2022046 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220322

fr.,f DW R
mrlsloa of ware. Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
Version#*
2022046
1
Is a payment required for this project?
No payment required
What amout is owed?*
Fee received
$240.00
Fee needed - send electronic notification
$570.00
Reviewing Office*
Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Colleen Cohn:eads\cmcohn
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Baker Farm Subdivision
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Camden Brunick
1 b. Primary Contact Email: * 1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
3/22/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Polecat Branch
Basin
Tar -Pamlico
Water Classification
WS-IV:NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
Longitude:
35.936384
-77.913349
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Nash
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)

Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Marguerite & James Baker
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB: 2069 / DP: 306
2c. Contact Person:
2d.Address
Street Address
P.O. Box 188
Address Line 2
City
Nashville
Postal / Zip Code
27856
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:
[e-mail]
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
Yes No
Yes No
U

3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Marguerite Baker
3b. Business Name:
3c.Address
Street Address
213 East Church St.
Address Line 2
City
Nashville
Postal / Zip Code
27856
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Camden Brunick
4b. Business Name:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
4c.Address
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27615
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Nashville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
372900175673U
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Barnes Hill Church Road
Address Line 2
City
Nashville
Postal / Zip Code
27856
3. Surface Waters
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
2b. Property size:
+/- 44.91
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Polecat Branch

3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-IV;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Tar -Pamlico
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030201010607
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
Existing conditions onsite consists of forested land and field areas as well as some non -jurisdictional ditch features. Specifically, there are three (3) wetland features (W1-W3), one (1)
intermittent stream (S01), and one (1) pond (Pond 1) feature located on the property. General land use in the vicinity of the project consists of forested and agricultural land with some
single-family rural housing. Barnes Hill Church Road bounds the property to the west.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 7.59 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Approximately 74 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of this project is to construct a single-family residential development and its necessary infrastructure.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The overall project consists of the construction of a single-family residential development including but not limited to; roadway infrastructure, residential lots, utilities, and SCMs.
Specifically, there is one (1) road crossing that impacts wetlands. Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc.
will be utilized for this project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2021-02444
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Steven Ball
Agency/Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
USACE: Site visit with Kyle Barnes on December 9, 2021 and PJD issued on January 24, 2022.
NCDWR: Site visit and field determination made by Josh Brigham on December 2, 2021 (TPBRRO #21-397).
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
It is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown. Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts

Impact A
2a1 Reason (?)
Road Crossing
2b. Impact type* (?)
P
2c. Type of W.
Headwater Forest
2d. W. name*
Wetland 2
2e. Forested*
Yes
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
Both
2g• Impact
area
0.088
(acres)
Impact A
Road Crossing -
Temporary Construction
Access
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland 2
Yes
Both
0.008
acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.008
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.096
21. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.088
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
S&EC completed and wetland delineation and stream buffer evaluation for the entire property so that natural resources could be identified, and impacts
minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Impact area "A" is proposed permanent and temporary impacts for a road crossing. This road crossing is
necessary to connect the southern portion with the northern portion of the proposed development. The crossing will occur at a near perpendicular angle
at the top of the wetland drainage in order to minimize wetland impacts to the maximum extent practicable.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt fencing will be utilized to protect the remining wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
There are no proposed permanent stream impacts and all permanent wetland impacts are less than 0.10 of an acre.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
There are no protected riparian buffers located onsite/adjacent.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstatellocal) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No

3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?"
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document
prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and
silvicultural operations. The Baker Farm Subdivision project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within the town of Nashville
ETJ, therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Water
Supply, Watershed Protection Program which limits development densities as well as requires protective riparian buffers; 2) the Phase II NPDES
Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post -
construction stormwater management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?"
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Subsurface disposal (septic tank) will be used and is reviewed only by Nash County Health Department.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
S&EC completed a Threatened & Endangered Species Report, to include a Self -Certification letter through the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), a
query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official Species List through the iPac. A formal request will be sent to the USFWS this
week. The USFWS will have 30 days to respond from the date of the sent request. S&EC will provide feedback to USACE from USFWS if they
concurred with the determinations made by S&EC that the proposed actions is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or
threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Please
see attached S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species report. A finalized report with be forthcoming upon request.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat? *
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential
Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on February 24, 2022, no historic listings or study list
entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. Additionally, no structures exist within the property boundaries.

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated f 00-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or dreg and drop files here to attach document
Baker Farm—PCN Attachments.pdf 22.05MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Camden M. Brunick
Signature
15W,5r 3'r.. 4
Date
3/22/2022

S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 1'alis of Meuse Rod, Suite 1(4, Raleigh, NC: 27615 • Thane: (919) M(-5900 • r.is: [phone]
sandec.cam
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: Baker Farm Subdivision S&EC Project # 14944
Date: Z Z--
The Department of the Army
U.S. Ai my Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Kyle Barnes
Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for
the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard
and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 372900175673
Site Address: East of Barnes Hill Church Rd
City, County, State: Nashville, Nash County, NC
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name:
ieser
Mailing Address: Zi 3 E . .
Telephone Number: 15 2.- 45
Email:
Applicant (please print) Date
Applicant
attire
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

Ra ... . Bb
..,... Bo N
0
o B
) B
o
i
...........l • ,
. .
. :
.. _
...
Ra
Piti \ ( :::N)R a„ B b , ,
- .4
„oz./ Bo B ,
Wh
FaB
It N rB
-7444"14.-iit\.
NC Center for Geographic Information&,A ettdcsl
11
Project Number: Map Title: N
14944.W1 0 500 1,000
Figure 2 - Soil Survey
Project Manager: I I I I I I I I
SB Baker Tract Feet
Scale: Nash County, NC
1" = 1000i S&
Date: Source: USDA Soil Survey Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
EC 8412 Falls of Neuse Road,Suite 104 Raleigh,NC 27613•Phone:[phone]•Fax[phone]
09/27/2021 Nash County, Sheet 8 sandegh,t

1,-, (,...\LIT\---r--7,_\\I :.. ___,---- I _l
--"- -) , —1 -\-.. _ I ri
.I I - - —
0-— ——1,--—.-.•-• -• . ir..
j -- 8 - 1
7. 1,6). - 1
6: , .—.# ---/krf":5.
F --J -4 „
L.
\-,L) i: ,,
G- ,
.� ---.
� L
,, ,./7„)
\ ,
,,,,, ,
/k
I %..-•-•-.`.-.-7 /
'' '. .*...'"-.6.) (1 lik al...v ../ 7.
tP,d)''.--.-‘-'-.-." / r ,
(7- -----„, 1 ,
\lb. ,.; • -w- \ \
-/n
1 * C11-'.- 7 -
4 /
J iv1. /.--
...' C \-. Cey4pc/) )
/ :4 1 ci
"*.---'
,:_... i
er.
oISAYaR
o .�
-jam �„
ck
• _.ill41 /
A, ,
c .
Nir IF
OWL
9 5 / ie 's.--)I
,A
,'
(,,.
i An '_
`�.._°1 i •, NC Center Geog aphip I formation\&Analysis
Project Number: Map Title: N
14944.W1 0 1,000 2,000
Figure 1 - USGS
Project Manager: I I I I I I I I
SB Baker Tract Feet
Scale: Nash County, NC
1" = 10001 S&
Source: 2019 Nashville, NC
Date: F Soil& Environmental Consultants, PA
0 9/2 7/2 0 21 Quad E C 8412 Falls ofNausc Road.Suit.104.Raleigh,NC 27615•Phone:[phone]•Fag:[phone]
vanJoc.com

