Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310057_Lab Data_20220223Environmental Chemists, Inc. envirochem 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab ■ 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax sM 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 ■ 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS info@environmentalchemists.com NCDENR-DWR Date of Report: Mar 07, 2022 127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext. Customer PO #: Wilmington NC 28405 Customer ID: 09010049 Attention: Chad Coburn Report #: 2022-03464 Project ID: Hog Waste (2nd sample) Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-08180 Site: Upstream 2/23/2022 3:50 PM Water Coburn/Ryan Test Method Results Date Analyzed Fecal Coliform SM 9222 D-2015 MF <20 Colonies/100mL 02/23/2022 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-08181 Site: Upstream 2/23/2022 3:50 PM Water Coburn/Ryan Test Method Results Date Analyzed Ammonia Nitrogen EPA 350.1, Rev. 2.0,1993 0.6 mg/L 03/01/2022 Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0,1993 0.31 mg/L 02/28/2022 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 < 0.04 mg/L 03/04/2022 Total Nitrogen (Calc) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) EPA 351.2, Rev. 2.0,1993 20.7 mg/L 03/02/2022 Total Nitrogen Total Nitrogen 2 1. 0 mg/L 03/04/2022 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-08182 Site: Waste Source 2/23/2022 3:25 PM Water Coburn/Ryan Test Method Results Date Analyzed Fecal Coliform SM 9222 D-2015 MF 6000 Colon ies/1 00m L 02/23/2022 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-08183 Site: Waste Source 2/23/2022 3:25 PM Water Coburn/Ryan Test Method Results Date Analyzed Ammonia Nitrogen EPA 350.1, Rev 2.0, 1993 210 mg/L 03/01/2022 Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0,1993 0.08 mg/L 02/28/2022 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 1.20 mg/L 03/04/2022 Total Nitrogen (Calc) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) EPA 351.2, Rev. 2.0,1993 268 mg/L 03/02/2022 Total Nitrogen Total Nitrogen 268 mg/L 03/04/2022 Report #.. 2022-03464 Page 1 of 2 [qlvirochem ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS Environmental Chemists, Inc. 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab ■ 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax info@environmentalchemists.com NCDENR-DWR Date of Report: Mar 07, 2022 127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext. Customer PO #: Wilmington NC 28405 Customer ID: 09010049 Attention: Chad Coburn Report #: 2022-03464 Project ID: Hog Waste (2nd sample) Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-08184 Site: Downstream 2/23/2022 3:40 PM Water Coburn/Ryan Test Method Results Date Analyzed Fecal Coliform SM 9222 D-2015 MF 500 Colonies/100mL 02/23/2022 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-08185 Site: Downstream 2/23/2022 3:40 PM Water Coburn/Ryan Test Method Results Date Analyzed Ammonia Nitrogen EPA 350.1, Rev. 2.0,1993 26.6 mg/L 03/01/2022 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 0.13 mg/L 03/04/2022 Total Nitrogen (Calc) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) EPA 351.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993 5 1. 0 mg/L 03/02/2022 Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0,1993 0.08 mg/L 02/28/2022 Total Nitrogen Total Nitrogen 51.1 mg/L 03/04/2022 Comment: Reviewed by: Report #:: 2022-03464 Page 2 of 2 Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94 6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405 910.392 Sample Receipt Checklist .0223 Client: I�1C,pt�7�J jZ— W���.rn,�N6MYDJP Z Z. ate: Z --- _ Report Number: _ 2022- 03 (o Receipt of sample: ECHEM Pickup ❑ Client Delivery UPS ❑ ❑ YES ❑ NO FedEx ❑ Other ❑ N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler? ❑ YES ❑ NO N/A 2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken? Original temperature upon receipt °C Corrected temperature upon receipt How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank Against es 'C IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N: 210835468 IR Gun Correcti nFactoB Ct10 0 ❑ YES ❑ NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified? YES ❑ NO 4. Were per custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed? YES ❑ NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers? YES ❑ NO 7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test? YES ❑ NO 10. Did samples arrive in a . qr�:'Lion 11:1 NO 11 'Alas adegUate sample volume available?' ----- -- - -! YES ❑ NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests? ❑ YES NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? ❑ YES ❑ NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12? ❑ YES ❑ NO 15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9? ❑ YES ❑ NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ❑ YES ❑ NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ❑ YES ❑ NO 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes? * TOC/Volati'es are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. ** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace) Sampie(s)ZZ-•0818( 081$3 &18S ,,,sere received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly adding (circle one): ZSOHNO3 HCI NaOH ITby ime of preservation: Y "S more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below Note: Notify customer service immediat ly for incorrectly preserved samples. obtain a new sample or notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. who was notified, date and time: Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspace COMMENTS: DOC. QA.002 Rev 1 oz- -s N O 3- n - o, A f� - � F fD n n n n n non ? n n n n G fw ffl A 7Cj r+ o B a a C R C N � a A � c a T II o U LAB m 3 NUMBER II n 9 � r r o � O Sample n p Type Composite O Z n or Grab 11 n ('� Container �J (PorG) Chlorine 17, mg/L f� NONE 1 rp y HCL O a � H,SO. 9 n z HNO3 NaOH y O THIO OTHER A � w N�w0`� N� to LA o c 3