20220555 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220408

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0 Yes 0 No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
20220555
Is a payment required for this project?*
O No payment required
0 Fee received
(;' Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
Version#*
What amout is owed?*
G $240.00
O $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
la. Name of project:
Sheetz - Chickenfoot Rd
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Krissina Newcomb
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/8/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Grays Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
B
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
34.94034341
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-78.92590899
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cumberland
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes t% No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
I Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
0 Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)

Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
lb. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
OO Nationwide Permit (NWP)
CI Regional General Permit (RGP)
❑ Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0 Yes C; No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
td. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
RI 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
C Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
C Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
0 Yes O No
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
OO Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
0Yes ®No
B. Applicant Information
OYes 0No
0 Yes 0 No
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
0 Owner 0 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Joseph P Riddle III; Trina T Riddle; Cameron Company LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
008473:00802
2c. Contact Person:
Joseph P. Riddle III
2d. Address
Street Address
502 Lennox Drive
Address Line 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28303
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
State I Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]

4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Krissina Newcomb
4b. Business Name:
Hal Owen & Associates Inc
4c. Address
Street Address
PO Box 400
Address Line 2
City
Lillington
Postal / Zip Code
27546
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Hope Mills
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0423-12-2980
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Chickenfoot Road
Address Line 2
City
Hope Mills
Postal / Zip Code
28348
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Grays Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
B
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040611
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
12
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
At the time of the investigation the site was unimproved. The uplands had been timbered and early succession grasses (broomsedge) dominated. The wetlands were wooded. Land use in
the vicinity is commercial and residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes ( No O Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.25
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
0

4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose is to construct a SHEETZ convenience store with restaurant, gas pumps, and car wash; includes parking lot for trucks.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The wetland will be filled and graded to create a level building area. Fuel pumps will be installed and the area paved. Typical construction equipment such as excavators, loaders, dump
trucks, and graders will be utilized.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
• Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary O Approved O Not Verified 0 Unknown O N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
Krissina Newcomb
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
6a. Is this a phased project?*
0 Yes ® No
U Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
no future impacts are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
❑O Wetlands 0 Streams -tributaries
0 Open Waters 0 Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
0 Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
fill
P
Headwater Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.250
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.250
2i. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.250
'4J
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The site plan utilizes almost every square foot of available space on the property for the store, fuel pumps, parking, and stormwater management. The
layout of the site must consider safe locations and arrangements for fuel pumps; drive aisles with sufficient widths and turning circles for vehicle and
truck maneuvering; and adequate parking for retail customers and employees. Other site constraints that limit facility design are existing right-of-ways
and utilities located along Chickenfoot Road. With these site constraints, avoiding the wetland impact was not feasible.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
NA
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State

2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
• Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
O DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
OO Mitigation bank 0 Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Wildlands Engineering - DANIELS CREEK
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Riparian wetland
3c. Comments
Credit availability has not been requested, but not confirmed.
Quantity:
0.25
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes • No
If no, explain why:
Cape Fear basin not subject (HUC 03030004)
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
0Yes ®No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
0 Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
O Yes No
0 N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
CI Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Hope Mills
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information C
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes • No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes • No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes • No

3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This commercial development is small and will not likely affect regional growth patterns.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes i No :I N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
municipal sewer system
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes O No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act impacts?*
O Yes O No
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
0 Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0 Yes ® No
O No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S
OYes 0No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0Yes ONo
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
OYes 0No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
OYes 0No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
US FWS iPaC (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ ). NC Natural Heritage Program (https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
0 Yes O No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Habitat Conservation National Marine Fisheries Service
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
O Yes O No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC State Historic Preservation Office (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)
CD0791 1 Reverend J. G. Fisher House (Gone) is indicated west of the site on Service Road, but appears to have been removed.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
OYes *,No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System (https://fris.nc.gov/fris/ )
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
SHEETZ-Chickenfoot RD_PCN_attachment.pdf 9.56MB
File must be PDF or KMZ

Comments
Signature
U By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Krissina Newcomb
Signature
! tlaa ticlaCi1cp
Date
4/8/2022

