest Surr TCMX 81. 46. - 135.
Pest Surr DCB 95. 30. - 117.
Pest Surr DCB 64. 36. - 127.
LABORATORY COMMENTS:
ND = Not detected at the report limit.
B = Analyte was detected in the method blank.
J = Estimated Value below Report Limit.
E = Estimated Value above the calibration limit of the instrument.
# = Recovery outside Laboratory historical or method prescribed limits.
End of Sample Report.

TestAmerica
ANALYTICAL TESTING CORPORATION
2960 FOSTBB Caeu:x'Om Dkivt; • (9499t LLe. TENVY.5SK6 37204
800-765-0980 • 615-726-3404 FAN
PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project Number:
Project Name:
Page: 1
Laboratory Receipt Date: 6/29/04
Matrix Spike Recovery
Note: If'Blank is referenced as the sample spiked, insufficient volume was received for the defined analytical batch for
MS/MSD analysis on an true sample matrix. Laboratory reagent water was used for QC,purposes.,
Analyte units Orig. Val. MS Val Spike Conc. Recovery Target Range Q.C. Batch Spike sample
I `
**PEST/PCB/HERB PARAMETERS**
Aldrin mg/1 <'0.00004 0-00086 0.00100. - 86
Aroclor 1016 mg/1 '< 0.00045 0.00881 0.0100 88
Aroclor 1260 mg/1 < 0.00049 0.00845 0.0100 84
g-BHC, Lindane mg/1 a 0.00003 0.00088 0.00100 88
4,4'DDT mg/1 c 0.00004 0.00098 0.00100 ' 98
Dieldrin mg/1 < 0.00004 0.00100 0.00100 100
Endrin mg/1 < 0.00003 0.00111 0.00100 111
Heptachlor mg/1 < 0.00003 0:.00089 0.00100. .89
Matrix Spike Duplicate
42. - 122. 4067 blank
50. - 114. 7680 blank
42. - 147. 7680 blank
1 32. - 127. :4067' blank.
25. - 160-' 4067 blank
136. - 146. 4067 blank
30..- 147. 4067 blank
34. - 111- 4067 blank
Analyte units Orig. Val. Duplicate RPD Limit Q.C. Batch
**PEST/PCB/HERB PARAMETERS**
Aroclor 1016 mg/1 0.00881 - 0.00948 7.33
Aroclor 1260 mg/1 0.00845 0.009d7 7,08
Laboratory Control Data
7680
7680
Analyte - units Known Val. Analyzed Val t Recovery Target Range Q.C: Batch
**PEST/PCB/HERB PARAMETERS**
Aldrin mg/1 0.00100 0.00075 75 42'- 122 '4067
Aroclor .1016 mg/1 0.0100 0.00994' 99 50.- 114 7680
Aroclor 1260 mg/1 0.0100 0.00888 89 15 - 127 7680
a-BHC. mg/1 0.00100 0.00072 -72 37;-, 134 4067
b-BHC mg/1 0.00100 0.00082 82 17 -':147 4067
Project QC continued . . .

Testi.merica
ANALYTICAL TESTING CORPORATION
2960 FINITE CKeirrrain DRIVE • N. sH ILLE. TENNESSEE 37204
800-765-0980 • 615-726-3404 FAX .
PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project Number:
Project Name:
Page: 2
Laboratory Receipt Date: 6/29/04
Analyte
Laboratory Control Data
units Known Val. Analyzed Val % Recovery Target Range Q.C. Batch
d-BHC mg/1 0.00100 0.00048 48 19 - 140 4067
g-BHC, Lindane mg/1 - 0.00100 0.00076 76 32 - 127 4067
II
Chlordane mg/1 0.0100 0.0103 103 45 - 119 4067
4,4'-DDD mg/1 0.00100 0.00091 91 31 - 141 4067
4,4'-DDE mg/1 0.00100 0.00089 89 30 -. 145 4067
4,4'DDT mg/1 0.00100 0.00084 84 . 25 - 160 4067
Dieldrin mg/1 0.00100 0.00087 '87 36 - 146 4067
Endosulfan i- mg/1 ,0.00100 0.00084 84 45 - 153 4067
Endosulfan II mg/1 0.00100 0.00089 89 10 - 202 4067
Endosulfan Sulfate mg/1 0.00100 0.00083 83 _ 26 - 144 4067
Endrin mg/1 0.00100 0.00095 95 30 - 147 4067
Endrin Aldehyde mg/1 6.00100 0.00088 88 40 - 144 4067
Heptachlor mg/1 0.00100 0.00079 79 34 - 111 4067
Heptachlor Epoxide mg/1 0.00100 0.00085 85 3 - 142 4067
Methoxychlor mg/1 0.00100 0.00100 100 53. - 152 4067
Toxaphene mg/1 0.0200 . 0.0263 132 11 41I'- 126 4067
Pest Surr TCMX % Rec - 84 46 - 135 7680
Pest Surr DCB % Rec 60 30,- 117 4067
Pest Surr DCB % Rec 35 36'- 127 7680
Analyte
Analyte
Duplicates
units Orig. Val. Duplicate P.PD Limit Q.C.
Blank Data
Batch Sample Dup'd
Blank Value Units - Q.C. Batch Date Analyzed Time Analyzed
Project QC continued . . .

TestAmerica
ANALYTICAL TESTING CORPORATION
21160 Fnsm CHEICHTHA DRIt4: • N..JH¢LLLE, TEN96ssoE 37204
800-765-0980 • 615-726.3404 FAX
PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project Number:
Project Name:
Page: 3
Laboratory Receipt Date: 6/29/04
**PEST/PCB/HERB PARAMETERS**
Aldrin
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
a-BHC
b-BHC
d-BBC
a -BBC, Lindane
Chlordane
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Pest Surr TCMX
Pest Surr DCB
Pest Surr DCB
End of Report for Project 380531
< 0.00004 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 i 1:51
< 0.'00045 mg/1 7680 7/ 2/04 . 3:04
< 0.00070 mg/1 7680 7/ 2/04 3:04
< 0.00049 mg/1 7680 7/ 2/04 3:04
< 0.00022 mg/1 7680 7/ 2/04 3:04
< 0.00047 mg/1 7680 7/ 2/04 3:04
< 0.00036 mg/1 7680 7/ 2/04 3:04
< 0.00049 mg/1 7680 7/ 2/04 3:04
< 0.00004 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04, 1:51
< 0.00004 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 151
< 0.00004 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51
< 0.00003 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 I' 1:51
< 0.00074 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51
< 0.00004 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51
< 0.00004 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51
< 0.00094 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51
< 0.00004 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51
< 0.00003 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51
< 0.00004 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51
< 0.00005 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51
< 0.00003 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 '1:51!
< 0.00005 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51i
< 0.00003 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51)
< 0.00004 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 ,1:51;
< 0.00003 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:511
< 0.00059 mg/1 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51
78. % Rec 7680 7/ 2/04 3:04
65. t Rec 4067 7/ 1/04 1:51
61. % Rec 7680 7/ 2/04 3:04

Effluent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Date:6/30/2004
Facility: Moore County WWTP NPDES # NC0037508
Laboratory: Meritech, Inc.
ipe #: 001 County: Moore
X /' i�t-� L- p.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charg�'�
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Comments
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time
% Eff.
Control
Repl.
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (Trig)
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
10.25
20.5
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
41
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
61.5
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
82
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Water Quality Data
' Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
6/22/2004
1
2
1:30 PM
3
4
10
•10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.350
0.418
0.364
0.511
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.354
0.359
0.444
0.379
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.383
0.339
0.559
' 0.329
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.428
0.421
0.416
0.416
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.304
0.390
0.430
0.441
10
10
10
10
10
.10
10
10
0.433
0.416
0.449
0.435
Day
Avg Wt/Surv: Control
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
%° Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
0.411
100.0
0.411
100.0
0.384
100.0
0.403
100.0
0.420
100.0
0.391
100.0
0.433
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
8.17
/
8.12
8.15
/
8.10
8.32
/
8.23
8.30
/
8.20
8.35
/
8.30
8.22
1/
8.28
8.29
/
8.31
7.42
/
7.33
7.46
/
7.30
7.38
/
6.95
7.36
/
6.92
7.41
/
7.05
7.63
1/
7.09
7.65
/
7.10
25.0
/
24.8
25.0
/
24.7
25.0
/
24.9
25.0
/
24.8
25.0
/
24.9
25.0
I/
24.9
25.0
/
24.8
1
2
4
5
6
8.17
/
7.93
8.17
/
7.80
7.98
/
7.93
7.90
/
7.80
7.66
/
7.70
7.90
i/
7.99
7.88
/
7.93
7.86
/
7.04
7.90
/
7.10
7.50
/
6.74
7.40
/
7.35
8.31
/
7.21
7.89
I/
7.20
7.91
/
7.20
25.0
/
24.8
25.0
/
24.7
25.0
/
24.9
25.0
/
24.8
25.0
/
24.8
25.0
!/
24.8
25.0
/
24.9
1
2
3
6/21/2004
6/22/2004
6/24/2004
24.00
23.83
23.95
134.00
142.00
146.00
47.00'
74.00
76.00
412
462
481
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
1.5
1.0
42.00
59.00
217
Normal
Hom. Var.
NOEC
LOEC
ChV
Method
Survival
82
Growth
GPI'
Ifs':
82
>82 , >82
>82
Steers
Stats Survival
Conc. Critical
10.25 10
20.5 10
, >82
Steers
Test Organisms
t..:_ Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 6/21/04
Hatch Time: 12:30-2:30 PM
Overall Result
ChV
>82
Growth
Calculated Critical Calculated
18 10 17
18 10 16
41 10 , 18
10 18
82 10 I 18
61.5
10 20
10 18
10 21
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)

