490030_Waste Utilization Plan_20220321

Grayhouse Farms Inc
This plan has been prepared for:
Grayhouse Farms
James Reid Gray
182 Grayhouse Road
Stony Point, NC 28678
704-902-5441
3/15/2022
This plan has been developed by:
NCDA&CS DSWC
Michael Shepherd
191 S. Main St
Mocksville, NC 27028
336-940-8901
eveloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signa re (manager or producer
Date
Date
- —
22_
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
5
Technical Specialist Signature
Date

Grayhouse Farms Inc
3/15/2022
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Narrative:
March 2022 Update
This waste management plan update is to address the changes to several
application fields. The previous waste management plan had 1,386 wettable
acres while this waste management plan includes 1,202 wettable acres. Most of
the fields removed from the waste management plan included fields that are no
longer leased. Even with the reduction of acres for land application, there is at
least twice the amount of land need to land apply waste produced on the farm
annually. Land application of waste will consist of center pivots irrigation and
honey wagon or dragline broadcast applications. PLAT was analyzed on all fields
and all fields ranked Low or Medium risk. Mortality will consist of burial and
rendering. Burial will take place at the corner of tract 9883 field 8 on high ground
over 300 feet away from the stream. Some fields in the plan may have corn
silage double cropped within one planting season. If this occurs, the PAN rate on
the second corn silage crop shall be half the PAN rate of the first planting. Waste
application on this second corn silage crop will likely occur outside of the normal
corn waste application window of 2/15 to 6/30, if so waste application shall be
restricted to the first 60 days after planting the second corn silage crop.Any
additional nitrogen needed must be recommend by an NCDA&CS Regional
Agronomist as a result of tissue sampling.
The waste management plan covers the waste produced at both the old dairy
facility and the new facility. The old facility consists of two waste storage ponds.
Most all the manure at this facility is scraped into the larger waste pond which
provides approximately 210 days of storage for 250 dry cows, 200 dairy heifers,
120 dairy calves, and 150 milk cows. The other waste pond at this facility
provides approximately 120 days of storage for the parlor water and manure
produced by the 150 milk cows while being milked. The new dairy facility
consists of 4 interconnected waste ponds and a sand separation lane. These
waste ponds provide 180 days of storage for 1,280 milk cows. Waste water can
be interchanged between these waste ponds to ensure freeboard levels are
maintained in each. Two center pivots (Fields CP3, CP4) are connected to these
waste ponds to assist in maintaining freeboard levels. Waste storage pond
volume calculations for both facilities is detailed in Samuel Bingham, P.E. waste
management system plan dated June 2, 2016.
3/14/2022 3:23:57 PM 1 / 1

Sources in Plan
Grayhouse Farms Inc
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S 6
Old Dairy Site Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 2,767,500 gals/year by 200 Dairy Heifers,
250 Dairy Dry Cows, 150 Dairy Milk Cows, 120 Dairy Calves Liquid Manure Slurry operation.
This two waste storage pond production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately
120 days and 210 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
27,725
Incorporated-4 wks or less
following application
27,725
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
18,483
Broadcast
18,483
Irrigated
18,483
Max. Available
PAN (Ibs)*
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus /
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
18,483
46,895
(28,412)
7,021,623
(4,254,123)
Year2
18,483
40,612
(22,129)
6,080,996
(3,313,496)
Year3
18,483
38,064
(19,581)
5,699,472
(2,931,972)
3/8/2022 3:13:42 PM 1 / 2

Sources in Plan
Grayhouse Farms Inc
S 8
The New Dairy Facility Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 9,918,720 gals/year by a 1,280
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
99,366
Incorporated-4 wks or less
following application
99,366
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
66,244
Broadcast
66,244
Irrigated
66,244
Max. Available
PAN (Ibs)*
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus /
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
66,244
199,834
(133,590)
29,921,179
(20,002,459)
Year2
66,244
138,276
(72,032)
20,704,111
(10,785,391)
Year 3
66,244
117,018
(50,774)
17,521,139
(7,602,419)
3/8/2022 3:13:42 PM 2 / 2

Grayhouse Dairy PAN Application Rates (Ib/ac) by Field and Crop
Field
Tract
Acres
Crop PAN application rate: (Ibs.
Plant Available Nitrogen per Acre)
Small Grain Sorghum Fescue
Cover Pasture
Corn Soybeans Small Grain
Silage Double Crop Silage
Application Windows
2/15-6/30 4/1-9/15 9/1-3/31
9/1-3/31
3/15-8/31
8/1-7/31
375 Bost 36.5 206 124 97
30
88
-
375 CP4 38.2 206 124 97
30
88
-
375 CP3 40.3 213 128 100
30
89
-
375 KW1 20.5 206 124 97
30
88
-
375 1 57.5 206 124 97
30
88
-
395 SP1 22.7 213 128 100
30
89
-
395 2 48 - - -
-
-
152
424 CG1 29.3 245 159 120
30
101
-
821 1 15.6 206 124 97
30
88
-
821 2 23 113 113 95
30
105
-
868 2 3.2 239 156 115
30
98
-
895 Lackey 41 201 121 92
30
79
-
8288 1 27.3 - - -
-
-
152
8678 1 44.6 213 128 100
30
89
-
9016 LF2 23.3 94 94 95
30
94
-
9050 Feim1 10.2 213 128 100
30
89
-
9228 SR2 21.1 174 105 80
30
69
-
9380 Miller 1 8.5 206 124 97
30
88
-
9380 Miller 2 3.9 201 121 92
30
79
-
9547 P1 17.3 219 132 103
30
93
-
9559 SR1 11.25 239 156 115
30
98
-
9729 Elk Upper 36.8 219 132 103
30
93
-
9729 Elk Lower 8.1 121 121 112
30
121
-
9883 CH1 19.4 206 124 97
30
88
-
9883 CH2 10.3 206 124 97
30
88
-
9883 5 15 - - -
-
-
119
9883 6 17.4 - - -
-
-
119
9883 7 81.4 - - -
-
-
119
9883 8 18.2 174 105 80
30
69
-
9884 2 11.8 - - -
-
-
135
9885 Doug 1 68 213 128 100
30
89
-
10034 Heifer 28.4 213 128 100
30
89
-
10034 OM1,2,3 115.3 213 128 100
30
89
-
10034 0 M 4 27 213 128 100
30
89
-
10034 OM5 46.4 213 128 100
30
89
-
10034 0 M 6 45 206 124 97
30
88
-
10035 ST1 63.1 213 128 100
30
89
-
10035 G07 47.4 213 128 100
30
89
-
Total acres
1202.25
Total Ibs. PAN for all acres (by crop)
205,276 126,284 99,066
30,041
82,231
1
26,581
cropland
hay or pasture
*Any crop following Soybeans must have N reduced by 20 Ibs.
*Any crop following Small Grain Cover must have N reduced by 30 Ibs.

Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract ID
Field
ID
Source
ID
SMU
Total
Acreage
Wettable
Acreage
Crop Name
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
N
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Res.
(Ibs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
1000
gal/A
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
tons
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
1000 gals
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
tons
375
CP3
S 8
ToB2
40.30
40.30
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irrig.
213
31.87
0
1,284.50
0
375
CP4
S 8
ToC2
38.20
38.20
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
206
0
0
Irrig.
206
30.83
0
1,177.55
0
375
Bost
S 8
ToC2
42.50
36.50
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
206
0
0
Broad.
206
30.83
0
1,125.15
0
375
KW1
S 8
ToC2
23.40
20.50
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
206
0
0
Broad.
206
30.83
0
631.93
0
375
CP3
S 8
ToB2
40.30
40.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Irrig.
15
2.25
0
90.46
0
375
CP4
S 8
ToC2
38.20
38.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Irrig.
15
2.25
0
85.74
0
375
Bost
S 8
ToC2
42.50
36.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
81.93
0
375
KW1
S 8
ToC2
23.40
20.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.24
0
46.01
0
375
1
S 8
ToC2
138.00
57.50
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
206
0
0
Broad.
206
30.83
0
1,772.50
0
375
1
S 8
ToC2
138.00
57.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
129.07
0
395
SP1
S 8
ToB2
23.10
22.70
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0
723.53
0
395
SP1
S 8
ToB2
23.10
22.70
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
50.95
0
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 1 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
395
2
S 6
CmC2
55.20
48.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
22.75
0
1,091.78
0
424 -
CG1
S 6
CmB2
30.20
29.30
Corn, Silage
22.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
245
0
0
Broad.
245
36.66
0
1,074.20
0
424 -
CG1
S 6
CmB2
30.20
29.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
65.77
0
821
1
S 8
ToC2
15.80
15.60
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
206
0
0
Broad.
206
30.83
0
480.89
0
821
1
S 8
ToC2
15.80
15.60
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
35.02
0
821
2
S 8
CsA
23.70
23.00
Corn, Silage
26 Tons
2/15-6/30
270
157
0
Broad.
113
16.91
0
388.92
0
821
2
S 8
CsA
23.70
23.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.24
0
51.63
0
868 -
2
S 8
CeB2
4.00
3.20
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
35.76
0
114.45
0
868 -
2
S 8
CeB2
4.00
3.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.24
0
7.18
0
895
Lacke
Y
S 8
FrC2
44.60
41.00
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
30.08
0
1,233.19
0
895
Lacke
Y
S 8
FrC2
44.60
41.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
92.03
0
8288
1
S 6
CmC2
29.40
27.30
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
22.75
0
620.95
0
8678
1
S 8
ToB2
47.00
44.60
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0
1,421.56
0
8678
1
S 8
ToB2
47.00
44.60
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
100.11
0
9016
LF2
S 8
CsA
24.67
23.30
Corn, Silage
26 Tons
2/15-6/30
270
176
0
Broad.
94
14.07
0
327.74
0
9016
LF2
S 8
CsA
24.67
23.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.24
0
52.30
0
9050
Feim
1
S 8
ToB2
10.90
10.20
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0
325.11
0
9050
Feim
1
S 8
ToB2
10.90
10.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
22.90
0
9228 -
SR2
S 8
FcC2
21.75
21.10
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
2/15-6/30
174
0
0
Broad.
174
26.04
0
549.39
0
9228 -
SR2
S 8
FcC2
21.75
21.10
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
47.36
0
9380 -
Miller
1
S 6
ToC2
8.50
8.50
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
206
0
0
Broad.
206
30.83
0
262.02
0
9380 -
Miller
2
S 6
FrC2
4.40
3.90
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
30.08
0
117.30
0
9380 -
Miller
2
S 6
FrC2
4.40
3.90
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
8.75
0
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 2 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
9380 -
Miller
1
S 6
ToC2
8.50
8.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
19.08
0
9547 -
P1
S 8
YaB2
17.50
17.30
Corn, Silage
20.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
219
0
0
Broad.
219
32.77
0
566.94
0
9547 -
P1
S 8
YaB2
17.50
17.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
38.83
0
9559
SR1
S 8
CeB2
12.00
11.25
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
35.76
0
402.35
0
9559
SR1
S 8
CeB2
12.00
11.25
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
25.25
0
9729
Elk
Uppe
r
S 8
YaB2
38.90
36.80
Corn, Silage
20.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
219
0
0
Broad.
219
32.77
0
1,205.99
0
9729
Elk
Lowe
r
S 8
BaB
8.10
8.10
Corn, Silage
26.6 Tons
2/15-6/30
285
164
0
Broad.
121
18.11
0
146.66
0
9729
Elk
Uppe
r
S 8
YaB2
38.90
36.80
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
82.60
0
9729
Elk
Lowe
r
S 8
BaB
8.10
8.10
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
18.18
0
9883
CH2
S 6
ToC2
10.60
10.30
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
206
0
0
Broad.
206
30.83
0
317.51
0
9883
CH1
S 6
ToC2
19.50
19.40
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
206
0
0
Broad.
206
30.83
0
598.02
0
9883
CH1
S 6
ToC2
19.50
19.40
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
43.55
0
9883
CH2
S 6
ToC2
10.60
10.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
23.12
0
9883
5
S 6
FrD2
15.00
15.00
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
119
0
0
Broad.
119
17.81
0
267.11
0
9883
6
S 6
FrD2
17.60
17.40
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
119
0
0
Broad.
119
17.81
0
309.85
0
9883
7
S 6
FrD2
88.30
81.40
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
119
0
0
Broad.
119
17.81
0
1,449.51
0
9883
8
S 6
FrD2
18.20
18.20
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
2/15-6/30
174
0
0
Broad.
174
26.04
0
473.88
0
9883
8
S 6
FrD2
18.20
18.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
40.85
0
9884
2
S 6
ToC2
14.40
11.80
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
135
0
0
Broad.
135
20.20
0
238.38
0
9885
Doug
1
S 8
ToB2
69.00
68.00
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0
2,167.40
0
9885
Doug
1
S 8
ToB2
69.00
68.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
152.63
0
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 3 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
10034
0M6
S 8
ToC2
46.00
45.00
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
206
0
0
Broad.
206
30.83
0
1,387.17
0
10034
0M5
S 8
ToB2
46.60
46.40
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0
1,478.93
0
10034
0M4
S 8
ToB2
27.70
27.00
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0
860.58
0
10034
Heifer
S 8
ToB2
29.80
28.40
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0
905.21
0
10034
OM1,
2,3
S 8
ToB2
120.00
115.30
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0
3,675.01
0
10034
0M6
S 8
ToC2
46.00
45.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
101.01
0
10034
0M5
S 8
ToB2
46.60
46.40
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
104.15
0
10034
0M4
S 8
ToB2
27.70
27.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
60.60
0
10034
OM1,
2,3
S 8
ToB2
120.00
115.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
258.80
0
10034
Heifer
S 8
ToB2
29.80
28.40
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
63.75
0
10035
ST1
S 8
ToB2
65.30
63.10
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0
2,011.22
0
10035
G07
S 8
ToB2
50.70
47.40
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0
1,510.80
0
10035
ST1
S 8
ToB2
65.30
63.10
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
141.64
0
10035
G07
S 8
ToB2
50.70
47.40
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
106.40
0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
36,942.80
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
12,686.22
Balance, 1000 gallons
(24,256.58)
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 4 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
Tract ID
Field
ID
Source
ID
SMU
Total
Acreage
Wettable
Acreage
Crop Name
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
N
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Res.
(Ibs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
1000
gal/A
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
tons
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
1000 gals
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
tons
375
CP3
S 8
ToB2
40.30
40.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Irrig.
15
2.25
0
90.46
0
375
Bost
S 8
ToC2
42.50
36.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
81.93
0
375
CP4
S 8
ToC2
38.20
38.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Irrig.
15
2.25
0
85.74
0
375
KW1
S 8
ToC2
23.40
20.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.24
0
46.01
0
375
Bost
S 8
ToC2
42.50
36.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
210.28
0
375
CP4
S 8
ToC2
38.20
38.20
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Irrig.
39
5.76
0
220.08
0
375
CP3
S 8
ToB2
40.30
40.30
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Irrig.
40
5.99
0
241.22
0
375
KW1
S 8
ToC2
23.40
20.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
118.10
0
375
CP3
S 8
ToB2
40.30
40.30
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
33 Bushels
4/1-9/15
128
0
30
Irrig.
98
14.67
0
590.99
0
375
Bost
S 8
ToC2
42.50
36.50
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
32 Bushels
4/1-9/15
124
0
30
Broad.
94
14.07
0
513.42
0
375
CP4
S 8
ToC2
38.20
38.20
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
32 Bushels
4/1-9/15
124
0
30
Irrig.
94
14.07
0
537.33
0
375
KW1
S 8
ToC2
23.40
20.50
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
32 Bushels
4/1-9/15
124
0
30
Broad.
94
14.07
0
288.36
0
375
1
S 8
ToC2
138.00
57.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
129.07
0
375
1
S 8
ToC2
138.00
57.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
331.27
0
375
1
S 8
ToC2
138.00
57.50
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
32 Bushels
4/1-9/15
124
0
30
Broad.
94
14.07
0
808.81
0
395
SP1
S 8
ToB2
23.10
22.70
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
50.95
0
395
SP1
S 8
ToB2
23.10
22.70
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
135.87
0
395
SP1
S 8
ToB2
23.10
22.70
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
33 Bushels
4/1-9/15
128
0
30
Broad.
98
14.67
0
332.89
0
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 5 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
395
2
S 6
CmC2
55.20
48.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
22.75
0
1,091.78
0
424 -
CG1
S 6
CmB2
30.20
29.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
65.77
0
424 -
CG1
S 6
CmB2
30.20
29.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
120
0
20
Broad.
50
7.48
0
219.22
0
424 -
CG1
S 6
CmB2
30.20
29.30
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
41 Bushels
4/1-9/15
159
0
30
Broad.
129
19.30
0
565.60
0
821
1
S 8
ToC2
15.80
15.60
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
35.02
0
821
1
S 8
ToC2
15.80
15.60
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
89.87
0
821
1
S 8
ToC2
15.80
15.60
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
32 Bushels
4/1-9/15
124
0
30
Broad.
94
14.07
0
219.43
0
821
2
S 8
CsA
23.70
23.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.24
0
51.63
0
821
2
S 8
CsA
23.70
23.00
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
20
Broad.
38
5.61
0
129.07
0
821
2
S 8
CsA
23.70
23.00
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
42 Bushels
4/1-9/15
161
18
30
Broad.
113
16.91
0
388.92
0
868 -
2
S 8
CeB2
4.00
3.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.24
0
7.18
0
868 -
2
S 8
CeB2
4.00
3.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
20
Broad.
48
7.11
0
22.75
0
868 -
2
S 8
CeB2
4.00
3.20
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
40 Bushels
4/1-9/15
156
0
30
Broad.
126
18.86
0
60.34
0
895
Lacke
Y
S 8
FrC2
44.60
41.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
92.03
0
895
Lacke
Y
S 8
FrC2
44.60
41.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
20
Broad.
36
5.39
0
220.87
0
895
Lacke
y
S 8
FrC2
44.60
41.00
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
31 Bushels
4/1-9/15
121
0
30
Broad.
91
13.62
0
558.31
0
8288
1
S 6
CmC2
29.40
27.30
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
22.75
0
620.95
0
8678
1
S 8
ToB2
47.00
44.60
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
100.11
0
8678
1
S 8
ToB2
47.00
44.60
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
266.96
0
8678
1
S 8
ToB2
47.00
44.60
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
33 Bushels
4/1-9/15
128
0
30
Broad.
98
14.67
0
654.05
0
9016
LF2
S 8
CsA
24.67
23.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.24
0
52.30
0
9016
LF2
S 8
CsA
24.67
23.30
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
20
Broad.
38
5.61
0
130.75
0
9016
LF2
S 8
CsA
24.67
23.30
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
42 Bushels
4/1-9/15
161
37
30
Broad.
94
14.07
0
327.74
0
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 6 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
9050
Feim
1
S 8
ToB2
10.90
10.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
22.90
0
9050
Feim
1
S 8
ToB2
10.90
10.20
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
61.05
0
9050
Feim
1
S 8
ToB2
10.90
10.20
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
33 Bushels
4/1-9/15
128
0
30
Broad.
98
14.67
0
149.58
0
9228 -
SR2
S 8
FcC2
21.75
21.10
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
47.36
0
9228 -
SR2
S 8
FcC2
21.75
21.10
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
20
Broad.
30
4.49
0
94.72
0
9228 -
SR2
S 8
FcC2
21.75
21.10
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
27 Bushels
4/1-9/15
105
0
30
Broad.
75
11.22
0
236.81
0
9380 -
Miller
2
S 6
FrC2
4.40
3.90
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
8.75
0
9380 -
Miller
1
S 6
ToC2
8.50
8.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
19.08
0
9380 -
Miller
2
S 6
FrC2
4.40
3.90
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
20
Broad.
36
5.39
0
21.01
0
9380 -
Miller
1
S 6
ToC2
8.50
8.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
48.97
0
9380 -
Miller
2
S 6
FrC2
4.40
3.90
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
31 Bushels
4/1-9/15
121
0
30
Broad.
91
13.62
0
53.11
0
9380 -
Miller
1
S 6
ToC2
8.50
8.50
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
32 Bushels
4/1-9/15
124
0
30
Broad.
94
14.07
0
119.56
0
9547 -
P1
S 8
YaB2
17.50
17.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
38.83
0
9547 -
P1
S 8
YaB2
17.50
17.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
103
0
20
Broad.
42
6.21
0
107.44
0
9547 -
P1
S 8
YaB2
17.50
17.30
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
34 Bushels
4/1-9/15
132
0
30
Broad.
102
15.26
0
264.06
0
9559
SR1
S 8
CeB2
12.00
11.25
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
25.25
0
9559
SR1
S 8
CeB2
12.00
11.25
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
20
Broad.
48
7.11
0
79.96
0
9559
SR1
S 8
CeB2
12.00
11.25
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
40 Bushels
4/1-9/15
156
0
30
Broad.
126
18.86
0
212.12
0
9729
Elk
Uppe
r
S 8
YaB2
38.90
36.80
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
82.60
0
9729
Elk
Lowe
r
S 8
BaB
8.10
8.10
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
18.18
0
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 7 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
9729
Elk
Uppe
r
S 8
YaB2
38.90
36.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
103
0
20
Broad.
42
6.21
0
228.53
0
9729
Elk
Lowe
r
S 8
BaB
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
112
0
20
Broad.
46
6.88
0
55.76
0
9729
Elk
Lowe
r
S 8
BaB
8.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
48 Bushels
4/1-9/15
186
35
30
Broad.
121
18.11
0
146.66
0
9729
Elk
Uppe
r
S 8
YaB2
38.90
36.80
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
34 Bushels
4/1-9/15
132
0
30
Broad.
102
15.26
0
561.69
0
9883
CH2
S 6
ToC2
10.60
10.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
23.12
0
9883
CH1
S 6
ToC2
19.50
19.40
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
43.55
0
9883
CH2
S 6
ToC2
10.60
10.30
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
59.34
0
9883
CH1
S 6
ToC2
19.50
19.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
111.77
0
9883
CH2
S 6
ToC2
10.60
10.30
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
32 Bushels
4/1-9/15
124
0
30
Broad.
94
14.07
0
144.88
0
9883
CH1
S 6
ToC2
19.50
19.40
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
32 Bushels
4/1-9/15
124
0
30
Broad.
94
14.07
0
272.89
0
9883
5
S 6
FrD2
15.00
15.00
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
119
0
0
Broad.
119
17.81
0
267.11
0
9883
6
S 6
FrD2
17.60
17.40
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
119
0
0
Broad.
119
17.81
0
309.85
0
9883
7
S 6
FrD2
88.30
81.40
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
119
0
0
Broad.
119
17.81
0
1,449.51
0
9883
8
S 6
FrD2
18.20
18.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
40.85
0
9883
8
S 6
FrD2
18.20
18.20
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
20
Broad.
30
4.49
0
81.70
0
9883
8
S 6
FrD2
18.20
18.20
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
27 Bushels
4/1-9/15
105
0
30
Broad.
75
11.22
0
204.26
0
9884
2
S 6
ToC2
14.40
11.80
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
135
0
0
Broad.
135
20.20
0
238.38
0
9885
Doug
1
S 8
ToB2
69.00
68.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
152.63
0
9885
Doug
1
S 8
ToB2
69.00
68.00
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
407.02
0
9885
Doug
1
S 8
ToB2
69.00
68.00
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
33 Bushels
4/1-9/15
128
0
30
Broad.
98
14.67
0
997.21
0
10034
0M6
S 8
ToC2
46.00
45.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
101.01
0
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 8 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
10034
0M5
S 8
ToB2
46.60
46.40
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
104.15
0
10034
0M4
S 8
ToB2
27.70
27.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
60.60
0
10034
Heifer
S 8
ToB2
29.80
28.40
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
63.75
0
10034
OM1,
2,3
S 8
ToB2
120.00
115.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
258.80
0
10034
0M6
S 8
ToC2
46.00
45.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
259.25
0
10034
0M5
S 8
ToB2
46.60
46.40
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
277.73
0
10034
0M4
S 8
ToB2
27.70
27.00
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
161.61
0
10034
OM1,
2,3
S 8
ToB2
120.00
115.30
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
690.14
0
10034
Heifer
S 8
ToB2
29.80
28.40
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
169.99
0
10034
0M5
S 8
ToB2
46.60
46.40
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
33 Bushels
4/1-9/15
128
0
30
Broad.
98
14.67
0
680.45
0
10034
0M6
S 8
ToC2
46.00
45.00
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
32 Bushels
4/1-9/15
124
0
30
Broad.
94
14.07
0
632.98
0
10034
0M4
S 8
ToB2
27.70
27.00
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
33 Bushels
4/1-9/15
128
0
30
Broad.
98
14.67
0
395.95
0
10034
Heifer
S 8
ToB2
29.80
28.40
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
33 Bushels
4/1-9/15
128
0
30
Broad.
98
14.67
0
416.48
0
10034
OM1,
2,3
S 8
ToB2
120.00
115.30
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
33 Bushels
4/1-9/15
128
0
30
Broad.
98
14.67
0
1,690.85
0
10035
ST1
S 8
ToB2
65.30
63.10
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
141.64
0
10035
G07
S 8
ToB2
50.70
47.40
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
0
Broad.
15
2.25
0
106.40
0
10035
ST1
S 8
ToB2
65.30
63.10
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
377.69
0
10035
G07
S 8
ToB2
50.70
47.40
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
283.72
0
10035
ST1
S 8
ToB2
65.30
63.10
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
33 Bushels
4/1-9/15
128
0
30
Broad.
98
14.67
0
925.35
0
10035
G07
S 8
ToB2
50.70
47.40
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
33 Bushels
4/1-9/15
128
0
30
Broad.
98
14.67
0
695.11
0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
26,785.11
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
12,686.22
Balance, 1000 gallons
(14,098.89)
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 9 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Year 3
Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
Tract ID
Field
ID
Source
ID
SMU
Total
Acreage
Wettable
Acreage
Crop Name
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
N
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Res.
(Ibs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
1000
gal/A
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
tons
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
1000 gals
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
tons
375
Bost
S 8
ToC2
42.50
36.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
210.28
0
375
CP4
S 8
ToC2
38.20
38.20
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Irrig.
39
5.76
0
220.08
0
375
CP3
S 8
ToB2
40.30
40.30
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Irrig.
40
5.99
0
241.22
0
375
KW1
S 8
ToC2
23.40
20.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
118.10
0
375
Bost
S 8
ToC2
42.50
36.50
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
3/15-8/31
88
0
0
Broad.
88
13.17
0
480.65
0
375
CP4
S 8
ToC2
38.20
38.20
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
3/15-8/31
88
0
0
Irrig.
88
13.17
0
503.03
0
375
CP3
S 8
ToB2
40.30
40.30
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
3/15-8/31
89
0
0
Irrig.
89
13.32
0
536.72
0
375
KW1
S 8
ToC2
23.40
20.50
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
3/15-8/31
88
0
0
Broad.
88
13.17
0
269.95
0
375
1
S 8
ToC2
138.00
57.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
331.27
0
375
1
S 8
ToC2
138.00
57.50
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
3/15-8/31
88
0
0
Broad.
88
13.17
0
757.18
0
395
SP1
S 8
ToB2
23.10
22.70
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
135.87
0
395
SP1
S 8
ToB2
23.10
22.70
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
3/15-8/31
89
0
0
Broad.
89
13.32
0
302.32
0
395
2
S 6
CmC2
55.20
48.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
22.75
0
1,091.78
0
424 -
CG1
S 6
CmB2
30.20
29.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
120
0
20
Broad.
50
7.48
0
219.22
0
424 -
CG1
S 6
CmB2
30.20
29.30
Sorghum, Grain
59 CWT
3/15-8/31
101
0
0
Broad.
101
15.11
0
442.83
0
821
1
S 8
ToC2
15.80
15.60
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
89.87
0
821
1
S 8
ToC2
15.80
15.60
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
3/15-8/31
88
0
0
Broad.
88
13.17
0
205.43
0
821
2
S 8
CsA
23.70
23.00
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
20
Broad.
38
5.61
0
129.07
0
821
2
S 8
CsA
23.70
23.00
Sorghum, Grain
65 CWT
3/15-8/31
105
0
0
Broad.
105
15.71
0
361.38
0
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 11 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
868 -
2
S 8
CeB2
4.00
3.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
20
Broad.
48
7.11
0
22.75
0
868 -
2
S 8
CeB2
4.00
3.20
Sorghum, Grain
57 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
Broad.
98
14.67
0
46.93
0
895
Lacke
Y
S 8
FrC2
44.60
41.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
20
Broad.
36
5.39
0
220.87
0
895
Lacke
Y
S 8
FrC2
44.60
41.00
Sorghum, Grain
46 CWT
3/15-8/31
79
0
0
Broad.
79
11.82
0
484.69
0
8288
1
S 6
CmC2
29.40
27.30
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
22.75
0
620.95
0
8678
1
S 8
ToB2
47.00
44.60
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
266.96
0
8678
1
S 8
ToB2
47.00
44.60
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
3/15-8/31
89
0
0
Broad.
89
13.32
0
593.98
0
9016
LF2
S 8
CsA
24.67
23.30
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
20
Broad.
38
5.61
0
130.75
0
9016
LF2
S 8
CsA
24.67
23.30
Sorghum, Grain
65 CWT
3/15-8/31
105
11
0
Broad.
94
14.07
0
327.74
0
9050
Feim
1
S 8
ToB2
10.90
10.20
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
61.05
0
9050
Feim
1
S 8
ToB2
10.90
10.20
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
3/15-8/31
89
0
0
Broad.
89
13.32
0
135.84
0
9228 -
SR2
S 8
FcC2
21.75
21.10
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
20
Broad.
30
4.49
0
94.72
0
9228 -
SR2
S 8
FcC2
21.75
21.10
Sorghum, Grain
40 CWT
3/15-8/31
69
0
0
Broad.
69
10.33
0
217.86
0
9380 -
Miller
2
S 6
FrC2
4.40
3.90
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
20
Broad.
36
5.39
0
21.01
0
9380 -
Miller
1
S 6
ToC2
8.50
8.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
48.97
0
9380 -
Miller
2
S 6
FrC2
4.40
3.90
Sorghum, Grain
46 CWT
3/15-8/31
79
0
0
Broad.
79
11.82
0
46.10
0
9380 -
Miller
1
S 6
ToC2
8.50
8.50
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
3/15-8/31
88
0
0
Broad.
88
13.17
0
111.93
0
9547 -
P1
S 8
YaB2
17.50
17.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
103
0
20
Broad.
42
6.21
0
107.44
0
9547 -
P1
S 8
YaB2
17.50
17.30
Sorghum, Grain
54 CWT
3/15-8/31
93
0
0
Broad.
93
13.92
0
240.76
0
9559
SR1
S 8
CeB2
12.00
11.25
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
20
Broad.
48
7.11
0
79.96
0
9559
SR1
S 8
CeB2
12.00
11.25
Sorghum, Grain
57 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
Broad.
98
14.67
0
164.98
0
9729
Elk
Lowe
r
S 8
BaB
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
112
0
20
Broad.
46
6.88
0
55.76
0
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 12 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
9729
Elk
Uppe
r
S 8
YaB2
38.90
36.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
103
0
20
Broad.
42
6.21
0
228.53
0
9729
Elk
Lowe
r
S 8
BaB
8.10
8.10
Sorghum, Grain
81 CWT
3/15-8/31
135
14
0
Broad.
121
18.11
0
146.66
0
9729
Elk
Uppe
r
S 8
YaB2
38.90
36.80
Sorghum, Grain
54 CWT
3/15-8/31
93
0
0
Broad.
93
13.92
0
512.13
0
9883
CH2
S 6
ToC2
10.60
10.30
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
59.34
0
9883
CH1
S 6
ToC2
19.50
19.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
111.77
0
9883
CH2
S 6
ToC2
10.60
10.30
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
3/15-8/31
88
0
0
Broad.
88
13.17
0
135.63
0
9883
CH1
S 6
ToC2
19.50
19.40
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
3/15-8/31
88
0
0
Broad.
88
13.17
0
255.47
0
9883
5
S 6
FrD2
15.00
15.00
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
119
0
0
Broad.
119
17.81
0
267.11
0
9883
6
S 6
FrD2
17.60
17.40
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
119
0
0
Broad.
119
17.81
0
309.85
0
9883
7
S 6
FrD2
88.30
81.40
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
119
0
0
Broad.
119
17.81
0
1,449.51
0
9883
8
S 6
FrD2
18.20
18.20
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
20
Broad.
30
4.49
0
81.70
0
9883
8
S 6
FrD2
18.20
18.20
Sorghum, Grain
40 CWT
3/15-8/31
69
0
0
Broad.
69
10.33
0
187.92
0
9884
2
S 6
ToC2
14.40
11.80
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
135
0
0
Broad.
135
20.20
0
238.38
0
9885
Doug
1
S 8
ToB2
69.00
68.00
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
407.02
0
9885
Doug
1
S 8
ToB2
69.00
68.00
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
3/15-8/31
89
0
0
Broad.
89
13.32
0
905.63
0
10034
0M6
S 8
ToC2
46.00
45.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
20
Broad.
39
5.76
0
259.25
0
10034
0M4
S 8
ToB2
27.70
27.00
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
161.61
0
10034
OM1,
2,3
S 8
ToB2
120.00
115.30
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
690.14
0
10034
0M5
S 8
ToB2
46.60
46.40
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
277.73
0
10034
Heifer
S 8
ToB2
29.80
28.40
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
169.99
0
10034
0M6
S 8
ToC2
46.00
45.00
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
3/15-8/31
88
0
0
Broad.
88
13.17
0
592.58
0
10034
0M5
S 8
ToB2
46.60
46.40
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
3/15-8/31
89
0
0
Broad.
89
13.32
0
617.96
0
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 13 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Grayhouse Farms Inc
10034
0M4
S 8
ToB2
27.70
27.00
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
3/15-8/31
89
0
0
Broad.
89
13.32
0
359.59
0
10034
OM1,
2,3
S 8
ToB2
120.00
115.30
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
3/15-8/31
89
0
0
Broad.
89
13.32
0
1,535.57
0
10034
Heifer
S 8
ToB2
29.80
28.40
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
3/15-8/31
89
0
0
Broad.
89
13.32
0
378.23
0
10035
ST1
S 8
ToB2
65.30
63.10
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
377.69
0
10035
G07
S 8
ToB2
50.70
47.40
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad.
40
5.99
0
283.72
0
10035
G07
S 8
ToB2
50.70
47.40
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
3/15-8/31
89
0
0
Broad.
89
13.32
0
631.27
0
10035
ST1
S 8
ToB2
65.30
63.10
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
3/15-8/31
89
0
0
Broad.
89
13.32
0
840.37
0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
23,220.61
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
12,686.22
Balance, 1000 gallons
(10,534.39)
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 1. Symbol * means user entered data.
3/8/2022 3:14:05 PM 14 / 14