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400, Lillington NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
www.halowensoil.com
7 April 2022
Mrs. Emily Greer
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification for
SHEETZ — Chickenfoot Road, Hope Mills (Proposed)
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Dear Mrs. Greer,
A Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted for the above referenced
property. The subject site contains 12 acres and is located on the southern side of Chickenfoot
Road, the western side of I-95, and the eastern side of Service Road in Hope Mills, NC. The
subject site is located in the Lower Rockfish Creek Subwatershed (HUC 030300040611) in the
Cape Fear River Basin. A wetland delineation was conducted for the 12-acre site by Hal Owen
& Associates Inc. staff on 8 February 2022. A linear wetland drain was found to start near
Service Road and cross the northwestern corner of the site to a culvert under Chickenfoot Road.
The proposed commercial development is for a SHEETZ convenience store. The plan
would permanently impact the entire 0.25 acre of headwater wetland. Due to space limitations
and site constraints, avoiding the wetland was not possible. This pre -construction notification is
being submitted pursuant to USACE Nationwide Permit 39 and NCDWR Water Quality General
Certification 4263. One-half acre of compensatory mitigation (2:1 to impact area) is proposed
through Wildlands Engineering — Daniels Creek mitigation bank.
Attachments include:
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package
• Site Plan\ Impact Map
• Threatened\Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat reports
• NC Historic Properties map
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
1'
Krissina B. Newcomb
Environmental Scientist
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION PACKAGE
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Chicken Foot Road
City, State: Hope Mills, NC
County: Cumberland
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Portion of 0423-12-2980
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Krissina Newcomb, Hal Owen & Assoc.
Mailing Address: PO Box 400
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
o
❑
EI
o
Lillington, NC 27546
910-893-8743
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Joseph P Riddle III, Trina T Riddle
Mailing Address: PO BOX 53729
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
FAYETTEVILLE NC 28305
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Krissina Newcomb
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
31 March 2022
Date
��Rt4or.No� j • A/e o OniS-
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
fl I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
fl I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
fl A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑
o
El
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n
n
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 1 2 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
z
0
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 34.94034341
Longitude: -78.92590899
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
n
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017
Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑
❑
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Project Name:
Sheetz — Chickenfoot Rd -NC Hwy 59
Address:
SE cor of US Hwy 301 Serv. Rd & NC Hwy 59
PIN:
0423-12-2980
County:
Cumberland
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name:
Cameron Company, LLC -Joseph P. Riddle III, etal
Mailing Address:
502 Lennox Drive, Fayetteville, NC 28303
Telephone Number:
910 — 864-3135
E-mail Address:
[e-mail]
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting
on -site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified
herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
I hereby authorize Mrs. Krissina Newcomb of Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. to act on
my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
jurisdictional determinations, CWA Section 401 and 404 permits and certifications, and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
This authorization will remain in effect for (5) five years unless revoked by the undersigned
in writing.
Authorized Signature Title
(Please legibly print name here:
1" \c r\ \1, `YOa�
Date

Property Summary
Tax Year: 2022
REID 0423122980000 PIN
Location 0 ? DR
Address
Administrative Data
Plat Book & Page
Old Map #
Market Area
Township
Planning Jurisdiction
City
Fire District
Spec District
Land Class
History REID 1
History REID 2
Acreage
Permit Date
Permit #
Property
Description
8058
NONE
COUNTY
HOPE MILLS
HM RECREATION
C100-COMMERC
92.37
0423-12-2980
92.37 ACS FISHER LD
W/S 1-95
Transfer Information
Deed Date
Deed Book
Deed Page
Revenue Stamps
Package Sale Date
Package Sale Price
Land Sale Date
Land Sale Price
Improvement Summary
Total Buildings
Total Units
Total Living Area
Total Gross Leasable Area
Photograph
Property Owner
Owner's Mailing
Address
9/9/2010
008473
00802
8/13/2018
0
0
0
0
RIDDLE, JOSEPH P III;RIDDLE, TRINA
T;CAMERON COMPANY LLC
PO BOX 53729
FAYETTEVILLE NC 28305
Property Value
Total Appraised Land Value $828,171
Total Appraised Building Value
Total Appraised Misc
Improvements Value
Total Cost Value $828,171
Total Appraised Value - Valued By $828,171
Cost
Other Exemptions
Exemption Desc
Use Value Deferred
Historic Value Deferred
Total Deferred Value
Total Taxable Value
$807,533
$807,533
$20,638

