540071_Inspection_20220215

Facility Number
5,7
71
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
C) Other Agency
Type of Visit: O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Rev kin 0 Structure Ev aluntion Q "Technical ,assistance
Reason for Visit: • Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergent) 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
S
Arrival Time:
Farm Name: bc;b ) G, r,12, l L ciLy-
Owner Name: 'YeAA
Departure Time:
O►v ner Entail:
Phone:
CountyRegion:1.- '4
KM
ylailing Address: o- qv C 1,0. 6 •�•- C a 5 5
Ph►•sical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Rath -up Operator:
Location of Farm:
LT-� `t cAr
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: �yw[ )
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
0
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Its
Boars
Other
1
Design Current
Vi'et Poultry Capacity Pop.
Design Current
Ca i aeit► Po
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
l).iin Coy.
Dairy l',tlf
Dairy Ileiter
l)n (ova
Nun -hair}.
liec I' Stocker
I3ee 1 Feeder
Bee I Brood C .»ti
Discharges and Stream f nvpaets
1, is any discharge observed from any part ache operatiuli?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ l r, ❑`No ❑ NA ❑ III-
▪ ti es E Nl7 ❑ NA ❑ N}:
b. Did the discharge reach waters oldie Slate? (I ryes, notify DWR) ❑ 1 es [] Nu [] NA ❑ NI,
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (ll'yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2, is there evidence of a past discharge lion) any part of the operation? ❑ Yes it _ ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential. adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yew El NA El NI
of the Stale other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
Sit 212020 Continued

`Facility Number: 5 - 1)
,Date of Inspection: A.- 1 — Z2_
waste C'nllcction & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall} Tess than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed ancl•'ur managed through
waste management or closure plan'
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health nr entiironmeotal threat. notify DWR
❑ Yes t o
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks. andfor wet stacks)
9. Does any pan of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Ataulicalion
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? lfyes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes GYNo
❑ 1'cs
0 Yes
0 Heavy Metals (Cu_ Zn, etc.)
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Typc(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop andior land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure andror operate per the irrigation design or wettable
;lures determination?
i 7. [does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a Zack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19_ Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available'?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑W1JP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, cheek the appropriate box below,
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakcrs on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 43
❑Monthly and l" Rai
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Nfo
ElfNo
❑ YesNo
▪ Yes
D10
Yes❑ Yes 'NoEl
['Other:
❑ Yes ❑`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste 1i ratlsters ❑ Weather Code
nfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
❑ Yes U 'a ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes n ❑NA ONE
5/12/2 I0 Continued
❑ NA ❑ NE
ID NA []NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE

Facility Number: 5 L) - -]
[Date of Inspection; f 1 5-- 2-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑Yes ❑ a ❑NA El NE
NP
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check ❑ Yes Na ❑ NA ❑
the appropriate boxes) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
0 Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fait to provide documentation of an actively eertilicd operator in charge? 0 Yes DNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? 0 Yes Er/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 121 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? 0 Yes Iti'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tiie drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Appiicstion Field ID Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a fallow -up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
-21I
4a--- 3`
3 -2
0
7f1 C - t
ac;„cr-t--1 (_.04,1±C-r
((f 6
4--0 9pria 0"AT
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
5it-
/ 1 n
a sa _9'f---d23
Phone:
Date: J'
2/412f111