Planned Crops Summary
Grayhouse Farms Inc
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in the plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
and Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) recommendations are also provided for each crop as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate.
The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where
available.
If a filed's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with
North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the
following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Wettable
Acres
SMU
LI
Crop Name
_
RYE
-
Recom-
mended
PAN
PLAT
Rating
P2O5 (Ibs/acre)
Crop
Removal Applied
375
Bost
42.5
36.5
ToC2
13
p
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
206
Medium
64
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 Bushels
124
Medium
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
97
Medium
47
NA
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
88
Medium
38
NA
375
CP4
1 38.2
38.2
ToC2
13
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
206
Low
64
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 Bushels
124
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
97
Low
47
NA
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
88
Low
38
NA
375
CP3
40.3
40.3
ToB2
13
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
213
Low
66
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 Bushels
128
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
100
Low
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
89
Low
39
NA
375
KW1
23.4
20.5
ToC2
13
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
206
Low
64
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
97
Low
47
NA
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
88
Low
38
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 Bushels
124
Low
26
NA
375
I 11
1381
57.51
ToC2
I 13
3/8/2022 3:13:55 PM 1 / 7

Planned Crops Summary
23.1
22.7
ToB2
13
55.2
48
CmC2
13
30.2
29.3
CmB2
13
15.8
15.6
ToC2
13
23.7
23
CsA
6.6
4
3.2
CeB2
15
Grayhouse Farms Inc
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
206
Low
64
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 Bushels
124
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
97
Low
47
NA
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
88
Low
38
NA
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
213
Low
66
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 Bushels
128
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
100
Low
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
89
Low
39
NA
I
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
152
Low
7
NA
Ail
L
Corn, Silage
22.5 Tons
245
Medium
77
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
41 Bushels
159
Medium
33
NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
120
Medium
58
NA
Sorghum, Grain
59 CWT
101
Medium
44
NA
I
I
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
206
Low
64
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 Bushels
124
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
97
Low
47
NA
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
88
Low
38
NA
Corn, Silage
26 Tons
270
Medium
88
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 Bushels
161
Medium
34
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
95
Medium
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
65 CWT
105
Medium
49
NA
I
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Medium
74
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 Bushels
156
Medium
32
NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Medium
56
NA
Sorghum, Grain
57 CWT
98
Medium
43
NA
3/8/2022 3:13:55 PM 2 / 7

Planned Crops Summary
Grayhouse Farms Inc
895
Lackey
44.6
41
FrC2
9
J
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
201
Medium
63
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 Bushels
121
Medium
25
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
92
Medium
45
NA
Sorghum, Grain
46 CWT
79
Medium
34
NA
8288
1
29.4
27.31
CmC21
13
Fescue Pasture
4.6 TonsL
152
Low
7
NA
8678
11
47
44.6
ToB2
13
M1 1 1
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
213
Low
66
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 Bushels
128
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
100
Low
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
89
Low
39
NA
9016
LF2
24.67
23.3
CsA
6.6
Corn, Silage
26 Tons
270
Medium
88
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 Bushels
161
Medium
34
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
95
Medium
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
65 CWT
105
Medium
49
NA
9050
I Feim1
I 10.9
10.2
ToB2
13
■
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
213
Low
66
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 Bushels
128
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
100
Low
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
89
Low
39
NA
9228 —I
SR2I
21.751
21.11
FcC2I
10
16
ii
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
174
Medium
54
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 Bushels
105
Medium
22
NA
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
80
Medium
39
NA
Sorghum, Grain
40 CWT
69
Medium
30
NA
9380 —
Miller 1
8.5
8.5
ToC2
13
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
206
Low
64
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 Bushels
124
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
97
Low
47
NA
3/8/2022 3:13:55 PM 3 / 7

Planned Crops Summary
Grayhouse Farms Inc
Sorghum, Grain 51 CWT
88
Low
38
NA
9380 —
Miller 2
4.4
3.9
FrC2
9
J
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
201
Medium
63
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 Bushels
121
Medium
25
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
92
Medium
45
NA
Sorghum, Grain
46 CWT
79
Medium
34
NA
9547 —
P1
17.5
17.3
YaB2
15
1
Corn, Silage
20.1 Tons
219
Medium
68
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 Bushels
132
Medium
27
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9.3 Tons
103
Medium
50
NA
Sorghum, Grain
54 CWT
93
Medium
40
NA
9559
SR1
12
11.25
CeB2
15
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Medium
74
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 Bushels
156
Medium
32
NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Medium
56
NA
Sorghum, Grain
57 CWT
98
Medium
43
NA
9729
I U plerl
38.91
36.81
YaB21
15
r
,1
Corn, Silage
20.1 Tons
219
Medium
68
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 Bushels
132
Medium
27
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9.3 Tons
103
Medium
50
NA
Sorghum, Grain
54 CWT
93
Medium
40
NA
9729I
Lower
8.11
8.11
Bad10
I ,
U
Corn, Silage
26.6 Tons
285
Medium
90
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
48 Bushels
186
Medium
38
NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
112
Medium
56
NA
Sorghum, Grain
81 CWT
135
Medium
61
NA
9883
C H 1
19.5
19.4
ToC2
13
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
206
Medium
64
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 Bushels
124
Medium
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
97
Medium
47
NA
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
88
Medium
38
NA
3/8/2022 3:13:55 PM 4 / 7

Planned Crops Summary
Grayhouse Farms Inc
9883
CH2
10.6
10.3
ToC2
13
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
206
Medium
64
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 Bushels
124
Medium
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
97
Medium
47
NA
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
88
Medium
38
NA
-
9883
5
15
15
FrD2l
9
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
119
Medium
6
NA
9883
6
17.6
17.4
FrD2
9
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
119
Medium
6
NA
9883
7
88.3
81.4
FrD2
9
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
119
Medium
6
NA
9883
8I
18.2I
18.2I
FrD2l
9
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
174
Medium
54
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 Bushels
105
Medium
22
NA
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
80
Medium
39
NA
Sorghum, Grain
40 CWT
69
Medium
30
NA
9884
2
14.4
11.8
ToC2
13
•
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons'
1351
Low
I 71
NA
9885I
Dougll
691
681
ToB21
13
•
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
213
Low
66
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 Bushels
128
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
100
Low
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
89
Low
39
NA
10034
Heifer
29.8
28.4
ToB2
13
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
213
Medium
66
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Medium
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 Bushels
128
Medium
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
100
Medium
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
89
Medium
39
NA
10034
OM1,2,
3
120
115.3
ToB2
13
mll
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
213
Low
66
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 Bushels
128
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
100
Low
49
NA
3/8/2022 3:13:55 PM 5 / 7

Planned Crops Summary
Grayhouse Farms Inc
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
89
Low
39
NA
10034
0M4
27.7
27
ToB2
13
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
213
Low
66
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 Bushels
128
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
100
Low
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
89
Low
39
NA
10034I
0M51
46.61
46.41
ToB2I
13
mil1 1
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
213
Low
66
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 Bushels
128
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
100
Low
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
89
Low
39
NA
10034
0M6
46
45
ToC2
13
Corn, Silage
18.9 Tons
206
Low
64
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 Bushels
124
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
97
Low
47
NA
Sorghum, Grain
51 CWT
88
Low
38
NA
10035
ST1
65.3
63.1
ToB2
13
I
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
213
Low
66
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 Bushels
128
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
100
Low
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
89
Low
39
NA
10035
G07
50.7
47.4
ToB2
13
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
213
Low
66
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Low
0
NA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 Bushels
128
Low
26
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9 Tons
100
Low
49
NA
Sorghum, Grain
52 CWT
89
Low
39
NA
Totals:
11,340.821
1,202.251
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
3/8/2022 3:13:55 PM 6 / 7

Planned Crops Summary
Grayhouse Farms Inc
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
<2
Low potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
leaching below the root zone.
None
> =
2 & < =
10
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
leaching below the root zone.
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
> 10
High potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
leaching below the root zone.
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation
practices that improve available water holding capacity of soil and
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are
Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328),
Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter
Strips(393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
P Loss Index
Rating "
P Management Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
26 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
3/8/2022 3:13:55 PM 7 / 7

Required Soil Test Values
Grayhouse Farms Inc
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that
should be taken based off information provided at time of soil tests. Fields that receive manure must have a soil
analysis conducted at least once every three years. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant
growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels.
Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,
respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc,
we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop
based on the first crop listed on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is
necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. If the first crop or rotation changes, these
recommendations may need to be reevaluated to ensure optimal ranges ofr crop production are maintained.
Tract ID
Field ID
Crop(s)
pH
Lime Recom.
for Crop(s)
(tons/acre)
Cu-I
Copper
Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc
Recommendation
375
Bost
5.1
0, 0
221
0, 0
297
0, 0
375
KW1
6.2
0, 0
153
0, 0
333
0, 0
375
CP3
6.4
0, 0
101
0, 0
296
0, 0
375
CP4
6.5
0, 0
127
0, 0
687
0, 0
375
1
6.6
0, 0
98
0, 0
251
0, 0
395
SP1
6.1
0, 0
117
0, 0
209
0, 0
395
2
Fescue/OGrass/Tim M
5.8
0.4, 0
103
0
160
0
424
CG1
6.3
0, 0
105
0, 0
250
0, 0
821
1
5.8
0, 0
80
0, 0
189
0, 0
821
2
5.8
0, 0
80
0, 0
189
0, 0
868
2
6.5
0, 0
178
0, 0
210
0, 0
895
Lackey
5.6
0, 0
81
0, 0
174
0, 0
8288
1
Fescue/OGrass/Tim M
5.9
0, 0
94
0
133
0
8678
1
6.4
0, 0
67
0, 0
269
0, 0
9016
LF2
6
0, 0
78
0, 0
149
0, 0
9050
Feim1
6.1
0, 0
50
0, 0
164
0, 0
9228
SR2
6.1
0, 0
195
0, 0
273
0, 0
9380
Miller 1
5.1
0, 0
77
0, 0
110
0, 0
9380
Miller 2
5.1
0, 0
77
0, 0
110
0, 0
9547
P1
6
0, 0
198
0, 0
281
0, 0
9559
SR1
6.1
0, 0
195
0, 0
273
0, 0
3/8/2022 3:14:16 PM 1 / 2

Required Soil Test Values
Grayhouse Farms Inc
9729
Elk
Lower
6.5
0, 0
178
0, 0
210
0, 0
9729
Elk
Upper
6.5
0, 0
178
0, 0
210
0, 0
9883
CH2
6.4
0, 0
582
0, 0
442
0, 0
9883
CH1
6.6
0, 0
814
0, 0
538
0, 0
9883
5
Fescue/OGrass/Tim M
7.1
0, 0
267
0
288
0
9883
6
Fescue/OGrass/Tim M
6.3
0,0
269
0
190
0
9883
7
Fescue/OGrass/Tim M
6.7
0,0
247
0
189
0
9883
8
6.4
0, 0
423
0, 0
495
0, 0
9884
2
Fescue/OGrass/Tim M
5.6
0.6,0
111
0
105
0
9885
Doug1
6.1
0, 0
118
0, 0
275
0, 0
10034
0M4
5.9
0, 0
79
0, 0
187
0, 0
10034
0M5
6
0, 0
111
0, 0
161
0, 0
10034
0M6
6
0, 0
121
0, 0
234
0, 0
10034
0M1,2,3
6.1
0, 0
109
0, 0
243
0, 0
10034
Heifer
6.4
0, 0
158
0, 0
385
0, 0
10035
G07
5.6
0, 0
47
0, 0
138
0, 0
10035
ST1
6.2
0, 0
200
0, 0
236
0, 0
Zinc and Copper Toxicity Levels in Soils
Metal
Soil Test Index
Recommended Action
Zn
300
Limit application on peanuts. Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
500
Cease application on peanut land. Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
Cu
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
3/8/2022 3:14:16 PM 2 / 2

SUO!SS!LIJO SUB lltrIOA
>
55'
co co
0
4
Gq
• • •
U U U LI Li LI LI U
8 -.=' 0. • F,t o =• 5-
0 =- --
-, L..
cr 2
— 2 -t 0-
0 oo.. , a,
.0 co ,--t•C ,__, -..
'-0--
,....,
Po <-• = (4
-- • -., C.6 '-<, CT) ra. 0 SI)
CD C '-' -7' ct
o m--. --_-,: CI:-
cr 0-Fo- 0
‘-• z co o - •
'-I 0-
0 '"1 co AD
X cr' 0 CI-
= ,--t P r, •
0
•
0_ -0 fa.. --o
O p o p
o • 4 o
n
-0 -0 -
o —
00 0
c„. z.-,•
0 5. °
P P
— —
CI Provide liquid drainage for stored manure

t-t
t••
t-t
tA 0
Li
CM
CD ce3
CD
"•0 0
0
er,
En
0
4:5 •
0
CD
CLL
0
c.)
co
Z-
0-
S' cp• 0
— .
= o
o cr
z
" 0
coCL 5-
On q Ug
5 0...
3 ;ID
C 01
co
01.
Co
Cl.. ...t.
0
"0
0
0
1.10!1V-lat it'01IIE4OOTAT
CI Minimum agitation when pumping
2
0
0
9.)
0
0
'71
0
0
-
0 P
0
0
jo woilog JUN.1 01
'71
F
t-t
• — •
cp
CD"'" • "' •
2
cs —•
=-• 0 o
'-' r' 5.• -t
co P
-t- 0
= —
Lto 0 0 -
0)
0
O.
0
0
0
(4)

z
)
FA. rTi
0107, 1995 Conference Proceedi
1334S Pd AWE
co 0
rn
Co
CX1
t•-)
LP)
4
1=1,
0
L-ri - 2 2 2
r• .n CA CA CA CA
0 eccbtzrzo
• HIP
7.D°
Th
11104 spuoi 3!
1-7
oluo par -cal pniN
cs;
ro
C. .0
CD
0
CD
Jopo iuewe6eueh elsem w
1311139110 104

D. a. (--) p,.:, ---, ...... ..,,, .... c "zt a_
B_. p = . • a = c:' ...-, e--t- 5
— cr- ▪ ... = .7.-.. Cr ,-f• 2;,,
`—' ^ "7:1 3 f. ca., •. = = • 2.; ,4 •• pr
0 0
,—,...
' rt,
2 9
.--1 0
o
(.1)
(7.24
,-% ri,
cr.2 C
PI.,
,--,-
.7, .—!-,
, cc P c: = F.,;
-, -.-• a
c7'
co
F4)
F'D ° COO
•
1-t

