310057_Complaint Investigation_20220223

Facility Number ®- O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
S O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspe on Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine Complaint O Follow-on O Referral O Emergencv O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: )) Departure Time:l'i(� County:tn
Farm Name: JOLLA, 1✓aljy� Owner Email: �"��`
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: ,�` , /�� Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
�ceder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder iE
Other
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -Layer
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operau ?
Discharge originated at: El Structure (Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify D WR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Region: WL90
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [;3116o ❑ NA ❑ NE
es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�J[� fhU(i5
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes 6 Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes mob'- o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ W
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA I yrvn
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA VXr
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA EUX`
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [v,Ad'1'
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application �--��
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q45
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[E;41r
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
M"L
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
Uj,PdP
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ED Wr
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ld'i"E
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA D4
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking []Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �ZE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [O,>W'
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [x�
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA E?<G
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑- A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA Q3,N'E
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA [; E
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
— /
❑ LN NA I E
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
D
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA E24
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA G FEE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA geE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawinzs of facility to better exalain situations (use additional Mazes as necessarv).
jSMa(diSckcoc c due- 7O uk� on and 4u<n- A cvKtA
svtt-J
in 0^R
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: glos.)go6%2C1Wj
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: na hsb-L
511212020