20201149 Ver 2_As Built Report_20220414

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20201149
Version* 2
Select Reviewer: *
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 04/14/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 4/14/2022
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes ® No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
ID#:*
20201149
Existing ID#
Project Type:
DMS • Mitigation Bank
Email Address: *
[e-mail]
Version:* 2
Project Name: Wolf King Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Mitigation Project
County:
Wayne
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type: *
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload:
Signature
Existing Version
Wolf King (20201149) Bank Parcel As Built Report
7.85MB
04142022.pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Print Name: * Jamey McEachran
Signature: *
I lCfabeitm,

Bank Parcel Development Plan As-Built Report
Wolf King Mitigation Site
DWR Project # 2020-1149 Version 2
Wayne County,North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
S W
M
aa= Y• S'+�%r "'«y.�, b�� rr,r��ae � ti � �vs ��� 9i 1' °J
P
, " r „�� x..,� !
y r�-
r7f $ ^,�4 �i '4�I � x� y. 'r -^ IyWf � , r
,*., :,,,,-,.,,,,,,-,..;t.,,,cori,4,. 4.,,,,,10‘44.1?„,.,,,, ' ,.. - ,,,,,:-,.--.....,, ,,:,--,,Ki.;,,,,ton, -,,,„.r,,
,.° At l'
r } FY P '
-. an „'� r ar i` _
Prepared By:
res
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
For Environmental Banc &Exchange, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh,NC 27612
919-623-9889
April 2022

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary 1
1.1 Project Location and Description 1
1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria 1
1.3 Project Components 2
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach 3
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions 4
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance 4
2 Methods 5
3 Reference 5
Appendix A: Site Maps and Credit Table
Figure 1. Site Location Map
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. As -Built Plat
Table 1. Wolf King Project Credits
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Plant Species Summary
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
- Vegetation Plot Photos
- Boundary Photos
- Invasive Photos
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
i

1 Project Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES), through its wholly owned subsidiary Environmental Banc
& Exchange (EBX), LLC, is pleased to provide this As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report for the
Wolf King Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank (Project). This Project provides
riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable and authorized impacts due to development within
the Neuse River Basin, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, United States Geological Survey (USGS)
8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC — 03020201) (Figure 1). In addition, it also provides nutrient
offset credits in the 03020201 HUC for existing and proposed development requiring such
mitigation. The Project is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC
02B .0295, Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703, the RES 2021 Neuse
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) made and entered into by EBX, LLC acting as the
Bank Sponsor (Sponsor) and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality -Division of Water
Resources DWR.
The Wolf King Mitigation Project is located within Wayne County, approximately one mile north
of Grantham, North Carolina, and can be accessed from Wolf Lane (Figure 1). The Project is located
within the Neuse River Basin, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, North Carolina Department
of Water Resources sub -basin 03-04-12 and United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14-digit
hydrologic unit code (HUC) 03020201170010 (Figure 1).
This Project provides an opportunity to protect 8.75 acres of riparian habitat. The project encompasses
one continuous easement and includes two unnamed tributaries and three ditches that drain north, and
ultimately drain to Horse Creek then eventually to the Neuse River (Figure 2). The total drainage area for
the Project is 78.24 acres (0.12 mi2). The land use within the project area previously was used for row crop
production. The Project area has been used extensively for agricultural production for over 50 years and
stream features within the project area have been manipulated and straightened. These activities have
negatively impacted both water quality and streambank stability along the Project streams. The
resulting observed stressors included streambank erosion, sedimentation, channel modification, and
the loss of riparian buffers and adjacent riparian areas.
1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria
Annual vegetation monitoring and visual assessments will be conducted. Riparian vegetation monitoring
is based on the "Carolina Vegetation Survey -Ecosystem Enhancement Program Protocol for Recording
Vegetation: Level 2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.2". Monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100
meters squared in size and cover at least two percent of the planted mitigation area. These plots were
randomly placed throughout the planted riparian buffer mitigation area (8.23 acres) and are representative
of the riparian restoration areas. The following data is recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height,
planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots are flagged with flagging tape. Data is
processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently
marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken
from the origin each monitoring year. There are seven monitoring plots in riparian restoration areas
(Figure 2).
Wolf King 1 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site April2022

Photos will be taken at all vegetation plot origins each monitoring year and be provided in the annual
reports. Visual inspections and photos will be taken to ensure that restoration and preservation areas are
being maintained and compliant. The measures of vegetative success for the Project will be the survival of
at least four native hardwood tree species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of the stems,
established at a density of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species
may be included to meet the performance standards as determined by NC Division of Water Resources.
A visual assessment of the conservation easement will also be performed each year to confirm:
• Easement markers are in good condition throughout the site;
• No encroachment has occurred;
• No invasive species in areas where invasive species were treated,
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement areas; and
• There has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
Component/
Feature
Monitoring
Maintenance through project close-out
Vegetation
Annual Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted plant
vegetation community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include
monitoring supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing Exotic invasive plant species
shall be treated by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation requiring
herbicide application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations. Vegetation maintenance activities will be
documented and reported in annual monitoring reports. Vegetation maintenance will
continue through the monitoring period.
Invasive and Nuisance Visual Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become
Vegetation Assessment dominant or alter the desired community structure of the Project. Locations of invasive
and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
Project Boundary
Visual Project boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
Assessment mitigation project and adjacent properties. Boundaries are marked with signs identifying
the property as a mitigation project and will include the name of the long-term steward
and a contact number. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post,
tree -blazing, or other means as allowed by Project conditions and/or conservation
easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or
replaced on an as -needed basis. Easement monitoring and staking/ signage maintenance
will continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
1.3 Project Components
This Project generates a total of 12,611.40 buffer credits (12,344.000 ft2 buffer restoration credits and
267.400 ft2 buffer preservation credits) and 346,552 ft2 of nutrient offset credits (17,856.558 lbs of N; 7.95
acres) within an 8.75-acre conservation easement (Table 1). Also, some of these buffer mitigation credits,
where viable, can be converted to nutrient offset credit in accordance with the Nutrient Offset Credit
Trading Rule, 15A NCAC 02B .0703. Upon receiving written approval by the NCDWR, buffer restoration
credits, within the 0-100-foot zone, (12,344 ft2) along JB1 can be converted to nutrient offset credit (15A
NCAC 02B .0703); generating 644.126 lbs of N. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4) and (5),
Wolf King 2 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site April 2022