1111 a-1011110j
wejuoa uo!).
9L xoq `X3olowolua Jo WO
qua awls eup.reo LploN
J19L-69L7:
0
CD
SUM paN pur soisem
co
CD
SID CA b,-.7 a. , P ,-; .....-- $1:
:--' • 5 4 "'-: '
7 = -$ -t cl. z
cr P CD .a •
CA. '73 0 CD CD t#D ,-i (1)
0 cc '''' a = 5'. E aa c = 0...
I•1 • to = -s
—. — -) ' Fd- = z "" (1, z
-,r) -3
.' .. UP cr
o• F• c,) ili . CP 0 ,.-...
C C/5 ,--I C/7 D.r. rp m•-• ,P,
<— c)
,-- -, (jg 0 C. CD
0 0
CD
-s ..t:
St 5 MI -5.41,..,?, _0. .9, 5'4 1 E. *
CD `-< = a_ ,-, SID
ly, .
-
1 0 P-1
S. . gs
0 -I ^f P P • 5°P '
< E-A • " P
^
CD ‘:IL .7:3 '--- Ca t = (D
-1 . = v) m-
=
CD P)
a 0 N
.., , CD 0 CD CI. C.0 ,-1
,-. •
0
C =
1 `p-", a=,. .
--iq k< 0-< n
aCD g
cc CD
,-+ s....., .-t
a- . 0
e,- '• s0 c
vcC-o2 . kl40r-m-Dsi-
0
, CD
77
<4 ---, eh', = -15 g 0 cr CP P4 aw;
0 (-) R
a (-)
In
— (v, a a
0 1
0 = Fr C =
a.
co
0-
C) co = pa Co CO
)-r-, 1 a j• =
01. 0 CD E
CD
C/D 5'
Cr:,
ainue
puno

Primary Secondary
7
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
�
ver5m—November 26, 2018
Routine Mortality
Burial three feet beneath the surface ofthe groundwdhi 24 hours ofknowledge ofanimal
death, The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(8.G.108-403). The bottom ufthe burial pit should beat least one foot above the seasonal
high water table. Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill atmunicipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQunder GS15AN{AC
13B .O20O.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S, 106-168.7.
A
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed � '
addi
tional
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of osize and design approved bythe
NC Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (G.S. 106-54970).
Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered byenNPDEGpermit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm -specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options-, contact the Division for guidance,
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part ofthe facility's CAWMPand is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
* Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refer to facility's animal
waste management system pennd),
° |nthe event ofimminent threat o/adisease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures o[measures for disposal according toG.S.10G'399.4.
»y
Signature of Tech Cal Specialist Date
3 r) 2 ,l 2 2

Burial Pit Location 3' deep over 300' away from Buffalo Shoals Creek
Google Earth

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of
the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, storical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding
(see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method
which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding
should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates
on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than
30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
n. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied
from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to a well

13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied
to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied
on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on
other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on
a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with
no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to
be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate
than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum
crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum
of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall
be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
SWCD
NRCS
704-663-1699
704-878-3039
704-873-6761
704-873-6761
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
1 December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: Samuel Bingham
b. Phone: [phone]
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

RCS
United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590
Prepared for: Grayhouse Dairy
By: Michael Shepherd
Farm:
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
Nutrient Management is applying nutrients
from all sources with the right placement, in
the right amount, at the right time, and from
the right source to minimize nutrient losses to
surface and groundwater. This practice is
accomplished through development and
implementation of a Nutrient Management
Plan, which can be part of a broader
Conservation Plan or CNMP that addresses
multiple resource concerns.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
A nutrient management plan is intended to
accomplish one or more of the following
objectives:
• To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for
plant production.
• To minimize agricultural nonpoint source
pollution of surface and groundwater
resources.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To protect air quality by reducing odors,
nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of
nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric
particulates.
• To maintain or improve the physical, chemical,
and biological condition of soil.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following components are included in
nutrient management plan specifications
typical of more 'traditional'
Tract(s): Date: 3 / 15 / 2022
fertilizer and manure application methods.
When precision ag/variable rate application
technology is utilized, see the next section of
this Job Sheet for additional guidance on plan
requirements.
• aerial site photograph(s)/imagery or site
map(s), and a soil survey map of the site,
• Sufficient soils information —such as dominant
soil map until for each planned field —needed
to apply nutrients at RYE and Soil Test Report
determined rates as appropriate; and to not
exceed rates determined by nutrient risk
assessment planning criteria.
• location of designated sensitive areas and the
associated nutrient application restrictions and
setbacks,
• results of approved risk assessment tools for
any necessary evaluations for nitrogen,
phosphorus, and erosion losses.
• current and/or planned plant production
sequence or rotation,
• soil, water, compost, manure, organic by-
product, and plant tissue sample analyses
applicable to the plan. Where non-NCDA soil
testing labs are used, nutrient
recommendations must be made using NCDA-
similar guidelines and methodologies. Note:
high levels of soil copper and zinc may be toxic
to production crops. Land application of these
nutrients must be accordance with
NCSU/NCDA crop toxicity guidelines.
• Realistic yield goals for the crops planned for
nutrient application,
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 1

• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC Realistic Yield Expectations (RYEs) or
sufficiently documented yield records,
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields,
• Planned P & K application rates based on soil
test results (see next section where P & K
applied through variable rate technology).
• listing and quantification of all nutrient sources
and form, including starter fertilizer
applications and legume -based cover crop
mixes.
• in accordance with the nitrogen and
phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), specify
the recommended nutrient application source,
timing, amount (except for precision/variable
rate applications specify method used to
determine rate), and placement of plant
nutrients for each field or management unit,
and
• guidance for implementation, operation and
maintenance, and recordkeeping as specified
by the CNMP or applicable NC DWQ or
NDPES permit.
Where precision/variable rate nutrient
application applications are planned and
made, some required planning components of
the preceding section may be provided by the
overall conservation plan. In addition, the
following components are required in nutrient
management planning.
• The geo-referenced field boundary and data
collected that was processed and analyzed as
a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or
soil amendment recommendations.
• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC RYEs or sufficiently documented yield
records
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields.
• The nutrient recommendation guidance and
recommendation equations used to convert the
GIS base data layer or layers to a nutrient
source material recommendation GIS layer or
layers.
• Soil testing documentation that crop
Phosphorus (P205) and Potassium (K20)
nutrient or soil amendment application will be
made per soil test results similar to NCDA
guidelines. Where P & K will not be applied
via variable rate application technology, but by
basic GPS guidance, recommended P & K
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
rates must be provided as specifications prior
to application.
• Note —where Diammonium phosphate (18-46-
0) is the primary variable rate P fertilizer
source applied on legume crops, additional N
will likely be needed to achieve RYEs.
The plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 standard and Federal, state, or
local regulations or policies. Changes in laws
or regulations may require a plan modification.
This Job Sheet is a required supplement to
the Nutrient Management Plan.
NC Permitted Animal Operations: For NC
DENR-DWR or NPDES permitted animal
operations, the waste utilization portion of the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) must meet requirements specified by
the Permit. The NC 1217 Interagency Group
provides guidance on the required minimum
elements of a CAWMP. This guidance is found in
Sec 1.1 of the latest 1217 Guidance Document,
located at:
http://www.ncagr.gov/SWC/tech/guidancedocumen
ts.html.
Nitrogen Leaching Index Values
Nitrogen Leaching Index values, obtained through
use of current Soil Hydrologic Group (SHG)-based
LI index maps in Sec II of the NC FOTG or RUSLE
2 field -specific soil loss calculations, are included
in the Nutrient Management Plan. SHGs per soil
map unit are available through selection of the Soil
Data Explorer and Soil Properties and Qualities
(then select "Soil Qualities and Features") tabs
once an Area of Interest has been defined in
NRCS Web Soil Survey.
If the Nitrogen Leaching Index > 10 for planned
fields, appropriate conservation practices must be
included in a conservation plan to prevent nitrogen
from leaving the field via surface or subsurface
runoff.
Below are conservation crop management
techniques and practices recommended for
mitigation of nitrate losses (practices also
documented in conservation plan):
page 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
The nutrient management plan has been
developed to meet nutrient application rate criteria
for all sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium
as specified by NRCS 590 Nutrient Management
standard criteria.
In addition to NCDA Agronomic Division soil test
recommendations, or soil test recommendations
made through similar guidelines, the plan is based
on NC INMC approved values for realistic yield
goals, nitrogen factors, phosphorus removal rates,
default nutrient values for animal waste, plant
availability coefficients for N, P, and K, and animal
waste generation volumes where applicable.
Approved values are found at:
http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/index.htm
Where manure is applied, farm records may also
be used through a procedure provided in SB 1217
Interagency Group guidance, available at:
http://www.ncagrgov/SWC/tech/1217committee.ht
ml
For NC permitted animal operations, planning
requirements for Plan "Amendments" (minor
modifications) and "Revisions" (Major
Modifications) are clarified by SB 1217 Interagency
Group Guidance.
ADDITIONAL PHOSPHORUS -RELATED
PLAN INFORMATION (Applicable when
increases in Soil Test P are expected on
the planned area)
In NC, a field -specific Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) evaluation is completed
in accordance with 590 Nutrient Management
standard General Criteria requirements, and
phosphorus must be applied in accordance with
590 standard Manure Phosphorus Application
Rates.
In addition to the basic plan components, plan
information on PLAT categorical ratings, P
drawdown strategies, and conservation practices
to reduce P loss risk is required when increases in
Soil Test P are expected on the planned area.
Typically, this could occur when manure is
consistently applied at Nitrogen -based rates. High
levels of phosphorus in the surface soil layer have
been linked to increasing risk of P loss through
surface runoff and leaching.
❑ Increases in Soil Test P are expected
on the planned area (not typical if P
application made per soil test results).
PLAT Categorical Ratings Information
When soil test phosphorus continues to increase
on a long term basis, PLAT may produce results
that require P-based manure application planning
and planning for no additional manure P.
Conditions that will require P-based or no-P
planning will be based on site specific resource
conditions, which will facilitate data input into
PLAT. PLAT categorical ratings that will require
enhanced P application planning are:
HIGH: P-based manure application is required
(limited to P uptake in harvested crop biomass)
VERY HIGH: No additional manure P or starter P
application to be specified in nutrient management
plan.
Phosphorus Drawdown Strategy
Information:
Implementation of a phosphorus `drawdown'
strategy may be a consequence of PLAT results,
or may be requested in order to lower soil test
phosphorus levels.
Should a reduction in soil test P be desired or
necessary, the only currently proven method of
substantial P 'drawdown' is to not apply manure -
based P and to plant and harvest crops that utilize
P currently present in the soil surface.
Crop specific estimated annual P removal amounts
are available on the NCSU Nutrient Management
in NC website:
http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/yields/index.php
Conservation Practices and Management
Techniques to Reduce P Loss Potential:
Conservation practices, especially those that
prevent soil particle detachment and trap sediment
at field edges are effective in preventing
phosphorus movement from the planned site.
Manure application techniques can also be applied
to reduce P loss risk. These practices must be
included in the conservation plan where
determined PLAT risk = HIGH for planned fields.
Consult the conservation plan developed in
conjunction with the nutrient management plan for
information on practices recommended to reduce
phosphorus AND nitrogen loss risks. Application
management techniques to reduce nutrient loss
risk may be prescribed below:
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 3

Long Term Strategy for Reduction of Soil P
Levels:
As noted in the P drawdown strategy section, the
only currently proven method for reducing high
levels of soil P is not applying P, paired with
producing crops on the planned site that use
existing soil P. Where soil P and PLAT
evaluations indicate an increasing risk to water
quality, substantially reducing soil P levels through
crop uptake can take many years of
implementation. When P is not applied, and
existing soil P is used by crops, eventually, soil will
become P deficient. Consult CES or NCDA
Regional Agronomy specialists for additional
information soil test P reduction timelines.
Manure P produced in excess of crop
requirements:
Consult the nutrient management plan for a
quantification of manure generated by the animal
feeding operation that may exceed crop P
requirements.
"Manure Hauler" Information
All manure waste applied on land owned by or
controlled by the Animal Feeding Operation (AFO)
owner or operator must be included in the nutrient
management plan. The volume difference in total
manure waste generated by the AFO and waste
applied to land not owned or controlled by the
producer must be accounted for in a nutrient
management plan.
General information on manure waste generated
by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be
recorded as specified in the NC CNMP
Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist or
other supplemental documentation to the nutrient
management plan. NRCS CNMP technical criteria
require documentation of manure exports off the
farm (this can be done below). The AFO
owner/operator should provide the third party
applicator with a current waste analysis in order to
facilitate agronomic crop application of the facility's
generated waste. Should land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator be
included in a nutrient management plan, the
complete plan must meet 590 criteria.
Type and Quantity of Animal Feeding Operation
(AFO) manure generated by the facility:
1,430 Dairy Milk Cow, 250 Dry Cow, 200 Dairy Heifer, 120 Calves
RECORDKEEPING
Waste reports from the NCDA & CS Agronomic
Division, or equivalent, are acceptable sources of
information for determining applied manure nutrient
amounts for recordkeeping or crop budgeting
purposes.
Records must be maintained for at least 5 years, or
for time and manner required by Permit for animal
operations to document plan implementation and
maintenance. As applicable, records include:
• soil, plant tissue, water, manure, and
organic by-product analyses resulting in
recommendations for nutrient application,
• quantities, analyses and sources of
nutrients applied,
• dates, and method(s) of nutrient
applications, source of nutrients, and rates
of application,
Quantity of AFO manure generated to be exported
off the farm for third party application:
0
• weather conditions and soil moisture at the
time of application; lapsed time to manure
incorporation; rainfall or irrigation event,
• crops planted, planting and harvest dates,
yields, nutrient analyses of harvested
biomass, and crop residues removed,
• dates of plan review, name of reviewer,
and recommended changes resulting from
the review, and
• all enhanced efficiency fertilizer products
used.
Additional records for precision/variable rate
sites must include:
• maps identifying the variable application
source, timing, amount, and placement of
all plant nutrients applied, and
• GPS-based yield maps for crops where
yields can be digitally collected.
• Documentation per field nitrogen
application rates do not exceed RYE -
based recommended rates
• Documentation that applied phosphorus
and potassium recommendations do not
exceed recommended rates specified by
soil tests.
• For non -variable rate application of P & K,
provide applied map with field boundaries
indicating source, timing, method, and rate
of all applications.
• Where 'chlorophyll reader' technology is
utilized, application records that nitrogen
rates match RYE -based N rates as closely
as possible.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 4

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The producer is responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. Review the plan periodically to
determine if adjustments or modifications to the
plan are needed. In NC, animal operations
permitting provisions may specify more frequent
review periods. Adhere to the following operation
and maintenance provisions:
• Protect fertilizer and organic by-product
storage facilities from weather and accidental
leakage or spillage.
• Properly calibrate application equipment to
ensure uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
• Workers should be protected from and avoid
unnecessary contact with inorganic fertilizers
and organic by-products. Extra caution must
be taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic wastes
stored in unventilated enclosures.
• The disposal of material generated by the
cleaning of nutrient application equipment
should be accomplished properly. Excess
material should be collected and stored or field
applied in an appropriate manner. Excess
material should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
• Disposal or recycling of nutrient containers
should be done according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 5

Grayhouse Dairy Land Applicaiton Fields
s"tts
i_.v:az4
r;

4.•
Groyh i
a
r
Statesvil

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tracts 375 Field Bost
Google Earth

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tract 31:35

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tracts 424

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tract 821

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tract 9729 and 868

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tract E'J5
duiS.