Tract Barnes Hill Church Rd Rmt_Subdivision Plat \ CIVIL \ Design \ Drawing \ CAD \Exhibit B_WETLANDS EXIST CONDITIONS.dwg
KSTONE Z:\CAD\2021\210528A_B
Mar 21, 2022-12:11pm Plotted
ROCKY
MOUNT
NOT TO SCALE
VICINITY MAP
•
NOTES
pp.D
S•R•1104/
1. ALL RIGHTS -OF -WAY ARE "PUBLIC" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. AREA IS COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD
3. ALL DISTANCES ARE CHORD
4. TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN IN VICINITY OF PROPOSED ROAD ALIGNMENTS IS FROM
AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY JOYNER KEENY, PLLC. ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTARY
TOPOGRAPHIC DATA IS FROM NASH COUNTY GIS IN JANUARY, 2022.
5. THIS PLAN IS PRELIMINARY AND IS NOT TO BE USED FOR RECORDATION,
CONVEYANCE OR SALES.
6. SURVEYOR DID NOT VISIBLY SEE ANY CEMETERIES IN ANY OPEN AREAS UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
7. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE FIELD
VERIFIED. JOYNER KEENY, PLLC CAN ONLY LOCATE UTILITIES THAT ARE ABOVE
GROUND AT THE TIME OF FIELD SURVEY. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON
ARE APPROXIMATE OR AS REPORTED BY VARIOUS RESPONSIBLE PARTIES. CALL N.C.
ONE CALL (800.632.4949) BEFORE DIGGING.
8. SURVEYOR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ANY UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, SUCH AS
UTILITIES, TANKS & PIPES ARE LOCATED HEREON.
9. PROPERTY LEGAL REFERENCE: BEING A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN
DEED BOOK 2069 PAGE 306, TRACT TWO.
10. PLAT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 36 PAGE 98 AND RE -RECORDED TO
CHANGE OWNERS NAMES AND ADD DEED DISTANCE INFORMATION TO PLAN.
11. NO TITLE SEARCH WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT; THIS MAP DOES NOT DEPICT
ENCUMBRANCES THAT ARE FOUND DURING A THOROUGH TITLE SEARCH.
12. EXCEPTIONS TO THE TITLE HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED TO SURVEYOR THEREFORE
NOT ALL EXCEPTIONS ARE SHOWN HEREON.
13. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS LOCATED IN THE MAPLE CREEK -TAR RIVER
WATERSHED (HUC 12# 030201010607) AND IN THE LOWER SAPONY CREEK WATERSHED
(HUC 12# 030201010605), BOTH CLASSIFIED AS WS-IV WATERS AND WITHING THE TAR
RIVER WATERSHED.
14. SUBJECT PROPERTY NO LOCATED WITHIN A DELINEATED FEMA FLOOD HAZARD RISK
ZONE AS PER FIRM PANEL NUMBER 3720372900J, EFFECTIVE DATE 11/03/2004.
15. WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE DELINEATED BY SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS, PA (S&EC) IN OCTOBER 2021. FLAGS 12-16 WERE MISSING AND NOT
FOUND.
THE INITIAL POSITIONS FOR THIS PROJECT WERE PRODUCED FROM STATIC GPS
OBSERVATIONS UTILIZING LEICA SR9500 DUAL FREQUENCY RECEIVERS AND WERE
COMPUTED BY NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) UTILIZING THE ONLINE POSITIONING
USER SERVICE (OPUS) METHODOLOGY AND ARE RELATIVE TO THE FOLLOWING NGS CORS
BASE STATIONS:
PID DESIGNATION:
AJ2913 RALEIGH CORS ARP
LATITUDE LONGITUDE DISTANCE (Meters)
N354712.852 W0783819.411 67710.2
PID DESIGNATION:
DG4687 RALEIGH DOT CORS ARP
LATITUDE LONGITUDE DISTANCE (Meters)
N354549.508 W0783444.395 63242.6
PID DESIGNATION:
DH7133 NCJA JACKSON NC CORS ARP
LATITUDE LONGITUDE DISTANCE (Meters)
N362430.563 W0772615.309 67461.8
,1
15" RCP
INV. =200.34
15" RCP
INV. =200.17
15" gRCCPP
INV. 151,P RCP
INV.=199.63
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF 6" WATERLINE ACCORDING
TO NASH COUNTY
7' OFF EDGE OF PAVEMENT
N/F MARGUERITE F. BAKER
NO DEED PB 31 PG 144CE
PIN: 372900089200
LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL
ZONE: R-40
N/F
ROBERT D. BAKER
DB 1986 PG 912
PB 31 PG 144
PIN: 372900089007
LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL
ZONE: R-40
N84°03'20"E
N/F
RONNIE M. &
DIANE P. UPCHURCH
DB 2714 PG 404
PB 21 PG 126
PIN: 372900072450
LAND ZRESIDENTIALE
ONE: R-40
333.76'
/
/
/
/
\
IPF
/
/
/
/
S89'01'04"W 194.67'
N/F
CHERYL FARRAR MOORE
DBR2092TMOORE
PG100
PB 30 PG 336
PIN:
LAND USE:372900069972IRESIDENTAL
ZONE: R-40
IPF
/
/
•Iy
/
•
PROJECT BOUNDARY
/
/
/
PROJECT
BOUNDARY
(Disturbed)
IPF In Conc.
4,1
60',o h'(/
•
/
/
i
/
2
0)
/
/
/
- 206-
/
N/F
CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH, INC.
DB 1847 PG 848
PB 29 PG 348
PIN: 372900187418
LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL
ZONE: R-40
/ / r
/ !/ /
NK7•52'4•'"E /I 259;§_2,
205- -
/ -204 - -
/ /
/ \
/
7 / r
/ / \
/ / \
/
/
/ / \ \
/ /
/
/
-
/
WETLANDS AREA "W2"
APPROX. 3.95 ACRES
i
6.
/
/
/
ETLANDS AREA "W3"
0.25 ACRES
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
/
/ ^ \
/ /-
APPROXIMATE WATER LINE
BASED ON NASH COUNTY GIS
JURISDICTIONAL \
WETLANDS
/
/
-
/J / / / N
7
/ J
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
_195
/
P
/
/
17 7777
WETLANDS AREA "W1" 77/kZ-'Q
APPROX. 0.85 ACRES
OVERACC AREA
/
• BO
N/F
ROSEBELL HOLDINGS, LLC.
DB 2777 PG 341
PIN: 372900167280
LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL )
ZONE: R740
/
/
EDGE OF
WATER
1://)
PR?JECT BOUNDARY
IAF
6'
8.0%
50' R/W
2.0%
6'
TYPICAL SECTION
NTS
3.
1
oos
N/F
DEBBIE V. JOYNER
DB 3106 PG 424
PB 20 PG 142
TRACT 1
PIN: 372900267159
LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL
ZONE: R-40
LEGEND
Lines Surveyed
Lines Not Surveyed
Water Line
Overhead Electric Line
Iron Property Corner
(set unless noted otherwise)
Utility Pole
Water Valve
Fire Hydrant
Iron Pipe Set
No Iron Set or Found
Deed Book
Map Book
Plat Book
Page Number
Cluster Box Unit
Square Feet
Acres
Right of Way
Minimum Building Line
Sight Distance Easement
Fire Hydrant
Water Valve
Rains Fine Sandy Loam, Poorly Drained
Bonneau Loamy Sand, Well Drained
Total
Cluster Box Unit
100
•
0
FH
IPS
NI
DB
MB
PB
PG
CBU
SF.
AC.
MBL
SDE
FH
WV
Ra
BoB
Tot
CBU
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
0
100
200
c7) Pei
Pei C)
'Cj2
BAKER FARM SUBDIVISION
WETLANDS IMPACT EXHIBIT
EXISTING CONDITIONS
DATE
03/21/22
SCALE
DRAWN BY
KES
JOB NUMBER
210528A
DRAWING FILE
LAYOUT TAB
LAYOUT
DESCRIPTION
PLLC
JoynerKeeny
Planning, Surveying & Engineering
1051 N. Winstead Avenue - P.O. Box 7533
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804
North Carolina Firm No. P-0551
V: 252.977.3124
F: 252.985.6026
PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR
REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NOT RELEASED FOR
CONSTRUCTION

