NC0037508_Inspection_20220407

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Stephen Glenn Morgan
Moore County
425 Edward Rd
Star, NC 27356
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 7th, 2022
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection Report
Moore County WPCF
NPDES WW Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County
Dear Permittee:
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted an inspection of the Moore County WPCF on
2/15/2022. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with the
conditions and limitations specified in NPDES WW Permit No. NC0037508. The findings and comments
noted during this inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the inspection report entitled
"Compliance Inspection Report".
There were no significant issues or findings noted during the inspection and therefore, a response to this
inspection report is not required.
Inspection Summary
The Moore Co. WPCF is a 10MGD, grade 4 facility. The facility's grounds and laboratory were well -
maintained. Stephen Morgan and Connie Flowers accompanied DEQ staff during the inspection. Records
were available for review and were found to be accurate. The facility submitted a permit renewal
application on 3/29/2021. We note that staff make a copy of each newly completed page of the ORC log
on a monthly basis. A bound book is another option for a ORC log. Back-up ORC Jeremy Monroe will be
removed and replaced with James Newman (Grade 4 WW). DMRs for Aug. and Feb. 2021 were
reviewed. Reports were free of errors and records were complete. The facility contracts with Meritech
Labs but will switch to Environment One in June.
Three out of four influent pumps are operational. One pump is currently being repaired. Headworks
alarm testing records are stored in the ORC's office. The facility has three back-up generators. Testing is
conducted regularly. Records are stored in the ORC's office. Influent sampling occurs for process control
D_E
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office 1225 Green Street. Suite 714 I Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
910.433.3300

only and is time -based. Copious biofilm was observed in the sampler tubing. The temperature inside the
refrigerated sampler cabinet at the influent and effluent was approximately 0°C. Contents of the debris
dumpster are disposed of once per day. Grit dumpsters are emptied every 1-2 days.
One primary clarifier was out of service for the season. Sludge blanket was approximately 1 ft. Sludge
blanket was approximately 4 in. in the secondary and tertiary clarifier. DO levels in both aeration basins
averaged —2.0 mg/I. Lime slurry is added to the second stage basin to adjust pH. One chamber in the
second stage basin was offline for valve replacement. Flow meters are calibrated twice annually. The
last calibration occurred on 8/4/21 and is scheduled for 2/16/22. There are six total sand filters. One
filter was down for media replacement at the time of the inspection. Transmittance in the UV
disinfection array was —65%. Replacement bulbs are kept in a secure storage shed next to the UV
array.
Sludge is hauled to the Anson Co. landfill. Drying beds are only used in emergencies.
Samples for permit compliance were collected at Outfall 001 from Moore Co. WPCF's 24-hour composite
equipment on February 15th, 2022. Parameters sampled were BOD, TSS, fecal coliform, and nutrients
(ammonia, NO2/NO3, TKN, and TP). These samples were submitted to the Division of Water Resources
Laboratory in Raleigh, NC.
Table 1. Laboratory results from compliance inspection testing on February 15th, 2022.
Parameter
BOD1
TSS4
Feca 12
Ammonia
NO2+N033
Total Phosphorus3
Result
3.1
6.25
6
0.02
12
2.4
Unit
mg/I
mg/I
CFU/100m1
mg/1 as N
mg/1 as N
mg/I as P
1 The glucose/glutamic acid standard exceeded the range of 198 ± 30.5 mg/I.
2 Sample exceeded holding time prior to receipt at lab.
3 Elevated PQL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution
4 Indicates that the analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the reported practical quantitation limit.
D_E
o.00nmom a en.ironmenaioWu�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quaky Division of Water Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office 1225 Green Street. Suite 714 I Fayetteville, North Caroiirta 28301
910.433.3300

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Stephanie Zorio with the Water
Quality Regional Operations Section in the Fayetteville Regional Office at 910-433-3300 or via email at
[e-mail].
Cc: Laser the
Sincerely,
r—DocuSigned by:
`—A99704FAED5D494...
Dr. Stephanie D. Zorio, Environmental Specialist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Fayetteville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
D_E
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office 1225 Green Street. Suite 714 I Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
910.433.3300