No Photo Found
Building Summary
Misc Improvements Summary
Card Unit
# Quantity
No Data
Measure Type
Base
Price
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed:
Land Summary
Land Class: C100-COMMERC
Soil
Zoning Class
CP
Description
1096-COMM-SQ-
FOOTAG
Total Land Value Assessed: $828,171
Eff Phys Depr (% Econ Depr (% Funct Depr (% Common Interest (%
Year Bad) Bad) Bad) Good) Value
Deeded Acres: 0
Size
2943349.20 SQUARE FOOT
PRICED
Rate
$2.43
Calculated Acres: 5.59
Size Adj. Land
Factor Adjustment
SHAPE-90.00
PHYSICAL-75.00
Land
Value
$820,731

Soil Size Adj. Land
Zoning Class Description Size Rate Factor Land Adjustment Value
CP
2300-SWAMP-WASTE 24.80 BY THE ACRE PRICE $300 $7,440
Total Land Value Assessed: $828,171
Ownership History
Owner Name Deed Type ok Stamps Sale Book Page Deed Date
Ownership Price
Current RIDDLE, JOSEPH P III/ RIDDLE, TRINA T/ CD -CORRECTIVE 50, 50 0 008473 00802 9/9/2010
CAMERON COMPANY LLC DEED
1 Back RIDDLE, TRINA T WD-WARRANTY 100 0 008467 00110 8/31/2010
DEED
2 Back RIDDLE, JOSEPH P III ID -INTEREST 100 0 007778 00510 12/31/2007
DEED
3 Back RIDDLE, MARCH F ID -INTEREST 100 0 004692 00178 7/16/1997
DEED
4 Back CAMERON COMPANY LIMITED WD-WARRANTY 100 0 003770 00412 5/21/1991
PARTNERSHIP DEED
5 Back INVESTORE TITLE EXCHANGE WD-WARRANTY 100 550 $550,000 003770 00408 5/21/1991
CORPORATION DEED
6 Back RIDDLE, J P JR WD-WARRANTY 100 0 003347 00151 12/22/1987
DEED
7 Back MARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WD-WARRANTY 100 0 003140 00001 3/7/1986
DEED
Notes Summary
Building Card
No Data
Date
Line Notes

0
Map Legend
boundary
Potential Wetland
points
200
400 ft
Map for reference only.
Not a survey.
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
Sheetz
Figure 1
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
Chicken Foot Road, Hope Mills, NC
Potential wetlands identified at
919-893-8743
subject site
8 February 2022