\ INSET
1"- 40'
l 7
L
w
h Rd Rmt S
u
H
ONE Z:\CAD\2021\2
aL.
Curve Table
Curve #
Length
Radius
Delta
Chord Direction
Chord Length
C1
80.69
265.00
17.45
S75° 19' 55"W
80.38
C2
171.35
265.00
37.05
S48' 05' 05"W
168.38
C3
146.53
265.00
31.68
S13° 43' 14"W
144.67
C4
39.27
25.00
90.00
S47' 07' 11"E
35.36
C5
39.27
25.00
90.00
S42° 52' 50"W
35.36
C6
23.76
315.00
4.32
N0° 02' 27"E
23.75
C7
90.00
315.00
16.37
N10° 23' 11"E
89.69
C8
123.23
315.00
22.41
N29° 46' 43"E
122.44
C9
447.91
315.00
81.47
S38' 36' 58'W
411.12
C10
398.57
265.00
86.18
N40° 58' 04"E
362.05
C11
101.20
315.00
18.41
N50° 11' 20"E
100.76
C12
109.74
315.00
19.96
N69° 22' 19"E
109.18
C16
37.60
25.00
86.18
S36' 15' 42"W
34.16
C17
9.80
210.00
2.67
N8° 09' 54"W
9.80
C18
190.88
210.00
52.08
N35° 32' 29"W
184.38
C19
306.19
210.00
83.54
S48' 35' 56'E
279.78
C21
105.52
210.00
28.79
N75° 58' 30"W
104.41
C23
85.81
225.00
21.85
N79' 26' 36"W
85.30
C24
29.18
225.00
7.43
N64' 48' 06"W
29.16
C25
21.03
25.00
48.19
N85° 10' 53'W
20.41
C26
12.37
50.00
14.18
S77° 48' 51"W
12.34
C28
82.56
50.00
94.60
N47' 47' 42"W
73.49
C29
78.65
50.00
90.13
N44' 34' 07"E
70.79
C30
67.61
50.00
77.47
S51 ° 37' 57"E
62.57
C31
21.03
25.00
48.19
S36' 59' 30"E
20.41
C32
89.44
175.00
29.28
S75' 43' 45'E
88.47
C33
39.27
25.00
90.00
S44' 37' 50"W
35.36
C34
39.27
25.00
90.00
N45° 22' 10"W
35.36
C35
197.82
260.00
43.59
S68' 34' 21"E
193.08
C36
379.10
260.00
83.54
N48' 35' 56"W
346.40
C37
88.20
260.00
19.44
S37' 03' 26"E
87.78
C38
88.14
260.00
19.42
S17' 37' 39"E
87.71
C39
4.94
260.00
1.09
S7° 22' 21"E
4.94
C40
38.88
25.00
89.12
N51 ° 23' 11"W
35.08
NOTES
P Bp D co
/ BP 60
s.R�11°4/
•
1. THIS PLAN REQUIRES REVIEW & APPROVAL BY NASH COUNTY AND NCDOT.
2. STREET CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF NCDOT-SUBDIVISION ROADS,
MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND NCDOT-STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ROADWAY AND STRUCTURES DATED JANUARY 1, 2000 (OR LATEST REVISION).
3. TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN IN VICINITY OF PROPOSED ROAD ALIGNMENTS IS FROM AN ACTUAL
FIELD SURVEY BY JOYNER KEENY, PLLC. ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTARY TOPOGRAPHIC DATA IS
FROM NASH COUNTY GIS IN JANUARY, 2022.
4. A COMPLETE & THOROUGH SURVEY AND SOIL EVALUATION IS REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDED
BEFORE PURCHASING OR DEVELOPING LOTS.
5. LOT DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
6. ELECTRIC POWER IS PROPOSED TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND.
7. NCDOT PROHIBITS THE USE OF PLASTIC CULVERT & DRAINAGE PIPE, THE CONSTRUCTION OF
BULK HEADS, MASONRY ENTRANCES, MASONRY LIGHT & MAIL BOX SUPPORTS (I.E. ANY
PERMANENT STRUCTURE) WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PLACE OR RUN HEAVY EQUIPMENT ACROSS PROPOSED DRAINFIELD
AREAS. ADDITIONALLY, THESE AREAS ARE NOT TO BE BORROWED FROM OR FILLED.
9. A 5'x20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT (DUE) SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THE FRONT
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF EACH LOT (SEE DETAIL).
10. THIS PLAN IS PRELIMINARY AND IS NOT TO BE USED FOR RECORDATION, CONVEYANCE OR SALES.
11. ALL RIGHT-OF-WAYARE "PUBLIC" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
12. ANY RELOCATION OF EXISTING ELECTRICAL FACILITIES WILL BE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE
DEVELOPER.
13. SUBDIVISION ENTRANCE SIGNS SHALL NOT EXCEED 32 sf & 6' IN HEIGHT.
14. SURVEYOR DID NOT VISIBLY SEE ANY CEMETARIES IN ANY OPEN AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
15. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE FIELD VERIFIED.
JOYNER KEENY, PLLC CAN ONLY LOCATE UTILITIES THAT ARE ABOVE GROUND AT THE TIME OF
FIELD SURVEY. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE OR AS REPORTED
BY VARIOUS RESPONSIBLE PARTIES. CALL N.C. ONE CALL (800.632.4949) BEFORE DIGGING.
16. SURVEYOR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ANY UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, SUCH AS UTILITIES,
TANKS & PIPES ARE LOCATED HEREON.
17. PROPERTY LEGAL REFERENCE: BEING PARCEL "A" DESCRIBED ON PLAT BOOK 36, PAGE 118, NASH
COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS.
18. WETLANDS SHOWN WERE DELINEATED BY SOIL AND ENVIROMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA AND
FIELD LOCATED BY JOYNER KEENY, PLLC.
19. EXCEPTIONS TO THE TITLE HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED TO SURVEYOR THEREFORE NOT ALL
EXCEPTIONS ARE SHOWN HEREON.
20. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS LOCATED IN THE MAPLE CREEK -TAR RIVER WATERSHED (HUC
12# 030201010607) AND IN THE LOWER SAPONY CREEK WATERSHED (HUC 12# 030201010605), BOTH
CLASSIFIED AS WS-IV WATERS AND WITHING THE TAR RIVER WATERSHED.
21. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL IN OR ADJACENT
TO NCDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY. ALL METHODS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND NCDOT STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS.
22. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK
REQUIREMENTS WITH THE BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
23. ANY HOUSE DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR/OWNER
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
24. SUBJECT PROPERTY NO LOCATED WITHIN A DELINEATED FEMA FLOOD HAZARD RISK ZONE AS
PER FIRM PANEL NUMBER 3720372900J, EFFECTIVE DATE 11/03/2004.
25. AREA COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD. ALL DISTANCES ARE CHORD DISTANCES, UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE.
26. EDGE OF PAVEMENT RADII AT INTERSECTIONS AREA 30' UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
27. APPROXIMATE EDGE OF POND TAKEN FROM AERIAL IMAGERY FROM THE AUTODESK
GEOLOCATION FUNCTION.
0J
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
PF
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF 6" WATERLINE ACCORDING
TO NASH COUNTY
7' OFF EDGE OF PAVEMENT
i
/
/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
WETLAND IMPACT "A"
PERMANENT ROADWAY IMPACT
3826.30 SF, 0.088 ACRES
\CULVERT B
SEE SHEET 3
•
\JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
/
IMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
•• ft ft
•
ROCTOR FARM ROAD
50' PUBLIC R/W
WETLAND IMPACT "A"
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION IMPACT
351.89 SF, 0.008 ACRES
WETLANDS 1MPAC SUMMARY
ERMANENT IMPACTS: 3826.30 SF, 0.088 AC
TEMPORARY IMPACTS: 351.89 SF, 0.008 AC
TOTAL IMPACTS: 4178.19 SF, 0.096 AC
IPF
N/F
MARGUERITE
NO DEEDE REFERENCE ER
PB 31 PG 144
PIN: 372900089200
LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL
ZONE: R-40
N/F
ROBERT D. BAKER
DB 1986 PG 912
PB 31 PG 144
PIN: 372900089007
LAND ZUSE: RESIDENTIAL
ONE: R-40
N84°03'20"E
j ILOT 1 I
20120 SF
N/F
RONNIE M. &
DIANE P. UPCHURCH
DB 2714 PG 404
PB 21 PG 126
PIN: 372900072450
LAND RS4D0 ENTIAL
ZONE: R
33.76'
o I o
o LOT 2
20000 SF
i LL
I
L - - -
IPF
LOT 59
20228 SF
LOT 58
20414 SF C39
LOT 57
20848 SF
LOT 60
63840 SF
I
coLOTLOT 8 20151 SF
0
co
rri
co
IPF-\
N87°52'49"E 197.26'
WETLAN
IMPACT "A"
(PERMANENT)
N 87° 52' 49"E
11101.00' 100.00' 100.00'
0 0
0
NILOT 9 oN
20066 SF
LOT 10
20000 SF
o
N LOT 11
20000 SF
1 n
0•.00'_ 100
, WETLAND
IMPACT "A"
(TEMPORARY)
I 20008 SF
On
•
LOT 55
48577 SF
S89°01'04"W 194.67'
N/F
CHERYL FARRAR MOORE
& ROBERT MOORE
DPG 710
B BPG 336
PIN: 372900069972
LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL
ZONE: R-40
---\
1259.62'
100.00'
o
of I
M LOT 12 0 oN
20000 SF
0
O IMITS
�ISTUR
N
100.00'
-[0
LOT 13
20000 SF
mi'NeT'J�'41E .6.01. (FIAT} ,
0.00' _ 100.00'
N/F
CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH, INC.
,DB 1847 PG 848
PB 29 PG 348
PIN: 3729001874-T8
LAND USE: REJDENTIAL
Z_0Nf-1 R-40
100.00'
0
o LOT 14
oN 20000 SF
w
O
N
(n
NAIL at IAF
100.00 100.00'
0
0
of I LOT 15
F,1) 20000 SF
w 1 Ta-
.77- I
of I
V)1
0
L L
0.00'
O
O
0
0
N
w
0
N
LOT 16
20000 SF
H
0
0
0
N
w
i-7
0
LOT 17 0
120000 SF
w
N
OT 18
120369 SF 6001
0
n o
100.00'-- i 100.00
87°52'49"E ►, •, �' oT
NO IMPACTS
IN THIS AREA
IMITS OF DISTURBANCE
ONSERVATION EASEMENT
LOT 35
20000 SF
APPROXIMATE EDGE
OF WATER
JURISDICTIONAL.
WETLANDS
-N89°37'50"E 300.05' - -I
100.00' - 100.03'- --100.02'
LOT 37
24506 SF
0.00 100.••'
0 IMPACTS
IN THIS AREA
54.53',49 �See
2j12•,
10 F
p \ 8: ?68 98,
w o 6 co '. \ iTOT
LOT 38 O I I I N I rn ^ 112 • p�
24506 SF N oo LOT 39 I w LOT 40 I LOT 41 o \
0 20000 p 20000 SF p 20027 SF I I \
`� IN IN I� 1lI
0
0 I o N LOT 42 I w i o•
�,�.I . =��-� u� -_-= . 0 20121 SF 0 1 0
c� LOT 431 N
00. • 0' 1.0.00' �1 • ` N 20852 SI
•���� 0 1 w
0
N
ONSERVATION
EASEMENT
LOT 54 0�
56690 SF
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLANDS
LOT 53
30105 SF
LOT 52
20076 SF
N89°37'50"E 200.00
LOT 50
20000 SF
175.00
LOT 47
20076 SF
u7
0
0
S89°37'50"W 200.00
LOT 48
20000 SF
I89'37'50"W 200.00"
P
LOT 49
20000 SF
200.00
O
O
J
0
0
o w
00
o�
N
N
LOT 46
29432 SF
LOT 45
23686 SF
LOT 44
23167 SF
(Disturbed)
IPF In Conc.
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L1
S2'07'11 "E
12.93
L2
S88'14'38"W
16.75
L3
S87'52'49"W
50.00
L4
N71 °17'52"W
26.87
L5
S87'52'49"W
6.20
L6
S87°52'49"W
23.80
L7
S77'42'03"W
42.72
L8
S87°52'49"W
36.90
L9
S87'52'49"W
19.80
S89°37'50"W 1248.3
N/F
ROSEBELL HQLDINGSLLC.
DB 2777I1PG 341
PIN: 3729QQ016728
LAND USE: f�ESIDENT L
ZONE: Ilkk-40 ,
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L10
N61'09'43"W
40.90
L11
S70'03'24"W
53.91
L12
S70'03'24"W
26.26
L13
S87°52'49"W
75.00
L14
S87'52'49"W
10.00
L15
N59°04'24"W
32.09
L16
S87°52'49"W
69.60
L17
S87°52'49"W
16.40
L18
S70'46'39"W
54.41
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L19
S87'52'49"W
35.00
L20
N71'25'42"W
72.00
L21
N6'49'06"W
9.01
L22
S89°37'S0"W
16.25
L23
N61'05'11 "W
47.33
L24
S89°30'20"W
50.22
L25
S61 °05'11 "E
44.73
L26
S61 °05'11 "E
2.60
L27
N89'37'50"E
12.13
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L28
N89'37'50"E
20.44
L29
S70'20'26"W
3.03
L30
S89'37'50"W
28.40
L31
N71 °04'46"W
3.03
L32
N62'39'41"E
49.04
L33
N7°05'23"W
20.08
L34
N6'58'16"W
43.74
L35
N2°07'11 "W
48.62
0
0
N
0
rn
N
O
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3.1
MpX
6'
8.0%
9'
50' R/W
q.
2.0%
9'
2.0%
6'
8.0%
TYPICAL SECTION
N TS
3.
1
3.1
MPX
TEMPORARY
TURNAROUND
EASEMENT
HAMMERHEAD
TURN -AROUND
16.76'
L2
IAF
TEMPORARY
TURNAROUND
EASEMENT
N/F
DEBBIE V. JOYNER
DB 3106 PG 424
PB 20 PG 142
TRACT 1
PIN: 372900267159
LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL
ZONE: R-40
LEGEND
Lines Surveyed
Lines Not Surveyed
Water Line
Overhead Electric Line
Iron Property Corner
(set unless noted otherwise)
Utility Pole
Water Valve
Fire Hydrant
Iron Pipe Set
No Iron Set or Found
Deed Book
Map Book
Plat Book
Page Number
Cluster Box Unit
Square Feet
Acres
Right of Way
Minimum Building Line
Sight Distance Easement
Fire Hydrant
Water Valve
Rains Fine Sandy Loam, Poorly Drained
Bonneau Loamy Sand, Well Drained
Total
Cluster Box Unit
Wx
•
0
FH
IPS
NI
DB
MB
PB
PG
CBU
SF.
AC.
R/W
MBL
SDE
FH
WV
Ra
BoB
Tot
CBU
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
TEMPORARY WETLANDS IMPACT
PERMANENT WETLANDS IMPACT
PROJECT INFORMATION
TAX MAP PARCEL ID NUMBER: 372900175673U
PROPERTY ADDRESS
0 BARNES HILL CHURCH RD
NASHVILLE, NC 27856
PROPERTY OWNER / DEVELOPER:
MARGUERITE F. BAKER
P.O. BOX 188 , NASHVILLE, NC 27856
(FOR CONTACT USE JOYNER KEENY AT (252)-977-3124 )
AREAS
R/W
RESIDENTIAL LOTS
CONSERVATION LOTS
TOTAL ACERAGE
- 4.52 ac
- 29.99 ac
- 10.46 ac
- 44.97 ac
LINEAR FOOTAGE OF STREETS
(4 STREET) = 3915 LF
LOTS
RESIDENTIAL LOTS =
CONSERVATION LOTS =
TOTAL LOTS =
60
2
62
ZONING: R-20
MIN. LOT SIZE = 20,000 sf
SETBACKS:
FRONT
SIDE
SIDE @ CORNER
REAR
MIN. WIDTH @ FRONT =
100
0
35'
12'
17.5'
25'
100'
100
200
SCALE: 1" = 100 FEET
OAK LEVEL TOWNSHIP, NASH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Planning, Surveying & Engineering
1051 N. Winstead Avenue - P.O. Box 7533
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804
North Carolina Firm No. P-0551
V: 252.977.3124
F: 252.985.6026
PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR
REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY

/
STA:10+00.00 PROCTOR FARM ROAD =
STA. 15+00.00 BARNES HILL CHURCH ROAD/
ASSEMBLY
/ / --
STA:10+00.00 JOSIAH WAY =
STA. 12+55.87 PROCTOR FARM ROAD
HW A2
INV: 194.90'
8" PVC
WATER L NE
—20 0 20
CROSS SECTION
SCALE: I " = 30 FEET
8" GATE VALVE
Y 6" x 8"TEE
WETLAND IMPACT A '
PERMANENT ROADWAY IMPACT
3826.30 SF, 0.088 ACRES
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLANDS
WETLAND IMPACT "A"
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION IMPACT
351.89 SF, 0.008 ACRES
�w
PVI STA: 13+97.26
PVI ELEV: 196.98
K: 50.00
LVC: 110.03
LOW PT. STA: 14+02.28
LOW PT ELEV: 197.28
(CULVERT B) (2) CLASS IV 24" RCP
BURRIED 6"
(STORM DRAINAGE)
DITCHES TO BE GRADED TO ALIGN
DITCH LOW POINT WITH PIPE ENDS
PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT
(AS MEASURED ALONG
CENTERLINE)
STA:10+00.00 BAKER POND TRAIL =
STA. 18+13.54 PROCTOR FARM ROAD
60' RIGHT—OF—WAY
31' BACK TO BACK
24" VALLEY CURB & GUTTER
SEE SHEET C-30
Curve Table
Curve #
Radius
Length
Chord Direction
CHORD LENGTH
DELTA
C3
290.00
436.17
N40° 58' 04"E
396.21
86°10'31"
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
WETLANDS IMPACT SUMMARY
PERMANENT IMPACTS: 3826.30 SF, 0.088 AC
TEMPORARY IMPACTS: 351.89 SF, 0.008 AC
TOTAL IMPACTS: 4178.19 SF, 0.096 AC
PROFILE SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "= 40 '
VERTICAL: 1 "= 4 '
Exhibit B WETLANDS PROFILES.dwg
Planning, Surveying & Engineering
1051 N. Winstead Avenue - P.O. Box 7533
Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804
North Carolina Firm No. P-0551
V: 252.977.3124
F: 252.985.6026

�rd�,,.BrNF°' ...
ROY COOPER k _,,
Governor o
ELIZABETH S.BISER
Secretary *ft`a+a+`e.'
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
December 2nd,2021
Steven Ball,Soil&Environmental Consultants
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh,NC 27587
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
TPBRRO#21-397
Nash County
Determination Type:
Buffer Intermittent/Perennial
❑Neuse(15A NCAC 2B .0714)
®Tar-Pamlico(15A NCAC 2B .0734) 0 Intermittent/Perennial Determination(where local
buffer ordinances apply)
❑Jordan(15A NCAC 2B .0267)(governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
Project Name: Baker Tract
Address/Location: Barnes Hill Church Rd.,Nashville,NC
Stream(s): Polecat Branch
Determination Date: 12/2/2021 Staff:Josh Brigham
Stream Not Soil USGS
Feature E/UP(') Subject(2) Subject Start@ Stop@ Survey _ Topo
A X X
(1)E=Ephemeral,I=Intermittent,P=Perennial,NP=Not Present,NE=Not Evaluated
(2)Refers to State riparian buffer rules only. Stream,wetland,or pond impacts are still subject to applicable water quality standards and permitting requirements.
Explanation: The stream(s)/pond(s)listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey
of Nash County,North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale.
Each feature that is checked"Not Subject"has been determined to not be an intermittent stream,perennial stream,a
pond connected to a stream feature,or the feature is determined not to be present. Stream features that are checked
"Subject"have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be subject to the buffer
rules. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps referenced above and are
therefore not subject to the buffer rules. However,if the stream features are present on the tract they are subject to
all other applicable North Carolina stream standards and permitting requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B and
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
DE s I North Carolina Department of Environmental QualityRaleigh I Division of Water Resources
o as ornrrur®a`
/�'®J% Raleigh Regional Office 1 3800 Barrett Drive ,North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

Baker Tract
Nash County
12/2/2021
Page 2 of 2
This on-site determination shall expire five(5)years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty(60)days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Paul Wojoski;DWR
—401&Buffer Permitting Unit;1617 Mail Service Center;Raleigh,NC 2 7699-1 61 7. If sending via delivery
service(UPS,FedEx,etc.):Paul Wojoski;DWR—401&Buffer Permitting Unit;512 N.Salisbury Street;
Raleigh,NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless,as detailed above,an appeal is requested within sixty(60)
days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office)at(919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination,please feel free to contact Josh Brigham at(919)791-4251.
Sincerely,
Scott Vinson,Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office,Division of Water Resources,NCDEQ
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Laserfiche
Consultant via email, Steven Ball, S&EC,[e-mail]
D E Q�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources I Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive 11628 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1628
919.791.4200

Baker Tract
Nash County, NC-DWR Project # 21-397
t BOB
fv
Ny .
- " „', , Feature A, Not Subject
,, 4,.:.4
44 r
, Bo B -„-,4, , -... ' .41„,,.
_ !. ' .
1
. ,
...
. ... .
....„ •
, It _. ...
„ , 4114' ,
8Ra ....„
. , .
....
, , .
•• ,
Bo,B,-.4, ..it- s' ti' 1- -. ;111.114- 7
•
.,
..
y NrB.._ . -
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet 8 Stn1Fa'•, Base map provided by S&EC
Nash CO.,NC 1989 i h� I.`' ::Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
Legend:
ence only::
-project boundary yr ,:

Baker Tract
Nash County, NC-DWR Project # 21-397
-21;frp . i) .444. 7 -
A 1 . J.I.
Sie
If
4.64
�'7 i
tIP,
* _ ANIN.—
_ .., —___— fiti 4
ir 11,er ,
T \
-ice ..
•
, iS
1 -4.- 7
i 04, , triple:dor )1" ili, ,,,.,
, ..... n 40,E
14
1 AYaR0a, of eV
1
4, _ F
F
A _ ...ilk _ ,€20*+ '� -
i
USGS Topographical Map fi 5r .,,, Base map provided by S&EC
Nashville Quadrangle 2019 -
� � wi"es
� �; ::Locations are approximate
1lisiand are provided for refer-
Legend. ��,It.'4i ence only::
-Project boundary .� ,.

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 1 1 /4/2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Mason Montgomery - 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Raleigh NC 27615
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW-2021-02444 Baker Tract
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Nashville City: Nash
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.936384 Long.: -77.913349
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 1983
Name of nearest waterbody: Polecat Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
■
Field Determination. Date(s): December 9, 2021
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
W1
35.936729
-77.912123
0.7 ac
Wetland
Section 404
W2
35.937059
-77.913982
3.3 ac
Wetland
Section 404
W3
35.935034
-77.914357
0.6 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Pond1
35.936970
-77.912236
2.6 ac
Pond
Section 404
A
35.936855
-77.91335
5
74 If
Intermittent
Stream
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
n Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
• U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
1 "=1000' 2019 Nashville, NC
n Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Nash County Soil Survey Sheet 8
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
• Photographs: • Aerial (Name & Date): Baker Tract revised
or n Other (Name & Date):
n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signaturend date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

