NC0021920_Special Order by Consent_19960425

NPDES DOCYHENT !;CANNING COVER SHEET
NC0021920
Whiteville WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Special Order by Conse
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
April 25, 1996
This document is printed on reuse paper - ig7nore any
content on the reYerse side

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Water Quality Section
Wilmington Regional Office
April 25, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Diane Williams Wilburn
FROM: Rick Shiver, P.G. `ZS S
SUBJECT: Special Order By Consent EMC WQ No. 96-11
Town of Whiteville
NPDES Permit No. NO0021920
Columbus County
Attached please find SOC EMC WQ No. 96-11 signed by the town
manager of the Town of Whiteville and the associated staff report
prepared by Steve West.
lbSS:DTA:BSW: P\STAFFNPD\NC21920.SOC
cc: Technical Support Branch
Aquatic Toxicity Group
Wilmington Regional Office Files
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF COLUMBUS
IN THE MATTER OF )
NORTH CAROLINA ) SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT
NPDES PERMIT ) EMC WQ NO. 96-11
NO. NC0021920
HELD BY THE TOWN )
OF WHITEVILLE
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.)
143-215.2 and 143-215.67, this Special Order by Consent is
entered into by the Town of Whiteville, hereinafter referred to
as the Town, and the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, an agency of the State of North Carolina created by
G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the Commission:
1. The Town and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) That the Town holds North Carolina NPDES Permit No.
NC0021920 for operation of an existing wastewater treatment
works and for making an outlet therefrom for treated
wastewater to White Marsh Swamp, Class "C-Sw" waters of this
State in the Lumber River Basin, but is unable to comply
with the final effluent limitation for mercury set forth in
the permit. Compliance will require developing and
implementing a collection system monitoring plan to
identify the source(s) of mercury entering the wastewater
treatment plant and perform subsequent remediation or
require installation of sufficient pretreatment of the
source(s).
(b) That noncompliance constitutes causing and
contributing to pollution of the waters of this State named
above, and the Town is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) That the Town desires to cause or allow the discharge
of 200,000 gpd of additional wastewater to the treatment
works, and that the discharge of such additional
wastewater will not result in any significant degradation
of the quality of any waters.
(d) That the Town will secure financing for monitoring and
remediation of the mercury source(s) which, when eliminated,
will allow the Town to be able to comply with the final
permit effluent limitation for mercury.

(e) Since this Special Order is by Consent, neither party
will file a petition for a contested case or for judicial
review concerning its terms.
2. The Town, desiring to comply with the permit identified in
paragraph 1(a) above, hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Provide the Wilmington Regional Office of the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM),
located at 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, with a list of all
additions of flow under all Special Orders, and update this
list each time flow is added to the system.
(b) Undertake the following activities in accordance with
the indicated time schedule:
1) Develop, submit to the Division, and implement a
plan to increase monitoring for mercury in the
collection system and wastewater treatment facility
in order to identify all sources of mercury entering
the collection system and wastewater treatment
facility on or before May 31, 1996;
2) Submit to the Division a summary of monitoring
study findings and plan to eliminate/control the
mercury source(s) on or before December 31, 1996;
3) Eliminate/control the mercury source(s) tributary to
the wastewater collection system and comply with the
final effluent limitations set forth in NPDES Permit
No. NO0021920 on or before October 31, 1997.
(c) Comply with all terms and conditions of the permit
except those effluent limitations identified in paragraph
1(a) above. See Attachments A, B and C for all monitoring
requirements and effluent limitations. The permittee may
also be required to monitor for other parameters as deemed
necessary by the Director in future permits or
administrative letters.
(d) During the time in which this Special Order by Consent
is effective, comply with the interim effluent limitations
contained in Attachments A and B. The following reflects
only the limitations that have been modified from NPDES
requirements by this Order:
Permit Limits Modified Limits (SOC)
Parameter Unit Monthly Avg. Daily Max. Monthly Avg. Daily Max.
Mercury ug/1 None 0.02 None 2.0

