SW8060608_Historical File_20170110

Energy, Mineral &
Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
January 10, 2017
Ms. Erin Acton, Assistant Vice President
REDUS NC Coastal, LLC
1 Independent Drive, 101 Floor
Jacksonville, FL 32202
Subject: Permit Modification and Extension
State Stormwater Management Permit No. SW8 060608
ROY COOPER
Governor
WILLIAM G. ROSS, JR.
Acting Secretary
TRACY E. DAVIS
Director
The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I and H
High Density Subdivision Wet Detention Pond and Infiltration Basin Project
Pender County
Dear Ms. Acton:
The Wilmington Regional Office received a complete, modified State Stormwater Management Permit
Application for The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I and II on October 24, 2016.
Division and Department Renaming:
Effective August 1, 2013 the State Stormwater program has been transferred from the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) to the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR). All previous
references to DWQ will remain in older stormwater permits issued prior to August 1, 2013 until they are
modified. Please note that the updated permit or any updated pages to the permit will now reference
DEMLR as the Division responsible for issuance of the permit. Additionally, the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) has been renamed the Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ)•
Permit Extension:
On August 5, 2009, the Governor signed Session Law 2009-406. This law impacts any development
approval issued by the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources under Article 21 of Chapter 143
of the General Statutes, which is current and valid at any point between January 1, 2008, and December
31, 2010. The law extends the effective period of any stormwater permit that was set to expire during this
time frame up to three (3) years from its current expiration date. On August 2, 2010, the Governor signed
Session Law 2010-177, which granted an extra year for an extension of up to four (4) years. This permit
shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 20, 2020, and shall be subject to the conditions and
limitations as specified therein. Please pay special attention to the conditions listed in this permit
regarding the Operation and Maintenance of the BMPs, recordation of deed restrictions, certification of
the BMP's, procedures for changing ownership, transferring the permit, and renewing the permit. Failure
to establish an adequate system for operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system, to
record deed restrictions, to certify the BMP's, to transfer the permit, or to renew the permit, will result in
future compliance problems.
Permit Modification:
Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that the project, as proposed, will comply with
the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000, effective September 1, 1995. We are
forwarding modified Permit No. SW8 060608 dated January 10, 2017, for the construction, operation and
maintenance of the BMP's and built -upon area associated with the subject project.
Modifications to the Permit: Infiltration Basin I has been modified to Wet Pond lB as an
alternative design per 15A NCAC 02H . 1008(h). It was not possible for the wet pond to have
been designed per 15A NCAC 02H .1005, effective October 1, 2008 because 1.) The seasonal
high water table (SHWT) was incorrectly determined in the original design. Its actual elevation
prohibits infiltration basin functionality, and 2.) The treatment system is completely surrounded
by homes and wetlands and so the available land to expand the system is limited.
State ofNiorth Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, NGneral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office 11.27 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington NIC 28405
910 7% 7215

.......,�............. ........ Page 2 of 3
Histoly:
The berm of Infiltration Basin I blew out in the fall of 2015, and sediment was discharged into the
wetlands. A large volume of soil was removed from the wetlands, and the basin was re -installed per the '
stormwater permit conditions. However, it became apparent that the original design was not sustainable
because the seasonal high water table (SHWT) used in the original design was incorrect. The SHWT has
now been found to be —2ft above the infiltration basin's inlet pipe, which is approximately 4ft too high for
an infiltration basin to function. The Division met with the permittee's engineer to discuss an appropriate
path forward, and determined that a wet pond was the only option.
This permit was originally designed in 2006 and most recently modified in 2007 before the permit was
transferred to REDUS NC Coastal, LLC as a bank -owned property on July 28, 2010. The property was
under a Notice of Violation (NOV) mainly for maintenance issues and for failure to certify the BMPs
when the permit was transferred. Historically, this permit was written under 15A NCAC 02H .1005,
effective September 1, 1995 (commonly referred to as the 1995 rule) at 1.5" for shellfish (SA)
waters. That regulation was modified per 15A NCAC 02H .1005, effective October 1, 2008 (commonly
referred to as the 2008 rule). Best management practices (BMPs) designed under the 2008 rule were
required to treat the greater of either the 1.5" storm or the difference in pre/post of the lyr24hr storm,
which is typically about 3.8". Therefore, the 2008 rule's required volume is significantly greater than
1995 rule. Additionally, 2008-rule BMPs within a mile of and draining to SA waters cannot discharge to
SA waters [per 15A NCAC .1005(a)(1)(C)] without employing additional structural features. The 2008
rule [15A NCAC .1005(h)(5)] also says that BMPs that were permitted under the 1995 rule can be
modified under the 1995 rule if they are "minor modifications", which the rule defines as a modification
that doesn't add BUA or increase the size of the BMP. Modifying Basin 1B from an infiltration basin to a
wet pond therefore triggered coverage under the 2008 rule. However, the design engineer determined that
the space required to build a wet pond per the 2008 rule was not available because homes have already
been constructed around Basin IB, and there are wetlands on the only available expansion point. The
Division has therefore determined that installing the largest possible wet pond as an alternative design per
15A NCAC 02H .I008(h) is appropriate.
Wet Pond 1 B Design: Please note that the reference datum used in the original design differs from the
reference datum in the new design. The old datum is —1 ft lower.
Permit Compliance and Future Actions:
1.) September 9, 2015 Inspection: The following items were requested:
a. Maintenance: Infiltration basins were in need of maintenance. The site was maintained
since the September 9, 2015 letter, but it appears to be needed again. We understand that
you have contacted your contractor to address those issues.
b. Designer's Certification: The certification for Basin 1C was on file. Partial certifications
for Basins lA and 1D were later provided. A final certification for each BMP is still
needed.
c. Deed Restrictions: A copy of the recorded deed restrictions was requested. The Master
Declaration of Protective Conditions for the Villages at Turtle Creek (BK3 029/PGO 10)
only covers lots 1-45. Lots 46-71 in Phases I and II are not covered by this document.
Recorded deed restrictions are needed for all of the lots.
2.) December 14, 2016: The property management company contacted the Division with BMP
maintenance concerns about an eroding amenity pond behind Leyland Way. Since this feature is an
amenity pond as opposed to a pond required by State Stormwater and the issues appear to be the
result of flooding, we have forwarded those concerns to the Town of Surf City.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office 1 127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, NC 28405
910 796 7215

State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 060608
Page 3 of 3
3.) Future Permit Transfer: The Division understands that you intend to submit a permit transfer
application to transfer the permit to the Homeowners' Association (HOA) as soon as possible. Please
be advised that SL2011-256 requires the following items to be in order with your application:
a. Documentation of 50% Sold: Please submit documentation that at least 50% of the lots
have been conveyed to families/members of the HOA.
b. Common Areas Deeded to HOA: Please submit copies of the deeds for the common
areas containing the stormwater BMPs.
c. Permit in Compliance: The BMPs must be complete, and in compliance prior to permit
transfer. Copies of the recorded deed restrictions and copies of the final BMP
certifications for each BIvIP are required for a compliant determination.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable; you have the right to
request an adjudicatory hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings
(OAH). The written petition must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and
must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of receipt of this permit. You should contact the OAH
with all questions regarding the filing fee (if a filing fee is required) and/or the details of the filing process
at 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714, or via telephone at 919-431-3000, or visit their
website at www.NCOAH.com. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Kelly
Johnson in the Wilmington Regional Office, at [phone].
Sincerely,
Tracy Da is, P.E., Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
GDS/kpj: \\\Stormwater\Permits & Projects\2006\060608 HD\2017 01 permit 060608
cc: Greg Thompson, PE, SEPI Engineering
Inspector, Pender County Planning
Inspector, Town of Surf City Inspections
Division of Coastal Management
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
State of North Carolina j Environmental Quality I Energy; Kneral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office 1 127 Cardinal Drive Extension ! Wilmington. NC 28405
910 796 7215

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
REDUS NC Coastal, LLC
The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases 1 and 11
NC 210 & Lodge Hall Rd, Surf City - Pender County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of six (6) infiltration basins in compliance with
the provisions of 15A NCAC 2H .1000, effective September 1, 1995 and one (1) wet pond
in compliance with the alternative design criteria provisions of 15A NCAC 2H .1008(h),
effective September 1, 1995 (hereafter referred to as the "stormwater rules') and the
approved stormwater management plans and specifications and other supporting data as
attached and on file with and approved by the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land
Resources (DEMLR) and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 20, 2020, and shall be
subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of stormwater
described in the application and other supporting data.
2. This stormwater system has been approved for the management of stormwater
runoff as described in Sections 1.6 &1.7 of this permit. The subdivision is permitted
for 71 lots; each allowed the maximum amount of built -upon area specified in
Section 11.16 of this permit. The stormwater systems have been designed to handle
the following amounts of impervious area: 1A-1 @11,025 ft2; 1A-2 @6,875 ft2; 1A-3
@2,361 ft2; B @339,953 ft2; 1 C @137,639 ft2, 1 D-1 @21,851 ft2; and 1 D-2
@46,652 ft2. Basin #1C must be operated with a 50' vegetated filter.
3. Approved plans and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference
and are enforceable parts of the permit.
4

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
4. The runoff from all built -upon area within each permitted drainage area of this
project must be directed into the permitted stormwater control system.
5. All stormwater collection and treatment systems must be located in either
dedicated common areas or recorded easements. The final plats for the project will
be recorded showing all such required easements, in accordance with the
approved plans.
6. The following design criteria have been permitted for the wet detention pond and it
must be provided and maintained at the design condition.
Wet Pond 1 B
a.
Drainage Area, acres:
Onsite, ft2:
Offsite, ft2.
17.27
752,249
0
b.
Total Impervious Surfaces, ft2:
Onsite, ft2.
Offsite, ft2:
339,953
339,953
0
c.
Average Pond Design Depth, feet:
4.89
d.
TSS Removal Efficiency:
90%
e.
Design Storm, inches:
1.50
f.
Permanent Pool (PP) Elevation, FMSL:
22.91
g.
Permitted PP Surface Area, ft2:
17,497
h.
Temporary Storage Elevation, FMSL:
25.40
i.'
Permitted Storage Volume, ft3:
51,780
j.
Predeve.lopment 1 yr-24 hr. discharge rate, cfs:
35.10
k.
Controlling Orifice, inch 0 pipe:
3.00
I.
Orifice Flow Rate, cfs:
0.24
M. PP Volume, ft3:
80,473
n.
Forebay Volume, ft3:
16,888
o.
Maximum Fountain Horsepower:
1/3
p.
Receiving Stream/River Basin:
Becky's Creek
q.
Stream Index Number:
18-87-8
r.
Classification of Water Body:
SA

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
7. The following design elements have been permitted for the infiltration basin
stormwater facilities, and must be provided in the system at all times -
Units
Basin
Basin
Basila
Basin
Basen
Basin
^
1C
1D 1=
1D 2
Drainage Area
29,988
16,454
7,072
283,381
38,304
80,666
Onsite
ft2
29,988
16,454
.7,072
283,381
38,304
80,666
Offsite
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total BUA
11,025
6,75
2,361
137,639
21,850
46,652
Lot BUA
0
0
0
84,875
8,565
19,770
Roads/Parking
2
ft2
8,876
5,238
1,697
36,273
9,648
21,997
Sidewalks
2,149
1,637
664.
22,809
3,637
4,885
Other
0
0
0
4,682
0
-
Offsite
0
0
0
0
0
0
Basin Depth
Feet
0.75
1.25'
1.25
2.25
2.25
2.05
Design Storm
Inches
4.5
4.5
4.5
1.5
4.5
4.5
SHWT
FMSL
29
28
28
10
24
23.7
Bottom Elevation
FMSL
31
30
30
12
27
25.7
Surface -Area @Bottom
ft2
6,025
2,208
1,085
9,377
2,790
6,534
Storage Volume
ft3
4,879
3,331
1,757
26,859
9,450
17,335
Storage/Bypass
Elevation
FMSL
31.75
31.25
31.25
14.25
29.25
27.75
Expected Infiltration Rate
in/hr
0.52
0.52
0.52
3
2.6
2.6
Time to Draw Down
Hours
16
28
20
7
13
12
Type of Soil
tY'
.' _:'`;
"�` "
Woodington Fine Sandy
Onslow Sandy Loam
Loam
Receiving Stream
f; h`' ''. °
Becky's Creek
River Basin
' >:'
Cape Fear
Stream Index Number
*'':': 4
18-87-8
Classification of Water
=" '
- ,`ti`�,.
«SA;HQW»
Body
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
No homeowner/lot owner/developer shall fill in, alter, or pipe any drainage feature
(such as swales) shown on the approved plans as part of the stormwater
management system without submitting a revision to the permit and receiving
approval from the Division.
2. The permittee is responsible for verifying that the proposed built -upon area for the
entire lot, including driveways and sidewalks, does not exceed the allowable built -
upon area. Once the lot transfer is complete, the built -upon area may not be
revised without approval from the DEMLR, and responsibility for meeting the built -
upon area limit is transferred to the individual property owner.
6

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
3. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one
or more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame specified
in the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the Director for
modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide
copies of revised plans and certification in writing to the Director that the changes
have been made.
4. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of
the system will be repaired immediately. If the stormwater system was used as an
Erosion Control device, it must be restored to design condition prior to operation as
a stormwater treatment device, and prior to occupancy of the facility. The
bioretention area may not be used as a sediment and erosion control device once
the planting soil has been placed.
5. The stormwater management system shall be constructed in its entirety, vegetated
and operational for its intended use prior to the construction of any built -upon
surface.
6. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for
revised plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, for any
modification to the approved plans, including, but not limited to, those listed below:
a. Any revision to the approved plans, regardless of size.
b. Project name change.
C. Transfer of ownership.
d. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area.
e. Further subdivision, acquisition, or sale of all or part of the project area. The
project area is defined as all property owned by the permittee, for which
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan approval or a CAMA Major permit
was sought.
f. Filling in, altering, or piping of any vegetative conveyance shown on the
approved plan.
g. The construction of permeable pavement for BUA credit.
7. The permittee shall submit final site layout and grading plans for any permitted
future areas shown on the approved plans, prior to construction.
8. The Director may determine that other revisions to the project should require a
modification to the permit.
9. Upon completion of construction, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification must be received from
an appropriate designer for the system installed certifying that the permitted facility
has been installed in accordance with this permit, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting documentation. Any deviations from the
approved plans and specifications must be noted on the Certification.
10. Access to the stormwater facilities shall be maintained via appropriate easements
at all times.
11. Permanent seeding requirements for the stormwater control must follow the
guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control
Planning and Design Manual.

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
12. Prior transfer of the permit, the stormwater facilities will be inspected by DEMLR
personnel. The facility must be in compliance with all permit conditions. Any items
not in compliance must be repaired or replaced to design condition prior to the
transfer. Records of maintenance activities performed to date will be required.
13. The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance necessary
to assure that all components of the permitted stormwater system function at
optimum efficiency. The approved Operation and Maintenance Plan must be
followed in its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled intervals
including, but not limited to:
a. Semiannual scheduled inspections (every 6 months).
b. Sediment removal.
C. Mowing and revegetation of side slopes.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of side slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
f. Debris removal and unclogging of structures, orifice, catch basins and
piping.
g. Access to all components of the system must be available at all times.
14_ Records of maintenance activities must be kept and made available upon request
to authorized personnel of DEMLR. The records will indicate the date, activity,
name of person performing the work and what actions were taken.
15. Decorative spray fountains are allowed in the pond, subject to the following criteria-
h. The minimum permanent pool volume is 30,000 cubic feet.
i. The fountain must draw its water from less than 2' below the permanent
pool surface.
j. Separated units, where the nozzle, pump and intake are connected by
tubing, may be used only if they draw water from the surface in the deepest
part of the pond.
k. The fountain may not be placed into the forebay.
I. The falling water from the fountain must be centered in the main pond, away
from the shoreline.
m_ The maximum horsepower for a fountain in this pond is 1/3 horsepower.
16. Prior to the sale of any lot, the following deed restrictions must be recorded:
a. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with
State Stormwater Management Permit Number SW8 060608, as issued by
the DEMLR under NCAC 2H.1000.
b. The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to the
extent necessary to maintain compliance with the Stormwater Management
Permit.
G. These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons and
parties claiming under them.
d. The covenants pertaining to stormwater may not be altered or rescinded
without the express written consent of the State of North Carolina, DEMLR.
e. Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plans may not take
place without the concurrence of the DEMLR.
f. The maximum built -upon area per lot is as follows:

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
Lot #
.
::Max ,
:.
BUPA.:
Lot
' 'Ifi�ax; �
Bl1A..
Lot
# ._
Magic
:.: g°U1 ._`
I Lot.#
Max.
BiJI
Lot #
Mai,:.::,
BUA :e .
1
4,152
16
3,731
31
3,659
46
4,176
61
4,187
2
4,152
17.
3,695
32
3,633
47
4,165
62
4,189
3
4,152
18
3,676
33
3,602
48
4,149
63
4,187
4
4,152
19
4,211
34
3,601
49
4,226
64
4,195
5
4,300
20
4,269
35
3,599
50
4,145
65
4,187
6
4,186
21
4,350
36
4,151
51
4,152
66
4,187
7
3,668
22
4,161
37
4,480
52
4,151
67
4,187
8
31608
23
4,165
38
3,849
53
4,151
68
4:,187
9
3,607
24
4,162
39
3,828.
54
4,151
69
4,183
10
3,607
2.5
40
4,022
55
4,147
70
4,186
11
3,517
26
41
4,255
56
4,166
71
4,186
12
4,156
27
3,681
42
4,087
57
4,165
72
4,232
13
3,692
28
3,672
43
3,829
58
4,213
73
4,289
14
3,776
29
3,668
44
4,128
59
4,253
15 1
3,691
1 30
3,664
45
4,425
60
4,189
This allotted amount includes any built -upon area constructed within the lot
property boundaries, and that portion of the right-of-way between the front
lot line and the edge of the pavement. Built upon area includes, but is not
limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick, stone, slate, coquina
and parking areas, but does not include raised, open wood decking, or the
water surface of swimming pools.
g. All runoff on the lot must drain into the permitted system. This may be
accomplished through providing roof drain gutters which drain to the street,
grading the lot to drain toward the street, or grading perimeter swales and
directing them into the pond or street. Lots that will naturally drain into the
system are not required to provide these measures.
h. Built -upon area in excess of the permitted amount will require a permit
modification.
16. A copy of the recorded deed restrictions must be submitted to the Division within
30 days of the date of recording the plat, and prior to selling lots. The recorded
copy must contain all of the statements above, the signature of the Permittee, the
deed book number and page, and the stamp/signature of the Register of Deeds.
17. 'The facilities shall be constructed, operated and maintained in accordance with the
provisions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and the supporting
documents attached to this permit and on file with the Division.
18. Built upon area includes, but is not limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel,
brick, stone, slate, coquina and parking areas, but does not'include raised, open
wood decking, or the water surface of swimming pools.
0

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and
approval by the Director. The permittee shall submit a completed and signed
Name/Ownership Change Form, accompanied by the supporting documentation as
listed on the form, to the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources at least
60 days prior to any one or more of the following events:
a. An ownership change including the sale or conveyance of the project area
in whole or in part, except in the case of an individual lot sale that is made
subject to the recorded deed restrictions;
b. The sale or conveyance of the common areas to a Homeowner's or
Property Owner's Association, subject to the. requirements of Session Law
2011-256;
c. Bankruptcy;
d. Foreclosure, subject to the requirements of Session Law 2013-121;
e. Dissolution of the partnership or corporate entity, subject to NCGS 57D-2-
01(e) and NCGS 57D-6-07;
f. A name change of the current permittee;
gg A name change of the project;
Fi. A mailing address change of the permittee;
2. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all of the terms and conditions of
this permit until such time as the Director approves the transfer request.
3. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Permittee to enforcement action by the DEMLR, in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
4. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) that have jurisdiction.
5. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including
those as may be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or
replacement stormwater management systems.
6. The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The
filing of a request for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance or
termination does not stay any permit condition.
7. Permittee grants permission to staff of the DEMLR to access the property for the
purposes of inspecting the stormwater facilities during normal business hours.
8. The permittee shall notify the Division in writing of any name, ownership or mailing
address changes within 30 days.
9. A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the
Permittee for a minimum of ten years from the date of the completion of
construction.
10. Any individual or entity found to be in noncompliance with the provisions of this
stormwater management permit or the requirements of the Stormwater rules is
subject to enforcement procedures as set forth in NCGS 143 Article 21.
10

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
11. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all permit conditions until such
time as the Division approves the transfer request. Neither the sale of the project,
in whole or in part, nor the conveyance of common area to a third party constitutes
an approved transfer of the stormwater permit.
12. If the use of permeable pavement for BUA credit within the lot is desired, the
permittee shall direct the lot owner to submit an application with all supporting
documentation and the application fee to the Division and receive a permit prior to
construction of the permeable pavement.
13. The permittee shall submit a permit renewal application request at least 180 days
prior to the expiration date of this permit. The renewal request must include the
appropriate documentation and the processing fee.
Permit modified and re -issued this the 101" day of January 2017
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
A-ex�d�czw
Tracy Daais, P.E., Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
11

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I and II
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 060608
Pender County
Designer's Certification: Wet Pond
Page 1 of 2
I, , as a duly registered in the
State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the project,
(Project)
for (Project Owner) hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the project
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
The checklist of items on page 2 of this form is a part of this Certification.
Noted deviations from approved plans and specifications:
Signature
Registration Number
Date
12
SEAL

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
Certification Requirements: Wet Pond Page 2 of 2
1. The drainage area to the system contains approximately the permitted
acreage.
2. The drainage area to the system contains no more than the permitted
amount of built -upon area.
3. All the built=upon area associated with the project is graded such that the
runoff drains to the system.
4. All roof drains are located such that the runoff is directed into the system.
5. The outlet/bypass structure elevations are per the approved plan.
6. The outlet structure is located per the approved plans.
7. Trash rack is provided on the outlet/bypass structure.
8. All slopes are grassed with permanent vegetation.
9. Vegetated slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
10. The inlets are located per the approved plans and do not cause short-
circuiting of the system.
11 The permitted amounts of surface area and/or volume have been provided.
12. Required drawdown devices are correctly sized per the approved plans.
13. All required design depths are provided.
14. All required parts of the system are provided, such as a vegetated shelf, a
forebay, and the vegetated filter.
15. The required dimensions of the system are provided, per the approved plan.
16. All components of the stormwater BMP are located in either recorded
common areas, or recorded easements.
cc: NCDEQ-DEMLR Regional Office
Inspector, Town of Surf City Building Inspections
Inspector, Pender County Planning
13

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I and II
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 060608
Pender County
Designer's Certification: Infiltration Basins
Page 1 of 2
I, , as a duly registered in the
State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/ weekly/ full time)
the construction of the project,
(Project)
for (Project Owner) hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the project
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
The checklist of items on page 2 of this form is included in the Certification.
Noted deviations from approved plans and specification:
Signature
Registration Number
Date
SEAL
14

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608
Certification Requirements: Infiltration Basin
1. The drainage area to the system contains approximately th.e permitted
acreage.
2. The drainage area to the system contains no more than the permitted
amount of built -upon area.
3. All the built -upon area associated with the project is graded such that the
runoff drains to the system.
4. All roof drains are located such that the runoff is directed into the system.
5. The bypass structure weir elevation is per the approved plan.
6. The bypass structure is located per the approved plans.
7. A Trash Rack is provided on the bypass structure.
8. All slopes are grassed with permanent vegetation.
9. Vegetated slopes are no steeper than 3.1.
10. The inlets are located per the approved plans and do not cause short-
circuiting of the system.
.11. The permitted amounts of surface area and/or volume have been provided.
12. All required design depths are provided.
13. All required parts of the system are provided.
_14. The required system dimensions are provided per the approved plans.
M. NCDEQ-DEMLR Regional Office
Inspector, Town of Surf City Building Inspections
Inspector, Pender County Planning
15

DEML,R USE ONLY
Permit Number
Applicable Rules: ❑ Coastal SW -1995 ❑ Coastal SW - 2008 ❑ Ph II - Post Construction
(select all that apply) ❑ Non -Coastal SW- HQW/ORW Waters ❑ Universal Stormwater Management Plan
❑ Other WO M9-mt Plan:
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
The Villages at Turtle Creek PhaseI and II
2. Location of Project (street address):
NC Hwy 210 and Lodge Hall Road
City:Surf QW County:Pender Zip:28443
3. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
From the ontersection of US 17 and NC Hwy 210 travel East on NC Hwy 210 for two (2) miles. Turn left after
Lodge Hall Road.
4. Latitude:34° 27 05.84" N Longitude:770 34' 43.74" W of the main entrance to the project.
H. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. a. Specify whether project is (check one): ❑New ®Modification ❑ Renewal w/ Modificationt
tRenewals with modifications also requires SVM 102 - Renewal Application Form
b.If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing
permit numberSW8 060608 Mod , its issue date (if known)11/09/2007 , and the status of
construction: ❑Not Started ❑Partially Completed* ® Completed* *provide a designer's certification
2. Specify the type of project (check one):
❑Low Density ®High Density ❑Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System []Other
3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from
DEMLR requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the st praj 8
if assigned, and the previous name of the project, if differeTte
�Cdr%il y
proposed, T 2016
4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required permaditscan be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748): BY,
❑LAMA Major NSedimentation/Erosion Control: _
❑NPDES Industrial Stormwater M404/401 Permit: Proposed Impacts
ac of Disturbed Area
b.If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name, Project/Permit Number,
issue date and the type of each permit:Construction completed in 2007; Modification to Infiltration Basin 1B
5. Is the project located within 5 miles of a public airport? ®No ❑Yes
If yes, see S.L. 2012-200, Part VI: http://12ortal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/rules-and-regulations
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 1 of 6

III. CONTACT INFORMATION
1. a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee,
designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the project):
Applicant/Organization:REDUS NC Coastal, LLC
Signing Official & Title:Erin Acton / Assistant Vice President
b. Contact information for person listed in item la above:
Street Address:l Independent Drive,l0th Floor
CityJacksonville State:FL Zip:32202
Mailing Address (if applicable):1 Independent Drive,l0th Floor
CityJascksonville State:FL Zip:32202
Phone: (904 ) 351-7346 Fax: (904 ) 351-7367
Email:erin.acton®weRsfargo.com
c. Please check the appropriate box. The applicant listed above is:
® The property owner (Skip to Contact Information, item 3a)
❑ Lessee* (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below)
❑ Purchaser* (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and
2b below)
❑ Developer* (Complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below.)
2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title below, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property Owner/Organization:
Signing Official & Title:
b. Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street Address:
City:
Mailing Address (if applicable):
City:
Phone: ( )
Email:
State: Zip:
State: Zip:
Fax:
3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project:
Other Contact Person/Organization:
Signing Official &
b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:
City:
Phone: ( 1
Email:
State:
Fax:
ECEI
BY:
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits: Town of Surf City
Point of Contact:Steve Padgett Phone #: (910 ) 328-3921
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 2 of 2

IV. PROJECT INFORMATION
I. In the space provided below, briefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated.
Stormwater runoff will be treated by six (6) previsouly certified infiltration basins This permit modification
is only for the Alternate Design conversion of infiltration Basinl-B to a retrofit wetpond All other basins will
remain as previosly certified and constructed Basin 1-B needs an alternate design due to elevated SHWT
2. a. If claiming vested rights, identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved:
❑ Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date:
❑ Valid Building Permit Issued Date:
❑ Other: Date:
b.If claiming vested rights, identify the regulation(s) the project has been designed in accordance with:
❑ Coastal SW -1995 ❑ Ph H - Post Construction
3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the Cape Fear River basin.
4. Total Property Area: 27.73 acres
5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area: acres
6. Total Surface Water Area: acres
7. Total Property Area (4) - Total Coastal Wetlands Area (5) - Total Surface Water Area (6) = Total Project
Area+:27.73 acres
+ Total project area shall be calculated to exclude the following: the normal pool of impounded structures, the area
between the banks of streams and rivers, the area below the Normal High Water (NHM line or Mean High Water
(MHW) line, and coastal wetlands landward from the NHW (or MHM line. The resultant project area is used to
calculate overall percent built upon area (BUA). Non -coastal wetlands landward of the NHW (or MHW) line may
be included in the total project area.
8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area / Total Project Area) X 100 = 46.9 %
9. How many drainage areas does the project have?7 (For high density, count 1 for each proposed engineered
stormwater BMP. For Iow density and other projects, use 1 for the whole property area)
10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there
are more than four drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area
provided in the same format as below. 1
Basin Information
Drainage Area 1
Drainage Area 2
Drainage Area 3
Drainage Area 4
Receiving Stream Name
Becky's Creek
Becky's Creek
See Attached
See Attached
Stream Class *
SA;THQW
SA;HQW
Stream Index Number *
18-87-8
18-87-8
Total Drainage Area (sf)
29,988 sq. ft.
16,454 sq. ft.
On -site Drainage Area (sf)
29,988 sq. ft.
16,454 sq. ft.
Off -site Drainage Area (so
0 sq. ft.
0 sq. ft.
Proposed Impervious Area** (sp
11,025 sq. ft.
6,875 sq. ft.
% Impervious Area** total
36.8%
41.8%
Impervious'' Surface Area
Drainage Area 1
Drainage Area 2
Drainage Area 3
Drainage Area 4
On -site Buildings/Lots (sf)
0 sq. ft.
0 sq. ft.
See Attached
See Attached
On -site Streets (so
8,876 sq. ft.
5,238 sq. ft.
On -site Parking (sf)
0 sq. ft.
0 sq. ft.
On -site Sidewalks (sf)
Z149 sq. ft.
1,637 sq. ft.
Other on -site (sf)
0 sq. ft.
0 sq. ft.Future
(sf)
Off -site (sf)
0 sq. ft.
0 sq. ft.
Existing BUA*** (sf)
Total (sf):
11,025 sq. ft.
6,875 sq. ft.
* Stream Class and Index Number can be determined at: httpY&ortaI.ncdenr.org&ebLwv s/csu/classifications
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 3 of 3

