310794_Lab Data_20220223

SM
Lenvirochem 'A
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 ■ 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 ■ 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
[e-mail]
NCDENR-DWR Date of Report: Mar 08, 2022
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext. Customer PO #:
Wilmington NC 28405 Customer ID: 09010049
Attention: Chad Coburn Report #: 2022-03463
Project ID: Hog Waste
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
22-08176 Site: Ditch (South) 2/23/2022 1:15 PM Water Coburn/Ryan
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
Fecal Coliform SM 9222 D-2015 MF 78000 Colon ies/100mL 02/23/2022
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
22-08177 Site: Ditch (North) 2/23/2022 1:30 PM Water Coburn/Ryan
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
Ammonia Nitrogen
EPA 350.1, Rev. 2.0,1993
65.8 mg/L
03/01 /2022
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
EPA 353.2, Rev, 2.0, 1993
19.4 mg/L
02/28/2022
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
0.12 mg/L
03/04/2022
Total Nitrogen (Calc)
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
EPA 351.2, Rev. 2.0,1993
87.5 mg/L
03/02/2022
Total Nitrogen
Total Nitrogen
107 mg/L
03/04/2022
Lab ID Sample ID:
Collect Date/Time
Matrix Sampled by
22-08178 Site: Ditch (South)
2/23/2022 1:15 PM
Water Coburn/Ryan
Test
Method
Results Date Analyzed
Fecal Coliform
SM 9222 D-2015 MF
<20 Colonies/100ml-
02/23/2022
Lab ID Sample ID:
Collect Date/Time
Matrix Sampled by
22-08179 Site: Ditch (North)
2/23/2022 1:30 PM
Water Coburn/Ryan
Test
Method
Results Date Analyzed
Ammonia Nitrogen
EPA 350.1, Rev. 2.0,1993
5.4 mg/L
03/01/2022
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993
127 mg/L
02/28/2022
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
0.34 mg/L
03/04/2022
Total Nitrogen (Calc)
Total Nitrogen
Total Nitrogen
133 mg/L
03/04/2022
Recalculated 318/22
Report #:: 2022-03463 Page 1 of 2

Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
[e-mail]
NCDENR-DWR Date of Report: Mar 08, 2022
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext. Customer PO #:
Wilmington NC 28405 Customer ID: 09010049
Attention: Chad Coburn Report #: 2022-03463
Project ID: Hog Waste
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
22-08179A Site: Ditch (North) 2/23/2022 1:30 PM Water Coburn/Ryan
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) SM 4500 Norg B-2011 5.7 mg/L 03/08/2022
Comment:
e
Reviewed by:
Report #:: 2022-03463 Page 2 of 2

Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Sa I 910.392.0223
mp a Recel'pt Checklist
Client: NCDGgP_— VJ1LW0&vVNJ a
Date: Q3 a, Report Number:
Receipt of sample:
❑ YES ❑ NO
ECHEM Pickup ❑ Client Delivery UPS ❑ FedEx ❑ Other ❑
❑ YES ❑ NO
N A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
Original temperature upon
N/A 2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
receipt °C
Corrected temperature upon receipt___
How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Bank
Againstbottles
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N: 210835468
❑ YES ❑ NO
Ct10 0
IR Gun Correction
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C,
YES ❑ NO
YES
was Project M Projr.
4. Were proper custody� g /QA notified?
procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
❑ NO
5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
YES ❑ NO
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
YES ❑ NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
YES ❑ NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
YES ❑ NO
YES ❑
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
NO
!X Y�_5 — `E NO
10 Did samples a -rive in goad
11 Was
X YES ❑ NO
ade Late o e
q s.mp!_ Holum,. avai!ab!�?
❑ YES GYNO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
s
❑ YES ❑
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? *
NO
❑ YES ❑
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
NO
❑
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
YES ❑ NO
❑ YES ❑ NO
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
❑ YES ❑ NO
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
**
Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation:
Samples)
(Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrect) Y Preserved
oioi-08�77
11
by adding (circle one):
or with headspace)
0$ f�19 were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
H SO.
Time of preservation: ;
HNO3 HCI NaOH
If more than one preservative is
needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immedia _ely for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample
o,
lotify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Sample(s)
were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
°C
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1

C � rp
IJ
; •�
P
bd A
I
tj
10 W."
S
.. 1
H
f�
o' a
O fA
\
O
rt ~
D
C o
� �
e
W
r•
LAB ID r W 1.1
NUMBER
II,
J
�
JN
o
—
II
C
to
Sample
Type
@
Composite
n n
ar
O
'b
11
C7 (� Container
o,
r
(PorG)
Chlorine
I
mg/L
V1
C
NONE
a'
A
HCI IV
a-
HzSO.
HNO3 C
N/OH
THIO Z
0
OTHER
M
Mm
c
p
_•
O
N
�O
♦1
N
N
Li
A
d
A