20220505 Ver 1_401 Application_20220329

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
ID# *
20220505
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Reviewer List:*
Select Reviewing Office: *
Submittal Type:*
Yes
• No
Mitchell Anderson:eads\mlanderson
Asheville Regional Office - [phone]
401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
Yes
No
How much is owed?* $240.00
$570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: * For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre -Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Project Contact Information
Name: Britten Yant
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp -Resort — Camp Golden Valley
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
County (ies)
Rutherford
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
PCN Application Package 3.29.22.pdf 27.59MB
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments or
comments:
The attached "After -The -Fact" Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf of Northgate
Golden Valley LLC, represented by Mr. Zach Bossenbroek. The project site consists of +/- 487 acres located at
182 Jellystone Pkwy, Bostic, in Rutherford County, North Carolina. The applicant is seeking Nationwide Permits
13, 39 & 58 for the authorization of stream and wetland impacts associated with the Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park
Camp -Resort.
Sign and Submit
By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

• I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

CLearWaer
An EnviroScience Company.
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,Inc.
www.cwenv.com
March 29, 2022
Brandee Boggs
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2638
Ms. Amy Annino
NC Division of Water Resources
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
RE: Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley
Nationwide Permit 13, 39 &58 After-The-Fact Application
NOV-2021-SS-0002
Rutherford County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Boggs and Ms.Annino,
The attached "After-The-Fact" Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf
of Northgate Golden Valley LLC, represented by Mr. Zach Bossenbroek. The project site consists
of +1- 487 acres located at 182 Jellystone Pkwy, Bostic, in Rutherford County, North Carolina.
The applicant is seeking Nationwide Permits 13, 39 & 58 for the authorization of stream and
wetland impacts associated with the Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-9800 if you have any questions regarding the
attached application and supplemental information. A copy of this application has been sent via
email to Ms. Andrea Leslie with the NC Wildlife Resources Commission, Byron Hamstead of the
US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Sincerely,
Britten Yant, P.W.S. R. Clem t Riddle, P.W.S
Biologist Senior Scientist
CC: NC Wildlife Resources Commission —Andrea Leslie
US Fish and Wildlife Service— Byron Hamstead
145 rh Avenue West,Suite B
Hendersonville,NC 28792
828-698-9800 Tel

Preliminary Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW— -
1. Project Name: Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort — Camp Golden Valley
2. Work Type: Private ✓ Institutional Government Commercial
3. Project Description/ Purpose:
The purpose of the project is to provide access across streams, install utilities under streams and
stabilize streams (After-The-Fact Permit).
4. Property Owner/Applicant:
Northgate Golden Valley, LLC
5. Agent/Consultant: ClearWater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company
6. Related Action ID Number(s): SAW-2018-00027 (Jurisdictional Determination)
7. Project Location -Coordinates,Street Address, and/or Location Description:
The project site is located at 182 Jellystone Pkwy, Bostic, in Rutherford County, North Carolina.
35.506581, -81.794434
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID: Parcel Number 1641626
9. Project Location—County: Rutherford County
10. Project Location—Nearest Municipality or Town : Bostic
11. Project Information—Nearest Waterbody: Murray Hilton Lake
12. Watershed/8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code: Broad - 03050105
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10&404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit _ Pre-Application Request
✓ Nationwide Permit# 13, 39 & 58 Unauthorized Activity
n Regional General Permit# n Compliance
n Jurisdictional Determination Request No Permit Required
Revised 20210513

An Envim5cience Company
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Attn: Scott McLendon, Chief Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890,
-and-
NC DWR, Webscape Unit
Attn: Paul Wojoski.
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
I, the current landowner/managing partner of the property identified below, hereby authorize.
Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) to act on my behalf as my agent during the
processing of jurisdictional determination requests and permits to impact Wetlands and Water of
the US subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10
of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. CEC is authorized to provide supplemental information as
needed at the request of the USACE orDWR.
Additionally, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
to enter upon the property herein described for the purposes of conducting onsite investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Wetlands and Waters of the US subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899, ,,
Property Owner of Record: ))t?q 46P1 etur)EJU `/
OLt-csi
Property Owner Address: 38 t_.. mbrA €'q C t 5 - n zoo
Phone Number: 00 ) &3 2 9 9 0 99 E3t.r , 105
Email address: Z bn IS5 broe G nor -I-h a+e bold ) Fa.v
Property Location: ) S Z. ' r: L.1.ry RJ5 1 ardi n c , - 2 Sb ) S
Owner/Managing partner Signature: 7
Owner/Managing printed name: . . .- . & H&4 . o '.
Date: 27 -
145 7th Avenue West, Suite B:
Hendersonville, NC 28792
Phone: [phone]
www.cwenv.com

Deed/Property Information

17:4w afA
(:JtO 111111111111111111111111311111111111111111IIIIIIII III
Doc ID: 006384070002 Type:
Recorded: 12/17/2019 at 11:54:43 AM
Fee Amt: $26.00 Page 1 of 2
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Instr# 201900006321
Rutherford County, NC
Rachel Thomas Register of Deeds
BK2028 PG3481-3482
ELECTRIC LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT
JAfter recording mail to: Rutherford Electric Membership Corporation
PO Box 1569, Forest City, North Carolina 28043
Drawn for Rutherford Electric Membership Corporation by 7 #447
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF 2 v �Fog
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,that we the undersigned(whether one or more)
(enter name of LLC) 44 277, 4-7-E- 7!OLt21d/ Vitill 4.0/ LL
TT_ P2 S ?
by(enter name of LLC representative) �r� , CZ/41 F/l/ ,(enter title of LLC representative)Cq7cF Der2, ?146OF m
(hereafter called the "grantor(s)") for a good and valuable consideration the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby
grant unto RUTHERFORD ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, a cooperative corporation (hereafter called the
"corporation"), whose address is 186 Hudlow Road, Forest City, North Carolina, and to its successors or assigns, the right to enter
upon the lands of the undersigned,and more particularly described as follows:
Being all that tract of land lying and being in�(7LDf ✓� �Township, IQt/ /� ✓ 1 County, North Carolina, and
•
consisting of y7r acres, more or less, which was acquired by the grantor(s) by(circle one)iar Will, or Intestate Successor
froma& SCiV73 G 1fs . The said tract being more particularly described and define, in said last recorded deed in the
chain of title as recorded in said county in Deed Book//52_ Page/79 to which reference is hereby made for full and complete
description and same is made a part hereof.
To construct, reconstruct, rephase, operate and maintain on the above-described lands and/or in or upon all streets, roads or
highways abutting said lands,an overhead or underground electric transmission and/or distribution line or system. The right-of-way
hereby granted shall include lands within op feet on each side of the constructed distribution and/or transmission line, with the
right to cut and trim trees and shrubbery that may interfere with or threaten to endanger the operation and maintenance of said line or
system,and to license,permit, or otherwise agree to the joint use or occupancy of the line or system by any other person, association
or corporation,for electrification,telephone,television,cable or data communications purposes.
The undersigned agrees that all poles, wires, and other facilities installed on the above-described lands at the corporation's
expense shall remain the property of the corporation,removable at the option of the corporation and that the undersigned will not
construct any structure (other than ordinary fencing) within )a feet of the centerline of said line or system, except upon prior
agreement thereto by the corporation in writing. The undersigned reserves all other rights to said lands not inconsistent with the rights
and easements herein granted.
The undersigned covenants that they are the owner of the above-described lands and that the said lands are free and clear of
encumbrances and liens of whatsoever character except those held by the following persons:
It is further understood that, whenever necessary, words used in this instrument in the singular shall be construed to read in
the plural and words used in the masculine gender shall be construed to read in the feminine.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has set his hand and seal this 1D-day of 20 A.D.
4/tea- G//' owl/ LAC
(print or type name of LLC)
(Signature)By: (L.S.)
(print or type name and
title of LLC representative) J C/ti le LL- rn/
A Book: 2028 Page: 3481 Seq: 1

Pq (SifA
C)I(:)g
STATE OF ��c,�e•,•+� ACKNOWLEDGMENT
COUNTY OF
,a Notary Public for County of C a..-\.o, , State
of do hereby certify that(name) SD�tv
�s,�u�
(title—Ex:Member Manager)!ZfSf'rF2Tt Gh FO4,f for(name of L.L.C.)friggfalfre y�-OL9 it/ //1 'k'y , L.L.C.,
a limited liability company, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument
on behalf of the limited liability company.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this k day of &ta„1,v 20 \0A.D.
My Commission expires IF
CAROL A.THOMAS • Qom .Ty....i
NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF MI Notary • se
Public N
COUNTY OF OAKLAND ••�At�j' '•�
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES May 4,2025 • _•
ACTING IN COUNTY OF O�� � • r
•
A Book: 2028 Page: 3481 Seq: 2

RutherfordCounty
Printed February 07, 2022
See Below for Disclaimer
Geo-pin City Deed Date
1664685831 6/9/2017 12:00:00 AM
Township Land Class Acreage
Golden Valley EXEMPT VALUE 495.38
Deed Book Deed Page Map Book
1152 194 38
Map Page Index Type Map Block Lot
182 CRP 169 1 3
Parcel Number Property Address Neighborhood
1641626 151 CAMP GOLDEN VALLEY RD A32G
Fire District Special Tax Districts Owner Name
F07 CHERRY MTN NORTHGATE GOLDEN VALLEY,LLC
Owner Mailing Address Owner Mailing City. Owner Mailing State
27777 FRANKLIN RD SOUTHFIELD MI
Owner Mailing Zip Land Tax Value Building Tax Value
48034 2239300 4122900
Total Assessed Value Revenue Stamp Structure Size
6362200 0 3260
Under Assmt Flag Subdivision Sale Price
N BLDGS CAMPGROUND PL38-182
OBJECTID 1
38803
Rutherford County Geographic Information Systems(GIS)Data Distribution Disclaimer The County of Rutherford acquires,develops,maintains and uses GIS data in
support of its internal business functions and for the public services it provides.The GIS data which Rutherford County distributes and to which it provides access,may
not be suitable for other purposes or uses.It is the users€"s responsibility to verify any information derived from the GIS data before making any decisions or taking
any actions based on the information.Rutherford County shall not be held liable for any errors in the GIS data.This includes errors of omission,commission,errors
concerning the content of the data,and relative and positional accuracy of the data.Source information used for this data may have been collected at different scales,
times or definitions,resulting in inconsistencies among features represented together on this map.In no event shall Rutherford County become liable to users of these
data,or any other party,for any loss or direct,indirect,special,incidental or consequential damages,including but not limited to time,money or goodwill,arising from
the use or modification of the data.The Geographic Information System(GIS)Data made available on the GIS website does not represent legally recorded maps or
surveys and is not intended to be used as such.The information contained in GIS data is dynamic and constantly changes over time.This data is not better than the
original sources from which they were derived.GIS data should not be used for navigational,tracking or any other purpose requiring exact measurement of distance or
direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features.Nor should it be used for making financial or any other commitments.The maps/data provided herein are
for illustration purposes only and are not suitable for site-specific decision making.Parcel data was prepared for the visual representation of real property found within
Rutherford County,and is not necessarily accurate by surveying standards.If absolute accuracy and detail is required,the deeds,plats and other related records on file
should be consulted.Parcel ownership lines are for taxing purposes only and are not intended for conveyance.This data has been developed using public funds.It is
therefore in the public domain.Users agree that they will not sell this data;neither will they sell or share their access to this data.As a condition of providing access to
electronic GIS data,Rutherford County reserves the right to require that the user agree in writing that the data will not be resold or otherwise used for trade or
commercial purposes pursuant to N.C.Gen.Stat.A§132.10.

