Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW3220305_Supplement-EZ Form_20220325SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE FORMS LOADED PROJECT INFORMATION 1 Project Name Rocky River WWTP Phase 3 Expansion 2 Project Area ac 234.86 3 Coastal Wetland Area ac N/A 4 Surface Water Area ac 6.6 5 Is this project High or Low Density? Low 6 Does this protect use an off -site SCM? No COMPLIANCE WITH 02H .1003(4) 7 Width of ve etated setbacks provided feet 30ft(per 02H .1017 8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? Yes 9 If BUA is proposed in the setback, does it meet NCAC 02H.1003 4 c-d ? N/A 10 I Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? No NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs: 11 Infiltration S stem 0 12 Bioretention Cell 0 13 Wet Pond 0 14 Stormwater Wetland 0 15 Permeable Pavement 0 16 Sand Filter 0 17 Rainwater Harvesting RWH 0 18 Green Roof 0 19 Level Spreader -Filter Strip LS-FS 0 20 Disconnected Impervious Surface (DIS) 0 21 Treatment Swale 0 22 Dry Pond 0 23 StormFilter 0 24 Silva Cell 0 25 lBayfilter 0 26 1 Filterra 0 FORMS LOADED DESIGNER CERTIFICATION 27 Name and Title: Kim Devendorf, PE 28 Or anization: Brown and Caldwell 29 Street address: 309 East Morehead Street, Suite 160 30 City, State, Zip: Charlotte, NC 28202 31 Phone numbers : 315 401-3634 32 Email: kdevendorf@BrwnCald.com Certification Statement: I certify, under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision, that the information provided in the form is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete, and that the engineering plans, specifications, operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here. 111119111111// CARgi, o��N 'pFESS/0• SEAL i 035365 '•��-FNGINEE i pEvt���'. �Sig*9 too nature.er Date 02/14/22 9:57 AM DRAINAGE AREAS 1 Is this a hi h density project? No 2 If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs 0 3 Does this project have low density areas? Yes 4 If so, number of low density drainage areas 5 5 Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule versions? No FORMS LOADED AREA INFORMATION Entire Site LD 1 LD 2 LD 3 LD 4 LD 5 4 T e of SCM N/A Swale Swale Swale Swale Swale 5 Total draina a area s ft 10230502 100302.00 69932.00 2450.00 21885.00 20184.00 6 Onsite draina a areas ft 10230502 100302.00 69932.00 2450.00 21885.00 20184.00 7 Offsite draina a area s ft N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8 Total BUA in project (sq ft 637900 sf N/A 2258 sf 1300 sf 3475 sf 4840 sf 9permitting) New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to s ft N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10permitting) New BUA not on subdivided lots (subject to s 64900 sf N/A 2258 sf 1300 sf N/A N/A 11 10ffsite BUA (sq ft N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots: Parking (sq ft N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sidewalk (sq ft 2200 sf N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roof (sq ft 11800 sf N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roadway s ft 44800 sf N/A 2258 sf 1300 sf N/A N/A Future (sq ft 40600 sf N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Other, please specify in the comment box below (sq ft 6100 sf N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 New infiltrating permeable pavement on subdivided lots (sq ft N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 14 New infiltrating permeable pavement not on subdivided lots (sq ft N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15permitting) Existing BUA that will remain (not subject to s ft 563516 sf N/A N/A N/A 3475 sf 4840 sf 16 Existing BUA that is already permitted (sq ft N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 17 Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft 9484 sf N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 18 Percent BUA 6% N/A 3% 53% 16% 24% 19 Design storm inches 2.3 in 2.3 in 2.3 in 2.3 in 2.3 in 2.3 in 20 Design volume of SCM cu ft N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 21 Calculation method for design volume N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A DDITIONAL INFORMATION Please use this space to provide any additional information about the r22drainage area(s): "Other" impervious area includes concrete boxes, vaults, and pads for electrical and wastewater processes LOW DENSITY DESIGN 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02H .1003 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes 2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes 3 Has the use of piping been minimized per .1003(2)(c)? Yes 4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances (H:V) 31 5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm? 2.51 6 lAre curb outlet swales proposed? No 7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s) (%) N/A 8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) N/A 9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s) (H:V) N/A 10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) N/A 11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? Yes 12 1 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? Yes 13 1 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes 14 JAre variations to rule .1003 proposed? No ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 15 Please use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project: The site has existing stormwater networks that will be utilized by directing drainage to existing networks. The existing networks discharge to vegetated swales that are outside the vegated buffer of Rocky River.