NC0026697_Wasteload Allocation_19920220

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0026697
PERMTTTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Town of Hayesville
Town of Hayesville WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal with Modification
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.072 MGD*
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
*Are asking for an upgrade to 0.097 MGD. Copyof their application
and upgrade proposal included.
RECEWING STREAM: Town Creek
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 04-05-01
Reference USGS Quad: GO3SE
County: Clay
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
(please attach)
Previous Exp. Date: 00/00/00 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
No change within three miles
Requested by: Randy Kepler Date:
Prepared by: / i� �� ,' Date:
Reviewed by: 1VLL 12Q. etsymsfov1801).“. /W • 65E- egfaisitem goiD.4 I?C
ta
OntdiA61-e-
10/8/91
Date: 0...14
y
a
Modeler
Date Rec.
Co
(4ii
Drainage Area (mi2 ) 7.27 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 3•�
7Q10 (cfs) O. rt Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0.7? 30Q2 (cfs) 74'
Toxicity Limits: IWC �..3 %�°� �� Acut
Instream Monitoring:
� �" ���-�K�
Parameters 9.0 •
Upstream i,vtIr Location �0 'lps. elfovIa/ J
Downstrearniemlh cxwk Location YI,Q/ u/ OdU.%
Effluent
Characteristics
NH3-N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (mg/1)
F. Col. (/100 ml)
pH (SU)
(f);49//)
v
Re terra .6472, itt;
rn07It fl�Y
�-9
nling-fiV
ginglave
ionwilen7
.O1lAnf,
�o
200
ac
(NS
Comments: tJoit ¶Wo SC:11/41-r Liµ-rs Foes —MC -rg° r.
1 ni (ae- ExDAfsiot3 ) Oa) Zf'/o (07osrr Pi b-
zo

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WAS `1'ELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 6491
Town of Hayesville/Town of Hayesville WWTP
NC0026697
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Modification
Town Creek
C
040501
Clay
Asheville
Kepler
10/8/91
G3SE
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7(210 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
RECEIVED
Water Quality Section
DEC ? I 1991
Asheville Regional Otis
Asheville, North Caroni"
03.5471.2320
1991
1.27
0.5
0.79
3.2
1.1
23
•
Facilityis requesting an upgrade to 0.097 MGD. Plans for improving the WWTP include flow
equalization, additional aeration units, and expanded chlorine contact facilities. Text from the
engineering proposal does not mention dechlorination but the schematic for the proposed changes
does. In any case, a chlorine limit will be necessary upon expansion as willon-i
mg/l-(su e rYand- --rng/1(winter). Fecal limits should be changed to 200/100 ml upon issuance
of this renewal. w
ify et A
1
it
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: I
FA-6 's,•I y i.�nwJci 0# iv_ a,�l� 41J rL�e4 r'L6P(li a N(�3 Ii it,.. e i5 �riSC � G �'Y /�S t�i(`�07, AAA"
s Ant C iryw I LL i l a Al;- C' 2 /'/i/J`V� 1Z /I /V )Z. G? f 113 ! i /
lot ,A�i
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
•
/ Date: l
Permits & Engineering:
--Ls) a..A_Jj_da
RETURN TO 'TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
,t,-071e
Date: 5/
Date: I 2_-L GI' raL
Date:
/2 7/7
1S au�.ot.,-� tie

Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (14/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 mi):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Toxicity Test (P/F):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
0.072
30
monitor
30
1000
6-9
monitor
monitor
monitor
Monthly Average
before expansion
0.072
30
monitor
30
200
6-9
monitor
@NCI8%
monitor
monitor
x
Monthly Average after
expansion
0.097
30
monitor
30
200
6-9
28.0
@23%
monitor
monitor
WQ or EL
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
Parameter(s) Affected
Chlorine
x fecal, toxicity test
x Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & S Pl1-K,CIAI J CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met? /t/f13
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
PAL saariefrpreg -4c, 1 77 terms /575 17 A ? /34 ? /AA k
�r.�c,e �, Al C "u� / — eye � Otis4.; 7.77, 4,, die �f w es sett.,,,
4 < tad. �y/ like e,¢P Ge/ Ln) d 4it c r /�/D c Airm h i /� ly ce.Y k fb L ,eeM a Yf /V r , J#-
ex-74.4.4dasnaka,„ ok nnz- s 5 •
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

