20201149 Ver 2_Construction Complete_20220413

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20201149
Version* 2
Select Reviewer: *
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 04/13/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 4/13/2022
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project: *
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
ID#:*
20201149
Existing ID#
Project Type:
DMS • Mitigation Bank
Yes No
Email Address: *
[e-mail]
Version:* 2
Project Name: Wolf King Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Mitigation Project
County: Wayne
Document Information
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload:
Signature
............................................
Print Name: *
Signature:*
Construction Complete_Wolf King_04112022.pdf 6.62MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Jamey McEachran

fires
April 11, 2022
Ms. Katie Merritt
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street, Archdale Building 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27620
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Houston, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: Wolf King Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Project (DWR #2020-1149
V2): Task 2 (Earthwork, Planting, and Installation of Monitoring Devices Completed) —
20 Percent Credit Release
Ms. Merritt,
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES), a wholly -owned entity of Environmental Banc
and Exchange (EBX, LLC) is pleased to inform you that mitigation earthwork, planting, and
installation of monitoring devices has been completed at the Wolf King Mitigation Project.
Monitoring devices include seven vegetation plots in the buffer/nutrient mitigation areas. This
letter is being submitted to request the release of credits associated with Task 2 as described in the
RES 2021 Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for nutrient offset and buffer mitigation
credit.
To support your review and approval of the release of Task 2 credits, the following are included
with this letter:
- Short summary of activities completed as required per the approved BPDP
- Figures representing all riparian restoration, riparian enhancement and riparian
preservation activities where applicable;
- A map showing the vegetation plot locations
- Detailed Planting Plan information
- Photos of the site, including vegetation plots and completed easement marking and invasive
species treatment
Short summary of Activities Completed:
Trees were planted on March 8th, 2022 and As -Built Site work was conducted on March 15th.
During as -built set-up, nine planted tree species were recorded, and the plots yielded an average
of 694 stems per acre (Table 3). There were no changes to the planting plan of bare root species.
The only change to the planting plan was that the site was too wet during construction to conduct
the no -till drilling that was proposed before the planting crew was to be onsite. Therefore the site
was broadcast seeded instead of no -till drill seeded. The easement is marked with
conservation easement signs that include the longterm steward, restricted activites and
contact information attached to t-posts every 100 feet (photos included). The total planting area
for the site was 8.23 acres and was limited to restoration and nutrient offset areas. Within the
preservation areas some invasives species were sprayed or cut and sprayed (March 14th).
res.us

A Baseline Monitoring Report will be submitted within the next week. No major modifications
from the approved Wolf King Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel Development Plan
were made during site construction. As we had survey completed prior to submitting the final bank
parcel development plan we do not expect any deviations to the buffer and nutrient credit amouns.
However, if any other deviations discovered as a result of the as -built work they will be included
in the baseline report that will be submitted to support the release of credits associated with Task
3. Should you require further documentation, please let us know. Finally, we anticipate a site visit
to be required for the release of Task 2 credits. We will be in touch to schedule this with you.
Thank you,
lapevul
Jamey McEachran Project Manager

2,175 agft of removed from the
allowable buffer mitigation,
due to diffuse flow
iTI
2,175 agft of removed from the
allowable buffer mitigation,
due to diffuse flow
owyg C° L° aI®, -t Iyfe Fig- ©e—fgc .TI to a1C / xxo LJ C°C ° 11,30 C - 3nle IA Ma - faxJo i(fxa- C �3 L.J G? C4.11, 07i51 7
Ores
50 100
Feet
Figure 2 - CCPV MVO 2022
Wolf King
Mitigation Site
Wayne County, North Carolina
Date 3/28/2022
Drawn by HKH
in = 100 feet
=Consenation Easement(875ac)
Surveyed Top ot Bank
=Vegetation Plots
Riparian Restoration tor Butter Credit (0-100 n1
]Riparian Restoration for Nutrient Offset Credit (0-1 BB it]
]Riparian Restoration for Nutrient Offset Credit (101-200 ft)
Riparian Preservation for Nutrient Offset Credit (0-100 ft)
.Riparian Preservation for Buffer Credit(0-100 ft)
REFERENCE
1) Honoontal DaO1m is NAD83 UTM Zone 17N
2) Map Projection is NAD_1983_StatePlane_
North_Carolina_FIPS 32OO_Feet
nt��'L'sr
►