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tracts 8288

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tracts 375 and 8678
Tract
field
1{
' 2000 ft
7

1.
Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tract 9016

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tract 9050
4,'E POSittriad‘ -.411:, eetV.
forre clear
ler • 4il:CiseZ; • '-rt
..r.151r •
f'•F"' •
; off•
4..7 . et15144:
•
•
r*Itis
..7
its

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tract 9380

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tract 9r47
n••
Okv tea..
e/k2
.'v yc' ef',
•�

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tracts 9559 and 9228
Field SIR?
Google Earth
1000 ft
AM

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tracts 9883 Fields CH1 & CH2
if

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tracts 91E183
1000 ft

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tracts 9884
..•
.,„ ce ...r, • .14 - . ,
.Fir , *.? it it ..).,‘ '',. v,„,•• .
. Cipior kcal. ;1St& ti 7 , . • •)1r ,
I I ILY .1.166 ' 40iitir -It' '
ss .4l iii Ct • • . A it gr .t, . .. ...,.. r
.0 * • ter, we :- • • * # Crts•-• /'
AS 444.al..'
41 • Nor .444• se1 • • •-•
' ;44•14 al, cer •1/40 ijoilief 441.. ••• sr 40.4 A914":
, 41• liger . 1vr S 11:4" 4:7 Itia:itS ' .
jit Ike 1. b lit)/ vir,
• Nt 4 •$' : - 44 -
h.A,41.. 416 4 yr hr. 1
- .,
7#e ,fit a.0...it.. -iee• 7

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tract 98135

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tract 10034
Westviaru.R
Google Earth "
„ .0-10034 Fields
2000 ft

Grayhouse Dairy
Application Fields
Tract 10035
1000 ft

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY22-SL027365
"" 4,
, Predictive
,s
� $ Mehlich-3 Extraction
- t.� i Soil Report
Links to Helpful Information
Client:
Client ID:
Grayhouse Farm -Andy
182 Grayhouse Rd / 527 New
Sterling Rd
Stony Point, NC 28678
Sampled County : Iredell
183601
Advisor: Michael Shepherd
P 0 Box 845 / 191 South
Main St
Mocksville, NC 27028
Advisor ID: 462141
Sampled: 02/17/2022 Received: 02/21/2022 Completed: 03/04/2022 Farm:
Sample ID: F-1
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 12
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.4 120-200 0
2 - 0.0
K2O
0
Mg S Mn Zn
0 0 0 0
Cu
0
B
0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.71 1.03 7.7 79 1.6 5.8 80 148 48 21
S-I
39
Mn-I
194
Soil Class: Mineral
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
133 160 160
Cu-I
103
Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.1 1
Sample ID: F-2
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 12
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 30
2 - 0.0
K2O
0
Mg S Mn Zn
0 0 0 0
Cu
0
B
0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.60 1.05 7.7 80 1.5 5.9 50 126 48 24
S-I
50
Mn-I
190
Soil Class: Mineral
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
131 133 133
Cu-I
94
Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.1 1
North Carolina
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler. Commissioner of Agriculture
Tobac4. Trust risrid Co emisslan

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY22-SL027365
Page 2 of 4
Sample ID: F-3
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 12
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 30
2 - 0.0
K2O
0
Mg S
0 0
Mn Zn
0 0
Cu
0
B
0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.56 0.89 9.0 87 1.2 6.3 45 160 52 25
S-I
34
Mn-I
424
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
267
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
190 190
Cu-I
269
Na
0.1
ESP
1
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: F-4
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 12 Note: $
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 - Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 0
2 - 0.0
K2O
0
Mg S
0 0
Mn Zn
pH$ 0
Cu
0
B
0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.41 0.86 11.1 95 0.5 7.1 179 252 56 28
S-I
48
Mn-I
391
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
236
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
288 288
Cu-I
267
Na
0.1
ESP
1
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: F-5
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (Ib/acre)
More
Information
Note: 12 Note: $
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 - Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 0
2 - 0.0
K2O
0
Mg S
0 0
Mn Zn
pH$ 0
Cu
0
B
0
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.46 1.00 9.4 91 0.9 6.7 100 203 54 26
S-I
39
Mn-I
196
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
125
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
189 189
Cu-I
247
Na
0.1
ESP
1
SS -I NO3-N

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY22-SL027365
Page 3 of 4
Sample ID: F-6
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 12
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.6 120-200 40
2 - 0.0
K2O
0
Mg S
0 0
Mn Zn
0 0
Cu
0
B
0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.56 0.95 6.6 76 1.6 5.6 41 113 44 23
S-I
48
Mn-I
227
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
153
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
105 105
Cu-I
111
Na
0.1
ESP
2
SS -I NO3-N

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY22-SL027365
Page 4 of 4
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Lime
Report Abbreviations
Ac exchangeable acidity
B boron
BS% % CEC occupied by basic cations
Ca% % CEC occupied by calcium
CEC cation exchange capacity
Cu-I copper index
ESP exchangeable sodium percent
HM% percent humic matter
K-I potassium index
K20 potash
Mg% %CEC occupied by magnesium
MIN mineral soil class
Mn manganese
Mn-AI1 Mn availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2 Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I manganese index
M-0 mineral -organic soil class
N nitrogen
Na sodium
NO3-N nitrate nitrogen
ORG organic soil class
pH current soil pH
P-I phosphorus index
P205 phosphate
S-I sulfur index
SS -I soluble salt index
WN weight per volume
Zn-AI zinc availability index
Zn-I zinc index
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at one
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Fertilizer
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-I and P-I values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS -I levels appear
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients In general, homeowners do not
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft . If you cannot find
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www•ncaor.pov/agronomi/obpart4.htm1s{ind information that
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
Test Results
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-AI1, Mn-Al2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinely
indicate levels fertility Visit www•ncapr.pov/apronomi/uyrst.htm
available)] of plant nutrients or other measurement.

x O
E
..0w u
VJ
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 5
Farm: COUNTY LINE ROAD / 1
2504 DAVIE AVE LID: 1203270HA9E4 Target pH: 6
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 10/30/2020 Processed: 11/3/2020
o
0
W
tit'
0
y
c
2
c
2
c
2
HM (%)
CO
N
N
N
C'')
LO
r`
N
m
c0c0r,
W(h
co
CO
U
ti
CO
of
T
U
of
o-
LO
V)
a
c
0
O
O
5
c
5
262 I
N_
125
Q
N
O
LO
LO
O
N
,-
N
N
54 )5o
N
,,-
N
N
(n
V
V
V
U
CO
CO.
N
<
N
,-
N
0)
6)
0)
a
Sr)
LO
LO
v
N
CO
0
m
'Cr
LO
LO
0
Mg (%)
20
26
26
Y
co
M
37
d
r
N
r
s—
o
0
0
a
d
0_
N
C-)
'cr
.0
M
rn
rn
CO
(0
CO
o
N
cc)
RI
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
0
.ir
0
a
d
0
N
Cu
Copper
m
w
C c
R
2 t
N
Y U
NN
c
co
m
Nw
43
E
2 4
g
pi
N
ao
P205
Phosphate
C
a
0
Z 12
2
4) i
E Q
-J 1-
V
c,O
M
M
O
Sample ID Crop
a
0
0
0
Z
NO CROP
N
M
Explanation of Symbols - Ibs/A (pounds per acre)
ai
E
8
ti

SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 26
Farm: LINDSEY FARM RD / G07
2504 DAVIE AVE LID: 1199237H2AE6 Target pH: 6
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 10/30/2020 Processed: 1113/2020
M
d)
ca
U
O
N
Min
G
C
c
c
c
Min
c
HM (%)
o
V
2.14
r
CA•
N.
CO
N
N
CO•
CO
N
c-
•V-
,-
•CO
N
,-
•N-
,-
•
N
o
N
m
03
CO
O
CO
N
r
r
CO
60
CO
CO
Co
CO
to
r
0
o)
CO
N
CO
N
N
CO
U
co
co
m
co
C
Sri
d
co
'
U
48
,f
LO
Ch
48
CO
40
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
128
422
519
CO
M
0")cO
CO
N
259
NCONN
N
250
0),-
150
�0
0.,
72
80
N
0
N
N
N-
0
148
O
O)
N
r
O
oo
C )
CO
CO
34
CO
v-
N
47
U)
M
7
co
N
V
M
U
N
CO
0
CO
CO
of
,I:
cc!
Q
N
N
2
C
d'
LO
,-
LO
CO
LO
CO
LO
CO
CO
M
CO
d-
LO
O)
tC)
Ca (%)
45
39
49
0
LO
44
44
e
18
O
27
CA
CA
LO
01
N
N
N
N
2
29
CO
0)
29
.-
N
CO
CD
Y
N
N
N
M
N
N
O
CO
N
CO
CO
N--
d
V'
N
N
07
N-
V
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CO
I�
CO
CS)
O_
N
CO
jct (0
C.O
W
CO
0)
O)
CD
0)
nq. 7
- o)
v
CD
"cr
a)
v
0)
v
a)
v
CT)
v
0)
d-
0)
Co
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CC)
CO
ev
N
CO
7
LO
CO
r
Co
E
in
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
See Note
Cu
Copper
a
m
C= c
C i
NN
C
CO m=
N
Mg
Magnesium
K20
Potash
P205
Phosphate
N
Nitrogen
Lime
Tons/Acre
7
s-
CO
x-
0.7
(q
0
C.
r
r
0
M
0
Crop
NO CROP
O_
0
0
0
Z
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
d
0
0
0
Z
0_
0
0
0
Z
o
d
Q.-
(6
CO
N
COLO
CO
N.
m
Explanation of Symbols - Ibs/A (pounds per acre)
n
This document may be reproduced only in its entirety. Waters Agricutural Laboratories has no

Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 1
Farm: BOST / BOST2
LID: 1199211 HE50B Target pH: 6
Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 10/30/2020 Processed: 11/3/2020
=
C
C
C
C_
C
OV
N
W N.
1—
N
V
N
N
N
N
N
9
(
N.
N.
N.
r-
.O (n
(0
co
(0
N
CO
N
(n
N
N
N
O
N
co
0
0
0
0
0
0
0))
NCO
CO
c00
O
M
N
ti'
CO
CO
N
N
V'
(0
CO
CO
CO
CO
M
N
co
M
(O
M
CO
N
(O
N
N
CO
V.
CO
CO
CO
N
00
CO
N
CO
M
(O
M
CO
N
(O
N
N
M
6)
co
o0
V
N
N
V
V
V-
co
V
co
V'
O
(0
W
V:
(O.
N
N
N
N
O
O
r-
O
O
M
(O
(n
co
(n
(n
(O
(0
(0
(0
co
6)
CO
't
v
't
(O
Ct
(n
am
ts.
CD
�CD
c-
(0
N
x—
N—
OD
N
d•
'0
CO
CA
N
CO
V'
CO
N
N
59
58
(O
(0
V
(O
0
0
169358P0
0
0
0
d
CL
d
d
d
LC)
LO
LO
CO
CO
rn
0)
rn
0)
0)
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
• N
CO
- (0
CO
N-
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
Sample [D� Crop
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
NO CROP 1.4
(O
r
M
,-
co.
,-
7
(O
CO
O
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
a
0
W
0
0
Z
NO CROP
• N
M
V
(O
(0
N
-v be reproduced only in its entirety. Waters Ag

M
Cq
CO
CO
0
r
d
0
O
a
Ci
O
0
N
d
0
C
0
U
O
(71
P-I K-I Mg (%) Ca (%) pHw Ac S-I Zn-I Zn-Al Mn-I Mn-AI Cu-I GEC BS (%) HM (%) Soil Class
33 80 26 53 6.5 1.2 33 178 178 472 0 70 7.3 84 1.77 Min
non
:_
3))
W
(O
O
7
CO
CO
CO
s-
h
LC)
CO
I.
Od'
'Cr
oo
O
O
O
462
r
W
CO
tO
CO
CO
N
N
N
CCOO
CO
CO
N
N
N
25
CO
CO
CO
ch
CO
N
V
O
m
co
(0
48
LO
LO
N
N
N
N
(O
Cfl
CO
0
169333P0
W
COM
CO
CO
0)
CO
CO
1.0
CO
( -
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
d
0
L
0
0
z
N
CO
7
u)
O
f-
Fertilizer recommendations ar

O
Vi
364 W. Park Drive i Warsaw, NC 28398- i Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 9
Farm: KENNETH / HEIFER
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13445899 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 9/14/2021 Processed: 9/16/2021
y
N
(a
_
0
N
2
x
4
`..
�,
CO
U
V'
Q
(1)
LIJ
Z
V
2
C.
2
Q
N
N
(
t).
a.
-..
C6:
0
.
Cif
2
d..
c
c_
c_
c
c
c_
c
2
2
2
2
-
N
'of
0.49
CO
LO
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
CO
0
CO
CA
CO
CO
CA
O
CT(3)
O
CA
CD
N°°
oo
N
rn
r
r
O
O
r
,r;
O
ci
T
r
r
r
r
r
r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
co
co
co
O
N
CC)
N
CO
CA
1,
N
C7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O0)
CEO
N
r
T-
r
T
p
COO
,-
CO
CO
C(
I`
Cr)
(O
N
CO
N
o
s-
O)
N
CO
r
0
r
M
CO
N
CO
N
co
co
co
rr
(n
0
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
N
CO
d'
O
O
N
i'
O
O
r
O
r
O
O
tO
CO
CO
1`
r
CO
O
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
h
0)
N
CO
CO
O
77 I
10
ti
Cn
O
CC)
CO
I 27
27
N
N
N
N
rCO
TN
rn
c)
O
v
co
co
(0
r
10
Q
0)
r
N
in
1�
10
Ci
XI
at
X
X
X
X
X
>>N
X
X
COCO
CO
co
0')
co
CDN
I--
r
o
CO
r-
0
a)
o
0)
O
O)
o
0)
CD
0)
O
0)
o
(n
CO
CO
CO
CO
03
CO
CO
N
C7
V' CO
O
n
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
co
o
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
0
0
Z
NO CROP
CC
00
ZZ
N CO
Cr
0 CO
Ix
.
aU
ved. Laboratory liability is limited to the fee assessed on t
f the NCDA Agronomic Division
4) N
L
U
0 N
C rn
=_
o
fl
Q
N U
� O

•NM
0
U I
364 W. Park Drive I Warsaw, NC 28398- I Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 10
Farm: LACKEY FARM RD / LACKEY
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13446316 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 9/14/2021 Processed: 9/16/2021
co
CI
0
co
c
c c
c
c
C c
c
c c
2
S
0.44
O N
eF d'
O O
N
d'
O
0.40
co
<t CO
0 0
d'
0
N N
O CO
O O
�.
CO
m
0)
L0
N
,:r
d'
CO
co
CO
CO
c)0
O
O
LO LO
CO CO
H.I.
C.i
M
CO
6)
06
5.5
5.7
O
Cfl
r
cc;
r
O
N
LO
CO
CO
a
Wr
r
.-
r
r-
c-
r
r
r
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r
0
0
0
r
0
0
0
0
r
LO
CO
CO
r--
N
r
N
I---r�
LO
LO
O
M
CO
N
r
LO
CO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
CO r
N
CO
0)
CO
O)
r
CO
N.-
O
V
r.
0
LO
N.
00
r
LO
0)
CO
N
LO(0
r
CO
LO
1-
N
O
CO
CO
N
0
.-
CO
CO
NCO
CO
LO ,-
CO
r
CO
CO
N
LO
LO
N
N
CO
CO
r
CO
Ln.
CO
Cam')
CO
N
CO
COV
CS)
COCN
CO
C.)
Q
CO
O
CO
r
CO
r
O
N
O
r
N
r
N
r
CO
0
O
O
_'
Q.
(0
N
Lri
M
Lri
d-
Lri
N
id
LO
Lri
CO
Lri
N
CO
r,-
LO
0
CO
f�
0
CO
LO
LO
'CCl0
59
59
O
59
(0
�.
LO
CO
(0
r
0
N
0
N
N
N
N N
CO
N
LOCa
N
1
CO
e-
CY
N
N
co
c-
•I
r
N
[t
CO
N
N
0)
N
N
0.
N
0)
VO'
M
CO
V
CO
CO
CO
,—
.;.
CC
(.0
N-
00i
O
CC
t`
N-
00
i
CO
819078RW
2'
a)
CD
0
CO
W'
(o
CO
0
0)
CO
Q'
CO
0)0
CO
819082RW
CC)
00
0
.0
819084RW
cY
(0
CO
0)
CO
tli
N
co
d- LO
co
r�
O
O
r0
a)
0
c
2
a)
E a
E
U O
U Cn
L5 a)
U
o 0)
0
L L
U U
o_
x
v
0' a
03
N
c �
E
co U
E
O
E
c 0
-p :..
a) N
CL
a) 0)
N
W m
m
a
N M
Z
E
� (6
a U
O
N
a) r
c
— c
0
c L6
Lai U
a)
Q U
co
o •U
Q
>, U
(0<
O c
c O
O
.773
cea 2
0.
Q
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
See Note
Cu
Copper
Mn
Manganese
C e
N kJ
B
Boron
Mg
Magnesium
0=
a
d
0 a
N o
a a
N
Nitrogen
Lime
Tons/Acre
M
O
r
r
N
r
M
r
N
0
O
0
b
0
R
0
M
0
Sample ID Crop
NO CROP
Ce
O
NO CROP
IX
0
NO CROP
CC
0
CC
0
CC
0
CC
0
CC
0
N
M
V' LO
co
r co
co
O
This document mt.
N
r
0
d
(0
r•