f-ke-ae
Facility Name / er-
SLf4/ff r .OMmf.e>
Permit # 6>17 Pipe # 0 /
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is ig % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed irty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
1.5-74r > P Ain/ . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effl ent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 a• cfs
Permitted Flow . 2------ MGD
IWC It %
Basin & Sub -basin AI 49,1-0/
Receiving Stream i `✓L.) ea ce-Ait
County Ccof y
Recommended by:
Dabe Witfrz
•
QCL PIF Version 9/91

d
Facility Name Of1/'it' OF Oa ' Permit # Pipe # ©0 /
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is 23 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quartet monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed after thirty from the effective date of this permit during the months of
/ . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final e uent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 cfs
Permitted Flow • 09 7 MGD
MC 3 %
Basin & Sub -basin J/flil 'sAt9SVD
Receiving Stream 7:ttiA) Cft
County L
Recommended by:
Date Z//(/i7i
QCL PIF Version 9/91

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : TOWN OF HAYESVILLE
Receiving Stream : TOWN CREEK
Summer 7Q10 : 0.5
Design Temperature: 23.
Subbasin : 040501
Stream Class: C
Winter 7Q10 : 0.79
►LENGTH► SLOPE VELOCITY 1 DEPTH Kd Kd Ka Ka KN
mile ft/mi fps ft design► @201/2 design( @201/2 design
Segment 1 0.601 20.401
Reach 1
Segment 1
Reach 2
0.901 16.001
1
0.145 0.56 1 0.33 1 0.29 1 5.68 1 5.321 0.63 1
1
0.336 2.17 1 0.28 1 0.25 1 7.46 1 6.981 0.38 1
Flow 1 CBOD NBOD
cfs mg/1 mg/1
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste 0.150 1 45.000 1148.500
Headwaters 0.500 2.000 1 1.000
Tributary 0.000 2.000 1 1.000
* Runoff 1 0.070 1 2.000 1 1.000
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 0.000
Tributary 1 23.000
* Runoff 1 0.000
D.O.
mg/1
0.000
7.720
7.720
7.720
0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000
2.000 1 1.000 1 8.580
2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

MODEL RESULTS
Discharger : TOWN OF HAYESVILLE
Receiving Stream : TOWN CREEK
The End D.O. is 8.43 mg/1.
The End CBOD is 2.14 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 1.69 mg/1.
SUMMER
TOWN OF HAYESVILLE-NH3=33 MG/L
SAVED ON LBDATA29 AS HAYSVL
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 4.95 0.60 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
45.00
0.00
148.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09700
0.00000

Seg # I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Seg # I
Reach
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Reach
Seg Mi I D.O.
0.00 5.94
0.10 5.56
0.20 5.29
0.30 5.12
0.40 5.02
0.50 4.96
0.60 4.95
0.60 8.47
0.70 8.47
0.80 8.46
0.90 8.45
1.00 8.45
1.10 8.44
1.20 8.44
1.30 8.43
1.40 8.43
1.50 8.43
# I Seg Mi I D.O.
I CBOD
11.94
11.67
11.41
11.15
10.90
10.66
10.42
2.25
2.23
2.22
2.21
2.20
2.19
2.18
2.17
2.16
2.14
I CBOD
1
1
SUMMER
TOWN OF HAYESVILLE-NH3=33 MG/L
SAVED ON LBDATA29 AS HAYSVL
NBOD I Flow I
35.10 0.65
33.83 0.66
32.60 0.66
31.42 0.67
30.29 0.68
29.21 0.69
28.16 0.69
1.79 23.69
1.78 23.69
1.77 23.69
1.76 23.69
1.75 23.69
1.73 23.69
1.72 23.69
1.71 23.69
1.70 23.69
1.69 23.69
NBOD I Flow I