4
I
W
tiLL
cr
W
ci
co
r
co
(0
0
q
W
C)
cq
C,4
OD
Clio
W
CV)
OD
(t)
C)
V-
0
M
0)
cli
C43
0000
ci
cy
ci
it
LL
&
ct)
0)
]�
00
N
cr
V)
0
ce)
LO
(/)(D
OD
N
a
U)
0
cr
(1)
0
fl-
�. a
0)
MC;
cm
'I
'IC6
1
1
co
er..;
co
U-
co
co
C,
co
00
MO
'L�)
6 (AM
ti
ON
o
0
C0,04
am
co
co
Ao
CO
cri
t-
Ic
OD ,i
C)
(0
ooT-
CV
r
"
SO
oo
C.')
..'
je
Q
ti
cr
CO
Lp
C
co
Lq
T--
t,-�
c4o)
co
ci
co
0
o
co
0
(W 4)
M
0)
ce)
DO
00
cf)
T.-
,.:
ce)
0�1
co
Nil
(Y)
Cf)
CL
0)
Ci
Cl)
v
L
CY
d
er
c
OOM
(D
,
co
cej
cf)
C3
co
r,
C)
0)
C10)
C/O
(0
ctt
co
CO
0
0
F-
EN
d)
Q
M
65
z
E
0
E
OL
E
co
Q0)co
E
ta`��aai
a
0
?-
�,O
ma.
W
coE
co
,IM
0
2,y,
ISO,
00)
CL
C,
E
.0
0
.0,)
to
0
0
is
1(
1
d-
or-
0
01

*" Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
*** Report only that amount of existing BUA that will remain after development. Do not report any existing B LIA that
is to be removed and which will be replaced by new BUA.
11. How was the off -site impervious area listed above determined? Provide documentation.
Previous Permit by Cavanuagh & Associates
Projects in Union County: Contact DEMLR Central O f ce staff to check xftheproject is located within a Threatened &
Endangered Species watershed that may be subject to more stringent stormwater requirements as per I SA NCAC 02B .0600.
V. SUPPLEMENT AND O&M FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance (O&M) forms
must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded
from http:/ /portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/bmv-manual.
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Energy, Mineral and
Land Resources (DEMLR). A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed application
instruction sheet and BMP checklists are available from
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms docs. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DEMLR Office. (The appropriate office may be found by locating project on the
interactive online map athft://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/ws/su/maps.)
Please indicate that the following required information have been provided by initialing in the space provided
for each item. All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest versions
for each submitted application package from hgp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms docs.
1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form. Yy -
2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants dejvt
Form. (if required as per Part VII below)
3. Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) (sealed, signed and dated) and O&M 5—
agreement(s) for each BMP.
4. Permit application processing fee of $505 payable to NCDENR. (For an Express review, refer toJ
http:/ /www.envhelv.org/pageslonesMexpress.htlnl for information on the Express program
and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Permit Coordinator for
additional information and to schedule the required application meeting.) Zee
5. A detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing the stormwater treatment/managementfor Z a
the project. This is required in addition to the brief summary provided in the Project
Information, item 1.
6. A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the
receiving stream drains to class SA waters within 1/2 mile of the site boundary, include the 1/2
mile radius on the map.
7. Sealed, signed and dated calculations (one copy).
8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5" x 14" (sealed, signed, & dated), including:_
a. Development/Project name.
b. Engineer and firm.
c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers.
d. Legend.
e. North arrow.
f. Scale.
g. Revision number and dates.
h. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of
impounded structures, the banks of streams and rivers, the MHW or NHW line of tidal
waters, and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NHW lines.
• Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures, the banks of streams or rivers, and the MHW (or NHW) of tida er C ���
i. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings & distances. C
j. Site Layout with all BUA identified and dimensioned.
k. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevatio OCT 2 4 2016
1. Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater contro easures.
BY:
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 4 of 4

m. Wetlands delineated, or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a
qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who
made the determination on the plans.
n. Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations.
o. Drainage areas delineated (included in the main set of plans, not as a separate document).
p. Vegetated buffers (where required).
9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations (Please identify i
elevations in addition to depths) as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing
elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5"x1.1" copy of the MRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also
include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DEMLR to verify the SHVVT prior
to submittal, [phone].)
10. A copy of the most current property deed. Deed book: 4091 Page No: 0073
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Provide documentation from the NC
Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information, item la, 2a, and/or 3a per 15A NCAC 21-1.1003(e).
The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned.
http:/ /www.secretary.state.nc.us/Corl2orations/CSearch.aspx
VII. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot number, lot size, and the allowable built -upon area must be provided
as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed restrictions and
protective covenants forms can be downloaded from httl2://12ortal.ncdenr.org/web/lr/state-stormwater-
forms does. Download the latest versions for each submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner, it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holder(s) certify that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project, if required, shall include all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DEMLR, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
VIII. CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/or firm (such as a
consulting engineer and/or firm) so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project (such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting Engineer:Eric Seidel, PE
Consulting Firm: SEPI Engineering and Construction
Mailing Address:5030 New Centre Dr., Suite B
City:Wihnington State:NC Zip:28403
Phone: (910 ) 550-3251
Email:eseidel@sel2iel,&eering.com
Fax: (910 ) 523-5716
1X. PROP ERT i OWNER A"diTHORIZAT!ON (if Contact information, item 2 has been filled out, complete this
section)
I, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 2a) , certify that I
own the property identified in this permit application, and thus give permission to (print or type name of person
listed in Contact Information, item 1a) with (print or type name of organization listed in
Contact Information, item
to develop the project as currently proposed. A copy of
the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been provided with the s ''..
party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system. i e
ACT 212n±�,
Form SW-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 5 of 5
BY:

As the legal property owner I acknowledge, understand, and agree by my signature below, that if my designated
agent (entity listed in Contact Information, item 1) dissolves their company and/or cancels or defaults on their
lease agreement, or pending sale, responsibility for compliance with the DEMLR Stormwater permit reverts back
to me, the property owner. As the property owner, it is my responsibility to notify DEMLR immediately and
submit a completed Name/Ownership Change Form within 30 days; otherwise I will be operating a stormwater
treatment facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility
without a valid permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement
action including the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day, pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6.
Signature: Date:
a Notary Public for the State of County of
do hereby certify that
before me this _ day of
personally appeared
. and acknowledge the due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAL
My commission expires
X. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 1a) Erin M. Acton, AVP ofRedus Properties, Inc.
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable st�mwater rules under 15A NCAC 2H .1000 and any other applicable state stormwater requirements.
A
Signature: 1� o�� W�� Date:
I, a Notary Public for the State of 1 Q County of
` t )Vcu , do hereby certify that C'I li I IT� personally appeared
before me this dly of =-Lp, and ackn ledge due a cution f the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
;AN'. HEATHER BRADY
14Y COMMISSION N FF2149*
• EXPIRES June 13.2019
N011300 D'S3 tom
SEAL
My cor"^-issio:. expires 13 I
nECE1VE�
ocr 2 a tots
BV:
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 6 of 6

Permit Number: — 441 U
(to be provided by DWQ)
Drainage Area Number:
Wet Detention Basin Operation and Maintenance Agreement
I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record will be kept in a
log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be
corrected, repaired or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BMP.
The wet detention basin system is defined as the wet detention basin,
pretreatment including forebays and the vegetated filter if one is provided.
This system (check one):
® does ❑ does not incorporate a vegetated filter at the outlet.
This system (check one):
❑ does ® does not incorporate pretreatment other than a forebay.
Important maintenance procedures:
- Immediately after the wet detention basin is established, the plants on the
vegetated shelf and perimeter of the basin should be watered twice weekly if
needed, until the plants become established (commonly six weeks).
- No poriion of the wet detention pond should be fertilized after the first initial
fertilization that is required to establish the plants on the vegetated shelf.
- Stable groundcover should be maintained in the drainage area to reduce the
sediment load to the wet detention basin.
- If the basin must be drained for an emergency or to perform maintenance, the
flushing of sediment through the emergency drain should be minimized to the
maximum extent practical.
- Once a year, a dam safety expert should inspect the embankment.
After the wet detention pond is established, it should be inspected one F Fm[VE
VA
within 24 hours after every storm event greater than 1.0 inches (or 1. chgpf a�
Coastal County). Records of operation and maintenance should be ke a o e
location and must be available upon request. BY:
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall
be repaired immediately.
BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
blow l will remediate theproblem:
The entire BMP
Trash debris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
The perimeter of the wet
detention basin
Areas of bare soil and/or
erosive gullies have formed.
Regrade the soil if necessary to
remove the gully, and then plant a
ground cover and water until it is
established. Provide lime and a
one-time fertilizer application.
Vegetation is too short or too
I Maintainvegetation at a height of
long. I
approximately six inches.
Form SW401-Wet Detention Basin O&M-Rev.4 Page 1 of 1

Permit Number:
(to be provided by DWQ)
Drainage Area Number:
BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How I will remediate theproblem:
The inlet device: pipe or
swale
The pipe is clogged.
Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the
sediment off -site.
The pipe is cracked or
Replace the pipe.
otherwise damaged.
Erosion is occurring in the
Regrade the swale if necessary to
swale.
smooth it over and provide erosion
control devices such as reinforced
turf matting or riprap to avoid
future problems with erosion.
The forebay
Sediment has accumulated to
Search for the source of the
a depth greater than the
sediment and remedy the problem if
original design depth for
possible. Remove the sediment and
sediment storage.
dispose of it in a location where it
will not cause impacts to streams or
the BMP.
Erosion has occurred.
Provide additional erosion
protection such as reinforced turf
matting or riprap if needed to
prevent future erosion problems.
Weeds are present.
Remove the weeds, preferably by
hand. If pesticide is used, wipe it on
the plants rather than spraying.
The vegetated shelf
Best professional practices
Prune according to best professional
show that pruning is needed
practices
to maintain optimal plant
health.
Plants are dead, diseased or
Determine the source of the
dying.
problem: soils, hydrology, disease,
etc. Remedy the problem and
replace plants. Provide a one-time
fertilizer application to establish the
ground cover if a soil test indicates
it is necessary.
Weeds are present.
Remove the weeds, preferably by
hand. If pesticide is used, wipe it on
the plants rather than spraying.
The main treatment area
Sediment has accumulated to
Search for the source of the
a depth greater than the
sediment and remedy the problem if
original design sediment
possible. Remove the sediment and
storage depth.
dispose of it in a location where it
will not cause impacts to streams or
the BMP.
Algal growth covers over
Consult a professional to remove
50% of the area.
and control the algal growth.
Cattails, phragmites or other
Remove the plants by wiping them
invasive plants cover 50% of
with pesticide (do not spray).
the basin surface.
ECEIVE
OCT Z 4 2016"
Form SW401-Wet Detention Basin O&M-Rev.4 Page 2 0
BY:

Permit Number:
(to be provided by DWQ)
Drainage Area Number:
BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How I will remediate theproblem:
The embankment
Shrubs have started to grow
Remove shrubs immediately.
on the embankment.
Evidence of muskrat or
Use traps to remove muskrats and
beaver activity is present.
consult a professional to remove
beavers.
A tree has started to grow on
Consult a dam safety specialist to
the embankment.
remove the tree.
An annual inspection by an
Make all needed repairs.
appropriate professional
shows that the embankment
needs repair. if applicable)
The outlet device
Clogging has occurred.
Clean out the outlet device. Dispose
of the sediment off -site.
The outlet device is damaged
Repair or replace the outlet device.
The receiving water
Erosion or other signs of
Contact the local NC Division of
damage have occurred at the
Water Quality Regional Office, or
outlet.
the 401 Oversight Unit at 919-733-
1786.
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such
that it will give an accurate depth reading and not readily penetrate into
accumulated sediments.
When the permanent pool depth reads 6.91 feet in the main pond, the
sediment shall be removed.
When the permanent pool depth reads 5.91 feet in the forebay, the sediment
shall be removed.
BASIN DIAGRAM
(fill in the blanks)
0 Permanent Pool Elevation 22.91
Sediment Removal . 17 T-t
l
- - - - - - - - - Sediment Removal Elevation 16 Volume
Bottom Ele�vatio 16 ----------------------------------------- ------ Bottom Elevation 15 1-ft
Storage Sedimei
Storage
FOREBAY MAIN POND
ECEIVE
OCT242016
BY:
Form SW401-Wet Detention Basin O&M-Rev.4 Page 3 of 4

Permit Number:
(to be provided by DWQ)
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the
performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any
problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
Project name: The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
BMP drainage area number: 1 B Drainage Area #4)
Print name: Redus NC Coastal, LLC
Title:Erin M. Acton - Assistant Vice President of Redus Properties, Inc.
Address:I Independent Drive, 10t' Floor Jacksonville, NC 32202
Phone:[phone]
DateJQ.ID•)W
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of
the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
I, �ck_4 ( �B (-GCS V__ , a Notary Public for the State of
-FI('y-1 da , County of DL)VCL , do hereby certify that
EY1' C) M . (R Cf Dn personally appeared before me this Ut4'-)
day of L, and acknowledge the due execution of the
forgoiements. Witness my hand and official
seal, ng t detention basi maintenance requir
:��?'^ ;: HEATHER BRADY
MY COMMIS$M 0 FF214S9
EXPIRES June 13, 2019
�407�388�'S7 .ppp
SEAL
My commission expires ' ` k 3 i I
BY:
Form SW401-Wet Detention Basin O&M-Rev.4 Page 4 of 4

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 9:36 AM
To: '[e-mail] ; Matt McDonnell; Christina Purcell
Cc: James, Trentt; Nick Garner ([e-mail]); Scott, Georgette; Eric Seidel
([e-mail]); [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, Villages at Turtle Creek - Stormwater
Todd,
I wanted to bring you in the loop with an issue that I had originally forwarded to the county yesterday, but Megan
indicated that it is in your jurisdiction. As you will read below, there is an amenity pond (not a permitted State
Stormwater pond) that is eroding and causing flooding. The State doesn't oversee flooding issues, and so I wanted to
connect you to the property managers, Christina Purcell and Matt McDonnell, as well as the property owner, Wells
Fargo represented by Erin Acton, (all cc'd). A contractor, Nick Garner, went out there recently and has proposed to
lower the outlet pipe of the pond to relieve flooding. There are of course questions about financial liability. But, I
wanted to bring the issue to your attention as they move forward with determining their next steps.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Megan Crowe[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:15 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Matt McDonnell <[e-mail]>; Christina
Purcell <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Cc: James, Trentt <[e-mail]>; Nick Garner ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Eric Seidel ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, Villages at Turtle Creek - Stormwater
Good Morning Kelly,
Thanks for including me, the project below is in the jurisdiction of Surf City therefore Pender County does not have any authority to
address these items. Please be in contact with the Town of Surf City.
Thanks and have a great Christmas if I don't talk with you sooner!
Megan
From: Johnson, Kelly[mailto:kelly.p.johnson@ncdenr_gov]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 11:24 AM
To: Matt McDonnell; Christina Purcell; [e-mail]
Cc: James, Trentt; Nick Garner (nickOccrgnc.com); Scott, Georgette; Megan Crowe; Eric Seidel
(eseidelO)sepiiengineering com)
Subject: SW8 060608, Villages at Turtle Creek - Stormwater
All,
I have been receiving a lot of inquiries about Turtle Creek lately, and so I wanted to touch base with everyone so that we
can hopefully get them addressed. The two main categories of questions are 1.) Maintenance, and 2.) The eroding
amenity pond.
Maintenance: We have received complaints about the infiltration basins being grown up. We issued an inspection
letter asking for maintenance last fall, and I talked to Nick Garner (the maintenance contractor) this morning. He said
that they had done that maintenance, but from the pictures from the property managers (example below) it looks like it

Johnson, Kelly
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:30 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly; maft. [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: James, Trentt; [e-mail]; Scott, Georgette; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, Villages at Turtle Creek - Stormwater
Kelly,
I just spoke to Nick Garner with CCRG. He is providing me a bid to clean up the basins on the permit. Nick will not be able
to get the work done until the first week of January due to the Holidays. The Bank will pay for this until the permit is
transfer red out of our name as we no longer are involved in this property. The permit will need to be transferred to the
HOA once the basin 1B which blew out last year is back in compliance. We are diligently working on this, and are
awaiting your approval on the modification application we submitted. We are very anxious to get the permit out of our
name as this is a compliance issue making large payments on a property that is no longer owned by the Bank.
1 he amenity pond is not the Bank's responsibility as it is not listed on the storm water permit. I will defer this decision to
the HOA.
Thank you!
Erin M. Acton
Real Estate Asset Manager
ORE Wholesale Banking
ik ti..A. I lnd� oeii c nt Dave. a ". F(ue; t,Ja_;scnvtle, F L3-2n Z�si-734 i 7 :-:]i:-i_
eri n.acton ewel Isfargo.com
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 11:24 AM
To: Matt McDonnell; Christina Purcell; Acton, Erin M
Cc: James, Trentt; Nick Garner ([e-mail]); Scott, Georgette; Megan O'Hare ([e-mail]); Eric
Seidel ([e-mail])
Subject: SW8 060608, Villages at Turtle Creek Stormwater
Al I,
I have been receiving a lot of inquiries about Turtle Creek lately, and so I wanted to touch base with everyone so that we
can hopefully get them addressed. The two main categories of questions are 1.) Maintenance, and 2.) The eroding
amenity pond.
Maintenance: We have received complaints about the infiltration basins being grown up. We issued an inspection
letter asking for maintenance last fall, and I talked to Nick Garner (the maintenance contractor) this morning. He said
that they had done that maintenance, but from the pictures from the property managers (example below) it looks like it
needs to be done again. i just wanted to iet you know that this is intended to be an ongoing maintenance item for the
permittee (Wells Fargo) to address, and not just a single occurrence. (I have inserted an excerpt of one of the
maintenance agreements below.) I have cc'd Trentt James, the State/DEMLR inspector for that area, so that he is
aware. We will schedule an inspection in the near future. Things are pretty backed upright now with the holidays, but
it will probably be in January. It may be a good time to re-engage Nick so that the inspection goes smoothly.

Eroding Amenity Pond: There is also an eroding amenity pond behind Leyland Way that is beginning to impact
property. This pond is not a State Stormwater treatment system, it is simply for amenity purposes. There are no
engineering specifications for it, and it isn't even mentioned in the permit text. This appears to be a flooding issue, and
so I have cc'd Megan O'Hare with the county. The State does not regulate flooding. Nick Garner has prepared a
proposal to fix the problem. An excerpt of that is provided below. (Nick has more details on this that he can provide,
but I just wanted to let you know that there is already a maintenance contractor engaged in this.)
I also have the modification application from SEPI Engineering (Eric Seidel) in my stack for review to fix that infiltration
basin that blew out last year. I hope to get to that fairly soon.
Thanks,
Kelly
Infiltration Basin:
7

. . . . . .....
lick
Ts �11111*illilli��(ufiii4 "L

IN% jNFJ1,.' A'�ltr.NitA�lrtrPfk1'%•:�►lic N AND:IAINIUNAN't �'. „.,:I�i"i:`►f�:�':I
,Zt•"7.f a'i"€?e flift LYtRik•ve-n; a(1(' at;0A4'.2111,Fr WF.t ilvp;;:t'lb�I. ]I4. lltg:f.i�.'z *,YF''.1Artf:': efosjon,
!-:tF.h :er��trri:rlf;tilt-�:1, ei'SZ?$Kii"C.,;<y1'.-.. 'sric! ��tl'fr:iu::,R'ti:9t3t"•�
* Zcl+:.rr i r �IrR' :irl' 1` ita#rttiEi}i is T}, ;Z at ttti3 i1 oQccs!,aqtM' utaintain adequatc vegetative cover, mow
.t"��:ir:::°i� e'RF�S'1' �'�STt;tiii t}tl'F ti !#1..tti7P1�217Fr i'11!;�'•-7 7+i �5,4111..�4�`, 1E,.ti., �,4:.i:.+;%'4 '.7..;:*:" .'d:fil.^(�
'LVC;Ai4wil Tmnt I1 r:. . ar:. at ._.rA.:t'."Oht}' wtk�O t:l 11, *:}a ; 'n"5ou overflow
4ltrltil4.: C(o 'ltps'. ,� JS;I dv1vtwnui,i�s:r, Lit d � <t;i'+ 13'C •sA!" 4;:4.i r:l�:I•^ f ►,': _,irV, "t'.x t .'i^:1PQvk'[S+IiCtit SI
K�SLt I fl CAi3 i7715.
y: :+t.t•s#2�:*i-Y' :5-:{ilt?.:liln%l:!yi 'vY+`irH �':r t•'r�7M ".ttt' ;F" t?3tC131 %VOCIR and ui when dcIith
t'a� 4Fr4`�fC",i.P1r,} i°:! tn:t I� -r ';t:, t,' +rt ti;, ^ ry t;,e; ,i�'r ��, 7 ; ?pt l;?� .•^-,tq;r; a];a:li m .icstorcd to the
it;tl ':7' t�r �9#?21 r i i'V f7 4i ;r'tita l r,d .. -c'ti+ :, ;.,..'}• t #a 1 ;?., . s4r}a ltmy r: use E iC icquirW wato table
.:•:•f�:;"r'Z"t# ti r. ,!`�` Sesftd r('l :lt}t,; LT.�:} t''•" #'+i'i+*i't".ti . 'Vk ;;ltilrty of the Miern to perfu nn as dcuiped. Rkc rnov<jd
ss�fiilox.t �' ;<`i ' ." ;= ds*.r..tiM .. ;,, ..:, :�;+�,,: ti,li;:': manner and shall not be handled in a manner hurt wrU
it SIarmwater trealment dCVu;e or streun. etc-).
!;%- ; t7", r,.`.`:t ;,.i unit. 'Tire benchmark will document the original
debsgn depth so that a"uratc scd}n:,17• _i'._ut:•. ,;tlurl readings can be taken. 'tote me Wrul`ing a t: ",c used to
determine the depth at the bencluna; � :.i:,,T! 1�,: 'r:7Gl: tir?!i it w;ffl give an acamite dtpi.h reading and not
readily penctmie into accumulated sedinwitts.
wheo thr tlexkAod,i•lith rvadi .._�..�°. __ fc•ctill tbiw prrtrx;711t]'iznt'ur7it> thx rorliu.,i°TNf �li;}JlI1ti'
rl;riloi; d lirnttr 4tttb th4c Pwirratto rntifrit Sliiul the iAlltt'.'Won ha.•ilt,
5. Ifthe Division delermines that the systcin i, i:tilow, lti ;} „z �u still r ti:i:t ,i..:t l,. P^e i^1+:7 od 10 orlgmttl
"gn spocifkanons. if the system esmwit K' TL'=`�iilrC,l I.i lur'T i;tn; 7itillt1C#g :: ;a11:C tt•+'1 k7 *:t:,7.t'i1water
control devices as allowed by NC.AC ZH .Ifs:*;; vitt•t hc' Jv CA :,;d
The eroding amenity pond is starting to impact property.
4

I
This is the proposal that Nick Garner prepared a few months ago:

ALrI TAL CAR OL A Tbc % d1mr "burr-Cmtk
IRESOURCE�x Evi tiozF"14flood
.�.
K.t? I.i.t�j D � Vus D ln.
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

Casmer, Jo.
From: Casmer, Jo
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 3:54 PM
To: '[e-mail]; 'eseidel(&sepiengineedng.com'
Subject: The Villages at Turtle Creek Phase I and II; Stormwater Permit SW8 060608
The Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (Stormwater Section)
received the Stormwater Permit Application and $505.00 fee on October 24, 2016. The project has been assigned
to Kelly Johnson and you will be notified if additional information is needed. Please be advised that the
construction of built -upon area may not commence until the Stormwater Permit is issued.
Jo Casmer
Administrative Assistant for DEMLIRIStormwater Section
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Assistance & Customer Service
910 796-7336 office
910 350-2004 fax
a o.casmeRD-ncdenr.aov
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
gc_ ''N+Dtfilfng C a*are's ,,,
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
h1orth Carolina Public Records taw and may be disciosed to third parties.

Completeness Review Checklist
lc fi
Paperwork EmaHed: Engineer on:
dpp�lement(s) (1 original per BMP) BMP Type(s):
nef�m�'with correct/original signatures (1 original per BMP except LS/VFS and swales)
ffJAVKH"cation with correct/original signatures r7l�`eed ---k- C-4cS
Pp or LLC: Sig. Auth. per SoS or letter ail Address:
505 (within 6mo) ©fmem�ail Address:
Design Engineer
Owner
ils Report with SHWT — f 9 Reviewer:
nipt culations (signecisealed)
No obvious errors l �f
ElDen ity includes common areas, et �p V ,P'-- i �-(b�`
ed ' Restrictions, if subdi ed: i
�Signed �-
&Notarized
Correct Template (C,: rnm/Res & HD/LD) or Dec Covenants & Rest.
Plans
F]'is MDe&ls (reads, cul-de-sacs, curbs, sidewalks, BMPs, Buildings, etc)
Grading Wetlands: Delineated or No Wetlands
Ocinity Map Layout (proposed BUA dimensions)
[E end 1'--7
g �B�Maps f�ect Boundaries
2e; ! 1-e
<-
Infiltration
Wet Pond
Offsite
Soils Report
Soils Report
�PE Cert for Master Lot #:
SHWT:
SHWT:
Deed Rest for Master Lot # Matches Master
Bottrm:
PP:
BUA Permitted (Master): sf
Visited:
BUA Proposed (Offsite): sf
Additional �'nforrnation:
BUA (sf)
DA (sf)
PP (ell
SHWT (el)
Depth (ft)
.SG (sf)
rerminea Proposed: Proposed: Proposed:
f

AO*E PI
0 ENGINEERING &
CONSTRUCTION
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: NCDEQ
Wilmington Regional Office
Land Resources — Stormwater Permitting
Attention: Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
Phone: [phone]
From: Eric Seidel, PE
Subject: Turtle Creek Phase I & II
Infiltration Basin 1B Alt. Design
We are sending you:
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Specifications
❑ Contracts
❑
Prints
❑
Copy of Letter
❑
Invoice
Date: October 24, 2016
VIA: Hand Delivered
5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B
Wilmington, NC 28403
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
RECEIVE
oCTz4�� D
SEPI Project No.: SC16.015.00
® Plans ® Applications
❑ Change Order ❑ Reports
Copies Date Description
2 10-24-16 Alternative Design Construction Drawings
1 $505 Application Fee
2 Application (1 original, 1 copy)
1 Wet Pond Supplement
1 O&M Agreement
1 10-24-16 Engineering Report (Calculations, Narrative, USGS.... ect.)
V
Comments:
Please find complete application package attached. Call with questions or concerns. Thanks.
Signed: Page:
�e�

The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
SW8 060608 Mod
Infiltration 1-B Alternative Design
STORMWATER REPORT
PREPARED FOR:
REDUS NC COASTAL, LLC
October 2016
c�,A Ww
SE��
PREPARED BY
10/zy//6
WA
S Pi
ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION
5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B
Wilmington, NC 28403
910-550-3251
RECEIVED
Xr z a zoos

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. STORMWATER NARRATIVE
II. CALCULATIONS
III. USGS MAP
IV. DEED & RECORDED PLAT
V. CORPORATION DOCUMENTATION
VI. SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE (Authorized Signing Agent)
VII. SOILS REPORT
VIII. DEED RESTRICTIONS

STORMWATER
NARRATIVE

10/24/16
Stormwater Narrative
The Villages at Turtle Creek Phase I and II
Infiltration Basin iB Alternative Design
The proposed project is to provide an alternative design to convert failed infiltration
basin (1-B) to a retrofit wet pond design. This design will be a modification to existing
stormwater permit #: SW8o6o6o8 Mod and will provide modifications for infiltration 1-B only.
All other basins within Phases I & II have been certified and properly maintained.
Currently Infiltration 0 does not properly infiltrate and has a SHWT that is approximately 4'
higher than originally permitted. The basin has been found to consistently hold 2' of water
above existing pipe invert, even while providing an unpermitted 18" CMP pipe and riser
structure. With the elevated SHWT the basin wants to function as a wet pond. An alternative
wet pond retrofit design (per i5A NCAC 02H .ioo8(h)) can provide equal or better stormwater
control, equal or better protection of waters of the state, and result in no increased potential for
nuisance conditions compared to that of existing infiltration basin 0.
Existing infiltration basin 1B provided and was permitted for 56,451 c.f. However, with the
variance in existing condition SHWT a significant amount of that treatment volume has been
lost. Conversion to a Wet Detention with additional excavation will allow the basing to function
above the required 1.5" runoff volume requirement. The original permit modification was
completed in 2007 and written under the 1995 rule. Design efforts propose extensive excavation
to maximize treatment volume. However, existing constraints such as wetlands and existing
homes have prevented the design reaching 2oo8 pre -post rules and regulations.
Stormwater Summary:
1.5" Runoff Volume Required: 42,995 c.f.
* Pre -Post 1-Yr, 24 hr. Required: 93,848 c.f.
* Ex. Treatment Volume: S7,810 c.f. (Functioning as Wet Detention Basin w/ No Infiltration)
* Prop. Treatment Volume: 51,78o c.f (Functioning as Wet Detention Basin w/ No Infiltration)
With existing constraints and elevated SHWT an Alternative Design will be well suited for this
site. This basin has been functioning as a wet pond for many years and needs to be expanded
and provide for a proper riser structure, spillway, and outfall. This design will provide equal or
better stormwater control, equal or better protection of waters of the state, and result in no
increased potential for nuisance conditions compared to that of the existing infiltration basin 1B.