o�wArEa
a`' qG Office Use Only:
k Corps action ID no.
t •.• i Y DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit(NWP) number: 13,39&58 or General Permit(GP) number:
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d. Type(s)of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification—Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification—Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑Yes ❑X No
lf. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank ❑ Yes ❑X No
or in-lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes ❑X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley
2b. County: Rutherford
2c. Nearest municipality/town: Bostic
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s)on Recorded Deed: Northgate Golden Valley, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book: 2028 Page: 3481
3c. Responsible Party(for LLC if Zach Bossenbroek
applicable):
3d. Street address: 38 Commerce Ave SW, Suite 200
3e. City, state, zip: Grand Rapids, MI, 49503
3f. Telephone no.: [phone] Ext. 103
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: R. Clement Riddle
5b. Business name ClearWater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 145 7th Avenue West, Suite B
5d. City, state, zip: Hendersonville, NC 28792
5e. Telephone no.: 828-698-9800
5f. Fax no.: N/A
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Parcel Number 1641626
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.506581 Longitude: -81.794434
lc. Property size: 487 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: South Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;Tr
2c. River basin: Broad -03050105
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The 487 acre property currently has an operating commercial campground.The property currently consists of rental cabins and camp sites along with
amenities including bathrooms,laundry,dining,and water park.Land use in the general vicinity of the project is primarily a mix of residential and
undeveloped land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.559
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams(intermittent and perennial)on the property: 23,449
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access across streams,install utilities under streams and stabilize streams(After-The-Fact Permit).
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Please Reference Attached Supplemental Information.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project(including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: SAW-2018-00027
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination,what type ❑x Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:ClearWater Environmental
Name (if known):ClearWater Environmental Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
04/09/2018-SAW-2018-00027(Attachment A)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for Yes ❑X No Unknown
this project(including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to"help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project(check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams—tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps (404,10)or impact
Permanent(P)or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Temporary(T)
W1 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.004
2h. Comments:
Impacts Included With Attached Supplemental Information(Wetland Impacts Table)
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER)or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent(INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent(P)or width (linear
Temporary(T) (feet) feet)
S1 - Choose one - -
S2 - Choose one - -
S3 - Choose one - -
S4 - Choose one - -
S5 - Choose one - -
S6 - Choose one - -
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 1,656
3i. Comments:
Impacts Included With Attached Supplemental Information(Stream Impacts Table)
1656 LF(1566 LF Permanent/90 LF Temporary)
0.160 AC(0.151 AC Permanent/0.009 AC Temporary)
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact(acres)
Permanent(P)or type
Temporary(T)
01 - Choose one Choose
O2 - Choose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number— mitigation impact impact
Permanent(P)or required? (square (square
Temporary(T) feet) feet)
B1 - Yes/No
B2 - Yes/No
B3 - Yes/No
B4 - Yes/No
B5 - Yes/No
B6 - Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to over 99%(2.555 acres)of wetlands on-site were avoided and remain undisturbed. 93%of on-site stream(21,793 linear feet)was avoided
as well.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures have been updated and best management practices are now being utilized on-site. For the remaining
proposed work,construction equipment would be operated from high ground as much as practical. Work is to be performed in the dry. Pump around/
dewatering details for the proposed stabilization work are included(Figure 5.1).
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by(check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a.Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal)wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 5.31 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The project is located in an unincorporated area of Rutherford County.The project will not result in greater than 24%imperviousness. Due to the
scope and location of the project,a Stormwater Management Plan is not required.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply(check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
E Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW
(check all that apply):
ESession Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the ❑Yes ❑X No
use of public(federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes"to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑Yes ❑No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?
lc. If you answered "yes"to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑Yes ❑No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑X Yes ❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑X Yes ❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes"to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Since development begun in February 2018,several changes occurred including,ownership team, project management,and contractors/consultants
working on the project which impacted consistency and project coordination.A"Notice of Violation"(NOV)letter dated April 12,2021 was issued by
the NC Division of Water Resources(DWR)in response to sediment impacts and unauthorized fill activities on-site(NOV-2021-SS-0002).ClearWater
responded to the NOV on May 10,2021.This after-the-fact permit application is part of the ongoing effort to resolve the violation.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes"to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is located on a parcel previously developed with a scout camp.The property is adjacent to a previously constructed residential
development.With the exception of the proposed restoration work designed by Headwaters Engineering,this is an after-the-fact permit.The proposed
project would not result in additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge)of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated from the project is treated by an an on-site wastewater treatment facility.The NCDEQ Non-Discharge Branch Map(Updated
July 2019)lists the wastewater treatment facility as having a 81,077 cubic feet capacity.Permit Number WQ0039947.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑X Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Please Reference Attached Supplemental Information.
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA's Essential Fish Habitat(EFH)Mapper. Impacts will not occur in a marine system.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Please Reference Attachment A.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodplain Mapping Program. FEMA Map Number 3710166500J&3710166400J,effective 7/2/2008(Figure 6).
R. Clement Riddle
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Supplemental Information
Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort
Camp Golden Valley
PCN Application
Section B. Project Information and Prior Project History, 3e.:
This after-the-fact permit application is intended to account for the stream and wetland
impacts that occurred during the construction of the Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-
Resort. These impacts include culvert installations, utility crossings, wetland fill, bridge
footers placed within the ordinary high water mark (OHWM), and bank stabilization using
rip-rap, boulders and streambed material. This application is intended to address the
"Failure to Secure a 401 Water Quality Certification" violation identified in the Notice of
Violation (NOV-2021-SS-0002) issued April 12, 2021, by the Division of Water
Resources. Impacts to Waters of the US are further depicted in Figure 5.0 as well as in
the Stream and Wetland Impact Tables included with this application.
Stream Impacts 42, 43, 44, and 45 are stream stabilization measure designed by
Headwaters Engineering. These stabilization measures are proposed and not after-the-
fact. They include two proposed vegetated geolifts to restore critically failing banks, a
boulder step pool to address a perched culvert and stabilization efforts related to the
removal of two instream check dams. A set of plans prepared by Headwaters Engineering
are included as part of the application (Figure 5.1).
Typical earth-moving equipment has been/will be utilized onsite in order to complete the
project (excavator, dump trucks, etc.).
Section F. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat, 5d:
ClearWater consulted the FWS's "Northern Long-Eared Bat Consultation Areas" map for
Rutherford County. The project is not located near any known occurrences of hibernacula
or maternity sites. It is the opinion of ClearWater that the project would have "no effect"
on the northern long-eared bat. See Attachment B.
A review of the NC Natural Heritage Program database on February 3, 2022 indicated a
documented occurrence of one federally protected species (White Irisette— Sisyrinchium
dichotomum) occurring within the project boundary.
On February 22 and 25, 2022 ClearWater preformed a field survey/habitat assessment
for potential federally threatened and endangered species. Potentially suitable habitat for
1

dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora) and white irisette (Sisyrinchium
dichotomum) were observed on site. The Threatened and Endangered Species Review
and Habitat Assessment is included in Attachment B.
Areas identified as potentially suitable habitat for dwarf-flowered heartleaf were surveyed
on March 28, 2022, within the USFWS Optimal Survey Window. Individuals of little brown
jug (Hexastylis arifolia), heartleaf ginger (H. heterophylla), and little heartleaf (H. minor)
were all observed in flower during the survey. No dwarf-flowered heartleaf individuals
were observed on-site; therefore, it is the opinion of ClearWater that the proposed project
would have no effect on dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora).
ClearWater is scheduled to perform further study during the USFWS designated optimal
survey window of mid-May through July for white irisette.
Section F. Supplementary Information, 7b.:
ClearWater reviewed the National Register of Historic Places records maintained by the
NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and available on SHPO's HPOWEB GIS
Service. The following sites were found within a 1-mile radius of the project boundary:
Site ID Site Name Status Distance from
Project
RF0073 Biggerstaff-Long House SO - Surveyed Only , +/- 0.3 miles ,
N/A Biggerstaff Fire Lookout SO - Surveyed Only +/- 0.7 miles
Tower
RF0075 Freeman House SD — Surveyed Gone +/- 0.8 miles
These properties are listed as Surveyed Only or Surveyed Gone with no further status
granted. It is the opinion of ClearWater that project construction will not affect the integrity
of these sites.
2

Wetland Impact Table
Wetland Impact Number Permanent or Temporary Type of Impact Type of Wetland Forested? Type of Jurisdiction Area of Impacts(acres)
Wetland Impact 1 Permanent Fill Headwater Wetland Yes 404 and 401 0.001
Wetland Impact 2 Permanent Fill Headwater Wetland No 404 and 401 0.003
Total: 0.004 acres

Stream Impact Table
Stream Impact Number Permanent or Temporary Type of Impact Stream Name Perennial or Intermittent Type of Jurisdiction Average Impact Width(Ft.) Impact Length(LF)
Stream Impact 1 Permanent Culvert !UTto South Creek(JD:S2) Perennial 404 and 401 5 15
Stream Impact 2 Permanent Culvert UT to South Creek(JD:S5) Perennial 404 and 401 2 40
Stream Impact 3 Permanent Culvert UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S14) Perennial 404 and 401 2 14
Stream Impact 4 Permanent Culvert UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S18) Perennial 404 and 401 2 28
Stream Impact 5 Permanent Bridge Footer UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 12
Stream Impact 6 Permanent Bridge Footer UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 19
Stream Impact 7 Permanent Bridge Footer UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 14
Stream Impact 8 Permanent Bridge Footer South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 2 4
Stream Impact 9 Permanent Bank Stabilization South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 2 79
Stream Impact 10 Permanent Bank Stabilization South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 2 13
Stream Impact 11 Permanent Bank Stabilization South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 2 18
Stream Impact 12 Permanent Bank Stabilization South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 2 12
Stream Impact 13 Permanent Bank Stabilization South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 4 93
Stream Impact 14 Permanent Bank Stabilization South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 2 25
Stream Impact 15 Permanent Bank Stabilization South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 3 55
Stream Impact 16 Permanent Bank Stabilization South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 2 32
Stream Impact 17 Permanent Bank Stabilization South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 2 15
Stream Impact 18 Permanent Bank Stabilization !South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 2 14
Stream Impact 19 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to South Creek(JD:S2) Perennial 404 and 401 2 8
Stream Impact 20 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 63
Stream Impact 21 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 14
Stream Impact 22 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S14) Perennial 404 and 401 2 56
Stream Impact 23 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S14) Perennial 404 and 401 2 14
Stream Impact 24 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 12
Stream Impact 25 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 18
Stream Impact 26 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 7
Stream Impact 27 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 8
Stream Impact 28 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 23
Stream Impact 29 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 13
Stream Impact 30 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 13
Stream Impact 31 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 53
Stream Impact 32 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S18) Perennial 404 and 401 2 36
Stream Impact 33 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 20
Stream Impact 34 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 10
Stream Impact 35 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 2 20
Stream Impact 36 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 4 130
Stream Impact 37 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 9 20
Stream Impact 38 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 9 98
Stream Impact 39 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 9 91
Stream Impact 40 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 9 12
Stream Impact 41 Permanent Bank Stabilization UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 9 55
Stream Impact 42 Permanent Stabilization(Boulder Step) UT to South Creek(JD:S2) Perennial 404 and 401 5 50
Stream Impact 43 Permanent Stabilization(Geolift) South Creek(JD:S1) Perennial 404 and 401 8 60
Stream Impact 44 Permanent Stabilization(Check Dam Removal) UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S14) Perennial 404 and 401 4 100
Stream Impact 45 Permanent Stabilization(Geolift) UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 6 60
Stream Impact 46 Temporary Utility Crossing UT to South Creek(JD:S2) Perennial 404 and 401 5 15
Stream Impact 47 Temporary Utility Crossing UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S14) Perennial 404 and 401 2 15
Stream Impact 48 Temporary Utility Crossing UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 8 15
Stream Impact 49 Temporary Utility Crossing UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S18) Perennial 404 and 401 2 15
Stream Impact 50 Temporary Utility Crossing UT to Murray Hilton Lake (JD:S12) Perennial 404 and 401 7 15
Stream Impact 51 Temporary Utility Crossing UT to South Creek(JD:S5) Perennial 404 and 401 2 15
Total LF: 1656 LF(1566 LF Permanent/90 LF Temporary)
Total AC: 0.160 AC(0.151 AC Permanent/0.009 AC Temporary)

Figures 1-6

Golde n Valley Cam p (+/- 487 AC)
Ü
0 4 82 Miles
Legend
Prop erty Bounda ry
145 7th Ave West, Suite BHendersonville, NC 28792
Site Vicinity MapFigure 1Rutherfordton County,North Carolina
Drawn by: BWY 2.9.22; CEC Project# 919
Prop erty Bounda ry
Golden Valley Camp (+1- 487 AC)
, -.., .....k.,43-
•
Pf) Plik N.,---72 1.r---) \..........1
pri' ..
01 + 51-\-;-- ° /:.. N-.. ill:, if : e'.'".- 1 \-
Of a _fr.A t? .._ .... ,4 . ili )m„ ti L4 Ir ,.. .._.,, , . ilo4c,..„,..)\ ....._,...,,y1,,
:, ,,
tr-v" i ) • 0 Aielt. 45}214 1 .5\----,,, =._ „!,„,,
_ .._...... , iik.,..t.,_ ti iii. /. .%° '.':'J
,- 7 jfi:
ri...r / tel . "1 + ,,,,,);;--7-.,X`;mo \ _
,
1 N, /I t)N__ .-- _L 1__ \-
leit (.
ler
, 8,' lr rar a• \ 8
./ .,,P;4k111 - \ -
r.rit ) - ,, . t
gaW1 "Wei47,0:11."5"..0111‘"■1111- ii •kt 14:\
, :._ , , ;., iiii \ _---\-1.-"---1 1 , '-, I
i \--,i-i--- V ) \---\p ,
....
1 Q�\\_,_ .,../„.,,,,.. ,..5,,, A
\fi
� ,,,
,,,,,,,, ,,, k 1
7�--5, -, \ i. �y N J / I rye
,.. ,
,,,
I., ,1 : \.,1„.. \ iliri).. \t„ __, . )-.2,r--,,L;vjj • _LIN-11---), .
0, ill ...'
,i, t ill ''/.... . .,-.A-- 011/ ( ,''''''''' /'' ''' ''.--'-/A:i.'
4'4,le/,,1,,71,.4.'.=/,\,i1:%'4,:1 e'4;.°.-
_ SSj1:1\\11,.,-i0N.1 ik)..----.--:-_.V''‘:',-1--'• .,:4.A:•-',!-I : ri
.e.-m1.ir...7.
Ira_i,!llial.l-d)ok'
1 ,-7--e.ix•)-;-iA,-'.//-:-----/,,'--.--._'-7_--_-2 Mr`?-1,---.---,.-/,,'0„
v j _\ /ram
mil}\ / ^ '1 I r_ I %� /� 2 �� \> J .o
Property Boundary - • ,o - J ,,, `,s `; `--,\_l1
'... `L\---:-\\-://...---)j c,:-..1 ,./....., ? , , ,.„ . _ :„ _____,
4-\/ ,, ,c,-7,1.:: :1.,_,' '_:,.,l I:\ss---\:::/_:,,,-1,:) . :. ,,,jf,:;\- j...2_ ".\---- ,;
Z\ ,, ry ...: -:,,,,,,,.\--,, ., --.--- „.14‘,,, ,----,,,„---......_ _____:„.
,,,- , ),...3, ,,, ,>...,-_-___Th : ',‘ .,/,---1- ;., \.,--, ._.,),,
\___ .....\-. -----/---------z,---Ncv ,
l --
z___ , 7-----\___--i ..,\\\„____, r--) , - „\...
Legend ,\ ,,o- J ,Ill/ll�>�y_ ,i.- `►,A', — )n `lb 1\'\--\ . Y. ,
0 0.25 0.5 1
r Property Boundary Miles
J
Drawn by:BWY 2.9.22;CEC Project#919 ` ', 1 / / 0
rLearWaLer USGS Topographic Map
Rutherfordton County, AnEnviroScience Company_ Dysartsville &
North Carolina Sunshine Quads
145 7th Ave West,Suite B
Hendersonville, NC 28792 Figure 2