(e) No later than 14 calendar days, after any date
identified for accomplishment of any activity listed in 2(b)
above, submit to the Director of DEM written notice of
compliance'or noncompliance therewith. In the case of
noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of the
reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a
statement identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or
times for accomplishment of listed activities may be affected.
(f) Enforce the water conservation provisions of the State
Building Code as it applies to new residential construction
(Volume II, Chapter IX 901.2).
(g) Identify any Infiltration and Inflow problems
associated with the facility and establish a program to
correct.
(h) Use forty percent (40 0) of the revenue received by a
municipality from additional one-half percent (1/20) sales and
use taxes levied during the first five fiscal years in which the
additional taxes are in effect in the municipality and thirty
percent (300) of the revenue received by a municipality from
these taxes in the second five fiscal years in which the taxes
are in effect in the municipality for water and sewer capital
outlay purposes or to retire any indebtedness incurred by the
municipality for these purposes.
3. The Town agrees that unless excused under paragraph 4, the
Town will pay the Director of DEM, by check payable to the
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadlines set out in
paragraphs 2(b) and 2(e), or failure to attain compliance
with the effluent limitations/monitoring requirements
contained in Attachments A and B.
Failure to meet a schedule date
Failure to maintain compliance with
any modified limit contained in the SOC.
Failure to achieve compliance with
final effluent limits at expiration
Monitoring frequency violations
$100/day for the
first 7 days;
$500/day
thereafter
$1000/violation
$10,000
$100 per omitted
per parameter
value

4. The Town and the Commission agree that the stipulated
penalties are not due if the Town satisfies the DEM that
noncompliance was caused solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party
but this defense shall not be available if the act or
omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a
contractual relationship with the permittee;
d. An extraordinary event beyond the permittees control.
Contractor delays or failure to obtain funding will not be
considered as events beyond the permittees control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within 30 days of receipt of written demand to pay the
penalties, or challenge them by a contested case petition
pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds for a collection
action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to
initiate. The only issue in such an action will be whether the 30
days has elapsed.
5. In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 143-215.67(b) the
Commission allows the Town to accept the additional waste
specified below to its waste disposal system:
200,000 gallons of unspecified domestic strength wastewater
The nature of the additional flows is such that the waste
characteristics do not exceed those generally associated
with domestic waste or are pretreated to domestic strengths.
Waste of greater than normal domestic strength may be
accepted if the parameter(s) that exceed normal domestic
strength wastewater are not those for which interim
limitations have been developed and it can be demonstrated
to the satisfaction of the Director that the additional
waste will not adversely affect the treatment efficiency of
the treatment system for any modified parameter or result in
the violation of any other permit limitation. All new and
proposed industrial waste tributary to the system must be
controlled using all needed mechanisms including but not
limited to adoption and implementation of industrial waste
control and pretreatment ordinances. No wastewater can be
accepted which will add toxic pollutants in quantities not
generally associated with domestic wastewater
characteristics, unless the acceptance of the additional
wastewater can be supported through appropriate analyses
acceptable to the Director.

6. This Special Order by Consent and any terms, conditions and
interim effluent limitations contained herein, hereby
supersede any and all previous Special Orders and
Enforcement Compliance Schedule Letters, and terms,
conditions, and limitations contained therein issued in
connection with NPDES Permit No. NC0021920.
7. Any Violation of terms of this Special Order hy Consent,
including paragraphs 2(b) and 2(e), above and Attachments A
and B shall terminate paragraph 5 of this Order and any
authorized additional waste not previously connected to the
system shall not thereafter be connected until the necessary
sewerage system improvements have been completed and placed
in operation.
8. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Order by
Consent is subject to enforcement action in addition to the
above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6.
9. The permittee, upon signature of the Special Order by
Consent, will be expected to comply with all schedule dates,
terms, and conditions of this document.
10. This Special Order by Consent shall expire
January 31, 1998.
Entered into this the day of 1996.
For the Town of Whiteville:
Jeff Emory
Town Manager
April 16, 1996
nager 1'signed) Date
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission
Chair of the Commission Date