"the area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25% of the
total area of buffer mitigation".
There will be a credit deduction for untreated flow entering riparian buffer areas according to 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (1) (2) (3) and Buffer Interpretation/Clarification #2008-019 Memorandum dated 08/19/2008.
Specifically, there is untreated flow (Ditch A) that enters reach JB1-A and untreated flow (Ditch C) that
enters reach JB2, at their upstream extents. Therefore, where untreated flow enters the easement boundary,
a 120° angle wedge, drawn 50 feet below the easement boundary, was removed from the associated buffer
area for crediting purposes (Figure 2). However, this area of exemption will still be planted and contained
within the conservation easement. Project credit details are below and in Appendix A; Table 1.
Total Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits
Mitigation Totals
Used Area Square Feet and Acres Credits
Restoration
12,344 ft2(0.28 acres) 12,344.000
Preservation
2,674 ft2 (0.06 acres) 267.400
Nutrient Offset
346,552 ft2 (7.95 acres) 17,856.558
Total 358,896 (8.23 acres)
12,611.400 (Buffer)
17,856.558 (Nutrient)
° According to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (4) and (5), "the area ofpreservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise
of no more than 25% of the total area of buffer mitigation.
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach
Buffer restoration and nutrient offset activities were conducted along stream reaches JB1-A, JB1-B, JB2,
and Ditch A, Ditch B, and Ditch C in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (n) and the Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703. Habitat was further
improved through Neuse buffer and adjacent riparian area plantings, treating invasive species, and
increasing the buffer to at least 200 ft. Riparian buffer activities improve riparian areas that filter runoff
from adjacent cropland, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. Planting consisted of
a composition of native bare -root tree species specified in Appendix B. The restoration of plant
communities within the Project not only provides stabilization and improves water quality within the
easement limits, but also provides ecological benefits to the entire watershed. Furthermore, some of these
buffer mitigation credits, where viable, can be converted to nutrient offset credit in accordance with the
Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule, 15A NCAC 02B .0703. Upon receiving written approval by the
NCDWR, buffer restoration credits, within the 0-100-foot zone, (12,344 ft2) along JB1 can be converted to
nutrient offset credit (15A NCAC 02B .0703), with the potential to generate 644.126 lbs of N.
Restoration activities also include the permanent protection of the riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas
from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer
through a conservation easement that have clearly visible easement markers and signs.
Buffer preservation was used along JB1-B and JB2, in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5). Preservation activities consist of permanently protecting the buffer from
cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer
through a conservation easement that have clearly visible easement markers and signs. No more than 25
percent of the total area of buffer mitigation was used for preservation credit pursuant to 15A NCAC 0295
Wolf King 3 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site April 2022

(o)(5). Furthermore, Buffer preservation only generated buffer mitigation credit and is not transferrable into
nutrient offset credits.
1.5 Construction and As Built Conditions
Mixed-Mesic Hardwood Forest — Coastal Plain Subtype (Schafale, 2012) was the target community type
and was used for all areas within the Project. This community composition is highly diverse and is suitable
given the Project's soil and landscape characteristics and will provide water quality and ecological benefits.
All riparian restoration areas were planted from top of bank back at least 50 feet from ditches and from
project streams with bare root tree seedlings on a nine by six-foot spacing to achieve an initial density of
approximately 807 trees per acre. Planting of the Project where riparian buffer restoration and nutrient
offset is being performed meets the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295. The
initial planting of bare root trees occurred on March 7, 2022. There were no deviations from the initial
planting plan. A list of the planted species can be found in Table 2.
Buffer preparation activities were completed in March 2022. The site was constructed in accordance with
the Approved Buffer Mitigation Plan. There was one minor alteration from the Mitigation Plan; the riparian
seed mix was broadcasted rather than sown via no till drill. There were no easement changes between the
submittal of the BPDP Approval and the construction of the site. The conservation easement is marked
every 150-200 feet with North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation signs attached to t-posts (Appendix
C). No livestock are present onsite; therefore, fencing was not installed.
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance
The Wolf King Monitoring activities were completed in March 2022. All Baseline Monitoring data is
present below and in the appendices. The Project is on track to meeting interim success criteria.
RES installed seven permanent vegetation plots on site. Monitoring of the seven permanent vegetation plots
was completed in March 2022. Vegetation tables are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix
C. Scanned vegetation monitoring plot data sheets are found in Appendix D. Monitoring Year 0 (MYO)
monitoring data indicate that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per
acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 526 to 809 planted stems per acre with a mean of 694 planted
stems per acre across all plots. A total of nine species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species
were not noted at baseline monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average tree
height observed was 1.4 feet.
The Project area was previously used as an agricultural field (corn). We kept the corn stalks in place to keep
the soil intact until the riparian seed mix becomes established. As previously mentioned, the seed mix was
distributed via broadcasting. Herbaceous vegetation will be monitored as it becomes established throughout
the Project. There was no encroachment observed or similar activities that would negatively affect the
functioning of the buffer. Diffuse flow was also maintained throughout the conservation easement area.
Additionally, initial invasive species treatment was administered in March 2022.
Wolf King 4 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site April 2022