Golden Valley Camp (+1- 487 AC)
Legend r I 4 . `.�....,, w_a N
Property Boundary
\
\ \ � i
j_ — —
I:i1 It s
•
i /;./ Sys:.
'-�- y ,.fF. . Y - - 1 - - //�
I , II) . ob. ._ " .,,
r
. i i k ti F-.o 4 't
;' .
i
' t . / .. 1 sr T. II II
•
j /'%
0_ /, l ' I
J.
•
. - j Property Boundary
0 500 1,000 2,000
/44
� Feet
Drawn by:BWY.2.9.22;CEC Project#919
Rutherfordton Count CLea vValer Aerial Photograph
Y AnEnviraScience Company® NCCGIA(2019)
North Carolina 1457thAve West,Suite B Figure 3
Hendersonville,NC 28792

Golden Valley Camp (+1- 487 AC)
0 500 1,000 2,000 :ti., N
-
Feet
I '
z
EvD
I
I
I
• an I
I. N �v
I12111M j •
,\
+' \ \ \\
PaD2
/ ' :'� ChA
/
.� /ChA,- ;
__ -- ChA / \
•
_ ;,•., r PaD2
L �A1 _ s_ - ",- - DAM ., _ .. / ;
• \ 1 //' /
r `�\\ /I� I,
\ I
r
I ChA
I l,I I
I I
/ H
1 I
ag BoA
I
BoA,/
1 -1 C --' \``\ /
iO3 `--,_-, \
r,r 7. —
o
••
I Legend
j 1219 I =Property Boundary
I1 .r '•' ' Soil
_ 3 -BOA-Bandana-Ostin Complex
a OD -ChA-Chewacla Loam
1
-DAM
i 1 Property Boundary -DOB-Dogue Loam
1 -EVD,EvE,EwF-Evard-Cowee Complex
•
141 I PaC2,PaD2-Pacolet sandy Clay Loam
Ea IMi
- ' TbC,TbD Tate-Greenlee Complex..,.� I -
��, UdC-Udorthents
11111111111
``A -
. ' :f.IdH;al:.,::. W-Water
•
Drawn by:BWY-2.9.22;CEC Project#919
Rutherfordton Count C� � VVa�r USDA Soils Mari
County, p An EnviraScience Company®
North Carolina Figure 4
145 7th Ave West,Suite B
Hendersonville,NC 28792

'-Stream Impact 10
P 4 -1 JOB NUMBER:
Stream Impact 2 Stream Impact 11 13 ft-Bank Stabilization Stream Impact 46 _• 21094
- -Stream
Stream Impact 9 .��,'
Stream Impact 51 +' 40 ft-Culvert 18 ft-Bank Stabilization 15 ft-Utility Crossing -
- P _ _ 79 ft-Bank Stabilization - •..
15 ft-Utility Crossing -_ ' Stream Impact 12 � _
\ i - Stream Impact 8 Stream Impact 17 - � 12 ft-Bank Stabilization • ' /%� i• W }
4 ft-Bridge Foot 15 ft-Bank Stabilization • e- "+- -1 >. 7 ,- [�R��* "E i ••�' , •,
/B11111
in OHWM - - - -- _- - Stream Impact 13 .•11 - ,a't+a' , r;,,t 'a. j_ `
• B . 93 ft-Bank Stabllzatlon Sy �� ;d r ur^s .�O11111
Stream Impact 18 Stream Impact 16 ' - - ,,.. b_. - w ..t r -- ` „
14 ft-Bank Stabilization �+' -- *II.,..
� 1• / /„ g Stream Impact 42-See Headwaters Eng.Plan
- 32 ft-Bank Stabilization +•''+� 'v ; K .�1 �ri T. Stream Impact 1
"'`Y--u'� _ y `t 1► • . •� •�'••_i'+ �� - 15 ft-Culvert 50 ft-Stabilization(Boulder Step) -,_
• - 't' ® _ t .� �' Stream Impact 19
ti' •• 5• Stream Impact 15 Q.. Stream Impact 14 /' 8 ft-Bank Stabilization. -
.r
r
i;. 55 ft-Bank Stabilization ,. 25 ft-Bank Stabilization -
*w In+�* 5 rm
" 1, r Stream Impact 43-See Headwaters Eng.Pla.. 1 alit - * :If ,_
� ' 60ft-Stabilizatlon(Geolifts)+ _ � ��
.�. ' '• ti 4 � ',SCM1... .,,,,,*7".:-. - '..k%,"lk," . . , . . \ ' -k'
r s • +p` • i [ '
. .• ,. :y�v ` cr4' Y+. A i •,,,, K t ~\. c� R' i 1 p:404
r
f� `\_
ry p
• w w'~`�
.. t p�• Ai.`d S ��w^S C. Lre tr .. Yi' iJ§ -•• 4. ..I * ,�I. � � `1r� 4 a1Z l• 11 • 5
•
•
) ._
it .
Y ... 11I�LTON ,. t
L.i ey
r _
.. . , _.., e....
___ .. ...„..,..,„. . .<\_) • .
. . . , ..J..\..,,..
. ,,,IA0
1 .....
•
• Stream Impact 20+ .' - -� •
-
� '-' 4 '63ft-Bank Stabilization I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
'- ." ' - x' ",0;. ; _' - , 'c � PLAN AND SPECIFICATION
•
. -l. - _ .. ^k Q :. - . Hv' - UNDER MY DIRECT
L ' WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
_ .y• la,,, ."•1 ® '�//IP ,i ��'` • _ • y SUPERVISION AND THATI AM
-"' 1, / Mir ' A DULV REGISTERED
•� - 1 '" ` •- "' •
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
H +' .
- \ t� IV UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
• ,� ,. _ '- _ r' ® Stream Impact 37 H�� STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
\ N '- ® 20 ft-Bank Stabilization �• Stream Impact 5 - l -� -• AS SIGNIFIED BY MY HAND
+ } •{ Stream Impact 23 Foot-o OHWM I�- . • •r a - AND SEAL.
~ •
-
tt ,4 7 14 ft Bank Stabilization J _ _
per• p - • s.� l
+ n ,'1, - ', •`•','` ��, • 5S..Stream Impact 47 1�
•
'•+; .. .. ' "'1 15 ft-Utility Crossing . . _ FOR
1 'M � v: NOT
u . .e ;+ y 00 ‘. • \ {. , +' 1 + CONSTRUCTION
• ' '" ". Stream Impact 44-See Headwaters Eng.Plan 1, .4`' - r }, - + - - ,
•• 100 ft-Stabilization _ �` t �
Z • _• �, ,S�"• '-' Stream Impact 38 +\
CVN
' "r^ Stream Impact 22 Y - �����
_ mill Stabilization m Impact 21 p
f ..
on
i; m•s �.. 56 ft •
Stream
v 14Strfta Bank Stabilization • z UJ
Q
.i -- 14 ft-Culvert �6 Stream Impact 24 •t' - z
- / .k`. - _ - mow' 12 ft-Bank Stabilization Z E —
f _ ,` .A
i l Stream Impact 6 -` - r✓
\ /f f r� 19ft-Bridge - _ 0 vo O
/ f Foot in OHWM • - _
. / ; ,- Stream Impact 25 t -` ' - .r, U ? H-
o e r� }}��Y {{.r. 18ft-Bank Stabilization U
Lu
,� L \ - -. �:n ' y.. ..-1•.- 54 - ,:r • Stream Impact 26 _ m
7ft-Bank Stabilization z Q
w _. . - \�. Ct - Stream Impact 39 ,�a.. r - •
' ' . - U LCZ
l__I
+r+,,. "91 ft-Bank Stabilization ,,. . . , -
N •
' Stream Impact 27 �. S .'1* .:` Q LL
. 8ft-Bank Stabilization
N a�i. w cU
Stream Impact 7 '� r-! ca co
- Stream Impact 45-See Headwaters Eng.Plan ,+ . " -
- _ 60 ft-Stabilization(Geolifts) r ® 14 ft-Bridge -' ., r^ J
o - - - Foot in OHWM ''1• 491116)111-.:'
VStream Impact 28 - + 0a
a • 23ft-Bank Stabilization of., {;-�',(G . -I Stream Impact 40 _ ry - 4 > O
c t i 1, �0` 12 ft Bank Stabilization o
Wetland Impact 2 4;1' i /i �, O s• �- :.,a.. �, - -- -g-^ �{ "
- - T .•- 0. 03 AC �cif i ,y r_ �� ` '3;1 -.Y-.- - to
0 Fill
s 5 , . _ _
- -- - -- - - -- -- -,. Stream Impact 48 `•� t •1,�+ r'e` I - -
•,. - 15ft-Utility Crossing /,}'ti i 4,-\�f,.... ■- •,� - - •r-I
k Stream Impact 41 - / t .'' - \ }55 ft-Bank Stabilization )" --' - 3 CD r^m Stream Impact 49 �- Stream Impact 29 r• 1 • •
:-1
15ft-Utility CrossingF � , 13ft-Bank Stabllzation �rP9"` „r,FiiE- _ C • UeStream Impact 32 9 . , rr '4#� r 'I CEEiE ?�,. „�,om€
o A11' ® Stream Impact 30 i', F •,• •
O W a:v
36 ft-Bank Stabilization 11114011i AZ . -,� k S� >< ar .
13ft-Bank Stabilization k it .1,-,.•y, ^ '�
wStream Impact4 +'F ;A + • ." }�
28ft-Culvert ,�./ _ 6-'... ° -, f `Li• • f l T T: _ �
g -
m ® '' LT
� ti r. Stream Impact 31 "'*' � .
Stream Impact 34 / �'=' ?� 53 ft-Bank Stabilization . •\• r
oo loft-Bank Stabilization s ' 't •'`r`;• ' IJ
s4>s: i T u [ c I
Stream Impact 33 O
20 ft-Bank Stabilization• - - SCALE: 1" = 200'
Stream Impact 50 i~, ,c , - t
15 ft-Utility Crossing Stream Impact 35 - ti 'v 1 rt-• .• DATE: 07/28/21
20 ft-Bank Stabilization •
! 3 _ DRAWN BY: PED
Stream Impact 36 z''+.1r •c�-
_ V'•[oa o^ mu limo 1 yin SI ` CHECKED BY: DWO
� 130 ft-Bank Stabilization � ��{
N A
' 0.001 AC-Fill 1 -- •- -• PHf(St Al '-t� �- ."";i ;PROJECT MGR: DWO
Wetland 3 :- �. k 4 • . ' - Figure 5.0
�
,

Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1
d
d
Q
(&>, NOTE: AERIAL IMAGERY-DATED —*
c.tic 2019 DOES NOT REFLEG I w
1— (I)
TP RFi.r_ EXISTING CONDITIONS. - o Z
0
Qx0Q o U)
I=
/ REMOVE MID-CHANNEL DEPOSITS; f W
SHIFT THALWEG 8'-10' NORTH 1+50 o cL
1 Qx k25 I
Dt5. \ —a4 -m < m (..)
zt
O CONFORM GEOLIFTS TO STABLE
Ox x� BANK AT DOWNSTREAM END, - ,-v `L * "=;
CONFORM GEOLIFTS TO STABLE SQ WEST OF OUTFACE CHANNEL {�' �_=0� �dv>'
BANK AT UPSTREAM END; ' _ N ?_=Q
PROTECT EXI TING TREES AS ; - ` N =
MUCK- AS PRACTICAL +75 -/ i =,y ;:t 4:
/ ,
liw.. - -..rillilliSit \
_I l
„ffitilik
,ePliew'L� ___ _ 11 STAGING AREA
11/ / ;44,, „IN, s‘ss,
0
APPROX. TOP OF BANK_Z 1 I ■ . rn o v
JUNE2021 11 \ � � " U
= 1 Fc c o
fir— EXISTING STORM DRAIN I / 45 elk Q z
lift- ,- AND CONCRETE HEADWALL I JrI Ims. 0' 20' 40' 6fl' as
0 W
I I UJw Ca w1 ) I I — _ - I U
/ _ - ,.��-� AEA. z
W
O gjZ
EXCAVATE POOL 1.5'+/- CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE; < D 0 >-
1150 BELOW EXISTING BED _„ ~_
SEE DETAIL 1150 J co Z
0
D
H
1- 0QO
u) z00
I Y
Q w O
1145 1145 00 W Q ct
2 m w
< 0 _ _
W I 0 I—
O
1140 1140 DATE: AUGUST 2021
0+00 0+25 0+50 0+75 1+00 1+25 1+50 1+75
SCALE: AS SHOWN
PROFILE SCALES:
H: 1" = 20'
v: 1" = 5' SOUTH CREEK
PLAN & PROFILE
Figure 5.1
SHEET 3 OF 9

Q
MAPPING NOTE:AERIAL
IMAGERY DATED 2019 DOES NOT a_w
/ .41- u, _..i. ::
+ REFLECT EXISTING CONDITIONS. o z
} STAGING AREA Zoz O
7 ‘ 11 , i
_ Aav AliiCONSTRUCTION ACCESS c)
6 \ ... A. .r 1 (f)
SEED, MULCH AND MAT Q m U
EXISTING 48" CMP = _ — £ j 0. DISTURBED BANKS.
_ I # _, LIVE STAKE IN WINTER 2011-22. CS .
100+00 100+25 100+50 100+75 101+00 101+25 101+50 101+75 101+91 .95 _ 5" c Z
-----0
, < `
UT1 TO SOUTH CREEK---- I L I J I --y V•
C; Tr PpQ'
PROP. BOULDER STEP"I
4/, 0
0
wrii *V
'� o i-
ceZ U U
W Z
4 � , Nz
a W
11161111-
0' 20' 40' 60' ❑ o u)
Y (ll CO
r U
Z
U)
W
p
O < ? z
1135 -----_—�� 1135 N D 0
co ct 1—
PROP. BOULDER STEP; oO O_
EXISTING BASE FLOW \\ < Q O
WATER SURFACE __ SET TOP OF STRUCTURE MIN. CI
I --I\ 10"ABOVE CMP INVERT ELEV. U) Z U p
I — Qc) O_
1130 I I 1130 Z w - 0
I — Q „ cow
EXISTING THALWEG/INVERT / H I- O D
SURVEYED BY HEADWATERS W O }
1125 ENG. JUNE 2021 1125 U)
DATE: AUGUST 2021
SCALE: AS SHOWN
PROFILE SCALES:
H: 1" = 20' 1120 20 UT1 PLAN &
1120 PROFILE
V: 1" = 5' 100000 100+25 100+50 100+75 101+00 101+25 101+50 101+75 102+00
Figure 5. 1
— SHEET 4 OF 9