CALCULATIONS

10/20/2016
EAS
Basin 1-B
Pond Calculations
Total Drainage Area
ft. acres
752,249 17.27
Impervious Area
Land Use
s . ft.
acres
.buildings
188,569
4.33
.parking/asphalt
113,771
2.61
sidewalks
37,613
0.86
Total
339,953
7.80
Stormwater Calculations:
Time of Concentration:
Hydraulic Length (L) = 2,050 ft.
change in Height (H) = 7.35 ft.
Tc = (L' /H)-3m 1128
24.23 min.
Flow for 1 year, 24 hour Storm (Q1)
QPR _ (CpRE) x (11) x (Area)
= 12.52 cis
QPOST = (CPOST) x (11) x (Area)
28.55 cfs
Detention Pond Design:
Pond Size -
Elevation
ft.
Surface Area
(sq. ft.
Perm Pool
22.91
17,497
Temp Pool
25.40
24,093
Top of Bank
26.20
25,883
Bottom of Pool
16.00
6,126
% impervious = 0.452
= 45.2%
say 46.0%
CPRE - 0.25
CPosT = (% imp.)(.95)+(1-% imp.)(.25)
= 0.57
11 = 2.90 in/hr
110 = 8.13 in/hr
Flow for 10 year, 24 hour Storm (Q10):
QPRE _ (CPRE) x (110) x (Area)
35.10 cfs
QPOST = (CPOST) x (110) x (Area)
= 80.03 ofs
State Surface Area Requirement at normal cool
Pond side slopes = 3 :1
Depth below N.P. = 6.91 ft.
SAIDA = 0.0232
(Chart for 85% TSS Removal for Wet Detention
Pond with Vagetative Filter
Required SA = (SAIDA) x (Total Drainage Area)
= 17,452 s . ft.
Provided Storage Volume: Average Depth Calculation:
Vol. _ [(Normal pool SA + Flood Pool SA) / 2] d= [0.25 x (1+ BVS SAINP SA)] + [((BVS SA +Btm SA)/2)x(D/BVS SA)]
x (F.P. elev. - N.P. elev.) = 4.89 ft
= 51,780 cu. ft.
State Volume Required for Storage of first 1.5" of runoff:
Rv = .05+ .009(% imp)
0.456724
V= (Design rainfall)(Rv)(Drainage Area)
= 42,946 cu. ft.
SC16.015.00 1 of 2

10/20/2016
EAS
Basin 1-B
Pond Calculations
Pond Volume:
Bottom SA = 6,126 sq. ft. el 16.00
Btm Vag Shelf SA = 16,343 sq. ft. el 22.41
Perm Pool SA = 17,497 sq. ft. el 22.91
Vol. _ [(NP SA + BVS SA) / 2] x (NP el. - BVS el.)+[(Bottom. SA + BVS SA) / 2] x (Bottom. el. - BVS el.)
1 = 80,473 cu. ft.
Forebav:
Required Volume
Vol. = 20% of Temporary storage provided
16,095 cu. ft.
Outlet Structure Design:
Flow for 2-day drawdown:
for Required Volume
Q = Required Vol. / 172,800 sec. (2-days)
= 0.249 cfs
Required Area of Pipe for 2-day drawdown:
A= Q/[CdxSQRT(2xgxh)]
Cd = 0.6
g = 32.2 ft./s2
h = (F.P. elev: N.P. elev.)/3
= 0.83 ft.
A = 0.0567 sq. ft.
Diameter of Pipe for 2-dav drawdown:
DIA. = SQRT[(A x 4) / pi]
0.2686 ft.
3.22 in.
*Use: 3 in diameter pipe
Drawdown time 3.0" pipe = 2.5 days
Provided Volume
Vol. _
= 16,888 cu. ft.
Flow for 5-day drawdown:
for Required Volume
Q = Required Vol. / 432,000 sec. (5-days)
0.099 cfs
Required Area of Pipe for 5-day drawdown:
A= Q/[CdxSQRT(2xgxh)]
Cd = 0.6
g = 32.2 ft./sz
h = (F.P. elev. - N.P. elev.) / 3
= 0.83 ft.
A = 0.0227 sq. ft.
Diameter of Pipe for 5-day drawdown:
F
IA. = SQRT[(A x 4) / pi]
0.1699 ft.
= 2.04 in.
SC16.015.00 2 of 2

USGS MAP

-MON-
-40.
46-
Ar-
-Oak--_
ky
•
46P

'.. � s�,jr- J ..✓. 1'/•�:' t }'�aE��n � r r.f } t T ,1.z •, f
1t.S{c 4,.1{}E '}i� �rl R V }#i9,} t
'1' 3 €
r
f=►.. � �,-^: �c 4 I�q L #, fl i ,
lot�
}ri� } ' }l�/1t,# }:{;js� i
s '�T 4' ' � S � 3 a`# # � •N�� ', � � v it t 1 /+'r%� fir �I /ti.#' S'% •� R R
� t �f =7!`. r!/•i � 1 /�r; Yb. JL, 1 t � • . I}I}�AI{ { �% ? �`�'i/'� 1 }
is f,'
+,` .�Q .'� �� .,• �i-'�". 'gam � � }��• ,iR��fl I{}'�IIi�^C" �
it T
14
Ik
lt
cd
:46—
r 1 1 t� +��• i, �• ��1C^t D {# RI}'+# } 1'}I#1�} a{1}1+'{�{ i}r t
r Via: �. �� rtc `✓ '. C,�, .q� ':1p - :;; k� i
r w"`i S f �.(� / �• r�+1 .oT - `:.+r�l;�. � .h.,.- ,�°+�1 a- f'•�D ..! `, . Yt
_ '_ w•. y,,\i � ,��� �r/1 '•r �� L f �- .�; f�' / � � °.�.. �'� �'q`7 1�•r�r� �s� r , * � d
- 5}•,�11'C� S�J�n} �� � t ��i,�� � N- ��. - '.�1? , �C•''7 `".ti j � �� F ^� � � �`� 1d tl:
�• s � ,Z � •..a +'w. f { i Mwu'• G� �}� \ r, I i ! J 3 r �,•�`Y y y'i . � ! ..
. s F <s �/ < I !' .,•F(� ti i C 1 F i , 1a.. � •-_:ae�' 1 '�•''%!__..
� ' � { �' f ,!`1 s � '?. #+' ! ` � i `\. i � ' r • 1.: s _� j; PSI � � , j
.. � • '�`,� ♦ `� ry ; '� r r.� . ' � � _ 1 ' � � -0:--•.. A.±. P � a_..1 �,., 1�.,� � :'. rC4.� 17 . •. r�` �`•"�.
� f'i P e .� � .� e� �; ~� I. � �':�..� •sue

DEED & RECORDED PLAT

Ayxx
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen K'Sullins
Governor Director -7j A 5Q4--e .
July 28, 2010
Mr. Chris S. Williard, Vice President
REDUS NC Coastal, LLC
8540 Colonnade Center .D-riv-e,-Suite 111
Raleigh, NC 27615
Subject: Name Change / Ownership Change
The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I and 11'
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 060608
Pender County
Dear Mr. Williard:
PO4 accEpkr!
Nc
Y IUfau S
�Ll ,
On July 21, 2010, the.Wilmington Regional Office received a request for transfer of
ownership of the Stormwater Management Permit for the subject project. On July 26,
2010 additional supporting information was submitted to verify the authorization of the
proposed Permittee's ownership of the subject property. Staff of the Division of Water
Quality has inspected the project and a Notice of Violation (Nov-2009-PC-0865) was
issued. On July 21, 2010 a Plan of Action from Mr. Chris Williard of REDUS for permit
compliance was received by this Office. The proposed plan of action has been accepted
and must be followed to bring this project into compliance with the Stormwater permit
requirements. According to the Plan of Action, the inspection deficiencies will be
completed by August 21, 2010.
As indicated on the Name/Ownership Change form, you have acknowledged receipt of
a copy of the permit, which includes the application and supplement forms, a copy of
the approved plans and a copy of the required Operation and Maintenance agreement.
By acknowledging receipt of the permit, notation of undertaking responsibilities of the
Permittee in the cover letter, and by signing the Name/Ownership Transfer form, you
have accepted the responsibility for complying with the terms and conditions outlined in
this permit. If you need additional copies of the permit, or copies of the approved plans,
please contact the Division of Water Quality in the Wilmington Regional Office at the
phone number below. Please replace the old second page of the permit with the
enclosed updated page.
Please be aware that the project's built -upon area and stormwater controls must
built and maintained in compliance with the permit documents and the approved
plans. Maintenance of the approved system shall be performed in accordance wi
the Operation and Maintenance agreement. Any modifications to this project mu,
be submitted to the Division of Water Quality and approved prior to construction.
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 Nonlfi�l C
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 ARnnative Action Employer Aati

State Stormwater Management Systems,
Permit No. SW8 060608
The issuance of this approval does not preclude you from complying with all other
applicable statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances, which may have jurisdiction
over the proposed activity, and obtaining a permit or approval prior to construction. If
you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Angela
Hammers or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Georgette cott
Stormwater Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
GDSlakh: S:1WQSISTORMWATERIPERMIl1060608.ju110
cc: William Gus Simmons, Jr., PE (Cavanaugh & Associates)
Pender County Building Inspections
Angela Hammers; Wi'RO; Central Files
Page 2 of 3

W-20-20
@111milliIIIIIIl'IIII111ler oaf Fa�TaP vvatte'PROP of 5
$C7
Excise Tax saoo+
NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
Tax Lot No.:
Verified by County on the day of , 2012 by
Mail after recording to: Grantee
This instrument was prepared by: R. Colby Slaughter, Esq., K&L Gates LLP, Charlotte, NC
Brief Description for the index
Phase I Common Area — The Villages at Turtle Creek
THIS DEED made as of the '24 day of April, 2012, by and between:
GRANTOR
REDUS NC COASTAL, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
c/o REDUS Properties, Inc.
9504 Colonnade Ctr. Dr.
D0221-010
Raleigh, NC 27615
GRANTEE
THE VILLAGES AT TURTLE CREEK
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a North
Carolina non-profit corporation
clo REDUS Properties, Inc.
9504 Colonnade Ctr. Dr.
D0221-010
Raleigh, NC 27615
Enter in appropriate block for each party: name, address, end, if appropridte, chWWter of cndty, e.g., GwrMion or perteership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns,
and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WI7NESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby
aclmowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that
certain lot or parcel of land situated in Pender County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
*Under N.C.G.S. § 105-228.29. no excise tax is due in association with a transfer where no consideration in property
or money is due or paid by the grantee to the grantor.
CH-3094WO vt
6

PM7
IUI Ill'i.11tllllllfP '" h:Y2 of P�SitoPRRW
None of the property herein conveyed includes the primary residence of Grantor.
The property heremabove described was acquired by Grantor by Instrument recorded in Book 3 754 at Page 277 in
the Pender County, North Carolina Register of Deeds.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto
belonging to the Grantee in foe simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor has done nothing to impair such title as Grantor received,
and Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, under or through
Grantor, except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions;
The lien for ad valorem taxes for the year 2012 and all subsequent years.
The requirements of applicable zoning and subdivision ordinances;
All declarations, easements, rights -of -way, restrictions, covenants and other matters of public record,
including, but not limited to, those easements, restrictions, conditions and covenants contained in that
document entitled "Master Declaration of Protective Conditions for The Villages at Turtle Creek"
recorded in Book 3029 at Page 010, in the Pender County, North Carolina Register of Deeds (as
supplemented and amended from time to time, the "Declaration");
Riparian rights of others to the property herein conveyed; and
Any matters that would be disclosed by an accurate, current survey and physical inspection of the
property herein conveyed
Such conveyance from Grantor to Grantee does not waive, release, or discharge any rights and easements of
Grantor, as "Declarant" under the Declaration, as to the Common Area (as such tern is defined in the Declaration),
all of which rights Grantor hereby confirms and reserves. Additionally, Grantor hereby reserves, for itself and any
successors and assigns, a perpetual non-exclusive easement on, over, to, under, and across all Common Area for the
purpose of further developing The Villages at Turtle Creek Subdivision. Such easement shall include, without
limitation, easement rights on, over, to, under, and across all Common Area for grading, drainage, access, ingress,
egress, and utilities, as deemed necessary by Grantor and its successors, assigns, and grantees for construction upon
or development of all other property in, or subject to the right to be annexed into, The Villages at Turtle Creek
subdivision.
[signature on following page]

III�III.rlallallllll�I�JII1�I��IIIIIIf �FM;.!I yr P w ltMa'OP=ROP
dddwaaa cc RRRRR Gaga 3 of S
written. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above
GRANTOR:
REDUS NC COASTAL, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability compau
By: REDXPR IN�C. a law coonits
Pritrt9dariie• 's
Title: Vice President
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF W &ke,
I, rl c."L 1. Riw—r.S allotary blicof Qakw-
State of North daralina, certify that f jjr s S . 41- IUCA'% (the "Signatory'.1
personally came before the this day and acknowledged that he is Vice President of REDUS PROPERTIES, INC., a
Delaware corporation, the Manager of REDUS NC COASTAL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and that
he/she, in such capacity and being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing on behalf of the corporation in such
capacity.
I certify that the Signatory personally appeared before me this day, and
(check one of the following)
(I have personal knowledge of the identity of the Signatory); or
(I have seen satisfactory evidence of the Signatory's identity, by a current state or federal
identification with the Signatory's photograph in the form of:
(check one of the following)
_ a drivel's license or
_ in the form of ); or
(a credible witness has sworn to the identity of the Signatory).
The Signatory acknowledged to me that he/she voluntarily signed the foregoing instrument for the purpose
stated and in the capacity indicated.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal this day of April, 2012
Notary Public JF
[Note: Notary Public must sign exactly as on notary seal)
Print Name:i
My Commission Expires: S- y - aO fL
-o [NOTARY SEAL] (MUST BE FULLY LEGIBLE)

iii01111111111��� 011 1 sOf �T P 9a of 5 t��P
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
Being all of that certain 151.185-acre tract located in Topsail Township, Pender County, North
Carolina described as "Tract B" in that certain Substitute Trustees Deed recorded in Book 3754,
Page 277 in the Pender County, North Carolina Register of Deeds.
LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING TRACTS:
(1) The property in Phase 1-A of the "The Villages of Turtle Creek" as recorded in Map
Book 44 at Page 29, and revised in Map Book 44 at Page 60, Map Book 45 at Page 43
and Ms ap Book 46 at Page 104, all in the Pender County, North Carolina Register of
(2) The property in Phase 1-B of "The Villages of Turtle Creek" as recorded in Map Book 45
at Page 44, and revised in Map Book 46 at Page 105, all in the Pender County, North
Carolina Register of Deeds.
(3) The property in Phase I-C of "The Villages of Turtle Creek" as recorded in Map Book 45
at Page 117, and revised in Map Book 45 at Page 139 and Map Book 46 at Page 44, all in
the Pender County, North Carolina Register of Deeds.
(4) All of that certain tract of property depicted as "Pump Station Easement' containing
0.195 acres as shown on that map recorded in Map Book 46 at Page 044, Slide 620,
Pender County, North Carolina Register of Deeds.
(5) All public road rights -of -way shown on and contained in the maps of Phase I -A, I-B and
1-C of "The Villages of Turtle Creek" described in items (1)-(3) above.
(6) All of those certain tracts of land described in deeds recorded in Book 1428 at Page 265
and Book 1426 at Page 322 in the Pender County, North Carolina Register of Deeds.
(7) All of that certain tract of land conveyed to Turtle Creek 37, LLC by Special Warranty
Deed from REDUS NC Coastal, LLC dated December 22, 2011 and recorded on
December 22, 2011 in Book 4007 at Page 192 in the Pender County, North Carolina
Register of Deeds.
(8) Any property within the above -described 151.185-acre tract which was not owned by
REDUS NC Coastal, LLC as of the date of recordation of that certain Amendment to
Declaration of Protective Conditions for the Villages at Turtle Creek recorded on
December 22, 2011 in Book 4007 at Page 181.
It being the intent that the above -described property be the property generally shown and
depicted as "Phase 1 Common Area Property" on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B.

I UU ILI III I I I I 1pipLilk gy. 'T"Mche i$;40:M.on
of 5
cvfliv,v-r e _ <IC4ERAL DIEPIc71oW OF
,Vr
Pon"', 0 ezwwl�
■ e ?RASC-1 (A)MUM A;LeA VXOPERTy

CORPORATION DOCUMENTATION
(LLC)

10/4=16
corporations Division
6
Elaine F. Marshall
Secretary
Click Here To:
North Carolina
DEPARTMENT OF THE
SECRETARY OF STATE
PO Box 29622 Raleigh, NC 27626-0622 (919)807-200o
View Document Filings File an Annual Report Amend a Previous Annual Report
Print a Pre -Populated Annual Report form
Corporate Names
Legal: Redus NC Coastal, LLC
Limited Liability Company Information
Sosld:
Status:
Annual Report Status:
Citizenship:
Date Formed:
Fiscal Month:
State of Incorporation:
Registered Agent:
1080158
Current Active
Current
Foreign
1 /22/2009
December
DE
Corporation Service Company
Corpora« Addresses
Mailing:
301 S. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-6000
Principal Office:
301 S. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-6000
Reg Office:
327 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27603-1725
Reg Mailing:
327 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27603-1725
Company Officials
All LLCs are managed by their managers pursuant to N.C.G.S. 5713-3-20.
Member: Redus Properties, Inc.
301 S. College Street
Charlotte NC 28288
Account
Login
Register
tftslAivww.sosnc.gov/SearcWprotorp/9041486
1/1

SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE
(Authorized Signing Agent)

SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE
REDUS PROPERTIES, INC.
I, Deanna J. Ernst, Assistant Secretary of REDUS Properties, Inc., (the "Corporation,% hereby
certify that the following resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the sole shareholder of the
corporation on -January 29, 2015, and that the same is reflected in its corporate records:
Resolution Regarding Officer Authority and Execution of Documents
RESOLVED, that the President and any Vice President (however designated), Managing Director,
Director, Associate or persons holding other such equivalent titles with the Corporation, or any
one of said officers, together with the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of the Corporation, if
required, be and they are hereby fully authorized to sign, execute, acknowledge, verify, deliver or
accept on behalf of and in the name of the Corporation, all agreements, indentures, mortgages,
deeds, conveyances, transfers, certificates, declarations, receipts, discharges, releases,
satisfactions, settlements, undertakings, petitions, schedules, accounts, affidavits, bonds, proxies,
and other instruments or documents (collectively, hereinafter referred to as "Documents') that
may arise in connection with or relate to the conduct of the business of the Corporation; provided,
however, that where required, any Document shall be attested by one of said officers other than
the officer executing such Document; and provided, further, that any Document may also be
executed, acknowledged, verified, delivered, or accepted on behalf of the Corporation in such
other manner and by such other officers as the Board or other governing body of the Corporation
may from time to time direct; and provided, further, that the provisions of this resolution are
supplementary to any pertinent provisions of the Corporation's governing documents. Except as
may otherwise be required, by law, any such Documents executed and delivered as aforesaid shall
be binding on the Corporation and shall be deemed to be authorized by the board or other
governing body. The President and any Vice President, (however designates), Managing
Director, Director, Associate or persons holding other such equivalent titles shall have, by virtue
of their office, the authority from time to time to act as an Assistant Secretary of the Corporation,
and to such extent, said officers are appointed to the office of Assistant Secretary;
RESOLVED FURTHER, that to the extent necessary, desirable or convenient in connection with
the execution and delivery of any Document that may arise in connection with or relate to the
conduct of the business of the Corporation, a duly elected Managing Director of the Corporation
may execute and deliver a Document as a Senior Vice President of the Corporation, a duly elected
Director ofthe Corporation may execute a Document as a Vice President of the Corporation, and a
duly elected Associate of the Corporation may execute a Document as an Assistant Vice President
of the Corporation; -and
RESOLVED FURTHER, that any and all actions heretofore or hereafter taken or caused to be
taken by the appropriate officers of the Corporation within the terms of the foregoing resolutions
be, and the same hereby are, approved, ratified, and confirmed.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that the following individual is a duly elected officer of the Corporation,
holding the title set forth opposite her name:
Erin M. Acton Assistant Vice President
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and the corporate seal of the Corporation this 9*
day of February, 2015.
``��01111f1#or1�
.• QYopert/. !15,,
° s
}• 4
# 5235911 fill,,ff11 %
Deanna J.,rpst, Assistant Secretary

SOILS REPORT

Eci
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP "Setting the Standard for service"
Geotechnical a Construction Materials f, Environmental • Facilities FX. Regisccmd Engi ieEang Fhm F-1078
WC Registered Geologists Firm C-406
SC Registered Engineering Firm 3239
June 24, 2016
Mr. Eric Seidel, P.E.
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5030 New Center Drive, Suite B
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Reference: Report of Seasonal High Water Table Estimation and Infiltration Testing
Turtle Creek Subdivision
Surf City, Pender County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49.2140
Dear Mr. Seidel:
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) recently conducted a seasonal high water table (SHWT) estimation
and infiltration testing adjacent to the stormwater best management practice (BMP) area(s) off
of Loggerhead Boulevard in Surf City, Pender County, North Carolina. This letter, with
attachments, is the report of our testing.
Field Testing
On June 22, 2016, ECS conducted an exploration of the subsurface soil and groundwater
conditions at one requested location shown on the attached Boring Location Plan (Figure 1).
ECS met onsite with Mr. Eric Seidel with SEPI Engineering and determined the boring location.
The purpose of this exploration was to obtain subsurface information of the in situ soils adjacent
to the stormwater BMP area(s). The BMP is an infiltration system that is holding water. ECS
was requested to verify the SHWT and saturated hydraulic conductivity of the in situ soils. ECS
explored the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions by advancing one hand auger boring
into the existing ground surface at the requested boring location. ECS visually classified the
subsurface soils and obtained representative samples of each soil type encountered. ECS also
recorded the S1 IWT and groundwater elevation observed at the time of the hand auger boring.
The attached Infiltration Testing Form provides a summary of the subsurface conditions
encountered at the hand auger boring location.
The SHWT and groundwater elevation was estimated at the boring location below the existing
grade elevation. A summary of the findings are as follows:
Location
SHWT
Groundwater
B-1
16 inches
I 30 inches
ECS has conducted one infiltration test utilizing a compact constant head permeameter near the
hand auger boring in order to estimate the infiltration rate for the subsurface soils. Infiltration
tests are typically conducted at two feet above the SHWT or in the most restrictive soil horizon.
Tests in clayey conditions are conducted and calculated up to 30 minute intervals. If an exact
hydraulic conductivity is necessary for these locations, then ECS recommends collecting
samples by advancing Shelby tubes and performing laboratory permeability testing.
ECS Capitd Services, PLLC • ECS Carolinas, LLP • ECS Central, PLLC + ECS Florida, LLC - ECS MWAtlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC = ECS Southeast, LLC • ECS Texas, LLP
www.ecslimited.com

Report of SHWT Estimation and Infiltration Testing
Turtle Creek Subdivision
Sun` City, Pander County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49.2140
June 24, 2016
Field Test Results
Below is a summary of the infiltration test results:
Location
Description
Depth
Inches/
hour
B-1
Orange/gray SAND w/ clay
18 inches
0.15
Infiltration rates and SHWT may vary within the proposed site due to changes in elevation and
subsurface conditions. The infiltration basin is adjacent to an identified jurisdictional wetland.
Based on observations made during the site visit, the bottom of the BMP appears to intersect
the groundwater elevation. SEPI collected elevations of the boring and the BMP bottom. ECS
anticipates that water will remain within the BMP.
Closure
ECS's analysis of the site has been based on our understanding of the site, the project
information provided to us, and the data obtained during our exploration. If the project
information provided to us is changed, please contact us so that our recommendations can be
reviewed and appropriate revisions provided, if necessary. The discovery of any site or
subsurface conditions during construction which deviate from the data outlined in this
exploration should be reported to us for our review, analysis and revision of our
recommendations, if necessary. The assessment of site environmental conditions for the
presence of pollutants in the soil and groundwater of the site is beyond the scope of this
geotechnical exploration.
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide our services to you on this project. If you have any
questions concerning this report or this project, please contact us at [phone].
Respectfully,
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
4400-' `� lx
K. Brooks Wall
Project Manager
bwal ICaD-ecslimited.com
910-686-9114
Attachments: Figure 1 - Boring Location Plan
Infiltration Testing Form
ASFE Document
}� .N.,
W. Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
Environmental Principal
bfu Itonttc-ecslimited.com
704-525-5152
2

R � •Y• 3'
' �' L � •.� rT f'- t Jet. �.
r�y ice' 7i # yi r
� �...iwr. � •���1 r "`yam• .�' .. _`�,. �v� _ � . -. _ _�� r� ,,�! _ Z, � .
•era - . ��.}: - `� • •� _ - � �' ;. � �..Xr
-
'� - - _ . �s . , • _.. '� � _'�4 rat ..:r - �:r '� * -' ' ��-.
a• .. i, r br' ti' '

Infiltration Testing Form
Turtle Creek Subdivision
Surf City, Pender County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49.2140
June 22, 2016
Location Depth USCS
B-1 0-6"
SM
6"-12"
S M
12"-18"
SP
18"-30"
SC
Soil Description
PEAT/with sand
Black silty SAND
Tan/orange/gray fine SAND
Orange/gray fine SAND w/ clay
Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 16 inches below the
existing grade elevation.
Groundwater was encountered at 30 inches below the existing grade
elevation.
Test was conducted at 18 inches below existing grade elevation
Infiltration Rate: 0.15 inches per hour

