NC0026000_Wasteload Allocation_19940330

NPDES DOCUWENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0026000
Tabor City WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
•:.^*x...t,_,..r,Trn.a+fXiMv.9AY7rva::..-fa
Wasteload Allocation
r:,,r... ._ ,.
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
March 30, 1994
Thies document le; printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the reYerise Bide

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0026000
PERMITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Town of Tabor City
Tabor City Wastewater Treatment Plant
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Modification/minor
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Minor '/
Design Capacity: 1.1 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow):
>t, nor v56 1 ems` F' &,U(LE
Comments: 5 10 = 0.Z-0456-5 c 1(.5 M,Z * D-019 Vvv(iDK.•. # Ixu Lsr,nir j
IWC = as-G'/v uor peocccv
57-L-10= 0.0 Z3cc-s C11,5rx."- NI 0.00Z 1,51kvesAlf lie)
RECEIVING STREAM: the Town Canal (U. T. to Grissett Swamp )
Class: C-Swamp
Sub -Basin: 03-07-57
Reference USGS Quad: K23NE (please attach)
County: Columbus
Regional Office: Wilmington Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 6/30/94 Treatment Plant Class: class II
Classification changes within three miles:
None
Requested by: Dana B6lden
Date: 2/20/94
Prepared by: /��� / ^ �/'4r— Date: 3 /36/ 9 -
Reviewed by: C tl JA ��.�LL/1idVv2e- . Date: f o i
UUL ‘6.5 (33 30 9�
at et- W L
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Z-I z 4 q.p
_
1'1S S.
Drainage Area (mil ) 1.0
Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 1. o
7Q10 (cfs) 0.0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0. 0 30Q2 (cfs) v. n
Toxicity Limits: IWC q o %
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters --rtw,a rl , a km.votsigo o w . cbl,P„n..1 cANctvCf, tit*?
Upstream Location us RD t VIPA.S5 l
niIt 0X'ntAt�� �5 nds bS10(xl o All
Locatio 1cne, Niu 3fth e
Downstream
Acu
Q1tTi? Pc F
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
5• o
/0•0
NH3-N (mg/1)
z • 0
y. a
D.O. (mg/1)
6,0
6.O
TSS (mg/1)
3 q
317
F. Col. (/100 ml)
zoo
( zoo
pH (SU)
6 - 9
6 - 1
RCS t ooA t_
C.L,\oR.tpJE. (Al/9)
l9.•0
la. .'b
ivTAL
YY'Sloogzo.,wtt15 (,,,,I 9)
w-/4 T11 .-
MO N i+011 •
-TQrA 1-
NK4Ocvavi (r11.66)
KoNerUL
^k.094a"0
Comments:
.4

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request #
Tabor City Waste Water Treatment Plant
NC0026000
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Renewal
the Town Canal (tributary to Grissett Swamp)
C - Swamp
03-07-57
Columbus
Wilmington
Bolden
2/22/94
K23NE
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
7758
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
Regional Staff assistance very beneficial in preparing this Fact Sheet
Note: chlorine limit
02.1097.7105
1989
1.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
100 %
Note: additional downstream monitoring location recommended due to possible localized impacts
and need for additional information on this Major's impact on the receiving swamp waters for
future basin management information.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
oP 7 C t4M,r LYP�QOP,e/i3 ?
. —IkilfaillIn RZ5,n.Aj ki&t.1 rcp+tot w ;pr{nl.r�tiy.