MERITECH
Chronic Fathead Minnow Benchsheet.
Transfer and Feeding Dates and Times
Test Initiation Data:
Start Date: •;):;)
Start Time: 130
Initials/Signature: _
Date/Time Fed ci.r.::)./..--
Date/T.ime Born
• Transfer
Date Time Initials
Day .1 '144) •
Day 2 1,s, 4'4 -4:1/44 C-c(.. rg:?)
Day 3.
/int:A:DA— gc.
Day 4
- Day 5-
DaY 6
Test Termination Data:
Initials/Signature:
End Date:
Date:
End Time: )(.124).—
# of Organisms per Chamber: IC.
Test Vessel Size: r
Test Solution Volume:
Temp. of Stock: ;-)0')C.,
# of Reps: •Li
Date Time 1
Day 0 f.;;?
Day 1
Day 2
_D.a.y_3_
_ _
Day 4
Day 5 .
Facility I i
N PD ES #
Dilution Water: .5..s\/...-f-t-110.(Vi..
Randomization: (YE§ NO
Incubator #:
Feeding
Initials Time 2.
Initials Time 3 Initials
Lfcx.-)11--
SL—
b :et prfL
-
1 0
300 0,41 PrIA
Day 6 I '
‘.'l
/1:14,:, SL. ttICK

o'! ,
/S4
N r..7 •
Chan-d1 7,nd..?h-yesi:.1a1 Deterrnins.-ii--ions
Fa c 1 it y NPDES #K‹._CO5:),Lres.t Dates: S tartf, End
Test Organism : Analyst Test Timel: Start
Day
COEIC • Ce,::,,--vtl,,,. 1 I 1
Z I .3
4 1 5
b [ / .
I
Reimarks -
Temp. Initial I ,??.e,"
7!.---';.:,,.:•2 I,..,I,r, ,:,3
"3'4 I :;.,-; .-.-:
:9S X I ..;::-rs--7>
!
.
Final I :) '1. li'-:
•,\ 4:: .- 1 .7) y ..4,
.J7,4F-3
:?.%) PI
-.),1,'"i I ',--i. '•
U. 0. i n 1 z 1 al 1 t7.-ii,
r'srcyce
;L. ?)(e)
.1.3i,f,
r-tq t
-inal 1 3.-3:2
"71,:lic=
IJ-c-L.
le fi-7-
•75
-c-i.---,
PH 1 n i 1:1 a 1 1 L.`:1 /7?-
c).1.,`:-;
-.-S i!-, z•---
Pi. 'T51)
63...;"
c,,- .‘l'?. ,111cz',
F i nal I .:,.::. 0-
r: f C.
"?,,,q':''
C!.-7•2Z)
• 75D 'iC,11.0 1 C.c.'.,,. 1
1
Alkalinity 1 -1-...J4-i
,...7,-;i'fli
----c.t
--zsri1 1
I
• .
Hardne Ss . I !--c's
k.3.7.;-s
,
4:41 I
,
Conduct . Ini ti al'. 6.1 ‘`-",1 • :3.,-;;„
:.),-,-.4.7r-
a:2cl
..,),0( 1 ,0.4...).., . 1 ;,77.-..:
!
- Final I '.;.?;.--;.- ‘ :.-1.,--Q-?, Pi c-f 0
!:),42.,
Di'441 1.1',us,-5--_> ILA7:s
1
:
Res. Chlorine I L.0,i
Conc. R-11-1. I I I I 3
Temp. init±aJJ 2( lo 1.?1,‹
Final I q.S) I dV..)-- I
Uay
4II o I /
A's/ - 1:75," P.S 1,1f-N4:-.,s.
1 I ,
Remarks
D .D. Initial I 1 ,
i-inalqi;;,-1rail'?-, 10 I
pH initiaT,;;-4- Fcl-
i na.I
I •
-7 .qpfg i I 7 &q. 1'45 . I
4-.3,:r 11.111
I
0,cici 7% G.& 17.V 1.71.
1 7.q.),--.) Ikr-Atil_ 11:inIc
Hardness 1 1.1 .1 I 1 1
Conduct,.Iit1a1I3.7s- 12- 4g I I I
Final I Li I Lit?: 11-.11-2TLI IV/,; I 1-1.St., I -C.z0 1,04-,;:' I
ChiIt-t. 1 1 /..tD..k I if.),,; I
Conc. I 1 1 2 I 3
Temp. in t I
Final I I
U.C. initial 1 .
1
Day 1 I
4 5 b
1 I
1
1 • 1
Remarks
pH initial 18/p, 1
Final .1
1 1
1 1 .
r6ne s s .
I I
1 Mx: 1
'‘ I
Con�uct.nit.ja11Lfl)
Final
Res.Chloririe
1 1

MERITECH, INC.
FISH LARVAL SURVIVAL/GROWTH DATA SHEET
CHRONIC FATHEAD MINNOW
FACILITY:
NPDES #: ;!
DATE OF TEST: 5.:. €
DATE WEIGHED:
ORGANISM:
PAGE' j '
OUTFALL;:
INITIALS:'
OF
'
CONC
REP.
FOIL WT.
(mg)
FOIL WT. +
ORG. (mg)
WT. OF
ORG. (mg)
# ORG`.
MEAN WT/
ORG. (mg)
SURV %
:�
C.)e)1
c
,,}
.11�
.. �' i
-
I
o
`
- c.
A
0)„ �a
1
1ti.:lt
-1. tilt i
1'
,00 , 3s-14
Lob
D
}
A
i
6.�. , L
L.,)� . (
•
— - r.� C.s y
ICJ , ' �, :
[ t�
c.'i
B
11
��
a
� . t €
1.0
,C% , ; ci
c
C
i
Y
Lei �'•.J
^).1.- f
(`%
ji%16 a.
11 �t

MERITECH,
FISH LARVAL SURVIVAL/GROWTH DATA SHE'ET
CHRONIC FATHEAD MINNOW
. ,
Reference Toxicant: )))c_tyr.
DATE OF TEST:
DATE WEIGHED:
ORGANISM: A Ai
f-410e1.1
PAGE •_:2- OF
INITIALR;
CONC
REP.
FOIL WT.
(Mg)
FOIL WT. +
ORG. (mg)
WT. OF '
ORG. (mg)
# ORG.
MEAN WT/
P'. (mg)
SURV %
A
1 -7
11-1&l. f
c.,,./7/ •L.,'
- 1-4:-/ 321>
,its e ) (a .
- .''.4...11. fr_.)
I. '''---
. 1
tr,`; 1 ,P (,...:.:...
t>, . li,•\: /_..' .
) -C.PC:7 •
-4'. 1 L' e 1 •
-.' 7 I', k. 4.- ) .
-/ tra
04. :0
4/,' / ix
( f—)
" 1 i
U.)•
1 CrD
D
..
,,,,,,„ es `,,.
i , ,.,•,.. ...,..
--7,1e, .,
..„,- ..7 .,
-. ,.
k2
.
L,',,.
A
17
-3 or,
i",h4)(1-
tq..if
. .,...... .f.-.1
.3
b ..,-)DV
t 0-o
B
a Ole, e 4i..)
b i D. 6.20
• -,,,. !----°"---%
..--), '1 LI -
. .
1
\...---.).
) .6(it...)
L 0-,D
R e . f / C,—/'
0 `... 1. r"
() 05 • ,"7---.4''
4 -2- .
, '
, _
".__'3
(.) — ( . • ''
C--)C)
D
•idei A' .
Lif7
0. •
sti Lif
I
Li, . 1.
L L.D
,, -
A
rl, 111.1,, 71 ,)--
g-. ,• t ,---
LC
i
t
B
1
1. L.)-:
..
J.,
,..-4 ,
(
,..,..,,,.
Ol
u pi /10..p
) 0.0 r (.7: r
L1.41f-'
(."-C)
t L. f i'',"
[ ()' 1 I. I
D
i 13 •c-1(
• t. ,...),-...,
- t-r.:,
it ., . i,f.-„s
L t....);)

MERITECH
Mortality Data: Chronic Fathead Testi
Start Date/Time i fie0.,-- End Date/Time ;- C2'd /f�
Concentration _� :' �,: k
Rep #1
Rep #2
Rep #3
Rep #4
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5Day 6 Day 7
•c 0•
'C^
Concentration IC :3•C i
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 bay 3 Day 4 Day 5' Day 6 Day 7
c
Rep :"1
Rep #2
Rep �j. G*
ep �3
Rep #4
• Concentration
Rep r1
Rep =2
Rep #3
Rep #4
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4, Day
i - - 7 177.)
.72)
C_j
5 Day6 Day?
( .J

MERITECH
Mortality Data: Chronic Fathead Test
Start Date/Time C:,;tir i End Date/Time'.> °4'..-_..; :' fi T,--
ConcentrationE-
Rep #-1
Rep #2
Rep n3
•Rep r4
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5.
•
f'
,1
tin -0
-0 73 C
Cpncentration (s;[-j(.
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 , , Day 6 Day 7
1
C) 0
Rep #1
Rep #2
Rep #3
Rep #4
Cr'
-)
1.
Day 6 Day 7
1)
C) D . ) Cam.•
Concentration B / .
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
Rep #1
Rep #2 i `—) fj)
'' I
Day'5 Day 6
Reps 0
p
L- /
Day 7

