NCG520024_Wasteload Allocation_19851009

Engineer
Date Rec.
rr NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION ,ems ��IZs'/gam zs'ro
Facility Name: £d.�; c g Io.µi / R �; r��cw� �f �rr,e i Date �/Z Or
Existing Q NC& SzoC�o���
Proposed Permit No.: - / to 3 / c 1 Pipe No.: C16/ JJ County: ft(Q co ,
E c__Lfer fip.. sc.( air �d i►^9
Design Capacity (MGD) : - 0. c)419 Industrial (% of Flow) : (c u It Domestic (% of Flow) :
Receiving Stream:
L n' r e t,nr(see
Reference USGS Quad: (r 4-4
Nee -
Class: G Sub -Basin: 6q W-d/
(Please attach) Requestor:
A-t e. G)er'casL
Regional Office
cvi 6 iJ 008
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design 'Temp.:
7Q10 (cfs) / 4/0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs)
Location of D.O. minimum (miles below outfall): Slope (fpm)
Velocity (fps):
Drainage Area (mil): '2 C �'
K1 (base e, per day):
Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs)
z 7
K2 (base e, per day):
Effluent
Character�/�istics
Monthly
Average
Comments
-y{
(�
i© 0— 0
Ji
( 'i-P_.
rc�.}-tiTik l
v ri-.
I
Cl ,-' ,, _ c,3
__
. c .A. / 4.-
.0
,4-..-
v--, (J
S` Ctio 4 UM
•C.
/ _Q
/
Origin�l JA�.l cc ion \\\/v��VV�////
Re ' end A UUIo'cation 0
nf� matiora 0
Pre ed Qd
Comments:
Effluent
Characteristics
r :-'tenthly
i'.verage
Comments '%
li
r
'� ,/Q}�c c�a t
`2.-% c to c
1�tR-csa.�
.
0
N L
�, f �C
.n Ch�,^-
/w�
st L ig ,�
so
Reviewed By:
LOVED

For Appropriate . Dischargers, List Complete Guideline limitations Below
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Maximum Daily
Average
cbmments
'ripe of Product Produced
Lbs/Day Produced
€fliuent Guideline Reference

~
P.
'
~
Reouest No.
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAK FORM
Facility Name EDDIE EVANS/ROY KJRKLAND
Type Of Waste i SAND DREDGING
Receiving Stream 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE
Stream Class 1 C
Subbasin 040401
County i MACON
Regional Office i ARO
Reouestor DALE OVFRCASH
Drainage Area (so mi) 295
7010 (cfs) 140
Winter 7010 (cfs) �
3002 (cfs) �
RECOMMENDED EFFLUFNT LIMITS
Wastoflow (mad) 01 ,0499
SETTLEABLE SOLIDS (ML/L): m.|
COMMENTS
THE DISCHARGE SHALL NOT CAUSE THF TURBIDITY OF THE
RECEIVING WATERS TO EXCEED 50 NTU~ IF THF TURBIDITY
EXCEEDS 50 NTU, THE DISCHARGE SHALL NOT CAUSE ANY
INCREASE IN TURBIDITY, °�u� ����"&
��� �A
� 2586
tA I its)
/
��
FACILITY lS 1 PROPOSFD (- EXISTING ( ) NEW ( )
LIMITS ARE 1 REVISION ( ) CONFIRMATION ( ) OF THOSE PRFVTOi|S|Y JRSUEB
RECOMMENDED BY:
REVIEWED BY!
SUPERVISOR, TECH. SUPPORT
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR
Approval is ( ) preliminary ( ) Q.
PERMITS MANAGER
-
_'-DATE
DATE A����.-���'
.-DATE �