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Sheetz- Chicken Foot Rd, Hope Mills, NC City/County: Hope Mills, Cumberland Co
Applicant/Owner: Sheetz
Investigator(s): Krissina Newcomb Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): linear Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 34.9411 Long:-78•9269 Datum:
Sampling Date: 8 February 2022
Soil Map Unit Name: NoA - Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
State: NC Sampling Point: 2
NWI classification: None
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X
Yes
Yes
No
No X
No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
in the field beside service road
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ ❑
❑ El
❑ 0
❑ 0
0 II
El ❑
El El
El
Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 2
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1 Andropogon virginicus FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
upland areas timbered
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist)
0-4 10YR 3/2
4-10 10YR 4/3
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
(Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
.❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑
❑ ❑
.❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
.❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑
.❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
B
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
fi
Texture Remarks
L
SL
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
B
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
❑I Red Parent Material (TF2)
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Sheetz- Chicken Foot Rd, Hope Mills, NC City/County: Hope Mills, Cumberland Co
Applicant/Owner: Sheetz
Investigator(s): Krissina Newcomb
Sampling Date: 8 February 2022
State: NC Sampling Point: 1
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 34.9413 Long:-78.9266
Soil Map Unit Name: NoA - Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
NWI classification: None
Slope (%): 2
Datum:
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
In drainageway east of service road
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ ❑
0 El
0 0
❑ 0
0 II
El ❑
El El
El
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 8
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 7
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Liquidambar styracaflua
Ligustrum sinense
Acer rubrum
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Prunus serotina
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Y FAC
Persea borbonia
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Arundinaria gigantea
50% of total cover:
Y
FAC
FAC
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1 Smilax laurifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
FACU
FACW
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
50% of total cover:
FACW
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
FACW
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-8 10YR 3/1
8-12 10YR 4/1 98
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
10YR 4/4 2 C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
(Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
.❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑
❑ ❑
.❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
.❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑
.❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
B
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
fi
Texture Remarks
SL
LS
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
B
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
❑I Red Parent Material (TF2)
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Krissina Newcomb, Hal Owen & Assoc., Po Box 400, Killington, NC 27546
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Cumberland City: Hope Mills
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.94034341
Long.: -78.92590899
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Rockfish Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
A
34.94116248
-78.92611508
0,25 ac.
wetland
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
• Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
• U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Hope Mills, NC (2019) 7.5 Minute
■❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: websoil survey
■❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
■❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: MAP NUMBER 3720042300J
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
• Photographs: • Aerial (Name & Date): Google Earth 2022
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
n Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
/- A/.6---
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Figure 2. Vicinity Map
The subject property is located south of Chicken Foot Rd, Hope Mills, NC.
Site coordinates are 34.94034341, -78.92590899.
05301 Semi, Rd
9Taylor Express, Inc
Fort eragg
C404.
BP
Ntf 9
°
WESTOVF_R
0
TERRY SA9 F
=Fayettevilfe
11
trf
DOLIZLAS SYRD
CD
Hope Mills
P,eerJ""A"°s''"
9
Grandsons Buffet
Hope %fills
SOUTH VIEW
Eastover
vender
Judson
Ce
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
31 March 2022 Sheetz-Chicken Foot Rd, Hope Mills, NC

Map Legend
Q boundary
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
919-893-8743
Map for reference only.
Not a survey.
Sheetz
Chicken Foot Road, Hope Mills, NC
8 February 2022
Figure 3
Aerial Photograph
Google Earth 2022

Map Legend
[_J boundary
Map for reference only.
Not a survey.
iipp-
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
Sheetz
Figure 4
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
www.halowensoil.com
Chicken Foot Road, Hope Mills, NC
USGS Topographic Map
919-893-8743
7.5 Minute Quadrangle
8 February 2022
Hope Mills, NC

Sheetz - Chicken Foot Rd, Hope Mills, NC
34° 56' 37" N
34° 56' 10" N
8
r
688900
689000
689100
NoA
yl°,;dap U 7 U © @Q e� [BIM ;,5f1
689200
Soil Map —Cumberland County, North Carolina
689300
689400
689500
I I I I I 1 1 I
688900 689000 689100 689200 689300 689400 689500 689600
689600
Map Scale: 1:6,000 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Meters
0 53 100 200 330
0 253 530
Feet
1000 15530
Mapprojedion: Web Mercator Conerwordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
689700
689700
689800
689900
I I I
689800 689900 690000
8
8
8
34° 56' 37" N
34° 56' 10" N
USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
3/31/2022
Page 1 of 3

Soil Map —Cumberland County, North Carolina
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Soils
0
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
▪ Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
to
121
0
k
Ida
0
0
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
el Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
▪ Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
rika Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Cumberland County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 23, Jan 21, 2022
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 1, 2018—Jul 31,
2018
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
3/31/2022
Page 2 of 3