Meritech, Inc.
Bioas.sav Sample Chain of Custodj.
642 Tamco Rd
Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone]
o�'
Client Information
Client: ('t1Cu`1� i43 .
Contact: 5'11 hc•;,tg —tys i k erc�
Address: iogiRcid.cc ' c.
City: Rlo st; d Qc.;
County: (1)0,cCQ..
State: NN1 Q
Type of Facility Generating Effluent:
Tel* ! C � i&evt: ula, �14C
PO D# I��*- 1, •K1�C+l1 (_eaa
NPDES #: Nc_,c(0 3 c4-5(.2
Phone: 91D 0S! - 3i
Pipe Number:
Zip: t.,V 3i5
was iltoc.-4 .r
Sample Information
Sampling Site: • fufN)Q'1t
Sample Type: ✓ Grab
Sampling Time: START Date: L at a4
END Date: 4 j a' j•a
Sample Chilled (Covered with Ice): Yes ,✓
Collector's Name (Print):
Collector's Signature:
Composite
Time:
Time: 0
No
of Containers o�
�}U�1 PM
PM
Tni (Welty "Test Information
Test Required: Chronic: V Test Organism: Ceriodaphnia Dubia: Y
Acute:
• TIC:
okicity Test Concentration(s):
List Any Special Requirements:
Pimephales promelas:
Mysidopsis balliiia:
Ks ^(^' �� 1 li' 1�� 9 .
Shipping Information
1
1
1
Relinquished By; ;D yl,L .t,I Date: (,10a/ 4 Time: lets(�PM
Received By: /c (;. . /L' ;: ,,,-- Date: ‘ -z z- er. e•( Time: /D 61 AM PM
Relinquished By: Date: Time: AM PM
Received By: Date: Time:. AM PM
Sample Temperature (C°): Method of Shipment: WTC(p/u) UPS Fed -Ex
Circle One ' Other
Sample Receiving (Laboratory Use Only)
Received From:
1111n,
sz- C
Received By: , () C6-e Date: f_Q 0-/
Sample Temperature (C0): Q. 0,/ O. Sample Condition:
Time': / d:c M pm
/

•Meritech, Inc.
Bioassay Sample Chain of Custody
642 Tamco Rd
Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone]
Client Information
Client: InC.L.o 1 W
Contact:-�^f�:r< . Br-1
Address: i 911 add or Rd
City: .A b.er
County: fy'i,^•cfk
State: ri c.
Type of Facility Generating Effluent:
?C; C_s.::t :cl,, 0.,io. c, 1,A9
PO'# Fcr►.i,
NPDES # r4ic:0,39/5Cg
Phone: °i. - 3 i q 14
Pipe Number:
Zip: R i 1
Sample Information
Sampling Site: F •} L I.A iT
Sample Type: ✓ Grab Composite . # of Containers �2
Sampling Time: START Date: b aiz,:l Time: ?,r0 cmp pM
END Date: t403/ 72. Time: n I7 �_ ; PM
Sample Chilled (Covered with Ice): Yes — No , '
Collector's Name (Print): e+;,tt,,f . �r,;, cr r F1'
Collector's Signature: 1,
Toxicity Test Information
Test Required: .Chronic: i✓
Acute:
MC:
i oxicity Test Concentration(s):
List Any Special Requirements:
Test Organism: Ceriodaphnia Dubia: �✓
Pimephales promelas:
Mysidopsis Bahia:
Shipping Information
Relinquished By: ;,_,14:. A, Date: 0 Ce2736.
Received B 1/ ' " '
Y /i% cr�L-��IC4.4^-Date: G •- G3 --a �/
Relinquished By: Date:
Received By: Date:
Sample Temperature (C°):
Time: ;% iL-6 PM
Time:/'././ (/ AM PM
Timer ` AM PM
Time: AM PM
Method of Shipment: WTC(p/u) UPS Fed -Ex
Circle One Other:
Sample Receiving (Laboratory Use Only)
Received From: I14(t, ite.b—OS
Received By: 11/7 Date:
Sample Temperature (C ): Sample tondr :
Time: - 3M PM

Meritech, Inc.
.Bioassay Sample Chain of Custody',
642 Tamco Rd
Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone]
Client Information
Client: (Yltru,;;,c; e
Contact:
Address: tCP'4 Pt ccd..e('�cl.
City: (A\•,Acc av—\
County: Der\ c)f k State:
G C, 2c-136
C.<<iact 14.
PO# f(\.;:
NPDES #: :3° T.3bc2
Phone: ,9i0- 2Yi-31146.
Pipe Number:
NC Zip: ,
Type of Facility Generating Effluent:
Sample Information
Sampling Site: E-C c u
Sample Type:
',- Grab Composite L✓•J�V i
;!��'L?.�i,# of Containers 3
: Dateatii osiTime: .;.. PM
Date: i., 1 a5k`.) Time: 01, G PM
Sample Chilled (Covered with Ice): Yes ✓ No
Collector's Name (.Print): '" j t; ., c.-''
Sampling Time: START
END
Collector's Signature: l,,.v,
Toxicity Test Information
Test Required: Chronic:
Acute:
'WC:
u oxicity Test Concentration(s):
List Any Special Requirements:
Test Organism: Ceriodaphnia Dubia: ✓
Pimephales proinelas:
Mysii dopsirrs//��balii a:
1 et\--hP..cd 1`Ll�0,:lv.ii a !/
r.
Shipping Information
Relinquished BY:
Received By:
Relinquished By:'
Received By:
Sample Temperature (C):
Date: v(i,„ �( Ti:me:i 1125 , PM
ate: � � y Time:%J•. : u
b.pM
Date: Time:, AM PM
Date: Time: AM PM
Method of Shipment: WTC(p/u) UPS Fed -Ex
Circle One Other:
Sample Receiving (Laboratory Use Only)
Received From:
Received By: ��,���:� Date: Cc�/c�c1
Sample Temperature (C°): /. 6/ / 6 Sample ondition:
Tin1e:,�,>AM PM

Title: Moore County Fish 6/22/04
File: Moore62204 Transform:
NO TRANSFORMATION
Shapiro - Wilk's Test for Normality
D=
W=
0.0677
0.9208
Critical W = 0.8840 (alpha = 0.01 , N = 24)
W = 0.9160 (alpha = 0.05 , N = 24)
Data PASS normality test (alpha = 0.01). Continue analysis.

Title: Moore County Fish 6/22/04
File: Moore62204 Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
Bartlett's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
Calculated B1 statistic = 18.7957 (p-value = 0.0021)
Data FAIL B1 homogeneity test at 0.01 level. Try another transformation.
Critical B = 15.0863 (alpha = 0.01, df = 5)
= 11.0705 (alpha = 0.05, df = 5)

Title: Moore County Fish 6/22/04
File: Moore62204 Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
Summary Statistics on Data TABLE 1 of 2
GRP IDENTIFICATION N MIN MAX ' MEAN
1 Control 4 0.3500 ' 0.51100.4108
2 10.25% 4 0.3540 0.4440! 0.3840
3 20.5% 4 0.3290 0.5590; 0.4025
4 41% 4 .0.4160 0.480 0.4203
5 61.5% 4 0.3040 0.4410 0.3913
6 82% 4 0.4160 0.4490' 0.4333
Title: Moore County Fish 6/22/04
File: Moore62204
Transform:
NO TRANSFORMATION
Summary Statistics -on Data TABLE 2 of 2
GRP IDENTIFICATION VARIANCE SD , SEM C.V. %
1 Control 0.0053' 0.0730 01
.0365
2 10.25% 0.0017 0.0414 0.0207
3 20.5% . , 0.0114 0.1069 0,0535
4 41% 0.0000 0.0057 '00028
5 61.5% 0.0039 0.0622 1 0.0311
6 82% 0.0002 0.0135 0.006.8-
17.7678
10.7898
26.5684
1.3513
15.8870
3.1217

Title: Moore County Fish 6/22/04
File: Moore62204
Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
Steel's Many -One Rank Test - Ho: Control<Treatment
MEAN IN RANK
GROUP IDENTIFICATION ORIGINAL UNITS SUM
1 Control 0.4108
2 10.25% 0.3840 17.00
3 20.5% 0.4025 16.00
4 41% 0.4203 2.0.00
5 61.5% 0.3913 18.00
6 82% 0.4333 , 21.00
CRIT. SIG
VALUE DF 0.05
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
Critical values are 1 tailed ( k = 5

J'
Department of Public Utilities
Wastewater Treatment' Plant
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
gilloaxe
January 6, 2004
Re: EPA Expanded Requirements for Permit Renewal
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Mrs. Valery Stephens
NCDENR/D WQ/NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Dear Mrs. Stephens:
I received a letter in mid -December explaining that EPA had revised and expanded the application requirements
for municipal permits. The new requirements mandate additional effluent testing:
1. Conduct 3 Priority Pollution Analysis (PPAs)
2. Conduct 4 toxicity tests for an organism other than Ceriodaphnia
Our lab supervisor spoke with Charles Weaver (NPDES Unit) and Kevin Bowden (Aquatic Toxicology)
explaining that the permit application was due and we had just found out about the additional tests. She was
told to have a PPA and a Fat Head Minnow Toxicity test tun in January and 'then begin piggy backing with our
regular quarterly testing starting in March. We will send the test results to you, Mr. Weaver and Mr. Bowden as
we receive them. The tests for January have been scheduled for the week of the,18tn
If additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call me at 910-281-3146.
Sincerely,
l
'fames D. Frye, System Superintendent
JDF/sab
cc: Mr. Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Office, DEM
Mr. Steve Wyatt, County Manager
Mr. Phillip Boles, Director of Public Utilities