2 Methods
Annual vegetation monitoring and visual assessments are being conducted. Riparian buffer vegetation
monitoring is based on the "Carolina Vegetation Survey -Ecosystem Enhancement Program Protocol for
Recording Vegetation: Level 1-2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.2" (Lee et al., 2006). As part of the buffer
and nutrient offset mitigation plan, there are seven fixed vegetation plots. Vegetation plots are a minimum
of 100 meters squared in size and cover at least two percent of the planted mitigation area for the Buffer
and Nutrient Offset Bank (8.23 acres). These plots were placed within areas where EBX is seeking riparian
buffer or nutrient offset credit. Data from those plots measuring success of the areas where buffer and
nutrient offset credit is being sought are provided in the monitoring reports. These plots were randomly
placed throughout the planted riparian mitigation area and are representative of the riparian restoration
areas. The following data will be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or
volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots were flagged with flagging tape.
3 Reference
EBX. 2021. Wolf King Mitigation Site — Bank Parcel Development Plan.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R.. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NCDENR. 2009. "Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (March 2019).
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Wolf King 5 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site April 2022

Appendix A
Project Background Tables and Site Maps

Table 1. Wolf King, 2020-1149 v2, Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (fe/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: P (Ibs)
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
18,500.684 I 0.000
Delivered
Nutrient Offset:
N (Ibs)
962.641
2,371.485
829.579
6,509.309
870.489
699.386
751.672
771.449
3,738.532
352.015
II
4
2
1
1
1 I
I
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
0
z
0
z
Riparian Buffer
Credits
i
1 1
124,744- .000
16,682.000
I I
I I
12,344- .000
1 1
I
153,770.000
Convertible to
Riparian
Buffer?
O O
z z
No
Yes
Yes
No
O O
z z
O O
z z
Yes
O
z
O
z
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
O
% Full Credit
%00T
%00T
%00T
%00T
g o
0 0
m mr41
0 0
m m
%00T
%00T
%00T
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
Mitigation (ft)
124,744
12,344
0
0
153,770
12,344
a
Z
Total Area (ft)
18,448
45,447
15,898
124,744
16,682
13,403
14,405
14,784
71,645
6,746
ma
�
358,896
12,344
346,552
Feature Name
Ditch A
Ditch 8
Ditch C
JB1-A
JB2
Ditch A
Ditch 8
Ditch C
JB1-A
JB2
m
m
Ditch A - Diffused Flow
Deduction
Ditch C - Diffused Flow
Deduction
Totals (ft2):
Total Buffer (ft2):
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
0-100
0-100
0-100
0-100
0 o
ry
0 0
101-200
101-200
101-200
101-200
O
o
0
O
0
0
0
0
Mitigation Activity
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Neuse 03020201 - Outside Falls Lake
a
•+ za
Feature Type
Ditch
Ditch
o -
- o
Ditch
Ditch
d/I
d/I
d/I
Ditch
Ditch
Subject? (enter
NO if
ephemeral or
ditch)
0 0
z z
No
Yes
Yes
No
0 0
z z
Yes
Yes
Yes
0
z
0
z
Location
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Credit Type
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
m
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
% Full Credit
0
o
G
ry
N
Total (Creditable)
Area for Buffer
Mitigation (ft)
m
pm -p
2,674
o
n
ni
.7i
v
Total Area (sf)
m m
o �
- .+
2,674
on
2
m
V
a
Feature Name
Mitigation Activity
a
1
CL
ti
0
a
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Credits
12,344.000
0 0
o v
o �
o rv0
Total Riparian Buffer: I 15,018 I 12,611.400
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Credits
17,856.558
Square Feet
12,344
o ry
Square Feet
346,552
Mitigation Totals
Restoration:
Enhancement:
Preservation:
Mitigatic
Nutrient Offset:
1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B.0250 (5)(a).
last updated 08/03/2020

Bennett Rd
!mburg Clinton (—) Warsaw
375 750
Feet
Falling Creek
Baptist Church
p1d c an"" Rd
Bennett Rd .c
4J
C
Legend
Conservation Easement
Neuse River Basin - 03020201 (Excluding Falls Lake Watershed)
14-Digit HUC - 03020201170010
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Wolf King
Mitigation Site
Date: 4/13/2022
Drawn by: HKH
Checked by: RTM
Ores
Wayne County, North Carolina
1 inch = 750 feet

co
22
Figure 2 - CCPV MVO 2022
�N
o �
Wayne County, North Carolina
REFERENCE
:110
tjelt
� t
INIII
G r�_
poi
{
�►r

422
Figure 3 - As -Built Map
2
D O
Y
N
Wayne County, North Carolina
o
2.
REFERENCE
jet.
moo
Mfg
111%.4-
PIP
Sej
c
0
to
ao
2
v
co
m
0
O
to
aJ
to
0
aJ
aJ
to
a
m
NN
c-1
N
LD
N'
ai
c
O
N
0
0
0
0
Mitigation Total
Restoration
Preservation
a▪ J (T
ar �
O LL N
to N
to N
to N
2
Total Nutrient Offs
m
00
Q1
0
c-1
0
N
0
0
0
0
0
O
c-I
to
t aJ aJ
to
I
c O O
o + +-
c c
to ar a)
ao '-
2 z z

Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Mit Plan %
As -Built %
Total Stems Planted
American sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
20
20
1,300
River birch
Betula nigra
20
20
1,300
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
10
10
700
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxii
10
10
700
Water oak
Quercus nigra
10
10
700
Northern red oak
Quercus rubra
10
10
700
Shumard's oak
Quercus shumardii
10
10
700
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
5
5
350
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
5
5
350
Total
6,800
Planted Area
8.23
As -Built Stems/Acre
826
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
MeStem
t?
Ave rage
Plante d
Height (ft)
1
567
0
567
Yes
1.3
2
769
0
769
Yes
1.2
3
809
0
809
Yes
1.5
4
769
0
769
Yes
1.7
5
769
0
769
Yes
1.4
6
526
0
526
Yes
1.4
7
647
0
647
Yes
1.5
Project Avg
694
0
694
Yes
1.4

ion Assessment Data
Appendix B. Veget
0
U
E
Annual Means
MY0 (2022)
H
..
O-
..
..
..
NN
N
..
.-I
n
011
0
1.0
To
01 .
O
..
C
L(1
..
..
ON
NN
01 ..
01
01
01ci
-1
O
C
0
.
O
..
C
�(1
..
..
ON
N
..
.
01
1.0
Current Plot Data (MY0 2022)
O
o
O
co
N
O
.-i
~
N
m
.--I
L(1
M1
N
LO
c-I
O
o
LOCO
1.0
7
d
N
m
A
Lc,
m
N
l0
1.0
CO
co
J
O
C
0
N
m
.--I
L(1
m
N
,.0l0
ti
CO
Tr
1.0
O
o
O
LO
N
rl
~
N
N
.-I
m
L(1
m
..
c-I
O
o
Lr)
LO
N
T
a
N
N
.-I
m
L(1
m
�(1
l0
NI
IA
0
N
N
.-I
m
L(1
m
L(1
l0
N
O
o
N
O
co
N
O
.-i
~
N
m
N
.--I
m
.--I
m
Tr
01
c-I
N
O
o
CO
01
d
N
m
N.
m
.--I
m
Tr
01
c-I
CO
01
1.0
co J
O
C
0
N
m
N.
m
.--I
m
Tr
01
CO
01
n
v
o
o
LO
N
.i
m
C
.--I
.-I
m
I-
01
.-'
o
LO
01
`°
a
M
C
.--I
.-I
m
N
01
l0
O1
up
IA
0
m
C
.--I
.-I
m
I-
01
LO
01
1.0
O
o
A
O
co
N
O
.i
~
C
N
N
N
m
m
N
N
0
NI
.--I
N
O
o
CO
O
CO
-
T
d
C
N
N
N
m
m
N
N
0
N
CO
01
co
J
O
0
C
N
N
N
m
m
N
N
0
N
CO
01
0
CO
N
0
o
O
LO
N
.i
~
..
a
a
a
.ti
01
..
c-I
O
o
l0
01
up
T
a
L(1
..
C
C
C.-
01
l0
O1
N
co
0
l(.
1
.
C
C
C
.--1
01
LO
01
1.0
O
o
N
O
N
O
~
.-I
.-I
l0
.-I
.-I
.-I
N
.-I
Tr
c-I
N
O
o
CO
N
-
d
A
F
LO
A
A
A
N
.--I
C
CO
n
1.0
O
0
-
-
.
---N.-..
CON
LL(1
Wolf King
Species Type
Tree
Shrub
Tre e
Tree
Tree
Tree
Tree
Tree
v
r
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Common Name
river birch
common buttonbusl-
common persimmon
American sycamore
swamp chestnut oak
water oak
willow oak
northern red oak
Shumard's oak
Scientific Name
Betula nigra
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Diospyros virginiana
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus michauxii
Quercus nigra
Quercus phellos
Quercus rubra
Quercus shumardii

Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Boundary Photos
Invasive Photos

Wolf King MY0 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
7 : ,
.� . it' : y _'� x" F �;4 :j; 'r' -':, �:"'.' .%'•re :-'. • „-
rg y '' - y -. d' t, , _ -i4- e a . nI ,G' ° .c '
•
Vegetation Plot 1 Vegetation Plot 2
r
alt
. °A.e
d ^*' F a '1 °i s _ . ° .� 1� 'C`r 1;;tr t� o ,. ' S,a s -
v- " �: `fi .�, .� "�` ',S` '`fix.. r;i #, ' ,e`F - ., 4k
�4 � AF +�-
3 k fir, y. v!4 i.' . -' t.b,s' ra.-f , t. �` =v-' -z..°
" "' ��/t - .• � "a s33, d}, a qua �6
'M� ., #" * ., .-_ . .� .^ .�'a «�... c ,gym'r., - .— _ a «E
Vegetation Plot 3 Vegetation Plot 4
4 i:.,... .,, ,,,,,,. ., 3:,.. — '' '' --OK:••• -- 6 .- , *IS, , .^.,,,, .;;,..'''- ' ,, :
i k.w 6.t 4-. ,-.;Zia Y�x• +uga (�° '
�a y-„s`7 ,t, �. "5`, s r L r i P
9,$' ,fit .0 ,ti 7� 3. "° 'w r� " .y'
¢ � � 1; ��
' - iF- : ! . :
.` tfi —, a g. 6 k - 3vx6 a 1 \ t .a - re' ir• I� s - h sT• ' _l. � 4 , �°. 7' �' « PS I.;1- y -fk, FA r?r # j ' _'144t.
, a' .. c` ° Ya .mar a -a: om: "r . c�;, a Vegetation Plot 6r .i. . .,,,,..— z _
Vegetation Plot 5