Town of Whiteville
EMC WQ No.
ATTACHMENT A
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — Interim Summer (April 1- October 31)
During the period beginning on the effective date of this Special Order and lasting until
October 31, 1997, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall serial number 001. Such
discharge shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Flow
BOD, 5 Day, 20° C
NH3 as N
Total Suspended Residue
Dissolved Oxygen ***
Fecal Coliform (geometric
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 +
Total Phosphorus
Chronic Toxicity
**
**
Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Monthly Avg'.
mean)
TKN)
3.0 MGD
5.0 mg/1
2.0 mg/1
30.0 mg/1
200/100 ml
Weekly Avg.
7.5 mg/1
45.0 mg/1
400/100 ml
Measurement Sample
Daily Max. Frequency Type
Continuous
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
28.0 ug/1 Daily
Daily
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
Recording
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
*Sample
Location
I or E
I, E
E
I, E
E, U, D
E, U, D
E
E, U, D
E
E
E
* Sample Location: E=Effluent, I=Influent, U=Upstream at US 74/76, D=Downstream at railroad crossing
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected three
times per week during June, July, August, and September and once per week during the remaining
months of the year.
** The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15t
of the respective influent value (85t removal).
*** The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/l.
**** Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 50t; January, April, July, and October; See Attachment C
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be
monitored weekly at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Town of Whiteville
EMC WQ No.
ATTACHMENT A
(continued)
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - Interim Summer (April 1- October 31)
During the period beginning on the effective date of this Special Order and lasting until
October 31, 1997, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall serial number 001. Such
discharge shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Conductivity
Oil and Grease
Lead
Mercury
Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Measurement Sample *Sample
Monthly Avq. Weekly Avq. Daily Max. Frequency Type Location
30.0 mg/1
* Grab U, D
60.0 mg/1 Weekly Grab E
50.0 ug/1 Weekly Composite E
2.0 ug/1 Weekly Composite E

Town of Whiteville
EMC WQ No.
ATTACHMENT B
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - Interim Winter (November 1 - March 31)
During the period beginning on the effective date of this Special Order and lasting until
October 31, 1997, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall serial number 001. Such discharge shall
limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Measurement Sample
Monthly Avq. Weekly Avq. Daily Max. Frequency Tie
Flow 3.0 MGD
BOD, 5 Day, 20° C ** 10.0 mg/1
NH3 as N 4.0 mg/1
Total Suspended Residue ** 30.0 mg/1
Dissolved Oxygen ***
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) 200/100 ml
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Chronic Toxicity
15.0 mg/1
45.0 mg/1
400/100 ml
Continuous
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
28.0 ug/1 Daily
Daily
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
Recording
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
*Sample
Location
I or E
I, E
E
I, E
E, U, D
E, U, D
E
E, U, D
E
E
E
be
* Sample Location: E=Effluent, I=Influent, U=Upstream at US 74/76, D=Downstream at railroad crossing
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected three
times per week during June, July, August, and September and once per week during the remaining
months of the year.
** The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 150
of the respective influent value (85o removal).
*** The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/l.
**** Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 50t; January, April, July, and October; See Attachment C
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be
monitored weekly at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Town of Whiteville
EMC WQ No.
ATTACHMENT B
(continued)
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - Interim Winter (November 1 - March 31)
During the period beginning on the effective date of this Special Order and lasting until
October 31, 1997, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall serial number 001. Such
discharge shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Conductivity
Oil and Grease
Lead
Mercury
Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Monthly Avq.
30.0 mg/1
Measurement Sample *Sample
Weekly Avg. Daily Max. Frequency TYRA Location
* Grab U, D
60.0 mg/1 Weekly Grab E
50.0 ug/1 Weekly Composite E
2.0 ug/1 Weekly Composite E

Attachment C
•
G. CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is 45% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document).
The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance
with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date
of this permit during the months of January, April, July, and October. Effluent sampling for this
testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
•
' NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
H. The Town of Whiteville must continue its study of infiltration and inflow problems of the:;;:.
town's collection system and report results to the Wilmington Regional Office: A schedule; of:
rehabilitation for the sewer system will be formulated with the Regional Office' after completion.of
• the I & I study.
•
I. CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:

1.) The North Carolina ,riodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay edure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is 50% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document).
The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance
with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date
of this permit during the months of January, April, July and October. Effluent sampling for this
testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits. then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.

STAFF REPORT
Special Order by Consent
Town of Whiteville
NPDES Permit No. NC0021920
April 25, 1996
I. Discussion
This report is being prepared in response to a request by
the Town of Whiteville to enter into an SOC due to
violations of permit final effluent limit for mercury.
Preliminary findings indicate the primary source(s) to be
dental offices. Remediation of the problem will require
additional testing to identify the source(s) and subsequent
remediation or control of the source(s). A chronological
list of violations is attached. Also included in this
report is a discussion of and recommendations for an
up -front penalty assessment.
II. Additional Information
a. Current MP screen - Attached
b. Funding source - The Town plans to use cash reserves
in its Utility Fund to finance all investigation and
remediation costs.
c. Instream assessment - The Town has requested an
additional 200,000 gpd to be added during the term of
the Order. The proposed flow should not result in any
additional mass loading of mercury to the plant. The
Town is permitted for 3 MGD and is currently operating
at an average of 1.55 MGD.
d. Additional flows - An additional 200,000 gallons of
domestic -strength wastewater has been requested during
the period of the SOC.
e. Facility improvements required by this Order - The
Order does not require any facility improvements other
than a potential for increased wasting of sludge. The
Order requires installation of additional pretreatment
systems if needed by any identified source(s).
f. Is facility monitored according to current NPDES Permit
or SOC? NPDES Permit
g. Does toxicity need to be included? Yes, comments are
needed from the aquatic toxicity group.