....
...,..." 1., \
N. . \\ -
,
//
• ,i /...
\,__,...-
..... „
Legend .---'. --'4',.?:, -„, —,.. .,,q.-:,,-7"' -1‘.'''--,''',:'‘, —."' Zlir..., •
4.0
_\- --\''.--2 \ „\\11../....:_if1)-----(-1.--1:,1:-/1/-..-.-1/./.:7-.1\--:111::--- -...:):.."''-.-.;
Evaluation Area
C .C)° Potentially Jurisdictional Intermittent Stream
C3 Potentially Jurisdictional Pond
- / .....
et 4 Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland in ; Al _
// • .." - / . , , „----
- •
2' Nash County Contours .
- ,•
_ - ( 2'
- , , ,.
.
... . ,
., ,- . •:- ,. • ...
*Upland Berm area not flagged.v, \\ __ -- ...N.
•N.D - .1- '"4 ..... .....-_--, ./-7'..... •......
771 ' 1 , '."-''IL-----'' ' . 7.'. • •' / ,/' /*---- _....... ......_ .„...„ •-..
.....__ ,_... / ) .
rrl . .. 58 , ' , ,'- '/"." • i i _
.__ . • / i _ - l .
• /
. ....
/ / , ---"=--....._---., , ,/ / - /----•
__ . • ---._ ,.. / / • 1-
..../ ..___
...
0 .
.. —.....—
c • . . - i .
.....
4101141:3!
.•...-
. .
--- 0
/
7 A -
1 -1
. .. --
‘ ..•:,
-- .- ?..- ' '•-- I /\ \ A .71.\Per Site visit with Kyle Barnes of the USACE •
Pond 1 _
\ A
12/9/10 . • •
..._.__ _ ___. • •
-- %-—. %. ' .1 • -' - -
.... /.''''r4r4IN rAlri/ ...,
........_ • N.....
\ \ '
. ....---,
.....
X X
- .—--•,,, 74,%-
' 01 tt PL , • , - :-
_ .• ,,,
.......... , ,
- - . \ v
• _,
\ . • f'
•/ • -, ,,
• • .„,
. \ •..... ,,
__ - _ , • • •
; /-.,.. • r'. Di t .. . \
- r ..... \
/•-\ ..,. \.... .;',.-.-..,.'•` '
• :
.,
\. __A__--- e----- ‘ 1 .A \ ---- e'..••
‘ \ . -r •y
,r . ,,,... , /
\ \
'.''.. , '";','' '' '1 It .... \ . D2 It •. / . -...„ 1 , ‘
4. ,..:.•,O,P..: / :: . ',,, i , \ \ ! .
--- . \ '
_
\ \ ‘ \
\ \ k \
\- ‘ \ \
\ .• .
i. Di st, `-\ \
\ ••••• --..... / .
/ ...• ...-• ------ ‘ •
i i 1 ...- e ,.,e'''...... /
) I 1 " ..." ..- .., •
aif_‘) I i 1 f r//
1 / ------ / I 1 I t
. '-441,V • ..\ V
1 I f I I I I e.........----.1 I '' 7
I .1
1
I
1
1 1 '
I
/ /:diAl .,, \....... /31 •
/ t ,'
....
•..---.. , / / .....—
I Detailed Delineation of Waters of the US
/ / / ..- ./ / / / \ - I3-,' .....
-,/ / / -----" // / ////r_......./ \
i / / ,..- --
/ / .... , ' '..-
...., Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only
...,,,./ // /./ „,... / / / / / / / i /
/ / / / / / i
. / / / / ..... / / / / / . I X \ / S&EC reserves the right to modify this map based on more fieldwork,
/ .." / .../ ,..../ ///// / / / I and any other additional information.Approximations were mapped using
e „ -- , , \ , i
_
,,, „ „ .....„ ...,,/// .......__ i 1 I e I -, topographic maps,air photos and ground truthmg.If the site is going
1 / /./' ..../ // /', /'-... \ I ( \ X T , 41111/4* ' 1 00 tt 111 \
\ / X \ X ''.. .
• .. , ....:._ . to be disturbed,S&EC's detailed delineation should be approved and
//.,./ ...-/"" / ..., / / s X X \ X .11 t, . • --._, _,_ '. .... i \ I -n -A. ,.- • ' -
//.... .....'... ./....' '... / / \ \ -......... \ . ..,.. permitted by the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers as required.If the user of
r/,... / / ....../ / / i I , \ . .'
this work desires an accurate map of the regulated features flagged by
\ N. \ ‘ \ !it;
/./ / ..,.------..... ...../- ./- /. .i \ V,,•t
\ \ \ \ \ I \ .."- • S&EC,they should retain a NC Registered Professional Land Surveyor to
' ——--"---'. ,...../
) \ \ ‘ locate S&EC's flaggmg.
/ \ \ \ )
,..... ........ .........
'/....----.../.. .....Iiir
/ ,,-----"--"--
'''./ /
JA V.V$ .......-'
/
\ • • \
• \ \ / ,
— - .
. i
_I ..fot_: / ''- .',.,-* ,!•! _ \ 1 ., -.• .
•
•
1, NC Center for Geographic Information&Analysis
Project No. N
14944.W1 Wetland Sketch Map
W E
Project Mgr.:
SB
- Baker Tract S& Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
S
Nash County, NC EC Scale: 4 ,,-1-12 Falls of Neuse Road,Suite 104,Raleigh,NC 27615•Phone:[phone]•Fax:[phone]
0 200 00 800
1"=200 Source: sandec.com
Aerials from NC One Map
12/10/21 Feet

S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
March 18, 2022
S&EC Project No: 14944.W5
Re: Online Project Review Request, Baker Farm, Nashville — Nash County, North Carolina
We have reviewed the referenced project using the USFWS North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We completed
our review March 18, 2022 and are submitting our project review package in accordance with the
instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of: A planned residential development that is proposing impacts to
wetlands.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps.
Baker Farm (35.936529, -77.914275). The site is located at Barnes Hill Church Road, Nashville — Nash
County, North Carolina.
Construction will commence following the anticipated Section 404 & 401 Approvals and should be
completed by the Nationwide Permit Expiration date of March 15, 2026.
This project review is needed under provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and
per General Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 29.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical habitat
considered in our review. The species conclusions table included in the package identifies our
determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Mason Montgomery at [e-mail]
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Depaitinent
Enclosures:
1. Project Request Review Package
2. S&EC T&E Species Report
3. Vicinity Maps
4. S&EC Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS Official Species List
7. NHP Report
8. FWS Species Conclusion Table
9. FWS Self -Certification Letter

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
March 18, 2022
S&EC Project No.: 14944.W5
To: Joyner Keeny
Attn: Nils Joyner
P.O. Box 7533
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Re: THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT
Baker Farm (+/- 44 acres)
Barnes Hill Church Road, Nashville, Nash County, NC
Dear Mr. Joyner:
On March 14, 2022, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) evaluated the Baker Farm property
shown on the attached maps for potential endangered species. The property is located off Barnes Hill
Church Road in Nash County, NC. Surface waters on -site flow into Polecat Branch in the Tar -Pamlico
River Basin, which has been classified in the "Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable to
Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina" as WS-IV; NSW.
We obtained the attached automatically generated official species list from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (FWS) and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report identifying the protected species on or
within one mile of the project area that could potentially be affected by the project. These FWS & NHP
reports were updated as of the date of this report. The official species list is valid for 90 days.
We conducted site assessments to identify potential suitable habitat and preliminary surveys for the
individual species listed on the official species list. This included assessing the physical characteristics of
the streams, identifying forest types, and looking for evidence of the listed species on -site. This survey
did not include any detailed sampling or netting. The results of the search are discussed below.
Baker Farm - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 1 of 6

March 18, 2022
S&EC Project #14944.W5
RESULTS:
The FWS official species list identified the following species for the Evaluation limits:
• Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus lewisi), Threatened
• Carolina Madtom (Noturus furiosus), Endangered
• Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), Threatened
• Tar River Spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana), Endangered
• Yellow Lance (Elliptio lanceolata), Threatened
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), Endangered
Of the species identified on the official species list, the NHP report did not identify any Federally
threatened or endangered species within the project area or within one mile of the project area. Other
State listed species were found within the project area as listed in the attached NHP report. The NHP
report did not identify any natural or managed land areas within the project area or within one mile of
the project area.
NEUSE RIVER WATERDOG (Necturus lewisi):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on -site for potential suitable habitat for
the Neuse River Waterdog. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
project area or within one mile of the site. This species is found in the Neuse River and Tar River
basins. The suitable habitat this species is found in is typically medium to large streams and rivers with
a moderate gradient and large bed material. The Neuse River Waterdog also needs riffles, runs, and
pools. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any evidence of the
species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. There is a short
section of intermittent stream. Due to the lack of perennial streams on -site, we have concluded that the
project would have "No effect" on the Neuse River Waterdog.
CAROLINA MADTOM (Noturus furiosus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on -site for potential suitable habitat for
the Carolina Madtom. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project
Baker Farm - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 2 of 6

March 18, 2022
S&EC Project #14944.W5
area or within one mile of the site. This species is found in the Neuse River and Tar River basins. The
suitable habitat this species is found in is also medium to large streams and rivers with a moderate
gradient and large bed material. The Carolina Madtom also needs continuous year-round flow and
cover for nesting habitat. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any
evidence of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable
habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. There is a short
section of intermittent stream. Due to the lack of perennial streams on -site, we have concluded that the
project would have "No effect" on the Carolina Madtom.
ATLANTIC PIGTOE (Fusconaia masons):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on -site for potential suitable habitat for
the Atlantic Pigtoe (Note: This did not include a detailed aquatic mussel survey for the presence of
mussels). The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area or
within one mile of the site. The suitable habitat for this species consists of medium sized creeks to large
rivers with excellent water quality. This species typically lives in streams with coarse sand and gravel
with moderate to high flowing water. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did
not find any evidence of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for
potential suitable habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. There is a short
section of intermittent stream. Due to the lack of perennial streams on -site, we have concluded that the
project would have "No effect" on the Atlantic Pigtoe.
TAR RIVER SPINYMUSSEL (Elliptio steinstansana):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on -site for potential suitable
habitat for the Tar River Spinymussel (Note: This did not include a detailed aquatic mussel survey
for the presence of mussels). The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within
the project area or within one mile of it. The suitable habitat for this species consists of silt free
sand and gravel substrate, with well oxygenated reaches. This species typically lives in streams
Baker Farm - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 3 of 6

March 18, 2022
S&EC Project #14944.W5
with coarse sand and gravel with moderate to high flowing water. While we did not specifically
sample for the species, we also did not find any evidence of the species while conducting our
preliminary survey of the streams for potential suitable habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. There is a short
section of intermittent stream. Due to the lack of perennial streams on -site, we have concluded that the
project would have "No effect" on the Tar River Spinymussel.
YELLOW LANCE (Elliptio lanceolata):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on site for potential suitable habitat for
the Yellow Lance (Note: This did not include a detailed aquatic mussel survey for the presence of
mussels). The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area or
within one mile of the site. The suitable habitat for this species consists of medium sized rivers and
small creeks with excellent water quality. This species typically lives in streams with clean, coarse sand,
and gravel with moderate to high flowing water. While we did not specifically sample for the species,
we also did not find any evidence of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the
streams for potential suitable habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. There is a short
section of intermittent stream. Due to the lack of perennial streams on -site, we have concluded that the
project would have "No effect" on the Yellow Lance.
MICHAUX'S SUMAC (Rhus michauxii):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat within the project area. We visited
a known population of Michaux's sumac within Wake County prior to conducting our preliminary
surveys. We found no individual Michaux's Sumac species within the project area. The NHP report
did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area. We found suitable habitat within
the project areas to include primarily disturbed open areas along field and pond edges. It should be
noted that this preliminary survey was done outside of the optimal survey window (May -October).
While we did not find any Michaux's Sumac plants within the project area, our survey was conducted
outside of the optimal survey window and as suitable habitat was found it is possible that Michaux's
Baker Farm - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 4 of 6