Mitigation
Total Area of Buffer Mitigation
Totals Square Feet
12,344
2,674
Total Nutrient Offset Mitigation
Totals Square Feet
Offset 221,219
Offset 120,983
Restoration
Rest
Preservation
Mitigation
Nutrient
N utri
Nutrient
N utri
101-200
0-100
Zone
0-100
101-200
Invasive Species Treatment
Ores
W E
SO 100
F et
Figure 3 -As-Built Map
Wolf King
Mitigation Site
Wayne County, North Carolina
Date 3/28/2022
Drawn by HKH
1 in= 100 feet
=Conserve ion Easement (875 ac)
Vegetation Plots
=Surveyed Top of Bank
Riparian Restoration tor Buiter Credit(0.loo it)
=Riparian Restoration for Nutria[ Offset Credit (o-1oofl)
Riparian Restoration for Nutha[ Offset Credit (1o1-2oofl)
=Riparian Preserkation for Nutrient Offset Credit (0-1oo ft)
= Ripen Preservation for BUHercreeit(o-loo i>)
REFERENCE
1) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Zone 17N
2) Map Projection is NAD_1983_StatePlane_
North_Carolina_FIPS 3200_Feet
i'rtl�a ij���'r'� t
Zone

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Mit Plan %
As -Built %
Total Stems Planted
American sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
20
20
1,300
River birch
Betula nigra
20
20
1,300
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
10
10
700
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxii
10
10
700
Water oak
Quercus nigra
10
10
700
Northern red oak
Quercus rubra
10
10
700
Shumard's oak
Quercus shumardii
10
10
700
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
5
5
350
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
5
5
350
Total
6,800
Planted Area
8.23
As -Built Stems/Acre
826
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
MeStem
t?
Ave rage
Plante d
Height (ft)
1
567
0
567
Yes
1.3
2
769
0
769
Yes
1.2
3
809
0
809
Yes
1.5
4
769
0
769
Yes
1.7
5
769
0
769
Yes
1.4
6
526
0
526
Yes
1.4
7
647
0
647
Yes
1.5
Project Avg
694
0
694
Yes
1.4

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 4. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Wolf King
Current Plot Data (MY0 2022)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
102767-01-0001
102767-01-0002
102767-01-0003
102767-01-0004
102767-01-0005
102767-01-0006
102767-01-0007
MY0 (2022)
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betulanigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
19
19
19
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
3
3
3
10
10
10
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
6
6
6
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
12
12
12
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
Quercusnigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
12
12
12
Quercusphellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
15
15
15
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
20
20
20
Quercus shumardii
Shumard's oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
7
7
7
4
4
4
5
5
5
2
2
2
22
22
22
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
14
14
14
19
19
19
20
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
19
13
13
13
16
16
16
119
119
119
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.17
8
8
8
6
6
6
8
8
8
6
6
6
8
8
8
5
5
5
6
6
6
9
9
9
567
567
567
769
769
769
809
809
809
769
769
769
769
769
769
526
526
526
648
648
648
694
694
694

Wolf King MY0 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
7 : ,
.� . it' : y _'� x" F �;4 :j; 'r' -':, �:"'.' .%'•re :-'. • „-
rg y '' - y -. d' t, , _ -i4- e a . nI ,G' ° .c '
•
Vegetation Plot 1 Vegetation Plot 2
r
alt
. °A.e
d ^*' F a '1 °i s _ . ° .� 1� 'C`r 1;;tr t� o ,. ' S,a s -
v- " �: `fi .�, .� "�` ',S` '`fix.. r;i #, ' ,e`F - ., 4k
�4 � AF +�-
3 k fir, y. v!4 i.' . -' t.b,s' ra.-f , t. �` =v-' -z..°
" "' ��/t - .• � "a s33, d}, a qua �6
'M� ., #" * ., .-_ . .� .^ .�'a «�... c ,gym'r., - .— _ a «E
Vegetation Plot 3 Vegetation Plot 4
4 i:.,... .,, ,,,,,,. ., 3:,.. — '' '' --OK:••• -- 6 .- , *IS, , .^.,,,, .;;,..'''- ' ,, :
i k.w 6.t 4-. ,-.;Zia Y�x• +uga (�° '
�a y-„s`7 ,t, �. "5`, s r L r i P
9,$' ,fit .0 ,ti 7� 3. "° 'w r� " .y'
¢ � � 1; ��
' - iF- : ! . :
.` tfi —, a g. 6 k - 3vx6 a 1 \ t .a - re' ir• I� s - h sT• ' _l. � 4 , �°. 7' �' « PS I.;1- y -fk, FA r?r # j ' _'144t.
, a' .. c` ° Ya .mar a -a: om: "r . c�;, a Vegetation Plot 6r .i. . .,,,,..— z _
Vegetation Plot 5

Wolf King MY0 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
T,
4,,,,„:, ! ''- :A*1--,•:' ---•°,r....t' , •-. 1 r--*, ,. 4-1'
Yy
tk- L.'
._ f
, w
\��'sa� '7.r s` ,� '�"�',�U.�S 1 F '�= � •`a'tY_"mR, „�e,�`�i ey%,"`
h '4- w
Vegetation Plot 7