Wolf King MY0 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
T,
4,,,,„:, ! ''- :A*1--,•:' ---•°,r....t' , •-. 1 r--*, ,. 4-1'
Yy
tk- L.'
._ f
, w
\��'sa� '7.r s` ,� '�"�',�U.�S 1 F '�= � •`a'tY_"mR, „�e,�`�i ey%,"`
h '4- w
Vegetation Plot 7

Wolf King Boundary Photos
pool
Ir
10,
•
'r, tf •
4
.. • ar,tit','+
J.
"yF .. ' },5:! • Ala -rcaouc. ,�� 'r'
14 .-y rnw may. _ -Y1!it..
, - ' ' —__,*.,,,,,..,_:;...0.,.!..,.y.2 'p
l,. { 1c ;-:" ,: a�:\: -0 _. a,
> .'::ri•, r' . ,. -;... 'c.. - :: -ate ,L•;:=•-
Boundary Photos all
Boundary Photos
91111grip111111
{ ;.'' .P..-�F-'Y.r z ' r 50 ar. y t�+ HM
11
rt
Boundary Photos Boundary Photos

Wolf King Invasive Photos
I •.�� .sls N;.S "ir y4 v y .. k`-a'Fr.
13�w 4 £ 9's. k :
x -
t.
.zr .e• - T '. \ 'le • r6 Y 4�
-, ` o `.il k'`"rY' ,: ti .•
l/` ! „••1�+ i.^firrti •r .""'i' y� 1' ,AF' 4'i4. !` ��'✓Tk'M1` 5 4
` s k7a ,4' tea°' Sy
. Ae SG@'u"i; ? � S. �. u� .}♦,
Invasive stump cut Invasive basal spray
_ � j
r. to - " Y ! !
'� �¢ ,' A
k
4 . ..,_„:1114 ,4, 40,. .. , . ..
,-..„ .-- . _
.1 .44, 4'-' '
77.41- . __it\,.-` 42A , 3.t.:
y F_ -1 *' '-:..,t-,-.- ,,..--444" 4, ,g,;;4,
tiwti" '' ox .• f w fi,1CI -3
iiit
4
1 _,p, % .__...,. , ,ii. , , _ .4._,, ,.. „4,..-v,,, ..e.,; ,,,,,r, _ -.4t ,. /_, ,.. 7„-,,.. ,_,_ . .„„__ ,,,-,.. __,,_:
� l r�' d f�e R
, ,„i.,,,,..,..„:__Ati,,,....,4.t.,::_,-„L,1
�n : f N fir.' 1
,,,,,,,k-,'-'1•14''1-'''?'-''''' ,, -----1:1)_-• )01I , ,
"y„ , ,„ .0 '
, Ili,'.;...1,*.o,---1 A- ,,irf, "--,„.,,,;,ck,r :41-,r.,,k .4.4„,,,4i
V-0 ,;/X '''''q
r f _ � � ",. . fly r
Invasive stump cut Invasive stump cut/basal spray

Appendix D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Sheets

L/JOLF IN(,
Woody Stem Data: CVS Level 2
Planted Woody Stems -- individual stems measured
Leader:
Project: k Team: /14 Plot: Date /1/2ZBearing: 12j1
Species Name
Coordinates
Height
DBH
Damage
X (0.1 m) Y (0.1 m)
(1 cm)Vigor
(1 cm)
1
1
• Cj
•
• S
(0
3
2
(I,C
Z• 2
1. rl
3
3
1 '
I
4
5
1► -V
•2.
i •
6
i 1/ i
H . 9
- . 2
7
Q. Co
1
4
�1
8
1.
•�1
r •
9
;{. 1
2 • Yi
. of
c--1
10
�'
Z. .
ci
11
r7
Co)
12
�- i' �. 1
�7•
- 1 �\
1
c i
13
•
'-i . '7
14
•
2 . 2
15
16
17
18
19
•
•
•
20
•
21
22
23•
•
24
25
26
•
•
27
•
.
28
.
29
30
31
32
•
33
.
34
35
•
.
36
.
37
•

\AEI 1
Woody Stem Data: CVS Level 2
Planted Woody Stems -- individual stems mea
Leader: 01 Project: jleadealt Team: Mi 11..) Plot vp2. Date 65ii5 / 22Bearing: 0
Species Name
Coordinates
Height
DBH
Vigor
Damage
X 0.1 m m
) Y 0.1
( ( )
(1 cm)
(1 cm)
1
V1 ,
. 5
• 5
3 1
2
,) vi,
z • 5
..6
2 0
3
t VI,
. 3
L, I
5
_-.1il/
•
•9
t
6
to
8
�
3 .
.
'2
9
UV^lJ
•
, .'7
G
i
11
• I
C •
7g
13
.\i 1) k
.
•
Z .
14
G)0Y
. ,,
.
1
15
G2 i)11
• 0
. 2
3 Z-
16
15 i' �+
4, . 1
`i .
52
17
L-f• 4
ci2
18
)`D-c
. 1
`A, 9
19
/„
• rJ
c-11
20
.
21
•
22
23
,
24
25
26
.
27
28
•
29
•
30
31
.
32
33
34
35
,
36
,
37
•
•