AC94437 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section Laboratory Results
Loc. Descr.: MOORE COUNTY WPCF
County: Moore Collector: S ZORIO VisitlD
Region: Fayetteville Report To FRO Location ID: NC0037508
River Basin LUM Collect Date: 02/15/2022 Priority COMPLIANCE
Emergency Collect Time: 13:34 Sample Matrix: WASTEWATER
COC Yes/No Sample Depth Loc. Type: Effluent
Final Report
If this report is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated.
CAS # Analyte Name
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
Result/
PQL Qualifier
LAB
0.4
Sample ID: AC94437
PO Number #
Date Received: 02/16/2022
Time Received: 08_30
Labworks LoginlD TASCENZO1
Delivery Method NC Courier
Final Report Date: 4/7/22
Report Print Date: 04/07/2022
Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
Units
oC
Method Analysis
Reference Date Validated by
2/16/22 MSWIFT
BOD, 5-Day in liquid
MIC
2.0 3.1 G5 mg/L SM 5210 B-2001 2/17/22 ESTAFFORD1
Coliform, MF Fecal in liquid
1 6 Q1
CFU/100m1 SM 9222 D-1997 2/16/22 JJURGEVICH
7664-41-7
NH3 as N in liquid
NUT
0.02 0.02 mg/L as N
EPA350.1 REV 2 2/18/22 ALWILLIAMS
E701177
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid
0.5 12 P mg/L as N
EPA 353.2 REV 2 2/18/22 ALWILLIAMS
7723-14-0
Phosphorus_total as P in liquid
0.10 2.4 P mg/Las P
EPA365.1 REV 2 3/3/22 ALWILLIAMS
TKN_N
Total Kjeldahl N as N in liquid
0.3 1.0 mg/L as N
EPA 351.2 REV 2 3/2/22 ALWILLIAMS
Residue_Suspended in liquid
WET
6.25 6.25 U,Y mg/L SM 2540 D-2015 2/22/22 ALWILLIAMS
WSS Chemistry Laboratory» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
"Not Detected" or "U" does not indicate the sample is analyte free but that the analyte is not detected at or above the PQL.
Page 1 of 3

NC DWX Laboratory Section R.esuCts/Samp[e Comments/Qualifier Definitions
Sample ID: AC94437
CAS # Analyte Name
PQL
Result/
Qualifier
Units
Method
Reference
Analysis
Date
Validated by
Sample Comments
MIC:Fecal Coliform-Q1-Sample exceeded holding time prior to receipt at lab.
MIC:BOD-G5-GGA standard exceeded the range of 198+/-30.5 mg/L.
NCDEQ-WSS-Chemistry Lab Data Qualifiers
Al The reported value is an average, where at least one result is qualified with a "U". The PQL is used for the qualified result(S) to cal
B1 Coliform-Countable membranes with less than 20 colonies. Reported value is estimated or is a total of the counts on all filters repor
B2 Coliform-Counts from all filters were zero. The value reported is based on the number of colonies per 100 ml that would have been
B3 Coliform-Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies. The value reported is calculated using the count from the smalle
B4 Coliform-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and <20. Reported value is estimated or is a total of the counts on all filters reported
B5 Coliform-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC). TNTC is generally defined as >150 colonies.
B6 Coliform-Estimated Value. Blank contamination evident.
B7 Coliform-Many non-coliform or non-enterococcus colonies or interfering non-coliform or non-enterococcus growth present. In this cc
BB1 MPN-No wells or tubes gave a positive reaction. Value based upon the appropriate MPN Index and reported as a less than "<" valu
BB2 MPN-All wells or tubes gave positive reactions. Value based upon the MPN Index and reported as a greater than ">" value.
C Total residual chlorine was present in sample upon receipt in the laboratory; value is estimated.
G1 BOD-The dissolved oxygen (DO) depletion of the dilution water blank exceeded 0.2 mg/L.
G2 BOD-The bacterial seed controls did not meet the requirement of a DO depletion of at least 2.0 mg/L and/or a DO residual of at lea:
G3 BOD-No sample dilution met the requirement of a DO depletion of at least 2.0 mg/L and/or a DO residual of at least 1.0 mg/L.
G4 BOD-Evidence of toxicity. This is generally characterized by a significant increase in the BOD value as the sample concentration de
G5 BOD-The glucose/ glutamic acid standard exceeded the range of 198 ± 30.5 mg/L.
G7 BOD-Less than 1 mg/L DO remained for all dilutions set. The reported value is an estimated greater than value and is calculated foi
G8 BOD-Oxygen usage is less than 2 mg/L for all dilutions set. The reported value is an estimated less than value and is calculated for
G9 BOD-The DO depletion of the dilution water blank produced a negative value.
J1 Surrogate recovery limits have been exceeded.
J10 Unidentified peak; estimated value.
J11 The reported value is determined by a one -point estimation rather than against a regression equation. The estimated concentration
WSS Chemistry Laboratory» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
"Not Detected" or "U" does not indicate the sample is analyte free but that the analyte is not detected at or above the PQL.
Page 2 of 3

