SW8060608_Historical File_20071217

WA-rk�
pG
r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
December 17, 2007
Mr. Brian D. Dilsheimer, Manager
Dilsheimer Communities of North Carolina, LLC, Manager
DCNC North Carolina I, LLC
2528 Independence Blvd., Suite 104
Wilmington, NC.28412
Subject: Approved Plan Revision
The Villages at Turtle Creek
Stormwater Project No. SW8 060608MOD
Pender County
Dear Mr. Dilsheimer:
On December 7, 2007, the Wilmington Regional Office received a plan revision for Stormwater
Management Permit Number SW8 060608MOD. The revisions include reallocation 600
square feet of built -upon -area from lot 36 (600 sf less) to lot 29 (600 sf more). It has been
determined that a formal permit modification is not required for the proposed changes. We are
forwarding you an approved copy of the revised plans for your files. Please replace the old
approved plan sheet C.5.1 with the new plan sheet C.5.1 stamped approved on December 17,
2007. Also, replace page 5 of 9 of the approved permit with the new pave 5 of 9, enclosed.
Please be aware that all terms and conditions of the permit issued on November 9, 2007,
remain in full force and effect. Please also understand that the approval of this revision to
the approved plans for the subject State Stormwater Permit is done on a case -by -case
basis. Any other changes to this project must be submitted to and approved through the
Division of Water Quality prior to construction. The issuance of this plan revision does not
preclude the permittee from complying with all other applicable statutes, rules, regulations
or ordinances which may have jurisdiction over the proposed activity, and obtaining a
permit or approval prior to construction.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at (910)
796-7215.
Sincerely,
CKA, �UA<-R,
Chris Baker
Environmental Engineer III
ENB1csb: S:IWQSISTORMWATERIPERMIT1060608MODPR.dec.07
cc: Eric Tomczak, P.E., Cavanaugh & Associates
Pender County Building Inspections
Chris Baker
Wilmington Regional Office
Central Files
r4 Carolina
�tura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060608 Modification
13. The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance
necessary to assure that all components of the permitted stormwater system
function at optimum efficiency. The approved Operation and Maintenance Plan
must be followed in its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled
intervals including, but not limited to:
a. Semiannual scheduled inspections (every 6 months).
b. Sediment removal.
C. Mowing and revegetation of side slopes.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of side slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
f. Debris removal and unclogging of structures, orifice, catch basins and
piping.
g. Access to all components of the system must be available at all times.
14. Records of maintenance activities must be kept and made available upon
request to authorized personnel of DWQ. The records will indicate the date,
activity, name of person performing the work and what actions were taken.
15. Prior to the sale of any lot, the following deed restrictions must be recorded:
a. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with
State Stormwater Management Permit Number SW8 060608, as issued
by the Division of Water Quality under NCAC 2H.1000.
b. The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to
the extent necessary to maintain compliance with the Stormwater
Management Permit.
C. These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons
and parties claiming under them.
d. The covenants pertaining to stormwater may not be altered or rescinded
without the express written consent of the State of North Carolina, Division
of Water Quality.
e. Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plans may not take
place without the concurrence of the Division of Water Quality.
f. The maximum built -upon area per lot is as follows:
Lot #
Max
BUA
Lot #
Max
BUA
Lot
#
Max
BUA.
Lot #
Max.
BUA
Lot #
Max.
BUA
1
4,152
16
3,731
31
3,659
46
4,176
61
4,187
2
4,152
17
3,695
32
3,633
47
4,165
62
4,189
3
4,152
18
3,676
33
3,602
48
4,149
63
4,187
4
4,152
19
4,211
34
3,601
49
4,226
64
4,195
5
4,300
20
4,269
35
3,599
50
4,145
65
4,187
6
4,186
21
4,350
36
3.551
51
4,152
66
4,187
7
3,668
22
4,161
37
4,480
52
4,151
67
4,187
8
3,608
23
4,165
38
3,849
53
4,151
68
4,187
9
3,607
24
4,162
39
3,828
54
4,151
69
4,183
10
3,607
25
40
4,022
55
4,147
70
4,186
11
3,517
26
41
4,255
56
4,166
71
4,186
12
4,156
27
3,681
42
4,087
57
4,165
72
4,232
13
3,692
28
3,672
43
3,829
58
4,213
73
4,289
14
.31776
29
4,186
44
4,128
59
4,253
15
3,691
30
3,664
45
4,425
60
4,189
PanaRnfQ