h. Does pretreatment need to be addressed? Pretreatment
is the issue of the Order. Currently -permitted SIUs
will also be monitored at an increased frequency as
part of the Town's investigation.
i. Facility type and design flow? The facility is a
oxidation ditch -type system and has a design flow of
3.0 MGD.
j. Is facility properly operated and maintained? Yes
k. Is NPDES Permit under adjudication? No
1. Are there special circumstances concerning issuance of
the SOC? No
m. Expiration date: January 31, 1997.
n. Are current NPDES parameters listed on the SOC
limits/monitoring page? Yes.
o. Discuss downstream water quality impacts. There should
be no increased mass loading of mercury during the
course of the Order. Any mercury currently being
discharged should settle into the bottom sediments
immediately downstream of the discharge. The entire
Lumber and Waccamaw River basins have been documented
to have unacceptable levels of mercury in fish tissue.
The immediate source of the mercury has yet to be
identified.
p. Explain mechanisms for arriving at interim limits and
compliance schedule. The compliance schedule was
devised by the Wilmington Regional Office. The
highest concentration detected was 2.1 ug/l, with most
of the levels right around the detection limit of
0.2 ug/1. The interim limit is recommended at
2.0 ug/1 (daily max). The final permit limit is
0.02 ug/1 (daily max).
III. Recommendations and Enforcement
The plant itself is extremely well -operated and
historically has been in compliance with all limits
except mercury. Weekly monitoring for mercury began in
April, 1992 and detected levels started in and have
been gradually increasing in frequency since early
1995. The Town took the initiative to contact the
regional office and inquire into the implications of
the limit exceedences. The Town was told that current
Division policy does not include issuance of NOVs for
daily maximum exceedences for mercury, but that did not
relieve the Town of its responsibility in remediating

the problem. The Town contacted dental offices in
Town, but to this office's knowledge no action was
taken by the Town as far as requiring installation or
modification of pretreatment at the offices. The Town
did increase its monitoring frequency of SIUs and
uncontrollable flows when the violations began. Also,
in an effort to control the effluent levels, the
frequency of sludge wasting at the plant was increased
with seemingly no effect.
The Regional Office feels the Town has been responsible
in its actions taken to correct the problem. However,
the Town did not take adequate action to completely
control what was a primary source of mercury from the
dental offices. A penalty on the low end of the scale
is recommended.

GKEX88/MP
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALYSIS REPORT
03/28/ 9t
PAGE
PERMIT---NC0021920 PIPE--001 REPORT PERIOD: 9502-9601 LOC-----E
FACILITY---WHITEVILLE WWTP, CITY OF DESIGN FLOW-- 2.5000 CLASS--�
LOC AT ION---WHITEVILLE REGION/COUNTY--08 COLUMBUS
00610 31616 50060 00300 TGP3E
MONTH U /MGD BOD RES/TSS NH3+NH4- FEC COLI CHLORINE DO CERI7DPF
LIMIT F 2.5000 F 10.00 F 30.0 F 4.00 F 200.0 NOL NOL NOL
3,5/02 2.5471E 3.36 2.3 .41 41.8 275.000 9.90
95/ 0 3 2 .0 22 4.76 6.0 .00 20.8 316.260 6.99
LIMIT F 2.5000 F 3.00 F 30.0 F 2.00 F 200.0 NOL NOL NOL
95/04 1.2293 3.53 2.0 .00 19.6 294.736 8.63 1
95/05 1.0232 4.59 1.3 .03 16.8 249.545 8.22
95/06 1.4810 3.85 1.9 .00 15.6 181.363 7.72
95/07 1.7093 2 .10 1.4 .00 98.5 168.000 7.36 1
Y5/08 1.1851 70 2 .00 4.6 247.626 7.51
l "5 /•fV /i w 1.0926 r... . :.9 1.7 .00 2.1 266.000 7.90
95/10 1 .5367 �w .; : 1.4 .00 5.2 257.454 8.07 1
LIMIT F 2.5000 F 10.00 F 30.0 F 4.00 F 200.0 NOL NOL NOL
95,: 1 "1 1.7600 ..'''..06 1.4 .00 4.1 283.157 8.87
w5/1? 1.3819 2 . _.3 2.4 .00 2.6 313.684 10.20
6 / 01 1.5822 2.5C 3.3 .00 1.3 294.76.E 10.69 1
AVERAGE 1.c' 9.4 ,. ' 6.67
MAXIMUM 4.0000 10.00 40.0 4.00 2256.0 480.000 12.50 1
.MIN rMUM .7800 LESS ; -:AN i_ESSTHAN LESSTHAN SSTHAN LESSTHAN L ES< i HAN 6.43 1
UNIT MGD Mc/L MG/L MG/L/1OOML UG/L MG/L PA aS/FAI

