NC0040011_Wasteload Allocation_19920729

NPDES DOCU BENT MCANNINO COVER SHEET
NC0040011
Yanceyville WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
(\Tste1oad Allocati n
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
July 29, 1992
Thitt document iIM printed on reuse paper - igaore any
coateat on the reireriae iaide

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 29, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Lowe
PROM: Susan A. Wilson.Q
THROUGH: Ruth Swanek C-5
Carla Sanderson
SUBJECT: Town of Yanceyville WWTP
NC0040011
Nickel Limitations
In my review of the draft permit for the Town of Yanceyville WWTP, I discovered that an
error had been made with regard to the Nickel limitation for both the 0.2 MGD flow and the
0.45 MGD flow. The previous Nickel limitation was based on WS waters. Since that time
the border for the WS water was changed to be above the Yanceyville WWTP discharge (as
requested by Yanceyville, since their water supply is directly upstream of the WWTP).
The following Nickel limitations should be applied to the Yanceyville WWTP permit:
Flow Nickel Limit
(MGD) Daily Maximum
0.20
0.45
361 µg/1
239 µg/1
Technical Support respectfully requests that the limitation be changed before the permit is
issued.
cc: Steve Mauney, WSRO

Page 1
Note for Coleen Sullins
From: Don Safrit
Date: Thu, Jul 9, 1992 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: NC0040011 Yanceyville
To: Charles Lowe
Cc: Coleen Sullins
Please discuss and confirm with Coleen - my first impression is that since the limit will be
"less stringent" and an obvious error was made, I do not think another notice is required.
Thanks, Don
From: Charles Lowe on Thu, Jul 9, 1992 1:05 PM
Subject: NC0040011 Yanceyville
To: Don Safrit
Don,
Susan Wilson was reviewing the draft for Yanceyville and discovered that an error had been
made in the derivation of one of the metals limits. The limit should be "less stringent" than
originally calculated. I don't have any more details yet. The permit is scheduled to issue
8/15. Do we need to go back to notice.
•
Charles

lefl- '513
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor Preston Howard
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Acting Director
July 13, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Planning and Management
FROM: Boyd DeVanel nning Branch
SUBJECT: Town of Yanceyville WWTP
Several members of the Water Quality Staff have reviewed the Environmental Assessment for the
wastewater treatment plant for the Town of Yanceyville. Our only comments involve the wasteload
allocation and are attached to this memo. I recommend that the document be modified and resubmitted to
the Division. If the consultant has any questions, they might contact Susan Wilson at 919-733-5083 in our
central offices in Raleigh.
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/733-2314 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Pollution Prevention Pays

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 9, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: Boyd DeVane
FROM: Susan A. Wilso
lg
THROUGH: Ruth Swanek V,;
Carla Sanderson Cx
SUBJECT: Town of Yanceyville WWTP
NC0040011
Technical Support offers the following comments on the Town of Yanceyville's
environmental assessment. The limitations presented in Part IV. 2. are incorrect. Upon
expansion of the wastewater treatment plant to 0.45 MGD, the following limits should be
met
Parameter summer/winter
BOD5 (mg/1) 28/30
NH3-N 2.3/13
DO 5/5
TSS (mg/1) 30/30
Fecal coliform (/100 ml) 200/200
pH (SU) 6-9/6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1) 28/28
The Town should refer to its draft permit for detailed information on toxics limits and its
toxicity testing requirement. The metals limits are based on Yanceyville's development of a
pretreatment program. Information available to Technical Support indicates that the
pretreatment program was established based on a textile industry discharging to the plant.
This contradicts the statement in Part IV. 2. of the assessment which states that the waste
"is primarily domestic in nature ...."
The Town should be sure that the new plant is appropriately designed to meet the limits
listed above, as well as toxic limits.
cc: Steve Mauney, WSRO

1 3
�♦`/
rI�')51O011
v» f ra,'7
.. .. . . .. .. .
DEPARTMENT T•I�iI: N T OF ENV.LR(:INMEN I , FII: I'IL fH, ANT) NATURAL RESOURCES
CE S
DIVISION (;iI:: PLANNING (!I"T) ASSESSMENT
PROJECT REVIEW FORM
1TI...E -• EXPANSION OF THE Y ANC EYVTL.LE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT TO
SERVE NEW DEVELOPMENT T .... W3.L_I... EXPAND ANT) FROM 0.25 TO '`). 45hGD
(EA/FCINS a: )
'ROJEGT
NO - 92--0952
;OUNTY --- CASWELL
'ATE — 06/10/92
ESPONSE DUE DATE
DISTRIBUTION L.J:ST
WILDLIFE
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
FOREST RESOURCES
SOIL AND WATER
WI NSTON S'ALEt'i REGIONAL OFFICE
AQ, WQ, GW, LQ
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (GW)
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (AQ)
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WQ)
PARKS AND RECREATION
WATER PLANNING
OTHER
iANAC;ER SIGN—OFF/REGION: DATE:
l'3")
JUN 15 I592
WATER QUALITY
SECTION
N—+IOUSE REVIEWER/AGENCY: DATE:
I`' A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW, THE FOL_L.OW. f.Y IS` SUBMITTED:
NO OBJECTION TO PROJECT AS PROPOSED
__ NO COMMENT
INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION
___.. CONSISTENCY STATEMENT NEEDED •.....•. NOT NEEDED
OTHER (SPECIFY F `x` AND ATTACH COMMENTS)
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT REQUIRED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS ('I:'• i'.iEF'A AND SEPA
RETURN TO MELBA MCGEE, DIVISION I FPLANNING AND ASSESSMENT