HomeMy WebLinkAbout19930786 Ver 2_Mitigation Plans_20070821q3-078G Va
'~EtVF? - &1'Al'ca GZUAUTY
~TL1~!C,~ ~"'!d7 Tn!~a~~'>~;'~? SRANCH
The Reserve at St. James Plantation
Mitigation Plan
Brunswick County, North Carolina
Prepared by:
Land Management Group, Inc.
Wilmington, NC
Prepared for:
The Reserve Development Company, LLC
St. James, NC
August 2007
t ~
Table of Contents
List of Tables, Figures, and Appendices ................................................................................. ii
1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................3
2.0 Site Description .......................................................................................................................3
2.1 Wetlands .............................................................................................................................3
2.2 Soils ....................................................................................................................................3
2.3 Vegetation ...........................................................................................................................4
3.0 Mitigation .................................................................................................................................4
3.1 Wetland Restoration ...........................................................................................................4
3.2 Wetland Preservation .........................................................................................................4
4.0 Monitoring ...............................................................................................................................5
5.0 Implementation Schedule .......................................................................................................5
6.0 Summary ..................................................................................................................................5
List of Tables and Figures
Table 1. List of tree and shrub species to be planted within created wetlands .........................6
Figure 1. Vicinity map ..............................................................................................................7
Figure 2. Topographic map ......................................................................................................8
Figure 3. Soils map ...................................................................................................................9
Figure 4. Aerial photograph ....................................................................................................10
Figure 5. Site plan showing proposed wetland impacts and mitigation .................................11
Figure 6. Wetland restoration #1 ............................................................................................12
Figure 7. Wetland restoration #2 ............................................................................................13
Figure 8. Wetland restoration #3 ............................................................................................14
ii
1.0 Introduction
In order to mitigate for 1.5 acres of 404 wetland impact associated with the Reserve at St.
James Plantation in St. James, North Carolina, the Reserve Development Company, LLC agrees to
restore wetlands on site, buy into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), and preserve
remaining wetlands on site. This tract is approximately 2372.24 acres in size and is located off of
Highway 211 in Brunswick County, NC (Figures 1 and 2).
The applicant proposes to restore 1.18 acres of 404 wetlands on site by removing old dirt
roads in three separate locations. The elevation of these areas will be restored to wetland grade and a
variety of shrubs and trees that are similar to vegetation growing in adjacent wetlands will be
planted. This mitigation plan outlines the restoration activities planned for the site.
2.0 Site Description
2.1 Wetlands
A site delineation of 404 wetlands was performed by Land Management Group, Inc.
and was approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on 06/12/02. The site contains a
total of 1,290 acres of 404 wetlands, most of which are Carolina Bays. Most of the wetlands
can be classified as non-riparian, however the upper limits of Polly Gully Creek, one
unnamed tributary to Polly Gully Creek, and two unnamed tributaries of Beaverdam Creek
exist within the property (Figure 2). The applicant has submitted a new wetland survey to the
Corps for reauthorization.
2.2 Soils
According to the Brunswick County Generalized Soil Survey, uplands within the site
are classified as Leon fine sand, Kureb fine sand, and Mandarin fine sand (Figure 3).
Wetlands within the site are shown as Murville fine sand.
3
2.3 Vegetation
Pond pine (P. serotina), loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus), black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica), red bay (Persea borbonia), and titi (Cyrilla racemiflora) are the dominant plant
species that exist in the wetlands on this property. Uplands support loblolly pine (Pinus
taeda), live oak (Quercus virginiana), longleaf pine (P. palustris), wax myrtle (Myrica
cerifera), and turkey oak (Q. laevis). There are several dirt logging roads located throughout
the tract, most are approximately 20' wide (Figure 4). A majority of the uplands within the
site have been cleared in anticipation of planned residential development.
3.0 Mitigation
3.1 Wetland Restoration
A total of 1.18 acres of uplands will be restored to wetlands by removing old fill
material (Figure 5). Material will be removed until the natural soil profile is reached. Any
existing culverts will be removed. If needed, a layer of organic material obtained from the
wetland areas to be filled will be removed and added on top of the excavated area to provide
a suitable substrate for vegetation establishment. Final grade of the wetland restoration areas
will be that of the adjacent existing wetlands. Native shrub and tree species (Table 1) will be
established in the restoration areas at an eight-foot spacing (a total of approximately 800
plants). In addition to the planted material, it is anticipated that vegetation from surrounding
areas will volunteer into the area.
In addition to the on-site restoration, the applicant will also buy into the Ecosystem
Enhancement Program for the restoration of 0.5 acre of non-riparian wetlands elsewhere
within the Lower Cape Fear Watershed.
3.2 Wetland Preservation
The applicant has already preserved a large amount of wetlands on site through
conservation easements with the North American Land Trust (HALT). Remaining wetlands
located within common areas that are not already preserved will be placed in a conservation
4
easement with NALT. Wetlands located within individual lots will be preserved using
restrictive covenants.