# 64e/
/coo2a77
7gkV of lierte5Wate
�;�.097nnoecrev
07-te:toi roe
geive-g44 frOrH A/Cc-at/es-is irate -of_ eZveciifes
micate mit ftekti, Fic-tary ��enteVTzy S`c c nn1 PALitY
ziiHIi3 Mani d gc-a tertey rr nG glee
csiel‘,/ti AC-4m0 of iimo.
fic:ttrijy ids v'io
/we
4
Artitite Mr- el Pc': a
4
4:429/75 1744_ ori‘atil
No Jo/rens pin wass 4
epr; "tAio
.141,14qtgrele C-elityi•ct
t m ��� / reneavigt-- £4c,c, _ I�wcc' eriger- reie
j_NP A:r nenWS/CN,e efilly ,( eiSa
72T /N 4-1#049 at 4ffl7ijL) Afeer col anti
Li,vf(1.- Qiz' «tp ewe zaVitoe*lL 0/tee/ilea:
a•q/aq l� 5//bkfrQ be (tailitclu oifitt2A/ 4frWA/$'N.
&of eS-Mkre-St e; Vat 41 It( 6,/
/ 7t
de/ niefre
6.3,S4f7/.Zr,Zc (it/flit)
Prnt t
5-7Parkc-
va:
I "
Zer-vez-er
tP
erhic
4-pibt r e icr
•
*wiriest
•
i^
<0 v>

64f1/
Aicoozgri
•
•
it; toi‘t of tlitYealitt-te-
05.547/ Z f c 0910
•/4*'/�7,/Z/
5.761II a • r
elWatit c 0_71 j es
ad+ tze,
3:0 Zf1f
•
•
ifyieStinete
6/17: ,0974#0;)
oyesreot
tAm Cr. e acts
.57olb 0.64 coMato eg
614.
Tashi CE.t)fl16t, F1'1,
03 M7�. r75t f' gT)
tAl7roo: 27 criticr--
Opt -4 1115. cfire;
3otti �'- c ff
Z
C.%
1
•
\,.
.5.4, oa c 71.175a isi()
,7010,v4
07c+0=
ak:i o(c cfs
30ai5
P.A. in °.
•
Utk, f t/
•

•
•
0•
d
}
•
Stre&:
(10.in Stc
SieP Lotion C CafCuS
4
•
•
4
•
•
•
•
d i st

TOWN OF HAYESVILLE - Allowable Waste Concentrations
Residual Chlorine
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L)
I WC (%)
Allowable Concentration (ug/I)
SUMMER
Ammonia as NH3
0.5 7Q10 (CFS)
0.097 !! DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.15035 !!! DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L)
0!!!!UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
23.118321
73.534752 ;::::::::::Allowable Concentration (mg/I)
WINTER
05
0.097
0.15035
1.0
0.22
23.11832
3.593947
.....:Ammonia as NH3
7Q10 (CFS)
!Nil DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
HE UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
1•11WC (%)
Allowable Concentration (mg/I)
0.79
0.097
0.15035
1.8
0.22
15.98873
10.10196
NC0026697
DAG 11/18/91