NC DWX Laboratory Section R.esuCts/Samp[e Comments/Qualifier Definitions
Sample ID: AC94437
CAS # Analyte Name
PQL
Result/
Qualifier
Units
Method
Reference
Analysis
Date
Validated by
J12 The calibration verification did not meet the calibration acceptance criterion for field parameters.
J2 The reported value failed to meet the established quality control criteria for either precision or accuracy.
J3 The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination.
J4 The data is questionable because of improper laboratory or field protocols (e.g., composite sample was collected instead of grab, p
J5 Temperature limits exceeded (samples frozen or >6°C) during transport or not verifiable (e.g., no temperature blank provided): non-
J6 The laboratory analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample. The data may not be accurate.
J7 This qualifier is used to identify analyte concentration exceeding the upper calibration range of the analytical instrument/method. Th
J8 Temperature limits exceeded (samples frozen or >6°C) during storage, the data may not be accurate.
J9 The reported value is determined by a one -point estimation rather than against a regression equation. The estimated concentration
M Sample and duplicate results are out of control". The sample is non -homogenous (e.g., VOA soil). The reported value is the lower
N1 Presumptive evidence and estimated value. The component has been tentatively identified base on mass spectral library.
N2 There is an indication that the analyte is present, but quality control requirements for confirmation were not met (i.e., presence of
N3 This code shall be used if the level is too low to permit accurate quantification, but the estimated concentration is less than the labo
N4 This code shall be used if the level is too low to permit accurate quantification, but the estimated concentration is less than the labo
N5 The component has been tentatively identified based on a retention time standard.
P Elevated PQL` due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution.
Q1 Holding time exceeded prior to receipt by lab.
Q2 Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab.
S Not enough sample provided to prepare and/or analyze a method -required matrix spike (MS) and/or matrix spike duplicate (MSD).
U Indicates that the analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the reported practical quantitation limit*. The number value repo
U, J6 The laboratory analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample. The data may not be accurate.
UU Indicates that the analyte was not detected by a screen analysis. The number value was determined by a one -point estimation at tf
✓ Indicates the analyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Note: The value in the blank shall not be s
X1 Sample not screened for this compound.
X2 Sampled, but analysis lost or not performed -field error.
X3 Sampled, but analysis lost or not performed -lab error.
Y Elevated PQL* due to insufficient sample size.
Z1 Inability to analyze the sample.
Z2 Questions concerning data reliability.
WSS Chemistry Laboratory» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
"Not Detected" or "U" does not indicate the sample is analyte free but that the analyte is not detected at or above the PQL.
Page 3 of 3

Regional Inspectors' Checklist for Field Parameters
[This checklist is to be completed during regional plant inspections for Field Laboratories, denoted by certification numbers in the 5000s.]
Facility Name: Moore Co. WPCF
Regional Plant Inspector: Stephanie Zorio
Permit #: NC0037508
Regional Inspector Contact #: 919-368-6077
Field Lab Certification #: 134
Region:FRO
Lab Contact: Connie Flowers
Date: 2/15/2022
I. Check the parameter(s) performed at this site for reporting purposes.
❑ Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) ® Temperature (TEMP) ❑ Specific Conductance (SC)
❑ pH ® Dissolved Oxygen (DO) ❑ Settleable Residue (SETT)
II.
General Laboratory (note any exceptions in section XI)
Are instruments, meters, probes, photometric cells, etc. maintained in good condition?
1/ Yes ❑ No
Are standards, reagents and consumables used within manufacturer expiration dates?
[TRC gel standard is exempt.]
I Yes
❑ No
Are the following items documented (J where applicable):
Item
TRC
pH
TEMP
DO
SC
SETT
Date of sample collection*
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
Time of sample collection*
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
Sample collector's initials or signature
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
Date of sample analysis*
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
Time of sample analysis*
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
Analyst initials or signature
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
Sample site (i.e., facility name, location, ID, etc.)
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
Instrument ID
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
Parameter
N/A
X
X
X
X
N/A
Data qualifiers, when required
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
*Date and time of sample collection and analysis may be the same for in situ or on -site measurements.
III. Total Residual Chlorine — reference method:
N/A
Total Residual Chlorine meter make and model:
Is a check standard analyzed each day of use? (Circle one: gel or liquid standard)
❑ Yes
No
Does the check standard recover within ±10% of the known value?
❑ Yes
No
What is the assigned/observed value of the daily check standard?
Is a 5-standard calibration verification performed? Note date of last verification:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Alternatively, does the lab construct a linear regression, using 5 standards, to calculate
results? Note date of last calibration curve constructed:
❑ Yes
❑ No
True values: ❑ pg/L ❑ mg/L
Obtained values: ❑ pg/L ❑ mg/L
What program are samples analyzed on?
Are results reported in proper units? Check one: ❑ pg/L ❑ mg/L
❑ Yes
❑ No
Are results reported between the facility's permit limit and the compliance limit of 50 pg/L?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Are results less than the low standard reported as "<x", where x=low standard conc.?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Is DPD/buffer added within 15 minutes of collection?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Is a post -analysis check standard analyzed if samples are analyzed at multiple sites?
❑ Yes
❑ No
IV. pH — reference method:
pH meter manufacturer and model: Orion Star A111
Is the pH meter calibrated with at least 2 buffers per mfg's instructions each day of use?
Note buffers used: 4, 7, 10
❑ No
y Yes
Is the pH meter calibration checked with an additional buffer prior to sample analysis?
Note check buffer used: 7
❑ No
y Yes
Does the check buffer read within ±0.1 S.U. of the known value?
Yes
❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration?
I1 Yes
❑ No
Check buffer reading(s)?
I1 Yes
❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection?
i1 Yes
❑ No