Woody Stem Data: CVS Level 2
Planted Woody Stems -- individual stems measured
Leader: C) Project: Team: I 4.) MEJPlot V'f3 Date: / / Bearing:5
3
Species Name
Coordinates
Height
DBH
Vigor
Damage
X (0.1 m) Y (0.1 m)
(1 cm)
(1 cm)
1
(UI1,
• 7
•
5)
_5
2
3 . 1
. (.
3
1' C 1,'4 i
• 11
• 1,
1-1
4
, k,J , VI
0. •
5
(. 'll >n ,
. 1
.
6
Q ,, °1
g. 1
• 4
7
c) ) ) 1,
. I-1-
.
q 9
1
8
i'!•
Li • S
-e . q
9rj
9
€Ch-.
•S •'a-
. 5
10
U ) 1(1
I .
3 .
11
. f '
(, •
1 `i
12
L . •
(, •
7
13
t ,,.) Ni
3 .
(, .
14
1I 1 '
if: • Z
•
50
15
'R •1
r,•
27.
16
1 ) C
�-1.
C.
17
0 1
01 • 2
c-ti Z#
18
y)
r . z)
ri . I
(
19
'12 1 ) ..
5
rt
20
11'ti (
l . 9
9 . 1
-, 9
,.11
21
.
22
23
.
24
,
25
.
26
.
27
.
28
.
29
.
30
.
31•
32
.
33
,
34
.
35
36
.
37
.

Woody Stem Data: CVS Level 2
Planted Woody Stems -- individual stems measured
Leader: Project —Deed -Oak Team: Plot dp Date 1 / (5 /7ZBearing: 22_0
Species Name
Coordinates
Height
DBH
Vigor
Damage
X (0.1 m) Y (0.1 m)
(1 cm)
(1 cm)
1
C.,
5•
L7
2
ceor
-2-y -7)
3
: Ui( (l
Z. 5
.('1
c )
4
CIL1 i.
C • 5
Gl
r7r
5
0-0 .
. .
6
('! (0 V)
.
. r1
7
CVC•
Z.•I
?. -
5v
8
0 0 .
1. Z
7. c'l
6)
9
• '7
. 4-
`a cn
10
c 1 V\
3 .
1 . 2.
11
t l
i, .
2.. 5
'5 9
12
(-11 S 41
.2
L...1 . I r,
13
y) ,
t . ,
r • CI
rl
14
. Li
'1 • --)
Co 1!
15
.
.
16
. a
.
F, `-/
17
c i
•• 0
• 1
91
18
( fl c,
. c
i • 9
<
19
1' >-
. I
Z
,,,
20
.
21
.
22
,
23
.
24
.
25
,
26
27
.
28
_
•
29
.
30
,
31
.
.
32
,
33•,
34
.
35
.
.
36
.
.
37
.
•

Woody Stem Data: CVS Level 2
014 k iv 9 Planted Woody Stems -- individual stems measured
Leader:
Species Name
Project: D Oak- Team: G I� Plot U P5 Date 3/ 1 c /7 Bearing: CJ
Coordinates
X(0.1m) Y(0.1m)
Height
(1 cm)
DBH
(1 cm)
Vigor
Damage
1
vA
G•c
. 5
6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
vvi
v1
`V)
0, v,
0
C J
C) •
d • al
3•�
'2, • 57)
01
• r.
Gj • 2)
`7•\
•�
. 1-4
�•rl
55
r
7')
2G
10
Q u 5 V1
5 •
2-
G
11
)(u
<1
12
13
14
0/1
)1 (-)C
`b e
•
0
C)
�U
15
16
17
18
19
20
,-11j'��
Y
ri •
r •
•
7.L
5. 0
U
44
�C)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

Woody Stem Data: CVS Level 2
Planted Woody Stems -- individual stems measured
Leader: Project:—B. Team:" - . Plot Ort, Date / / Bearing: Id
f
Species Name
Coordinates
Height
DBH
Vigor
Damage
X (0.1 m) Y (0.1 m)
(1 cm)
(1 cm)
1
D4)VO
c' •ra
c) • 5
5( )
'�
2
yitp'ir;
.•rf
? .
E. Z
3
C 0'0In
0 .
c) • G.
-)()
4
it s 5In
2. • 1-
1 •
"-a 0
6
( . 1(E 1
. (
C:'(
7
(, -e' ►n
Is • C1
7 • i-. ,,
";-1
8
C1L15%
,r .
al .CI
3
10
ii, ;1';U17
Co ..
11
rt't; ,1'
2 . U
12
- e(vC
._:
c�
13
��Yt�
1 . ',
9 .c,
L-iz)
14
.
15
.
16
.
17
.
18
.
19
.
20
.
21
.
22
.
23
.
24
.
25
.
26
.
27
.
28
.
29
.
30
.
31
.
32
.
33
.
34
.
35
.
36
.
37
.

Woody Stem Data: CVS Level 2
Planted Woody Stems -- individual stems measured
Leader: Project: Dead Oak Team: '� bl Plot Vf7 Date* / / Bearing: c
Species Name
Coordinates
Height
DBH
Vigor
Damage
X 0.1 m .1 m
) Y 0
( ( )
(1 cm)
(1 cm)
1
C, UV!)
C • LI
"L • ._
cJ
3
2
2 .J
9 . C)
5
3
►V
Co . L.
et . i
4
(
% . C,
6 .
;Cj
5
C
. q
LF 1I
6
C
• •-L
7
Mi 11'
0 • `r
I
8
G 'Sk
2. I
1. Co
z9
9
r\IiY J
3.Li
1 •r)
'r
10
.
1-1. "'-'1n.
11
i:.
'7 • �7
C. •
(- Co
12
, �i .5
. 5�
U. �'i
13
1
.rj
"t .
i /
14
�;
4�v
15
��
:
17
.
18
.
19
.
20
.
21
•
22
.
23
.
24
.
25
.
26
.
27
.
28
,
29
,
30
.
31
••
32
.
33
••
34
.
35•.
36
.
37
.