B Zn Mn Cu See Note
magnesium
N P205 K20
Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
I.
.............
Lime
Tons/Acre
O
l0
6
CI
Q)
tff
-
00
0
Z
a
0
0
Z
LI
0
0
0
cn
130
C
O
0
0
Q
— N
.0
_N
L
E
>,
O
0
c
as
a
x
W
This document ME

•
Q
cn
364 W. Park Drive 1 Warsaw, NC 28398- 1 Phone [phone]
N
N
01
10
a
r
N
O
eceivedt 9
-
L7
m
CO
O
0
O
0
O
N
N
O
N
CO
N
co
CO
N
m
co
o
O
0
1
O
O
1-
0 0 •0
O
co
O
0
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
m
O
O
LC)
CO
N
d
O
0')
eF
O
CO
Cs!
O
m
M
O
m
P')
CO
N
O
O
CA
N
O
O
O
N
10
N
10
N
O
au
CO CD
O
O
rn
co
10
0)
O
rn
CO
N M 1F
0
Z
0
t
I
a
V U
Mn
Manganese
c C
N N
0
0
m
S
Sulfur
Mg
Magnesium
V m
N i
a
P205
Phosphate
0
Z m
z
Lime
Tons/Acre
0.3
vt
0
CO
0
CO
0
Sample I[' Crop
1 NO CROP
o
U
o i
NO CROP
0
U
0
0
0
E
0
H

Page 13
Target pH: 6.2
d: 9/14/2021 Processed: 9/16/2021
P I CEC BS f%1 HM (%1 I Sell CinAC
= C
_C
C
i CO
I�
M
O
O
O
003
00)
0)0)
O
co
O)
co
r-
co
N..V
Cfl
Ui
N
r-
N
N
W
CO
Z
=
0
=
2
2
Qo
c-
,-
N
c-
O
O
O
O
00
)O
co
r
co
0
0
0
0
0)
d'
0)
N
N
-
coco
co
_
0)
N
N
W
Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM
Farm: SUE POPE / SP1
LID: AAE13445898
st Method: Mehlich HI
(%) pHw Ac S.I Zn-I 2
0
0
N
0
LO
CO
CO
0)
CO
CO
CO
N
CO
W
d'
O
,---
O
C]
I,-
N
�F
cc;
1i(0(xi
O
V
0
N
06
10
LO
C.0
CO
0
0
.."-`
0)
N
CO
0)
crkC\INNN
Sample ID Lab ID MEI M
(0
N.
CO
v
c0
10
N
v
(0
CC
4)
(0
1.13
CO
3)
0
0)
0
0)
X) CO
03
V CO
V
NCDA Soil erti ity Recommendations (Ibs/A)
Mn Cu See Note
Manganese Copper
c
NN
e
Ca 4
CO
V)
en
g
to
2C
K20
Potash
Lo
o=
Q
N a
N
Nitrogen
Lime
Tons/Acre
00
0
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
IL
Y
J
0
Z
o_
Et
U
0
Z
a
cc
U
0
Z
i
i
c
F
V CO
7-
ad
s
u
S
E
U.
C
G
a
cc
k
W
0.
E
0
0
a
0
0
m
m
0
(0
C Z
O N
> B
0 3
U_ a
E >
O 'a5
C 0
O
0) m
Q 0)
Q E
0
U m
m 0
O
CN a,
M
0 CO a
L .0
a oO
E =
E
E Z
0 c
O m
V-"-"S
L N
O. U
0 0
0
L w
a) O
C
,J c
0 a c
Nco
ass
p E
0)
N O
C
O 0
co 0
m 2
E m
E o
0 t0
U
Qom) m
0
N
=
-C U
ti
U1
0
This document m:

■O
co
E
0
364 W. Park Drive Warsaw, NC 28398- I Phone [phone]
- -- -� urower: l3KHY11UU5t 1 AKM Page 5
Farm: FEIMSTER / FEIM 1
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13446321 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 9/14/2021 Processed: 9/16/2021
Sample III Lab ID P-I K-I Mg (%) Ca (%) pHw Ac S-I Zn-I 1 Zn-AI Mn-I Mn-Al Cu-I Na ESP CEC BS (%1 HM (%ol Soil f'_lace
2
0
co
(0
0
2
0
0
co
N.
—
0
o
0
L0
�
o0
03
O
N
N
T
r
r
r
1.0
c')
W
O.
O
CO0
Lc)
N
CO
N
LO N
COam
L'
n
3)
3)
b
V
a)
O
E'
ia)
U
a)
a
E E
U O
U co
la a)
U a3
0 0
o c)
c
U
x
C w
0
>
w
cr
Q) N
E
M U
E •
U
O
m _
c
R
ai
a) O)
U
w CO
0 m
W
(S m
Z w
E Q
= a)
a 0
to O N
ci
c x
w
0
a) U
U
rs w
0
O 'U
o
(A Q
O
OO•
.O
c >
R i
w Q
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (lbs/A)
Mn Cu See Note
Manganese Copper
B
Boron
(.
N
Mg
Magnesium
V t
N
N w
a
P205
Phosphate
w
Z _e
Z
Lime
Tons/Acre
0
co
0
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
1
Y
0
Z
a
a
d
c
-c
c
c
c
Q
V
V
S
u
c
L
E
u)
O
C
0
..g'
R
Q
x
w
This document ME

Uml
Z
i.E�
(44
co
N
M
0)
N
0)
0
a
00
T
CO
U
z
m
L
N
co
a
V/
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 6
Farm: HOME FARM 2 / 0M4
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13445896 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Pcir. „e.l. Oil n/9n9,
as
0
R
U
a
0
i
....
om'.
M
LLO
V
a
0)
w
Z
6
o
C
2
C
a..
i
N
NI C
V)
(..).
Q,-
Q
c;
0
'-'
or
`e
G..
+
:a
or
l6
_c
Min
Min
: _c
c
2.57
nsA
0)
a
) d'
I CJ
m
a
O
0)
CO
CA
0
CO
00
CO
CO
O)
O
CA
LO
�
�t
I-
M
N
c-
(NJ
,—
0
0
0
0
0
00
LO
N
Ln
N
LO
f--
00
0)
Cfl
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
,-
CO
N
O)
N
of
O)
co
O
N
00
O
N
CO
ON
<-
N
00
LO
CO
0
d-
N
N
N
N
N
N
CO
O
00
,-
0
0
0
oO
O
O
O
00
LO
CO
LO
Cfl
Ln
LO
59
64
CO
LO
(..si
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
0)
N
CO
N CO
CO
d'
N-
CO
N CO
CO
CO
N C0
CO
LO
CO
XXIXXXX
� CO
d'
-
d-
O
0) 0')
o
0)
0
0
0)
0
Oo
m co
m
cn
0
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
Mn Cu See Note
Manganese Copper
c C
N iv
C
coW L
m
V) .t
Mg
Magnesium
V' a
N i
a°
01
L
a
N Q
a. 0
N
rt
Z a
Lime
Tons/Acre
0
d-
0
d
0
M
0
0
Sample ID Crop
1 ... NO CROP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
NO CROP
S
V COd-
LO
i
1
c
U
'Ec
C
Ti
R
C
LL
T
Fertilizer recommendatio
This document mt

W
C
CI •L
▪ °
Z
0
J
9
O
CLCD
Ce
- •L
tA
•�<
L
< (15
O/�
Vd
CO
0
N
O
0
C
0
L
a)
0)
op
0
Z
d
0
[Cf
O.
0)
M
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 7
Farm: HOME FARM 2 / 0M5
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13445902 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received. A/14/9/)91 all a/9n74
co
co
R
0
2
x
'...
o
CO
W'
0
a.
ci)
R
Z,
(1..
C.
2
Q.
NV-
C.
N
CO
t)
>?.
al
0
"--
2
O.
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
o
v
0
0.35
0.46
co
0
C
0
0
1-
0
0
CO
N
I�
O)
(0
N.
O)
N-
0)
O)
c
CO
co
c0
Cb
co
O)
M
M
M
M
co
M
N
CO
,-
LC)
I\
CO
I--
CO
CO
I,-
C-
N
r
r-
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
O
O
co
c0
O
Or
N
c0=
(0
cM-
r
r
Cb
',_
CO
C10
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
N 00
d'
MO
ci
co
CO
o)
'ct
M
N
O
N
M
r
N
N
N
V
V
Cn
C))
T
N
co
tt
03
0
Ln
r
CO
C)N
V
O
N
0
O)
N
M
Ln
co
N-
(Ni
CO
O)
CO
N
0
d'
CO
CO
N-
CO
N
V
CO
LC)
CO
0)
N
N
N
CO
0
0
CO
N
Cb
00
N
O
O
r
r
O
r
O
O
O
r
N
0)
0)
cA
O
c0
O
N
CO
CO
LC)
LO
LC)
to
Ln
CO
CO
N-��(0
55
LOC
65
csJ
V
NNNNCONNNN01
CO
c0
N
LO
CO
CO
N
CO
CO CA
N
N
CO
m
N
CO
I`
N
V
0)
N
N
N
M
C
NO
N
M
,-
M
CO
N
INO
tt
E
X
X
X
X
IIII
it19101RW
819102RW
0
O
0)
0
0) 0)
0
0
0
O
O
0)
0)
0) 0)
O
6)
6)
N
M 1-
LC)
(0
r
O
0)
N
L)1
0
U
co ▪ ▪ N
• a
E E
O • 0
U Cn
15 N
=�
U
N
0 Co
0
m
a 0
a X
c
N
a
> 0)
W
a
Q) L
• O
O • (Q
co 0
E
0 .• I..
N
c
-to 'm
o
mcn
0 co
O 003• 03
a 0)
Z • U
cts
• o.
To 0
as
X -c
a) U
a X
W
— C
0
C �
U
)
a W
0
0
• ,6
'U
.0 Q
> U
O o
c c
O
c >
(0 N
a
w
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
See Note
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
M
o
0.4
r
0
M
0
LO
0
V
0
CO
0
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
00
0
0
NO CROP
NO CROP
000
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO CROP
NO CROP
c
:\I
CO
d- LO
(0
I,-
c0
0)
1
C
1
0
C
C
u
0
0
0
0
m
0
Cu
0
E
c z
0
N
>
O d
J
CU
E >
O m
• N
O
Q 0
Q E
O N
O L
m 0
L >.
• <0 2
• L !)
a -0
• T
E
E Z 0
O c
O O T,
a
c
L • d
U z• +
O O N
R
0 U
c -J
O a `m
ca 0 E
CO a
m
Cn
O 8
co 0
a
c
Q) L
E
E
U • `O
m
N m
N
- m
L.L.
0 d
0
0

0
0
364 W. Park Drive I Warsaw, NC 28398- I Phone [phone]
N
0
N
CO
N CO 0) r
G) • Q y °.►
Cr/ m ▪ y
co ,Th d • U
( 0
i. a`
0
0)
u
O
CL
cu
(0
uJ
N.
O
O
0
co
0)
O
O)
N
0
O
0)
rn
N
co
M
O
CO
CO
O
O
0)
co
N
N.
c c c c c
CO
O
0)
co
Ln
N
r)
co
O
m
O
(C)
CO
O
O
O
N
O
03 CO ro
(C) M (O
CO ti
Z
d
O
O
O
O
0 O O
L()
CO
0
CO
Ln
O
CO
CO 00
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0 0
CO
CO
O
N
co
O
Ln
71*
co
M
O
O
N
CS) CO CO
N 0 03
N
CO
N
O)
CO
CO
N
V
N
0)
O
O
N
CO
CO O
M CO 0
M
N
0)
M
CO
N
N
N
0)
O
O
N
CO
CO
LO WCO
M
O
CO
CO
N
0)
N
O
M
0)M N
0
co
O
O
O
N
O
Q
CD
LC).
O
O
O
Ln
O
O
to
O
Ln
Cr). W f�
Lo LC) LC)
O
0
CO
CO
O
O
O
LC)
O CO
O
CO
00,
` "' d' (0 N
NNNN
O
N
CO
CO M V r
N N N N N
L
CO
On CO M
c0 L0 0) 7f CO
71. 71' t` LC) N
N
O
CO
N (00
co
CO
O N V
M
0)
0)
0)
CO
0)
0)
O
L(1
0
O
rn
CO
(0
CO
O
rn
O
0)
O
0
O
rn
O
O
LC)
O
0)
co
LO
0
0)
CO
819052RW
N
CO
d'
LO
O
co
O
c
i+
co
d
E
0
V
d
CL
V
_£
2 am
a v
N4 N
C
COW g.
m
to 3
co
Mg
Magnesium
O. a
CN +°
0
1 .4.
0 r
a
N C
0. a
N
Nitrogen
NO CROP 0.3
al
EQ
. 2
F
M
0
CO
o
CO
O
CO
O
CO
6
1....-
O
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
NU CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
0
:)
z
NU CROP
NO CROP
N
CO V to
O N-
co
O)
0
c
0
c
0
N
0
U
E
O
C
O
0)
0
0
z
4)
_c
0
(3
c v.)O
m
c ▪ J]
E
E
Oo
0
r
0
0
0
E
3'
m
0
is
.0
>
N
(n
0
0
0
0
0
This document ma

.0
364 W. Park Drive I Warsaw, NC 28398- 1 Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 1
Farm: COTTON GIN FIELD / CG1
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13446318 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 9/14/2021 Processed: 9/16/2021
§
%
J
oo
&
-
0)
Co
0
}
as
»
0
.
cc
C
.-
N
0
kCO
k&&
a
0
0
&
/
c
/
k
/
/
@
a
-
a
c
N
a
N-
m
a
n»
n
6
a
6
a
=
-
.-
m
0)
0)
CO
0)
0)
0)_
/
\
6.4
\
/
/
-
-
-
n
-
_
—
—
—
2
—
6
6
6
0
6
6
+
/
\
@
@
/
0
0
o
0
c
Q
G
f$\
p
N
7
7
7
c
_
_
®
_
©
_
R
2
&
\
\
\
CO
CO
CO
CO
®
CO
Q
3
2
\
\
\
G
\
-
-
m
@
/
CO
/
CO
/
«
o
o
#
«
n
0
6
a
a
G
58
G
63
G
2
cc,
CO
w
<
=
w
a
a
(
N
3
S
7
%
A
?
o
w
co
in
co
7r
»
m
<
_
Sample ID Lab ID
1 819086RW
a
$
a
a
a
$
%
CC
a
0
IX
m
CO$
%
0
/
/
/
/
CO
_
CO
CO
c
w
CO
t
z
CO
\
) /
/ E
k \
/ \
o \
/\
/
j
/
\
\
/
\
j
co
§
/
0
\
\
LLI
0
0
a /
o
<
/\
c (
\ j
/\
See Note
CU
Copper
N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn
Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
*
m
=
<
on the sample as received. Laboratory liability is limited to the fee assessed on
This document ms

W
c
12
® �L
U
Z L
0
L co
O -
it
N .L
•�<
oy L
ict
.—
0
VJ
364 W. Park Drive i Warsaw, NC 28398- I Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 2
Farm: DOUGLAS FIELDS / DOUG 1
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13445900 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 9/14/2021 Processed: 9/16/2021
CI)
Cn
-
a
tO
C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
HM(%)
0.37
0.36
0.50
rn
N
0
r-
M
0
co
N
0
m
CO
0
co
CO
0
...
(n,
m'
(0
0
CO
C3)
0)
r-
CO
N
CO
0)
N
0)
CA
N
0
V.
ti
CD
CO
l0
CO
CD
0
CO
5.6
CO
Cfl
CO
r�
5.7
O.
uj
N-
,-
R
2
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
Cr'0
x-
CO
Lr"
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2'
CO
{
I-
a)
co
0)
co
N
N-
a)
N
CO
0
t-
V
CO
N
CO
LC)
N
CA
O
N
.5
NV'
00
CO
CO
NI-
0
e
LO
N
N
N
N
CO
e-
N
N
G
N
0
d'
(A
CI
d'
-srN
CD CO
C
N_
CV
O
CON
O
0
N-
NNCOCOCOCOMN
n
LO
CO
CO
0)
-
CO
0
N
CO
CO
0
CO
CO
CO
fl.
,-
CO
0
CO
0
CO
6)
0)
co
CO
O
CO
M
CO
co
CO
4°
�
CQ
0
0
CO
0
CO
64
59
CO
CO
N
CO
N
CO
O
CO
coIQ
2
N
N co
24
N
24
CO
N
CO
N
N
00
CO
M
M
M
N
CO
6.
Cs)
CO
N
0
00
M
Go
0
LO
C
r
CO
0
CO
0)
T
CO
CC
CO
0
r
CO
CC
CO
0)
r
0
CC
CO
0
r
CO
CC
CO
o
r
CO
819065RW
(0
(0`D
0
CO
0.
N
0')
V' (O
CD
00
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
co
0
co
0
co
0
co
0
0.5
co
0
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
0
0
0
0
Z
NO CROP
NO CROP
0.
e
0
0
h
m
0
0
a
Q d
Q 0)
0 ti
N
N o
O
c `C) 7)
0 m
(0 L .N
-o d w
0 .0 a 7
7 �
E Z
O C o
O
L
-
a
d
O V fO
0
LEm
a Ls:
_c
O O
m
D v
o
E
m o
N
O 0
co
a
a)
E
O m
J
N `
g
i U
L_ Q
0) N
L N
`m >
0
N
a
Q
.Q
0
O =_
'
C
0
This document mt