High Density Residential Subdivisions
yr
Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenances
In accordance with Title 15 NCAC 2H.1000, the Stormwater Management Regulations, deed restrictions and
protective covenants are required for High Density Residential Subdivisions where lots will be subdivided and
sold and runoff will be treated in an engineered stormwater control facility. Deed restrictions and protective
covenants are necessary to ensure that the development maintains a "built -upon" area consistent with the
design criteria used to size the stormwater control facility.
I,. ). S�a� , acknowledge, affirm and agree by my signature below, that I will
cause the following deed restrictions and covenants to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot:
9. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with State Stormwater
Management Permit Number , as issued by the Division of Water Quality under
NCAC 2H.1000.
2. The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to the extent necessary to
maintain compliance with the stormwater management permit.
3. These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons and parties claiming under
them.
4. The covenants pertaining to stormwater may not be altered or rescinded without the express written
consent of the State of North Carolina, Division of Water Quality.
5. Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plan may not take place without the concurrence
of the Division of Water Quality.
6. The maximum allowable built -upon area per lot is square feet. This allotted amount
includes any built -upon area constructed within the lot property boundaries, and that portion of the
right-of-way between the front lot line and the edge of the pavement. Built upon area includes, but is not
limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick, stone, slate, coquina and parking areas, but does
not include raised, open wood decking, or the water surface of swimming pools.
OR, if the proposed built -upon areas per lot will vary, please REPLACE #6 above with the following:
6. The maximum built -upon area per lot, in square feet, is as listed below:
Lot # BUA Lot # BUA Lot # BUA Lot # BUA
This allotted amount includes any built -upon area constructed within the lot property boundaries, and
that portion of the right-of-way between the front lot line and the edge of the pavement. Built upon area
includes, but is not limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick, stone, slate, coquina and
parking areas, but does not include raised, open wood decking, or the water surface of swimming
pools.
All runoff from the built -upon areas on the lot must drain into the permitted system. This may be
accomplished through a variety of means including roof drain gutters which drain to the street, grading
the lot to drain toward the street, or grading perimeter swales to collect the lot runoff and directing them
into a component of the, stormwater collection system. Lots that will naturally drain into the system are
not required to pro,*
these additional measures.
I,fW OL, (/) V WWI) , a'Notary Public in the
State of )r"An)---O,C�ountyof.-Youxh2tajhlu,
do hereby certify thatUn_ p personally geared
before me this the �� day of (��.yxbe.�J , 20_0() , and acknowledge
the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official seal,
P& �,wtLzi,- SEAL
Signature
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
My Commission expires Notarial seal
Robyn L. DroniWW, Notary Public
Foim DRPC-3 Rev. I Page 1 of 1 Low Merton T �o��
My comssE )OAug
Member, Pennaylvanla Association of Notaries

Z/
Table 5.1 MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREAS
FOR PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL LOTS
LOT
NUMBER
MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE AREA
(SQ. FT.)
LOT
NUMBER
MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE AREA
(SQ. FT.)
1
4,152
24
4,162
2
4,152
25
3
4,152
26
4
4,152
27
3,681
5
4,300
28
3,672
6
4,186
29
4,268
7
3,668
30
3,664
8
3,608
31
3,659
9
3,607
32
3,633
10
3,607
33
3,602
11
3,517
34
3,601
12
4,156
35
3,599
13
3,692
36
3,551
14
3,776
37
4,480
15
3,691
38
3,849
16
3,731
39
3,828
17
3,695
40
4,022
18
3,676
41
4,255
19
4,211
42
4,087
20
4,269
43
3,829
21
4,350
44
4,128
22
4,161
45
4,425
23
4,165
NOTE 1: AVG SQ. FT. PER LOT IS 3,923 SQ. FT.
(168,669 SQ. FT. / 43 LOTS = 3,923 SQ. FT.)
NOTE 2: TOTAL BUA FOR EACH LOT INCLUDES 55' X 55' BUILDING
ENVELOPE, PLUS 18' WIDE DRIVEWAY (VARYING LENGTHS), PLUS SECTION
OF DRIVEWAY WITHIN ROW (124 to 180 SF, DEPENDING ON LOCATION IN
PHASE 1), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SIDEWALKS AND CURB ARE NO
INCLUDED IN BUA.