1
Date:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot (continued): 102767-01-0001
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Mar 2022 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 102767-01-0001
VMD Year (1-5):
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X-Axis bearing (deg):
arty:
Role: Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X:
10
Y:
Datum:
UTM Zone:
10
131
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Mar 2022 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
337 Quercus rubra
338 Diospyros virginiana
339 Quercus rubra
340 Quercus nigra
341 Quercus phellos
342 Diospyros virginiana
343 Cephalanthus occidentalis
344 Diospyros virginiana
345 Diospyros virginiana
346 Diospyros virginiana
347 Quercus shumardii
348 Betulanigra
349 Quercus sp.
350 Diospyros virginiana
# stems: 14
Species Name
0
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.6
2.2
2.8
5.9
5.2
4.7
4.1
3.4
2.7
2.6
7.7
8.3
8.9
9.2
0.5
2.7
1.2
0.4
1.5
3.2
4.8
6.3
7.9
9.8
8.8
7.0
4.7
2.2
60.0
15.0
63.0
51.0
20.0
51.0
18.0
58.0
48.0
28.0
60.0
50.0
10.0
26.0
If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody
Vigor*
Damage* Notes
Stems) Form:
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 1
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot (continued): 102767-01-0001
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Mar 2022 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampling**:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >lOcm, explain why to the right.): LI lOcm LI 50cm LI 100Cm LI 137cm
FI
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-10
Seed
cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sapi
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Required ifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. .1
I.2
• • 3
I..4 `"5
It:6
I:7
I:18
I
t10 Foim WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 102767-01-0001
Y:5m
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 131 °
# stems: 14
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 2
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot 102767-01-0002
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
1
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum:
UTM Zone:
I X-Axis bearing (deg):
10
0
arty:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Mar 2022 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
# stems: 19
Species Name
Quercus nigra
Quercus nigra
Betula nigra
Quercus phellos
Quercus rubra
Quercus nigra
Betula nigra
Quercus shumardii
Quercus rubra
Diospyros virginiana
Quercus nigra
Quercus rubra
Quercus phellos
Quercus rubra
Quercus phellos
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Quercus phellos
0
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.5
2.5
3.3
5.4
8.8
7.4
5.2
3.3
1.1
0.4
2.1
3.4
6.5
8.6
8.0
6.1
4.4
2.1
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.9
4.0
3.8
3.8
3.7
6.4
6.3
6.3
6.6
6.8
9.2
9.1
9.1
8.9
8.7
31.0
20.0
41.0
21.0
85.0
36.0
42.0
32.0
50.0
29.0
29.0
39.0
22.0
15.0
32.0
52.0
42.0
48.0
41.0
If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody
Vigor*
Damage* Notes
Stems) Form:
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 3
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot (continued): 102767-01-0002
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Mar 2022 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampling**:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >lOcm, explain why to the right.): LI lOcm LI 50cm LI 100Cm LI 137cm
FI
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-10
Seed
cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sapi
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Required ifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. .1
I.2
• • 3
I..4 `"5
It:6
I:7
I:18
I
t10 Foim WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 102767-01-0002
0
0 0
Y:5m
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 0 °
# stems: 19
map size:
N small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 4
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot 102767-01-0003
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
1
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum:
UTM Zone:
I X-Axis bearing (deg):
10
355
arty:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Mar 2022 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
# stems: 20
Species Name
Quercus nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Quercus phellos
Quercus nigra
Quercus michauxii
Quercus phellos
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Quercus shumardii
Quercus rubra
Diospyros virginiana
Quercus rubra
Quercus nigra
Quercus michauxii
Quercus shumardii
Quercus phellos
Diospyros virginiana
Platanus occidentalis
Platanus occidentalis
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.7
3.1
4.7
6.6
8.7
8.1
6.4
4.8
3.4
1.8
0.5
2.2
3.9
6.2
8.1
9.8
8.3
6.3
3.8
1.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.9
0.9
3.4
3.5
3.4
3.5
3.6
6.3
6.3
6.4
6.2
6.1
6.2
9.2
9.1
9.2
9.1
51.0
50.0
42.0
51.0
46.0
10.0
47.0
47.0
58.0
48.0
44.0
57.0
46.0
50.0
22.0
43.0
54.0
46.0
49.0
39.0
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
Stems) Form:
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 5
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot (continued): 102767-01-0003
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Mar 2022 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampling**:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >lOcm, explain why to the right.): LI lOcm LI 50cm LI 100Cm LI 137cm
FI
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-10
Seed
cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sapi
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Required ifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. .1
I.2
• • 3
I.•4 `"5
It:6
I:7
I:18
I
t10 Foim WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 102767-01-0003
Y:5m
0
0 0
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 355 °
# stems: 20
map size:
N small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 6
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot 102767-01-0004
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
1
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum:
UTM Zone:
I X-Axis bearing (deg):
10
220
arty:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Mar 2022 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
393 Cephalanthus occidentalis
394 Cephalanthus occidentalis
395 Quercus rubra
396 Quercus rubra
397 Quercus shumardii
398 Quercus shumardii
399 Cephalanthus occidentalis
400 Quercus michauxii
401 Quercus rubra
402 Quercus shumardii
403 Quercus shumardii
404 Quercus shumardii
405 Quercus nigra
406 Quercus shumardii
407 Quercus shumardii
408 Betula nigra
409 Betula nigra
410 Cephalanthus occidentalis
411 Betulanigra
# stems: 19
Species Name
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
1.1
1.8
2.5
5.5
4.8
3.5
2.1
1.2
0.7
3.9
5.1
6.2
7.1
8.4
9.8
9.9
9.0
8.0
6.9
5.6
7.2
9.0
9.7
8.3
6.7
3.3
1.9
0.4
1.2
2.5
4.5
6.0
7.5
8.8
5.3
3.7
1.9
0.6
27.0