March 18, 2022
S&EC Project #14944.W5
Sumac exists and therefore we concluded the project would "May affect" Michaux's Sumac. We
recommend consulting with the USFWS and/or conducting follow up surveys within the optimal
survey window.
BALD EAGLE (Haliaeetus leucocephalus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat, nesting sites, and individual Bald
Eagles within the project area. During our survey, we found no evidence of Bald Eagles or any nesting
sites within the project area. The NHP report did not identify any known nests on -site or within one
mile of the site. Given the lack of species present, we have concluded that the project is "Unlikely to
disturb nesting bald eagles". We believe no Eagle Act Permit is required.
NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT (Mvotis septentrionalis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys for suitable habitat and individual Northern Long-
eared Bats (NLEB's) within the project area. During our survey, we found no individual species.
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
section 7 responsibilities." Due to the nature of the project being residential development, we
concluded that the project would "May affect, but not likely to adversely affect" NLEB's.
CONCLUSION:
After completing the habitat assessments and preliminary surveys, S&EC completed the attached
"Species Conclusion Table" and "Self -Certification Letter". Using language typically used by the FWS
in their conclusion letters, we have concluded that it appears the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
However, as suitable habitat exists for Michaux's Sumac the USFWS should be consulted to determine
if surveys need to occur during the optimal survey windows for Michaux's Sumac to ensure that no
plants exist within the disturbed limits of the project. We strongly recommend requesting a
concurrence letter from the FWS.
Baker Farm - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 5 of 6

March 18, 2022
S&EC Project #14944.W5
Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Departiiient
Attachments:
1. USGS Vicinity Map
2. Soil Survey Vicinity Map
3. Aerial Map
4. Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS List of threatened and endangered species that occur in your proposed location, and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. Official Species List. March 7, 2022.
7. NHP report: Project Name. March 7, 2022.
8. S&EC — FWS Species Conclusion Table. March 18, 2022.
9. S&EC — FWS Self -Certification Letter. March 18, 2022.
References:
-North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Biotics Database. Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
-US Fish and Wildlife Service. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) & Raleigh Ecological Services Field
Office Online Project Reviews website.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Species status assessment report for the Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni). Version
1.2. March 2017. Atlanta, GA.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. Michaux's Sumac Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 3Opp.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/ Southeast Region. 2019. Carolina Madtom. Species Profile.
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/wildlife/fishes/Carolina-madtom/.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/ Southeast Region. 2019. Neuse River Waterdog... Species Profile.
http s: //www. fws. gov/southeast/wildlife/amphibians/neuse-river-waterdog/
Baker Farm — S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 6 of 6

�-�� �—n_ __,,,__,... ....7_____„4.7
„.....____.) •
i \'() (---,,CKi\c-V
v.__ (--- (
,.,_
- ?
fp. .
_ _
, _____ ..
_._
1v
-______ ,
,, (f---z-----\
----_;-- - v /-., .____,,,,
,..._,/._, , ,.
4,...,, ,_ ,-----.._....z
-v---,..r>--'
:, .
, . , z
ci „,., __, c) 1/4._
F ,
Si-9, .
�, U t, r
ti� Zi
4
\------t(!
I L---'''7 ` dk
,-------r--- 1 v\\) 7--/'
. ( --,, .
, ) 1 - --_,...\-
I \ \ \ \))/
\-7-V-i C-\\\\-\\,. ..
1 -14P6z, (--// ''-\.N: , / ii) ''‘f,
i •n, . I / .).•- /i ''\,\c„)*".'-).4( ... .—
I C , _ C
...... , £ c :7)
ISAYBROp4,�a
/ /-'n
. fl' ' P.
,--- 7 in
\ i - , - V 4
\,
„NM
- 7
. ,.....i)__c.j ._ " ,------,... , .
` 95•
f
f I/r
/ I 0 Al ___
`^_._ NC Center Geeg rpphip I E foJmation`&Analysis
Project Number: Map Title: N
14944.W5 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: USGS Map I I I I I I I I
M M Baker Tract Feet
Scale: Nash County, NC
1" = 10001 S&
Date: Source: 2019 Nashville, NC Soil&Environmental Consultants, PA
0 3/18/2 0 2 2 Quad E� 8411 Falk d Neu.Rwd Sae 104.Rakigh NC 176 L5•Phone:[phone]•Fax:(919,8969467

Ra - -- - Bb
hop.
BoB
NoB
Bo B ::}. - 5
1
Ra
., 0104.
J.
B BoB , f
/ : ..
�-h
Fa
NrB
17.7:-. ...., , cx..4.,
-------NL_ r ....,..at,. ._
NC Center for Geographic Information&Araaly ,
Project Number: Map Title: N
14944.W5 0 500 1,000
Project Manager: Soil Survey Map 0 I I I I I I I
MM Baker Tract Feet
Scale: Nash County, NC
1" = 1000' S&
Date: Source: USDA Soil Survey �� Soil &Environmental Consultants, PA
84 L2 Falk of lever Read Suer 104 Rabe*.NC 17613•Phone(919)SMr5960•Fax:[phone]
03/18/2022 Nash County, Sheet 8 aandee men

. •
., 'fix. e 'a 41!'t,� r:
ems' r ..
.'0.-
' 4-1 1Ik.i„. •....
..,.:J••... •r'•...4._-r_ig',''ri...--',W .-.`'!..•. - 'fiC-- .7'•.-.. •- s r7.--:_.,.l..''d4......:1'1.-,1.16- ' ,' ,
•
;; .'' .-, . : 4 t ,: , .. :• �,. .. _ ti x f : '•
._: ..w ' {rye .� . •'
►'
•
•
•
fit
•
,ef r it:, . .Legend :
Evaluation Area :7 .�• `
i
�co Potentially Jurisdictional Intermittent Stream _ , • . ;' �
I h •
II +i:
Potentially Jurisdictional Pond � � ` `�`` �
PotentiallyJurisdictional Wetland 1.-T - - ;. x y;•,',+. _ -,,. .° : r'.."-„'
} :y0 S is it i "
. ',. '.71- le, ilor.
irA.
•
•
N • 1_•3u. - • ..F". tip+ z` -'�L - ': ` ' I.
m i i ~teak .N ' , ..4.:. # ',
. 1 - • f.c...7.:-.4 c. .,-.;7_. . •:-. -.:- ..,,,,,...i.,._-. ..,,...4•_. , ... ,r.*tft,3 _ ,7,
4.. •• p.71^..,:qz 4 ..' 01.4 4'' .-71:- ',.:".:.......-7 Or :" ,4.... 0,..41-..,_ ' , . • . ; ''
•
Per Site visit with Kyle Barnes of the USAGE --,•-L • . 4414111*:'' -'-, ;
--r4. K4 '; .•••• ..
12/9/10 / 4"4"44,-... .11,
•
may`^! 1 r ` s — ; •+ •+ ' _j. - ?I ..'l; .. - • . .
•
It
l' 44
ity
•
•
.....'4.*:_..-1, -.,.• ;.• ...r.' -.,.- -....,tp.' ipk. - ,-j .777. •-• -.....-::::ok,r..7 .
kt
•
•.., r_ .' ' • ....:'n' ' : : . i6likle 4.1444' 44V:IrA'•' '.
•
iitt,
,„:. ...- . .,L.4,.::,:A .AL.,.. it ,...: 47.i,74::-..tirbir.0:{4.X-'JP. ' ,-j.iiii''
4,...
.A1,„ . . . ..V-- : * - ' • - V e ' 10.----011 . ...- . y,:. ;2.
--,..-..: ::... 0, ..40,„--.., -..,...j".!.. e. .„..ii.ifo......;.:... ..•-.. .p. -.04.,?...1.,.....1... ..-A4c-,............0..0 4, . IR t 4 •
jil
f :`'� �-• - r . �i. f • . ' f • y _. 4 Y � „, ,, `fi,F , .y,4 # ,,- x i��. , .r ••- • r NC Center for'�eographic Information&Analysis
•
Project No. N
14944.W5 W,/aa.:E Aerial Photo Map
Project Mgr.: S&IBaker TractSoil & Environmental Consultants, PA
MM
Nash County, NC
Scale: 0 200 400 800 E t412 Falls of Neuse Road,Suite 104,Raleigh,NC 27615•Phone:[phone]•Fax:[phone]
1"=200' Source: sand
'CO1i3
Aerials from NC One Map
3/18/22 Feet