Soil Map —Cumberland County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CaB
Candor sand, 1 to 8 percent
slopes
16.6
10.8%
CaD
Candor sand, 8 to 15 percent
slopes
1.7
1.1%
JT
Johnston loam
5.2
3.4%
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
58.5
38.0%
NoB
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6
percent slopes
10.2
6.6%
Pg
Pantego loam
2.0
1.3%
Ra
Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes
13.7
8.9%
WaB
Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6
percent slopes
46.3
30.0%
Totals for Area of Interest
154.2
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
3/31/2022
Page 3 of 3

r.1310,1113
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Invento
March 31, 2022
Wetlands
ID Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
LI Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Sheetz- Chicken Foot Rd, Hope Mills, NC
Freshwater Emergent Wetland 0 Lake
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland u Other
Freshwater Pond U Riverine
Source: Esri
SDA, US
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This page was produced by the NWI mapper

Sheetz - Chicken Foot Rd, Hope Mills, NC
Northing: = 434,910, Easting = 2,020,554
Northing: = 434,910, Easting = 2,024,022
Northing: = 431,442, Easting = 2,020,554 Page 1 of 2 Northing: = 431,442, Easting = 2,024,022
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. This map incorporates changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest
product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov.
r
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
With BFE or Depth
Regulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance
Flood Hazard
Areas Determined to be Outside the
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Jurisdiction Boundary
FIRM Panel Boundary
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
e
1 inch = 500 feet
1:6000
0 125 250
0 25 50 100
Meters
500
Feet
National Flood Insurance Program
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
Panel(s):0423
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY CID
CUMBERLAND 370076
COUNTY
TOWN OF HOPE 370312
MILLS
Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown
below should be used when placing map
orders; the Community Number(s) shown
above should be used on insurance
applications for the subject community.
SELECTED PANELS:
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
3720042300J 1/5/2007

/.sego
FEMA: National Flood Insurance Program
Page 2of2cq`+
aQYA�Fti y
,'�rT
z,
Panel(s):0423
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY CID
CUMBERLAND COUNTY 370076
TOWN OF HOPE MILLS 370312
Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown below should be
used when placing map orders; the Community Number(s)
shown above should be used on insurance applications for
the subject community.
SELECTED PANELS:
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
3720042300J 1/5/2007
NOTES TO USERS
LEGEND
Base map information and geospatial data used to develop this FIRMette were obtained
from various organizations, including the participating local community(ies), state and
federal agencies, and/or other sources. The primary base for this FIRM is aerial imagery
acquired by the State in 2010. Information and geospatial data supplied by the local
community(ies) that met FEMA base map specifications were considered the preferred
source for development of the base map.
See geospatial metadata for the associated digital FIRMette for additional information
about base map preparation. Base map features shown on this FIRMette, such as
corporate limits, are based on the most up-to-date data available at the time of publication.
Changes in the corporate limits may have occurred since this map was published. Map
users should consult the appropriate community official or website to verify current
conditions of jurisdictional boundaries and base map features. This map may contain
roads that were not considered in the hydraulic analysis of streams where no new
hydraulic model was created during the production of this statewide format FIRM.
Flood elevations on this map are referenced to either or both the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) or National Geodetic Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29), and are
labeled accordingly. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground
elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. To obtain current elevation, description,
and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map, or for information
regarding conversion between NGVD 29 and NAVD 88, please contact the Information
Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at [phone], or visit its website at
http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/.
LEGEND
MAP REVISIONS
There are no maprevisions for the
selected area.
NOTES TO USERS
This is an official FIRMette of a portion of the effective panels
listed in the Title Block shown on Page 1. The information
represented on this FIRMette was extracted from the effective
digital flood hazard data available at http://fris.nc.gov/fris.
Base flood elevation data, floodway, nonencroachment widths,
nformation on certain areas no in the Special Flood Hazard
Areas protected by flood control structures, and other pertinent
data are available in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) available at
http://fris.nc.gov/fris. Users should be aware that flood elevations
shown on this FIRMette represent elevations rounded to one
tenth of a foot (0.1') and should be utilized in conjunction with
data available in the FIS.
MORE INFORMATION
Letters of Map Amendment (LOMA)
1-877-336-2627
http://msc.fema.gov/
Letters of Map Revision (LOMR)
919-715-5711
www.ncfloodmaps.com
Flood Insurance Availability
North Carolina Division of Emergency
919-715-5711
Management (NCDEM)
http://www.nccrimecontrol.orq/nfip
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
1-877-638-6620
http://www.fema.qov/businessinfip
Questions about this FIRMette
1-877-336-2627
h
http://fema.qov