� Geolechnical Engineering Report
�
Geotechnical Sepvlces Are Performed top
Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects
Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of
their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engineer
may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil
engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geo-
technical engineering report is unique, prepared solelyfor the client. No one
except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first
conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one - not
even you - should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one
originally contemplated.
Read the Full Report
Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical
engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary.
Do not read selected elements only.
A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on
A Unique Set of Project -Specific Factors
Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project -specific factors
when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the clients
goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general nature of the
structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure
on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access
roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engi-
neer who conducted the study specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on
a geotechnical engineering report that was:
• not prepared for you,
• not prepared for your project,
• not prepared for the specific site explored, or
• completed before important project changes were made.
Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical
engineering report include those that affect:
the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a
parking garage to an office building, or from alight industrial plant
to a refrigerated warehouse,
elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the
proposed structure,
composition of the design team, or
project ownership.
As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project
changes - even minor ones - and request an assessment of their impact.
Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems
that occur bemuse their reports do not consider developments of which they
were not informed.
Subsurface Condltloki6 Lan Change
A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the
time the study was performed. Do not rety on a geotechnical engineering
report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by
man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natu-
ral events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Always
contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it
is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent
major problems.
Most Geotechnical Hindings Are Professional
Opinions
Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where
subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engineers
review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment
to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual
subsurface conditions may differ -sometimes significantly from those indi-
cated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your
report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of
managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions.
A Report's Recommendations Are IN Fnal
Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your re-
port. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engineers
develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers
can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual

subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engi-
neer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for
the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction
observation.
A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to
Misinterpretation
Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineer-
ing reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your
geotechnical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team
after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review
pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors
can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by
having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction
conferences, and by providing construction observation.
Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Loge
Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon
their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or
omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should
never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings.
Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize
that separating logs from the report can elevate risk.
Give Contractors a Complete Report and
Guidance
Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make
contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what
they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give con-
tractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, butpreface it with a
clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the
report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's
accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer
who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct ad-
ditional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer.
A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have sufficient
timeto perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give
contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at
least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unantici-
pated conditions.
Read Responsibility Provisions Closely
Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that
geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines.
This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led
to disappointments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such
outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory
provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations" many of these
provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin
and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read
these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should
respond fully and frankly.
Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered
The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a geoenviron-
mental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical
study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually re-
late any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g.,
about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated
contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous
project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoenvironmental in-
formation, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk management guidance.
Do not rely on an environmental reportprepared for someone else.
Obtain Professional Assistance To Deal with Mold
Diverse strategies can be applied during building design, construction, op-
eration, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from grow-
ing on indoor surfaces. To be effective, all such strategies should be devised
for the express purpose of mold prevention, integrated into a comprehensive
plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a professional mold prevention
consultant. Because just a small amount of water or moisture can lead to
the development of severe mold infestations, a number of mold prevention
strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry. While groundwater, wa-
ter infiltration, and similar issues may have been addressed as part of the
geotechnical engineering study whose findings are conveyed in -this report,
the geotechnical engineer in charge of this project is not a mold prevention
consultant; Free of 0o sorvkw M
0eOn&%%"eroreaftslimymm OdpW or sued
for 0e puppm of =N PMYNIft. Pralper ODE of
08 P8C==dl= soeveyed In 01s PAW w0 eof Of awl
lIn =M*W 0 prevent mold IM Ova* In op 0 0e Mwe-
tmee Involved
Rely on Your ASF&Member Geotechnical
Engineer For Additional Assistance
Membership in ASFE/The Best People on Earth exposes geotechnical engi-
neers to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine
benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer with your
ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information.
jOVSFE
The Beet People in Earth
8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Telephone:' 301/565-2733 Facsimile: 301/589-2017
e-mail: [e-mail] www.asfe.org
Copyright 2004 byASFE, inc. Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is st ictly prohibited, except with ASFB specific
written permission. Excerpting, quoting or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of ASFE, and only for purposes
of scholarly research or book review. Only members of ASFE may use this document as a complement to or as an element of a geotechnical engineering report. Any other firm,
individual, or other entity that so uses this document without bego anASFE member could be committino neofioent or intentional (fraudulent) misrepresentation.
IIGER06045.0M

DEED RESTRICTIONS

M ED BK3290PG192
07 PUG -7 AM 10: 28
JC: is M,SWICEGOOD
REGISTER, OF DEEDS
PENDER COUN T Y, NC
,SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
FOR THE VILLAGES AT TURTLE CREEK
Prepai'i' Murchison, Taylor & Gibson, PLLC 8
16 North Fitch Avenue, Wilmington, NC 29401
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA _ �� 1
COUNTY OF PENDER Area)
This SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATIC�i OF PR CT1VE COVENANTS FOR
THE VILLAGES AT TURTLE CREEK is made this? day of 2007,
by DCNC NORTH CAROLINA I, L.L.C., a North Caroli limited liability company
("DECLARANT').
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the DECLARANT heretofore executed that certain Master Declaration
of Protective Covenants for The Villages at Turtle Creek and caused the same to be recorded in Book
3029, Page 10, et seq., in the Pender County Registry (hereinafter, the "Protective Covenants");
WHEREAS, in Section 11.6 of the Protective Covenants, the DECLARANT
subjected the Property (as defined in the Protective Covenants) to the State of North Carolina rules
and regulations covering stormwater runoff; as these rules and regulations are amended from time to
time;
WHEREAS, in Section 8.4 and Section 15.3 of the Protective Covenants, the
DECLARANT reserved the right to amend the Protective Covenants and subject the Property to
additional covenants and easements;
WHEREAS, in connection with State Stormwater Management Permit Number SW8
051025 acquired by the Association from the Division of Water Quality e DWQ") under NCAC
2H.1000, DWQ is requiring that the Protective Covenants be amended to include the rules and
regulations provided in this Supplemental Declaration;
NOW THEREFORE, in accordance with its rights under Section 8.4 and Section 15.3
Of the Protective Covenants, the DECLARANT does hereby amend the Protective Covenants as
follows:
1. Article 11 Section 11.6 is hereby deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the
following text:
"11.6 Stormwater Run -Off. All Units shall be subject to the State of North Carolina rules and
regulations concerning stormwater runoff as these rules are amended from time to time. Without
limiting the foregoing, DECLARANT hereby reserves the right to impose additional restrictions
upon the Properties as and to the extent required by the terms of the stormwater permit(s) for The
Villages at Turtle Creek as issued by the State of North Carolina. Such additional restrictions may be
imposed by DECLARANT by the recording of a Supplemental Declaration, and no joinder or
consent of the Association or any other Owner or Person shall be required on such Supplemental
Declaration. These regulations, which apply to all of the real property described in Exhibit A and
are subject to revision as to any Future Development Property, currently provide:
M6

OK329OPG 193
(a) The following covenants in this Section 11.6 are intended to ensure ongoing
compliance with State Stonawater Management Permit Number SW8 060609 as issued by the
Division of Water Quality under NCAC 2H.1000.
(b) The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to the extent
necessary to maintain compliance with the Storrnwater Management Permit.
(c) These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons and parties
claiming under them.
(d) The covenants pertaining to stormwater may not be altered or rescinded without the
express written consent of the State of North Carolina, Division of Water Quality.
(e) Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plans may not take place without
the concurrence of the Division of Water Quality.
0) The maximum built -upon area ("Max BUA") per lot is as follows:
r
W:t d�` ::
- ..eX' 11=.
y
" A
1
4152
16
3,731
31
3,659
46
4176
61
4187
2
4152
i7
3 695
32
3 633
47
4165
62
4189
3
4152
18
3 676
33
3,602
48
4149
63
4187
4
4,162
19
4,211
34
3601
49
4,226
64
4,195
5
4.300
20
4.269
35
3.699
50
4145
1 65
4.187
6
4186
21
4350
36
4,151
51
4162
1 66
4,187
7
3,068
22
4161
37
4,480
52
4.151
1 67
4187
8
3,608
23
4165
38
3 849
53
4151
1 68
4187
9
3,607
24
4162
39
3 828
54
4151
69
4183
10
3.607
NIA
NIA
40
4 022
55
4147
70
4186
11
1517
NIA
WA
41
4.255 1
56
4166
71
4186
12
4156
27 1
3,661
42
4,087
57
4165
72
4 232
13
3,692
28
3 672
43
3.829
58
4 213
73
4.289
14
3,776
29
3,668
44
4128
59
4 253
NIA
NIA
15 1
3,691
30
3.664
45
4,425
60
4189
NIA
NIA
This allotted amount includes any built -upon area constructed within the lot property
boundaries, and that portion of the right-of-way between the front lot line and the edge of the
pavement. Built upon area includes, but is not limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick,
stone, slate, coquina and parking areas, but does not include raised, open wood decking, or the water
surface of swimming pools.
(g) All runoff on the lot must drain into the permitted system. This may be accomplished
through providing roof drain gutters which drain to the street, grading the lot to drain toward the
street, or grading perimeter swales and directing them into the pond or the street. Lots that will
naturally drain into the system are not required to provide these additional measures.
(h) Built -upon area in excess of the permitted amount will require a permit modification.
4. DECLARANT hereby retains and shall shall have the unilateral right, by
Supplemental Declaration, to amend the Protective Covenants as DWQ shall reasonably require in
connection with stormwater management permits applicable to the Property (including, without
limitation, the imposition of rules or restrictions that DWQ may require in connection with the
annexation of additional property into the scheme of these Protective Covenants).
5. DECLARANT reserves the right to transfer the Stonmwater Management Permit and
the responsibility for maintenance of the stormwater runoff system and facility to The Villages at
Turtle Creek Homeowners Association, Inc. (the "Association'). At the time of such transfer, the
Association shall accept conveyance and transfer of the Stormwater Permit and carry out and abide
by the duties and obligations contained therein.
6. DECLARANT, being the owner or having all of the rights in and to the Property,
hereby declares that the Property shall be held, sold, and conveyed subject to the Protective
Covenants, as amended by this Supplemental Declaration, which covenants shall run with title to the
64986

BK3290PG 194
Property and shall be binding on all parties having any right, title, or interest in the described
Property or any part thereof; and shall inure to the benefit of each owner thereof.
EXCEPT AS AMENDED HEREIN, the Protective Covenants shall be and remain in frill
force and efl'eot.
DCNC NORTH CAROLINA, I, L.L.C.
By: DiIsheimer Communities of North Carolina,
L.L.C., its sole manager
Dr. J&
Vice President
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
I, h)it F%C(/ V&1�c1 a Notary Public of said County and State, do
hereby certify thatj.& ij.kl.,w personally appeared before me this day and
acknowledged that that he is the Vice President of Dilsheimer Communities of North Carolina,
L.L.C., a North Carolina limited liability company that is the sole manager of DCNC NORTH
CAROLINA I, L.L.C., a North Carolina limited liability company (the "Company") and that by
authority duly given, he executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of and as the act of the sole
manager of the Company.
WITNESS my land and official stamp or seal, this I sr day of 2007.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
�op%=4 4v
AWriP
MComma
I�
t
64"6

Johnson. Kel
From: Nick Garner <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 10:17 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: Turtle Creek Farm Pond Repair
Attachments: Turtle Creek Erosion b.JPG; Turtle Creek Existing Pond PLA.N.pdf; Turtle Creek Existing
Pond Repair Map 10-19-16.pdf; Turtle Creek Pond Erosion a.JPG; Turtle Creek Pond Erosion
c.JPG; Turtle Creek Pond Erosion d.JPG; Turtle Creek Pond Erosion e.JPG; Turtle Creek
Pond riser structure b.JPG
Kelly,
Attached is some info for your records regarding the erosion associated with an existing farm pond in the Village at
Turtle Creek development I checked out yesterday. From what I can see on the plans, the only interaction it has with the
developments BMP's is a 15 ft. emergency spillway constructed for the Infiltration Basin 1D-2. I spoke with Cameron
about this and his has forwarded me to Trent James in your Office. I left a message. I'll keep you posted on what I find. I
just want to make sure you're aware since you're already involved with the development's SW compliance issues.
Thanks for your help!
COASTAL CAROLINA
411RESOLIRCE GRDURo�c
Nick Garner
2921 Blue Clay Rd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
910.470.4225
nir_k@ccrgr,c.com

COASTAL CAROLINA
RESOURCE GROUP im;
ftiuitditrurf liwnlr I wtfr.uer uu.rfsaal) rtwrs� wallet° rseuiewY++tffrefft
9 10 -79-P432
Coastal Carolina Resource Group, Inc.
2921 Blue Clay Rd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
910-791-5432 (0) 910-791-4768 (F)
[e-mail]
TO
Wells Fargo (Attn: Erin Acton)
1 Independence Drive, 10th Floor
Jacksonville, FL 32202
PH:904-351-7346
[e-mail]
C)ICE
DATE: September 7, 2016
INVOICE #: 9691
RE: Village at Turtle Creek
Stormwater Pipe Repair
ITEM # I DESCRIPTION LINE TOTAL
1 Coastal Carolina Resource Group (CCRG) replaced a failing 100 foot section of 24" inch doubling walled $ 8,970.00
plastic HDPE pipe between two catch basins. Please see attached map for location details. The old pipe
had deflected underground due to unstable soils and caused sinkholes to form throughout the pipeline
leading to the accumulated sediment in the pipe. CCRG temporarily took down a picket fence located in
the repair area. CCRG continued by utilizing a rubber tracked excavator to dig up and remove the old
pipe back to useable pipe sections. CCRG graded the trench to the proper elevation and compact the
subsoils as well as lined the trench with geofabric and washed #57 stone in preparation for the new pipe
install. A new 100 ft section of 24" HDPE pipe was installed and coupled to the stable sections of old
pipe. CCRG coupled the new and old pipe sections with the specified manufacturer coupler as well as
installed gaskets inside factory joint connections and finally wrapped each pipe joint with geo-fabric to
help prevent future leaking. CCRG finished by backfilling the repair and compacting soils around the pipe
back to grade to prevent future deflection problems. Repair area was sodded with new centipede grass.
CCRG reinstalled the picket fence once repair was completed. Please see attached CD for pictures of
pipe repair.
Total
$ 8,970.00
I Terms: Due Upon Receipt
Make all checks payable to Coastal Carolina Resource Group, Inc.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESSI

i1
rI VaL-J�

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 1:48 PM
To: 'Eric Seidel'
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
Eric,
I haven't gone through any of the numbers, but I talked with Georgette about the situation and we agree that this is
really the only viable option given the circumstances. The only recommendation that we have is to do what you can to
ensure that the discharge flows as slowly as possible into the wetlands so that they do not blow out.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Eric Seidel [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 3:01 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
Kelly,
Please find Alternative Design for Turtle Creek Basin 1B attached. I believe that the design rneets the criteria of an
alternative design, based on the fact the project is grandfathered into the 1995 rules (1.5" treatment volume) and treats
above and beyond current in field conditions. Volume calculation totals can be found on the attached plan.
Please make a determination on whether or not the State will accept the proposed alternative design. Once a
determination is made we can move forward with formal permitting. If you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss
in more detail please let me know. Thanks.
ce+eararr►p rs mta�►s
S EPI
CNtitNlCRINO &
C4D9ST5PULT10M
Eric Seidel, PE I Site/Civil Project Engineer
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B I Wilmington, NC 28403
Direct: 910.550.3251 1 Cell: 252.339.2136 1 sepiengineering.com
Connect with us: Linkedln I Twitter I Facebook
Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the
attorney -client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive
this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 9:53 AM
To: Eric Seidel
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II

Thanks!
From: Eric Seidel [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 9:36 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
Kelly,
SEPI is now under contract to provide alternate design calculations for Basin #iB. 1 hope to have a solution for us to
discuss in a few weeks. Thanks.
co -Vim" IS Wars
SEPI
CN0,fit[RfXG s
cesxf.afsVCT1CX
Eric Seidel, PE I Site/Civil Project Engineer
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B I Wilmington, NC 28403
Direct: 910.550.32511 Cell: 252.339.2136 1 sepieneineerine.com
Connect with us: Linkedln ( Twitter I Facebook
Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the
attorney -client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive
this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kelly.p.johnsonCa ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 8:36 AM
To: Eric Seidel
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
OK. Thanks.
KJ
From: Eric Seidel [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 8:16 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
Kelly,
Wells Fargo has requested pricing for preliminary design calculations to see if we can come to an alternative design
agreement. Once we get a design agreed upon we plan on moving forward with approval and construction
plans. Thanks.
Hope you had a great weekend.

Eric Seidel, PE I Site/Civil Project Engineer
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B I Wilmington, NC 28403
Direct: 910.550.3251 I Cell: 252.339.2136 1 sepieneineerine.com
Connect with us: Linkedin j Twitter I Facebook
Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and maybe subject to the
attorney -client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive
this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
From: Johnson, Kelly fmailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 3:43 PM
To: Eric Seidel
Cc: erin.acton(d)wellsfargo.com
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
Eric,
I am in the same boat. I can't tell you what will be acceptable unless we know what is proposed. There will have to be
some sort of design, and that design is TBD. You will have to determine what can be done through a design process and
then we will have to figure out the best path forward.
I am in the middle of something that will take the rest of the day, and I am out tomorrow. But I will be back Friday if we
need to pick this back up again.
Thanks,
KJ
From: Eric Seidel [mailto:eseidel @se pie ngineering.coml
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 3:16 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
Kelly,
Can we get any assurance that moving forward with an "Alternative Design" that a retrofit wetpond would be
acceptable in this area? The client would like some sort of confirmation from the State before agreeing to additional
design fees, which would ultimately lead to additional construction fees.
I cannot confirm that we can do better than the 1.5" storm event without doing -design calculations. If site constraints
allow we will make it as large as possible. Thanks.
Ctirtrrunq is *on
SEPI
Eric Seidel, PE I Site/Civil Project Engineer
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B I Wilmington, NC 28403
Direct: 910.550.32511 Cell: 252.339.2136 1 sepieneineerine.com
Connect with us: Linkedin I Twitter I Facebook

Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the
attorney -client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive
this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kelly.p.johnsonOncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 2:48 PM
To: Eric Seidel
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
Eric,
When we work through these difficult situations, we typically try to find a compromise solution as a means to justify
requiring what is essentially "less" from a project than would be required by law. I think the best approach is to
determine the best that can be done onsite and go from there. For instance, is it possible to hold -more than the 1.5"
storm, but not necessarily the full 2008 rule depth? What other positive items can be accomplished in the design that
would be in excess of the 1995 requirements?
(Also, FYI, the term "exemption" is a term we use for another type of project. An example would be if you wanted to
build a bulkhead. You would therefore need a CAMA Major and so you would, by law, have to get State
Stormwater. But, there isn't any BUA to permit in that situation so the project would officially be labeled as "exempt"
from permitting. Your project is an "Alternative Design" per 15A NCAC 02H .1008(h).)
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Eric Seidel [mailto:[e-mail])
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 2:11 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
Kelly,
I just spoke with the client (Wells Fargo) and they would like to make a formal exemption request for a retrofit wet pond
design, for the 1.5" design storm, to discharge to Becky's Creek (SA;HQW). Based on previously discussed site
constraints I believe this site is well suited for an exemption. Please let me know if this is something the State is willing
to consider and we can write a formal exemption letter.
The client understands that if an exemption is granted a retrofit design would need to be completed. Thanks.
Ct rfae s!P is �n
SEPIt
Eric Seidel, PE I Site/Civil Project Engineer
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B I Wilmington, NC 28403
Direct: 910.550.32511 Cell: 252.339.2136 I seaieneineerine.com
Connect with us: Linkedln I Twitter I Facebook

Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the
attorney -client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive
this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
From: Johnson, Kelly[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:59 AM
To: Eric Seidel
Subject: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases i cat Ii
Eric,
Here are the notes I will leave on file from today's meeting:
1.) History: The berm of Infiltration Basin 113 blew out last fall. Sediment was discharged into the wetlands, but has
now been removed and the basin has been re -installed per the stormwater permit conditions. But, the original
design is not sustainable. I understand that you are working with the permittee to figure out how to move
forward.
2.) SHWT: The SHWT used in the original design has been determined to be incorrect. The SHWT has now been
found to be —2ft above the inlet pipe, which is approximately Oft too high for an infiltration basin to work.
3.) Datum: The reference datum used in the original design will differ from the reference datum in the new
design. The old datum is —1ft lower.
4.) Location: There does not appear to be a stream within 50ft of the basin, but the basin is surrounded mostly by
wetlands and homes that have been constructed.
5.) Regulations: This permit was originally designed in 2006 and most recently modified in 2007. Both of these
permits were written under the 1995 rule [15A NCAC .1005] at 1.5" for SA waters. That regulation was modified
in 2008 to increase the volume that has to be treated. BMPs designed under the 2008 rule have to treat the
greater of either the 1.5" storm or the difference in pre/post of the 1yr24hr storm. (This usually works out to
about 3.8". This means that the 2008 rule is harder to comply with than the 1995 rule.) And, 2008-rule BMPs
within a mile of and draining to SA waters also cannot discharge to SA waters [15A NCAC .1005(a0(1)(C)] unless
they do a few extra things. (The options are listed here: http://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-
land-resources/energy-mineral-land-permit-guidance/sw-technical-review-workgroup ). The 1995 rule also has
SA discharge requirements. Wet ponds were not permitted to SA waters in 1995. (There is actually a caveat to
that in the 1995 version of 15A NCAC .1005(2)(b)(i) which references options under 15 NCAC 02H .0126. But,
staff here don't know of any ponds that were ever done that way. And if you pull the caveat regulation, it really
doesn't seem to offer a way to install a pond in SA. It is an odd inclusion in the rule. But, I wanted to mention it
in case you pull the regulations yourself and wonder what the options are.) The 2008 rule [15A NCAC
.1005(h)(5)] also says that BMPs that were permitted under the 1995 rule can be modified under the 1995 rule if
they are "minor modifications", which the rule defines as a modification that doesn't add BUA or increase the
size of the BMP.
6.) Path Forward: This will be an unusually challenging problem to solve given the current footprint of the existing
(non-functional) BMP and the SHWT. We discussed a few potential options to consider. You could pump the
water and infiltrate it in another spot if land is available. You could also see if you could put in a 2008 pond. Or,
if those options aren't feasible then you could design an "Alternative Design" per 15A NCAC 02H .1008(h). This
is the section of the rule that allows the Division to work with permittees and engineers and approve unusual
designs when they are warranted. This is always done on a case -by -case basis. But, if there is something
unusual that you have in mind that meets the intent of the regulations we can meet to discuss any ideas you
have.
7.) Permit Compliance: Please keep in mind that the current, permitted, configuration is known to not be
functioning. Per Section 11(3) of the permit, the Division could formally issue a violation if this isn't addressed in
a timely fashion. I would prefer to work with you all to address the issue as opposed to issuing formal
violations. I appreciate the permittee's work to remove the sediment from the wetlands last fall, and the
permittee's work to hire an engineer to assess the situation. I understand that the contract between the
permittee and the engineer does not include BMP re -design, but I hope that a contract is put in place to ensure

re -design soon. Please also keep in mind that the current configuration blew out last time, and it is therefore at
risk of doing so again if it isn't rectified in the near future.
Thanks,
Kelly
V-CI.I.E ' o� vuson-
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

Eric Seidel
To: Eric Seidel
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
From: Eric Seidel
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 3:01 PM
To: 'Johnson, Kelly'
Cc: erin.acton(awellsfargo.com
Subject: RE: SW8 060608, The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & II
Kelly,
Please find Alternative Design for Turtle Creek Basin 1B attached. I believe that the design meets the criteria of an
alternative design, based on the fact the project is grandfathered into the 1995 rules (1.5" treatment volume) and treats
above and beyond current in field conditions. Volume calculation totals can be found on the attached plan.
Please make a determination on whether or not the State will accept the proposed alternative design. Once a
determination is made we can move forward with formal permitting. If you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss
in more detail please let me know. Thanks.
Ct4rbrOM9 is
SEPI
I
CON 51RVCT10N
Eric Seidel, PE I Site/Civil Project Engineer
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B I Wilmington, NC 28403
Direct: 910.550.32511 Cell: 252.339.2136 1 sepieneineerina.com
Connect with us: Linkedin I Twitter i Facebook
confidentiality Notice: This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to the
attorney -client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive
this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
ECEIVE
AUG 3 0 20%
BY:
:PJ
AUG 1�

0
m
Q
COm
O�
N 0L Ld
:D (n
INFILTRATION BASIN I B
PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVE DESIGN
RETROFIT WET POND CONVERSION
TOP OF BANS 10' EMBANK-MENT TOP OF BANK
EL. 26.0 EL. 26.0
TEMPORARY POOL EL. 25.4
SNWT 23.41 '
Qo NORMAL. POOL EL. 22.91
.�
21.51 21.5
FOREBAY � 1
1 3 MAIN POOL. 1
3 BOTTOM EL.19.0 1
3 3
DETENTION POND & FOREBAY SECTION
NTS
BOTTOM EL. 19.0
NN
S
STORMWATER SUMMARY:
E
NC GRID
0
O 3 WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
FOR THE LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND FACILITIES
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
THELOCATIONS OFEXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE
SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMA TE WA Y OK Y AND HA VE NOT BEEN
INDEPENDENT[ Y VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS
REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE
EXACTLOCATIONOFALL EXISTINGUTILITIESBEFORE COMMENCING
WORK, ANDAGREES TOBEFULLY RESPONSIBLEFORANYAND
ALL DAMAGES WHICHMIGHTBE OCCASIONED BY THE
CONTRACTOR'SFAILURETOEXACTLY LOCATEANDPRESERVEANY
ANDALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
NOTICE:
CONSTRUCTION S17E SAFETYIS THE SOLERESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR NEITHER THE OWNER NOR THE ENGINEER SHALL BE
EXPECTED TO ASSUMEANYRESPONSIBILITYFOR SAFETY OF THE
WORK, OFPERSONSENGAGEDINTHE WORK OFANYNE4RBY
STRUCTURES, OR OFANY OTHER PERSONS.
SEPI
E N G I N E E R I N G&
C O N S T R U C T I O N
1025 WADE AVENUE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
919.789.9977
11020 DAVID TAYLOR DRIVE, SUITE 115
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
704.714.4880
5030 NEW CENTRE DR., SUITE B
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
910.523.5715
www.sepiengineering.com
��11�tlrrlllrr
CA
L
ftftiz 'fill 1111W ,
` x III11 r/
NOTE: ALTERNATIVE "'�.�`�� co NO DESIGN PROVIDES EQUAL OR BETTER , �
STORMWATER CONTROL, EQUAL OR BETTER PROTECTION
OR
OF WATERS OF TBE STATE, & RESULT IN NO INCREASED ' z SEA
POTENTIAL FOR NUISANCE CONDITIONS COMPARED TO THAT =
,� C-21 z
OF EXISTING INFILTRATION BASIN 1B. N �
Illrr
COPYRIGHT@ 2012
SEPI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC
w
0
A
L42 12
EL. 26.0 3
0
`%l
6" 41-01y 61"
PLAN
).0
JCL I IUIV H m
OUTLET STRUCTURE FOEIVE
rTI s �2013
BY:
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
t IN FEET
1 inch = 20 ft. Horz.
PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
w
J_
L-
C-)
(13
Z
0
W
O
0
z
�
w
�
�
Q
a�
w
N
a
w
U
J
F-
F--
0
a
w
U
PROJECT MANAGER
FIELD SURVEY DATE:
EAS
s/r7/2=
CHECKED BY:
DRAWING DATE:
-
s/s0/=6
DRAWN BY:
JOB #:
EAS
SHEET
C-1.0
1 Of 1

4PICOASTAL CAROLINA
�11 RESOURCE GROUP imc
c•c itecfni�t;Er y. ¢_� aalll ( tti.N06AN uuttu•ot 1 ntut%tt aL4 Un- fln" W'Kvttettl
14-7 1-51432
Coastal Carolina Resource Group, Inc.
2921 Blue Clay Rd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
910-791-5432 (0) 910-791-4768 (F)
[e-mail]
TO Wells Fargo (Attn: Erin Acton)
1 Independence Drive, loth Floor
Jacksonville, FL 32202
PH:904-351-7346
[e-mail]
INVOICE
DATE: July 8, 2016
INVOICE: 9187-C
RE: The Villages at Turtle Creek
Stormwater Treatment Facility Repairs
Final Invoice
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
LINE TOTAL
1
Coastal Carolina Resource Group (CCRG) as promised has removed the eroded sediment from the
jurisdictional wetland located in the Village at Turtle Creek subdivision. CCRG reseeded the wetland with
approved wetland seed as requested by NCDENR. CCRG has repaired the blown out berm associated
with the infiltration basin 1B by installing new soil, landlock fabric and sod . CCRG has removed the
unwanted soils, vegetation and corresponding root mat previously located in the basin. CCRG has rebuilt
the inlet pipe energy dissipater and installed new infiltration sand in the basin back to the original design
elevation. CCRG finished by repairing all the sinkholes throughout the development associated with the
stormwater catch basins listed on the contract as well as additional sinkholes brought to our attention
by the HOA. Please reference the mailed picture DVD's for additional details associated with the repairs.
$ 59,458.52
Total
$ 59,458.52
Terms: Due Upon Receipt
Make all checks payable to Coastal Carolina Resource Group, Inc.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!

r+
o = D =
O S = fD
3 s o
. o
S -0 fD v
o a o
N N X r+ [D N
N 3 0 0
3 '•+ ^ 'a
(D
t!Q S M aQ O
N S c C-1 CD
r�D c afD 0 �i
_ = Q =
r+
o 3,
C Q r+
r+ fD -u
S r C r+•
0 X O
O =
c
aq rt
:3N
Q O O
N ry
O c
3 3 o 1O
m �
a o o`
p D Ln =_
< ` v
r+
v 0 CA
cr v �
(D
(D
(D O
(A° h
O W
ram+, _• W
O is
CD O
0 (D
N
cu r F
N aq
v a CFQ
n. Q o
o A
o FLn
c c
rF (D
(D 0
OIQ (D
O =
h
� Q- O
N O
7• N
GHQ S
ro m
c o n
M 0
fz n
v
O rt Cn
c
CL 3 CD
a '°
0
o
(j) s
G
(D c
� N
(D
0 m zs — �
O O (D
(n
C
A
n
1 to
p fD
-M7C
�
S
S m
0
fn � co) -n
O
L
0
C CD
-0 3 0 o c
M
o
3
N
3
(D m 3 a
rt
c
M
°c
N
=
CL v a 0
�iP
N
_
0
O
z O 3
m
N
y
L
v
7
rt
O (D °
cm
N c=n
y n
n
�_
fD
N
N
:D
h
:3O N S
ram+
A
�G
N
N 3 (D
:3
O
n (D
3
c
_h �-
�0 �r
�
3
N�
l0
v
w �Co f D
u
00
3
m
r+ N
N
-6
0
3
— p_
�
o a-=
N
fCn
O
(D
(D
R/ A (D
G
O CT
—
a
(A
L
mmCO
m' o ° '°
o
,'
fD
_
Q7
y < CL =
oQ
o
a to
W
v
�n
CDCOD
0 m
O
m
3
°
C O
Q�
N = 3
n
O
O
N CL CD iv %
X C
CLN
n CD
rNt O
(D
aq
CD L `C
r+
ClQ (D M O
dQ
_
(D
� _
CD
° M 0
o
N
rtNJ
7 O n
V
pOQ
—
OD
rD
fD in
= d
3
C
(o
O -'
rn rn
Q< S (D
:3
coo
ro
co
O
0
�'+
s CD rr
p
�
rD (
3
X a qQ
rNj
Q
(D a
0+
rt
N N
O
w
O
n
W
O
C
S
c
(D N AO fD
p
�:3D
CL
r+ fD <
0
o
o rD 3 m
r*
m r°1+ Q
m
fD
o
co z o_
::- io n
S' OR � m
(D X r+ O
S
3n
aq
CD
_
y m X 'O
3
In O
C y S
C
a
N 03
m 3 nx-
c
a) r+ v
y,
W O
v
A (D n
c
n V)
5�0,
m
:3rD (D :3
-� c S
y N <
O N
rA+ j
aq y O
3 -a
mr+ Q
o o
=r
N rF
N ry,
(D

