400058_Inspection_20220309

i Division Of Water ROsooroeir •
O Invision of •SoU and Water. Cols on
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: • Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:
/-/a
Departure Time:
County: Region: kheC)
Farm Name: zt yLj Owner Email:
Owner Name:7,40.,,Azde
'/
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Represenative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone: 9/9 ,2r-,3 3d
Title: Phone: f ? _ , L __ /74
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number: / YT53
Certification Number:
Longitude:
•
trine
itorreot
" Capacity rop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
*skit Gent
Wet Poultry , Capacity Pop,
Layer
Non -Layer
Best ►n Ouri ent
x`9 Pont try CaphtY Pop,
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
.Cattle
Capaollat
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [J(No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes El No El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ o ❑ NA
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

umber: slid -
Date of Inspection:, — 2,3
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ll/
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
[(No ❑ NA El NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes 13 No
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen 1 threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
EiNo El NA ❑NE
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
U No ❑ NA
❑ Yes I3 No
❑ Yes [3No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Least- Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Ra
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
El Yes
❑ Yes
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
El Other:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
El Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
infall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
No El NA ❑NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑NA El NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
No El NA El NE
No I] NA ❑NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes QNo ❑NA ❑NE
5/12/2020 Continued

7).ty umber: ye r P 1
Date of Inspection: — —
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes I2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes E/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes liNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes liNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
r wm and
�'niaamie,�x fax�cealiaEtt � any�g answers and/or a�dadditionalatdouiror ilay.Q
rife Oit**60. yriacifitylibOor e444ain siknatrtons (us6 adnaI pales A4,neGessary)
/d - , //
T-5-- R-/ _ /3
, ia—
?///S, igd
�-C
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
A, /ems (sQ /7 et
Phone: Mo
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: ,Q,/
5/12/2020