The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140417 Ver 1_Application_20140424 3040 NC Hwy 42 West, Clayton NC 27520 P:919-606-1065 – F:919-585-5570 March 28, 2014 Ms. Sarah E. Hair Wilmington Regulatory Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 RE: Pre-Construction Notification: Nationwide Permit 23 TIP Number B-5411 Replace Bridge No. 124 over Phillips Creek on SR 1318 (River Rd) Bladen County, NC Dear Ms. Hair; The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge No. 124 on River Road (SR 1318) over Phillips Creek. Enclosed is an application for a Clean Water Act Section 404 Nationwide Permit 23 and 401 General Water Quality Certification No. 3891. The purpose of this project is to replace a bridge over a structurally deficient dam and spillway with a culvert and improve roadway safety. The proposed culvert is of adequate size for hydraulic passage, reduces the cost of construction and maintenance compared to a bridge, and improves aquatic life passage through the removal of the dam and spillway. The roadway will be widened to ensure the safety of the traveling public as the existing shoulders do not meet current design standards. Hydrology will be restored a portion to the original downstream channel of Phillips Creek, and the existing pond above the dam will be allowed to convert to wetlands upon completion of the construction. Impacts to waters of the U.S. include 110 linear feet of permanent stream impacts due to culvert construction and removal of hydrology from the existing spillway channel as well as 20 linear feet of temporary stream impacts due to dewatering. There are also 0.01 acres of wetland impacts associated with culvert construction. Hydrology will be restored to 30 linear feet of stream channel at the outlet of the proposed culvert and impact to 60 feet of tributary waters at the spillway outlet. The contractor will be required to re-establish dimensions of the existing channel once the pond is completely drained. Approximately 0.22 acres of pond will convert to wetland. This area will be vegetated with an appropriate wetland seed mix after accumulated sediment has been removed. Sills and baffles (see attached plans) have been included in the culvert design to reduce velocity through the barrel and match existing stream channel dimensions. Some removal of sediment may be required to tie the stream channel into the culvert, but this will be limited to the area upstream of the culvert, as generally shown in the attached plans. To prevent headcutting, the inlet of the B-5411 Permit Application March 28, 2014 Page 2 of 2 culvert pipe will be at the approximate elevation of the historic stream bed in the pond area, and the outlet matches the elevation of the bed below an existing grade control point in the stream channel. The preceding information, along with the enclosed project information sheet, Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), vicinity map, U.S Geological Survey (USGS) map, impact summary table, wetland and stream impact drawings, preliminary construction plans, historic and archaeological resource assessments, and Programmatic Categorical Exclusion are being submitted for your review. A copy of this application is also being sent to the NC Division of Water Resources for their 401 Certification review. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at (919)-606-1065 Sincerely, Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. Philip May Senior Environmental Scientist Cc: Mason Herndon, NCDWR James Rerko, NCDOT Division 6 Greg Purvis, P.E., Wetherill Engineering, Inc. 3040 NC Hwy 42 West; Clayton, NC 27520 P:919-606-1065 – F:919-585-5570 Project Information Sheet Date: 3/28/2014 Project Name: TIP B-5411 Replace Bridge No. 124 over Phillips Creek on SR 1318 (River Rd) Name of Property Owner/Applicant: North Carolina Department of Transportation Consultant/Agent: Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. Related/Previous Action IDs: SAW-2012-1673 Site Address: N/A Subdivision Name (if applicable): N/A City: Tar Heel, NC County: Bladen County Lat: 34.738741 Long: -78.751903 USGS Quadrangle(s): Tar Heel River Basin(s): Cape Fear 8-Digit HUC(s): 03030005 Nearest Stream(s): Phillips Creek Directions to Site: From Wilmington take NC 87 to Tar Heel, turn right on Tar Heel Ferry Road and cross the Cape Fear River. Take your next right on River Road and proceed to the project area. Requested Action: Pre-application Request Jurisdictional Determination Request Final Preliminary Permit Application: Nationwide 23 General Individual Page 1 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. _____________ DWQ project no. _______________ Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit 401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. Yes No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. Yes No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replace Bridge No. 124 over Phillips Creek on SR 1318 (River Rd) 2b. County: Bladen 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Tar Heel, NC 2d. Subdivision name: n/a 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: B-5411 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): James Rerko 3d. Street address: 500 Transportation Drive 3e. City, state, zip: Fayetteville NC 28301 3f. Telephone no.: (910) 437-0207 3g. Fax no.: (910) 486-1959 3h. Email address: jjrerko@ncdot.gov Page 2 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Phil May 5b. Business name (if applicable): Carolina Ecosystems Inc. 5c. Street address: 3040 NC Hwy 42 West 5d. City, state, zip: Clayton, NC 27520 5e. Telephone no.: 919-606-1065 5f. Fax no.: 919-585-5570 5g. Email address: phil.may@carolinaeco.com Page 3 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): See attached plans 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.73874 Longitude: - 78.75190 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1c. Property size: Project Area 1.5 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed project: Phillips Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Land use in the project vicinity consists primarily of residential development and agricultural areas. A forested buffer of varying width is present adjacent to Phillips Creek. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: Approximately 0.1 acres of wetlands are present within the study area. 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: Approximately 130 linear feet of stream channel is present within the study area 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The project will replace an existing bridge over a dam and spillway with a pipe arch culvert. The dam and spillway have been categorized by the NC Dam Safety Section as having "conditions that are indicators of continued deterioration that may lead to failure". The existing bridge also has a deck geometry appraisal of 2 out of 9. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing the existing bridge with a 20'-1" x 12'-6" structural plate pipe arch culvert. A culvert was chosen as a replacement structure as it provides adequate hydrologic passage and reduces cost of construction and maintenance as compared to a bridge. In addition, the existing bridge spanned a dam, and stream flow was already impeded. The proposed culvert will be of sufficient length to provide 11-foot lanes with 6-foot shoulders. This will provide a safer roadway as the existing shoulders do not meet current safety standards. Minor regrading of the roadway fill slope will occur to allow for the wider roadway. The proposed culvert is designed to restore hydrology to the original Phillips Creek channel from which water was diverted by the spillway. The area upstream of the roadway will convert from pond to wetland after completion of the construction. Rip rap will be placed at the inlet and outlet of the proposed culvert to stabilize the stream banks. The existing dam and spillway will be removed and replaced with clean fill. Standard road building equipment will be used for construction such as excavators, dump trucks, bulldozers, and cranes. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: Yes No Unknown 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? Preliminary Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Brian Smith/James Pflaum Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Ecosystems Inc. Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 01/24/13 SAW-2012-1673 Page 4 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 5 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland (if known) 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ – non-404, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 P T Mechanized Clearing Riverine Swamp Forest Yes No Corps DWQ <0.01 W2 P T Fill Riverine Swamp Forest Yes No Corps DWQ <0.01 W3 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W4 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W5 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W6 P T Yes No Corps DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.01 2h. Comments: 0.005 acres of permanent fill and 0.005 acres of mechanized clearing will result from the culvert construction. Impact site designations (W1, W2) correspond to Site 2 on the attached plans. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number - Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ – non-404, other) 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 P T Culvert Phillips Creek PER INT Corps DWQ 6 110 S2 P T Dewatering Phillips Creek PER INT Corps DWQ 10 20 S3 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S4 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S5 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S6 P T PER INT Corps DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 130 3i. Comments: Stream impacts include both the original Phillips Creek channel and the current spillway channel. Impact site designations (S1, S2) correspond to Site 2. Page 6 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) O1 P T Phillips Creek Draining & Fill Pond 0.09 O2 P T Phillips Creek Conversion to Uplands Pond 0.05 O3 P T Phillips Creek Conversion to Wetlands Pond 0.22 O4 P T Phillips Creek Draining & Fill Tributary 0.03 4f. Total open water impacts 0.39 4g. Comments: Impact site designations (O1, O2, O3) correspond to Site 1 and O4 correponds to Site 3 on the attached plans. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: Page 7 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other: Catawba Randleman 6b. Buffer impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet) B1 P T Yes No B2 P T Yes No B3 P T Yes No 6h. Total buffer impacts 0.0 0.0 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Guard rail and steep slopes are being implemented to minimize wetland impacts associated with roadway fill. An off site detour will be used during project construction to avoid temporary impacts associated with an onsite detour. In addition, the project will result in restoration of hydrology to 30 linear feet of the original Phillips Creek stream bed and approximately 0.22 acres of the old pond bed within the right-of-way will convert to wetlands upon completion of the project. This area will be vegetated with an appropriate wetland seed mix after accumulated sediment has been removed. The contractor will be required to re-establish dimensions of the existing channel once the pond is completely drained. The culvert has been designed with sills and baffles to mimic the channel dimensions of the stream, reduce velocity through the barrel, and maintain aquatic passage. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. NCDOT BMP's for bridge demolition and construction as well as North Carolina standard erosion control measures will be strictly enforced throughout project construction. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Yes No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? Mitigation bank Payment to in-lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity Page 8 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 9 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: Yes No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 24.1 % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project involves replacement of existing infrastructure, and a negligible increase in impervious surface will result from this project (852 square feet). The stormwater design has been reviewed by NCDOT. Stormwater will sheet flow off the roadway to vegetated areas, which matches existing conditions. GC 3891 does not require a SMP. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Certified Local Government DWQ Stormwater Program DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply Watershed Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Coastal counties HQW ORW Session Law 2006-246 Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No Page 10 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No 1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Yes No 1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: PCE does not require Clearinghouse review. Yes No 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? Yes No 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No 2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No 3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. No wastewater will be generated by this project. Page 11 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? Yes No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? Yes No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Communication with USFWS regarding the lack of American chaffseed and rough-leaf loosestrife habitat. USFWS Website http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html, for Bladen County and North Carolina Natural Heritage Program GIS data updated July 2012, and on-site habitat review. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? EFH Mapper Website:http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index.html 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? Yes No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The project was reviewed by the NCDOT HEU for Historic and Archeological Resources, see attached HPOWEB Map Service http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/ National Register of Historic Places http://www.nps.gov/nr/research/ Project does not involve new location construction, it is a replacement of existing infrastructure. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Backwater of Cape Fear River - FEMA notification by NCDOT 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program http://www.ncfloodmaps.com/ Applicant/Agent's Printed Name _______________________________ Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Date N C 5 3 TarHeelFerry Rd B urney R d R i v e r R d BaldwinBranch Chur c h R d G r i m e s S i n g e ltary R d C r o o k e d B ay Branch H a rriso n C r e e k N C 1 3 1 N C 5 3 N C 8 7 D o w d D a i r y R d Gum S p r i n g R d O w e n H i l l R d Ce n t e r R d N C 2 4 2 C a p e F e a r R i v e r El l i s C r e e k G o o d m a n S w a m p P h i l l i p s C r e e k Bi g S w a m p Black S w a m p Bu c k B r a n c h ³Date: February 2014 3040 NC 42 West; Clayton, NC 27520 P: (919)-606-9145 F:(919)-585-5570 B-5411 Bladen County Replace Bridge No. 124 over Phillips Creek on SR 1318 (River Rd)0120.5 Miles Figure 1: Vicinity Map Project Location Bladen County, NC Tar Heel Study Area NCDOT Roads USGS Named Streams County Boundary Project Location Bladen C ounty R obeson C ounty River Rd Date: February 2014 3040 NC 42 West; Clayton, NC 27520 P: (919)-606-9145 F:(919)-585-5570 B-5411 Bladen County Replace Bridge No. 124 over Phillips Creek on SR 1318 (River Rd)05001,000 Feet Figure 2: USGS Map Study Area³ Ta r H e e l Q u a d Du b l i n Q u a d Tar Heel Quadrangle ExistingOpenOpen StructurePermanentMechanized PermanentPermanentChannelWaterWaterRestoration SiteStationSize / Type Fill InClearingPondSWImpactsConversionConversionof Stream No.