0_Q
MAPPING NOTE:AERIAL
Wirir EXISTING CHECK DAM IMAGERY DATED 2019 DOES NOT w
1 TO BE REMOVED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS FROM REFLECT EXISTING CONDITIONS. o z
CLEARED AREA ON LEFT BANK O
TO SOUTH CREEK�ao >JJT2
C; Tr W
O i�i.�._` EXISTING CHECK DAM
N'�'`�� •.#1 11+5 p ---....---
\ 2 TO BE REMOVED o
O
„4011ImmarilligillinialuMMIMMm."Maims _ Tat
Ila 0 ss's‘ ‘)'' s,"''''''''4''
" CROP. CONSTRUCTED PROP. TOP OF BANK; SEE `w`OF 'Sd\ '
1"LIZ= =
RIFFLES; RE USE o) yz=7
HECK DAM STONE TYPICAL SECTIONS SHEET 6 _U RI _�
FOR CHANNEL THROUGH --possigiv40 =
SEDIMENT BASIN --_,V, : � ;'
0
0
tri o
ctco 0 U
W z 0)
f- O
cc a)4 .gt iii (;) z
Lj N J
❑ 0 U)
40' 60' LUw m
I r U
y� Z
PROFILE SURVEYED BY -
W
THALWEG EXTRACTED HEADWATERS ENG. JULY 2021 - ZZ• Z U
FROM BARE EARTH LiDAR Q Z
SEDIMENT ALREADY REMOVED Q c H
1215 FROM CHANNEL DOWNSTREAM J co (D Z
i-\ OF CHECK DAM 1 0o H W D
- _ \ ----\\ i/ \\\ < 0 Q O
----- _J \ w Z U o
Y
_ \\\ Z
Q W O
1210 1 \--- CO � WW
< U m 2
W 2 3 H
DISPOSE OF EXCAVATED SEDIMENT H D O} D
IN APPROVED UPLAND AREA(S) 0
1205 PROPOSED PROFILE DATE: AUGUST 2021
UPSTREAM OF CHECK DAM 1
SCALE: AS SHOWN
UT2 PLAN &
PROFILE SCALES: PROFILE
1200 H: 1" = 20'
10+00 V: 1" = 5' 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 Figure 5.1 SHEET 5 OF 9

\\ \ cZ/SITE 255 - � Q
/ # „0- _'IP
\\ \ 1- (n
\ \ o Z
\ \ / FOUR COURSES GEOLIFTS; SEE - O
\ \ TYPICAL SECTION UT3 zp Cr)
\\ \ f W
\ \ 1------ /
U
\\ \ �7 PROTECT MATURE TREES AT w
\ \ UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM ENDSin
\ \ ar. Q m U
\\\\ GRADE POINT BAR 6' +/- BACK 0
-- \ 's‘ „ -W
Z=� -
_ `SF — SF sF CONSTRUCTION ACCESS =U 3 N -o
�� AROUND SITE 271 =y=��:l < ,
on, Amc-_
' :
s
o p s�
_ii,muliedsgit! p ',5 .- C `TENT SITE 272
F \ T
l oifliontoI
3 \ ) [ NTTE271 .= +
s I o
%.
,gi,s.„
M°A- 4r
.----__
1..._0 _E9ca,)
o l
aca " U
� ui z 0
0
.. Q w P Z
d- 4 „i ,
UQ a J
e ft - 0' 20' 40' 60' uat w m
2 , 0
z
w
o E Zz
1235 1235 1
N m ° Z
CO H 0
PROP. CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE < 0 Q 0
1230 - I 1230 Y Q u) fl
Q w O
mwQ fl
2 „ mw
Q U _ 2
1225 1225 I- O O Lt
U)
DATE: AUGUST 2021
SCALE: AS SHOWN
PROFILE SCALES:H: 1" = 20' 1220 1220 UT3 PLAN &
V: 1" = 5' 300+00 300+50 301+00 PROFILE
Figure 5.1
SHEET 6 OF 9

Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1
Golden Valley Camp (+/- 487 AC)
Ü01,000 2,000500Feet
Legend
Property Boundary
Flood Hazard Zones
Zone Type
1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Regulatory Floodway
Special Floodway
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee
Area with Risk Due to Levee
145 7th Ave West, Suite BHendersonville, NC 28792
Rutherfordton County,North Carolina
Drawn by: BWY 2.9.22; CEC Project# 919
Property Boundary
FEMA Flood MapNumber: 3710166500J & 3710166400JEffective Date: 7/2/2008Figure 6
Attachment A:
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination - SAW-2018-00027
Issued April 9, 2018

U.S. AR1VMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id.SAW-2018-00027 County:Rutherford U.S.G.S. Quad:NC-Dysartsville
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Northgate Holdings,LLC
Zachary Bossenbroek
Address: 401 Hall Street SW,Suite 385
Grand Rapids,MI 49503
Telephone Number: 616-240-8444
E-mail: zbossenbroek( northgateholdings.com
Size(acres) 480 Nearest Town Bostic
Nearest Waterway South Creek River Basin Upper Broad
USGS HUC 03050105 Coordinates Latitude:35.506581
Longitude:-81.794434
Location description: The project is located at 164 Girl Scout Camp Road,Golden Valley in Rutherford County,NC.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
There appear to be waters including wetlands,on the above described project area/property,that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC § 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).The
waters including wetlands,have been delineated,and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable.The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 9/18/2017.Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,including determining compensatory
mitigation.For purposes of computation of impacts,compensatory mitigation requirements,and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S.This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part 331).However,you may
request an approved JD,which is an appealable action,by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters including wetlands,on the above described project area/property,that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC §403).
However,since the waters including wetlands,have not been properly delineated,this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters including wetlands,at the project area,which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters
including wetlands,on your project area/property delineated.As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC §403)and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
El There are waters including wetlands,on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters including wetlands,on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
El The waters including wetlands,on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps.The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE.We strongly

•
SAW-2018-00027
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion,this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified,this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which,provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations,may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters including wetlands,have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on DATE.Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S.,to include wetlands,present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City,NC,at(252)808-2808 to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US,including wetlands,without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,construction or
placement of structures,or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC §401 and/or 403).If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program,please contact William Elliott at 828-271-7980 ext 4224 or
William.a.elliottAusace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 04/09/2018.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants,or anticipate participation in USDA programs,you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information(This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination,you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and request for appeal(RFA)form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers •
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele,Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Room 10M15
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5,and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form,it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Divisio Office if you d of o je to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: _William Elliott
IiV `
Date of JD: 04/09/2018 Expiration Date of JD:Not applicable

Camp Golden Valley (+/- 480 AC
)
Jurr,4 4.nol w.'Jana and wawa Identbsd on Ws map turn tom located MUM automat., a¢vacv uCat g . Timbre
napping grade Cabal Posdenng 5y-tam (GPM and 1,. 1ubs.9u..t d3[annthl arrechn of dul data. CPC nabob may
ancnstals unconectabh anon au ba Iopognphy,vegeYLw an,, an:Sot nvdUpath signal error.
Nola. The Ruseated voWnd and sawn ll4Wna.,s sppmdmn4. Them arcs haw bean Inept{ MM. nald: honeses,
flay ban not been surv.yed. Waugh CoaMLlar Emamnomal Consultants, Inc. (CEC) h mnAd.rd tow amnam.nl.
Me 05 Amy Cups el Ergneers (Carpal is the only agency that an nuke anal d.d1es regarding Ivtsdktbn.l weN+nd
and watan of the US delineations. Therein, alp,.Cnimry abm*naWns an subject In change am -Cm nrllatIon is
obtainsd. CEC shone/ namanands that warm vertf3Eon be obtain.d hem du Corps pier la doting .n Me papery,
beginning any ale work. or makale any I.gal lslanoa on mb delerrrmtian.
Cis map was pepar.d by CEC using the bast nlomraton available to GEC al the Urea at produdbn. Thb map Is ha
n(ormationel rumours only and Mould hot be used to delamina phase boundaries, roadways, properly boundary Inn,
nor legal dasa9tlons. Thh map shl not be ansbued to be an oranal sunray of any data deprad.
Comae Data: Prole cl Bowdary barn Nah.aid County C6.
Rutherford County,
North Carolina
Poteati 11ydu351466en,l Water
W d1m0 (AC9
W1
1.832
Stream(IF)
SI
5,385
Opal Watc(AC.
OW1
11134/
Wl
0.009
S1
694
W3
0.164
S3
1,971
W4
0D48
S4
308
WS
0.055
S5
1,917
W6
0005
S6
69
Legend
r Project Boundary
W7
0.015
S7
1.415
wa
0.001
SB
117
W9
0005
S9
t@
W10
0071
S50
1,150
WI l 0006
511
222
Wil
0.136
811
4,756
W 15 0010
S13
864
W16 0.030
S14
678
W17
0.005
S15
1,588
WI8
0.006
SI6
178
CLearWaLer
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
W19
0016
Sl7
354
W20
0.154
SIB
739
Total 2559 Total 23,449
'ota1 11,844
Stream & Wetland
Delineation Map
Delineated Sept.18 - 28, 2017
Figure 5

•
O
co
u
a)
c
E
co
U
y -.
• .� t+�'..�"r�.r..•-j:: t.
c
a)
CD
.J
0
i
a
A U
C
0
U
I I
Open Water
0
0
0
m
0
ca
c
0
ca
0
0
z

b
coW
W
O
0
E
co
U
s;a` 4a
a2 ;i
fir,
((( n\
. ,
/\
..�
�,
' 'tea\\}___.
a
y
a
A
nt
5 E
N :I
N
m m
n N
N N
M a
.n
., E
g
3
3''
i>
5.
3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 R
1
.t.1•11•
E N
0
-0'L o
_ ? Fl
C 0 U U N
---I I I ( o
1 i I 1-

0 ` l
co !•
•

Attachment B:
Threatened and Endangered Species Information

Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort — Camp Golden Valley
Approximately 487 Acres
Rutherford County, NC
Threatened and Endangered Species Review and Habitat Assessment
Prepared For
Northgate Golden Valley LLC
38 Commerce Ave SW
Suite 200
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Prepared By
rCLea ater W
An EnviroScience Company
145 7th Avenue W
Suite B
Hendersonville, NC 28792
March 29, 2022

Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION 2
2.0 METHODOLOGY 2
3.0 HABITAT CLASSIFICATION 3
3.1 Planted Pine Stands 3
3.2 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest 4
3.3 Chestnut Oak Forest 4
3.4 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest 5
3.5 Low Mountain Pine Forest 5
3.6 Maintained Corridors 5
3.7 Bottomland Forest Wetland 6
3.8 Headwater Forest Wetland 6
3.9 Emergent Wetland 6
3.10 Soils 6
4.0 PROTECTED SPECIES 7
4.1 Bog Turtle 7
4.2 Dwarf-flowered heartleaf 8
4.3 Indiana Bat 8
4.4 Northern Long-eared Bat 9
4.5 Rock Gnome Lichen 10
4.6 Small-whorled pogonia 10
4.7 White irisette 11
5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12
List of Tables
Table 1: US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC - Official Species List.
Table 2: USDA Soil Units occurring within the project boundary.
List of Figures
Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3: NCCGIA Aerial Imagery Map
Figure 4: Habitat Map
Figure 4.1: Potentially Suitable Habitat Locations for Protected Species Map
Figure 5: NRCS Soils Map
Appendices
Appendix A: US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC - Official Species List and NC
Natural Heritage Program Data
Appendix B: Photolog
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 1
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The following report includes methods used and results for a threatened and endangered
species survey and habitat assessment for the proposed approximately 487-acre project
known as Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort — Camp Golden Valley. The study
area is a partially developed campground with adjacent forested areas. The tract is in the
Town of Bostic in Rutherford County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The site ranges in elevation
from 1,140 feet to 1,760 feet above mean sea level (MSL) (Figure 2).
The threatened and endangered species survey was conducted to determine the
occurrence of or the potential for existence of federally listed threatened and endangered
animal and plant species within the study area (Figure 3). Completion of this survey was
directed by and complies with three current state and federal regulations: the Federal
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543), the North Carolina Endangered
Species Act (N.C.G.S. Sect. 113 article 25), and the North Carolina Plant Protection and
Conservation Act of 1979 (N.C.G.S. Sect. 19b 106: 202.12-22).
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The protected species surveys and habitat assessment were conducted on February 22,
February 25, and March 28, 2022, on the approximately 487-acre project by ClearWater
Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company (ClearWater) to determine the
potential for occurrences of animal and plant species listed as endangered or threatened by
current federal regulations.
An official species list was obtained through the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
Information and Planning and Consultation (IPaC) on February 3, 2022. This species list
provides existing data concerning the presence or potential occurrence of threatened or
endangered species in the defined project boundary (Appendix A). The FWS lists six
federally threatened and endangered species, in addition to the bog turtle (threatened due
to similar appearance), as occurring or potentially occurring in the project boundary.
Table 1. FWS IPaC generated Official Species List for federally protected species listed as
potentially occurring within the project boundary.
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Bog Turtle _ Clemmys muhlenbergii Threatened'
Dwarf-flowered heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora Threatened
Indiana Bat Myotis sodalis Endangered
Northern long-eared bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
Rock gnome lichen Gymnoderma lineare Endangered
Small whorled pogonia Isotria medeoloides Threatened
White irisette Sisyrinchium dichotomum Endangered
1 Threatened due to similar appearance; not subject to Section 7 consultation.
A database search from the NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) dated February 3, 2022,
provided existing data concerning the presence or potential occurrences of federal and
state listed species in Rutherford County, North Carolina within one mile of the site
(Appendix A).
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 2
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