1t , Nc vd €, cr's ) r
-rnIkcd w 'Dour K,bo.Jt-
S `H C I,aEit +Ir,.E fat
, -to '- -C1ntc7'iA)I `F._ J/30A
Recommended by: Date: Ir most}, 111 w
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment: C. t ._ GC( 74-61,- Da
Regional Supervisor:14 i,� (' C- Z— lS (--, t' t 1— Date: - t --ci 1/41
Permits & Engineering: Date: ./20,`
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: APR 1 3 1994
Farrell Keough

2
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Coliform (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (pg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/I):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Coliform (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Limits Changes Due To:
Parameter(s) affected:
Residual Chlorine
TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Chronic Toxicty (Ceriodaphnia) P/F
90%
90 %
March, June, September, December
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
1.1
5.0 10.0
2.0 4.0
6.0 6.0
30 30
1,000 1,000
6-9 6-9
monitor monitor
nr nr
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
1.1
5.0 10.0
2.0 4.0
6.0 6.0
30 30
200 200
6-9 6-9
Jeff i:A latte ►3.0
nr nr
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
WQ or EL
WQ
WQ
WQ Do
WQ
facility upgrading should allow for dechlorination
capability, therefore meeting this limit should be
achievable
x_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: US 701 Bypass
Downstream Location #1: approximately 75 yards below discharge
Downstream Location #2: Iron Hill Bridge
Parameters: Temperature, dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, conductivity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach updated evaluation of facility, including toxics spreadsheet, modeling analysisif
modeled at renewal, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name Tabor City Waste Water Treatment Plant Permit # NC0026000 Pipe # 001
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is 90 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
guartertv monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of Mar., Jun., Sept.,
and Dec. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge
below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 0.0 cfs
Permitted Flow 1.1 MGD
IWC 100 %
Basin & Sub -basin 03-07-57
Receiving Stream tributary to Grissett Swamp
County Columbus
QCL P/F Version 9/91
Recommended b =
Farrell Keoigh
Date a mot, %°tst,

Facility Name:
Permit Number:
Engineer:
Subbasin:
Receiving Stream:
USGS quad #:
Request Number:
Date:
Expiration date:
Tabor City Waste Water Treatment Plant
NC0026000
Bolden
03-07-57
Town Canal [ unnamed tributary to Grissett Swamp ]
K23NE
7758
2/22/94
6/30/94
Existing WLA checked:
Staff Report:
Topo checked:
USGS Flows confirmed:
PIRF / APAMS:
IWC Spreadsheet:
Stream Classification:
Nutrient Sensitivity:
Instream Data:
x
x
x map attached
na
nr
nr
x
not a Pretreatment facility
facility already at 5 and 2
x Downstream site may be too far away; will contact region to see if closer site available
Brief of WLA Analysis
Previous WLA's
1976: first issuance and limits of 5 and 2 with a fecal limit of 200 / 100 ml and pH of 6 - 8.5
1980: fact sheet not dated, but looks like a re -issuance with same limits
1983: re -issued with same limits, (summer only), but fecal coliform now is 1,000 / 100 ml
1984: re -issued with winter limits, (still advanced tertiary and 1,000 / 100 ml fecal limit)
1989: re -issued with same limits and a recommendation of removal
The facility is undergoing extensive upgrading, (per conversation with Steven West; Wilmington]. Due to this money being put into the
plant maintenance, the Region felt that now was the time to require a chlorine limit. The minor modification on the WLA is somewhat of
a misnomer; the facility is adding a flow -equilibrated chlorine feed system, thus no change in the NPDES Permit is requested, therefore
the addition of a chlorine limit would not be SOP. Since the Region concurs that this additional limit would be pertinent and the facility
did not object to its addition I will require a 28.0 µg/I limit. This limit will probably have the added benefit of giving the operator a
mechanism for requesting moneys to fulfill it..
Staff Report indicates facility has trouble meeting limits when flows exceed 0.7 mgd. Only DMR data we have when flows get that high
is for January, 1993 and ammonia was violated during that month. Probably I and I was the reason for this excessive flow since most
other months are well below 0.7 mgd. Since the facility is putting moneys into plant upgrades, (including I and I) then we can only
assume that limits should be met in the future....
The 1989 WLA recommended facility remove discharge; only alternative would be land application; this area is swampy, therefore the
surficial aquifer would be hydrologically connected to such application. Also, no other township is close enough for Regionalization...
1A/
4 ('("AMA H
Per NUCC, facility is a Major, therefore the toxicity test will remain....
Due to the low velocities in this swamp system, I
checked on possible alternative downstream
monitoring locations. The current downstream
location, Iron Hill Bridge, is approximately 5 miles
downstream of discharge point. There is another
location approximately 75 yds below the discharge
point which may reflect the localized impacts due to
low velocities. This proposed second downstream
monitoring location will also discount the additional
flow present from the swamp discharge at Iron Hill
Bridge. Early modeling analysis indicated a DO sag
at milepoint 0.8, but a later re -modeling of the
discharge indicated the sag was at 2.4 miles below
the discharge. Unfortunately, both these models were
run with a zero 7Q10, thus reliability is questionable.
Since our current model techniques do not present
these swamp systems effectively, this additional
instream monitoring should prove beneficial for later
basin management analysis.
701
l Ha, -
Cl.p Na,
SeMohlenl
R„r
S• amp
GYM S•r
S,mneeJ Nu,
Gore La
41144,1e
Ilene Pen Ner
Bad
Bee /Jared H4r
Ba, Rer
noy
1 one).
