Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20220345 Ver 1_WR Upland and Wetland Foms_20220314 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site:DENC Person County Pipeline City/County:Rougemont/Person Sampling Date: 09-Mar-22 Applicant/Owner:Dominion Energy North Carolina State:NC Sampling Point: W Section, Township, Range: S TR Investigator(s):J. lawler, PWS Local relief (concave, convex, none):/ Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Slope: ° Saddleconcave 2.0% 1.1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Datum: MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.:Long.: 36.298322°-78.843134° Soil Map Unit Name:Lignum Silt Loam NWI classification:N/A YesNo Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.) YesNo Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologysignificantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologynaturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. YesNo Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo Hydric Soil Present?Is the Sampled Area YesNo within a Wetland? YesNo Wetland Hydrology Present? Remarks: Herbaceous wetland in area previously disturbed by logging operations Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1)True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Dry Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift deposits (B3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: YesNo Depth (inches): 0 Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? YesNo 4 Depth (inches): YesNo Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? 2 Depth (inches): YesNo (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Antecdent Precipitation Tool Remarks: Prior period has been normal. Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: W Species? AbsoluteIndicator Dominance Test worksheet: Rel.Strat. % CoverStatus (Plot size:) 30' Cover Tree Stratum Number of Dominant Species 00.0% That are OBL, FACW, or FAC:(A) 4 1. 00.0% 2. Total Number of Dominant 00.0% 3. (B) Species Across All Strata: 4 00.0% 4. Percent of dominant Species 00.0% 5. (A/B) 100.0% That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 00.0% 6. 00.0% Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. 00.0% Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 8. 0= Total Cover OBL speciesx 1 = 00 (Plot size:) 30' Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum FACW speciesx 2 = 4590 1535.7%FAC Acer rubrum 1. 54162 FAC speciesx 3 = 1535.7%FAC Liquidambar styraciflua 2. 624 FACU speciesx 4 = 1023.8%FAC Pinus taeda 3. 00 UPL speciesx 5 = 24.8%FAC Quercus nigra 4. (B) Column Totals:(A) 105276 00.0% 5. 00.0% 6.Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.629 00.0% 7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 00.0% 8. Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 00.0% 9. Dominance Test is > 50% 00.0% 1 10. 42 = Total Cover 1 (Plot size:) Shrub Stratum Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 00.0% 1. 1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 00.0% 2. 1 00.0% 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 3. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 00.0% 4. Definition of Vegetation Strata: 00.0% 5. Four Vegetation Strata: 00.0% 6. Tree stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. 00.0% 7. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 0= Total Cover (Plot size:) 30' Herb Stratum Sapling/shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding 4065.6%FACW Scirpus cyperinus 1. vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 1016.4%FAC Panicum virgatum Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, 2. regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 58.2%FACW Juncus effusus 3. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft 23.3%FACU Eupatorium capillifolium 4. in height. 23.3%FACU Solidago canadensis 5. 23.3%FACU Rubus argutus 6. Five Vegetation Strata: 00.0% 7. Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 00.0% ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in 8. diameter at breast height (DBH). 00.0% 9. Sapling stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody 00.0% 10. vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 00.0% 11. Shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody 00.0% 12. vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. = Total Cover 61 ) (Plot size: 30'Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, Woody Vine Stratum including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody 2100.0%FAC Vitis rotundifolia 1. species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. 00.0% 2. 00.0%Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines, regardless of 3. height. 00.0% 4. 00.0% 5. Hydrophytic 00.0% Vegetation 6. YesNo Present? = Total Cover 2 Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Cut-over area disturbed by logging *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers Soil Sampling Point: W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) MatrixRedox Features Depth 1 Color (moist)% Color (moist)%TypeLoc²TextureRemarks (inches) 0-1010YR4/19510YR7/35CMLoam 10-1210YR4/29510YR7/35CMClay laom 1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ²Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix 3 Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147,148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Depressions (F8) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 136) MLRA 147, 148) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Sandy Redox (S5) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Hydric Soil