20050666 Ver 1_USACE Comments_20050823

RE: The Bridges at Mint Hill mall - status
Subject: RE: The Bridges at Mint Hill mall - status
From: "Jones, Amanda D SAW" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:43:50 -0400
To: "John Dorney" <[e-mail]>
We're sticking with the NWP. Talked to
getting a submittal to us (to address
stuff) later this week supposedly.
Huysman this morning and they will be
our incomplete issues and Sec. 7 ESA
Amanda D. Jones
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
828-271-7980 ext. 231
fax: [phone]
-----Original Message-----
From: John Dorney [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 7:48 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Ian McMillan; alan Clark; Tom Reeder
Subject: The Bridges at Mint Hill mall - status
as you may have heard, Cyndi Karoly is sick (pancreatis, gallstones,
local infection, etc.) and will be out for several weeks. she asked me
to look at the Bridges at Mint Hill project in Mecklenburg. Have you
(the Corps that is) made a decision about an Individual Permit versus
NWP yet? we have several requests to do an Individual Certification
(which - unlike the Corps - does not change our review process just
requires more public input). i am leaning toward an Individual
Certification if you do not do an IP (if you do an IP, there will
automatically have to be an Individual Certification based on your
Public Notice). Please advise. the project is still on hold for us -
they have not responded to the June 14 letter for more information.
once you decide on IP vs NWP, i'll get ahold of them to work on the
Cumulative Impact analysis. This will require action by the Town to
adopt proper land use control measures so they may as well start that
process.
tom - once the Corps decides on the permit type, i'll talk to you about
these issues.
thankx
L
1 of 1 9/12/200.`