Rai
CRl.ES SWAMP

Tabor City WWTP NC0026000
U•stream: 701 B •ass
Month Tem • DO
Saturation
Fecal
Conductivit
Jan-94
Dec-93
Nov-93
Oct-93
Sep-93
Aug-93
Jul-93
Jun-93
May-93
Apr-93
Mar-93
Feb-93
9
9
12
18
22
22
25
22
20
15
15
16
8.0
7.1
1.4
6.9
6.2
4.9
7.8
7.7
8.2
7.4
8.5
7.1
69%
61%
13%
73%
71%
56%
94%
88%
90%
73%
84%
72%
35
19
16
33
89
89
131
908
134
216
38
107
200
175
300
Downstream: Iron Hill Bride
Tem• II•
=tl•
9
9
12
16
22
23
25
23
19
15
15
13
8.0
9.9
9.2
6.9
2.2
6.0
0.6
2.0
8.3
7.7
8.5
7.9
69%
85%
85%
70%
25%
70%
7%
23%
90%
76%
84%
75%
27
29
78
10
19
177
75
13
30
83
5
73
125
125
200
Ammonia [2 / 4 mg/I] - Residual Chlorine - Fecal Coliform
Instream Waste Concentrations
Residual Chlorine
7Q10 (cfs)
Design Flow (mgd)
Design Flow (cfs)
Stream Std (µg/I)
Upstream bkgrd level (µg/I)
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (41)
Allowable Concentration (mg/p
Fecal Limit
Ratio of 0.0 :1
0.0
1.1
1.702
17
0
100.0%
17.0
0.017
200/100m1
0.0
1.1
1.702
1
0.22
100.0%
1.0
0.0
1.1
1.702
1.8
0.22
100.0%
1.8
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7Q10 (cfs)
Design Flow (mgd)
Design Flow (cfs)
Stream Std (mg/I)
Upstream bkgrd level (mg/i)
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (mg/I)
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (cfs)
Design Flow (mgd)
Design Flow (cfs)
Stream Std (mg/I)
Upstream bkgrd level (mg/I)
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (mg/I)
3/7/94

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section / Intensive Survey Group
July 1, 1992
MEMORANDUM
To: Ruth Swanek
Through: Jay Sauber
From: Howard Bryant /4114 5
Subject: Long-term BOD Analysis forTabor City WWTP
County: Columbus
NPDES # NC0026000
Receiving Stream: Town Canal
Sub -basin: 030757
DAY BOD NH3-N TKN-N NOX-N TN-N
0 1.90 4.5 3.10 7.6
5 1.85 2.10 4.1 3.00 7.1
10 3.58 2.00 3.7 3.10 6.8
15 5.41 1.40 3.6 3.40 7.0
20 15.38 0.05 0.8 5.40 6.2
25 19.81 0.02 0.8 5.90 6.7
30 20.73 0.01 0.7 6.30 7.0
35 21.95 6.5-3.t= 3.9 LQNOx-r\i]
40 22.79 3.4 . Li = 13.6 EAcclz port,.25 03
50 23.77 Z9.06 - 13.6 = 15. M 6 [5oo a,- 46o0= c6 `t
60 24.96 i.85 7b•y6 ' 8.36 [cBoo mu1tipI telt. %' mode°
70 25.70 6,5 -
3.17. 3.9 [4140,-#9
80 26.32 3.4 • ti : 13 - 6 Egc.c tS Poe is %]
90 26.95 13.6 ' ` - 5 = 61- Z 5.6 co„r ,anl v¢, bax-4 6+0
100 27.48 rno►elwtrz, Lue..11,,-*: loo* 'NO,t---- 14]
110 27.97
120 28.41 0.05 0.9 • 6.50 7.4
140 29.06
Date Collected: February 4, 1992
1000
cc: Central Files
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Collected by: Long
pH: 8.1
Test evaluation: excellent
Seeded: seeded

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTING OfSELF-MONITORINGSUMMARY] Tuc, Feb 15, 1994
FACILITY
APl(
-- -
STOWE•I'l1ARR MIIJS PERM CIIR LIM:I.2%
NC0004812/001 Begin: hr sent' :I'IF MN APR JUL OCTNonCont
g I Y Q p:
Counly:GAS111N Region: MINI Subhasin: (-1'036
I'I:.1.00 Special
1Q10: 125.00 IWC(%):1.22 Order:
.._... .....