•
ENGINEERING PROPOSAL
APPLICATION FOR NPDES PERMIT RENEWAL
TOWN OF HAYESVILLE
CLAY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
JUNE, 1991
GENERAL
The Town of Hayesville -ntl operates a wastewater treatment plant
(WWTP) which is allowed to discharge72,00Qgpd of treated effluent to Town
Creek under NPDES Permit No. NC0026697. The location of the WWTP is
shown on Figure One attached Effluent limitations are secondary with
monthly averages of 30 mg/L BOD 30 mg/L TSS and 1000/100 ml Fecal
Coliform. The WWTP is operating near hydraulic capacity at the present
time.
The Town recognizes the need to expand the WWTP in the near future so
that sewer service will be available to accommodate perceived future growth
Accordingly, the Town is applying for a flow increase of 25,000 gpd to 97,000
gpd total average flow under their existing permit in conjunction with the
normal permit renewal process.
II. EXISTING PLANT
The Town maintains and operates a complete mix, extended aeration
activated sludge wastewater treatment plant, originally constructed in 1964.
Original plant components include bar screen, aeration basin, clarifier and
aerobic digester. The treatment plant has been upgraded twice n the past
ten (10) years, replacing the original surface aerators with blowers to deliver
diffused air, and adding chlorination and flow measurement capability. The
most recent upgrade added influent equalization and pumping and
dechiorination facilities. A schematic of the existing treatment components
is shown in Figure Two attached

III. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The existing WWTP will require that certain improvements be made in order
to process the additional flow These improvements include the addition of
a 25,000 gpd package treatment unit the Town presently has in storage.
Chlorination facilities will also need to be expanded by extending the existing
chlorine contact basin and constructing a new loading dock for chlorine
cylinder transfer. A new influent splitter box is proposed to divide incoming
flow between the new and existing aeration units The proposed orientation
of the required improvements is shown on Figure Three attached

TO: PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
DATE• January 15, 1992
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
COUNTY Clay
PERMIT NUMBER NC0026697
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address:
2. Date of Investigation:
3. Report Prepared By:
Town of Hayesville WWTP,
NCSR 1140
Hayesville, North Carolina
January 7, 1992
Kerry S. Becker
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number:
•
Hugh Powell and
Marshall Reynolds
704-389-8043
5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of U.S. Hwy 64 Bus. and
NCSR 1140 in Hayesville, travel south 0.55 mils on NCSR 1140 to
t reatment facility on the right.
6 Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
L atitude: 35° 02' 30"
Attach a USGS map extract and
d ischarge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. 150-SE
Longitude: 83° 49' 15"
indicate treatment facility
site and
U.S.G.S. Quad Name Hayesville, NC
7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading):
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included):
9. Location of nearest dwelling: > 500 feet
N/A
Flat
Page 1

10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Town Creek
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Hiwassee 04-05-01
c Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream
uses: Serves as habitat for the propagation and maintenance
of wildlife.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1 Type of wastewater: 100 % Domestic
Industrial
a. Volume of Wastewater: 0.097 MGD (Design Capacity)
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater:None
c. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: Unknown
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved
should be required not needed x
2 Production rates (industrial discharges only) in pounds per day:
a. Highest month in the past 12 months: lbs/day
b. Highest year in the past 5 years: lbs/day
3. Description of industrial process (for industries only) and
applicable CFR Part and Subpart:
4. Type of treatment (specify whether proposed or existing): The
e xisting extended aeration facility consists of a flow
e qualization unit, aeration basin, rectangular clarifier, chlorine
d isinfection, and dechlorination. The Town has located on -site
(but not installed) a extended aeration package plant for the
t reatment of the additional flow.
5. Sludge handling and disposal scheme. Sludge is dried on sand beds
with final disposal in the county landfill
6. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet):
Page 2

7 SIC Codes(s): 4952
Wastewater Code(s): Primary 01 Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code: 062-1
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1 Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant funds
(municipals only)? No
2 Special monitoring requests: Testing for Toxicity should be added
to the permit.
3. Additional effluent limits requests:
4. Other:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Asheville Regional Office recommends renewing NPDES Permit
Number NC0026697 with the requested increase in flow to 0.097 MGD.
Signatu
e of Report Preparer
Water Quali'y Regional Supervisor
Date
Page 3