1►]
ww n
o:
T C
K 2
m
(D
rri
r�r
C
y' M
m
1"F
. �...�
0- cr
o (D
- O n
= O
Gam')
m
�
C O �
°n°
3 =r
a
s
�
O
N
=r O
? m
O of rr
N
Q
Z
O
n
c c `^
0
O
m
'+
W (D (SD
cu
CL O
O
N m �'
an r*
LA
y O O1
rD
t0q O
rf. =
O
O
Cr
O cu
O
O '" 7
O
O
,may
(DD
O r=t
O (mD
(D
, t Q ;pz-
3
rt
c m
—. O N
Oq
r+ fl-
Q
N m -O
C
O!
cr O O
O
O O
O O
O
fl.
N pAj
m m m
�'.D
m
a
m
-O
fu A -
v+ m '+
0
H
O
C
m
�
v v
3
m
N
O_
O
O
A
2 O
I
-0
h 3
m
C v
r-r
(A
m
O
3
C
O
m
rL O
O
O
N cn
3'
O =�
O'
C
rt 0�
M
m
r* h
S 3
_
m (n
m g
m
7 m
m m
X
O
m
�G
c O CD
CD o rt
X o Q
m O
c
(D a
(� `
M
m = m
CD
O
N po
00 S O
o O
00 = A
Q D
m
7
Fo<
V
T
3
A•
M
E
M
3
v
7
rn
w
O
C
a
in
aq
O
O
a
7
O
M
S
M
n
O-
(D
n
0)
C
y
CD
S
v
Q
O-
(D
m
v
(D
C O 0
O
ID
In In N O
rn:CD
:3
c CD
m v lD
c K
m O 01
N O
0D o N
o � _
Gn
C) .
000 rn O
3�
3
� C
ID
a
.m
o �
7
N N
0
z
ro
o S
Gl N
a 3
M �p
N. N
OQ N
d
v ao
m
m N
a
M, �p
o C
m• n
M M,-
0
c <
m o
< Sr
� m
o n
m
m N.
< cm
M =$
E --
CD
n n
0
'< n
0 0
nm
a-c
m
s
�^ n
3 0
3
Imll N
N 7
a° n
!D o
o m
c �
m w
m 0
m a
s �
m
m m
o
� o
m 3
m m
m
m
o �
n
S
D �
N <
M Cr
C m
n N
(D c
m �
a a
m
3 ID
v
m
o
> >
0_ M
a
m _
m to
m
N
3 m
CD aq
N m
m o
an
� o
� s
s m
m
X- o
o ^i
c m Z,
p p p m
W v n'
7 n o y�
m
+�mzma
M
M
s v, m
to _3 m
W (D ANO go
Lq
V1
I� N =. n �
�° — m �° n
I� ro I
NZ
N Co O n
W e*
m - m
N 3
w j m
v Q1 0rt0 (D
n — p '1
O(D
Z
;O n
N
00
(D U
(D W
3
O
3

C n
ND - �
O
(
0 ai
N
n N
`
C)
r3+ O
rD
:^
S
^' C
0
=3
`G (n
r+
D-
(D N
=3
A
n
l
CU
fll
Nn
wv- O
fX
=
N r'►
cn O
En OJ
(D
NO
j
00 (D
O
S
(D
F� Q
nC
:3
0" (D
O
7
N
C:)(D
m
00
�.
:34b
M
U (p
(A
CL
(D
1
CL
O
CD
(D
R
V
-Z
2
L"
0
� 3
((DD G
G cn
O
0
(D
n
v
=t;
m
r+
O
O
r+
S
r+
N
Q
CL
N
C `
o
n ((DD
D A
(D
C�
G
7
00 O
O �
09
o �
00 S
C
O (D
rTi
� T
Ln o:
(D CU
TI
M
(D 0-
M
Q �C
N N
N
O O
(D rn
:3 F�
10, O
7 0n
((DD
S
O
rn
m
S n
v
r+
(AA--IU1m
C A O m
cn m rt 3
tD ram+ M
CD L�
•=n* cno
�=rm a=r
mc.Q3 En
(A CD CD O
0 O!
(D � —
(D .�
(DN r,
71 C)0)
� 00 _•
N I '
NJO
00 O N
O _
O�
C) �O
coo W O
D :
3:3
�s
CD
a
.m
o
7
N O1
o Z
C 0
d st
N N
0
o s
N N
n3
co
pq N
m
w �
� N
n
0. m
'O E
m n
K m
CL
o
7
c <
3 0
d
7 m
o n
M
< cm
m 7
� m
M
o C'
< n
0 0
n fD
u• 7
N
m3
s�
3 0
m 7
Nan
d
d
P o
!�
— 7
0 n
c m
c 7
N
It
o O
o
Z
rt (D (D
g C
0
m =
to O
W (D
jLnM.
(D (D
CL n
� � G
N ((DD
cn
N
CO
LUUJ
—
(D _
� N
W 3
- 0) oa
p
to
o
m
a Z
m n
3 N
7 •A
(D O
(D W
3
n
O
3
m m
m
aq Q.
M
�
m
7
nD
� A
O
M n
rr
m
3
cm.
(D
(D

(D
�
-
p 0 CA m -
m r+ 0 B
n # Er § w ..
.. q J
7//A/
/®(®CL
o
£ ° \
/ } ƒ E 2
X-/ �0
Ln cu b 6
] 0 NJ �
® _
q En\
o UCD 0 F-A
Cl) :3go
� �:3k�
ƒ 2 q
% 0 \
2 v s
n
3
77
cr
�
=r
%
t
t
2
ƒ
�
�
�
�
�
�
\
CL
]
g
0
ƒ
�
$
r
I
0
�
a'
E
\
/
q
S
�
$
E
�
CL
�-1
0
0
@
7
�
w
%
�
]
w
c n 0 -
.. .. = 0
m M!3
n
�(D/ /
fEaE(n
an£ 0
R� Cr 7
�k c�
( ]
� 2K
� o
/ 2&
k CO/
2/
2§
n I
0 m-1
w �
§f
§ mw
G
m
z�2.
22 2ID
WD n CQ �
/
m
j/�
» ® M m M
|
=qa7�
\ \ / «
$
$ ®$ 0
m
CD
\ 2 k
FL
®
— / M \ /
03 0R
\Ln
k
m
ƒ §
0q (D
n — o
\ °�
.z
77
\00
M w
}
B
-V
(D
k
e
K
�
m
k
I
%
0
E
&
r+
/
%
9
�

n ;;
to
c
Q
m
d
rr
C0
C
S
(D
m
r-r
c � o m
a y rt
M r* o
'.* (A c
m S O u0
m +
O > d
c � m
rr+ O _
A c
rn (Dd
(D rD n =
O
cn v
• 3 N
oo (3D O• 00
in
Ol ry V+ Ol
O (D O 'Lp
OO 3 O
00 00
S
r Q
O
3 :3
n
CL
N <
3 V
T
3
m
n'
(D
a:
(D
: — m
(D (D dM.
(D m 3
rt CLa4
ro ° O•
3 iD w3
cu rr
— S o
g m
(D �
O O
g �, cu
p+
< — O
3 7
c � c
h- (D
j (3D (D
0 N rD
CL
(<D O
n
(D y
. p 3.
� � 3O m
m
3 cD C4
— (D
0 m n
3 CL
(D `n° a
rD 7
M
fD 7
r) O
CJ S
3
CL 3
=r
3 S
� cD
n
Co
-. c
3 �r
0o _
r► r-r
O c
O p
Q(i
C7 �
N� `<
O
O
O 3
-h
h c'
? !D
S
C S
c
rt
W
3 CL
rDO
c
-G O
cD
N cD
C A O (A -n
(nm:*31
CD
c
o .
Mr_ —V) =
Mr_ CL m
77
V.
N O
O O N
O O —
al —
O O -
co O
D
3o
° n
o °
ID
EL
m
o
N
. d
0
z
m
m
7
o S
m
n 3
m m
N. N
Qq N
7 �
00
m
n
a �p
0 7
n
K m
n
o
7
c <
3 o
N
< S
7 �p
O n
m
OR
< R
ro 7
F v
n O
0
< n
o -o
n F
o m
c 7
m of
m o
m -0
S �
N �
7 m
m �
o
� o
'mD 3
7 °
O 7
.o N
z7
n
� 3
m a
N <
m
7 �p
ncr
N
� C
-< m
m
° o
< r
CD S
3 d
m r*
w o
7 3
CL M
mn
m o
s�
N
3 m
m aq
N m
m o
m0
S f�D
7 n
F o
o7
~<
c cL
o p 0 m m
ei
7� W�
N �',� m A
n �f
z
LO M � �:
C " i AAA
MCI
(D �
S � rD �. m
e
a . AA:n eel a
O 5 .
W (D
r hii'i p 20 ee
.nID
n
M — rD =
CL I t
m V,r
C
N (D _! O
W e�
W m
rD LO
N � �
W � N
OTi O1 ao. (D
a to
O _
0 Z
n
3 N
Oo
(D (N
3
O
3

(7)
O
7
S -<
ac
rD
mn
O.
OQ
o (D
o
70
CD D
N O
C
3 (D
n m
r-r �
O
S r+
m
n
O
N 3
� <
O (D
3
m 7
3 n
O
3
o 0
3 c
Q
'-r
ryr O
O "
O
3 r*
N (D
(D
. r+
3
N �
CD
rnr O
0-
:3
N
n
y' C
N N
C N
CD rF
N S
fD
O �
n� aq
fD
CD y
n
O O
CD c
rF rF
S (D
X-
C_ N
C
00
Q O
cn
FQ - O
CD Ol
3 O
N
3" N
Q) y
Vf
d
90
Q '
w —1 (A
c O m
0
A S
:-r
O
O Q
m
c) — m`
(gyp � 3
7- N
N M D]
0000 10`cNn
o � ON
0000 O
3 W
N
n
L
M
3
r
V
T
O
m
0'
N
M
E
(D
� C
v
r-r
(D d
1"f
c 0
3 0
3
.� O
3
r�r O00
`*
3
En CL
Q O
pu 3 X
•C rt �
S
rt (D
-s
O � r+
S
3 3 fD
rr F•
O0 N co
0! •-uEA
r r
O —
rt S (D
< n
Cl) �
n
O 0
QN
3 3
c ID D]
G Q
c
v
C
d
1+ rD a-
O O
q m
rt
3 O
pq C
r-t
O O
m � O CL
O C D
3 Uq fD
C7 S
r+ 3 O
O C
m Q
O
3
on
1. A
c
O ID
rr
n ��
rt(OD
3
(!) N O
� 3'
(. (CID)
m�.M
CD 0
c
pOi
0�i 7C
(p 3
3 (�
n(D
CD
�
3
N N
N O
00
O f7D
—
�
O
00
Ch
00
W 0
D S
3 v3i
C) p to to m
^ ^
O O m -1
3 W -0 (1
es:
=O
m
(D rt O
(D m
Z
LD m M
a�
0
o —
LU N (Dcm v,
r p go r:
Lnn
o
— (D n
j (D
cn
= c c v
_ rl
N mLn _! O
N 0 n
W — .*
w m
m
— W O m
� 00 m
3
O m
m r)
N
DC
�.Zi 4-
w
(mD
O
3
3
(D
(D
SZ
O
vq
O
0
O
X-
0
m
Q
O
(D
(D
aQ
O
S
C

opomm
am
ID j fyD
w�
a 3
'. Z
rr tD MC a_v O.
G
a �o
ro
S M
a
Ln . m
C 7
y
.. w NJ (p 04 {/1
r p 90 ;
U,
F.a =+, n m
n
— m 3
n a'
CLUl
W0
N
A
W M
m
F
tD _ O
N 3
w 7 (D
O1 00 (D
Q
ro
7
m
O
o z
;. m n
N
00
ro
w
m w
7
1O
3
V

� , � �� ram^ •` � , + { '/ ! � � � { � � V�• � ,
� �J'-• � 1. yr..
s `':t 'R n.��ao r
"' �o..! fib v, ytlk '
�`� of tt,. ' 'r� : � � � •
4 OF
``. - � «_�-,.��..i •; i .� 1, '
t 4�ll �%/ ! i+'i�� 1�' `.•y Q ti„•1 L e ���i?�' aj , (i` _ �� .
IVA
" NS-
I • a'It J �s :i i l • l � �� " � a� w• �. ,� i �r• t � r { � f � � �, � r �� �`�•
el 4P
' '+��1t !4'�,i4;1�1• °y� aaa•(w ` .�� 'i'l1'=i;
It
#e �f R, t t e,.,.�1 fi •�� IM_
liilti
1 iii i'4i�11i � ��f'ff{t. f` {i 44 !� �6 �� 0•
it
11f r ,t� "fit,
� tf � • ,. f?`,�P�4}{I� S! �'f r,f w r"'�' • r "f � .5�1 J F ��
ti f
}1�„_„_,,,�}:f� fa} a tPti44; yj'IY � ��'}`°}'j{; 4 •1 4 f..4 f 1 E y. 4,� ' '� `. �'�', '' �"1
s�, 'rt`ffi'�1 � �}.�• ,�f+ifl }},fft6 !{.4:, f+,•J•f " !- ��
�"� r�.4�t,�i t e°:.� � i, •a �!�}.f+� IP t 4(.+��yF f�'!, .� +`••� "�

.
�. 4ip-
�' •r
_ qw• ,� ter' -dip
—
r
_ �4 — l
Alb.
_
i
M
■
■ —.did
f
yt IFAl, y-
.nh 4W
Aft. 4 Q
— �- -dqL
opr
Met -
AMP
AMI
Wy
i* •
T �
:� 30
Flo

WV012'T
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP "Setting the Standard for service"
Zr Geotechnical a Construction Materials • Environmental a Facilities I4C Registered Engineering Firm F-1078
NC Registered Geologists Firm C-406
SC Registered Enginaaring Firm 3259
June 24, 2016
Mr. Eric Seidel, P.E.
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5030 New Center Drive, Suite B
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Reference: Report of Seasonal High Water Table Estimation and Infiltration Testing
Turtle Creek Subdivision
Surf City, Pender County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49.2140
Dear Mr. Seidel:
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) recently conducted a seasonal high water table (SHWT) estimation
and infiltration testing adjacent to the stormwater best management practice (BMP) area(s) off
of Loggerhead Boulevard in Surf City, Pender County, North Carolina. This letter, with
attachments, is the report of our testing.
Field Testing
On June 22, 2016, ECS conducted an exploration of the subsurface soil and groundwater
conditions at one requested location shown on the attached Boring Location Plan (Figure 1).
ECS met onsite with Mr. Eric Seidel with SEPI Engineering and determined the boring location.
The purpose of this exploration was to obtain subsurface information of the in situ soils adjacent
to the stormwater BMP area(s). The BMP is an infiltration system that is holding water. ECS
was requested to verify the SHWT and saturated hydraulic conductivity of the in situ soils. ECS
explored the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions by advancing one hand auger boring
into the existing ground surface at the requested boring location. ECS visually classified the
subsurface soils and obtained representative samples of each soil type encountered. ECS also
recorded the SHWT and groundwater elevation observed at the time of the hand auger boring.
The attached Infiltration Testing Form provides a summary of the subsurface conditions
encountered at the hand auger boring location.
The SHWT and groundwater elevation was estimated at the boring location below the existing
grade elevation. A summary of the findings are as follows:
Location
SHWT
Groundwater
B-1
16 inches
30 inches
ECS has conducted one infiltration test utilizing a compact constant head permeameter near the
hand auger boring in order to estimate the infiltration rate for the subsurface soils. Infiltration
tests are typically conducted at two feet above the SHWT or in the most restrictive soil horizon.
Tests in clayey conditions are conducted and calculated up to 30 minute intervals. if an exact
hydraulic conductivity is necessary for these locations, then ECS recommends collecting
samples by advancing Shelby tubes and performing laboratory permeability testing.
ECS Capitol Services, PLLC• ECS Carolinas, LLP- ECS Central, PLLG • ECS Florida, LLC- ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC* ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Southeast. LLC • ECS Texas, LLP
www.ecslimited.com

Report of SHWT Estimation and Infiltration Testing
Turtle Creek Subdivision
Surf City, Pander County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49.2140
June 24, 2016
Field Test Results
Below is a summary of the infiltration test results:
Location
Description
Depth
In
hour
B-1
Orange/gray SAND w/ clay
18 inches
0.15
Infiltration rates and SHWT may vary within the proposed site due to changes in elevation and
subsurface conditions. The infiltration basin is adjacent to an identified jurisdictional wetland.
Based on observations made during the site visit, the bottom of the BMP appears to intersect
the groundwater elevation. SEPI collected elevations of the boring and the BMP bottom. ECS
anticipates that water will remain within the BMP.
Closure
ECS's analysis of the site has been based on our understanding of the site, the project
information provided to us, and the data obtained during our exploration. If the project
information provided to us is changed, please contact us so that our recommendations can be
reviewed and appropriate revisions provided, if necessary. The discovery of any site or
subsurface conditions during construction which deviate from the data outlined in this
exploration should be reported to us for our review, analysis and revision of our
recommendations, if necessary. The assessment of site environmental conditions for the
presence of pollutants in the soil and groundwater of the site is beyond the scope of this
geotechnical exploration.
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide our services to you on this project. If you have any
questions concerning this report or this project, please contact us at [phone].
Respectfully,
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
K. Brooks Wall
Project Manager
bwall(c-ecslimited.com
910-686-9114
Attachments: Figure 1 - Boring Location Plan
Infiltration Testing Form
ASFE Document
Ord_j ; .V -
I WA"�
W. Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
Environmental Principal
bfulton ecslimited.com
704-525-5152
K

® APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION
Turtle Creek Subdivision
Surf City, Pender County,
North Carolina
ECS Project 9 49.2140
June 22, 2016
KBW
SCALE SHOWN ABOVE
w
Figure 1— Boring Location Plan
Provided by: Google Maps

Infiltration Testing Form
Turtle Creek Subdivision
Surf City, Pender County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49.2140
June 22, 2016
Location Depth USCS
B-1 0-6"
SM
6"-12"
S M
12"-18"
SP
18"-30"
SC
Soil Description
PEAT/with sand
Black silty SAND
Tan/orange/gray fine SAND
Orange/gray fine SAND w/ clay
Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 16 inches below the
existing grade elevation.
Groundwater was encountered at 30 inches below the existing grade
elevation.
Test was conducted at 18 inches below existing grade elevation
Infiltration Rate: 0.15 inches per hour

� Geolechnical Engineering Repopt
�
Gootechnical Services Are Performed for
Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects
Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of
their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engineer
may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil
engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geo-
technical engineering report is unique, prepared solelyfor the client. No one
except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first
conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one - not
even you -should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one
originally contemplated.
Read the Full Report
Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical
engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary.
Do not read selected elements only.
A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on
A Unique Set of Project -Specific Factors
Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project -specific factors
when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the client's
goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general nature of the
structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure
on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access
roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engi-
neer who conducted the study specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on
a geotechnical engineering report that was:
not prepared for you,
not prepared for your project,
not prepared for the specific site explored, or
completed before important project changes were made.
Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical
engineering report include those that affect:
the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a
parking garage to an office building, or from alight industrial plant
to a refrigerated warehouse,
elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the
proposed structure,
composition of the design team, or
project ownership.
As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project
changes - even minor ones - and request an assessment of their impact.
Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems
that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they
were not informed.
Subsurface Conditions Can Change
A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the
time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineering
report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by
man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natu-
ral events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Always
contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it
is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent
major problems.
Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional
Opinions
Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where
subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engineers
review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment
to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual
subsurface conditions may differ -sometimes significantly from those indi-
cated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your
report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of
managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions.
A Report% Recommendations Are Not Final
Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your re-
port. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engineers
develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers
can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual

subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engi-
neer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for
the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction
observation.
A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to
Misinterpretation
Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineer-
ing reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your
geotechnical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team
after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review
pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors
can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by
having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction
conferences, and by providing construction observation.
Do Not Redraw the Englneer's Logs
Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon
their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or
omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should
never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings.
Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize
that separating logs from the report can elevate risk
Give Contractors a Completo Report and
Guidance
Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make
contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what
they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give con-
tractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, butpreface it with a
clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the
report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's
accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer
who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct ad-
ditional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer.
A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have sufficient
timeto perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give
contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at
least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unantici-
pated conditions.
Read Responsibility Provisions Closely
Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that
geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines.
This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led
to disappointments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such
outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory
provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations" many of these
provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin
and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read
these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should
respond fully and frankly.
Geoenveronmental Concerns Are Not Covered
The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a geoenviron-
mental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical
study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually re-
late any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g.,
about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated
contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous
project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoenvironmental in-
formation, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk management guidance.
Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else.
Obtain Professional Assistance To Deal with Mold
Diverse strategies can be applied during building design, construction, op-
eration, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from grow-
ing on indoor surfaces. To be effective, all such strategies should be devised
for the express purpose of mold prevention, integrated into a comprehensive
plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a professional mold prevention
consultant. Because just a small amount of water or moisture can lead to
the development of severe mold infestations, a number of mold prevention
strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry. While groundwater, wa-
ter infiltration, and similar issues may have been addressed as part of the
geotechnical engineering study whose findings are conveyed in -this report,
the geotechnical engineer in charge of this project is not a mold prevention
consultant; mn of the swvlu pa* med in comm do mo
the WNW*" enswril steely were Adkuw or wmkww
11m, the pe7m of mold peveenon. P1'olw1' mpmmAlm of
fhe recommOtloes eoeveyed In idle r4pon iwX mot of loll
Am sit to prevent motel Ire mowft In or sw the smc-
NN hivol"
Rely on Your ASFE-Member Gootechnical
Engineer For Additional Assistance
Membership in ASFE/The Best People on Earth exposes geotechnical engi-
neers to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine
benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer with your
ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information.
ASFE
The lest People on EePth
8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Telephone:' 301/565-2733 Facsimile: 301/589-2017
e-mail: [e-mail] www.asfe.org
Copyright 2004 by ASFE, Inc. Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with ASFE§ specific
written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document Is permitted only with the express written permission of ASFE, and only far purposes
of scholarly research or book review. Only members of ASFE may use this document as a complement to or as an element of geotechnical engineering report. Any other firm,
individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being anASFE member could be committing negligent or intentional (fraudulent) misrepresentation.
I1GER06045.0M

(I - Q-0 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT
NAME OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY: Redus NC Coastal, LLC
SECRETARY OF STATE ID NUMBER: 1080158 STATE OF FORMATION: DE
REPORT FOR THE YEAR: 2016
SECTION A: REGISTERED AGENT'S INFORMATION
1. NAME OF REGISTERED AGENT: Corporation Service Company
2. SIGNATURE OF THE NEW REGISTERED AGENT:
Filing Office Use Only
E-Filed Annual Report
1080158
C:A201610206.501
4/11/2016 05:63
Changes
SIGNATURE CONSTITUTES CONSENT TO THE APPOINTMENT
3. REGISTERED OFFICE STREET ADDRESS & COUNTY 4. REGISTERED OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS
327 Hillsborough Street 327 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27603-1725 Wake County Raleigh, NC 27603-1725
SECTION B: PRINCIPAL OFFICE INFORMATION
1. DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS: Real Estate
2. PRINCIPAL OFFICE PHONE NUMRFR, 7044109147
4. PRINCIPAL OFFICE STREET ADDRESS & COUNTY
301 S. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-6000
3. PRINCIPAL OFFICE EMAIL: Privacy Redaction
5. PRINCIPAL OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS
301 S. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-6000
SECTION C: COMPANY OFFICIALS (Enter additional Company Officials in Section E.)
NAME: Redus Properties, Inc.
TITLE: Member
ADDRESS:
301 S. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28288
NAME:
TITLE:
ADDRESS:
NAME:
TITLE:
ADDRESS:
SECTION D: CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT. Section D must be completed in its entirety by a person/business entity.
Redus Properties, Inc., by DEANNA ERNST - AUTHORIZED PER; 4/11 /2016
SIGNATURE
Form must be signed by a Company Official listed under Section C of this form.
Redus Properties, Inc., by DEANNA ERNST - AUTHORIZED PER: Member
Print or Type Name of Company Official
CATS
Print or Type The Title of the Company Official
This Annual Report has been filed electronically.
MAIL TO: Secretary of State, Corporations Division, Post Office Box 29525, Raleigh, NC 27626-0525

Johnson, Kelly
From:
Steenhuis, Joanne
Sent:
Thursday, March 03, 2016 12:15 PM
To:
[e-mail]
Cc:
Johnson, Kelly
Subject:
RE: Turtle Creek
Of course, I am most concern with the wetland impacts and your window is quickly depleting (of getting the sediment
out without damaging too much of the vegetation. You may have to seed with wetland seed mix, if you get too far into
the growing season. Just an FYI.
Of course, Kelly is involved with the stormwater pond and its issues.
Let me know when you get the go ahead with the clean-up.
Thanks!
Joanne Steenhuis
Senior Environmental Specialist
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Direct phone [phone]
Joaiule.Ste enliuisC)ncdenr.gov
"E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties."
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 201612:10 PM
To: Steenhuis, Joanne <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Turtle Creek
Hey Joanne,
I put out the temporary wattle dam last month or so as soon as I got approval from Wells Fargo. I have been in contact
with Erin at Wells Fargo within the last few months. She has been waiting on SEPI engineering to give her their report
on the state of the basin and development and what will be involved in getting it certified. As of last Friday, we were all
sent a report from SEPI giving their recommendation. Erin has contacted Eric at SEPI requesting a timeline for the repair
and certification. I was contacted by Eric on Monday or Tuesday to discuss the situation. I informed them that I am still
waiting on Wells Fargo to give the go ahead. I have created the plan for repair and laid out the plan to all needed staff.
From my conversation with SEPI conversation, the overall plan as I understand it, is as follows:
1. Repair the berm and wetland impacts.
2. Remove all unwanted vegetation and accumulated sediment from basin.
3. Replenish lost infiltration sand with new and regrade back to original design.
4. SEPI will bring in geotechnical services to test infiltration rates once repairs are complete.
5. Based un the results, SEP! will either certify and request the removal of the riser structure or try to apply for a
modification if infiltration is not satisfied.
I figured I would hear something soon from Wells Fargo once they have processed the information given to them by
SEPI.

