20060711 Ver 1_Individual_20060425

Office Use Only: 2 ~~ (~ o ~ ®rs l n ~ ay1002
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I.
II.
Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
^ Section 404 Permit ^
^ Section 10 Permit ^
^ 401 Water Quality Certification

Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: I W ~ P f o o ~ o~
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: (~f
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^(~ nom]
Applicant Information ~ ~ ~ L5 LI 4/
1. Owner/Applicant Information APR 1. 3 2006
Name: I-4o i_~~r Qo~ ~ T t LL C,
Mailing Address: IoW1Z y-iaDs~G ~,.~Ur~n T~i~. 114ETLAI~.SMIDSTORMWATERaRANGti
IZ ~ t~E i 4 al ~ 1.1 c, Z'1 lv i 3
Telephone Number: 9 i ~ • 255 - ~~c~ Z. Fax Number: ~ i y - ~, c s ~-- i ~ q -{
E-mail Address:
2. AgentlConsultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: iz w ~+ ~ M ~ ~-~-~
Company Affiliation: TN a r-t p s~ ~.1 ;~ ~~~~c-+.~-r€ s
Mailing Address: i s~ 1-1ou...r sacz,lc~s t2c,~~
Telephone Number: ~t~~ 5"71- o~~a g Fax Number: ~ i.Ct _ S ~"t - c~ f'~t
E-mail Address: m•11~r. P~ ~ ~~~-F4.1:~-~- n-~-{. ;-~,
,~-
A ' ' ' T~ t
y~
_':
.~ €;~ ~ ,~
Page 5 of 12 j
F''.~ ~:.~,'
~a~~~~r ,
~~t
;. ,.
---- -- - ~%V(,H

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name ofproject: ~-1 ~~i`~ i'p4a-te: - PN Amt l ~ ~-
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): C3(v3 ~ ~~ ~ LZ Scj
4. Location
County: ~~~E Nearest Town: Flo ~~~( SP~~.-l4s
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): 1-~ ~1.c_:r Po ~ ~ t t- PN a ~~ 1 ~ ~
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
~,Ag"-( Air-lLi ~VE~'= ~ER-~~ RaAC~ (5R iil~~
RO --t i r~ ~ ~ a F AJ E. r~ t `= E~ InciD ~~ t~ ~'~ b `(~'A s 5
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): t~ 3 5 - 37 ' 5 ~} t,J "~ ~ - Si - 21
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): ~ ~. 7 ~ .4~
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): 1-~ a ~rz- s L,A kE
8. River Basin: ~ APB ~E.<le-
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of thiAAS application: ~C~~~ ~sTE. W STN ~YYP~R-~~•1~i
TnUO - ~1~rhLe~.7 -( L,A.» ~~~F]Z- A~•t~.uPKt~ -C L2-E'~•0~1~p~
Page 6 of 12

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
ec A D c~ ~f ~ V T~ t~ ~Z ~. , ~ S~ au,~-t ov ~ Gdy = pa-t ~ ~
T 3 c. v sc~
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:_.~~~~~Y 5~ E~
~ T F a ~l ~ ~ 5~-P.~J . ~~ ~
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. ~ ~ Q
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: `T'E-~Pc~-s~ 2Y r, ~-tQ~ c'r 5
`Ty ~ 't2.CA K W ti ~ ~ Spa ~L t ?s~2Y ~~>~ GQ~ ~ ~ :..l ~s
2. Individually list wetland impacts below: t,~, ~ ~
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact sepazately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Yeaz floodplains aze identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Cazolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: D • ~ Z- A ~
Total area of wetland impact proposed: a
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below: ,~ - ~°""L
~ ~ ~P,a
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet Before Im act (leases eci )
'TEMPor~a~
-~~ .a~
35.1 3
ti.l~aE
5~ zZ `
Ptrz~a ~~,r.~..
2 ~ ., -a O.ll rio.ler 5.~(0~ ~~
TE-tpvr-++¢-Y
Ili-3'
~odt.
(o.ZG~
..
'' ~~ )6 Sfr ~1c,~~. ~.~~~ .
5 ~~ ~~ 15.o"T vc U E a ~o, .,

* List each impact sepazately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the lineaz footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several Internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.). ~~ ~ o v E 'S , 7 7.
~ l ~ 7S
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 1 `f-'3 . (.(© ~G
Page 8 of 12

4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: ~~A
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on ma)
T e of Im act*
~ p Area of
Im act
p
(acres)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
ba ,ocean, etc.)

" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation ~ ~/k
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
E?~TEr~S- Oal D ` .SA t1 ~'t/~t?~( Sc1J c'~
Do~1~ a~,t,. r3 E~ti~ ~.~ ~aa_v.r ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~--
VIII. Mitigation ~'~
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state. nc. us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ^ No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) -~ f ~
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ^ No ~ If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Gone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I .
Page 11 of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
-rOw.i CF -aoi.,r~.{ SPA-•~14~ Sd-~+EJL
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No ~,
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application?
Yes ^ No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
- choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
pplicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page l2 of 12

L

• Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com .
December 3, 2004
S&EC Project No.: 9214.W2
Holly Pointe, LLC
Attn: Lance Williams
10612 Winding Wood Trail
Raleigh, NC 27613
~,~, ~~
~~~'~ ~~
~~~.
~,, - ~~
1?';

Q~c~@od~~
APR 1 3 2006
DENR - WATER QUALITI'
YVETLNrD3 AND ST(1FtMWATER BRANCH
Re: Detailed Wetlands Delineation and Town of Holly Springs /Proposed Cape Fear River
Buffer Evaluation, Holly Pointe Phase II (+/-50 acres),
Holly Springs, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Williams:
On December 1, 2004, S&EC personnel completed a detailed wetland delineation and Holly
Springs /Proposed Cape Fear River Buffer evaluation on the Holly Pointe Phase II site. The site
is located on the north side of Avent Ferry Road (SR 1115) approximately 4000 feet east of its
crossing with Norris Branch iri Holly Springs, North Carolina. The site is approximately 50 acres
in size. Figure 1 shows the location of the site on a USGS topographic quadrangle.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We have determined that wetlands and a jurisdictional stream exist on the site. A US Army
Corps of Engineers (USAGE; Ms. Jennifer Burdette) and Town of Holly Springs (Ms. Heather
Keefer) site meeting was held on December 2, 2004 to verify our wetland delineation, to make
"importance" stream calls, and to determine features subject to Holly Springs Riparian Buffers.
The attached wetland sketch map depicts the approximate location of wetlands and jurisdictional
waters identified on the site. Please refer to the sketch map and the results and recommendations
section below for more detailed information.
SCOPE OF WORK
The detailed wetland delineation consisted of pedestrian reconnaissance of the property to
examine the soils, vegetation, and hydrology for the presence of areas that meet the criteria for
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Far• (7(1417?.(1-94(lfi
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