GFEX88/MP
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALYSIS REPORT
03/28/9e
PAGE 2
PERMIT--NC0021920 PIPE-001 REPORT PERIOD; 9502-9601 LOC---E
FACILITY---WHITEVILLE !;JWTP , CITY OF DESIGN FLOW-- 2.5000 CLASS--2
LOCA i ION--WHI T EV'ILLE REGION/COUNTY--08 COLUMBUS
00010 00095 00400 00556 00600 00665 01051 71900
MONTH TEMP CNDUCTVY PH OIL-GRSE TOTAL N PHOS-TOT LEAD MERCURY
LIMIT NOL NOL 9.0 6.0 F 30.000 NOL NOL
'45/02 13.57 7.9-7.2 .500 8.420 .7300 .0000 .1000
95/03 16.43 446.0 8.1-6.9 .250 8.590 .6600 .0000 .0750
LIMIT NOL NOL 9.0 6.0 F 30.000 NOL NOL
95/04 18.76 571.2 7 .7--6 .9 .000 15.200 1.5900 .0000 .3000
95/ 0 5 21.43 643.4 8 . '3--6 .000 17.300 1.9700 .0000 .1400
95/06 23.48 8 .4-6 .5 .000 14.500 1.7800 .0000 .2460
7, 5/ .07 25.02 524.9 8 .0-6 .5 .000 1 1 .820 1.3600 5.0000 .6250
'. 5/08 25.13 620.2 7.9-7.2 .800 16.100 1.8000 .0000 .5400
-'`S/09 23 21 662.3 8 .. 7 . M .000 16.100 1.4800 .0000 .7000
5 / 1 0 21.29 538.3 8 . 1 -7 . .000 14.000 1.5700 .0000 .2 7 5 0
LIMIT NOL NOL ' .0 6.0 F 30.000 NOL NOL
` 5,�A.1 15.94 471.2 8.1-6.0 .000 10.100 .8400 .0000 .2400
Y: 1"2 12.64 469.6 8.0-6.6 18.500 1.1400 .0000 .4000
9t_ /,01 11.38 455 .:3 8 .0- ' .0 .200 12.900 .8900 .2000 .3200
AvEF.AGE 19.02 540.6 .159 1'3 .627 1.3175 . .433 .3300
MAXIMUM 27.00 818.0 _ �. 8.700 2.000 18.500 1 . ;;' 700 20.0000 2.1000
1 1 .t i1;9UM 7.80 288.0 6.()00 8.420 ._.
UNIT DEG . C UsMHOSi CM U MG/L MG/L MG/L UG/L UG/L

JEFF B. EMORY
City Manager
Na5E'2.7277MDI,
U MAR
2 ,..�s
G4 of Z�hIfee1lie
March 19, 1996
Mr. Steve West
Department of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
RE: SOC Application
City of Whiteville
Dear Steve:
317 S. Madison Street
P.O. Box 607
Whiteville, North Carolina 28472
[phone]
Enclosed please find a copy of the City of Whiteville application for a Special Order
of Consent (SOC). The City would appreciate your review, and comments, prior to the
application being forwarded to Raleigh.
Thank you for your cooperation. I look forward to hearing from you. I would also
like to stress that the City would be more than happy to meet with you at your office to
discuss this matter in further detail.
Sincerely,
Jeff Err}'bry
City Manager
JE.sdr
Enclosures