Nick Garner
Coastal Carolina Resource Group
2921 Blue Clay Rd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
P: 910.470.4225
On Mar 3, 2016, at 11:27 AM, Steenhuis, Joanne <[e-mail]> wrote:
Nick,
Have you had a chance to start on the clean up?
Joanne Steenhuis
Senior Environmental Specialist
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Direct phone [phone]
Joanne.Stcenhuis(,u;;ncdenr. ov
**E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.**

February 24. 2016,
Erin Acton
Wells: Fargo Bank -Real Estate Asset .N4 ger
i Independence Drive, .lob:Floor
Jacksonville, FL 32202
Subject; Letter of Opinion The Villages of Turtle Creek Stormwater Assessment
SWO606 8MOD'Phases I & II
Dear Ms. Actoin.,
SEPI Engineering & Construction (SEPI) has completed the necessary deed research.
file reNriew, and regulatory meetings to make a professional recommendation on the
current regulatory status of the Phase l & 11 stormwater .system. These findings have
been completed based on lime items number 2 and 3 of the current NCDEQ Notice of
Violation Inspections R"rt All documentation described below will be included in
Appendix A & B of this letter.
Deed Res
trictions•
A supplemental declaration ofprotedtive covenants has'l fo d and was filed with
the . Onder County Register of Inds as BK:3290 Pt :192 on August 7"'. 2007: The
suPplemcDt dues allocate the maximum built -Upon area f'Max BUA") for all 73 lots.
This document is a supplement to the original 'Master Declaration of Protective
Conditions for the Villages at Turtle Creek 'filed :with Pender County Register of
Deeds as BK:3029. Pii:0i 0 on August 17*. 2006.
s Master Declaration of Protective Conditions UB°3029 PG:a10
Supplemental Declaration of Protective Covenants, DB:3290 PGs 192
The current 'forth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
stormwater permit (SW8 060608'1 OD) was completed on November 91h, 1007 and.
defines theMax BUA. forol'l 73 lots. The recorded supplement updates the previously
defrned Max BLA for lm 1-45 and includes the remaining Phase II lots 46-73.
It was found that two lots differ from permitted and recorded Max BUA.
Lot 24: 4,186 s,f permitted Max BUA 3,668 61 recorded Max BLA
e 1,0.16: 3,551 s.£. permitted Max OUA: 4,UsI s.f Mwordod Max'BUA

Fortunately bath of these lots drain to the some Infiltration Basin (Basin 1B) and the
overall increase between recorded and permitted BU-A is only $2 s,£ Per meeting. with
NCDEQ. on February I I" 2016, it was determined that this discrepancy could be handled
by a Plan Revision better showing that Basin I B can handle the additional 82 s1 of
impervious surface.
There also may be a need for a .retrofitted Basin 13 design based: on the current
finctionaliq of the basin and future Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT) .findings, This
will be described in greater detail in the Recotnintndation section. If retrofit design is
required the Bti:A discrepancy can bL a0001,1tited for in the updated stormwa►ter
calculations.
Ce twications;
There are a U-tal of seven (7) permitted infiltration basins. within Phases I & 11, which treat
strormiwater rtnotY. A file review has revealed that sip: (61 of the infiltration basins have
been.pretivusly certified.
Infiltration Basin
Design Firm
Engineer
llate. Certified
lA-1
Cavanaugh & Associates
William Simmons, PE.
8/23:12010
IA-2
Cavanaugh & Associate's
William Simmons. PE
8/23/2010
IA-3
Cap=aural &Associates
William Simmons. PE
8/23120 0
1B
Cavanaugh & Associates
NIA
MA
I c
Cavanau h & Associates
Eris Tonto PE
1 /16/2008
1D-1
Cavanaugh & Associates
William Simmons, PE
8/212010
l D-
Cavanaugh & .Associates
William Simmons. PE
8.23/2010
To date the ;only uncertified infiltration basin is Basin, I.B. The drainage area for Basin I B
treats the majority of the Western portion of Phase I and all of Phase II. With phase '11
reaching ultimate build out it would be appropriate to move forward with final
certification_
Rtecommendi tion
It is SfiPI's recommendation to repair and rernediate Infiltration Basin I.B back :to
permitted conditions, as required by NICDEQ Operations & Maintenance agreement.
There is a concern, by the State, that the SHV%7 has raised in this area and infiltration rates
have dim inishad or ha-.e been greatly reduced since the original permit. A. major cause for
this, could be the neglect of the basin allowing the natural soil media to be overgrown with
vegetation and to accumulate with sediment. There is also an unpernutted racer structure
locatedin the basin that may need to he removed dependent upon soil test results. If the
riser is to remain ca?culations w ill have to be provided to NCDLQ for review and approval.
Once the Basin is brought bark to permitted condition a soil test will need to be performed
testing for SHWT and Infiltration Rate. These tests will determine if the basin can
function as previously designed. If these tests come back as permitte then SEPI can MM-e
pg. 2

forward with an As -Built survey and inspection. to detern inc if an} other modifications
need to be made Before certification.
If the soil tests come back with a higher SHWT and,,or lower infiltration rate than
pt►rmitted a retrofit design will need to be done and approN ed by NCDEQ. This was
discussed during the meeting with NCDFQ. on February 11%, 2016..
Our findings .show that only Infiltration Basin 1B is left to be certified. The results of
future soil testing will determine the remaining steps needed for final certification,
Discrepancies between the deeded and permitted BUA .restriction of.lots 29 & :36 can be
handled by a Plan Revision litter and br updated calculations.
Respectfully Submitted.
SEPI. Engineering & Construction, Inc.
Eric A. Seidel, PF
Site/Civil Project Engineer
Date: February 24. 2016
Enclosed:
Appendix A. Supplemental Protective Covenants
Appendix B: Master Protective Conditions
Appendix. C: Existing Certifications.
Appendix D: Stormwater Permit (SW9060608 Mod)
pg.. 3.

IVO.Die-ndix A..16
SUPPLEMENTM,
PRQTECTIVE COVENANTS

'11 FD OK329OPC 192
077 .''G - 7 AND 28
JC it ztr�fi p,',
1t.? OF Gec©S.
SUPPI.K1►tl>iNTAL• DECLAUTim OFPi7t)T1r;Ci' w COVENANTS
FOR' M"GES ATTuMU C"REEIIC
Murchison, Taylor &.Ci'ibson, i'I.LC R
16 North fifth Avenue, WBmington,, NC 28401
STATE OF NORTH CAROL.INNA
COUNTY OF PENM
This SUPPLEMENTAL DELL ARAT1 . OF PR9VCT1VF COVENANTS, FOR
THE VII.L.AGES AT TURM, CREEK made this dayof 2007
by WNW NORTH CAROLINA 1, LJX., ,0 North Carrol' }imikeil fisbiJiiy eompany
("DEt LMUNT").
Q TY
WHEREAS, the DECLARANT heretofore ==ted that certain Master Declaration
ofi'rotectivc Covertants for The V11189as et Turtle Creek and caused On.same to be recorded in Book
3024, Page 10, at,seq., in the Pender County Rogisary (hetzina(4 the "Projective Covtarants,5,
WHEREAS. in :fation iIA of the Protective Covenants, the DEGL.A1t NT
subjected the Property (as defined in the: Protective Covenants) to the State of North Carolina rules
and regulation nts covering ttormwpter runoi4 as these rules and regulations ors a Boot time to
time;
WHEREAS, in &9W, 8 and Esotion 15.3 of the Protective GovenaM the
LIECLARAIN" 1' reserved the right to amend %e Protective Covenants sod subject the Property :to
additional covenants and easernents;
WHEREAS, in connection with State Stormwat r-Managerim t Pe itNumber SW$
05iM5 acquired by the Association from the Division of Water Quality ("DWQ") under NCAC
2H.I000, DWQ is reguitiitg Shot theprotective Covenants be vnended to include the rules and
re8platrorepr9vlded in this Swiemental Declaration;
MW 1'HEI2ETfOPZ in W40AIRIM with its;rights tinder Section $A and filqfW 1 .3
Of the FmtwhVe Covenants, the DECLARANT does hereby anmd.1k Protective Covenants as
ibllows:
1. �ifj le 11. ,an: 11.6 is hereby deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the
falbwing'text:
Run- (}ff .All Units .shall be :suboci to film $tti0e at North rolin8 .t41es and
�regu)ations coneerni ng sterrawsw ;runoff as these rules. we amehft.d :f m time to timt. Without
limiting the foregoing, DECLARANT hereby reserves the tight to impose additional reMctions
upon the Propertws as and to the extent required by ttre fortis or the storarwater permit(st for The
Villages atTurdo Crack as is=W by the State of North Carolina. Such additional restrictions maybe
by 6 Suppltem=W E3ecl aration, and no joinder or
by LIECLAR111�'f the: eFeeeotdia of: u
consent of the Association or arty other Owner or Person shall be ,t""hed on wch Supplemental
17echaeatian. These regerlatfons, which apply Yti al3 of the real pmperry described in Eahiblt A acid
are subject to revision 88 to isi iy Fntiint DeoveiapMoot. ftiperty, corantiy pie
6MM

OK3290FG 193
(a) The !following cosertattts in this .Section 11.6 are Wended to mssure ongoing
etomplianee with State Stortmvratt r .MOnOrment Permit Number SWO 060608 as issued by the
Division of Water Quality under ATCAC 2H 109.
(b) The State of North Camlitra is made a beneficiary of these covenants to the extent
nemsary to troarmain comi rmam with the Stormweter Management Peanut.
(c) These covenants art to run with the land and be binding on all persons and parties
claiming under them.
(4) The covenants pertaining to stotttowater :nay .not be throned or rescinded without the
express Miller consent of the State of North Carolina, Division of Water Quality.
(0) Aitetntion of the drainage as shown on the approved plans may not take place without
the concurmwc ofthe Division of wer fjuality.
M The maximum built -upon am ("Max BUA") per lot is as follows:
t �atfJ:
_ g! BUA
Lot.Gl
is
-NAB"..
a]31
Lot #'T
Ox BUA
Loi
BUA
. illa>c tsUA
1
4162
31
M
46
,mac
4116
61
4.187
2
4.152
17
3.695
1 32 173,013
47
4.165
62
4189
3
4,152
18
3 76
33
IM
48
4149
63
418.7
4
4.162
10
4 211
34
3,801
40
4
64
4196
8
4,300
20
4
3ti
€�99
$tt
4145
65
4187
ti
41tt6
21
4 350
30
.: 4161
bi
162
t30
4,187
7
3 t3ti8
22
4161
F 97
4.48t1
8x
4.151
8T
4 I"
8
3608
23
4165
.38
849
63
4151
68
41$7
9
1t1
3 t�7
3 601
24
N!A I
4 82
MA
$9
4A
3 828
4 022
64
tit:
.151
147
59
70
4183
4160
12
4156
27
3 8B1
42
43
4.007
3 829
57
;
4165
$.213
72
73
4.2
4.280
13
3.892
2211
672wi
iR
3,716
29
.3 Bt38
44
41Z8
59
4
MA
NIA
16
3 69I
30
SBa
Al
4 426
.60
4189
NIA
MIA
This allotted amount includes any built -upon met constructed within the tot pmpeny
boundaries, and that portion of the right-of-way between the feat lot line and :t ie edge of .the
pavemera. W"t upon area includes, but is not limited to, structures, aWhalt, coneftte, gravel, brick,
stone, slate, coquina and panting areas, but does not include raised, open wood decking, or the water
surface ofswimm3ngpoois.
(g) All runoff- ort the lot must drain into the permitted eystem. This may be.accomptishe d
through providing roof drain gutters which drain to the street, grading the lot to drain toward the
, or grading perimeter swales and directing them fi t the pond or the suead. Lots that will
naturally drain into the system are not required to provide these additional measures.
(h) guilt upon area in excess of the permitted amount will require a .permit modification.
4. DECLARANT hereby retains. and shall shall have the w laterw right, by
SupplementaI Declaration. to amend the Protective Covenants as DWQ shall seasonably require in
oonnectioa with stormwatrr Management permits applicable to the Poperty (including, without
limitation, 60 intposition of rules or restrictions that DWQ may require in connection with the
annexation ofaddi#ional:property into the scheme ofthu m lhotecti" Cuvptta►its).
S. DECIAliANT reserves the right to transfer the StotrttwOter Management Permit and
the mqx msibllity for mainsenum rf due stomtwaW runoff system and &cility to The Villages at
Turtle Creek Homeuvrtt m Association, Inc. (the "AssocisOn"). At the time. of such transfer, the
Association shall accept .conveyance and transfer of the Stormwater Permit and carry out and abide
by duties and obligations contained the thL
6. DF-CLARANT, being the owner or having all of the rigM.s .in and to the pmpe"y,
hereby declares that the Property shall be hW, sold, and ;conveyed subject to the Protective:
Covenants, as amended by this Supplemental Declamtirn; which covenants shall ruts with title to the
a4sas

BK3290r 194
Property and slash be binding are all parties having arty tj&%t title, or InWest in the desere'bed
Ptrnperly ar any par+ thereof. a0 chaff inure .to the benefit ofeach sst thtareuf.
EXCEPT AS AMMED HMEIM the 1'mtective Covenants $hall be and remain in fizll
farce and effect.
D(NC NORTH CAROI.iNk I, L,L.c.
fly. Uilshomer Communities ofNmth Cawfins,
L.LC, its scale manager
vice President
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
1,11 c A (ker. e � a Notary Public of said County and State, do
hereby cethti£y tl>at�.L: .,+,r _ Personally append before me this day and
aci kMedvil that that he is the Yiee president of DilaWmer Communities of Notth Carotin,
L.L.C., a North Cemi'eraa limited liability company that is the sole manager of;DCNC NORTH
CAROLINA I, L.L:C a North Camliha limited liability company (the "Company") and that by
authority duly given, he executed the foreping instrument on behalf of and as the act of the sole
rnsanager of the Compahty.
WITNESS my heard and official stamp or anal, this J s � day *f_ Gt f d,- , 2007.
My Cominisdon Expires:
049A
— - Notary Pobiic
tNdtCrtw�s"* ter
towu'TF �O^ �.if
it� � �y,...�. r • .

Appendix
MASTER
JIT
PROTECTIVE COND ILIONS

FILED
06 AUG 17 AN [P 55
Je tZr M, SWICEG040
REGISIER or DEEDS
PEN; --ER CCUNTY,hC
193029PGO 10
as a►�a vet.
�te�sMisr �rf✓I3eed�
P aft comes, NC
MASTER DES: L ARATION OF PROTECTIW,, CONDITIONS
FOR THE VILLAGES AT TURTLE CREEK
NORTH CAROLINA.
PROARM BY:
MuRCEfUso�v, T�Ye aUe & GU�asat�,>p W
16 NORTH FIFTY AVEsNUIt
w11.-MmfiT(7N ,NC 28401
PENIDER COUNTY
48M.3
57

BX3029PG936
(c) These coven2n.3 arse to Am with the land and be binding on all perattns and parties
claiming under them.
(d) The covenants pertaining to starrnwater may not be altered or rescinded without the
express written consent of the Mate of'North Carolina, Minion of Water Quality,
(e) A:ltemfian of the drainage as shown an the appravc i :plans may pot take place
without the eenncurrenecof.the Division ofWaterQuality;
M ne mueimum buil!-upon area (-Mu BUA") Per lot is as .follows:
Maac.SUA
Ada c BLtA
3250
tli
3
31
t"r
2
3 ...
i7
8A55 32 _jp
l.r ,.
3,250
''-
3,455
3i
1 $.ti50
850
4 . —
3
19 340 34
_ ;_
_ adi
21
22
23
3t;6Q
� t't6t3
3.8b
3
_ 35
38
37
35
2�.650
B
3 ti4C
_
g,250
3,p
7_k
3 254
8
3.250
9
3 50
2
3
3
3;260
10
3 250
a6
3.290
AO
3.
11
3,260
26
27
3 260
3 i150 1
41
42
3,4V
12
3 290
3260
1.3 1
_ 250
28
950
4.3 1
3 850
14
3�455
29
3 8W
44
3 M
t5
3 455
30 i
3 t35Q
45
3,850
This ailatted asnauzit intcludes any built -upon acne constructed within the lot property
boundaries and that portion of the right-of-way between the front lot line and the edge of the
pavament. Built upon arc& includes, but is not limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, grave(, h:;bk,
stone, slate, coquins and parking areas, but down not include raised, open wood decking, or thee water
surface of swimming pools,
(9) All runoff' on the tat must drain into the permitted syftM. this stay be
accomplished :through providing roof drain,gotters which chain to the street, grading the lot to drain
toward the street, Or;Vuling pe,:imeter swales and directitng them into the pond or the AML Lots
drat will natur.:lly drain into .the system are not ratuired to provide these adriitionai rneasturs:
(h) Built -upon area in excess ofthe permitted amount will require a permit modification.
11.7 K3c � ofN4ttcaa yormins Gtndition. Any last, condition, structure or ffuwmvement:placed.
allowed to wrist or made of ar t>pM any Unit in violation of'this ARTICLE l t ,ball be deemed to be
noaconfatntit . Upon written request from the BoW er the DECLARANT, $a owner t nsibl a for
said noncon%aning. condition, or the owners' AasaetadOn to which the Owner belongs shall, at its own
cost and expow, correct such non onfatnting use, structure or improvement is accordance with the
innsnuctialls ufthe Board or the MC',I.ARAN'l , Should an Owner fail to act as t�uired, The Board, the
DECLARANT, or its designees shall have the right -to eaytet the property and cartedthe nnonconiforrniug
condition. Ali costs, together with the interest at the MAIM UM rate them allowed by lase, way be
assessed against the Owner of the Lot or .Dwelling Unit and collected as an Individual Assessment as
provided in ARTICLE 9.
ARTiCLE'12
FAMME-MM
121 enis for ►? ivi hereby reserved unto DBCL.A, ". 'l (.la long as the
tafiire8, There .are
DFCL--RANT owtn; any property dra gibed on. Etrhlblt A or Exhibit B unto the Association, and
unto T"nc designees of each, access and. maintenance easements upon, across; over, end under all of
the Properties to the extent reasonably necessary for the purpose of .replacing, eenairing, and
ana•ntaitt ng ony table television system, any master television entering system, irrigation systems;
any security and similar systertrp,. marls, walkways; hireynxle pathways, Moreatian pathwayv, trails,
pond$,.: takes. wetlands, drainage stemys: street lights, stgitaM and all utilities, :Including, bent not
"Mited to, water, sewer, ►Utter boxes, telephone, garbage pickup; and electridtyi irrigation and .for
tiro purpose Of indalting airy of the foregoing on property which it ov-ns or within easmeatts
&M, 3

A-p e--n-dl*X,AO-4
P, U:
E-AISTING CERTTIPTCATIONTS
.A. -A-

rie woes rt `i`urde erg Mwee€ I & 2
Sus,TMa. Sf PeMit No. MIVS 060608 Medfr=tion
State Stomlwwteer �ernent systems
Page I of 2
I, P , E. as a dwy reg,s#es�� 5�' ► ,.i8. E..9ineer In
t�s Stm of No-Ih Caro ina, hating been auth
-6100) thO ODn8# cfon of *.heptt ss -
` he "%,.; !, acies at Turtle Creek P'iaper, � 3�
3!' RED.:: 1. C:ast; , LTC,
{Project C1Merj hereby ettate that, to the
best of my abllMO s, dui ►mare grid WIDOW* was used in the eat serVation of the project
Oonstructlon such that the oonstriucton was observed to be bu8t within substanttat
comphence and intent of the approved plans and especffieationes,
The cl ec Wlst of items or page 2 of this form are it pert of this Ceirtificatism.
Noted deviatf)nS from appmed planes and specifwations:
`s a ii�i':.cll Ce4ion isatUed fOr C1Yc'i13..?;1age
:A a~3 aD c 7 . wt is acknowledged ~.'gat ar age
a ; r rasi s .lE
and :.G were pl-evioas y certified. A s3:.bse_.Ient certiE;a:iwn Wi .
Le s-t--it ed frz the Yemaln le,- of the areas descxibea In t%a-, permit
z�r awl wore hyv x:ee-. �u���ete., *Pease �.
1
ReOstratfor NumberData
PgCM 7 of 6

T11-o a, Turtle Creek Phases 1 & 2
Storrri%ater Perj n-t No. SW8 O&D608 &.00odiiX ation
Pen.IL,, COIJITY
Designer's Certification
S6 )' - I . OeMellt SVS4 17-15
41wation
Page -13 6 2
.!.jly registered in
A-t the StslA of M'orth Carcl',na, having been author el L" obsenre ,P e6od'calllyAkeekly.uil
time) theconstfuction of the pra:`e-ct.
A
(Project)
f.^r -btl-�am-
jftX
_gt rOj(P �ecl O%vner) h6rety state that, tc the
best of my at-Aities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the project
coist,,on,tion such that the constriction was observed to be built within substantial'
,xrnpllance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
The C) +rktis' of items on page 2 of this fora; are a part of this Ceet,,Ncation.
ol-Jo tuon,rorn dev-tas f F, P 1 0 ppr ved plans and specifications:
A14W.15.
Signature
RegisIrcition Number
4
Date, a
CAP,�Zx/
�tv
SEA.
A,
4—PA 4;! M IVIZ

The vllweti at unie CreePhases ! & 2
Stiorr, No. SV%,'6 NT'i5ob Mo�difll-.',.Cati---A,i
PencE-r-�� �unt
Designer's Certification
i
i.
SW"o S4c,%-myzte, Mk` nawrnerct S:ys%.,,-ns
Per"'nit Na
Pace I Of 2
-7
,
4-he State, of North Cxo!i1nasv'na been author;: 1 -ed Is otiselVe c ee A IV
+11 C"I", S,ru, Y,,)n of the pr6."ec-1,
I �I
- 4400 /
'Proje." Owner) hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due are and diligence was -iseci ir. We observatio-int the project
con sIr*j&vor-- such t at the c�nstructjon. was observed to be Win wfthln sutstantia' ,
cc,npliarlce and intern; of the apprw-,-cd plans and sW-fficafions.
Trio. Gfic'Oklist of ite,tris on Page 2'of this form area part of this Certification.
I
Nc.-,!.,Cd ;,-Ierlations frctrr apprCIVed plans and ipet,,itir-WA'Ons:
1,4
A7 Aout OAvz T
Signature.
Registration f-VIuniber—
f i
we
pac,e 8 of 9

APIPENDIX D.-

1"OpAlun - ;Xd118W<4' RFS� Jr'. se'rZIy-�,
'!C Nahl,its- 'N:c-
t�' 'sl� . -
Divimun tj wato Owali-V
November.9,2007
Mr. Brian 1) Dilshemer, Manager
Dilsheirn ' er Communities of North for
th rth Carolina 1, LLC
Carolina LLC. Manager
2528 Independence Blvd., Suite 10-4
Wilmington, NC 28412
:
Subject: Storm water Peffni1
t No. $W8 06060$_ Mp4ification
The Villages at Turtle Cr994 Phases I and it
High Density Subdivision Project
Pinder County
Dear Mr, Dilsheimer-
The Wilmington Regional Office received a complete, modified Stormwater management
Permit Application for The Villages at Tuttle Creek Phases I and 11, on November 6. 2007.
Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that the project, as proposed, . posed, will
comply with the Stormwater Regulations se forth in TiUe 15A NCAC 2H.1000. We are
forwarding Permit No SW8 060608 Mod- dated November 9. 2007. for the construction of the
subject project.
Thispe.rm.it shall be effective from the date of issuance until November 30, 2016. and shall be
subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please Pay special attention to
the Operation and Maintenance requirements in this permit. Failure to establish an adequate
system for operation and maintenance of the stormwater M. anagement system will result in
future compliance problems.
If any parts.. requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable you have
the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within sixty(60) aays,
following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands
are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please
contact Ch ' Baker. or me at [phone].
Sin
Edward Beck
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
ENB]csb S - '%WQS1STOR.MWATER'��PERMIr060608MOD j-jovC7
Cc: Eric Tomczak, P.E., Cavanaugh & Assp6ates
Pender County Planning Department
Chris Balzer
V1lrn.i-.n9i9.n Regional Office
Drt -Ai.!' 61 Awa Qtw-�t.. i t I- Y*11 SM-U 1'eoler 01
Custo=r Scr% ice

k4ariagemen, System's
Permit "'V 1 6 !k-s 000P
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTME14T OF ENIMMONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER OUALITY
STATE STORMWATERMIMIA—GEM, ENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In axordance Mh the Provisjorm:V, Article 21 Of Chapter 143, General Statutes of
North Carolina as ainnended, and other applicable Laws. Rules. and Regulation
FERMiSSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
—1f7an D Ddsheirner Dllsheimer CcITIMunitle.0 Of North Carolina. LLC
DCIVC North Carolina 1. LLC
The Vfflages at Turtle Creek Phases / and 11
IVC 210 & Lodge Half Rd SiMt City - Perlder County
FOR THE
ccr Mttructior,. operation and maintenance of 7 infiltration basins in compliance with the
provisions of I 5A NCAC 2H 1000 (hereafter referred to as the "Storm4later rules I and
the approved stormwater management plans and spec!fications and other supporting
data as attached and on file with and approved by the Division of Water Quality and
considered part of this permit
This permit shall be effective from the -date of issuance until November 30, 2016. and
small be subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
1. DESIGN STANDARDS
i This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of stormwater
described in the application and other supporting data
2 This stormwater system has been, approved for the tranagementof stormwater
%jnoff as described in Section 1,6 &1 .7 on ,pages 3 & 4 of this permit. The
subdivision is permitted for 71 lots; ea
I . Qh allowed the maximum amount of built-
upor area specified in Ser1inn 11.15 of this
permit. The stormwater systems have
been desi led to hand -le the followin arnounts of impervious qrea:,IA-1
1832,36 .1 ft2. B @339 953 ft'. 1 C C137,339
zU I i t I 1r. and -1 U-2 @02-110 ft' Basins #1 B"and # 1 C must -be
onerated with a 50' vegetaferl filter.
1; Approved pats and specificaj,,ons to,- this prNpeot are ncorporated by reference
and are enforceable parts of the permit.
4. "i"he runoff frorn all Invilt-up-on area within each permitted drainage area of :tits
Ploject must be 04trected into the permitted stm-mwater control system.
pa'-.2 " --'s 0

a$t9le Strjr----Wa*- Miar4age7rienl Systems
E, im- I i0-q
r" I :,O-,r- - co, 1,10r. and tfeat:T,:ort systems rrjUS4 be locajecl ;n eithe'r
ul� Ali V . ., iwaie. ��ect
dedicated common areas or re-corced a
e sements ?'ire final plats for the project
will be recorded showing all such recuired easernerits. i, ac 0 ance w e
approved plans. M I C fd t h th
S. The following, design cernents have bee" permitted for the infiltration basin
stormwater facilities. and must be, Prcvfided in the system at all tirnes-
n
-br-a-Wige Area
IA-1
i6i§66----;,-k-454
1*2
1 A-3
77�-07-2
8
1 C
!D-1
1D-2
Ons:te
752 249
283 38-1
�
3 8,8
19-0 - 3j�-
offsite
29988
le.454
�072.
762:249
2 83.3281
'38.878
90,3r)6
Totai 811A
0
C
0 0 0
Lot SUA
Roa-,asiPar King
0
8.87e
0
5.236
0
1,697
ISS 569
11.3 ,77!
84875
36273
i 1066
1111,1)68
12,382
24,043
Sidewalks
Othel
2. 149
1,637
664
,613
22,809
3 637
.
6,385
Ofrsoe
0
0
0
0
4,682
0
0
0
0
asir Dept!
Feet 1
:0 75
125
2.25
0
05
Sto". ­—FAW§
Inches
-'�
4, 5 ;
- - - .'�.
4.5
`----'�7 - - 7-7-6-
45 . 11. � 1.-- 4.5
4.5
SHM
- - --
.w6ftiTm
- L
9 6
28.0
_
-7
I
� -
19�0
100
2 31
I
Elevation
FMSL
310
__--
I
X0
-- - -4---
X0
---,:
12.0
2 7. -0
2530
�Suiiice Area
--
- ---
opottorn
ft..
6 025
2 208
1-085 1
4,802
9�377
2790
9,
6.534
Storage
ft:;
4.879
3 331
11
56A 5 0
26.859
7 887
17.3.35
Storage;Bypass !
Elevation
FIVISL
31-75
V-25
31,25
26.5
14.25
29.25
27.75
Infiltration Rate
inthr
C1 52
0 5-4
0 521
40
30
26
26
ff�-�t6 -Draw-
Down
Hours,
.-16
4-6
20
27
7
13
12
Type of SoP
Woodingtor Fine Sandy
:.oar
Onslow Sandy Loam
Stream
!lover
StiiiW Index
Numbet
14. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
Becky's Creek
18-V-8
"-SA:HOW"
No homeowner/jot ownerAdeveloper shall fill in, after-oT pipe any drainage feature
(such as swales) shown on the approved plans as part of the storMwater
management system without sutImitting a revision to the permit and receiving
approval frorn the 041 1 sion-
.2: The pei -r-Jttee is responsible for verifying that P',e PrOP0600 00141-upoin area for
the entire !rat, if"Cluding driveways and sidewalks. does not e.XCC-ed the allowable
built -upon area Once the lot transfer is complete, thetuilt-apon area oney, not be
revised MWIcipt approval frorn `,he Drvisio- of Water Quality, and resporsibility for
meeting the bulit-up-on area iii-L4 is fransferred to the inc!rOdUal Property owner.
P--A^� 1,--4 L�

Ste' 5tc­nvvater ?--,Aan-age"rent Systems
i err. tea. ' "� �0608 Modis�r_"a: "
w. The Director *:gay notify the permittee when the perr'1'tfed site odes not rraeet otle
or more of the rnimmum reguimments 4f the Perm 4 Within the time frame
specified ir~ the r+otfce, the permittee shall sutxmit a written time schedule to the
D►rectot for miadifying the site to meet minirrurr requirements: The permittee
shall provide copies of revised piars and certVicatiCIn ir•: w+`=ting to the Director
that the charges have been, mracte.
4- During V:rnstruction, erosion sha'1 be kept to a Mirlirrum and any eroded areas cif
tree system >n vV be repaired imr ediately. If ti ne stormwater systerr,; was used as
an Erosion .Control device, er must be restored to design condition prior to
operation, as a stormwater treatment device, arid prior to occupancy of the
facility. The. bvetention area Ma.Y riot be used as a sedrmer;t and erosion ocn :roi
device once !h- a p'arfing s6i has been placed
The stormwater rnanagement system.. shay', be constnAicted in its entirety
vegetated and operaticra; for its intended use prior to the construction cf any
built -upon surface.
6, The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval fur
revised plans, specrficat;cn.s, and calculations prior to construcior for any
modification to the approved plans, incloding, but not limited to: those listed
below:
a. Any revision to the approved plans regardless of size.
b. Project name change.
c Transfer of ownership.
d. Redesign or addition to the .approved amount of built -upon area,
e further subdivision acquisitior, , or sale of all or par; of the project area.
The project area is defined as all property owned by the permittee, for
which Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan approval or a CAMA Major
permit was sought,
f. Filling in aitering, or piping of any vegetative conveyance shown or the
approved plan.
The permittee shall submit final site layou+ and grading plarts for any permitted
future areas shown o.n the approved plans. prior to construction,
The Director may determine that other revisions to the project should require a
modification to the permit.
9 upon completion of construction. prior to issuance of a. Certificate of Occupancy,
and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification mist be received
`rorr an appropriate designer for the system insta?led certifying that the permitted
facility. has been installer! in acconla-in whit this perm,t, the app:; ved plans and
specifications, and other supporting documentation. Any deviations from the
approved plans and specifications must be ncited or the Certification.
0 Access to the stormwater facilities shall be mairstar;ed via appropriate
easemersts at all times.
? . Permanent seeding requirements for the stownwater .control mist follow ;'tie
guideilnes establishea rn the North Carolina Erosinn..and Sediment Control
Planning and. ID�esign Manual-
t . Prior transfer Of the permit, the stormwater faciaties w.11 be inspected by D'v. fq
personnel. The fact+ity must be in corr.pliance with ai permit conditions. Any
hems not irr compliance must be repaired or replac d to design condition prior to
tt c transfer Records of rriaintenance activates perte:rmed le date k0l be
i0 uired.
Pzrlr.� Al e%f C

State Stormwater Management Sysfer%s
Re rrn.LN p. 1� - 49 0L
_ —60LM_odifjWjov
13. The permittee shall at atares provide the operation and maintenance
necessary to assure that all components of the permitted stormwater systerr,
functior at optimum efficiency. The approved Operation and Maintenance Plan
must be followed in its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled
mtervals including. but rot limited to
a. Semiannual scheduled irspections;every 6 rno.nths'.
b. Sediment removal,
C. Mowing and revegetati . on of side slopes.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of side slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
f. Debris removal and unclogging of structures, orifice, catch basins and
piping
g. Access to ail components of *,he system must be available at all tinnes.
14. Records of maintenance activities must be kept and made available upon
request to authorized personnel of DWQ The records wail indicate the date_
activity, name of person performing the work and what actions were taken.
15 Prior to the sale of any lot, the following deed restrictions must be recorded
a. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with
State Stormwatet Management Permit Number SW8 060608, as issued
by the Division of Water Quality under NCAC. 2H. 1000.
b, The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to
the extent necessary to maintain compliance with the Storrnwater
Management Permit.
C. These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons
and parties claiming under them.
d. The covenants pertaining to stormwater may not be altered or rescinded
without the express written consent of the State of North Carolina, Division
of Water Quality
e, Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plans may not take
place without the concurrence of the Division of Water Quality.
f. The maximum built -upon area per lot is as follows -
Lot #
Max
Lot fax
Max
Lot 0 1
Max.
Lot At Max.
SUA SUA
SUA
__L_ SUA
su
3,731
1 31
-3-
F 3,659
—1
46
4 176
ei
2
4,152 17
4 -15-2 1-8 3V6
3.633
3,602
47
48
4,165
62
63
4189
4149
4
..... .... . .
4.1-52 ' 19 4,211
34
3 01
4,187
1 4 ,195
49 1 4 226
1 64
a
14s34v
20
i 426
4rt386
21
4,350
3,668
22
4.161
3,608 ,
23 4,165. 1
9 3.667-7-
1.0
1607
26
3,599
50
36
751
52
38
1 3,849
53
54
27
1681
42
13 3,692
28
3,672
43
14 3.776 T!
29
1 4,186
15 3,691
30
3.664
1 45
5 4,022 If 55
4-255
1 56
4.087
57
3.62§
4,128
59
4,145
65
4.187
4,152
66
4,1.87 1
4,151
W
67 T 4,187
+-
4,759
68
4,1H.87
4.151
69
4,183
7-O'--�
—4. j 8-6
—71-7
4,232
1
4 289,
4'
ozna � of 0

State Storm pater Management Systems
Perini+ Y0. SW8 060608 Modificaf c.-I
This aiiotted amo;mt includes any toil -upon area censtructed.within the
Ict property boundaries; and that portion of the right-of-way between the
front ,,n line and the edge of the pavement. Built upon area includes. but is
not limited to stri Mures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick. stone, slate
coquina and parking areas; but does riot include raised, open woos;
deckiing.. or the water surface of swimming pools.
g. All runoff on the lot must drain into the permitted system. This may be
accomplished through providing roof drain gutters which drain to the
s.treet grading the lotto drain toward the street, or grading perimeter
swales and directing .then, into the pond or street. tots that will naturally
grain into the system are not required to provide these measures.
h Built -upon area in excess of tyre permitted amount will require a permit
mon !fication.
16. A copy of the recorded deed restrictions must be submitted to the division within
30 days of the date of recording the plat, and prior to selling lots. The recorded
copy Trust contain all of the statements above, the signature of the Permittee, the
deed book number and page and the stamp/signature of the Register of Deeds.
17 This permit shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in
accordance with the conditions of this permit, the approved plans and
specifications and other supporting data.
18. BuPt :upon area includes, but is not limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete,
gravel, brick. stone, slate, coquina and parking areas, but does not include
raised, open woad decking, or the water surface of swimming pools.
Ill. GENERAL CONDITIONS
This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and
approval by the Director In the event there is either a desire for the facilities to
change ownership, or there is a name change of the P+ermittee, a
"Name/Ownership Change Form" must be submitted to the Division of Water
Quality, signed by the parties involved, along with the appropriate documentation
as listed on page 2 of the form. The project must be in good standing with: DWO.
The approval of this request will be considered on its *newts and may or may not
be approved.
2. The permittee is responsible for compliance with al of the terms and conditions
of this permit until such tame as the Director approves the transfer request.
3 Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Pe mittee to enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality, in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
4 The issuance of the permit does not preclude the Peittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances., which may be imposed by
other government agencies (iocal, stateand federal) that have jurisdiction.
5 In the event that the facilities #ail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Per nittee shall take immediate cotrective action,
including those as may be required by this Division.. such as the construction of
additional or .replacement stormwater management systems
6. The pjermit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The
filing of a request for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance or
termination does not stay any oermA condition
pans A ns a

State Storm -water Management Systems
Permit Nc3. SWB 060608 Modifrestior
7. PeumJttee grants oerr*rission to staff of the DWdQ to amass the property for the
Purposes of inspecting the stormwater facilities during norma, business hours.
& The permi:'tee shad notffy the DiV lion in wreting of any na;ne, ownership or
mailing address changes within 30 days.
g, A c,py of the apprcved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by
the Perrr*ittee for a m nimum of ten years from the date of the compiet►on of
construction
Permit issued this the 10th day of July 2007,
NORTH CARqkfl0 ENV OONVIENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
LA
T*, Qofeen Hgullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Panm '1` n3

COASTAL CAROLINA
RESOURCE GROUP me
ri,tccsrres��a'wtt1:_ (e.�, a!�.acr�e :.:m•.ai�ta,.i a �s�r;xvr c..:_Saa• r�:.,ea,yys>6aE6.Cs8.
Coastal Carolina Resource Group, Inc.
2921 Blue Clay Rd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
910-791-5432 (0) 910-791-4768 (F)
nick@ccrl?nc.com
TO Wells Fargo (Attn: Erin Acton)
1 Independence Drive, IDth Floor
Jacksonville, FL 32202
PH: 904-351-7346
[e-mail]
1N�'c?Tc.
DATE: February 1, 2016
INVOICE: 8926
RE: The Villages at Turtle Creek
Stormwater Treatment Facility Repairs
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
LINE TOTAL
1
Coastal Carolina Resource Group (CCRG) installed two temporary erosion control wattle dams to help
contain the eroded Basin 4 berm sediment that has accumulated inside the jurisdictional wetland as
requested by Johanne Steenhuis with NCDENR. CCRG has emailed before and after installation pictures
for your records.
$ 2,925.00
Total
$ 2,925.00
Make all checks oavahle to Coastal Carolina Resource Group, Inc.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!

I
co
a
!
m
M
,•
oF
Tp
cil
r �P
{
I

via emou�1
COASTAL CAROLINA
`- ►RESOURCE GROUPllrr.
awhsaa s;was luunjw I suvaaaL.ra a m.l a I rhwssa w Ina-
-9
Coastal Carolina Resource Group, Inc.
2921 Blue Clay Rd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
910-791-5432 (0) 910-791-4768 (F)
[e-mail]
TO Wells Fargo (Attn: Erin Acton)
1 Independence Drive, 10th Floor
Jacksonville, FL 32202
PH:904-351-7346
[e-mail]
Gl"CAr\rAJh-Tb 1213I20
INVOICI?
DATE: November 20, 2015
INVOICE:
RE: The Villages at Turtle Creek
Stormwater Treatment Facility Repairs
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
LINE TOTAL
1
Coastal Carolina Resource Group (CCRG) repaired the outstanding compliance issues for the stormwater
treatment facilities located in the Village of Turtle Creek subdivision which were present during the site
$ 10,400.00
evaluation on 9-21-2015. The Following repairs were provided:
Infiltration Basin #4
1) Repair inlet spillway: CCRG repaired riprap inlet spillway by utilizing a small excavator to remove
existing riprap, graded out spillway area and replaced underlying geo-fabric with a new NCDOT certified
fabric. CCRG finished by reinstalling riprap and adding an additional 4 tons of rock.
2) Remove vegetation: CCRG utilized a hand crew to access overgrown basin to remove all unwanted
woody and herbaceous vegetation present. CCRG trimmed basin and vegetation back to the required 6
inch height. All removed unmulchable vegetation was collected and removed offsite and disposed of in a
composting facility.
3) Remove accumulated sediment: CCRG utilized a small excavator to remove and regrade accessible
accumulated sediment present near the inlet pipe.
4) Bare banks: CCRG will repaired approx. 2000 Sq.Ft. of bare banks present around basin. CCRG utilized
a small excavator to score compacted soil surface. CCRG continued by raking in a coastal grass seed mix
and covering area with a biodegradable excelsior mat to protect seed and future erosion until
established.
Infiltration Basin #S
1) Remove Vegetation: CCRG utilized a hand crew to access the overgrown basin and removed all
unwanted woody and herbaceous vegetation present. CCRG trimmed basin and vegetation back to the
required 6 inch height. All removed unmulchable vegetation was collected and removed offsite and
disposed of in a composting facility.
2) Erosion Repair: CCRG repaired a small isolated area of erosion along the banks near a fence line.
CCRG regraded area by hand and installed a land lock geofabric to secure soil to back. CCRG finished by
raking in a coastal blend seed mix and coverine_area with a biodegradable excelsior mat.
Infiltration Basin #6
1) Repair Erosion: CCRG repaired riprap inlet spillway by utilizing a small excavator to remove existing
riprap, grading out spillway area and replacing underlying geo-fabric with a new NCDOT certified fabric.
CCRG finished by reinstalling riprap and adding an additional 4 tons of new rip rap.
Infiltration Basin #7 and #8

Wegetation Removal: CCRG cut and removed all cattails present in basins. Chemical treatment will be
required for future control and maintenance.
Catch Basin Re airs
1)Catch Basin Repair 1: CCRG removed accumulated sediment from catch basin located on the eastern
side of Landsdowne Circle.
2) Catch Basin Repair 2: CCRG repaired leaking catch basin present on the North side of Landsdowne
Circle. CCRG removed grate to access catch basin and installed hydraulic cement around inlet pipes to
prevent future leaking.
3) Catch Basin Repair 3: CCRG pulled grate to access catch basin and remove a small broken section of
rim that holds the grate. CCRG concreted this small section to create a lip for the grate to rest on.
Total
$ 10,400.00
Note:
Please reference attached pictures for details.
Make all checks payable to Coastal Carolina Resource Group, Inc.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESSI

'�.�4t h Basin#2 i
�.� Infiltration Basin#8
Catch +Basin#1 * tn�tration Basin#7
Catch Basinks�•� Infiltration Basin#6
r .. � _
''� 1�1. " •' i .yvt
lnfiltration Basin#S
a
Infiltration Basin#4
5
A' ~
,
i.
)Sic eah 4

COASTAL CAROLING The Village at Turtle Creek Stormwater System Repair Key Map
►RESOURCE GROUP,,z

29
Ln
r4
r4
t4y\Mi1 WtMOOn-\-Ct�
MI-bi 201C

Ln
0
C44
q
(A
�
L)
�

Ln
0
N
N
N
r-I
P
L
u
0-
0
a
C
O
4-1
4-0
GJ
N
N
L
O
Q
cc
r_
O
u
a)
Q
N
C
u
m
LL
L
3
E
L
O
N
a} 0
Ln
0)
m
a
E
0
u
w N
f0
4A
m
co
c
0
4 `o
Y 'n
� c
U �
t C
O
� f0
t
00
C
7
u
L
(1
e-
m
0)
0
m 0
m 0
0_
c x
0 0)
r� v
4 u
C �
N
Y
0) �
OJ
d
U 3
_yv
' •3
E-•
N
e-1
d
3
Y
a
c
0 oa
+� c
m
m
+r E
C O
� •ut
U
U x

Ln
0
N
N
N
e-I
N
Q1
L
U_
d
LL
C
0
a
i
0
4-0
^-
W L
u
a
t
0
n
a,
cc
c
0
U
C
LL
L
a,
m
3
E
0
++
Ln
J
v LAA
Q
Q COO
M
C..7 = .n
T
a
L
i L
VAR
3
L
IZ
L
L
a
Q
y
co
0
0
C
Y
a
a
V
_a
7
i
N
5
a

Ln
c
N
N
N
e-I
C
C
U WJ
d
p �
U L
�
I
M
L]
�❑ p
m
+ (U
m
0
3
OL
Ln
ti
W
• C
C
m
m
C
C
O
1�+
�
Y
m
Y
y
v
L
N
a
dI
L
a
aU
c
�
�
O
L
Y
C
O
•�
•p
N
N
T
�'
f0
f0
3
An
OL
Ln
c
�
c
m
o
c
t
u
41
�
F •+ I U
Y
m
h .�.
Ln
CL
!�
n w
m
d
•a

Ln
0
N
N
N
ei
U
m
LL
L
a)
y�
7
E
L
O
N
z
�I
C h
CJ Lu
C� LU
C.� h.
l
BEN
C
Kfl
K
k4�
N
U
�
O
C
O
O
m
d0
U
y >
{°A
r li
00
N
coF.
m
C
O
i
C
' O
4+
L
;N
L
ill
Y
Y
d
N
N
V
`
L
V
N
Nj
�
Wp
O4.0
7
V
00
c
+�
pp
c
U
as . . r`r�i.,;.4 �... ."
• O
� _ I, _
C
°
tko
a)
L7
aj
�
Y
�
C
�
y'
f
m
C
m
++
I
O
I
Q!
U
Y
N
(U
V
Qj
N
N
!H
3
3
a
d

Ln
1-1
N
�
�CL
CM
C --1 LIA
4 Gl*i
�
/ 0 . c
a
� � 2
./! E
/ m
S-
:�
rm )�
U
u .
u
2 . u -
■|
` (t
a �i !
k9\ CL
:2 § § .*U M§
. . 2 X u
m
\ƒ E
*\ �
�
§ � � r |
0)
u
■ u 2
k �
. a

Ln
0
N
N
N
r-I
U
L.
E
L
O
4-0
V)
CL
cm
© LLLf _

��tAc- OvrzJohnsonKellItoC�1 ��► 1
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 9:09 AM
To: [e-mail]'
Cc: Nick Garner ([e-mail])
Subject: RE: Turtle Creek
Attachments: 2015 12 pictures 060608 for email 2015 12 03.pdf
Erin,
I talked to Nick this week, and he is trying to find an engineer to certify the system. That means that the engineer will go
look at the site and sign off that everything has been built according to the permitted design. The issue is that there is at
least one basin, Basin 113 (which is numbered as #4 on Nick's map), that isn't built per the plan. See attached. The
infiltration basin isn't supposed to have an outlet pipe, but one is in place. (infiltration basins hold water for a period of
time while it soaks into the ground. Water isn't supposed to go anywhere through a pipe from the basin.) An engineer
will have to decide what to do about it. He/she may determine that the pipe isn't needed, and if that is the case then
you just remove it. But, I suspect that the pipe was installed because the infiltration basin wasn't working. If so; then
there could be a few reasons for that. It may be that the bottom of the basin got clogged with all of the debris that Nick
removed and now that it has been removed you may be fine. But, the water table in the area may be too high for the
basin to work even with debris removed. If so, then we will have to see what the engineer recommends to
change. Another reason to get an engineer out there sooner than later is because there is clearly some sort of stability
issue with that berm. Nick said that they put in a temporary fix, and I don't know all of the details of what was done or
how confident he is in it staying in place while all of this is worked out. But, you certainly don't want it to blow out
again.
As for the other two items in my letter, it looks like you got the maintenance under control. But, you will also have to
look into the deed restriction issue. We require deed restrictions for subdivisions to be recorded before homes are sold
so that when people buy a home they are limited to a certain amount of impervious area that can be built on their
lot. The reason for that is because the volume of water that runs off of impervious surfaces (such as roofs, patios, or
driveways) is higher than the volume of water that runs off of grass. If homeowners pave more of their lots that was
planned when the basins were designed, then more water will run off of the subdivision than can fit in the infiltration
basins, and then the system won't work. So, we need to make sure that there are deed restrictions in place for all of the
lots.
If you have further questions please let me know.
Kelly
From: [e-mail][mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 8:01 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Turtle Creek
Good Morning Kelly!
Nick Garner with Coastal Carolina sent the attached invoice with photos for the original work that needed to be done. I
know the berm break needs to be repaired still, and I am waiting on Nick's quote.
What is the Bank's next step regarding the initial repairs per your 09/09/15 letter?
Thank yowl

Erin M. Acton
Real Estate Asset Manager
ORE Wholesale Banking
'NeHS ral'90 Sailk, N.A. ! ?. indepenaent D;'ivp-, 3.011 i`IQD;` ^ i.;". ,cr;;ty lie. _ }'
i6 1 'C U E`I C�y�y-� �.-.�3•-q �.:rl ;r,;.0..34.9_6g3,4 1 Fax `72I?.'
erin.acton0wellsfargo.com
From: Rick Owens fmailto:rick(dpestcoexterminating com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 3:22 PM
To: Acton, Erin M
Subject:
44COASTAL CAROLINA
wKSGURCE GROUP,,
Nick Garner
2921 Blue Clay Rd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
910.470.4225
nickPccrRnc.com

ca �
N
� U
° °
m
� � d
a
M P-
IL
: nZ7,
jo
rr
t.
' LL
r � '
1 1 W
i 2 - � :.. �3•..r—,. �*.I� r .�-. � '..'. fir^. i .r" �I � rP �� "' f} r�
�l , ,'�c—• t �, :r- gI -- - HV�.✓ fir:•'' s'.�'� ' �� � �
� y � - � i .--war -+ �. - � �`u � �,•y-•,.. �a.:a'` ski r r
v , rya _'° ' i y T . .�� � ��'� r ;�,4^ "2 • y�,•y"+ .-

c
v)
u
a)
0 4-J V,
> E
V) 0
Ln 0 4-
V)
C) L
to
a)
4--J
CL m "0
V)
0
cc
4-0
u
ca
0
4-J
m
V)
m
0
4-J
oa
co
0 o
CL
Ln
-0 0
C -F-J
LLJ c
i

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 9:01 AM
To: Joanne Steenhuis; James, Trentt; '[e-mail]'
Cc: Weaver, Cameron
Subject: FW: Villages at Turtle Creek
Attachments: MOV_5981-1.3gp
Nick,
The issues for stormwater remain the same as were listed in my 9/9/15 letter (maintenance, PE Cert & deed
restrictions). But, if the BMP(s) can't be certified then an engineer will also have to determine what needs to be done
and the permit will have to be modified accordingly. For the wetland issues, you will have to discuss those with Joanne
Steenhuis (NC 401/Wetlands, cc'd) and she can tell you if the CORPS will be involved, I do not know. For the E&SC
issues, the contact is Trentt James (DEMLR, cc'd). (Joanne & Trentt, 1 think you both saw the attached video last week
showing the berm blow out.)
Erin,
I got your separate email asking who is responsible, and I thought it would be best to send a single email so that you can
be included on this email chain as well. The stormwater permittee (REDUS NC Coastal, LLC) is responsible for all
stormwater compliance items until the permit is transferred (usually to an HOA). Stormwater permits do not transfer
with the sale of land in NC. I do not know how responsibility works for wetlands and E&SC, but I am sure that Joanne
and Trentt will know.
Thanks,
KJ
From: Nick Garner [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 3:07 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Villages at Turtle Creek
Kelly,
I've been out of town this week for Thanksgiving and have just been informed of the berm eroding at Turtle Creek. I'm
not sure if you've been out there to check this out yet. We are currently working up some numbers to repair this
erosion. I guess with all the rain, that saturated earthen berm couldn't take anymore and gave way across from the inlet
pipe. We have installed a temporary sediment fence at the base of the slope as well as a temporary outlet pipe and PAM
to help settle out the sediment.
What are our options for the sediment that has eroded and accumulated at the base of the hill and in the edge of the
wetland? Do we leave it, hand remove from the wetland or should we use a machine to remove as much as possible
without disturbing the natural hydric soils? Are permits required since this is a maintenance issue? Thanks!
Nick Garner
From: Johnson, Kelly[mailto:kellv.p.iohnsonPncdenr.pov]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:31 AM
To: [e-mail]

Cc: Nick Garner ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Villages at Turtle Creek
Erin,
I got your name from Carray Young a while back. She indicated that you were now overseeing this one for Wells Fargo.
am an engineer with the NC Division of Energy and Land Resources (DEMLR). I had been working with Carray to get the
items in the attached letter resolved. I know that Nick Garner of Carolina Resources Group was hired to address
maintenance. You may already be aware of the berm breach that happened there on Sunday, but if not, I wanted to
send you the attached video. I talked to Mck a few weeks ago, and he had been trying to find an engineer to get out
there to look at it because it has to be certified by an engineer to show that it has been constructed per the plans. Or,
alternatively, if it was not constructed per the plans the permit will need a modification to re -design the system. Please
keep me informed of the status with this.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: James, Trentt
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 9:33 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Villages at Turtle Creek
Trentt James
Environmental Senior Specialist
Land Quality Section
Division of Energy, Mineral, & Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
910.796.7305 office
trentt. james(a-ncdenr.aov
127 Cardinal Dr. Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
AI C.- - -- N-athin? "'DITIpores -,
E7lae C:::resPu,;aura& n? - F"O i" Ijik; ad, ire's sis su"'JeS:Ito the
From: Weaver, Cameron
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:06 AM
To: Scott, Georgette <georgette.scott0ncdenr.eov>; James, Trentt <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<dan.sams9ncdenr.eov>; Steenhuis, Joanne <ioanne.steenhuis(a)ncdenr.eov>
Subject: FW: Villages at Turtle Creek
Good morning.
Forwarding a message that came in this morning to me concerning a breach in a Stormwater system and discharging to a
stream.

Cameron Weaver.
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Sen!ice
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/guest
DEACS Website: htta:Hpo-tal.ncdenr.org/web/deao/
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Matt McDonnell[mailto:matt.mcdonnellCa)gopropertymgt coml
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:00 AM
To: Weaver, Cameron
Subject: Villages at Turtle Creek
Good Morning Cameron,
The Board at Villages at Turtle Creek would like DENR to know about an issue they are having with their
retention pond.
See video attached. The retention wall has collapsed and is running into a stream. Coastal Carolina Resource
Group has been contacted and heading there this morning.
Let me know if you have any questions,
Matt McDonnell, CMCA
GOProperty Management
910-681-1684 (Phone)
910-681-1682 (Fax)
matt.mcdonnell(a,gopropertvm .com
1213 Culbreth Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 www.gopropertym .com
better association management

Johnson, Kell
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 2:31 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: Villages at Turtle Creek
Attachments: 2007 07 permit 060608,doc; 2007 11 permit 060608.doc; 2007 12 permit_pr 060608.doc;
2009 09 CEI_BIMS 060608.pdf; 2009 10 NOV 060608.docx; 2010 05 CEI_BIMS 060608.pdf;
2010 06 NOV 060608.docx; 2010 07 permit 060608.docx; 2010 09 CEI_compliant
060608.docx; 2010 09 CEI_compliant 060608.docx; 2015 09 CEI_deficient 060608.docx;
2015 09 CEI deficient 060608.docx
Erin,
It is nice to "meet" you as well. REDUS NC Coastal, LLC became the permittee in 2010 (see 2010 07 permit 060608), and
is responsible for implementing all of the permit requirements including maintaining and certifying the stormwater
system. I have attached some of the history, though these are mainly the Word versions as I do not have scans of all of
the final documents. I also do not know all of the history of this one personally. I became involved when we received a
call from a concerned homeowner in August.
If you have further questions, please let me know. My number is 910.796.7331.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 2:15 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Villages at Turtle Creek
Kelly,
I am taking over for Carray on this one. Nice to "meet" you. Nick did indicate there was going to be some additional
work needed above our initial agreement. He was going to work on sending me the specific scope and pricing. I have not
yet seen it. I was going to reach out to you regarding this. I though the Bank was only liable for the original scope.
Anything above that scope was not our responsibility. Can you please further clarify this for me? I apologize for the
questions, as I am stepping into this in the middle.
Thank you!
Erin M. Acton
Real Estate Asset Manager
ORE Wholesale Banking
'Polls Fargo Bank, N.A. indepe.idcnt 0-ive, 1Y.1 Flo^r I Jacksonv:1i:,, F'- 32202
MAC .'__ 094-100
Tel [phone] j Cell 90 z-349-6934 j Fax 9U-?51-7367
erin.acton(alwellsfargo.cwm
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kelly.p.johnson(.U)ncdenr.govl
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:31 AM
To: Acton, Erin M
Cc: Nick Garner (nicWccrgnc.com)
Subject: FW: Villages at Turtle Creek

Erin,
I got your name from Carray Young a while back. She indicated that you were now overseeing this one for Wells Fargo.
am an engineer with the NC Division of Energy and Land Resources (DEMLR). I had been working with Carray to get the
items in the attached letter resolved. I know that Nick Garner of Carolina Resources Group was hired to address
maintenance. You may already be aware of the berm breach that happened there on Sunday, but if not, I wanted to
send you the attached video. I talked to Nick a few weeks ago, and he had been trying to find an engineer to get out
there to look at it because it has to be certified by an engineer to show that it has been constructed per the plans. Or,
alternatively, if it was not constructed per the plans the permit will need a modification to re -design the system. Please
keep me informed of the status with this.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: James, Trentt
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 9:33 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Villages at Turtle Creek
Trentt James
Environmental Senior Specialist
Land Quality Section
Division of Energy, Mineral, & Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
910.796.7305 office
trentt. iames(cancdenr.Qov
127 Cardinal Dr. Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Email corresprvsder=:e to .,r.d from f»is add,, E�s_ is subjtc to the•
rior"h a,:.* imij t:
From: Weaver, Cameron
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:06 AM
To: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; James, Trentt <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<[e-mail]>; Steenhuis, Joanne <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Villages at Turtle Creek
Good morning.
Forwarding a message that came in this morning to me concerning a breach in a Stormwater system and discharging to a
stream.
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office

NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ Website: http://portal.ncdenr.ore/web/guest
DEACS Website: http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/deao/
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Matt McDonnell [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:00 AM
To: Weaver, Cameron
Subject: Villages at Turtle Creek
Good Morning Cameron,
The Board at Villages at Turtle Creek would like DENR to know about an issue they are having with their
retention pond.
See video attached. The retention wall has collapsed and is running into a stream. Coastal Carolina Resource
Group has been contacted and heading there this morning.
Let me know if you have any questions,
Matt McDonnell, CMCA
GOProperty Management
910-681-1684 (Phone)
910-681-1682 (Fax)
matt.mcdonnellAggpropgdpnjzt.com
1213 Culbreth Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 www.gopropertMgt.com
better association management

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:48 AM
To: 'Story, Grayson T LtCol USSOCOM HQ J-53'
Subject: RE: SW8 060608 - The Villages at Turtle Creek
Attachments: MOV 5981-1.3gp
Gray,
I just got the video, I assume you shot it (attached)? That is unbelievable.
Since my letter, the bank and your property manager hired Carolina Resource Group to maintain the system. It appears
from the video that the work had been done. Your property manager notified CRG of the incident, and they are on their
way there if they haven't arrived already. I was told that the plan is to find an immediate fix for now, and then to go
back out there and re -assess for a more permanent solution on Monday. The other thing I asked them to do is to have
an engineer certify that the system was installed per the permitted plans. If that cannot be done, then the next step is
to have them modify the plan to an alternate configuration.. That means that they will have to hire an engineer to
redesign a system, permit it, and install it. I emailed the bank to clarify that point this morning.
I am sorry that this has been such an ordeal, but I suspect that the berm breach will expedite resolution.
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Story, Grayson T LtCol USSOCOM HQ J-53 [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 9:57 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SW8 060608 - The Villages at Turtle Creek
Kelly -
Can you give me an update on the REDUS NC Coastal, LLC, that was due to NC DNR by 9 Oct 2015?
V/R/
Gray
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 3:43 PM
To: Story, Grayson T LtCol USSOCOM HQ J-53; James, Trentt
Subject: RE: SW8 060608 - The Villages at Turtle Creek
Gray,
Please see the attached letter that went out today.
Thanks,
KJ
-----Original Message -----
From: Story, Grayson T LtCol USSOCOM HQ J-53 [mailto:[e-mail]]

Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:54 AM
To: James, Trentt <[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SW8 060608 - The Villages at Turtle Creek
Trentt -
Thanks for the update. Will await the inspection letter when ready.
Kelly -
Can you confirm that REDUS NC Coastal, LLC, is a subsidiary of Wells Fargo; and, if so, does REDUS still has the
Stormwater Permit for the infiltration basins?
V/R/
Gray
-----Original Message -----
From: James, Trentt [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:42 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly; Story, Grayson T LtCol USSOCOM HQ J-53
Subject: RE: SW8 060608 - The Villages at Turtle Creek
Gray,
I may be able to make it out there Friday, but if not it is going to be next Thursday. I have it on my list of things to see.
Sorry for the delay.
Thanks
Trentt James
Environmental Senior Specialist
NCDENR - Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources - Land Quality Section
127 Cardinal Dr. Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 7:58 AM
To: Story, Grayson T LtCol USSOCOM HQ J-53
Cc: James, Trentt
Subject: RE: SW8 060608 - The Villages at Turtle Creek
Gray,
Trentt said that he would go by there the next time he is in that area. He has a large territory, and so he tries to do see
as many places as he can that are "close" to each other on each trip up there. I do not have a date to give you.
Thanks,
Kelly

-----Original Message -----
From: Story, Grayson T LtCol USSOCOM HQ J-53 [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 4:10 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: SW8 060608 - The Villages at Turtle Creek
Kelly -
Any word on when the inspection will be completed and when we can expect a copy of the inspection letter?
Also, was it confirmed that REDUS NC Coastal, LLC, is a subsidiary of Wells Fargo and if REDUS still has the Stormwater
Permit for the infiltration basins?
V/R/
Gray
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 3:13 PM
To: James, Trentt
Cc: Sams, Dan; Scott, Georgette; Story, Grayson T LtCol USSOCOM HQ J-53; [e-mail]
Subject. SW8 060608 - The Villages at Turtle Creek
Trentt,
I had a call from a landowner, Grayson Story (cc'd), who owns property in The Villages at Turtle Creek Phase I (SW8
060608). He is concerned about infiltration basin #113 near his home. Will you please go out there and see what needs
to be done? He reports that the basin has trees/scrubs growing in it that are as tall as he is.
Here is some info:
1. Permits: Recent permits
7/28/10: Name/Ownership Change transferred permit to REDUS NC Coastal, LLC
b. 12/17/07: Plan Revision to re -allocate impervious area between two lots (no change to the plans)
c. 11/9/07: Permit modification. This is the current plan set.
Mr. Story wants to be copied on the inspection letter to the permittee via email.
3. Permit Transfer: This one is permitted to REDUS NC Coastal, LLC, which I believe is a subsidiary of Wells Fargo (the
subdivision was once bank owned)..I understand that the development has been built -out, and so it will eventually need
to be transferred to the HOA once it is in compliance.