The NHP indicates one high-accuracy element occurrence (EO) of white irisette within the
study area. The EO straddles the property boundary in the southwest corner of the site.
This EO states that 13 white irisette individuals were observed in 2005. An additional high-
accuracy EO for white irisette is listed approximately 0.9 miles west of the study area. No
other threatened or endangered species EOs were found in the NHP database as
occurring within one mile of the project boundary.
During pedestrian field surveys conducted by ClearWater biologists, site habitats were
identified and compared with recognized habitats for seven federally protected species
potentially occurring on the site. Potential flora were identified to the taxonomic unit level
necessary to determine if the observed specimen was a protected species.
3.0 HABITAT CLASSIFICATION
During our site visits on February 22 and 25, 2022, Tyson Kurtz, Britten Yant, and R.
Clement Riddle identified nine habitats: planted pine stands, dry-mesic oak-hickory forest,
chestnut oak forest, mesic mixed hardwood forest, low mountain pine forest, maintained
corridors, bottomland forest wetland, headwater forest wetland, and emergent wetland.
(Figure 4). A general overview of the site and descriptions of each habitat type are
included below.
The project site covers approximately 487 acres and is currently under construction for a
Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort. The central area of the site is a former girl
scout camp that in recent years has been expanded and converted into a camping resort.
Developed areas are focused around the central valley that contains an unnamed tributary
to South Creek with an impoundment that formed an approximately 10-acre lake. A
wastewater treatment plant was constructed north of Fire Tower Road to serve the
camping resort. Additional development activities include road and cabin construction on
the mountainsides above the central valley. Construction activities were ongoing at the
time of this assessment.
The main stem of South Creek runs through the project site along Fire Tower Road. A
reach of Smart Branch is also within the project site. Streams on site are designated trout
streams by the NC Division of Water Resources.
Forested areas are occupied by a mixture of typical piedmont and mountain species.
Depending on aspect, the forest understories are dense with evergreen shrubs or sparse
with minimal cover of grass species. Logging activities have taken place across the site to
varying intensity, based on historic aerial photographs and existing stands of planted
pines.
The following is a description of each of the habitat types identified on the referenced site.
3.1 Planted Pine Stands
In the northeast portion of the site, several stands of densely planted loblolly pine
(Pinus taeda) stands are present. These areas have distinct rows of loblolly pine
trees that appear to be around 30 years old. Loblolly pine dominates the canopy
along with sparse cover of Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana), sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), white oak
(Quercus alba), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), black cherry (Prunus
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 3
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

serotina), southern red oak (Q. falcata), and post oak (Q. stellata). The
understory is sparse with saplings of the aforementioned species in addition to
American beech (Fagus grandifolia), eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana),
American holly (Ilex opaca), blueberry (Vaccinium sp.), and hickory (Carya sp.).
The herbaceous layer is nearly absent with only sparse cover of striped
wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata) and roundleaf greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia)
observed. Roundleaf greenbrier was also observed in the vine stratum.
3.2 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest
The dry-mesic oak-hickory forest habitat is the dominant forest type on the
project site. The habitat occupies the mid-elevation, primarily steep, south facing
slopes above the developed areas and below the xeric ridge tops. The species
composition of this habitat type varies across the site with age of the stand and
previous logging activities. The tract of oak-hickory forest in the southwest
portion of the site is mature, with larger canopy trees and a lower stem density.
The areas of oak-hickory forest north of Fire Tower Road and in between existing
developed areas are dense with younger canopy trees and increased
composition of pine species.
In general, the overstory of this habitat is dominated by white oak, pignut hickory
(Carya glabra), tulip poplar, and northern red oak (Quercus rubra). Additional
canopy tree species observed include several hickories (Carya spp.), sourwood,
southern red oak, chestnut oak (Quercus montana), black cherry, loblolly pine,
shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), scarlet oak (Q. coccinea), and black locust
(Robinia psuedoacacia). Woody understory species are sparse to moderately
dense and include flowering dogwood (Corpus florida), eastern redcedar, and
American holly. The herbaceous layer was observed to be sparse and composed
of Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), rattlesnake plantain orchid
(Goodyera pubescens), little brown jug (Hexastylis arifolia), a sedge (Carex sp.),
blue-eyed grass (Sisrynchium sp.), and an unknown grass species.
3.3 Chestnut Oak Forest
On and near the ridge tops, the oak-hickory forest transitions to a canopy
dominated by chestnut oak. The chestnut oak forests are dry, steep, and rocky.
Previous logging activities are evident and result in varied tree density across the
site. South of Fire Tower Road, the chestnut oak forest contains low-density,
mature hardwoods. North of Fire Tower Road, the chestnut oak forest is
comprised of dense, smaller, hardwood tree species.
In general, the dominant canopy tree species observed in this habitat type
include Chestnut oak, sourwood, scarlet oak, tulip poplar, and southern red oak.
Red maple (Acer rubrum), black cherry, and white oak were also observed in the
canopy. On exposed slopes, the understory contained minimal shrubs and low-
density saplings of canopy tree species. Christmas fern, roundleaf greenbrier,
and an unknown sedge (Carex sp.) were observed in sparse cover on the forest
floor. On sheltered slopes, mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia) was observed in
dense thickets with beetleweed (Galax urceolata) and little brown jug as the
dominant ground cover.
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 4
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

ClearWater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience Company Page 5 Project #919 Yogi Bear’s Jellystone Park Camp-Resort – Camp Golden Valley

3.4 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest The mesic mixed hardwood forest is found on the sheltered mid-elevation slopes and lower elevation areas surrounding the streams and developed area. Species composition and density varies depending on proximity to developed areas and elevation. The dominant canopy tree species observed in this habitat include red maple, sweetgum, American beech, black cherry, tulip poplar, and sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis). Additional tree species observed include sourwood, white pine (Pinus strobus), box elder maple (Acer negundo), shortleaf pine, northern red oak, pignut hickory, and mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa). Dominant shrub species varied based on aspect and proximity to the streams. The most prevalent shrub species observed include ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), American holly, mountain laurel, and great rhododendron (Rhododendron maximum). Additional shrub species observed include flowering dogwood, strawberry bush (Euonymus
americana), and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense). The herbaceous layer was relatively sparse during the survey and species composition widely varied across this habitat type. Dominant herbaceous species observed include river cane (Arundinaria gigantea), Christmas fern, cranefly orchid, partridge berry (Mitchella
repens), and little brown jug. On sheltered slopes, beetleweed, rattlesnake plantain, hepatica (Hepatica sp.), and an unknown species of wild ginger (Hexastylis sp.) were observed.
3.5 Low Mountain Pine Forest Two relatively small areas of low mountain pine forest are located upslope of both sides of the mouth of the lake. This community type is a blend of dense mountain and piedmont species that occurs on low to mid-elevations slopes. The dense canopy of this habitat is dominated by white pine, chestnut oak, sourwood, and northern red oak. The shrub layer is dense and is dominated by mountain laurel, white pine, great rhododendron, American holly, and red maple. The herbaceous layer is nearly absent, likely due to the dense shrub stratum. Observed herbaceous species include little brown jug, beetleweed, and trialing arbutus (Epigaea repens).
3.6 Maintained Corridors Maintained powerline easements, old logging roads, and the margins of recently paved roads are all included in this habitat type. These areas lack mature woody vegetation and are composed primarily of weedy and non-native species. Soils are disturbed or non-native in this habitat type. Dominant species observed in the herbaceous stratum include multiple species of broomsedge (Andropogon sp.), blackberry (Rubus sp.), goldenrod (Solidago sp.), Chinese lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), lovegrass (Eragrostis sp.), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), cinquefoil (Potentilla sp.), deertongue (Dicanthelium sp.), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), wild carrot (Daucus carota), St. John’s wort (Hypericum sp.), and saplings of loblolly pine and sweetgum. One maintained corridor runs through a wetland and is discussed in the Bottomland Forest Wetland habitat.
3.7 Bottomland Forest Wetland
An approximately one-acre bottomland forest wetland is located along the north
side of Fire Tower Road. This wetland occurs in the floodplain of Smart Branch and
has a canopy that is dominated almost exclusively by red maple and sweet gum.
Tulip poplar were observed around the margins. The shrub layer is relatively sparse
and composed of young red maple and sweetgum. The herbaceous layer is sparse
and dominated by multiple species of sedge (Carex spp.), common rush (Juncus
effusus) and golden ragwort (Packera aurea). Additional herbaceous species
observed include agrimony (Agrimonia sp.) and bugle weed (Lycopus virginicus).
Grape (Vitis sp.)was observed in the vine layer.
A maintained powerline easement cuts through this wetland. Herbaceous species
observed exclusively within the maintained easement include swamp aster
(Symphyotrichum puniceum), nutsedge (Cyperus sp.), blue stem (Andropogon sp.),
deertongue, and seedbox (Ludwigia alternifolia).
3.8 Headwater Forest Wetland
Several small headwater forest wetlands occur in the valleys adjacent to headwater
streams. These wetlands varied in composition but mostly contain mineral soils and
exhibit saturated soil conditions. Red maple and tulip poplar are the dominant
canopy tree species. The shrub layer is moderately dense and was observed to
contain highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), tag alder (Alnus serrulata),
American holly, spicebush (Lindera benzoin), great rhododendron, sweetgum, and
elderberry (Sambucus nigra). The herbaceous layer is moderately dense and
contains multiple species of sedge (Carex spp.), netted chain fern (Woodwardia
areolata), Christmas fern, common rush, cinnamon fern (Osumda cinnamomea),
Japanese honeysuckle, and river cane.
3.9 Emergent Wetland
An emergent wetland is located along the eastern edge of Luckadoo Mountain
Road. This wetland lacks trees but contains a few dogwood (Corpus sp.) shrubs.
Herbaceous species observed include false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica), arrowleaf
tearthumb (Persicaria sagittata), seedbox, common rush, jewelweed (Impatiens
capensis), three-way sedge (Dulichium arundinaceum), multiple species of sedge
(Carex spp.), Japanese honeysuckle, nutsedge, curly doc (Rumex crispus),
Allegheny monkey flower (Mimulus ringens), sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), and
swamp aster.
3.10 Soils
Soils mapped by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Rutherford
County Soil Survey are listed in Table 2 and shown in Figure 5 (NRCS 2022).
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 6
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

Table 2. USDA Soil Units occurring within the project boundary.
Map Unit Map Unit Name
Symbol
BoA Bandana-Ostin complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
ChA Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
DoB Dorian loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded
EvD Evard-Cowee complex, escarpment, 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony
EvE Evard-Cowee complex, escarpment, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stony
EwF Evard-Cowee complex, 50 to 85 percent slopes, rocky
PaC2 Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
PaD2 Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately eroded
TbC Tate-Greenlee complex, escarpment, 6 to 15 percent slopes, very stony
TbD Tate-Greenlee complex, escarpment, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very stony
UdC Udorthents, loamy, 0 to 15 percent slopes
4.0 PROTECTED SPECIES
The following is a brief description of each federally listed species included in the survey, its
recognized habitat, and comments regarding survey results for that species.
4.1 Bog Turtle
The bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii) is ►Fe,� ,.a„,w„Hw.w
federally listed as threatened in North Carolina. r,.' ••r. .14, `4'
This is the smallest emydid turtle, and one of •,„
the smallest turtles in the world. Adult
carapace length is 7.9 to 11.4 cm (3.1 to 4.5nWV�y u
inches). The dark brown or black carapace "`5 .% : �''�\,1'
may be marked with radiating light lines or a V'Vy „ '�;� •
light blotch on the vertebral and pleural scutes.
Kati''•,_
Scute annuli are usually prominent in juvenile = 4 _ f
and young adult specimens, but the carapace `I ,: f . %` '
may be nearly smooth in old adults. The head, ". • ` •" " ' r °
neck, and limbs are typically dark brown with variable reddish to yellow spots and
streaks. A large reddish-orange to yellow blotch is visible behind and above
each tympanum, sometimes merging into a continuous band on the neck. The
upper jaw is weakly notched. The plastron is brown or black, but often with
lighter yellow blotches towards the medial and anterior scute edges. A mature
male bog turtle has a concave plastron and a long, thick tail, with the vent
posterior to the rear edge of the carapace with tail extended. The female has a
flat plastron and a thinner, smaller tail, with the vent at or beneath the rear
carapace edge.
The southern population of the bog turtle, ranging from southern Virginia to
northern Georgia, is also protected with a threatened designation because its
physical appearance is similar to the northern population. The southern bog
turtle population is separated from the northern population by approximately 250
miles. However, individual bog turtles in the southern population closely
resemble individuals in the northern bog turtle population, causing difficulty in
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an Enviroscience Company Page 7
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