•
0
CI)
364 W. Park Drive 1 Warsaw, NC 28398- 1 Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 10
Farm: HOME FARM / 0M3
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13461010 Target pH: 62
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 10/1/2021 Processed: 10/5/2021
Sample ID Lab ID P-I K-I Mg (%) Ca (%) pHw Ac S-I Zn-I Zn-AI Mn-I Mn-AI Cu-1 Na ESP CEC BS (%) HM (%) Soil Class
M
417 0
N
M
0.38
0.49
o
o
O
N
W
1,-
0)
0)
W
N-
0)
M
00
0
O)
O
c)
7.5
CO7-
CO
CO
1;
ci
,-
,-
t-
..
c-
,-
r
r
T
r
-
r
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
CO
CO
CD
CO
O
W
0
O
coU
CO
0
0
0
0
0
0
co
O
in
co
-I-'�-
7
r-
N
0)
0
0
—
00
Lc,
in
—
—
N
CON
oo
1—
COl()
(0
O
0)
N
r—
N
CO
N
N
N
M
CO
M
M
N
N
CO
N
N
0
,-
0
0
0
O
co
N
1--
d)
N
Lo
64
59
(o
57
co
co
30
(
30
co
1V
N
N
N
N
coc0')
0)
0
'V
co
co—
O
co
O
co
CO
N
CO
(O
N
0
co
0
0
V
0
N
N
N
N
LO
w
(0
LO
1n
CO
0
CO
CO
CO
:11
CO
d-
(O
CO
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (lbs/A)
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
in
c)o
10
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
2 NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
0
0
U
0
z
a)0
ti
m
a)
0
a) Q1
c
0) O
C
O 0
co
a
c
a) L
E
E `o
O o
N_ m
LL • a
L)
U
(5 2�
a) Q N T
a
L=
0
fn
0
G
O
co
O
This document ma

'3
V)
364 W. Park Drive Warsaw, NC 28398- Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 11
Farm: KENNY WAUGH / KW1
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13469179 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 10/1/2021 Processed: 10/5/2021
Sample ID Lab ID P-I K-I Mg (%n) Ca (%) pHw Ac S-1 Zn-I Zn-AI Mn-i Mn-AI Cu-I Na ESP CEC BS (%) HM (%) Soil Class
0.24
N
CO
co
O
O
O
N
0")
0)
W
O
M
Cn
03
7.4
7.5
N
,—
N
r
N
O
O
O
O
co
N
0
0
0
O
0
N
M
O
M
M
M
CO
0
N
N
[t
CO
CI
N
r
V
O
c')
N
c7
N
N
CO
CO
6)
CO
COCONN
CO
CO
CO
0
O
0
O
--
N
N
CO
C4
Cfl
CO
64
N
M
61
59
O
CO
N
NNNN731
'd'
MO
N
M
0)
N
N CO
CO
N
N
N
0
811532QW
811533QW
811534QW
00
N CO
'CI'
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
co
0
d
0
oe
0
0
z
NO CROP
NO CROP
\1
CO
CY
J
1
v
.(
u
n
E
a
a)
U
ed to the fee assessed on t'
ived. Laboratory liability is
f the NCDA Agronomic Division
N
0. m
N m
c
0
a >,
O
d
This document ma

SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 12
Farm: LIPPARD FARM / LF1
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13461011 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Reneivnri• 1nil /9n79 0 �.
in
CI
0
CO
2
244,
to
03
0
a
w
Z
0
a0
2
2
a.
NCO
C.
N'',
UJ
Q
Q.
AS
0
0
0)
2'
�'.
a
CCCCCCCCcos
2
2
2
2
2
2
co
O
N
CO
N
94 0.24 I
79 0.43
LO
et
N
CO
co0,
O
O
C
0
0
0
co
co00
co
00
CO
co
co
V
CO
c0
LO
co
(o
N.
(0
CO
LO
CO
CO
(0
r
<-
N-
0
0
0
0
0
C)
0
a
O
CO
CO
CO
0
CNO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
co
L.
CO
CO
0
N
O
N
d'
M
ON
co
M
O�
L•-
LO
CON
0
N
CO
CO
C,,
N
CON
N
CO
,-
LO
N
.--
O
-
CO
CO
M
O
CNV
(0
CO
CO
NC
---
-CA
M
CO
d'
CO
CO
CO
LOO
CN
O
O
O
T
C.
0
p
T
ti
co
CO
O)
LO
co
LO
CO
LO
LC)
LO
LO
LO
LO
CO
LO
LL°
54
LO
CO
LO
L()
(9
LO
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
CO
O)
N
el-
CO
eh
LO
O
LO
N
CO
N
LO
LO
N
N.
N
N
N
N
LO
N
CO
N
CI
XI
•
0
C7
0
0
0
C3
C3
Q
<-
N
CO
V'
LC)
CO f'-
CO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
LO
Ln
CO
00
00
00
CO
CO
CO
CO
N CO
et
CO
Cfl
r CO
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
Mn Cu See Note
Manganese Copper
C to
NN
c
co o
03
Sulfur
Magnesiumg
K20
Potash
QE.
Y)
N� t
/
1. a
N
Nitrogen
Lime
Tons/Acre
CD
CO
d
co
o
Cb
d
co
o
�
0
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
a
0000000
J
0000000
Z
a
0
Z
a
0
Z
a
0
Z
a
0
2
a
0
2
a
0
Z
i
L
1
(
V CO
et
LO
Cfl
L`
CO
L
1
1
E
v
C
C
C
R
C
LL
This document ma
Q
0
ved. Laboratory liability is limited to the fee assessed on t

364 W. Park Drive I Warsaw, NC 28398- J Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 13
Farm: LIPPARD FARM / LF2
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13461007 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 10/1/2021 Processed: 10/5/2021
HM (%) Soil Class
0.42 Min
C
C
'cc
N
d'
0
COr
CO
0
N
0
N.
N
0
In
Ca
co
r-
CO
co
d'
Co
(3)
oO
CO
h
CEC
C0
Cn
0
(O
t`
co
t`
co
Cn
a
to
r
�-
r-
-
r
(
r
0
r
0
r
0
r
0
0
0
U
(
N
O
LC)
O
C
LO
C0
5
0
0
0
0
C
CCO
O
LO
LO
Cd-
O
Q
N-
O
O
M
r
CO
.—
CO
N
0))
,--
c
N
°O
CV
CO
r
CO
N
CO
N'
NCO
CO
C O
N
r
CS
O
N
r
Q.
f`
LC).
ti
LCj
N
(0
d'
(0
0)
C(j
(
c.)
N
LC)
57
56 I
59
to
a)
2
24
24
N
I,-
N
d-
N
Y
N
co
N
c')
d-
N
Ch
In
co
CO
a
N
CO
1�
Lp
d'
N
(O
f�
N
f•--
CL Cr
d'
NNNNN
tn LO
CO
0
LO
LC)
CO
0
CO
LO
CO
0
I -
LO
0)
CI
CO
CO
00
N CO
d• LA
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
0.7
n
0
co
0
0
U
O
NO CROP
0
U
0
0
U
0
,
'f
CO
d- LC)
J
I
.S
0
c
C
C
(
)
u
This document m,

W
L
U °
Z
°
L c
O�J /d i. L
N�
•y E
a
co 115
0
.0
364 W. Park Drive Warsaw, NC 28398- l Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 5
Farm: DAGENHEART / DF4
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13469184 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received 10/1/2021 Processed: 10/5/2021
P-1 K-1 Mg (%) Ca (%) pHw Ac S-1 Zn-I Zn-Al Mn-I Mn-Al Cu-I Na ESP CEC BS (%) f HM (%) Soil Class
C
c
d-
d-
LO
O
O
0)
M
W
CO
Q)
00
io
V
O
O
O
(
O
O
O
O
O
N-
O
N
V
W
CO
0)0)o
N
N
CO
a)
o
N
N
CO
V
V
co
O
O
O
(O
M
O
O
O
51
49
0
N
N
N
0
N
M
N
0
N.
to
0
ott
4)
�
Cli
r
la
ca
811541 QW
811542QW
N
CO
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (lbs/A)
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B -fin Mn Cu See Note
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
$ample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
a
0
rx
U
0
Z
NO CROP
N
CO
L
E
U
yN
Fertilizer recommendation
a) x
Q
L3 a)
c
n
0
CL
8
1)
c
This document mt

364 W. Park Drive I Warsaw, NC 28398- i Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 8
Farm: HOME FARM / OM1
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13461009 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 10/1/2021 Processed: 10/5/2021
P-I K-I Mg (%) Ca (%) pHw Ac S-I Zn-I Zn-AI Mn-I Mn-Al Cu-I Na ESP I CEC BS (%) HM (%) Soil Class
d:
M
N
N
CO
CO
0.57
CO
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
co
CO
O)
N
d•
M
0)
d•
CO
CO
0)
CO
0)
CO
Cr)
0)
CO
,-
1.0•
o)O
•(.0fl
7.2
c i
0
CO
iri
d'
co
0)
0
CD
r�
N
r-
N
N-
N
N
N
c-
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
co
O
c0
L()
O
(N
LO
N
CO
0
0
0)
0)
CO
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
O
co
CO
1
'.eF
W
F.
N
N
CO
N_
n"
M
v-
N
COs-o,-0)
M�
N
N-
M
N
N
e-
N
N
M
"t
N
CO
CO
_O
M
0
N
0‘''''
N
CO
N
LO
N CO
0
M
CO
1`
r
0)
CO
CO
CO
0
N
N
N
N
N
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
O
CO
O
d'
O
d'
CO
co
0
0
0,-
o
0
0
0
O
LO
'cF
0)
d•
0)
LO
M
0
co
CO
CO
LC)
0
LO
CC)
CO
0
CO
LO
C
CO
56
Co
55
(0
59
(0
N
N
N
N
N
20
N
N
21
f`
LC)
0)
N
CO
O
V
124 I 79
CO
N.
CO
O
O)
0)
CO
N
CO
CO
LO
(0
O
CO
CO
d-
d•
r�
N.
M
0
M
M
LO
Sample ID Lab ID
1
811509QW
O
0
N
0
a
811515QW
811516QW
0
LO
7
(0
r
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
0
N
CO
d'
LO
CO r�
CO
0)
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
0
0
0
0
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
:N
CO
d'
LO
CO r--
co
O
c
L
a >,
E
cn U
I
cn
E
a
n
O
O
This document rn

364 W. Park Drive Warsaw, NC 28398- i Phone [phone]
V%
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 9
Farm: HOME FARM / 0M2
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13461008 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlieh III Received: 10/1/2021 Processed: 10/5/2021
is
•Q
°.
_'..
1,3
°1
N,
CO
0
a.
Ili
03
Z
T
0
£
C.
g'.
a
N
T
0
N'.
a_
Cp
0
'..
0
2
,Y'..
1 0.24
CON
o
CO
0
CS)ct
N
0
0.45
0.25
CO
0
C)
10
O
N
O
N
O
O
LC)
O
O
N
O
N
CO
CO
5.4
CA
CO
CO
r
N
r
N
r
N
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
aO
N
s_
to
O
W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
0)
OO
OO
Cr)
(00
C)
01
N
N
o�
0'
0)
0)
N
C`')
N(0
N
N
--
(Q
Ch
N
CO
r
COO
N.
O
in
W
0
0)
N
CO
N
(0
N
N
CO
'ct
CO
to
O
' r
N
N
(0
N
't
N
CO
N
o
O
o
N
r
O
O
N
CO
o
O
r
O
co
co
co
0)
O
N-
ti
LO
LO
Ln
V
(0
LO
CO
CO
0
N
(0
59
0
CO
CO
LO
CO
'Cr
CO
CO
CON
18
N-
20 I
N
t-
O
O
O
O
N
(0
'Cr
V
V
LO
CO
LC)
N
_
t
_
O
O
1
O
Sample ID Lab ID
1 811494QW
811495QW
811496QW
811497QW
811498QW
811499QW
a
O
0
Ln
CO
N
CO
[t
LO
CO
n
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
0.3
0.7
Ln
o
L0
r
(0
o
CO
0
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
N
CO
[t
LO
(O
ti
O
.7)
O
O
c
0
0)
0
0
Z
N
w
0
to
O
u)
E
U
0)
C
O
T
t
a
O
0
L
a
a)
c
O
a
O
Cn
c6
N
w
0
(13
73
c
m
E
E
0
U
d)
m
N
Li
ion Number 635
ai
75.
eceived. Laboratory liability is limited to the fee assessed on
This document im

a)
c
< U)
V O
Z
• O
t
O
C
I /IJ- 5
12
_>1• Q
vac CD
a
II MON
0
co
2
0
a
(1- 1
u
W
CO
0 Z °1
O Y _M
WWQ
0 U Q
ca
2 u-
C7
GO GO N
LO 00 00
0
N N 01 N
0 0 U
� � N
CO CO 00
■
0
Z
Zn Mn Cu
Zinc Manganese Copper
B
Boron
S
Sulfur
3
C c
m
M
W
N
a
LA
ON
t
a
N, a
O. a
N
Nitrogen
1 ..............
Lime
Tons/Acre
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
0
z
U
0
z
o
U
O
Z
Q'
c
a
C
0
0
c
O
0
Q
V co4..
0
co
0
0
0
0
0
a
x
W
m
a
0
a
m
0
m
0
0
O
0
N
0
0
C S
�
.m
U_
.)
C L
L �
Q
a c• rg
• r
N
C 0)
• M
O �p �
d
L w
0
a ._
O E
E Z ��-
O O
0 O m
L
�
w
L
O_
0
en
O O
a R
a) 0 .0
U J 5
O
0 O
2
(0 'o
Vl
co
0
0
a
0
0
E
E
O
U
m
m 0
N 5
3
11
m
0)
U
O_
a
0
y
This document ma

0
0)
x
CD
i c
cu
CI rL
U °
Z
C
0.
C
EX 5
cn
>a
d
<
0
CO
0
N
0
0)
0
C
0
.0
a
00
M
03
Q
z
0
Y
Cri
co
er
2504 DAVIES AVE
To
O
0
c-
0 415 0.1 2 8.0 88 0.21
a.
W
o
Mg (%) Ca (%)
03
CO
CO
LC)
N
N
a
CO
Lo
N
Sample ID Lab ID
1 811543QW
3
ri
n
0
V
a)
G
z
This document ma
sLi
0
0
U

.0
V�
364 W. Park Drive 1 Warsaw, NC 28398. 1 Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 3
Farm: DAGENHEART / DF2
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13469185 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received. 10/1/2021 Processed: 10/5/2021
P-I K-I Mg (%) Ca (%) pHw Ac S-I Zn-I Zn-AI Mn-I Mn-AI Cu-I Na ESP I CEC BS (%) HM (%) Soil Class
c
cc
C
c
_C
1 0.12
0.44
0.15
0;0
M
COCV
OM
O
O
O
co
c)
co
0
0
0)
co
co
O)
O)
0) 0)
CO
O)
CO
CO
5 I 10.0
co
5 I 7.4
2 I 7.4
5 I 9.8
(a
6
O
N
—
CO
r
LC)
1�
V
r
LO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
CV
to
co
O
CO
CO
CO
d-
0
00
0
CA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
dr
co7
0)
COLO
r
M
M
N
O)
N
NT.
CO
N
N
N
N
M
N
0)
N
r
0
0)
r
(0
ON
CO
N
N
N
r
N
CV
000
CO
N
0)
CA
CO
(0
CO
CO
0)
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
M
M
O
O
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
r
0
(0
(O
N-
N
(0
LO
(O
h.
LO
59
CO
LO
N
0
CO
LO
LO
LO
58 I
25
27
_
CO
CO
_
CO
N
N
V
N
CO
NY
0)
W
CO
LO
N
N
00
N
LO
N
N
ch
LO
CO
CO
N
Sample ID Lab ID
1 811545QW
811546QW
0
7t
co
0
V
(n
811549QW
0
co
co
811551QW I
CO
CO
CO
N
CO
V
U)
(0
N-
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
Tons/Acre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zino Manganese Copper
c0
O
0.5 1
Sample lD Crop
•
1 NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
0
O
U
O
Z
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
N
CO
V
LO
co
c
Oco
X
E
a
0
U
0
'a
m
m
.0
N
O
0
0-
0
0`
is
-J
d
0
0
N
E
0
0
0
0
41
0
m
This document ME