90 PASS
91 PASS
92 PASS
93 PASS
94
,....
--
---
.......
-
--°'+.,
•-•
..,..1
NR PASS
NR b1
PASS --
PASS ...
-.
N1
---
--•
PASS
bl
PASS
PASS
nu,e
•--
(3�
-•-
"-
SPJ,
-•-
PASS
..-
-._
Pi,,,,
PA.S
PASS
--.
_
N I I:AWNS CROSSING PERM CIIR LIM:90%
NC0062367/001 Begin:l/IPl4 Frequency: Q 1'A: 6 JAN AI'R JUL OCT NonComp:SINGLI!
Coumy:WAKE Region: RRO Subhasin: NEU02
rF:o.05 Special
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%):100.0 (haler.
90 •••
91 PASS
92 PASS
93 FAIL
94
---
--
-
FAIL
--
-•
--
PASS
-. _.-
PASS ---
PASS -
FAIL FAIL
---
-•-
FAIL
FAIL
PASS
PASS
PASS
•--
-••
PASS
---
--
--
nil 1113.-----.
FAIL -
FAIL PASS
PASS --
SiIGAR 11111.TRUCK STOP PERM: CIIR LIM 2.4%
NC00!9831/00I Begin:8/1/93 Fmiuency: Q PA: 6 MAY AUG NOV !RIB NonComp:SINGIi
County:MdX)WI71. Region: ARt) Subhasin: C11330
I'I':0.005 Special
7Q10: 0.320 IWC(%):2.36 Order
90 --•
91 ••-
92 17.68'
93 >100'
94
---
--•
35.35'
>100'
---
-•-
---
-
--- --
68.2',>100' >100'
PASS
---
>100'
---
>100'
--
>100'
PASS
PA
51.76'
IC Na
>100' >100'
BI
>100'
>100'
4A
SUGAR MOUNTAIN UTILITIES PERM: CIIR LIM 72%; WIIEN I'F 1.0 CIIR LIM 84%
NO1022900/001 Begin:9/1/93 Frequency: Q 1'A' 6 JAN AI'R JUL OCT NnnContp:SINGLI1
County:AVIEI(Y Region: AR( Suhlmsin: WA'101
PF:0.50 Special
7Q10:0.30 IWC(%):52.49 Order
Y 90 PASS
91 PASS
92 PASS
93 PASS
94 PASS
•••
---
-
-
--
-
-•
-
FAIL •-
PASS •-•
PASS -•
PASS ---
---
---
--•
FAIL
PASS
FAIL
PASS
PASS
•--
Ni
---
-
---
PASS
--
FAIL -••
PASS
PASS -•-
PASS --
LATE
-
SWIVTII:X'TIUiti l'I:RM AC LIM:69%
NC0001406/001 Begin: I/1/92 I'retpcncy: Q 6 JAN AI'R JUL OCT NonComp:
County:IlARNE1T Regi,m:l•'RO Suhbasin:CP1rI3
IT: 2.50 Special
7QIA 500.00 IWC(7.):0.69 Under: •
90 NONE'
91 88.1'
92 38.39'
93 >99.0'
94 LATE
-
-
56.21'
---
--
--
56.21'
-
NONE' ---
94.7' --
68.84' 69.87'
89.79' -
---
'--
NONE'
70.71'
98.91'
66.44'
---
--
-
53.36'
--
--
--
rA
NONE' -•-
89,6' -
113.44' -
40.0' 38.07'(s)
--
--
_.
66.93'
Sw II1.-IiCKRICII, INC. I'IiRM CIIR LIM:57%
NC000.3344/001 Degin:9/I/'12 Fnslucncy: Q PA' 6 MAR JUN SEP DEC NonComp:
County; DUPLIN Region: WIRO Subhasin: CPI•22
l'F:1.5 Special
7Q10: 1.77 IWC(%):57 Order.
90 ---
91 --•
92 FAIL
93 NR/FAIL
94
--
-•-
---
NRJPASS
-
•--
••-
NA/PASS
- -.-
__ ...
PASS -
--- -
---
„.
-
PASS
_._
__
--
--
-
-
-
-
••.
•..
-„
PASS
-_. •-
-- -_
- ---
••- --
-
--
NIWAIL
PASS
TAOOR CITY PERM CIIR LIM:90%
N00026000/001 Begin:2/I/02 Frequency: Q I'A' 6 MAR JUN SEP DEC NonComp:SINGLE
County:COLUMBUS Region: WIRO Subbasin:l.UM57
IT:1.10 Special
7QI0:0.00 IWC(%): 100.00 order.