enforcing prohibitions protecting the northern population. Therefore, the FWS
has designated the southern population as "threatened (similarity of
appearance)." This designation prohibits collecting individual turtles from this
population and bans interstate and international commercial trade. It has no
effect on land management activities of private landowners in southern states
where the bog turtle lives.
Potentially suitable habitat for bog turtle was not found on site. Nearly all the
wetlands on site are forested. The emergent wetland areas lack the deep organic
soils and the microtopographic relief required for bog turtle nesting habitat.
Additionally, the northern population of bog turtle does not occur in North
Carolina. It is of the opinion of ClearWater that the proposed project would have
no effect on the northern bog turtle.
4.2 Dwarf-flowered heartleaf
Dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora) is federally listed as threatened in
North Carolina. Dwarf-flowered heartleaf habitat includes acidic sandy loam soils
along bluffs and nearby slopes, hillsides and ravines, in boggy areas adjacent to
creekheads and streams. Soil type is the most important habitat requirement
(Pacolet, Madison, or Musella types) (Murrell 2015). The plant needs sunlight in
early spring for maximum flowering and seed production. Flowering and fruiting
occurs from mid-March to early June.
The dwarf-flowered heartleaf has the smallest flowers of any North American
Hexastylis; most are less that 0.4 inch long with narrow sepal tubes (never more
than .28 inch wide). The jug-shaped flowers range from beige to dark brown,
sometimes greenish or purplish. The evergreen leaves are leathery, dark green,
and heart-shaped.
Potentially suitable habitat was found on site. The Pacolet soil series underlays
nearly half of the project site (Figure 5). Of the areas with Pacolet soil, there are
several steep, sheltered slopes adjacent to streams that are considered
potentially suitable habitat (Figure 4.1). These areas were surveyed for the
potential presence of dwarf-flowered heartleaf on March 28, 2022. Individuals of
little brown jug (Hexastylis arifolia), heartleaf ginger (H. heterophylla), and little
heartleaf (H. minor) were all observed in flower during the survey (Photolog
Photos 11-20). No dwarf-flowered heartleaf individuals were observed on-site
during the survey conducted within the USFWS Optimal Survey Window of
March-May. Therefore, it is the opinion of ClearWater that the proposed project
would have no effect on dwarf-flowered heartleaf(Hexastylis naniflora).
4.3 Indiana Bat
The Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) is federally listed as an endangered species. It
is a medium-sized Myotis closely resembling the little brown bat (Myotis
lucifugus) but differing in coloration. Its fur is a dull grayfish chestnut rather than
bronze, with the basal portion of the hairs of the back dull lead colored. This
bat's underparts are pinkish to cinnamon, and its hind feet smaller and more
delicate than in M. lucifugus. The calcar is strongly keeled. This species uses
limestone caves for winter hibernation. The preferred caves have a temperature
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 8
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

averaging 37 degrees to 43 degrees Fahrenheit in -
midwinter, and a relative humidity averaging 87
percent. Summer records are rather scarce. A F ':
few individuals have been found under bridges and • •
in old buildings, and several maternity colonies I � }.
have been found under loose bark and in the - --
hollows of trees. Summer foraging by females and • 81
•
juveniles is limited to riparian and floodplain areas.
Creeks are apparently not used if riparian trees
have been removed. Males forage over floodplain 3111,
ridges and hillside forests and usually roost in
caves. Foraging areas average 11.2 acres per
animal in midsummer. This bat has a definite breeding period that usually occurs
during the first 10 days of October. Mating takes place at night on the ceilings of
large rooms near cave entrances. Limited mating may also occur in the spring
before the hibernating colonies disperse.
No caves or large rock outcroppings were observed on site. Potentially suitable
summer habitat was found on site; however, the FWS recovery plan documents
Rutherford County as known only to contain suitable winter habitat for the
Indiana bat. Therefore, it is the opinion of ClearWater that the proposed project is
not likely to adversely affect the Indiana bat.
ClearWater biologists did not conduct a bat survey to confirm or deny the
presence of protected bat species.
4.4 Northern Long-eared Bat
The Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis), is a medium-sized
bat about 3 to 3.7 inches in length but with a wingspan of 9 to 10 inches. As its
name suggests, this bat is distinguished by its long ears, particularly as
compared to other bats in its genus, Myotis, which are actually bats noted for
their small ears (Myotis means mouse-eared). The NLEB is found across much
of the eastern and north central United States and all Canadian provinces from
the Atlantic coast west to the southern Northwest Territories and eastern British
Columbia. NLEBs spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called
hibernacula. They typically use large caves or mines with large passages and
entrances; constant temperatures; and high humidity with no air currents.
Summer habitat for the NLEB consists of the cavities, hollows, cracks, or loose
bark of live or dead trees typically greater than three inches DBH (diameter at
breast height).
No naturally occurring suitable wintering habitat for the NLEB exists within the
property boundary. Potentially suitable summer habitat for NLEBs was observed
on site in the form of mature trees and large snags in the forested areas.
ClearWater biologists did not conduct a bat survey to confirm or deny the
presence of protected bat species.
ClearWater consulted the FWS's maps of North Carolina counties that contain
confirmed hibernation or maternity sites. Rutherford County does contain multiple
watersheds listed as having confirmed hibernation or maternity sites; however,
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 9
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

these identified areas are greater than 20 miles from the project site. Therefore,
this project satisfies the 4(d) rule and consultation with USFWS is not required. It
is of the opinion of ClearWater that the project is not likely to adversely affect the
NLEB.
4.5 Rock Gnome Lichen
Federally listed as an endangered species, rock gnome lichen (Gymnoderma
lineare) occurs on rocks in areas of high humidity either at high elevations
(usually vertical cliff faces) or on boulders and large rock outcrops in deep river
gorges at lower elevations. Distinguishing characteristics include dense colonies
of narrow (.04 inch) straps that are blue-grey on the upper surface and generally
shiny-white on the lower surface. Near the base they grade to black (the similar
species of Squamulose cladonias are never blackened toward the base).
Fruiting bodies are borne at the tips of the straps and are black (similar Cladonia
species have brown or red fruiting bodies). Flowering occurs July through
September.
Suitable habitat for this species was not observed within the project boundary.
Small rock outcrops were identified on site but the entire site is below 1,800 feet
above MSL. Rock gnome lichen habitat is typically above 5,000 feet or in moist
river gorges (not present on this site). It is the opinion of ClearWater that the
proposed project would have no effect on the rock gnome lichen.
4.6 Small-whorled pogonia
Small-whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) is federally listed
as an endangered species. It occurs on upland sites in mixed-
deciduous or mixed-deciduous/coniferous forests that are
generally in second or third growth successional stages.
Characteristics common to most sites include sparse to •
moderate ground cover in the species' microhabitat, a relatively %-
open understory canopy, and proximity to features that create
long persisting breaks in the forest canopy. Soils at most sites d
are highly acidic and nutrient poor, with moderately high soil .
moisture values. Light availability could be a limiting factor for
this species. The stem is smooth, hollow pale green and 3.7- ' " `'4.1-"-7f •
9.8 inches tall with a single whorl of 5 to 6 light green elliptical leaves 3 inches
long and 1.6 inches wide. A flower is borne at the top of the stem. It is
distinguished from the similar Isotria verticillata by the latter's purplish stem and
long, dark sepals.
Potentially suitable habitat for the small whorled pogonia was not observed on
site. The project site does contain numerous edges of oak-hickory forest;
however, the understory, soil series, and underlying geology of the site do not
indicate highly acidic soils conditions that are required for this species. It is the
opinion of ClearWater that the project is not likely to adversely affect his species.
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 10
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

4.7 White irisette
White irisette (Sisyrinchium - r
dichotomum) is federally listed as t
endangered. This plant occurs on rich, :.,
basic soils probably weathered from
amphibolite, in clearings and the edges . ' • •-{
of upland woods where the canopy is 1: '. .
thin and often where downslope runoff
has removed much of the deep litter
layer ordinarily present on these sites. - • - .
This plant grows in a dichotomously- F '
branching pattern. It is 4 to 8 inches '' _ '
•
tall with palebluish-green bluish- reen basal leaves '" • •
,� ,
and tiny white flowers with reflexed petals in a cluster of 4 to 6 at the ends of
winged stems. The fruit is round with 3 to 6 seeds. White flowers and
dichotomous branching pattern distinguish it from similar species. The species
flowers in late May through July (USFWS 2013).
Potentially suitable habitat for the white irisette was observed in several locations
on site (Figure 4.1). Areas of potential suitable habitat are above 1,300 feet
above MSL, on Evard-Cowee complex soil series, are southwest to southeast
facing steep, rocky slopes, and have oak-hickory forest types with partially open
canopy or edge habitat. Additionally, the underlying geology of these areas is
known to contain lenses and layers of silicate and amphibolite rock which tends
to result in neutral soil acidity, which is key for this species.
The area in which the NHP documented occurrence of white irisette is in a stand
of mature oak-hickory forest with an open understory. This area was documented
to have been thinned by logging activities (prior to the 2000s), leaving gaps in the
canopy that allow partial sunlight to penetrate to the forest floor. Several grass
and sedge species were observed on the forest floor around the bases of the
mature hardwoods.
Additional areas of potential suitable habitat are located north of Fire Tower
Road. These areas contain younger stands of trees that appear to only be 20-40
years old. Loblolly pine is present with cover ranging from approximately 20-60%
in these areas. Abundant loblolly pine and the resulting pine litter makes these
areas less suitable for white irisette. However, pine establishment is typically
temporary, and the same species of understory grass and sedge species
observed in these areas were also observed in the more mature stand of highly
suitable habitat. Therefore, these areas are still considered potentially suitable
habitat for white irisette.
Due to documented occurrence of white irisette along the project boundary and
observations of potentially suitable habitat on site, ClearWater recommends that
areas of potential suitable habitat be surveyed for white irisette during the FWS
designated Optimal Survey window of late May — July. Any additional
development in areas of potentially suitable habitat is recommended to be placed
on hold until the targeted survey is conducted to confirm or deny the presence of
white irisette.
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 11
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
During completion of threatened and endangered species habitat assessments for the
Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort — Camp Golden Valley project, ClearWater
observed potentially suitable summer habitat for NLEB. Potentially suitable habitat for
dwarf-flowered heartleaf and white irisette were also observed on site.
This project satisfies the 4(d) rule for the NLEB and consultation with USFWS is not
required.
Areas identified as potentially suitable habitat for dwarf-flowered heartleaf were surveyed
on March 28, 2022, within the USFWS Optimal Survey Window. Individuals of little brown
jug (Hexastylis arifolia), heartleaf ginger (H. heterophylla), and little heartleaf (H. minor)
were all observed in flower during the survey. No dwarf-flowered heartleaf individuals were
observed on-site; therefore, it is the opinion of ClearWater that the proposed project would
have no effect on dwarf-flowered heartleaf(Hexastylis naniflora).
ClearWater recommends a targeted species survey be conducted for white-irisette during
the USFWS designated optimal survey windows of mid-May through July. A formal
biological conclusion for potential effects on white irisette cannot be drawn at this time.
A bat survey was not conducted to formally confirm or deny the presence of federally
protected bat species.
Potential flora were identified to the taxonomic unit level necessary to determine if the
observed specimen was a protected species.
It is of the opinion of ClearWater that the development of the Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park
Camp-Resort — Camp Golden Valley project is not likely to adversely affect federally
protected species listed as potentially occurring within the project boundary, with the
potential exception of white irisette.
Because of the transitory nature of some of the listed threatened and endangered species
and the particular flower/fruiting periods of some plants; it is possible that endangered
species populations and locations may change over time. Therefore, any potential findings
at a later date should be fully investigated and coordinated with appropriate agencies to
prevent potential adverse impacts.
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 12
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

6.0 REFERENCES
Fryer, Janet. 2019. Isotria medeoloides, small whorled pogonia and Isotria verticillata,
large whorled pogonia. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station,
Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/forb/isospp/all.pdf. Accessed February
2022.
Murrell, Zack et al. 2007. Ecological, Morphological, Micromorphological and Molecular
Analysis of the Species in the Hexastylis Complex. North Carolina Department of
Transportation. https://connect.ncdot.gov/proiects/research/RNAProiDocs/2002-
04FinalReport.pdf. Accessed March 2022.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2021. Web Soil Survey for
Rutherford County.
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.qov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx; Accessed
February 2022.
NCNHP (North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Database). 2021.
https://ncnhde.natureserve.orq/; Accessed February 2022
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic Map of North Carolina: Raleigh, North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development,
Geological Survey Section, scale 1:500,000, in color.
https://ncdenr.maps.arcqis.com/apes/MapSeries/index.html?appid=a8281 cbd24b
84239b29cd2ca798d4a10
North Carolina State University. White irisette.
https://proiects.ncsu.edu/cals/plantbiology/ncsc/rare/images/Sisyrinchium dichot
omum NHP.pdf. Accessed February 2022.
USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 1997. Recovery Plan for Rock Gnome
Lichen (Gymnoderma lineare) (Evans) Yoshimura and Sharp. Atlanta, GA. 30 pp.
USFWS. 1992. Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) Recovery Plan.
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0931/ML093160787.pdf
USFWS. 1995. White Irisette Recovery Plan.
https://proiects.ncsu.edu/cals/plantbiology/ncsc/rare/Recovery Sisyrinchium.pdf.
Accessed February 2022.
USFWS. 2007. Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) Draft Recovery Plan: First Revision. U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, MN. 258 pp.
USWFS. 2016. Northern Long-eared Bat Consultation Areas: Rutherford County.
https://www.fws.qov/asheville/pdfs/NLEB-4DRule Rutherford.pdf; Accessed
December 2021.
USFWS. 2021. Critical Habitat Interactive Mapper.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?url=https://services.arcgis.co
m/QVENGdaPbd4LUkLV/ArcGIS/rest/services/USFWS Critical_Habitat/Feature
Server&source=sd. Accessed February 2022.
USFWS. 2022. Bog Turtle. Environmental Conservation Online System.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6962; Accessed March 2022.
USFWS. 2022. Dwarf-flowered heartleaf. Environmental Conservation Online System.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458; Accessed March 2022.
USFWS. 2022. Indiana Bat. Environmental Conservation Online System.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5949; Accessed March 2022.
USFWS. 2022. Rock Gnome Lichen. Environmental Conservation Online System.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3933; Accessed March 2022.
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 13
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

USFWS. 2022. White Irisette. Environmental Conservation Online System.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8097; Accessed March 2022.
USWFS Asheville Field Office. 2016. Northern long-eared bat—what it means for you
project. https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html;
Accessed February 2022.
USFWS Information, Planning, and Consultation System. 2022.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/; Accessed February 2022.
USFWS Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office. 2018. Optimal Survey Windows for
North Carolina's Federally Threatened, Endangered, and At Risk Plants.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pdfs/Optimal Survey Windows for listed plants.pdf
; Accessed February 2022.
ClearWater Environmental Consultants,an EnviroScience Company Page 14
Project#919 Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp-Resort—Camp Golden Valley