O
cn
364 W. Park Drive i Warsaw, NC 28398- i Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 4
Farm: DAGENHEART / DF3
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13469183 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 10/1/2021 Processed: 10/5/2021
Sample ID Lab ID P-1 K-I Mg (%) Ca (%) pHw Ac S-I Zn-I Zn-AI Mn-I Mn-AI Cu-I Na ESP CEC BS (%) HM (%) Soil Class
O
N
0.20 I
O
0.10
CO
CO
LC)
N
O
O
O
O
O
CD
0))
0)
00)
0)
0)
0)0)
O
co
O�
O
•
7.7
O
CO
CO
CO
N
O
O
N
co
V
CO
,-
N
c-
co
M
NI-r
•,-
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0)
co
�
0
ccI
In
W
N
c-
W
0)
N.-
o
O
O
O
o
o
0
(n
m
r-
co
(
-
(0
N
Cn
r
CO
cl-
N
V
N
N
M
N
'd'
N
V
N
N
(o
N
�
N.
co
-
O
cn
V
co
c'')
0)
7r
c0
O
N
"CC
N
00
CO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cn
O
N
CO
-al-
t�
(.0
C0
CO
CO
CO
(0
Cn
CO
CO CO
56
La
59
59
N
N
N
29
CO
29
30
CO
N
N
O
O
CO
ti
ti
0(0
0)
N
In
811556QW
811557QW
811558QW
0)
0
811561QW
LO
LC)
CO
1.0
Cn
Ln
C
‘.-
W
CO
CO
•,'
N
CO
-
In
CO
N
NCDA Soil Fertility Recommendations (Ibs/A)
Lime N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
TonslAcre Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
00
o
m
O
Sample ID Crop
1
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
N
M
'd•
Cn
CO
t-
I
1
0
E
a
m
LL
0 d
m
d) >,
Q
0 C
0
0
1)
O
O
CO
c
O
X
This document mi

0
364 W. Park Drive I Warsaw, NC 28398- I Phone [phone]
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 1
Farm: ELK SHOALS / ELK
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13528541 Target pH: 6.2
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 11/5/2021 Processed: 11/9/2021
P-I K-I Mg (%) Ca (%) pHw Ac S-I Zn-I Zn-AI Mn-I Mn-AI Cu-i' Na ESP CEC BS (%) HM (%) Soil Class
0.39
cot�
(c)M
0.55
0.56
O
O
O
O
0
CO
O)
CA
N--CA
CA
CO
0)
Is -
Cn
N
5.8
O)
O
�t
• 00
cc;
m
cc;
cc;
6
e-
r-
N-
c-
r
x-
s-
v-
r-
r-
r-
r-
r-
r-
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
co
O
Co
O
O
00
In
co
0)
N
CO
I�
O
r
N
0
,-
M
=
=
=
N
—
0o00000,0
N
M
M
C(0
0
W
M
N
CO
N h.
CO
0
N
0
CO
Ln
O
N
(
C`')
N
N
N-,-
N
n
VM
0
M
OO')
N
N
N
N
CO
N
N
N
CO.71
CO
N
0
CO
lO
NI'
CO
CO
N
CO
CO
Nt
CO
CO
CO
N
CO
N
CO
N
d'
CO
tfi
0
0.-
0
0.-
C;
,--
W
CO
N
O
CO
O
t-
CO
CO
CO
f-
CO
CO
CO
O)
CO
N
Cn
N
N
O
N
I-
N-
LO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
14
N
N
CM")
N
30
CN
v
coo
LO
CO
LO
CV
CC),-
CO
CO
_
1.0
N
N
N
Sample ID Lab ID
1 846127PW
846128PW
6)
O
846131PW
846132PW
846133PW
846134PW
-
CO
CO
CO
N
CO
[r
in
CO
N.
CO
N P205 K20 Mg S B Zn Mn Cu See Note
Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese Copper
0.5
O
0
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
0
E
A
0
c
co
E
0
U
This document may'

O
VJ
910) 293-2108
364 W. Park Drive Warsaw, NC 28398- l Phone
d
0
0
2 (n
(LL
w 0
O Q
>-
Q w
cc W
O 0)
lt
3 E
O LL
0
SOUTHERN STATES
LID: AAE13528542
N
0
rcecervea: i 1/b/Z021 Processed
Ca (%) pHw Ac S-I Zn-I Zn-AI Mn-I Mn-AI Cu-I Na ESP CEC BS (%) HM (%
56 6.2 1.0 45 355 355 278 0 228 0.1 1 9.7 90 0.44
56 5.9 1.2 43 212 212 322 0 178 0.1 1 6.7 127 n I,n
A O
0 ti CO
0
Off) CO
(0
0 ,-
NO
N
T
00
LO
N LO
T O
CO
CO
T
N.
M
O CO
CO N-
O)
N.
N
W
CA
V
CO
to
0 0
O
0
0
T
0
LC) N
' CO T
CO
N _
CO
CO
CON
O
0;)
0 0
0
0
0
0
O
N
LM
CO
((0)�10�
CO
N
N
T
50 655
204 254
Cfl
N CV
T T
0)
c-
r
N
on Lv
v
LO
N O
O T
CO
,_
O
r
0
CO
rn
M
r�
co
62 6
54 6.
(0
10
10
(n
ccoo
v
v
t
"r
N-
co
o
CO
N
O
cNNCOCONNNN
K)
V
O) 0)co
V V
-
O
0 co
cL
Iii•iima_
N
n o CO
N TT
-
O NT
Cr)
Sample ID Lab 1D
1 846119PW
a Z
OT
N C
09.0 I . I r vv
846122PW
a
V.
NNNN
s
LO
a
CO
s
CI
(004 c
co
cCO
CO 0
met
CO
CO
CO
N CO
V L()
00
N.
00
d)
0)
0
C
i U
(1
a) d
E E
• fs
U O
U U)
9 U
c.).O
ca
O CD
o 0)
• (a
.0
C1 X
0 W
75 0-
> 0)
w
II)
d)
E
2
MC U_
=
(U • _
E
• O
a) •
m
eL
0)
U
W (6
U
C o)
o m
j,
Z
� U
E
o ,
(n 3
CU U
C x
W
C
_0
C
76
ro U
0 U
n
(/)
� U
Q
E
i. U
• Q
O v
C 0
.� --
(6 • 2
0_ Q
x
W Q
Mg S B Zn Mn
Magnesium Sulfur Boron Zinc Manganese
0
43
g. 0.
P205
Phosphate
Nitrogen
Lime
Tons/Acre
0.5
N.
0
CO
o
O.
T
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
NO CROP
CC
U
0
NO CROP
NO CROP
X
)
j
11
U
O
CC
U
O
N CO
V'
Ln CO
N
Cb
ro
(a
0
0
.(
0
4)
E
0
� n
Nm
-c
0) `o
w
io
>.
0
U
a
0
0
0
0
C
-c
m
This document ma

W
®
U 0
�F+
Z eQ
� O
O J
L
c
.-`
Q
cts N
i
c co
Q
vi
0
364 W. Park Drive I Warsaw, NC 28398- I Phone [phone]
grower: (I- AYHOUSE FARM Page 1
Farm: FIELD AT DAIRY / BARN
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13480979 Target pH: 6
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Received: 10/11/2021 Processed: 10/13/2021
BS (%) HM (%) I Soil Class
96 n 49 Min
= C
C_
I CO
- CO
7 0
NI-
CO
O
i ,—
i co
O
oo
tJ
W
0
�
N
�o
Q.
W
s—
Z
o
0
0
7
3
0;i
63
V
IC
0
-
O-
0")
c
r2,
o
O
O
W
co
CO
co
N
Q
N
0
(0
N
(
V
oM
C
N
N
(0
-
LO
0
CO
cn
(0
CCO
00
u
a'
CO
o
Cl
-
N
-
a
CO(0co
to
0
�
cc
N
N
co
N
O
n
CP
d
N
m
1 820252QW
a
N
'1
b CO
0
N
N
V CO
O
a)
E
0
m
u_
0
0
Z
Mn Cu See Note
Manganese Copper
N N
m 0
ro
S
Sulfur
5
3
mC
2
K20
Potash
P205
Phosphate
C
Z m
z
Lime
Tons/Acre
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
0
U
0
Z
0
U
0
Z
c
c
T
C
a
V co
u
1
u
C
S
F
u
C
c
c
ct
c
c
W
This documen
0
m
0
U

364 W. Park Drive Warsaw, NC 28398- J Phone [phone]
Vi
SOUTHERN STATES [5316] Grower: GRAYHOUSE FARM Page 2
Farm: STEWART / ST1
2504 DAVIES AVE LID: AAE13480980 Target pH: 6
STATESVILLE, NC 28625 Test Method: Mehlich III Receivpri 1fV11/2n21 D.. ,. 4nId ],-Inn..
o
co
as
-
'Q
0)
_'
r
o)
CO
0'
V,
a
c,
w
(
Z.
3
a0
2
C
_
Q
N
U)
0
4
_'.
a
R.
V
`
cn
Y'.
a(M
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
CO
l0
'sr
N
(3)
l0
CO
o
0
0
0
0,
o
0
O)
COO
oo
n
CO
CO
oo
co
O
O)
N
.--
CO
N
CO
(0
0)
(0
I.
CO
O
CO
CO
co
—
N
r-
N
r
c-
r
c-
r
.-
,-
r
r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
(N
co
cc)O
O
CO7-
N
0o
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c0
n
CO
CO
O
`n
0)
co
CD
R
oco
o
O)
v
co
o)
o
co
rt
co
co
CO
N
N
r
N
c-
\-
N
(co
oo
O
0
( )
O)
0
(0
co
co
,-
co
co
N
N
(0
CO
N.
Csj N
N.
CO
M
co
00
cO
CO
00.
O
O
N
N
os-o.-oo.-.).-
M
CO
(0
CO
'ct
CO
N
O
co
LO
CO
(n
CO
CO
CO
m
(o
45
CO
rt
CO
CO
(�
LO
CO
d
M
29
29
M
N
NNNN
N
N
co
V
N
N
N
N
M
CO
N
°)r
e
CO
Sample ID Lab ID
1 820244QW
a
0
0
0
G
0
o
'.0
CO
(`
CO
6)
O
1'
d'
I
r1'
a
c0
(O
NNNNNNN
0
O
0
0
O
O
0
.
N
N
N
N
N
N
33
CO
c0
o
CO
CO
V CO
t()
(O
t.
CO
See Note
Cu
Copper
0
v
c. c
2 m
c
m
2
u
N 171
B
Borah
/A w
V1 N
3
CO N
2 c
ILL
V ,
N
m °
P205
Phosphate
N
Nitrogen
Lime
Tons/Acre
r,
0
r•---
d
Sample ID Crop
1 NO CROP
NO CROP
NO CROP
0
000
Z
0
Z
0
Z
0
Z
0
Z
c
V
M ')
l0
CO
I.
CO
(
f
L
(
.0
f
(
(
u
O
received. Laboratory liability is limited to the fee assessed on
This document 1114

APPENDIX 6.1
Wettable Acres Determination Certification
Name of Facility: . hto44.5 e rani •. J i _. Facility Number: y'Q - je)
Owner(s) Name: , MSS G re hone No:
Mailing Address: `� �� �r-1r'�. t fa h j f40..
By signing this form, the facility owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge the completion of the
Wettable Acres Determination. All necessary Wettable Acres Determination Field Data Sheets and
calculations were completed to conduct a Wettable Acre Determination. The facility's Waste
Utilization Plan has been amended as necessary to reflect actual wetted acreage. A copy of all
worksheets, calculations, and other Wetted Acres Determination documents, along with the
applicable Waste Utilization Plan and Wettable Acre Determination Certification will be filed with
the local Soil and Water Conservation District. A copy will also be kept on site with the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be approved by a technical
specialist and filed with the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. If any
modifications to the existing irrigation system or any new irrigation equipment was required to
adequately address the waste management needs of this facility, an Irrigation Specialist or
Professional Engineer has certified the design and installation below.
Owner Name:
Owner Signature: Date:
Technical Specialist Name:
Technical Specialist Signature: Date:
If assisted by an Irrigation Specialist or Professional Engineer please read and sign below:
Animal waste application equipment has been designed or modified to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan and according to NRCS Standards. Animal waste
application equipment has been installed according to NRCS Standards and is ready for use.
Irrigation Specialist/PE Name:
Irrigation Specialist/PE Signature:
u.( c i ku-v,P.E
Date: Yiz
WADC - 2/06
Submit this form to:
NC Division of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636

Operation and Maintenance
Center Pivot
See Emergency Response Plan in case of an emergency leak or failure of center pivot system.
Field Calibration
A couple methods can be used to field calibrate the center pivot. A flow meter can measure
the volume of water irrigated per rotation or containers can be spread from the center of pivot
to the end of machine to measure depth of application. Every 75 feet is suggested. Determine
if application depth is correct for the 360° rotation setting using the flow meter volume or
direct measured volume.
Manufacturer's Operating Instructions
Brock Equipment Company provided operating guidelines for the Reinke manufacturing
Company center pivot machine, pump, etc. to Grayhouse Farms, Inc. Complete routine
maintenance recommended by manufacturer.
Safety Precautions
See safety precautions provided or available from manufacture of the center pivot. This system
is propelled by moving towers in a circle around pivot. An experienced operator is required to
operate system. Working or standing near center pivot and pumps could be life threating.
Monitoring during Pumping Activities
Pumping activities shall be monitored closely especially during the start-up phase to insure no
spills or discharges occur. Each time center pivot system is started, a four wheeler or vehicle
will be used to check all hydrants and the center pivot machine to insure that everything is
working properly. Solids content should be relatively low in waste pond used for irrigation but
some solids are in waste water. Cleaning sprinklers maybe routinely required.
Agitation
Agitation is the most critical operation in maintaining available storage capacity in waste
storage ponds. The agitation homogenizes the manure mixture and provides a more
consistent nutrient content. Samples shall be obtained for nutrient analysis after waste pond is
well mixed. Prior analysis will be used to estimate the present analysis.
Agitation of manure storage facilities releases gases that may increase odor levels and present a
health hazard. Consideration shall be given to weather and wind conditions, time of day, and
day of week to minimize the possibility of odor conflicts while agitating.

System Start Up
Crack valve at pump and slowly remove air from supply lines. Once air is removed, bring
system up to operating pressure and flowrate. See monitoring during pumping activities above
and manufacture recommendations of center pivot for safety precautions.
System Shut Down
Follow center pivots manufacturer's recommendations for system shut down and winterizing
system after applications are completed.

Emergency Response Plan
Gray House Dairy
i
In Case of an Emergency Leak or Failure of Center Pivot System
Implement the following first containment steps:
a. Stop all other activities to address the spill.
b. Use skid loader or tractor with blade to contain or divert spill or leak, if possible.
c. Call for help and excavator if needed.
d. Complete the clean-up and repair the necessary components.
e. Assess the extent of the emergency and request additional help if needed.
Emergency Contacts
Department 1 Agency
Fire
Rescue Services
Local authority
Available equipmentlsuoplies for r
Phone Number
911
911
911
Equipment Type
Contact Person
Phone Number
Nearest excavation equipment
Jimmy Gray
704-902-5441
Grading Company
Jeff Barnes
828-446-9367
Contacts to be made by the owner or operator within 24 hours
Organization
Div. of Water Resources,
Mooresville
Environmental Emergency Hotline
NRCS Technical Specialist
Phone Number
336-776-9699
800-662-7956
704-873-6761 x3
Be prepared to provide the following information:
a. Your name and contact information.
b. Farm location and other pertinent identification information.
c. Description of emergency.
d. Estimate of the amounts, area covered, and distance traveled.
e. Whether manure has reached surface waters or major field drains.
f. Whether there is any obvious damage: employee injury, fish kill, or property damage.
g. Current status of containment efforts.