510107_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220330

J�Mlvlslon of Water Resources
Facility Numbers © - F _ETFO Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Com liance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emerge
Date of Visit: 1,3,110t Zu�Arrival Time: Departure Time:
Farm Name: oy w Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone:
O Other O Denied Access
Co ntyr�4"+M1� Region: RPA
Physical Address: Ci lt-r'f i 4 6� " ' � ' &
Facility Contact: Title: Phone: [ i tJ - 3 9 5-r o
Onsite Representative: Integrator: -So, + �"�'-A.1
Certified Operator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:*5 f 4boR3s Longitude: --gj y Z9 *g Z9
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
[Non -Layer
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[-]Yes
[:]No
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
.E!rNA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes VN
❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - O Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
��NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 2 Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
2TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
PKo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
Flo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
T
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or im rovement�
r
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J21/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 194",-V','JA4 , SnM .
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E!INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [-]Yes ❑�1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination? TT
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reaulred Records & Documents
❑ YesN ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NoNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements [-]Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall 0Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �% N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes rr o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: 1 _ b Date of Inspection: 9 i G
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Zo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ErNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours andlor document
❑ Yes E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
A!J"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
;EI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑Yes
W'N
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
ID
flZ�
��Z©ZIP
LAVgo
r"� T f 6111
ct� ��s
Reviewerilnspector Name: \ \A_'�-e
Reviewev Inspector Signature: um� ce�g�
Page 3 of 3
.7v%
Phone:g1 (-4qI-41Z4"7—
Date: 31 3D t Z D -LZ
511212020