90 PR
91 --
92 PASS
93 -
94
IC
•-•
-
-
PASS
PASS
FAIL
PASS
--- -
--- -
FAIL PASS
-- --
FAIL
FAIL
PASS
FAIL
NR
FAIL
-
PASS
PASS
FAIL
-
-
DA
PASS
PASS
PASS
FAIL PASS
-• ---
••- ---
- -
PASS
FAIL
PASS
FAIL
TAKEDA CHEMICAL PRODUCTS PERM AC LIM:NO AC 0 90% (1'TIID 24HR)
N00059234/001 Begin:10/2/89 Eminency: Q PAT 6 FEB MAY AUG NOV NonComp:
County:NEWIIANOVIIR Region:WIRO Subhasin:CPF17
1'1:0.444 Special JOC:I1/29/92-9/1/94 AC MONIT 2411R PA:07111D)
7Q I0: 918.0 IWC(%):0.07 Order:
V 90 -
91 FAIL
92 PI,Pmy
93 FAILI
94 6.3
NR
FAILI
PI,Pmy
FAIL
PI.NONEI
FAIL(
FI,Pmy
FAILI
- FAILI FAIL( FAIU PASSI PASS1 FAIU FAIU
FAILI,bl NR - - NR - FI, Fmy PI,Fmy
PASSI,PASSPASSI,FAILmFAILI,FAILmyFAILI,FAILmyFAILI,FAILmyFAILI,FAILmyPASSmy,PAS56.731
PASSI,1.73t FAILI,6.3t FAILI,<0.3 FAILI,1.7t 3.87.3.871' FAILI,3.87t PASSI.1.73t FAILI,3.87t
FAIL(
PI,Pmy
B1,01,38.731
3.87,FAILIt
'I'AI.I.W(8)DESTATES WWI' I'IikM:CIIR LIM 90%
N('0066523/001 Begin: I/1/93 Fn'rµency: Q I'/V 6 MAY AUG NOV FEB NonComp:SINGLE
('auntv.IINION Ref: h11O1 Subbasin:YAM!
1'1::.010 Special
7Q10: (1.0 IW('I%d: 100,11 Itnter.
90 -
91 -
92 •••
n3 ...
94 PASS
•••
--
...
---
-
---
-- .-
-• ...
... -.
-.
-
_-
.-
_-
-..
__
-
-
-
-
-„
•.. -
-- -
-„ -
-
-,-
---
I ARBOR( ) WWII' I'IiRM CIIR I.IM: 8.0%
N('t/020015Ak)1 Begin:9/22 8s FmMp'y: 1.) PA: JAN AI'R 1111.00I' NonComp:
Couniy:I0XiLCOMBI( Region: RRO Subhasin:'I'AkO3
PF:5.0 Special
7Q10:90.0 IWC(%):7.92 Order:
Y 90 NR
91 PASS
92 PASS
93 PASS
94
PASS
-•-
--
-
--
-
-
-
PASS -
Ni -
PASS -
PASS -
-
PASS
--
-
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
PASS -
PASS --
PASS --
PASS --
-
-
-
-
0 2 consecutive failures = significant noncompliance Y I're 1990 Daly Available
IJ1G1TID:
PERM = Permit Requireurm I.H1* = Administrative letter • Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q- Qunnerly; M• Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Seminnnunlly; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D• Discontinued monitoring requirement; 1S- Conducting independent study
Begin = Firm noudr nnuired 7Q10 = Receiving %(ream low flow criterion (cfs) 6 = quarterly monitoring incenses rah mouldy upon single failure Months that testing must occur • ex. JAN,APR,JUL,O<'r NonComp = Cunem Compliance Requitement
1'I: = Penuitte'J flow (MGM) IW('7F = Insteram waste comminution n PAT = Pass/Fail chronic test AC = Acute CIIR = Chronic
Data Notation: f - Fathead Minnow: • • ('rriralnpbuia so.: my - Mvsid .shrimp: ('I,V . Chmnie value: r - Mortality of stated n rrentner at highest concentration: at - Performed by DIIM Art TUX Gmun: hi • Ond test
Repining Notation:... = Data not required; NR - Not reported; ( ) . Beginning of Quarter Facility Activity Status: 1 - Inactive, N • Newly Issucd(fo construct); 11 • Active but not discharging; t-More data available fur month in question SIG = ORC signature needed
49