Figures

Golden Valley Camp (+/- 487 AC)
Ü
0 4 82 Miles
Legend
Property Boundary
145 7th Ave West, Suite BHendersonville, NC 28792
Site Vicinity MapFigure 1Rutherfordton County,North Carolina
Drawn by: BWY 2.9.22; CEC Project# 919
Property Boundary
Golden Valley Camp (+/- 487 AC)
Ü
0 0.5 10.25 Miles
Legend
Property Boundary
145 7th Ave West, Suite BHendersonville, NC 28792
USGS Topographic MapDysartsville &Sunshine QuadsFigure 2
Rutherfordton County,North Carolina
Drawn by: BWY 2.9.22; CEC Project# 919
Property Boundary
Golden Valley Camp (+1- 487 AC)
Legend r I 4 . `.�....,, w_a N
Property Boundary
\
\ \ � i
j_ — —
I:i1 It s
•
i /;./ Sys:.
'-�- y ,.fF. . Y - - 1 - - //�
I , II) . ob. ._ " .,,
r
. i i k ti F-.o 4 't
;' .
i
' t . / .. 1 sr T. II II
•
j /'%
0_ /, l ' I
J.
•
. - j Property Boundary
0 500 1,000 2,000
/44
� Feet
Drawn by:BWY.2.9.22;CEC Project#919
Rutherfordton Count CLea vValer Aerial Photograph
Y AnEnviraScience Company® NCCGIA(2019)
North Carolina 1457thAve West,Suite B Figure 3
Hendersonville,NC 28792

C , .
„.... ,...___ 1, , „, i,._ ( . _____- amp Golden Valley (+1- 487 AC )
. , ..,..„.
„.., ___..., ,... ... ........ ..__ ________,
L . . . __ii, / , iA _,... '
�. r r:� , . ,
, , , : 'Irv-7— ,
„ -__ , .. ,. .... , -______ ,....
; ',Y •.. i-:.. — ; ' . - It f ' r II 6/H J ``� \\ . I -• \ fi +'
,*. ' :
i ''•e F' 1.7J$ 1� • �1\` f/� J I ` `r h rt r e
f ' ' yit r ;i \ 1 \ I
a ,' • . ., \_..„ .,41k --, \ 1 , '. ', k' ' I---- /
ycci
\ _ F-_ • I. ' A 7 l cr may'
1.
• ` . • •1'r'W I. ' r'; '6=X � s i.�.4 . \;:�..1.i 1� t.' ' . 4. t •.
Y, `—__— _—__ RJ rt IIII 1 1..\• •a' �.,�i Y
p1�-\ i .* -- •- \`'\: 6: y; i e I I �'t\ ,i�,-..- t. is !.- $
- t,2
\..' R '1 .•-1 ' ,‘,'•••::' •: -:-,--t - . \ i \ '• ,..,, .,...„., „......._.:0 -
) .,'•,..., . ... .,\ :,..... _ _. ..,. ,,,,,. • \ , _ ,
, ./. , , —______.,
, L.._
,,.__c
. ). i.,, ...:,.,.,,. ,,,, „. \-.T . >. . .,
„ ,
1 ..-.. ....:,..,,.......,„ , \.,.____,,
F,+ N fI�
•
•
� �' �-.....: - %i tom..•.
-• < r.. / - �,_— — "` ' � ... ...... . . / ( ,t
L . \er. K r ,err'': — I 'J ': Y.. 4,c , -R , •-c. --r .� ..:::1� -4`' -'ij-.,Wi • ,
'�% ' ,
yk$ : , t, lit_
i
• ,-„ „44'..i.;.': : I. I 1 ( .-1 I / i ./ ' •i ,
f.
>i '1�,.. Y •x 1` 'air................. ti, �� �' 1 I �'
1 C a. , �� r �I / %q- _,° ' `''4"4.‹ 1 , , s' 4, ..'�4-.i.r.: - .-,. / ' ' 1 i ;a I
�'+f j �� ! i' Y k `�R , ! {: 'o ff, . , `--�' 1
k.
X.., / ; v. ` :::ram• t 1
f f� • y��:. r I
'
(
\ -3i -�' ' N.,_ 04, i �r ' i r-te
j „y
--ti __
l • ' ; :.,`' .' - _07 t- :� (/ \ I .�. r�.e aj ::.1t? r r - a . � l .� � nr �
vi, ij ...
I. __
. . .
„___
. 'i:,./..,. , ,
I' J A : �a : .. .). :. ,,.
. ..„ t
e.
'7 i 1 \‘). /.: ''4 .. : / ,.--,_,---__., i 7- 1
.-._ , ' '0,:.-\k,( /
rs :{( :/.../..- _ ,� :' fir, __ ` .• ,,.
•
I
i iic } 1 !~- ''° The Maintained Corridor habitat type is not shown due to scale
,Ill ` ,'� ' . ► 1/ JI T `' and lack of current aerial imagery showingall corridors.
•
.',i / ;Ag I i * L_ Parcel Boundary Terrestrial Habitats
,, r ar''"'. .: 7
i,. --------- — — —' ., Contours - 20 ft Chestnut Oak Forest
. r
1 ...:0, ....,..,
t ;' �__:..7—..� 1, �' Streams Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest
. "; 3 { i,,,,....,.: • : 4-1 �f.41 v,. ,,,,.. e:.l tje,e. /'�P 1 7...,..:
.. 1 4;: ..
�'' Wetland Habitats Low Mountain Pine Forest
_z40
- j s ,. L Bottomland Forest Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest
0 500 1 ,000 2 000 • ` '
> .w-1•i&i�' ',\ Emergent Planted Pine Stand
Feet Headwater Forest Developed Areas - No Habitat
Drawn by:1TJK 3.17.22;ClearWater Project#919 . .
CLearWaerHabitat Ma
Rutherfordton County, An EnviroScience Company=- p
North Carolina 145 7th Avenue West, Suite B Figure 4
Hendersonville, NC 28792

Ca„ , ,m, . ,. p Golden Valley_(+1- 487 AC )
ti ..
.--- .7/ 7 , .-(T ------ \ ',.. \ , . , . , 4.4irkq).716,\_ ,,, \ \ \ iikrk . , .
_____ „, , ,__
. ,..... , . _ ___ , ,, ,
„ ..., ... -...... , \ ,. , .,
.„, . , „.__,..,. ',, 1 .1...- i- .--. ---, \ \ \ ' ‘ • ,,, \ ',, '\,. ,s,.,,...1 \ ', \I ' ',\ \ .. ..; \ \ \ , k k , \ i.
yy / l ' .' ` ,. , `` } 4 it
\\_ r , tom: �\� \ ,\ .\\\\ i J J .
•
\� \ —`____-_ Project Boundary \_\ ;J
> � �\_— �. -7 ter. 1 .." ,\.. '...iy
I (
it
\ {I \ •
f I ; i.
/ , „ , „ i ) 1 (---_.; „... .-----...."1 , .
Jy/ ify( r� i 7 r'1 I J `\\ i• \.%:,‘II .,., _ 1 1 . �� �
• �'
�I \
4 r 1 - -#.; ' \:.-)4.'stilirr ''.4-4 . r .,,• ,0-4.,.._.. ...,
..._.' l
' ' - ;�� %- -
- l '
1 f I i; + + . f ce' - . Illigh,r _ 't> _ %f✓ - ' -• �- . '-.
4 f yr i
mkt
ilieeolir"'"'
' i Iti, ) . ,. . ,
. _,... , , , 7, ,.
_ . ri.,./ .,/,
..
t ! f 1
_ ..
...: .... ... 7 . , .. ..,, ,.. ..____..... ___, ,_______ _L___......... ., „ , „\\..., ,.... ,...„ .
/ i' ' 1: Ali i.k.' ..
: :"--._.'1') ). '\,....0
—Th i'l i : ' /. 1 } / / ,/ .///I"7„, ----r-"7„,.. — .. __.-- +i/ .//,, yr. / ,/, • .• ! I . I it'
( 1 I .7'IL/-( C(l'•-i.'\' c) 1--7-'-'7:— -- ' i ?:';'('''.- ----. fa „-• s4),)- 1 .-- ..r.
44 '...,N 0 i \ -V /4 : ). ) I I i
1 d ` ' f�� ���� ram. j� •�y •1 I •, J C����I - 1 ' 1,. ~�\ 4
/ // . 1 I 1 =� 1, I f I L[/;/ --. //./_\'� _ - :ti ' `-- ,`4_ 1, 1 i /'r
\ �\, ��J•�\: i' ( r-_ f ;''r' \ l N-1\\�=- - \r• rd. .14l \.� ;
1 % I r� _ 1. ��— ��—', I-/-..--------- \ -_ •i` "' f 1 •,•
:'.4. '. . .:: . •:,,,-,.,,,',,,,•2 F.,...„-:-.-___..--. -..,..--...„-.__ ,.1 ',,,,'•4., 1. c j[I//1 („------___--i"---..:::•-.:'—j.:71-ii_------.,7\.,\\•, ""„ . . 1 , , ,.. , ,," .. ' . •
. /� �
��� , ,�,� \ l"' /I � 'J — Pro ect Boundary
r � � t . 1 rY r
/ _'.i �/7ill( I i.� Suitable Habitat - Dwarf Flowered Heartleaf
' '—I - - t I Documented White Irisette Population
_ S fff Suitable Habitat - White Irisette
0 500 1 ,000 2,000 — Suitable Edge Habitat - White Irisette
Feet Ir ( I ( Contours 20 ft '
Drawn By:TJK 2 24J22;Clearwater Project#919 �•_ I -- _ - h• r_
CLear\A/aer Federal T&E Species
Rutherfordton County, Are EnviroScience Company
Suitable Habitat Map
North Carolina 145 7th Avenue West, Suite B Figure 4.1
Hendersonville, NC 28792

EvE
EwF
PaD2
PaD2
ChA
PaD2
W
EvE
EvD
PaD2
EvE
TbD
ChA
EvE
EvD
EwF
PaC2
EvE
PaC2
PaC2
EvD
EvE
ChA
BoA
TbC
DoB
EwF
EvD
UdC
BoA
ChA
DAM
BoAEwF
PaD2
Golden Valley Camp (+/- 520 AC)
Ü01,000 2,000500Feet
Legend
Property Boundary
BoA - Bandana-Ostin Complex
ChA - Chewacla Loam
DAM
DoB - Dogue Loam
EvD, EvE, EwF - Evard-Cowee Complex
PaC2, PaD2 - Pacolet Sandy Clay Loam
TbC, TbD - Tate-Greenlee Complex
UdC - Udorthents
W - Water
145 7th Ave West, Suite BHendersonville, NC 28792
USDA Soils MapFigure 5Rutherfordton County,North Carolina
Drawn by: BWY 1.25.22; CEC Project# 919
Property Boundary
Appendix A:
US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC -
Official Species List and NC Natural
Heritage Program Data

United States Department of the Interior #�
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville,NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.govinc-es/es/countyfr.html
In Reply Refer To: February 03, 2022
Project Code: 2022-0002885
Project Name: Camp Golden Valley
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by
section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin
their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act(Act) of
1973, as amended(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service)—Asheville Field Office's (AFO)website: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/nccounties.html. The AFO website list includes "species of concern"—species that
could potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future.
Also available are:
• Design and Construction Recommendations
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/Recommendations.html
• Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants
https://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/plant survey.html
• Northern long-eared bat Guidance
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/projectreview/NLEB inWNC.html
• Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists.
Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act,

02/03/2022 2
the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each
county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project
planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may
be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the
enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of
the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts)that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a B
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands

02/03/2022 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

02/03/2022 2
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0002885
Event Code: None
Project Name: Camp Golden Valley
Project Type: New Construction
Project Description: Former Girl Scout Camp. Data for after the fact permit application.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.goog1e.com/maps/@35.5001782,-81.80010380059682,14z
of
f.,
5
', f.�DLr r,'�.I,
ti. I hlin
# 1 .
Counties: Rutherford County, North Carolina

02/03/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 8 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Indiana Bat Myotis sodalis Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5949
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
Bog Turtle Glyptemys muhlenbergii Similarity of
Population:U.S.A.(GA,NC, SC,TN,VA) Appearance
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. (Threatened)
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6962
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743

02/03/2022 4
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Dwarf-flowered Heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458
Small Whorled Pogonia Isotria medeoloides Threatened
Population:
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1890
White Irisette Sisyrinchium dichotomum Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8097
Lichens
NAME STATUS
Rock Gnome Lichen Gymnoderma lineare Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3933
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

02/03/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Actl and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
THERE ARE NO FWS MIGRATORY BIRDS OF CONCERN WITHIN THE VICINITY OF YOUR PROJECT
AREA.
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area.When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.

