20140404 Ver 1_Application_20140422

Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No.(From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp.Design
(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ft)(ft)(ft)
2 Charles Creek near Drop Inlet/Junc. Box & -- - ----7 14 -
Fire Department Pipe Stub
4 Site 4 outlet of crossline;Pipe Ext., Precast - - - - -<0.01* - - - -
UT to Charles Creek Endwall w/ splash apron
and ditch tie in
relocation
TOTALS:0 0 0 0 0 <0.01*0 7 14 0
Notes: 1. Approximately 70 sq. ft. of permanent surface water impacts to the tributary.
SHEET 1 OF 1 4/10/2014
ONSLOW COUNTY OLD FOLKSTONE RD
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WBS # 45333.1.12
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
SURFACE WATER IMPACTSWETLAND IMPACTS
From:Herndon, Mason
To:Shaver, Brad E SAW; Mathis, Stonewall D
Subject:RE: Old Folkstone Road SR 1519 Onslow County (UNCLASSIFIED)
Date:Friday, June 07, 2013 4:05:44 PM
I agree that Site 2 was questionable. According to GIS it does become a blueline stream further
downstream, Charles Creek (SA HQW). I didn't think it would score more than 19 on the DWQ stream
form because it was a weak natural valley, straight and dry. Stoney, we should probably fill out stream
form to confirm a call....my bust we should have done that when we were out there.
MH
Mason Herndon
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection/Transportation Permitting
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message-----
From: Shaver, Brad E SAW [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 11:02 AM
To: Mathis, Stonewall D; Herndon, Mason
Subject: RE: Old Folkstone Road SR 1519 Onslow County (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
I would like to make this as painless as possible. That said I took your maps and overlaid as best I
could the project to Lidar, see attached.
I would agree on all accounts but I am just not sure about site 2. I say that only because the lidar
image shows a fairly lengthy valley position upstream of the crossing which I would expect in a natural
system. Also according to Lidar the drainage area appears to be approximately 11 acres very close to
what you would expect for an intermittent stream system. In otherwords it does not appear that this
feature has been rerouted or extensively ditched. In a lot of cases those features which are considered
tributaries not requiring mitigation are those finger extensions from something that clearly was ditched
downstream. I am not convinced by lidar this feature fits that scenario.
Did you happen to take any pictures or could you provide any more descriptors that lead you all to the
current assessment?
Brad
-----Original Message-----
From: Mathis, Stonewall D [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 5:01 PM
To: Kimmel, Mary P
Cc: Mathis, Stonewall D; Cooke, Scott E; Herndon, Mason; Westphal, Anneliese; Foushee, Celia B;
Shaver, Brad E SAW
Subject: Old Folkstone Road SR 1519 Onslow County
Hey Mary,
Anneliese, Celia, and I met with Mason yesterday June 5, 2013 to review the five sites from the
attached maps that you provided. The following resulted from the meeting.
Site 1 It appears that no jurisdictional features are present in the review area of site 1
Site 2 It appears that both ends of the cross line are jurisdictional within the review area. This feature
appears to be a jurisdictional tributary for which we would likely not have to mitigate for impacts.
Impacts would have to be permitted.
Site 3 It appears that no jurisdictional features are present in the review area of site 3
Site 4 It appears that beginning at the outlet end of the cross line and continuing in the downstream
direction off of the ROW, the feature is a jurisdictional tributary for which we would likely not have to
mitigate for impacts. The ditch subject to relocation and associated driveway pipes appear to not be
jurisdictional. A new ditch tie in below the ordinary high water mark of the tributary would be an
impact that would need to be permitted accordingly along with the other proposed impacts. There
appear to be no jurisdictional features on the upstream side of the road at this location.
Site 5 - It appears that no jurisdictional features are present in the review area of site 5
You will notice that there are a lot of appears above. The USACE will need to concur with these calls.
This project would likely need a Nationwide Permit 14 from the USACE and corresponding Water Quality
Certification 3886 from the NC Division of Water Quality for the 404/401 impacts. Also, we would need
to apply to NC Division of Water Quality Stormwater section for stormwater considerations. Also, we
need to submit to historic. Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thank you,
Stoney
________________________________
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
From:Wilson, Travis W.
To:Mathis, Stonewall D; Baker, Jessi E; Lane, Stephen
Subject:RE: Old Folkstone road widening
Date:Monday, March 03, 2014 8:38:56 AM
WRC does not request an in water work moratorium for this project.