Job #: 14944.W5
March 18, 2022
Threatened and Endangered Species Photo Report for the Baker Farm Property
Photo 1:
,, 4,4...1,,,„,, • _rkAl k f ,.i,,, -,t .-',2,•:' ja_.N.,•'•414.•", -..t. 444#0—. '•i .
� .a ,�Q; . ! rj? rter, TA ... - $ iv kr.
i yy• } '• tee-. "a. S•, 1:-)* r 2rA 0 , --.' ' ii , '',.;.:,11..2.0.4.-X, 1. ,••-.,,,.1,7k.N i 74'r It W.rrIger..
il i, X.,<l 1 i Tr if?. --rre,,%•0"..4.' ,- -.&44-• ' A..an.
1 ,A,0, 4#4 'I r ,_,-"4
ii io ..ifill .., io:fri d , ,:,,F'rii: t '''.!-'. ---: e .- " ' ' l'
t `
C•• ' . ••WI.-42./ ..TA 4.4,1....,-r-c-' ' ;t c, _:. 5ili,:3 •
it ♦ ., :,_• _. •: , '_ •tire• �q,�� _ .� d $-�:r -•,,r
L 7.• 7{ y di 7.r Or
"mac
Y r1
' der. •
.:- 'rt qv.. l .
,�� J, i .
a 'E• , ' sue' i� ;.
Photo 2: Intermittent stream
'filivi jai f IIL l'r Lii n
t ofjii.
.111 t , V V'�Ss .i F `ly s,,; b,,J `_ .•e_1:i i� it ls. ,I f' 7,,it .
: 4,:lr zi
',, i 1 , 4' , ,4,-,_ , 1„,--4:, „ 1.4 ..) ip, _,, . .,t, , r ••firL • ',. r•'_' 4 .: /1•1.4..,1 i /1 1.4;iti .., '
1 .. ic, ‘, '4 r. . i 1,. 46_,„ „7.,;.:..I rill •I I ..,,,.'1 -• \J ,ir ir' Il. ,,,,,f, .' I 0, d li 'I-. Ji I. '". •V 1
i Ilii
��' I ' + • =�j!' '_ f., k� ', � Yfrl �'?��H.'' � �1. 9 -ry.�f ..04,r•b���y�),}�,Q��',
. #e Y; Vo.�
....:�Y: ae . a
c : .,.s. r fir, - '. 1 �`'ry .."�°`•.•. .:F' ,pd.5:•Y+�: 4 ;tl �•�� •.
•
a. �� �• __. �� 4 mod:•. -.. } -,
•
113
'r�':�,• ~, •�W'`4^ _��--. f,a�. �•y^tea.�'? 4 d .r ._�. �,'r.`� :y, lit
K=.. - - i + ,Fy. 1 f,y..S€.'_ - fib_• ..R� Ft�'i,y •P '1„ ,'- -
.: �'. :. s. :G-'d�'47.. .' ram' ", :s.
,:y`.F# t ':. x •7:.•_r•t"� 4 'off W :,. '+h •^ y, „'.' • y ;A
lit
-L. • '• , �. .�^ ; :r�. . ter;w=r. ;: >` r .r
�:':� 'yy� lJ� w� v. _
}.Ta.' .T/ ^'•�J„ �:�•r" : [:e��xn �f�t:.••.,,{1:' •
�.. b. �•]f� F4��:.. `
3!r , 0 ".
•
;.�.� � �4{�� �,� 7�aa� • .,�5_.�u� *� 5•.•. �," �.�.�s%:"` p,-1�<4;1,--. 1 •'T � ':•�j: f�3 �':z.;� • �g'i• ,��-a'=s1�i �'-YI' I:o:�Z. s �4.; 'ti �' �':a���`��.. �_ ..
f ��y �+,yam R �, �`.`
r •
3 ,5 :.:! - 4 _ i; Imo ::.• 'Y'l Y ls�^y 'AM i. F - Sj
1

Job#: 14944.W5
March 18, 2022
Photo 3: Field edge
75-'1
Ilir
�i _ 4i-. ',�. #ky--.ey.+ x.,.
"+aC?:G; �' _+wo ..„_. Viz,, s;pc k•
, :0). . ,:::• ::,'''
7.
_ • _ •fit' ;�1�r
:t':' Ai y1) L 4 �f ii, tillt 44iA'-4 • a
mil I{ 4*, }} + jl !.' ' -
,:-;, • ; Vb,: k aY~0$14P } .Ci - �':is I.F`::
::''. •
,,,ors,.. °-•a.. .-r,iyij,' 3 F
.; ;'^. .,y�,tiry . .,
•
.r+.. +'gym.•-•+ .•
•—
h
n'
to...,
� R�f - �.w. 4ssj-�l-."' " / � t d'�j�e,• �a .
�5. 1`cL:4' 4 0.f'¢.."+ �`r4". 'd-. a'y,u•.n r-
Photo 4: Pond ed_e
. _r,„.,....„....,4r.,......I!..-1...-..4,1! ,'-.......:: :-...;..7,.. .',..'..".....•..:, ' ''' '.--- --- l•-‘1;-'..y.it' 11.-,•• 4,1—,Tir..4.14,- _.:•,,:- ,•••• -
ii
',' _�r� f: ifr:r: rq f .+ : r r•i. ,;rid
I ' 4sEthq7.1i.'„:',,., .....,...:',,,lw,......... -.• ,.
im...,,,,...,.......„......p,,,,..„,„„...„....
_, ...,:.,,.1„.,... .: . ....•..,..,,.....:..
.„:„.,.,• 2 di.e.N4 iiii,..7.1,010.•:!'W if.eri.t._i;.:..'.Airmk"::,y0:411*;% ..
A. 1. 1•:'1.Af-'..!.ih• i. •' ";';'..! ii. ..'''. '
4
.....,, ,, .:A
-{ '• ,,I r, i.f it„....,,. .,. �rz r.�.,., H '.'.d•;,' k3 �t: '-4;�` �..
A
';E • li I _ . #4a' *ir ,a,-'::';?�"r $ � ! - `tw7„1 pi., 't', .: is t
,lr< �r a" �;i1 �. { � .° �� .. ,v • a v;l'.
ft
= '.�: '.'t'J' • y weir,°•;' ,�� i ,1 �:� _:c�:: -.
of • . - ; ','• .,i' .t: .•'s:s'f::, .i ;7.[ . - 4
•
4
".,...._...11,,..,... 1,..... ..,, , • • ,.. . ...,. ...:,., . ...„[.,.,, .,.....(...„....„..•.,. .. .,..,,... .,,,,.1.,L.t ):4•2'..,4';i4,,...„.: .-•.' 4.. ...,.: ',i,..i,
fit'' . '.7• -". f •' x;: ,Ia•. . 1
.1;•••1•74':.,•, ..,1
•
•
r�; ;` h sty �� .?x' ,..� }
-�.: • '. ay : � ., '. `Yt°i fey'• . • _ - -_
0

Job#: 14944.W5
March 18, 2022
Photo 5: Field ed l e
w`.,I g.',A, .."ASVW k 1
rso, tc--4,4100,41%,,,,i-i4 4
i ,i k, '.et ,,,,At'2.34•.tit
•
-..; r_ ':� +fie •c54:—..
3