I will bring you the file.
Thanks,
Kelly
Kelly Johnson
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]
4

Johnson, Kelly
From:
Johnson, Kelly
Sent:
Tuesday, October 20, 2015 11:21 AM
To:
'[e-mail]'
Cc:
Nick Garner ([e-mail])
Subject:
RE: Villages at Turtle Creek
Ca rray,
Nick Garner is here today (for an unrelated project), and he mentioned that you all would need to get an extension to
get the work done out there. Nick said that he is going to have his crew there on 11/2/15, and that he is also talking
with an engineer about the certification. Let's extend the due date until 11/30/15.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: [e-mail][mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 9:13 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: Villages at Turtle Creek
Hi Kelly,
Hope you are staying afloat up there. I'm sure you are crazy busy with all the flooding happening but just wanted to give
you a quick update that we are engaging Nick Garner's company for the work. He is getting his insurance for us and once
we have that we can sign the agreement and he can get started. If you need anything in the meantime, please let me
know.
Thanks!
Carray Young IWELLS FARGO
Real Estate Asset Manager, AVP
ORE Wholesale Banking
WdIs Fargo I 1 Indep,�ndant Drive; 1011h Floor I J cksonville, FL 32202
P,e.AC-23094- C-0
el 904-351-73.47 1 Ce11 '_04-248-1 139 I F?•x 904-351-�'367
Carray.You ng@we I Isfarg_o.com

Johnson, Kel
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 201512:58 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: The Village at Turtle Creek Stormwater Repairs
Attachments: 0000_Regulations_Transfer_1st Transfer Law_SL2011-256 2011.pdf; 0000
_Regulations_Transfer_2nd Transfer Law SL2013-121 2013.pdf
Ca rray,
Being in compliance is one piece of transferring the permit to an HOA (but it is the biggest piece). The other things that
we will need include:
1.) Name,/Ownership Change Form which is available on our website under "miscellaneous forms",
http:Hpoliai.ncdenr.org/web/ir/state-sormwater-forms does. There are two forms. One is labeled for
transfers to HOAs and the other is not. You will want to choose the one for HOAs.
2.) Documentation that at least 50% of the homes have been sold. (This is intended to be sold to families. If there
is a builder that you sold it to that owns over 50% then we may have to talk about transferring to him. But, that
is a different form etc. If that is the case please let me know.)
3.) Documentation that the HOA owns the common areas where the BMPs are located.
There are two regulations that cover transfers (both attached). The first one is for transferring to HOAs. The second
covers MIA permittees and people who want to get covered under an old permit that don't have access to the old
permit. (The old permit is generally under and old/less stringent law.)
If you have further questions please let me know.
Thanks,
KJ
From: [e-mail][mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:15 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: The Village at Turtle Creek Stormwater Reriairs
Hi Kelly,
Can you please confirm if we have the above work completed, this will satisfy you and we will be good to transfer to the
HOA?
Thanks,
Carray Young %WELLS FARGO
Re; ; Estate Asset Manager, AVP
ORE Wholesale Banking
�'•tc:iis "arc, i ?.: idf peiment Drive, 10th; Floor I Jacksonville, FL 322102
FrlAC-'":309s-10ON
==1-1fi47 1 [:L I C,04-248-1139 Fax C-C)4-3S1-73,67
Carry .Youn -'vvellsfarao.com

From: Nick Garner [rrNai!to:nick+lccrQnc.coml
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 7:29 PM
To: Young, Carray G
Subject: The Village at Turtle Creek Stormwater Repairs
Good Evening Carray,
Attached is a proposal as promised for Coastal Carolina Resource Group to repair the outstanding compliance issues
associated with the Stormwater treatment system in the Village at Turtle Creek subdivision. I have also attached our
insurance and W-9 forms as requested.
Also, I have contacted Larry Sneeden who is a local engineer familiar with Stormwater systems to see if he would be
interested in providing a certification for this system to verify that it was built as the permitted design after the repairs
are completed. I can forward him the permit info and inspection report you originally forwarded to me. His contact info
is: Isneeden0coastalstofm% ater.co;r: and 910.520.1835. If our proposal is excepted I will need to contact the NCDENR
office to have the Stormwater design plans and permits pulled and copied to help expedite our repairs as well as the
engineer certifications.
If you have any questions regarding our proposal, please feel free to contact me. Thanks again and have a great evening!
0 COASTAL CAROLINA
'RESOURCE GROORat
i1iiC,s. Garner
2921 Blue Clay Rd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
910.470.4225
nick;=v ccrenc.ccrn

Johnson, Kel
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:52 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: Villages at Turtle Creek - Permit SW 060608
Carray,
I am not sure that I understand the question. Here is the permit text:
Lot _ Max ' Lot #� I, Max �? Lot i Max_Lot # � Max.
�_ _ BUA BUA # t BUA BUA
I- 1
4,152 .
16
3�731
31 I
i 2 ��. ,.
4-152 !
17-
1 3•F695 32
44 _
4,1362
19
"
4,211 _�
344- 4
Sr-4.3Att
20
1 4 269
35
. 8
4,185
21
4 35ii
Fl
I 36 _4
83.608--
3,ti68
_.r.--
22
13
4,.61
j�,165
37 4
38 3
_ 3.6{37
24
I �,162
_ �39 3
10 �3,W
4 3,517
2a
y2t3
T 40 4
1�- 41 4
12 4,156
157 3'692
2i
28
3,611:1
47YJ 4
T
1
. ;
3,672
43 3
66 ...
44
15
Lot* _..
BUA
61 4,^37 '
62
_48 4,14
49 4,228
T50
x3
,64
4187
4,1 85
4,145
_ 65 1
4.187�
_1 14.152
S<"r I
4,1E37
_ 52_%- 4151
�s
1 67
f
59 4,151-'
1 68
4A87
54�-4__,15169
;
4.183
55� ,._414F _
1770
_
+ 56 4,166
J. 71 I
+4186�:
f 57 4,165
72
�4„232
58 4,_2_'.3 R7`3 4 289
59,253 r.
_ 60 4 leg
-,_ -
Here is the recorded restriction (for instance lots above lot 45 are not in there):
8K3029P6036
(c) 14M cs> t4 tuts attto n►a whh the 1- W and tc bindit on ail ;,,on taxi pw&j
Ji indug wftz dwm
R' 'rhe cove,ss►uts parhiniug to alotsnwtW Dray Wbe altstted or reacinded without the
aYPftse uAttan censen: of tha Ott: Of NWh Caroline, Nvisins of Water Quar-q'.
(c) Ahcratwre of the dnonW as shown on the apptovod #ws mly not take piers
without the cowunuce of the DivWon of Water Qnaiity.
M no mtax xm buth--upim area (-Max RUA1°) per lot is as f'oltoww
8
_ 2s
.
33
4 3.25C1
i
"9
450
4AJV
7
3 75C _
22
.._
_.
24 -i
4G _ 3,466
42
143n23St!
i
? Z5t!
,._141
8,2tit!
13
23 1 SRt y
3 - �ti�_
48 3
'4—
A5 3
"5
Is there something else that I am missing?
Thanks,

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:12 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Villages at Turtle Creek - Permit SW 060608
Kelly,
The document numbers do match what was outlined in the Permit. Does that mean we are okay on this front?
Carray Young ;WELLS FARGO
Real Estate Asset Manager, AVP
ORE Wholesale Bankir,
I .'. M0e+x :...:i.t 1�nve, 10th Floor i 1ar. Grivik.,
734
Carrr,Y.Yo� (g_ y� llsfar o.com
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kelly.p.iohnson@ ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 1:43 PM
To: Young, Carray G
Subject: RE: Villages at Turtle Creek - Permit SW 060608
Carray,
I haven't looked at this in detail because I am in the middle of some other things, but I wanted to go ahead and get back
to you. The permit lists all of the lots and all of their respective impervious area per lot values. All of the lots have to be
recorded for an impervious value equal to or less than the amount that the permit allows. So, if Lot 5 is allowed 4,567sf
and the deed restrictions for Lot 5 are 4,000sf then that is fine. It just couldn't give Lot 5 5,000sf.
Hopefully that makes sense?
Kelly
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 12:23 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: Villages at Turtle Creek - Permit SW 060608
Hi Kelly,
Can you tell me if these are the documents you are looking for in regards to the deed restrictions?
Thanks!
Carray Young WELLS FARGO

Real Estate Ass .t M nager, AVP
GRE Wholesale Banking
I. ... r
Ye
Carray.Yc u na-'q 4vellsfaryo.com
3

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
September 9, 2015
Mr. Chris Willard
REDUS NC Coastal, LLC
8540 Colonnade Center Drive, Suite 111
Raleigh, NC 27615
Ms. Deanna Ernst
REDUS Properties, Inc, (member of REDUS NC Coastal, LLC)
301 S. College St.
Charlotte. NC 28288
Subject: Notice of Inspection - Not Compliant
The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & III
State Stormwater Management Permit No. SW8 060608
Pender County
Dear Mr. Willard & Ms. Ernst:
Donald van der Vaart
Secretary
On September 4, 2015, the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Res urces (DEMLR)
inspected The Villages at Turtle Creek Phases I & III, located in Pender County to determine the status f compliance with
the State Stormwater Management Permit Number SW8 060608 issued most recently on July 28 This inspection
was in response to a complaint from a homeowner. DEMLR file review and site inspection reveale at the site is not in
compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. Please find a copy of the completed form entitled "Compliance
Inspection Report" attached to this letter, which summarizes the findings of the recent inspection.
As indicated in the attached inspection report, the following deficiencies must be resolved per the permit which is enclosed
for your reference:
1. Maintenance [Permit Section II (13)]: Please maintain the infiltration basins per the Operation and Maintenance
Agreements, enclosed. In particular, Basins 1B and I are severely overgrown as shown in the enclosed
pictures.
2. ' Designer's (Engineer's) Certification [Permit Section II (9)]: Please submit a certification for all of the BMPs. The
enclosed certification dated January 16, 2008 is only for Basin 1 C. During the certification process, please ask
your engineer to pay particular attention to Basin 1 B which may have an unpermitted riser. Our inspector was
unable to see it well due to the overgrown plants.
3. Deed Restrictions [Permit Section II (15)]: Please submit deed restrictions for all of the lots in the subdivision.
Restrictions recorded in BK3029/PG010 on August 17, 2006, which is enclosed for your review, do not include all
of the lots in the subdivision. Please ensure that all lots' maximum impervious values are recorded at or below
the amount allowed by the permit.
Please inform this Office in writing before October 9, 2015, of the specific actions that will be undertaken and the time
frame that will be required to correct the deficiencies. Failure to provide the requested information, or to respond to this
letter by the due date, may initiate enforcement action including the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If a written plan of action is not submitted to this office by October 9, 2015 then DEMLR staff will re -inspect the site and
issue a Notice of Violation if the listed deficiencies have not been addressed.
If the property covered by this permit has beentwill be sold or legally conveyed to another entity or if the permit holder has
changed its name and/or mailing address, or if the project name has been changed, it is your responsibility as the
permittee to submit a completed and signed Name/Ownership change form to DEMLR at least 30 calendar days prior to
making the changes. These forms are available on our website at: hftp://I)ortal.ncdenr.org/web/ir/state-stormwater-
forms-docs.
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section — Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 • (910) 796-72151 Fax: [phone]

SW8 060608
September 9, 2015
If you have any questions, please contact me at the Wilmington Regional Office, telephone number (910)-796-7331 or via
email at [e-mail].
gineer
enc: Compliance Inspection Report, September 4, 2015
Inspection Pictures September 4, 2015
Permit, July 28, 2010
Deed Restrictions, BK3029/PG010
Designer's (Engineer's) Certification, January 16, 2008 (for Basin 1c Only)
OWAgreements
W6
hy GDS1kpj: 1llStormwater\Permits & Projects120061060608 HD12015 09 CEI_deficient 060608
cc: Eric Tomczak, PE, Cavanaugh & Associates (Engineer of record, 2008)
Georgette Scott, Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater Supervisor
WiRO Stormwater File
Page 2 of 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: SW8060608 Effective:07/28/10
Project: The Villages at Turtle. Creek Ph I & II
Owner: Redus NC Coastal LLC
County: Pander
Region: Wilmington
Expiration: 11 /30120
Adress: NC 210 And Lodge Hall Rd
City/State/Zip: Surf City NC 28445
Contact Person: Chris Willard Title: Vice President Phone: [phone]
Directions to Project:
From the intersection of US 17 and NC 210, travel east on NC 210 two (2) miles. Turn left after Lodge Hall Road
Type of Project: State Stormwater - HD - Infiltration
Drain Areas: 1Al - (Beckys Creek (Bishops Creek)) (03-06-24) ( SA;HQW)
1A2 - (Beckys Creek (Bishops Creek)) (03-06-24) (SA;HQW)
1A3 - (Beckys Creek (Bishops Creek)) (03-06-24) (SA;HQW)
1 B - (Beckys Creek (Bishops Creek)) (03-06-24) (SA;HQW)
1C - (Beckys Creek (Bishops Creek)) (03-06-24) (SA;HQW)
1 D1 - (Beckys Creek (Bishops Creek)) (03-06-24) (SA;HQW)
1 D2 - (Beckys Creek (Bishops Creek)) (03-06-24) (SA;HQW)
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 09/04/2015 EntryTime: 10:15AM
Primary Inspector: Elsie C James
Secondary Inspector(s):
Kelly Johnson
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: State Stormwater
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
M State Stormwater
(See attachment summary)
Exit Time: 12:OOPM
Phone:
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
page: 1

Permit: SW8060608 Owner - Project: Redus NC Coastal LLC
Inspection Date: 09/0412015 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
File Review Yes No NA NE
Is the permit active? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Signed copy of the Engineers certification is in the file? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Signed copy of the Operation & Maintenance Agreement is in the file? ❑ ❑ ❑
Copy of the recorded deed restrictions is in the file? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Certification: The 1/16/08 certification covers only Basin_1 C. A complete certification is needed.
Deed Restrictions: BK3029/PG010 is recorded, but it does not show lots above Lot 45 (lot numbers go
up to 73). Additionally, the recorded amounts differ from the Permitted amounts (though they are
generally lower in the recorded document). Lots can be restricted below the Permitted values but all
lots' deed restrictions must be recorded.
Built Upon Area Yes No NA NE
Is the site BUA constructed as per the permit and approval plans? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the drainage area as per the permit and approved plans? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Is the BUA (as permitted) graded such that the runoff drains to the system? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Certification needed.
SW Measures Yes No NA NE
Are the SW measures constructed as per the approved plans? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the inlets located per the approved plans? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the outlet structures located per the approved plans? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Certification needed.
Operation and Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Are the SW measures being maintained and operated as per the permit requirements? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Are the SW BMP inspection and maintenance records complete and available for review or provided to ❑ ❑ ❑
DWQ upon request?
Comment: Basins 1 B and 1 C are overgrown. All BMPs should be maintained per their O&M agreements.
page: 2

d
d
c�
a�
I—
m
era
m
I
ao
O
to
O
t0
O
00
Nf
Ln
c
rn
i
C
u
v
4
a
c

State Stormwater Inspection Report
General
Project Name: vi1
Permit No: SW8 )a
Expiration Date:
Contact Person:
Phone Number:
Inspection Type:
Inspection Date: /� r
Time In: /,0?
Time Out: �� e' CIO
Current Weather: N N
Recent Rain (Date)?
Rain — in
Location
Facility Address / Location:
City: Zip: County: Lat: ° ` "N Long: - ° ` "W
Permit Information
Rule Subject to (circle one): 1988 Coastal Rule 4iQ�u
astal Rule 2008 Coastal Rule Session Law 2006-246
Goose Creek ality aters Outstanding Resource Waters
Density (circle one): High (HD) Low (LD)
Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) (insert number of each):
Wet Ponds Infiltration Basins Infiltration Trenches LD Swales Stormwater Wetlands
Dry Ponds Bioretention Permeable Pavement Sand filters (circle one) Open Closed
Cistern Level Spreader/Filter Strip Other (specify):
File Review (6-^ r-) 'W-- wl.. ww urr
1.
Is the t
i ?
2.
Signed Enghwe
s-Certification on file?
3.
Signed OpEa
' d Maintenance agreement on file. 1 0
4.
Recorded D
d Res 'ctions on file?
0 1b.A'� �n dV 10 V0T Vwww UF%F&yf-!
Site Visit- guilt Unnn Area IRIIA1 %f-- Li urw urn
5. BUA is constructed and consistent with the permit requirements?
6. BUA (aspermitted) is graded such that the runoff drains to the system? (high density only)
7. Drainage area is consistent withpermit? (i.e. no un ermitted drainage to the SW BMPs
8. Drainage area is stabilized? (to reduce risk of sedimentation to the SW BMPs
Site Visit: Stormwater RMPe V-- K1— MIA Lll�
9. Stormwater BMPs are located per the approvedplans?
10. Stormwater BMPs have dimensions (e . length, width, area) matching the approvedplans?
11. Stormwater BMPs are constructed per the approvedplans? 19 e a a-s M UAIE' o',"ry�.
Site Visit: Operation and Maintenance VaQ Ll— MIA L11M
12. Access points to the site are clear and well maintained?
13. Trash has been removed as needed?
14. Excessive landscape debris ass clippings, leaves, etc) is controlled?
15. Stormwater BMPs being operated and maintained as per the permit requirements? /13tltc, Ovrn�Row,•,
16. Inspection and Maintenance records are available for inspection? (high density only, 1995 —present only)
Yes Nn NIA N/E
1 17. Is the site compliant with other conditions of the permit?
sae visit: utner water wuaiitv issues Yes No N/A N/E
18. Is the site compliant with other water quality issues as noted during the inspection?
State Stormwater Inspection Report, Version 3.0 3-09 Page 1 of 2

�4
>m LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT
NAME OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY: Redus NC Coastal, LLC
REPORT FOR THE YEAR: 2015
SECRETARY OF STATE L.L.C. ID NUMBER: 1080158
NATURE OF BUSINESS: Real Estate
REGISTERED AGENT: Corporation Service Company
REGISTERED OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS: 327 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27603-1725
E-Filed Annual Report
9041486
Do not data enter manually.
STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE
REGISTERED OFFICE STREET ADDRESS: 327 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27603-1725 Wake County
PRINCIPAL OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: 7044109147
PRINCIPAL OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS
PRINCIPAL OFFICE STREET ADDRESS
Company Officials:
Name: REDUS Properties, Inc.
Trtle.: Member
Address:
301 S College Street
Charlotte, NC 28288
301 S. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-6000
301 S. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-6000
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT MUST BE COMPLETED BY ALL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES
REDUS Properties, Inc., by DEANNA ERNST - AUTHORIZED PERSON
4/11/2015
FORM MUST BE SIGNED BY A MANAGER/MEMBER DATE
REDUS Properties, Inc., by DEANNA ERNST - AUTHORIZED PERSON Member
TYPE OR PRINT NAME TYPE OR PRINT TITLE
ANNUAL REPORT FEE: E-Paid MAIL TO: Secretary of State • Corporations Division • Post Office Box 29525 • Raleigh, NC 27626-0525

-564-? u
knnzw_13
SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE
REDUS PROPERTIES, INC.
I, Deanna J. Ernst, Assistant Secretary of REDUS Properties, Inc., (the "Corporation"), hereby
certify that the following resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the sole shareholder of the
corporation on January 29, 2015, and that the same is reflected in its corporate records:
Resolution Regarding Officer Authority and Execution of Documents
RESOLVED, that the President and any Vice President (however designated) Managing Director,
Director, Associate or persons holding other such equivalent titles with the Corporation, or any
one of said officers, together with the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of the Corporation, if
required, be and they are hereby My authorized to sign, execute, acknowledge, verify, deliver or
accept on behalf of and in the name of the Corporation, all agreements, indentures, mortgages,
deeds, conveyances, transfers, certificates, declarations, receipts, discharges, releases,
satisfactions, settlements, undertakings, petitions, schedules, accounts, affidavits, bonds, proxies,
and other instruments or documents (collectively, hereinafter referred to as "Documents") that
may arise in connection with or relate to the conduct of the business of the Corporation; provided,
however, that where required, any Document shall be attested by one of said officers other than
the officer executing such Document; and provided, further, that any Document may also be
executed, acknowledged, verified, delivered, or accepted on behalf of the Corporation in such
other manner and by such other officers as the Board or other governing body of the Corporation
may from time to time direct; and provided, further, that the provisions of this resolution are
supplementary to any pertinent provisions of the Corporation's governing documents. Except as
may use be required by law, any such Documents executed and delivered as aforesaid shall
be binding on the Corporation and shall be deemed to be authorized by the board or other
governing body. The President and any Vice President, (however designated), Managing
Director, Director, Associate or persons holding other such equivalent titles shall have, by virtue
of their office, the authority from time to time to act as an Assistant Secretary of the Corporation,
and to such extent, said officers are appointed to the office of Assistant Secretary;
RESOLVED FURTHER, that to the extent necessary, desirable or convenient in connection with
the execution and delivery of any Document that may arise in connection with or relate to the
conduct of the business of the Corporation, a duly elected Managing Director of the Corporation
may execute and deliver a Document as a Senior Vice President of the Corporation, a duly elected
Director of the Corporation may execute a Document as a Vice President of the Corporation, and a
duly elected Associate of the Corporation may execute a Document as an Assistant Vice President
of the Corporation; -and
RESOLVED FURTHER, that any and all actions heretofore or hereafter taken or caused to be
taken by the appropriate officers of the Corporation within the terms of the foregoing resolutions
be, and the same hereby are, approved, ratified, and confirmed.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that the following individual is a duly elected officer of the Corporation,
holding the title set forth opposite her name:
. _un Assistatat..,-1 Piesic3cr
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and the corporate seal of the Corporation this 90'
day of February, 2015.
Deanna J. t, Assistant Secretary

0 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT
NAME OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY: Redus NC Coastal, LLC
SECRETARY OF STATE ID NUMBER: 1080158 STATE OF FORMATION: DE
REPORT FOR THE YEAR: 201E
SECTION A: REGISTERED AGENT'S INFORMATION
'I. NAME OF REGISTERED AGENT: Corporation Service Company
2. SIGNATURE OF THE NEW REGISTERED AGENT:
Fling Office Use Orly
E-Fled Annual Report
1080158
CA201610205501
4/11/2016 05:53
Changes
SIGNATURE CONSTITUTES CONSENT TO THE APPOINTMENT
3. REGISTERED OFFICE STREET ADDRESS & COUNTY 4. REGISTERED OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS
327 Hillsborough Street 327 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27603-1725 Wake County Raleigh, NC 27603-1725
SECTION B: PRINCIPAL OFFICE INFORMATION
1. DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS: Real Estate
2. PRINCIPAL OFFICE PHONE NUMBER: 7044109147
4. PRINCIPAL OFFICE STREET ADDRESS & COUNTY
3. PRINCIPAL OFFICE EMAIL: Privacy Redaction
5. PRINCIPAL OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS
301 S. College Street 301 S. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-6000
Charlotte, NC 28202-6000
SECTION C: COMPANY OFFICIALS (Enter additional Company Officials in Section E.)
NAME: Redus Properties, Inc. NAME:
TITLE: Member
ADDRESS:
301 S. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28288
TITLE:
ADDRESS:
NAME:
TITLE:
ADDRESS:
SECTION D: CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT Section D must be completed in its entirety by a person/business entity.
Redus Properties, Inc., by DEANNA ERNST - AUTHORIZED PER! 4/11 /2016
SIGNATURE
Form must be signed by a Company Official listed under Section C of this form.
DATE
Redus Properties, Inc., by DEANNA ERNST -AUTHORIZED PER! Member
Print or Type Name of Company Official Print or Type The Titie of the Company Official
This Annual Report has been filed electronically.
MAIL TO: Secretary of State, Corporations Division, Post Office Box 29525, Raleigh, NC 27626-0525

August 23, 2010
Ms. Angela Hammers
NCDENR
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
CAVANAU G H
Solutions through integrity and partnership
Response to Notice of Violation (Nov-2009-PC-0865)
Designer's Certifications — Partial Certification for Basins 1A and 1 D
The Villages at Turtle Creek — Phase I and I I
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 060608 Mod
Pender County
Dear Ms. Hammers;
This letter and attachments follow our conversation last week regarding the status of items
specified in the Plan of Action submitted for the subject project on July 21, 2010. As we
discussed, the permittee has completed the repairs and improvements described in the Plan of
Action, and such improvements have been reviewed by me and determined to be within
substantial conformance with the Plan of Action and the aforementioned Stormwater Permit.
Please note that the Designer's Certification submitted is marked as 'Partial', covering basins
1A and 1 D only. Basins 1 B and 1 C were addressed in a previous certification. The remainder
of the project described in the aforementioned permit (Phase II) will be addressed under a Final
Designer's Certification once all construction activities have been completed that pertain to that
portion of the project described in the Stormwater Permit.
Deed Restrictions, as requested, will follow under separate cover.
Thank you again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. If, upon receipt and review
of this information, you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter at greater length,
please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience.
Regards,
TES, P.A.
neering
Enclosures:
1. Designer's Partial Certification dated 8/23/2010
cc: Mr. Chris S. Williard, Vice President, REDUS NC Coastal, LLC