Roy Cooper,Governor
al ■■■
■■ R NC DEPARTMENT OF D.Reid Wilson,Secretary
■
■■k■A NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■ Missy Buchanan
Deputy Dire ttrr,Natural Heritage Program
N CN H D E-17050
February 3, 2022
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
145 7th Avenue West
Hendersonville, NC 28792
RE: Camp Golden Valley; 919
Dear ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one-mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
1) 1:1 W.JONES STREET,RALEIGI I.NC 27603 1051 MAIL SERVICE CENTER.RALEIGH.NC 27699
OFC 919707.5120 • FAx [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Camp Golden Valley
Project No. 919
February 3, 2022
NCNHDE-17050
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name mmon Name st Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Natural 22959 Chestnut Oak Forest --- 2010 C 3-Medium --- --- G5 S5
Community (Dry Heath Subtype)
Natural 22957 Dry-Mesic --- 2010 C 3-Medium --- --- G4G5 S4
Community Oak--Hickory Forest
(Piedmont Subtype)
Natural 22956 Low Mountain Pine --- 2010 D 3-Medium --- --- G3G4 S2?
Community Forest (Montane Pine
Subtype)
Natural 22958 Mesic Mixed Hardwood--- 2005-05-23 D 3-Medium --- --- G3G4 S4
Community Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
Vascular Plant 21841 Sisyrinchium White Irisette 2005-05-23 C 2-High Endangered Endangered G2 S2
dichotomum
Vascular Plant 27607 Smilax lasioneura Blue Ridge Carrion- 2009-Pre F? 3-Medium --- Significantly G5 S1
flower Rare
Peripheral
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Name11.11 Representational Rating Collective Rating
Yellowtop/Biggerstaff Mountain R1 (Exceptional) C1 (Exceptional)
No Managed Areas Documented within the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/helo. Data query generated on February 3,2022;source: NCNHP, Q4,January 2022.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 6

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Camp Golden Valley
Project No. 919
February 3, 2022
NCNHDE-17050
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name r Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
_Ill` Date Rank I_ mm i
Crustacean 9128 Cambarus lenati Broad River Stream 2018-02-15 E 3-Medium --- Significantly G2 S2
Crayfish Rare
Crustacean 31047 Cambarus spicatus Broad River Spiny 2011-09-20 E 3-Medium --- Special G3 S2
Crayfish Concern
Freshwater Fish32464 Etheostoma Seagreen Darter 2015-06-15 E 3-Medium --- Significantly G4 S3
thalassinum Rare
Liverwort 22774 Frullania appalachiana A Liverwort 2005? E 3-Medium --- Significantly G3G4 S1?
Rare Limited
Moss 28784 Bryum limbatum A Moss 2007-04-23 E 4-Low --- Significantly G5? S1?
Rare Disjunct
Natural 19632 Chestnut Oak Forest --- 2010 E 4-Low --- --- G5 S5
Community (Dry Heath Subtype)
Natural 22959 Chestnut Oak Forest --- 2010 C 3-Medium --- --- G5 S5
Community (Dry Heath Subtype)
Natural 30302 Chestnut Oak Forest --- 2010 E 4-Low --- --- G4G5 S4
Community (Herb Subtype)
Natural 22957 Dry-Mesic --- 2010 C 3-Medium --- --- G4G5 S4
Community Oak--Hickory Forest
(Piedmont Subtype)
Natural 3846 Low Elevation Rocky --- 2006-09-14 A 4-Low --- --- G1 S1
Community Summit (Basic
Subtype)
Natural 22956 Low Mountain Pine --- 2010 D 3-Medium --- --- G3G4 S2?
Community Forest (Montane Pine
Subtype)
Natural 22958 Mesic Mixed Hardwood--- 2005-05-23 D 3-Medium --- --- G3G4 S4
Community Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
Natural 7003 Montane Oak--Hickory --- 2010 E 4-Low --- --- G3 S3
Community Forest (Basic Subtype)
Page 3 of 6

Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Element Accuracy Federal State Glotate
Group Observation Occurrence -Status Status _Ailk,Rank
_ Date Rank IlL
Natural 8053 Rich Cove Forest --- 2010 E 4-Low --- --- G2G3 S2
Community (Foothills Rich
Subtype)
Vascular Plant 33198 Collinsonia tuberosa Piedmont Horsebalm 2001-07-16 E 3-Medium --- Significantly G3G4 S1S2
Rare
Peripheral
Vascular Plant 22574 Collinsonia tuberosa Piedmont Horsebalm 2005? E 2-High --- Significantly G3G4 S1S2
Rare
Peripheral
Vascular Plant 27606 Packera paupercula Balsam Ragwort 2009-Pre E 4-Low --- Special G5 S1?
var. paupercula Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant 20971 Sisyrinchium White Irisette 2006-09-14 F 2-High Endangered Endangered G2 S2
dichotomum
Vascular Plant 21841 Sisyrinchium White Irisette 2005-05-23 C 2-High Endangered Endangered G2 S2
dichotomum
Vascular Plant 27607 Smilax lasioneura Blue Ridge Carrion- 2009-Pre F? 3-Medium --- Significantly G5 S1
flower Rare
Peripheral
Vascular Plant 22576 Thermopsis mollis Appalachian Golden- 1995-06 E 2-High --- Significantly G3G4 S2
banner Rare
Throughout
Vascular Plant 22573 Trillium simile Sweet White Trillium 2001-07-16 E 3-Medium --- Special G3 S2
Concern
Vulnerable
Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Namr Representational Rating E Collective Rating
Yellowtop/Biggerstaff Mountain R1 (Exceptional) C1 (Exceptional)
BRD/First Broad River Headwaters Aquatic Habitat R1 (Exceptional) C4 (Moderate)
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on February 3,2022;source: NCNHP, Q4,January 2022.
Page 4 of 6

Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 5 of 6

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 6 of 6
Appendix B :
Photolog

^` tij,"' i 1 1t f
'E • 3ti, a- 4•
t a
ai i
n 3j r 1! 1 Ai f�"
t,f e;1 i-
.I s:,t i..„i 1i,.l„i,,.•
1Ii'
11'
I, + E 4 IIII i
€ 1 i1 ti
r
L
T
Photo 1. Typical view of planted pine stand habitat.
t
r •
1
•.A
4
� 2 R J�9�ll g 22 II
Photo 2. Typical view of young stand of dry-mesic oak-hickory forest habitat type north of
Fire Tower Road. Potentially suitable habitat for white irisette.

;-. Ni rl, . .1!,lift
1 t
i.,:1 �' r 11 i I,r �� a Y ;1.' f,!f ' , 9‘ s .�
;441 d
, t '�W Pik,
�.
r a^
1 + � Y f_ '! 9_v
1 S 11 t t
i _ �-1-� - � •kS Y" v
k ; .i' i •p it,-.1 ,i s Is s `' ---`' — �.d
t �v t r r *fi' .1 v mow'
r, q '1 h, F ¢ s
•
_ Ito-',. _ Y L4 ,1, 1' ,e.�'� a .y , 7: ,---1:'RP.- „ -
- x y , �€'. . a s` o
0
Photo 3. Typical view of mature stand of dry-mesic oak-hickory forest south of Fire
Tower Road. Potentially suitable habitat for white irisette.
•`9
1;40
x �11•t Itjt * ri, ' *`.. A.%ii 5' ./. .4". �C
•
.,' - I 021'021202'2 100
Photo 4. Typical view of mesic mixed hardwood forest.

'Cyy 1 's r- 7P
I
•
j
r- .e ..
.1 w'22, 1 l 5,
Photo 5. Potentially suitable habitat for dwarf-flowered heartleaf within mesic mixed
hardwood forest habitat.
�, 4øi . rf t
�" 0i,
`y ` 1!
RY , «t 3S 1
d� a ii %!p�hi ' 7 T_ /
j
sr \ `y
,y ,x is a rw'!'ar-r• r. ?
Photo 6. Typical view of mesic mixed hardwood forest on north facing slopes.

4
.• . „--., ,, , ,,,,,,i,,,,„,, ,,, , ,-
_,:,...,.......-. .. , ,,, ,,.. .,„_,
, ....,,_, ,,,„ ,.
• . ;,,,„.
., ...2 :1't,,, .L.
tr
110k '4 ip,,,,,,, .4 I liP
{
a
Photo 7. View of one of several maintained corridors.
4_ ._-.irk' '- 4 fir` t_ 4ITY
. ..
Vs
... ,. .......,_ _ .. . ..,
. - - �
� �
. _.. ,,,...‘.. .,..,
_,
--;•,_;-4--.,-*7-- ....., Arf-,- -
- 1' -- --.';'
- 'r.f - • 'bid �1 J
`,02a12�~2~2'/3t1 2 -1:CI`�1�©.
Photo 8. Typical view of bottomland forest wetland habitat.

•
ff---..-5-`,1''''''`g4I'lin*r'----. - --'''''..."'''.'„:",r;''' *, .,..c , -v.,,_.-, -, ..
t . =.
Photo 9. Typical view of headwater forest wetland habitat.
try,t �
�a1e&Time'Tue,1 I tii1
Position'--35 5951 ° , 7 1}5n t '_;
:Altitude.1133ft{-452,
< i
SGatuhi N1GS 8p :* 4 s -;
Azimuth'Bearing 354`NQ1 W:6382m1 s True{-
Ele�etion Angle P 1; + y x"' ,
ry # �
Horizon Angie o1 3 • I '. r
• Zoom 1 E1X
°ice ' ' a
t.
4oO emergent wetland ,, 3-
x; �
� �T:• �I am' Y l� 14 `� `�I-.' -}Y,S_R' -3P ,¢.� �` ����r � ' 1�
.+�fa _,.y l 4,f;,r = .. , Pie" v..c. : }` ,-► -pt' �
�g �a 6 P A g4 `-A.:-
RCN .kl' 3',. " -c=
.1-'''''.---'''''''''').'-‘&.... V5: '7..*.,-s:--'r Y,''''.4-VI:;itA,---
.4.7 To.::,,*:,,,,c,,..,,,,,.-...T,-;,....,_, ,. 4, . ,t, ,,,,,,:"..,,,-1.-- -,04,,,- ',- ' - ,,..: ( , -rrz"f..„:
iii
23
", '--r-�F.-_, .-ail--.1 -.� - ' -yam~'* . i'1TK �'�•�+C} �.r �� _ ! 1
Photo 10. Typical view of emergent wetland habitat.

eV ..a
,' i rel' a
•
• . s
, 414 .4
a riikilH-PL.k71/4'• ,._,,,,,,.. • 4,-, .
00 ,
'4 ti - '`io. , 0a1/28lM2R 13:41
_1611
Photo 11. Little brown jug (Hexastylis arifolia) in flower.
qi-4 1
-;-t, - -
-.. : ... . ,
111 :44;*14441;114P4: ---k's' . - .416.. i
" -' ,\ ik e
; VP r � %,'
L ►11
r
yfy y ;i 1 ., 030 t.t8/202`2 ii 3:o
dc-iikL ,,..+1,... . 14 ,
l
Photo 12. Another little brown jug (Hexastylis arifolia) in flower(damaged).

1;2 i p ,
i . N ..40Q1P: No+%.. , •
At yy1
• S 6
r........._______ , e L. --._ - -,
,,, . _
. _ 4' 1. v., z, . - .-
(4111/4,,.. 4 - , , ' , .- .- . . . . 4 ii.
- _ _-*. - - r t+s+rww. p
3 J ir 1 - e• ._' _yam
•
" •.4
e^` i.
. np ......i, 1 `'• 031�28120.022 11 1
\ -.. -'
' 'mow-
.�.., iiv
Photo 13. Heartleaf ginger (Hexastylis heterophylla) in flower.
s
r ' .4 a
•
It % 6 • _ ' v
air
' / - jw -
•
•
ff k
tes
- •'R�
r .' �) a 03;12�812022. 11 :Q9
`OP"
it :1w ,g+ 11 r
..f .? 4 „ .r 011 .-
Photo 14. Heartleaf ginger(Hexastylis heterophylla) calyx tube width.

S ""' , CV
-
4
• r lirkj,ap:._
•
• i" '�1 uK
; 4
6 .I.'
-. .•it S.,,... .. 'it;. t,
. 0 ft....„ EZ.
•
Ale
F�
i
•
,' 00112011E022 TI :'10
Photo 15. Heartleaf ginger (Hexastylis heterophylla) calyx lobe width.
0 • 'tE.y 0
IoNi, Nit, , ,+,_,.. -ii. ._.---,,,,!...01/1. ./ ' ;4, --. '
k +� %'
o..-.A. :� d y
• Apr. 1
Fti.
\"�
1t 4
. °° o3/2°020'22- 12:E04 .
,, , 1 r, tftr'- :;- . .
4
Photo 16. Additional heartleaf ginger(Hexastylis heterophylla) in flower.

-
1%
* I - y i •
,
T
kf
';' '. --,..; '-. '6 16.4.:-. Niso.,a . . 4 t 1-•
��' ,. , �4 .03�20120022 1.2015"--
y J 4
..,,„ ..,,,si ..i, ____, ..ork. s......ts„.
Photo 17. Little heartleaf (Hexastylis minor) in flower.
f ,
JI
%PI
411
�. . Atail*- 4010_ •
- 4 - was
tt
, AZtiktitV..„,;, . ' -
.l .. . - • - ��7-
� r .a
�' z
. , ' cN•1"r? 03"1`-8/202 :1 5.
N R. ��• „Ilk N R
". 11 IE
Photo 18. Little heartleaf(Hexastylis minor) flower up close.

` ,
lir
› /
, 4,4
�4 e
r+
V
r ,/ . 4
A i
r r 1
• - ' Ilill4 .
• 1 0,3/28/2022 12: 15 1
44OP. / --.. . ih...4k.%. "kik
. L1 Alkimillik:
Photo 19. Little heartleaf (Hexastylis minor) calyx tube opening width vs calyx lobe
length.
f
464. .... *ilk , ...._ . '
a y.
....z
'. 4 1 1/'
,, . . •
...
, 1
. ....f.:,,4c . ,
t...... ,
,,,,,..., ,._, . , - - ; ,.. k ,.:ik''';"6,`.‘_
....., ,
..e6
i .4;�' _,
. r 7 w
R
Vi:l
a' -' IS - ,„iik it • -
:11
Ali, .
� "03/248/2022 12:1�7
Photo 20. Another little heartleaf(Hexastylis minor) leaves with more "typical" variegation
pattern.

SMENr p
ra� '°' aP__ F T
°- U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
Northern Long-Eared Bat Consultation Areas
' 9 a Rutherford County
N
Burke Co .
Mcdowell Co .
.,. II y .
k
MO NTA1N
,� Rutherford Co .
Rutherfordtor r,
Spindale
Forest City'
Polk Co .
_ _,-- - Boiling
Springs,
1-.
,Tryon ",yid Rica,
Landrum
ee
National Geographic,Esn; DeLorme,HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS,NASA,
ESA, METI,NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, increment P Corp.
a
0 North Carolina County Boundary
��
Watersheds with Known NLEB Maternity Trees or Hibernation Sites W �4141.11107.4j�` 4�
Ifyour project falls within 111011 ''w
AllifOS
'�
the red areas identified in � � 1116
l
Rutherford County, please 0 5 Miles .�
contact the USFWS I ' I USFWS Ecological Services Black box indicates
Asheville Field Office. 0�� Asheville,apDate:North Carolinarilit large mapfextent
5 Kilometers Map 2/3/2016 �.,.