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SITE PLANS AND IMPACT MAPS
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

R/W
J
400 20' 40'
SCALE ', inch = 90 fl
REVISIONS
NCI
O
W
F
N
1 /12/2022
JEV
PAM BY
JEV
2021120
wsvwp W-39S7
540 AS NOTED
rig
C6
Do Nof Use For Construction - -
00/55 ` �E

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
• ENDANGERED SPECIES AND DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT ASSESSMENT
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

Mil a n uulurr.
a- 141][4 N.IX
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE . :
4lit'ff 3 '/'% Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: April 07, 2022
Project Code: 2022-0029476
Project Name: Sheetz - Chicken Foot Rd
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act(Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

04/07/2022 2
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project-related impacts.Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.

04/07/2022 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

04/07/2022 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

04/07/2022 2
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0029476
Event Code: None
Project Name: Sheetz - Chicken Foot Rd
Project Type: Commercial Development
Project Description: 12 acres, Hope Mills
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@34.940004200000004,-78.9255861485959,14z
KI: .
a,
Counties: Cumberland County, North Carolina

04/07/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 7 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Appearance
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 (Threatened)
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743

04/07/2022 4
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1286
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Pondberry Lindera melissifolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1279
Rough-leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

04/07/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
THERE ARE NO FWS MIGRATORY BIRDS OF CONCERN WITHIN THE VICINITY OF YOUR PROJECT
AREA.
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.

04/07/2022 2
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network(AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding,wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC -Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical

04/07/2022 3
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort(indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar).A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

04/07/2022 4
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Hal Owen&AssociateHal Owen &Associates
Name: Krissina Newcomb
Address: PO Box 400
City: Lillington
State: NC
Zip: 27546
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

Roy Cooper,Governor
• ■■■
r ■■ • NC DEPARTMENT OF D.Reid Wilson,Secretary
■■•■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• ■•■ Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director,Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-17644
April 7, 2022
Krissina Newcomb
Hal Owen & Associates Inc
PO Box 400
Lillington, NC 27546
RE: Sheetz - Chicken Foot Rd
Dear Krissina Newcomb:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally-
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler@a ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
0 121 W.JONES STREET.RALEIGH.NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER.RALEIGH.NC 27699
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Sheetz - Chicken Foot Rd
April 7, 2022
N CN H D E-17644
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
ienti is am
roup
t
bservation
Date
Element Accuracy
Occurrence
Rank
Federal
Status
jilk Global State
Rank Rank
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
Natural
Community
Vascular Plant
33740 Somatochlora
georgiana
33780 Stylurus ivae
Coppery Emerald
Shining Clubtail
9912 Cape Fear Valley
Mixed Bluff Forest
12294 Orthochilus ecristatus Spiked Medusa
2004-Pre
2004-Pre
2006
1957-08-07
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
H?
5-Very
Low
H? 5-Very
Low
A 3-Medium
X 4-Low
Significantly G3G4 S1?
Rare
Significantly G4 S1?
Rare
G1G2 S1S2
Endangered G2G3 S1
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on April 7, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q4, January 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

Colonial
Heights
April 7, 2022
▪ Project Boundary
▪ Buffered Project Boundary
NCNHDE-17644: Sheetz - Chicken Foot Rd
Page 3 of 3
1:22,227
0 0.175 0.35
ti ti
0 0.3 0.6
0.7 mi
1.2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO. NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esc China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
NC HISTORIC PROPERTIES MAP
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

Map for reference only.
Not a survey.
0
Big Rockfish Presbyterian
1,000 2,000 ft
ish Presbyterian Church- _-_
Reverend J. G. Fisher House (Gone)
Map Legend
NCHPOpoints
NCHPO NR SL DOE Boundaries
Local District Boundaries
boundary
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
Sheetz
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
NC State Historic Properties
www.halowensoil.com
Chicken Foot Road, Hope Mills, NC
Map
919-893-8743
7 April 2022