NOTE: NEW PHONE NUMBER AND MAILING ADDRESS

Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1718 Hwy 56 West
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

From: Mathis, Stonewall D
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 3:58 PM
To: Baker, Jessi E; Wilson, Travis W.; Lane, Stephen
Cc: Mathis, Stonewall D
Subject: Old Folkstone road widening

Hey Travis and Jessi,

Would you please advise on whether an in water work moratorium would be required at the
referenced project site and if so what would be the applicable dates? I do not have good stream
dimension/water profile info for this at the moment, but from memory I believe this water body
was about 2-3 feet wide at water surface and around 6 -8 inches deep at some of its deeper spots
and really averaged around 3 to 4 inches deep; this is from recollection of my last visit which was
many months ago but I can obtain and provide more certain current data if it would make a
difference for your decision; please let me know if you need that info. This project proposes to do
2’ widening on each side of the road and as such would require the installation of a drop inlet and
pipe stub on the outlet end of the existing crossline in this apparent intermittent reach of Charles
Branch (SA HQW). This would require a Nationwide permit 14 from the USACE and Water Quality
Certification 3886 from NCDWR and as such this work would have to be done in a dry work area
with bypass pumping to maintain downstream flows, however, the work area would not be
traversable by fish (if any present) during the construction of the drop inlet and pipe stub. Please
see the attached maps and plan sheets (see site 2 on the plan sheet; this location is immediately
beside the fire station at Sneads Ferry). Please note that site 2 is what is encircled on the topo and
aerial map. Please let me know if you need additional information.

Hey Stephen,

Please advise on whether you would claim site 2 as CAMA AEC and whether a CAMA permit would
be required. Please note that site 2 is what is encircled on the topo and aerial map. Please let me
know if you need additional information.

Thank you,
Stoney

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From:Baker, Jessi E
To:Mathis, Stonewall D
Subject:RE: Old Folkstone road widening
Date:Friday, March 28, 2014 9:15:40 AM
Marine fisheries moratorium is not required at this location.

Thanks,

Jessi

From: Mathis, Stonewall D
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 7:59 AM
To: Baker, Jessi E
Cc: Mathis, Stonewall D
Subject: FW: Old Folkstone road widening

Hey Jessi,

I visited this site again on March 10, 2014. The stream at the requested location is approximately 2
feet wide by 3 inches deep on average in the near downstream area of our project location. I did
not see any fish in the stream at this location during my visit on March 10, 2014 and I was there for
several minutes performing a NCDWQ Stream Identification form evaluation. Please see the
attached pictures also taken on the downstream end of our project location. Please reply.

Thank you,
Stoney

From: Mathis, Stonewall D
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 3:58 PM
To: Baker, Jessi E; Wilson, Travis W.; Lane, Stephen
Cc: Mathis, Stonewall D
Subject: Old Folkstone road widening