December 2, 2004
S&EC Project #: 9214.W2
Page 2 of 5
jurisdictional wetlands by the procedures described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual (January 1987 -Final Report). Areas on the site with positive indicators of
hydric soils and evidence of wetland hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation were flagged with
sequentially numbered, pink S&EC logo flagging. Proof of wetland hydrology would be the
existence of hydric soils with oxidized root channels in the upper 12 inches of the "A" horizon,
water borne deposits, drift lines, scour marks, drainage patterns, regional indicators of soil
saturation, etc. Surface waters such as intermittent and perennial stream channels, ponds, and
lakes, which aze also subject to regulation by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) as
waters of the US, were also identified: These surface waters may also be referred to as
jurisdictional waters to indicate that they are within the jurisdiction of the USAGE. It is
important to note that wetlands are also classified as waters of the US and regulated by the
USAGE..
The Proposed Cape Fear River Basin• Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strate~y:
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas with Existing Forest Vetietation rules will apply to
50-foot wide riparian buffers directly adjacent to surface waters in the Cape Feaz River Basin
(intermittent streams, perennial streams, lakes, ponds, and. estuaries), excluding wetlands. The
rule will define surface waters as features approximately shown on either the most recent version
of the soil survey map prepazed by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) of the US
Department of Agriculture (USDA) or the 7.5-minute quadrangle topographic maps prepared by
the US Geologic Survey (USGS). Surface waters that appear on these maps will not be subject
only if an on-site determination by the NC Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) shows that
they fall into one of the following categories:
1) Ditches and manmade conveyances other than modified natural streams;
2) Manmade ponds and lakes that are located outside natural drainage ways; or
3) Ephemeral (stormwater) streams.
S&EC's Chatham County Riparian Buffers Evaluation and Proposed Cape Fear River buffer
evaluation consisted of examining each feature on the site that is shown on the most recent
version of the pertinent topographic map or soil survey for applicability to the Cape Fear River
Basin riparian buffer rule using NC-DWQ stream evaluation techniques. Figure 2 shows the
location of the site on the relevant Wake County Soil Survey map.
Holly Springs Buffer Rules
According to the Holly Springs Buffer Rules (Cape Feaz Basin Riparian Buffer Protection: 7.06-
24), thirty-foot (30') riparian buffers will be placed on each side of all intermittent and perennial
streams, ponds, lakes, and other bodies of water that are shown on the most recent version of the
relevant USGS topographic quadrangle and/or Wake County Soil Survey. When conflicts occur
between field conditions and the depiction on the USGS or Soil Survey maps, documentation
must be submitted for staff consideration.

December 2, 2004
S&EC Project #: 9214.W2
Page 3 of 5
RESULTS & RECOMMENDATIONS
Wetlands and Jurisdictional Waters:
We have determined that wetlands and jurisdictional waters (i.e., a perennial stream) exist on the
site. The wetland sketch map depicts the approximate location of wetlands and jurisdictional
waters identified within the evaluated area.
Jurisdictional waters on-site include feature A, a perennial stream, that flows throughout the
north-central portion of the site. This stream was deemed "important" by Ms. Jennifer Burdette
of the USACE. All other features (including the pond on property) depicted on the relevant
USGS and Soil Survey maps were deemed non jurisdictional.
The only jurisdictional wetland on-site includes a bottomland hardwood forest wetland occurring
along the floodplain of feature A (flags O 1 to 11 A & l OB). The NC-DENR's "Classifications
and Water Quality Standards Applicable to Surface Water and Wetlands of North Carolina"
classified surface waters on-site as C.
All S&EC flags comprising the wetland and jurisdictional waters delineation should be
surveyed and a Wetland Delineation Map generated for use in USACE approval and
permitting. All jurisdictional channels should be surveyed at the bank and their widths
recorded. The Wetland Delineation Map should include all of the information listed on the
attached'Requirements for Wetland Delineation Maps'. S&EC delineation flag numbers
should be shown on the wetland survey.
Town of Holly Springs /Proposed Cape Fear River Buffers:
The surface waters (i.e., intermittent streams, perennial streams, ponds) that could be potentially
subject to the Town of Holly Springs /Proposed 50-foot Cape Fear River Buffers include
features A through G. No other surface waters are indicated on either the USGS topographic or
Wake County Soil Survey maps. The only surface water that S&EC actually believes would be
subject to the Holly Springs /Proposed Cape Fear River buffers consist of feature A (throughout
its extent along the north-central portion of the site). Ms. Heather Keefer of the Town of Holly
Springs verified this determination.
REGULATIONS
Regulations that apply to jurisdictional wetlands and waters present on the site are discussed below.
ProQosed Caere Fear River Buffer Rules
It was decided by the Environmental Management Commission that temporary Cape Fear River Basin Rules would
not be enacted prior to adopting permanent rules. A specific date has not been set as to when the permanent Cape