Wolf King As-Built Complete Other Activities Photos
k
9.',1'...'' '''-.' ',,' :Ae*..^.4-:=?--%,'''.i*-4t'-'1',/ ,,a,.._,...__
,. .. , _, .. _,,,„., ,, ...._„..,,,,,_ , -,e•N 4' rrr".4.---,.- if',- 7--14-1 . - ,,,,A,,, ,
4.
Y r.' 5 ra _
..
• �� t <
:- - jr t ' ,`zsx y.. 4r� C uM,¢�sN:e-•rti .4% NNmeNoc"'"i ;.t �eaT . y�eu e h•N.ol�,L nl:.
c A ue 3a
vi
a �.:;n .ae ii.W
,. i� �^ dra � - " /. -.- t.. ' yM 3N + '9z. ^..- FP S � v _ 'v bt s "" _�M ea¢^" �„, ar;• ar' .i ` rr m `k , -'' '- . Fa• , m �- �� . .a 'Jii0 .�3 \A. , +-tt a ' '
•
ll'
%
,as1 ,a4.. s .' \. �� ya a p-„�....
am, ''$1 - ` .g �ti"�Y • �.. �r 6"�` ' `
{ j•._,-'' - ,,S_. 9 '4.. ,e�w �. ti- i �' 'te a
x� + � : � � -' a s�r mac+ �°
eP "�, q.- ' `� 'd °l d f_.J' , -ice �` �,�t'J o-s , Y,.,,
Boundary Photos Boundary Photos
Boundary and Seeding Complete
, , :.,.,;,,e.„ .. . „
,,,,,,,,
., , ,, ‘ ,, ... „,,,.,,, ,i,.._, ,.. ..4 . ,-
.,IFS i , qqq ,
�a sx :y :w•= - x ue., '
- . � � t
y'_ J t �; : .fi .-,.- � - .., _, p
f( }�
,, c s«* - "d. - ::'o �: �€a VGA „p.. -i r -
ry s
Invasives Sprayed

Wolf King, 2020-1149 v2, Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits
Neuse 03020201 - Outside Falls Lake
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
19.16394
N/A
Credit Type
Location
Subject? (enter
NO if
ephemeral or
ditch')
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Feature Name
Total Area (ft2)
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
,
Mitigation (ft)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
%Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Convertible to
Riparian
Buffer?
Riparian Buffer
Credits
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset?
Delivered
Nutrient Offset:
N (lbs)
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: P (Ibs)
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-100
Ditch A
18,448
1
100%
No
-
Yes
962.641
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-100
Ditch B
45,447
1
100%
No
-
Yes
2,371.485
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-100
Ditch C
15,898
1
100%
No
-
Yes
829.579
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I/P
Restoration
0-100
JB1-A
124,744
124,744
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
124,744.000
Yes
6,509.309
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I/P
Restoration
0-100
JB2
16,682
16,682
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
16,682.000
Yes
870.489
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
101-200
DitchA
13,403
1
33%
No
-
Yes
699.386
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
101-200
Ditch B
14,405
1
33%
No
-
Yes
751.672
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
101-200
Ditch C
14,784
1
33%
No
-
Yes
771.449
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I/P
Restoration
101-200
JB1-A
71,645
1
33%
No
-
Yes
3,738.532
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I/P
Restoration
101-200
JB2
6,746
1
33%
No
-
Yes
352.015
-
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
JB1-B
12,344
12,344
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
12,344.000
Yes
644.126
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-100
DitchA- Diffused Flow
Deduction
2,175
0
1
100%
No
-
No
-
-
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-100
DitchC- Diffused Flow
Deduction
2,175
0
1
100%
No
-
No
-
-
Totals (ft2):
Total Buffer (ft2):
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):
358,896
153,770
153,770.000
18,500.684
0.000
12,344
12,344
346,552
N/A
Enter Preservation Credits Below
Total Ephemeral Area (ft) for Credit:
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ftu):
Total Eligible for Preservation (ftu):
Credit Type
Location
Subject?
Feature Type
Rural
Rural
Yes
Yes
I/P
I/P
Mitigation Activity
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
12,344
12,344.000
Enhancement:
0
0.000
Preservation:
2,674
267.400
Total Riparian Buffer:
15,018
12,611.400
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Nutrient Offset.
Nitrogen:
346,552
17,856.558
Phosphorus:
0.000
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
0-100
0-100
Feature Name
JB1-B
JB2
Preservation Area Subtotals (ftu):
1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B.0250 (5)(a).
0
0
3,755
0.0%
4,115
16.2%
Total (Creditable)
Total Area (sf)
Area for Buffer
Mitigation (ft2)
1,056
1,056
1,618
1,618
2,674
2,674
Ephemeral Reaches as % TABM
Preservation as % TABM
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
% Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Riparian
Buffer Credits
10
100%
10.00000
105.000
10
100%
10.00000
161.800
last updated 08/03/2020