4.0 Monitoring
A general site analysis will occur immediately after mitigation activities have been completed
and will consist of taking photographs of the restored wetlands to evaluate initial success. A small
narrative will be written that summarizes mitigation activities and will be submitted to the Corps and
DWQ office. From then on, monitoring will occur annually for three years, or until deemed
successful by the Corps and DWQ. During each monitoring event, the vegetation within the restored
areas will be counted and identified. Success criteria will be the survival of at least 70% of planted
vegetation. A monitoring report that summarizes these results and includes photographs of the
mitigation site will be submitted to the Corps and DWQ. Because of the small size of the wetland
restoration areas, hydrological monitoring will not occur. However, the survivorship of wetland
plants within the areas will provide a good indication of hydrology.
5.0 Implementation Schedule
Wetland mitigation will commence as soon as all necessarypermits have been obtained, with
wetland vegetation planting occurring during the first winter season.
6.0 Summary
In order to mitigate for 1.5 acres of freshwater wetland impacts associated with the Reserve at
St. James Plantation in St. James, NC, the applicant agrees to restore 1.18 acres of wetlands on-site
by removing old fill material (dirt roads). These areas will then be planted with native wetland
vegetation. In addition, the applicant agrees to buy into the EEP for the restoration of 0.5 acre ofnon-
riparian wetlands within the Lower Cape Fear River watershed. Finally, they will preserve all
remaining wetlands on site. These actions will compensate for jurisdictional wetland impacts within
the tract and fulfill the requirements of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of Water
Quality.
5
Table 1. Tree and shrub species to be planted within the wetland restoration area at the Reserve
at St. James Plantation. Vegetation is typical of existing on-site wetlands. Species to be planted
are based on nursery availability.
Common Name Scientific Name
Pond Pine Pinus serotina
Loblolly Bay Gordonia lasianthus
Red Bay Persea borbonia
Sweet Pepperbush Clethra alnifolia
Gallberry Ilex glabra
Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera
6
€ '~~~''~ ~ 5 1Ctnea, '. ~ r',:~
IhN :~ . lF-- c, Bnhn~., .
n.-x OIL :1. rt - _ - \ ti,~n(µna SpjMq lalho+r ~ d`~.. '•
~- a f,
- ~. }+Jj ~
,1 y1
_ 'Til ~"`h r~;l .a~ ~ ~ ~` ~;_ *~-I ~f
Mti rr aq~' c x't gd 3F
~~k , `Stnd~vvPfi~vt `'
~~' '1 ~
- SITE ~ ' ~ -~iI~;~ ~
. ~
-`~1
~' +
a 1
~. !'. k .
rrJ -
"+_
.v b ~ > "c ,, ~, p~la c rytic
~)•+It`I~ ~u55~
~ ~__
-~~ '; as
''~f~~{ r - 1 CJFc>rt
i {R-! 4 Y
0runpyit[h ~ ~ t ~ Ly~_ N,NIn
-i
1 T'q~T]} tldK~ry
Ey,lk ~•.1 e5!!t1 ~ 1}, ~1 .., 11 I:~'~4. t \~
~A
t :~ . I.
}1, ~.,1,
t~
'~~
. .'a
~~
N
t
y i f...r I ...~A = 4. t1`k~'Y b~ t ~~
°w
w~ ~ } ~ f ~ ~ Z0~
*Boundanes are approxirraare aria are - ~s~rE ,~r ~ --'~" .,~~1~;~~~:-~
I not meant to be absolute „
SCALE 1 = 1 Mile
Map Source: North Carolina Atlas ~ Gazetteer. Pg 87.2003
The Reserve at St. James LMG Figure 1
Brunswick County, NC LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP larc Vicinity Map
Environmental Consultonts
02-06-223
August 2007
(
r r
..... ! ~
- ~ I~ i ~ - - _ =~
~G { `"~~ w
N ~ -
= ~ 1~
~t > f
i '.
r
94 `
kl ~' r { ~
.. ~ _ - _
1 r _
i ' .,
~ ~ .a ~..:. SITE ~ ~~.~-
e ..y _.r ' ~ __ _ _ _ _ ~--_ k
< ~' ~ t - - -.~ ."g ~ ~ ~
( LONG d ~ A C M r-~` ~- -~'~__ ~ /'r 1 - .
1 ~ "-~" - 1~ I i 1~ I I
I I '. ~I Bf'ACN -
_ --_._~_.~_I. _. _ _ '_ I _ ~ ~
I a A Y ~ - _. ' -. I ~.. _ _ _ ~.,L _ _ ~ _ ~ -. _
~ ~ I ~ '- 1
d
I i Ir ~ I i i
_ y ,
~. ~
~r'2 S ..
L~~'~• i
1
~,~ _ l,~s1 p, i .r ~. 1 i 1 N
l.~.rr. t.(i, ~ .
'`Boundaries are approximate and are ~~ siTE
not meant to be absolute SCALE 1" - 5000'
Map Source: Lockwoods Folly & Southport Quadrangles 7.5 minute (topographic) 1990.