MODEL RESULTS
Discharger : TOWN OF HAYESVILLE
Receiving Stream : TOWN CREEK
The End D.O. is 5.87 mg/1.
The End CBOD is 13.34 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 14.55 mg/l.
SUMMER
TOWN OF HAYESVILLE _l? E SOC
CBOD = 67.5 & QW = .0
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 5075 0.50 1
Reach 1
67.50 90.00 0.00 0.08340

1
Seg # 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Seg #
Reach # 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Reach #
Seg Mi 1 D.O.
0.00 6.13
0.10 5.98
0.20 5.87
0.30 5.81
0.40 5.77
0.50 5.75
0.60 5.75
0.70 5.77
0.80 5.80
0.90 5.83
1.00 5.87
Seg Mi I D.O. I
CBOD
15.46
15.23
15.01
14.79
14.57
14.36
14.15
13.94
13.74
13.54
13.34
CBOD
SUMMER
TOWN OF HAYESVILLE R-SOC
CBOD = 67.5 & QW = . 0 4 ,._
NBOD I Flow I
19.28 0.63
18.75 0.63
18.23 0.63
17.72 0.63
17.23 0.63
16.75 0.63
16.29 0.63
15.83 0.63
15.39 0.63
14.97 0.63
14.55 0.63
NBOD I Flow I

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger :
Receiving Stream .
Summer 7Q10 :
Design Temperature:
Segment 1
Reach 1
TOWN OF HAYESVILLE
TOWN CREEK
0.5
23.
Subbasin : 040501
Stream Class: C
Winter 7Q10 : 0.79
ILENGTHI SLOPE VELOCITY 1 DEPTH' Kd Kd Ka Ka KN
mile ft/mi fps ft design) @201/2 'design' @203a design
1.001 20.401
I Flow
1 cfs
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste
Headwaters
Tributary
* Runoff I
1 I
0.137 10.55 1 0.33 1 0.29 1 5.36 I 5.021 0.63 I
1 1
CBOD
mg/1
1
1
NBOD
mg/1
0.129 1 67.500 1 90.000
0.500 1 2.000 1.000
0.000 1 2.000 1.000
0.000 1 2.000 I 1.000
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile
D.O.
mg/1
0.000
7.720
7.720
7.720

Zit
Request Form for In -Stream. Assessment
/2],
ozio5o Wimp 6)
NAME OF FACILITY Town of Hayesvi lle
COUNTY Clay
SUBBASIN 040501
REGION _ASHEVILLE DES • ai-
_ Z GN FLOW 0 . MGD
RECEIVING STREAM Town Creek Class C Waters
BACKGROUND DATA:
A. Why is SOC needed? (Facility is out of compliance .
effluent limits? with which
The Town will be connecting a nursing home with a di
scharge scharge of 9600
gpd to the WWTP. The proposed addtional flow will exceed
capacity of the WWTP.
the design
B . History of SOC requests: N/A Oprx
151nobj
1. Monthly Average waste flow _
prior to any SOC 0.06840 n83mgd.
2. SOC flow added: Date: flow:
Date: flow: mgd
g
Date: flow: mgd
g
total of previously approved SOC flow:
mgd
3. Flows lost from plant
4. This SOC request
mgd
flow: mgd
flow: 0.00960 mgd
5. Total plant flow post--SOC
(sum of original flow and
o93
SOC flow minus losses) flow: 0.078"0 mgd
6. Is this an accurate flow balance for l ant? Why/why y/why not?
Flows are based upon DMR data submitted to the Division s�.on by the
POTW.
C. Please attach DMR summary for past year for all l permitted parame-
ters. If possible, include reports from previous years
facility has been under SOC for morep y ars if
�. than a year.

THIS SOC:
A Request is for domestic or industrial waste If it is a combin-
ation, please specify percentages.
100% Domestic waste
B What type of industry? please attach any pertinent data.
N/A
C The region proposes the following SOC limits:
BODE 45.0 mg/1
NH3 monitor. mg/1
DO monitor mg/1
TSS 30.0 mg/1
fecal coliform 1000.0 #/100 ml
pH 6.0 - 9.0 SU