Date Plotted : Mar 16, 2022 - 4:0lpm Plotted By
KSTONE Z:\CAD\2021\210528A_Baker Tract Barnes Hill Church Rd Rmt_Subdivision Plat \ CIVIL \ Design \ Drawing \ CAD \ Exhibit B_WETLANDS SITE PLAN.dwg
a
y to
b a
00
7cH
4E'r
cob
to to
C
a
r
to
x
CJ
a
h
un
to
co
a
to
70
co
a
h1
rn
t-
to
co
co
co b4,77OHHc4C4NHh1h1 V c)h7Hcotrjti
kCr,ZcCOoco baaH
c7Pc o10 OOr";rkkmal0::'' t71007C1.12hz
b5-,0 ,,,ZZ�ot1ppr+y ° Nyt v
h7b�c���o''y'ybyCrir cab -3trJ-'t".'Z�`o,C)H07'0 �b y_'.7oOt- :v ..C:01 vD;vti ,-`O`to n
CD CD
O_ti � Ool ,°o yrlrr3�rEoZ7hiP0Obo%0ZZrlt•vo a0�00 0„oyv)v)yvc]bmhlb�oco0"7cOm�r'btT1 �y4v' �czbO-34,4,tri:, Z O�71oo�Oy''�m co co
'�z44' av at;:g4ZO bhi rl 1y Zr"
0,,v0O,�rcotm�y�OCz yp„�4>Z
d� �a_,��aco ,��r,zc)a r rt�0'"z
•
b bZC�ZOOtrr1mZ CIorr-IH' C
xz��rn�btrl Z-Cy ..z�mtr~t"
tnO�by� fir" O" PI
nvz n ZZc'iy'ti
C
b ro�br�y� 0 r" �n0O�a
r Z
r Z o f oT1 7c, '-.3 ti 0 � b
tl Z y CD PI •=1 bm Cj bh1 70 c)
hi %� b h1 iiiii:
�4 j Z clroaal11 O ~bn „uo� 4- r11 h1 Z HNy
070 b)b
c)CD�CvyrCtbvrrnv '� C7a-7ccr
tH
n2Otnp,,, lc 7�ti�
ba 0NOaZd?N-a07r 077
Hc)by70 orl
h C 0
0c�y bl
b r ° PII
ZGo p oT 7c o�b c,Cri bib E b4��ti�
7n O� Z H Pc
co
a
L9
L8
L7
L6
CD
4,
W
N
L1
Line #
Line Table
coN
S87°52'49"W
J
coN
S87°52'49"W
z
S87°52'49"W
S88°14'38"W
(1)
Direction
J
J
J
N
CP
4,:
v1
•
O
N
N
N
J
J
4; ((0
Occ
W
(
N
-
*
*
*
*.
m
19.80
36.90
N
23.80
61
26.87
cn
O
16.75
N
Length
J
N
O
(O
iv
O
0
W
L18
L17
L16
cn
L14
CA
NJ0
1
co
4k
Line Table
(/)
J
0
a)
COW
S87°52'49"W
S87°52'49"W
Z
cn
CO
4
4,
(/)
co
J
N
S87°52'49"W
(1)
J
0
W O
(n
J
O
OW
Z
0)
CO
C-'1
Direction
cn
16.40
0)
Cr)
0
32.09
10.00
75.00
26.26
53.91
40.90
rn
up
7-
L27
L26
L25
N
4,
N
W
N
N
L21
L20
(0
Line #
Line Table
Z
0o
0-
W
-4
O
N
o)
O
cn
N
a)
O
cn
N
a)
W
0
o
z
a)
O
c
N
0)
co
W
-4cn
o
z
rn
C°
o
O
z
N
cn
N
S87°52'49"W
Direction
N
C'�
N
Q1
O
44.73
cD
O
N
47.33
16.25
cD
O
J
N
O
35.00
Length
CA
CD
W
4,
Crr1
W
CA
N
L31
L30
L29
L28
Line #
Line Table
Z
N
_
-
Z
0)
_
CD
*
Z
J
CAO
z
N
G•
J
(0
rl
N71'04'46"W
(n
(gyp
Crt
'-.4O
0)
O
N
a)
z
Cep
C.4
.4
Wp
rT1
Direction
coo
0)
Ni
w
J
4,
20.08
cco
O
-
3.03
.o90
4,
O
S"'
0
W
20.44
Length
z
O • �
z
cnm
m
C D
nm
-gym
o °
zm
X
G��ak ah�1OZb�bt��' Z�a Or H a
���0bpCh-3 o „ pc 4, �b'7cbZ G) C,y 7171c)bc"..< 0p0bZO'vCyCZH�
tD Cr 7z1 l. 'Cabcoy4b1�C~ 1R'OO'CObco70tll
,O
O
CD h 1 Z a C„ c% „„ 4 tC 4'� to b y 7c n Pc
ccpp4>r,c)OHun'tlZOH`'a'7rCHrl
a r-r"HZtc'v0C4%b"CO c7c) un
o, p NCO „�i,ZpyOZttrl
O~-1 h�ytvr co rl ZP Fil
c4v O�Z�El 1C�S-1O rn.,Cth�1"'�
hya' rr rT1ca,a11ZZt H1-c0CCZCbna
r~ ' v' h1 7c 0 C4 a O "t 1„, al 4, , 00 y y O b
a a to b 4 h1 'A H al t o '� `C 7c •-ci , , 7 p0 `b
r, HcIO-3zun 1�n,vk(4ZNr"ybb„C)0
71 nZ -,„yaHy"nr4C)t2' Za4a
al HZcc�b�ay0ca'ro°Nb��botc
o
1 al H19!!:
i b HOb 04)-20
H� t_ rlogn�O C..°7,c7'r~i)' ttrlbyrtrl t
Z bbz Ob al
��yby„Z
p0c4 H H t-,'-roc �H HHP
al
tin Cal �� �� b O� yv
rZn un
m cri 0 h b b1 al
0 O
0 Z ti b b 4,c4 00 ,ti 4 (ID b
x C) Z1=1 4 a ~7 ,,
al
Pc n1 ~Cz rl ba 'ro0
ti
n
,-0 ci A
O Z -0 co
• oC O7b.or
7.1 f?1 LA 0 CO m
N O N -(mj A z
473
XI (m/100-0 >41.6041
- omo
N T1
✓ r'1
0
m
-n
m
0
m
0
11
m
m
z
0)
co 0
O -1
0)
'11 O
NO'35'18"W 239.45' 1
t
cn
0)0 I
0 Cr'I- I / I�)
N O ''/l m
°22'10'W 301.05' _imi'k
(� 1
II
'- coNN O
0-1 OO I
(r
(nW I1
0'22'10"W 301.05' (TOT)- (�
100.00' 100.00' 101.05'4
ozor— — ozo� — AI
0 0
J N J
op~
CFI
oN O 0iT1O0 I N
0 00
0
T1 -1
O 0 Cn
0 ,1NI ITI
Nuc _
N O
J --1
nD
(/) C
CDC
CD
CD
100.00 _
100.00'
E
V
S
0
S
■
■
■
100.00'
0°22'10"E 301.05—
CO
WO
N 4,
0)
'1
S0'29'40"E 250.22—
DATE
C40
C39
W
COrsj
C37
C36
C35
C34
0
CA
0
NJ-
0
0
0
0
C29
C28
C26
C25
C24
0
0
W
0
0
CO
C18
0
J
0
01
C12
0
n
0
0
CO
0
00
C7
C6
C5
C4
0
W
0
N
0
Curve #
Curve Table
COW
OD
co
ODD
88.20
J
(O
0
O
J
CO
39.27
39.27
89.44
N
0
W
J
a)
OJO
01
01
82.56
12.37
21.03
cNO
-
oo
O
01
NJ
(,4
o-)
(O
190.88
9.80
37.60
109.74
0
0
398.57
447.91
ivJ
c..1
W
90.00
23.76
39.27
39.27
Q1
W
cn
0O
0)
(0
Length
25.00
260.00
no
0
0
o
260.00
260.00
N3
o
0
0
N
U'
0
o
25.00
J
cn
O
0
25.00
Cn
o
OOOO
0
U1
O
0
Cn
O
0
U1
o
0
25.00
225.00
225.00
N
0
OOOO
0
NJ
0
0
NJ
0
0
NJ
o
0
25.00
CA
cn
0
0
CA
cn
0
0
265.00
315.00
315.00
CAN
cn
0
0
315.00
U'
0
0
25.00
265.00
6Ni
cn
O
0
265.00
O
a
co
((00
N
.
0
O
Co
-
N
-
O
-
4,
co-
01
4
01
Cn
(O
O
O
0
O
O
0
c(00
N
Co
COH
(O
J
J
0
-
W
-
a)
0
-
-
00
C
(O
J
4'
CA
-
OO
cn
CO
J
co
CO
Cn
4,
N
O
00
N
O
J
00)
co
(0
(O
a)
CO
00))
00
CO
J
N
0)
W
J
.
("4
N
O
O
0
0
O
0
0)
CO
J
O
cn
-3
cn
''
O
Z
cn
°
NJ CA
-
(./)
no
S17° 37' 39"E
S37° 03' 26"E
N48° 35' 56"W
S68° 34' 21"E
N45° 22' 10"W
S44° 37' 50"W
S75° 43' 45"E
S36° 59' 30"E
S51° 37' 57"E
N44° 34' 07"E
N47° 47' 42"W
S77° 48' 51"W
Z
CO
01
- O
CD-
C�r1
N64° 48' 06"W
Z
J
(O
ON)
aa))
N75° 58' 30"W
S48° 35' 56'E
N35° 32' 29"W
Z
CO
"
cn
41,
(n
W
CO
cn..
N
*
Z
0)
CO
N
Iv
CO
rri
Z
cn
0
O
rri
N40° 58' 04"E
S38° 36' 58"W
N29° 46' 43"E
N10° 23' 11"E
Z
O
O
tv
J
m
S42° 52' 50"W
S47° 07' 11"E
(n
W
W
-P...m
S48° 05' 05"W
S75° 19' 55"W
Chord Direction
CA
O
87.71
87.78
346.40
193.08
CAI
0)
35.36
88.47
no
0
62.57
70.79
73.49
f
N
No
ND0
�_
O
85.30
279.78
CO
9.80
34.16
O
co
00
100.76
OWi
N
0CA
W
N
122.44
CO
Co
19
NJ
CA
Cn
W
cn
0')
35.36
-.
J
168.38
CO
O
00
Chord Length
00
0 -i
O CA
'1
' I 200.00'
_SO'22'10"E _ 245.00
0 -1
0
0�
cn
'11
SO°22'10"E
KJ
40
cn
cf) Oa
i7
W
to
O
245I00`-
▪ —-4N�9.40W 956.19' (
Pc
7c
b
b
co
co
co
II II II II
DESCRIPTION
BY
N2°07'11 "W 184.0O'
- i cfl
IAo
��*` N2°07'11"W 201.50" ?
u 4 W- 1
,ik-tx °07'11"W 193.46
N.'‘
1 04
4441
1
-<
0
C
8V.L Ino.W1
0
U1
N
CO
!38WfN 8or
m
co
0
r
m
S2°07'11 "E
0 O
N
CO
N2'07'11"W
383.82'
-N2°07'11"W 198.00
N2°07'11"W 190.45
SO°29'40"E 200.19'
r11-1-1
W 20
m z
ADO
P1217J
Z0D
-�C21
Z -<
0
2°0711 W 175.00
200.00r_
N
o
0�
Nrn
-n
rn -1-1
rn Z 0
ADO
r11Z120
z0?>
-1 20
Z
0
n
z z
0
0
N
0
D
1
m
BAKER FARM SUBDIVISION MAJOR SUBDIVISION
OAK LEVEL TOWNSHIP, NASH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WETLANDS IMPACT EXHIBIT
SITE PLAN

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2022-0016565
Project Name: Baker Farm
March 07, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological

03/07/2022
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.

03/07/2022 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

03/07/2022 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

03/07/2022 2
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0016565
Event Code: None
Project Name: Baker Farm
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: This property is located in Nash County, NC, and is approximately 44
acres.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.93677705,-77.91345319365018,14z
Counties: Nash County, North Carolina

03/07/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 7 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansana
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Threatened
Endangered
Threatened

03/07/2022 4
Insects
NAME
STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Candidate
STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

03/07/2022 5
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency:
Name:
Address:
Address Line
City:
State:
Zip:
Email
Phone:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mason Montgomery
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
2: Suite 104
Raleigh
NC
27615
[e-mail]
7047732837

Roy Cooper, Governor
al ■■■
■■ R NC DEPARTMENT OF
■
■ ■k■A NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
March 7, 2022
Robert Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Baker Farm; 14944.W5
Dear Robert Zarzecki:
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Dire ttrr, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-17348
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/officesLDirectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
j 1:1 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGI NC 27603 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699
OFC 015 707.9120 • FA x 919.707.9121

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Baker Farm
Project No. 14944.W5
March 7, 2022
NCNHDE-17348
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
f Date Rank
Mammal 24389 Corynorhinus Eastern Big -eared Bat 2006-Pre E 5-Very --- Special G3G4T S3
rafinesquii macrotis Low Concern 3
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/helo. Data query generated on March 7, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q4, January 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

March 7, 2022
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
NCNHDE-17348: Baker Farm
1:22,984
0 0.175 0.35
1 1 ti 't
0 0.3 0.6
0.7 mi
1.2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE. Garmin. Irnermap, increment P Corp.. GEBCO. USGS,
FAO. NPS, NRCAN, GNAW.. IGN, Kadaster NI_ Ordnance Survey. Esri Japan.
MErt. Evr China (Hung i R.* IQ) OpenslreetMap Contributors, and the GIs
User Community
Page 3 of 3

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Baker Farm
Date: March 18, 2022
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Neuse River Waterdog
Necturus lewisi
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on March 14, 2022.
Carolina Madtom
Noturus furiosus
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on March 14, 2022.
Atlantic Pigtoe
Fusconaia masoni
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on March 14, 2022.
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio
steinstansana
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on March 14, 2022.
Yellow Lance
Elliptio lanceolata
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on March 14, 2022.
Michaux's Sumac
Rhus michauxii
Suitable habitat present
May affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on March 14, 2022. It should be noted this
survey took place outside of the optimal survey
window (May through October).
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus Ieucocephalus
Unlikely to disturb nesting
Bald Eagles
No Eagle Act permit required
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on March 14, 2022.
Northern Long-eared Bat
Myotis septentrionalis
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on March 14, 2022. Relying upon the
findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic
Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities
Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill our
project -specific section 7 responsibilities.
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an informed
decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Mason Montgomery / Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department at S&EC, PA
Signature /Title
March 17, 2022
Date

FLEE' I & WILDLIFE
gENV ECI;
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date:
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Baker Farm
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package