Hey Travis and Jessi,

Would you please advise on whether an in water work moratorium would be required at the
referenced project site and if so what would be the applicable dates? I do not have good stream
dimension/water profile info for this at the moment, but from memory I believe this water body
was about 2-3 feet wide at water surface and around 6 -8 inches deep at some of its deeper spots
and really averaged around 3 to 4 inches deep; this is from recollection of my last visit which was
many months ago but I can obtain and provide more certain current data if it would make a
difference for your decision; please let me know if you need that info. This project proposes to do
2’ widening on each side of the road and as such would require the installation of a drop inlet and
pipe stub on the outlet end of the existing crossline in this apparent intermittent reach of Charles
Branch (SA HQW). This would require a Nationwide permit 14 from the USACE and Water Quality
Certification 3886 from NCDWR and as such this work would have to be done in a dry work area
with bypass pumping to maintain downstream flows, however, the work area would not be
traversable by fish (if any present) during the construction of the drop inlet and pipe stub. Please
see the attached maps and plan sheets (see site 2 on the plan sheet; this location is immediately
beside the fire station at Sneads Ferry). Please note that site 2 is what is encircled on the topo and
aerial map. Please let me know if you need additional information.

Hey Stephen,

Please advise on whether you would claim site 2 as CAMA AEC and whether a CAMA permit would
be required. Please note that site 2 is what is encircled on the topo and aerial map. Please let me
know if you need additional information.

Thank you,
Stoney

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From:Lane, Stephen
To:Mathis, Stonewall D
Subject:RE: (SR1518) Old Folkstone Road widening
Date:Friday, March 14, 2014 10:12:23 AM
Hi Stoney,

As we discussed, I visited the culvert carrying Charles Creek under Old Folkstone Road (Site 2) as
you requested on March 5, 2014 and have determined that the site is not within a CAMA AEC. This
project will not require a CAMA permit from the NCDCM. Please let me know if I can be of any
further assistance.

Sincerely,

Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative

From: Mathis, Stonewall D
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 3:58 PM
To: Baker, Jessi E; Wilson, Travis W.; Lane, Stephen
Cc: Mathis, Stonewall D
Subject: Old Folkstone road widening
Importance: High

Hey Travis and Jessi,

Would you please advise on whether an in water work moratorium would be required at the
referenced project site and if so what would be the applicable dates? I do not have good stream
dimension/water profile info for this at the moment, but from memory I believe this water body
was about 2-3 feet wide at water surface and around 6 -8 inches deep at some of its deeper spots
and really averaged around 3 to 4 inches deep; this is from recollection of my last visit which was
many months ago but I can obtain and provide more certain current data if it would make a
difference for your decision; please let me know if you need that info. This project proposes to do
2’ widening on each side of the road and as such would require the installation of a drop inlet and
pipe stub on the outlet end of the existing crossline in this apparent intermittent reach of Charles
Branch (SA HQW). This would require a Nationwide permit 14 from the USACE and Water Quality
Certification 3886 from NCDWR and as such this work would have to be done in a dry work area
with bypass pumping to maintain downstream flows, however, the work area would not be
traversable by fish (if any present) during the construction of the drop inlet and pipe stub. Please
see the attached maps and plan sheets (see site 2 on the plan sheet; this location is immediately
beside the fire station at Sneads Ferry). Please note that site 2 is what is encircled on the topo and
aerial map. Please let me know if you need additional information.

Hey Stephen,

Please advise on whether you would claim site 2 as CAMA AEC and whether a CAMA permit would
be required. Please note that site 2 is what is encircled on the topo and aerial map. Please let me
know if you need additional information.

Thank you,
Stoney

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Site 2 34.544713 N, 77402735 W
Site 434.550145N, 77.402416W
SR 1548 SR 1519 Old Folkstone Road
Charles Creek SA HQW
1
5
1
9
1 6 9 7
1518
1515
2
2
0
5
C l a y H i l l R d
Old Folkstone Rd
S
n
e
a
d
s F
erry
R
d
Old Mill Rd
Neighborhood Rd
H a w k L n
E a g l e s N e s t D r
Old Folkstone Road 2 Foot Symmetrical WideningSneads Ferry, Onslow County
¹
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Feet
Site 2 34.544713 N, 77402735 W
Site 434.550145N, 77.402416W
SR 1548 SR 1519 Old Folkstone Road
Charles Creek SA HQW
1
5
1
9
1 6 9 7
1518
1515
2
2
0
5
C l a y H i l l R d
Old Folkstone Rd
S
n
e
a
d
s F
erry
R
d
Old Mill Rd
Neighborhood Rd
H a w k L n
E a g l e s N e s t D r
Old Folkstone Road 2 Foot Symmetrical WideningSneads Ferry, Onslow County
¹
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Feet
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

D
R
O
P

I
N
L
E
T

(
S
T
D
.