The Reserve at St. James LMG Figure 2
Brunswick County, NC LANDMANAGP.MENTGROUPrnc USGS Topgraphic Map
02-06-223 ~ Environmentnl Consuftnnts
August 2007
Lo
Mu M
Fo To Mu
To ,
Ra
o Pn Fo
B NO
Wo
Mu
Fo
o CT
Lo
Kr6
_,
Ly
Mk Ra
Lo
FoTo
Pn _ _
; o
~
~~~' L
Mk
Fo Ra Lo
B ,,,
~Lo
;%
a Mu
Mu
0
~o Mu ti. _
\ _
' a
Mu i
Lo ~ _
Mu
~ ~ _
- = .
Mu
t Mu ~~~s C/ ~ Mu
' 46 eiV
Mu
Ma ''Ma
Mu Mu LO Mu _ KrB K
B
Mu
_ r
u Mu _
Ma __ Mk
a -~
Mu CT
~ Mk
Lo Kr6 Kr6
,
-. Lo W~
-~
Kr6
a < ,
.
rB ~,', Ma ' KrB ~_ Ma
Ma y a
Kr6' LoMa ~ ~~ ;
~
~,
Mu
r M -
-
O ; Bea .~ek
-
- _ ~
Mk Tm
k rB Mu -
LO
Mu Lo
Tm ' __ Tm Tm Tm _' _
T Tm
Mu Tm Mu Lo ' ~
d ~d r~- , ... .,:.
~}' ,*~
BoUndaIICJ dIC c1~11.11UJ(IIIICdIC addu ade SITE ~e~' ~~^~ ~- ....`7'r~~~'B,~`°~ 3••`" "
not meant to be absolute SCALE 1" = 2500'
Map Source: NRCS Soil Survey.
The Reserve at St. James LMG Figure 3
Brunswick County, NC LA.`dDMANAGE.4IENTGROUP~nc Soils Map
02-06-223 ~ Environmental Consudtants
August 2007
Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography
The Reserve at St. James LMG Figure 4
Brunswick County, NC LAND MANAGEMENTGR6UPio-,: Aerial Photograph
02-t)6-223 Environments! Consultonts
Auaust 2007
*Boundaries are approximate and are ~~gfT~
not meant to be absolute SCALE 1" = 2500'
t~ `\ \~ \ \~ \\
\'\\ \ \\ \\ \` \~~ \\`\.
~~
~\ \ ~ ~
\ \\ \~` \
... L
O
\`
\
\
\ \
\
~1
'\
\ \ ~\. ~\. .N
~
`
~~
~ \ \
ti
\~~
\\
\ \'`
\
\\ Q~
•~ Q
~\ ~, \ \
J - ~~
`
\ \
~~.
~~~
.
\
\~~ ~ ~
~~//~~ ~, \
~~ M ~ ~~
~`~~ ~`~
.
~
\ \ \\
`'~
~
~
~
~
`
,\
~^ ~
\,
~
\ ~
\
n ~ \~~ \. l 1 ~~
~
--\.., ~
- ..~. `
y,,.-.
\
~ ~
,.
.. ~ ~ \
',
; .
\
_~
\. ~
:.._
~ ~
~\
~~
\ ~
`
,
J
z
0
w
O
a
a
3
w
5
w
O
r
a
z
J
w
a
5 ~
m ~ ~E
°~~~
r~ S
c~ ~~ #d
~~~ ~~
i
<)
Q
N
0
~~
~, ;
~~
J
Q
V
c O
~r,
;_. c,
c
G
0
G
N
N
CC
C
~ ~
6
~. a
v v
t N
0
d' n"
O ~
~' d
~= ~ ~
~~_~ I
0.. \ ^..p ... I
`~. •. -.
i, `.
y+! ~,.
Y„
. ~,',
,.:
PRELIMINARY- FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
'~D
.. •"
Figure 7. Proposed Wetland Restoration
Auyust 2007
®' 4.04 'J4~etlands I ~`~=~I .w_ .. Nader~tanziale
~~ 50 1 OU 200 P~°d, ~~ o.~;~p~,~,„ ~,1vFlmvt&CR~
Proposed V,'etland Restoration SCALE t"= 10U' "m~°'~"~`""~!~69.~~ ~~
PRELIMINARY- FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
D
,, _,
-_1
~.
_
_ i
~%
__
~ ~ .,
/ ~~
/ ~
~ / ,t, ~,
~.
..~ ,~ ~.
Figure 8. Proposed Wetland Restoration
P•.UQUSt 2007
- ~ .. .-~
® 404 'v'Veil01'tds ~-` ~ _ - `'~edenStarziote
0 5G 10C 200 ao~„~.,, ~,Tqc~&Qt~p
w~m~ep. ~.nrt.awe
Proposed Wetlol~d Restoration SC?.LE 7 "= 100' ~~~~^~z~a~sb;.~~„