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution. Control Plant
NC0037508
Form Approved 1/14/99
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies
to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Treatment Works. If the treatment works
is required to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting
following pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information
is
has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or
authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the
required by the permitting authority for each outfall through
which effluent discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows
collected through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these
and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed
below any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum,
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
' Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent
in this section. All information reported must be based on data
data must comply with' QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136
by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided
effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
i, ,
1
to waters of the United S
ates.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE
DAILY DISCHARGE
Conc.
Units
Mass
.Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of .
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MU MDL
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC <
0. 0051mg/1
<
0. 00
5mg/=
10; '
EPA200.8
BERYLLIUM
I.
CADMIUM
<
0.002mg/1
<
0.002mg/.
10
EPA200.8
CHROMIUM
<
0.005mg/1
<_0.005mg/�
10
EPA200.8.
COPPER
0.042mg/1
0.029mg/:
29
EPA200.8l.
LEAD
0
0.006mg/1
<
0.003mg/-
1Q
EPA200.8
MERCURY
0, 0004mg/1
<
0.00J2mg/1
� I
10 '
-
EPA245.1
NICKEL
0
0.007mg/1
<
0.005mg/1
•�'
10,
EPA200.8
SELENIUM .0.00=mg/1
<
0.005mg/1
1
10;
EPA200.8
SILVER
0
0.006mg/1
<
0.002mg/1
29i
EPA200.8
THALLIUM
ZINC
0
0.07Lmg/1
0.051mg/1
29'
EPA200.8
CYANIDE
B
BDL
mg/1
BDL
mg/1
5'
335.3
TOTAL PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS
1
i
HARDNESS (AS CaCO3)
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide
information on other metals requested
by the pe mit writer.
Aluminum
1.28
m /l ,
�
3.812mg/1
10L
EPA200.8
Iron
1.402mg/
3.76Cmg/1
101
EPA200.8
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 10 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NC0037508 •
Outfall number: 001
' (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
neu V nrenuen..� " AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE::
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
Mol bdenum
Chloride. 39...mg/1
NO3+NO2-N 9.22 mg/1
4200.8
Page l0a of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NC0037508
Form Approved 1/14i99
OMB Number 2040-0086
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the Uriited States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
1
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MU MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of ,
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS.
ACROLEIN
i
ACRYLONITRILE
i.
BENZENE
BROMOFORM
1
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
l,
CLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROMO-METHANE
',
1
CHLOROETHANE
I,!
2-CHLORO-ETHYLVINYL
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
Ii
I
DICHLOROBROMO-METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
I
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
I
I.
TRANS-1,2-DICHLORO-ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1,3-DICHLORO-PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE -
i'
METHYL BROMIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
.
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLORO-ETHANE
1
TETRACHLORO-ETHYLENE
1
,
TOLUENE
1.
"
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 11 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NC0037508
Form Approved 1/14/99
OMB Number 2040-0086
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT •
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
\
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MU MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
1 of ;
Samples
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
I'
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLORETHYLENE
I.
VINYL CHLORIDE1.
i.
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information
on other
volatile o genic compounds
requested
by the
permit writer.
I ,
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
.
2-CHLOROPHENOL
,
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
'I
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4.6-OINITRO-O-CRESOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
i
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
I
PHENOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to
provide information
on other
acid -extractable
compounds
requested
by the
permit writer:
I,
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS.
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 12 of 21

BENZO(A)PYRENE
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NCO037508
Form Approved 1/1449
OMB Number 2(340-0086
Outfall number: nut (Complete once for each outfell discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MU MDL
3,4 BENZO-FLUORANTHENE
. .
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
r, 1
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
I'
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-ETHER
1
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-PROPYL)
ETHER
I
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)'PHTIiALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
CHRYSENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE.
DIBENZO(A,H) ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
I •
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
3,3•DICHLOROBENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITR0TOLUENE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 13 of 21

•
1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NC0037508
Form Approved 1/14i99
. OMB Number 2040-0086
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent
to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE
DAILY DISCHARGE ,
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
'Mass
Units'
Number
1 of 1
Samples
.ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MU MDL
FLUORANTHENE
i
FLUORENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
••
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
-
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
„
.
HEXACHLOROETHANE
i
INDEN0(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
I
N-NITROSODI- METHYLAMINE
I
•
N-N ITRO S O D I-P H E N Y LA M I N E
i
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
I
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral .compounds requested
by the permit writer.
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to
provide information
on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides)
requested
by the permit
writer.
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
,
OTHER PARTS OF FORM
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 14 of 21

•
• FACILITY NAME AND RMIT NILMft
More County water Pollution Control Plant
NC0037508.
Form Approved 1/14/99
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the pastI1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years' prior;to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronictoxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this' section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. I
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on ttie'cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted. I . '
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again: Rather, provide the information
requested in question E.4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using attemate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions) on which other sections of the form to
complete. li
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent
Xchronic acute
toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
,
following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half nears. Allow one
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the
column per test (where each species
constitutes a test). Copy this page if
Test number:
more than
Test
-three tests are being reported.
number.
Test number:
a. Test information. Result, Attached
Test species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab (samples used.
24-Hour composite
1
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each) 1
Before disinfection
After disinfection
N
1
After dechlorination
1
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 15 of 21

• FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NCCC37508
j Form Approved 1/14/99
OMB Number 204o-o086
Results Attached Test number:. ' Test number: number:
.Test
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the
test was intended to assess chronic toxicity,
acute toxicity, or both.
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If labora
ory water, specify type; if receiving water,
specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
l
i. Type of dilution water. It salt water,
specify "natural° or type of artificial sea
salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
-
j. Give the percentage effluent used
for all concentrations in the test series.
I ,
i
k. Parameters measured during the test.
(State whether parameter meets
test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results. r
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
. effluent "
%
; %
/ %.
• LC50
95% C.I.
%
' %
Control percent survival
%
1 '
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 16 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NC0037508
! i Form Approved 1/14,99
OMB Number 204o-0086
'Chronic:
NOEC -
%
%
°
IC25
%
Control percent survival
%
Other (describe)
•
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance. -
1
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
i'
1'
What date was reference toxicant test run
(MM/DD/YYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatrnent works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation? I.
_Yes X No If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information: If you have submitted
of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information
results.
Date submitted: (MM/DD/YYYY)
biomonitoring test information,
was submitted to the permitting
I
I
or information regarding the cause
authority and a summary of the
Summary of results: (see instructions)
I ,
i
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.. • ;;
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 17 of 21

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/kai1 an
Facility: MOORE CO WWTP
Acute,LC50 Date: 12/11/03
NPDES#: NC0037508
Laboratory Perfor ing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
X
Signature �� tof Operator in�zMeffponsible Charge,
*.
Signature of Laboralto jf supervisor
Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Comments:
..* PASSED: -8.85% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. oflWater Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Maiil Service Center
Raleigh,iNorth Carolina 27699-1621
10 11 12
# Young Produced
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
22
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
22
2
17
3
20
4
24
5
25
6
25
25
18
12
26
24
# Young Produced
28
23
22
23
28
24,19
19
24
24
22
27
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
L
•L
L
L
L
L
L
L-
L
L
L
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample lst sample 2nd sample
8.00
7.98
7.86
8.06
s
t
a
r
' t
lst sample
e
n
d
7.86
7.08
7.77
7.09
8.01•
7.89
7.84
8.00
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.74
7.15
7.90
7.12
8.05
8.04
8.02
8.04
s
t, e
a n
r d
t
2nd sample
7.77
7.08
7.83
7.03
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
as %,
combinin
Chronic Test Results
,'Calculated t = -1.285
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -8.85
% Mortality
8.33
Control
10.00
Treatment 2
Avg.Reprod.
21.67
Control
23.58
Treatment 2.
Control CV
I9.416%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91:7%
PASS FAIL
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 112/03/03
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/01/03 Sample-2: 12/04/03
Sample Type/Duration
Grab Comp. Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample
replicates)
%
%
%
%
%
%
.%
%
%
%
X,'
24 hrs
24.1 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
lst P/F
S S
A A
M M
P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos).
i
Chlorine(mg/1)
temp. at receipt(°C)
44
167
457
465
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
2.5
Concentration,
Mortality
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
% -- %
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - 'Other
,start;/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
Cnnr
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

Effluent Toxicity Report Forzn - Chronic Pass/Fail 'and Ac LC50
Facility: MOCRE CO WWTP NPDES#:
#:
Laboratory Perforwing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
S1.paLure
Signature
bf Operatcr i `P sponsible Charge
A /'�/
or Laboratory Supervisor
NC0037508 Pioett:
i
Date: 09/18/03
County: ROBESON
Comments:
t PASSED: -11.07% Reduction *
:fork Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
1 2 3
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. oif Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
t Young "Produced •
19
20
17
27
24
23
17
19
18
21
16
23
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
n Young Produced
22
25
23
16.
15
22
23
28
25
25
23
24
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
pH
lst.sample
Control
Treatment 2 :
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
8.04
8.02
7.81
7.98
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.58
7.06
7.33
7.05
1st sample
8.03
8.01
7.75
7.89
s
t
a
r
t
,1st sample
e
n
d
7.80
7.05
7.77
7.02
2nd sample
8.05
8.02
7.92
7.89
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
n
d
7.66
7.11
7.58
7.04
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates
Chronic Test Results
'Calculated t. -1.563
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -11.07
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
20.33
Control
0.00
Treatment
2
22.58
Treatment
2
(Control CV
16.423%
% control orgs
producing 3rd-
brood
91.7% .
• r.
I.
PASS FAIL
Check One
Complete, This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 09/10/03
Collection (Start); Date
Sample 1: 09/08/03 Sample 2: 09/11/03
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp',
Duration
23.2 hrs
24.1 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
1st P/F
S
A
M
S
A
M
P
Hai dness (mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at',receipt(°C)
•
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
start/end
LC50 =• %
95%Confidence Limits ..
o -- o
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
44
168
350
385
<0.1
•<0.1
0.2
0.2
•
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
Control
start/end
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
High
Conc.
D.O.