E
7 2007 C AVA N A U G H
Solutions through integrity and partnership
December 7, 2007 Via Hand Delivery
Mir. Chris Baker
Environmental Engineer
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 5
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension D
Wilming
ton, North Carolina 28405
Re: The Villages at Turtle Creek - Revision to SW8 060608 Modified Permit
Dear Mr. Baker:
Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A. (CA) on behalf of DCNC North Carolina I, LLC, hereby submits
the following application to the NCDENR Division of Water Quality for review of a revision of
High Density Stormwater Permit SW8 060608. This existing permit was issued as a
modification for the subject development identified as 'The Villages of Turtle Creek,' which is
located in the Town of Surf City, Pender County, North Carolina on November 9, 2007.
CA is applying for the revision of this permit based on changes to the Lot BUA's for Lot 29 and
Lot 36. Both Lots are located within the same drainage area and therefore, no stormwater
infiltration basins volumes will change, rather only the associated BUAs for Lot 29 and Lot 36.
Specifically, 600 square foot of BUA from Lot 36 will be moved to Lot 29.
To facilitate your review of the enclosed documentation, the following is a list of the items
constituting the application:
1. A check made payable to NC DENR in the amount of $1,000.00 to satisfy the review fee for
review of this revised application.
2. One (1) original copy of the executed 'Stormwater Management Permit Application Form.'
3. One (1) copy of the executed `High Density Residential Subdivision Deed Restrictions and
Protective Covenances'.
4. Two (2) copies of Sheet C.5.1 with the revised BUA Table shown.
Please do not hesitate to contact our office should you have any questions, comments, or
require any additional information.
Regards,
CAAVVANAUGH & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
G
Eric S. Tomczac
Cc: Tom Miner, DCNC North Carolina I, LLC
JB Dilsheimer, DCNC North Caroline I, LLC

about:blank
November 29, 2007
The Villages of Turtle Creek
The Express Permitting Group is in receipt of the request, received on 11/28/07, to revise the
storrriwater plan for Villages of Turtle Creek. Chris Baker will be performing the review. A submittal
date of December 7, 2007 has been established. However, Chris is familiar with the project since he
just worked on the permit. He is willing to accept the package as a "drop-off' and not require a
meeting. The fee for a Plan Revision in Express is $1,000. The check should accompany the
package. When you bring the package in, please have me or Chris paged by the receptionist so that
one of us can come to the lobby and get the submittal. This is important.
Thank you,
Janet Russell
Express Permitting
1 of 1 11/29/2007 2:54 PM

"I
Reviewer (�L lz
MCDENR Submit (2" �i
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone] FAX [phone] A
Time
Request for Express Permit Review Confirm
FILL-IN all Information below, FAX to Express Coordinator along with a comuleted questionnaire,
a detailed narrative and vicinity map of the project location.
APPLICANT: Name 7_$ b+#,syl 1µsr Title
Company Name ,L Eta flKMUNInt-S .O
PROJECT: Name �� V1_U'6r'J9A of County -Pc,&,%r,_
ENGINEERICONSULTANT INFORMATION:
Name E-¢«- - 1 o c2At[ Company a%J ti"A AL&'V.A'.d^
Address i3o rs Fr�a..,r STr_&&T Suw-w Zoe City State, &G Zip Z.sctn)
Phone_g10 _90Z yu(,z Fax 9rto 392. ybi Z Email erg' -hens
----------------- ----- ------ ----------- ----- ----------------------------__..._._.___--------------------__....-----------------_--
❑ SCOPING MEETING ONLY DWQ DLR DCM Other
---------------------------- _ _----------------------------------------------------------.____------------------------------------------------------
❑STREAM ORIGIN DETERMINATION # of Stream calls Stream Name
STORMWATER ❑ Low Density 901JES
igh Density -Detention Pond ❑ High Density - Other --
c ck all that apply) ❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutterigh Density -Infiltration Off -site
Wetlands MUST be addressed below Phase II ❑ Plan Revision
❑ COASTAL MGT. ❑ Excavation & Fill ❑ Bridges & Culverts ❑ StructuresInformation- ❑ Upland Dev. -
------------ ......... -------- ------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
-----
❑ LAND QUALITY ❑ Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with acres to be disturbed
WETLANDS (401)- --Wetlands on Property ? ` ---❑ Yes ❑ No Isolated Wetlands on Prop rty? - ❑ Yes ❑ No
(Check all that apply) Wetlands will be impacted? ❑ Yes ❑ No Wetland impacts: acre(s)
Wetlands delineation has been completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Buffers impacted: Acre(s)
USACOE Approval of Delineation completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
404 Application in Process w/USACOE? ❑ Yes ❑ No / Permit recv'd from USACOE❑Yes ❑ No
401 Application Required? ❑ Yes [] No If Yes, ❑ Regular ❑ Express
--------------- ---------- -------- ---------- ----- ---------------- ------------
A_dditional fees, not to exceed 50% of the original Express Review permit application fee may be charged for
subsequent reviews due to the insufficiency of the permit application:
Total Fee:$ fJ( Stormwater $ Zfi000 Date Received
CAMA $�_ _ E C E l V r-
LQS $ NOV 2 8 2007
401 $ 4
/z007

