NC0050342_Correspondence_20041101

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING; COVER SHEET
NC0050342
Muddy Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
November 1, 2004
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the reirerse side

imap://[e-mail]:143/f...
Subject: Re: re recent modification to NC0050342 - Winston Salem Muddy Cr WWTP
From: [e-mail]
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:23:04 -0500
To: Sergei Chemikov <[e-mail]>
CC: [e-mail]
thanks for the explanation - didn't mean to stir things up, but was
responding to what was written. I understand what you did and why you
did it.
1 of 1 11/1/2004 4:17 PM

mailbox:///q/Documents%20and%20Settings/sergei_chernikov/Applica...
Subject: Re: re recent modification to NC0050342 - Winston Salem Muddy Cr WWTP
From: Sergei Chernikov <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:11:31 -0500
To: [e-mail]
Marshall,
We don't consider all modifications as minor modifications. But these particular
modifications were considered minor because they only involved relocation of sampling
points and update of toxicity language. There was no change in flow or composition of
the waste, no new limits, no changes in limits, etc.
Sergei
[e-mail] wrote:
thanks for the explanation. 40 CFR Part 1122.63 spells out which
changes to permits are considered to be minor modifications. If a given
change does not fall into one of those categories, it must be considered
a major mod under 40 CFR 122.62, must go to public notice, and be sent
to EPA for review, according to the MOA. If NC really considers all
mods as minor mods, that's a problem. Is it really typical practice for
all mods to be considered as minor by NC?
I understand changes needed to be made to this permit, but they don't
seem to qualify as minor mods to me.
Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D.
Environmental Engineer
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
phone: [phone] ext. 594
fax: [phone]
1 of 1 11/1/2004 4:18 I'M

imap://sergei.chernikov%40dwq. [e-mail]:143/f...
Subject: Re: re recent modification to NC0050342 - Winston Salem Muddy Cr WWTP
From: [e-mail]
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 09:57:26 -0500
To: Sergei Chemikov <[e-mail]>
CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
thanks for the explanation. 40 CFR Part 1122.63 spells out which
changes to permits are considered to be minor modifications. If a given
change does not fall into one of those categories, it must be considered
a major mod under 40 CFR 122.62, must go to public notice, and be sent
to EPA for review, according to the MOA. If NC really considers all
mods as minor mods, that's a problem. Is it really typical practice for
all mods to be considered as minor by NC?
I understand changes needed to be made to this permit, but they don't
seem to qualify as minor mods to me.
1 of 1 11/1/2004 4:16 PM

imap://[e-mail] net:143/f...
Subject: re recent modification to NC0050342 - Winston Salem Muddy Cr WWTP
From: [e-mail]
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 09:25:47 -0500
To: [e-mail]
just got this final modification. It looks like a number of non -minor
mods were made to the permit, but I don't think a draft of those was
sent here first for review. The MOA does require that major mods also
be reviewed by EPA. wanted to bring this to your attention. thanks
Marshall
1 of 1 11/1/2004 4:16 PM