.Effluent Toxicity Report Form -. Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute
,.
LC50 Date: 06/12/03
X
S•gna"ture of
Signature of
Facility: AMERIC_1N WATER SERVICE-MOORE NPDES7: NC0037508
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH, INC.
Operator in R/esponsible Charge
-
Latoratory Supervisor
Work Order:
MAIL 'ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
1 2 3 4 5
Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Comments:
PASSED: -2.89% Reduction *
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Wit Sexvice Center
Raleigh',, North Carolina 27699-1621
9 10 11 12
n Young Produced
24
20
20
13
17
22
20
15
19
24
19
29
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
25
21
22
20
18
23
16
19.
16
21
25
23
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
pH
1st sample
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
8.00
8.00
7.85
7.77
s
t
a
r
t
1st
1st sample 2nd sample
7.99
8.00
7.80
7.75
s
e t
n a
d r
t
sample 1st
7.57
7.05
7.55
7.04
8.02
8.00
7.94
7..95
e t e
n a n
d r d
t
sample 2nd sample
7.80
7.03
7.84
7.05
7.67
7.09
7.61
7.04
LC50/Acute Toxicity
(Mortality expressed
Test
as %, combining
replicates
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.383
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -2.89
%i Mo'rtality
Avg.Reprod.
. 0.00
Control
20.17
Control
;, . 0 . 00
Treatment 2
20.75
' Treatment
2
Control CV
21.232%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
..brood
j 83.3%
I '
PASS FAIL
Check One
CompletelThis For Either Test
Test Start Dater 06/04/03
Collection•(Star:t) Date
Sample 1: 06/02403, Sample 2:06/05/03
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp.' Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 iX '24 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 ' iX , 24 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine (mg/1)
Sample temp. at
receipt(°C)
42
160
354
415
<0.1
<0.1
1.5
1.7
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
% -- %
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit
Spearman Karber Other
--
start end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
High
Conc.
D.O.

1,1
kk
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 03/13/03
Facility! AMERICAN WATER SERVICE-MOORE NPDESt:
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH, INC.
X
r insponsible Charge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor,
NC0037508 Pipe..=: 001 County: MOORE
Comment s,:
* PASSED: -15.14% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
1
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of;Water Quality
N.C. DEN?.
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh Borth Carolina 27699-1621
5 6 7 8 9 '10 11 12
# Young Produced
18
16
18
20
17
18
18
17
21
19
19,
17
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
Effluent %: 41% '
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
21
20'
20
22
23
25
19
19
21
22
19,
20
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
•L
Chronic Test Results
,'Calculated t = -4.128
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -15.14
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
'„0M0
Control.
18.17
Control
0:00
Treatment
2
20.92
Treatment
2
Control CV
p.725%
% control orgs
'producing 3rd
brood
' 100%
PASS FAI
Xjl
Check One
1st sample 1st
pH
'Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
7.98
7.94
7.88
7.95
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.81
7.08
7.77
7.06
sample 2nd sample
7.99
7.95
7.86
7.95
s
t
a
r
t
1st
e
n,
d
sample
7.74
7.12
7.60
6.84
7.99
7.94
7.97
7.98
s
t
a
r
t
2nd
e
n
d
sample.
7.71
7.08
7.56
6.95
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates
Complete'This For Either Test
Test Start Date:1 03/05/03
Collection (Star;t) Date
Sample 1:,03/03/I03,, Sample 2: 03/06/03
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.,
Duration
X
23.3 hrs
Ix
22.5 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
1st
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Ccnd . (µmhos )
Ch]Jorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. atIreceipt(°C)
46
174
380
457
<0.1
<0.1
0.5
0.5
%
%
%
• o
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
a
%
%
%
%
%
Concentrati do
Mortality
star:/end
LC50
95% Confidence Limits
% --
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit _
Spearman Karber _ Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
j
High
•
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration.(hrs):
D.O.
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

•
Effluent Toxicity Report Form -
L
Chronic, Pass/Fail and Acute;LC50
Date: 12/11/02
Facility: AMERICAN WATER SERVICE-MOORE -NPDES#:
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH, INC.
X
ature o •perator
ignature of Laborat
onsible Charge
upervisor
NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Comments:
* PASSED: -6.78% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
1 2 3 4 5 6
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh; North Carolina 27699-1621
8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
28
30
30
29
•
2 9\
,24
28
30
33
16
32
30
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 41% •
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
30
33
36
30
27
26
26
30
3.1
29
32
32
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = -6.78
%, Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0E.00
Control
28.25
Control
. O'L00
Treatment
2
30.17
Treatment
2
Control CV
15Y767%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91.7%
PASS FAI
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment,2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample
8.05
8.04
7.83
7.89
s
t e
a •n
r d
t
1st sample
7.65
7.10
7.72
7.02
1st sample 2nd sample
8.03
8.11
7.84
7.86
s
t
a
r
t
1st
8.06
8.04
7..86
7.98
s
e t' e
n a n
d r d
sample 2nd sample
7.62
7.04
7.58
7.03
7.63
7.02
7.71
7.06
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %,
combining replicates
Complete;This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 12/04/02
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/0202, Sample 2: 12/05/02
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp'.
Duration
,
24 hrs
IX
24 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
1st P/F
S
A
P
S
A
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at;receipt(°C)
46
176
403
452
<0.1
<0.1
1.2
0.4
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
A%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%.
Concentration
Mortality
start end
LC50 =
'95% Confidence Limits
% --
Method of Determination
Moving Average - Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
r,,nn
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia.
Duration(hrs):
D.O.
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 09/19/02
Facility: AMERICAN WATER SERVICE-MOORE NPDES#:
NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Laboratory Per ormin
X
is
Test: MERITECH,.INC.
ignature ot Operator-t Responsible
Signature ot Laboratory pervisor
Charge
Comments:
*.PASSED: 0.00% Reduction *
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,'North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
17
24
30
25
30
25
25
21
21
30
30
23
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L.
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
21
3
22
31
27
28
33
29
18
36
21
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L ..
L
L
_32
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction =
� % Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
' • Control
25.08
Control
1' 8.33
Treatment
2
25.08
Treatment
2
Control CV
17.038%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91.7%
PASS FAI
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample
8.12
8.13
7.89
7.98
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.55
7.07
7.57
7.04
1st sample 2nd sample
8.16
8.18
7.91
8.01
t
a
r
t
1st
8.17
8.11
7.96
7.96
s
e t e
n a n
d r d
t
sample 2nd sample
7.47
7.06
7.61
7.05
7.43
7.06
7.50
6.96
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %,
combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 09/11/02
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/09/02 Sample 2: 09/12/09
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X, 24 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 , X: 22.6 hrs T P P
Hardness (mg/1)
Spec.
Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
46
180
442
454
<0.1
<0.1
1.7
0.1
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
start/end
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
% --
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman'Karber _ Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
Cnnn
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass Fail
and Acute LC50 Date: 06/13/02
Facility: AMERICAN WATER SERVICE-MOORE NPDES#: NC4037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH, INC.
X
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
/1141
Signature of La -oratory Supervisor
Comments:
* PASSED: -18.63% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail,Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .
# Young Produced
24
22
19
23
24
22
26
20
20
15
25
23
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young'Produced
24
29
24.
25
26
22
23
22
29
28
31
29
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
'Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -3.261
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -18.63
%� Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
21.92
Control
jr 0:.00
Treatment 2
26.00
Treatment
2
Control CV
13,.820%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood .
91.7%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.11
8.07
7.93
8.06
8.05
8.06
7.84
7.89
8 .01
8.04
7.82
7.94
s s s
t e t e t
a n a n a
r d r d r
t •t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.68,
7.07
7.57
7.02
7.62
7.04
7.62
6.94
e
n
d
7.50
7.05
7.45
7.05
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 06/05/02
Collection (Start)'Date
Sample 1: 06/03/02 Sample 2: 06/06/02
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 i X' 24.5 hrs L . A A
U M M
Sample 2 IX 24 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond. (jimhos)
Ch1orine(mg/1)
Sample temp. atIreceipt(°C)
42
175
420
461
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
2.4
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
. %
%'
%
%
•Concentration
1,
Mortality
start
LCSO = %
95% Confidence Limits
% --
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
end start/end
Control
IpH;
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
High
Conc.
D.O.
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87),rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