33.0
51.0
70.0
70.0
58.0
50.0
49.0
56.0
61.0
59.0
58.0
53.0
61.0
68.0
54.0
41.0
28.0
42.0
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody
Vigor*
Damage* Notes
Stems) Form:
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 7
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot (continued): 102767-01-0004
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Mar 2022 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampling**:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >lOcm, explain why to the right.): LI lOcm LI 50cm LI 100Cm LI 137cm
FI
Species Name
u
e
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-10
Seed
cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sapi
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Required ifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. .1
I.2
• • 3
I..4 `"5
It:6
I:7
I:18
I
t10 Foim WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 102767-01-0004
Y:5m
0
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 220 °
# stems: 19
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 8
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot 102767-01-0005
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
1
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum:
UTM Zone:
I X-Axis bearing (deg):
10
Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
40
arty:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
ID
Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Mar 2022 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
# stems: 19
Species Name
Quercus nigra
Quercus michauxii
Betula nigra
Quercus shumardii
Quercus shumardii
Quercus shumardii
Diospyros virginiana
Diospyros virginiana
Diospyros virginiana
Quercus shumardii
Quercus rubra
Quercus phellos
Platanus occidentalis
Betula nigra
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra
Quercus nigra
Quercus nigra
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
6.8
6.9
7.0
6.9
6.9
7.0
9.9
9.8
0.5
1.9
3.5
5.3
7.1
8.9
9.4
7.7
4.3
2.5
0.7
0.5
1.6
3.5
5.5
7.2
8.6
2.2
0.6
46.0
43.0
61.0
55.0
57.0
42.0
25.0
33.0
20.0
20.0
57.0
50.0
50.0
40.0
50.0
40.0
25.0
50.0
53.0
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody
Vigor*
Damage* Notes
Stems) Form:
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 9
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot (continued): 102767-01-0005
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Mar 2022 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampling**:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >locm, explain why to the right.): LI lOcm LI 50cm LI 100Cm LI 137cm
FI
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-10
Seed
cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sapi
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Required ifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. .1
I.2
• • 3
I..4 `"5
It:6
I:7
I:18
I
t10 Foim WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 102767-01-0005
Y:5m
T
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 40 °
# stems: 19
N map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 10
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot 102767-01-0006
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
1
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum:
UTM Zone:
I X-Axis bearing (deg):
10
Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
10
arty:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Mar 2022 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
# stems: 13
Species Name
Quercus rubra
Betula nigra
Quercus phellos
Quercus shumardii
Quercus shumardii
Quercus rubra
Betula nigra
Quercus shumardii
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Quercus shumardii
Quercus shumardii
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Quercus rubra
O R 9.9 0.5
O R 8.7 2.7
O R 0.5 0.6
O R 2.2 1.8
R 4.2 3.3
O R 6.0 4.6
R 9.9 7.0
R 7.5 9.9
® R 5.2 8.1
O R 3.3 6.7
® R 2.0 5.5
® R 0.4 4.4
O R 1.8 9.5
50.0
52.0
50.0
40.0
32.0
59.0
39.0
31.0
48.0
42.0
32.0
49.0
43.0
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody
Vigor*
Damage* Notes
Stems) Form:
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 11
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot (continued): 102767-01-0006
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Mar 2022 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampiing" *:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >lOcm, explain why to the right.): LI lOcm LI 50cm LI 100Cm LI 137cm
FI
Species Name
u
e
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-10
Seed
cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sapi
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Re quired ifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. .1
I.2
• • 3
I..4 `"5
It:6
I:7
I:18
I
t10 Foim WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 102767-01-0006
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 10 °
# stems: 13
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 12
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot 102767-01-0007
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
1
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum:
UTM Zone:
I X-Axis bearing (deg):
10
20
arty:
Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Mar 2022 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
447 Quercus rubra
448 Quercus phellos
449 Quercus michauxii
450 Cephalanthus occidentalis
451 Cephalanthus occidentalis
452 Cephalanthus occidentalis
453 Quercus phellos
454 Quercus shumardii
455 Quercus rubra
456 Quercus rubra
457 Quercus phellos
458 Quercus shumardii
459 Betula nigra
460 Quercus phellos
461 Quercus phellos
462 Betula nigra
# stems: 16
Species Name
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.4
2.0
6.2
3.5
1.7
0.7
0.5
2.1
3.4
5.4
7.5
9.4
9.5
8.0
6.4
O R 5.1
7.6
9.0
9.1
6.5
5.2
4.2
0.6
1.6
3.0
4.4
6.5
7.8
4.8
3.4
1.7
1.0
52.0
53.0
49.0
30.0
44.0
48.0
61.0
48.0
42.0
33.0
46.0
67.0
52.0
50.0
20.0
41.0
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
Stems) Form:
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 13
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead,
M=missing.
Plot (continued): 102767-01-0007
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Mar 2022 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species
subsampling**:
eight Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >lOcm, explain why to the right.): LI lOcm LI 50cm LI 100Cm LI 137cm
FI
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-10
Seed
cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sapi
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Required ifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. .1
I.2
• • 3
I..4 `"5
It:6
I:7
I:18
I
t10 Foim WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 102767-01-0007
Y:5m
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 20 °
# stems: 16
N map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 14
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
ANIMal, Human TRAMp1ed, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1