Present? YesNo Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil appears hydric US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site:DENC Person County Pipeline City/County:Rougemont/Person Sampling Date: 09-Mar-22 Applicant/Owner:Dominion Energy North Carolina State:NC Sampling Point: W - Upland Section, Township, Range: S TR Investigator(s):J. lawler, PWS Local relief (concave, convex, none):/ Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Slope: ° Hillsiderolling 3.0% 1.7 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Datum: MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.:Long.: 36.298329°-78.842916° Soil Map Unit Name:Lignum Silt Loam NWI classification: YesNo Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.) YesNo Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologysignificantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologynaturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. YesNo Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo Hydric Soil Present?Is the Sampled Area YesNo within a Wetland? YesNo Wetland Hydrology Present? Remarks: Area clear-cut by lkogging Hydrology Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1)True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Dry Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift deposits (B3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: YesNo Depth (inches): Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? YesNo Depth (inches): YesNo Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Depth (inches): YesNo (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Antecedent Precipitation Tool Remarks: Prior period has been normal. Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Dominant Sampling Point: W-Upland Species? AbsoluteIndicator Dominance Test worksheet: Rel.Strat. % CoverStatus (Plot size:) 30' Cover Tree Stratum Number of Dominant Species 00.0% That are OBL, FACW, or FAC:(A) 3 1. 00.0% 2. Total Number of Dominant 00.0% 3. (B) Species Across All Strata: 6 00.0% 4. Percent of dominant Species 00.0% 5. (A/B) 50.0% That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 00.0% 6. 00.0% Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. 00.0% Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 8. 0= Total Cover OBL speciesx 1 = 00 (Plot size:) 30' Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum FACW speciesx 2 = 24 1033.3%FACU Quercus alba 1. 3296 FAC speciesx 3 = 1033.3%FAC Pinus taeda 2. 42168 FACU speciesx 4 = 1033.3%FAC Liquidambar styraciflua 3. 00 UPL speciesx 5 = 00.0% 4. (B) Column Totals:(A) 76268 00.0% 5. 00.0% 6.Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.526 00.0% 7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 00.0% 8. Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 00.0% 9. Dominance Test is > 50% 00.0% 1 10. 30 = Total Cover 1 (Plot size:) Shrub Stratum Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0.0% 1. 1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 0.0% 2. 1 0.0% 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 3. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 0.0% 4. Definition of Vegetation Strata: 00.0% 5. Four Vegetation Strata: 00.0% 6. Tree stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. 00.0% 7. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 0= Total Cover (Plot size:) 30' Herb Stratum Sapling/shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding 1534.1%FACU Eupatorium capillifolium 1. vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 1022.7%FACU Andropogon virginicus Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, 2. regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 1022.7%FAC Panicum virgatum 3. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft 511.4%FACU Rubus argutus 4. in height. 24.5%FACW Scirpus cyperinus 5. 24.5%FACU Verbascum thapsus 6. Five Vegetation Strata: 00.0% 7. Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 00.0% ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in 8. diameter at breast height (DBH). 00.0% 9. Sapling stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody 00.0% 10. vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 00.0% 11. Shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody 00.0% 12. vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. = Total Cover 44 ) (Plot size: 30'Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, Woody Vine Stratum including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody 2100.0%FAC Vitis rotundifolia 1. species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. 00.0% 2. 00.0%Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines, regardless of 3. height. 00.0% 4. 00.0% 5. Hydrophytic 00.0% Vegetation 6. YesNo Present? = Total Cover 2 Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers Soil Sampling Point: W-Upland Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) MatrixRedox Features Depth 1 Color (moist)% Color (moist)%TypeLoc²TextureRemarks (inches) 0-610YR5/2100Loam 6-1210YR6/6100 1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ²Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix 3 Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Histosol (A1)Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147,148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Depressions (F8) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 136) MLRA 147, 148) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Sandy Redox (S5) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Hydric Soil Present? YesNo Depth (inches): Remarks: Soil does not appears hydric US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0