EfilUent Toxicity Report Form -
Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute'LC50 Date: 03/14/02
Facility:ERICAN WATER'SERVICE-MOORE NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Laboratory Performing' Test: MERITECH, INC'.
X .
Signature o Operator in esponsible Charge
Signature of Laborato
pervisor
Comments:
*;PASSED: -23.08% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail1Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
24
20
21
14
22
19
23
21
22
20
20
21
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
Effluent %: 41%
. TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
3 4
7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
20
25
24
25
25
27
26
27
27
27
25
26
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = -23.08
Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
j Control
20.58
Control
0.00
Treatment 2 .
i
25.'33
Treatment
!Control CV
12.160%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91.7%
PASS FAIL
f
Check Onel
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample
7.66
7.70
7.55
7.73
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.60
7.62
7.60
7.57
1st sample 2nd sample
7.66
7.68
7.53
7.42
s
t
a
r
1st
7.63
7.65
7.37
7.52
s
e t
n a
d r
t
sample 2nd sample
7.58
7.03
7.73
7.17
e
n
d
7.62
7.24
7.62
7.22
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test'
(Mortality expressed as % combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 03/06/02
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/04/02 Sample 2: 03/07/02
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
24 hrs
X,
24 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
1st
S
A
M
M
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
4 4 1 ..... =- -....._...
17614E3
i
. <0. <C._
2.i
%
%
%
%
%
., %
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
start/end
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit _
Spearman Karber _ Other
I
Note: Pease
Complete =hi_
Section : _sc
Control
tart/End
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
High
Conc.
D.G.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic
Date: 12/13/01
Facility: AMERICAN WATER SERVICE-MOORE NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001'County: MOORE
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH, INC.
X
Signature of Operator
Responsible Charge
Signature of Laboratupervisor
Comments:
* PASSED: -8.28% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL.ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh; North Carolina 27699-1621
9 10 11 12
# Young Produced 22 30 27 28 22 23 22 27 25 30 29 29
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L
LLLL L L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9' 10 11 12
pH
Young Produced
28 29 28 32 23 21 29 28 30 29 33 30
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
LLLLLLL
lst sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.06
8.11
7.81
7.93
8.09
8.12
7.80
7.93
8.10
8.11
8.02
7.95
s s s
t e t e t e
a n a n a r d r d r d
t t t
lst sample lst sample 2nd sample
7.67
7.22
7.58
7.06
7.75
7.30
7.58
7.07
7.78
7.27
7.66
7.32
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t'= -1.612
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -8.28
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
I 01.00
(Control
26.17
Control
' 0'.00
Treatment 2
28.33
Treatment 2
Control CV
;12.285%
% control orgs
producing 3rd "
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date 12/05/01
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/03401 Sample 2: 12/06/01
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab Comp.
Duration
SIX ! 24 hrs
X 24 hrs
2nd
lst P/F
D
I S S
L A A
U M M
T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
'Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at ;receipt(°C)
46
197
435
520
<0.1
<0.1
1.0
0.1
(Mortality expressed as % combining replicates .
%
%
%
%
%
J %
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration''
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
Mortality
start•/end . start/end
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
o
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
Control
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
High
Conc.
D.O.
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and
Date: 09/19/01
Facility: AMERICAN "LATER SERVICE-MOORE NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH, INC.
x
Signature of Opera iEfor in Responsible Charge
,---
Signature of Labox'a ¢''`y Supervisor
Comments:
* PASSED: -19.17% Reduction *
[Mork Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. pENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.11 12
# Young Produced
18
22
22
23.
21
22
17
10
25
20
22.
18
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
•L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
24
24
23
22
22
25
22
23
24
24
28
25
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
. Chronic Test Results
'Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = -19.17
,% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
20.00
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
23.83
Treatment
2
Control CV
19.540%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample '2nd sample
8.15
8.17
7.98
8.07
s
a
r
t.
1st sample
e
n
7.97
7.30
7.98
7.50
8.13
8.19
8.03
8.07
s
t
a
r
t
,lst
8.10
8.15
8.04
8.17
e t e
n a n
d r d
t
sample 2nd sample
7.85
7.45
7.58
7.26
7.72
7.51
7.62
7.30
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining. replicates)
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 09/12/01
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/10/01 Sample 2: 09/13/01
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
X'
24 hrs
24.1 hrs
2nd
1st P/F
D
I S S
L A A
U M M
T P P
Hardriess(mg/1)
Spec. ,Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
46
175
462
485
<0.1
<0.1
1.7
0.3
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50
95% Confidence Limits
--
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
1
D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

r.
MER1TECHI INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
A Division .Of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Client: Moore County WWTP ' Date Sampled 109/25/03
1094 Addor Rd Digested II 99/25/03
Aberdeen, NC 28315 Analysis 110/03/03
Attention Stephanie Brixey Analyst: PI I
NPDES # NC0037508
EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury Analysis
Meritech ID # Sample ID Result Reporting Limit
MBLK1003B Method Blank <0.5 ng/L 0.5,ng/I
M09250309 Field Blank < 1.0 ng/L 1 1.0 ng/1
i
M09250310 Plant Effluent 16.3 ng/L (.1.0'ng/1
I hereby certify that 1 have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road • P.O. Box 27 • Reidsville, NO7320
[phone] • [phone] Fax

Client: Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Rd
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention Stephanie Brixey
NPDES # .NC0037508
MERITECK
•
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
A Division of Water Technology and Controls', Inc.
I
Date Sampled :'12/Q8/03
Digested. 12/08/03
Analysis 1,2/11/03.
Analyst: ; ' EH
EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury Analysis
1 ' ,
Meritech ID # ' Sample ID • Result • ' Reporting Limit
MBLK1211B MethOd.Blank ' <,0.5 ng/L O. !ng/1
M12080301 Field Blank ' < 1.0ng/L !I'M ng/l
.-
• M12080302 Effluent 11.8 ng/L .1.0 6g/I
; ..
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
aboratory Repre'sentative
!. 1
642 Tamco Road • P.O. Box 27 • Reidsville, NC27320.
[phone] • [phone] Fax

FAC1 JTY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NC0037508
Fomi Approved 1/14/99
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which, receive RCRA,'CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must.
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment Program. • Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment, program?
XYes No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works. I ,
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Numberof'CIUs.
1
1
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU. I;
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Intek I
Mailing Address:
105.Taylor Street
Aberdeen, NC 28315
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge. - ,
Principal product(s): woven polyester fabric
polyester yarn -dyes
Raw material(s):
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
159,407 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
•
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system in
gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
I
gpd - (continuous or intermittent) 1
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU. is subject to the following:
•
a. Local limits X Yes No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards _Yes X No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution' Control Plant
NC003750
Form Approved 1/14/89
OMB Number 2040.0086
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?. -
Yes X'No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years
_No,(go to F.12.)
received RCRA haliardous
or mass, specify units).
Units
waste by truck; rail, or dedicated pipe?
_Yes
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
Truck Rail Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount .
,
i
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remedlation Waste. 'Does the treatment works currently (orhas it peen notified
Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) . '
that it will) receive waste'from
and future site.
other remedial waste
remedial activities? -
1
.
originates (or is expected to originate in
'I
_No
, Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or
' ' the next five years).
•
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are, expected to be received). Include
• (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
data on 'volume and concentration, if known.
F.15: Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
No
••
1
_Yes
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
Continuous If intermittent, describe
-
discharge schedule.
_Intermittent
- • • END OF PART F:
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE 1 '' '
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forriis 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 21

0310812004 15: 39 9102812047
1
MOORE COMITP
PAGE 02/03
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT pNUMBER:
moot C iur Lf 1 DtJJa Uu)ttcA CDf1kio1 Nay}
NC po394og
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
Farm Approved 1/14199 •
OMB Number 2040.0086
.PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCIA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
Yes No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
Industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. -Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b, Number of CIUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL. USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name:
Mailing Address: �c c0\1C1C CI.
abak dew N 3IS
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the Industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
F.6. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materiels
discharge.
Principal product(s); C. DL),N 'C CAS
Raw materlal(s):
F.6. Flow Rate.
hat affect or contribute to the SIU's
53}.LL\ Coated.. u,,1 rh c\i c�s►.�zinc, oc load cbicizr
a. Process wastewater flow rate, Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged Into the collection system in gallons per day
(gpd) and whether the discharge Is continuous or intermittent
1 % t . 500 gpd ( X continuous or Intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate, Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system in
gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or Intermittent,
gpd (____continuous or intermittent) _
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X Yes No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ,,-,Yes No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
`l0 CAR '413 e.lac.koQtaki n0
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 16 of 21

034181200,4 15:39- 9102812047
MOORE COWWTP
PAGE 03/03
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
f''rkzort r�n UJa.NQC �01WAill n eAtt (bl` 1 leant.
r4 C OD3'1504
I' Form Approved 1/14199
OMANumber 2040-0086
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has.the SIU caused
upsets, interference) at the treatment works In the past three years?
or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
_Yes, )( No IF yes, describe each episode. .
I.
RCRA HAZARDOUS• WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous
Yes' _No (go to F.12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply): _
-Truck Rail 'Dedicated Plpe
waste by truck, rail, or dedicated pipe?
; -
i
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass: specify units):
EPA Ha73r,ctpMs Waste Number Amount Units
i
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12, Remadlatton. Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that ti well) receive waste
• Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) No
Provide a list of sites and the requested Information (F.13 - F.15.) fat each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin, Describe ttie site and type of facility at which the CERCLAIRCRAIor other.remediel waste
the next five years).
from remedial activities?
1
originates (or is expected to originate in
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include
(Attach additional sheets If necessary).
data on volume and concentration, if known.
F.15, Waste Treatment .
a. Is this waste treated (or will It be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
Yes No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide Information about the namoval efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous Intermittent If intermittent; describe discharge schedule.
•"
I •
r
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH'
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
OTHER PARTS OF FORM -
H 1
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev, 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-8 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 21

Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF)
Use separate forms for each industry/pipe
Enter BDL values as < (value)
Total # of samples =>
Maximum (mg/1) _>
or Maximum (lb/d) =>
or 6-month-using BDL Average (mg/1) =>
: -- `or Average Loading (Ib/d)_> -
% violations,(chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _>
Total # of samples =>
Maximum (mg/1) _>
or Maximum (lb/d) =>
or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/I) =>
or Average Loading (lb/d) =>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _>
'Total # of samples =>
Maximum (mg/1) =>
or Maximum (lb/d) _>
or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) =>
or Average Loading (lb/d) =>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) =>
Control Authority,
Town Name => Moore County
WWTP Name => Moore County WPCP
NPDES # => NC0037508
lst 6 months, dates => 01-01-02 06-30-02
2nd 6 months, dates => 07-01-02 12-31-02
Industry
Name Intek Corporation
1UP # A004
Pipe # 001
Flow, mgd
BOD
TSS
Ammonia
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
lst 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
176
171
10
10
10
10
1
0
0.324
0.346 -
226
213
320
180
12.6
N / A
0.138
0.170
118
89
185 .
131
12.6 --
-N/A
0
0
0 -
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
.N/A
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
COD
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months,
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months .
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months.
1
1
1
1
1
1
10 -
10
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
<0.002
< 0.002
1648
1192 -
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.002
< 0.002
1018
869
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
- N/A
N/A
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
I
- 1
0
0
1
1
1
1
< 0.002
0.005
N / A
N / A _
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.00020
< 0.00020
< 0.002
0.005
N / A
N / A
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.00020
< 0.00020
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
* POTW must enter at least one of these
four rows, Please indicate how averages were calculated
Avg period could be month, Qtr, or 6-month & if BDL , 1 /2BDL, or zero values used.
BDL => Below Detection Limit
IUP => Industrial User Permit
SNC => Significant Non -Compliance
TRC => Technical Review Criteria
mg/1=> milligrams per liter
lb/d => pounds per day
mgd => million gallons per day
WWTP => wastewater treatment plant
Chapter: PAR Guidance File name: PAR_IDSF.xIsakr iSiohebstime/ Q 1c 1il flttr 9, section B, pages 12, 13, 14 Blank IDSF Form, Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each IUP pipe - Page

Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF)
Use separate forms for each industry/pipe
Enter BDL values as < (value)
Total # of samples =>
* Maximum (mg/I) _>
- * - or Maximum (1b!d) _>
- * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) _> -
* or Average Loading (lb/d) =>
% violations, (chronic SNC is>= 66%) _>
% T'RC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _>
Total # of samples =>
* Maximum (mg/I) =>
* or Maximum (lb/d) =>
* or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) =>
* or Average Loading (lb/d) =>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) =>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _>
Total # of samples =>
* Maximum (mg/1) _>
* or Maximum (1b/d) _>
* or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) _>
* or Average Loading (lb/d) =>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _>
Industry Name Intek Corporation
IUP # A004
Pipe # 001
NO2 + NO3
Total Phos
Barium
Beryllium
lst 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
<0.50
N/A
1.40
N/A
0.012
_0.012_
<0.001._
<0.001_.-
<-0.50—
" --N/-A -------
1.40 --
= N-/'A
-0.012
-- 0012 -
<0.001
<0.001
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
TTO
1st 6 months
2nd. 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1
1
<0.10
<0.10
< 0.10
<0.10
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
,
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
lst 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
* POTW must enter at least one of these
four rows, Please indicate how averages were calculated
Avg period could be month, Qtr, or 6-month & if BDL , 1/2BDL, or zero values used.
BDL => Below Detection Limit
IUP => Industrial User Permit
SNC => Significant Non -Compliance
TRC => Technical Review Criteria
mg/I => milligrams per liter
lb/d => pounds per day
mgd => million gallons per day
WWTP => wastewater treatment plant
Chapter: PAR Guidance File name: PAR_IDSF.xIs I vi iohe eA'iigilq 1cli6ikr 9, section B, pages 12, 13, 14 Blank IDSF Fonn, Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each IUP pipe - Page of

Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF)
Use separate forms for each industry/pipe
Enter BDL values as < (value)
Total # of samples =>
* Maximum (mg/1) _>
* or Maximum (lb/d) =>
* or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) =>
-- *_ _ _---or-Auerage.Loading (lb/d)--> -
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %),=>
Total # of samples =>
* Maximum (mg/1) _>
* or Maximum (lb/d) _>
* or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) _>
* or Average Loading (lb/d) _>
% violations,'(chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _>
*
Total # of samples =>
or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) =>
or Maximum (lb/d) =>
or Average (mg/1) _>
- or Average Loading (lb/d) =>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) =>
TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %)'=>
Industry Name Intek'Corporation
IUP # A004
Pipe # .001
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months.
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.002
< 0.002
0.096
0.074
<0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.002 - -
< 0.002
0.096 --
0.074
N/A -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
. N/A
N/A
'N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A •
pH
Oil & Grease
Aluminum•
Antimony
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6-months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
10
10
22
17
2
1
1
1
7.59
7.80.
52'
66
0.12
0.20
0.25
0.37
N/A
N/A
25.5
20.2
0.11
0.20
0.25
0.37
0
0
0
0 -
`N/A.
N/A
N/A
-N / A
0
0
- 0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Fluoride
Chloride
Molybdenum
TKN
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0.85
0.87
4.6
4.1
< 0.002
N/A
18
N/A
0.85
0.87
4.6
4.1
<0.002
N/A
18
. N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A.
N/A
N/A
N/A
4* POTW must enter at least one of these
four rows, Please indicate how averages were calculated
Avg period could be month, Qtr, or 6:month & if BDL , 1/2BDL, or zero values used.
BDL => Below Detection Limit
IUP => Industrial User Permit
SNC => Significant Non -Compliance
TRC => Technical Review Criteria
mg/1=> milligrams per liter
lb/d => pounds per day
mgd => million gallons per day -
WWTP => wastewater treatment plant
Chapter: PAR Guidance File name:PAR_IDSF.xlsaLamgieheiskeAC1 lKh&itthr 9, section B, pages 12, 13, 14 Blank IDSF Form, Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each IUP pipe - Page of

Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF)
Use separate forms for each industry/pipe
Enter BDL values as < (value)
Total # of samples =>
* Maximum (mg/I) =>
* or Maximum (lb/d) _>
-*. — or'6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) _>
* _ __ ._==or_Average-Loading (lb/d) _>
% violations,(chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 -%) _>
*
Total # of samples =>.
Maximum (mg/I) _> ..
or Maximum (lb%d) _>
or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) _>
or Average Loading (lb/d) =>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _>
Total # of samples =>
Maximum (mg/1) =>
or Maximum (Ib/d) _>
or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) _>
or Average Loading (lb/d) =>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) =>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _> '
Control Authority,
Town Name => Moore County
WWTP Name => Moore County WPCP
NPDES # => NC0037508
1st 6 months, dates => 01-01-02 to 06-30-02
2nd 6 months, dates => 07-01-02 to 12-31-02
Industry
Name Erico Incorporated
IUP # A005
Pipe # 01.
Flow, mgd
BOD .
TSS
Ammonia .
1st 6 months.
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months .
2nd 6 months-
178
173
6
0 **
6
0 **
5
0
0.030
0.028
12
N/A
2
N/A
2.17
N/A
0.0158
0.0144
5.8
N/A
- <2
N/A
1.25 -
-N/A
0
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0-
0
. 0
0
0
• N/A
N/A
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium -
COD
1st 6 months '
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1
0
11
10 "
6
1
6
0 **
<0.00,5 =
N/A
<0.002
<0.002
0.009 -
0.021
21•
.; N/A
<0.005 •
N/A
<0.002..
<0.002
0.002
0.021
14
N/A
N/A •
N/A
0.
. 0,
0.
0
0
. 0
N/A
N/A
. 0
- 0
0
0
0
0-
Copper
Cyanide
Lead . .
Mercury
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
11
10
2
1
5'
1
1
0
0.600
0.295
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.003
< 0.00020
N, / A
0.099
0.150
< 0.005 .
. < 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.003
• < 0.00020
N / A
0
0
0
0
0
0
N./A
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
* POTW must enter at least one of these
four rows, Please indicate how averages were calculated
Avg period could be month, Qtr, or 6-month & if BDL , 1/2BDL, or zero values used.
** See Narrative
BDL => Below Detect on Limit
IUP => Industrial Use Permit
' SNC => Significant Non -Compliance
TRC => Technical Review Criteria
mg/1 mill => !grams per liter
Ib/d => pounds per day
mgd,=> million gallons per day
WWTP => wastewater treatment plant
Chapter: PAR Guidance File name: PAR IDSF.xlstRitnisiehathatimeA1i i , lchllptIor 9, section B, pages 12, 13, 14 Blank IDSF Form, Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each IUP pipe - Page of

Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF)
Use separate forms for each industry/pipe
Enter BDL values as < (value)
Total # of samples =>
* Maximum (mg/1) _>
" _ _ = or Maximum (lb/d) =>
-=or 6-1honth=using -BDL-"Average-(mg/1) _>
* or Average Loading (lb/d) =>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _>
Total # of samples =>
Maximum (mg/1) _>
* or Maximum (Ib/d).=>_
* or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) _>
* or Average Loading (lb/d) _>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) =>"
• % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33: %). =>
Total # of samples _>
* _ Maximum (mg/I) _>
* or Maximum (Ib/d) _>
* or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) _>
* or Average Loading (lb/d) _>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC violations, (SNC is.>= 33 %) _>
Industry Name Erico Incorporated
IUP # A005
Pipe # : 01
Fe
Molybdenum
TKN
NO2 + NO3
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
lst 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1
0
1
0
5
0
•1
0
0.051
N / A
0.074
N / A __ .
_ _ _4.70__ __
_ _ N./ A -- _
- -- 0.7-1-----
- ---N -/-A- -- -
-
0:05-1
N/A
0.074
N/A
2.52
N/A
0.71
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A .
N/A
, N/A
- N/A
Total Phos
TTO
lst 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1
0
1
0
0.21
N/A
.. <0.10
N/A
0.21
N / A
< 0.10
Certifies for
-
TTO as not
N/A
N/A
N/A
being •,- .
N / A. "
N / A
N / A
present
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
* POTW must enter at least one of these
four rows, Please indicate how averages were calculated
Avg period could be month, Qtr, or 6-month & if BDL , 1/2BDL; or zero values used.
BDL => Below Detection Limit
IUP => Industrial User Permit
SNC => Significant Non -Compliance
TRC => Technical Review Criteria
ing/1=> milligrams per liter
lb/d => pounds per day
mgd => million gallons per day
WWTP => wastewater treatment plant
4 Chapter: PAR Guidance File name: PAR _!DSF.xlsl'lbmnisiehadritimerC'i ; lch>IPttzr 9, section B, pages 12, 13, 14 Blank IDSF Form, Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each IUP pipe - Page of

Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF)
Use separate forms for each industry/pipe
Enter BDL values as < (value)
Total # of samples =>
Maximum (mg/I) =>
or Maximum (lb/d) =>
or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/I) _>
-- or Average -Loading (Ib/d) =>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _>
Total # of samples =>
Maximum (mg/1) _>
* or Maximum (1b/d) _>
* or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) _>
* or Average Loading (lb/d) _>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _>
% TRC-violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _>
*
*
Total # of samples =>
Maximum (mg/1) _>
or Maximum, (lb/d) _>
or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) =>
or Average Loading (Ib/d) _>
% violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) =>
% TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _>
Industry Name Erico Incorporated
IUP # A005
Pipe # 01
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6. months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
11
10
1
0
6
1
6
1
0.100
0.273
< 0.005
N / A
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.025
< 0.025
0.007
0.094
< 0.005
-N / A
< 0.005
< 0.005-
< 0.025 -
< 0.025-
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
pH
Oil & Grease-
Chloride
Aluminum
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months -
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
12
10
1
1
5
1
2
1
9.83
9.69
1.8
21.0
26
139
0.75
0.29
N/A
N/A
1.8
21.0
12
139
0.43
0.29
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Fluoride
Barium
Beryllium
Antimony
1 st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months
2nd 6 months
1st 6 months _
2nd 6 months
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0.84
N/A
<0.625
N/A
<0.001
N/A
0.005
N/A
0.84.
N/A
<0.625
N/A
<0.001
N/A
0.005
N/A
N/A
N/A -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
* POTW must enter at least one of these
four rows, Please indicate how averages were calculated
Avg period could be month, Qtr, or 6-month & if BDL , 1/2BDL, or zero values used.
BDL => Below Detection Limit
IUP => Industrial User Permit
SNC => Significant Non -Compliance
TRC => Technical Review Criteria
mg/1=> milligrams per liter
lb/d => pounds per day
mgd => million gallons per day
WWTP => wastewater treatment plant
• • Chapter: PAR Guidance File name: PAR_IDSF.xls(Ron iohmlati¢.eiCi grist, IGIMPtkr 9, section B, pages 12, 13, 14 Blank IDSF Form, Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each IUP pipe - Page of

MOORE COUNTY WATEPLUTION CONTROL PLANT
S. R. 1100, 4 MILES S.E. OF
PINEBLUFF, NO. CAR. 28373
4
G
? �4',`°' P � P
o GOAOo�
O
1.0-13.4
m g.d.
SE\/AGE
:UENT
,ISr'oSAL
I
t •
1.0-13.4
m.g.d.
0 -13.4
1 mq.d..
Return Activated 0-6.7mr.d.
B.O.P. Make -Up 0 -1.4 m.q.d.
---PRIMARY SLUDGE
_ .LWASTE ACTIVATED
- -SLUDGE----
THICKENER
• -&N A-E-R 0•B I C
DIGESTER
SLUDGE I
1.0 -13.4
* rn.g.dl •
t
�� ' .., GPO ?
‹' e p?� GPO
Return Activated 0-6.7m.a.d,
J
SLUDGE DRYING BEDS
Drainage to
Raw Sewage Influent
1.0 -13.4 ,
m.g.d.
EFFLUENT
Discharge
001
6,7 MGD
° Land Application
° Llrrifill Subtitled "1)"
;�:; PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC

•1.
r
(,1•
`� '„ r• t:inicblu(fis
--.-
• .7
•
_ y
/
/
/ /\
7..1 �J
C•
=J
•. •
•`
Lam. �.•�
1094 Addor Road
: Aberdeen. NC 28315
T. \:
Secondary highway.
hard SurtaCe -.-. -
InlcrsUte Route ' U.S. Route ( Stale Route
February 20, 19
Legend
OX — Facility
— Outfall
NPDES:N00017508
MOORE COUNTY WATER POLLUTION
CONTROL PLANT
JAMES DELMO FRYE.
System Superintendent
[phone]
Fax: [phone]
RCAD CI —a SSI FICAT7ON .1.
oy
Imp•a<d write
Unimp(wed road_
P1NEBLUFF, N. C.
N 3500 —W 7922.5/7.5
1 tiAB
•:.( I: (,,ICVLS..0 IVIC.:
DMA 7111 ix ir-6/511ES Y147

State of Nottli Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality ,
PERMIT NAME/OWNERSIP CHANGE FORM
Any changes made to this form vvill result in the application being returned.
(THIS FORMAIAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN bRIINA4,)
For more information, visit our web site at: h2o.ennstate.ric.Us'indpu/
L gEOTJIRED ITEMS
1. Submit one original of the completed and appropriately executed permit Name/Ownership Change Form. For a
change of ownership, the certification must be signed by both the current permit holder and the new applicant.
For a name change only, •the certification must be signed by the applicant.
2._ Provide legal document.ton-of the transfer -of ownership (auch.-as"a Contract, deed, artiele of incorporation, et.)
for ownership changes. A copy of the Association Bylaws and Declarations should be submitted for a change of
Qv/unship to a Homeowner's Association.
3. Submit a properly executed Operation ancl Maintenance Agreement for all Single!FaMily- Spray/Drip Irrigation
permits requesting a change of ownership.
II. CURRENT PE
I'
Iv INFORMATION
1. Permit number:
NC 0037508- •
2. Permit holder's name:
3. ofEdan nume and title Denn is BrObs t- 11
(Person legally respoble for permit)
1
_ . Di-rectarMoore-. CountY • --
Moore Waterand:7:Sew:er:AUthoritS,
4. Mailing address:
5227 Highway 15-501, P.
(title)
0 Box 19127
City : Carthage
Telephone number; (910 ) 947-6315
M. INMW OWNER/NAME INFORMATION
State: NC . 28327
Facsimile rturaber: (910 ) 94 7 - 9, 92 •
1. This request for a permit change is a result of:
a. Changein ownership of property/company
b. Name change only
X c Otheplea.wexplain)Mi5Oreirlqater. and Sewer" Authority was dissolved
, ebruary Z000'," and, all assets were
transferred to the County of Moore.
FORM: PNOCF 06/00 Page 1 of 2
1,4

•
2, New owner's name (name to be used in permit): County of -Moore
W. David McNi1;1,Jr.
SCILiS
3. New owner's or signing official'a name and title:
4. Mailkg address:
(Person legally responsible for pemait)
County Manager
(title)
Moore,County Public Utilities, IP.' O. Box 1927
Car Carthage State:
Telephone number: ( 9 1° ) •9 4 7 6 3 15
IV. CERrITFICATION
NC Zip: r 2 8 3 2 7
• Facsimile number: 9 1'0 ) 9 4 7 -.1 9 9 2
1, Current Permittee's Certification:
Dennis B r ob S t , attest that this application for_name/Ownership change has been reviewed and. is
accurate and complete to the best of ray knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are
not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachmentts aranot included, this application
package Will be returned as incomplete. I understand I will continue to be responsible for compliance with the
Date:
current pemnt until a new permi
Signature: /
- 2. A.pplicants Certification:
is
Jr
W . David McN e i 1 1,,attest ter this application for name/ownershiP change has been reviewed and is
accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are
not, completed and that if all required supporting information and. attachmentare' not included, this application
mfas.uc
Signatire: o pieta.
L/f4/14/ Pate:
package wi1 be r
1.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACICAGE;INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION, AND
MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ODRESS:
NORTH CAROLLNA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIROMNIENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
- DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT l•
EtV‘ii.5. Postal Service:
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER • 512 NORTH SALISBURY, STREET, SUITE 1219
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699..161.7 • ' • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA. 27604
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
I! i;
FORM: PNOCF 06/00 Page 2 of 2

-1
`
� `
-FEB�
�
^�= o ^WZ
r

ADDENDUM 1
NPDES PERMIT # NC0037508
REQUEST FOR RENEWAL
January 2,2004
Sludge Management Plan:
The Sludge Management Plan for the Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
consists of two items.
1. Disposal of Sludge in a Subtitle D Landfill.
2. Land Application Permit (Permit #WQ0018018) which has never'been used.
If you have any questions concerning our Sludge Management Plan do not hesitate to call James D. Frye
at 910-281-3146.