8
4
0
.
1
4

&

8
4
0
.
1
6
)

S
S
T
S
T
S
T
S
S
ST
S
T
S
T
S
T
S
T
S
C
R
O
S
S
L
I
N
E

P
I
P
E
.
T
O

E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

2
4
"

R
C
P

1
"
=
2
0
’
I
N
S
E
T
S
c
a
l
e

1
"

=

4
0
’
0
4
0
’
4
0
’
8
0
’
SIT
E

#
2
2
4
"

R
C
P

P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

1
2

L
F

O
F
2
4
"

R
C
P

P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

4

L
F

O
F
2
4
"

R
C
P

P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

1
6

L
F

O
F
FOR DEWATER
I
N
G
14 LINEAR FEET - TEMPORARY IM
P
A
C
T
S
FOR DRAINAGE
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
7 LINEAR FEET - PERMANENT IM
P
A
C
T
S
TOTAL IMPACTS:SSTSTS IMPACTS LEGENDIMPACTSPERMANENT STREAMIMPACTSTEMPORARY STREAM
S
H
E
E
T

3

O
F

5
S
N
E
A
D
S

F
E
R
R
Y

V
O
L
U
N
T
E
E
R

F
IR
E

D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
D
B

2
9
3
4

P
G

6
4
3
P
A
D
G
E
T
T

P
R
O
P
E
R
T
IE
S
SR 1519 - OLD

F
O
L
K
S
T
O
N
E

R
O
A
D

(
6
0
’
R
/
W)
2
0
’

B
S
T
15
"
C
M
P
2
4
"

R
C
P
W
O
O
D
S
B
S
T
W
O
O
D
S
E
X
IS
T
IN
G

R
/
W
E
X
IS
T
IN
G

R
/
W
60.00’
2
4
"

R
C
P
NAD 83/ 2001
1"=2
0
’
INSE
T
S
S
S
SS
A
P
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E

L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y

P
I
P
E

T
O

B
E

R
E
L
O
C
A
T
E
D
P
E
R
M
A
N
E
N
T

I
M
P
A
C
T
S
7
0

S
Q
F
T

O
F

T
O
T
A
L

I
M
P
A
C
T
S
:
S
c
a
l
e

1
"

=

4
0
’
0
4
0
’
4
0
’
8
0
’
S
I
T
E

#
4
S
S
T
S
T
S
I
M
P
A
C
T
S

L
E
G
E
N
D
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
P
E
R
M
A
N
E
N
T

S
T
R
E
A
M
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y

S
T
R
E
A
M
P
I
P
E

E
X
T
E
N
S
I
O
N
E
L
B
O
W

W
I
T
H

4
’

2
4
"

R
C
P
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E

(STD. 838.80 OR 838.11)CONCRETE END WALL PROPOSED PRECAST
S
H
E
E
T

5

O
F

5
RUFUS E. MURRAY
SARAH JAMES MYLES
MILTON THOMAS YOPP
IN
G
R
E
S
S
/
E
G
R
E
S
S

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
15"
RCP
24" RCP
NCDOT GPS MON. "DDC5"
20’ BST SR 1519 - OLD FOLKSTONE ROAD (60’ R/W)
S
O
I
L
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
6
0
.0
0
’
15"
RCP
24" RCP
SR 1519 - OLD FOLKSTONE ROAD (60’ R/W)NAD 83/ 2001