Project Name I , ,- VWewss OF to ei-L E ��><
Stormwater Express Questionnaire (1019/2007)
1. What is the applicant's full legal name? bIL%161MfJ 69ARWITIFF-3 cF dnkcve.t411aukuk)LLC
Is the applicant associated with Sale proprietor Corporation TOLLC
U Partnership �j Municipality
If it's an LLC, is it 51 anager-managed or ❑ Member -managed?
+)What is the applicant's title within the Corp., LLC or Partnership? MAWAG
Will an agent (someone otherthan the applicant) be signing the application? WYes ,T No
If Yes, what is the agent's name and title?
_F-Qie- 'Toa i Pf
Or Please note the application signature requirements are listed in NCAC 2H.1003 (e). In
summary, only the sole proprietor of a sole proprietorship, the designated manager, member -
manager, president or vice president of a corporation or LLC, the general partner of a
partnership, or a ranking official of a municipality may sign permit applications and supplements.
The signature of the engineer or other agent can be accepted only if accompanied by a signed
letter of authorization from one of the aforementioned individuals. Corporations, LLC's and
Partnerships must be registered with the NC Secretary of State's Office, and be active. Please
note that spelling, capitalization, and punctuation are extremely important. Please provide the
entity name exactly as on filewiththe NC Secretary of State.
2 Project Location: County ' 16JihER. Nearest Town/City 2F -rY
(Attach a detailed vicinity map with both local street names and SR, NC, US or Interstate
highway numbers, plus other relevant information such as town or city names, directions to, etc.
Show the nearest intersection of two major roads on the vicinity map. A major road is any 1, 2 or
3 digit NC, US or interstate highway.)
If the project is located in Brunswick, Onslow, or New Hanover Counties, or a small
portion of northern Pender County, NPDES Phase II Post -Construction rules will apply,
unless a vested development right, as described in the Session Law, can be
demonstrated, which is dated prior to July 1, 2007.
3. Receiving stream name &e y,s C.L6,4"re River Basin _ ��jqe ' e.4
What is the classification of the receiving stream? SA I. AQh
For SA or SR waters, a separate scaled topographic map will be required. The project must be
accurately located on the map and the % mile radius from the property comer closest to the SA
or SR receiving stream must be drawn on the map. If you claim that the project is not within
mile of SA or SR waters, you must conduct a series ,of chlorides tests to demonstrate that the
chlorides level at a point in the receiving stream that is at least Y2 mile from the project is less
than 500 ppm. Samples must be sent to a State certified lab for testing.
4. If the project is high density, what type of stormwater management BMP's are being proposed?
(check all that apply)
Wet Detention Infiltration Trench Infiltration Basin Sand kter
Bio-retention Wetlands Alternative e Offsite
Dry Detention NPDES Phase II Other
How many separate BMP's are being proposed? 103 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Other
5. Is there offsite runoff from the adjacent properties or public right-of-wa that will §61n into any of
the proposed BMP's on the project and is not being diverted? Yes L9/No ElN/A
6. is a road across other property required to access the project? ❑ Yes [fl No ❑ NIA
7. Is there any existing development or pre-1988 existing SSA located on pre�erty l ❑N/A
(Please document, delineate and identify on the plans.) We No
8. Will the high density project collect all of the proposed BUA? es F Pk E�N/g
(if not, attach a separate explanation sheet)
Revised 10/Page 1 of 29/2007 NOV 2 8 2007
DW11
PROJ # .�.�,$_�

Project Name 1"I'e- &Ja
9. Will the project invol a the subdivision and sale ofproperty? Jes No N/A
Is the subdivision Mresidential or 0 commercial? ❑ ❑
How many lots are proposed? 7%
(geed restrictions are required for all residential, commercial, low density or high density sub-
divisions. Specific language for the various types of subdivisions is avail ble from DENR.)
10. Will the plans show all delineated wetlands? 7YYes ❑ No ❑ NIA
(All projects require either a signed wetlands delineation, map or a wetlands report to be
submitted with the application. Only a trained professional may provide information regarding
the presence or absence of wetlands.)
11. Are wet detention ponds or other engineered controls proposed to be I Fated ad'acent
wetlands? [9Yes RNo ❑ NIA
(If, yes, a physical means to prevent the dewatering of the wetland must be provided, or the
SHWT must be provided to demonstrate that the permanent pool of the BMP is above the
SHWT and will not dewater the wetlands over time. Where possible, all BMP's and swales
should outlet into back the wetland (with level spreaders).
12. For infiltration projects, a site visit must be completed with the DENR soils scientist to verify the
soil type, water table and infiltration rate provided in the soils report.
What Is/was the scheduled site visit date? GrAPLeyr-
(Include a copy of the consultant's soil report with the application.)
13. Level Spreaders are required at the outlet of all engineered controls an/wales prior to entering
surface waters or wetlands. Will the plans reflect level spreaders? s ❑ No ❑ N/A
(The purpose of the level spreader is to reduce the energy of the incoming runoff and to
promote diffuse sh t flow to prevent erosion and scour into the receiving waters or wetlands.)
14, Is thisjproject A W�to an existin
p g permit lyeVnlG,BvFl� onl
A lot that will be treated in an existing, previously permitte P? L47-.5 h/INIA?
AW
What is the name of the existing permitted facility?9Yi/� _ 10,64A07- &2 `A
What is the permit number of the existing permitted facility? SW8 D ('bl,D$
Is the permitted facility in compliance with its permit? es No N/A
Have the deed restrictions been recorded? tes
es o N/A
Have the deed restrictions been submitted? es No N/A
Has the Designer's Certification been submitted? C�9&-R+�, No N/A
15. Do the plans reflect all information in 15A NCAC 2H.1003 (g)? [Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
16. Will all of the design requirements for each proposed BMP be met? 5fes ❑ No. ❑ N/A
(If not, attach a separate explanation sheet. Please note that the Express program is not set up
to handle any type of deviation from the standard design.)
17. For each BMP in all high density projects, and low density curb outlet swale projects, the/
individual drainage area for each proposed BMP must be clearly delineated.
18. Any revisions made to the application as a result of this review may cause changes to the other
documentation. Plans, calculations, application, and supplements should be reviewed for any
necessary changes. For example, changing the orifice size will require a modification to the
calculations, the pond details on the plans, and -page 1 of the supplement.
19. IS THE PROJECT DESIGNED AND THE APPLICATION READY TO SUBMIT? ❑ Yes No
Complete applications may be ac pted earlier if there is a cancellation in our submittal
schedule. L f
Page 2 of C E
Revised 10/9/2007 NOV 2 8 2007F
pen, u
DWQ

al+w.rnnaaw�wivenc+w uuamVas
C,
Gf
+
DO
1-04n
W{�(L
to
.�
8
CO
ti
M_
CV
N
W
�
IE
to
9 r,
c
��
N'b0'�N�cgM�`j
�
og
_
O
C•N3ld
�I'titi�
LO
W
�
c�cbtb
�cbcb��
nro
w
sv
900 1 wan7 m
soot 's a a3e�v3non+
�
f
19
y
� rns u
37,1vni 1V S3MIM 3H1
a
nasviw
aav
xouruamo
w
�
ft
sacs ror issssuoH
amj
NW 03MM u
vm
-
T� f—
Owl
l
�.9`
00,
� Lp
fCD