Are sample results reported to 0.1 pH units on the eDMR?
1/ Yes
❑ No
Is a post -analysis check buffer analyzed if samples are analyzed at multiple sites? N/A
❑ Yes
❑ No
V. Temperature — reference method:
What
//
instrument(s) is used to measure
DO meter ❑ Conductivity meter
temperature? Check all that apply: n pH meter
Digital thermometer ❑ Glass thermometer
Is the instrument/thermometer calibration checked at least annually against a NIST
traceable thermometer? *See comment
►1 Yes ❑ No
Is NIST traceability documentation maintained on site?
/1
Yes ❑ No
Are samples measured within 15 minutes?
a
Yes ❑ No
Are sample results reported in degrees C?
L
Yes ❑ No
VI. Dissolved Oxygen — reference method:
DO meter make and model: YSI Pro 20 (2 meters)
Is the air calibration of the DO meter performed each day of use?
L Yes ❑ No
Is meter calibration documented?
L Yes ❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection?
/1 Yes No
Are results reported in mg/L?
/1 Yes ❑ No
If samples are analyzed at multiple sites, is the meter recalibrated at each site or a post-
analysis calibration verification performed? N/A
Yes No
Does the post -analysis verification theoretical value agree within 0.5 mg/L of the meter
calibration reading?
Yes No
VII. Conductivity — reference method:
Conductivity meter make and model: Orion Model 150
Is the meter calibrated daily according to the manufacturer's instructions? Note standard
used (this is generally a one -point calibration):
I Yes No
Is a daily check standard analyzed? Note value: 1413
I Yes
No
Is meter calibration documented?
I Yes
No
Are samples analyzed within 28 days of collection?
I Yes
No
Is a post -analysis check standard analyzed if multiple samples are analyzed? N/A
Are results reported in pmhos/cm (some meters display equivalent pS/cm units)?
I Yes No
VIII. Settleable Residue — reference method:
N/A
Does the laboratory have an Imhoff Cone in good condition?
❑ Yes
No
Is the sample settled for 1 hour?
❑ Yes
No
Is the sample agitated after 45 minutes?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Volume of sample analyzed? Note volume analyzed (must use 1 L):
❑ Yes ❑ No
Date and time of sample analysis (settling start time)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Time of agitation after 45 minutes of settling?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Sample analysis completion (settling end time)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 48 hours of collection?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Are results reported in ml/L?
❑ Yes ❑ No
IX. Was a paper trail (comparing contract lab and on -site data to DMRs)
performed? If so, list months reviewed:
❑ Yes ❑ No
X. Is follow-up by the Laboratory Certification program recommended?
❑ Yes ❑ No
XI. Additional comments: The facility uses NIST digital thermometers and calibrates quarterly.
Please submit a copy of this completed form to the Laboratory Certification program at:
DWR Lab Certification, Water Sciences Section, 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC, 27699-1623
Electronic copies may be emailed to [e-mail].
Revision 3/2021