(From/To)Or Additional ReasonWetlandsin WetlandsimpactsimpactsPermanentto Uplandsto WetlandsHydrology (ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(lf)(ac)(ac)(lf) 315+28 to 15+64 -L- RTRemoval of existing bridge--0.028---- 215+37 to 16+66 -L- RT 20'-1" x 12'-6" Aluminum Structural Plate Pipe Arch 0.0050.005-0.015110--30 115+15 to 17+68 -L- LT --0.086--0.0470.222- TOTALS:0.010.010.110.021100.050.2230 ATN Revised 3/31/05 3/28/2014 Bridge 124 over Phillips Ck on SR1318 (River Road) BLADEN COUNTY NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WBS - 45427.1.1 (B-5411) WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Project Tracking No.:12-01-0005 “NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 1 of 9 Aerial photograph of Bridge No. 124, illustrating the project APE. Project Tracking No.:12-01-0005 “NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 2 of 9 Photograph of ROW south of SR 1318 facing west (towards Bridge No. 124). Photograph of early 20th-century farmstead and ROW north of SR 1318 and east of Bridge No. 124 (facing north). Project Tracking No.:12-01-0005 “NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 3 of 9 Photograph of SR 1318 facing east towards Bridge No. 124. Photograph of the western edge of Johnson’s Millpond north of SR 1318 (facing north). Project Tracking No.:12-01-0005 “NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 4 of 9 Photograph of Johnson’s Millpond north of SR 1318 (facing northeast). Photograph of spillway south of SR 1318 (facing east). Project Tracking No.:12-01-0005 “NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 5 of 9 Photograph of concrete foundation and turbine bays south of SR 1318 (facing north). Photograph of sluice pipe and turbine bay at 31BL163**. Project Tracking No.:12-01-0005 “NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 6 of 9 Sluice gates, mill dam, and millpond on May 25, 2012 (facing west). Sluice gates, mill dam, and millpond on September 27, 2012 (facing west). Project Tracking No.:12-01-0005 “NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 7 of 9 Western sluice gate on May 25, 2012 (facing northwest). Sluice gates on September 27, 2012 (facing west). Project Tracking No.:12-01-0005 “NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 8 of 9 Eastern sluice gate on May 25, 2012 (facing north). Remains of previous bridge supports in spillway at Bridge No. 124 (facing southeast). Map Unit Legend Bladen County, North Carolina (NC017) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI AaA Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 3.6 14.6% Ch Chewacla and Chastain soils, frequently flooded 4.6 18.3% LaB Lakeland sand, 1 to 7 percent slopes 6.8 27.2% Ro Roanoke loam 3.2 12.7% WgB Wakulla sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes 5.7 22.8% WmB Wickham fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes 1.1 4.5% Totals for Area of Interest 24.9 100.0% Soil Map–Bladen County, North Carolina Bridge No. 124 on SR 1318 Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/20/2012 Page 3 of 3 Project Tracking No.:12-01-0005 “NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 9 of 9 Detail of the 1885 map of Bladen County with the possible location of 31BL163** circled in red. River R d LaB Ch WgB Ro AaA WmB 705600 705600 705650 705650 705700 705700 705750 705750 705800 705800 705850 705850 705900 705900 705950 705950 706000 706000 38 4 6 2 5 0 38 4 6 2 5 0 38 4 6 3 0 0 38 4 6 3 0 0 38 4 6 3 5 0 38 4 6 3 5 0 38 4 6 4 0 0 38 4 6 4 0 0 38 4 6 4 5 0 38 4 6 4 5 0 38 4 6 5 0 0 38 4 6 5 0 0 38 4 6 5 5 0 38 4 6 5 5 0 0200400600100 Feet 06012018030 Meters± 34° 44' 25'' 78 ° 4 4 ' 5 7 ' ' 34° 44' 14'' 78 ° 4 4 ' 5 8 ' ' 34° 44' 15'' 34° 44' 25'' 78 ° 4 5 ' 1 7 ' ' 78 ° 4 5 ' 1 6 ' ' Map Scale: 1:2,310 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map—Bladen County, North Carolina (Bridge No. 124 on SR 1318) Natural ResourcesNatural ResourcesNatural ResourcesNatural Resources Conservation ServiceConservation ServiceConservation ServiceConservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/20/2012 Page 1 of 3 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Units Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Gully Short Steep Slope Other Political Features Cities Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Map Scale: 1:2,310 if printed on A size (8.5" × 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Bladen County, North Carolina Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 14, 2012 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 6/21/2006; 6/22/2006 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map–Bladen County, North Carolina (Bridge No. 124 on SR 1318) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/20/2012 Page 2 of 3 RA L - W S 0 3 3 , 4 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 , P : \ 20 1 3 \ 1 3 1 0 0 . 0 1 B - 5 4 1 1 \ R o a d w a y \ X s c \ E a r t h w o r k X S C V o l u m e S u m m a r y . x l s PROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.B-5411X-1A NO T E : E M B A N K M E N T C O L U M N I N C L U D E S B A C K F I L L F O R U N D E R C U T St a t i o n U n c l . E x c . Em b t El (c u . y d . ) (c u . y d . ) 13 + 8 5 . 0 0 0 0 14 + 0 0 . 0 0 12 1 14 + 3 5 . 0 0 28 2 14 + 5 5 . 1 9 16 1 15 + 0 0 . 0 0 32 6 15 + 5 0 . 0 0 16 78 9 16 + 0 0 . 0 0 3 11 1 6 16 + 2 5 . 1 2 4 37 2 16 + 5 0 . 0 0 6 38 1 17 + 0 0 . 0 0 17 47 3 17 + 5 0 . 0 0 20 12 8 18 + 0 0 . 0 0 25 15 18 + 5 0 . 0 0 27 5 19 + 0 0 . 0 0 29 2 19 + 3 5 . 0 0 25 1 19 + 5 0 . 0 0 12 0 19 + 8 5 . 0 0 27 0 CR O S S - S E C T I O N S U M M A R Y ST A T E O F N O R T H C A R O L I N A DI V I S I O N O F H I G H W A Y S C' � o �? � � o Slteo .3 �lt�'� � �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER (POND)-FILL IN OPEN WATER DENOTES RESTORED STREAM HYDROLOGY * * ■ * DENOTES MECHANIZED � �` �'� • " � CLEARING �DENOTES OPEN WATER CONVERSION TO UPLANDS DENOTES OPEN �r�TF�� CONVERSION T ,F F r�r_,r�ir,-rc� �TI I