HomeMy WebLinkAbout820305_Routine Inspection_20220324/06 3/41,97_
Facility Number
`Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ..,C5 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Arrival Time:
Ci
Departure Time:
AkZe.",
Owner Name: /� ;1'Z 4 .-( 77€.?
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
/1)4fl)
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
JJ
Phone:
17
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number: q/ COi
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
plOg
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Curren
Wet. Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
D ` Po
Design Current
Ca ' aci Po .
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Curren
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes .e1To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes _Q-No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes_..-e)No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued
Facility Number:
6(5
Date of Inspection: 5 C. vt:;-.)-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
46/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes .-J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes. 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes J2'?io ❑ NA ❑ NE
,Fires ❑ No ❑ NA n NE
❑ Yes ,allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes l'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,e'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �7tt�'/c) /,i&, 1
13. Soil Type(s): ,4t 55x. ,1e
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists 0 Design ❑ Maps 0 Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
,Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking 0 Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes_ 2•No
❑ Yes.No
❑ Yes pi -No
❑ NA
❑ NA
O NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
O NE
❑ Yes ,❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,❑rNo 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1No 0 NA 0 NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
AErires 0 No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes ...EFNo ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes „121'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 Continued
Facility Number:
Date of Inspection: 349/-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
O Yes_12 No
❑ Yes j=1. No
❑ Yes Ft No
❑ YesNo
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes .,,e' No 0 NA
❑ YesjNo
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
O Yes
❑ Yes
_-'No
ZNo
.2No
❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
0 NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any ad
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations( se additional pages necessary).
ti(
ccom endat ons or' and oth
comments.
a `l) hLeed /Leed CcarcP�7 70
pii7)7a oc� moo /Leed ./v 9e-r�-
n-e-1L,.L4 Til ilt44 ceze
ee-tie
2¢rcldu
I14fr,1 iieden
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
an � A'heleA66rt�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: q'i 3 �75V�
Date: / 9
2/4/2015
FACILITY #: a';"--.'3 FARM NAME:
PERMIT (#19)
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS %
- EXPERIATION DATE �? ` 3
- CURRENT N MBER OF ANIMAL
OIC CARD 7 • R NO
s
LAGOON LEVEL
NUMBER OF ANIMALS c cq y
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST(ESOR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NQ.,
-GOOD OF� 9Q DAY,
DATE Of; -
DATE/ % , 1
DATE 2/-2,5/ "
EVERY 3 YEARS:
BEFORE OR AFTER
NITROGEN LEVEL
NITROGEN LEVEL
NITROGEN LEVEL
WASTE REPORT (#21)
41,35-'
CT e (3
SOIL REPORT (#21)
DATE ! - 13 Igf)
P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 8000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
Not over PAN
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
IRR2 (#21)
CROP TYPES
CROP TYPES
CROP TYPES
CALBRIATION (#24)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION
FLOW RATES
RAIN FALL (#2i)
zz„,c, aLL,cy
,4 +
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
S U D G E (#21 & 25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE — /0_
i f�
0: 3. 0 P: �5 i Li % RATIO OF SLUDGE , 3 .'`
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
RAIN 3REAKER FORM
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st- Ends September 30th
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September 1st -Ends March 31st
Oats: Opens September 1st- Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15th
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31 st