December 2, 2004
S&EC Project #: 9214.W2
Page 4 of 5
Fear Buffer Rules will be enacted. It is important to note that the decision to not adopt temporary rules can be
changed at any time. The buffer rules will protect up to 50 feet from the edge of existing "surface waters" (i.e.,
intermittent streams, perennial streams, ponds, lakes and estuaries) found within the Cape Fear River Basin. The 50-
foot buffer consists of two zones. The~first zone is measured 30 feet landward from the top bank of streams and is
intended to contain an undisturbed forested area. The second zone extends 20 feet landward from the edge of the
first zone and is intended to contain a vegetated buffer. Grading with re-vegetating is pernussible in Zone 2 (the
outer 20 feet of the 50 foot buffer). Mitigation for road crossings is mandatory for impacts greater than 150 feet in
width and utility lines running parallel and within Zone 1. Please call if you would like to discuss the
uses/allowances within buffered areas. In order for a project not to be subject to these buffer rules, an
approved site specific plan for proposed impacts to wetlands and other waters of the US would have to be
obtained from the USACE and the DWQ prior to enactment of the rules.
Wetland Permitting
Wetland impact permits are issued on aper-project basis as determined by the USACE. The USACE has determined
that impacts on parcels sub-divided from larger tracts are sometimes considered to be cumulative to existing impacts
for the large tract. If this is the case, then thresholds as discussed below may not apply and impacts to wetlands must
be considered in light of existing permits.
Preconstruction notification to the USACE and the NC-DWQ is not required for wetland impacts that meet the
general conditions of Nationwide Permit 39 and that impact less than 1/10 acre per project. Preconstruction
notification and approval by the USACE is required for wetland impacts that exceed 1/10 of an acre and /or an
stream channel impacts. Preconstruction notification and approval by the NC-DWQ is required for wetland
impacts that exceed 1/10 of an acre if the property is west of I-95 or 1/3 of an acre if the project is east of I-95.
Preconstruction notification and approval by the NC-DWQ is required for ~ stream channel impacts
within buffered basins (i.e. the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Randleman, and portions of the Catawba Basins) or for
cumulative stream impacts that exceed 150 linear feet in non-buffered basins. If development impacts exceed
the thresholds for notification and proposed impervious area for the project exceeds 30%, then stormwater treatment
to meet the pollutant removal design standard of 85% removal of total suspended solids (i.e., wet detention basins,
stormwater wetlands, bioretention areas, etc.) will likely be required by the NC-DWQ. The maximum permanent
impact allowed per project under the nationwide pernuts is 1/2 acre of wetland and/or 300 linear feet of USACE
important stream channel. Nationwide Permit 391imits above-grade fills within 100-year floodplains specifically
prohibiting above-grade fill within the floodway. Additionally, Nationwide Permit 39 limits stream channelization
and relocation to streams with an average annual flow of less than lcfs.
Per project impacts to vegetated wetlands in excess of 1 acre or impacts to streams that contain "significant aquatic
function" in excess of 1501inear feet will most likely require mitigation by the NC-DWQ. The USACE may require
mitigation for any wetland/jurisdictional waters impacts. Actual mitigation requirements are typically determined on
a case-by-case basis. Wetland mitigation is a complex process that requires planning and monitoring. S&EC will
discuss mitigation issues with you if we believe your project may require mitigation.
Impacts to channels containing "significant aquatic function" in excess of the notification thresholds may require
mitigation. Channel mitigation is typically intended to replace lost significant aquatic functions and values.
Relocating channels is considered to be an adverse impact and typically results in mitigation within the new channel.
Therefore, this type of mitigation usually requires that meanders be created within constructed channels. Side-slopes
and beds be vegetated; riprap is discouraged.
A complete NC-DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification application for a Nationwide Permit has a maximum 60-day
processing period. A complete USACE Nationwide Permit application has a 45-day processing period, while
Individual Permit applications submitted to the USACE have no maximum processing periods. The USACE
requires that all impacts to wetlands or Waters of the US, less than 1/10 acre, be reported to the USACE
within 30 days of the completion of construction:

December 2, 2004
S&EC Project #: 9214.W2
Page 5 of 5
Nationwide Permits can potentially be utilized if the project is designed to impact up to 1/2 acre of jurisdictional
wetlands or waters of the US including a maximum of 3001inear feet of important stream channel impact under
NWP 39. Cumulative impacts per project over these nationwide thresholds will require an individual permit.
Individual Permits require an analysis to determine that the proposed impact is the least environmentally damaging
practical alternative, typically require compensatory mitigation, notification to adjacent property owners, a public
notice, and may require a public hearing. All impacts greater than 1/10 acre require written justification.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
If you choose to have us perform additional work, the following is a listing of additional services:
(1) Notification to the USACE and NC-DWQ regarding impacts to jurisdictional-areas and
riparian buffers and permitting issues, if required. This additional work can be completed at our
hourly rates or a proposal can be generated. Please advise.
Please call me if you need further explanation of the information provided..
Sincerely,
~ ~.~_
Aaron Cooper
Botanist /Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
USGS Topographic Quadrangle
Wake County Soil Survey
Wetland Sketch Map
Requirements for Wetland Delineation Maps

Project: Scale:
9214 W1 1":2000'
Project Date:
IAgr~ SC 11n4N4
Figure 1- USGS Map
New Hill, Cokesbury, Apex
& Fuquay Quadrangles
Holly Pointe Phase 2
Holly Pointe LLC
Wake County, NC
~ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
- APR 1 3 2006
DENR - WATEk gUALi'IY
WETUWDS AND STORMVYATER BRANCH

APR 1 3 2006
l7~NR - WpTEf~ G1UALl1"r.,~
Project(: swage: Figure 2-Soil Survey
9214.W1 1 :1320' ($heet 89)
Project Date: ~ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
IAgr.: SC 11f24l04 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
Holly Pointe Phase 2
Holly Pointe LLC [phone] • [phone]
Wake County, NC Web Page: Www.SandEC.com

REQUIREMENTS FOR
WETLAND DELINEATION MAPS
Revised 9/1 I/02
1. Location of each point (wetland flags & channel locations) on the map; including a tick mark, with a descriptive
number (i.e. the actual flag number as hung in the field or sequential numbers assigned by surveyor for channel
locations). These points need to be legible in order for S&EC to verify that all of our wetland flags and channel
locations were surveyed and connected properly.
2. Listing of each point's northings and eastings (NC coordinate grid) or metes and bounds. If metes and bounds are
used, wetlands must be tied to a property corner or other known point and ties shown on the map so that the
survey could be replicated in the future.
3. Closure of all wetland boundaries resulting in distinct polygons and width of channels or linear wetlands labeled
as marked on S&EC flags. Total wetland acreage should be indicated for each polygon and for the total site.
4. Property lines must be closed and entire property or parcel must be shown. Total property acreage and total
acreage of jurisdictional wetlands and waters within the evaluated areas should be listed. If any part of the
property was not evaluated, the areas should be clearly identified and labeled.
5. Maps should show as least the property and wetland lines (topo lines are optional). The map should
include a vicinity map and be prepared on:
1. Sheets no larger than 11 x 17". If multiple sheets are used, match lines must be shown and there
must be overlap, and a master map of the whole site showing the sheets matched with each other
must be included.
- or-
2. On any size sheet if a digital file is provided with the paper copy in an AutoCad 14 or earlier
version, .dxf, .dwg or Microstation compatible format.
6. All surveys must be signed and sealed by the surveyor.
Map title should be "Wetland Delineation for Project Name."
Map must have title, north arrow, and bar scale.
The following corps sign off title block should be included on the map:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as
determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from this date. This determination was made
utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual"
Name:
Title:
Date:
10. The survey should indicate that wetlands were delineated by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
Contact S&EC if any difficulties in map interpretation occur, or if these instructions are not clear.

..
{?~1~~ f f J'•
> .....
__